Next Article in Journal
Year-Long Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Salmonella enterica Serogroups Isolated from a Wisconsin Dairy Farm
Previous Article in Journal
Examining Infant and Child Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Lyme Disease During Pregnancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY Virulotypes of the Type 3 Secretion System in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Death Risk Factor in Pediatric Patients

by
Carolina G. Nolasco-Romero
1,2,
Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarro
3,
Rodolfo Norberto Jimenez-Juarez
4,
Uriel Gomez-Ramirez
1,2,
Juan Carlos Cancino-Díaz
5,
Beatriz López-Marceliano
1,2,
Magali Reyes Apodaca
6,
Mónica Anahí Aguayo-Romero
4,
Gerardo E. Rodea
2,
Lilia Pichardo-Villalon
7,
Israel Parra-Ortega
7,
Fortino Solórzano Santos
8,
Mónica Moreno-Galván
9 and
Norma Velázquez-Guadarrama
1,*
1
Laboratorio de Investigación en Microbiología y Resistencia Antimicrobiana, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
2
Posgrado en Ciencias Quimicobiológicas, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11350, Mexico
3
Departamento de Investigación, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
4
Departamento de Infectología, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
5
Laboratorio de inmunomicrobiología, Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11350, Mexico
6
Unidad de Investigación y Diagnóstico en Nefrología y Metabolismo Mineral Óseo, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
7
Laboratorio Clínico, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 067209, Mexico
8
Laboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
9
Departamento de Hemato-Oncología, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2024, 13(12), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121030
Submission received: 10 October 2024 / Revised: 7 November 2024 / Accepted: 20 November 2024 / Published: 22 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)

Abstract

:
The poor prognosis of infections associated with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be attributed to several conditions of the patient and virulence factors of the pathogen, such as the type III secretion system (T3SS), which presents the ability to inject four effectors into the host cell: ExoS, ExoT, ExoU and ExoY. The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of exo genes through multiplex polymerase chain reaction in P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients at a third-level pediatric hospital and their relationships with clinical variables, e.g., the origin of the sample, susceptibility profile and outcome, through a multinomial logistic regression model. A total of 336 bacterial strains were obtained from cystic fibrosis (CF; n = 55) and bloodstream infection (BSI; n = 281) samples, and eleven presence (+)/absence (−) exo virulotype patterns were identified. The virulotype V3 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+) was observed in 64.28%, followed by V1 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+) with 11.60%. Additionally, V2 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−) was present in 11.60%, and V7 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−) was present in 4.17%. The remaining virulotypes (8.33%) identified were clustered in the other virulotype (OV) group (V4, V5, V6, V8, V9, V10 and V11). The clinical records of 100 patients and their outcomes were reviewed. Fifteen patients died (CF = 4; BSI = 11). V2 and V1 were the virulotypes most related to pandrug resistance (PDR), whereas the V1 relative risk of death was determined to be almost four-fold greater than that of V3, followed by V2 and OV. In summary, the virulotypes V1, V2 and CF are related to death. This study highlights the association of T3SS virulotypes with the susceptibility profile, clinical origin and their potential for predicting a poor prognosis.

1. Introduction

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant (MDR and XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, elevated costs and chronic infections, and a poor prognosis is commonly associated with the health status of the patient (i.e., immunocompromised states) and the characteristics of the microorganism, e.g., its resistance phenotype and virulence factors [1,2]. In particular, outcomes from respiratory diseases and P. aeruginosa bloodstream infection (BSI) have been attributed to the toxins secreted by the type III secretion system (T3SS) [3]. Four main effectors, which are injected into host cells through the T3SS, have been described in P. aeruginosa: ExoS, ExoT, ExoU and ExoY [4]. The most widely characterized and studied among them are ExoS and ExoU, owing to their important clinical relevance [5].
Compared to other common hospital pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa has the ability to evade the immune system and cause tissue damage through T3SS effectors, which may represent an additional risk factor in healthcare-associated settings and in areas of immunocompromised patients in adults and children [3,6].
The successful dissemination of MDR/XDR strains of P. aeruginosa is influenced by a complex interplay of pathogenicity, epidemic potential and antibiotic resistance, and most of these strains belong to a limited number of globally prevalent clones [7]. A recent study on T3SS in P. aeruginosa strains with cytotoxic phenotypes revealed its association with the exoU genotype, related to greater capacity for acute tissue damage and sepsis, while non-cytotoxic strains are more frequently related to the exoS genotype [8]. An example of this is the Liverpool epidemic disease (LES) P. aeruginosa strain ST146, which is an MDR clone that chronically infects and colonizes the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis [7]. While the exoU+/exoS− genotype is an independent risk factor for early mortality in bloodstream infections and shows a negative correlation with XDR profiles, it is also related to the high-risk clone ST235, which is often associated with a poor prognosis [9].
The exoU gene is located in different conjugative elements, such as the PAPI-2 pathogenicity island or the ExoU, A, B and C islands, which are integrated through recombination with tRNA-Lys. This gene encodes a potent A2-family phospholipase, which is considered the most virulent effect residing in the T3SS. Its overregulation is correlated with an unfavorable prognosis and early mortality [5,10].
The ExoS protein presents distinct functions, including its GTPase activity over small GTPases, which regulate diverse cellular functions, such as cell migration, phagocytosis and cytoskeleton organization, such as Rho, Rac and Cdc42, and its adenosine diphosphate ribosyl transferase (ADPRT) activity over several Ras-related proteins involved in the organization of the cytoskeleton, which is dependent on the eukaryotic cofactor factor activating ExoS (FAS) [11]. Both activities affect the organization of actin in the cytoskeleton of the host cell by reducing cell-cell adherence and facilitating the invasion of P. aeruginosa through epithelial barriers [12]. The exoS gene commonly presents distributions excluding the exoU gene, whereas the exoT and exoY genes are present in most isolates and are considered part of the core genome of the bacterium [5,13].
The mutual exclusion of ExoS and ExoU is difficult to interpret because of the chromosomal codification of exoS and the presence of exoU in a mobilizable genetic element [5,13,14]. Additionally, the expression of exoU and exoS in isolates that present or lack both genes is uncommon. Although both exotoxins facilitate several mechanisms for bacterial propagation and pathogenesis, these effectors are not expressed cooperatively or simultaneously; however, while the secretion of ExoS has been associated with endocytosis and intracellular bacterial survival, ExoU induces rapid destruction of the plasmatic membrane of host cells [6,12,15].
On the other hand, recent studies have shown that ExoT induces cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase in melanoma cells, suggesting that this effector plays a regulatory role in the cell cycle [16]. ExoY presents nucleotide cyclase activity. This effector promoted the accumulation of different cyclic nucleotides (cNMPs), with a preference for guanine monophosphate (cGMP) and uracil monophosphate (cUMP) over adenine monophosphate (cAMP) and cytokine monophosphate (cCMP); however, its contribution to the virulence of P. aeruginosa is still unclear [17].
P. aeruginosa strains isolated from early infections have shown a higher frequency of T3SS-secreted effectors, followed by isolates from children and, finally, adults with chronic infections. Furthermore, an inverse correlation is observed between the duration of infection and the decrease in the percentage of isolates secreting T3SS effectors [18].
Several methods for the molecular detection and identification of the P. aeruginosa T3SS exoU, exoS, exoT and exoY virulotypes have been widely implemented through multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) [19]; nevertheless, the relationship between the complete genotype and its impact on the prognosis of infection has not been completely established. In the case of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa, a poor prognosis can be attributed to several medical conditions of the patient, highlighting clinical cases with preexisting comorbidities, in addition to the presence of virulence factors, such as the T3SS, which plays a crucial role in the pathogenicity of the microorganism [10]. In the present study, we analyzed the presence of the genes coding for exotoxins and their multiple combinations in isolates of multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa recovered from pediatric patients at a third-level pediatric hospital and their relationships with specific variables, such as the origin of the clinical sample used for pathogen isolation, the susceptibility profile of the isolates and the clinical outcome of the patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Biological Samples

A total of 336 cultures of P. aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis (CF; n = 55) and blood-stream infection (BSI; n = 281) from pediatric patients at the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez (HIMFG) were obtained from 2017 to 2023. The samples (blood and sputum) from the Department of Central Laboratory of the HIMFG were kept at 4 °C for no more than three days for immediate use. The bacterial cultures were collected as follows: Clinical isolates were initially inoculated in Petri dishes with blood agar (DIBICO). The plates were incubated at 37 °C for up to 96 h. After bacterial growth, reseeding was performed on both Mueller-Hinton (BIOXON) and cetrimide (OXOID) differential and selective agar plates, which were subsequently incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 42 °C, respectively, for identification according to colony and microscopic morphology. The production of N2 in nitrate broth (DIBICO) supplemented with Durham tubes, oxidase and catalase activities, pigment production and growth at 42 °C were also evaluated. Bacterial identity was confirmed with a MALDI-TOF (Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) automated system. All strains were preserved in silk milk (OXOID) at −70 °C for further use. This study was approved by the HIMFG Research, Biosafety and Ethics Committees (HIM/2017/042. SSA 1742). In the latter, the need for informed consent and/or assent was assessed based on the age of the patient. Informed consent was signed by the patient’s parents or representatives; only P. aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections (BSI) or cystic fibrosis (CF) were requested. Patient identification data were collected solely by the committee and researchers under its supervision. The only data required for the study were the source of the sample and the outcome.

2.2. Molecular Detection of Exo Virulotypes Through mPCR

The isolation and purification of genomic DNA from the cultures confirmed as the species P. aeruginosa were performed as follows: tubes with Mueller-Hinton broth were inoculated with the bacterial isolates. All the tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The biomass was processed with the Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, WI, USA.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The design was performed on the sequences of the exoS (NP_252530.1), exoT (NP_248734.1), exoY (NP_250881.1) and gyrB (NP_064724.1) genes of strain PAO1 (NC_002516.2) and the exoU gene (NC_008463.1) of strain PA14 deposited in GenBank. The primers used were designed in silico using the Primer-BLAST server (NCBI) and the gene set was selected according to homology, GC% content, melting temperature (Tm) and amplicon size generated [19,20,21,22,23] (Table 1).
The reactions were aliquoted in a final volume of 50 µL, containing 25 µL of 2X Multiplex PCR Master (JenaBioscience®, Jena, Germany), 10 µM forward and reverse primers and 50 ng of genomic DNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The enzymatic reactions were performed in an Axygen thermal cycler (Corning, MA, USA) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 62 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 40 s; and a final extension cycle at 72 °C for 5 min, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the annealing temperatures of each pair of primers designed in this study were considered.
The presence (+)/absence (−) of exo genes in the bacterial isolates was assessed in order to analyze the distribution of exo genes in the 336 isolates. The bacterial strains P. aeruginosa PAO1 and PA14 were employed as positive controls for the exoS and exoU genes, respectively. Both strains amplify exoT and exoY, in addition to the constitutive gene gyrB of P. aeruginosa. Blood and CF samples positive for Staphylococcus aureus, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae were used as negative controls (Supplementary Materials Figure S1)
The PCR products were finally loaded onto a 1% agarose gel supplemented with Midori Green Advance (NipponGenetics, Tokyo, Japan). The running conditions for electrophoresis were determined as follows: 90 V, 300 mA, per 40 min. Amplicons were visualized in a Syngene GVM20 UV transilluminator.

2.3. Determination of the Susceptibility Profile

The susceptibility profiles of 105 isolates were previously reported by Aguilar-Rodea et al. [24,25]. The remaining isolates were evaluated to determine their susceptibility profile by employing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) method via the agar dilution test, according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) 2024 edition guidelines and breakouts established for P. aeruginosa [26]. Thirteen antibiotics (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were evaluated: gentamycin (GEN), tobramycin (TOB), amikacin (AK), meropenem (MEM), imipenem (IMI), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (CPM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LEV), piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T), aztreonam (AZT), fosfomycin (FOS) and colistin (CS). The reference strains employed for validation of the test included the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and the Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) reference strains. Since the 2024 edition of the CLSI guidelines does not include breakout points for the evaluation of the susceptibility of fosfomycin (FOS), the values proposed by Smith et al. [27] were employed, which were followed up by Aguilar-Rodea et al. [25]. The cutoff points are as follows: S ≤ 64 µg/mL, I = 128 µg/mL and R ≥ 256 µg/mL. Additionally, the 2024 CLSI edition eliminates the breakpoints for gentamicin, so the breakpoints to be used for this antibiotic correspond to those present in the 2023 edition, which are S ≤ 4 µg/mL, I = 8 µg/mL and R ≥16 µg/mL [28]. Categorization of resistance according to Magiorakos et al. [29] was employed for classification of the isolates studied as multidrug resistant (MDR; nonsusceptible to at least one agent in three or more categories of antibiotics), extensively drug resistant (XDR; nonsusceptible to at least one antimicrobial agent in all but one or two categories), or pandrug resistant (PDR; resistant to all categories of antibiotics) [29].

2.4. T3SS Virulotypes and Clinical Variables

For this study, we considered samples from pediatric patients with a confirmed CF diagnosis and positive P. aeruginosa culture, in addition to blood culture samples positive for the bacteria. Initial analyses sought to evaluate the T3SS virulotypes as the response variable, while predictor variables included sample origin (BSI/CF), susceptibility profile and patient outcome. Ultimately, 137 isolates of the initial 336 that met these criteria were included.
To obtain the relationship between virulotypes and clinical outcome, the response variable was patient mortality, operationally defined as death attributed to bacterial infection in cases of cystic fibrosis (exacerbation due to P. aeruginosa infection) and, in cases of bloodstream infection, bacteremia (isolation of P. aeruginosa in cases of primary bacteremia on days 7, 14 and 30) and sepsis (presence of tachycardia, pyrexia and hypotension due to infection). Duplicate data from the same patient were discarded and only the isolate associated with death was considered, resulting in 100 cases. In this data, clinical death was attributed to bacterial infection in four CF patients and eleven BSI cases.

2.5. Statiscal Analysis

For the first analysis, data were summarized overall and by virulotypes. Categorical variables were described as frequency and percentages, and Fisher’s exact test was used. A multinomial logistic regression model was developed to associate virulotypes within the clinical data of the analyzed samples with “V3” as the reference class, and each covariate was quantified by generalized odds ratios (gORs). The inclusion criteria were as follows: bacterial isolates of clinical origin (i.e., CF, BSI); evaluation of isolates to determine their susceptibility profile, categorized according to Magiorakos et al. [29]; and clinical records documenting either discharge or death attributed to bacterial infection.
In a subsequent set of analyses, mortality was analyzed as a response variable. A chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was performed to assess the presence of an association between 2 categorical variables. Factors associated with mortality were identified using a multilevel Poisson regression model with robust error variance (level 1: strains and level 2: patients).
Statistical analysis was performed with Stata version 17.0 (Stata, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) and RStudio version 4.4.0 (Vienna, Austria) packages [30,31]. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of T3SS Virulotypes

The previously designed primers were used to standardize the reaction. The annealing temperatures of each pair of primers were taken into account with the objective of assessing the correct identification of each gene, avoiding the formation of secondary products and false positives and optimizing the reaction without losing its effectiveness. Once the optimal amplification conditions were established, the exo genes were screened in the collection of clinical isolates.
The distribution of the exo genes in the P. aeruginosa isolates in this study revealed that the exoU gene was present in 24.70% (n = 83/336) of the isolates, whereas the exoS gene was present in 69.94% (n = 235/336) of the isolates and exoT was identified in 96.13% (n = 323/336) of the isolates. Additionally, exoY was observed in 80.65% of the evaluated isolates (n = 271/336). Up to eleven virulotypes patterns corresponding to the T3SS exo genes were identified in the P. aeruginosa isolates. The most abundant pattern was virulotype V3, which was observed in 63.98% of the isolates (n = 215/336), followed by virulotype V1, which was identified in 11.60% (n = 39/336); virulotype V2, which was identified in 11.60% (n = 39/336) of the isolates; and V7, which was identified in 4.16% (n = 14/336) of the isolates. For analysis, the remaining virulotypes identified in the study were identified and clustered into the other virulotype (OV) group (V4, V5, V6, V8, V9, V10, V11), which accounted for up to 8.63% (n = 29/336) of the total (Table 2; Supplementary Materials Table S1).

3.2. Associations Between Multidrug Resistance and Virulotypes

We analyzed the association between the different virulotypes and origin of the sample, susceptibility to antibiotics and patient outcome. Those data that did not have all this information was discarded, leaving 137 that met these criteria. A total of 113 (82.48%) isolates were obtained from BSI patients. The remaining isolates were obtained from CF patients (16.06%; n = 22). According to the categorization of resistance of isolates, 20.44% (n = 28/137) of the cultures were categorized as PDR, 46.72% (n = 64/137) were classified as XDR and 28.49% (n = 39/137) were determined as MDR (Table 3, Supplementary Materials Table S2). Regarding the clinical outcome and its consideration of all the isolates obtained from one single patient, the deaths of 15 patients were attributed to bacterial infection; 4 of these cases were diagnosed with CF (V3 in 6 cases) and 11 were diagnosed with BSI (dominance of V1 and V2 in 5 and 3 cases, respectively).
In our dataset, the most frequent T3SS virulotypes were V3, with a frequency of 53.28% (n = 73/137); V2, with 24.08% (n = 33/137); V1, with 11.67% of the isolates (n = 16/137); and V7, with 2.18% (n = 3/137). The remaining virulotypes (OVs) were identified with a frequency of 8.75% (n = 12/137). The model employed the most frequent virulotype as a reference, which was represented by V3. Baseline characteristics of the sample are shown stratified by virulotypes (Table 3). The highest rate of mortality was observed for V1 (37.5%). Regarding clinical origin, V2 was detected with a significantly higher frequency among isolates from BSI, as was V7 from CF (p = 0.001). Finally, OV, V1 and V3 were more predominant with an XDR profile, as was V2 with a PDR profile (p < 0.001).
In the multinomial logistic regression analysis (Table 4), isolates from patients with death showed higher odds of having V1 (gOR = 5.120, 95% CI: 1.264–20.733) and V2 (gOR = 4.756, 95% CI: 1.113–20.328) versus having V3. Additionally, CF patients had lower odds of having V1 versus having V3 compared with BSI patients (gOR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.025–0.999). Finally, isolates with a PDR profile presented greater odds of having V2 (gOR = 38.790, 95% CI: 8.319–180.895) versus having V3 compared with isolates with MDR, followed by the OV (gOR = 14.890, 95% CI: 1.079–205.387) and V1 (gOR = 7.000, 95% CI: 1.040–47.099) groups. Isolates with XDR had a higher odds of having OV versus isolates with MDR (gOR = 10.506, 95% CI: 1.212–91.053).

3.3. T3SS Virulotype as a Risk Factor for Death

The relationships between the study variables (clinical origin of the isolate, susceptibility profile and T3SS virulotype) and death are described in Table 5, with the V1 virulotype and the XDR resistance phenotype having significant values.
In the model where the response variable was death, a total of 15 cases were used to determine the outcome of death caused by the infection. A total of 4 patients were diagnosed with CF, while the remaining 11 patients were diagnosed with BSI.
Table 6 presents the factors associated with mortality. Compared with the V3 virulotype, the V1 virulotype had a 3.69-fold increased risk of death (RR = 3.690, 95% CI: 1.259–10.82). Compared with V3, V7 (RR = 0.00000001, 95% CI: 0–0.0000001) presented a negative association with death. Patients with CF had a greater risk of death than those with BSI (RR = 3.3643, 95% CI: 1.181–11.230).

4. Discussion

The T3SS is a virulence factor consisting of a needle-like multicomponent complex that injects effector proteins from the cytosol of bacteria into the host cell and has been associated with poor prognosis in cases of acquired pneumonia, keratitis and otitis [15]. In the case of P. aeruginosa, the T3SS is associated with the severity of infection and has been demonstrated when it allows the injection of Exo effectors [3,4,5].
By developing a mPCR assay, it was possible to analyze the frequency of the virulotypes evaluated to reduce costs and make the determination quickly [21,22,23]. The distribution of each exo gene in the 336 P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from pediatric patients in the HIMFG were evaluated, and the results indicate that the exoT gene was the most common (96.13%), whereas exoU was considered the least common. In this work, more CF isolates were positive for the exoT and exoS genes, and only two positive cases were positive for exoU. Similar data were reported by other groups in CF, who reported the exoT gene in 47 isolates (95.9%) (n = 47/49), whereas both exoY and exoS were identified in 48 isolates (97.9%) (n = 48/49); however, exoU was identified in 31 CF isolates (63.2%) (n = 31/49) [32]. Other studies reported that the exoS gene was the most prevalent gene, followed by exoU, with lower frequencies of both exoT and exoY [33].
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the presence of the exoU gene varies significantly according to the origin of the sample, e.g., its presence ratios are observed in bacteremia (13%–64%), CF (10%) and keratitis (61.5%) [34]. Otherwise, the study performed by Juan et al. [3] reported the exoS gene at frequencies ranging from 58 to 72% [3]. They associated this effector with an invasive phenotype, as observed with PAO1 or PAK strains. Additionally, they reported lower frequencies of exoU (28–42%) and its association with highly cytotoxic phenotypes, as observed with PA14 or PA103 strains [3]. According to our results, the sole presence of exoU is not associated with a specific origin of isolation (BSI; CF). A similar trend was demonstrated for the prevalence of genes encoding effector proteins of the T3SS, which was independent of the site of infection, with the exception of the isolate recovered from the CF samples, where exoS was prevalent [35].
The calculated models demonstrated that the relative risk of death was greater in virulotype V1, where exoS was absent. Moreover, the exoU+ gene has been associated with death in early bacteremia; recent studies also associated this gene with multidrug resistance events, highlighting resistance to fluoroquinolones [3,9,14,36,37]. Furthermore, it was possible to identify the relative risk for death regarding the T3SS virulotypes V1 and V2, which presented an exoU+ genotype. Additionally, V2 presented a relatively high risk of presenting a PDR resistance phenotype, followed by V1, whereas V3 presented a relatively high probability of presenting an MDR resistance phenotype.
Some studies have explored the phenotypic secretion of T3SS effectors simultaneously in P. aeruginosa. Through immunoassays, the prevalence of ExoU/ExoT-secreting isolates was identified compared with the ExoS/ExoT phenotype in respiratory tract clinical samples, as was the expression of ExoT and ExoS alone with no other exotoxins. In addition, none of the isolates expressed ExoU alone [38]. Although expression assays were not performed in this study, virulotypes with the sole presence of exoU− or exoU/exoY positive variants without the presence of other exotoxins were not identified. Instead, the V7 virulotype was present in only 3.91% (n = 14/336) and did not present a relative risk for death according to the results of the models.
Some limitations of our study are the lack of identification of chaperone proteins and the evaluation of the effects of these exotoxins in both in vitro and in vivo models. Wu et al. [34] demonstrated, through in silico analysis, the association of the loss of cytotoxicity with the presence of a punctual mutation in the SpcU chaperone protein, which is critical for the optimal activity of ExoU [34]. Additionally, studies on the structure of T3SS have shown that alterations in its architecture result in a decrease in virulence, despite the presence of toxic effectors [5]. However, the data generated in this work reveals a virulotype-prognosis relationship that can be investigated considering these factors in further studies. Other aspects to consider in the present study are the fact that samples were obtained from a single pediatric center, which indicates that our results reflect the behavior of T3SS virulotypes in a delimited sector of the pediatric population, of which, in addition, other clinical conditions could be considered for future studies that allow establishing the relationship of these patterns with the outcome and conditions of patients (i.e., hematological diseases that increase the risk of death [39]). In addition, the relationship of other virulence factors that contribute to the pathogenicity of the microorganism should be considered.
One of the main differences among the virulotypes identified in our study was the presence of the exoY gene in V1, V3, V5, V8 and V10, with distinct frequencies ranging from 0.29% to 63.98%. No differences in prevalence were observed regarding the presence or absence of the exoY gene in V1 and V2, respectively; however, both virulotypes presented 5.1- and 4.7-fold increased risks of death with respect to V3, where exoU was absent and exoY was present. In contrast to the results reported by other researchers who identified exoU/exoY genotype clinical isolates, a close relationship among the exoY+ genotypes, in addition to lung damage in cases of nosocomial pneumonia, was demonstrated [40]. Other research groups have also demonstrated that the exoY gene presents a high rate of nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and deletions, especially in clinical isolates. However, the changes produced by SNPs and deletions (frame shifts and protein truncation) were not sufficient to prevent infection, considering that other virulence factors could be coexpressed at the time of infection. [8,19].
Several studies have analyzed the T3SS virulotype, focusing on the presence of ExoS and ExoU, which are considered the most prevalent effectors and have been employed as typing genes for P. aeruginosa high-epidemiological-risk clones [8,36,37,38]. In the present study, the 105 P. aeruginosa strains previously typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and the genotyping data of the MexAB-OprM pump regulators, described by Aguilar-Rodea et al. [24,25] (2017), were considered. These data are part of the working group collection (Supplementary Materials Table S2). No significant relationship was identified between T3SS virulotyping and sequence type (ST235, ST233, ST1725), haplotype of MexAB-OprM (H12), including the origin of the sample, susceptibility profile and clinical outcome. These clones are related to XDR/MDR resistance phenotypes and exoU+ and exoS+ genes, forcing us to investigate the potential of these isolates to clonally disseminate [24,41].
The high-epidemiological-risk clone ST235 presented a significant rate of the presence of the exoU gene [14]. Its combination is unfavorable for prognosis. Moreover, this clone has been demonstrated to present increased mortality in comparison with other high-risk clones [14,36]. Clones related to CC235 presented both V1 and V2 virulotypes in four clinical cases, with a clinical outcome of death. Even though the WHO reclassified P. aeruginosa as a high-priority group [42], higher-death-risk clones are distributed worldwide, representing a health issue in patients with infections associated with these strains. This evidence highlights the need for characterization of every clinical isolate, from evaluation of the susceptibility profile, genotyping of the T3SS and, if possible, characterization of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump haplotype. The application of these measures in the early clinical diagnosis of infection must still be considered for a favorable and timely response against the bacterial pathogen, especially in high-epidemiological-risk clones and immunocompromised patients.
ExoU-producing P. aeruginosa strains have been identified in five-year-old pediatric patients with CF infections; however, these types of strains are poorly represented in persistent chronic infections [13,32,43]. In this work, the isolates recovered from the CF clinical samples presented a dominance of virulotype V3; nonetheless, ten isolates from this group presented exoU, which is included in the V1, V2 and V9 virulotypes, possibly attributed to the characteristics of the treatment with antibiotics. Specifically, long-term therapies can induce a selection event in strains, eradicating those presenting exoU, whose deficiency can lead to evasion of the immune response, promoting a chronic infection process [13]. In addition, the V9 virulotype, characterized by the presence of the exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+ genes, was identified in two isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). In a study by Sarges et al. [32], the exoS+/exoU+ virulotype was detected in 61.2% (n = 30) of the isolates evaluated. The authors observed a high frequency of this virulotype in cases of intermittent infection, mainly in the early phases of infection. In contrast, cases of chronic infection and greater severity were associated with the exoS+ genotype [32]. In a study conducted by Horna et al. [44], an unusually high frequency of the exoU+/exoS+ genotype was recorded. This was attributed to the presence of specific pressures that allow the presence of both genes. Additionally, an association was reported between this genotype and MDR/XDR profiles, which exhibit a tendency toward high levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones [44].
Furthermore, as ExoS inhibits the synthesis of interleukins by alveolar macrophages via the modulation of the initial inflammatory response, a selective event of exoS+ strains with the capacity to colonize and persist in chronic infectious processes caused by this bacterium can occur [2,4]. Bacterial persistence in chronic infections caused by P. aeruginosa can also induce the dysregulation of toxic effectors and the continuous production of antibodies against the T3SS, indicating a role over time in the pathogenesis of the infected lung; for example, in coinfection cases in patients with CF, commonly with S. aureus, it has been reported that P. aeruginosa does not exclusively employ its T3SS to modulate the immune response of the host and avoid its own eradication but also to eradicate S. aureus [4,14,32]. In patients with hematologic conditions, P. aeruginosa BSI has been linked to a significantly elevated risk of mortality compared to other Gram-negative bacteria. Similarly, a correlation has been observed between prognosis and the primary site of infection, with mortality rates typically high when associated with pulmonary infection [45]. Conversely, in non-CF isolates, P. aeruginosa has been associated with an increased risk of mortality, prolonged hospitalizations and exacerbations in adults with bronchiectasis [46].
In the Mexican pediatric CF patient population, a high prevalence of P. aeruginosa colonization has been reported, with 20% of MDR clones and 8.2% of XDR identified [47]. On the other hand, P. aeruginosa bacteremia (BSI) is mostly hospital-acquired, with a significant proportion in intensive care units (ICUs) [45]. Mortality associated with P. aeruginosa BSI in children is high, with in-hospital mortality rates ranging from 29% to 39% [39,45]. Factors associated with increased mortality include neutropenia, ICU admission and inadequate empiric therapy [45]. In patients with MDR P. aeruginosa, an overall mortality rate of 31% has been observed, with higher rates observed in those infected [48]. Numerous studies have shown that appropriate therapy can significantly reduce mortality [9,39], so clinical application of T3SS is relevant.

5. Conclusions

According to the results of our study, we can conclude that the P. aeruginosa V1 and V2 virulotypes present a greater risk of death. Compared with the V3 virulotype, V2 is mostly involved in bloodstream infections. This study highlights the effects of different combinations of T3SS virulotypes on bacterial virulence, their associations with the susceptibility profile and their potential for predicting a poor prognosis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pathogens13121030/s1, Figure S1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of amplicons obtained by multiplex PCR using primer pairs for exoU, exoS, exoT, exoY and gyrB genes; Table S1: Date generated during virulotypes analyses; Table S2: Additional Models.

Author Contributions

C.G.N.-R., B.L.-M. and N.V.-G. designed the experiments, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. C.G.N.-R., F.-J.P.-G. and N.V.-G. analyzed and interpreted the data from patients. J.C.C.-D. and N.V.-G. made substantial contributions to the conception of the study. R.N.J.-J., M.R.A., M.A.A.-R., L.P.-V., I.P.-O. and F.S.S. diagnosed, treated and included the patients in the study. C.G.N.-R., F.-J.P.-G., M.M.-G. and N.V.-G. contributed to data analyses and interpretation. F.-J.P.-G. made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data. C.G.N.-R., U.G.-R., G.E.R. and N.V.-G. were involved in drafting the manuscript. N.V.-G. performed registration and acquisition of resources for the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Federal Resources from the Ministry of Health and Assistance (SSA), México., HIM/2021/042-SSA 1742. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías. This work was part of CGNR’s PhD dissertation, and she was a CONAHCyT (964702) fellow.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez and was registered with the number HIM/2017/042. SSA 1742.

Informed Consent Statement

All parents were informed about the nature of the study and were provided with written consent (HIM-LC-RCPR.01). Our study was conducted according to the principles enshrined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information Files.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to César Arellano Arellano for his invaluable assistance in the review of the primer design for mPCR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Behzadi, P.; Baráth, Z.; Gajdács, M. It’s Not Easy Being Green: A Narrative Review on the Microbiology, Virulence and Therapeutic Prospects of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Depluverez, S.; Devos, S.; Devreese, B. The Role of Bacterial Secretion Systems in the Virulence of Gram-Negative Airway Pathogens Associated with Cystic Fibrosis. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Juan, C.; Peña, C.; Oliver, A. Host and Pathogen Biomarkers for Severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215 (Suppl. S1), S44–S51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jouault, A.; Saliba, A.M.; Touqui, L. Modulation of the immune response by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type-III secretion system. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1064010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  5. Horna, G.; Ruiz, J. Type 3 secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 246, 126719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hardy, K.S.; Tessmer, M.H.; Frank, D.W.; Audia, J.P. Perspectives on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Effector ExoU and Its Subversion of the Host Innate Immune Response to Infection. Toxins 2021, 13, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Oliver, A.; Mulet, X.; López-Causapé, C.; Juan, C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist. Updat. 2015, 21–22, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sawa, T.; Momiyama, K.; Mihara, T.; Kainuma, A.; Kinoshita, M.; Moriyama, K. Molecular epidemiology of clinically high-risk Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: Practical overview. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 64, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Peña, C.; Cabot, G.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Zamorano, L.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.; Murillas, J.; Almirante, B.; Pomar, V.; Aguilar, M.; Granados, A.; et al. Influence of virulence genotype and resistance profile in the mortality of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 60, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kothari, A.; Kherdekar, R.; Mago, V.; Uniyal, M.; Mamgain, G.; Kalia, R.B.; Kumar, S.; Jain, N.; Pandey, A.; Omar, B.J. Age of Antibiotic Resistance in MDR/XDR Clinical Pathogen of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Barbieri, J.T.; Sun, J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS and ExoT. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 152, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, J.J.; Tsuei, K.C.; Shen, E.P. The role of Type III secretion system in the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbial keratitis. Tzu Chi Med. J. 2021, 34, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Rodrigues, Y.C.; Furlaneto, I.P.; Maciel, A.H.P.; Quaresma, A.J.P.G.; de Matos, E.C.O.; Conceição, M.L.; Vieira, M.C.D.S.; Brabo, G.L.D.C.; Sarges, E.D.S.N.F.; Lima, L.N.G.C.; et al. High prevalence of atypical virulotype and genetically diverse background among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from a referral hospital in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0238741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Hayashi, W.; Izumi, K.; Yoshida, S.; Takizawa, S.; Sakaguchi, K.; Iyori, K.; Minoshima, K.I.; Takano, S.; Kitagawa, M.; Nagano, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance and Type III Secretion System Virulotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Dogs and Cats in Primary Veterinary Hospitals in Japan: Identification of the International High-Risk Clone Sequence Type 235. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0040821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Foulkes, D.M.; McLean, K.; Haneef, A.S.; Fernig, D.G.; Winstanley, C.; Berry, N.; Kaye, S.B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Toxin ExoU as a Therapeutic Target in the Treatment of Bacterial Infections. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  16. Qin, S.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, C.; Pu, Q.; Deng, X.; Lan, L.; Liang, H.; Song, X.; Wu, M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Silistre, H.; Raoux-Barbot, D.; Mancinelli, F.; Sangouard, F.; Dupin, A.; Belyy, A.; Deruelle, V.; Renault, L.; Ladant, D.; Touqui, L.; et al. Prevalence of ExoY Activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Reference Panel Strains and Impact on Cytotoxicity in Epithelial Cells. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 666097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  18. Jain, M.; Bar-Meir, M.; McColley, S.; Cullina, J.; Potter, E.; Powers, C.; Prickett, M.; Seshadri, R.; Jovanovic, B.; Petrocheilou, A.; et al. Evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion in cystic fibrosis: A paradigm of chronic infection. Transl. Res. 2008, 152, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Ajayi, T.; Allmond, L.R.; Sawa, T.; Wiener-Kronish, J.P. Single-nucleotide-polymorphism mapping of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretion toxins for development of a diagnostic multiplex PCR system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 3526–3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Ye, J.; Coulouris, G.; Zaretskaya, I.; Cutcutache, I.; Rozen, S.; Madden, T.L. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Anuj, S.N.; Whiley, D.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Bell, S.C.; Wainwright, C.E.; Nissen, M.D.; Sloots, T.P. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the ecfX and the gyrB genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 63, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Markoulatos, P.; Siafakas, N.; Moncany, M. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: A practical approach. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2002, 16, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Hendolin, P.H.; Markkanen, A.; Ylikoski, J.; Wahlfors, J.J. Use of multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of four bacterial species in middle ear effusions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 2854–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Aguilar-Rodea, P.; Zúñiga, G.; Rodríguez-Espino, B.A.; Olivares Cervantes, A.L.; Gamiño Arroyo, A.E.; Moreno-Espinosa, S.; de la Rosa Zamboni, D.; López Martínez, B.; Castellanos-Cruz, M.D.; Parra-Ortega, I.; et al. Identification of extensive drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains: New clone ST1725 and high-risk clone ST233. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Aguilar-Rodea, P.; Zúñiga, G.; Cerritos, R.; Rodríguez-Espino, B.A.; Gomez-Ramirez, U.; Nolasco-Romero, C.G.; López-Marceliano, B.; Rodea, G.E.; Mendoza-Elizalde, S.; Reyes-López, A.; et al. Nucleotide substitutions in the mexR, nalC and nalD regulator genes of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump are maintained in Pseudomonas aeruginosa genetic lineages. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0266742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 34th ed.; Wayne, P.A., Ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Malvern, PA, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, E.C.; Brigman, H.V.; Anderson, J.C.; Emery, C.L.; Bias, T.E.; Bergen, P.J.; Landersdorfer, C.B.; Hirsch, E.B. Performance of Four Fosfomycin Susceptibility Testing Methods against an International Collection of Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e01121-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 33rd ed.; Wayne, P.A., Ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Malvern, PA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. StataCorp. STATA/MP 14.1. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13; StataCorp, L.P.: College Station, TX, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R.; RStudio, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sarges, E.D.S.N.F.; Rodrigues, Y.C.; Furlaneto, I.P.; de Melo, M.V.H.; Brabo, G.L.D.C.; Lopes, K.C.M.; Quaresma, A.J.P.G.; Lima, L.N.G.C.; Lima, K.V.B. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Virulotypes and Their Association with Clinical Features of Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 3771–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Pournajaf, A.; Razavi, S.; Irajian, G.; Ardebili, A.; Erfani, Y.; Solgi, S.; Yaghoubi, S.; Rasaeian, A.; Yahyapour, Y.; Kafshgari, R.; et al. Integron types, antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence gene profile, alginate production and biofilm formation in Iranian cystic fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Infez. Med. 2018, 26, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, T.; Dong, X.; Wu, D.; Zhu, L.; Xu, K.; Zhang, Y. The type III secretion system facilitates systemic infections of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the clinic. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0222423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Feltman, H.; Schulert, G.; Khan, S.; Jain, M.; Peterson, L.; Hauser, A.R. Prevalence of type III secretion genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 2001, 147 Pt 10, 2659–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Del Barrio-Tofiño, E.; López-Causapé, C.; Oliver, A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fischer, S.; Dethlefsen, S.; Klockgether, J.; Tümmler, B. Phenotypic and Genomic Comparison of the Two Most Common ExoU-Positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clones, PA14 and ST235. mSystems 2020, 5, e01007-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. El-Solh, A.A.; Hattemer, A.; Hauser, A.R.; Alhajhusain, A.; Vora, H. Clinical outcomes of type III Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 1157–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Yuan, Q.; Guo, L.; Li, B.; Zhang, S.; Feng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, M.; Hu, H.; Chen, H.; Yang, Q.; et al. Risk factors and outcomes of inpatients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections in China: A 9-year trend and multicenter cohort study. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1137811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. Wagener, B.M.; Anjum, N.; Christiaans, S.C.; Banks, M.E.; Parker, J.C.; Threet, A.T.; Walker, R.R.; Isbell, K.D.; Moser, S.A.; Stevens, T.; et al. Exoenzyme Y Contributes to End-Organ Dysfunction Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: An Exploratory Study. Toxins 2020, 12, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Morales-Espinosa, R.; Delgado, G.; Espinosa, L.F.; Isselo, D.; Méndez, J.L.; Rodriguez, C.; Miranda, G.; Cravioto, A. Fingerprint Analysis and Identification of Strains ST309 as a Potential High Risk Clone in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Population Isolated from Children with Bacteremia in Mexico City. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. WHO. Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hu, H.; Harmer, C.; Anuj, S.; Wainwright, C.E.; Manos, J.; Cheney, J.; Harbour, C.; Zablotska, I.; Turnbull, L.; Whitchurch, C.B.; et al. Type 3 secretion system effector genotype and secretion phenotype of longitudinally collected Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from young children diagnosed with cystic fibrosis following newborn screening. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Horna, G.; Amaro, C.; Palacios, A.; Guerra, H.; Ruiz, J. High frequency of the exoU+/exoS+ genotype associated with multidrug-resistant “high-risk clones” of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from Peruvian hospitals. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Pilmis, B.; Alby-Laurent, F.; Fasola, M.L.; Seegers, V.; Guery, R.; Guet-Revillet, H.; Postaire, M.; Toubiana, J.; Bille, E.; Lortholary, O.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections in children: A 9-year retrospective study. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2020, 179, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Finch, S.; McDonnell, M.J.; Abo-Leyah, H.; Aliberti, S.; Chalmers, J.D. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Impact of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Colonization on Prognosis in Adult Bronchiectasis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 1602–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rosales-Reyes, R.; Rodríguez-Alvarado, M.; Lezana-Fernández, J.L.; Sánchez-Lozano, J.Y.; Gayosso-Vázquez, C.; Jarillo-Quijada, M.D.; Toledano-Tableros, J.E.; Arredondo-Mercado, M.J.; Alcántar-Curiel, M.D.; Lincopan, N.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates From a Cohort of Mexican Children With Cystic Fibrosis Show Adaptation to a Chronic Phenotype. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2020, 39, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tacconelli, E.; Tumbarello, M.; Bertagnolio, S.; Citton, R.; Spanu, T.; Fadda, G.; Cauda, R. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: Analysis of trends in prevalence and epidemiology. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 220–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
Table 1. Primers employed for endotoxin detection via mPCR.
Table 1. Primers employed for endotoxin detection via mPCR.
Target GenesSequences (5′ to 3′)Product Size (bp)
exoUF: GAC AGA TCG CTA CGC ATC CA
R: AGA TGT TCA CCG ACT CGC TC
688
exoSF: CGT CGT GTT CAA GCA GAT GG
R: GAA TGC CGG TGT AGA GAC CA
533
exoTF: TGC GGT AAT GGA CAA GGT CG
R: AAC AGG GTG GTT ATC GTG CC
459
exoYF: GTC TCT ACA GGA TCA GCC GC
R: CGT CGC TGT GGT GAA ACA TC
330
gyrBF: TGG GAA CAG GTC TAC CAC CA
R: CAG ACC GCC TTC GTA CTT GA
243
Table 2. T3SS virulotypes in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates.
Table 2. T3SS virulotypes in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates.
VirulotypeT3SS VirulotypesFrequency (n = 336/100%)
V1exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+39 (11.60%)
V2exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−39 (11.60%)
V3exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+215 (63.9%)
V4exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−3 (0.89%)
V5exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+8 (2.38%)
V6exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY−9 (2.67%)
V7exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−14 (4.16%)
V8exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY+3 (0.89%)
V9exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+4 (1.19%)
V10exoU−/exoS+/exoT−/exoY+1 (0.29%)
V11exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−1 (0.29%)
Genes that were identified (+) in the virulotypes are highlighted in bold.
Table 3. Clinical variables evaluated for the study P. aeruginosa isolates.
Table 3. Clinical variables evaluated for the study P. aeruginosa isolates.
Virulotypes
VariableOVV1V2V3V7Totalp-Value
DeathNo10 (90.91%)10 (62.5%)27 (81.82%)63 (85.14%)3 (100%)113 (82.48%)0.274
Yes1 (9.09%)6 (37.5%)6 (18.18%)11 (14.86%)0 (0%)24 (17.52%)
Clinical originBSI11 (100%)14 (87.5%)33 (100%)55 (74.32%)2 (66.67%)115 (83.94%)0.001
CF0 (0%)2 (12.5%)0 (0%)19 (25.68%)1 (33.33%)22 (16.06%)
Susceptibility profileMDR1 (9.09%)3 (18.75%)4 (12.12%)30 (40.54%)1 (33.33%)39 (28.47%)<0.001
PDR2 (18.18%)3 (18.75%)18 (54.55%)5 (6.76%)0 (0%)28 (20.44%)
S0 (0%)1 (6.25%)0 (0%)4 (5.41%)1 (33.33%)6 (4.38%)
XDR8 (72.73%)9 (56.25%)11 (33.33%)35 (47.3%)1 (33.33%)64 (46.72%)
p-value < 0.05, BSI: bloodstream infection, CF: cystic fibrosis, PDR: pandrug resistant, XDR: extensively drug resistant, S: sensitive. V1 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+); V2 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−); V7 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−); OV (other virulotype group): comprising V4 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−), V5 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+), V6 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY−), V8 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY+), V9 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+), V10 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT−/exoY+) and V11 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−).
Table 4. Factors associated with the most frequent virulotypes of P. aeruginosa, with the V3 virulotype used as a reference.
Table 4. Factors associated with the most frequent virulotypes of P. aeruginosa, with the V3 virulotype used as a reference.
OV vs. V3V1 vs. V3V2 vs. V3V7 vs. V3
Death, yes vs. no: gOR0.9635.124.7560
95% CI0.092–10.0071.264–20.7331.113–20.3280
p-value0.9750.022 *0.035 *0.99
Clinical origin, CF vs. BSI: gOR00.1605.048
95% CI00.025–0.99900.185–137.166
p-value0.9950.049 *0.990.337
Susceptibility profile, PDR vs. MDR: gOR14.89738.790
95% CI1.079–205.3871.040–47.0998.319–180.8950
p-value0.044 *0.045 *<0.001 *0.997
Susceptibility profile, XDR vs. MDR: gOR10.5062.8932.9790.473
95% CI1.212–91.0530.674–12.4180.800–11.0970.017–12.862
p-value0.033 *0.1530.1040.658
Susceptibility profile, S vs. MDR: gOR01.885013.423
95% CI00.134–26.43400.579–310.913
p-value10.63810.105
gOR generalized Odds radio, *: significant p value < 0.05, CI: confidence interval = 95%, CF: cystic fibrosis, PDR: pandrug resistant, XDR: extensively drug resistant, S: sensitive. V1 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+); V2 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−); V7 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−) OV (other virulotype group): comprising V4 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−), V5 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+), V6 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY−), V8 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY+), V9 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+), V10 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT−/exoY+) and V11 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−).
Table 5. Independence test between the different study variables and death outcome.
Table 5. Independence test between the different study variables and death outcome.
VariableDischarged
Patients
n = 85 (85%)
Death
Patients n = 15 (15%)
Total
n = 100 Patients
p Value
T3SS virulotypeV19 (10.59%)6 (40%)15 (15%)0.003 *
V220 (23.53%)5 (33.33%)25 (25%)0.419
V351 (60%)6 (40%)57 (57%)0.149
V72 (2.35%)0 (0%)2 (2%)0.548
OV8 (9.41%)1 (6.67%)9 (9%)0.732
Susceptibility profilePDR19 (22.35%)3 (20%)22 (22%)0.839
XDR39 (45.88%)11 (73.33%)50 (50%)0.049 *
MDR27 (31.76%)4 (26.67%)31 (31%)0.694
S4 (4.71%)2 (13.33%)6 (6%)0.195
Clinical originCF12 (14.12%)4 (26.67%)16 (16%)0.222
BSI73 (85.88%)11 (73.33%)84 (84%)0.400
*: chi-square test significant, p value < 0.05; BSI: bloodstream infection; PDR: pandrug resistant; XDR: extensively drug resistant; MDR: multidrug resistant; S: sensitive. V1 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+); V2 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−); V3 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+); V7 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−); OV (other virulotype group): comprising V4 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−), V5 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+), V6 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY−), V8 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY+), V9 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+), V10 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT−/exoY+) and V11 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−).
Table 6. Relative risk for death associated with the most frequent genotypes of P. aeruginosa.
Table 6. Relative risk for death associated with the most frequent genotypes of P. aeruginosa.
Death Clinical Outcome per VariableRR95% CIp Value
Clinical origin (Ref. BSI)
CF3.6431.181–11.230.024 *
Susceptibility profile (Ref. MDR)
PDR0.5310.144–1.9550.341
S2.4590.772–7.8360.128
XDR1.4990.533–4.2160.443
Virulotype (Ref. V3)
OV1.1850.110–12.770.889
V13.6901.259–10.820.0174 *
V22.9070.852–9.9170.0882
V70.000000010–0.0000001<0.001 *
RR: relative risk, *: p value < 0.05, CI: confidence interval = 95%, BSI bloodstream infection, PDR: pandrug resistant, XDR: extensively drug resistant, S: sensitive. V1 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+); V2 (exoU+/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−); V7 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−); OV (other virulotype group): comprising V4 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY−), V5 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT+/exoY+), V6 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY−), V8 (exoU−/exoS−/exoT−/exoY+), V9 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY+), V10 (exoU−/exoS+/exoT−/exoY+) and V11 (exoU+/exoS+/exoT+/exoY−).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nolasco-Romero, C.G.; Prado-Galbarro, F.-J.; Jimenez-Juarez, R.N.; Gomez-Ramirez, U.; Cancino-Díaz, J.C.; López-Marceliano, B.; Apodaca, M.R.; Aguayo-Romero, M.A.; Rodea, G.E.; Pichardo-Villalon, L.; et al. The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY Virulotypes of the Type 3 Secretion System in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Death Risk Factor in Pediatric Patients. Pathogens 2024, 13, 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121030

AMA Style

Nolasco-Romero CG, Prado-Galbarro F-J, Jimenez-Juarez RN, Gomez-Ramirez U, Cancino-Díaz JC, López-Marceliano B, Apodaca MR, Aguayo-Romero MA, Rodea GE, Pichardo-Villalon L, et al. The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY Virulotypes of the Type 3 Secretion System in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Death Risk Factor in Pediatric Patients. Pathogens. 2024; 13(12):1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nolasco-Romero, Carolina G., Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarro, Rodolfo Norberto Jimenez-Juarez, Uriel Gomez-Ramirez, Juan Carlos Cancino-Díaz, Beatriz López-Marceliano, Magali Reyes Apodaca, Mónica Anahí Aguayo-Romero, Gerardo E. Rodea, Lilia Pichardo-Villalon, and et al. 2024. "The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY Virulotypes of the Type 3 Secretion System in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Death Risk Factor in Pediatric Patients" Pathogens 13, no. 12: 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121030

APA Style

Nolasco-Romero, C. G., Prado-Galbarro, F. -J., Jimenez-Juarez, R. N., Gomez-Ramirez, U., Cancino-Díaz, J. C., López-Marceliano, B., Apodaca, M. R., Aguayo-Romero, M. A., Rodea, G. E., Pichardo-Villalon, L., Parra-Ortega, I., Santos, F. S., Moreno-Galván, M., & Velázquez-Guadarrama, N. (2024). The exoS, exoT, exoU and exoY Virulotypes of the Type 3 Secretion System in Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Death Risk Factor in Pediatric Patients. Pathogens, 13(12), 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13121030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop