Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Lipopeptides Are Effective against Pear Fire Blight
Previous Article in Journal
Community-Acquired Solitary Brain Abscesses Caused by Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Healthy Adult
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of Salmonella enterica Bacteriophages Identifies Two Novel Phage Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms12050895
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Partial Characterization of Three Bacteriophages Isolated from Aquaculture Hatchery Water and Their Potential in the Biocontrol of Vibrio spp.

by
İhsan Yaşa
1,*,
Serap Evran
2,
Asiye Esra Eren Eroğlu
1,
Cengiz Önder
3,
Maryam Allahyari
4,
Gülçin Menderes
3 and
Müberra Kullay
3
1
Basic and Industrial Microbiology Section, Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye
2
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye
3
Kılıç Seafood Juvenile Fish Adaptation and Hatchery Facility, 09320 Aydın, Türkiye
4
Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 895; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050895
Submission received: 30 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 23 April 2024 / Published: 29 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacteria Control by Phages)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacteriophages are currently considered one of the most promising alternatives to antibiotics under the ‘One Health’ approach due to their ability to effectively combat bacterial infections. This study aimed to characterize Vibrio species in hatchery water samples collected from an aquaculture farm and investigate the biocontrol potential of their bacteriophages. Vibrio spp. (n = 32) isolates confirmed by LNA probe-based qPCR were used as hosts. Three Vibrio phages were isolated. IKEM_vK exhibited a broad host range, infecting V. harveyi (n = 8), V. alginolyticus (n = 2), V. azureus (n = 1), and V. ordalii (n = 1). IKEM_v5 showed lytic activity against V. anguillarum (n = 4) and V. ordalii (n = 1), while IKEM_v14 was specific to V. scophtalmi (n = 4). The morphological appearance of phages and their lytic effects on the host were visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All three phages remained relatively stable within the pH range of 6–11 and up to 60 °C. The lytic activities and biofilm inhibition capabilities of these phages against planktonic Vibrio cells support their potential applications in controlling vibriosis in aquaculture systems.

1. Introduction

The aquaculture sector is one of the fastest-growing industries globally. It shows promise in meeting the demand for animal protein-based foods, given the increasing human population [1]. However, bacterial infectious diseases have become a major challenge for aquaculture due to intensive production practices [2,3]. Farms situated in coastal areas, where the average annual temperature ranges between 20 °C and 26 °C, offer significant advantages for aquaculture. Unfortunately, these temperature ranges also facilitate the outbreaks of vibriosis caused by Vibrio spp. [4].
Vibrio spp. are non-spore-forming, motile, curved, Gram-negative, halophilic, facultative anaerobic bacteria [5]. They inhabit oceans, estuaries, and the internal organs of aquatic organisms, as well as environments where freshwater fish farming is practiced. Over ten species of Vibrio, including V. harveyi, V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. vulnificus, and V. ponticus, have been reported as causative agents of diseases in numerous countries. Proficient swimmers, Vibrio spp. can adhere to other organisms living in water, thereby possessing the potential to infect various fish hosts [6]. Furthermore, they are often associated with the development of acute gastroenteritis in humans who consume raw or undercooked contaminated seafood, particularly shellfish [7,8].
Antibiotic-resistant Vibrio spp. pose a major concern [9]. Several studies in recent years have demonstrated that Vibrio spp. exhibit resistance to eight or more antibiotics commonly used for treating vibriosis [10,11,12]. Moreover, Vibrio spp. are known to form significant biofilms. However, antibiotics have been found to have minimal effect on controlling biofilm formation [13]. Bacteria within the biofilm can transfer resistance genes more readily than planktonic cells, thereby increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance dissemination. Consequently, it is imperative to develop and implement new alternatives targeting antibiotic-resistant bacteria and/or biofilms [14].
Bacteriophages, also known as bacterial viruses, present promising alternatives for microbial control compared to chemotherapeutic agents [15]. They offer advantages such as pathogen specificity, high efficiency, and minimal harm to natural microbiota compared to antibiotics [16]. Phages have undergone extensive research as antimicrobial agents in various fields, including medicine, veterinary science, agriculture, aquaculture, and food science. The efficacy of phage therapy relies on the phage’s ability to colonize infected tissues and propagate lytically within them. Before being included in the therapeutic application, each newly isolated phage must undergo rigorous characterization. This process includes determining the phage’s latent period, burst size, host range, multiplicity of infection (MOI), and phage and plaque morphology. If a phage is a candidate for potential therapeutic use, its entire genome should be sequenced. To prevent uncontrolled gene transfer during the therapy process, it is important to avoid lysogenic phages. Additionally, it is crucial to ensure that phage genomes do not contain any virulence factors or antibiotic-resistance genes that could be transferred to bacteria [17,18].
The feasibility of phage therapy as an ideal method for microbial control, even in sensitive environments such as hatcheries and adaptation facilities, is evidenced by the occurrence of autonomous transfers among animals following the initial application in aquaculture trials [19]. Promising results have been reported in recent years regarding the application of phage therapy as an alternative method to control pathogenic bacteria in aquaculture. A new jumbo phage, which is effective against V. coralliilyticus infections and holds potential for phage therapy against coral diseases, has been identified [20]. In one study, the application of Vibrio phages to shrimp resulted in a 70% higher survival rate compared to the disease control group [21]. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of vB_Pd_PDCC-1 phage, which has a broad host range, during the early development of yellowtail amberjack (Seriola rivoliana), and it was reported that the phage had positive effects at the larval stage [22]. In another study, it was demonstrated that feeding shieldfish with a phage cocktail led to a significant reduction in the numbers of Vibrio and Edwardsiella species in their intestines. Furthermore, phage cocktail feeding was reported to effectively prevent bacterial dysbiosis in shieldfish [23].
The economic feasibility and sustainability of an aquaculture industry depend largely on the effectiveness of disease management strategies. In this regard, our focus was on utilizing bacteriophages that infect Vibrio as potential alternative control agents for pathogens causing infections and losses in aquaculture. In this study, three new bacteriophages were isolated from the hatchery water of sea bream (Dicentrarchus labrax). The study aimed to characterize Vibrio phages and assess their potential as biocontrol agents against different Vibrio species. The efficiency of all three phages in controlling pathogens and biofilms under in vitro conditions supports their use for in vivo applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification of Vibrio spp.

From 2019 to 2023, a total of 45 water samples were collected from an aquaculture facility located along the coastline of Aydın province. The samples were taken from tanks where disease was detected during routine pathological examinations conducted by the fish health unit. Membrane filtration method was applied to isolate Vibrio species from samples. Each water sample was passed through 0.45 nm membrane filters (GVS, 1215676) [24]. The filter papers were placed on Thiosulphate-Citrate-Bile-Sucrose (TCBS, Merck) agar, a selective medium. Then, petri dishes were incubated at 27 °C for 24 to 48 h. Colonies with different morphotypes were subcultured in TCBS agar. The pure colonies were then examined by Gram staining, with particular attention paid to Gram-negative rod- and comma-shaped presumptive isolates. These isolates were preserved in a 25% glycerol solution at −20 °C for further analysis and bacteriophage isolation.
Genomic DNA extraction was performed from pure isolates grown in LB broth (containing 1.5% NaCl) using the High Pure Preparation kit (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentration was checked using Qubit™ 4 (Invitrogen, New York, NY, USA). It was ensured that the DNA concentration for Real-Time PCR (qPCR) was greater than 30 µg/mL.
The design and control of Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) based TaqMan probe targeting Vibrio spp. was conducted through the utilization of the Clustal W Alignment program and Oligo 7 software. The probes were labeled FAM, serving as a fluorescent dye. To ensure the specificity of the primers and probes at the genus level, a verification process was carried out using BLAST within the GenBank database. Subsequently, the synthesized primers and probes were obtained from MicroSynth, Balgach, Switzerland.
The primer and probe sequences specific to the genera used are shown in Table 1. Real-time PCR assays were performed on a LightCycler 96 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using the following reaction mix: 10 μL 2 × LightCycler 480 Probes Master mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), 0.5 μL of each primer (10 μM stock solution), 0.2 μL probe, 3.8 μL ddH2O, and 5 μL DNA. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, then 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 60 s. V. anguillarum (ATCC 14181) strain was used as the positive control, while P. damselae subsp. piscicida (ATCC 51736), E. coli (ATCC 10231), and P. aureginosa (ATCC 27853) strains were used as negative controls.
The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the 27 F and 1492 R primers [26]. The PCR products were visualized using gel electrophoresis and sequenced by Letgen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Izmir, Türkiye). The resulting sequences were compared to the 16S rRNA gene in the NCBI database using BLAST. Finally, the sequences of each isolate were uploaded to GenBank.

2.2. Isolation of Vibrio Infecting Phages

Water samples were collected periodically from the aquaculture waters where Vibrio spp. were isolated. The samples were placed in 500 mL sterile bottles and transported to the laboratory while maintaining the cold chain. Fifteen Vibrio isolates, one from each species listed in Table S1 and confirmed by qPCR, were used as target bacteria for phage isolation. To augment hypothetical phages in water samples, 1 mL of the target bacterial culture and 5 mL of water samples were initially incubated for 48 h in conical flasks containing 50 mL of 2× Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) with 1.5% NaCl. Following incubation, the enrichment media were centrifuged for 20 min at 8000 rpm, and the resulting supernatants were passed through 0.22 nm syringe tip cellulose acetate (CA) filters (GVS, 1213641) and subsequently transferred to new sterile falcons.
The Double-Layer Agar (DLA) method was employed to analyze phage plaques [27]. Filtrates were diluted in phage buffer (200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) across a range of 101–108. Subsequently, 200 μL of each dilution was combined with 100 μL of host bacteria in a microcentrifuge tube. The resulting phage–host suspension was then transferred to pre-prepared semi-solid agar (0.5%) cooled to 45–47 °C. This suspension was poured onto Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) containing 1.5% agar and incubated for 24 h. Phage plaques were harvested using a sterile Pasteur pipette and resuspended in microcentrifuge tubes containing 50 μL of phage buffer. This process was iterated six times to obtain petri dishes with pure phages. The pure phages were repropagated using the previously described enrichment protocol, and their titers were determined using the DLA method. The phage lysates obtained were stored at 4 °C for further studies.

2.3. Determination of Phage–Host Specificity

Phage host range analysis was carried out utilizing a drop-spot plaque assay [28]. Lawn plates were prepared using overnight cultures, and 8 μL of each phage stock was individually transferred onto distinct bacterial lawns. Subsequently, the plates were incubated at 27 °C for a period of 24–48 h. The presence of plaques was visually inspected at the end of the incubation period.

2.4. One-Step Growth Curve

The host culture was adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 1 at 600 during the mid-exponential growth phase. Subsequently, 5 mL of phage suspension was added to 5 mL of the host culture. Samples were collected at intervals of 5 min over a period of one hour and subjected to phage titration using the DLA method following treatment with 1% (v/v) chloroform [29]. Three independent experiments were conducted. The burst size (Bs) of the phages was determined using the formula Bs = Pt/P0, where Pt represents the phage titer at the plateau phase, and P0 represents the initial infectious titer [30].

2.5. Effects of Temperature and pH on Phage Stability

To assess the impact of temperature and pH on phage stability, phage suspensions (1.0 × 108 pfu/mL) were subjected to incubation in a water bath across a temperature range of 20 to 80 °C. Following 1 h of incubation, the phage titer was determined. Tryptic soy broth (TSB) containing 1.5% NaCl was prepared at eight distinct pH levels using 0.1 N HCl and NaOH. Phages were introduced into TSB (1.5% NaCl) in equal volumes and then incubated for 1 h at 27 °C. Subsequently, phage titers were determined after the incubation period [31].

2.6. Analysis of Scanning Electron Micrographs of Phage Infection

Vibrio spp. cells (100 µL, 108 CFU/mL) were mixed with 500 µL (108 PFU/mL) of the individual phage isolates and incubated at 27 °C for 6 h. The mixture was then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (diluted in sterile phosphate-buffered saline) and 1% osmium tetraoxide (Sigma Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated in a series of ethanol concentrations (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 96%, and 100%). Following dehydration, they were dried using a Critical Point Dryer (Leica, Istanbul, Türkiye) [32]. Finally, the samples were coated with a gold–palladium layer of 8 nm thickness before visualization with a Scanning Electron Microscope (Thermo Scientific, Istanbul, Türkiye).

2.7. Optimal Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) Determination

To determine the optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI), serial dilutions of host cells in exponential phase were performed and added to aliquots of a stock solution of phages. Ratios of 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 were utilized, along with 100 μL of phage and 100 μL of Vibrio spp. (1 × 108 CFU/mL). The final mixture was then combined with 5 mL of TSB (%1.5 NaCl). The mixtures were shaken at 27 °C for 10 h. Afterward, they were centrifuged at room temperature at 8000× g for 5 min to remove the cells. The precipitate was discarded, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 nm syringe tip CA filter. Phage titers were determined using a DLA method. The optimal MOI was determined as the one yielding the highest phage titer [33]. Three parallel experiments were conducted to validate this MOI.

2.8. Anti-Biofilm Activity of Phages against Vibrio spp.

The biofilm-forming capacities of Vibrio spp. in both the presence and absence of phages were assessed following the crystal violet test protocol [34]. Overnight active cultures of Vibrio spp. adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity were inoculated into microtiter plates containing sterile 100 μL TSB (1.5% NaCl). Following inoculation, individual phages (at optimum MOI concentration) were added to wells containing target bacteria and incubated at 27 °C for 24 h. Bacterial control wells contained only sterile medium and bacterial culture, while negative control wells contained only TSB (1.5% NaCl). After the incubation period, the microplate wells were washed three times with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The biofilms were then fixed by incubation at 80 °C for 30 min. After fixation, biofilms adhering to the microplate wells were stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet and incubated for 10 min. After several washes, the stained adherent biofilms were solubilized with 95% ethanol. Measurements were then taken using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 545 nm. Three separate wells were seeded for each isolate and phage, and the average of the results was used for analysis. Experiments were performed independently in triplicate.

2.9. Antibacterial Effects of Phages against Planktonic Vibrio spp.

Phage lytic activity was investigated by measuring changes in optical density absorbance to examine the in vitro lysis of bacteria, following a previous study with minor modifications. Bacterial cultures in the logarithmic phase (approximately 104 CFU/mL) were distributed into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. Phage suspensions were added to wells containing the target bacteria at a ratio of optimum MOI, with 50 µL per well. For each analysis, a bacterial control sample inoculated with the host culture, but not with phages, and a sterile growth medium inoculated only with phages were included. The microtiter plate was incubated at 27 °C in a programmable real-time multi-mode microplate reader, and changes in absorbance at OD600 were automatically recorded at 60 min intervals over a period of 24 h [35].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA, USA). The results were presented as standard deviations. Significance was determined at the 5% level (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Rapid Detection of Vibrio spp.

A total of 68 isolates were obtained from 45 water samples analyzed using TCBS agar. Following microscopic and phenotypic observations, 26 of these samples were discarded. Rapid detection of 32 Vibrio spp. was achieved from the remaining 42 suspicious isolates using the LNA probe-based real-time PCR designed in this study. Additionally, fragments of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified and sequenced as an internal control for all possible isolates. The analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences of 32 Vibrio spp. isolates revealed the presence of the following species: V. harveyi, V. anguillarum, V. scophthalmi, V. alginolyticus, V. fluvialis, V. chagasii, V. sinaloensis, V. diabolicus, V. mediterranei, V. crassostreae, V. azureus, V. qinghaiensis, V. ordalii, V. neonatus, and V. vulnificus (Table S1).

3.2. Isolation and Partial Characterization of Vibrio-Infecting Phages

The DLA method was used for phage isolation. Fifteen Vibrio isolates, confirmed by qPCR, were used as host bacteria for bacteriophage isolation. This resulted in the purification of three phages named IKEM_vK, IKEM_v5, and IKEM_v14 (Figure 1). IKEM_v5 formed clear plaques that were 2–4 mm in size, while IKEM_vK and IKEM_v14 formed smaller, turbid plaques that were 1–3 mm in size. IKEM_vK demonstrated a wider host range by infecting 12 out of 32 Vibrio species, while IKEM_v5 and IKEM_v14 showed plaque formation abilities in 5 and 4 isolates, respectively (Table 2).
To describe the life cycles and adsorption capabilities of all three phages, an initial phage infection process was determined by a single-step growth curve experiment. We calculated the latent period and burst size of the phages by analyzing the dynamics of free and total phage numbers. The burst time of the IKEM_vK, IKEM_v5, and IKEM_v14 phages was found to be 25, 20, and 30 min, respectively (Figure 2). All three phages remained stable at temperatures up to 40 °C and were able to withstand temperatures up to 60 °C. They also maintained their activity within the pH range of 5–10. (Figure 2D,E). At MOI 0.01, IKEM_vK achieved the highest level with 1.82 × 109 PFU/mL. Meanwhile, IKEM_14 and IKEM_v5 showed the highest level at MOI 0.001 with 1.68 ×1010 PFU/mL and 1.46 × 109 PFU/mL, respectively (Figure 3).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was utilized to analyze phages and phage-exposed Vibrio spp. cells (Figure 4). Three phages showed different morphologies. IKEM_vK had an icosahedral head of ~57.6 nm diameter and a tail of ~108.9 nm length (Figure 4A). IKEM_v14 had a head diameter of ~46.51 nm and a tail length of ~126.9 nm (Figure 4B). IKEM_v5 showed a head diameter of ~56.9 nm and a tail length of ~105.6 nm (Figure 4C). The images also revealed bacterial lysis resulting from bacteriophage infection and the release of phage particles (Figure 4D,E). Particularly, it was observed that phage particles tended to adsorb more onto the cell surface during bacterial cell division (Figure 4F). SEM analysis confirmed the attachment of all three phage particles to their hosts and demonstrated their lytic capabilities.

3.3. In Vitro Phage Treatment Assays

The biofilm stability in the presence and absence of phages is detailed in Figure 5. The OD590 values of cultures treated with phages showed a significant decrease at 24 h compared to untreated control cultures.
IKEM_vK phage, possessing a wide host range, was applied to 12 isolates, including the V. harveyi, V. alginolyticus, V. azureus, and V. ordalii strains, resulting in the inhibition of biofilm formation by more than 50% in 7 of them. The highest level of biofilm inhibition, 75.9%, was observed in V. harveyi strain Gdp17 (Figure 5A,B). V. scophthalmi strains Gdp33, Gdp35, Gdp38, and Gdp39, treated with IKEM_v14, exhibited reductions in biofilm formation by 61.5%, 45.8%, 60.5%, and 39.8%, respectively (Figure 5C,D). When the growth medium of V. anguillarum strains Gdp19, Gdp20, Gdp30, Gdp34, and V. ordalii strain Gdp41 was supplemented with IKEM_v5 phage, it was able to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation to varying degrees, ranging from 33.8% to 59.9% (Figure 5E,F).
Bacterial inactivation was measured against Vibrio spp. hosts, where each individual phage exhibited the highest biofilm inhibition. In control samples lacking phages, it was noted that Vibrio spp. (V. harveyi strain Gdp17, V. scophthalmi strain Gdp33, and V. anguillarum strain Gdp34) proliferated during the incubation period, resulting in a concurrent rise in absorbance values (Figure 6). The phage control remained constant at all time points (ANOVA, p > 0.05).
Two hours after the initial inoculation, the optical densities of the Gdp17 isolate cultured alone and cultured with IKEM_vK were measured as 0.35 ± 0.03 and 0.34 ± 0.02, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in these values (ANOVA, p > 0.05), the optical density of the control environment containing only Gdp17 was 0.64 ± 0.02 at the 8th hour of the experiment. In contrast, the optical density of Gdp17 cultured with IKEM_vK was 0.46 ± 0.01, and this difference was statistically significant (ANOVA, p < 0.05). However, bacterial inactivation remained considerably high after 24 h of incubation. The optical density of Gdp17 cultured alone was measured as 1.66± 0.02, while that cultured with IKEM_vK was measured as 0.84 ± 0.01. (Figure 6).
After phage treatment with IKEM_v14, statistically significant initial results were obtained at the 12th hour of the experiment (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The optical densities of Gdp33 cultured alone and cultured with IKEM_v14 were recorded as 0.80 ± 0.01 and 0.51 ± 0.02, respectively. At the 24th hour of the experiment, the optical density of host cells cultured alone was 1.74 ± 0.02. In contrast, the optical density was measured as 0.65 ± 0.03 in the medium exposed to IKEM_v14. These values were found to be significantly different (ANOVA, p < 0.05), indicating an effect of IKEM_v14 on the host cells. (Figure 6).
Following treatment with the IKEM_v5 phage, statistically significant initial results were obtained at the 4th hour of the experiment (ANOVA, p < 0.05). The optical densities of Gdp34 cultured alone and co-cultured with IKEM_v5 were recorded as 0.49 ± 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.03, respectively. By the 24th hour of the experiment, the optical density of host cells cultured alone reached 1.58 ± 0.02. Conversely, in the medium exposed to IKEM_v5, the optical density was measured to be 0.52 ± 0.01. These values showed a significant difference (ANOVA, p < 0.05), indicating the effect of IKEM_v5 on the host cells (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Bacterial outbreaks are becoming more common in aquaculture environments, which is worsened by global warming [36]. The increasing resistance of bacteria in biofilms to antibiotics is a significant obstacle to current treatment methods that rely on antibiotics [37,38,39]. Vibriosis outbreaks caused by Vibrio species are devastating bacterial diseases in aquaculture due to their broad host range and high mortality rates. Due to the growing awareness of antibiotic resistance and restrictions on antibiotic use, phage applications are increasingly popular as alternatives to antibiotic treatment in animal production sectors [40,41,42]. The use of phages is particularly promising for controlling infections in aquatic environments such as aquacultures [43,44]. The effectiveness of disease management protocols is crucial for the viability of the aquaculture industry. In this study, we collaborated with industry experts to explore the potential of vibrio-targeted bacteriophages as an alternative method to control pathogens that cause harmful infections and economic losses in aquaculture systems [45].
We used LNA probe-based qPCR in the study, which greatly facilitated the identification of 32 Vibrio spp. Furthermore, the 16S rRNA gene of each isolate was sequenced, and an internal control was performed for all possible isolates. The real-time PCR method enabled the discrimination of members of the genus Vibrio in less than 4 h. LNA probes offer significant advantages such as high sensitivity, a wide linear range, a clinically relevant detection limit, ease of design, and improved signal generation [46,47]. LNA probes have the ability to distinguish single-base mutations through amplification curves without the need for complex detection or additional Tm analysis [48].
Analysis of 16S rRNA sequences from Vibrio species isolated from aquaculture waters showed that V. harveyi (25%), V. anguillarum (12.5%), and V. scophthalmi (12.5%) had higher rates compared to other Vibrio species. These species are already frequently isolated during vibriosis outbreaks [49,50]. Vibrio harveyi is frequently found in shrimp cultures, whereas Vibrio anguillarum is commonly associated with disease in sea bass and trout [51,52,53]. Studies suggest that Vibrio scophthalmi is an opportunistic pathogen that typically does not cause disease in healthy fish. However, exposure to environmental stressors can weaken fish immunity, making them susceptible to infection by this bacterial species, which can result in illness or death [54]. For instance, when the water temperature reaches 20 °C, Japanese eels (Anguilla japonica) are more susceptible to infection by V. scophthalmi, which can cause severe enteritis and ascites symptoms, ultimately resulting in high mortality rates. Moreover, V. scophthalmi is considered a secondary infectious agent that significantly increases the mortality rate of diseased fish following infections by other pathogens [55].
We used Vibrio spp. isolates as hosts and obtained three bacteriophages (IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14 and IKEM_v5) by repeated plaque purification. In discriminating between the phages, we first focused on phage plaque morphologies at the same titers. It was previously reported that transformations between clear and turbid plaques could occur depending on the phage titer. The size and morphology of phage plaques are also determined by the lysis time [56]. The IKEM_v5 phage has a shorter latent period compared to IKEM_vK and IKEM_v14, resulting in larger plaques due to a higher burst size. Previous studies have shown that an increase in burst size leads to the formation of larger plaques [57].
The host ranges of all three phages were determined by conducting spot tests on phage-treated bacterial cultures. IKEM_vK exhibited a broader host range, infecting 12 out of 32 Vibrio strains, including V. harveyi, V. ordalii, V. azureus, and V. alginolyticus. Meanwhile, IKEM_v5 and IKEM_v14 showed plaque formation abilities in five (V. anguillarum, V. ordalii) and four (V. scophthalmi) strains, respectively. The results indicate that the IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5 isolates are distinct phages with different host ranges. Bacteriophage receptor specificity is directly associated with host range, as receptor proteins bind to specific structures on the outer surface of host bacteria [58]. In silico studies can now predict phage host ranges in advance [59]. The proper selection of bacteriophages is crucial for the success of phage-mediated protection and treatment. When selecting phages, it is important to consider criteria such as host range, burst size, survival in the usage environment, and latent period [60]. In our study, all three phages were found to be stable up to 40 °C and within a pH range of 5–10, indicating their ability to survive under normal seawater conditions (0–35 °C and pH 7.4–8.4).
The use of phages is a promising alternative to prevent and control biofilm formation, which is one of the most important virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria. Bacteria in biofilms are much more resistant to antibiotics than planktonic cells [14,61]. Our crystal violet staining experiments showed that most of the strains we isolated were strong biofilm producers. However, all three phages demonstrated biofilm inhibition capabilities ranging from 75.9% to 15.7% when added to the growth medium of Vibrio hosts. IKEM_vK was successful in reducing biofilm formation by over 50% in seven Vibrio spp. isolates. Meanwhile, IKEM_v14 provided biofilm inhibition ranging from 61.5% to 39.8% in the four strains it infected. IKEM_v5 exhibited the highest anti-biofilm activity at 59.9%. Previous studies have demonstrated the anti-biofilm effect of phages and their enzymes (enzibiotics) [62]. It was observed that the efficacy of phage FE11 in controlling biofilm formation by V. parahaemolyticus was directly correlated with a high concentration of phages [63]. Nonetheless, bacterial density may still be an uncontrolled variable in field applications. Hence, implementing the periodic administration of phages at a specific titer by propagating them in situ during treatment, rather than using the traditional dosing method, will enhance the success of phage-mediated protection and treatment.
In this study, we investigated the lytic activity of phages on planktonic Vibrio cells. The optical densities of Vibrio spp. cells cultured with phages were significantly lower than those of the control groups until the 20th hour of the experiment. However, bacterial growth resumed after 20 h, albeit slowly. It is important to note that over time, host bacteria may develop resistance to phages. The previous literature reported that bacterial phage resistance is associated with decreased virulence in the host [29]. To prevent the development of resistance, it is recommended to isolate several phages with different host ranges and apply them in mixtures against target pathogens [16,43,64]. However, a balance must be struck in the cocktail’s host range, as a more costly, broader lytic spectrum may encourage the undesired selection of resistant bacterial strains or kill off unintended bacteria, thus posing a risk of disrupting beneficial microbiota. An alternative approach is to utilize cocktails comprising phages that target distinct receptors on the same bacterial cell, which may assist in the retardation of the emergence of resistance [44,45,65]. The establishment of phage libraries isolated against pathogens obtained from local farms will facilitate the development of more effective phage cocktails tailored to the target region. Personalized cocktails, currently employed in human medicine, minimize the impact on normal microbiota by excluding “useless phages” [42,66]. This approach would be particularly beneficial in industrial treatments, especially in aquaculture, where large quantities of phages may be necessary.

5. Conclusions

Effective disease management strategies are crucial for success in animal production industries. Through industry–academic collaboration, we successfully isolated new Vibrio strains and their infecting phages. Our findings demonstrate the potential of these phages to combat vibriosis agents originating from local farms. However, further studies, such as full genomic characterization, are needed for the safe use of these phages in aquaculture and to prevent the transfer of pathogenic traits through phages. The objective of our future research is to continually update the phage library against vibriosis by enriching it with new isolates and developing novel phage cocktails tailored to regional application segments. While phage therapy still has some limitations, future applications utilizing phage components or phage design represent the driving force of our study. The renewed interest in phage research motivates scientists, and the data generated in this field will be important milestones for successful future applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12050895/s1, Table S1: Homologues of Vibrio isolates according to the 16S ribosomal RNA gene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, İ.Y., S.E. and A.E.E.E.; methodology, A.E.E.E. and M.A.; G.M. and M.K.; resources, G.M. and C.Ö.; writing—original draft preparation, İ.Y., A.E.E.E. and S.E.; writing—review and editing, İ.Y. and S.E.; project administration, İ.Y. and S.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination and KILIÇ Sea Food Inc. supported a part of this study, which was carried out under the Industry-University Cooperation Project FBG-2019-21359. In addition, another part of the study was funded by Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination under the general research project number FGA-2021-22524.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data supporting the findings of this study have been deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 10 February 2024)) with accession numbers PP270122-PP270153.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted at the Industrial and Molecular Microbiology Research Laboratory of Ege University Faculty of Science and the Kılıç Seafood Juvenile Fish Adaptation and Hatchery Facility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors affirm that they do not possess any identifiable conflicting financial interests or personal affiliations that might have given the appearance of influencing the research presented in this paper. C.O., G.M. and M.K. are affiliated with the Kılıç Seafood Fish Health unit and provided consultation and expertise for this research.

References

  1. Boyd, C.E.; McNevin, A.A.; Davis, R.P. The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply. Food Secur. 2022, 14, 805–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramasamy, H.; Chellam, B.; Heo, M. Molecular studies, disease status and prophylactic measures in grouper aquaculture: Economic importance, diseases, and immunology. Aquaculture 2010, 309, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mugimba, K.K.; Byarugaba, D.K.; Mutoloki, S.; Evensen, Ø.; Munang’andu, H.M. Challenges and solutions to viral diseases of finfish in marine aquaculture. Pathogens 2021, 10, 673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baker-Austin, C.; Oliver, J.D.; Alam, M.; Ali, A.; Waldor, M.K.; Qadri, F.; Martinez-Urtaza, J. Vibrio spp. infections. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yaashikaa, P.R.; Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S. Isolation and identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus from prawn (Penaeus monodon) seafood: Preservation strategies. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 99, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.L. Correlation of total bacterial and Vibrio spp. populations between fish and water in the aquaculture system. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Froelich, B.A.; Daines, D.A. In hot water: Effects of climate change on Vibrio–human interactions. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 4101–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Loo, K.Y.; Law, J.W.F.; Tan, L.T.H.; Pusparajah, P.; Wong, S.H.; Chan, K.G.; Lee, L.H.; Letchumanan, V. The burden of Vibrio sp. infections—A scoping review. Prog. Microbes Mol. Biol. 2023, 6, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Loo, K.Y.; Letchumanan, V.; Law, J.W.F.; Pusparajah, P.; Goh, B.H.; Ab Mutalib, N.S.; He, Y.W.; Lee, L.H. Incidence of antibiotic resistance in Vibrio spp. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2590–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Elmahdi, S.; DaSilva, L.V.; Parveen, S. Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in various countries: A review. Food Microbiol. 2016, 57, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gxalo, O.; Digban, T.O.; Igere, B.E.; Olapade, O.A.; Okoh, A.I.; Nwodo, U.U. Virulence and antibiotic resistance characteristics of Vibrio isolates from rustic environmental freshwaters. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 732001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Haifa-Haryani, W.O.; Amatul-Samahah, M.A.; Azzam-Sayuti, M.; Chin, Y.K.; Zamri-Saad, M.; Natrah, I.; Amal, M.N.A.; Satyantini, W.H.; Ina-Salwany, M.Y. Prevalence, antibiotics resistance and plasmid profiling of Vibrio spp. isolated from cultured shrimp in Peninsular Malaysia. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ashrafudoulla, M.; Mizan, M.F.R.; Park, S.H.; Ha, S.D. Current and future perspectives for controlling Vibrio biofilms in the seafood industry: A comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1827–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Abe, K.; Nomura, N.; Suzuki, S. Biofilms: Hot spots of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in aquatic environments, with a focus on a new HGT mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Higuera, G.; Bastías, R.; Tsertsvadze, G.; Romero, J.; Espejo, R.T. Recently discovered Vibrio anguillarum phages can protect against experimentally induced vibriosis in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Aquaculture 2013, 392, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Doss, J.; Culbertson, K.; Hahn, D.; Camacho, J.; Barekzi, N. A review of phage therapy against bacterial pathogens of aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Viruses 2017, 9, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ssekatawa, K.; Byarugaba, D.K.; Kato, C.D.; Wampande, E.M.; Ejobi, F.; Tweyongyere, R.; Nakavuma, J.L. A review of phage mediated antibacterial applications. Alex. J. Med. 2021, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Katharios, P.; Kalatzis, P.G.; Kokkari, C.; Sarropoulou, E.; Middelboe, M. Isolation and characterization of a N4-like lytic bacteriophage infecting Vibrio splendidus, a pathogen of fish and bivalves. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0190083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Echeverría-Vega, A.; Morales-Vicencio, P.; Saez-Saavedra, C.; Alvarez, M.A.; Gordillo, F.; Del-Valle, R.; Solís, M.E.; Araya, R. Characterization of the Bacteriophage vB_VorS-PVo5 Infection on Vibrio ordalii: A Model for Phage-Bacteria Adsorption in Aquatic Environments. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 550979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jacquemot, L.; Bettarel, Y.; Monjol, J.; Corre, E.; Halary, S.; Desnues, C.; Bouvier, T.; Ferrier-Pagès, C.; Baudoux, A.C. Therapeutic potential of a new jumbo phage that infects Vibrio coralliilyticus, a widespread coral pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 415995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, L.; Fan, J.; Liu, Q.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, H.; Huang, S.; Ma, Y. Isolation and characterization of specific phages to prepare a cocktail preventing Vibrio sp. Va-F3 infections in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 482159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Veyrand-Quirós, B.; Gómez-Gil, B.; Lomeli-Ortega, C.O.; Escobedo-Fregoso, C.; Millard, A.D.; Tovar-Ramírez, D.; Balcázar, J.L.; Quiroz-Guzmán, E. Use of bacteriophage vB_Pd_PDCC-1 as biological control agent of Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae during hatching of longfin yellowtail (Seriola rivoliana) eggs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 1497–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cui, H.; Xu, Y.; Cong, C.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Li, S.; Li, J.; Wang, L. Evaluation of the preventive effect of phage cocktails on turbot ascites and its influence on main physiological indicators. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gomez-Gil, B.; Roque, A. Isolation, enumeration, and preservation of the Vibrionaceae. Biol. Vibrios 2006, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thompson, J.R.; Randa, M.A.; Marcelino, L.A.; Tomita-Mitchell, A.; Lim, E.; Polz, M.F. Diversity and dynamics of a north atlantic coastal Vibrio community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4103–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Frank, J.A.; Reich, C.I.; Sharma, S.; Weisbaum, J.S.; Wilson, B.A.; Olsen, G.J. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Karaynir, A.; Salih, H.; Bozdoğan, B.; Güçlü, Ö.; Keskin, D. Isolation and characterization of Brochothrix phage ADU4. Virus Res. 2022, 321, 198902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Montso, P.K.; Mlambo, V.; Ateba, C.N. Characterization of lytic bacteriophages infecting multidrug-resistant shiga toxigenic atypical Escherichia coli O177 strains isolated from cattle feces. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 484104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mateus, L.; Costa, L.; Silva, Y.J.; Pereira, C.; Cunha, A.; Almeida, A. Efficiency of phage cocktails in the inactivation of Vibrio in aquaculture. Aquaculture 2014, 424, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kropinski, A.M. Practical Advice on the One-Step Growth Curve. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1681, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yamaki, S.; Kawai, Y.; Yamazaki, K. Characterization of a novel bacteriophage, Phda1, infecting the histamine-producing Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 118, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shatila, F.; Yaşa, İ.; Yalçın, H.T. Biofilm Formation by Salmonella enterica Strains. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 1150–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Application of a novel lytic podoviridae phage Pu20 for biological control of drug-resistant Salmonella in liquid eggs. Pathogens 2021, 10, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. O’Toole, G.A. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 47, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ture, M.; Altinok, I.; Cebeci, A.; Caliskan, N. Characterization of novel bacteriophage HP-T19 that targets Hafnia alvei. Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 694–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Santos, L.; Ramos, F. Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: Current knowledge and alternatives to tackle the problem. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Watts, J.E.M.; Schreier, H.J.; Lanska, L.; Hale, M.S. The rising tide of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: Sources, sinks and solutions. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Reverter, M.; Sarter, S.; Caruso, D.; Avarre, J.C.; Combe, M.; Pepey, E.; Pouyaud, L.; Vega-Heredía, S.; de Verdal, H.; Gozlan, R.E. Aquaculture at the crossroads of global warming and antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Schar, D.; Zhao, C.; Wang, Y.; Larsson, D.G.J.; Gilbert, M.; van Boeckel, T.P. Twenty-year trends in antimicrobial resistance from aquaculture and fisheries in Asia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chuah, L.O.; Effarizah, M.E.; Goni, A.M.; Rusul, G. Antibiotic Application and Emergence of Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) in Global Catfish Aquaculture. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2016, 3, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pereira, C.; Moreirinha, C.; Lewicka, M.; Almeida, P.; Clemente, C.; Cunha, Â.; Delgadillo, I.; Romalde, J.L.; Nunes, M.L.; Almeida, A. Bacteriophages with potential to inactivate Salmonella Typhimurium: Use of single phage suspensions and phage cocktails. Virus Res. 2016, 220, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Culot, A.; Grosset, N.; Gautier, M. Overcoming the challenges of phage therapy for industrial aquaculture. Aquaculture 2019, 513, 734423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kowalska, J.D.; Kazimierczak, J.; Sowińska, P.M.; Wójcik, E.A.; Siwicki, A.K.; Dastych, J. Growing trend of fighting infections in aquaculture environment—Opportunities and challenges of phage therapy. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Glonti, T.; Pirnay, J.-P. In Vitro Techniques and Measurements of Phage Characteristics That Are Important for Phage Therapy Success. Viruses 2022, 14, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ramos-Vivas, J.; Superio, J.; Galindo-Villegas, J.; Acosta, F. Phage therapy as a focused management strategy in aquaculture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Song, G. LNA real-time PCR probe quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA. Exp. Ther. Med. 2012, 3, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chu, S.V.; Vu, S.T.; Nguyen, H.M.; Le, N.T.; Truong, P.T.; Vu, V.T.; Phung, T.T.; Nguyen, A.T. Fast and Sensitive Real-Time PCR Detection of Major Antiviral-Drug Resistance Mutations in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients by Use of a Predesigned Panel of Locked-Nucleic-Acid TaqMan Probes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, R.; Ou, X.; Sun, X.; Shen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, X. Multiplex LNA probe-based RAP assay for rapid and highly sensitive detection of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1141424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, X.; You, C.; Zeng, Y. Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Vibrio Species in Black Rockfish Sebastes schlegeli. Fishes 2023, 8, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Qin, L.; Zhang, Z. Establishment of Multiple Microfluidic Fluorescence Quantitative PCR Detection Technology for Five Main Mariculture Bacterial Pathogens. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2023, 44, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, X.H.; He, X.; Austin, B. Vibrio harveyi: A serious pathogen of fish and invertebrates in mariculture. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2020, 2, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kapetanović, D.; Vardić Smrzlić, I.; Gavrilović, A.; Jug-Dujaković, J.; Perić, L.; Kazazić, S.; Mišić Radić, T.; Kolda, A.; Čanković, M.; Žunić, J.; et al. Characterization of Vibrio Populations from Cultured European Seabass and the Surrounding Marine Environment with Emphasis on V. anguillarum. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hansen, M.J.; Kudirkiene, E.; Dalsgaard, I. Analysis of 44 Vibrio anguillarum genomes reveals high genetic diversity. PeerJ 2020, 8, e10451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Qiao, G.; Lee, D.C.; Woo, S.H.; Li, H.; Xu, D.H.; Park, S.I. Microbiological characteristics of Vibrio scophthalmi isolates from diseased olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish. Sci. 2012, 78, 853–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Z.; Yu, Y.X.; Wang, Y.G.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.F.; Zhang, H.; Liao, M.J.; Li, B. Complete genome analysis of a virulent Vibrio scophthalmi strain VSc190401 isolated from diseased marine fish half-smooth tongue sole, Cynoglossus semilaevis. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Novianty, R.I.; Budiarti, S. Lytic bacteriophage for Photobacterium damselae isolated from water environment. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. 2014, 2, 549–553. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gallet, R.; Kannoly, S.; Wang, I.N. Effects of bacteriophage traits on plaque formation. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stone, E.; Campbell, K.; Grant, I.; Mcauliffe, O. Understanding and Exploiting Phage-Host Interactions. Viruses 2019, 11, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Albrycht, K.; Rynkiewicz, A.A.; Harasymczuk, M.; Barylski, J.; Zielezinski, A. Daily Reports on Phage-Host Interactions. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 946070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Harper, D.R. Criteria for Selecting Suitable Infectious Diseases for Phage Therapy. Viruses 2018, 10, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ferriol-González, C.; Domingo-Calap, P. Phages for biofilm removal. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Manoharadas, S.; Ahmad, N.; Altaf, M.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Al-Rayes, B.F. An Enzybiotic cocktail effectively disrupts preformed dual biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yang, M.; Chen, H.; Huang, Q.; Xie, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ding, Y.; Chen, M.; Xue, L.; Wu, Q.; et al. Characterization of the novel phage vB_VpaP_FE11 and its potential role in controlling Vibrio parahaemolyticus biofilms. Viruses 2022, 14, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Silva, Y.J.; Costa, L.; Pereira, C.; Mateus, C.; Ngela Cunha, A.; Calado, R.; Gomes, N.C.M.; Pardo, M.A.; Hernandez, I.; Almeida, A. Phage Therapy as an Approach to Prevent Vibrio anguillarum Infections in Fish Larvae Production. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Suh, G.A.; Lodise, T.P.; Tamma, P.D.; Knisely, J.M.; Alexander, J.; Aslam, S.; Barton, K.D.; Bizzell, E.; Totten, K.M.C.; Campbell, J.L.; et al. Considerations for the Use of Phage Therapy in Clinical Practice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2022, 66, e02071-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. McCallin, S.; Sacher, J.C.; Zheng, J.; Chan, B.K. Current State of Compassionate Phage Therapy. Viruses 2019, 11, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 12 00895 g001
Figure 1. Plaques produced by phages IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C).
Figure 1. Plaques produced by phages IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C).
Microorganisms 12 00895 g001
Microorganisms 12 00895 g002
Figure 2. Life cycle parameters of IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C) and stability of phages at several pH values (D) and temperatures (E).
Figure 2. Life cycle parameters of IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C) and stability of phages at several pH values (D) and temperatures (E).
Microorganisms 12 00895 g002
Microorganisms 12 00895 g003
Figure 3. Multiplicity of infection values of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5 phages.
Figure 3. Multiplicity of infection values of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5 phages.
Microorganisms 12 00895 g003
Microorganisms 12 00895 g004
Figure 4. Electron microscopy images of phages IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C). Image of Vibrio harveyi strain Gdp1 lysed by IKEM_vK (D). V. anguillarum strain Gdp30 (E) and V. scophthalmi strain Gdp33 cells surrounded by phages (F). Phage particles are indicated by green arrows.
Figure 4. Electron microscopy images of phages IKEM_vK (A), IKEM_v14 (B), and IKEM_v5 (C). Image of Vibrio harveyi strain Gdp1 lysed by IKEM_vK (D). V. anguillarum strain Gdp30 (E) and V. scophthalmi strain Gdp33 cells surrounded by phages (F). Phage particles are indicated by green arrows.
Microorganisms 12 00895 g004
Microorganisms 12 00895 g005
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of phages on biofilm formation of Vibrio spp. (A,C,E) are the Vibrio biofilm production capacity measured at 590 nm wavelength in the presence and absence of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5, respectively. (B,D,F) are the percentage biofilm inhibition rates of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5 phage, respectively.
Figure 5. Inhibitory effect of phages on biofilm formation of Vibrio spp. (A,C,E) are the Vibrio biofilm production capacity measured at 590 nm wavelength in the presence and absence of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5, respectively. (B,D,F) are the percentage biofilm inhibition rates of IKEM_vK, IKEM_v14, and IKEM_v5 phage, respectively.
Microorganisms 12 00895 g005
Microorganisms 12 00895 g006
Figure 6. Lytic activity of phages against Gdp17, Gdp33, and Gdp34 isolates. The presented data represents the mean values of three independent experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviations.
Figure 6. Lytic activity of phages against Gdp17, Gdp33, and Gdp34 isolates. The presented data represents the mean values of three independent experiments. Error bars represent the standard deviations.
Microorganisms 12 00895 g006
Table 1. Primers and probe information.
Table 1. Primers and probe information.
CodeSequence 5′-3′Tm (°C)TargetReference
567 FGGC GTA AAG CGC ATG CAG GT61.416S rDNA[25]
680 RGAA ATT CTA CCC CCC TCT ACA G54.316S rDNA
Vsp PTTA AGT CAG ATG TGA AAG CCC GGG59.416S rDNAThis study
Table 2. Assessment of host range through spot testing.
Table 2. Assessment of host range through spot testing.
Host RangeVibrio Phages
IKEM_vKIKEM_v14IKEM_v5
V. harveyi
Gdp1 (PP270122)+
Gdp6 (PP270125)+
Gdp14 (PP270130)+
Gdp17 (PP270133)+
Gdp22 (PP270137)+
Gdp25 (PP270139)+
Gdp28 (PP270140)+
Gdp29 (PP270141)+
V. anguillarum
Gdp19 (PP270135) +
Gdp20 (PP270136) +
Gdp30 (PP270142) +
Gdp34 (PP270146) +
V. scophtalmi
Gdp33 (PP270145) +
Gdp35 (PP270147) +
Gdp38 (PP270150) +
Gdp39 (PP270151) +
V. alginolyticus
Gdp18 (PP270134)+
Gdp24 (PP270138)+
V. azureus
Gdp32 (PP270144)+
V. ordalii
Gdp41 (PP270152)+ +
V. neonatanus
Gdp42 (PP270153)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yaşa, İ.; Evran, S.; Eren Eroğlu, A.E.; Önder, C.; Allahyari, M.; Menderes, G.; Kullay, M. Partial Characterization of Three Bacteriophages Isolated from Aquaculture Hatchery Water and Their Potential in the Biocontrol of Vibrio spp. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050895

AMA Style

Yaşa İ, Evran S, Eren Eroğlu AE, Önder C, Allahyari M, Menderes G, Kullay M. Partial Characterization of Three Bacteriophages Isolated from Aquaculture Hatchery Water and Their Potential in the Biocontrol of Vibrio spp. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050895

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yaşa, İhsan, Serap Evran, Asiye Esra Eren Eroğlu, Cengiz Önder, Maryam Allahyari, Gülçin Menderes, and Müberra Kullay. 2024. "Partial Characterization of Three Bacteriophages Isolated from Aquaculture Hatchery Water and Their Potential in the Biocontrol of Vibrio spp." Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050895

APA Style

Yaşa, İ., Evran, S., Eren Eroğlu, A. E., Önder, C., Allahyari, M., Menderes, G., & Kullay, M. (2024). Partial Characterization of Three Bacteriophages Isolated from Aquaculture Hatchery Water and Their Potential in the Biocontrol of Vibrio spp. Microorganisms, 12(5), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050895

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop