Next Article in Journal
Identification of Mycoplasma Species in Cattle Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease Mortality
Previous Article in Journal
Cast from the Past? Microbial Diversity of a Neolithic Stone Circle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome’s Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review

by
Luana Alexandrescu
1,2,
Adrian Paul Suceveanu
1,2,*,
Alina Mihaela Stanigut
2,3,
Doina Ecaterina Tofolean
2,4,
Ani Docu Axelerad
2,
Ionut Eduard Iordache
5,
Alexandra Herlo
6,
Andreea Nelson Twakor
7,
Alina Doina Nicoara
2,7,
Cristina Tocia
1,2,
Andrei Dumitru
1,
Eugen Dumitru
1,2,8,
Laura Maria Condur
2,
Cristian Florentin Aftenie
2 and
Ioan Tiberiu Tofolean
1,2
1
Gastroenterology Department, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, 145 Tomis Blvd., 900591 Constanta, Romania
2
Medicine Faculty, “Ovidius” University of Constanta, 1 Universitatii Street, 900470 Constanta, Romania
3
Nephrology Department, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, 145 Tomis Blvd., 900591 Constanta, Romania
4
Pneumology Department, Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, 145 Tomis Blvd., 900591 Constanta, Romania
5
Department of General Surgery, “Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, 145 Tomis Blvd., 900591 Constanta, Romania
6
Department XIII, Discipline of Infectious Diseases, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 2 Eftimie Murgu Square, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
7
Internal Medicine Department, Sf. Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Hospital, 145 Tomis Blvd., 900591 Constanta, Romania
8
Academy of Romanian Scientist, 3 Ilfov Street, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(11), 2341; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112341
Submission received: 1 November 2024 / Revised: 13 November 2024 / Accepted: 14 November 2024 / Published: 16 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Gut Microbiota)

Abstract

:
Recent advances have highlighted the gut microbiota as a significant contributor to the development and progression of atherosclerosis, which is an inflammatory cardiovascular disease (CVD) characterized by plaque buildup within arterial walls. The gut microbiota, consisting of a diverse collection of microorganisms, impacts the host’s metabolism, immune responses, and lipid processing, all of which contribute to atherosclerosis. This review explores the complex mechanisms through which gut dysbiosis promotes atherogenesis. We emphasize the potential of integrating microbiota modulation with traditional cardiovascular care, offering a holistic approach to managing atherosclerosis. Important pathways involve the translocation of inflammatory microbial components, modulation of lipid metabolism through metabolites such as trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), and the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that influence vascular health. Studies reveal distinct microbial profiles in atherosclerosis patients, with increased pathogenic bacteria (Megamonas, Veillonella, Streptococcus) and reduced anti-inflammatory genera (Bifidobacterium, Roseburia), highlighting the potential of these profiles as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Probiotics are live microorganisms that have health benefits on the host. Prebiotics are non-digestible dietary fibers that stimulate the growth and activity of beneficial gut bacteria. Interventions targeting microbiota, such as probiotics, prebiotics, dietary modifications, and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), present effective approaches for restoring microbial equilibrium and justifying cardiovascular risk. Future research should focus on longitudinal, multi-omics studies to clarify causal links and refine therapeutic applications.

1. Introduction

The gut metagenome has been identified as an environmental factor affecting adiposity and obesity through the modulation of host lipid metabolism [1]. It serves as a source of inflammatory chemicals, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and peptidoglycan, which may contribute to metabolic diseases [2]. The gut microbiota, a dynamic and diverse community of trillions of microorganisms, plays a significant role in human health, influencing numerous physiological processes, including metabolism, immune modulation, and even brain function [3]. The gut microbiota consists of six phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes being the predominant types. The fungi most frequently examined in gut microbiota studies include Candida, Saccharomyces, Malassezia, and Cladosporium. The human gut microbiota includes not only bacteria and fungi but also viruses, phages, and archaea, predominantly M. smithii [4,5]. Dysbiosis, or the imbalance of microbial species within the gut, has been increasingly linked to metabolic and inflammatory diseases, ranging from obesity and type 2 diabetes to cardiovascular diseases like atherosclerosis [6,7]. Researchers are increasingly acknowledging the “gut–heart axis” as a critical focus for understanding the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [8].
Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory condition resulting from dysregulation of lipid metabolism and an inappropriate immune response, characterized by the buildup of cholesterol-rich macrophages within the arterial wall [9]. The gut microbiota metabolizes the dietary lipid phosphatidylcholine into trimethylamine, which induces atherosclerosis and inflammation [10]. Additionally, levels of choline, trimethylamine N-oxide, and betaine have been identified as predictors of CVD risk in humans [11]. Lv et al. utilized pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, revealing that atherosclerotic plaques harbor bacterial DNA with phylotypes prevalent in the gut microbiota and that the quantity of bacterial DNA in the plaques is linked with inflammation [12].
Furthermore, the gut microbiota influences lipid metabolism by regulating the absorption and processing of dietary fats and cholesterol [13]. Specific microbial communities facilitate lipid accumulation in the arterial wall, thereby advancing the development of atherosclerotic plaques. Short-chain fatty acids, specifically acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are generated by gut bacteria via the fermentation of dietary fibers, representing a significant connection in this relationship [14]. SCFAs display both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects on vascular health. Leukocytes must undergo diapedesis to reach the damage site [15]. Adhesion molecules help this process. For example, propionate demonstrates anti-inflammatory properties that may offer protection against atherosclerosis [14]. Conversely, acetate may enhance cholesterol production, exacerbating lipid buildup in arterial walls [15].
Studies utilizing high-throughput sequencing have demonstrated that patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis often display an increase in pathogenic genera, such as Megamonas, Streptococcus, and Veillonella [16]. They also show a reduction in beneficial bacteria, including Bifidobacterium and Roseburia [16]. The compositional shifts may create an inflammatory environment that promotes atherosclerotic changes. This shows the potential of gut microbiota as both a biomarker and therapeutic target for CVD [17].
Microbiota-targeting methods face many challenges when used in clinical practice. Due to study designs, patient groups, intervention methods, and clinical trial outcomes are inconsistent, which is a major issue. The developing regulatory frameworks for various medicines, especially FMT and microbiota-modulating medications, can hinder clinical acceptance [2]. Few long-term studies have examined the efficacy and safety of these interventions in diverse patient populations [18,19,20].
This narrative review will investigate the evidence linking gut microbiota composition with atherosclerosis progression. We will explore potential pathways as well as the impact of dietary and microbial interventions. Our main aim is to understand the gut–heart axis and its implications for cardiovascular health.

2. Pathophysiological Mechanisms

The association between gut microbiota and atherosclerosis involves several mechanisms, particularly inflammation, lipid metabolism, and the synthesis of SCFAs [21].

2.1. Inflammation and Immune Activation

One of the most significant ways gut microbiota can influence atherosclerosis is through inflammatory responses. The imbalance in microbial composition can compromise gut barrier integrity. This is something called “leaky gut” (increased permeability) [22]. This mechanism allows bacterial components (LPS) to translocate from the gut into the bloodstream [23]. These potent pro-inflammatory molecules from the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria stimulate the immune system, triggering a systemic inflammatory response [24]. Once in circulation, LPS binds to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on immune cells, activating the nuclear factor–Kappa B (NF-κB) pathway, which in turn promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines [25]. The start and progression of atherosclerosis depend on inflammation. The endothelium recruits immune cells, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines such IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β, leading to plaque instability [26]. Recent studies show that gut-derived LPS and systemic inflammation interact, supporting the gut–heart axis’s role in atherosclerosis [27,28,29].

2.2. Lipid Metabolism Modulation

Besides inflammatory pathways, the gut microbiota profoundly affects lipid metabolism, which is a critical element in the progression of atherosclerosis. Specific gut bacteria metabolize dietary constituents, including choline, phosphatidylcholine, and L-carnitine, into trimethylamine (TMA). Figure 1 shows that TMA is converted by the liver into TMAO [23]. This compound is linked to atherogenesis, as it can strengthen cholesterol deposition in arterial walls, hinder reverse cholesterol transport, and provoke inflammatory responses in vascular tissues [30].
Wang et al. showed that elevated plasma TMAO levels are strongly linked to increased cardiovascular risk, and their study demonstrates that reducing TMA formation in the gut can attenuate atherosclerosis in mice [32]. This pathway exemplifies how the gut microbiota’s metabolic functions can directly contribute to atherogenic processes through modifications in lipid processing [33].

2.3. SCFA Production and Vascular Health

SCFAs, including acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are another important group of microbial metabolites that modulate host physiology [34]. Produced by gut bacteria through the fermentation of dietary fibers, SCFAs have both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects on vascular health [28]. Propionate, for instance, has anti-inflammatory properties that may protect against atherosclerosis by inhibiting vascular inflammation and reducing lipogenesis. Butyrate is known for its beneficial effects on gut health, promoting barrier integrity and anti-inflammatory cytokine production [35]. Nonetheless, the function of acetate is more intricate, as it can act as a substrate for cholesterol synthesis in the liver. This can lead to lipid accumulation in the arteries [36].
Beyond these direct impacts, gut microbiota can modulate immune cells involved in plaque formation and progression [21]. Certain bacteria produce metabolites that activate regulatory T-cells (Tregs), which have anti-inflammatory effects. They can potentially reduce plaque buildup and improve plaque stability [30]. Dysbiosis, in contrast, can result in elevated levels of Th17 cells that produce pro-inflammatory cytokines like as IL-17 [37]. They are known to accelerate atherosclerosis progression [24]. Moreover, certain bacteria such as Streptococcus and Veillonella, developed in atherosclerotic patients, have been detected within atherosclerotic plaques themselves. This means that this possible microbial translocation can directly affect plaque composition [38]. Figure 2 below summarizes some of the consequences of dysbiosis.
Thus, the gut microbiota influences atherosclerosis through multiple pathways involving inflammatory signals, lipid metabolism, SCFA production, and immune modulation [39]. These methods show the potential of gut microbiota to act as a biomarker for cardiovascular risk and for creating therapeutic targets. It establishes the basis of the “gut–heart axis”, showing the significance of gut health in vascular health and the prevention of atherosclerosis [40].

3. Gut Microbiota Profiles in Atherosclerosis

The composition of gut microbiota differs significantly between individuals with atherosclerosis and healthy controls. Specific microbial profiles may influence the progression of this disease [41]. High-throughput sequencing technologies, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, have allowed researchers to identify microbial taxa associated with atherosclerotic CVD [34]. Studies on both humans and animal models have found that patients with atherosclerosis have a secondary manifestation, and that is an imbalance in gut microbial composition, with a higher prevalence of pro-inflammatory bacteria and a lower presence of beneficial, anti-inflammatory microorganisms [42,43,44]. Figure 3 shows the microbiota sites affect atherosclerosis.
One prominent finding in gut microbiota research on atherosclerosis is the increased abundance of certain bacterial genera, such as Megamonas, Veillonella, and Streptococcus in patients with this condition [45]. Megamonas has been linked to obesity and metabolic diseases, generating metabolites such as acetate and propionate that may influence lipid metabolism, Dysregulation, and inflammation [46]. Likewise, Veillonella, a genus proficient in amino acid fermentation, is often higher in individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD). Veillonella has been associated with both obesity and insulin resistance [45]. Streptococcus (in atherosclerotic plaques) is another genus associated with CVD [47].
Conversely, beneficial bacterial genera, such as Bifidobacterium and Roseburia, are often depleted in individuals with atherosclerosis. Bifidobacterium is a well-known probiotic genus that plays a role in strengthening gut barrier integrity and reducing systemic inflammation [48]. Guaman et al. have shown Bifidobacterium to produce acetate, which supports a healthy gut environment and reduces the translocation of endotoxins like LPS into the bloodstream [49]. In their study, they demonstrated that lower levels of Bifidobacterium in atherosclerosis may contribute to a leaky gut and systemic inflammation, which exacerbates cardiovascular risk [49]. Roseburia, acknowledged for its capacity to generate butyrate, a SCFA, is crucial for sustaining gut health by facilitating anti-inflammatory mechanisms and enhancing epithelial barrier integrity [50]. Amiri et al. reached the conclusion that the reduction of Roseburia in atherosclerotic patients implies a loss of protective butyrate production, and this potentially contributes to disease progression [51].
Another critical aspect of gut microbiota profiles in atherosclerosis is the Firmicutes–to–Bacteroidetes ratio, which is often altered in metabolic and inflammatory diseases [52]. De Filippo et al. [53] and Montenegro et al. [54] showed that increased abundance of Firmicutes (linked to energy metabolism and caloric absorption) and a decrease in Bacteroidetes (associated with anti-inflammatory effects) may contribute to a pro-inflammatory state and increased cholesterol levels, both of which are risk factors for atherosclerosis. Furthermore, according to Yoo et al. [55], specific species within these phyla, such as Collinsella, have been found to be more abundant in atherosclerotic patients. The authors showed that Collinsella is associated with increased gut permeability and inflammatory cytokine production [55].
The gut microbiota in atherosclerosis shows a unique composition characterized by a boost in pro-inflammatory, pathogenic bacteria and a decrease in beneficial, anti-inflammatory bacteria. This imbalance seems to facilitate disease progression via pathways related to inflammation, lipid metabolism, and gut barrier dysfunction [47].

4. Mechanisms of Dysbiosis in Atherosclerosis

Dysbiosis, the imbalance of gut microbial composition, is a significant factor in the development and progression of atherosclerosis [56]. Diet is one of the most influential factors in shaping the gut microbiome, and dietary patterns high in saturated fats, refined sugars, and low in fiber—characteristic of a Western diet—promote dysbiosis [57]. Such a diet encourages the growth of pathogenic bacteria while reducing beneficial microbes that thrive on dietary fiber, like Bifidobacterium and Roseburia [58]. The reduction of SCFA-producing bacteria in individuals with atherosclerosis contributes to a “leaky gut” (increased gut permeability), allowing pathogens to enter into the systemic circulation [59]. The translocation of microbial components, such as LPS from Gram-negative bacteria, from the gut to the bloodstream induces systemic inflammation, a main contributor to atherosclerosis [60]. Figure 4 shows the route from bacterial invasion to thrombus formation.
Firmicutes are more efficient at breaking down and absorbing energy from food. This contributes to obesity and metabolic syndrome, both being risk factors for atherosclerosis [61]. In contrast, Bacteroidetes are associated with the production of anti-inflammatory compounds, so their reduction skews the microbiome toward a more inflammatory state [62].

4.1. Metabolism Imbalance and Atherogenic Effects

Microbial metabolites are essential in the gut–heart axis, affecting systemic inflammation, lipid metabolism, and immunological activation [63]. Dysbiosis results in an increase of TMA-producing bacteria, such as Escherichia and Klebsiella, which consequently raises TMAO levels (chemical linked to cardiovascular risk) [64]. TMAO promotes cholesterol accumulation in macrophages, enhances foam cell formation, and induces pro-inflammatory pathways, all of which contribute to plaque development in the arteries [65]. Dysbiotic microbiomes also generate low levels of SCFAs, including butyrate and propionate, which are essential for regulating lipid metabolism and mitigating inflammation [66]. This eliminates a protective barrier against atherosclerosis [67].

4.2. Immune Dysregulation and Inflammation

The inflammatory environment promoted by dysbiosis extends beyond metabolites to involve direct interactions with immune cells. Koren et al. [68] detected in the atherosclerotic plaques certain bacterial genera associated with dysbiosis. In their study, the authors found that Chryseomonas was found in all atherosclerotic plaque samples, and that Veillonella and Streptococcus were present in the majority of samples [68]. Furthermore, the same study revealed that numerous supplementary bacterial phylotypes were prevalent in both the atherosclerotic plaque and oral or gastrointestinal samples from the same individual [68]. This translocation can promote localized inflammation, attracting immune cells and increasing the likelihood of plaque instability [69]. On this issue, Omenetti et al. mention that dysbiosis favors the expansion of Th17 cells, while reducing regulatory T cells (Tregs) that help control immune responses [64]. The authors conclude that this imbalance exacerbates systemic inflammation, worsening atherosclerosis progression [70].

4.3. Mechanisms of Gut Barrier Dysfunction

Dysbiosis disrupts the gut barrier, which normally prevents harmful bacteria and their metabolites from entering circulation [71]. Pathogenic bacteria like Collinsella prevalent in atherosclerotic patients, can modify the gut composition by boosting permeability and facilitating the production of inflammatory cytokines [72]. A weakened barrier allows bacterial compounds such as LPS and peptidoglycan to enter the bloodstream, instigating systemic inflammation and causing vascular damage. This mechanism connects the localized impacts of dysbiosis in the gastrointestinal tract to systemic inflammation and the advancement of atherosclerosis [73].
Dysbiosis in atherosclerosis is consequently induced by an imbalance of microbial species, modified metabolite synthesis, immunological dysregulation, and failure of the gut barrier. These processes jointly promote a pro-inflammatory background that accelerates plaque development and destabilization [74].

5. Potential of Microbiota-Based Interventions

As evidence increasingly associates gut microbiota with atherosclerosis progression, researchers are investigating microbiome-based therapies as potential therapeutic methods [75]. On this matter, Kelly et al. [76] state that these therapies can restore microbial equilibrium, diminish inflammation, and regulate the synthesis of metabolites that influence cardiovascular health. The authors also mention that main strategies incorporate the use of probiotics, prebiotics, dietary alterations, FMT and microbiota-targeted pharmacological development [76].
In a study on mice, Huang et al. [77] proved that probiotic strains, namely Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, had anti-inflammatory effects and the ability to enhance gut barrier integrity. In this study, Bifidobacterium promoted the production of acetate, which is a SCFA that reduces gut permeability and limits systemic inflammation by decreasing endotoxin translocation into the bloodstream [77]. In another study on 14 Yorkshire swine, Aboulgheit et al. demonstrated that probiotic supplementation lowers the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and improves lipid profiles, thus potentially reducing the risk of atherosclerosis [78]. The results reported that dietary treatment with apple sauce combined with L. plantarum probiotic effectively induces Nrf2 activity in vivo [78]. Although more human studies are required, probiotics represent a promising and accessible approach for managing atherosclerosis through gut microbiota modulation.
Prebiotics are non-digestible dietary fibers that stimulate the growth and activity of beneficial bacteria in the gut [79]. In a study conducted by Rossi et al. [80] that analyzed 55 bifidobacteria for the ability to ferment glucose, Bifidobacterium sp. ALB 1 grown on inulin showed the greatest degradative capability, fermented the longest chains of inulin, and did not exhibit stringent selectivity based on its degree of polymerization [80].
SCFAs such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate play protective roles in cardiovascular health by reducing inflammation, enhancing gut barrier integrity, and regulating lipid metabolism [81]. Increasing dietary fiber intake through prebiotics can promote the growth of these beneficial bacteria, counteracting dysbiosis associated with atherosclerosis [82]. In his study, Stojanov et al. [83] suggest that individuals with higher fiber intake have a lower Firmicutes–to–Bacteroidetes ratio. This is linked to a better metabolic health and reduced cardiovascular risk.
Diet is one of the most powerful influencers of gut microbiota composition. Ma et al. [84] associate greater microbial diversity and an increase in beneficial bacterial species with a diet high in fiber, plant-based foods, and omega-3 fatty acids. In this study, Mediterranean-style diets that are rich in fibers and polyphenols promoted SCFA production and reduced inflammation. In contrast, Aziz et al. [85] state that Western diets high in saturated fats and refined sugars promote dysbiosis by encouraging the growth of pro-inflammatory bacteria and reducing SCFA-producing microbes.

5.1. Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Novel Approach

FMT has emerged as a promising intervention for modulating the gut microbiota in various conditions, including metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [86]. Recent studies have demonstrated its potential to improve lipid profiles, reduce systemic inflammation, and enhance gut barrier integrity [87,88,89].
FMT involves the transfer of gut microbiota from a healthy donor to a recipient, aiming to restore a balanced microbiome [90]. Although predominantly utilized for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection, FMT is being investigated for metabolic disorders, such as atherosclerosis. Early studies indicate that FMT from healthy donors can improve insulin sensitivity and reduce inflammatory markers. For example, De Groot et al. [91] noted a substantial reduction in insulin sensitivity in 22 individuals two weeks post-allogenic METS-D FMT. The authors also noted an accelerated intestinal transit time subsequent to RYGB-D FMT, alterations in faecal bile acids, inflammatory markers, and variations in several intestinal microbiota taxa.
Figure 5 below shows the impacts of dysbiosis and the role of FMT.
As understanding of the gut–heart axis progresses, researchers are exploring tailored pharmaceuticals that alter specific microbial pathways. TMA synthesis in the gut has demonstrated a potential in decreasing TMAO levels [92]. These medications aim to diminish the formation of atherogenic metabolites by specifically targeting TMA-producing bacteria, thereby preserving the total microbial diversity of the microbiome [93].

5.2. Summary of the Potential and Challenges of Microbiota-Based Therapies

Personalized microbiota modification may improve therapeutic effects [94]. Probiotics, prebiotics, and FMT may work best when tailored to the individual’s microbiota, genetic profile, and health status [95]. Now that microbiome sequencing and computational modelling can better profile gut microbial communities, physicians can anticipate how patients will respond to certain therapies [96].
Figure 6 shows how gut microbiota, lifestyle, and cardiovascular outcomes are linked. Diagnostic tests like microbiome profiling and microbial structural product analysis help to determine gut microbiota abundance [97]. The diagram shows lifestyle and metabolic risk factors such poor diet, lack of exercise, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, hypertension, abnormal cholesterol levels, diabetes, and obesity.
These variables cause gut dysbiosis [98]. In combination with these risk factors, gut dysbiosis can cause cardiovascular illnesses like atherosclerosis and heart failure [99]. Pathological alterations include inflammatory immune cell infiltration and fibrosis that cause these illnesses [100,101].

6. Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions

One of the strengths of this review is that it highlights how gut microbiota affects cardiovascular health and consolidates gut–heart data. Mechanistic and therapeutic approaches are uniquely integrated to provide a thorough picture of atherosclerosis therapies. Moreover, this study synthesizes recent developments and identifies important gaps, such as the long-term consequences of microbiota-targeted therapy. It outlines future studies to better understand the gut–heart axis and atherosclerosis.
This study also has some limitations that we will address here. Numerous studies examining this relationship are observational or involve animal models. This constrains the capacity to draw conclusive causal conclusions in humans. Additionally, gut microbiota composition is influenced by numerous factors such as diet, genetics, medications, and lifestyle, making it difficult to isolate specific microbial contributions to atherosclerosis.
Moreover, probiotics, prebiotics, and FMT are promising microbiota-targeting medicines, but they face many hurdles. Another limitation of this study is that it includes patient response heterogeneity due to genetic predispositions, pre-existing health problems, and gut microbiota makeup. This heterogeneity makes therapy outcome prediction and protocol creation difficult. FMT, which can transmit pathogens and cause immunological reactions, remains a safety concern.
The dependence on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and metagenomics to examine microbiota composition involves additional constraints. Although these approaches yield significant insights into microbial diversity and abundance, they inadequately address functional elements of the microbiome, including metabolic activity and interactions between microbial metabolites and host tissues. Moreover, these methods of examining the microbiota remain underutilized due to high costs and technical complexities.
Innovative microbiota-based therapies (probiotics, prebiotics, dietary alterations, and FMT) can restore microbial equilibrium by generating an abundance of anti-inflammatory, SCFA-producing bacteria while suppressing the growth of pro-inflammatory species [98].

7. Conclusions

The influence of gut microbiota on cardiovascular health is a groundbreaking and significant research domain, altering our comprehension of atherosclerosis as a condition affected not alone by conventional risk factors but also by the gut–heart axis. The research indicates that the composition and function of gut microbiota are closely associated with the development and progression of atherosclerosis. In this study we found that pro-inflammatory bacteria (Megamonas and Streptococcus) are linked to plaque formation and inflammatory pathways, whereas beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium and Roseburia) seem to provide protective mechanisms that help maintaining gut barrier integrity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A., A.P.S., A.D., E.D., I.T.T., A.N.T., A.D.A., A.D.N., D.E.T., A.H., I.E.I., E.D., A.M.S., C.F.A., L.M.C. and C.T.; methodology, A.D., E.D., I.T.T., C.T. and A.P.S.; software I.E.I., A.H., A.N.T., E.D. and L.M.C.; validation, D.E.T., A.H., L.M.C., A.M.S., C.F.A., A.D.N. and E.D.; formal analysis, L.A., A.P.S., A.D., E.D., I.T.T., A.D.A., A.N.T., D.E.T., A.H. and E.D.; investigation L.A., A.D., E.D., I.T.T., C.T., A.P.S., A.D.A., C.F.A., D.E.T., I.E.I., A.M.S., A.H., L.M.C., A.N.T. and E.D.; resources, L.A., A.D., E.D., I.T.T., A.D.N., C.T. and A.P.S.; data curation C.T., A.P.S., D.E.T. and I.E.I.; writing—original draft preparation, D.E.T., I.E.I., A.M.S., L.M.C., A.H., A.D.N., A.N.T. and E.D.; writing—review and editing, L.A., A.D., C.F.A., E.D., I.T.T., A.D.A., C.T. and A.P.S.; visualization L.A., A.D., E.D., I.T.T., C.T., A.P.S., D.E.T., I.E.I., C.F.A., A.D.A., A.H., A.D.N., L.M.C., A.M.S., A.N.T. and E.D.; supervision, L.A., A.P.S. and I.T.T.; project administration L.A., A.P.S. and I.T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jian, Z.; Zeng, L.; Xu, T.; Sun, S.; Yan, S.; Zhao, S.; Su, Z.; Ge, C.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, J.; et al. The intestinal microbiome associated with lipid metabolism and obesity in humans and animals. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 2915–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Erbs, G.; Newman, M.A. The role of lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan, two glycosylated bacterial microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), in plant innate immunity. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  3. Afzaal, M.; Saeed, F.; Shah, Y.A.; Hussain, M.; Rabail, R.; Socol, C.T.; Hassoun, A.; Pateiro, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Rusu, A.V.; et al. Human gut microbiota in health and disease: Unveiling the relationship. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 999001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Zhu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, K.; Cui, M.; Ye, W.; Zhao, G.; Jin, L.; Chen, X. The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders. J. Neuroinflammation 2020, 17, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  6. Voiosu, A.M.; Daha, I.C.; Drăgan, V.; Birligea, M.; Vîjan, A.; Bălănescu, P.; Benguș, A.; Voiosu, T.A.; Mateescu, R.B.; Băicuș, C.R. Markers of cardiac dysfunction associated with inflammation in a cohort of patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2024, 36, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ahlawat, S.; Asha; Sharma, K.K. Gut-organ axis: A microbial outreach and networking. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 72, 636–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bui, T.V.A.; Hwangbo, H.; Lai, Y.; Hong, S.B.; Choi, Y.J.; Park, H.J.; Ban, K. The Gut-Heart Axis: Updated Review for The Roles of Microbiome in Cardiovascular Health. Korean Circ. J. 2023, 53, 499–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Moore, K.J.; Sheedy, F.J.; Fisher, E.A. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: A dynamic balance. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 709–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Zhen, J.; Zhou, Z.; He, M.; Han, H.X.; Lv, E.H.; Wen, P.B.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.T.; Cai, X.C.; Tian, J.Q.; et al. The gut microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide and cardiovascular diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1085041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Tang, W.H.W.; Li, X.S.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Khaw, K.T.; Wareham, N.J.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Boekholdt, S.M.; Hazen, S.L. Plasma trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) levels predict future risk of coronary artery disease in apparently healthy individuals in the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Am. Heart J. 2021, 236, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Lv, H.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, B.; Li, Z.; Yin, T.; Liu, C.; Xu, B.; Wang, D.; Li, B.; Hao, J.; et al. Characteristics of the gut microbiota of patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques positive for bacterial genetic material. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 13, 1296554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Schoeler, M.; Caesar, R. Dietary lipids, gut microbiota and lipid metabolism. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019, 20, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  14. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici, C.; Negreanu, L.; Tarantino, G. Is fatty liver always benign and should not consequently be treated? J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2013, 64, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Deacu, S.; Neculai-Candea, L.; Pricop, S.; Aschie, M.; Mocanu, L.; Popa, M. Vascular Adhesive Peptide-1 (VAP-1) Expression in Wounds—A New Vital Reaction Marker? Rom. J. Leg. Med. 2021, 29, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martins, D.; Silva, C.; Ferreira, A.C.; Dourado, S.; Albuquerque, A.; Saraiva, F.; Batista, A.B.; Castro, P.; Leite-Moreira, A.; Barros, A.S.; et al. Unravelling the Gut Microbiome Role in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  17. Deacu, M.; Enciu, M.; Nicolau, A.; Bălţătescu, G.I.; Neculai-Cândea, L.S.; Deacu, S.; Popa, M.F. Morphopathological features induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection—A series of 57 autopsies. Histol. Histopathol. 2023, 38, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prykhodko, O.; Burleigh, S.; Campanello, M.; Iresjö, B.M.; Zilling, T.; Ljungh, Å.; Smedh, U.; Hållenius, F.F. Long-Term Changes to the Microbiome, Blood Lipid Profiles and IL-6 in Female and Male Swedish Patients in Response to Bariatric Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Nutrients 2024, 16, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  19. Park, H.; Park, N.Y.; Koh, A. Scarring the early-life microbiome: Its potential life-long effects on human health and diseases. BMB Rep. 2023, 56, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Kim, J.H.; Jeon, J.Y.; Im, Y.J.; Ha, N.; Kim, J.-K.; Moon, S.J.; Kim, M.-G. Long-term taxonomic and functional stability of the gut microbiome from human fecal samples. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Negreanu, L.; Bataga, S.; Cijevschi Prelipcean, C.; Dobru, D.; Diculescu, M.; Dumitru, E.; Gheonea, D.I.; Gheorghe, L.; Gheorghe, C.; Goldis, A.; et al. Romanian Task Force for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Excellence centers in inflammatory bowel disease in Romania: A measure of the quality of care. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2014, 23, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takiishi, T.; Fenero, C.I.M.; Câmara, N.O.S. Intestinal barrier and gut microbiota: Shaping our immune responses throughout life. Tissue Barriers 2017, 5, e1373208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Chakaroun, R.M.; Massier, L.; Kovacs, P. Gut Microbiome, Intestinal Permeability, and Tissue Bacteria in Metabolic Disease: Perpetrators or Bystanders? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Farhana, A.; Khan, Y.S. Biochemistry, Lipopolysaccharide. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554414/ (accessed on 12 October 2024).
  25. Soares, J.B.; Pimentel-Nunes, P.; Roncon-Albuquerque, R.; Leite-Moreira, A. The role of lipopolysaccharide/toll-like receptor 4 signaling in chronic liver diseases. Hepatol. Int. 2010, 4, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  26. Mutengo, K.H.; Masenga, S.K.; Mweemba, A.; Mutale, W.; Kirabo, A. Gut microbiota dependant trimethylamine N-oxide and hypertension. Front. Physiol. 2023, 14, 1075641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Forkosh, E.; Ilan, Y. The heart-gut axis: New target for atherosclerosis and congestive heart failure therapy. Open Heart 2019, 6, e000993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Almeida, C.; Gonçalves-Nobre, J.G.; Costa, D.A.; Barata, P. The potential links between human gut microbiota and cardiovascular health and disease—Is there a gut-cardiovascular axis? Front. Gastroenterol. 2023, 2, 1235126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Majumder, S.; Kiritkumar, R.M.; Shetty, V.; Mukherjee, S.; Narayan, P. Cardiovascular diseases and the heart-gut cross talk. Indian Heart J. 2024, 76, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  30. Popescu, R.C.; Botea, F.; Dan, C.; Iordache, I.E.; Ghioldis, A.; Leopa, N. Ventralex® ST Patch for Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral Hernias. J. Soc. Laparosc. Robot. Surg. 2021, 25, e2021.00071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  31. Scientific Image and Illustration Software|BioRender. Available online: https://www.biorender.com/ (accessed on 29 October 2024).
  32. Wang, B.; Qiu, J.; Lian, J.; Yang, X.; Zhou, J. Gut Metabolite Trimethylamine-N-Oxide in Atherosclerosis: From Mechanism to Therapy. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 723886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici, C.; Sinescu, C.; Moldoveanu, A.; Petrisor, A.; Diaconu, S.; Cretoiu, D.; Braticevici, B. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: One entity, multiple impacts on liver health. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2017, 33, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cong, J.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, R. Intestinal Microbiota-Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids in Host Health and Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  35. Du, Y.; He, C.; An, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fu, W.; Wang, M.; Shan, Z.; Xie, J.; Yang, Y.; et al. The Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammation and Body Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, J.; Jin, X.; Yang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, M. Immune mechanism of gut microbiota and its metabolites in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1034537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  37. Ziganshina, E.E.; Sharifullina, D.M.; Lozhkin, A.P.; Khayrullin, R.N.; Ignatyev, I.M.; Ziganshin, A.M. Bacterial Communities Associated with Atherosclerotic Plaques from Russian Individuals with Atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  38. Shariff, S.; Huey, A.K.S.; Soni, N.P.; Yahia, A.; Hammoud, D.; Nazir, A.; Uwishema, O.; Wojtara, M. Unlocking the gut-heart axis: Exploring the role of gut microbiota in cardiovascular health and disease. Ann. Med. Surg. 2024, 86, 2752–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Belli, M.; Barone, L.; Longo, S.; Prandi, F.R.; Lecis, D.; Mollace, R.; Margonato, D.; Muscoli, S.; Sergi, D.; Federici, M.; et al. Gut Microbiota Composition and Cardiovascular Disease: A Potential New Therapeutic Target? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. Kim, M.; Huda, M.N.; Bennett, B.J. Sequence meets function-microbiota and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  41. Hutchison, E.R.; Kasahara, K.; Zhang, Q.; Vivas, E.I.; Cross, T.L.; Rey, F.E. Dissecting the impact of dietary fiber type on atherosclerosis in mice colonized with different gut microbial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2023, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. Nii, T.; Maeda, Y.; Motooka, D.; Naito, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Oguro-Igashira, E.; Kishikawa, T.; Yamashita, M.; Koizumi, S.; et al. Genomic repertoires linked with pathogenic potency of arthritogenic Prevotella copri isolated from the gut of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023, 82, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Larsen, J.M. The immune response to Prevotella bacteria in chronic inflammatory disease. Immunology 2017, 151, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. Yafarova, A.A.; Dementeva, E.V.; Zlobovskaya, O.A.; Sheptulina, A.F.; Lopatukhina, E.V.; Timofeev, Y.S.; Glazunova, E.V.; Lyundup, A.V.; Doludin, Y.V.; Kiselev, A.R.; et al. Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Alterations Associated with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, X.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y.; Wei, F.; Li, X.; Feng, Y.; Jin, X.; Liu, D.; Guo, Y.; Hu, Y. Inulin-enriched Megamonas funiformis ameliorates metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease by producing propionic acid. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2024, 9, 84, Erratum in NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2024, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Zhang, S.M.; Huang, S.L. The Commensal Anaerobe Veillonella dispar Reprograms Its Lactate Metabolism and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production during the Stationary Phase. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0355822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Sayols-Baixeras, S.; Dekkers, K.F.; Baldanzi, G.; Jönsson, D.; Hammar, U.; Lin, Y.T.; Ahmad, S.; Nguyen, D.; Varotsis, G.; Pita, S.; et al. Streptococcus Species Abundance in the Gut Is Linked to Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis in 8973 Participants from the SCAPIS Cohort. Circulation 2023, 148, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q.; He, C.; Fu, C.; Wei, Q. The role of the gut microbiota in health and cardiovascular diseases. Mol. Biomed. 2022, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  49. Guamán, L.P.; Carrera-Pacheco, S.E.; Zúñiga-Miranda, J.; Teran, E.; Erazo, C.; Barba-Ostria, C. The Impact of Bioactive Molecules from Probiotics on Child Health: A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nie, K.; Ma, K.; Luo, W.; Shen, Z.; Yang, Z.; Xiao, M.; Tong, T.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X. Roseburia intestinalis: A Beneficial Gut Organism from the Discoveries in Genus and Species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 757718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  51. Amiri, P.; Hosseini, S.A.; Ghaffari, S.; Tutunchi, H.; Ghaffari, S.; Mosharkesh, E.; Asghari, S.; Roshanravan, N. Role of Butyrate, a Gut Microbiota Derived Metabolite, in Cardiovascular Diseases: A comprehensive narrative review. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 12, 837509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  52. Magne, F.; Gotteland, M.; Gauthier, L.; Zazueta, A.; Pesoa, S.; Navarrete, P.; Balamurugan, R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. De Filippo, C.; Cavalieri, D.; Di Paola, M.; Ramazzotti, M.; Poullet, J.B.; Massart, S.; Collini, S.; Pieraccini, G.; Lionetti, P. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14691–14696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  54. Montenegro, J.; Armet, A.M.; Willing, B.P.; Deehan, E.C.; Fassini, P.G.; Mota, J.F.; Walter, J.; Prado, C.M. Exploring the Influence of Gut Microbiome on Energy Metabolism in Humans. Adv. Nutr. 2023, 14, 840–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  55. Yoo, J.Y.; Sniffen, S.; Percy, K.C.M.; Pallaval, V.B.; Chidipi, B. Gut Dysbiosis and Immune System in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ACVD). Microorganisms 2022, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  56. Singh, T.; Kaur, G.; Kaur, A. Dysbiosis—An Etiological Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases and the Therapeutic Benefits of Gut Microflora. Adv. Gut Microbiome Res. 2023, 2023, 7451554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zinöcker, M.K.; Lindseth, I.A. The Western Diet-Microbiome-Host Interaction and Its Role in Metabolic Disease. Nutrients 2018, 10, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  58. Cronin, P.; Joyce, S.A.; O’Toole, P.W.; O’Connor, E.M. Dietary Fibre Modulates the Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  59. Mamic, P.; Snyder, M.; Tang, W.H.W. Gut Microbiome-Based Management of Patients with Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023, 81, 1729–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Popescu, R.C.; Leopa, N.; Iordache, I.E.; Dan, C.; Moldovan, C.; Ghioldis, A.C.; Olteanu, C.M.; Kacani, A.; Cindea, I.; Popescu, I. Prevention of delayed gastric emptying after right colectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2023, 102, e35255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  61. Tassoni, D.S.; Macedo, R.C.O.; Delpino, F.M.; Santos, H.O. Gut Microbiota and Obesity: The Chicken or the Egg? Obesities 2023, 3, 296–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Maciel-Fiuza, M.F.; Muller, G.C.; Campos, D.M.S.; do Socorro Silva Costa, P.; Peruzzo, J.; Bonamigo, R.R.; Veit, T.; Vianna, F.S.L. Role of gut microbiota in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1098386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  63. Rahman, M.M.; Islam, F.; -Or-Rashid, M.H.; Mamun, A.A.; Rahaman, M.S.; Islam, M.M.; Meem, A.F.K.; Sutradhar, P.R.; Mitra, S.; Mimi, A.A.; et al. The Gut Microbiota (Microbiome) in Cardiovascular Disease and Its Therapeutic Regulation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 903570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  64. Tacconi, E.; Palma, G.; De Biase, D.; Luciano, A.; Barbieri, M.; de Nigris, F.; Bruzzese, F. Microbiota Effect on Trimethylamine N-Oxide Production: From Cancer to Fitness-A Practical Preventing Recommendation and Therapies. Nutrients 2023, 15, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  65. Laryushina, Y.; Samoilova-Bedych, N.; Turgunova, L.; Kozhakhmetov, S.; Alina, A.; Suieubayev, M.; Mukhanbetzhanov, N. Alterations of the Gut Microbiome and TMAO Levels in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  66. Shin, Y.; Han, S.; Kwon, J.; Ju, S.; Choi, T.G.; Kang, I.; Kim, S.S. Roles of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  67. Wolf, D.; Ley, K. Immunity and Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  68. Koren, O.; Spor, A.; Felin, J.; Fåk, F.; Stombaugh, J.; Tremaroli, V.; Behre, C.J.; Knight, R.; Fagerberg, B.; Ley, R.E.; et al. Human oral, gut, and plaque microbiota in patients with atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4592–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  69. Gusev, E.; Sarapultsev, A. Atherosclerosis and Inflammation: Insights from the Theory of General Pathological Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  70. Omenetti, S.; Pizarro, T.T. The Treg/Th17 Axis: A Dynamic Balance Regulated by the Gut Microbiome. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  71. Brandl, K.; Schnabl, B. Is intestinal inflammation linking dysbiosis to gut barrier dysfunction during liver disease? Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 9, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  72. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.X.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, J.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Stolfi, C.; Maresca, C.; Monteleone, G.; Laudisi, F. Implication of Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Gut Dysbiosis and Diseases. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Popa, M.F.; Stefanescu, C.; Corici, P.D. Medical-legal identification methods with the aid of cheiloscopy. Rom. J. Leg. Med. 2013, 21, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Unc, O.D.; Steriu, L.; Iordache, I.; Kabtour, B.; Ples, D.; Calin, I.; Grasa, C. Localizări rare ale chistului hidatic. Prezentări de caz [Rare forms of hydatid cyst. Case reports]. Chirurgia 2010, 105, 103–107. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Kelly, T.N.; Bazzano, L.A.; Ajami, N.J.; He, H.; Zhao, J.; Petrosino, J.F.; Correa, A.; He, J. Gut Microbiome Associates with Lifetime Cardiovascular Disease Risk Profile Among Bogalusa Heart Study Participants. Circ. Res. 2016, 119, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  77. Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Quan, G.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhong, L. Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 prevents atherosclerosis via inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 7496–7504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  78. Aboulgheit, A.; Karbasiafshar, C.; Zhang, Z.; Sabra, M.; Shi, G.; Tucker, A.; Sodha, N.; Abid, M.R.; Sellke, F.W. Lactobacillus plantarum probiotic induces Nrf2-mediated antioxidant signaling and eNOS expression resulting in improvement of myocardial diastolic function. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2021, 321, H839–H849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  79. Davani-Davari, D.; Negahdaripour, M.; Karimzadeh, I.; Seifan, M.; Mohkam, M.; Masoumi, S.J.; Berenjian, A.; Ghasemi, Y. Prebiotics: Definition, Types, Sources, Mechanisms, and Clinical Applications. Foods 2019, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  80. Rossi, M.; Corradini, C.; Amaretti, A.; Nicolini, M.; Pompei, A.; Zanoni, S.; Matteuzzi, D. Fermentation of fructooligosaccharides and inulin by bifidobacteria: A comparative study of pure and fecal cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6150–6158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  81. Xiong, R.-G.; Zhou, D.-D.; Wu, S.-X.; Huang, S.-Y.; Saimaiti, A.; Yang, Z.-J.; Shang, A.; Zhao, C.-N.; Gan, R.-Y.; Li, H.-B. Health Benefits and Side Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Foods 2022, 11, 2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tanţău, A.; Leucuţa, D.C.; Tanţău, M.; Boţan, E.; Zaharie, R.; Mândruţiu, A.; Tomuleasa, I.C. Inflammation, Tumoral Markers and Interleukin-17, -10, and -6 Profiles in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 3427–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Stojanov, S.; Berlec, A.; Štrukelj, B. The Influence of Probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio in the Treatment of Obesity and Inflammatory Bowel disease. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ma, W.; Nguyen, L.H.; Song, M.; Wang, D.D.; Franzosa, E.A.; Cao, Y.; Joshi, A.; Drew, D.A.; Mehta, R.; Ivey, K.L.; et al. Dietary fiber intake, the gut microbiome, and chronic systemic inflammation in a cohort of adult men. Genome Med. 2021, 13, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  85. Aziz, T.; Hussain, N.; Hameed, Z.; Lin, L. Elucidating the role of diet in maintaining gut health to reduce the risk of obesity, cardiovascular and other age-related inflammatory diseases: Recent challenges and future recommendations. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2297864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  86. Luqman, A.; Hassan, A.; Ullah, M.; Naseem, S.; Ullah, M.; Zhang, L.; Din, A.U.; Ullah, K.; Ahmad, W.; Wang, G. Role of the intestinal microbiome and its therapeutic intervention in cardiovascular disorder. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1321395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ye, W.; Fan, J.; Wu, W.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Q.; Qian, L. Effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on metabolic health of DBA mice. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1352555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Di Vincenzo, F.; Del Gaudio, A.; Petito, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: A narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2024, 19, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Díaz-García, C.; Moreno, E.; Talavera-Rodríguez, A.; Martín-Fernández, L.; González-Bodí, S.; Martín-Pedraza, L.; Pérez-Molina, J.A.; Dronda, F.; Gosalbes, M.J.; Luna, L.; et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation alters the proteomic landscape of inflammation in HIV: Identifying bacterial drivers. Microbiome 2024, 12, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Napiórkowska-Baran, K.; Biliński, J.; Pujanek, M.; Hałakuc, P.; Pietryga, A.; Szymczak, B.; Deptuła, A.; Rosada, T.; Bartuzi, Z.; Jaros; et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in a patient with chronic diarrhea and primary and secondary immunodeficiency (common variable immunodeficiency and splenectomy). Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1456672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  91. de Groot, P.; Scheithauer, T.; Bakker, G.J.; Prodan, A.; Levin, E.; Khan, M.T.; Herrema, H.; Ackermans, M.; Serlie, M.J.M.; de Brauw, M.; et al. Donor metabolic characteristics drive effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on recipient insulin sensitivity, energy expenditure and intestinal transit time. Gut 2020, 69, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  92. Zhao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, W. Drug-microbiota interactions: An emerging priority for precision medicine. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gupta, N.; Buffa, J.A.; Roberts, A.B.; Sangwan, N.; Skye, S.M.; Li, L.; Ho, K.J.; Varga, J.; DiDonato, J.A.; Tang, W.H.W.; et al. Targeted Inhibition of Gut Microbial Trimethylamine N-Oxide Production Reduces Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis and Functional Impairment in a Murine Model of Chronic Kidney Disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 1239–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  94. Bhattacharjee, P.; Karim, K.A.; Khan, Z. Harnessing the Microbiome: A Comprehensive Review on Advancing Therapeutic Strategies for Rheumatic Diseases. Cureus 2023, 15, e50964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  95. Al-Fakhrany, O.; Elekhnawy, E. Next-generation probiotics: The upcoming biotherapeutics. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2024, 51, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, N.; Ma, J.; Kim, W.; Kim, J.; Belenky, P.; Lee, I. Genome-resolved metagenomics: A game changer for microbiome medicine. Exp. Mol. Med. 2024, 56, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  97. Schmartz, G.P.; Rehner, J.; Gund, M.P.; Keller, V.; Molano, L.-A.G.; Rupf, S.; Hannig, M.; Berger, T.; Flockerzi, E.; Seitz, B.; et al. Decoding the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of microbiota using pan-body pan-disease microbiomics. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Longo, S.; Del Chierico, F.; Scanu, M.; Toto, F.; Legramante, J.M.; Rizza, S.; Putignani, L.; Federici, M. An Investigation of Metabolic Risk Factors and Gut Microbiota in Unexplained Syncope. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ghanbari, F.; Hasani, S.; Aghili, Z.S.; Asgary, S. The potential preventive effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on cardiovascular risk factors through modulation of gut microbiota: A review. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 4569–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, H.; Dhalla, N.S. The Role of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Pathogenesis of Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  101. Alghamdi, K.S.; Kassar, R.H.; Farrash, W.F.; Obaid, A.A.; Idris, S.; Siddig, A.; Shakoori, A.M.; Alshehre, S.M.; Minshawi, F.; Mujalli, A. Key Disease-Related Genes and Immune Cell Infiltration Landscape in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Bioinformatics Investigation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. In vivo metabolic pathways of TMAO and its precursors. Choline is metabolized by the choline trimethylamine-lyase system. Betaine can be catalyzed by L-carnitine dehydrogenase and subsequently reduced to TMA. L-carnitine can be immediately turned into TMA, and TMA can be oxidized to TMAO in the liver and intestines (jejunum and cecum) before entering the bloodstream. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Figure 1. In vivo metabolic pathways of TMAO and its precursors. Choline is metabolized by the choline trimethylamine-lyase system. Betaine can be catalyzed by L-carnitine dehydrogenase and subsequently reduced to TMA. L-carnitine can be immediately turned into TMA, and TMA can be oxidized to TMAO in the liver and intestines (jejunum and cecum) before entering the bloodstream. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g001
Figure 2. How the oral microbiome can contribute to an increased frequency of strokes. The presentation focuses on the significant adverse consequences that dysbiosis has on the central nervous system, the vascular system, the gut, the liver, the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates, and fat tissue. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Figure 2. How the oral microbiome can contribute to an increased frequency of strokes. The presentation focuses on the significant adverse consequences that dysbiosis has on the central nervous system, the vascular system, the gut, the liver, the metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates, and fat tissue. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g002
Figure 3. Microbiota locations that impact atherosclerosis. Bacterial DNA identified in atherosclerotic plaques may originate from bacteria located in the superior or inferior gastrointestinal tract. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Figure 3. Microbiota locations that impact atherosclerosis. Bacterial DNA identified in atherosclerotic plaques may originate from bacteria located in the superior or inferior gastrointestinal tract. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g003
Figure 4. Pathway from bacterial invasion to blood clot: Bacterial cells release various components, including LPS, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), which can trigger an immune response. The invasion activates immune receptors such as CXCR2, CCR2, TLR-4/2, and NLRP3. This leads to an increase in inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, Th17, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP1, and CRP. The immune response causes a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) levels and increases expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin, ZO-1, vWF, PECAM-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1, disrupting endothelial function. Plaque formation involves oxidative stress, inflammatory cell infiltration, an imbalance in M1/M2 macrophage ratio, formation of foam cells, and lipid accumulation within the arterial wall. As plaque forms, factors like Cdc42 activation and increased collagen-binding proteins contribute to clotting. This leads to altered clotting and partial thromboplastin times, ultimately promoting thrombus (blood clot) formation [17]. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Figure 4. Pathway from bacterial invasion to blood clot: Bacterial cells release various components, including LPS, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), which can trigger an immune response. The invasion activates immune receptors such as CXCR2, CCR2, TLR-4/2, and NLRP3. This leads to an increase in inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, Th17, IFN-γ, GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-8, TNF-α, MCP1, and CRP. The immune response causes a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) levels and increases expression of endothelial adhesion molecules, such as E-selectin, ZO-1, vWF, PECAM-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1, disrupting endothelial function. Plaque formation involves oxidative stress, inflammatory cell infiltration, an imbalance in M1/M2 macrophage ratio, formation of foam cells, and lipid accumulation within the arterial wall. As plaque forms, factors like Cdc42 activation and increased collagen-binding proteins contribute to clotting. This leads to altered clotting and partial thromboplastin times, ultimately promoting thrombus (blood clot) formation [17]. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g004
Figure 5. Potential health impacts of gut microbiota imbalance and role of FMT: Gut dysbiosis has been linked to neurological disorders like multiple sclerosis, cardiovascular conditions such as atherosclerosis, metabolic issues including obesity and type 2 diabetes, liver diseases like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and gastrointestinal disorders such as C. difficile infection, IBS, and IBD. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Figure 5. Potential health impacts of gut microbiota imbalance and role of FMT: Gut dysbiosis has been linked to neurological disorders like multiple sclerosis, cardiovascular conditions such as atherosclerosis, metabolic issues including obesity and type 2 diabetes, liver diseases like non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and gastrointestinal disorders such as C. difficile infection, IBS, and IBD. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 29 October 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g005
Figure 6. The potential and challenges of microbiota-based therapies in atherosclerosis. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 13 November 2024).
Figure 6. The potential and challenges of microbiota-based therapies in atherosclerosis. Created with BioRender.com [31] (accessed on 13 November 2024).
Microorganisms 12 02341 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alexandrescu, L.; Suceveanu, A.P.; Stanigut, A.M.; Tofolean, D.E.; Axelerad, A.D.; Iordache, I.E.; Herlo, A.; Nelson Twakor, A.; Nicoara, A.D.; Tocia, C.; et al. Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome’s Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112341

AMA Style

Alexandrescu L, Suceveanu AP, Stanigut AM, Tofolean DE, Axelerad AD, Iordache IE, Herlo A, Nelson Twakor A, Nicoara AD, Tocia C, et al. Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome’s Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(11):2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alexandrescu, Luana, Adrian Paul Suceveanu, Alina Mihaela Stanigut, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Ani Docu Axelerad, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Alexandra Herlo, Andreea Nelson Twakor, Alina Doina Nicoara, Cristina Tocia, and et al. 2024. "Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome’s Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review" Microorganisms 12, no. 11: 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112341

APA Style

Alexandrescu, L., Suceveanu, A. P., Stanigut, A. M., Tofolean, D. E., Axelerad, A. D., Iordache, I. E., Herlo, A., Nelson Twakor, A., Nicoara, A. D., Tocia, C., Dumitru, A., Dumitru, E., Condur, L. M., Aftenie, C. F., & Tofolean, I. T. (2024). Intestinal Insights: The Gut Microbiome’s Role in Atherosclerotic Disease: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms, 12(11), 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12112341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop