1. Background
Aluminum alloy 7050 is a heat-treatable alloy that achieves high mechanical strength through age-hardening heat treatments and is widely used in the aircraft and aerospace industries [
1,
2]. Prior to age hardening, aluminum alloys are prepared by solution heat treatment and quenching. The objective of the solution heat treatment is to dissolve the secondary phases into the aluminum matrix at a particular temperature, and the objective of quenching is to cool the material to room temperature as quickly as possible to obtain a supersaturated solution. Then, the supersaturated solution will form dispersed strengthening particles in the matrix during aging, which improves mechanical properties [
3]. The quenching step is essential for the final mechanical properties and is required to balance two contradictory effects, namely, the quench-induced coarse precipitation with sizes of approximately 100 nm and the residual stress resulting from thermal gradients formed during quenching. Residual stress is known to have detrimental effects on the final mechanical properties and deteriorate manufacturing accuracy, especially for thick plates [
4]. The elimination and inhibition of residual stress is necessary, thus, quenching is followed by stress relief. However, residual stress cannot be removed completely in the stress relief step.
In addition to the stress relief step after quenching, the regulation of the quenching step itself has received attention. It is well known that decreasing the cooling rate during quenching can lower the magnitude of residual stress; however, a lower cooling rate may produce additional quench-induced coarse precipitations, which affects the final mechanical properties. In most cases, ensuring the finial mechanical properties has a higher priority than residual stress reduction, and thus residual stress control is difficult due to the limited regulation window of cooling rate during quenching. According to the principle of precipitation during quenching for most 7xxx aluminum alloys, a high cooling rate must be maintained within the quench-sensitive temperature range, which typically ranges from 200 °C to 400 °C. If this condition is not met, significant additional performance losses will occur [
5]. In a recent study, a multistage quenching process was proposed for 120 mm thick AA 7050 plates based on spray quenching technology that adopted a high cooling rate during the initial stage until cooling to temperatures less than 200 °C, and a lower cooling rate was adopted in the second stage to control the residual stress [
6]. Compared with regular quenching, multistage quenching can reduce the maximum residual stress by only approximately 5–10%. On the premise of ensuring hardenability, it seems that a higher residual stress reduction is difficult to acquire because the cooling rate in temperatures below the quench-sensitive temperature range do not affect the residual stress as much as the cooling rate in the quench-sensitive temperature range.
Furthermore, the material will harden by the precipitation phenomena that occur during quenching. Hardening during the quench will give rise to a higher yield strength at ambient temperatures during quenching, which in turn will produce larger residual stress magnitudes [
7]. This hardening effect is especially significant in the quenching of thick plates. For example, the yield strength of as-quenched thick AA7449 plates, wherein the 75 mm thick plate exhibited a much larger yield strength (255 MPa) than the 20 mm thick plate (210 MPa) [
8]. These additional hardening effects make it more difficult to reduce the residual stress by lowering the cooling rate.
For thick plates, it is conceivable that the hardening effects that accumulate in a relatively long cooling process must be more significant than those observed in thin plates, and these hardening effects are partly responsible for the high-magnitude residual stresses in thick plates. These hardening effects were first ascribed to the homogeneous nucleation of the
η′ phase, such as the low-temperature precipitation that occurs during fast cooling from 250 to 150 °C in a commercial AA7150 alloy [
9]. However, it is doubtful that the uniform nucleation in such a short quenching time can support the remarkable hardening effects. In a more recent study, the in situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements demonstrated that the nanosized precipitates formed during quenching in an AA7449 alloy harden the material significantly, and these authors suggested that the hardeners formed during quenching are mainly solute clusters, and that other larger precipitates can be neglected [
10]. It should be noted that a special phenomenon was exhibited during the experiment, wherein the volume fraction of accumulated clusters after quenching decreased significantly after reheating to temperatures between 80 to 150 °C [
11]. This phenomenon can be explained as follows: The solute clusters formed in such short times during quenching that they were supercritical nucleated and were not as stable as the larger precipitates were. Referred to the kinetic Monte Carlo simulation of clustering in AA7050, the early-stage small clusters in the simulation are loose aggregates that were regarded as unstable because they appeared and disappeared easily [
12]. Therefore, the quench-induced clusters are easily dissolved upon heating, which will lead to a reduction in the yield strength of a hardened material after heating to relatively higher temperatures. For example, in an AA6082 alloy, the dissolution of clusters may lead to a marked decrease in the Vickers hardness within the first minute of artificial aging at temperatures greater than 210 °C [
13].
It can be inferred that the quench-induced residual stress can be reduced not only by reducing the thermal stress but also by eliminating the high level of yield strength of a significantly hardened material (corresponding to the as-quenched aluminum plates). As previously mentioned, the high yield strength of an as-quenched material can be rapidly decreased by reheating to a relatively higher temperature.
Therefore, an optimized quenching technology called interrupted quenching was proposed, which follows a new path to reduce the residual stress by lowering the yield strength of the material rather than just lowering the thermal stress. In this new path, after the core of the part was cooled down to quench-sensitive temperatures (210 °C), the cooling is stopped and the part is placed in air for a period of time so that the surface temperature reheated to 150–160 °C to make the accumulated hardeners (solute clusters) partly dissolve during quenching. This process produces a relative low yield strength, which reduces the residual stress. Afterward, the part is cooled to room temperature.
Interrupted quenching tests were conducted for 115 mm thick 7050 aluminum plates by using spraying quenching equipment, and the samples subjected to interrupted quenching were compared with samples subjected to regular (spray) quenching. The results show that this interrupted quenching approach has a satisfactory effect on residual stress reduction.
3. Results and Discussion
In this study, samples from the surface and core in different states were studied, as shown in
Figure 4a. The heat treatment status for each sample is shown in
Table 2. The results show that the as-quenched stage both in the surface and core exhibit a significantly higher yield strength (226/216 MPa) compared with the samples subjected to an additional solution heat treatment at 476 °C for 30 min (175/176 MPa). This finding indicates that the as-quenched material was significantly hardened by precipitation or clustering during quenching. Furthermore, the samples that were subjected to extra reheating at 160 °C for 20 s (in a 160 °C salt bath) and then cooled to 25 °C exhibited a decrease in yield strength (192/194 MPa). In addition, the electrical conductivity is decreased upon heating too, as shown in
Figure 4b. These findings indicate that the accumulated as-quenched hardeners (clusters) may dissolve upon heating because the structural stability of clusters are far less than those of large precipitates, as mentioned by the in situ SAXS results [
11].
The mechanism of residual stress production has been well recognized in previous research, which is considered to be the result of inhomogeneous elastoplastic deformation due to the thermal stress during quenching [
15,
16,
17]. The magnitude of the residual stress exhibits a linear trend with the magnitude of the residual plastic deformation. In most cases, the evolution of the elastoplastic deformation includes two main stages. The first deformation stage occurs during the initial portion of the quench, which is mainly driven by thermal stress and produces a tensile deformation in the surface and a compression deformation in the core. Taking the precipitation hardening effect into account, the increase in yield strength may hinder these deformations, but the accumulation of the hardening effect over such a short time is usually not sufficient to significantly affect the deformation. The second deformation stage occurs in the latter portion of the quench, when the thermal stress decreases to a certain level and the internal elastic stress caused by the former plastic deformation exceeds the yield strength at ambient temperatures and produces a deformation contrary to the deformation that occurs in the first stage. The plastic deformation in the second stage should be promoted because this deformation may decrease the final magnitude of the residual stress. The hardening effect in the second stage increases the yield strength of the material, which increases the difficulty of plastic deformation in the second stage. It is possible that decreasing the hardening effect may reduce the residual stress.
Therefore, an interrupted quenching technology was proposed based on the idea of reducing the yield strength through an extra heating process aiming to promote plastic deformation in the second stage. That is, after quenching for a period of time (30 s), the surface was cooled to approximately 100 °C and the core was cooled to about 200 °C (below the quench-sensitive temperature range). Then, the spray quenching was interrupted for a period of time (about 20 s). In interrupting, the heat transfer from surface to the surroundings decreases significantly, and the surface material will be re-heated by the heat transfer from the internal to surface. Finally, the material was cooled to room temperature through spraying.
The sketch of the interrupted quenching is shown in
Figure 5, and includes the time–temperature–property (TTP) diagram of 7050 aluminum alloy [
5] and the cooling curves of surface and core in thickness direction in the middle-part of samples undergoing regular quenching and interrupted quenching, respectively. The TTP diagram was corresponding to the 99.5% maximum hardness that approximately reflects the critical time of precipitation beginning. The cooling curves corresponding to spray quenching tests were provided by the finite element analysis (FEA) developed using ABAQUS [
18]. The parameters used in the heat transfer analysis were consistent with the parameters in literature [
6], the starting geometry was chosen as an isotropic rectilinear block measuring 250 mm × 250 mm × 115 mm, and the initial temperature was set to 476 °C. The TTP diagram suggests that the regulation window is limited and that the cooling rate can only be adjusted when the core temperature decreases below 200 °C. According to the core cooling curve of the 115 mm thick rectilinear block, a high cooling rate must be sustained in initial 30 s (approximation) until temperature decreases below the quench-sensitive temperature range. Further, the tendency of a temperature re-rise is shown in the surface cooling curve from the FEA calculations, and the measurement of surface temperature using a contact thermocouple in the interrupting period shows that the temperature may re-rise to 141 °C within 20 s (as shown in the square dots in
Figure 5).
A high cooling rate was adopted during the initial quenching to ensure the hardenability of the material, and an adjustment was made to the cooling rate only in the latter stage of quenching to avoid additional coarse precipitation. For the surface, a large number of hardeners accumulated, which created a significant hardening effect. As previously mentioned, the hardeners may dissolve easily upon heating resulting in a lower yield strength. This phenomenon leads to a decrease in the yield strength at ambient temperatures, thus promotes the second-stage plastic deformation. In addition, the thermal stress, as the resistance of the second stage of plastic deformation, may also decrease by the tendency to a uniform temperature field. In the interrupting period, the second stage of plastic deformation, i.e., the recovery of the initial plastic deformation will be promoted.
For each quenching test, the residual stress along the thickness in the width direction was measured using the CCM, as shown in
Figure 6. The results show that interrupted quenching can satisfactorily control the residual stress. The maximum tensile (core)/compressive (surface) residual stress was reduced to 184/199 MPa using interrupted quenching compared with the regular quenching, which produced a residual stress of 229/268 MPa. The compressive residual stress decreased by 42 MPa in the core and the tensile residual stress decrease by 72 MPa in the surface.
In the interrupted quenching process, the cooling path changes only at temperatures less than 200 °C, which are outside the quench-sensitive temperature range. Therefore, the reduction in the cooling rate may not produce additional quench-induced coarse precipitation, which may lead to an additional performance loss after aging treatment. This lack of additional quench-induced coarse precipitation is illustrated in the comparison of the core and surface microstructures from both regular quenching and interrupted quenching processes, as shown in
Figure 7. This Figure shows that no significant difference exists between the core and surface microstructures after regular quenching or interrupted quenching.
In fact, the change in the cooling process at temperatures less than the quench-sensitive temperature range may not significantly affect the as-aged performance. The temperature changes during quenching are usually rapid, and the volume fraction of the accumulated precipitation (clustering) during quenching is limited compared to the amount of precipitation during the subsequent aging treatment. This precipitation is significantly enough to harden the as-quenched material, but does not affect the as-aged condition to any significant extent. As shown in
Figure 8, the as-aged performance including the yield strength and electrical conductivity is almost the same after interrupted quenching and regular quenching. Therefore, in contrast to regular quenching, the interrupted quenching process reduced the residual stress without creating detrimental effects in the as-aged performance.
Furthermore, the Vickers hardness along thickness direction (in the middle-part of samples) after ageing treatment was shown in
Figure 9. Results show that the interrupted quenching does not bring additional performance after ageing, which means that the hardenability will not deteriorate with interrupted quenching.