Next Article in Journal
Exercise Affects Mucosa-Associated Microbiota and Colonic Tumor Formation Induced by Azoxymethane in High-Fat-Diet-Induced Obese Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Friend or Foe: Exploring the Relationship between the Gut Microbiota and the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Digestive Cancers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Aboveground Epichloë Endophytic Fungi on the Rhizosphere Microbial Functions of the Host Melica transsilvanica

College of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 956; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050956
Submission received: 17 April 2024 / Revised: 5 May 2024 / Accepted: 7 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Microbe-Induced Abiotic Stress Alleviation in Plants)

Abstract

:
In nature, the symbiotic relationship between plants and microorganisms is crucial for ecosystem balance and plant growth. This study investigates the impact of Epichloë endophytic fungi, which are exclusively present aboveground, on the rhizosphere microbial functions of the host Melica transsilvanica. Using metagenomic methods, we analyzed the differences in microbial functional groups and functional genes in the rhizosphere soil between symbiotic (EI) and non-symbiotic (EF) plants. The results reveal that the presence of Epichloë altered the community structure of carbon and nitrogen cycling-related microbial populations in the host’s rhizosphere, significantly increasing the abundance of the genes (porA, porG, IDH1) involved in the rTCA cycle of the carbon fixation pathway, as well as the abundance of nxrAB genes related to nitrification in the nitrogen-cycling pathway. Furthermore, the presence of Epichloë reduces the enrichment of virulence factors in the host rhizosphere microbiome, while significantly increasing the accumulation of resistance genes against heavy metals such as Zn, Sb, and Pb. This study provides new insights into the interactions among endophytic fungi, host plants, and rhizosphere microorganisms, and offers potential applications for utilizing endophytic fungi resources to improve plant growth and soil health.

1. Introduction

Symbiosis between plants and microbes is a prevalent phenomenon in nature [1]. Microorganisms such as endophytes and rhizosphere and phyllosphere are involved in various stages of plant growth and development [2]. The symbiotic microbiota with plants can enhance the metabolic capacity of plants, improve the efficiency of nutrient uptake, and explore new nutritional pathways and defense processes for host plants [3,4,5]. In particular, rhizosphere microorganisms of plants are known as the second genome of plants because of their rich diversity, complex regulatory networks, and important roles in affecting plant growth and development and improving plant stress resistance [6]. Many studies have focused on the influence of environmental factors or pathogenic microorganisms on rhizosphere microorganisms [7]. Will symbiotic microorganisms, such as some endophytic fungi that are only present in the above-ground part of plants, have an impact on rhizosphere microorganisms in the subsurface part, and what impact will they have? Such research can help us better understand the interaction between endophytic fungi, host plants and rhizosphere microorganisms, which is very valuable in ecological research.
The endophytic fungi Epichloë, studied in this research, typically forms mutualistic symbiotic associations predominantly with cool-season grasses [8]. The host grass provides nutrients to Epichloë, which in turn enhances the host’s resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses such as drought, herbivory, and pathogen infections [9,10,11]. What sets it apart is that, due to long-term coevolution with the host, this symbiotic relationship is highly stable, allowing Epichloë to complete part or all of its lifecycle inside the host grass and eventually vertically transmit through seeds [12]. The unique and stable symbiosis of Epichloë, which confers beneficial traits to the host grass, has garnered widespread scientific interest and sparked a surge of research in microbiology, genetics, plant physiology, and animal science. An aspect often overlooked is its tissue-specific distribution within the host, typically found only in aboveground parts such as stems, leaf sheaths, seed coats, and endosperm layers [13,14]. The host plant can also coexist with both endophytic fungi and rhizospheric microorganisms. Due to its vertical transmission through seeds and its distribution restricted to aboveground tissues, Epichloë has temporal and spatial priority over rhizospheric microorganisms compared to those associated with the host’s roots [15,16]. In recent years, with the development and application of high-throughput sequencing technologies, it has been discovered that Epichloë fungi can influence the diversity of fungi and bacteria in the rhizosphere of grasses. For instance, endophytic fungi (E. festucae var. lolii strains AR1 and AR37) can alter the fungi and bacterial community structure of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Samson 11104) [17]. Casas et al. found that the endophytic fungi E. occultans altered the bacterial community composition of potted perennial ryegrass soil but had no significant impact on the fungi community [18]. Endophytic fungi E. coenophiala significantly affected the fungi community in the rhizosphere of tall fescue and increased the relative abundance of certain microbial genera [19]. This indicates that aboveground Epichloë endophytic fungi can impact rhizospheric microorganisms. However, studies have mainly focused on artificial grasses such as tall fescue and perennial ryegrass, and have only elucidated the effects of Epichloë on the structure and diversity of host rhizospheric microbial communities, while the analysis of its influence on rhizospheric microbial functional genes and functional groups is relatively lacking.
But there are also plenty of Epichloë fungi in native grasslands. Melica transsilvanica, the host of this study, is a perennial grass belonging to the gramineous family. It coexists symbiotically with E. guerinii [20,21]. It is extensively dispersed throughout Europe, Central Asia, Russia, Siberia, and the Caucasus; nevertheless, it is only found naturally in China, on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountain, where it is highly valuable for study due to its good palatability and soft grass [22]. As experimental technology advances, sequencing depth is growing and the metagenomic study of soil microbial function is being utilized progressively [23]. In this study, metagenomics was used to sequence the rhizosphere soil of M. transsilvanica-E. guerinii symbionts (EI) and non-symbionts (EF). This study aims to achieve the following: (1) to further analyze the differences in the functional genes of rhizosphere soil microorganisms, focusing on functional genes related to soil nutrient cycling, virulence factors and heavy metal resistance; and (2) to analyze the differences in the functional groups of microorganisms carrying functional genes. In order to improve the understanding of Epichloë—host plant—rhizosphere microbial interaction, it also provides a theoretical basis for better use of endophytic fungi resources, improve agricultural production efficiency, and promote soil health and ecological sustainable development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Materials and Sample Collection

The mountain steppe on the north slope of the Tianshan Mountain, China (87.42° E, 43.47° N, elevation 1393 m), with an annual mean temperature of 3 °C and an annual precipitation of 208.4 mm, is where the Melica transsilvanica seeds were harvested in August 2020. To properly destroy the endophytic fungi in the seeds, one portion was kept at 4 °C in a refrigerator, and the other portion was exposed to dry heat at 70 °C for 25 days [24]. The treated seeds were propagated in August 2022 in order to prevent the effects of dry heat on the seeds themselves. Aniline blue staining was used to confirm that the propagated seeds had no bacteria present, and they were then seeded and proved to be non-symbiontes (EF) in further testing [25]. After being sown into sterilized vermiculite in February 2023, seeds that had not been microwave-sterilized developed into three or four leaves. The plants’ sheaves of leaves were ripped, then aniline blue was added. Plants exhibiting endophytic fungi mycelia were found to be symbionts (EI).
To minimize external environmental influences, we conducted indoor potted plant experiments. Soil from the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains (87.42° E, 43.47° N, 1393 m above sea level) was mixed with sterile vermiculite in a 3:1 volume ratio and placed into 1 L nutrient bowls. Each treatment, EI and EF, had 18 replicate bowls, totaling 36. Each bowl was planted with 5 plants of consistent growth from the sterile vermiculite substrate. Daily additions of deionized water maintained a 70% soil moisture content, and any fallen leaves or other plants were promptly removed. After 8 months of growth in a controlled environment chamber, we collected rhizosphere soil. Large pieces of soil without roots were gently shaken off, and soil adhering to fine roots was brushed off with a sterile brush. The soil was quickly passed through a 2 mm sieve to remove roots, debris, and other impurities, then stored at −80 °C for metagenomic sequencing [26]. For each treatment, rhizosphere soil from 30 plants in a total of 6 nutrient bowls was randomly mixed to create one sample, with 3 samples prepared for each group.

2.2. Soil Metagenomics Sequencing

The PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit from Mobio Laboratories was used to extract DNA from a 0.25 g rhizosphere soil sample in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. With the use of a Thermo Fisher Scientific NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA), the extracted DNA’s quality and amount were evaluated. Wekemo Tech Group Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China) employed the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) platform for library preparation and sequencing, adhering to the manufacturer’s guidelines. After sonication to reach a 350 bp size range, end repair, adenylation, and amplification were performed on the genomic DNA according to the Illumina sequencing methodology. Using the Trimmomatic-based KneadData program (v0.10.0), quality control was carried out. The efficacy and efficiency of the quality control procedure were assessed using FastQC (v0.11.9). After removing adaptor sequences and reducing low-quality reads from the initial metagenomic sequencing data—which contained reads with N bases and a minimum quality score cutoff of 20—clean reads (Table S1) were obtained.

2.3. Metagenomic Data Processing

Functional database annotation: Initiating from the reads of quality-controlled genomic data, the HUMAnN3 software (v3.0.2), which is based on the DIAMOND algorithm, was utilized to map the reads from each sample against the KEGG gene database. The abundance of functional categories was calculated based on the sum of gene abundances corresponding to KO (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and Pathway terms. For further annotation related to virulence factors and heavy metal resistance, the DIMOND software (v 0.8.17.79) was employed, leveraging the Virulence Factors of Bacterial Proteins Database (VFDB) and the BacMet database, which are specialized repositories for such annotations. Functional species annotation: The taxonomic composition of the samples was determined by aligning the sequences against a proprietary microbial nucleic acid database constructed by Microeco Ltd., which includes sequences from bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses that are present in the NCBI NT nucleic acid database and the RefSeq complete genome database. Subsequently, the Bracken software (v2.7) was used to estimate the actual abundance of species within the samples, thereby providing a comprehensive profile of both functional genes and their host taxa abundance information. This integrated approach ensures a thorough understanding of the functional capabilities and species diversity within the microbial communities under study.

2.4. Data Visualization and Statistical Analysis

By utilizing the STAMP (Version 2.1.3) software, we conducted a differential analysis of the abundance of functional genes between groups. Furthermore, we employed the Bioinformatics Cloud platform (Wekemo Bioincloud: https://www.bioincloud.tech/task-meta accessed on 4 May 2024) to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on the functional gene sets between the two groups. To assess the variability in microbial functional communities among different group samples, we implemented a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis based on the Bray–Curtis distance metric, followed by a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [27].

3. Results

3.1. C Cycling

Within the KEGG database, the two carbon fixation pathways are delineated by the functional pathways map00710 (carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms) and map00720 (carbon fixation in prokaryotes), while map00680 is associated with methane metabolism. No significant differences were observed in the overall abundance of genes related to the three pathways between the EI and EF groups (Figure 1A). However, the principal component analysis (PCA) results for gene sets related to the carbon cycle revealed a clear separation between the two groups along the PC1 and PC2 axes, indicating a divergence in their functional gene compositions. Further analysis using STAMP indicated (Figure 2) that the abundance of glpX and rplB genes, which are part of the carbon fixation pathway in photosynthetic organisms, was significantly higher in the EF group (p < 0.05). Conversely, in the carbon fixation pathway of prokaryotes, the genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase (icd and IDH) were not only more abundant in the EI group but also significantly higher than in the EF group (p < 0.05). Notably, the porA, porC, and porG genes, which encode key enzymes of the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA cycle), pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR), were present at lower abundances in the EI group but were significantly higher than in the EF group (p < 0.05). This pathway, proposed by Evans in 1966 [28], is one of the few autotrophic CO2 fixation pathways in bacteria, suggesting a stronger prokaryotic carbon fixation potential in the EI rhizosphere.
We traced the microbial origins of the genes within the aforementioned pathways. Figure 3 presents the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of the three functional communities, all of which exhibit good representativeness (stress < 0.05). The results demonstrate that the community structures of the three functional groups in both the EI and EF groups are distinct. Further analysis using LEfSe to identify functionally enriched microbes with significantly altered abundance in the rhizosphere soil revealed (Figure 4) that the Pseudomonas genus exhibited significant differences at the genus level across all three functional groups (LDA > 2). As a typical microorganism of the reductive acetyl-CoA carbon fixation pathway [29], the higher relative abundance of Pseudomonas in the EI rhizosphere soil suggests a greater potential for CO2 fixation.

3.2. N Cycling

Our principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene set of the (map00910) nitrogen cycle pathway showed that the distance between EI and EF samples was small (Figure 5A). Subsequently, we mapped the relevant genes to specific nitrogen cycle pathways (Table S2) and conducted a STAMP analysis (Figure 5C). The results indicated that the abundance of the nxrAB gene was significantly higher in the EI group compared to the EF group (p < 0.05). The nxrAB gene primarily participates in the nitrification process, converting nitrite to nitrate. In contrast, the abundance of nirBD and nrfAH was significantly higher in the EF group than in the EI group (p < 0.05), corresponding to the pathway of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia. Therefore, it can be inferred that the rhizosphere microbiota of EI plants exhibit a stronger nitrification capacity, which promotes the host’s nitrogen uptake. We also traced the microbial origins of the genes within the nitrogen cycle pathways (Figure 5D). Pseudomonas was found to be more enriched in the rhizosphere of EI, and Nitrosoarchaeum, as an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon, also showed a higher abundance in EI, which may be key to the stronger nitrification capacity in the EI rhizosphere. Furthermore, NMDS analysis revealed differences in the community composition of nitrogen cycle-related functional groups between EI and EF (Figure 5B).

3.3. P Metabolism

We separately annotated the abundance of genes related to phosphorus metabolism. PCA analysis showed clear separation and differences between the EF and EI groups in PC1 and PC2, indicating significant differences in the genes related to phosphorus metabolism between the two (Figure 6A). Classifying these functional genes into relevant pathways, it appears that the rhizosphere microbes of EF plants are more capable of promoting phosphorus cycling. Specifically, genes related to Sec-SRP (Secreted Soluble Reactive Phosphorus) involved in phosphorus transformation and cycling were significantly more abundant in EF than in EI (Figure 6B).

3.4. Resistance to Heavy Metals and Virulence Factors

Through annotation with the VFDB (virulence factor) database, we found that the abundance of virulence factors in the rhizosphere of EI plants was lower, and the types were fewer compared to EF plants (Figure 7A). This indicates that the presence of the Epichloë endophytic fungi can reduce the enrichment of virulence factors in the host rhizosphere, thereby enhancing host resistance. Annotation with the BacMet (heavy metal resistance) database revealed that the rhizosphere of EI plants was enriched with more microbial functional genes resistant to Zn, Sb, and Pb (Figure 7B).

4. Discussion

In terms of carbon cycling, previous studies have shown that the host’s root exudates and litter are the main sources of soil organic carbon. The infection of endophytic fungi increases the host’s biomass, so that the litter into the soil increases, resulting in an increase in soil organic carbon and other substances [30]. The presence of endophytic fungi may also promote the secretion of some compounds by the host root, directly affecting the content of soil carbon [31]. Through the analysis of functional genes and related microbial groups in rhizosphere soil, this study found that the presence of Epichloë increased the abundance of the key gene porA in the host rhizosphere microorganism rTCA, and increased the abundance of Pseudomonas in the corresponding functional groups. Studies have shown that PFOR encoded by porA is an important enzyme in the rTCA cycle, which is involved in the transformation of pyruvate to acetyl coenzyme A. Pseudomonas is a typical reducing acetyl coenzyme A carbon sequestration pathway [32,33]. Yang et al. [34] found, in the carbon sequestration study of soil microorganisms in arid desert oases, that the rTCA cycle indicated by the difference in the porA gene is one of the most common carbon sequestration pathways. When Ren et al. [35] used the macrogenome combined with the macrotranscriptome to study the soil microbial function in Tarim Basin, he also found that the rTCA cycle driven by porA, porG and IDH1 genes is one of the carbon sequestration pathways. These two aspects indicate that the presence of Epichloë can enrich the host rhizosphere with more microorganisms with the ability to fix CO2, and also increase the abundance of carbon-fixing function genes, which may be the third reason why endophytic fungi increase the organic carbon content of the host rhizosphere soil.
In terms of nitrogen cycling, endophytic fungi can reduce the impact of low nitrogen stress on the host by directly enhancing the absorption of nutrients by the host. There are also related studies that evaluate the nitrification potential of soil by measuring the nitrate nitrogen in soil; find that the presence of endophytic fungi can increase soil nitrification [36]. Endophytic fungi infection can reduce the activity of nitrification-inhibiting substances in the host rhizosphere, and then affect soil nitrification [37], which is consistent with the conclusion that the rhizosphere microorganisms of EI plants have stronger nitrification in this study. For the functional gene level of Epichloë affecting the nitrogen cycling of host rhizosphere microorganisms, only two articles have reported that the presence of Epichloë festucae affects the nitrogen cycling process of rhizosphere microorganisms of host ryegrass; under low nitrogen stress, the abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea in the rhizosphere of the symbiotic species increased. And there are differences in the functional groups of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms between the symbiotic and non-symbiotic species [38,39]. The results of this study were more prominent than those of our study, but in the same direction as our conclusions, which may be due to the fact that the above experiments were conducted under low nitrogen conditions, and the role of endophytic fungi was highlighted.
Interestingly, the results of the comprehensive functional groups showed that Epichloë could recruit a large number of growth-promoting bacteria Pseudomonas in the host rhizosphere, which was consistent with the conclusions of previous studies, that is, Pseudomonas bacteria were the dominant bacterial groups widely distributed in the rhizosphere, seed and leaf of EpichloëAchnatherum inebrians symbiosis [40]. Pseudomonas had a nitrogen fixation effect in the plant rhizosphere, as well as the role of regulating plant hormones and increasing abiotic stress tolerance [41]. As early as 1996, it was found that Pseudomonas was a strong candidate soil inoculant bacteria to improve crop yield [42]. Recent studies also found that inoculation of P. aeruginosa could promote the growth of pea (Pisum sativum) [43], and inoculation of P. moraviensis could positively promote the growth and physiology of wheat (Triticum aestivum), while significantly improving the soil organic matter and nitrogen availability [44]. Therefore, Pseudomonas play an important role in promoting plant growth and development. We concluded that the overall growth-promoting effect of Epichloë on the host was partially attributed to the recruitment of Pseudomonas by symbiosis. As for why endophytic fungi chose it as a “helper”, it is also a scientific question worthy of future research.
In the context of phosphorus metabolism, this study did not observe significant differences between the EI and EF groups, and it is even possible that the potential of rhizosphere microorganisms in phosphorus metabolism for EI plants is lower than that for EF. However, some research has indicated that E. gansuensis improves the growth of its host A. inebrians under low phosphorus stress by regulating amino acid metabolic pathways, amino acid content, and organic acid content, and by increasing phosphorus utilization efficiency [45]. This phenomenon may be related to the symbiotic relationship between plants and endophytic fungi, where the endophytic fungi may enhance the host’s own phosphorus absorption and reduce the host’s reliance on rhizosphere microorganisms with the function of activating phosphorus or secreting organic phosphorus. Previous studies have concluded that Epichloë has no significant effect on the content of the available phosphorus in host rhizosphere soil under non-stress conditions, which can also confirm this view [46].
The influence of Epichloë on the host in producing specific metabolites to resist pathogen invasion in both aboveground and belowground parts has been extensively studied [47]. In this study, the lower abundance and diversity of virulence factors enriched in the root zone of EI plants further corroborate this finding. Additionally, Epichloë can enhance host tolerance to heavy metal ions such as cadmium (Cd2+), aluminum (Al3+), zinc (Zn2+), and copper (Cu2+) in soil. According to a large number of previous studies, under the stress of toxic heavy metals, symbiotic plants have higher antioxidant enzyme activity and chlorophyll a and b contents, and lower proline and malondialdehyde contents than non-symbiotic plants, indicating that the presence of Epichloë can better activate the antioxidant system of host plants [48,49,50]. The activity of antioxidant enzymes in plants was increased to reduce the ROSs (reactive oxygen species) produced under heavy metal stress. The oxidative damage of ROSs to nucleic acid, membrane and chloroplast pigment was alleviated. In addition to protecting photosynthetic pigments from destruction, Epichloë also enhances the activity of the enzymes related to photosynthesis and chlorophyll synthesis [51]. Other studies have shown that heavy metal stress, especially Cu2+, can cause plants to produce excessive ethylene and accelerate plant senescence, while Epichloë can regulate ethylene synthesis and inhibit plant senescence, thereby enhancing the host’s tolerance to heavy metals [52]. In conclusion, endophytic fungi enhance the host’s tolerance to heavy metal ions by improving the host’s antioxidant capacity and photosynthesis level, and by activating related hormone signals. In this study, it was found that the abundance of the functional genes of microorganisms resistant to Zn, Sb and Pb in the rhizosphere microorganisms of EI plants was higher than that of EF plants. To a certain extent, this indicates that Epichloë enhances the host’s tolerance to heavy metal ions, which not only affects the physiological response of the host plant itself, but it also indirectly affects the resistance of rhizosphere microorganisms symbiosis with the host to heavy metals.
This study provides new insights into the interactions among Epichloë, host plants, and rhizosphere microorganisms, offering potential applications for utilizing these microbial relationships to improve plant growth and soil health. However, there are some limitations in the study. For example, although metagenomic approaches can reveal the functional gene composition of microbial communities, there is a lack of direct measurement of microbial activity and metabolic processes. Future research could further explore the complex interaction mechanisms between endophytic fungi and host plants by combining metagenomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, among other multi-omic approaches, to investigate how these interactions affect plant growth and the functional aspects of soil ecosystems.

5. Conclusions

The presence of Epichloë can change the community structure of the functional groups related to the carbon cycle in the rhizosphere microorganisms of the host Melica transsilvanica, and significantly increase the abundance of porA, porG and IDH1 genes in the rTCA cycle of the carbon sequestration pathway. This may be the third reason why endophytic fungi increase the organic carbon content of the host rhizosphere soil in addition to the other two main factors, namely, increasing host litter and altering host root exudates. The abundance of the nxrAB gene in the rhizosphere microbial nitrogen cycle pathway in EI plants was significantly higher than that in EF plants, and the community structure of related functional groups also changed. The changes in carbon and nitrogen nutrient cycling in rhizosphere microorganisms may be related to the fact that the presence of Epichloë recruits a large number of Pseudomonas bacteria in the host rhizosphere. In addition, the presence of Epichloë also reduces the enrichment of virulence factors by host rhizosphere microorganisms and significantly increases the accumulation of heavy metal resistance genes to Zn, Sb and Pb. To a certain extent, it indicates that Epichloë enhances the host’s resistance to soil-borne pathogens and heavy metal ions, which not only affects the physiological response of host plants, but also indirectly affects the rhizosphere microorganisms that are symbiotic with the host and cooperate with the host to develop resistance to stress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12050956/s1, Table S1: Data output quality; Table S2: Key genes corresponding to pathways associated with the nitrogen cycle; Table S3: Key genes corresponding to pathways related to phosphorus metabolism.

Author Contributions

C.S. led the study and was responsible for resources and funding; C.W. drafted the manuscript and was in charge of experiment and data analysis visualization; M.Z. and J.H. participated in the experiments; W.H. conducted research design and review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760704) and the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022D01A79) and special found of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Soil and Plant Ecological Processes (23XJTRZW07).

Data Availability Statement

The sequences were submitted to the NCBI database (ID: PRJNA949598).

Acknowledgments

The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. Thanks to N.N. Zhang for her support of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hassani, M.A.; Durán, P.; Hacquard, S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 2018, 6, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Compant, S.; Clément, C.; Sessitsch, A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo-and endosphere of plants: Their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Russ, D.; Fitzpatrick, C.R.; Teixeira, P.J.P.L.; Dangl, J.L. Deep discovery informs difficult deployment in plant microbiome science. Cell 2023, 186, 4496–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, K.K.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.H. Cross-kingdom co-occurrence networks in the plant microbiome: Importance and ecological interpretations. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 953300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, J.; Cook, J.; Nearing, J.T.; Zhang, J.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Langille, M.G.; Cheng, Z. Harnessing the plant microbiome to promote the growth of agricultural crops. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse CM, J.; Bakker PA, H.M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, J.H.; Anderson, A.J.; Kim, Y.C. Root-associated bacteria are biocontrol agents for multiple plant pests. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Clay, K.; Schardl, C. Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am. Nat. 2002, 160, S99–S127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mosaddeghi, M.R.; Hosseini, F.; Hajabbasi, M.A.; Sabzalian, M.R.; Sepehri, M. Epichloë spp. and Serendipita indica endophytic fungi: Functions in plant-soil relations. Adv. Agron. 2021, 165, 59–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Waqar, S.; Bhat, A.A.; Khan, A.A. Endophytic fungi: Unravelling plant-endophyte interaction and the multifaceted role of fungi endophytes in stress amelioration. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 206, 108174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fardella, P.A.; Clarke, B.B.; Belanger, F.C. The Epichloë festucae antifungi protein Efe-AfpA has activity against numerous plant pathogens. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tadych, M.; Bergen, M.S.; White, J.F., Jr. Epichloë spp. associated with grasses: New insights on life cycles, dissemination and evolution. Mycologia 2014, 106, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Deng, Y.; Yu, X.; Yin, J.; Chen, L.; Zhao, N.; Gao, Y.; Ren, A. Epichloë Endophyte Enhanced Insect Resistance of Host Grass Leymus Chinensis by Affecting Volatile Organic Compound Emissions. J. Chem. Ecol. 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scott, B.; Green, K.; Berry, D. The fine balance between mutualism and antagonism in the Epichloë festucae–grass symbiotic interaction. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 44, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saikkonen, K.; Young, C.A.; Helander, M.; Schardl, C.L. Endophytic Epichloë species and their grass hosts: From evolution to applications. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 90, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mack, K.M.L.; Rudgers, J.A. Balancing multiple mutualists: Asymmetric interactions among plants, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and fungi endophytes. Oikos 2008, 117, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wakelin, S.; Harrison, S.; Mander, C.; Dignam, B.; Rasmussen, S.; Monk, S.; Fraser, K.; O’Callaghan, M. Impacts of endophyte infection of ryegrass on rhizosphere metabolome and microbial community. Crop Pasture Sci. 2015, 66, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rojas, X.; Guo, J.; Leff, J.W.; McNear, D.H.; Fierer, N.; McCulley, R.L. Infection with a shoot-specific fungi endophyte (Epichloë) alters tall fescue soil microbial communities. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mahmud, K.; Lee, K.; Hill, N.S.; Mergoum, A.; Missaoui, A. Influence of Tall Fescue E. pichloë Endophytes on Rhizosphere Soil Microbiome. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Moon, C.D.; Guillaumin, J.J.; Ravel, C.; Li, C.; Craven, K.D.; Schardl, C.L. New Neotyphodium endophyte species from the grass tribes Stipeae and Meliceae. Mycologia 2007, 99, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Ren, A.Z.; Wei, Y.K.; Lin, F.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.-J.; Gao, Y.-B. Taxonomy, diversity and origins of symbiotic endophytes of Achnatherum sibiricum in the Inner Mongolia Steppe of China. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 301, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Castro, S.; Muratet, A.; Szczepaniak, M.; Nguefack, J.; Hardion, L. RAD sequencing, morphometry and synecology clarify the taxonomy of the Melica ciliata (Poaceae) complex in France and Poland. J. Syst. Evol. 2023, 61, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qian, X.; Gunturu, S.; Guo, J.; Chai, B.; Cole, J.R.; Gu, J.; Tiedje, J.M. Metagenomic analysis reveals the shared and distinct features of the soil resistome across tundra, temperate prairie, and tropical ecosystems. Microbiome 2021, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shi, C.; Lu, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhang, R.S.; An, S.Z. Using 70 °C dry treatment to make endophyte-free seeds of Melica transsilvanica. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2016, 24, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Becker, M.; Becker, Y.; Green, K.; Scott, B. The endophytic symbiont Epichloë festucae establishes an epiphyllous net on the surface of Lolium perenne leaves by development of an expressorium, an appressorium-like leaf exit structure. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bulgarelli, D.; Rott, M.; Schlaeppi, K.; Ver Loren van Themaat, E.; Ahmadinejad, N.; Assenza, F.; Rauf, P.; Huettel, B.; Reinhardt, R.; Schmelzer, E.; et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 2012, 488, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gao, Y.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, S.; Liu, Y. Wekemo Bioincloud: A user-friendly platform for meta-omics data analyses. iMeta 2024, 3, e175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fuchs, G. Alternative pathways of carbon dioxide fixation: Insights into the early evolution of life? Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 65, 631–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kozaeva, E.; Volkova, S.; Matos, M.R.A.; Mezzina, M.P.; Wulff, T.; Volke, D.C.; Nielsen, L.K.; Nikel, P.I. Model-guided dynamic control of essential metabolic nodes boosts acetyl-coenzyme A–dependent bioproduction in rewired Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng. 2021, 67, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, L.; Chen, X.; Wei, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.; Ni, B.J. A critical review on nitrous oxide production by ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 9175–9190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panchal, P.; Preece, C.; Peñuelas, J.; Giri, J. Soil carbon sequestration by root exudates. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Iqbal, J.; Siegrist, J.A.; Nelson, J.A.; McCulley, R.L. Fungi endophyte infection increases carbon sequestration potential of southeastern USA tall fescue stands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012, 44, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, K.H.; Blankenship, R.E. Both forward and reverse TCA cycles operate in green sulfur bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 35848–35854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, Y.; Yang, X.; Gong, L.; Ding, Z.; Zhu, H.; Tang, J.; Li, X. Changes in soil microbial carbon fixation pathways along the oasification process in arid desert region: A confirmation based on metagenome analysis. CATENA 2024, 239, 107955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ren, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, D.; Zeng, H.; Zhao, S.; Chen, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, C.; et al. Diversity and contributions to nitrogen cycling and carbon fixation of soil salinity shaped microbial communities in Tarim Basin. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Handayani, I.P.; Coyne, M.S.; Phillips, T.D. Soil organic carbon fractions differ in two contrasting tall fescue systems. Plant Soil 2011, 338, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, J.; McCulley, R.L.; Phillips, T.D.; McNear, D.H., Jr. Fungi endophyte and tall fescue cultivar interact to differentially affect bulk and rhizosphere soil processes governing C and N cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 101, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, Z.; Jin, Y.; Yao, X.; Wei, X.; Li, X.; Li, C.; White, J.F.; Nan, Z. Gene analysis reveals that leaf litter from Epichloë endophyte-infected perennial ryegrass alters diversity and abundance of soil microbes involved in nitrification and denitrification. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 154, 108123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, Z.; White, J.F.; Malik, K.; Chen, H.; Jin, Y.; Yao, X.; Wei, X.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Soil nutrient dynamics relate to Epichloë endophyte mutualism and nitrogen turnover in a low nitrogen environment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2022, 174, 108832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ju, Y.; Kou, M.; Zhong, R.; Christensen, M.J.; Zhang, X. Alleviating salt stress on seedings using plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from the rhizosphere soil of Achnatherum inebrians infected with Epichloë gansuensis endophyte. Plant Soil 2021, 465, 349–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Richardson, A.E.; Barea, J.M.; McNeill, A.M.; Prigent-Combaret, C. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 2009, 321, 305–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xie, H.; Pasternak, J.J.; Glick, B.R. Isolation and characterization of mutants of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 that overproduce indoleacetic acid. Curr. Microbiol. 1996, 32, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sasirekha, B.; Shivakumar, S. Statistical optimization for improved indole-3-acetic acid (iaa) production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and demonstration of enhanced plant growth promotion. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ul Hassan, T.; Bano, A. The stimulatory effects of L-tryptophan and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on soil health and physiology of wheat. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2015, 15, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.; Hou, W.; Jin, J.; Christensen, M.J.; Gu, L.; Cheng, C.; Wang, J. Epichloë gansuensis increases the tolerance of Achnatherum inebrians to low-P stress by modulating amino acids metabolism and phosphorus utilization efficiency. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, J.; Deng, Y.; Yu, X.; Wu, G.; Gao, Y.; Ren, A. Epichloë endophyte infection changes the root endosphere microbial community composition of Leymus chinensis under both potted and field growth conditions. Microb. Ecol. 2023, 85, 604–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Fernando, K.; Reddy, P.; Guthridge, K.M.; Spangenberg, G.C.; Rochfort, S.J. A metabolomic study of Epichloë endophytes for screening antifungi metabolites. Metabolites 2022, 12, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhai, Y.; Chen, Z.; Malik, K.; Wei, X.; Li, C. Effect of fungi endophyte Epichloë bromicola infection on Cd tolerance in Wild Barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum). J. Fungi 2022, 8, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wiewióra, B.; Żurek, G. The response of the associations of grass and Epichloë endophytes to the increased content of heavy metals in the soil. Plants 2021, 10, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, K.; Missaoui, A.; Mahmud, K.; Presley, H.; Lonnee, M. Interaction between grasses and Epichloë endophytes and its significance to biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and the rhizosphere. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Żurek, G.; Wiewióra, B.; Rybka, K.; Prokopiuk, K. Different response of perennial ryegrass—Epichloë endophyte symbiota to the elevated concentration of heavy metals in soil. J. Appl. Genet. 2022, 63, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, J.; Hou, W.; Christensen, M.J.; Li, X.; Xia, C.; Li, C.; Nan, Z. Role of Epichloë endophytes in improving host grass resistance ability and soil properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 6944–6955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Total abundance of gene sets in the three main pathways of the carbon cycle (A); different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences, as determined by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and the principal component analysis (PCA) of carbon cycle gene sets (B).
Figure 1. Total abundance of gene sets in the three main pathways of the carbon cycle (A); different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences, as determined by one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and the principal component analysis (PCA) of carbon cycle gene sets (B).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g001
Figure 2. Intergroup variations in pathway gene sets for map00710 (A), map00680 (B), and map00720 (C) analysis.
Figure 2. Intergroup variations in pathway gene sets for map00710 (A), map00680 (B), and map00720 (C) analysis.
Microorganisms 12 00956 g002
Figure 3. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of functional class groups by map00710 (A), map00720 (B), and map00680 (C).
Figure 3. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of functional class groups by map00710 (A), map00720 (B), and map00680 (C).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g003
Figure 4. Variations in microorganisms’ lefse analyses in the routes map00710 (A), map00720 (B), and map00680 (C) (LDA > 2).
Figure 4. Variations in microorganisms’ lefse analyses in the routes map00710 (A), map00720 (B), and map00680 (C) (LDA > 2).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g004
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene set associated with the nitrogen cycle (map00910) (A), differential gene abundance in major pathways (C), and the taxonomic origins of functional groups related to the nitrogen cycle (D) alongside a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis (B).
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene set associated with the nitrogen cycle (map00910) (A), differential gene abundance in major pathways (C), and the taxonomic origins of functional groups related to the nitrogen cycle (D) alongside a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis (B).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g005
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene set associated with phosphorus metabolism (A), and the variation in gene abundance within key pathways (B).
Figure 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene set associated with phosphorus metabolism (A), and the variation in gene abundance within key pathways (B).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g006
Figure 7. Variations in the rhizosphere microorganisms of EI and EF plants with respect to the virulence factor (A) and heavy metal resistance (B).
Figure 7. Variations in the rhizosphere microorganisms of EI and EF plants with respect to the virulence factor (A) and heavy metal resistance (B).
Microorganisms 12 00956 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Shi, C.; Huang, W.; Zhang, M.; He, J. The Impact of Aboveground Epichloë Endophytic Fungi on the Rhizosphere Microbial Functions of the Host Melica transsilvanica. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050956

AMA Style

Wang C, Shi C, Huang W, Zhang M, He J. The Impact of Aboveground Epichloë Endophytic Fungi on the Rhizosphere Microbial Functions of the Host Melica transsilvanica. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):956. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Chuanzhe, Chong Shi, Wei Huang, Mengmeng Zhang, and Jiakun He. 2024. "The Impact of Aboveground Epichloë Endophytic Fungi on the Rhizosphere Microbial Functions of the Host Melica transsilvanica" Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050956

APA Style

Wang, C., Shi, C., Huang, W., Zhang, M., & He, J. (2024). The Impact of Aboveground Epichloë Endophytic Fungi on the Rhizosphere Microbial Functions of the Host Melica transsilvanica. Microorganisms, 12(5), 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop