Next Article in Journal
Post-Migration Stress and Mental Health Outcomes: A Comparative Study of Syrian Refugee Women in Houston and Jordan
Previous Article in Journal
Dead in Life: Narratives About Circumstances Prior to Suicide in Rural Western Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Canadian Institute for Inclusion and Citizenship, School of Social Work, The University of British Columbia (Okanagan), Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(2), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020067
Submission received: 19 December 2024 / Revised: 17 January 2025 / Accepted: 20 January 2025 / Published: 28 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Work, Employment and the Labor Market)

Abstract

Background: Ableism obstructs employment equity for disabled individuals. However, research lacks a comprehensive understanding of how ableism multidimensionally manifests across job types, disability types, stages of employment, and intersecting identities. Objectives: This scoping review examines how ableism affects disabled workers and jobseekers, as well as its impacts on employment outcomes, variations across disabilities and identities, and the best practices for addressing these. Eligibility Criteria: The included articles were 109 peer-reviewed empirical studies conducted in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, Norway, and Finland between 2018 and 2023. Sources of Evidence: Using terms related to disability, ableism, and employment, the databases searched included Sociology Collection, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Education Source, Academic Search Complete, and ERIC. Charting Methods: Data were extracted in tabular form and analyzed through thematic narrative synthesis to identify study characteristics, ableist barriers within employment, intersectional factors, and best practices. Results: Ableism negatively impacts employment outcomes through barriers within the work environment, challenges in disclosing disabilities, insufficient accommodations, and workplace discrimination. Intersectional factors intensify inequities, particularly for BIPOC, women, and those with invisible disabilities. Conclusions: Systemic, intersectional strategies are needed to address ableism, improve policies, and foster inclusive workplace practices.
Keywords: ableism; employment equity; disability discrimination; workplace inclusion; intersectionality; disability disclosure; workplace accommodations; scoping review; Global North ableism; employment equity; disability discrimination; workplace inclusion; intersectionality; disability disclosure; workplace accommodations; scoping review; Global North

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, R.H.; Asselin, R.; Stainton, T.; Hole, R. Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020067

AMA Style

Sharma RH, Asselin R, Stainton T, Hole R. Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Social Sciences. 2025; 14(2):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Ramona H., Renée Asselin, Timothy Stainton, and Rachelle Hole. 2025. "Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature" Social Sciences 14, no. 2: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020067

APA Style

Sharma, R. H., Asselin, R., Stainton, T., & Hole, R. (2025). Ableism and Employment: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Social Sciences, 14(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop