Next Article in Journal
Nervous Necrosis Virus-like Particle (VLP) Vaccine Stimulates European Sea Bass Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses and Induces Long-Term Protection against Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of Potentially Virulent Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Drinking Water and Commonly Consumed Aquatic Products by Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification
Previous Article in Journal
Discrepancies in Serology-Based and Nucleic Acid-Based Detection and Quantitation of Tomato Spotted Wilt Orthotospovirus in Leaf and Root Tissues from Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Peanut Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Analysis as a Potential Target for Identification of Trichophyton verrucosum in Different Culture Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Feline Demodicosis Case Report—First Molecular Characterization of Demodex Mites in Romania

Department of Parasitology and Dermatology, Banat‘s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine “King Michael I of Romania” from Timisoara, no. 119, Calea Aradului, 300645 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(11), 1474; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111474
Submission received: 23 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 9 November 2021 / Published: 12 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Cat demodicosis is uncommon to rare, and is caused by Demodex cati, Demodex gatoi and another unnamed species. The investigated patient was a mix-breed, 10-year-old feline with no dermatological history. Alopecia, erythema, minor erosions and ulcerations and crusts, associated with pruritus and self-trauma, were observed on the head. Dark, agglutinated cerumen was also present in the external ear canal. The agent causing the skin condition in the feline patient was identified as being a Demodex genus mite, based on the specific, morphological characteristics noticed upon the microscopic examination of deep skin scrapes. Biological samples were collected from the patient with to perform a PCR assay for clear species-determination and morphological assessment. PCR amplification of DNA extracted from the Demodex mites produced a single band of ~330 bp, indicating the presence of the D. cati species. The acaricidal treatment consisted of topical treatment using a fluralaner and moxidectin-based spot-on. Upon follow-up appointments, scheduled three times at a monthly interval, the patient failed to provide a positive result upon deep skin scrapes. The negative scrapes were also accompanied by the complete resolution of the existing lesions. In conclusion, this is the first molecular study to highlight the presence of Demodex cati within the feline population of Romania, and the fluralaner-moxidectin spot-on therapy has led to a complete recovery of the feline patient affected by feline demodicosis.

1. Introduction

Demodicosis is a skin condition caused by Demodex genus mites (Acariformes: Demodecidae). Feline demodicosis is an uncommon to rare condition, and it is caused by three species of Demodex mites (D. cati, D. gatoi and one species that, despite being mentioned in several research papers, has yet to receive a name) [1].
These mites show high host specificity [2] and their location can vary according to species. Thus, D. gatoi is identified in the epidermal layer, as opposed to D. cati, which is found within the hair follicle [3].
This condition has been mainly diagnosed in immune-suppressed cats, such as cats suffering from chronic diseases like FIV, diabetes mellitus, squamous cells carcinoma or chronic breathing disorders [4,5].
The most frequent locations identified in feline patients include the head (ears and periocular region), and the dorsal area. Feline demodicosis is generally manifested through well-defined alopecia, erythema and crusts, all of which are lesions that could evolve into pruritic, bacterial complications [6,7].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Report

2.1.1. Clinical Exam

The investigated patient was a mixed-breed, 10-year-old cat with no dermatological history. The cat was adopted by the owner at the age of 3 months, and it was spayed after having 2 consecutive births (2 years of age). Thirty days before the consulting, in November 2019, the cat had disappeared from home. Upon her return, the owner noticed symptoms such as excessive scratching and hair loss, associated with weight loss as well as increased sensitivity to external stress factors.
Alopecia, erythema, minor erosions and ulcerations and crusts, associated with pruritus and self-trauma, were observed on the head (Figure 1a–c). Dark, agglutinated cerumen was present in the external ear canal.

2.1.2. Diagnostic

The main differential diagnoses included a ringworm infection, Malassezia dermatitis, bacterial infections and mite infestations. Following clinical examination, we have proceeded to perform a Wood’s lamp test, a trichogram, ear-cytology, otoscopy and a skin scrape.
Several deep skin scrapes were performed from the lesion margins, the obtained material was mixed in mineral oil, a coverslip was applied, and the samples were examined directly, using the 10x magnification objective of a microscope.
Measurements were also taken, in order to establish the specific sizes of the mites’ body segments (gnathosoma, podosoma and opisthosoma).
Otoscopy and cytological examinations of the ear secretions were performed. Subsequent bacterial culture and antibiogram were also performed, Due to the excessive weight loss of the animal, we also performed a quick test (FIV Ab/FeLV Ag—Vet Expert) in order to identify the possible presence of these debilitating viruses, based on the identification of serum, blood or plasma antibodies. The first follow-up was scheduled within 3 weeks after the initial consult and the next follow-ups were scheduled on a monthly basis, for four consecutive months. During every follow-up visit, we performed skin scrapes, and we established the clinical evolution, following treatment.

2.2. PCR Protocol

In order to achieve clear species-determination, we collected biological material for PCR.
DNA was extracted from the skin scrapings, using a commercial kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol for tissue samples (ISOLATE II Genomic DNA Kit, Bioline®, Cincinnati, OH, USA). It was then amplified by PCR, as previously described by Frank et al. [8], using forward primer ACTGTGCTAAGGTAGCGAAGTCA and reverse primer TCAAAAGCCAACATCGAG to amplify 16S rRNA DNA, 2 µL Extracted DNA and MyTaq Red Mix (Bioline®). PCR amplification parameters were 95°C for 90 s, followed by 35 cycles of 55°C for 30 s, 68°C for 120 s and 94°C for 30 s, with a final cycle consisting of 55°C for 30 s and 68°C for 5 min. The PCR product was visualized on 1.5 % agarose gel, stained with Midori Green™ (Nippon Genetics®; Europe Gmbh, Düren, Germany), cleaned with Isolate II PCR and Gel Kit (Bioline®) and sequenced using the forward and reverse PCR primers at Macrogen Europe® Company (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) (Figures S1 and S2).
BLAST was used to compare the sequence with all entries available in GenBank.

2.3. Therapeutic Protocol

The acaricidal treatment consisted of topical treatment using a fluralaner and moxidectin based pipette (Bravecto plus®, MSD, Kenilworth, NJ.USA). The dose was 250 mg/animal weighing between 2.8–6.25 kg, administered monthly (4 administrations overall). In order to improve the immune function, we recommended the use of RX immuno support® (Rx vitamins, Elmsford, NY, USA) capsules, given per os (1x1/day, for 10 days, repeated after 10 days).
The recommended treatment of the bacterial otitis consisted in daily cleansing of the external ear canal using Epiotic® (Virbac, Carros, France), a salicylic acid based solution, followed by instillation of 3-5 drops/ear of Aurizon® (Virbac)—marbofloxacin, clotrimazole, dexamethasone acetate, twice/day for 15 days.

3. Results and Discussion

Following otoscopy and cytological examination of the ear secretions, we ruled out Otodectes cynotis infestation and established the diagnostic of bacterial otitis. The following bacterial strains were identified through the subsequent bacterial culture: Staphylococcus intermedius, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, beta-hemolytic Streptococci. An antibiogram was also performed, highlighting sensitivity of the identified pathogens to chloramphenicol (++++), ciprofloxacin, tobramycin, amikacin (+++) and resistance to trimethoprim, lincomycin, spectinomycin (-).
All the scrapes proved positive for the presence of mites. Based on specific, morphological characteristics, the identified mites were classified as species of the Demodex genus.
The body sizes of 7 Demodex mites (3 males and 4 females) are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2.
The arithmetic average of the mites’ total length was: 198.33 µm, with 15 µm (gnathosoma), 55 µm (podosoma) and 127.66 µm (opisthosoma), for males; 201.5 µm, with 18 µm (gnathosoma), 49 µm (podosoma) and 134.5 µm (opisthosoma), in females.
Following detailed morphological examination, we established that the identified mites were Demodex cati.
Demodex species are prostigmatic mites with a body consisting of: gnathosoma, podosoma and opisthosoma, with four rudimentary, short, and telescopic legs that give them a vermiform appearance. D. cati has a trapezoidal gnathosoma, the width of the base exceeding the length. The opisthosoma is about five times longer than wide, representing about 2/3 of the total length. It is striated transversely and ends tapered [9].
According to studies, D. cati is similar in size to those identified in our study. Lowenstein et al. [10] noticed values of 181.7 ± 17.9 µm of the total length, in males, with the gnathosoma measuring 14.7 ± 1.2 µm, the podosoma 52.2 ± 2.6 µm and the opisthosoma 114.2 ± 17.0 µm. Females had a total length of 219.0 ± 27.4 µm, with the gnathosoma measuring 16.2 ± 1.9 µm, the podosoma 58.7 ± 2.6 µm and the opisthosoma 143.9 ± 25.4 µm. Values of 181.7 ± 17.9 µm (males) and 219 ± 27.4 µm (females), representing the total length were reported by Taffin et al. [7].
In the case of D. gatoi, studies indicate values of 90.6±4.8µm (gnathosoma 14.5 ± 0.4 µm, podosoma 39.5 ± 1.3 µm, opisthosoma 36.6 ± 4.1 µm) [3] and 90.6 ± 4.8 µm [7], representing the total length of males. The total length values noticed in females were 108.3 ± 4.4 µm (gnathosoma 15.5 ± 0.7 µm, podosoma 42.3 ± 1.6 µm, opisthosoma 50.3 ± 4.0 µm) [3] and 108.3 ± 4.4 µm [7].
Smaller sizes, respectively 170.8 ± 1.4 µm (gnathosoma 24.3 ± 0.8 µm, podosoma 58.2 ± 0.9 µm, opisthosoma 88.4 ± 0.5 µm) [8] and 140–175 µm [7], representing the total length, were noticed in Demodex spp. males.
PCR amplification of DNA extracted from Demodex mites produced a single band of ~330 bp.
The product matched 100% with D. cati sequences deposited in GenBank JX193759 throughout the entire compared region.
The used primers are highly conserved among Demodex species, including D. gatoi, D. caprae, D. brevis, D. folliculorum, D. canis, D. injai and an unnamed species affecting cats [8,11].
The quick test (FIV Ab/FeLV Ag-Vet Expert) results came back positive for FIV Ab and negative for FeLV Ag. The feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus (FIV and FeLV, respectively) are severe diseases that frequently affect domestic cats causing immunosuppression and consequently, predisposing felines to secondary diseases (such as, feline demodicosis) [7,12,13].
According to the antibiogram, the recommended antibiotic class to be used in this case was the fluoroquinolones.
The applied therapy based on the use of fluralaner and moxidectin proved successful, and 3 weeks post-treatment the skin scrapes became negative, and the clinical aspect had improved considerably, as shown in Figure 3. Consequently, alopecia, erythema, erosions, ulcerations, crusts, pruritus, and self-trauma disappeared.
Moreover, following the recommended treatment against bacterial otitis, dark, agglutinated cerumen was not present in the external ear canal.
The efficacy of fluralaner in feline demodicosis has been evaluated before [14,15], while moxidectin has also been used previously for the treatment of canine demodicosis [16,17], as well as in the control of various feline parasitic infections.
No adverse reactions were recorded following administration of the product. Moreover, the easy application of the product has avoided supplementary stress for the animal. No mites could be identified any longer within three weeks following the administration of the product, as well as during the entire 4-month follow-up period.
The clinical history, physical examination, and microscopic observation of the mite in skin scrapings are used to diagnose Demodex spp. infections, however molecular methods of detection, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), have substantially improved infection diagnosis [8,17].
We may thus conclude that this is the first molecular study to highlight the presence of demodicosis (caused by Demodex cati) within the feline population of Romania, and that therapy using fluralaner and moxidectin leads to the complete resolution of clinical signs in the studied patient.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10111474/s1. Figure S1: Sequencing result, Figure S2, Sequencing result.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.I.; formal analysis, I.L., S.G.; investigation, M.S.I., I.L., S.G. and M.I.; resources, M.S.I.; data curation, T.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.I. and I.L.; writing—review and editing, T.F. and M.I.; supervision, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by own funds of Banat University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Timisoara.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and the proper procedures of the University Veterinary Clinics of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Timișoara, approved by the Ethics Committee protocol number 34/1.12.2012 of the Romanian Veterinary College.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient owner to include in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Alina Denis Tekin for her technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beale, K. Feline demodicosis: A consideration in the itchy or overgrooming cat. J. Feline Med. Surg. 2012, 14, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Burr, H.N.; Paluch, R.N.; Roble, G.S.; Lipman, N.S. Chapter 32—Parasitic Diseases. In American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine, the Laboratory Rabbit, Guinea Pig, Hamster, and Other Rodents; Suckow, M.A., Stevens, K.A., Wilson, R.P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 839–866. ISBN 9780123809209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Desch, C.E., Jr.; Stewart, T.B. Demodex gatoi: New species of hair follicle mite (Acari: Demodecidae) from the domestic cat (Carnivora: Felidae). J. Med. Entomol. 1999, 36, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kano, R.; Hyuga, A.; Matsumoto, J.; Nogami, S.; Nemoto, S.; Hasegawa, A.; Kamata, H. Feline demodicosis caused by an unnamed species. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 92, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moriello, K.A.; Newbury, S.; Steinberg, H. Five observations of a third morphologically distinct feline Demodex mite. Vet. Dermatol. 2013, 24, 460-e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neel, J.A.; Tarigo, J.; Tater, K.C.; Grindem, C.B. Deep and superficial skin scrapings from a feline immunodeficiency virus-positive cat. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 2007, 36, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taffin, E.R.; Casaert, S.; Claerebout, E.; Vandekerkhof, T.J.; Vandenabeele, S. Morphological variability of Demodex cati in a feline immunodeficiency virus-positive cat. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2016, 249, 1308–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Frank, L.A.; Kania, S.A.; Chung, K.; Brahmbhatt, R. A molecular technique for the detection and differentiation of Demodex mites on cats. Vet. Dermatol. 2013, 24, 367-e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Desch, C.; Nutting, W.B. Demodex cati Hirst 1919: A redescription. Cornell Vet. 1979, 69, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Löwenstein, C.; Beck, W.; Bessmann, K.; Mueller, R.S. Feline demodicosis caused by concurrent infestation with Demodex cati and an unnamed species of mite. Vet. Rec. 2005, 157, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bernstein, J.A.; Frank, L.A.; Kania, S.A. PCR amplification and DNA sequence identification of an unusual morphological form of Demodex cati in a cat. Vet. Dermatol. 2014, 25, 487-e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gomez-Lucia, E.; Collado, V.M.; Miró, G.; Martín, S.; Benítez, L.; Doménech, A. Clinical and Hematological Follow-Up of Long-Term Oral Therapy with Type-I Interferon in Cats Naturally Infected with Feline Leukemia Virus or Feline Immunodeficiency Virus. Animals 2020, 10, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Favrot, C.; Wilhelm, S.; Grest, P.; Meli, M.L.; Hofmann-Lehmann, R.; Kipar, A. Two cases of FeLV-associated dermatoses. Vet. Dermatol. 2005, 16, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matricoti, I.; Maina, E. The use of oral fluralaner for the treatment of feline generalised demodicosis: A case report. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2017, 58, 476–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Duangkaew, L.; Hoffman, H. Efficacy of oral fluralaner for the treatment of Demodex gatoi in two shelter cats. Vet. Dermatol. 2018, 29, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Perego, R.; Spada, E.; Foppa, C.; Proverbio, D. Critically appraised topic for the most effective and safe treatment for canine generalised demodicosis. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mueller, R.S.; Rosenkrantz, W.; Bensignor, E.; Karaś-Tęcza, J.; Paterson, T.; Shipstone, M.A. Diagnosis and treatment of demodicosis in dogs and cats: Clinical consensus guidelines of the World Association for Veterinary Dermatology. Vet. Dermatol. 2020, 31, 5–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Feline demodicosis—lesional aspects: (a,b)—alopecia, erythema, small ulcerations and crusts in the external ear canal (before treatment); (c)—black secretions are present in the external ear canal.
Figure 1. Feline demodicosis—lesional aspects: (a,b)—alopecia, erythema, small ulcerations and crusts in the external ear canal (before treatment); (c)—black secretions are present in the external ear canal.
Pathogens 10 01474 g001
Figure 2. Male Demodex—body segments sizes.
Figure 2. Male Demodex—body segments sizes.
Pathogens 10 01474 g002
Figure 3. Hair regrowth in the ear area and decrease in size of ulcerative lesions, absence of crusts (following treatment, 3 weeks).
Figure 3. Hair regrowth in the ear area and decrease in size of ulcerative lesions, absence of crusts (following treatment, 3 weeks).
Pathogens 10 01474 g003
Table 1. Demodex mites body sizes.
Table 1. Demodex mites body sizes.
No.SexTotal LengthGnathosomaPodosomaOpisthosoma
1.Male188 µm13 µm59 µm116 µm
2.Male219 µm16 µm54 µm147 µm
3.Male188 µm16 µm52 µm120 µm
4.Female214 µm26 µm41 µm147 µm
5.Female207 µm18 µm50 µm139 µm
6.Female197 µm12 µm53 µm132 µm
7.Female188 µm16 µm52 µm120 µm
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ilie, M.S.; Imre, M.; Giubega, S.; Luca, I.; Florea, T.; Morariu, S. Feline Demodicosis Case Report—First Molecular Characterization of Demodex Mites in Romania. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111474

AMA Style

Ilie MS, Imre M, Giubega S, Luca I, Florea T, Morariu S. Feline Demodicosis Case Report—First Molecular Characterization of Demodex Mites in Romania. Pathogens. 2021; 10(11):1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ilie, Marius Stelian, Mirela Imre, Simona Giubega, Iasmina Luca, Tiana Florea, and Sorin Morariu. 2021. "Feline Demodicosis Case Report—First Molecular Characterization of Demodex Mites in Romania" Pathogens 10, no. 11: 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111474

APA Style

Ilie, M. S., Imre, M., Giubega, S., Luca, I., Florea, T., & Morariu, S. (2021). Feline Demodicosis Case Report—First Molecular Characterization of Demodex Mites in Romania. Pathogens, 10(11), 1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10111474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop