Next Article in Journal
Repression of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strain AG10 in Drosophila melanogaster In Vivo Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnosis, Characterization and Treatment of Emerging Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Interkingdom Detection of Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Molecules by Mammalian Taste Receptors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization of Dengue Virus Strains from the 2019–2020 Epidemic in Hanoi, Vietnam
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Food Chain Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Terms of Ribotype and Antimicrobial Resistance

1
Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 KN3K Dublin, Ireland
2
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
3
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Central Pathology Laboratory, St James’s Hospital, Dublin 8, D08 RX0X Dublin, Ireland
4
Central Veterinary Research Laboratory, Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Backweston, Celbridge, W23 X3PH Kildare, Ireland
5
UCD-Centre for Food Safety, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
6
Environmental Sustainability and Health Institute, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman, Dublin 7, D07 H6K8 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1296; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051296
Submission received: 14 March 2023 / Revised: 12 May 2023 / Accepted: 12 May 2023 / Published: 16 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Characterization and Treatment of Emerging Pathogens)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to characterize C. difficile isolates from the farm, abattoir, and retail outlets in Ireland in terms of ribotype and antibiotic resistance (vancomycin, erythromycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, and rifampicin) using PCR and E-test methods, respectively. The most common ribotype in all stages of the food chain (including retail foods) was 078 and a variant (RT078/4). Less commonly reported (014/0, 002/1, 049, and 205) and novel (RT530, 547, and 683) ribotypes were also detected, but at lower frequencies. Approximately 72% (26/36 tested) of the isolates tested were resistant to at least one antibiotic, with the majority of these (65%; 17/26) displaying a multi-drug (three to five antibiotics) resistant phenotype. It was concluded that ribotype 078, a hypervirulent strain commonly associated with C. difficile infection (CDI) in Ireland, was the most frequent ribotype along the food chain, resistance to clinically important antibiotics was common in C. difficile food chain isolates, and there was no relationship between ribotype and antibiotic resistance profile.

1. Introduction

Clostridioides difficile is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium of ubiquitous nature. They have been isolated from the feces of a range of different animals that are both asymptomatic or suffering from severe enteric disease and are the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in humans [1]. Symptoms caused by C. difficile infection (CDI) vary from mild to serious and fulminant colitis, which may result in mortality [2]. The factors promoting CDI include treatment with antibiotics. Although treatment with nearly all classes of antibiotics has been associated with CDI, third-generation cephalosporins, penicillins, clindamycin, and fluoroquinolones active against the commensal bowel flora are considered to present the highest risk. These anti-bacterial compounds disrupt the gut microbiota, remove competing organisms, and thus facilitate C. difficile outgrowth, colonization, and toxin production [3].
Ribotyping is a tool used for the definition of lineages and the study of the epidemiology in humans based on the heterogeneity of the ribosomal intergenic spacer region (ISR) [4]. This technique detects the ISR variation of the 11–12 copies within the rRNA operon in the genome. PCR of this region generates fragments of different lengths, which can be identified by capillary gel-based electrophoresis or be compared online against a database of isolates with known ribotypes [5].
There are currently over 800 C. difficile ribotypes reported worldwide. Only toxin-producing strains cause disease in humans, with several of these having increased virulence (hypervirulence) [6]. Diarrhea is associated with the production of toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB), both of which cause intestinal inflammation. Toxigenic strains may also produce C. difficile transferase (CDT), a third unrelated binary toxin thought to play a role in epithelial adhesion that is associated with enhanced virulence and higher patient mortality [6,7]. C. difficile’s ribotypes can be classified into five main clades (I-V). Among these, Clade II and V are considered the most relevant as they include hypervirulent ribotypes 027 and 078, respectively, and other clinically important RTs, such as RT244 and RT176 [7].
Several different ribotypes have been detected in hospitals and associated with human illness and outbreaks. Ribotypes 014/020 (20.5%), 001 (18.2%), and 078/126 (18.2%), for example, were detected in Spanish hospitals in a study by Alcalá et al. [8]. Ribotypes RT002 (11.6%), RT015 (10.9%), and RT005 (7.2%) were isolated from CDI patients in England [9], and ribotypes 014/020 and 001/072 are considered endemic throughout Europe [10]. In recent years, ribotypes 078 (17%), 020 (9%), and 014 (8%) have been frequently detected in Ireland [11].
Although C. difficile was historically considered to be a hospital-associated disease, there is a high genetic relatedness between human and animal isolates which often belong to the same genotype [12]. Indeed whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis has shown that isolates from human, animal, and environmental sources are often indistinguishable [13]. The multi-directional spread of C. difficile occurs between these different sources and inevitably results in the contamination of food [14].
It is, therefore, to be expected that the same C. difficile ribotypes occur in food-producing animals and humans [15,16]. Ribotypes 078 and 126, for example, often isolated from CDI patients, are also common in pigs [12,17], poultry [18], and cattle [19]. Although less information is available for sheep, previously detected ribotypes in humans (RT014, RT010, and RT045) have been isolated from ovine sources [20,21,22].
Many of these ribotypes, including 078, 126, 027, and 014/020, have also been isolated from a range of retail foods, including pork, turkey, beef [23,24,25], chicken [18,26], shellfish and bivalve mollusks [27,28,29], and vegetables [30,31,32,33].
Antibiotics have played an important role in the emergence of C. difficile. Tetracycline usage in animal husbandry, for example, was a key driver in the emergence of hypervirulent RT078, which acquired tetracycline resistance elements from Streptococcus suis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli when under selective pressure [34]. Treatment with antibiotics is also a risk factor for current human infections, which are often associated with the disruption of the gastrointestinal tract microflora [35].
CDI in humans is treated with vancomycin, metronidazole, or a combination of both, which has inevitably increased the prevalence of resistance to these antibiotics in C. difficile [36]. Plasmid-mediated resistance to metronidazole was recently identified by Boekhoud et al. [37]. Thus, the current guidelines on the management of C. difficile infection in adults in the USA recommend treatment using vancomycin and fidaxomicin instead of metronidazole [38]. Additionally, many C. difficile strains are resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones, and penicillins, commonly used to treat other bacterial-associated illnesses in humans [3,39]. The prevalence of C. difficile resistance to metronidazole and vancomycin varies in different countries and has been reported to be 3.6–17.9% in the USA and 44.6% in Israel, respectively [40,41]. Considerably lower rates have been described in the UK and Ireland (0.7% metronidazole resistance in the former and 2% vancomycin resistance in Ireland) [42]. Resistance to rifampicin ranges from 0.7% in the UK to 63.6% in Hungary [43,44] and 65.3% in the USA [41,45].
The increasing resistance of C. difficile to antibiotics has driven the emergence of new ribotypes resulting in altered epidemiology in humans [46]. For example, the rapid emergence of hypervirulent C. difficile RT027 during the early 2000s has been attributed to the acquisition of fluoroquinolone resistance, a conjugative transposon in two distinct lineages, and the frequent use of this antibiotic for the treatment of a range of gastrointestinal infections in humans [47]. Despite this link between ribotypes and antibiotic resistance, the majority of studies to date have reported one or the other but not both.
Previous research in our group found C. difficile at all stages of the food chain in Ireland and obtained isolates from farms, abattoirs, and retail foods [48]. The objective of the current study was to characterize these isolates in terms of ribotype, with a representative selection being tested for antibiotic resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. C. difficile Isolates

The isolates were previously obtained in our laboratory as part of a surveillance study [48]. Isolates tested belonged to bovine farm water (5), bovine farm soil (6), bovine carcass (1), ovine feces (1), ovine carcasses (2), ovine farm soil (4), broiler feces (1), broiler farm water (2), broiler farm soil (11), wild rocket leaves (1), coleslaw (1), and cottage cheese (1).

2.2. PCR Ribotyping

The protocol used for PCR ribotyping was that described by ECDC [49], with minor modifications. The intergenic spacer region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes was initially amplified by PCR using the primers described by Bidet et al. [50]. Briefly, 12.5 µL of HotStarTaq Mastermix (QIAGEN Ltd., Manchester, UK), 0.25 µL of each primer (10 μM), 10 µL RNAse free water (QIAGEN Ltd., Manchester, UK), and 2 µL of the template were added to a MicroAmpTM Optical 96-well reaction plate (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK). Sealed PCR plates were then inserted into a Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK), where the amplification protocol included a denaturation step of 15 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 60 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 30 min at 72 °C.
After the initial PCR, denaturation of the generated fragments was required before further analysis in an automated sequence and fragment analysis system. For this, 2 µL of the PCR products were added to 9.5 µL of Highly Deionized (Hi-Di) Formamide (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK) and 0.5 µL of GeneScan 1200 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK) and denatured for 2 min at 95 °C in a thermal cycler. The plate was cooled down for 10 min in a fridge before the PCR products were analyzed on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, Cheshire, UK) with default settings for POP7 and 50 cm capillary length. The raw data files obtained (*fsa files) from the ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer were uploaded to the freely available WEBRIBO database (https://webribo.ages.at/; last accessed 1 September 2022) to compare our isolates with profiles stored in the database and confirm the PCR ribotypes [5].

2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Testing

The antibiotics metronidazole, vancomycin, erythromycin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin, and rifampicin were selected for MIC testing. Metronidazole is the recommended first-line treatment option for mild-to-moderate CDI, while vancomycin can be used as a substitute or in combination [51]. Rifampicin is used as an adjunctive therapy to CDI [52]; however, its increased use in tuberculosis treatment has been associated with the emergence of rifampicin-resistant C. difficile strains [53], linked with recurrent CDI [54]. Moxifloxacin, erythromycin, and clindamycin are not frequently used to treat CDI, but are widely detected in virulent C. difficile strains and are important markers for treatment failure and for the spread of the disease in healthcare settings [55,56,57,58].
E-test strips (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) were used following the protocol described by the manufacturer. In brief, the isolates were recovered from Protect Select Anaerobe Cryobeads (Technical Service Consultants Ltd., Lancashire, UK) and stored at −80 °C by aseptically transferring a single bead to 30 mL of Mueller–Hinton broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK (CM0405)). Isolates were incubated anaerobically in an A35 Anaerobic workstation (Don Whitley, Victoria Works, Yorkshire, UK) at 37 °C for 24 h or until an OD600nm= 0.5 (108 CFU mL−1) was achieved as measured using a spectrophotometer DeNovix DS-C (DeNovix Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA). A sterile swab (Sparks Lab Supplies, Dublin, Ireland (SW001)) was then used to spread the broth culture on Brucella, vitamin K, and haemin agar (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK (B2926-500G)) with 5% defibrinated horse blood (TCS Biosciences Limited, Botolph Claydon, Buckingham, UK (HB034)). Plates were air-dried for 15 min in the anaerobic cabinet before the E-test strips were aseptically placed on top of the agar using sterilized forceps and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions (as described above). The MIC values were then obtained using the scale (µg mL−1) provided by the manufacturer. MIC values for each antibiotic were compared to the epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFF) and breakpoints found in the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [59] for C. difficile and classified as susceptible or resistant accordingly.

3. Results

The characterization of the isolates in terms of PCR ribotyping and antimicrobial resistance is presented in Table 1.
In bovines, all of the five isolates from farm water belonged to RT078 (two isolates) or the variant 078/4 (3). One of these was sensitive to all of the antibiotics tested, two were resistant to VAN or MOX, while the remaining isolates displayed multi-resistant phenotypes (MET-VAN-RIF and MET-MOX-VAN-RIF). Ribotypes 078, 078/4, 049, 547, and 683 and an inconclusive result were obtained in bovine farm soil with corresponding antibiotic resistance profiles VAN, ERY-MOX-VAN-RIF, ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF, MET-VAN-RIF, and sensitive to all and ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF, respectively. A bovine carcass isolate (RT078/4) was resistant to MET-VAN-RIF.
The ovine feces isolate was ribotype 078/4 and resistant to MOX. Ovine farm soil isolates belonged to RT078 (three isolates), with one isolate being an inconclusive ribotype and demonstrating three different phenotypical resistance profiles (ERY-CLIN-MOX, MOX, and sensitive to all). Both ovine carcass isolates were RT078/4, and one showed antimicrobial resistance to ERY-MET-VAN.
In broilers, a fecal isolate (RT078) showed simultaneous resistance against ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF. In water collected from broiler farms, one of the two isolates was resistant to MOX (RT078/4), while the other was susceptible (inconclusive RT). Ribotypes detected in broiler farm soil (11 isolates) had diverse ribotypes and antibiotic resistance patterns, including RT078 (MET-VAN-RIF and two sensitive), 078/4 (MET-VAN-RIF, MOX-VAN, and MET-MOX, one each), 049 (ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF), 002/1 (CLIN-MOX-VAN-RIF), 014/0 (ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF), and 205 and 530, both of which were sensitive to all antibiotics tested.
In retail foods, all strains belonged to RT078, although antibiotic resistance profiles differed. In cottage cheese, susceptibility to all antibiotics tested was reported. In coleslaw and wild rocket leaves, resistance to MET-VAN-RIF and ERY-MET-VAN-RIF was observed, respectively.
Overall, the highest resistance was observed for VAN (52.7%), followed by RIF and MET (41.6% each), MOX (30.5%), ERY (25%), and CLIN (19.4%) and 47% of the isolates were multi-drug resistant (≥three antibiotics).

4. Discussion

4.1. C. difficile’s Ribotype Prevalence along the Food Chain

In this study, nine different C. difficile ribotypes were detected, which reflects the diversity in sample type and source. RT078 and its variant (RT078/4) were the most common ribotypes. This was not unexpected as several previous studies have reported RT078 to be the predominant ribotype in meat and vegetable food chains [1,18,19,30,60,61,62,63].
The bovine isolates belonged to ribotypes 078, 078/4, 049, 547, and 683. Previous studies also reported ribotype 078 in bovine feces [1,19,60], while other authors have reported ribotype AI-82/1 [64,65], which was not detected in bovine isolates in our study.
The ovine isolates were identified as RT078 and 078/4. To the best of our knowledge, none of these ribotypes have been previously reported in sheep. Other ribotypes found in sheep and not detected in our study include 066 [21], 045 [66], 015, and 097 [67].
Broiler isolates belonged to RT-078, 078/4, 002/1, 014/0, 049, 205, and 530. Of these, ribotypes 002, 049 [68], 014 [64,65,68], and 205 [61,69] had been previously found in broilers.
The retail isolates included ribotype 078, which has only been previously reported in retail foods [30].
Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that ribotypes 530, 547, and 683 have been described in a C. difficile study.

4.2. Antimicrobial Resistance of the Selected C. difficile Isolates

Our study suggests there is no relationship between a specific ribotype and the antibiotic resistance phenotype. RT078, for example, had several resistance patterns, including susceptibility to all antibiotics (38.5%; 5/13), resistance to VAN (15.4%; 2/13), MET-VAN-RIF (15.4%; 2/13), MOX, ERY-MOX-CLIN, ERY-MET-VAN-RIF, and ERY-MET-CLIN-VAN-RIF (each 7.69%; 1/13). Solomon et al. [70] reported there was no correlation between clinical RT078 isolates and antimicrobial resistance patterns with diverse profiles obtained even in isolates from the same healthcare setting. These findings are consistent with the suggestion by Spigaglia et al. [39] that there are multiple drivers for antibiotic resistance in C. difficile, including the acquisition of genetic elements, alterations in target sites, changes in metabolic pathways, etc. Moreover, the same authors reported that antibiotic resistance is maintained in C. difficile regardless of the burden imposed on the cell or the absence of a selective pressure.
The observed resistance to erythromycin (25%) in isolates from bovine (three), ovine (one), and broiler (two) farm soil, ovine and broiler carcasses (one each), and wild rocket leaves (one), has been previously described in isolates from dairy and beef cattle [71,72], sheep [22], and human patients [73,74,75,76]. At the retail level, erythromycin-resistant C. difficile has been widely reported in beef, sheep, goat, and poultry meats [69,77], lettuce [78,79], and ready-to-eat foods [80].
Metronidazole is used to treat a range of infections in both food animals and humans, including CDI. A high percentage of isolates were resistant to metronidazole (42%), including broiler feces (one), bovine farm water (two), bovine (three), ovine (one), and broiler (five) farm soil, bovine carcass (one), wild rocket leaves (one), and coleslaw (one). Even though metronidazole resistance was reported to be rare in C. difficile [81], metronidazole-resistant C. difficile strains have been isolated from cattle [82], chicken, beef, and sheep carcasses [83,84], foods such as meat products [85], and lettuce [79] and humans [39,42,86]. This is often mediated by mutations in gyrA/B [81].
One-fifth (20%) of the C. difficile strains tested in our study displayed clindamycin resistance. These isolates came from sources such as broiler feces (one), bovines (two), and soil from ovine (one) and broiler (three) farms. C. difficile-resistant strains have been previously reported in cattle [87] and poultry [18,65,88], on beef and sheep carcasses [83], in raw beef and cooked pork meats [89,90,91,92], ready-to-eat salads [78,79,80], and human isolates [42,72,74,93]. It has been suggested that clindamycin-resistant C. difficile strains possess the erm(B) gene, which also confers resistance to erythromycin [57,94]. Our data provide further evidence of these co-resistances in C. difficile.
Eleven of the 36 C. difficile isolates tested were resistant to moxifloxacin, which included ovine feces (one), bovine (two) and broiler (one) farm water, and bovine (one), ovine (three), and broiler (three) farm soil. Similar results were previously described in C. difficile strains from cattle [72,95,96], soil on poultry farms [65], pig carcasses [97], ready-to-eat salads [58,78], and clinical isolates [93,98,99]. Furthermore, reduced susceptibility to moxifloxacin has been linked to increased mortality in human CDI [100].
Approximately half (53%, 19/36) of our isolates displayed vancomycin resistance. These isolates were from broiler feces (one), bovine farm water (three), bovine (five) and broiler (six) farm soil, bovine and ovine carcasses (one each), and wild rocket leaves (one) and coleslaw (one). Other authors have reported vancomycin-resistant C. difficile strains in calf feces [87], doner kebab and meatballs [85], and human patients [40,41,42,101]. Vancomycin and metronidazole are commonly used drugs to treat C. difficile infection [2], with Adler et al. [40] describing resistance to both antibiotics simultaneously, as observed in this study.
In addition, 15 of the isolates were resistant to rifampicin, which were isolated from broiler feces (one), bovine farm water (two), bovine (four) and broiler (five) farm soil, bovine carcass (one), wild rocket leaves (one), and coleslaw (one). Rifaximin resistance in C. difficile isolates is associated with point mutations in the rpoB gene which encodes the beta subunit of RNA polymerase [52] and has been previously reported in clinical isolates [52,81,99,100,101,102,103]. Indeed, in recent years there has been increasingly reported rifampicin resistance in C. difficile, reflecting the increased use of this antibiotic in medicine [104,105,106].
Multi-drug resistance, defined as resistance to three or more antibiotics simultaneously [107], was detected in 17 out of the 36 isolates tested from a range of stages along the food chain. Among these, the most relevant were two C. difficile strains isolated from retail foods resistant to MET-VAN-RIF in coleslaw and ERY-MET-VAN-RIF in wild rocket leaves, similar to that described in lettuce (ERY-MET-VAN) by Han et al. [79]. Multi-drug-resistant bacteria are often present in rinse water, and vegetable products may be cross-contaminated during the washing process [108]. Moreover, in recent years, C. difficile strains with multi-drug resistance have been associated with major outbreaks [76,109].
As humans, animals, and the environment are reservoirs for clinically important ribotypes with multi-directional spread, the health of all three is interconnected and reliant on adopting a One Health approach. Thus, a range of different stakeholders must work together to reduce the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant C. difficile strains. This should include the restricted use of antibiotics in both human and veterinary settings, but more comprehensive control will require the development of vaccines to reduce carriage in both humans and animals [13].

5. Conclusions

Overall, this study PCR-ribotyped and examined the antibiotic resistance phenotype of 36 food chain isolates. It was concluded that RT078 was the predominant ribotype, although another seven were identified, including three new ribotypes. Resistance to clinically important antibiotics such as erythromycin (25%; 9/36), metronidazole (42%; 15/36), clindamycin (19%; 7/36), moxifloxacin (31%; 11/36), vancomycin (53%; 19/36), and rifampicin (42%; 15/36) was common, with 72% (26/36) of isolates resistant to at least one antibiotic and 47% (17/36) displaying a multi-drug resistant phenotype. These data suggest that virulent ribotypes of C. difficile with phenotypic antibiotic resistance are present in the food chain, which could contribute to the spread of the infection to high risk groups in the community. Our data also suggested that there was no association between ribotype and antibiotic resistance profiles.

Author Contributions

P.M.: investigation, experimental design, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. A.D.: investigation, methodology, formal analysis, and writing—review and editing. P.W.: methodology, supervision, and writing—review and editing. T.R.R.: writing—review and editing. M.M.: writing—review and editing. S.F.: writing—review and editing. J.F.: writing—review and editing. D.B.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, experimental design, methodology, project administration, supervision, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Food Institutional Research Measure (FIRM) administered by the Department for Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) (Grant number 17F206). Pilar Marcos was supported by the Teagasc Walsh Scholarship Scheme (number 2018210).

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there are no conflict of interest in this work.

References

  1. Rodriguez, C.; Avesani, V.; Van Broeck, J.; Taminiau, B.; Delmee, M.; Daube, G. Clostridium difficile in young farm animals and slaughter animals in Belgium. Anaerobe 2012, 18, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cohen, S.H.; Gerding, D.N.; Johnson, S.; Kelly, C.P.; Loo, V.G.; McDonald, L.C.; Wilcox, M.H. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile in adults, 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2010, 31, 431–455. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Owens, R.C.; Donskey, C.J.; Gaynes, R.P.; Loo, V.G.; Muto, C.A. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stubbs, S.L.; Brazier, J.S.; O’Neill, G.L.; Duerden, B.I. PCR targeted to the 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer region of Clostridium difficile and construction of a library consisting of 116 different PCR ribotypes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 461–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Indra, A.; Huhulescu, S.; Schneeweis, M.; Hasenberger, P.; Kernbichler, S.; Fiedler, A.; Wewalka, G.; Allerberger, F.; Kuijper, E.J. Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates using capillary gel electrophoresis-based PCR ribotyping. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 57 Pt 11, 1377–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dayananda, P.; Wilcox, M.H. A Review of Mixed Strain Clostridium difficile Colonization and Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Knight, D.R.; Elliott, B.; Chang, B.J.; Perkins, T.T.; Riley, T.V. Diversity and Evolution in the Genome of Clostridium difficile. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 721–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alcalá, L.; Martin, A.; Marin, M.; Sanchez-Somolinos, M.; Catalan, P.; Pelaez, T.; Bouza, E. The undiagnosed cases of Clostridium difficile infection in a whole nation, where is the problem? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, E204–E213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Herbert, R.; Hatcher, J.; Jauneikaite, E.; Gharbi, M.; d’Arc, S.; Obaray, N.; Rickards, T.; Rebec, M.; Blandy, O.; Hope, R.; et al. Two-year analysis of Clostridium difficile ribotypes associated with increased severity. J. Hosp. Infect. 2019, 4, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Couturier, J.; Davies, K.; Gateau, C.; Barbut, F. Ribotypes and New Virulent Strains Across Europe. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1050, 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  11. Health Service Executive (HSE)—Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC) Enhanced Surveillance of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection in Ireland: Q2 2021 National Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/microbiologyantimicrobialresistance/clostridioidesdifficile/enhancedsurveillance/quarterlyreports/CDINationalReport_Q22022_v2.0_Final.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  12. Álvarez-Perez, S.; Blanco, J.L.; Harmanus, C.; Kuijper, E.; Garcia, M.E. Subtyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078/126 isolates of human and animal origin. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Knetsch, C.W.; Connor, T.R.; Mutreja, A.; van Dorp, S.M.; Sanders, I.M.; Browne, H.P.; Harris, D.; Lipman, L.; Keessen, E.C.; Corver, J.; et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals potential spread of Clostridium difficile between humans and farm animals in the Netherlands, 2002 to 2011. Euro. Surveill. 2014, 19, 20954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lim, S.C.; Knight, D.R.; Riley, T.V. Clostridium difficile and One Health. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2020, 26, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weese, J.S. Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Vet. Lab. Diagn. 2020, 32, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bolton, D.; Marcos, P. The Environment, Farm Animals and Foods as Sources of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Humans. Foods 2023, 12, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Andres-Lasheras, S.; Bolea, R.; Mainar-Jaime, R.C.; Kuijper, E.; Sevilla, E.; Martin-Burriel, I.; Chirino-Trejo, M. Presence of Clostridium difficile in pig faecal samples and wild animal species associated with pig farms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harvey, R.B.; Norman, K.N.; Andrews, K.; Hume, M.E.; Scanlan, C.M.; Callaway, T.R.; Anderson, R.C.; Nisbet, D.J. Clostridium difficile in poultry and poultry meat. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 1321–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Costa, M.C.; Stämpfli, H.R.; Arroyo, L.G.; Pearl, D.L.; Weese, J.S. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile on a veal farm, prevalence, molecular characterization and tetracycline resistance. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 152, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Knight, D.R.; Riley, T.V. Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Clostridium difficile Carriage in Australian Sheep and Lambs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5689–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Romano, V.; Albanese, F.; Dumontet, S.; Krovacek, K.; Petrini, O.; Pasquale, V. Prevalence and genotypic characterization of Clostridium difficile from ruminants in Switzerland. Zoonoses Public Health 2012, 59, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Avberšek, J.; Pirš, T.; Pate, M.; Rupnik, M.; Ocepek, M. Clostridium difficile in goats and sheep in Slovenia, characterisation of strains and evidence of age-related shedding. Anaerobe 2014, 28, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Songer, J.G.; Trinh, H.T.; Killgore, G.E.; Thompson, A.D.; McDonald, L.C.; Limbago, B.M. Clostridium difficile in Retail Meat Products, USA, 2007. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 819–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Weese, J.S.; Avery, B.; Rousseau, J.; Reid-Smith, R. Detection and Enumeration of Clostridium difficile Spores in Retail Beef and Pork. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 15, 5009–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Varshney, J.B.; Very, K.J.; Williams, J.L.; Hegarty, J.P.; Stewart, D.B.; Lumadue, J. Characterization of Clostridium difficile isolates from human fecal samples and retail meat from Pennsylvania. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Weese, J.S.; Reid-Smith, R.J.; Avery, B.P.; Rousseau, J. Detection and characterization of Clostridium difficile in retail chicken. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pasquale, V.; Romano, V.; Rupnik, M.; Capuano, F.; Bove, D.; Aliberti, F.; Krovacek, K.; Dumontet, S. Occurrence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in edible bivalve molluscs. Food Microbiol. 2012, 31, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Troiano, T.; Harmanus, C.; Sanders, I.M.J.G.; Pasquale, V.; Dumontet, S.; Capuano, F.; Kuijper, E.J. Toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in edible marine bivalve molluscs in Italy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 208, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Agnoletti, F.; Arcangeli, G.; Barbanti, F.; Barco, L.; Brunetta, R.; Cocchi, M.; Conedera, G.; D’Este, L.; Drigo, I.; Spigaglia, P.; et al. Survey, characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile from marine bivalve shellfish of North Adriatic Sea. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 298, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Metcalf, D.S.; Costa, M.C.; Dew, W.M.; Weese, J.S. Clostridium difficile in vegetables, Canada. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 51, 600–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Eckert, C.; Burghoffer, B.; Barbut, F. Contamination of ready-to-eat raw vegetables with Clostridium difficile, France. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 1435–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Primavilla, S.; Farneti, S.; Petruzzelli, A.; Drigo, I.; Scuota, S. Contamination of hospital food with Clostridium difficile in Central Italy. Anaerobe 2019, 55, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tkalec, V.; Janezica, S.; Skoka, B.; Simonica, T.; Mesarica, S.; Vrabica, T.; Rupnik, M. High Clostridium difficile contamination rates of domestic and imported potatoes compared to some other vegetables in Slovenia. Food Microbiol. 2019, 78, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dingle, K.E.; Didelot, X.; Quan, T.P.; Eyre, D.W.; Stoesser, N.; Marwick, C.A.; Coia, J.; Brown, D.; Buchanan, S.; Ijaz, U.Z.; et al. A Role for Tetracycline Selection in Recent Evolution of Agriculture-Associated Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 078. mBio 2019, 10, e02790-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lim, S.C.; Androga, G.O.; Knight, D.R.; Moono, P.; Foster, N.F.; Riley, T.V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from food and environmental sources in Western Australia. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Surawicz, C.M.; Brandt, L.J.; Binion, D.G.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Curry, S.R.; Gilligan, P.H.; McFarland, L.V.; Mellow, M.; Zuckerbraun, B. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 478–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boekhoud, I.M.; Hornung, B.V.H.; Sevilla, E.; Harmanus, C.; Bos-Sanders, I.M.J.G.; Terveer, E.M.; Bolea, R.; Corver, J.; Kuijper, E.J.; Smits, W.K. Plasmid-mediated metronidazole resistance in Clostridioides difficile. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Johnson, S.; Lavergne, V.; Skinner, A.M.; Gonzales-Luna, A.J.; Garey, K.W.; Kelly, C.P.; Wilcox, M.H. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 5, e1029–e1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Spigaglia, P.; Mastrantonio, P.; Barbanti, F. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridium difficile. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1050, 137–159. [Google Scholar]
  40. Adler, A.; Miller-Roll, T.; Bradenstein, R.; Block, C.; Mendelson, B.; Parizade, M.; Paitan, Y.; Schwartz, D.; Peled, N.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. A national survey of the molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile in Israel, the dissemination of the ribotype 027 strain with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and metronidazole. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 83, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Snydman, D.R.; McDermott, L.A.; Jacobus, N.V.; Thorpe, C.; Stone, S.; Jenkins, S.G.; Goldstein, E.J.; Patel, R.; Forbes, B.A.; Mirrett, S.; et al. U.S.-Based National Sentinel Surveillance Study for the Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrheal Isolates and Their Susceptibility to Fidaxomicin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6437–6443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Freeman, J.; Vernon, J.; Morris, K.; Nicholson, S.; Todhunter, S.; Longshaw, C.; Wilcox, M.H. Pan-European Longitudinal Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance among Prevalent Clostridium difficile Ribotypes’ Study Group. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 248-e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, J.S.; Jiang, Z.-D.; Garey, K.W.; Lasco, T.; Dupont, H.L. Use of rifamycin drugs and development of infection by rifamycin-resistant strains of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2690–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Terhes, G.; Maruyama, A.; Latkóczy, K.; Szikra, L.; Konkoly-Thege, M.; Princz, G.; Nagy, E.; Urbán, E. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility profile of Clostridium difficile excluding PCR ribotype 027 outbreak strain in Hungary. Anaerobe 2014, 30, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Goldstein, E.J.; Citron, D.M.; Sears, P.; Babakhani, F.; Sambol, S.P.; Gerding, D.N. Comparative susceptibilities to fidaxomicin (OPT-80) of isolates collected at baseline, recurrence, and failure from patients in two phase III trials of fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5194–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Spigaglia, P. Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, 23–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, M.; Miyajima, F.; Roberts, P.; Ellison, L.; Pickard, D.J.; Martin, M.J.; Connor, T.R.; Harris, S.R.; Fairley, D.; Bamford, K.B.; et al. Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marcos, P.; Whyte, P.; Rogers, T.; McElroy, M.; Fanning, S.; Frias, J.; Burgess, C.M.; Bolton, D.J. The prevalence of Clostridioides difficile on farms, in abattoirs and in retail foods in Ireland. Food Microbiol. 2021, 98, 103781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Laboratory Procedures for Diagnosis and Typing of Human Clostridium difficile Infection; Technical Report. 2018. Available online: www.ecdc.europa.eu (accessed on 20 January 2023).
  50. Bidet, P.; Barbut, F.; Lalande, V.; Burghoffer, B.; Petit, J.C. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 175, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vardakas, K.Z.; Polyzos, K.A.; Patouni, K.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Samonis, G.; Falagas, M.E. Treatment failure and recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole, a systematic review of the evidence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Curry, S.R.; Marsh, J.W.; Shutt, K.A.; Muto, C.A.; O’Leary, M.M.; Saul, M.I.; Pasculle, A.W.; Harrison, L.H. High frequency of rifampin resistance identified in an epidemic Clostridium difficile clone from a large teaching hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Obuch-Woszczatyński, P.; Lachowicz, D.; Schneider, A.; Mól, A.; Pawłowska, J.; Ożdżeńska-Milke, E.; Pruszczyk, P.; Wultańska, D.; Młynarczyk, G.; Harmanus, C.; et al. Occurrence of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 027 and it’s closely related PCR-ribotype 176 in hospitals in Poland in 2008-2010. Anaerobe 2014, 28, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tijerina-Rodríguez, L.; Garza-González, E.; Martínez-Meléndez, A.; Morfín-Otero, R.; Camacho-Ortiz, A.; Gonzalez-Diaz, E.; Perez-Gomez, H.R.; Villarreal-Treviño, L.; Maldonado-Garza, H.; Esparza-Ahumada, S.; et al. Clinical characteristics associated with the severity of Clostridium [Clostridioides] difficile infection in a tertiary teaching hospital from Mexico. Biomed. J. 2022, 45, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ackermann, G.; Tang-Feldman, Y.J.; Schaumann, R.; Henderson, J.P.; Rodloff, A.C.; Silva Jr, J.; Cohen, S.H. Antecedent use of fluoroquinolones is associated with resistance to moxifloxacin in Clostridium difficile. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 526–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Carroll, D.N. Moxifloxacin-induced Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Pharmacotherapy 2003, 23, 1517–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spigaglia, P.; Barbanti, F.; Mastrantonio, P. European Study Group on Clostridium difficile (ESGCD) Multidrug resistance in European Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 2227–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rodriguez-Palacios, A.; Ilic, S.; LeJeune, J.T. Clostridium difficile with Moxifloxacin/Clindamycin Resistance in Vegetables in Ohio, USA, and Prevalence Meta-Analysis. J. Pathog. 2014, 2014, 158601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). MIC Distribution for Clostridioides Difficie. 2023. Available online: https://mic.eucast.org/search/?search%5Bmethod%5D=mic&search%5Bantibiotic%5D=-1&search%5Bspecies%5D=564&search%5Bdisk_content%5D=-1&search%5Blimit%5D=50 (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  60. Keel, K.; Brazier, J.S.; Post, K.W.; Weese, S.; Songer, J.G. Prevalence of PCR ribotypes among Clostridium difficile isolates from pigs, calves, and other species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 1963–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Abdel-Glil, M.Y.; Thomas, P.; Schmoock, G.; Abou-El-Azm, K.; Wieler, L.H.; Neubauer, H.; Seyboldt, C. Presence of Clostridium difficile in poultry and poultry meat in Egypt. Anaerobe 2018, 51, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Krutova, M.; Zouharova, M.; Matejkova, J.; Tkadlec, J.; Krejci, J.; Faldyna, M.; Nyc, O.; Bernardy, J. The emergence of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 in piglets in the Czech Republic clusters with Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 isolates from Germany, Japan and Taiwan. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 308, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, L.J.; Yang, L.; Gu, X.X.; Chen, P.X.; Fu, J.L.; Jiang, H.X. The first isolation of Clostridium difficile RT078/ST11 from pigs in China. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Janezic, S.; Zidaric, V.; Pardon, B.; Indra, A.; Kokotovic, B.; Blanco, J.L.; Seyboldt, C.; Diaz, C.R.; Poxton, I.R.; Perreten, V.; et al. International Clostridium difficile animal strain collection and large diversity of animal associated strains. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Berger, F.K.; Mellmann, A.; Bischoff, M.; von Muller, L.; Becker, S.L.; Simango, C.; Gartner, B. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of Clostridioides difficile detected in chicken, soil and human samples from Zimbabwe. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 96, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. de Boer, E.; Zwartkruis-Nahuis, A.; Heuvelink, A.E.; Harmanus, C.; Kuijper, E.J. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in retailed meat in the Netherlands. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 144, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Koene, M.G.J.; Mevius, D.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Harmanus, C.; Hensgens, M.P.M.; Meetsma, A.M.; Putirulan, F.F.; van Bergen, M.A.P.; Kuijper, E. Clostridium difficile in Dutch animals, their presence, characteristics and similarities with human isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Frentrup, M.; Thiel, N.; Junker, V.; Behrens, W.; Münch, S.; Siller, P.; Kabelitz, T.; Faust, M.; Indra, A.; Baumgartner, S.; et al. Agricultural fertilization with poultry manure results in persistent environmental contamination with the pathogen Clostridioides difficile. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 7591–7602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Heise, J.; Witt, P.; Maneck, C.; Wichmann-Schauer, H.; Maurischat, S. Prevalence and phylogenetic relationship of Clostridioides difficile strains in fresh poultry meat samples processed in different cutting plants. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 339, 109032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Solomon, K.; Murray, S.; Scott, L.; McDermott, S.; Drudy, D.; Martin, A.; O’Donoghue, C.; Skally, M.; Burns, K.; Fenelon, L.; et al. An investigation of the subtype diversity of clinical isolates of Irish Clostridium difficile ribotypes 027 and 078 by repetitive-extragenic palindromic PCR. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60 Pt 8, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zidaric, V.; Pardon, B.; Dos Vultos, T.; Deprez, P.; Brouwer, M.S.; Roberts, A.P.; Henriques, A.O.; Rupnik, M. Different antibiotic resistance and sporulation properties within multiclonal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes 078, 126, and 033 in a single calf farm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 8515–8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Blasi, F.; Lovito, C.; Albini, E.; Bano, L.; Dalmonte, G.; Drigo, I.; Maresca, C.; Massacci, F.R.; Orsini, S.; Primavilla, S.; et al. Clostridioides difficile in Calves in Central Italy, Prevalence, Molecular Typing, Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Association with Antibiotic Administration. Animals 2021, 11, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Keessen, E.C.; Hensgens, M.P.; Spigaglia, P.; Barbanti, F.; Sanders, I.M.; Kuijper, E.J.; Lipman, L.J. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of human and piglet Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 078. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2013, 2, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Usui, M.; Nanbu, Y.; Oka, K.; Takahashi, M.; Inamatsu, T.; Asai, T.; Kamiya, S.; Tamura, Y. Genetic relatedness between Japanese and European isolates of Clostridium difficile originating from piglets and their risk associated with human health. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chow, V.C.Y.; Kwong, T.N.Y.; So, E.W.M.; Ho, Y.I.I.; Wong, S.H.; Lai, R.W.M.; Chan, R.C.Y. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance among common Clostridium difficile ribotypes in Hong Kong. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Isidro, J.; Menezes, J.; Serrano, M.; Borges, V.; Paixão, P.; Mimoso, M.; Martins, F.; Toscano, C.; Santos, A.; Henriques, A.O.; et al. Genomic Study of a Clostridium difficile Multidrug Resistant Outbreak-Related Clone Reveals Novel Determinants of Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rahimi, E.; Jalali, M.; Weese, J.S. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in raw beef, cow, sheep, goat, camel and buffalo meat in Iran. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bakri, M.; Brown, D.J.; Butcher, J.P.; Sutherland, A.D. Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat salads, Scotland. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 817–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Han, Y.; King, J.; Janes, M.E. Detection of antibiotic resistance toxigenic Clostridium difficile in processed retail lettuce. Food Qual. Saf. 2018, 2, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rahimi, E.; Afzali, S.Z.; Baghbadorani, Z.T. Clostridium difficile in ready-to-eat foods in Isfahan and Shahrekord, Iran. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 2, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huang, H.; Weintraub, A.; Fang, H.; Nord, C.E. Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium difficile. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Androga, G.O.; Knight, D.R.; Lim, S.C.; Foster, N.F.; Riley, T.V. Antimicrobial resistance in large clostridial toxin-negative, binary toxin-positive Clostridium difficile ribotypes. Anaerobe 2018, 54, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hampikyan, H.; Bingol, E.B.; Muratoglu, K.; Akkaya, E.; Cetin, O.; Colak, H. The prevalence of Clostridium difficile in cattle and sheep carcasses and the antibiotic susceptibility of isolates. Meat Sci. 2018, 139, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bingol, E.B.; Hampikyan, H.; Muratoglu, K.; Akkaya, E.; Cetin, O.; Colak, H. Characterisation and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Clostridioides (Clostridium) Difficile Isolated from Chicken Carcasses. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 64, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ersöz, Ş.Ş.; Coşansu, S. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile Isolated from Beef and Chicken Meat Products in Turkey. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2018, 38, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Peláez, T.; Alcalá, L.; Alonso, R.; Rodríguez-Créixems, M.; García-Lechuz, J.M.; Bouza, E. Reassessment of Clostridium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1647–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Doosti, A.; Mokhtari-Farsani, A. Study of the frequency of Clostridium difficile tcdA, tcdB, cdtA and cdtB genes in feces of Calves in south west of Iran. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2014, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Dharmasena, M.; Jiang, X. Isolation of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from animal manure and composts being used as biological soil amendments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00738-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kouassi, K.A.; Dadie, A.T.; Nanga, Z.Y.; Dje, K.M.; Loukou, Y.G. Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium difficile in cooked beef sold in Cote d’Ivoire and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Anaerobe 2014, 28, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodriguez, C.; Taminiau, B.; Avesani, V.; Van Broeck, J.; Delmée, M.; Daube, G. Multilocus sequence typing analysis and antibiotic resistance of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from retail meat and humans in Belgium. Food Microbiol. 2014, 42, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Atasoy, F.; Gücükoğlu, A. Detection of Clostridium difficile and toxin genes in samples of modified atmosphere packaged (MAP) minced and cubed beef meat. Ank. Üniversitesi Vet. Fakültesi Derg. 2017, 64, 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  92. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, D.Y.; Cho, Y.S. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile isolated from various raw meats in Korea. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Sholeh, M.; Krutova, M.; Forouzesh, M.; Mironov, S.; Sadeghifard, N.; Molaeipour, L.; Maleki, A.; Kouhsari, E. Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile derived from humans, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2020, 9, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bandelj, P.; Golob, M.; Ocepek, M.; Zdovc, I.; Vengust, M. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Clostridium difficile Isolates from Family Dairy Farms. Zoonoses Public Health 2017, 64, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rodriguez Diaz, C.; Hakimi, D.-E.; Vanleyssem, R.; Taminiau, B.; VanBroeck, J.; Delmee, M.; Kosak Koulagenko, N.; Daube, G. Clostridium difficile in beef cattle farms, farmers and their environment, Assessing the spread of the bacterium. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 210, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Masarikova, M.; Simkova, I.; Plesko, M.; Eretova, V.; Krutova, M.; Cizek, A. The Colonisation of Calves in Czech Large-Scale Dairy Farms by Clonally-Related Clostridioides difficile of the Sequence Type 11 Represented by Ribotypes 033 and 126. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Cho, A.; Byun, J.W.; Kim, J.W.; Oh, S.I.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, H.Y. Low Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Slaughter Pigs in Korea. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1034–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Spigaglia, P.; Barbanti, F.; Dionisi, A.M.; Mastrantonio, P. Clostridium difficile isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones in Italy, emergence of PCR ribotype 018. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2892–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tenover, F.C.; Tickler, I.A.; Persing, D.H. Antimicrobial-resistant strains of Clostridium difficile from North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2929–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Krutova, M.; Capek, V.; Nycova, E.; Vojackova, S.; Balejova, M.; Geigerova, L.; Tejkalova, R.; Havlinova, L.; Vagnerova, I.; Cermak, P.; et al. The association of a reduced susceptibility to moxifloxacin in causative Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile strain with the clinical outcome of patients. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Goudarzi, M.; Goudarzi, H.; Alebouyeh, M.; Azimi Rad, M.; Shayegan Mehr, F.S.; Zali, M.R.; Aslani, M.M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates in Iran. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2013, 15, 704–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hecht, D.W.; Galang, M.A.; Sambol, S.P.; Osmolski, J.R.; Johnson, S.; Gerding, D.N. In vitro activities of 15 antimicrobial agents against 110 toxigenic Clostridium difficile clinical isolates collected from 1983 to 2004. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 2716–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. O’Connor, J.R.; Galang, M.A.; Sambol, S.P.; Hecht, D.W.; Vedantam, G.; Gerding, D.N.; Johnson, S. Rifampin and rifaximin resistance in clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 2813–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Garey, K.W.; Salazar, M.; Shah, D.; Rodrigue, R.; DuPont, H.L. Rifamycin antibiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Ann. Pharmacother. 2008, 42, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zhao, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, L.; Chin, D.P.; Wang, S.; Jiang, G.; Xia, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Q.; Ou, X.; et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Johanesen, P.A.; Mackin, K.E.; Hutton, M.L.; Awad, M.M.; Larcombe, S.; Amy, J.M.; Lyras, D. Disruption of the Gut Microbiome, Clostridium difficile Infection and the Threat of Antibiotic Resistance. Genes 2015, 6, 1347–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria, An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Doyle, M.E. Multidrug-resistant pathogens in the food supply. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mutai, W.C.; Mureithi, M.W.; Anzala, O.; Revathi, G.; Kullin, B.; Brugu, M.; Kany’a, C.; Odoyo, E.; Otieno, P.; Musila, L. High Prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant Clostridioides difficile Following Extensive Use of Antimicrobials in Hospitalized Patients in Kenya. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 604986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. PCR ribotyping, antibiotic susceptibility phenotype profiles, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the isolates tested from different stages of the food chain. ERY = Erythromycin (Resistant > 4 µg mL−1), MET = Metronidazole (Resistant > 2 µg mL−1), CLIN = Clindamycin (Resistant > 16 µg mL−1), MOX = Moxifloxacin (Resistant > 4 µg mL−1), VAN = Vancomycin (Resistant > 2 µg mL−1), and RIF = Rifampicin (Resistant > 0.004 µg mL−1) [59]. Resistance to each antibiotic according to the ECOFF values is highlighted in bold.
Table 1. PCR ribotyping, antibiotic susceptibility phenotype profiles, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of the isolates tested from different stages of the food chain. ERY = Erythromycin (Resistant > 4 µg mL−1), MET = Metronidazole (Resistant > 2 µg mL−1), CLIN = Clindamycin (Resistant > 16 µg mL−1), MOX = Moxifloxacin (Resistant > 4 µg mL−1), VAN = Vancomycin (Resistant > 2 µg mL−1), and RIF = Rifampicin (Resistant > 0.004 µg mL−1) [59]. Resistance to each antibiotic according to the ECOFF values is highlighted in bold.
Isolate SourceRT 1Antimicrobial Susceptibility (S) or Resistance (R) (MIC in µg mL−1)
ERYMETCLINMOXVANRIF
Bovine farm water078S (1)S (0.094)S (4)S (<0.002)R (3)S (<0.002)
078S (1.5)S (0.5)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
078/4S (0.75)S (0.047)S (<0.016)R (>32)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
078/4S (0.75)R (>256)S (0.032)S (3)R (>256)R (0.5)
078/4S (0.25)R (>256)S (8)R (>32)R (>256)R (0.5)
Bovine farm soil078S (2)S (0.125)S (4)S (<0.002)R (>256)S (<0.002)
078/4R (8)S (0.19)S (8)R (>32)R (>256)R (0.064)
049R (>256)R (>256)R (>256)S (3)R (>256)R (1)
547S (0.25)R (>256)S (0.064)S (2)R (>256)R (1)
683S (0.75)S (0.125)S (4)S (<0.002)S (2)S (<0.002)
IN 2R (>256)R (>256)R (>256)S (1)R (>256)R (0.19)
Bovine carcass078/4S (0.5)R (>256)S (0.047)S (3)R (>256)R (1)
Ovine feces078/4S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (6)R (>32)S (1.5)S (<0.002)
Ovine farm soil078R (>256)S (0.125)R (>256)R (>32)S (1)S (<0.002)
078S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
078S (1.5)S (0.047)S (<0.016)R (>32)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
IN2S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (8)R (>32)S (0.75)S (<0.002)
Ovine carcasses078/4R (24)R (>256)S (6)S (0.064)R (3)S (0.003)
078/4S (1.5)S (0.047)S (2)S (0.5)S (1.5)S (<0.002)
Broiler feces078R (>256)R (>256)R (>256)S (3)R (>256)R (0.19)
Broiler farm water078/4S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)R (>32)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
IN 2S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
Broiler farm soil078S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (0.75)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
078S (0.38)R (>256)S (0.064)S (2)R (>256)R (0.5)
078S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
078/4S (1.5)R (>256)S (<0.016)S (3)R (>256)R (1)
078/4S (1)S (0.047)S (8)R (>32)R (3)S (<0.002)
078/4S (1)R (>256)S (6)R (>32)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
049R (>256)R (>256)R (>256)S (1.5)R (>256)R (2)
002/1S (0.25)S (<0.016)R (>256)R (>32)R (>256)R (0.75)
014/0R (>256)R (>256)R (>256)S (1.5)R (>256)R (0.75)
205S (0.25)S (<0.016)S (6)S (<0.002)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
530S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (0.75)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
Coleslaw078S (0.5)R (>256)S (0.5)S (2)R (>256)R (1)
Cottage cheese078S (0.19)S (<0.016)S (<0.016)S (0.5)S (<0.016)S (<0.002)
Wild rocket leaves078R (>256)R (>256)S (0.25)S (1.5)R (>256)R (0.047)
% Resistance 25 (9/36)41.6(15/36)19.4 (7/36)30.5 (11/36)52.7 (19/36)41.6 (15/36)
1 RT = Ribotype; 2 IN = Inconclusive result.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marcos, P.; Doyle, A.; Whyte, P.; Rogers, T.R.; McElroy, M.; Fanning, S.; Frias, J.; Bolton, D. Characterization of Food Chain Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Terms of Ribotype and Antimicrobial Resistance. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051296

AMA Style

Marcos P, Doyle A, Whyte P, Rogers TR, McElroy M, Fanning S, Frias J, Bolton D. Characterization of Food Chain Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Terms of Ribotype and Antimicrobial Resistance. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5):1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marcos, Pilar, Aoife Doyle, Paul Whyte, Thomas R. Rogers, Máire McElroy, Seamus Fanning, Jesus Frias, and Declan Bolton. 2023. "Characterization of Food Chain Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Terms of Ribotype and Antimicrobial Resistance" Microorganisms 11, no. 5: 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051296

APA Style

Marcos, P., Doyle, A., Whyte, P., Rogers, T. R., McElroy, M., Fanning, S., Frias, J., & Bolton, D. (2023). Characterization of Food Chain Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Terms of Ribotype and Antimicrobial Resistance. Microorganisms, 11(5), 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop