Next Article in Journal
The Practice of Augmented Reality in Islamic Education and the Level of Motivation Among UAE Secondary School Students
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Location and Spatial Distribution of Violence Against Women in Peru
Previous Article in Special Issue
Partnership in the Classroom: Engaging Students Through Inclusive Student-Teacher Relationships to Advance Social Justice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Developing an Inclusive, Student-Led Approach to Scaling Up the Benefits of Pedagogical Partnership for Social Justice in Higher Education

by
Alison Cook-Sather
1,*,
Abhirami Suresh
1 and
Edmund Dante Nguyen
2
1
Education Department, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA 19010, USA
2
Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(2), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020079
Submission received: 16 November 2024 / Revised: 7 January 2025 / Accepted: 21 January 2025 / Published: 31 January 2025

Abstract

(1) Background: Uneven access to the experience of extra-classroom, student–faculty pedagogical partnerships, as well as the relatively small number of students who can participate in this work, raise equity concerns. Calls to scale up such partnership opportunities often focus on expanding the number and kind of existing partnership projects in a given context, which requires resources and infrastructure that many institutions do not have. (2) Method: We took a students-as-co-researchers approach to a three-phase action-research project to test our hypothesis that (a) assessing the benefits of pedagogical partnership, (b) conceptualizing a new approach to fostering those benefits, and (c) piloting that approach could inform efforts at our own and other institutions to pursue social-justice goals in higher education. (3) Findings: Both our review of the wider literature and our analysis of our own partnership program’s student and faculty participant perspectives affirmed that participating in extra-classroom, student–faculty pedagogical partnerships fosters in students personal learning-related capacities, deepens understanding of other learners and of teachers, and builds career-ready competencies. The new scaling-up approach to fostering these benefits that we conceptualized and have begun to pilot has the potential to be more inclusive, equitable, and feasible than replicating existing extra-classroom pedagogical partnership models. (4) Conclusions: Creating such opportunities for students to develop educational, interpersonal, and professional capacities and competencies can contribute to equity and social justice in higher education.
Keywords: pedagogical partnership; students as co-researchers; action research; equity pedagogical partnership; students as co-researchers; action research; equity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cook-Sather, A.; Suresh, A.; Nguyen, E.D. Developing an Inclusive, Student-Led Approach to Scaling Up the Benefits of Pedagogical Partnership for Social Justice in Higher Education. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020079

AMA Style

Cook-Sather A, Suresh A, Nguyen ED. Developing an Inclusive, Student-Led Approach to Scaling Up the Benefits of Pedagogical Partnership for Social Justice in Higher Education. Social Sciences. 2025; 14(2):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cook-Sather, Alison, Abhirami Suresh, and Edmund Dante Nguyen. 2025. "Developing an Inclusive, Student-Led Approach to Scaling Up the Benefits of Pedagogical Partnership for Social Justice in Higher Education" Social Sciences 14, no. 2: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020079

APA Style

Cook-Sather, A., Suresh, A., & Nguyen, E. D. (2025). Developing an Inclusive, Student-Led Approach to Scaling Up the Benefits of Pedagogical Partnership for Social Justice in Higher Education. Social Sciences, 14(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14020079

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop