Next Article in Journal
Staphylococcus aureus Behavior on Artificial Surfaces Mimicking Bone Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Review of the Key Factors Influencing the Indoor Airborne Spread of SARS-CoV-2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/pathogens12030383
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses and Host Interactions

by
Zhihui Lyu
,
Cierra Wilson
and
Jiqiang Ling
*
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2023, 12(3), 383; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030383
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 February 2023 / Published: 28 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Translational fidelity refers to accuracy during protein synthesis and is maintained in all three domains of life. Translational errors occur at base levels during normal conditions and may rise due to mutations or stress conditions. In this article, we review our current understanding of how translational fidelity is perturbed by various environmental stresses that bacterial pathogens encounter during host interactions. We discuss how oxidative stress, metabolic stresses, and antibiotics affect various types of translational errors and the resulting effects on stress adaption and fitness. We also discuss the roles of translational fidelity during pathogen–host interactions and the underlying mechanisms. Many of the studies covered in this review will be based on work with Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, but other bacterial pathogens will also be discussed.

1. Introduction

Protein synthesis is a multistep and extensively regulated process central to all cells. It is estimated that 70% of cellular ATP is consumed to synthesize proteins [1]. The ribosome makes proteins using mRNAs as the template and aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) as substrates [2,3]. The correct pairing of mRNA codons and tRNA anticodons ensures that the genetic information stored in DNA (and passed to mRNAs) is accurately reflected in the protein sequence. It is well established that both the initial selection of cognate aa-tRNAs and subsequent kinetic proofreading against near-cognate aa-tRNAs are critical for maintaining decoding fidelity on the ribosome [4,5]. Another important step to ensure translational fidelity is aa-tRNA synthesis, during which amino acids are attached to the corresponding tRNAs by specialized aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) [6]. Due to the structural similarity between different amino acids, the active site of aaRSs often fails to adequately distinguish between the correct and incorrect amino acids; many aaRSs thus use pre- or posttransfer editing to proofread the aa-tRNAs and prevent the accumulation of misacylated tRNAs [7,8]. In addition, free-standing editing factors provide another sieve to remove misacylated tRNAs in trans [9,10]. Collectively, these quality control mechanisms lead to a base-level amino acid misincorporation rate of ~1 in 10,000 decoding events (reviewed in [11]). Such error rates result in approximately 10% of the proteins containing at least one amino acid misincorporation, a level well tolerated by cells [12]. Mutations in translational factors and aminoglycoside antibiotics may increase missense errors to 10−3–10−2 [11,13,14]. Compared with missense errors, stop-codon readthrough occurs at a higher frequency of 10−3 to 10−2 [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Mutations and environmental stresses may further increase readthrough errors to ~10% [15]. In this review, we discuss the genetic and environmental factors that affect bacterial translational fidelity in the context of host-related stress conditions as well as how changing translational fidelity affects bacterial interaction with the host.

2. Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses

Bacteria are frequently exposed to stressful conditions such as oxidants, heat, nutrient starvation, acids, and antibiotics [21,22]. Many of the stresses are experienced by pathogens during host infections [23]. For instance, bacterial infections activate macrophages and neutrophils to produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, and acidic pH is found in the gastrointestinal and genital tracts and intracellular phagolysosomes [23,24,25]. This section reviews how different stresses affect translational fidelity and how translational errors influence bacterial stress resistance (Figure 1 and Table 1).

2.1. Effects of Oxidative Stress on Translational Fidelity

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are produced by phagocytes and also as by-products during bacterial respiration [23,54]. H2O2 reacts with iron to generate highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH·) [55]. ROS can oxidize various amino acid residues including cysteine and methionine. The editing sites of threonyl- (ThrRS) and alanyl- (AlaRS) tRNA synthetases both contain a cysteine that is critical for editing misacylated Ser-tRNAs [56,57,58]. An earlier report shows that the editing site cysteine of E. coli ThrRS (C182) is susceptible to oxidation by H2O2 [31]. ThrRS misacylates Ser to tRNAThr and requires efficient editing to hydrolyze Ser-tRNAThr. Oxidation of ThrRS leads to the accumulation of Ser-tRNAThr in vitro and Ser misincorporation at Thr codons in vivo, as demonstrated by enzymatic, reporter, and mass spectrometry assays [31]. The following work reveals that ThrRS C182 is oxidized to a sulfenic acid at low micromolar concentrations of H2O2 [32]. Such sensitivity requires deprotonation of the C182 thiol group by surrounding His residues. Oxidation of ThrRS appears to be well tolerated by wild-type E. coli but causes a severe growth defect in the absence of heat-shock proteases [31]. This is in line with studies showing that the ThrRS C182A mutation results in little growth defect [13,48]. In contrast, mutating the editing site Cys (C666 in E. coli and C719 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae) of AlaRS inhibits growth at elevated temperatures [48,59]. The striking difference between ThrRS and AlaRS editing defects is presumably due to the nature of translational errors. Whereas Ala → Ser replacements increase protein hydrophilicity and destabilize the proteome by increasing protein misfolding and degradation, Thr → Ser changes may be better tolerated due to the similar properties of Thr and Ser. Intriguingly, a recent study revealed that oxidation of E. coli AlaRS does not lead to an editing defect, despite oxidation of C666 being detected by mass spectrometry [60]. It is possible that the oxidized form of AlaRS still preserves editing efficiency; alternatively, oxidation of AlaRS may not be complete under tested conditions, and the remaining nonoxidized AlaRS hydrolyzes Ser-tRNAAla in trans. It seems that the AlaRS editing site has evolved to resist oxidative stress and avoid detrimental Ala → Ser misincorporation in the proteome.
Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS) uses the editing site to hydrolyze misacylated p-Tyr-tRNAPhe and prevent misincorporation of p-Tyr at Phe codons [61,62,63]. Under oxidative stress, Phe is oxidized to m-Tyr, which is a better substrate for PheRS aminoacylation than p-Tyr and thus poses a dangerous threat to quality control [64]. Recent work demonstrates that Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium PheRS improves editing efficiency under oxidative stress to defend against the toxicity of m-Tyr and p-Tyr [34]. Oxidation of PheRS occurs at multiple residues, as revealed by mass spectrometry. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of nonoxidized and oxidized PheRS show that oxidation enlarges the editing pocket, which may explain the enhanced editing activity of PheRS upon oxidation [65]. The seemingly opposite effects of oxidation on ThrRS and PheRS editing efficiency are likely linked to the different severity of mistranslation events. As discussed above, Thr → Ser misincorporation resulting from ThrRS editing deficiency is well tolerated, whereas mistranslation of Phe codons with m-Tyr and p-Tyr impairs fitness under oxidative stress conditions [34,64].
In addition to aaRSs, ribosomal RNAs and proteins are also targets of ROS [66,67]. Oxidation of rRNA impairs various steps of translational elongation [66], and ribosomal proteins undergo reversible or irreversible oxidation under stress conditions [67]. Oxidative stress induced by menadione appears to increase the rates of stop-codon readthrough and frameshift errors in Staphylococcus aureus, as shown by dual-luciferase reporters [68]. The underlying mechanism is unclear, and whether oxidative stress affects ribosomal fidelity in other bacteria remains to be determined.

2.2. Effects of Metabolic Stresses on Translational Fidelity

Cellular metabolism is heavily influenced by environmental conditions such as nutrient availability, oxygen levels, and pH. Growing evidence suggests that dysregulation of cellular metabolism leads to altered translational fidelity. An earlier study shows that carbon starvation promotes stop-codon readthrough in E. coli, although the mechanism remains unclear [30]. Another study reveals that anaerobic and sublethal concentrations of chloramphenicol lower the level of succinyl-CoA, which modifies methionyl-tRNA synthetase at several lysine residues [41]. Decreased MetRS succinylation enhances misacylation of Met to noncognate tRNAs and presumably increases Met misincorporation at non-Met codons [41].
Translational termination at stop codons is mediated by release factors [69]. Kinetic experiments in vitro demonstrate that the activity of release factors decreases under acidic conditions [70,71,72]. We have recently shown that acidic pH caused by an overflow of glucose metabolism promotes stop-codon readthrough, supporting that low pH impairs the release factor activity in vivo [15].
The connection between metabolism and translational fidelity is further revealed by a recent genetic screening [73]. In a genome-wide screening of an E. coli knockout library, we have identified several genes that control metabolic processes to affect stop-codon readthrough. In particular, CyaA controls the synthesis of cyclic AMP, which is a master regulator of metabolic pathways [74]. We show that deleting cyaA decreases readthrough of stop codons, at least partially by repressing the expression of tRNAs that compete with release factors [73]. It is possible that amino acid imbalance may also contribute to the efficiency of readthrough.

2.3. Antibiotics Affecting Translational Fidelity

Aminoglycosides are among the first antibiotics isolated from microbes and used clinically [75]. Aminoglycosides bind the A site of the 30S ribosomal subunit and promote misreading of mRNA codons [35,76]. Ribosomal mistranslation results from stabilization of near-cognate codon–anticodon interactions upon binding of aminoglycosides [77]. Aminoglycoside antibiotics are bactericidal, and the killing effect is thought to be caused by protein mistranslation and misfolding [37,78]. Bacteriostatic antibiotics targeting the ribosome are normally not considered error-inducing, but it is shown that chloramphenicol and spectinomycin indeed promote stop-codon readthrough [16]. How these antibiotics enhance readthrough is not fully understood. It is likely caused by feedback regulation of tRNA expression: slowing ribosome translation enhances expression of rRNAs and tRNAs, which competes with release factors to suppress stop codons [16].

2.4. Translational Fidelity and Stress Resistance

Reduced translational fidelity is mostly detrimental to cells by increasing protein misfolding and destabilizing the proteome. However, several studies have shown that certain types of translational errors may be beneficial under certain stress conditions. In E. coli, RpoS is a master regulator of the general stress response [21]. Increased translational errors (misincorporation, stop-codon readthrough, and frameshift) caused by ram mutations in the ribosomal gene rpsD enhance the protein level of RpoS and protect cells against oxidative stress [28,79]. RpoS expression is regulated at transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational levels [21]. It is shown that ribosomal errors lead to a DsrA-dependent increase in RpoS translation. Mistranslated proteins also bind and titrate ClpXP away from degrading RpoS. For an unknown mechanism, RpoS appears to regulate the protein level of RpoH, a sigma factor that controls the expression of heat-shock genes [29]. Ribosomal errors increase the protein level of RpoH in a manner dependent on RpoS, leading to protection of E. coli cells under heat stress [29]. In addition to ribosomal mistranslation, increased errors in translation initiation and misincorporation of amino acid analogs also protect E. coli against heat [38]. The same types of mistranslation further elevate the SOS response and increase survival in the presence of DNA-damaging antibiotics (e.g., ciprofloxacin) [38]. It is likely that not all translational errors elicit the same stress responses, and there is a fine line between mistranslation-induced stress protection and toxicity. Whether mistranslation and certain types of translational errors affect stress responses in other bacteria remains an interesting question for exploration in future studies. For example, with recent advances in genome engineering, it would be intriguing to systematically engineer Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens and determine how increasing and decreasing aminoacylation and ribosomal errors affect resistance to oxidative, heat, and metabolic stresses. Advancement in quantitative proteomics is also necessary to determine changes in the rates of various translational errors under stress and host conditions.

3. Altered Translational Fidelity in Salmonella and Other Bacteria

3.1. Ribosomal Fidelity Mutations in Salmonella

Mutations in ribosomal small subunit protein S12 (uS12, encoded by rpsL) have been found to increase translational fidelity and confer resistance to streptomycin [27,80], whereas mutations in uS4 (encoded by rpsD) often lead to reduced translational fidelity [27,81]. Given the opposite effect of rpsL and rpsD mutations on translational fidelity, it is surprising to find that both rpsL K42N (high-fidelity) and rpsD I199N (error-prone) Salmonella mutants have severe defects in the expression of virulence genes, such as those in the SPI1 Type 3 Secretion System and flagellar motility [26]. Such mutations also impair the infection of host cells and colonization in a zebrafish model [26]. Attenuation of SPI1 gene expression in ribosomal mutants is due to the enhanced degradation of the master regulator HilD by the heat-shock protease Lon. It is proposed that increased translational errors in the rpsD I199N mutant activate the expression of Lon, whereas rpsL K42 mutation decreases intrinsic misfolded proteins, leading to more Lon protease available to degrade HilD [26]. These findings suggest that Salmonella has evolved an optimal translational fidelity suited for host invasion. The rpsL K42N mutant also shows improved fitness under bile salt stress, which depends on maintaining a high level of intracellular ATP [82].

3.2. Modification Defects of tRNAs in Bacterial Pathogens

Transfer RNAs are heavily modified molecules, and modifications in the anticodon loop often perturb the accuracy of ribosomal decoding [83,84]. The mS2i6A37 modification is catalyzed by MiaABC and promotes stop-codon readthrough by near-cognate tRNAs [73,85,86]. In Salmonella, deletion of miaA induces pleiotropic effects on cell physiology, including decreased growth, altered sensitivity to several amino acids analogs, and hypersensitivity to oxidative and heat stresses [87,88]. MiaA is required for the efficient expression of virulence genes controlled by VirF in Shigella flexneri [44] and is also crucial for the virulence of ExPEC in mice [45]. Deleting miaA impairs gut colonization, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections caused by ExPEC. The level of MiaA changes during stress conditions (e.g., high salt). Both ablation and overproduction of MiaA increase frameshift errors [45]. Whether altering translational fidelity is sufficient to affect the virulence of Shigella and ExPEC remains to be determined.
TrmD catalyzes the methylation of guanine at position 37 to form 1-methylguanosine (m1G37) of all three tRNAPro isoacceptors [89,90]. Lack of m1G37 results in elevated frequencies of ribosomal +1 frameshift at Pro codons in E. coli and Salmonella [89,91,92]. M1G37 deficiency causes the accumulation of uncharged tRNA and global ribosome stalling, resulting in activation of the stringent response [93]. TrmD is critical for cell growth and is believed to be essential in several bacterial species, including E. coli, Salmonella, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pneumoniae [89,94,95,96,97]. The various mutations in the trmD gene severely reduce colony size and impair the growth of S. typhimurium [97]. Decreases in m1G37 levels in E. coli and Salmonella cause membrane damage and lower efflux activity, thus sensitizing these bacteria to various classes of antibiotics such as polymyxin B, ampicillin, gentamicin, and rifampicin [98]. Salmonella, as an intracellular pathogen, requires Mg2+ transport into cells for survival and virulence [99]. At low Mg2+ concentration, a decrease in TrmD activity slows down the translation of the Pro-codon-rich leader sequence mgtL, which in turn activates transcription of the Mg2+ transporter mgtA [100].
MnmE and GidA bind together and form a heterodimeric complex to catalyze the addition of a carboxymethylaminomethyl (cmnm) group at the five positions of the tRNA wobble uridine ((c) mnm5s2U34) [101,102,103]. The absence of this modification results in an increased level of ribosomal frameshift in E. coli and Salmonella [39,104,105,106]. GidA potentially regulates several cell division genes and proteins; thus, deletion of gidA results in a filamentous morphology due to a defect in chromosome segregation [107]. GidA and MnmE impair Salmonella growth and play a role in the regulation of virulence, including invasion of intestinal epithelial cells and motility [40]. GidB, which is in the same operon as GidA, is a methyltransferase responsible for N7 methylation of G527 (m7G572) of the 16S ribosomal RNA [108]. GidB promotes UGA readthrough in E. coli [73]. Under nalidixic acid stress, the gidB deletion Salmonella mutant exhibits reduced motility, filamentous morphology, and smaller colony size compared to the WT [109].

3.3. Glu and Asp Misincorporation in Mycobacteria

In many bacteria (e.g., Mycobacteria), GatCAB is responsible for converting Glu-tRNAGln and Asp-tRNAAsn to Gln-tRNAGln and Asn-tRNAAsn, respectively [42,110,111]. GatCAB mutations in Mycobacterium smegmatis are found to increase Gln → Glu and Asn → Asp mistranslation [42]. Intriguingly, such mistranslation events lead to the production of RNA polymerase complexes that are functional yet resistant to rifampicin treatment [42,43]. Rifampicin targets RNA polymerase and is frequently used clinically to treat mycobacterial infections. RNA polymerases isolated from mistranslating strains show increased phenotypic resistance (or tolerance) to rifampicin, suggesting that mistranslated RNA polymerase carries amino acid replacements that decrease rifampicin binding [43]. Furthermore, introducing a high-fidelity mutation in the ribosomal protein RpsL (K43N) increases sensitivity to rifampicin. A more recent study from the Javid group shows that some clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis contain mutations in GatCAB that decrease its stability, resulting in increased translational errors and rifampin tolerance [112]. These studies indicate that translational errors may provide benefits to cells through statistical translation of specific proteins.

3.4. Editing Defects in Host-Restricted Bacteria

Mycoplasma is a bacterial parasite that depends on a vertebrate host for survival and growth [113]. The genomes of Mycoplasma species are highly reduced, and several aaRSs either lack the entire editing domain or carry mutations at critical residues in the editing site [50]. Biochemical analyses confirm that Mycoplasma LeuRS and PheRS are indeed defective in editing [50,114]. This is consistent with mass spectrometry data revealing that Leu and Phe codons are mistranslated as Val and Tyr, respectively [50]. In addition to Mycoplasma, the majority of host-restricted bacteria (e.g., Helicobacter, Borrelia, and Rickettsia) have also lost the editing function in many aaRSs [51]. This is in sharp contrast to free-living bacteria that maintain robust editing activities. Whether statistical translation of the proteome provides benefits to the intracellular life cycle remains an open question.

3.5. Trans-Editing in Streptococci

Freestanding trans-editing factors provide another safeguard to hydrolyze misacylated tRNAs and enhance translational fidelity [9,10]. In Streptococcus pneumoniae, MurMN uses several tRNAs as substrates to synthesize peptides on the cell wall. It has been previously shown that MurM serves as a trans-editing factor to hydrolyze Ser-tRNAAla in vitro [115]. A recent study reveals that MurMN attenuates the stringent response and protects S. pneumoniae against acid stress [49]. Expressing the editing domain of AlaRS in the ΔmurMN deletion strain partially suppresses the stringent response. It is thus hypothesized that the accumulation of misacylated tRNAs in the ΔmurMN strain activates the stringent response, although it is unclear how this is achieved. Pneumococcal cells experience acidic pH in hosts [116]. Deleting murMN decreases macrophage phagocytosis via increased expression of an autolysin LytA [49]. Expressing the AlaRS editing domain in ΔmurMN restores phagocytosis to the WT level, suggesting that accumulation of Ser-tRNAAla decreases macrophage phagocytosis.

3.6. Aminoglycoside-Induced Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce global translational errors and are lethal to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria at high doses [75,117]. However, sublethal concentrations of tobramycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic produced by Streptomyces tenebrarius and commonly used to treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa, have been shown to promote biofilm formation [36]. Other aminoglycosides tested show a similar stimulation on biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa and E. coli. This effect on biofilm formation depends on the aminoglycoside response regulator (Arr) gene. It is proposed that aminoglycosides, for an unknown mechanism, increase the phosphodiesterase activity of the Arr gene to inactivate c-di-GMP and promote biofilm formation [36].

3.7. Mistranslating ProRS/tRNAPro in Streptomyces

Variation or mutation in the tRNA sequence can lead to stop-codon suppression and missense errors [118,119,120]. A recent study reports that plant pathogens’ Streptomyces species encode a tRNAProA variant and an anomalous prolyl-tRNA synthetase isoform (ProRSx), which attaches Pro to tRNAProA and deliberately translates Ala codons as Pro [52]. In addition to ProRSx, S. turgidiscabies encodes two canonical ProRSs, which recognize the anticodon of normal tRNAPro. The anticodon of tRNAProA is changed to AGC and recognizes GCU Ala codons. ProRSx has evolved to efficiently aminoacylate tRNAProA with Pro. Expressing the S. turgidiscabies ProRSx/tRNAProA pair leads to Pro misincorporation at Ala codons. The biological function of Pro mistranslation in Streptomyces remains an interesting open question.

4. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

In the past two decades, increasing numbers of studies have revealed remarkable plasticity and broad physiological roles of translational fidelity. In addition to genetic mutations, multiple environmental cues (e.g., stress conditions) affect various types of translational errors. Most of these studies are performed in laboratory conditions, and the errors are detected using reporters. Advances in high-sensitivity mass spectrometry technology would allow the detection and quantitation of different translational errors in bacterial and host proteomes under native conditions. It has been shown that certain types of translational errors benefit bacteria under stress conditions, yet the activation threshold of stress responses by mistranslation and the trade-off between benefits and harms remain to be determined. It is also puzzling why different types of translational errors sometimes induce distinct cellular responses and fitness changes. Our current understanding of how translational fidelity affects bacterial pathogens within hosts is spotty, and the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Future studies are warranted to clarify the mechanisms and to investigate how different types of translational errors impact host interactions of various pathogens.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM136213 to J.L.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

References

  1. Pontes, M.H.; Sevostyanova, A.; Groisman, E.A. When Too Much ATP Is Bad for Protein Synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 2586–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Nissen, P.; Hansen, J.; Ban, N.; Moore, P.B.; Steitz, T.A. The structural basis of ribosome activity in peptide bond synthesis. Science 2000, 289, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Ogle, J.M.; Ramakrishnan, V. Structural insights into translational fidelity. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2005, 74, 129–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pape, T.; Wintermeyer, W.; Rodnina, M. Induced fit in initial selection and proofreading of aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 3800–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rodnina, M.V.; Wintermeyer, W. Ribosome fidelity: tRNA discrimination, proofreading and induced fit. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ibba, M.; Söll, D. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 617–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ling, J.; Reynolds, N.; Ibba, M. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis and translational quality control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mascarenhas, A.P.; An, S.; Rosen, A.E.; Martinis, S.A.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Fidelity mechanisms of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. In Protein Engineering; RajBhandary, U.L., Köhrer, C., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 153–200. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahel, I.; Korencic, D.; Ibba, M.; Söll, D. Trans-editing of mischarged tRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15422–15427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vargas-Rodriguez, O.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Exclusive use of trans-editing domains prevents proline mistranslation. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 14391–14399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mohler, K.; Ibba, M. Translational fidelity and mistranslation in the cellular response to stress. Nat. Microbiol. 2017, 2, 17117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Evans, C.R.; Fan, Y.; Weiss, K.; Ling, J. Errors during gene expression: Single-cell heterogeneity, stress resistance, and microbe-host interactions. mBio 2018, 9, e01018-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mohler, K.; Aerni, H.R.; Gassaway, B.; Ling, J.; Ibba, M.; Rinehart, J. MS-READ: Quantitative measurement of amino acid incorporation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1861, 3081–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wohlgemuth, I.; Garofalo, R.; Samatova, E.; Gunenc, A.N.; Lenz, C.; Urlaub, H.; Rodnina, M.V. Translation error clusters induced by aminoglycoside antibiotics. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Lyu, Z.; Fan, Y.; Evans, C.R.; Barber, K.W.; Banerjee, K.; Igoshin, O.A.; Rinehart, J.; Ling, J. Metabolic stress promotes stop-codon readthrough and phenotypic heterogeneity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 22167–22172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fan, Y.; Evans, C.R.; Barber, K.W.; Banerjee, K.; Weiss, K.J.; Margolin, W.; Igoshin, O.A.; Rinehart, J.; Ling, J. Heterogeneity of stop codon readthrough in single bacterial cells and implications for population fitness. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dunn, J.G.; Foo, C.K.; Belletier, N.G.; Gavis, E.R.; Weissman, J.S. Ribosome profiling reveals pervasive and regulated stop codon readthrough in Drosophila melanogaster. eLife 2013, 2, e01179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wangen, J.R.; Green, R. Stop codon context influences genome-wide stimulation of termination codon readthrough by aminoglycosides. eLife 2020, 9, e52611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kramer, E.B.; Vallabhaneni, H.; Mayer, L.M.; Farabaugh, P.J. A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 2010, 16, 1797–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kramer, E.B.; Farabaugh, P.J. The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA 2007, 13, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Battesti, A.; Majdalani, N.; Gottesman, S. The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 65, 189–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Storz, G.; Imlay, J.A. Oxidative stress. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fang, F.C.; Frawley, E.R.; Tapscott, T.; Vazquez-Torres, A. Bacterial stress responses during host infection. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hampton, M.B.; Kettle, A.J.; Winterbourn, C.C. Inside the neutrophil phagosome: Oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing. Blood 1998, 92, 3007–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Winterbourn, C.C.; Hampton, M.B.; Livesey, J.H.; Kettle, A.J. Modeling the reactions of superoxide and myeloperoxidase in the neutrophil phagosome: Implications for microbial killing. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 39860–39869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fan, Y.; Thompson, L.; Lyu, Z.; Cameron, T.A.; De Lay, N.R.; Krachler, A.M.; Ling, J. Optimal translational fidelity is critical for Salmonella virulence and host interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bjorkman, J.; Samuelsson, P.; Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Novel ribosomal mutations affecting translational accuracy, antibiotic resistance and virulence of Salmonella Typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, Y.; Wu, J.; Ung, M.H.; De Lay, N.; Cheng, C.; Ling, J. Protein mistranslation protects bacteria against oxidative stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 1740–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Evans, C.R.; Fan, Y.; Ling, J. Increased mistranslation protects E. coli from protein misfolding stress due to activation of a RpoS-dependent heat shock response. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 3220–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ballesteros, M.; Fredriksson, A.; Henriksson, J.; Nystrom, T. Bacterial senescence: Protein oxidation in non-proliferating cells is dictated by the accuracy of the ribosomes. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 5280–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ling, J.; Söll, D. Severe oxidative stress induces protein mistranslation through impairment of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase editing site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4028–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, J.; Fan, Y.; Ling, J. Mechanism of oxidant-induced mistranslation by threonyl-tRNA synthetase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 6523–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bullwinkle, T.; Reynolds, N.M.; Raina, M.; Moghal, A.B.; Matsa, E.; Rajkovic, A.; Kayadibi, H.; Fazlollahi, F.; Ryan, C.; Howitz, N.; et al. Oxidation of cellular amino acid pools leads to cytotoxic mistranslation of the genetic code. eLife 2014, 3, e02501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Steiner, R.E.; Kyle, A.M.; Ibba, M. Oxidation of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase positively regulates translational quality control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 10058–10063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Davies, J.; Gorini, L.; Davis, B.D. Misreading of RNA codewords induced by aminoglycoside antibiotics. Mol. Pharmacol. 1965, 1, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Hoffman, L.R.; D’Argenio, D.A.; MacCoss, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Jones, R.A.; Miller, S.I. Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation. Nature 2005, 436, 1171–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kohanski, M.A.; Dwyer, D.J.; Wierzbowski, J.; Cottarel, G.; Collins, J.J. Mistranslation of membrane proteins and two-component system activation trigger antibiotic-mediated cell death. Cell 2008, 135, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Samhita, L.; Raval, P.K.; Agashe, D. Global mistranslation increases cell survival under stress in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Bregeon, D.; Colot, V.; Radman, M.; Taddei, F. Translational misreading: A tRNA modification counteracts a +2 ribosomal frameshift. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shippy, D.C.; Eakley, N.M.; Lauhon, C.T.; Bochsler, P.N.; Fadl, A.A. Virulence characteristics of Salmonella following deletion of genes encoding the tRNA modification enzymes GidA and MnmE. Microb. Pathog. 2013, 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schwartz, M.H.; Waldbauer, J.R.; Zhang, L.; Pan, T. Global tRNA misacylation induced by anaerobiosis and antibiotic exposure broadly increases stress resistance in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 10292–10303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Su, H.W.; Zhu, J.H.; Li, H.; Cai, R.J.; Ealand, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.X.; Kayani, M.U.; Zhu, T.F.; Moradigaravand, D.; et al. The essential mycobacterial amidotransferase GatCAB is a modulator of specific translational fidelity. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Javid, B.; Sorrentino, F.; Toosky, M.; Zheng, W.; Pinkham, J.T.; Jain, N.; Pan, M.; Deighan, P.; Rubin, E.J. Mycobacterial mistranslation is necessary and sufficient for rifampicin phenotypic resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1132–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Durand, J.M.; Dagberg, B.; Uhlin, B.E.; Bjork, G.R. Transfer RNA modification, temperature and DNA superhelicity have a common target in the regulatory network of the virulence of Shigella flexneri: The expression of the virF gene. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 35, 924–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Fleming, B.A.; Blango, M.G.; Rousek, A.A.; Kincannon, W.M.; Tran, A.; Lewis, A.J.; Russell, C.W.; Zhou, Q.; Baird, L.M.; Barber, A.E.; et al. A tRNA modifying enzyme as a tunable regulatory nexus for bacterial stress responses and virulence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 7570–7590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bacher, J.M.; Waas, W.F.; Metzgar, D.; Crécy-Lagard, V.; Schimmel, P. Genetic code ambiguity confers a selective advantage on Acinetobacter baylyi. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 6494–6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kermgard, E.; Yang, Z.; Michel, A.M.; Simari, R.; Wong, J.; Ibba, M.; Lazazzera, B.A. Quality control by isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase of Bacillus subtilis is required for efficient sporulation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Kelly, P.; Backes, N.; Mohler, K.; Buser, C.; Kavoor, A.; Rinehart, J.; Phillips, G.; Ibba, M. Alanyl-tRNA synthetase quality control prevents global dysregulation of the Escherichia coli proteome. mBio 2019, 10, e02921-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aggarwal, S.D.; Lloyd, A.J.; Yerneni, S.S.; Narciso, A.R.; Shepherd, J.; Roper, D.I.; Dowson, C.G.; Filipe, S.R.; Hiller, N.L. A molecular link between cell wall biosynthesis, translation fidelity, and stringent response in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2018089118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, L.; Boniecki, M.T.; Jaffe, J.D.; Imai, B.S.; Yau, P.M.; Luthey-Schulten, Z.A.; Martinis, S.A. Naturally occurring aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases editing-domain mutations that cause mistranslation in Mycoplasma parasites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 9378–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Melnikov, S.V.; van den Elzen, A.; Stevens, D.L.; Thoreen, C.C.; Soll, D. Loss of protein synthesis quality control in host-restricted organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E11505–E11512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Vargas-Rodriguez, O.; Badran, A.H.; Hoffman, K.S.; Chen, M.; Crnkovic, A.; Ding, Y.; Krieger, J.R.; Westhof, E.; Soll, D.; Melnikov, S. Bacterial translation machinery for deliberate mistranslation of the genetic code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2110797118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. An, S.; Musier-Forsyth, K. Trans-editing of Cys-tRNAPro by Haemophilus influenzae YbaK protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 42359–42362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Imlay, J.A. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 755–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Imlay, J.A. The molecular mechanisms and physiological consequences of oxidative stress: Lessons from a model bacterium. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dock-Bregeon, A.; Sankaranarayanan, R.; Romby, P.; Caillet, J.; Springer, M.; Rees, B.; Francklyn, C.S.; Ehresmann, C.; Moras, D. Transfer RNA-mediated editing in threonyl-tRNA synthetase. The class II solution to the double discrimination problem. Cell 2000, 103, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Beebe, K.; Ribas de Pouplana, L.; Schimmel, P. Elucidation of tRNA-dependent editing by a class II tRNA synthetase and significance for cell viability. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Dock-Bregeon, A.C.; Rees, B.; Torres-Larios, A.; Bey, G.; Caillet, J.; Moras, D. Achieving error-free translation; the mechanism of proofreading of threonyl-tRNA synthetase at atomic resolution. Mol. Cell. 2004, 16, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Lyu, Z.; Ling, J. Impact of alanyl-tRNA synthetase editing deficiency in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 9953–9964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kavoor, A.; Kelly, P.; Ibba, M. Escherichia coli alanyl-tRNA synthetase maintains proofreading activity and translational accuracy under oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ling, J.; Roy, H.; Ibba, M. Mechanism of tRNA-dependent editing in translational quality control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Roy, H.; Ling, J.; Irnov, M.; Ibba, M. Post-transfer editing in vitro and in vivo by the beta subunit of phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 4639–4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ling, J.; Yadavalli, S.S.; Ibba, M. Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase editing defects result in efficient mistranslation of phenylalanine codons as tyrosine. RNA 2007, 13, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Bullwinkle, T.; Lazazzera, B.; Ibba, M. Quality control and infiltration of translation by amino acids outside of the genetic code. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014, 48, 149–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Srinivas, P.; Steiner, R.E.; Pavelich, I.J.; Guerrero-Ferreira, R.; Juneja, P.; Ibba, M.; Dunham, C.M. Oxidation alters the architecture of the phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase editing domain to confer hyperaccuracy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 11800–11809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Willi, J.; Kupfer, P.; Evequoz, D.; Fernandez, G.; Katz, A.; Leumann, C.; Polacek, N. Oxidative stress damages rRNA inside the ribosome and differentially affects the catalytic center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 1945–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Shcherbik, N.; Pestov, D.G. The Impact of Oxidative Stress on Ribosomes: From Injury to Regulation. Cells 2019, 8, 1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Kyuma, T.; Kizaki, H.; Ryuno, H.; Sekimizu, K.; Kaito, C. 16S rRNA methyltransferase KsgA contributes to oxidative stress resistance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Biochimie 2015, 119, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Youngman, E.M.; McDonald, M.E.; Green, R. Peptide release on the ribosome: Mechanism and implications for translational control. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 62, 353–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kuhlenkoetter, S.; Wintermeyer, W.; Rodnina, M.V. Different substrate-dependent transition states in the active site of the ribosome. Nature 2011, 476, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Shaw, J.J.; Trobro, S.; He, S.L.; Aqvist, J.; Green, R. A Role for the 2’ OH of peptidyl-tRNA substrate in peptide release on the ribosome revealed through RF-mediated rescue. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 983–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Indrisiunaite, G.; Pavlov, M.Y.; Heurgue-Hamard, V.; Ehrenberg, M. On the pH dependence of class-1 RF-dependent termination of mRNA translation. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 1848–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lyu, Z.; Villanueva, P.; O’Malley, L.; Murphy, P.; Ling, J. Genome-wide screening reveals metabolic regulation of translational fidelity. BioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zheng, D.; Constantinidou, C.; Hobman, J.L.; Minchin, S.D. Identification of the CRP regulon using in vitro and in vivo transcriptional profiling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 5874–5893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Becker, B.; Cooper, M.A. Aminoglycoside antibiotics in the 21st century. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Carter, A.P.; Clemons, W.M.; Brodersen, D.E.; Morgan-Warren, R.J.; Wimberly, B.T.; Ramakrishnan, V. Functional insights from the structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit and its interactions with antibiotics. Nature 2000, 407, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Demirci, H.; Murphy, F.t.; Murphy, E.; Gregory, S.T.; Dahlberg, A.E.; Jogl, G. A structural basis for streptomycin-induced misreading of the genetic code. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Davis, B.D.; Chen, L.L.; Tai, P.C. Misread protein creates membrane channels: An essential step in the bactericidal action of aminoglycosides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 6164–6168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Fredriksson, A.; Ballesteros, M.; Peterson, C.N.; Persson, O.; Silhavy, T.J.; Nystrom, T. Decline in ribosomal fidelity contributes to the accumulation and stabilization of the master stress response regulator sigmaS upon carbon starvation. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Davies, J.; Gilbert, W.; Gorini, L. Streptomycin, suppression, and the code. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1964, 51, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Agarwal, D.; Kamath, D.; Gregory, S.T.; O’Connor, M. Modulation of decoding fidelity by ribosomal proteins S4 and S5. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lyu, Z.; Ling, J. Increase in ribosomal fidelity benefits Salmonella upon bile salt exposure. Genes 2022, 13, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. El Yacoubi, B.; Bailly, M.; de Crecy-Lagard, V. Biosynthesis and function of posttranscriptional modifications of transfer RNAs. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2012, 46, 69–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Suzuki, T. The expanding world of tRNA modifications and their disease relevance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 375–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Petrullo, L.A.; Gallagher, P.J.; Elseviers, D. The role of 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine in readthrough and suppression of nonsense codons in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1983, 190, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vacher, J.; Grosjean, H.; Houssier, C.; Buckingham, R.H. The effect of point mutations affecting Escherichia coli tryptophan tRNA on anticodon-anticodon interactions and on UGA suppression. J. Mol. Biol. 1984, 177, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ericson, J.U.; Bjork, G.R. Pleiotropic effects induced by modification deficiency next to the anticodon of tRNA from Salmonella Typhimurium LT2. J. Bacteriol. 1986, 166, 1013–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Blum, P.H. Reduced leu operon expression in a miaA mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 5125–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gamper, H.B.; Masuda, I.; Frenkel-Morgenstern, M.; Hou, Y.M. Maintenance of protein synthesis reading frame by EF-P and m(1)G37-tRNA. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Bystrom, A.S.; Bjork, G.R. The structural gene (trmD) for the tRNA(m1G)methyltransferase is part of a four polypeptide operon in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1982, 188, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bjork, G.R.; Wikstrom, P.M.; Bystrom, A.S. Prevention of translational frameshifting by the modified nucleoside 1-methylguanosine. Science 1989, 244, 986–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gamper, H.; Li, H.; Masuda, I.; Miklos Robkis, D.; Christian, T.; Conn, A.B.; Blaha, G.; Petersson, E.J.; Gonzalez, R.L., Jr.; Hou, Y.M. Insights into genome recoding from the mechanism of a classic +1-frameshifting tRNA. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Masuda, I.; Hwang, J.Y.; Christian, T.; Maharjan, S.; Mohammad, F.; Gamper, H.; Buskirk, A.R.; Hou, Y.M. Loss of N(1)-methylation of G37 in tRNA induces ribosome stalling and reprograms gene expression. eLife 2021, 10, e70619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Hou, Y.M.; Matsubara, R.; Takase, R.; Masuda, I.; Sulkowska, J.I. TrmD: A Methyl Transferase for tRNA Methylation With m(1)G37. Enzymes 2017, 41, 89–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kobayashi, K.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Albertini, A.; Amati, G.; Andersen, K.K.; Arnaud, M.; Asai, K.; Ashikaga, S.; Aymerich, S.; Bessieres, P.; et al. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 4678–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. O’Dwyer, K.; Watts, J.M.; Biswas, S.; Ambrad, J.; Barber, M.; Brule, H.; Petit, C.; Holmes, D.J.; Zalacain, M.; Holmes, W.M. Characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae TrmD, a tRNA methyltransferase essential for growth. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 2346–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Bjork, G.R.; Jacobsson, K.; Nilsson, K.; Johansson, M.J.; Bystrom, A.S.; Persson, O.P. A primordial tRNA modification required for the evolution of life? EMBO J. 2001, 20, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Masuda, I.; Matsubara, R.; Christian, T.; Rojas, E.R.; Yadavalli, S.S.; Zhang, L.; Goulian, M.; Foster, L.J.; Huang, K.C.; Hou, Y.M. tRNA methylation is a global determinant of bacterial multi-drug resistance. Cell Syst. 2019, 8, 302–314.e308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Groisman, E.A.; Hollands, K.; Kriner, M.A.; Lee, E.J.; Park, S.Y.; Pontes, M.H. Bacterial Mg2+ homeostasis, transport, and virulence. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2013, 47, 625–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Gall, A.R.; Datsenko, K.A.; Figueroa-Bossi, N.; Bossi, L.; Masuda, I.; Hou, Y.M.; Csonka, L.N. Mg2+ regulates transcription of mgtA in Salmonella Typhimurium via translation of proline codons during synthesis of the MgtL peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 15096–15101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Yamada, Y.; Murao, K.; Ishikura, H. 5-(carboxymethylaminomethyl)-2-thiouridine, a new modified nucleoside found at the first letter position of the anticodon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9, 1933–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Meyer, S.; Wittinghofer, A.; Versees, W. G-domain dimerization orchestrates the tRNA wobble modification reaction in the MnmE/GidA complex. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 392, 910–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Yim, L.; Moukadiri, I.; Bjork, G.R.; Armengod, M.E. Further insights into the tRNA modification process controlled by proteins MnmE and GidA of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 5892–5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Urbonavicius, J.; Qian, Q.; Durand, J.M.; Hagervall, T.G.; Bjork, G.R. Improvement of reading frame maintenance is a common function for several tRNA modifications. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 4863–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Urbonavicius, J.; Stahl, G.; Durand, J.M.; Ben Salem, S.N.; Qian, Q.; Farabaugh, P.J.; Bjork, G.R. Transfer RNA modifications that alter +1 frameshifting in general fail to affect -1 frameshifting. RNA 2003, 9, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Jager, G.; Nilsson, K.; Bjork, G.R. The phenotype of many independently isolated +1 frameshift suppressor mutants supports a pivotal role of the P-site in reading frame maintenance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Shippy, D.C.; Heintz, J.A.; Albrecht, R.M.; Eakley, N.M.; Chopra, A.K.; Fadl, A.A. Deletion of glucose-inhibited division (gidA) gene alters the morphological and replication characteristics of Salmonella enterica Serovar typhimurium. Arch. Microbiol. 2012, 194, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Okamoto, S.; Tamaru, A.; Nakajima, C.; Nishimura, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Tokuyama, S.; Suzuki, Y.; Ochi, K. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1096–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mikheil, D.M.; Shippy, D.C.; Eakley, N.M.; Okwumabua, O.E.; Fadl, A.A. Deletion of gene encoding methyltransferase (gidB) confers high-level antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Sheppard, K.; Akochy, P.M.; Salazar, J.C.; Söll, D. The Helicobacter pylori amidotransferase GatCAB is equally efficient in glutamine-dependent transamidation of Asp-tRNAAsn and Glu-tRNAGln. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 11866–11873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Nakamura, A.; Yao, M.; Chimnaronk, S.; Sakai, N.; Tanaka, I. Ammonia channel couples glutaminase with transamidase reactions in GatCAB. Science 2006, 312, 1954–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Li, Y.Y.; Cai, R.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Hendrickson, T.L.; Xiang, Y.; Javid, B. Clinically relevant mutations of mycobacterial GatCAB inform regulation of translational fidelity. mBio 2021, 12, e0110021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rottem, S. Interaction of mycoplasmas with host cells. Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Han, N.C.; Kavoor, A.; Ibba, M. Characterizing the amino acid activation center of the naturally editing-deficient aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase PheRS in Mycoplasma mobile. FEBS Lett. 2022, 596, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shepherd, J.; Ibba, M. Lipid II-independent trans editing of mischarged tRNAs by the penicillin resistance factor MurM. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 25915–25923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Park, S.Y.; Kim, I.S. Identification of macrophage genes responsive to extracellular acidification. Inflamm. Res 2013, 62, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Aguirre Rivera, J.; Larsson, J.; Volkov, I.L.; Seefeldt, A.C.; Sanyal, S.; Johansson, M. Real-time measurements of aminoglycoside effects on protein synthesis in live cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2013315118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Eggertsson, G.; Söll, D. Transfer ribonucleic acid-mediated suppression of termination codons in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 1988, 52, 354–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Santos, M.A.; Tuite, M.F. The CUG codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in Candida albicans. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 1481–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Lant, J.T.; Berg, M.D.; Heinemann, I.U.; Brandl, C.J.; O’Donoghue, P. Pathways to disease from natural variations in human cytoplasmic tRNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5294–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pathogens 12 00383 g001 550
Figure 1. Translational fidelity is altered by environmental cues. Translational fidelity is maintained through the correct attachment of amino acids to tRNAs and accurate decoding on the ribosome. Environmental cues, such as oxidative stress, nutrient starvation, acid stress, and antimicrobials, have been shown to alter translational fidelity, which results in various changes in bacterial fitness and host interactions.
Figure 1. Translational fidelity is altered by environmental cues. Translational fidelity is maintained through the correct attachment of amino acids to tRNAs and accurate decoding on the ribosome. Environmental cues, such as oxidative stress, nutrient starvation, acid stress, and antimicrobials, have been shown to alter translational fidelity, which results in various changes in bacterial fitness and host interactions.
Pathogens 12 00383 g001
Table
Table 1. Translational errors in bacteria.
Table 1. Translational errors in bacteria.
Error TypesBacteriaSources of ErrorPhenotypesRef.
GlobalS. typhimurium,
E. coli		Mutations in rpsDDecreased cell invasion and animal colonization; increased resistance against oxidative stress and heat; decreased motility[26,27,28,29]
High-fidelityS. typhimurium,
E. coli		Mutations in rpsLDecreased cell invasion and animal colonization; decreased resistance against oxidative stress; decreased motility[26,27,28]
ReadthroughE. coliCarbon starvationIncreased protein oxidation during aging[30]
Thr → SerE. coliOxidative stress damages the editing site of ThrRSMild growth defect with excess Ser[13,31,32]
Phe → m-TyrE. coli,
S. typhimurium,
Oxidation of Tyr to m-TyrPheRS editing defect decreases growth under oxidative stress[33,34]
GlobalE. coli, P. aeruginosaAminoglycosidesBactericidal; increased biofilm formation at sublethal doses[35,36,37]
Initiation errorsE. coliDeleting initiator tRNAsIncreased tolerance to fluoroquinolones and heat stress[38]
FrameshiftS. typhimuriumDeleting gidA or mnmEMutations in gidA and mnmE decreases Salmonella invasion and host colonization[39,40]
ReadthroughE. coli,
S. typhimurium		Acid stress, excess sugarMay promote tolerance to acid stress[15]
ReadthroughE. coliChloramphenicol, etc. Unclear[16]
Multiple AA → MetE. coliAnaerobic growth and antibiotic stressDecreased MetRS succinylation increases Met misacylation[41]
Gln → Glu, Asn → AspM. smegmatis
M. tuberculosis		Mutations in tRNAs or gatCABIncreased phenotypic resistance to rifampicin[42,43]
ReadthroughS. flexneriDeleting miaADecreased expression of virulence genes[44]
FrameshiftExPECDeleting or overexpressing miaADeleting miaA attenuates virulence[45]
Ile → ValA. baylyiEditing-defective IleRSImproved growth with excess Val[46]
Ile → ValB. subtilisEditing-defective IleRSSporulation defect[47]
Ala → SerE. coliC666A mutation in AlaRSDecreased motility[48]
Ala → SerS. pneumoniaDeleting murMNDecreased macrophage phagocytosis[49]
Leu → Val, Phe → Tyr etc.M. mobile and other host-restricted bacteriaNatural editing-defective aaRSsMay be adaptive to parasitic cycle[50,51]
Ala → ProStreptomyces spp.ProRS/tRNAProA pairUnclear[52]
Pro → AlaC. sticklandii,
P. aeruginosa etc.		Deleting proXUnclear[9,10]
Pro → CysH. influenza,
C. crescentus etc.		Deleting ybaKUnclear[10,53]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lyu, Z.; Wilson, C.; Ling, J. Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses and Host Interactions. Pathogens 2023, 12, 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030383

AMA Style

Lyu Z, Wilson C, Ling J. Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses and Host Interactions. Pathogens. 2023; 12(3):383. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lyu, Zhihui, Cierra Wilson, and Jiqiang Ling. 2023. "Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses and Host Interactions" Pathogens 12, no. 3: 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030383

APA Style

Lyu, Z., Wilson, C., & Ling, J. (2023). Translational Fidelity during Bacterial Stresses and Host Interactions. Pathogens, 12(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop