Next Article in Journal
Do or Die: HPV E5, E6 and E7 in Cell Death Evasion
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterisation of Stress-Associated Protein Gene Family to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses of Grapevine
Previous Article in Journal
How GBS Got Its Hump: Genomic Analysis of Group B Streptococcus from Camels Identifies Host Restriction as well as Mobile Genetic Elements Shared across Hosts and Pathogens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathogenicity Factors of Botryosphaeriaceae Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: New Developments on Their Action on Grapevine Defense Responses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/pathogens11091026
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Secreted Glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA Inhibits Defense Responses in Nicotiana benthamiana

by
Danhua Zhang
1,†,
Zhaoyilin Wang
2,†,
Naoki Yamamoto
1,†,
Mingyue Wang
1,
Xiaoqun Yi
1,
Ping Li
2,
Runmao Lin
3,
Zohreh Nasimi
1,
Kazunori Okada
4,
Keiichi Mochida
5,6,7,8,
Yoshiteru Noutoshi
9 and
Aiping Zheng
1,10,*
1
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Rice Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
3
Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4
Agro-Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
5
Bioproductivity Informatics Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama 2300045, Japan
6
Microalgae Production Control Technology Laboratory, RIKEN Baton Zone Program, RIKEN Cluster for Science, Technology and Innovation Hub, Yokohama 2300045, Japan
7
Kihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 2440813, Japan
8
School of Information and Data Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
9
Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8530, Japan
10
State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pathogens 2022, 11(9), 1026; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091026
Submission received: 7 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 3 September 2022 / Published: 9 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Pathogenicity Factors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Anastomosis group AG-1 IA of Rhizoctonia solani Khün has a wide host range and threatens crop production. Various glycosyltransferases secreted by phytopathogenic fungi play an essential role in pathogenicity. Previously, we identified a glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT (AG11A_09161) as a secreted protein-encoding gene of R. solani AG-1 IA, whose expression levels increased during infection in rice. In this study, we further characterized the virulence function of RsIA_GT. It is conserved not only in Basidiomycota, including multiple anastomosis groups of R. solani, but also in other primary fungal taxonomic categories. RsIA_GT possesses a signal peptide (SP) for protein secretion, and its functionality was proven using yeast and Nicotiana benthamiana. The SP-truncated form of RsIA_GT (RsIA_GT(ΔS)) expressed in Escherichia coli-induced lesion-like phenotype in rice leaves when applied to punched leaves. However, Agrobacterium-mediated transient expressions of both the full-length RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) did not induce cell death in N. benthamiana leaves. Instead, only RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppressed the cell death induced by two reference cell death factors BAX and INF1 in N. benthamiana. RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, a mutant RsIA_GT(ΔS) for the glycosyltransferase catalytic domain, still suppressed the BAX- or INF1-induced cell death, suggesting that the cell death suppression activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS) would be independent from its enzymatic activity. RsIA_GT(ΔS) also suppressed the H2O2 production and callose deposition and showed an effect on the induction of defense genes associated with the expression of BAX and INF1. The transient expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) in N. benthamiana enhanced the lesion area caused by R. solani AG-1 IA. The secreted glycosyltransferase, RsIA_GT, of R. solani AG-1 IA is likely to have a dual role in virulence inside and outside of host cells.

1. Introduction

Rhizoctonia solani Khün, the basidiomycete soil-borne fungal pathogen, infects many plants belonging to over 180 genera from 32 families [1,2]. R. solani contains 13 anastomosis groups (AG-1 to AG-13), and these anastomosis groups show high genetic diversity [3,4]. This high genetic diversity gives it a broad host range [3]. R. solani AG-1 IA is the causal agent of rice sheath blight disease [5,6]. This pathogen rarely produces asexual spores and infects the host through sclerotia or runner hyphae [7,8]. The lesion phenotype in leaf sheath and leaf blades of rice plants infected by this pathogen becomes visible mainly from the late tillering stage to the stem elongation stage. For rice, the global yield losses due to sheath blight typically range from 10–30% to more than 50% when the outbreak is severe [9]. Sheath blight management still requires studying the pathogenesis of R. solani AG-1 IA in great detail given the significant loss it causes.
Toxin A, toxin B, and the lethal toxin (LT) of Clostridium difficile, hemorrhagic toxin from Clostridium sordellii, and the α-Toxin of Clostridium novyi are the members of the family of large clostridial cytotoxins [10,11]. Toxin A and B could lead to antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis [12,13,14], and hemorrhagic toxins from C. sordellii are related to the gas gangrene syndrome [15,16]. These proteins show glycosyltransferase (GT) activity and could glycosylate GTPases, members of the Rho family, leading to its biologically inactive [11,17,18,19]. Several glycosyltransferase families have been identified and exhibit substantial structural diversity among the families [20]. However, all these glycosyltransferases contain a small, conserved D (aspartic acid) XD motif, which is essential for enzyme activity [20]. Other amino acid residues nearby the DXD motif are conserved among the large clostridial cytotoxins and are important for enzyme activity [21]. Substitution of the DXD motif aspartic acids decreased glucosyltransferase activity by approximately 5000-fold and completely blocked glucohydrolase activity [21]. The double mutant of these aspartic acids also lost its enzyme activity [21]. Substituting Asp 270 and Arg 273 caused glucosyltransferase activity to reduce by about 200-fold and blocked glucohydrolase activity [21]. Studies on important amino acid sites of the large clostridial cytotoxin could promote exploration of the pathogenetic mechanism of GTs in plant pathogens. Glycosylation of effectors and host target proteins by GTs are post-translational modifications and directly affect pathogen virulence and host defense ability [22]. The involvement of glycosylation pathways in pathogenesis in several fungal pathogens has been identified. The glycosyltransferase NleB from Citrobacter rodentium, mannosyltransferase Pmt4 from Ustilago maydis and ALG3 from Magnaporthe oryzae, and the N-glycosylation of the protein disulfide isomerase Pdi1 from U. maydis, respectively, affect pathogens’ virulence in varying degrees [23,24,25,26]. Although the effect of GTs on fungal virulence has been extensively explored in many pathogens, there is no report on that in R. solani AG-1 IA.
Plant pathogens deliver virulence factors inside and outside of plant cells using various signal motifs and pathways to promote effective colonization [27,28,29]. Gram-negative bacterial pathogens mainly employ type ΙΙ secretion system (T2SS) and type III secretion system (T3SS) to inject virulence factors into host cells [30,31,32]. The components of T2SS are encoded by 12 to 16 genes, which usually appear in a gene cluster [33,34]. The T3SS consists of approximately 25 different proteins, and nine core proteins are conserved in a wide variety of gram-negative plant pathogens [31,35,36]. The T3SS is called the Hrp (hypersensitive response and pathogenicity) system in plant pathogens because the hrp genes largely encode components of T3SS, and mutation of any one of the hrp genes will lead to the complete loss of the hypersensitive response and their pathogenic ability [37,38,39,40]. There is evidence that plant pathogens utilize the Hrp system directly to transfer Avr effector proteins into plant cells [38]. Rust fungi use haustoria to form a close association with host plant cells, and the haustoria are essential in the delivery of virulence and avirulence factors [41]. The AvrL567 proteins from Melampsora lini were the first identified rust Avr proteins delivered directly into the plant cells [42]. AvrL567 proteins contain SPs and are expressed in haustoria and could induce a hypersensitive response (HR) depending on the NBS-LRR L5, L6, or L7 resistance proteins of flax [42]. Some obligate biotrophs, for example, the oomycete downy mildews and the ascomycete powdery mildew pathogens, use the same strategies as the rust fungi to deliver virulence and avirulence factors into host plants [43]. Other hemibiotrophic oomycetes and fungi, such as Phytophthora, also utilize haustoria to transport pathogenesis factors during the early stage of infection [44]. Additionally, plant pathogenic Phytophthora species and oomycetes produce several effectors possessing N-terminal RXLR-dEER-motif, LxLFAK, ChxC, or the Crinkler motif (CRN) [45]. These motifs are required for these effectors targeting host cells [45]. The haustoria-producing pathogenic fungi, including the barley powdery mildew, the wheat stem rust, and the wheat leaf rust fungi, encode a small group of effectors with signal peptides (SPs) for protein secretion and the conserved Y/F/WxC-motif to promote the transport of these effectors into plant cells [46]. These analyses suggest that secretion signals and systems are crucial for the pathogenicity of plant pathogens.
In our previous study, a draft genome sequence of R. solani AG-1 IA was analyzed to predict 965 potential secreted proteins [47]. Among them, 45 secreted protein-encoding genes, which showed two-fold or more significant up-regulation in the early infection stage of R. solani AG-1 IA in rice, were tested for potential secreted effectors [47], resulting in the identification of a glycosyltransferase (AG1IA_09161 named RsIA_GT) causing cell death phenotype on rice leaves. Here, we further characterized the virulence function of RsIA_GT using Nicotiana benthamiana. Transient expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS), an SP-truncated form of RsIA_GT, or the mutant RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A could suppress cell death induced by BAX or INF1 in N. benthamiana, indicating the independency of the suppression effects from the glycosyltransferase activity. The RsIA_GT(ΔS) could also suppress the H2O2 production, callose deposition, and transcriptional responses of defense-related genes induced by BAX or INF1. Accordingly, RsIA_GT(ΔS)-expressed N. benthamiana leaves showed enhanced susceptibility to R. solani AG-1 IA.

2. Results

2.1. RsIA_GT Is Widely Distributed in Late-Diverging Fungi and Highly Conserved among R. solani Isolates

RsIA_GT encodes a 346-aa protein that contains a glycosyltransferase domain (57–241 aa). It belongs to ‘glycosyltransferase family 2’ in CAZymes classification [http://www.cazy.org, accessed on 26 July 2022]. To see the distribution and conserved degree of the homologs of this protein in fungi, BLASTP searches against the non-redundant protein database ‘nr’ were performed with E-value of 1.0 × 10−10 and the minimum query coverage of 75%. We found homologous proteins in the fungal categories of Basidiomycota [386 proteins in 293 species], Ascomycota [881 proteins in 642 species], Mucoromycota [78 proteins in 63 species], Zoopagomycota [11 proteins in 10 species], and Chytridiomycota [14 proteins in 8 species]. In contrast, no homologous proteins were found in the earliest-diverging categories Microsporidia and Cryptomycota. These results implicate that fungi acquired and evolved this glycosyltransferase during the process of adaptation and co-evolution between pathogen fungi and hosts. To check the molecular evolutionary relationship of the glycosyltransferase in basidiomycetes, we analyzed selected 16 glycosyltransferase-homologous proteins in 13 fungal species in a phylogenetic tree. The maximum likelihood tree formed two major clusters for (1) proteins in Ceratobasidiaceae and Tulasnellaceae, and (2) proteins in other Agaricomycetes (Figure 1). As expected, R. solani anastomosis groups are located in the same clade with closer positions (Figure 1). The RsIA_GT showed high identify and similarity with two proteins in R. solani AG-1 IB (CEL61542.1, 93% identity, 95% similarity; CCO37913.1, 88% identity, 91% similarity), one protein in R. solani AG-3 (EUC56006.1, 89% identity, 93% similarity), and one protein in R. solani AG-8 (KDN33818.1, 88% identity, 92% similarity) (Table S2). We could find a highly homologous sequence (IC-TC_DN321_c0_g1_i1) with RsIA_GT by a TBLASTN search against the AG-1 IC transcriptome contigs assembled by Yamamoto et al. [48]. It indicates the evolutionary conservation of RsIA_GT orthologues in AG-1.

2.2. Signal Peptide (SP) of RsIA_GT Is Functional

The protein RsIA_GT was predicted to contain an SP by SignalP 3.0 (Figure 2a). To evaluate the functionality of this SP, we used the yeast secretion system (YST). The YST comprises the yeast strain YTK12 and the vector pSUC2 carrying the sequence encoding invertase without the native SP. YTK12 can only grow on the YPRAA medium containing raffinose as the sole carbon source after being transformed by a recombinant pSUC2 introduced with the functional SP [49]. The DNA fragment for the SP of RsIA_GT was inserted in the upstream region of the invertase gene as in-frame fusion in pSUC2, and it was then transformed into the YTK12.
The SPs of Mg87 protein in M. oryzae and Avr1b in P. sojae served as the negative and the positive control, respectively [50,51]. The YTK12 transformed by pSUC2 containing the SP of Avr1b showed growth on the YPRAA medium, indicating that the SP could lead to the secretion of invertase and hydrolyze raffinose to support the growth of YTK12 (Figure 2b). In contrast, the negative control containing the SP of Mg87 and the vector-free strain YTK12 did not grow on the YPRAA medium (Figure 2b). The YTK12 carrying pSUC2 with RsIA_GT SP could grow on YPRAA (Figure 2b). The color reaction was also applied to further check the function of the SP of RsIA_GT. Each of the transformed yeast strains was grown in a liquid YPDA medium and the colorless 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) was added into each culture to test if it can be reduced into the red insoluble 1, 3, 5-triphenylformazan (TPF) by the invertase. As a result, the SP of RsIA_GT and the positive control but not the negative controls presented red (Figure 2b).
INF1 is a well-characterized elicitin with SP produced by P. infestans, which can infect potato and tomato plants [52]. When INF1 was transiently expressed in N. benthamiana leaf cells by the Agrobacterium syringe infiltration method, HR cell death was observed (Figure 2c). The SP is required for this INF1-inducing HR cell death [53,54,55]. Therefore, we substituted the native coding sequence of SP of INF1 with that of RsIA_GT to produce a chimeric protein. The chimeric protein was named SP(RsIA_GT)-C-INF1. The transient expression of SP(RsIA_GT)-C-INF1 could also induce HR in the leaves of N. benthamiana (Figure 2c). The RsIA_GT and GFP as negative controls could not induce the HR (Figure 2c). Trypan blue staining confirmed the cell death in the area of the necrotic lesions induced by INF1 and SP(RsIA_GT)-C-INF1 (Figure 2d). Western blot confirmed the expression of these proteins in N. benthamiana (Figure 2e). These results proved that the SP of RsIA_GT is functional.

2.3. RsIA_GT of R. solani AG1-IA Induces Cell Death and Leaf Chlorosis in Rice

The SP of the amino acid chain is usually cleaved off when the protein is exported through the membrane [56]. The RsIA_GT(ΔS) without SP, which is the tentative mature form of RsIA_GT, contains 320 amino acids and has a molecular weight of 35.2 kDa. The DNA fragment of RsIA_GT(ΔS) was fused with the downstream of the coding sequence of maltose-binding protein (MBP, 42.5 kDa) to produce a chimeric protein RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP (about 77.74 kDa). The chimeric protein RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP was successfully expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (Figure 3a). To examine whether the protein RsIA_GT(ΔS) has a virulent activity in rice, we put the protein extract prepared from E. coli expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP protein onto rice leaves pierced with a punch. The protein extracted from E. coli expressing MBP was used as a control. As shown in Figure 3b, the RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP-containing protein extract treatment induced chlorosis in rice leaves. The lesion and yellowing area was 60 times than that of the control (Figure 3b,c). In the previous study, the full-length RsIA_GT protein prepared with E. coli was shown to produce chlorosis in rice [47]. In this study, we confirmed the virulence activity of RsIA_GT in rice again and showed that its activity is in the coding region except for SP.

2.4. RsIA_GT(ΔS) Suppresses INF1- and BAX-Induced Cell Death in N. benthamiana

We tested if the RsIA_GT protein can induce necrosis or yellowing in the leaves of N. benthamiana. The full-length RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), GFP, INF1, or BAX were transiently expressed in the leaves of N. benthamiana by the syringe infiltration method using Agrobacterium. The results showed that neither RsIA_GT nor RsIA_GT(ΔS) could induce cell death (Figure 4a). Trypan blue did not stain the infiltrated area, confirming the no HR induction by RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (Figure 4b). The western blot confirmed the expression of these proteins (Figure 4c).
Next, we tested whether RsIA_GT possesses a suppressing activity to plant immunity. For this aim, the RsIA_GT or RsIA_GT(ΔS) was co-infiltrated with INF1 or BAX into N. benthamiana leaves to see if cell death induced by INF1 or BAX was suppressed or not because INF1- and BAX-induced cell death in N. benthamiana is related to the disease resistance response [57,58]. As a result, RsIA_GT(ΔS) but not RsIA_GT suppressed cell death induced by INF1 and BAX (Figure 4d). Trypan blue staining supported these results (Figure 4e). The western blot confirmed co-expression of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), and GFP with BAX or INF1 (Figure 4f). The inhibition of BAX- or INF1-induced cell death suggests the immune suppressive activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS) in N. benthamiana. Since full-length RsIA_GT did not exhibit inhibitory activity to the HR cell death, translocation of RsIA_GT into cytoplasm space might be required for cell death suppression in N. benthamiana.

2.5. RsIA_GT(ΔS) Inhibits H2O2 Production and Callose Deposition and Affects Expression of Defense-Related Genes

As mentioned above, RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppresses HR cell death induced by INF1 and BAX. In order to test whether the productions of H2O2 and callose triggered by INF1 and BAX are also inhibited by RsIA_GT(ΔS), we performed DAB and aniline blue staining on N. benthamiana leaves after co-expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) with INF1 or BAX. In the leaves expressed with BAX or INF1, the stained areas with DAB (Figure 5a,b) or aniline blue (Figure 5c,d) were detected 12 h and 24 h after the agroinfiltrations, respectively. When RsIA_GT(ΔS) was co-expressed with BAX or INF1, these signals were almost undetected (Figure 5a–d). The GFP was used as a negative control; however, no suppression of the signals was observed (Figure 5a–d). These results indicate that RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppressed the H2O2 production and callose deposition induced by BAX and INF1.
Furthermore, a quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to monitor the expressions of the defense-related genes after the transient expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) with BAX or INF1 in N. benthamiana leaves. We selected respiratory burst oxidase homolog B (RbohB), pathogenesis-related gene 4a (PR4a), and WRKY12 as marker genes of defense response; RbohB is involved in the production of H2O2 [59,60], WRKY12 is a transcription factor that activates defense-related genes [61,62], and PR4a gene is activated by jasmonic acid-dependent defense response pathway [63,64]. The leaf samples were collected at 12 and 36 h after co-infiltration of Agrobacterium harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS) and BAX or INF1 and subjected to the qRT-PCR analysis. The transcript abundances of PR4a and WRKY12 at 12 h and RbohB at 36 h in the leaves where RsIA_GT(ΔS) and BAX or INF1 were co-expressed were significantly reduced compared with the control with GFP instead of RsIA_GT(ΔS) (Figure 5e,f). In the BAX-induced defense responses, the reduction rate of RbohB and WRKY12 transcript levels was over ten and five times to those of the control, respectively (Figure 5e). The PR4a expression level reduced over ten times compared to the control (Figure 5e). As for INF1, RbohB, WRKY12, and PR4a, the reduction rates were over three times, nearly two times, and over two times, respectively, compared to the control (Figure 5f). These results indicate that RsIA_GT(ΔS) interferes with transcriptional responses of defense genes during HR.

2.6. The Suppression Activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS) for the BAX- or INF1-Induced HR Cell Death Is Possibly Independent from Its Glycosyltransferase Activity

Toxins of the large clostridial cytotoxins have glycosyltransferase activity [21]. They take a glucosyl moiety from UDP-glucose and attach it to the target proteins, such as Rho and Ras GTPases. The DXD motif and the close vicinity amino acid residues of the DXD motif in these toxins are conserved and essential for the glycosyltransferase activity [11,12,13,14,15]. To check whether RsIA_GT(ΔS) contains these conserved residues and the DXD motif, multiple alignment of the amino acid sequence of RsIA_GT(ΔS) with the large clostridial cytotoxins was performed. As shown in Figure 6a, RsIA_GT(ΔS) contains the DXD motif [D168, L169, and D170] and the arginine residue [R154], which are conserved in these toxins.
To examine if the potential glycosyltransferase activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS) is required for the suppression of immune responses induced by BAX or INF1, we prepared an agroinfiltration construct for a mutant version of RsIA_GT(ΔS), of which conserved three amino acid residues (R154, D168, and D170) were substituted with alanine. The leaves were collected at four days after the agroinfiltration, and necrotic lesions (Figure 6b) and HR cell death confirmed by trypan blue staining (Figure 6c) were detected. Similar to RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A also suppressed the necrosis induced by both BAX and INF1 (Figure 6b). GFP used as a negative did not suppress cell death. Trypan blue staining further confirmed the results (Figure 6c). Western blot analysis confirmed the co-expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, and GFP with BAX or INF1 (Figure 6d). These results suggested that the suppression effect of RsIA_GT(ΔS) on HR cell death induced by BAX or INF1 is possibly independent of its potent glycosyltransferase activity.

2.7. Transient Expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) Enhances the Susceptibility of N. benthamiana to R. solani AG-1 IA

To examine whether the overexpression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) in host plants enhances the susceptibility to R. solani AG-1 IA, we transiently expressed the RsIA_GT(ΔS) protein in the leaves of N. benthamiana by the agroinfiltration method. After two days, the leaves were inoculated with a 2 mm2 active mycelial plug of R. solani AG-1 IA. GFP was used as a negative control. In the leaves infiltrated with Agrobacterium harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS), significant necrotic lesions were observed compared with those of the GFP control (Figure 7a,b). Quantitative measurement of the lesion area demonstrated that the lesions observed in the leaves with transient expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) were over 27 times than that of the control (Figure 7c). This result showed that the disease symptom caused by R. solani AG-1 IA was promoted in the leaves expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS). The consistency of it with the interference in the plant defense responses indicates the virulence function of RsIA_GT(ΔS).

3. Discussion

Glycosyltransferases and mannosyltransferases play different roles from each other during host infection by pathogens. Several glycosyltransferases and mannosyltransferases function as virulence factors that have been identified from many fungal pathogens [24,26,65,66]. However, similar virulence factors have not yet been reported in R.solani AG-1 IA. Our previous and current study showed that a secreted protein, RsIA_GT, having a glycosyltransferase domain, induced chlorosis in rice leaves. This result clearly demonstrated the virulence activity of this secreted protein. Although, it seems not to meet specific criteria as an effector protein predicted by several algorithms [66], RsIA_GT was proven to have a virulent function during infection of R. solani AG-1 IA. Since R. solani AG-1 IA is a necrotrophic fungal pathogen, induction of chlorosis or necrosis would facilitate its infection.
The N-glycosylation of the apoplastic effector PsXEG1 from P. sojae could protect it against the degradation by the host apoplastic aspartic protease GmAP5 [67]. In U. maydis, the N-glycosylation of the protein disulfide isomerase Pdi1 is required for the secretion of the pathogens’ virulence factors [25]. The O-mannosyltransferase Pmt4 of U. maydis and promoting appressorium formation by O-mannosylation Msb2 could also promote the fungal spreading inside of infected leaves by O-mannosylated Pit1 [24]. In M. oryzae, ALG3-mediated N-glycosylation of effector Slp1 is critical for its activity during host infection [26]. RsIA_GT is likely to glycosylate effector proteins before and after being secreted from R. solani AG-I IA to promote the infection to host plants. The KOBITO1 is a glycosyltransferase-like protein and could regulate the plasmodesmatal permeability and stomatal patterning in Arabidpsis thaliana [68]. Finally, we speculate that the enhanced pathogenicity of R. solani AG-1 IA by RsIA_GT(ΔS) might be caused via the regulation of plasmodesmatal permeability and stomatal patterning.
We also found that RsIA_GT could suppress H2O2 production and callose deposition and affect the expression of genes related to defense responses induced by INF1 or BAX when the SP-truncated RsIA_GT was expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. The transient expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) could also promote the symptom formation caused by R. solani AG-1 IA in N. benthamiana. Surprisingly, the native form of RsIA_GT showed no such immune-suppressing activity. RsIA_GT in plant apoplastic space induces necrosis; however, RsIA_GT inside plant cells can suppress defense responses. Suppression of host immunity by effector proteins or bioactive chemical molecules is required for the infection of biotrophic pathogens. The potential biotrophic interaction of R. solani at the early infection stage was recently demonstrated in the interaction with Brachypodium distachyon. Thus, the finding of immune-suppression activity of particular R. solani-secreted proteins is reasonable [69,70]. However, further study is needed to verify if such biotrophic stage also exist in N. benthamiana because pretreatment of salicylic acid did not attenuate virulence of R. solani in A. thaliana [71].
Our results suggest that RsIA_GT should work inside host cells at least in N. benthamiana. R. solani AG-1 IA may directly release RsIA_GT into host cells; otherwise. the secreted RsIA_GT from R. solani into apoplast may be incorporated into host cells possibly by hijacking the host protein sorting mechanism. Further analysis is needed to directly observe the presence of RsIA_GT protein in host cells during infection of R. solani AG-1 IA.
The phylogenetic analysis showed that homologs of RsIA_GT are widely distributed in basidiomycetes fungi and highly conserved across different R. solani anastomosis groups. These secreted glycosyltransferases homologous to RsIA_GT may also function as a virulence factor in these plant-associated fungi. Further analysis in the conservation of essential amino acid residues of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain among these homologous proteins and validation as a virulence factor would reveal commonality or difference in infection strategy of these fungi.
HR, including cell death, is vital to suppress the progression of pathogens [72]. The defense response induced by INF1 and BAX was shown to inhibit the spreading of pathogen hyphae in hosts [73,74,75]. The H2O2 produced during HR is harmful to pathogens [76,77]. The expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppressed the various defense responses triggered by INF1 and BAX. We initially speculated that the glycosylation of the target protein by RsIA_GT(ΔS) is a possible mechanism for its immune-suppressing activity. However, RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, a mutated form of RsIA_GT(ΔS) that possibly lacks the glycosyltransferase activity, was shown to suppress the HR cell death induced by BAX and INF1. This result indicates that RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppresses plant immune responses by inhibiting the target protein independent of its enzymatic activity. It has been shown that INF1 could form a complex with SERK3/BAK1 and NbLRK1 to promote cell death and resistance to pathogens in N. benthamiana [78,79]. BAX/BAK is necessary for mediating cell death [80,81,82]. Pattern recognition receptor activates Rboh to produce reactive oxygen species, possibly leading to HR cell death and up-regulated expressions of defense-related genes through the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Because RsIA_GT(ΔS)-suppressed H2O2 production and interference in defense gene expressions leads to callose deposition, it may target the pattern recognition receptor complex. Further analysis will verify this possibility and highlight the role of RsIA_GT(ΔS) in determining fungal pathogenicity and fungus–host interactions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains, Plant Materials, and Culture Conditions

The R. solani national standard strain AG1IA was cultured in PDB medium (200 g potato, 20 g sucrose, add distilled water to 1000 mL) at 28 °C for over two nights to inoculate rice leaves for RNA extraction. Competent E. coli DH5α was used to construct vectors. The transformed strains were cultured at 37 °C in Luria Bertani (LB) medium. Competent E. coli BL21 was used for prokaryotic expression, and these transformed strains were cultured at 37 °C in LB medium. A. tumefaciens GV3101 was used for transient expression in N. benthamiana and cultured in YEP medium at 28 °C. N. benthamiana was cultured at 18-h/6-h night-day photoperiods at 23 °C for transient expression.

4.2. Plasmid Construction

The PCR fragments of the coding sequence of RsIA_GT(ΔS) (without SP) were fused to the downstream of the coding sequence of MBP located in the prokaryotic expression vector to produce the chimeric protein RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP. The PCR fragments of INF1, BAX, GFP, RsIA_GT(ΔS), and RsIA_GT were inserted into the p35S-FLAG vector to produce 35Spro::INF1-FLAG, 35Spro::BAX-FLAG, 35Spro::GFP-FLAG, 35Spro::RsIA_GT(ΔS)-FLAG, and 35Spro::RsIA_GT-FLAG for cell death inhibition and western blot analysis. The sequence encoding the SP of RsIA_GT was fused with the upstream region of the coding sequence of invertase in the pSUC2 vector and the upstream region of the coding sequence of INF1 (without the native SP) to investigate the function of the SP. The sequence encoding the key amino acid residues of the catalytic domain of RsIA_GT(ΔS) was replaced with alanine and inserted into the p35S vector to produce the transient expression construct for the mutant RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A. All primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

4.3. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

The N. benthamiana leaves, which transiently expressed target proteins, were sampled at different time points. The collected leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen, and then RNAs were extracted according to the manufacturer’s instruction of EZ-10 Total RNA Mini-Preps Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The 1st-strand cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s instructions for HiScript II One Step RT-PCR Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The RNA extraction of R. solani AG-1 IA was conducted by the abovementioned method. These cDNAs were used for qRT-PCR assays. The relative expression values were determined using reference genes, actin in R. solani AG-1 IA and EF1a in N. benthamiana, respectively, and calculated with the formula 2–ΔΔCt.

4.4. Trypan Blue Staining for Detecting Cell Death

Dead cells could be stained with trypan blue, and we used this method to evaluate the cell death-inducing activity of proteins. The leaves of N. benthamiana were collected after two days inoculated by A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying different vectors. The leaves were immersed in the stationary liquid (acetic acid: ethanol = 3:1) for two days, the stationary liquid was discarded, and the leaves were washed with distilled water twice. Then, the leaves were immersed in the staining solution (0.67 g trypan blue, 100 mL phenol, 100 mL lactic acid, 100 mL glycerol, 100 mL distilled water, and 600 mL ethanol) for one day at room temperature. Then, the staining solution was replaced with a destaining solution (chloral hydrate 2 g/mL) and incubated for two days.

4.5. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine Staining for Detecting H2O2

Hydrogen peroxide is produced during the plant immune response and could be detected by staining with 3, 3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB), which forms a brown compound. The N. benthamiana leaves under transient expression of proteins were collected and immersed in the DAB staining solution (1 mg/mL) for two days at room temperature. Then, the leaves were placed in 95% alcohol and microwaved for 1 min until completely discolored. The leaves were immersed in the destaining solution (chloral hydrate 2 g/mL) until the background color disappeared. We washed the leaves with distilled water twice and imaged with a microscope.

4.6. Aniline Blue Staining for Detecting Callose Staining

Callose is also a product produced during the plant immune response and could be observed by aniline blue staining. The N. benthamiana leaves transiently expressed proteins were collected and immersed in the destaining solution (80 mL lactic acid, 80 mL glycerine, 80 mL phenol, 80 mL distilled water, and 640 mL ethanol) at 65 °C under a dark place. After decolorization, the leaves were washed with 50% ethanol twice. Then, the leaves were placed into the staining solution (K2HPO4·3H2O 17.1165 g, pH 9.5, aniline blue 0.05 g, distilled water to 500 mL) for 1 h. The leaves were placed on a slide adding 50% glycerol and detected callose by a fluorescence microscope.

4.7. Analysis of Cell Death Suppression in N. benthamiana

Strains of A. tumefaciens GV3101, respectively, carrying vectors 35Spro::RsIA_GTs-FLAG, 35Spro::RsIA_GT(ΔS)-FLAG, and 35Spro::GFP-FLAG were inoculated in YEP medium containing appropriate antibiotics for 48 h at 28 °C. The bacterial cultures above were, respectively, collected and re-suspended in MMA buffer [10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES (pH 5.7), 200 μM acetosyringone] to a final OD600 of 0.5. All suspensions were incubated for 2–3 h in the dark prior to infiltration. Then, N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with the MMA incubation buffer containing 35Spro::GFP-FLAG, 35Spro::RsIA_GT(ΔS), and 35Spro::RsIA_GT-FLAG, respectively. The infiltration sites were challenged one day after with the MMA incubation buffer containing A. tumefaciens carrying 35Spro::INF1-FLAG or 35Spro::BAX-FLAG. A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 carrying the vector 35Spro::GFP-FLAG was used as a negative control. Cell death status was observed and compared over the next few days.

4.8. Construction of Phylogenetic Tree

BLASTP searches of amino acid sequence of RsIA_GT against the GenBank [83] non-redundant protein database ‘nr’ were performed to find homologous proteins with RsIA_GT. Then, selected 16 homologous protein sequences in 15 basidiomycete strains were retrieved from GenBank and imported into MEGA 7 [84]. A multiple sequence alignment was prepared using MUSCLE [85] and applied for the construction of a phylogenetic tree with the maximum likelihood method using the Whelan and Goldman + Freq. model.

4.9. Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Proteins were extracted, according to Moffett et al. [86] described, and made a little modification. Approximately 0.5 g leaf tissues of N. benthamiana, respectively, expressed RsIA_GT-FLAG, RsIA_GT(ΔS)-FLAG, INF1-FLAG, BAX-FLAG, and GFP-FLAG were harvested at two days post infiltration and powdered in liquid nitrogen using mortars and pestles. Resultant powders were re-suspended by 1.0 mL of extraction buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 2% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone] and centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant containing the transiently expressed proteins was, respectively, collected into new centrifuge tubes. The extracted proteins were separated by electrophoresis in 12.5%, 10%, or 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels. Then, the separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes at 25 volts for 10 min. The nitrocellulose membranes were washed three times by TBS-T buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.5), 0.05% Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl] and then blocked with TBS-T buffer containing 5% milk for 1.5 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed three times by TBS-T buffer and then incubated at 4 °C overnight with TBS-T buffer containing 5% milk and an anti-FLAG antibody (1:2000 dilution, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The membranes were washed three times with TBS-T buffer and then incubated with the mouse-anti-rabbit second antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Then, these membranes were visualized with BeyoECL Star kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and photographed on X-ray films.

5. Conclusions

Our study provided evidence that RsIA_GT(ΔS), a secreted glycosyltransferase from R. solani AG-1 IA, inhibits plant defense responses and promotes the pathogen infection. RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, the mutant of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain, still inhibited cell death, H2O2 production, and callose deposition induced by INF1 or BAX in N. benthamiana. Although further studies on the GT activity of the mutant RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A are needed, this suggests that RsIA_GT(ΔS) might contribute to virulence independently of its enzymatic activity. Future studies on receptors or interacting proteins of RsIA_GT could be helpful to elucidate the pathogenic mechanism of R. solani AG-1 IA and provide a valuable target for disease resistance breeding.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens11091026/s1, Table S1: Primers used in this study, Table S2: Sequence similarities among RsIA_GT homologs in R. solani.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z. and A.Z.; methodology, D.Z., Z.W. and R.L.; investigation, D.Z., Z.W. and N.Y.; writing-original draft preparation, D.Z.; writing-review and editing, Y.N., Z.N., K.O., N.Y. and K.M.; supervision, A.Z., X.Y. and M.W.; project administration, A.Z.; funding acquisition, A.Z., N.Y. and P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 2019YFN0010, 2020YFH0161, and 22GJHZ0024), the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 31400130), and the National 973 Project (No. 2014CB160304), Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Sichuan Agricultural University (No. 201910626113).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the members for helpful discussions and review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Hane, J.K.; Anderson, J.P.; Williams, A.H.; Sperschneider, J.; Singh, K.B. Genome sequencing and comparative genomics of the broad host-range pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG8. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sattari, A.; Fakheri, B.; Noroozi, M.; Gudarzi, K.M. Breeding for resistance to sheath blight in rice. Int. J. Farming Allied Sci. 2014, 3, 970–979. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fiers, M.; Edel-Hermann, V.; Héraud, C.; Gautheron, N.; Chatot, C.; Le Hingrat, Y.; Bouchek-Mechiche, K.; Steinberg, C. Genetic diversity of Rhizoctonia solani associated with potato tubers in France. Mycologia 2011, 103, 1230–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Budge, G.E.; Shaw, M.W.; Colyer, A.; Pietravalle, S.; Boonham, N. Molecular tools to investigate Rhizoctonia solani distribution in soil. Plant Pathol. 2009, 58, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gautam, K.; Rao, P.; Chauhan, S. Efficacy of some botanicals of the family compositae against Rhizoctonia solani Khün. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 33, 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  6. Molla, K.A.; Karmakar, S.; Molla, J.; Bajaj, P.; Varshney, R.K.; Datta, S.K.; Datta, K. Understanding sheath blight resistance in rice: The road behind and the road ahead. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 895–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marshall, D.S. Infection cushion formation on rice sheaths by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 1980, 70, 947–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, S.; Peng, X.; Wang, Y.; Hua, K.Y.; Xing, F.; Zheng, Y.Y.; Liu, W.; Sun, W.X.; Wei, S.H. The effector AGLIP1 in Rhizoctonia solani AG1 IA triggers cell death in plants and promotes disease development through inhibiting PAMP-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsiboe, F.; Nalley, L.L.; Durand, A.; Thoma, G.; Shew, A. The economic and environmental benefits of sheath blight resistance in rice. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2017, 42, 215–235. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bette, P.; Oksche, A.; Mauler, F.; Von Eichel-Streiber, C.; Popoff, M.R.; Hahermann, E. A comparative biochemical, pharmacological and immunological study of Clostridium novyi alpha-toxin, C. difficile toxin B and C. sordellii lethal toxin. Toxicon 1991, 29, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aktories, K. Rho proteins: Targets for bacterial toxins. Trends Microbiol. 1997, 5, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kelly, C.P.; Pothoulakis, C.; LaMont, J.T. Clostridium difficile colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 330, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Taylor, N.S.; Thorne, G.M.; Bartlett, J.G. Comparison of two toxins produced by Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 1981, 34, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bongaerts, G.P.A.; Lyerly, D.M. Role of toxins A and B in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile disease. Microb. Pathog. 1994, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McGregor, J.A.; Soper, D.E.; Lowell, G.; Todd, J.K. Maternal deaths associated with Clostridium sordellii infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 161, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hatheway, C.L. Toxigenic clostridia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1990, 3, 66–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Just, I.; Wilm, M.; Selzer, J.; Rex, G.; Von Eichel-Streiber, C.; Mann, M.; Aktories, K. The enterotoxin from Clostridium difficile (ToxA) monoglucosylates the Rho proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 13932–13936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popoff, M.R.; Chaves-Olarte, E.; Lemichez, E.; Von Eichel-Streiber, C.; Thelestam, M.; Chardin, P.; Cussac, D.; Chavrier, P.; Flatau, G.; Giry, M.; et al. Ras, Rap, and Rac small GTP-binding proteins are targets for clostridium sordellii lethal toxin glucosylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 10217–10224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aktories, K.; Just, I. Monoglucosylation of low-molecular-mass GTP-binding Rho proteins by clostridial cytotoxins. Trends Cell Biol. 1995, 5, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiggins, C.A.R.; Munro, S. Activity of the yeast MNN1 α-1,3-mannosyltransferase requires a motif conserved in many other families of glycosyltransferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7945–7950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Busch, C.; Hofmann, F.; Selzer, J.; Munro, S.; Jeckel, D.; Aktories, K. A common mtif of eukaryotic glycosyltransferases is essential for the enzyme activity of large clostridial cytotoxins. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 19566–19572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lu, Q.H.; Li, S.; Shao, F. Sweet talk: Protein glycosylation in bacterial interaction with the host. Trends Microbiol. 2015, 23, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wong, F.; Lung, T.; Giogha, C.; Creuzburg, K.; Ong, S.Y.; Pollock, G.L.; Zhang, Y.; Fung, K.Y.; Pearson, J.S.; Hartland, E.L. Mutagenesis and functional analysis of the bacterial arginine glycosyltransferase effector NleB1 from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 1346–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fernández-álvarez, A.; Marín-Menguiano, M.; Lanver, D.; Jiménez-Martín, A.; Elías-Villalobos, A.; Pérez-Pulido, A.J.; Kahmann, R.; Ibeas, J.I. Identification of O-mannosylated virulence factors in Ustilago maydis. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marín-Menguiano, M.; Moreno-Sánchez, I.; Barrales, R.R.; Fernández-Álvarez, A.; Ibeas, J.I. N-glycosylation of the protein disulfide isomerase Pdi1 ensures full Ustilago maydis virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, X.L.; Shi, T.; Yang, J.; Shi, W.; Gao, X.S.; Chen, D.; Xu, X.W.; Xu, J.R.; Talbot, N.J.; Peng, Y.L. N-glycosylation of effector proteins by an α-1,3-mannosyltransferase is required for the rice blast fungus to evade host innate immunity. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 1360–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Birch, P.R.J.; Rehmany, A.P.; Pritchard, L.; Kamoun, S.; Beynon, J.L. Trafficking arms: Oomycete effectors enter host plant cells. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, S.; Xu, J.R. Effectors and effector delivery in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1003826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kämper, J.; Kahmann, R.; Bölker, M.; Ma, L.J.; Brefort, T.; Saville, B.J.; Banuett, F.; Kronstad, J.W.; Gold, S.E.; Müller, O.; et al. Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature 2006, 444, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Henderson, I.R.; Navarro-Garcia, F.; Desvaux, M.; Fernandez, R.C.; Ala’Aldeen, D. Type V protein secretion pathway: The autotransporter story. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. 2004, 68, 692–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hueck, C.J. Type III protein secretion systems in bacterial pathogens of animals and plants. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 379–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Galán, J.E.; Collmer, A. Type III secretion machines: Bacterial devices for protein delivery into host cells. Science 1999, 284, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Filloux, A. The underlying mechanisms of type II protein secretion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004, 1694, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sandkvist, M. Type II secretion and pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2001, 69, 3523–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cornelis, G.R.; Boland, A.; Boyd, A.P.; Geuijen, C.; Iriarte, M.; Neyt, C.; Sory, M.P.; Stainier, I. The virulence plasmid of Yersinia, an antihost genome. Microbiol. Mol.Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 1315–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cornelis, G.R.; Wolf-Watz, H. The Yersinia Yop virulon: A bacterial system for subverting eukaryotic cells. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 3, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lam, E.; Kato, N.; Lawton, M. Programmed cell death, mitochondria and the plant hypersensitive response. Nature 2001, 411, 848–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alfano, J.R.; Collmer, A. The type III (Hrp) secretion pathway of plant pathogenic bacteria: Trafficking harpins, Avr proteins, and death. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 5655–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Midland, S.L.; Keen, N.T.; Sims, J.J.; Midland, M.M.; Stayton, M.M.; Burton, V.; Smith, M.J.; Mazzola, E.P.; Graham, K.J.; Clardy, J. The structures of syringolides 1 and 2: Novel C glycosidic elicitors from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2940–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Van Gijsegem, F.; Genin, S.; Boucher, C. Evolutionary conservation of pathogenicity determinants among plant and animal pathogenic bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 1993, 1, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Catanzariti, A.M.; Dodds, P.N.; Lawrence, G.J.; Ayliffe, M.A.; Ellis, J.G. Haustorially expressed secreted proteins from flax rust are highly enriched for avirulence elicitors. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Dodds, P.N.; Lawrence, G.J.; Catanzariti, A.; Ayliffe, M.A.; Ellis, J.G. The Melampsora lini AvrL567 avirulence genes are expressed in haustoria and their products are recognized inside plant cells. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 755–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Panstruga, R. Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perfect, S.E.; Green, J.R. Infection structures of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal plant pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2001, 2, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jiang, R.H.Y.; Tripathy, S.; Govers, F.; Tyler, B.M. RXLR effector reservoir in two Phytophthora species is dominated by a single rapidly evolving superfamily with more than 700 members. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4874–4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Godfrey, D.; Böhlenius, H.; Pedersen, C.; Zhang, Z.; Emmersen, J.; Thordal-Christensen, H. Powdery mildew fungal effector candidates share N- terminal Y/F/WxC- motif. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, A.P.; Lin, R.M.; Zhang, D.H.; Qin, P.G.; Xu, L.Z.; Ai, P.; Ding, L.; Wang, Y.R.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. The evolution and pathogenic mechanisms of the rice sheath blight pathogen. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yamamoto, N.; Wang, Y.; Lin, R.; Liang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Deng, Q.; et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis discloses the molecular basis of a heterogeneous fungal phytopathogen complex, Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 subgroups. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jacobs, K.A.; Collins-Racie, L.A.; Colbert, M.; Duckett, M.; Golden-Fleet, M.; Kelleher, K.; Kriz, R.; LaVallie, E.R.; Merberg, D.; Spaulding, V.; et al. A genetic selection for isolating cDNAs encoding secreted proteins. Gene 1997, 198, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gu, B.; Kale, S.D.; Wang, Q.H.; Wang, D.H.; Pan, Q.N.; Cao, H.; Meng, Y.L.; Kang, Z.S.; Tyler, B.M.; Shan, W.X. Rust secreted protein ps87 is conserved in diverse fungal pathogens and contains a RXLR-like motif sufficient for translocation into plant cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dou, D.; Kale, S.D.; Wang, X.; Jiang, R.H.; Bruce, N.A.; Arredondo, F.D.; Zhang, X.; Tyler, B.M. RXLR-mediated entry of Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b into soybean cells does not require pathogen-encoded machinery. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1930–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kamoun, S.; Lindqvist, H.; Govers, F. A novel class of elicitin-like genes from Phytophthora infestans. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997, 10, 1028–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kamoun, S.; van West, P.; Vleeshouwers, V.G.; de Groot, K.E.; Govers, F. Resistance of Nicotiana benthamiana to phytophthora infestans is mediated by the recognition of the elicitor protein INF1. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1413–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Huitema, E.; Vleeshouwers, V.G.; Cakir, C.; Kamoun, S.; Govers, F. Differences in intensity and specificity of hypersensitive response induction in Nicotiana spp. by INF1, INF2A, and INF2B of Phytophthora infestans. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kawamura, Y.; Hase, S.; Takenaka, S.; Kanayama, Y.; Yoshioka, H.; Kamoun, S.; Takahashi, H. INF1 elicitin activates jasmonic acid- and ethylene-mediated signalling pathways and induces resistance to bacterial wilt disease in tomato. J. Phytopathol. 2009, 157, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nielsen, H.; Engelbrecht, J.; Brunak, S.; Heijne, G.V. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kamoun, S.; Van West, P.; De Jong, A.J.; De Groot, K.E.; Vleeshouwers, V.G.A.A.; Govers, F. A gene encoding a protein elicitor of Phytophthora infestans is down-regulated during infection of potato. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997, 10, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, M.J.; Dong, J.F. Induction and expression of mammalian Bax gene and its promoting effect on alkaloid synthesis in Catharanthus roseus. Life Sci. 2006, 36, 500–507. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pogány, M.; von Rad, U.; Grün, S.; Dongó, A.; Pintye, A.; Simoneau, P.; Bahnweg, G.; Kiss, L.; Barna, B.; Durner, J. Dual roles of reactive oxygen species and NADPH oxidase RBOHD in an Arabidopsis-Alternaria pathosystem. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1459–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Asai, S.; Ohta, K.; Yoshioka, H. MAPK signaling regulates nitric oxide and NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative bursts in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1390–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Eulgem, T.; Somssich, I.E. Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, H.S.; Park, Y.H.; Nam, H.; Lee, Y.M.; Song, K.; Choi, C.; Ahn, I.; Park, S.R.; Lee, Y.H.; Hwang, D.J. Overexpression of the Brassica rapa transcription factor WRKY 12 results in reduced soft rot symptoms caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum in Arabidopsis and Chinese cabbage. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shi, W.; Hao, L.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Guo, X.; Li, H. The Gossypium hirsutum WRKY gene GhWRKY39-1 promotes pathogen infection defense responses and mediates salt stress tolerance in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell Rep. 2014, 33, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Eggermont, K.; Penninckx, I.A.M.A.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Vogelsang, R.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Broekaert, W.F. Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 15107–15111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Fernandez-Alvarez, A.; Elias-Villalobos, A.; Ibeas, J.I. The O-mannosyltransferase PMT4 is essential for normal appressorium formation and penetration in Ustilago maydis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3397–3412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Abdelsalam, S.S.H.; Kouzai, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Inoue, K.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Tsuge, S.; Mochida, K.; et al. Identification of effector candidate genes of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA expressed during infection in Brachypodium distachyon. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Xia, Y.Q.; Ma, Z.C.; Qiu, M.; Guo, B.D.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, H.B.; Zhang, B.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Xuan, M.R.; Sun, L.; et al. N-glycosylation shields Phytophthora sojae apoplastic effector PsXEG1 from a specific host aspartic protease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 27685–27693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kong, D.Y.; Karve, R.; Willet, A.; Chen, M.K.; Oden, J.; Shpak, E.D. Regulation of plasmodesmatal permeability and stomatal patterning by the glycosyltransferase-like protein KOBITO1. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kouzai, Y.; Kimura, M.; Watanabe, M.; Kusunoki, K.; Osaka, D.; Suzuki, T.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; et al. Salicylic acid-dependent immunity contributes to resistance against Rhizoctonia solani, a necrotrophic fungal agent of sheath blight, in rice and Brachypodium distachyon. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 771–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kouzai, Y.; Shimizu, M.; Inoue, K.; Uehara-Yamaguchi, Y.; Takahagi, K.; Nakayama, R.; Matsuura, T.; Mori, I.C.; Hirayama, T.; Abdelsalam, S.S.H.; et al. BdWRKY38 is required for the incompatible interaction of Brachypodium distachyon with the necrotrophic fungus Rhizoctonia solani. Plant J. 2020, 104, 995–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdelghany, M.M.A.; Kurikawa, M.; Watanabe, M.; Matsui, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Ichinose, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Kouzai, Y.; Noutoshi, Y. Surveillance of pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia solani Japanese isolates with varied anastomosis groups and subgroups on Arabidopsis thaliana. Life 2022, 12, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jamir, Y.; Guo, M.; Oh, H.S.; Petnicki-Ocwieja, T.; Chen, S.R.; Tang, X.Y.; Dickman, M.B.; Collmer, A.; Alfano, J.R. Identification of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors that can suppress programmed cell death in plants and yeast. Plant J. 2004, 37, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L.; Yang, S.; Shen, L.; Yu, H.; Wang, R.; Wen, J.; Tang, Q.; Hussain, A. SGT1 is required in PcINF1/SRC2-1 induced pepper defense response by interacting with SRC2-1. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lacomme, C.; Cruz, S.S. Bax-induced cell death in tobacco is similar to the hypersensitive response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7956–7961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Dou, D.; Kale, S.D.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Jiang, R.H.Y.; Arredondo, F.D.; Anderson, R.; Thakur, P.; et al. Carboxy-terminal motifs common to many oomycete RXLR effectors are required for avirulence and suppression of BAX-mediated programmed cell death by Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1118–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Baxter, A.; Mittler, R.; Suzuki, N. ROS as key players in plant stress signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chamnongpol, S.; Willekens, H.; Moeder, W.; Langebartels, C.; Jr., S.H.; Montagu, M.V.; Inzé, D.; Camp, W.V. Defense activation and enhanced pathogen tolerance induced by H2O2 in transgenic tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5818–5823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kanzaki, H.; Saitoh, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Berberich, T.; Ito, A.; Kamoun, S.; Terauchi, R. NbLRK1, a lectin-like receptor kinase protein of Nicotiana benthamiana, interacts with Phytophthora infestans INF1 elicitin and mediates INF1-induced cell death. Planta 2008, 228, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhou, J.G.; Wang, P.; Claus, L.A.N.; Savatin, D.V.; Xu, G.Y.; Wu, S.J.; Meng, X.Z.; Russinova, E.; He, P.; Shan, L.B. Proteolytic Processing of SERK3/BAK1 regulates plant immunity, development, and cell death. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Karch, J.; Molkentin, J.D. Regulated necrotic cell death: The passive aggressive side of Bax and Bak. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, J.; Wen, J.Q.; Lease, K.A.; Doke, J.T.; Tax, F.E.; Walker, J.C. BAK1, an Arabidopsis LRR receptor-like protein kinase, interacts with BRI1 and modulates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 2002, 110, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Westphal, D.; Dewson, G.; Czabotar, P.E.; Kluck, R.M. Molecular biology of Bax and Bak activation and action. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Benson, D.A.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman, D.J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E.W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D36–D42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Moffett, P.; Farnham, G.; Peart, J.; Baulcombe, D.C. Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death. Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ. J. 2002, 21, 4511–4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pathogens 11 01026 g001 550
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of RsIA_GT and glycosyltransferase in other basidiomycetes. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−7084.07) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search was obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Whelan and Goldman + Freq. model and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Numerals on branches indicate probabilities with 1000 bootstrap trials. A red asterisk indicates RsIA_GT.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of RsIA_GT and glycosyltransferase in other basidiomycetes. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−7084.07) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search was obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Whelan and Goldman + Freq. model and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Numerals on branches indicate probabilities with 1000 bootstrap trials. A red asterisk indicates RsIA_GT.
Pathogens 11 01026 g001
Pathogens 11 01026 g002 550
Figure 2. Prediction and functional validation of the signal peptide (SP) of RsIA_GT: (a) The score provided by SignalP 3.0 for the SP analysis of RsIA_GT. The 27 amino acid residues of the N-terminus of RsIA_GT were predicted as an SP. (b) Functional validation of SP of RsIA_GT by yeast secretion system (YST). (top) Yeast strains containing pSUC2 vectors with or without functional SP could grow on the CMD-W medium containing sucrose and glucose as carbon sources but not tryptophan for vector selection. The SPs of Mg87 protein of M. oryzae and Avr1b protein of P. sojae are the negative and the positive control, respectively. (middle) Only yeast containing pSUC2 vectors with functional SP could grow on the YPRAA medium. (bottom) Validation of invertase activity outside the yeast cells with 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazlium chloride (TTC). The supernatants of the liquid culture medium of each yeast strain were supplemented with colorless TCC. The invertase activity can be detected as the red color of 1,3,5-triphenylformazan (TPF) by the conversion of TTC to TPF with invertase enzymatic activity. (c,d) Functional validation of the SP of the RsIA_GT using INF1-induced cell death in N. benthamiana leaves as an indicator by transient expression of Agrobacterium syringe infiltration method. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration (c), and it was subsequently stained with trypan blue (d). RsIA_GT without SP and green fluorescent protein (GFP) served as the negative control. INF1 served as the positive control. (e) Western blot confirmation expression of INF1, SP(RsIA_GT)-C-INF1, RsIA_GT, and GFP using anti-FLAG antibody.
Figure 2. Prediction and functional validation of the signal peptide (SP) of RsIA_GT: (a) The score provided by SignalP 3.0 for the SP analysis of RsIA_GT. The 27 amino acid residues of the N-terminus of RsIA_GT were predicted as an SP. (b) Functional validation of SP of RsIA_GT by yeast secretion system (YST). (top) Yeast strains containing pSUC2 vectors with or without functional SP could grow on the CMD-W medium containing sucrose and glucose as carbon sources but not tryptophan for vector selection. The SPs of Mg87 protein of M. oryzae and Avr1b protein of P. sojae are the negative and the positive control, respectively. (middle) Only yeast containing pSUC2 vectors with functional SP could grow on the YPRAA medium. (bottom) Validation of invertase activity outside the yeast cells with 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazlium chloride (TTC). The supernatants of the liquid culture medium of each yeast strain were supplemented with colorless TCC. The invertase activity can be detected as the red color of 1,3,5-triphenylformazan (TPF) by the conversion of TTC to TPF with invertase enzymatic activity. (c,d) Functional validation of the SP of the RsIA_GT using INF1-induced cell death in N. benthamiana leaves as an indicator by transient expression of Agrobacterium syringe infiltration method. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration (c), and it was subsequently stained with trypan blue (d). RsIA_GT without SP and green fluorescent protein (GFP) served as the negative control. INF1 served as the positive control. (e) Western blot confirmation expression of INF1, SP(RsIA_GT)-C-INF1, RsIA_GT, and GFP using anti-FLAG antibody.
Pathogens 11 01026 g002
Pathogens 11 01026 g003 550
Figure 3. RsIA_GT(ΔS) induces chlorosis after the treatment with wounded rice leaves: (a) SDS-PAGE of the soluble fraction of protein extracts of the uninduced (lanes 1 and 2) and the induced (lane 3) E. coli BL21 strain expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP. A red asterisk shows the expected size of the target protein (77.74 kDa). (b) Rice leaves treated with the extracted proteins (20 μg/mL, not purified) of E. coli expressing plasmids harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP or MBP (CK: the negative control). The photographs were taken at five days after the treatments. (c) Lesion-like area in rice leaves induced by treating the protein extract of E. coli BL21 expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP at five days after the treatment. The areas were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent mean ± SE of three independent biological replicates (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 3. RsIA_GT(ΔS) induces chlorosis after the treatment with wounded rice leaves: (a) SDS-PAGE of the soluble fraction of protein extracts of the uninduced (lanes 1 and 2) and the induced (lane 3) E. coli BL21 strain expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP. A red asterisk shows the expected size of the target protein (77.74 kDa). (b) Rice leaves treated with the extracted proteins (20 μg/mL, not purified) of E. coli expressing plasmids harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP or MBP (CK: the negative control). The photographs were taken at five days after the treatments. (c) Lesion-like area in rice leaves induced by treating the protein extract of E. coli BL21 expressing RsIA_GT(ΔS)-MBP at five days after the treatment. The areas were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent mean ± SE of three independent biological replicates (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Pathogens 11 01026 g003
Pathogens 11 01026 g004 550
Figure 4. Evaluation of the cell death-inducing activity and the immunity-suppressing activity of RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) in Nicotiana benthamiana using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression analysis: (a,b) Visible necrotic phenotype (a) and trypan-blue stained cell death (b) induced by the transient expressions of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), BAX, and INF1. GFP served as the negative control. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration. Both RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) did not induce cell death in N. benthamiana. (c) Western blot confirmation of expression of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), BAX, INF1, and GFP using anti-FLAG antibody. (d,e) Visible necrotic phenotype (d) and trypan-blue stained cell death (e) after the co-expression of RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) with BAX or INF1. GFP served as the negative control. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration. (f) Western blot confirmation of co-expression of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), and GFP with BAX or INF1 using anti-FLAG antibody. The blue asterisks indicate the protein bands of BAX. The green asterisks indicate the protein bands of INF1. The red asterisks indicate the protein bands of the correct size. Both RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) did not induce cell death in N. benthamiana. Only RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppressed the HR cell death induced by BAX and INF1 in N. benthamiana.
Figure 4. Evaluation of the cell death-inducing activity and the immunity-suppressing activity of RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) in Nicotiana benthamiana using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression analysis: (a,b) Visible necrotic phenotype (a) and trypan-blue stained cell death (b) induced by the transient expressions of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), BAX, and INF1. GFP served as the negative control. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration. Both RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) did not induce cell death in N. benthamiana. (c) Western blot confirmation of expression of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), BAX, INF1, and GFP using anti-FLAG antibody. (d,e) Visible necrotic phenotype (d) and trypan-blue stained cell death (e) after the co-expression of RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) with BAX or INF1. GFP served as the negative control. The photograph was taken at four days after the infiltration. (f) Western blot confirmation of co-expression of RsIA_GT, RsIA_GT(ΔS), and GFP with BAX or INF1 using anti-FLAG antibody. The blue asterisks indicate the protein bands of BAX. The green asterisks indicate the protein bands of INF1. The red asterisks indicate the protein bands of the correct size. Both RsIA_GT and RsIA_GT(ΔS) did not induce cell death in N. benthamiana. Only RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppressed the HR cell death induced by BAX and INF1 in N. benthamiana.
Pathogens 11 01026 g004
Pathogens 11 01026 g005 550
Figure 5. RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppresses the product of H2O2 and callose as well as the expression of the defense-related genes induced by BAX and INF1 in N. benthamiana: (a–d) Detection of H2O2 by DAB staining method (a,b) and callose by aniline blue staining method (c,d) in the leaves agroinfiltrated with BAX (left), BAX and GFP (middle), and BAX and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (right). GFP served as a negative control. The leaves were sampled at 12 h (a,b) and 24 h (c,d) after the agroinfiltrations and used for the staining experiments, respectively. Bar (a and b), 2 mm. Bar (c,d), 10 μm. The white and red arrows indicate the representative areas for the accumulations of H2O2 and callose, respectively. (e,f) Expression analysis of defense-related genes, RbohB, PR4a, and WRKY12 in N. benthamiana leaves agroinfiltrated with BAX and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (e) and INF1 and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (f). GFP was used as a negative control. The leaves were collected at 12 h and 36 h after the agroinfiltrations and used for RNA extraction to synthesize cDNA for the qRT-PCR analysis. The experiments were repeated three times with independent biological samples. ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. RsIA_GT(ΔS) suppresses the product of H2O2 and callose as well as the expression of the defense-related genes induced by BAX and INF1 in N. benthamiana: (a–d) Detection of H2O2 by DAB staining method (a,b) and callose by aniline blue staining method (c,d) in the leaves agroinfiltrated with BAX (left), BAX and GFP (middle), and BAX and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (right). GFP served as a negative control. The leaves were sampled at 12 h (a,b) and 24 h (c,d) after the agroinfiltrations and used for the staining experiments, respectively. Bar (a and b), 2 mm. Bar (c,d), 10 μm. The white and red arrows indicate the representative areas for the accumulations of H2O2 and callose, respectively. (e,f) Expression analysis of defense-related genes, RbohB, PR4a, and WRKY12 in N. benthamiana leaves agroinfiltrated with BAX and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (e) and INF1 and RsIA_GT(ΔS) (f). GFP was used as a negative control. The leaves were collected at 12 h and 36 h after the agroinfiltrations and used for RNA extraction to synthesize cDNA for the qRT-PCR analysis. The experiments were repeated three times with independent biological samples. ** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test.
Pathogens 11 01026 g005
Pathogens 11 01026 g006 550
Figure 6. Conservation of key amino acid residues of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain in RsIA_GT and assessment of their requirements for the suppression activity of HR cell death: (a) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain of RsIA_GT and eight large clostridial toxins: LT (X82638 from Clostridium sordellii strain 6018), Toxin_B (X53138 from Clostridioides difficile strain VPI 10463), Toxin_BF (Z23277 from C. difficile strain 1470), Toxin_A (M30307 from C. difficile strain VPI 10463), α-Toxin (Z48636 from Clostridium novyi), Ochlp (D11095 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Surlp (M96648 from S. cerevisiae), and Mnnlp (L23753 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The red asterisks indicate the key amino acid residues of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain. (b,c) Co-expression analysis of RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, and GFP with INF1 or BAX in N. benthamiana leaves for the evaluation of the requirement of the key amino acids for the immune suppression activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS). The indicated combinations of genes were agroinfiltrated, and necrosis (b) and cell death detected with trypan blue staining (c) were observed at three days after the treatment. GFP served as a negative control. (d) Western blot confirming the co-expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, and GFP with BAX or INF1 using an anti-FLAG antibody. The blue asterisks indicate the protein bands of BAX. The green asterisks indicate the protein bands of INF1. The red asterisks indicate the protein bands of the correct size.
Figure 6. Conservation of key amino acid residues of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain in RsIA_GT and assessment of their requirements for the suppression activity of HR cell death: (a) Alignment of the amino acid sequences of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain of RsIA_GT and eight large clostridial toxins: LT (X82638 from Clostridium sordellii strain 6018), Toxin_B (X53138 from Clostridioides difficile strain VPI 10463), Toxin_BF (Z23277 from C. difficile strain 1470), Toxin_A (M30307 from C. difficile strain VPI 10463), α-Toxin (Z48636 from Clostridium novyi), Ochlp (D11095 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Surlp (M96648 from S. cerevisiae), and Mnnlp (L23753 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The red asterisks indicate the key amino acid residues of glycosyltransferase catalytic domain. (b,c) Co-expression analysis of RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, and GFP with INF1 or BAX in N. benthamiana leaves for the evaluation of the requirement of the key amino acids for the immune suppression activity of RsIA_GT(ΔS). The indicated combinations of genes were agroinfiltrated, and necrosis (b) and cell death detected with trypan blue staining (c) were observed at three days after the treatment. GFP served as a negative control. (d) Western blot confirming the co-expression of RsIA_GT(ΔS), RsIA_GT(ΔS)R154A D168A D170A, and GFP with BAX or INF1 using an anti-FLAG antibody. The blue asterisks indicate the protein bands of BAX. The green asterisks indicate the protein bands of INF1. The red asterisks indicate the protein bands of the correct size.
Pathogens 11 01026 g006
Pathogens 11 01026 g007 550
Figure 7. Transiently expressed RsIA_GT(ΔS) enhanced the symptom formation caused by R. solani AG-1 IA in N. benthamiana: (a,b) R. solani AG-1 IA was inoculated to the leaves of N. benthamiana at 2 days after the filtration with Agrobacterium harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS) or GFP. The lesion formation was observed at three days after the inoculation. (c) The lesion area was quantified using the ImageJ software. Data were mean ± SE of three independent biological replicates (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Figure 7. Transiently expressed RsIA_GT(ΔS) enhanced the symptom formation caused by R. solani AG-1 IA in N. benthamiana: (a,b) R. solani AG-1 IA was inoculated to the leaves of N. benthamiana at 2 days after the filtration with Agrobacterium harboring RsIA_GT(ΔS) or GFP. The lesion formation was observed at three days after the inoculation. (c) The lesion area was quantified using the ImageJ software. Data were mean ± SE of three independent biological replicates (** p < 0.01, Student’s t-test).
Pathogens 11 01026 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Yamamoto, N.; Wang, M.; Yi, X.; Li, P.; Lin, R.; Nasimi, Z.; Okada, K.; Mochida, K.; et al. Secreted Glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA Inhibits Defense Responses in Nicotiana benthamiana. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091026

AMA Style

Zhang D, Wang Z, Yamamoto N, Wang M, Yi X, Li P, Lin R, Nasimi Z, Okada K, Mochida K, et al. Secreted Glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA Inhibits Defense Responses in Nicotiana benthamiana. Pathogens. 2022; 11(9):1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Danhua, Zhaoyilin Wang, Naoki Yamamoto, Mingyue Wang, Xiaoqun Yi, Ping Li, Runmao Lin, Zohreh Nasimi, Kazunori Okada, Keiichi Mochida, and et al. 2022. "Secreted Glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA Inhibits Defense Responses in Nicotiana benthamiana" Pathogens 11, no. 9: 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091026

APA Style

Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Yamamoto, N., Wang, M., Yi, X., Li, P., Lin, R., Nasimi, Z., Okada, K., Mochida, K., Noutoshi, Y., & Zheng, A. (2022). Secreted Glycosyltransferase RsIA_GT of Rhizoctonia solani AG-1 IA Inhibits Defense Responses in Nicotiana benthamiana. Pathogens, 11(9), 1026. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11091026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop