Next Article in Journal
Genotyping, Assessment of Virulence and Antibacterial Resistance of the Rostov Strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Attributed to the Central Asia Outbreak Clade
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Alternatives for Continuous In Vitro Culture of Babesia bigemina in Medium Free of Components of Animal Origin
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Sequence Polymorphism of Two Genes Encoding Theileria parva Antigens Recognized by CD8+ T Cells among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Cattle in Malawi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Haemoproteus spp. and Leucocytozoon californicus Coinfection in a Merlin (Falco colombarius)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiologic Survey on Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis Infection in Corvids from Central Italy

by
Francesca Mancianti
1,
Giuliana Terracciano
2,
Camilla Sorichetti
1,
Giuseppe Vecchio
3,
Daniele Scarselli
3 and
Stefania Perrucci
1,*
1
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Viale delle Piagge n. 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana-Sezione di Pisa, Strada Statale Dell’Abetone e del Brennero, n. 4, 56123 Pisa, Italy
3
Studio Agrofauna, Via dell’Artigianato n. 53/55, 57121 Livorno, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(5), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050336
Submission received: 16 March 2020 / Revised: 25 April 2020 / Accepted: 28 April 2020 / Published: 30 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Parasitic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Free-ranging corvids—678 magpies (Pica pica) and 120 hooded crows (Corvus cornix) from nine protected areas of the Pisa province (central Italy)—were examined for Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis. The intracardiac blood clots from 651 magpies and 120 hooded crows were serologically examined for T. gondii. The DNA extracted from the hearts of seropositive birds was then used to perform a nested PCR for the amplification of the T. gondii B1 gene and for genotyping for SAG genetic markers. Breast muscle samples from 678 magpies and 91 hooded crows were tested by an artificial digestion method for Trichinella. Data were statistically analyzed. Forty-five (5.8%—41 magpies and four hooded crows) out of the 771 examined animals scored seropositive for T. gondii, with titers ranging from 1:25 to 1:100. T. gondii DNA was detected in 15 of the 45 positive birds and T. gondii genotypes II and III were identified. No positivity for T. pseudospiralis was found. No significant differences between the two species of corvids and among the different areas of origin were observed for seropositivity to T. gondii. This is the first extensive study on both T. gondii and T. pseudospiralis in magpies and hooded crows, as well as the first detection of T. gondii SAG genotypes in magpies.

1. Introduction

Magpies (Pica pica) and hooded crows (Corvus cornix) are sedentary birds with a scavenger behavior, feeding on carcasses, arthropods, vegetables, small prey and food waste [1]. Due to their feeding habits, these avian species may become infected by zoonotic parasites transmitted by the ingestion of oocysts and/or tissue infective stages, thus potentially contributing to the spread of these parasites and an increased risk of human infection [2,3].
Among zoonotic parasites, Toxoplasma gondii is an Apicomplexan species with felids as both definitive and intermediate hosts, whilst warm-blooded vertebrates, including birds, are intermediate hosts. Infection takes place by the ingestion of tissue cysts or of mature oocysts, shed by final hosts and sporulated in the environment. T. gondii has a cosmopolitan distribution and represents one of the most common human parasites [4,5]. In previous studies performed by molecular and/or serological analysis, different avian species have been found to be infected by T. gondii worldwide [6,7,8,9,10,11], with high prevalence values often observed in raptors and scavenger birds [1,7,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, data about T. gondii infections in corvids from European countries are scarce, being referred to in only two studies carried out in Spain [6,18].
Trichinella is a nematode genus whose adults live in the small intestine, while the infective larvae localize in the striated muscle of the same individual. Infection occurs following the ingestion of muscle larvae of infected hosts [19]. The genus Trichinella is a complex of at least 13 genotypes and can be divided into two clades: a clade consisting of “encapsulated” species/genotypes (including the species Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella britovi, Trichinella nativa, Trichinella murrelli, Trichinella nelsoni, Trichinella patagoniensis, Trichinella chanchalensis and the Trichinella genotypes T6, T8 and T9) and a “non-encapsulated” clade consisting of three species (Trichinella papuae, Trichinella zimbabwensis, and Trichinella pseudospiralis) [20,21].
All species of this genus can infect mammals, including humans, while only a few of them can infect birds or reptiles [20]. T. pseudospiralis is the only species capable of infecting both mammals and birds. It has a broad distribution area in Europe [22], and it is present in Italy, where it has been reported in wild mammals, humans and birds [23]. A role of birds in the spreading and maintenance of this species in nature has been suggested [23]. T. pseudospiralis-infected corvids could be eaten by other animals, such as rodents, which in turn can be consumed by wild boars or foxes. In this way, infected corvids may contribute to increasing the risk of human infections.
T. pseudospiralis infection has never been reported in European corvids, but it has been found in two specimens of Corvus frugilegus in Kazakhstan, Asia [2,23,24].
The present survey aimed to assess the occurrence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and of T. gondii DNA, perform a molecular genotyping, and assess the occurrence of T. pseudospiralis larvae in muscles, in magpies and in hooded crows living in faunistic areas of central Italy.

2. Results

Forty-five (41 magpies and 4 hooded crows) out of the 771 examined animals (5.8%) were found positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies, with titers ranging from 1:25 to 1:100. In detail, 3.3% (4/120) of the hooded crows and 6.3% (41/651) of the magpies scored positive. T. gondii DNA was detected in 15 out of the 45 positive specimens (2.3%). DNA was only successfully amplified in samples collected from magpies. The genotyping yielded eight genotypes II and seven genotypes III.
No statistically significant difference for seropositivity to T. gondii between the two species of corvids, neither among the different areas of origin, was found.
All birds examined for T. pseudospiralis were found negative.

3. Discussion

Hooded crows (C. cornix) and magpies (P. pica) are considered the most common corvid species in central Italy [25]. These animals are very versatile and opportunistic in finding food sources, and the feeding behavior of magpies is very similar to that of hooded crows, except for a few slight differences. In fact, feeding on a wide range of animals and vegetable foods, both animals are omnivorous [25]. Moreover, frequently feeding on carrions and food waste, they are both considered “scavenger” birds [1,25]. However, both these bird species may also feed on animals they hunt [26,27,28,29]. This feeding behavior has allowed a remarkable numerical expansion of populations of both these birds in Italy [30]. As a consequence, hooded crows and magpies are considered problematic species in Italy and other countries because of the damage they may cause to agricultural crops and because of the predation of passerine and galliform nests of hunting interest [25,31]. The feeding habits of these avian species slightly differ, with magpies being more able to consume greater quantities of insects than hooded crows. In addition, differently from hooded crows, magpies do not show differences in feeding habits according to the season [25]. Hooded crows, in fact, prefer feeding mainly on plants in the autumn–winter season, while in spring–summer their diet is mainly based on hunted animals or the remains of dead animals [25]. Finally, although magpies have a nesting attitude near human buildings or streets, hooded crows avoid nesting on trees near human settlements [29]. However, all the animals examined in this study lived in protected areas for faunistic restoration in the Province of Pisa, where human activities and settlements are strictly limited.
Toxoplasmosis is the most diffused parasitic zoonosis and a significant cause of health problems in humans worldwide [4,32,33]. Positive corvids are considered a potential source of T. gondii infection for other wild and domestic animals, including cats [32], thereby contributing to the transmission and the spread of the disease, and to an increased risk of human infection [33].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first survey on T. gondii in corvids from Italy and the only European extensive study assessing T. gondii infection in these avian species, carried out by both serology and PCR.
The One Health approach recently suggested for this zoonotic infection recommends the monitoring of T. gondii prevalence by integrating human, domestic animals and wildlife data in the same area [4]. In northwest Tuscany, the seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in human populations has been investigated in a large sample of persons, resulting in an overall prevalence of 21.4% and, more specifically, of 19.4% in women of reproductive age [34,35]. Moreover, T. gondii infection has been previously reported with variable prevalence values in other wild animal species living in the same protected areas in the Province of Pisa, such as red foxes (53.4%), waterfowls (8.7%) and hares (0.9%) [10,36,37].
Despite corvids being included among potential sentinel animals for assessing the spread of T. gondii [1,6,25], the examined corvid population showed a low occurrence of toxoplasmic infection.
Similar studies in Europe, made on a smaller number of corvid specimens, have shown high seroprevalence rates (80.5%) in Corvus corax from Spain [18], while five out of 33 magpies were found positive for PCR [6]. Several crows (Corvus spp.) from Israel were found to be infected, with an overall seropositivity of 42.6% and the identification of the T. gondii genotype II from a seropositive animal [1]. Lastly, in a recent paper, a PCR prevalence of 16.36% was registered in nine out of 55 brain samples of hooded crows from public parks in Tehran, identifying the genotype III [38].
Along with corvid feeding behavior and sedentary habit, the main risk factors associated with high T. gondii seroprevalence in these birds include the age, the population density, the season and the density of human and feline populations in the area [1,8,32,33,39]. The low prevalence rates found in corvids examined in this study may be linked mainly to this latter factor, as all the carcasses examined here came from protected areas for faunistic restoration, where human activities and the presence of T. gondii final hosts are strictly limited.
In a previous investigation, the use of both heart and brain tissues was proven to enhance the sensitivity of testing for T. gondii DNA [11]. Therefore, although heart tissue is considered a more sensitive tissue in respect to brain tissue in chickens [5,7,11,40,41], the PCR prevalence rates recovered in the present study are probably underestimated, because only cardiac samples could be examined.
The identification of both SAG genotypes II and III appears in agreement with previous studies on similar avian species [1,38].
Although a role of birds in the spread of T. pseudospiralis has been suggested [23], a lack of parasitological evidence for T. pseudospiralis infection was observed in the examined corvids. These results agree with the findings of previous studies performed in several European countries, including Italy, Slovakia and Romania, which reported a negative result for all the examined birds of prey and corvids, magpies and crows included [42,43,44,45].
In Europe, T. pseudospiralis was found in different species of wild animals, such as birds of prey, wild boars, raccoons and red foxes, and was also reported in domestic pigs and rats [2,20,45,46,47,48]. Nevertheless, it is less common than encapsulated species and more common in mammals than in birds [20,23,24,48].
Although these latter findings can be related to the limited number of studies conducted on birds compared to studies concerning mammals [38,41], a lower risk of infection in birds rather than in mammals has also been suggested [20,23,38]. Moreover, according to Pozio [23], the role of birds in the epidemiology of T. pseudospiralis still needs to be elucidated. As mentioned, among corvids, T. pseudospiralis had previously been reported in only two specimens of Corvus frugilegus out of 732 examined corvids in Kazakhstan, Asia [2].
In Italy, T. pseudospiralis has been recently identified as the species responsible for some episodes of human infections, probably caused by the consumption of infected wild boar meat [http://www.ispalim.unina.it/Trichinella%20Pozio.pdf]. In birds from Italy, T. pseudospiralis has been reported only in nocturnal raptors in central Italy [49]. Despite the very low prevalence (1%), this finding may suggest that T. pseudospiralis could be endemic in this geographical area [49]. In addition, T. pseudospiralis has recently been reported in red foxes and wild boars in central Italy, and in some neighboring regions of northern Italy, such as Emilia Romagna and Liguria ([45], Deni personal communication).

4. Materials and Methods

A total of 798 wild corvids—678 magpies (P. pica) and 120 hooded crows (C. cornix)—of both sexes, provided by rangers of the Province of Pisa during the period December 2012–July 2013 and hunted in nine different areas for faunistic restoration located in eight different municipalities of the Province of Pisa (43°42’42”48 N, 10°24’52”92 E, Tuscany, central Italy) (Table 1), were examined. In these protected areas, human settlements and activities, as well as the presence of T. gondii final hosts, are strictly restricted.
Blood samples from 771 deceased animals (651 magpies and 120 crows) were collected from the heart or body cavities to determine the prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma antibodies. Serum samples were examined by modified agglutination test (MAT) using Toxoscreen DA®, (Biomérieux, Lyon, France), starting from a 1/25 dilution as reported by Molina Lopes et al. [18].
Portions of myocardial tissue (about 10 g) and blood samples from seropositive subjects were selected, homogenized and used to perform PCR analysis for Toxoplasma DNA using the QIAamp® DNA minikit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
PCR for the amplification of the B1 gene was performed as reported by Jones et al. [50]. The genotypes were characterized by using five genetic markers (SAG1, 3′-SAG2, 5′-SAG2, alt. SAG2, SAG3) as described by Su et al. [51], modified.
The artificial digestion technique was the elective method for the diagnosis of Trichinella spp. in infected animals [42], with the pectoral, head and neck muscles considered as the more sensitive samples in birds [23,24,42,49,52]. In this study, breast muscle samples (5 g each) from 678 magpies and 91 hooded crows were tested by artificial digestion following the method reported by the European Commission Regulation 2075/2005 [52] for the search of T. pseudospiralis larvae. After digestion, the larvae that were eventually recovered from the muscle were processed for molecular typing [20,21,22,23].
The differences in the prevalence of T. gondii in the two corvid species and in the nine different areas of the Pisa province examined in this study were statistically analyzed using the statistical package SPSS Advanced Statistics 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The A χ2 test with the Yates correction was chosen as the reference test. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

This is the first extensive study aiming to evaluate the occurrence of both T. gondii and T. pseudospiralis in magpies and hooded crows, as well as the first report on the detection of T. gondii SAG genotypes in magpies. Although the feeding habits of the examined avian species would predispose them to toxoplasmic infection, the prevalence rates found were quite low. Despite the documented presence of T. pseudospiralis in wild animals from Tuscany and some neighboring regions, especially in wild boars and foxes, the results obtained in this study seem to indicate that in the examined areas, corvids do not harbor T. pseudospiralis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P. and F.M.; formal analysis and investigation, S.P., G.T., C.S., F.M., G.V., D.S.; resources, S.P., G.T., F.M., G.V., D.S.; data curation, S.P., G.T., C.S., F.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P., F.M.; writing—review and editing, S.P., G.T., C.S., F.M., G.V., D.S.; supervision, S.P. and F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Simonetta Stefanelli for her invaluable technical support and Lisa Guardone for her kind help in revising the English language.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salant, H.; Hamburger, J.; King, R.; Baneth, G. Toxoplasma gondii prevalence in Israeli crows and griffon vultures. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 191, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shakeinov, B. Spontaneous infection of birds with Trichinella pseudospisralis, Garkavi 1972. Folia Parasitol. 1980, 27, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  3. Waap, H.; Cardoso, R.; Leitão, A.; Nunesc, T.; Vilares, A.; Argaté, M.J.; Meireles, J.; Cortese, H.; Ângelo, H. In vitro isolation and seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in stray cats and pigeons in Lisbon, Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aguirre, A.A.; Longcore, T.; Barbieri, M.; Dabritz, H.; Hill, D.; Klein, P.N.; Lepczyk, C.; Lilly, E.L.; McLeod, R.; Milcarsky, J.; et al. The One Health Approach to Toxoplasmosis: Epidemiology, Control, and Prevention Strategies. Ecohealth 2019, 16, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Dubey, J.P.; Beattie, C.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Man; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1988; pp. 1–220. [Google Scholar]
  6. Darwich, L.; Cabezon, O.; Echeverria, I.; Pabon, M.; Marco, I.; Molina-Lopez, R.; Alarcia-Alejos, O.; López-Gatius, F.; Lavín, S.; Almería, S. Presence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum DNA in the brain of wild birds. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 183, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dubey, J.P. A review of toxoplasmosis in wild birds. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 106, 121–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cabezon, O.; Garcıa-Bocanegra, I.; Molina-Lopez, R.; Marco, I.; Blanco, J.M.; Höfle, U.; Margalida, A.; Bach-Raich, E.; Darwich, L.; Echeverría, I.; et al. Seropositivity and risk factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild birds from Spain. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cabezón, O.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M.; Morera, V.; García-Bocanegra, I.; González-Solís, J.; Napp, S.; Ribas, M.P.; Blanch-Lázaro, B.; Fernández-Aguilar, X.; Antilles, N.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in seagull chicks is related to the consumption of freshwater food resources. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mancianti, F.; Nardoni, S.; Mugnaini, L.; Poli, A. Toxoplasma gondii in waterfowl: The first detection of this parasite in Anas crecca and Anas clypeata from Italy. J. Parasitol. 2013, 99, 561–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nardoni, S.; Rocchigiani, G.; Varvaro, I.; Altomonte, I.; Ceccherelli, R.; Mancianti, F. Serological and molecular investigation on Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild birds. Pathogens 2019, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Aubert, D.; Terrier, M.E.; Dumetre, A.; Barrat, J.; Villena, I. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in raptors from France. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 172–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lopes, A.P.; Sargo, R.; Rodrigues, M.; Cardoso, L. High seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in wild animals from Portugal. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Straub, M.H.; Kelly, T.R.; Rideout, B.A.; Eng, C.; Wynne, J.; Braun, J.; Johnson, C.K. Seroepidemiologic survey of potential pathogens in obligate and facultative scavenging avian species in California. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Love, D.; Kwok, O.C.; Verma, S.K.; Dubey, J.P.; Bellah, J. Antibody prevalence and isolation of viable Toxoplasma gondii from raptors in the southeastern USA. J. Wildl. Dis. 2016, 52, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mirza, V.; Burrows, E.B.; Gils, S.; Hunter, S.; Gartrell, B.D.; Howe, L. A retrospective survey into the presence of Plasmodium spp. and Toxoplasma gondii in archived tissue samples from New Zealand raptors: New Zealand falcons (Falco novaeseelandiae), Australasian harriers (Circus approximans) and moreporks (Ninox novaeseelandiae). Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 2283–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gazzonis, A.L.; Zanzani, S.A.; Santoro, A.; Veronesi, F.; Olivieri, E.; Villa, L.; Lubian, E.; Lovati, S.; Bottura, F.; Epis, S.; et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in raptors from Italy: Seroepidemiology and risk factors analysis. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 60, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Molina-López, R.; Cabezón, O.; Pabón, M.; Darwich, L.; Obón, E.; Lopez-Gatius, F.; Dubey, J.P.; Almería, S. High seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in the Common raven (Corvus corax) in the Northeast of Spain. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012, 93, 300–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gottstein, B.; Pozio, E.; Nockler, K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Korhonen, P.K.; Pozio, E.; La Rosa, G.; Chang, B.C.H.; Koehler, A.V.; Hoberg, E.P.; Boag, P.R.; Tan, P.; Jex, A.R.; Hofmann, A.; et al. Phylogenomic and biogeographic reconstruction of the Trichinella complex. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sharma, R.; Thompson, P.C.; Hoberg, E.P.; Scandrett, W.B.; Konecsni, K.; Harms, N.J.; Kukka, P.M.; Jung, T.S.; Elkin, B.; Mulders, R.; et al. Hiding in plain sight: Discovery and phylogeography of a cryptic species of Trichinella (Nematoda: Trichinellidae) in wolverine (Gulo gulo). Int. J. Parasitol. 2020, 50, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zamora, M.J.; Alvarez, M.; Olmedo, J.; Blanco, M.C.; Pozio, E. Trichinella pseudospiralis in the Iberian peninsula. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 210, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pozio, E. Trichinella pseudospiralis an elusive nematode. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 231, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pozio, E. The broad spectrum of Trichinella hosts: From cold- to warm-blooded animals. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 132, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rolando, A. I Corvidi Italiani; Edagricole: Bologna, Italy, 1995; p. 142. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hochachka, W.M.; Scharf, C.S. Black-billed magpie, Pica pica, predation on bats. Can. Field Nat. 1986, 100, 121–122. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pacenovský, S. Attack of the black-billed magpie (Pica pica) on the noctule bat (Nyctalus noctula). Vespertilio 2006, 9–10, 231–232. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mikula, P.; Morelli, F.; Lučan, R.K.; Jones, D.N.; Tryjanowski, P. Bats as prey of diurnal birds: A global perspective. Mammal Rev. 2016, 46, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boxall, P.C. Further observations of predation by black-billed magpies on small mammals. J. Field Ornithol. 1982, 53, 172–173. [Google Scholar]
  30. Politi, P.; Giacchini, P.; Petretti, F. Selezione dell’habitat e interazione di gazza Pica pica, cornacchia grigia Corvus cornix e taccola Corvus monedula nel territorio del parco naturale del Monte Conero (AN). ALULA VIII 2001, 1–2, 52–62. Available online: http://www.hystrix.it/download/1-GEST_FAUNA/pdf%20pubblicazioni/1-pdf%20pubblic_scient/37-Politi%20etal-Alula%208%2052-62,2001.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2020).
  31. Fähndrich, S.; Vogler, U. Ridurre i danni dei corvi in orticoltura. Extension Orticoltura 2010, 6, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  32. Afonso, E.; Lemoine, M.; Poulle, M.L.; Ravata, M.C.; Romand, S.; Thulliez, P.; Villena, I.; Aubert, D.; Rabilloud, M.; Riche, B.; et al. Spatial distribution of soil contamination by Toxoplasma gondii in relation to cat defecation behaviour in an urban area. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Thompson, R.C. Parasite zoonoses and wildlife: One Health, spillover and human activity. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pinto, B.; Castagna, B.; Mattei, R.; Bruzzi, R.; Chiumiento, L.; Cristofani, R.; Buffolano, W.; Bruschi, F. Seroprevalence for toxoplasmosis in individuals living in north west Tuscany: Access to Toxo-test in central Italy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 31, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pinto, B.; Mattei, R.; Moscato, G.A.; Cristofano, M.; Giraldi, M.; Scarpato, R.; Buffolano, W.; Bruschi, F. Toxoplasma infection in individuals in central Italy: Does a gender-linked risk exist? Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Verin, R.; Mugnaini, L.; Nardoni, S.; Papini, R.A.; Ariti, G.; Poli, A.; Mancianti, F. Serologic, molecular, and pathologic survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in free-ranging red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in central Italy. J. Wildl. Dis. 2013, 49, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ebani, V.V.; Poli, A.; Rocchigiani, G.; Bertelloni, F.; Nardoni, S.; Papini, R.A.; Mancianti, F. Serological survey on some pathogens in wild brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in Central Italy. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 9, 465–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Abdoli, A.; Arbabi, M.; Pirestani, M.; Mirzaghavami, M.; Ghaffarifar, F.; Dalimi, A.; Sadraei, J. Molecular assessment of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in hooded crows (Corvus cornix) in Tehran, Iran. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 57, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Du, F.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Q.; Hu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, J. Soil contamination of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in pig farms in central China. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Dubey, J.P.; Levy, M.Z.; Sreekumar, C.; Kwok, O.C.; Shen, S.K.; Dahl, E.; Thulliez, P.; Lehmann, T. Tissue distribution and molecular characterization of chicken isolates of Toxoplasma gondii from Peru. J. Parasitol. 2004, 90, 1015–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii infections in chickens (Gallus domesticus): Prevalence, clinical disease, diagnosis and public health significance. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57, 60–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blaga, R.; Calin, G.; Vasile, C.; Zocevic, A.; Pozio, E.; Boireau, P. Trichinella species circulating among wild and domestic animals in Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 159, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Komorová, P.; Salamatin, R.; Hurníková, Z.; Hapl, E.; Molnár, L.; Halán, M. The parasite fauna of buzzards (Buteo spp.) in the territory of Slovakia—The results of an initial study. Ann. Parasitol. 2013, 59, 38. [Google Scholar]
  44. Komorová, P.; Salamatin, R.; Hurníková, Z.; Hapl, E.; Molnár, L. A survey of the endoparasites of corvids in Slovakia and a new record of Spiniglans sharpiloi tapeworm in the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica). Ann. Parasitol. 2013, 59, 39. [Google Scholar]
  45. Merialdi, G.; Bardasi, L.; Fontana, M.C.; Spaggiari, B.; Maioli, G.; Conedera, G.; Vio, D.; Londero, M.; Marucci, G.; Ludovisi, A.; et al. First reports of Trichinella pseudospiralis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) of Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 178, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hurnìkova, Z.; Hrckova, G.; Ågren, E.; Komorova, P.; Forsman, J.; Hovancova, B.; Molnar, L.; Letkova, V. First finding of Trichinella pseudospiralis in two Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) from Sweden. Helminthologia 2014, 3, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Nockler, K.; Reckinger, S.; Pozio, E. Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella pseudospiralis mixed infection in a wild boar (Sus scrofa) of Germany. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 137, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Santrac, V.; Nedic, D.N.; Maric, J.; Nikolic, S.; Stevanovic, O.; Vasilev, S.; Cvetkovic, J.; Sofronic-Milosavljevic, L. The first report of Trichinella pseudospiralis presence in domestic swine and Trichinella britovi in wild boar in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Parasitol. 2015, 60, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pozio, E.; Goffredo, M.; Fico, R.; La Rosa, G. Trichinella pseudospiralis in sedentary night-birds of prey from Central Italy. J. Parasitol. 1999, 85, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jones, C.D.; Okhravi, N.; Adamson, P.; Tasker, S.; Lightman, S. Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18s rDNA genes of Toxoplasma gondii in aqueous humor. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 634–644. [Google Scholar]
  51. Su, C.; Shwab, E.K.; Zhou, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Dubey, J.P. Moving towards an integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 2010, 137, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. EC (European Community). Regulation (EC) No 2075/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 December 2005 laying down specific rules on official controls for Trichinella in meat. Off. J. EC 2005, 338, 60–82. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Faunistic areas and municipalities of origin of the 798 wild corvids—678 magpies (Pica pica) and 120 hooded crows (Corvus cornix)—of both sexes, examined for anti-Toxoplasma antibodies and Toxoplasma gondii DNA, as well as for larvae of Trichinella pseudospiralis in the muscle.
Table 1. Faunistic areas and municipalities of origin of the 798 wild corvids—678 magpies (Pica pica) and 120 hooded crows (Corvus cornix)—of both sexes, examined for anti-Toxoplasma antibodies and Toxoplasma gondii DNA, as well as for larvae of Trichinella pseudospiralis in the muscle.
MagpiesHooded Crows
TrichinellaToxoplasmaTrichinellaToxoplasma
Faunistic Area (Municipality)N. of birdsN. of birdsN. of birdsN. of birds
Asciano
(S. Giuliano Terme)
27281515
Bientina (Bientina)-104--
Calcinaia (Calcinaia)52552022
Casaglia (Montecatini Val di Cecina)686887
Casale Marittimo
(Casale Marittimo)
163158--
Guardistallo (Guardistallo)9950--
Navacchio (Cascina)71692525
Querceto (Montecatini Val di Cecina)138582351
Rio Arbiaia (Pomarance)6061--
Total67865191120

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mancianti, F.; Terracciano, G.; Sorichetti, C.; Vecchio, G.; Scarselli, D.; Perrucci, S. Epidemiologic Survey on Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis Infection in Corvids from Central Italy. Pathogens 2020, 9, 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050336

AMA Style

Mancianti F, Terracciano G, Sorichetti C, Vecchio G, Scarselli D, Perrucci S. Epidemiologic Survey on Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis Infection in Corvids from Central Italy. Pathogens. 2020; 9(5):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mancianti, Francesca, Giuliana Terracciano, Camilla Sorichetti, Giuseppe Vecchio, Daniele Scarselli, and Stefania Perrucci. 2020. "Epidemiologic Survey on Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis Infection in Corvids from Central Italy" Pathogens 9, no. 5: 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050336

APA Style

Mancianti, F., Terracciano, G., Sorichetti, C., Vecchio, G., Scarselli, D., & Perrucci, S. (2020). Epidemiologic Survey on Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella pseudospiralis Infection in Corvids from Central Italy. Pathogens, 9(5), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop