Next Article in Journal
Prospects of Using High-Throughput Proteomics to Underpin the Discovery of Animal Host–Nematode Interactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation of the Use of Dried Blood Samples for the Detection of Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies in Stray Cats (Felis s. catus)
Previous Article in Journal
Rhipicephalus Tick: A Contextual Review for Southeast Asia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do All Roads Lead to Rome? The Potential of Different Approaches to Diagnose Aelurostrongylus abstrusus Infection in Cats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intestinal Parasites of Neotropical Wild Jaguars, Pumas, Ocelots, and Jaguarundis in Colombia: Old Friends Brought Back from Oblivion and New Insights

1
Biomedical Research Center Seltersberg (BFS), Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
2
CIBAV Research Group, Veterinary Medicine School, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050034, Colombia
3
Panthera, New York, NY 10018, USA
4
Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2021, 10(7), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822
Submission received: 9 June 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 28 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Felid Parasitoses, New Insights and Open Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Neotropical wild felids (NWF) are obligate carnivore species present in Central and South America, and some are considered endangered due to constantly decreasing populations. NWF can become infected by a wide range of protozoan and metazoan parasites, some of them affecting their health conditions and others having anthropozoonotic relevance. Parasitological studies on NWF are still very scarce, and most data originated from dead or captive animals. On this account, the current study aimed to characterize gastrointestinal parasites of free-ranging jaguars (Panthera onca), pumas (Puma concolor), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), and jaguarundis (Herpailurus yagouaroundi), i.e., four out of six NWF species endemic to Colombia. Fecal samples from jaguars (n = 10) and ocelots (n = 4) were collected between 2012 and 2017 as part of the Jaguar Corridor Initiative from six geographic locations in Colombia. In addition, cestode specimens were obtained during puma and jaguarundi necropsies. Scat samples were processed by standardized sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin (SAF), sedimentation, and flotation techniques and by carbol fuchsin-stained fecal smears. Morphological evaluation of feces showed the presence of one cestode (Spirometra sp.), a nematode (Toxocara cati), an acanthocephalan (Oncicola sp.), and one cyst-forming coccidian (Cystoisospora-like oocysts). Feces oocysts were submitted to a Toxoplasma gondii-specific PCR for species identification, but no product was amplified. The cestodes isolated from a puma and jaguarundi were molecularly characterized by sequencing cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, identifying them as Taenia omissa and as a T. omissa sister lineage, respectively. These results collectively demonstrate the potential role of NWF as natural reservoir hosts for neglected zoonotic parasites (e.g., Spirometra sp., T. cati) and highlight their possible role in parasite transmission to human communities. Due to public health concerns, the occurrence of these parasites should be monitored in the future for appropriate zoonotic management practices in conservation strategies and wild felid health management programs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The family Felidae (order: Carnivora) is currently composed of 45 recognized non-hybrid extant wild species with a worldwide distribution throughout all biomes except the Antarctic polar ice caps and insular Oceania [1,2]. All members are obligate carnivores acting as apex predators or mesocarnivores in many terrestrial ecosystems. Large wild felids serve as effective umbrella and keystone species, contributing to maintaining and regulating associated biodiversity and ecosystems where they occur [3]. Neotropical wild felids (NWF) are well-known hosts of important zoonotic protozoan parasites, such as Toxoplasma gondii [4,5], Cryptosporidium sp., and Giardia sp. [6,7] and are often reservoirs of hemoparasites such as Trypanosoma cruzi [8] and tick-borne piroplasmids such as Babesia sp., Cytauxzoon felis [9], and Anaplasma sp. [10]. Moreover, the presence of metazoan parasites has also been reported in non-domestic NWF, showing them as feasible hosts of gastropod-borne metastrongyloid lungworms [11,12] or Dirofilaria immitis, the causative agent of heartworm disease [13]. Other helminths, for instance, hookworms [14], trematodes [15], and cestodes, [13,16,17,18] have also been reported in non-domestic wild felids as well as ectoparasites like ticks, mites, and fleas [19]. The sophisticated ways in which parasite life cycles have evolved to ensure transmission involve complex interactions with vertebrate and invertebrate hosts, and parasite assemblage reflects the host’s trophic position within the food web [20]. Thus, parasite populations and communities are useful indicators of environmental stress, food web structure, and biodiversity [20,21]. The neotropics are the most diverse region with the largest number of animal species in the world [22,23], felids not being the exception. Colombia is home to six species of NWF (Table 1). Several of these species co-occur or are wholly sympatric; for example, puma, jaguarundi, and ocelot are sympatric to jaguar ranges in Colombia, but not necessarily the other way round [24,25,26].
The potential multiplicity of NWF parasite species has never been evaluated in the unique Central and South American hinge-joining key territory of Colombia. Despite numerous data on the ecology and biology of non-domestic felids in Colombia [25,27,28], little is known about free-ranging NWF-associated infectious diseases (e.g., virus, bacteria, fungi) and their parasite fauna. Additionally, parasite surveillance in natural ecological systems is an important tool to understand wildlife health, parasite biodiversity, ecology, and conservation [29]. Hence, the current study aims to present the first description of gastrointestinal parasite fauna from free-ranging jaguars, pumas, ocelots, and jaguarundis at eight sampling locations in Colombia through copromicroscopic and necropsy-based approaches on detailed morphology and further molecular identification.

2. Results

2.1. Copromicroscopical Evaluation

Parasitological evaluation of jaguar (P. onca) and ocelot (L. pardalis) faeces through basic coprological standard techniques simultaneously evidenced three metazoan parasite taxa belonging to Platyhelminthes and Acanthocephala, plus a protozoan of the phylum Alveolata (Subphylum: Apicomplexa). A high infection rate (~36%; 5/14) of cestode eggs belonging to Spirometra sp. was found (Figure 1a). The oval-shaped diphyllobothriid eggs corresponded to Spirometra sp. These asymmetric yellowish eggs showed a slightly distinct operculum at the cone-shaped pole (Figure 1b). Furthermore, we also identified golden, slightly pear-shaped ascarid-type eggs with characteristic thick-pitted eggshells (Figure 1c). Therefore, the traits of ascarid-type eggs depicted above corresponded well to the zoonotic nematode Toxocara cati. Additionally, pale and slightly oval eggs of Oncicola sp., with a delicate external membrane, were detected. Finally, un-sporulated Cystoisopora-like oocysts (Sarcocystidae) were also identified in jaguar and ocelot scat samples (Figure 1d,e, respectively).

2.2. Cestode Identification and Characterization of Rostellar Hooks

The macroscopical analyses of helminth specimens collected from the small intestine of a puma (P. concolor) and a jaguarundi (H. yagouaroundi) evidenced the presence of taeniid cestodes in both felids during necropsy procedures. Both cestodes presented a ribbon-like strobila with many proglottids. Immature and mature proglottids were wider than longer, increasing in length towards the posterior part. Additionally, two rows of hooks in a well-developed rostellum were noticed. All rostellar hooks of anterior row were larger and alternated with those of second row, which were consistently smaller (please refer to Videos S1 and S2). Armed rostellum evidences a total of 48 hooks. The basic morphological measures of large and small hooks (n = 24, n = 21, respectively) were: 282.64 µm and 205.31 µm total length (TL), 135.26 µm and 99.57 µm total width (TW), 202.89 µm and 164.62 µm blade length (BL), 135.59 µm and 97.69 µm apical length (AL), 59.28 µm and 45.34 µm guard length (GL), 47.49 µm and 38.86 µm guard width (GW), 39.32 µm and 27.46 µm blade curvature (BC), and 45.03 µm and 22.07 µm handle (HW). Along the strobila, each proglottid showed marginal alternating irregular genital pores, demonstrating the presence of a single set of reproductive organs (Figure 2). These morphological traits correspond well to the cyclophyllidean genus Taenia.
In order to identify the species of adult cestodes found in puma and jaguarundi, 858 bp-long fragments of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of both specimens were characterized and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. Representative COI sequences of relevant Taenia species including all specimens reported from felids were included. The specimen from puma clustered within the lineage composed of representatives of Taenia omissa, while the jaguarundi isolate formed a sister lineage to them (Figure 3).

2.3. Toxoplasma gondii PCR

None of the jaguar nor ocelot faecal oocyst samples analyzed showed effective amplification of the T. gondii-specific 529 bp DNA repetitive fragment. Nevertheless, both the internal and positive controls of each test amplified normally, and negative controls never showed amplification.

3. Discussion

Since the vast majority of available data on wild felid parasite fauna come from captive, deceased, or highly anthropized individuals, and data on free-ranging NWF are scarce [30], the findings presented here constitute an important contribution to baseline understanding of the parasite fauna harbored by free-ranging wild felids (~67% of species) of Colombia. Agricultural expansion negatively impacts the occupancy of wild felid communities across human-modified landscapes [31,32], and these adverse anthropogenic factors may in turn influence their respective parasite communities. Thus, more frequent domestic animal–human–wildlife interface favors a plethora of infectious pathogens to emerge, spread, cross species barriers, and eventually evolve [14,33]. Here, we describe free-ranging wild felid parasites, including zoonotic parasites, heightening the importance of NWF living in human-modified landscapes and highlighting the need for appropriate zoonotic management practices in wild felid health management programs, due to public health concern and conservation.
Sparganosis is a globally distributed neglected water- and food-borne disease caused by larval stages of Spirometra sp. located in various human body tissues [34]. The occurrence of Spirometra infections across South America has been reported since the beginning of the 20th century [35]. This cestode has been previously recorded in Geoffroy’s cat (Leopardus geoffroyi), puma, and jaguarundi in western Paraguay [36]; the guiña (Leopardus guigna) in Chile [37]; and jaguar, puma, and margay (Leopardus wiedii) in Brazil [16,38]. Additionally, ocelots from Peru [39] and Brazil [38] have been shown to represent feasible definitive hosts of Spirometra sp. To the best of our knowledge, we report Spirometra sp. here for the first time in Colombian free-ranging jaguars and ocelots. Human cases of sparganosis have been previously reported in South America [40,41,42], but to date there is only a single six-decades-old case report from Colombia [43]. In addition, ascarid nematodes were shown to be broadly prevalent in some wild felids, and T. cati is the dominant parasite in some of them due to its complex life cycle, including lactogenic transmission and a wide array of paratenic hosts (e.g., rodents) [44]. We report T. cati in jaguars and ocelots, highlighting again the potential role of NWF in parasite transmission to local human communities. Despite the worldwide distribution of anthropozoonotic T. cati and its endemicity in most American countries [45], feline as well as human toxocarosis is still poorly understood in Colombian rural areas, since most studies have been conducted in urban areas, including large cities of the country [46].
Despite T. gondii negative molecular assays, here we describe un-sporulated Cystoisospora-like oocysts in wild jaguars and ocelots. Since there are at least eight Eimeria species described previously in felids as spurious findings, meaning that identified Eimeria oocysts belonged to prey animals and passed through the felid’s gut into faeces [47], it would be recommended to posteriorly identify if Cystoisospora-type oocysts reported here belonged to Cystoisospora rivolta, Hammondia hammondi, or Besnoitia spp., frequently reported as cyst-forming coccidians in domestic and wild felids [48]. Furthermore, the cyclophyllidean cestode T. omissa, which was firstly reported in 1910 [49], was also evidenced during necropsy procedures of the deceased puma. To date, T. omissa molecular data information is restricted to reports in natural intermediate hosts such as domesticated alpacas (Vicugna pacos) [50] and free-living red brockets (Mazama americana). Meanwhile, puma [51] and Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) [18] have also been reported as T. omissa-definitive hosts. Therefore, the present study enlarges the sequence data for this tapeworm of felids, expands the geographical distribution range of T. omissa to Colombia, and adds jaguarundi as a new definitive host for an uncharacterised sister linage of T. omissa. In comparison to faeces, carcass evaluation increases the chance of parasite detection. The copromicroscopic detection of Taenia sp. eggs tends to be of lower sensitivity when compared to carcass evaluation, since taeniid eggs are usually passed within mature proglottids, and show intermittent shedding analogously to other cestodes. [52]. The acanthocephalan genus Oncicola, consisting of twenty-four recognized species, has been circulating in South American felines for almost 9000 years [53,54]. Some scattered reports of O. canis, O. oncicola, and O. venezualensis have been reported in jaguars, ocelots, pumas, and margays across the American continent [13,55,56,57,58,59,60]. We report this parasite genus in free-ranging jaguars and ocelots in Colombia for the first time since 1968 [61].
Based on the fact that parasites are associated with retarded growth, reproductive disorders, tissue damage, inflammation, and mortality in wildlife [14], constant parasitological investigations of Colombian NWF are needed. This should be considered not only for conservation strategies and wild felid health management programs but also for public health concerns. For a better comprehension of parasite fauna infecting free-ranging NWF in Colombia, we also encourage further studies of the highly arboreal margay and the rare Northern tiger cat (L. tigrinus) to complement baseline data for the complete set of six endemic species reported to date in Colombian territories. Likewise, for comparative purposes, further parasitological surveys of the species included in the present study (i.e., jaguar, puma, ocelot, and jaguarundi) should be performed at a larger sample size in different biomes and seasons throughout the American continent. Finally, since the indirect life cycles of Spirometra sp. and T. cati require two to three hosts, including humans as aberrant hosts, it is desirable to analyze potential intermediate hosts (e.g., tetrapods, invertebrates, and copepods) in agricultural and semi-aquatic landscapes for a better understanding of these neglected parasites in the tropics and to delineate appropriate zoonotic health management practices to avoid human infections. Intriguing felid metastrongyloid cardiopulmonary nematodes have become spotlighted in the parasitology of wild felids [12,62]. Thus, we encourage future studies on epizootiological drivers of feline , aelurostrongylosis, angiostrongylosis, crenosomosis, gurltiosis, and troglostrongylosis in NWF [12,37,63], as these parasitoses have been discredited in populations of wild felids [11,37].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Area

The current study was conducted across the highly heterogeneous Colombian biomes of the Andean, Amazonian, and Orinoquía regions. Based on the Köppen–Geiger climate classification [64], the eight sampling geographic locations included in the present study belong to tropical monsoon (Am), tropical rainforest (Af), and tropical wet and dry climate (Aw) (see Table 2). The jaguar and ocelot faecal samples were collected from three locations in Santander, and one from Antioquia, Casanare, and Córdoba departments, respectively. Furthermore, cestode specimens (i.e., scolex, strobila, and proglottids) were collected from a deceased wild puma in Caquetá and a road-killed jaguarundi in Cundinamarca (refer to Figure 4).

4.2. Sample Collection and Laboratory Procedures

The current study includes free-ranging wild jaguar (n = 10) and ocelot (n = 4) faecal samples collected between 2012 and 2017 as part of the Jaguar Corridor Initiative, a conservation and monitoring program carried out by the Panthera organization across the jaguar’s range [65]. Collected faeces came from direct sampling sites of trails that were regularly monitored by trap cameras (refer to Figure 5). Faeces were identified by associated tracks and followed the general features and morphometric characteristics of wild felid depositions [66]. The traditional ecological knowledge of locals was also very helpful for monitoring and sampling these reclusive individuals [67]. Once identified in the field, well-formed faeces were dry preserved and fixed in 70% EtOH until subsequent copromicroscopic evaluation, as recommended for challenging tropical environments [68]. Furthermore, we collected a cestode sample serendipitously during the necropsy of a young road-killed wild jaguarundi male in Cundinamarca. The cestode specimen was carefully extracted from the ileum. Additionally, free cestode proglottids and whole tapeworms firmly attached by their scolex to the jejunum mucosa of an adult deceased female puma at Caquetá were collected. Cestode specimens were gently rinsed in physiological buffered saline solution (PBS) and thereafter preserved in 96% EtOH until further molecular evaluation. All sampling procedures were performed in agreement with the Guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists for the Use of Wild Mammals in Research and Education [69,70], the EU Directive 2010/63/EU, and the final approval of the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of the Universidad de Antioquia (AS No. 132) under collection permit No. 0524 of 2014 (IDB0321), Colombia.

4.2.1. Basic Copromicroscopic Analyses

Since there is no single copromicroscopic method to diagnose all parasitic stages concomitantly, the jaguar and ocelot faeces examination was performed by means of the following qualitative techniques for cysts, oocysts, eggs, and parasite larvae detection to optimize data collection: modified sodium-acetate aceticacid formaldehyde (SAF) technique [71], simple sedimentation technique [72], zinc sulfate centrifugal flotation technique, and fast carbol-fuchsin stained faecal smears [73]. The parasitic specimens were identified through morphometry under an Olympus BX53 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) semi-motorized direct light microscope (100×, 400×, and 1000×) equipped with an Olympus DP74 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) digital camera using the cellSens standard imaging software (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The parasites’ identification was based on general morphology, shape, size, and color, according to Deplazes et al. (2016) [74].

4.2.2. Molecular Phylogenetics

Adult cestodes obtained from the jejunum of the female puma and the ileum of the male jaguarundi were carefully removed from the epithelium and/or lumen of the small intestine, trying to preserve the scolex, strobila, and proglottids integrity. The obtained helminths were first photographed using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ25R, Tokyo, Japan). Amplification of partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) was achieved with primers JB3 [75] and Cox1R [76] using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, USA) and the following cycling conditions: 35 cycles of 10 s at 98 °C, 15 s at 60 °C, and 50 s at 72 °C. PCR products were gel-checked, purified with Exonuclease I and FastAP alkaline phosphatase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), and directly Sanger-sequenced at SeqMe (Dobříš, Czech Republic). Contiguous gene sequences were assembled and inspected for errors in Geneious 7.1.9 (http://www.geneious.com, accessed on 3 June 2021 [77]). COI coding sequences were aligned using MAFFT’s L-INS-i [78] translational align of Geneious. The phylogenetic tree was estimated by maximum likelihood in IQ-TREE 1.6.5 [79]. The best-fitting model of nucleotide evolution was chosen according to the corrected Akaike information criterion in IQ-TREE ([80,81]) and nodal supports estimated through running 100 standard nonparametric bootstrap replicates.

4.2.3. Faecal DNA Isolation and Toxoplasma gondii Molecular Evaluation

Total DNA isolation was performed using the Class II type B2 BSC and the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) following manufacturer’s instructions. A 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment conserved among 60 strains and more sensitive than B1 gene was used for T. gondii molecular detection. Amplification of repeated fragments was performed using Toxo4 and Toxo5 primers set under previously described conditions [82]. Tachyzoites of the T. gondii RH- and ME49 strain were used as positive DNA controls.

Supplementary Materials

The following material is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens10070822/s1, Video S1: 3D model of T. omissa rostellar large hook, Video S2: 3D model of T. omissa rostellar small hook.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.U., E.P., C.H. and J.J.C.-G.; methodology, M.U., E.P. and J.B.; sample collection, E.P. and M.U.; validation, M.U. and J.B.; formal analysis, M.U. and J.B.; investigation, M.U.; resources, E.P., J.B. and J.J.C.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U.; writing—review and editing, C.H., J.B., E.P., J.V. and J.J.C.-G.; visualization, M.U.; supervision, J.J.C.-G. and C.H.; funding acquisition, J.J.C.-G., J.B. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the final published version of the manuscript and authorship is limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.

Funding

The project where samples were collected was funded by ALBAN Postgraduate Scholarship, Liz Claiborne and Art Ortenberg Foundation and the Kaplan Scholarship, “Panthera”. Molecular characterization of the specimens was funded by Czech Science Foundation Project No. 19-28399X. The APC was funded by Justus Liebig University Giessen.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The current study was conducted according to the Guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists for the use of wild mammals in research and education, the EU Directive 2010/63/EU, and approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation of Universidad de Antioquia (AS No. 132) under collection permit No. 0524 of 2014 (IDB0321).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The putative Taenia omissa sequences obtained from puma (Puma concolor) [PUM_CPB_Fem_20] and jaguarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi) [YAG_CG_Male19] were deposited in GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH, Bethesda, USA) and are available at ENA (European Nucleotide Archive) in Europe and the DDBJ (DNA Data Bank of Japan) under accession numbers MZ351292 and MZ351293, respectively.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our thanks to the “Panthera” organization for their technical support, contribution with field work and sample collections. We are grateful to C.M. Wagner, R. Ortiz and C. Valderrama for the partial collection of samples and to Diana Stasiukynas who helped with labeling, storage, and delivery of samples. The CIBAV Research Group thanks to the Bicentennial Doctoral Excellence Scholarship Program of Colombia (“Programa de becas de excelencia doctoral del bicentenario”) for financial support to the PhD student M.U. and the Consolidation Strategy (CODI 2018–2019) of the Universidad de Antioquia. Finally, we acknowledge the “Panthera” organization, Diana Stasiuskynas, and Manuelita for the kindly bestowed pictures of jaguars, puma, ocelot, and jaguarundi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. No funder had any role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kitchener, A.C.; Breitenmoser-Würsten, C.; Eizirik, E.; Gentry, A.; Werdelin, L.; Wilting, A.; Yamaguchi, N.; Abramov, A.; Christiansen, P.; Driscoll, C.; et al. A revised taxonomy of the Felidae. The final report of the Cat Classification Task Force of the IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group. Cat News 2017. Available online: https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/32616 (accessed on 29 June 2021).
  2. Li, G.; Davis, B.W.; Eizirik, E.; Murphy, W.J. Phylogenomic evidence for ancient hybridization in the genomes of living cats (Felidae). Genome Res. 2016, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Thornton, D.; Zeller, K.; Rondinini, C.; Boitani, L.; Crooks, K.; Burdett, C.; Rabinowitz, A.; Quigley, H. Assessing the umbrella value of a range-wide conservation network for jaguars (Panthera onca). Ecol. Appl. 2016, 26, 1112–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Montazeri, M.; Mikaeili Galeh, T.; Moosazadeh, M.; Sarvi, S.; Dodangeh, S.; Javidnia, J.; Sharif, M.; Daryani, A. The global serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in felids during the last five decades (1967–2017): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pena, H.F.J.; Marvulo, M.F.V.; Horta, M.C.; Silva, M.A.; Silva, J.C.R.; Siqueira, D.B.; Lima, P.-A.C.P.; Vitaliano, S.N.; Gennari, S.M. Isolation and genetic characterisation of Toxoplasma gondii from a red-handed howler monkey (Alouatta belzebul), a jaguarundi (Puma yagouaroundi), and a black-eared opossum (Didelphis aurita) from Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 175, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zahedi, A.; Paparini, A.; Jian, F.; Robertson, I.; Ryan, U. Public health significance of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species in wildlife: Critical insights into better drinking water management. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2016, 5, 88–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Oates, S.C.; Miller, M.A.; Hardin, D.; Conrad, P.A.; Melli, A.; Jessup, D.A.; Dominik, C.; Roug, A.; Tinker, M.T.; Miller, W.A. Prevalence, environmental loading, and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia isolates from domestic and wild animals along the central California coast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8762–8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rocha, F.L.; Roque, A.L.R.; de Lima, J.S.; Cheida, C.C.; Lemos, F.G.; de Azevedo, F.C.; Arrais, R.C.; Bilac, D.; Herrera, H.M.; Mourão, G.; et al. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in neotropical wild carnivores (Mammalia: Carnivora): At the top of the T. cruzi transmission chain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Alvarado-Rybak, M.; Solano-Gallego, L.; Millán, J. A review of piroplasmid infections in wild carnivores worldwide: Importance for domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. André, M.R. Diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia/Neoehrlichia agents in terrestrial wild carnivores worldwide: Implications for human and domestic animal health and wildlife conservation. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018, 5, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Diakou, A.; Dimzas, D.; Astaras, C.; Savvas, I.; Di Cesare, A.; Morelli, S.; Neofitos, Κ.; Migli, D.; Traversa, D. Clinical investigations and treatment outcome in a European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) infected by cardio-pulmonary nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2020, 19, 100357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Traversa, D.; Morelli, S.; Di Cesare, A.; Diakou, A. Felid cardiopulmonary nematodes: Dilemmas solved and new questions posed. Pathogens 2021, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pence, D.B.; Tewes, M.E.; Laack, L.L. Helminths of the ocelot from Southern Texas. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Seguel, M.; Gottdenker, N. The diversity and impact of hookworm infections in wildlife. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2017, 6, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. González, P.; Carbonell, E.; Urios, V.; Rozhnov, V.V. Coprology of Panthera tigris altaica and Felis bengalensis euptilurus from the Russian far east. J. Parasitol. 2007, 93, 948–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arrabal, J.P.; Pérez, M.G.; Arce, L.F.; Kamenetzky, L. First identification and molecular phylogeny of Sparganum proliferum from endangered felid (Panthera onca) and other wild definitive hosts in one of the regions with highest worldwide biodiversity. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 13, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ulziijargal, G.; Yeruult, C.; Khulan, J.; Gantsetseg, C.; Wandra, T.; Yamasaki, H.; Narankhajid, M. Molecular identification of Taenia hydatigena and Mesocestoides species based on copro-DNA analysis of wild carnivores in Mongolia. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 11, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lavikainen, A.; Haukisalmi, V.; Deksne, G.; Holmala, K.; Lejeune, M.; Isomursu, M.; Jokelainen, P.; Näreaho, A.; Laakkonen, J.; Hoberg, E.P.; et al. Molecular identification of Taenia spp. in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) from Finland. Parasitology 2013, 140, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Souza, U.A.; Webster, A.; Dall’Agnol, B.; Peters, F.B.; Favarini, M.O.; Schott, D.; Zitelli, L.C.; Mazim, F.D.; Kasper, C.B.; Ott, R.; et al. Ticks, mites, fleas, and vector-borne pathogens in free-ranging neotropical wild felids from southern Brazil. Ticks Tick. Borne. Dis. 2021, 12, 101706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marcogliese, D.J. Parasites of the superorganism: Are they indicators of ecosystem health? Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hudson, P.J.; Dobson, A.P.; Lafferty, K.D. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pimm, S.L.; Jenkins, C.N.; Abell, R.; Brooks, T.M.; Gittleman, J.L.; Joppa, L.N.; Raven, P.H.; Roberts, C.M.; Sexton, J.O. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 2014, 344, 1246752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jenkins, C.N.; Pimm, S.L.; Joppa, L.N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Scognamillo, D.; Maxit, I.E.; Sunquist, M.; Polisar, J. Coexistence of jaguar (Panthera onca) and puma (Puma concolor) in a mosaic landscape in the Venezuelan llanos. J. Zool. 2003, 259, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boron, V.; Xofis, P.; Link, A.; Payan, E.; Tzanopoulos, J. Conserving predators across agricultural landscapes in Colombia: Habitat use and space partitioning by jaguars, pumas, ocelots and jaguarundis. Oryx 2020, 54, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nagy-Reis, M.; Oshima, J.E.d.F.; Kanda, C.Z.; Palmeira, F.B.L.; Melo, F.R.; Morato, R.G.; Bonjorne, L.; Magioli, M.; Leuchtenberger, C.; Rohe, F.; et al. Neotropical Carnivores: A data set on carnivore distribution in the Neotropics. Ecology 2020, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jędrzejewski, W.; Robinson, H.S.; Abarca, M.; Zeller, K.A.; Velasquez, G.; Paemelaere, E.A.D.; Goldberg, J.F.; Payan, E.; Hoogesteijn, R.; Boede, E.O.; et al. Estimating large carnivore populations at global scale based on spatial predictions of density and distribution—Application to the jaguar (Panthera onca). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Boron, V.; Tzanopoulos, J.; Gallo, J.; Barragan, J.; Jaimes-Rodriguez, L.; Schaller, G.; Payán, E. Jaguar densities across human-dominated landscapes in Colombia: The contribution of unprotected areas to long term conservation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Thompson, R.C.A.; Lymbery, A.J.; Smith, A. Parasites, emerging disease and wildlife conservation. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Otranto, D.; Deplazes, P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 9, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Payán, E.; Boron, V. The future of wild mammals in oil palm landscapes in the Neotropics. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2019, 2, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boron, V.; Deere, N.J.; Xofis, P.; Link, A.; Quiñones-Guerrero, A.; Payan, E.; Tzanopoulos, J. Richness, diversity, and factors influencing occupancy of mammal communities across human-modified landscapes in Colombia. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 232, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Reperant, L.A.; Cornaglia, G.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E. The importance of understanding the human–animal interface. In One Health: The Human-Animal-Environment Interfaces in Emerging Infectious Diseases; Mackenzie, J.S., Jeggo, M., Daszak, P., Richt, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 365, pp. 49–81. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuchta, R.; Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M.; Brabec, J.; Młocicki, D.; Sałamatin, R.; Scholz, T. Sparganosis (Spirometra) in Europe in the molecular era. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 882–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mueller, J.F.; Miranda Froes, O.; Fernandez, T. On the occurrence of Spirometra mansonoides in South America. J. Parasitol. 1975, 61, 774–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schmidt, G.D.; Martin, R.L. Tapeworms of the Chaco Boreal, Paraguay, by two new species. J. Helminthol. 1978, 52, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Acuña-Olea, F.; Sacristán, I.; Aguilar, E.; García, S.; López, M.J.; Oyarzún-Ruiz, P.; Brito, J.L.; Fredes, F.; Napolitano, C. Gastrointestinal and cardiorespiratory endoparasites in the wild felid guigna (Leopardus guigna) in Chile: Richness increases with latitude and first records for the host species. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 13, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Almeida, G.G.; Coscarelli, D.; Melo, M.N.; Melo, A.L.; Pinto, H.A. Molecular identification of Spirometra spp. (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) in some wild animals from Brazil. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tantaleán, M.; Michaud, C. Huéspedes definitivos de Spirometra mansonoides (Cestoda: Diphyllobothriidae) en el Perú. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2005, 12, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Moulinier, R.; Martinez, E.; Torres, J.; Noya, O.; de NOya, B.A.; Reyes, O. Human proliferative sparganosis in Venezuela: Report of a case. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1982, 31, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Beaver, P.C.; Rolon, F.A. Proliferating larval cestode in a man in Paraguay. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1981, 30, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kikuchi, T.; Maruyama, H. Human proliferative sparganosis update. Parasitol. Int. 2020, 75, 102036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gomez, J.J.; Botero, D. The first case of sparganosis in Colombia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1958, 7, 597–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Peng, Z.-W.; Ning, Y.; Liu, D.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.-X.; Zhai, Q.-A.; Hou, Z.-J.; Chai, H.-L.; Jiang, G.-S. Ascarid infection in wild Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) in China. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bolivar-Mejia, A.; Alarcón-Olave, C.; Calvo-Betancourt, L.S.; Paniz-Mondolfi, A.; Delgado, O.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J. Toxocariasis in the Americas: Burden and disease control. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2014, 1, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. López-Osorio, S.; Penagos-Tabares, F.; Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J.J. Prevalence of Toxocara spp. in dogs and cats in South America (excluding Brazil). Adv. Parasitol. 2020, 109, 743–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duszynski, D.W.; Kvičerová, J.; Seville, R.S. The Biology and Identification of the Coccidia (Apicomplexa) of Carnivores of the World; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dubey, J.P. A review of Cystoisospora felis and C. rivolta-induced coccidiosis in cats. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 263, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lühe, M.F.L. Cystotänien südamerikanischer Feliden. Zool Jahrb 1910, 12, 687–710. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gomez-Puerta, L.A.; Yucra, D.; Lopez-Urbina, M.T.; Gonzalez, A.E. The alpaca (Vicugna pacos) as a natural intermediate host of Taenia omissa (Cestoda: Taeniidae). Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 246, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gomez-Puerta, L.A.; Alarcon, V.; Pacheco, J.; Franco, F.; Lopez-Urbina, M.T.; Gonzalez, A.E. Molecular and morphological evidence of Taenia omissa in pumas (Puma concolor) in the Peruvian Highlands. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2016, 25, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Figueiredo, A.M.; de Carvalho, L.M.; González, M.J.P.; Torres, R.T.; Pla, S.; Núñez-Arjona, J.C.; Rueda, C.; Vallverdú-Coll, N.; Silvestre, F.; Peña, J.; et al. Parasites of the reintroduced Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) and sympatric mesocarnivores in Extremadura, Spain. Pathogens 2021, 10, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Amin, O.M. Classification of the Acanthocephala. Folia Parasitol. 2013, 60, 273–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sianto, L.; de Souza, M.V.; Chame, M.; da Luz, M.d.F.; Guidon, N.; Pessis, A.-M.; Araújo, A. Helminths in feline coprolites up to 9000 years in the Brazilian Northeast. Parasitol. Int. 2014, 63, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Patton, S.; Rabinowitz, A.; Randolph, S.; Johnson, S.S. A coprological survey of parasites of wild Neotropical Felidae. J. Parasitol. 1986, 72, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Santos, E.G.N.; Chame, M.; Chagas-Moutinho, V.A.; Santos, C.P. Morphology and molecular analysis of Oncicola venezuelensis (Acanthocephala: Oligacanthorhynchidae) from the ocelot Leopardus pardalis in Brazil. J. Helminthol. 2017, 91, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Marteau, M. Oncicola venezuelensis n. sp. (Archiacanthocephala: Oligacanthorhynchida), parasite de l’Ocelot (Felis pardalis L.). Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comparée 1977, 52, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Thatcher, V.E.; Nickol, B.B. Some acanthocephalans from Panama and Colombia. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 1972, 39, 245–248. [Google Scholar]
  59. Benatti, D.; De Santi, M.; Werther, K.; Tebaldi, J.H.; Hoppe, E.G.L. Helminthfauna of road-killed cougars (Puma concolor) from the Northeastern Region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Veterinária 2021, 30, e024120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Palmer, J.P.S.; Dib, L.V.; Lobão, L.F.; Pinheiro, J.L.; Ramos, R.C.F.; Uchoa, C.M.A.; Bastos, O.M.P.; Silva, M.E.M.; Nascimento, J.L.D.; Pissinatti, A.; et al. Oncicola venezuelensis (Marteau, 1977) (Acanthocephala: Oligacanthorhynchidae) in puma concolor in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 2020, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Orrell, T. NMNH Extant Specimen Records; National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  62. Vieira, F.M.; Muniz-Pereira, L.C.; de Souza Lima, S.; Neto, A.H.A.M.; Guimarães, E.V.; Luque, J.L. A new metastrongyloidean species (Nematoda) parasitizing pulmonary arteries of Puma (Herpailurus) yagouaroundi (É. Geoffroy, 1803) (Carnivora: Felidae) from Brazil. J. Parasitol. 2013, 99, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Di Cesare, A.; Morelli, S.; Colombo, M.; Simonato, G.; Veronesi, F.; Marcer, F.; Diakou, A.; D’Angelosante, R.; Pantchev, N.; Psaralexi, E.; et al. Is angiostrongylosis a realistic threat for domestic cats? Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Beck, H.E.; Zimmermann, N.E.; McVicar, T.R.; Vergopolan, N.; Berg, A.; Wood, E.F. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Rabinowitz, A.; Zeller, K.A. A range-wide model of landscape connectivity and conservation for the jaguar, Panthera onca. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143, 939–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chame, M. Terrestrial mammal feces: A morphometric summary and description. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2003, 98, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zuercher, G.L.; Gipson, P.S.; Stewart, G.C. Identification of carnivore feces by local peoples and molecular analyses. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2003, 31, 961–970. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wultsch, C.; Waits, L.P.; Hallerman, E.M.; Kelly, M.J. Optimizing collection methods for noninvasive genetic sampling of neotropical felids. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2015, 39, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sikes, R.S.; Gannon, W.L. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 2011, 92, 235–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sikes, R.S. 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J. Mammal. 2016, 97, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yang, J.; Scholten, T. A Fixative for intestinal parasites permitting the use of concentration and permanent staining procedures. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1977, 67, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dennis, W.R.; Stone, W.M.; Swanson, L.E. A new laboratory and field diagnostic test for fluke ova in feces. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1954, 124, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  73. Heine, J. A simple technic for the demonstration of cryptosporidia in feces. Zentralbl. Veterinarmed. B 1982, 29, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Deplazes, P.; Eckert, J.; Mathis, A.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Zahner, H. Parasitology in Veterinary Medicine; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wagenigen, The Netherlands, 2016; ISBN 978-90-8686-274-0. [Google Scholar]
  75. Bowles, J.; Blair, D.; McManus, D.P. Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1992, 54, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wicht, B.; Yanagida, T.; Scholz, T.; Ito, A.; Jiménez, J.A.; Brabec, J. Multiplex PCR for differential identification of broad tapeworms (Cestoda : Diphyllobothrium) infecting humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3111–3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Nguyen, L.-T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chernomor, O.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Syst. Biol. 2016, 65, 997–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Kalyaanamoorthy, S.; Minh, B.Q.; Wong, T.K.F.; von Haeseler, A.; Jermiin, L.S. ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 587–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Homan, W.L.; Vercammen, M.; De Braekeleer, J.; Verschueren, H. Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustrations of parasite eggs detected in faecal samples of free-ranging jaguars and ocelots: (a) High number of Spirometra sp. eggs; (b) Single Spirometra sp. egg (60.72 µm × 33.38 µm); (c) Non-embryonated Toxocara cati egg (63.86 µm × 53.43 µm) carrying a zygote; (d) Oncicola sp. egg (64.30 µm × 46.68 µm); (e) Un-sporulated Cystoisospora-like oocyst (12 µm × 12 µm; Sarcocystidae). Scale-bars: (a) 200 µm; (bd) 20 µm; (e) 10 µm.
Figure 1. Illustrations of parasite eggs detected in faecal samples of free-ranging jaguars and ocelots: (a) High number of Spirometra sp. eggs; (b) Single Spirometra sp. egg (60.72 µm × 33.38 µm); (c) Non-embryonated Toxocara cati egg (63.86 µm × 53.43 µm) carrying a zygote; (d) Oncicola sp. egg (64.30 µm × 46.68 µm); (e) Un-sporulated Cystoisospora-like oocyst (12 µm × 12 µm; Sarcocystidae). Scale-bars: (a) 200 µm; (bd) 20 µm; (e) 10 µm.
Pathogens 10 00822 g001
Figure 2. Morphological traits of putative Taenia omissa specimens. (a) Scolex photograph of T. omissa obtained from puma; (b) Large and (c) small rostellar hooks outline drawings of adult Taenia sp. specimen from jaguarundi gastrointestinal tract (ileum); (d) jaguarundi, and (e) puma cestodes ribbon-like strobila (red arrows indicate genital pores). TL: total length, TW: total width, BL: blade length, AL: apical length, GL: guard length, GW: guard width, BC: blade curvature, HW: handle width. Scale-bars: (b,c) 50 µm; (d,e) 1 mm.
Figure 2. Morphological traits of putative Taenia omissa specimens. (a) Scolex photograph of T. omissa obtained from puma; (b) Large and (c) small rostellar hooks outline drawings of adult Taenia sp. specimen from jaguarundi gastrointestinal tract (ileum); (d) jaguarundi, and (e) puma cestodes ribbon-like strobila (red arrows indicate genital pores). TL: total length, TW: total width, BL: blade length, AL: apical length, GL: guard length, GW: guard width, BC: blade curvature, HW: handle width. Scale-bars: (b,c) 50 µm; (d,e) 1 mm.
Pathogens 10 00822 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic position of Taenia sp. isolates obtained from puma and jaguarundi. Maximum likelihood tree from IQ-Tree based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene sequences analyzed as single partition using GTR + F + I + G4 model selected according to corrected Akaike information criterion. Nodal values show standard bootstrap supports above 50 (100 replicates). Specimens collected from puma and jaguarundi are shown in bold. GenBank accessions are given after taxa names. The branch length scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic position of Taenia sp. isolates obtained from puma and jaguarundi. Maximum likelihood tree from IQ-Tree based on cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene sequences analyzed as single partition using GTR + F + I + G4 model selected according to corrected Akaike information criterion. Nodal values show standard bootstrap supports above 50 (100 replicates). Specimens collected from puma and jaguarundi are shown in bold. GenBank accessions are given after taxa names. The branch length scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site.
Pathogens 10 00822 g003
Figure 4. Geographical locality of sampled free-ranging neotropical wild felids (NWF).
Figure 4. Geographical locality of sampled free-ranging neotropical wild felids (NWF).
Pathogens 10 00822 g004
Figure 5. Camera trap-images of monitored free-ranging neotropical wild felids (NWF) of the present study: (a) jaguar female (Panthera onca) with two cubs; (b) adult ocelot (Leopardus pardalis); (c) puma (Puma concolor); (d) jaguarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi).
Figure 5. Camera trap-images of monitored free-ranging neotropical wild felids (NWF) of the present study: (a) jaguar female (Panthera onca) with two cubs; (b) adult ocelot (Leopardus pardalis); (c) puma (Puma concolor); (d) jaguarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi).
Pathogens 10 00822 g005
Table 1. Neotropical wild felid (NWF) species of Colombia.
Table 1. Neotropical wild felid (NWF) species of Colombia.
Risk Classification
GenusSpeciesCommon NameCITES aUICN bNational b
Herpailurusyagouaroundi *Jaguarundi, Eyra catAppx IILCNE
Leoparduspardalis *OcelotAppx ILCNE
LeoparduswiediiMargay, Tree ocelotAppx INTNE
LeopardustigrinusNorthern tiger catAppx IVUNE
Pantheraonca *JaguarAppx INTVU
Pumaconcolor *Puma, CougarAppx ILCNE
* Species included in the current study. a All appendix I species are threatened with extinction. b LC: least concern; NT: near threatened; VU: vulnerable; NE: not evaluated.
Table 2. Detailed sampling areas and climate classification.
Table 2. Detailed sampling areas and climate classification.
DepartmentMunicipalitySampling LocationClimate aSample Type
AntioquiaYondóCiénaga de BarbacoasAm AfFeces o
CaquetáSan José del FragüaPuerto belloAfMetazoan Δ
CasanareHato CorozalLa ChapaAmFeces o
CórdobaPuerto LibertadorLa EsmeraldaAfFeces o
Cundinamarca--AwMetazoan
SantanderEl HatoLas PampasAfFeces
SantanderPuerto WilchesLas PalmasAmFeces
SantanderPuerto WilchesCaño LimónAmFeces
a Köppen–Geiger Am: Tropical monsoon; Af: Tropical rainforest; Aw: Tropical wet and dry. o Jaguar (Panthera onca) faeces. Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) faeces. Δ Puma (Puma concolor) collected helminths. Jaguarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi) collected helminths.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uribe, M.; Payán, E.; Brabec, J.; Vélez, J.; Taubert, A.; Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J.J.; Hermosilla, C. Intestinal Parasites of Neotropical Wild Jaguars, Pumas, Ocelots, and Jaguarundis in Colombia: Old Friends Brought Back from Oblivion and New Insights. Pathogens 2021, 10, 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822

AMA Style

Uribe M, Payán E, Brabec J, Vélez J, Taubert A, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, Hermosilla C. Intestinal Parasites of Neotropical Wild Jaguars, Pumas, Ocelots, and Jaguarundis in Colombia: Old Friends Brought Back from Oblivion and New Insights. Pathogens. 2021; 10(7):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uribe, Manuel, Esteban Payán, Jan Brabec, Juan Vélez, Anja Taubert, Jenny J. Chaparro-Gutiérrez, and Carlos Hermosilla. 2021. "Intestinal Parasites of Neotropical Wild Jaguars, Pumas, Ocelots, and Jaguarundis in Colombia: Old Friends Brought Back from Oblivion and New Insights" Pathogens 10, no. 7: 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822

APA Style

Uribe, M., Payán, E., Brabec, J., Vélez, J., Taubert, A., Chaparro-Gutiérrez, J. J., & Hermosilla, C. (2021). Intestinal Parasites of Neotropical Wild Jaguars, Pumas, Ocelots, and Jaguarundis in Colombia: Old Friends Brought Back from Oblivion and New Insights. Pathogens, 10(7), 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop