Next Article in Journal
Protective Properties of Attenuated Strains of African Swine Fever Virus Belonging to Seroimmunotypes I–VIII
Next Article in Special Issue
Heterotrimeric G-Protein Signalers and RGSs in Aspergillus fumigatus
Previous Article in Journal
Acquired AmpC β-Lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae from Healthy Humans and Animals, Food, Aquatic and Trout Aquaculture Environments in Portugal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptomic and Functional Studies of the RGS Protein Rax1 in Aspergillus fumigatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus

1
Department of Microbiology, Graduate School, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea
2
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Daejeon University, Daejeon 34520, Korea
3
School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(4), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040272
Submission received: 12 February 2020 / Revised: 3 April 2020 / Accepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 9 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Signal Transduction in Pathogenic Fungi)

Abstract

:
Trimeric G proteins play a central role in the G protein signaling in filamentous fungi and Gα subunits are the major component of trimeric G proteins. In this study, we characterize three Gα subunits in the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. While the deletion of gpaB and ganA led to reduced colony growth, the growth of the ΔgpaA strain was increased in minimal media. The germination rate, conidiation, and mRNA expression of key asexual development regulators were significantly decreased by the loss of gpaB. In contrast, the deletion of gpaA resulted in increased conidiation and mRNA expression levels of key asexual regulators. The deletion of gpaB caused a reduction in conidial tolerance against H2O2, but not in paraquat (PQ). Moreover, the ΔgpaB mutant showed enhanced susceptibility against membrane targeting azole antifungal drugs and reduced production of gliotoxin (GT). The protein kinase A (PKA) activity of the ΔganA strain was severely decreased and protein kinase C (PKC) activity was detected all strains at similar levels, indicating that all G protein α subunits of A. fumigatus may be a component of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and appear to possess the PKC signaling pathway as an alternative backup pathway to compensate for PKA depletion. Collectively, the three Gα subunits regulate growth, germination, asexual development, resistance to oxidative stress, and GT production differently via the PKA or PKC signaling pathway. The function of GanA of A. fumigatus was elucidated for the first time.

1. Introduction

G protein signaling is a universal means of signal transduction in living organisms, activating many G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) mediated cellular processes. The G protein signaling pathway consists of a series of components. External signals are transmitted to target genes via GPCR, heterotrimeric G proteins, and various downstream regulators and control numerous regulators of the G protein (RGSs) [1,2,3]. One of the uppermost components of these pathways is the G protein α subunit, which is activated by means of GDP/GTP exchanges and interacts with downstream effectors [1,2,3]. In the model filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans, three Gα proteins, namely, FadA, GanA, and GanB, were identified [3]. FadA-mediated signaling pathways promote vegetative growth and inhibit conidiation and sterigmatocystin production via cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) [4,5,6]. The FadA-PKA signaling pathway is conserved in most Aspergillus, which control toxin synthesis and conidiation [4,7]. GanB forms a functional heterotrimer with SfaD (Gß) and GpgA (Gɤ) and is activated by the GDP/GTP exchange factor RicA [8]. GanB also positively regulates the germination of conidia and negatively controls asexual sporulation [9,10]. The activity of GanB-mediated signaling is negatively regulated by RgsA [11]. The GanB homologue of A. flavus GpaB function in conidiation, stress responses, toxin production, and virulence [12]. The function of GanA in A. nidulans is not yet characterized.
Like A. nidulans, three predicted Gα proteins, GpaA (Afu1g13140), GpaB (Afu1g12930), and GanA (Afu3g12400) have been identified in the A. fumigatus genome [13]. GpaA of A. fumigatus functions as the cognate Gα for FlbA (a regulator of G protein signaling, RGS) and activates vegetative growth while inhibiting asexual development. The dominant activating GpaAQ204L strain causes reduced conidiation and the dominant interfering GpaAG203R mutant restores conidiation [14]. GpaB is a member of the adenylate cyclase stimulating Gα proteins and regulates asexual sporulation via activation of cAMP synthesis. GpaB-PkaC1 signaling is involved in the activation of the PKA catalytic subunit PkaC1 and has been proposed to induce both hyphal growth and conidiation [15]. Unlike GpaA and GpaB, the role of GanA in A. fumigatus is not yet established.
In the present study, to elucidate the function of Gα subunits in A. fumigatus further, we generated corresponding deletion mutants and investigated the roles of Gα proteins on the growth, development, stress response, and toxin production via comparative analyses.

2. Results

2.1. Bioinformatic Summary of Gα Subunits

The ORFs of gpaA (Afu1g13140), gpaB (Afu1g12930), and ganA (Afu3g12400) encodes the protein lengths of 353, 356, and 359 amino acids, respectively in A. fumigatus AF293. Based on the protein sequences, three Gα subunits were aligned and compared (Figure 1A). GpaA shares 49.3% and 46.3% identity with GpaB and GanA, and GpaB shares 44.3% identity with GanA. The domain structures of the Gα subunits are very simple and contain only one Gα domain (340, 340, and 343 aa, E-value; 1.24e-221, 3.03e-193, and 2.98e-160) and one GTP-binding ADP ribosylation factor (Arf) domain inside of the Gα domain (170 to 285 aa, 175 to 286 aa, and 176 to 349 aa) (Figure 1B). To characterize the Gα subunits encoding genes, the mRNA levels of gpaA, gpaB, and ganA at different time points in the asexual development were examined, and found that gpaA and ganA mRNA was highly expressed both early (6 h) and later (48 h) developmental phase. The mRNA levels of gpaB was increased at the later developmental phase (Figure 1C).

2.2. Generation of Gα Subunit Null Mutants

A targeted gene replacement strategy was used to disrupt the Gα subunit encoding genes from the A. fumigatus AF293.1 (pyrG1) strain [16], with double-joint PCR (DJ-PCR) utilized [17] (Figure 2A). The deletion construct containing the A. nidulans selective marker (AnipyrG+) with the 5′ and 3′ franking regions of the Gα subunit encoding genes was introduced into the recipient strain AF293.1 [16]. AnipyrG+ was amplified from FGSC4 genomic DNA with the primer pair oligo 697/oligo 698. The transformants were isolated and confirmed by means of PCR (Figure 2B) and further confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion (Figure 2C). The oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table S1. We also generated relevant complemented strains and found that the cultural phenotypes were similar to those of wild type (WT) (Figure S1).

2.3. Gα Subunits Are Involved in Vegetative Growth and Germination

To observe the growth phenotypes of the mutant strains, we point inoculated conidia (1 × 105) of the WT and mutant strains on to MMG, MMY, and YG media, and incubated for three (MMY and YG media) or five days (for the MMG medium) at 37 °C. As shown in Figure 3A, the colony colors were generally differed depending on the mutant strain and culture medium used. Furthermore, while the radial growth rate of the ΔgpaA strain was increased in MMG medium, the growth rates of the ΔgpaB and ΔganA strains decreased significantly compared to that of WT in the MMG and MMY media (Figure 3B). To investigate the roles of the Gα subunits in controlling spore germination, we analyzed the kinetics of germination in the mutant strains in comparison to that of the WT strain. Excluding the ΔgpaB strain, the conidia of all strains began to germinate after 4 h of incubation, and nearly all conidia were germinated at 14 h. However, at 12 h, while approximately 95% of the ΔgpaA, ΔganA, and WT strains of conidia germinated, only 20% of the ΔgpaB mutant conidia germinated (Figure 3C), suggesting that GpaB positively regulates conidia germination and that the low germination rate affects the decreased mycelial growth. Germination rates of the ΔganA mutant conidia were higher than those of WT conidia at 6, 8, and 10 h of incubation, suggesting that GanA is required for proper conidial germination.

2.4. Gα Proteins Regulate Asexual Sporulation

After vegetative growth, A. fumigatus forms numerous asexual developmental structures including aerial hyphae, conidiophore, metulae, and phialides, which produce chains of conidia. To investigate the roles of Gα proteins in asexual sporulation (conidiation), we carried out quantitative analyses of conidia relative to the growth area on the MMG medium. Conidia production in the ΔgpaA mutant (7.95 × 107 conidia/cm2) was dramatically increased to a level that was nearly 1.5-fold that of the WT strain, whereas in the case of the ΔgpaB strain, the conidia number was significantly lower than in the WT strain (about 0.6-fold) (Figure 4A). We then analyzed the mRNA expression levels of key asexual developmental regulators (abaA and brlA) compared these results with those of the WT strain, finding that the losses of gpaA and gpaB showed opposite results. While the loss of gpaA resulted in significantly increased levels of the corresponding mRNA, the ΔgpaB strain exhibited significantly reduced levels of corresponding mRNA (Figure 4B). These results suggest that GpaA regulates the conidiation and expression of developmental regulators negatively and GpaB is necessary for both proper asexual development.

2.5. GpaB Regulates the Oxidative Stress Response

To test whether Gα proteins are associated with stress responses, the growth of the mutant strains was determined under a variety of stressors. The mutants exhibited no altered tolerance to the cell wall stressors Calcofluor white and Congo red (data not shown). In the treatment of oxidative stressors, the ΔgpaB mutant was significantly sensitive to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), growth was inhibited approximately 20% compared to an untreated control. However, the ΔgpaB mutant showed more tolerance against paraquat (PQ) (Figure 5A). To determine the potential contribution of GpaB to oxidative stress, we analyzed the activity of catalases and superoxide dismutases (SODs). Among three catalases, the activity of the conidia specific catalase CatA and mycelial catalase Cat2 were reduced by the loss of gpaB (Figure 5B). While the activity of cytoplasmic Cu/Zn SOD (SOD1) was increased in the ΔgpaB and ΔganA strain, the mitochondrial Mn SOD (SOD2) activity was reduced in the ΔgpaB strain (Figure 5C). These data indicate that GpaB plays a protective role against oxidative stress and it is exerted through CatA, Cat2, and SODs.

2.6. Gα Subunits Positively Govern Resistance to Membrane Targeting Antifungal Drugs

To investigate the involvement of Gα subunits in governing the response to membrane targeting antifungal drugs, we tested the susceptibility of WT and mutant strains to the azole class of antifungal drugs using E-Test strips. As shown in Figure 6, Itraconazole failed to inhibit all tested strains except the ΔgpaB strain. The mutant strains were more susceptible to Voriconazole than the WT strain. While the Voriconazole MIC was 1.0 µg/mL for the WT strain, the MICs for the ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains were 0.75, 0.25, and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively. The ΔgpaB strain was the most susceptible to azole antifungal drugs. These results suggesting that Gα proteins positively regulate resistance against membrane targeting azole drugs.

2.7. Gα Subunits Are Involved in Gliotoxin Production and Protection

Gliotoxin (GT) is the most important secondary metabolite and is regulated by G protein signaling. As Gα proteins are the main components in relation to G protein signaling, we examined the GT production of Gα protein encoding gene deletion mutants. The expression level of GT biosynthetic transcription factor gliZ mRNA was significantly lower in the ΔgpaB strain (0.17 to 0.33-fold) than in other mutant and WT strains (Figure 7A). Accordingly, we assessed the levels of GT itself in the indicated strains, finding that all mutants produced smaller amounts of GT (Figure 7B).

2.8. Gα Subunits Control Protein Kinase A (PKA) and Protein Kinase C (PKC) Activity

In the model fungus A. nidulans, G protein signaling pathways are involved in cAMP/PKA signaling pathway [3]. G proteins α subunits are known to regulate cAMP/PKA signaling pathway by regulated the adenylate cyclase activity. To determine whether Gα subunits are involved in cAMP/PKA signaling in A. fumigatus, the PKA activity was assessed using fluorescent kemptide (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) as a PKA substrate. In conidial extracts, all strains exhibited PKA activity regardless of presence of cAMP and ΔganA strain showed highest activity. The ΔgpaA and ΔgpaB strains exhibited very high PKA activity levels compared to that of the WT strain in the presence of cAMP. In contrast, the ΔganA strain showed almost negligible detectable PKA activity in mycelial preparations (Figure 8A). We also attempted to detect the effects of Gα subunits on PKC activity with PepTag Non-Radioactive PKC Assay Kit (Promega, USA). PKC activities were not detected in conidial preparation because PKC was localized in septa and cell wall of growing hyphae [18]. All strains tested presented PKC activity in mycelial extracts, and the highest level of activity was found in the ΔganA strain (Figure 8B). These results indicate that the G protein α subunit GanA likely plays a role in regulating PKA activity.

3. Discussion

The G protein signaling of Aspergillus functions during vegetative growth, asexual development, the stress response, and virulence in humans [1,2,3,19,20]. G protein α subunits play important roles as an upstream signal intermediator and regulate asexual sporulation and germination [9,13,15,21]. To elucidate more profound roles of Gα subunits, in this study we comparatively characterized the Gα subunits GpaA, GpaB, and GanA in A. fumigatus.
Previously, Mah and Yu generated the dominant activating (GpaAQ204L) or interfering (GpaAG203R) mutants and found that GpaA of A. fumigatus positively regulates vegetative growth but inhibits conidiation and functions as a primary target of FlbA [14]. Similar to the phenotypes of the dominant interfering (GpaAG203R) mutant strain, the ΔgpaA mutant strain exhibited increased conidia production (Figure 4A). In addition, we newly found that deletion of gpaA increased mRNA levels of central regulatory genes for conidiation including abaA and brlA, implying that the GpaA singling can repress asexual development via negative regulation of brlA. In A. nidulans, the FadA (GpaA homologue) repress conidia via PKA activity [22]. These results demonstrated that the role of GpaA signaling in conidiation is conserved in two Aspergilli.
Research has also suggested that GpaB appears to be involved in vegetative growth and conidiation via PkaC1 signaling [15]. Our study also found that the ΔgpaB strain similarly showed reduced vegetative growth and conidiation. Interestingly, the germination rate of the ΔgpaB mutant was significantly lower than those of other strains (Figure 3C), suggesting that the reduced radial growth may be due to the lower germination rate. Unlike our results, the phenotype of the ΔgpaB mutant in A. flavus is slightly different. The colony size of the ΔgpaB mutant was increased compared to that of WT and complemented strains [12], suggesting that the roles of GpaB may not be conserved in Aspergillus.
With regard to the fungi response against oxidative stresses by the enhanced expression of the SOD and catalase, the SOD activity was increased by the treatment of PQ and the catalase activity was enhanced by exogenous H2O2 [23]. Therefore, tolerance against oxidative stress was detected with the growth rate and activity of the SOD and catalase. The tolerance to oxidative stress was similar to those of all strains tested here except the ΔgpaB mutant. The ΔgpaB mutant displayed less growth under oxidative stress generated by 5 mM H2O2 and showed low activity of conidia specific catalase CatA and mycelial catalase Cat2, which may confer conidial tolerance against H2O2. Tolerance against another oxidative stressor, PQ, showed an opposite trend. The growth was increased at 0.4 mM PQ and the activity of cytoplasmic SOD1 was high in this condition due to the loss of gpaB (Figure 5). However, the activity of SOD2 (mitochondrial Mn SOD) was reduced. It has been reported that SOD2 plays a major role in the protection against high temperatures [24]. These data indicate that GpaB is involved in oxidative stress responses in this fungus.
In addition, we tested the growth and MIC of WT and mutant strains in the presence of azole antifungal agents and found that mutant strains were highly susceptible to azole class agents (Figure 6), indicating G protein α subunits play key roles in governing the resistance to azole drugs and a better understanding of downstream signaling pathways would open up new research avenues to the development of enhanced therapeutic measures for fungal infections.
In some Aspergillus species, the G protein signaling pathway plays an important role in secondary metabolism [3]. In A. nidulans, the G protein mediates cAMP signaling are required for sterigmatocystin biosynthesis [11]. In A. flavus, The Gα subunit GpaB is also essential for the biosynthesis of aflatoxins, and aflatoxin production was drastically inhibited by the loss gpaB [12]. Despite the small difference in the amounts, the Gα encoding gene deletion mutants of A. fumigatus produced less GT than the WT strain. The collection of these results proposes that Gα subunits are important components in the production of secondary metabolites.
The GpaA homologue of A. nidulans FadA is involved in the activation of cAMP dependent protein kinase A (cAMP/PKA) [10,25]. Deletion of the PKA catalytic subunit pkaA led to hyperactive conidiation with restricted vegetative growth, and the overexpression of pkaA caused reduced conidiation and enhanced vegetative growth [25]. GpaA of A. fumigatus paired with RGS FlbA and had a role in vegetative growth and asexual development. The dominant interfering gpaA mutant caused reduced hyphal growth and increased conidiation [14]. GpaB also participates in the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Deletion of gpaB results in reduced conidiation and decreased activation of adenylate cyclase [15]. To verify these findings, we detected the PKA and PKC activities of mutant and WT strains. Mycelial extracts of the ΔgpaA and ΔgpaB strains exhibited significant PKA activity only in the presence of cAMP (Figure 8A). This result suggests that PKA exists but is not activated in these mutant strains, likely due to the lack of significant amounts of cAMP and confirming that GpaA and GpaB are components of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. However, PKA activity was scarcely detected in the G protein α subunit mutant strain, ΔganA irrespective of cAMP (Figure 8A), indicating that PKA may be severely decreased by the absence of ganA. PKC activity was detected in the protein extracts of all mutant strains, and the highest level was detected in the ΔganA strain (Figure 8B). From this finding, we proposed that all G protein α subunits of A. fumigatus may be a component of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway and may possess the PKC signaling pathway as alternative backup pathway to compensate for PKA depletion. Understanding of GanA-mediated signaling and the PKC signaling that are associated with the development of A. fumigatus will require further investigation.
In conclusion, we characterized the role of genes encoding for Gα subunits in the human pathogen A. fumigatus. Our results demonstrated that the roles GpaA, GpaB, and GanA are slightly different, but play crucial roles in fungal growth, development, and secondary metabolism through the PKA or PKC signaling pathway. Additional experiments for dissecting the downstream effects of the G protein signaling pathway will be needed to understand how the Gα proteins play different roles in A. fumigatus.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains and Culture Conditions

Glucose minimal medium (MMG) and MMG with 0.1% yeast extract (MMY) were used for the culturing of wild type (WT, AF293) and Gα encoding gene null mutant strains [26,27]. The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. To examine the production of secondary metabolites, conidia of relevant strains were inoculated at a final concentration of 5 × 105 conidia/mL to 50 mL of liquid MMY and incubated at 250 rpm at 37 °C for four days.

4.2. Nucleic Acid Manipulation and Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) assays were conducted as previously described [14]. Briefly, conidia (5 × 105 conidia/mL) of the WT and mutant strains were inoculated into MMY medium and incubated at 37 °C for 3 days or 4 days (for gliZ). Individual colonies were then collected and squeeze-dried. Each sample was homogenized using a Mini Bead beater in the presence of the TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and silica/zirconium beads (BioSpec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA). QRT-PCR assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a Rotor-Gene Q device (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). For the qRT-PCR process, the One Step RT-PCR SYBR Mix (MGmed, Seoul, Korea) was used. The primers used in this experiment are listed in Table S1. The PCR conditions were 95℃ for 5 min followed by 95 and 55℃/30 s for 40 cycles. Amplification of one single specific target DNA was checked by a melting curve analysis. The expression ratios were normalized to the ef1α expression level and calculated according to the ΔΔCt method [29].

4.3. Phenotype Analyses

To examine the germination levels, conidia of the WT and mutant strains were inoculated in liquid MMY and incubated at 37 °C, and germ tube formation outcomes were examined every 2 h after inoculation under a microscope. For an oxidative stress test, hydrogen peroxide (5 mM) and paraquat (0.4 mM) were added to the MMY media. The effects of azole antifungal agents to the growth of WT and mutant strains were investigated with E-test strips (Biomérieux, Durham, NC, USA) impregnated with a gradient of Iitraconazole or Voriconazole. Conidial suspensions (1 × 104 conidia) were inoculated to solid medium and E-test strips placed on the plate. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) values were determined as the zone edge intersect the strips. The production of gliotoxin (GT) was determined, as described previously [30], and the GT standard was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

4.4. Measurements of Enzyme Activity

A freeze-dried sample was used for total protein extraction following a protocol previously described [31]. Catalase activity on gels was detected by the potassium ferricyanide reagent [32] and SOD activity was visualized by negative staining using nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the method of Beauchamp and Fridovich [33]. To measure the PKA and PKC activities, PepTag® Non-Radioactive cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Assay kit and PepTag® Non-Radioactive PKC Assay Kit (Promega, USA) were used.

4.5. Statistical Analyses

Comparisons of mRNA expressions, radial growth, and viability within the different strains were performed by one-way ANOVA and adjusted with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. All results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The experiments were performed with three replicates for the indicated strain and were repeated three times.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/4/272/s1, Figure S1: Colony morphologies of WT, mutant, and complemented strains, Table S1: The oligonucleotides used to in this study.

Author Contributions

K.-S.S. conceived of and supervised the study; K.-S.S. and S.-S.K. designed the experiments; Y.-H.C., N.-Y.L., S.-S.K., and K.-S.S. performed the experiments; K.-S.S. and S.-S.K. analyzed the data; Y.-H.C., S.-S.K., H.-S.P., and K.-S.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5C2A03082827).

Acknowledgments

We thank all of our lab members for the helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Morris, A.J.; Malbon, C.C. Physiological regulation of G protein-linked signaling. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 1373–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McCudden, C.R.; Hains, M.D.; Kimple, R.J.; Siderovski, D.P.; Willard, F.S. G-protein signaling: Back to the future. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 551–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yu, J.H. Heterotrimeric G protein signaling and RGSs in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Hicks, J.K.; Yu, J.H.; Keller, N.P.; Adams, T.H. Aspergillus sporulation and mycotoxin production both require inactivation of the FadA Gɑ protein-dependent signaling pathway. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 4916–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yu, J.H.; Keller, N. Regulation of secondary metabolism in filamentous fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 437–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, J.H.; Wieser, J.; Adams, T.H. The Aspergillus FlbA RGS domain protein antagonizes G protein signaling to block proliferation and allow development. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 5184–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roze, L.V.; Beaudry, R.M.; Keller, N.P.; Linz, J.E. Regulation of aflatoxin synthesis by FadA/cAMP/protein kinase A signaling in Aspergillus parasiticus. Mycopathologia 2004, 158, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kwon, N.J.; Park, H.S.; Jung, S.; Kim, S.C.; Yu, J.H. The putative guanine nucleotide exchange factor RicA mediates upstream signaling for growth and development in Aspergillus. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1399–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chang, M.H.; Chae, K.S.; Han, D.M.; Jahng, K.Y. The GanB Gɑ-protein negatively regulates asexual sporulation and plays a positive role in conidial germination in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 2004, 167, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lafon, A.; Seo, J.A.; Han, K.H.; Yu, J.H.; d’Enfert, C. The heterotrimeric G-protein GanB(ɑ)-SfaD(ß)-GpgA(ɤ) is a carbon source sensor involved in early cAMP-dependent germination in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 2005, 171, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Han, K.H.; Seo, J.A.; Yu, J.H. Regulators of G-protein signalling in Aspergillus nidulans: RgsA downregulates stress response and stimulates asexual sporulation through attenuation of GanB (Gɑ) signalling. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 53, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Yang, K.; Qin, Q.; Lin, G.; Hu, T.; Xu, Z.; Wang, S. G Protein ɑ Subunit GpaB is Required for Asexual Development, Aflatoxin Biosynthesis and Pathogenicity by Regulating cAMP Signaling in Aspergillus flavus. Toxins (Basel) 2018, 10, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liebmann, B.; Gattung, S.; Jahn, B.; Brakhage, A.A. cAMP signaling in Aspergillus fumigatus is involved in the regulation of the virulence gene pksP and in defense against killing by macrophages. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2003, 269, 420–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mah, J.H.; Yu, J.H. Upstream and downstream regulation of asexual development in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liebmann, B.; Muller, M.; Braun, A.; Brakhage, A.A. The cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase a network regulates development and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 5193–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Xue, T.; Nguyen, C.K.; Romans, A.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; May, G.S. Isogenic auxotrophic mutant strains in the Aspergillus fumigatus genome reference strain AF293. Arch. Microbiol. 2004, 182, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yu, J.H.; Hamari, Z.; Han, K.H.; Seo, J.A.; Reyes-Dominguez, Y.; Scazzocchio, C. Double-joint PCR: A PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2004, 41, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Teepe, A.G.; Loprete, D.M.; He, Z.; Hoggard, T.A.; Hill, T.W. The protein kinase C orthologue PkcA plays a role in cell wall integrity and polarized growth in Aspergillus nidulans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2007, 44, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neves, S.R.; Ram, P.T.; Iyengar, R. G protein pathways. Science 2002, 296, 1636–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xue, C.; Hsueh, Y.P.; Heitman, J. Magnificent seven: Roles of G protein-coupled receptors in extracellular sensing in fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 1010–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shin, K.S.; Yu, J.H. Expression and Activity of Catalases Is Differentially Affected by GpaA (Gɑ) and FlbA (Regulator of G Protein Signaling) in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mycobiology 2013, 41, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yu, J.H.; Mah, J.H.; Seo, J.A. Growth and developmental control in the model and pathogenic aspergilli. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Angelova, M.B.; Pashova, S.B.; Spasova, B.K.; Vassilev, S.V.; Slokoska, L.S. Oxidative stress response of filamentous fungi induced by hydrogen peroxide and paraquat. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Narasipura, S.D.; Chaturvedi, V.; Chaturvedi, S. Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii SOD2 reveals distinct roles of the two superoxide dismutases in fungal biology and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1782–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shimizu, K.; Keller, N.P. Genetic involvement of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase in a G protein signaling pathway regulating morphological and chemical transitions in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics 2001, 157, 591–600. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kafer, E. Meiotic and mitotic recombination in Aspergillus and its chromosomal aberrations. Adv. Genet. 1977, 19, 33–131. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pontecorvo, G.; Roper, J.A.; Hemmons, L.M.; Macdonald, K.D.; Bufton, A.W. The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans. Adv. Genet. 1953, 5, 141–238. [Google Scholar]
  28. Brookman, J.L.; Denning, D.W. Molecular genetics in Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2000, 3, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bok, J.W.; Keller, N.P. LaeA, a regulator of secondary metabolism in Aspergillus spp. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jung, M.G.; Kim, S.S.; Yu, J.H.; Shin, K.S. Characterization of gprK Encoding a Putative Hybrid G-Protein-Coupled Receptor in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wayne, L.G.; Diaz, G.A. A double staining method for differentiating between two classes of mycobacterial catalase in polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels. Anal. Biochem. 1986, 157, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Beauchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Summary of Gα proteins in A. fumigatus. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of GpaA, GpaB, and GanA proteins using MUSCLE (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/). (B) Predicted A. fumigatus Gα proteins are presented schematically using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de). Green; ADP ribosylation factor (Arf) domain. (C) The mRNA levels of gpaA, gpaB, and ganA throughout the asexual development of wild type (WT).
Figure 1. Summary of Gα proteins in A. fumigatus. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of GpaA, GpaB, and GanA proteins using MUSCLE (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/). (B) Predicted A. fumigatus Gα proteins are presented schematically using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de). Green; ADP ribosylation factor (Arf) domain. (C) The mRNA levels of gpaA, gpaB, and ganA throughout the asexual development of wild type (WT).
Pathogens 09 00272 g001
Figure 2. Verification of ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA. (A) Schematic illustration of the gpaA, gpaB, and ganA regions and restriction maps of WT and mutant strains. (B) PCR amplicons for the three strains compared to that of WT. Lane M, molecular weight marker. (C) The KpnI (for ΔgpaA and ΔganA) and XhoI (for ΔgpaB) digestion patterns of individual amplicons. While the mutant amplicons are cut into two fragments, the WT amplicon remains uncut.
Figure 2. Verification of ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA. (A) Schematic illustration of the gpaA, gpaB, and ganA regions and restriction maps of WT and mutant strains. (B) PCR amplicons for the three strains compared to that of WT. Lane M, molecular weight marker. (C) The KpnI (for ΔgpaA and ΔganA) and XhoI (for ΔgpaB) digestion patterns of individual amplicons. While the mutant amplicons are cut into two fragments, the WT amplicon remains uncut.
Pathogens 09 00272 g002
Figure 3. The mutants showed altered vegetative growth and germination. (A) Colony photographs of WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains inoculated on solid MMG (for five days), MMY, and Yeast extract-Glucose (YG) media grown for three days. (B) Radial growth rates of WT and three mutant strains. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (C) Kinetics of germ tube outgrowth in WT and mutant strains when inoculated in MMY at 37 °C.
Figure 3. The mutants showed altered vegetative growth and germination. (A) Colony photographs of WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains inoculated on solid MMG (for five days), MMY, and Yeast extract-Glucose (YG) media grown for three days. (B) Radial growth rates of WT and three mutant strains. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (C) Kinetics of germ tube outgrowth in WT and mutant strains when inoculated in MMY at 37 °C.
Pathogens 09 00272 g003
Figure 4. Regulation of asexual development by Gα proteins. (A) Conidia numbers produced by WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains relative to the corresponding growth area (cm2). (B) Transcript levels of the asexual developmental regulator genes in mutant strains compared to WT as determined by quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR). The mRNA levels were normalized using the ef1α gene, according to the ΔΔCt method. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA test: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Regulation of asexual development by Gα proteins. (A) Conidia numbers produced by WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains relative to the corresponding growth area (cm2). (B) Transcript levels of the asexual developmental regulator genes in mutant strains compared to WT as determined by quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR). The mRNA levels were normalized using the ef1α gene, according to the ΔΔCt method. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA test: ** p < 0.01.
Pathogens 09 00272 g004
Figure 5. Oxidative stress responses as mediated by Gα proteins. (A) Radial growth of the WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains in the presence of the oxidative stressors H2O2 (5 mM) and paraquat (PQ, 0.4 mM) following incubation at 37 °C for 48 h. (B) Catalase and (C) SOD activities of WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains shown in non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels.
Figure 5. Oxidative stress responses as mediated by Gα proteins. (A) Radial growth of the WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains in the presence of the oxidative stressors H2O2 (5 mM) and paraquat (PQ, 0.4 mM) following incubation at 37 °C for 48 h. (B) Catalase and (C) SOD activities of WT, ΔgpaA, ΔgpaB, and ΔganA strains shown in non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels.
Pathogens 09 00272 g005
Figure 6. Deletion of Gα proteins reduce resistance against azole antifungal drugs. The effects of azole antifungal agents on the growth of WT and mutant strains were investigated with E-test strips. MIC values were presented as yellow.
Figure 6. Deletion of Gα proteins reduce resistance against azole antifungal drugs. The effects of azole antifungal agents on the growth of WT and mutant strains were investigated with E-test strips. MIC values were presented as yellow.
Pathogens 09 00272 g006
Figure 7. The roles of Gα proteins in gliotoxin (GT) production and protection. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of gliZ gene in mutant strains compared to WT. (B) Determination of GT production in WT and mutant strains. The culture supernatant of each strain was extracted with chloroform and subjected to TLC. Statistical differences were evaluated with ANOVA tests. ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. The roles of Gα proteins in gliotoxin (GT) production and protection. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of gliZ gene in mutant strains compared to WT. (B) Determination of GT production in WT and mutant strains. The culture supernatant of each strain was extracted with chloroform and subjected to TLC. Statistical differences were evaluated with ANOVA tests. ** p < 0.01.
Pathogens 09 00272 g007
Figure 8. Gα proteins regulate protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC) activity. (A) PKA activity levels of four strains as monitored by gel electrophoresis. (B) PKC activity of WT and mutant strains. A phosphorylated substrate migrates toward the anode (+). Conidial and mycelial extracts were analyzed.
Figure 8. Gα proteins regulate protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase C (PKC) activity. (A) PKA activity levels of four strains as monitored by gel electrophoresis. (B) PKC activity of WT and mutant strains. A phosphorylated substrate migrates toward the anode (+). Conidial and mycelial extracts were analyzed.
Pathogens 09 00272 g008
Table 1. A. fumigatus strains used in this study.
Table 1. A. fumigatus strains used in this study.
StrainGenotypeReference
A. nidulans FGSC4veA+ (Wild type)FGSC a
AF293Wild type[28]
AF293.1pyrG1[16]
ΔgpaApyrG1 ΔgpaA::AnipyrG+This study
ΔgpaBpyrG1 ΔgpaB::AnipyrG+This study
ΔganApyrG1 ΔganA::AnipyrG+This study
a FGSC, Fungal Genetics Stock Center.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, Y.-H.; Lee, N.-Y.; Kim, S.-S.; Park, H.-S.; Shin, K.-S. Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens 2020, 9, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040272

AMA Style

Choi Y-H, Lee N-Y, Kim S-S, Park H-S, Shin K-S. Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens. 2020; 9(4):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Yong-Ho, Na-Young Lee, Sung-Su Kim, Hee-Soo Park, and Kwang-Soo Shin. 2020. "Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus" Pathogens 9, no. 4: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040272

APA Style

Choi, Y. -H., Lee, N. -Y., Kim, S. -S., Park, H. -S., & Shin, K. -S. (2020). Comparative Characterization of G Protein α Subunits in Aspergillus fumigatus. Pathogens, 9(4), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9040272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop