Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Association between Campylobacter Colonization and Microbiota Composition in the Intestine of Commercial Broilers
Next Article in Special Issue
Ruminal Fluid Transplantation Accelerates Rumen Microbial Remodeling and Improves Feed Efficiency in Yaks
Previous Article in Journal
Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children: A Forgotten Disease?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rumen Microbiota Predicts Feed Efficiency of Primiparous Nordic Red Dairy Cows
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms11071723
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of an Innovative Silage of Agro-Industrial Waste By-Products in Pig Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Its Effects on the Pig Gastrointestinal Microbiota

by
Ioannis Skoufos
1,*,
Aikaterini Nelli
2,
Brigkita Venardou
2,
Ilias Lagkouvardos
2,
Ilias Giannenas
3,
Georgios Magklaras
1,
Christos Zacharis
1,
Lizhi Jin
4,
Jin Wang
5,
Evangelia Gouva
2,
Stylianos Skoufos
2,
Eleftherios Bonos
1 and
Athina Tzora
2
1
Laboratory of Animal Science, Nutrition and Biotechnology, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture, University of Ioannina, Kostakioi Artas, 47100 Arta, Greece
2
Laboratory of Animal Health, Hygiene and Food Quality, Department of Agriculture, School of Agriculture, University of Ioannina, Kostakioi Artas, 47100 Arta, Greece
3
Laboratory of Nutrition, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Meritech (Asia Pacific) Biotech Pte Ltd., Singapore 079903, Singapore
5
National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Animal Health, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(7), 1723; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071723
Submission received: 26 April 2023 / Revised: 26 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Microbiome in Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether dietary supplementation with an innovative silage (IS) created using 60% olive mill waste, 20% grape pomace, and 20% deproteinised feta cheese waste solids can modulate the composition of the intestinal microbiota in weaned (Exp. 1) and finishing (Exp. 2) pigs. In Exp. 1 (40 day supplementation), forty-five crossbred weaned pigs were randomly assigned to the 0% (Control), 5%, or 10% IS groups (15 replicates/experimental diet). In Exp. 2 (60 day supplementation), eighteen finishing pigs from Exp. 1 were fed the control diet for 8 weeks before being re-assigned to their original experimental groups and fed with the 0% (Control), 5%, or 10% IS diets (six replicates/experimental diet). Performance parameters were recorded. Ileal and caecal digesta and mucosa were collected at the end of each experiment for microbiota analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing (five pigs/experimental diet for Exp. 1 and six pigs/experimental diet for Exp. 2). No significant effects on pig growth parameters were observed in both experiments. In Exp. 1, 5% IS supplementation increased the relative abundance of the Prevotellaceae family, Coprococcus genus, and Alloprevotella rava (OTU_48) and reduced the relative abundance of Lactobacillus genus in the caecum compared to the control and/or 10% IS diets (p < 0.05). In Exp. 2, 5% IS supplementation led to compositionally more diverse and different ileal and caecal microbiota compared to the control group (p < 0.05; p = 0.066 for β-diversity in ileum). Supplementation with the 5% IS increased the relative abundance of Clostridium celatum/disporicum/saudiense (OTU_3) in the ileum and caecum and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum (OTU_17) in the caecum and reduced the relative abundance of Streptococcus gallolyticus/alactolyticus (OTU_2) in the caecum compared to the control diet (p < 0.05). Similar effects on C. celatum/disporicum/saudiense and S. gallolyticus/alactolyticus were observed with the 10% IS diet in the caecum (p < 0.05). IS has the potential to beneficially alter the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota in pigs.

1. Introduction

Pig meat is a major animal protein source worldwide, accounting for a third of the overall meat production [1]. However, the intensive pig production systems implemented to achieve high meat production involve efficient feed utilisation, rapid growth rates, and confined rearing in high stocking densities of fattening pigs. These factors exert intense pressure on different components of the gastrointestinal tract, namely the mucosa, the immune system, and the intestinal microbiota, with potential negative impacts on their function and health [2]. The microbiota has a pivotal role in host growth and health via its contributions to nutrient availability, immunomodulation, and inhibition of pathogen colonisation [3,4,5]. However, stressors such as abrupt weaning at an early age, antimicrobial use, and management practices (e.g., diet changes, overcrowding, co-mingling, and poor hygiene) may lead to disturbances in the composition and function of this microbial community, called dysbiosis, predisposing pigs to intestinal infection and reduced productivity [2,6,7,8].
A common practice in the pig industry to control, alleviate, or prevent gastrointestinal dysfunction and disease coupled with modulatory effects on the composition of the microbiota is the use of antimicrobials as treatment, pro- or meta-phylaxis, or even as growth promoters [9,10,11]. However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance led to the adaptation of stringent measures in antimicrobial use in the European Union, namely the 2006 ban on antimicrobial growth promoters (Regulation—EC: No. 1831/2003) and the restrictions in antimicrobial use for treatment in livestock (Regulations—EU: No. 2019/6 and No. 2019/4), with similar trends also being observed worldwide [12,13,14,15]. An alternative, well-established strategy for manipulating the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota is via dietary intervention. Agro-industrial waste by-products of plant and animal origin are promising dietary ingredients that are capable of providing energy, protein, and other nutrients, as well as beneficial bioactive components such as polyphenols, nondigestible polysaccharides, and bioactive peptides for livestock. These feed ingredients can be fed to livestock directly or after modification processes (e.g., ensilage or solid-state fermentation) [16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, the utilisation of these locally produced animal feeds, along with the associated reduced costs and environmental impact, contributes to the sustainability of pig production [16,20]. In previous studies, inclusion of various agro-industrial waste by-products in the diet of pigs from different production stages led to changes in the composition of the gastrointestinal and faecal microbiota and the numbers of selected bacterial populations, indicating their ability to influence this microbial community [21,22,23,24,25,26].
In Greece, the production of olive oil, cheese, and wine are important sectors of the agro-industry. However, these activities are associated with the production of agro-industrial waste by-products in large quantities. In an attempt to minimise their environmental burden, an optimised ensilage methodology was developed recently to produce an innovative silage (IS) containing, namely, olive mill wastewater solids, grape pomace solids, and deproteinised feta cheese waste solids, for utilisation in animal nutrition [27]. Subsequent inclusion of the IS in the diets of broiler chickens was associated with improved growth performance, beneficial changes in the gastrointestinal microbiota, predominantly increased Bifidobacterium spp., decreased Enterobacteriaceae family counts, and improved meat hygiene and quality [28]. The objective of the current study was to provide an initial insight on the effects of two IS inclusion levels in the diets of weaned pigs (Exp. 1) and finishing pigs (Exp. 2) on the composition of the ileal and caecal microbiota using high-throughput amplicon (16S rRNA gene) sequencing.

2. Materials and Methods

All procedures described in the two pig trials were approved by the Research Committee of the University of Ioannina, Greece (research project registration: 61291) and were carried out in accordance with Greek (Presidential Degree 56/2013) and EU (Directive 2010/63/EU) legislation regarding the use of animals for scientific purposes. All animals were monitored by a veterinary surgeon throughout the experimental period.

2.1. Experimental Design, Diets, and Animal Management

Two consecutive dietary intervention experiments with a randomised complete block design were conducted in weaned pigs (Exp. 1) and finishing pigs (Exp. 2), respectively, at commercial pig farm settings. IS was produced as previously described [27] using the optimal mixture of olive mill waste (60%), grape pomace (20%), and deproteinised feta cheese waste (20%) solids with coarsely ground maize grains after a 30 day fermentation using Lentilactobacillus (former Lactobacillus) buchneri as a starter culture.
In the first experiment (Exp. 1), forty-five crossbred (1/4 Large White × 1/4 Landrace × 1/2 Duroc) weaned pigs (34 days old) were selected (average body of 8.32 ± 1.13 kg) from a commercial pig farm with a 28 day weaning practice and randomly assigned to the three different experimental groups fed with 0% (Control), 5%, or 10% IS, respectively (15 piglets/experimental diet). All pigs were individually ear-tagged. The ingredient composition of the experimental diets and their chemical composition were determined according to AOAC [29] and are presented in Table 1. The experimental diets were isonitrogenous and isocaloric and were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of the weaned pigs according to the National Research Council guidelines [30]. All pigs in each treatment were housed together in a single fully slated pen and had ad libidum access to feed and water throughout the 40 day experimental period. Commercial management practises were employed regarding artificial lighting and controlling humidity and ambient temperature. The body weight of the pigs was recorded at the start (day 0) and end (day 40) of the trial.
In the second experiment (Exp. 2), eighteen finishing pigs retained from the first experiment were used. In the period between the two experiments (8 weeks), all these pigs were fed the same commercial control diet. On day 97, the eighteen pigs were weighed (average weight 59.47 ± 3.51 kg) and re-grouped according to the initial experimental groups and housed in pens (6 pigs/experimental diet). The ingredient composition of the experimental diets and their chemical composition were determined according to AOAC [29] and are presented in Table 2. The experimental diets were isonitrogenous and isocaloric and were formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of the finishing pigs according to the National Research Council guidelines [30]. All pigs in each treatment were housed together in a single, fully slated pen and had ad libidum access to feed and water throughout the experimental period. Animal management practices were as described in the first experiment. The body weight of the pigs was recorded at the start (day 97) and end (day 157) of the trial.

2.2. Digesta Sampling from the Gastrointestinal Tract

At the end of the two pig trials, 15 pigs from Exp. 1 (5 pigs/experimental diet) and 18 pigs from Exp. 2 (6 pigs/experimental diet) were slaughtered under commercial conditions (pre-slaughter electrical stunning; bleeding; scalding/dehairing for Exp. 1 and skinning for Exp. 2; evisceration). For both trials, the gastrointestinal tract of all animals was removed for sampling of ileal and caecal digesta and mucosa. All samples were collected aseptically in sterile containers (Sarstedt AG & Co. KG, Nümbrecht, Germany), homogenised, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −40 °C until further processing.

2.3. Assessment of Ileal and Caecal Bacterial Diversity Using High-Throughput Sequencing

2.3.1. DNA Extraction

Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from the ileal and caecal samples using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quantity was determined using a Qubit 4 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3.2. 16S rRNA High-Throughput Sequencing

Aliquots of the extracted DNA were used for PCR amplification of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA using the primers 341F and 806R [31]. After the preparation and purification of the amplicon libraries using the Nextera XT index kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and the AMPure XP system (Beckmann Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the addition of the PhiX control library (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at a 10% v/v ratio, paired-end (300 bp) sequencing was carried out on the MiSeq Sequencing System (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (300 cycles) (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The obtained sequencing data of the 16S rRNA amplicons were further processed using the UPARSE-based “Integrated Microbial Next-generation sequencing” platform (IMNGS, www.imngs.org, accessed on 9 December 2022) [32,33]. Raw sequence reads were demultiplexed (demultiplexer v3.pl), trimmed by ten nucleotides, filtered (sequences with <200 and >600 nucleotide lengths excluded), and merged with paired reads. Clustering of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was set at a 97% similarity level, while rare OTUs (<0.25% relative abundance) were removed [34]. Alpha and beta diversity and bacterial composition after taxonomic binning were determined using the R script-based Rhea pipeline [35]. Differences in the relative abundances of taxa across dietary treatments were evaluated using the pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Similarities to the closest known species for OTUs with significant differences in abundance between dietary treatments were recorded using the 16S-based ID service of EZBioCloud (www.ezbiocloud.net, accessed on 2 February 2023) with the identification similarity percentage provided [36]. Probability values of <0.05 and <0.10 denote statistical significance and tendency, respectively. The individual pig was considered the experimental unit for the statistical analysis. The data were visualised using Illustrator CS6 Version 16.0.0 (Adobe Inc., San José, CA, USA).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Final weight and weight gain data were analysed using the one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) of SPSS (version 20.0). In both experiments, each individual pig was considered the experimental unit. Levene’s test was used to test data homogeneity, and Tukey’s test was used for post hoc comparisons between the dietary treatments. Statistical significance was set at probability values of 5% (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Pig Performance

The effects of the different IS inclusion levels in the diets of weaned and finishing pigs on growth performance are presented in Table 3. In both Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, dietary supplementation with 5% and 10% IS had no effect on final body weight or weight gain (p > 0.05).

3.2. Influence of IS Supplementation on the Composition of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota

To evaluate the effect of the different IS inclusion levels in the diets on the composition of the ileal and caecal microbiota in weaned pigs (Exp. 1) and finishing pigs (Exp. 2), high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (V3–V4 region) was performed. A total of 3,120,963 raw paired-end reads with an average of 49,539 ± 13,467 reads per sample were sequenced from all intestinal samples of both pig trials. Following the post-sequence processing of the reads, the number of high-quality sequences obtained was 2,059,530, with an average of 32,691 ± 9006 reads per sample, and a total of 289 OTUs were observed.

3.2.1. Exp. 1 (Weaned Pigs)

Dietary supplementation with 5% and 10% IS had no effect on the alpha diversity indices (p > 0.05) and beta diversity (PERMANOVA p > 0.05) in both the ileal (Figure 1A) and caecal (Figure 1B) microbiota of weaned pigs.
In the ileum, the dominant phylum was Firmicutes (93.47%), followed by Actinobacteriota (5.35%), and Pseudomonadota (0.63%), with the remaining phyla (Bacteroidota, Chloroflexota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Spirochaetota) having a relative abundance lower than 0.3%. The most abundant families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the weaned pigs are presented in Figure 2. Interestingly, the Clostridiaceae family and Clostridium genus were numerically more abundant in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet, whereas the Lactobacillaceae family and Lactobacillus genus, coupled with the Limosilactobacillus genus for the 10% IS diet, were numerically more abundant in the control and the 10% IS-supplemented pigs (p > 0.10). However, none of the experimental diets led to statistically significant effects on the composition of the ileal microbiota in weaned pigs (p > 0.05).
In the caecum, Firmicutes (68.40%) and Bacteroidota (30.12%) were the predominant phyla, while Actinobacteriota (1.02%), Verrucomicrobiota (0.20%), Pseudomonadota (0.08%), Spirochaetota (0.05%), and Cyanobacteria (0.02%) were minor bacterial populations. The most abundant families and genera in the caecal microbiota of weaned pigs are presented in Figure 3, with statistically significant differences in the relative abundance shown in Figure 4. At the family level, the relative abundance of Prevotellaceae increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the control diet (p = 0.032), with this observation also occurring as a tendency compared to the 10% IS diet (p = 0.056) (Figure 3). At the genus level, the relative abundance of Coprococcus increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the control (p = 0.036) and 10% IS (p = 0.032) diets (Figure 4i), while the relative abundance of Lactobacillus decreased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the 10% IS diet (p = 0.032), with this observation also occurring as a tendency compared to the control diet (p = 0.064) (Figure 4ii). At the species level, the relative abundance of Alloprevotella rava (OTU_48, 90.43% identification similarity) was increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the 10% IS diet (p = 0.032), with this observation occurring as a tendency compared to the control diet (p = 0.064) (Figure 4iii).

3.2.2. Exp. 2 (Finishing Pigs)

Dietary supplementation of finishing pigs with the 5% IS led to a compositionally different caecal bacterial community compared to the control diet (PERMANOVA p = 0.039, Figure 5B), with this observation also occurring as a tendency for the ileal microbiota (PERMANOVA p = 0.066, Figure 5A).
In the ileum, Richness, Shannon Effective, and Simpson Effective indices were increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the control (p = 0.041, p = 0.009, and p = 0.041, respectively) and 10% IS (p = 0.017, p = 0.052, and p = 0.052, respectively), diets indicating a more diverse bacterial community in the ileum of these pigs. The Shannon Effective Index is presented in Figure 6i as a representative of the alpha diversity indices. The dominant phylum was Firmicutes (98.59%), with Actinobateriota (1.38%), Pseudomonadota (0.02%), Bacteroidota (0.01%), and Verrucomicrobiota (<0.001%) being present in low abundance. The most abundant families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the finishing pigs are presented in Figure 7, with statistically significant differences in the relative abundance shown in Figure 6. The relative abundance of the Clostridiaceae family (Figure 7), Clostridium genus (Figure 6ii), and Clostridium celatum/disporicum/saudiense (OTU_3, 98.33% identification similarity, Figure 6iii) was increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the control diet (p = 0.026 for all three comparisons), with this observation also occurring as a tendency compared to the 10% IS diet (p = 0.082 for all three comparisons).
In the caecum, the Simpson Effective Index was increased in pigs fed with the 5% and 10% IS diets compared to the control diet (p = 0.009 and p = 0.017, respectively), indicating that the experimental diets led to a more compositionally diverse caecal microbiota in these pigs (Figure 8i). The dominant phylum was Firmicutes (95.23%), followed by Bacteroidota (2.88%), and Actinobateriota (1.51%), with the remaining phyla (Spirochaetota, Pseudomonadota, Cyanobacteriota, and Verrucomicrobiota) having a relative abundance of less than 0.4%. The most abundant families and genera in the caecal microbiota of the finishing pigs are presented in Figure 9, with statistically significant differences in the relative abundance shown in Figure 8. The relative abundance of Streptococcaceae family and Streptococcus genus decreased in pigs fed with the 5% (p = 0.004 for both comparisons) and 10% (p = 0.017 for both comparisons) IS diets compared to the control diet (Figure 8ii and Figure 9), while the relative abundance of Clostridiaceae family and Clostridium genus increased in pigs fed with the 5% (p = 0.004 for both comparisons) and 10% (tendency, p = 0.052 for both comparisons) IS diets compared to the control diet (Figure 8iii and Figure 9). These observations were also evident at the species level, with the relative abundance of Streptococcus gallolyticus/alactolyticus (OTU_2, 100% identification similarity, Figure 8v) decreasing and that of Clostridium celatum/disporicum/saudiense (OTU_3, 98.33% identification similarity, Figure 8vi) increasing for 5% (p = 0.004 for both comparisons) and 10% (p = 0.017 and p = 0.004, respectively) IS diets compared to the control diet. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium pseudolongum (OTU_17, 99.77% identification similarity, Figure 8iv) increased in pigs fed with the 5% IS diet compared to the control (p = 0.030) and 10% IS (p = 0.009) diets.

4. Discussion

Agro-industrial waste by-products are promising feed ingredients associated with more sustainable and cost-effective livestock production and a reduced environmental burden [16]. However, prior research on their dietary and/or nutraceutical potential by investigating their impact on animal performance and health is essential. Previously, an innovative silage containing olive mill wastewater, grape pomace, and deproteinised feta cheese waste solids, major waste by-products of the Greek agro-industry, was developed and utilised in broiler nutrition with beneficial effects on performance and parameters of health and meat quality [27,28]. The current small-scale study aimed to provide insight on the potential of this IS as a diet ingredient for pigs by investigating its effects on the performance and composition of the gastrointestinal microbiota of weaned (Exp. 1) and finishing (Exp. 2) pigs.
In the present study, the IS addition at two inclusion levels (5% and 10%) had no effect on body weight or weight gain in either of the two experiments with the weaned and finishing pigs. Previous studies evaluating the use of olive mill, winery, or cheese-making waste by-products as feed ingredients in the diet of weaned, growing, and finishing pigs mostly reported no significant effects on performance parameters [23,25,37,38,39,40], except for one report [21], in which grape pomace-containing silage supplementation increased several of these parameters in weaned pigs. In the initial investigation of the same IS as a feed additive in broiler diets, the body weight and weight gain of the chicken significantly increased with the 10% inclusion level [28], but this effect was not replicated in the present study with the pigs. This difference in efficacy highlights the differences in digestive physiology between poultry and swine.
Considering the important role of the gastrointestinal microbiota on animal health and productivity, this study focused on whether IS could influence the composition of the microbial community in weaned and finishing pigs. Although several studies evaluating the use of olive mill, winery, or cheese-making waste by-products as feed ingredients in pig nutrition reported compositional changes in the gastrointestinal microbiota, the majority of them utilised culture-dependent PCR targeting specific bacterial populations in faeces [21,24,25,37,41], with only two of them performing a more in-depth investigation of the caecal and faecal microbial community using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing [23,39]. In the current work, the latter methodology was employed in an attempt to provide a better insight into the alterations induced by IS in the ileal and caecal microbiota.
In Exp. 1, IS inclusion in the diet of weaned pigs had a limited effect, mostly evident on the caecal microbiota. In particular, no significant differences were observed in the ileal microbiota; however, the 5% IS-fed pigs were characterised by a numerically higher relative abundance of the Clostridiaceae family and Clostridium genus, while the Lactobacillaceae family and Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus genera were numerically more abundant in the control and 10% IS groups. This observation might indicate that the 5% inclusion level promoted a faster maturation of the ileal microbiota post-weaning [42]. This notion is further supported by the compositional changes that occurred in the caecal microbiota of the 5% IS-fed pigs. Namely, the relative abundances of the Prevotellaceae family and Coprococcus genus increased while the relative abundance of the Lactobacillus genus decreased, all of which represent well-established shifts in the maturing microbiota [43,44,45,46,47]. This finding could be attributed to the flavonoids contained in the IS, as similar changes have been observed in the faecal microbiota of weaned pigs supplemented with quercetin, a flavonoid compound that is also present in winery and olive mill waste by-products [48,49]. The Prevotellaceae family and Coprococcus genus are involved in the fermentation of nondigestible carbohydrates and the production of short-chain fatty acids, as well as other important functions such as immunomodulation and colonisation resistance to pathogens, all of which contribute to the improved pig performance associated with these bacterial populations [43,47,50,51,52]. Furthermore, the inclusion of the 5% IS in the diet of weaned pigs led to an increase in the relative abundance of OTU_48, identified as a member of the Alloprevotella genus (90.43% similarity to A. rava), a typical coloniser of the caecal mucosa associated with nondigestible fibre degradation and propionate production [53,54,55]. Based on the above, the IS seems to have accelerated the maturation of the gastrointestinal microbiota by stimulating bacterial populations involved in the utilisation of complex carbohydrates and the production of short-chain fatty acids, rendering it a promising feed ingredient post-weaning that should be further explored in future studies.
Dietary supplementation with IS led to an alteration in the composition of the ileal and caecal microbiota of finishing pigs, with the 5% inclusion level exerting the strongest effect. In terms of α- and β-diversity, the ileal and caecal microbiota were compositionally more diverse and different in the 5% IS-fed pigs compared to the control group. Inclusion of 10% IS was also associated with increased diversity in the caecal microbiota. The main compositional changes induced by IS supplementation included an increase in the relative abundances of Clostrdiaceae family, Clostridium genus, and C. celatum/disporicum/saudiense (OTU_3, 98.33% identification similarity) in the ileum and caecum and a reduction in the relative abundances of Streptococcaceae family, Streptococcus genus, and S. gallolyticus/alactolyticus (OTU_2, 100% identification similarity) in the caecum. Similar observations were previously reported in weaned and growing pigs following dietary inclusion of quercetin and polyphenol-rich grape processing by-products, indicating that the observed changes are likely associated with the phenolic compounds of the olive mill and winery waste by-products of the IS [25,48,49]. C. celatum has previously been considered to contribute to carbohydrate metabolism, mucin degradation, and SCFA production as well as to cross-feeding by producing simpler carbohydrates and peptides in vitro and in pigs, whereas the increase of C. disporicum/saudiense was negatively correlated to growth and butyrate production in pigs [48,56,57], indicating that further research concerning the role of these clostridial species in pigs is required. S. gallolyticus/alactolyticus are members of the S. bovis/S. equinus complex, common colonisers of the gastrointestinal tract involved in protein and carbohydrate degradation and opportunistic pig pathogens with an emerging role in bacterial endocarditis [58,59,60], that have been considered signatures of the gastrointestinal dysbiosis induced by Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium and porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus infections in pigs [61,62]. An additional finding was the increase in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium pseudolongum (OTU_17, 99.77% identification similarity) in the caecum with IS supplementation, with similar observations reported in previous studies evaluating the use of olive mill, winery, or cheese-making waste by-products in pig diets associated with the nondigestible polysaccharides contained in these ingredients [21,23,24]. B. pseudolongum has been shown to possess a wide-ranging repertoire of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes as well as to exert immunomodulatory effects via direct interaction with the host or compositional manipulation of the gastrointestinal microbiota. Thus, IS inclusion in the diet of the finishing pigs was associated with a reduction of opportunistic pathogens and stimulation of commensals with potentially beneficial functions in pig nutrition and health that merit further research.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, IS addition in the diets led to alteration in the ileal and caecal microbiota of weaned and finishing pigs, with the 5% inclusion level considered to be most effective. In the case of weaned pigs, IS supplementation was associated with an increase in the Prevotellaceae family, Coprococcus, and Alloprevotella genera and a reduction in the Lactobacillus genus in the caecum, indicative of a more mature microbiota capable of complex polysaccharide utilisation. In finishing pigs, IS supplementation increased C. celatum/disporicum/saudiense and B. pseudolongum and reduced S. gallolyticus/alactolyticus, suggesting an enhanced carbohydrate metabolism and improved health in the gastrointestinal tract. The findings of this small-scale study show that innovative silage is a promising feed ingredient for use in pig nutrition that should be further investigated regarding its effects on performance and gut functionality and health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, I.S. and I.G.; methodology, I.G., G.M., C.Z. and E.B.; software, A.N. and G.M.; validation, I.S. and I.G.; formal analysis, I.S., E.B., L.J. and G.M.; investigation, I.S., A.T., E.B., L.J., J.W. and S.S.; resources, I.L., A.T., L.J. and E.G; data curation, A.N., A.T., I.L., G.M., L.J. and B.V.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S., A.T., B.V. and A.N.; writing—review and editing, B.V., I.L., A.N., G.M., L.J., A.T., E.B., E.G. and S.S.; visualisation, I.S. and B.V.; supervision, I.S. and I.G.; project administration, I.S.; funding acquisition, I.S., I.G., L.J. and J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge support of this research work by the project “Development of research infrastructures for the design, production and promotion of the quality and safety characteristics of agri-food and bio-functional products “(EV-AGRO-NUTRITION)” (MIS 5047235), which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Data Availability Statement

Primary sequencing data were uploaded to the ENA public repository with the accession number PRJEB61448.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Databases. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  2. Celi, P.; Cowieson, A.J.; Fru-Nji, F.; Steinert, R.E.; Kluenter, A.M.; Verlhac, V. Gastrointestinal functionality in animal nutrition and health: New opportunities for sustainable animal production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 234, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kamada, N.; Chen, G.Y.; Inohara, N.; Nunez, G. Control of pathogens and pathobionts by the gut microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rowland, I.; Gibson, G.; Heinken, A.; Scott, K.; Swann, J.; Thiele, I.; Tuohy, K. Gut microbiota functions: Metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Gresse, R.; Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Fleury, M.A.; Van de Wiele, T.; Forano, E.; Blanquet-Diot, S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: Understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 851–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. DeGruttola, A.K.; Low, D.; Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E. Current understanding of dysbiosis in disease in human and animal models. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2016, 22, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Trevisi, P.; Luise, D.; Correa, F.; Bosi, P. Timely Control of Gastrointestinal Eubiosis: A Strategic Pillar of Pig Health. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holman, D.B.; Chenier, M.R. Antimicrobial use in swine production and its effect on the swine gut microbiota and antimicrobial resistance. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lekagul, A.; Tangcharoensathien, V.; Yeung, S. Patterns of antibiotic use in global pig production: A systematic review. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2019, 7, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zeineldin, M.; Aldridge, B.; Lowe, J. Antimicrobial Effects on Swine Gastrointestinal Microbiota and Their Accompanying Antibiotic Resistome. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goutard, F.L.; Bordier, M.; Calba, C.; Erlacher-Vindel, E.; Góchez, D.; de Balogh, K.; Benigno, C.; Kalpravidh, W.; Roger, F.; Vong, S. Antimicrobial policy interventions in food animal production in South East Asia. BMJ 2017, 358, j3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Xiong, W.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, Z. Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in food animals. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 18377–18384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tiseo, K.; Huber, L.; Gilbert, M.; Robinson, T.P.; Van Boeckel, T.P. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wallinga, D.; Smit, L.A.M.; Davis, M.F.; Casey, J.A.; Nachman, K.E. A Review of the Effectiveness of Current US Policies on Antimicrobial Use in Meat and Poultry Production. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2022, 9, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ajila, C.M.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M.; Tyagi, R.D.; Godbout, S.; Valero, J.R. Bio-processing of agro-byproducts to animal feed. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2012, 32, 382–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lemes, A.C.; Egea, M.B.; de Oliveira Filho, J.G.; Gauterio, G.V.; Ribeiro, B.D.; Coelho, M.A.Z. Biological Approaches for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds From Agro-industrial By-products: A Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 802543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ominski, K.; McAllister, T.; Stanford, K.; Mengistu, G.; Kebebe, E.G.; Omonijo, F.; Cordeiro, M.; Legesse, G.; Wittenberg, K. Utilization of by-products and food waste in livestock production systems: A Canadian perspective. Anim. Front. 2021, 11, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Reguengo, L.M.; Salgaco, M.K.; Sivieri, K.; Marostica Junior, M.R. Agro-industrial by-products: Valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Food Res. Int. 2022, 152, 110871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rauw, W.M.; Rydhmer, L.; Kyriazakis, I.; Overland, M.; Gilbert, H.; Dekkers, J.C.; Hermesch, S.; Bouquet, A.; Gomez Izquierdo, E.; Louveau, I.; et al. Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 3575–3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kafantaris, I.; Stagos, D.; Kotsampasi, B.; Hatzis, A.; Kypriotakis, A.; Gerasopoulos, K.; Makri, S.; Goutzourelas, N.; Mitsagga, C.; Giavasis, I.; et al. Grape pomace improves performance, antioxidant status, fecal microbiota and meat quality of piglets. Animal 2018, 12, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nguyen Cong, O.; Taminiau, B.; Pham Kim, D.; Daube, G.; Nguyen Van, G.; Bindelle, J.; Abdulaye Fall, P.; Vu Dinh, T.; Hornick, J.L. Effect of increasing levels of rice distillers’ by-product on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile and colonic microbiota of weaned piglets. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 788–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tardiolo, G.; Romeo, O.; Zumbo, A.; Di Marsico, M.; Sutera, A.M.; Cigliano, R.A.; Paytuvi, A.; D’Alessandro, E. Characterization of the Nero Siciliano Pig Fecal Microbiota after a Liquid Whey-Supplemented Diet. Animals 2023, 13, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sanchez, C.J.; Barrero-Dominguez, B.; Martinez-Miro, S.; Madrid, J.; Banos, A.; Aguinaga, M.A.; Lopez, S.; Hernandez, F. Use of Olive Pulp for Gestating Iberian Sow Feeding: Influence on Performance, Health Status Indicators, and Fecal Microbiota. Animals 2022, 12, 3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fiesel, A.; Gessner, D.K.; Most, E.; Eder, K. Effects of dietary polyphenol-rich plant products from grape or hop on pro-inflammatory gene expression in the intestine, nutrient digestibility and faecal microbiota of weaned pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2014, 10, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ao, W.; Cheng, M.; Chen, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Liu, M.; Zhou, B. Fermented Apple Pomace Improves Plasma Biochemical and Antioxidant Indicators and Fecal Microbiota of Weaned Pigs. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Petrotos, K.; Papaioannou, C.; Kokkas, S.; Gkoutsidis, P.; Skoufos, I.; Tzora, A.; Bonos, E.; Tsinas, A.; Giavasis, I.; Mitsagga, C. Optimization of the Composition of a Novel Bioactive Silage Produced by Mixing of Ground Maize Grains with Olive Mill Waste Waters, Grape Pomace and Feta Cheese Whey. AgriEngineering 2021, 3, 868–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bonos, E.; Skoufos, I.; Petrotos, K.; Giavasis, I.; Mitsagga, C.; Fotou, K.; Vasilopoulou, K.; Giannenas, I.; Gouva, E.; Tsinas, A.; et al. Innovative Use of Olive, Winery and Cheese Waste By-Products as Functional Ingredients in Broiler Nutrition. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Association of Analytical Chemists, AOAC International: Arlington, VA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  30. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; p. 420. [Google Scholar]
  31. Klindworth, A.; Pruesse, E.; Schweer, T.; Peplies, J.; Quast, C.; Horn, M.; Glockner, F.O. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lagkouvardos, I.; Joseph, D.; Kapfhammer, M.; Giritli, S.; Horn, M.; Haller, D.; Clavel, T. IMNGS: A comprehensive open resource of processed 16S rRNA microbial profiles for ecology and diversity studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Reitmeier, S.; Hitch, T.C.A.; Treichel, N.; Fikas, N.; Hausmann, B.; Ramer-Tait, A.E.; Neuhaus, K.; Berry, D.; Haller, D.; Lagkouvardos, I.; et al. Handling of spurious sequences affects the outcome of high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiling. ISME Commun. 2021, 1, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lagkouvardos, I.; Fischer, S.; Kumar, N.; Clavel, T. Rhea: A transparent and modular R pipeline for microbial profiling based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons. PeerJ 2017, 5, e2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ferrer, P.; Calvet, S.; Garcia-Rebollar, P.; de Blas, C.; Jimenez-Belenguer, A.I.; Hernandez, P.; Piquer, O.; Cerisuelo, A. Partially defatted olive cake in finishing pig diets: Implications on performance, faecal microbiota, carcass quality, slurry composition and gas emission. Animal 2020, 14, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Verge-Merida, G.; Barroeta, A.C.; Guardiola, F.; Verdu, M.; Balart, M.; Font, I.F.M.; Sola-Oriol, D. Crude and acid oils from olive pomace as alternative fat sources in growing-finishing pigs. Animal 2021, 15, 100389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, R.; Yu, H.; Fang, H.; Jin, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, J.; Zhou, C.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; Fu, Y.; et al. Effects of dietary grape pomace on the intestinal microbiota and growth performance of weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 74, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nessmith, W.B., Jr.; Nelssen, J.L.; Tokach, M.D.; Goodband, R.D.; Bergström, J.R. Effects of substituting deproteinized whey and(or) crystalline lactose for dried whey on weanling pig performance2. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 3222–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kobayashi, Y.; Itoh, A.; Miyawaki, K.; Koike, S.; Iwabuchi, O.; Iimura, Y.; Kobashi, Y.; Kawashima, T.; Wakamatsu, J.; Hattori, A.; et al. Effect of liquid whey feeding on fecal microbiota of mature and growing pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2011, 82, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. De Rodas, B.; Youmans, B.P.; Danzeisen, J.L.; Tran, H.; Johnson, T.J. Microbiome profiling of commercial pigs from farrow to finish. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 1778–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mach, N.; Berri, M.; Estelle, J.; Levenez, F.; Lemonnier, G.; Denis, C.; Leplat, J.J.; Chevaleyre, C.; Billon, Y.; Dore, J.; et al. Early-life establishment of the swine gut microbiome and impact on host phenotypes. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015, 7, 554–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Fang, C.; Zhao, L.; Chen, F. The maturing development of gut microbiota in commercial piglets during the weaning transition. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Guevarra, R.B.; Hong, S.H.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, B.R.; Shin, J.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, B.N.; Kim, Y.H.; Wattanaphansak, S.; Isaacson, R.E.; et al. The dynamics of the piglet gut microbiome during the weaning transition in association with health and nutrition. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Choudhury, R.; Middelkoop, A.; Boekhorst, J.; Gerrits, W.J.J.; Kemp, B.; Bolhuis, J.E.; Kleerebezem, M. Early life feeding accelerates gut microbiome maturation and suppresses acute post-weaning stress in piglets. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 7201–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luise, D.; Le Sciellour, M.; Buchet, A.; Resmond, R.; Clement, C.; Rossignol, M.N.; Jardet, D.; Zemb, O.; Belloc, C.; Merlot, E. The fecal microbiota of piglets during weaning transition and its association with piglet growth across various farm environments. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0250655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, B.; Qin, W.; Xu, Y.; Yang, W.; Chen, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhao, J.; Ma, L. Dietary Quercetin Supplementation Attenuates Diarrhea and Intestinal Damage by Regulating Gut Microbiota in Weanling Piglets. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 6221012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tapia-Quiros, P.; Montenegro-Landivar, M.F.; Reig, M.; Vecino, X.; Cortina, J.L.; Saurina, J.; Granados, M. Recovery of Polyphenols from Agri-Food By-Products: The Olive Oil and Winery Industries Cases. Foods 2022, 11, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009, 294, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Amat, S.; Lantz, H.; Munyaka, P.M.; Willing, B.P. Prevotella in Pigs: The Positive and Negative Associations with Production and Health. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Singh, V.; Lee, G.; Son, H.; Koh, H.; Kim, E.S.; Unno, T.; Shin, J.H. Butyrate producers, “The Sentinel of Gut”: Their intestinal significance with and beyond butyrate, and prospective use as microbial therapeutics. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1103836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Holman, D.B.; Brunelle, B.W.; Trachsel, J.; Allen, H.K. Meta-analysis to define a core microbiota in the swine gut. mSystems 2017, 2, e00004-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Gao, Q.; Sun, G.; Duan, J.; Luo, C.; Yangji, C.; Zhong, R.; Chen, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wangdui, B.; Zhang, H. Alterations in gut microbiota improve SCFA production and fiber utilization in Tibetan pigs fed alfalfa diet. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 969524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, J.; Xu, R.; Jia, M.; Su, Y.; Zhu, W. Metatranscriptomic analysis of colonic microbiota’s functional response to different dietary fibers in growing pigs. Anim. Microbiome 2021, 3, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Torres-Pitarch, A.; Gardiner, G.E.; Cormican, P.; Rea, M.; Crispie, F.; O’Doherty, J.V.; Cozannet, P.; Ryan, T.; Lawlor, P.G. Effect of cereal soaking and carbohydrase supplementation on growth, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microbiota in liquid-fed grow-finishing pigs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Raimondi, S.; Musmeci, E.; Candeliere, F.; Amaretti, A.; Rossi, M. Identification of mucin degraders of the human gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jans, C.; Meile, L.; Lacroix, C.; Stevens, M.J. Genomics, evolution, and molecular epidemiology of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex (SBSEC). Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 33, 419–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moreno, L.Z.; Matajira, C.E.C.; Gomes, V.T.M.; Silva, A.P.S.; Mesquita, R.E.; Christ, A.P.G.; Sato, M.I.Z.; Moreno, A.M. Molecular and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of atypical Streptococcus species from porcine clinical specimens. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 44, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sitthicharoenchai, P.; Burrough, E.R.; Arruda, B.L.; Sahin, O.; Dos Santos, J.G.; Magstadt, D.R.; Pineyro, P.E.; Schwartz, K.J.; Rahe, M.C. Streptococcus gallolyticus and Bacterial Endocarditis in Swine, United States, 2015–2020. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bescucci, D.M.; Moote, P.E.; Ortega Polo, R.; Uwiera, R.R.E.; Inglis, G.D. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Temporally Modulates the Enteric Microbiota and Host Responses To Overcome Colonization Resistance in Swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01569-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Z.; Zhang, W.; Su, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Ma, L.; Sun, J.; Guo, J.; Wen, F.; Mei, K.; et al. Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in piglets of different breeds exposed to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 990642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 01723 g001 550
Figure 1. Multidimensional scaling (MSD) plots based on the generalised UniFrac dissimilarity matrix of ileal (A) and caecal (B) microbial profiles of each dietary treatment group of weaned pigs. There was no statistical significance (p > 0.05) for all pairwise comparisons of the dietary treatment groups based on the PERMANOVA test. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Figure 1. Multidimensional scaling (MSD) plots based on the generalised UniFrac dissimilarity matrix of ileal (A) and caecal (B) microbial profiles of each dietary treatment group of weaned pigs. There was no statistical significance (p > 0.05) for all pairwise comparisons of the dietary treatment groups based on the PERMANOVA test. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Microorganisms 11 01723 g001
Microorganisms 11 01723 g002 550
Figure 2. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the weaned pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Figure 2. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the weaned pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Microorganisms 11 01723 g002
Microorganisms 11 01723 g003 550
Figure 3. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the caecal microbiota of the weaned pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Figure 3. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the caecal microbiota of the weaned pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Microorganisms 11 01723 g003
Microorganisms 11 01723 g004 550
Figure 4. Differential relative abundance of bacterial genera (i,ii) and OTUs (iii) in the caecal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in weaned pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the relative abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05). A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Figure 4. Differential relative abundance of bacterial genera (i,ii) and OTUs (iii) in the caecal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in weaned pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the relative abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05). A total of five replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Microorganisms 11 01723 g004
Microorganisms 11 01723 g005 550
Figure 5. Multidimensional scaling (MSD) plots based on the generalised UniFrac dissimilarity matrix of ileal (A) and caecal (B) microbial profiles of each dietary treatment group of finishing pigs. PERMANOVA pairwise comparisons of the dietary treatment groups with a p-value < 0.05 denote statistically significant differences. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Figure 5. Multidimensional scaling (MSD) plots based on the generalised UniFrac dissimilarity matrix of ileal (A) and caecal (B) microbial profiles of each dietary treatment group of finishing pigs. PERMANOVA pairwise comparisons of the dietary treatment groups with a p-value < 0.05 denote statistically significant differences. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Microorganisms 11 01723 g005
Microorganisms 11 01723 g006 550
Figure 6. Differences in alpha diversity indices (i) and relative abundance of bacterial genera (ii) and OTUs (iii) in the ileal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in finishing pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the Shannon Effective Index and the relative bacterial abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01). A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Figure 6. Differences in alpha diversity indices (i) and relative abundance of bacterial genera (ii) and OTUs (iii) in the ileal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in finishing pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the Shannon Effective Index and the relative bacterial abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01). A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Microorganisms 11 01723 g006
Microorganisms 11 01723 g007 550
Figure 7. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the finishing pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Figure 7. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the ileal microbiota of the finishing pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Microorganisms 11 01723 g007
Microorganisms 11 01723 g008 550
Figure 8. Differences in alpha diversity indices (i) and relative abundance of bacterial genera (ii,iii) and OTUs (iv–vi) in the caecal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in finishing pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the Simpson Effective Index and the relative bacterial abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01). A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Figure 8. Differences in alpha diversity indices (i) and relative abundance of bacterial genera (ii,iii) and OTUs (iv–vi) in the caecal microbiota in response to IS supplementation in finishing pigs. The bold line represents the median, while the * symbol indicates statistically significant differences in the Simpson Effective Index and the relative bacterial abundance between dietary treatment groups (Wilcoxon Rank Sum statistical test), with the number of stars indicating the level of significance (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01). A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig). A, control; B, 5% IS; and C, 10% IS.
Microorganisms 11 01723 g008
Microorganisms 11 01723 g009 550
Figure 9. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the caecal microbiota of the finishing pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Figure 9. Stacked bar plots of the average relative abundance of the top bacterial families and genera in the caecal microbiota of the finishing pigs fed with the control (A), 5% IS (B), and 10% IS (C) diets. A total of six replicates were used per experimental diet (replicate = pig).
Microorganisms 11 01723 g009
Table
Table 1. Composition and chemical analysis of the control and experimental diets of Exp. 1.
Table 1. Composition and chemical analysis of the control and experimental diets of Exp. 1.
Ingredient (%)Weaned Pig Diets
Control5% IS10% IS
Maize43.6036.9730.34
Innovative Silage (IS)0.005.0010.00
Soybean meal (47% CP)15.8016.3716.94
Barley20.0020.0020.00
Fishmeal (62% CP)3.003.003.00
Wheat middlings3.003.003.00
Soybean oil2.003.064.12
Minerals and vitamins premix *6.006.006.00
Whey permeate (4.5% CP)6.006.006.00
Zinc oxide0.300.300.30
Benzoic acid0.300.300.30
Chemical analysis (as fed basis)
Digestible energy, MJ/kg13.8713.8613.86
Crude protein, %17.6417.6417.64
Dry matter, %89.0387.6886.32
Ash, %5.455.455.46
Crude fat, %4.505.436.37
Crude fibre, %2.902.862.82
Acid detergent fibre, %3.303.263.22
Neutral detergent fibre, %9.869.619.36
Ca, %0.580.580.58
Total P, %0.490.480.48
Lysine, %1.181.191.19
Methionine + Cystine, %0.740.740.73
* Provided per kg of complete diet: 15,000 IU retinyl acetate, 50 mcg 25-hydroxycholecalciferol, 9.96 mg alpha-tocopherol acetate, 10.02 mg menadione nicotinamide bisulphite, 3 mg thiamine mononitrate, 10.02 mg riboflavin, 6 mg pantothenic acid, 6 mg pyridoxine hydrochloride, 40.02 mcg cyanocobalamin, 100 mg ascorbic acid, 35 mg niacin, 300 mcg biotin, 1.5 mg folic acid, 375 mg choline chloride, 200 mg ferrous sulphate monohydrate, 90 mg copper sulphate pentahydrate, 60 mg manganese sulphate monohydrate, 100 mg zinc sulphate monohydrate, 2 mg calcium iodate, 300 mg sodium selenide, 150 mg L-selenomethionine—selenium, 1500 FYT 6-phytase, 80 U β-1,4-endoglucanase, 70 U β-1,3 (4)-endoglucanase, 270 U β-1,4-endoxylanase, 5000 mg benzoic acid, 40.8 mg butylated hydroxy-toluene, and 3.5 mg propyl gallate.
Table
Table 2. Composition and chemical analysis of the control and experimental diets of Exp. 2.
Table 2. Composition and chemical analysis of the control and experimental diets of Exp. 2.
Ingredient (g/kg)Finishing Pig Diets
Control5% IS10% IS
Wheat45.0037.4530.05
Innovative silage (IS)0.005.0010.00
Soybean meal (47% CP)14.0015.6017.10
Barley27.6027.6027.60
Wheat middlings9.509.509.50
Soybean oil1.152.103.00
Minerals and vitamins premix *1.001.001.00
Booster supplement †0.250.250.25
Salt0.500.500.50
Limestone1.001.001.00
Chemical analysis (as fed basis)
Digestible energy, MJ/kg13.3413.3413.34
Crude protein, %16.5516.7516.95
Dry matter, %87.6886.3384.98
Ash, %4.564.574.58
Crude fat, %2.433.384.33
Crude fibre, %3.883.863.84
Acid detergent fibre, %4.624.594.56
Neutral detergent fibre, %13.6513.4513.24
Ca, %0.570.570.57
Total P, %0.390.390.39
Lysine, %1.071.101.13
Methionine + Cystine, %0.620.620.62
Threonine, %0.750.760.78
Tryptophan, %0.230.230.24
* Provided per kg complete diet: 6500 IU retinyl acetate; 1200 IU cholecalciferol; 12.5 mcg 25-hydroxycholecalciferol; 60 mg alpha-tocopherol acetate; 2 mg menadione nicotinamide bisulphite; 2 mg thiamine mononitrate; 7 mg riboflavin; 25 mg pantothenic acid; 3 mg pyridoxine hydrochloride; 25 mcg cyanocobalamin; 25 mg nicotinic acid; 1 mg folic acid; 0.15 mg biotin; 300 mg choline chloride; 108 mg Fe from ferrous sulphate monohydrate; 25 mg Cu from copper sulphate; 48 mg Mn from manganese oxide; 84 mg Zn from zinc oxide; 1.2 mg I from calcium iodate; 0.24 mg Se from sodium selenite; 700 mg methionine; 100 mg L-tryptophan; 2730 L-Lysine mg HCl; 1182.02 mg L-threonine; 1500 FYT 6-fytase; 200 FXU endo-1,4-β-xylanase. † Provided per kg of complete diet: 871.88 mg L-lysine HCl; 824.74 mg L-threonine; 98.87 mg L-tryptophan; and 44 mg DL-methionine.
Table
Table 3. Effect of IS supplementation on the performance of weaned and finishing pigs.
Table 3. Effect of IS supplementation on the performance of weaned and finishing pigs.
Weaned Pigs (Exp. 1)Control5% IS10% ISSEMp-Value
Initial body weight *, kg8.308.328.400.1770.975
Final body weight *, kg26.4726.3827.640.4940.518
Weight gain *, kg18.1618.0619.240.3910.401
Finishing pigs (Exp. 2)
Initial body weight †, kg57.7559.4861.180.8500.272
Final body weight †, kg122.08123.60127.951.5100.281
Weight gain †, kg64.3364.1166.761.2500.659
* n = 45 (15 pigs per experimental diet); † n = 18 (6 pigs per experimental diet); IS, innovative silage; and SEM, Standard Error of Mean.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skoufos, I.; Nelli, A.; Venardou, B.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Giannenas, I.; Magklaras, G.; Zacharis, C.; Jin, L.; Wang, J.; Gouva, E.; et al. Use of an Innovative Silage of Agro-Industrial Waste By-Products in Pig Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Its Effects on the Pig Gastrointestinal Microbiota. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071723

AMA Style

Skoufos I, Nelli A, Venardou B, Lagkouvardos I, Giannenas I, Magklaras G, Zacharis C, Jin L, Wang J, Gouva E, et al. Use of an Innovative Silage of Agro-Industrial Waste By-Products in Pig Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Its Effects on the Pig Gastrointestinal Microbiota. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7):1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071723

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skoufos, Ioannis, Aikaterini Nelli, Brigkita Venardou, Ilias Lagkouvardos, Ilias Giannenas, Georgios Magklaras, Christos Zacharis, Lizhi Jin, Jin Wang, Evangelia Gouva, and et al. 2023. "Use of an Innovative Silage of Agro-Industrial Waste By-Products in Pig Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Its Effects on the Pig Gastrointestinal Microbiota" Microorganisms 11, no. 7: 1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071723

APA Style

Skoufos, I., Nelli, A., Venardou, B., Lagkouvardos, I., Giannenas, I., Magklaras, G., Zacharis, C., Jin, L., Wang, J., Gouva, E., Skoufos, S., Bonos, E., & Tzora, A. (2023). Use of an Innovative Silage of Agro-Industrial Waste By-Products in Pig Nutrition: A Pilot Study of Its Effects on the Pig Gastrointestinal Microbiota. Microorganisms, 11(7), 1723. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071723

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop