Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Characterization of Potassium-Solubilizing Rhizobacteria (KSR) Promoting Cotton Growth in Saline–Sodic Regions
Previous Article in Journal
A Clean and Health-Care-Focused Way to Reduce Indoor Airborne Bacteria in Calf House with Long-Wave Ultraviolet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Microbiome of Fertilization-Stage Maize Silks (Style) Encodes Genes and Expresses Traits That Potentially Promote Survival in Pollen/Style Niches and Host Reproduction

by
Michelle E. H. Thompson
and
Manish N. Raizada
*
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(7), 1473; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071473
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

:
Within flowers, the style channel receives pollen and transmits male gametes inside elongating pollen tubes to ovules. The styles of maize/corn are called silks. Fertilization-stage silks possess complex microbiomes, which may partially derive from pollen. These microbiomes lack functional analysis. We hypothesize that fertilization-stage silk microbiomes promote host fertilization to ensure their own vertical transmission. We further hypothesize that these microbes encode traits to survive stresses within the silk (water/nitrogen limitation) and pollen (dehydration/aluminum) habitats. Here, bacteria cultured from fertilization-stage silks of 14 North American maize genotypes underwent genome mining and functional testing, which revealed osmoprotection, nitrogen-fixation, and aluminum-tolerance traits. Bacteria contained auxin biosynthesis genes, and testing confirmed indole compound secretion, which is relevant, since pollen delivers auxin to silks to stimulate egg cell maturation. Some isolates encoded biosynthetic/transport compounds known to regulate pollen tube guidance/growth. The isolates encoded ACC deaminase, which degrades the precursor for ethylene that otherwise accelerates silk senescence. The findings suggest that members of the microbiome of fertilization-stage silks encode adaptations to survive the stress conditions of silk/pollen and have the potential to express signaling compounds known to impact reproduction. Overall, whereas these microbial traits have traditionally been assumed to primarily promote vegetative plant growth, this study proposes they may also play selfish roles during host reproduction.

1. Introduction

The style tissue of angiosperms is a reproductive channel comparable to the uterus and fallopian tubes in humans, through which male gametes are transmitted to an ovule [1]. In the global staple crop, maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays, corn), the styles are the uniquely long, fast-growing tissues referred to as silks: the threads that emerge from the tips of maize cobs [2,3]. Maize is monoecious and wind pollinated (anemophilous); pollen grains are released from the tassel (male inflorescence) and dispersed by wind, with some subsequently landing on a receptive silk that, by necessity, is exposed to the external environment [2]. When a pollen grain germinates on a silk, a pollen tube grows through the long silk channel, through which sperm nuclei migrate [2]. Each silk leads to an ovule, so each of the hundreds of grains of maize on a cob represents the successful transmission of sperm nuclei through a silk, followed by double fertilization and seed formation.
Silks at the critical fertilization stage have been termed “transmitting silks”, as they contain the pollen tube actively transmitting the male gametes to the ovule [4]. Using next generation sequencing (NGS), our group recently showed that transmitting silks have a complex microbiome, termed the transmitting silk microbiome (TSM): >1300 bacterial genera and >5000 taxa were identified in silks of a North American modern maize diversity panel grown in Ontario, Canada [4]. Systematic culturing of the style tissue was first reported using silks from the same field trial [5]. This was the first systematic culture-based analysis from a plant style microbiome to the best of our knowledge. The study also improved the taxonomic resolution of the TSM (from both healthy and Fusarium graminearum-treated silks) [5]. However, the functions of these microbes remain unknown, and exploring their potential functions may improve plant production, breeding, targeted treatments, and more generally, our understanding of angiosperm reproduction and plant–microbe interactions. Microbes have also been cultured from exposed silk tissue of randomly selected cobs from select maize fields in Brazil [6].
Maize seeds also have a microbiome [7,8,9]. Hybrid maize seed has been shown to share part of their seed microbiome with both parents [10]. There is evidence of vertical transmission of the plant microbiome [11], with convincing evidence that at least one Bacillus taxon is inherited from maize pollen [12]. For bacteria to be vertically transmitted, they would need to be associated with the maternal tissue, or on the paternal side, a successful pollen tube [13,14] and/or male gametes [15]. We hypothesize that the TSM may encode traits that promote host reproductive success (e.g., promote pollen tube growth), thereby ensuring their own long-term survival. Bacteria promote successful mating in some animals [16,17], but it is unknown whether this occurs in plants.
Members of the TSM may originate from the environment, pollen, or from the maternal host plant. The microbes may be vertically transmitted, or, alternatively, they may simply use the nutrient-rich reproductive tissues as habitats, or in the case of maize pollen, as dispersal mechanisms. Regardless, these microbes face abiotic stressors: pollen undergoes dehydration [18] and is rich in toxic aluminum [19]; there are dynamic pH changes in the style tissue which correlates with pollen tube growth [20,21,22]; furthermore, silks can experience water and nitrogen limitations [23,24,25,26]. Additionally, maize reproduction and grain yield are threatened by climate change, largely due to drought [4,27]. Therefore, our second hypothesis is that the TSM encodes traits that promote tolerance to the abiotic stresses of reproductive tissues.
As already noted, fertilization-stage silks from the same field trial were used for NGS [4] and culturing [5]. Here, we selected a subset of the previously reported bacterial isolates from healthy silks [5], focusing on prevalent taxa, and undertook genome mining and functional testing in vitro to test whether the bacteria of fertilization-stage silks show evidence, first, of adaptation to abiotic stressors relevant in pollen and transmitting silks, and second, of signaling molecules known to promote maize reproduction, including auxin, ethylene from its precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and nitric oxide.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methodology Overview

Bacteria were previously cultured from field-grown, open-pollinated silks of 14 maize genotypes that spanned the heterotic groups underlying North American commercial maize germplasm, as described in [5,28]. Briefly, under sterile conditions, the husk-free, exposed ends of the silks were discarded, and the husk-covered silks were separated into segments (Figure 1a). The tip and base portions were then ground and cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and LB agar, and unique individual colonies underwent subsequent culturing, storage, and DNA isolation [5,28]. The microbes were then assigned taxonomic predictions using 16S rDNA sequencing, contig assembly, and BLAST searching, as previously described [5,28]. Here, select bacteria from non-infected (healthy) pollinated silks (focusing on prevalent taxa) underwent in vitro testing, whole-genome sequencing, and gene mining.

2.2. In Vitro Testing of Microbial Traits

A subset of bacteria from healthy silk tissues were tested in various assays (Supplementary Text S1). The indole-containing compound production assay (proxy for indoleacetic acid, IAA) was modified from Johnston-Monje and Raizada [7], which was based on Bric et al. [29]. The bacteria were tested for their ability to grow in an anaerobic chamber (Baker-Ruskinn Concept 500, The Baker Company, Inc., Sanford, FL, USA, gas mix: Linde, 10% H2, 10% CO2, and 80% N2) on media without added nitrogen, as adapted from the American Type Culture Collection’s “ATCC medium: 1312 Azospirillum amazonense (LGI medium)”, and contained molybdenum to facilitate biological nitrogen fixation. The poly(ethylene glycol) tolerance protocol, a proxy for drought tolerance, was adapted from Hernández-Fernández et al. [30] and Latif et al. [31]. The acid and aluminum tolerance protocol was adapted from Huang et al. [32] and Lim et al. [33].

2.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing, Gene Annotation, and Mining

Single-colony liquid cultures of 25 isolates from healthy silk tissues (including representatives from the most prevalent species and OTUs cultured and some special inclusions) were used for bacterial genomic DNA isolation using the DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (product number 1222450; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (Figure 1b). Illumina sequencing was conducted by third parties (Lavie Bio Ltd., Rehovot, Israel, and MiGS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Both Lavie Bio and MiGS sequences were bioinformatically analyzed at MiGS. The gene annotation files for the isolates were combined into one Excel file to search for genes of interest. Further details can be found in Supplementary Text S2.

3. Results

3.1. Overview of Whole-Genome Mining and In Vitro Testing for Traits Relevant to the Silk Environment

To test for microbial traits relevant for promoting silk health and/or microbial survival in the silk environment, whole-genome sequencing and candidate gene mining were undertaken for representatives of the most prevalent species from healthy silks along with additional bacteria that were selected to expand the taxonomic diversity or based on the literature. In total, 25 bacteria were mined, of which a subset were functionally tested in vitro, including the most prevalent species.

3.2. Water Limitation-Associated Traits

Since silk growth is limited by water availability [34], and since exposed silks can dry out, we hypothesized that silk microbiota may contribute to silk health and/or their own survival by synthesizing and exporting/importing osmoprotectants including trehalose, glycine betaine, ectoine, carnitine, proline betaine, and proline [35,36] (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Below, we describe the genes discovered for these osmoprotectants and the results of functional testing for tolerance to PEG-6000 in vitro (Figure 3). For the gene mining, proline-specific genes were excluded, because as an amino acid, proline is involved with many cellular processes [37]. Carnitine biosynthesis has not been observed in bacteria [38]. In general, osmoprotectant exporters are theorized in bacteria but are mostly not identified, with the exception of the msc system below:
Osmoprotectant export genes: The genes mscL and mscS encode mechanosensitive channels that play important roles in the bacterial export of solutes and other osmoprotectants, particularly under osmotic shock [39]. The mscL gene is nearly ubiquitous in bacteria [39] and was found in all 25 genomes analyzed, while mscS was detected in 17 bacteria.
Trehalose biosynthesis and import genes: Candidate genes involved in four common trehalose biosynthesis pathways (otsAB, treS, treYZ, and treP) [40,41] were identified (Figure 3). Of these, otsA/otsB were detected in 19 of the 25 bacteria, treY/treZ in 16 bacteria, treS in 2 bacteria, and treP also in 2 bacteria. No genes were found for a fifth pathway (treT) previously found in some primitive bacteria [41,42]. The gene treB, involved in the movement of trehalose from the bacterial periplasm to the cytoplasm [43,44], was identified (10 bacteria), along with genes (treA, treC, and treF) from multiple pathways involved in converting trehalose into glucose [treA (6 bacteria), treC (11 bacteria), and treF (4 bacteria)] [43,45]. With respect to the bacterial uptake of trehalose by the LpqY-sugA-sugB-sugC recycling transporter, sugA and sugB were only detected in one isolate (H13) [46]. Regarding the trehalose transport and utilization operon thuEFGKAB [47], only one bacterium encoded the trehalose utilization gene thuA.
Ectoine biosynthesis and import genes: With respect to ectoine, within the biosynthesis ectABC operon [48], ectA, ectB, and ectC were found in one bacterium (isolate H13), while potential matches for ectB were found in sixteen other isolates (Figure 3). Isolate H13 also contained ectT, an importer for multiple osmoprotectants, with a higher affinity for ectoine and hydroxyectoine [49]. No genes were detected for the osmoregulated transporter TeaABC, which imports ectoine [50,51,52]. There are additional ectoine-specific import genes (ehuABCD) that share an operon with catabolism genes (eutABCDE) [53]; the genes doeA and doeB are also involved in ectoine catabolism [54,55]. All of the latter ectoine import genes (ehuA, ehuB, ehuC, and ehuD) and several of the catabolism genes (eutB, eutC, doeA, and doeB) were detected in one isolate, R07. The ectD gene is also involved in ectoine catabolism (produces hydroxyectoine) [55,56], and one isolate (H13) contained two ectD genes.
Glycine betaine biosynthesis and import genes: The genes betA and betB are involved in converting choline to glycine betaine [36] and were found in 19 genomes. The biosynthesis enzymes gbsB (a type III alcohol dehydrogenase) and gbsA (a glycine betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase) (operon gbsAB) also transform choline into betaine [36], but these genes were not found. Glycine betaine-specific importers include betU, betP, opuD, the opuA transport system operon (genes opuAA, opuAB, and opuAC), and the osmU operon (genes osmY, osmX, osmW, and osmV, responsible for importing glycine betaine, choline-O-sulfate, and possibly others) [35,36,57,58,59,60,61]. Ten of the genomes contained osmU genes, five of which contained all four genes (osmY, osmX, osmW, and osmV), while one isolate (H13) notably had genes for two routes of import for glycine betaine (betP and the opuA transport system).
Choline biosynthesis and import genes: Choline is a precursor for glycine betaine, but choline itself is not an osmoprotectant [62,63]. The genes betT, opuB, and choXWV import choline into bacteria [36,64,65], and of these, betT was found in 10 genomes, choW, choV, and choX were found in 3 genomes, while opuB was not identified. Choline biosynthesis does not appear to be clearly identified in bacteria.
Promiscuous osmoprotectant import genes: Contrasting the more substrate-specific transporters, some transporters import a variety of osmoprotectants. The proP transporter imports most osmoprotectants, including ectoine, glycine betaine, and proline [36,66,67,68,69]. The majority of silk-associated bacteria sequenced (20/25 genomes) included at least one copy of the proP gene or a likely proP variant. The proU transporter has a higher affinity for glycine betaine but also imports most osmoprotectants, including choline, carnitine, proline betaine, and ectoine and includes the genes proV, proW, and proX [36,59]. Sixteen of the genomes contained all three proU genes, and an additional genome contained only proV. The opuC transporter imports the osmoprotectants glycine betaine, choline, carnitine, proline betaine, and ectoine [36,65] and was not detected in any of the genomes.
In vitro testing of silk-associated bacteria under water limitation: All 18 isolates tested grew moderately at 10% PEG-6000 [14–64% of growth (OD600) compared to growth without PEG]. Of the 12 most prevalent isolates, 5 also grew at 30% PEG-6000: M31 (Stenotrophomonas pavanii), Q13 (Exiguobacterium indicum-acetylicum), L19 (Pantoea ananatis), L21 (Klebsiella aerogenes), and Q26 (Kosakonia cowanii) (Figure 3). Of the remaining six isolates tested, four grew at 30% PEG: R67 (Pseudomonas parafulva), U39 (Rahnella aquatilis), H13 (Paenibacillus glucanolyticus), and Q27 (Klebsiella variicola-pneumoniae) which was the top performer in the collection, growing better at 30% PEG than without PEG.
Of the 18 isolates that were tested for PEG tolerance, all 6 that contained a betT gene (associated with choline import) were resistant to 30% PEG-6000. Two isolates contained treP (a trehalose biosynthesis pathway), both of which were resistant to 30% PEG-6000. Of the nine isolates that were resistant to 30% PEG-6000, eight contained proP (osmoprotectant import), eight contained betA and betB (glycine betaine biosynthesis), seven contained otsA/B (a trehalose biosynthesis pathway), seven contained at least one gene for trehalose import, six contained treY/Z genes (a trehalose biosynthesis pathway), five contained proU operon genes, five contained ectB (ectoine biosynthesis), and three contained osmU operon genes (glycine betaine and choline import). Two isolates were noteworthy: H13 and R67. Isolate H13, which was resistant to 30% PEG-6000, contains the treP trehalose biosynthetic gene and also uniquely contains genes associated with glycine betaine import, ectoine and hydroxyectoine import, unique trehalose-specific importer genes, eight variations of proP, ectD-1, and ectD-2 genes for ectoine catabolism, and all three ectoine biosynthesis genes (ectA, ectB, and ectC). Isolate R67 was moderate to highly resistant to 10% PEG-6000 and mildly resistant to 30% PEG-6000; it contains choline-specific importer genes, and uniquely contains two copies of treS (a trehalose biosynthesis pathway).

3.3. Indole Compound-Associated Traits (Auxin Biosynthesis)

The plant hormone auxin is involved in stimulating plant growth, and plant auxin signaling and regulation transcripts are abundant in maize silks [70,71]. Furthermore, maize pollen is abundant in the auxin, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and delivers IAA to silks upon pollination, where it stimulates egg cell maturation [70]. Bacteria encode five auxin biosynthetic pathways (Figure 4 and Figure 5) [72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Within the 25 bacterial genomes, genes from 4 IAA biosynthetic pathways were identified (Figure 5).
IAM pathway: In the indole-3-acetamide (IAM) pathway [72,81,82], the gene iaaH (indoleacetamide hydrolase) was found in two bacteria, and the genes nthA and nthB (nitrile hydratase subunits alpha and beta) were found in one bacterium. Nitrile hydratase can connect the IAM and IAN pathways [81].
IAN-specific pathway: In the IAN (indole-3-acetonitrile) pathway [81], the genes for a nitrilase family protein were found in five bacteria, specifically belonging to Class 13 nitrilases [83]. Pseudo genes listed as “nitrilase family protein” were not counted (B09 and L17).
IPyA, TAM, and TSO pathways: pathway-specific upstream enzymes: In the indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPyA) pathway, the gene for indolepyruvate decarboxylase (sometimes annotated as ipdC) was found in 14 bacteria [84]. Thirteen of the genomes contained both a version of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and indole-3-pyruvic acid decarboxylase, which are both involved in the IPyA pathway. An alternative route to IPyA involves indole lactate dehydrogenase converting indole-3 lactate into IPyA and vice versa [72], although this enzyme was not detected in any of the genomes here. In the tryptamine pathway (TAM) in Gram-negative bacteria, a putative amine oxidase is required [72,76,85,86]; candidate primary-amine oxidases were found in nine bacteria. In the tryptophan side-chain oxidase (TSO) pathway [72,87], no genes encoding a TSO enzyme were detected in the genomes.
IPyA, TAM, and TSO pathways: shared downstream enzymes: There is a common enzyme in the IPyA, TAM, and TSO pathways that transforms indole-3-acetaldehyde into IAA: some studies report this as indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (AIDH, also called AldA), while others report it as indole-3-acetaldehyde oxidase [72,82,85,87,88]. A report from Duca and Glick suggests that AIDH converts indole-3-ethanol to indole-3-acetaldehyde [72]. No indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase annotated genes were found, but the bacteria encoded a generic aldehyde dehydrogenase: 11 were annotated as aldA (not to be confused with capitalized AldA), and 23 were annotated only as ‘aldehyde dehydrogenase’; another 5 were annotated as ‘acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (acetylating)’. It should be noted that aldehyde dehydrogenases are not specific to the IAA pathway.
Alternative route: IAA acetyltransferase (IAAT), which may be encoded by the gene ysnE, may be involved in another Trp-dependent IAA synthesis pathway [73] but was not detected in the genomes.
In vitro testing of silk-associated bacteria for indole compound production: Of the 17 isolates tested, 5 convincingly produced indole compounds (3/3 replicates): E04 (Pantoea agglomerans), L19 (Pantoea ananatis), L72 (Pantoea ananatis), S39 (Leclercia adecarboxylata), and H13 (Paenibacillus glucanolyticus). Of these, all five contained at least one copy of the gene encoding indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, four encoded indolepyruvate decarboxylase, and one encoded a nitrilase family protein. S39 (positive for indole production) was the only sample tested that encoded indole-3-acetamide hydrolase. S39 also contained one amine oxidase gene, making it a total of three potential IAA-production pathways implicated in its genome.

3.4. Nitrogen Limitation Traits

Since silk growth is limited by nitrogen [89], we screened the silk-associated bacterial genomes for nitrogen fixation (nif) genes (Figure 6). Only 1 of the 25 isolates, P1-19CT-C (Q27) (Klebsiella variicola/pneumoniae), contained a suite of nif genes (nifABDEHJKLMNQSTUVWXYZ). The gene nifJ, which is not specific to nitrogen fixation, was found in 11 of the genomes.
In vitro testing of silk-associated bacteria under nitrogen limitation: Of the 17 isolates tested, 9 grew on the second restreak onto nitrogen-free media (pre-reduced for oxygen, in anaerobic chamber): J11 (Pantoea vagans), E04 (Pantoea agglomerans), L19 (Pantoea ananatis), L21 (Klebsiella aerogenes), Q26 (Kosakonia cowanii), V50 (Lactococcus lactis), Q27 (Klebsiella variicola/pneumoniae), S39 (Leclercia adecarboxylata), and B09 (Enterobacter). Of these, isolate Q27 was confirmed to contain a suite of nif genes.

3.5. Pollen/Fertilization Signaling Traits

Bacteria in the silks/pollen tubes may play a role in signaling, with molecules including GABA, ethylene, and nitric oxide.
GABA genes: Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA, γ-aminobutyrate) is a signaling molecule involved in stimulating and guiding pollen tube elongation towards the ovule based on a concentration-dependent gradient [90,91]. Genes involved in GABA production (gadR, gadC, gadB, gts, and gadA) have been identified in lactic acid bacteria [92,93]. The gene gadC (glutamate:gamma-aminobutyrate antiporter) permits the export of GABA via the uptake of glutamate [94]. Here, gadC was found in two silk-associated bacteria, Lactococcus lactis (V50) and Rahnella aquatilis (U39) (Figure 7). Additionally, 11 bacteria contained GABA permease (gabP), which imports GABA [95] and, hence, could theoretically modulate the host GABA concentration. The other gad/gts genes were not found here.
ACC deaminase genes: In maize silks, pollination induces the synthesis of the plant hormone ethylene, which then promotes egg cell maturation, while blocking ethylene has the opposite effect [70]. Additionally, ethylene signals senescence [96,97]. Bacteria can secrete the enzyme ACC deaminase, which cleaves the precursor of ethylene, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), thus reducing the plant ethylene concentrations [98,99] and possibly extending or regulating the pollination window. The structural gene encoding ACC deaminase (acdS) [98] was detected in the genome of one transmitting silk bacteria (H13) (Figure 7). Other ACC-related genes such as ACC deaminase regulatory gene (acdR) and ACC synthase [100,101] were not detected in the bacterial genomes here.
Nitric oxide genes: The signaling molecule nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to alter the rate and direction of pollen tube growth [102,103]. Nitric oxide synthase oxygenase was detected in the genome of one transmitting silk-associated bacteria (Q13) (Figure 7). Other NO-associated genes, such as nirS, heme-based monooxygenase, pterin cofactor H4B, and THF synthesis were not found [104,105,106].

3.6. Aluminum Tolerance Traits

Maize pollen has high concentrations of aluminum [19], and since bacteria have been shown to reside on the pollen surface [107], we hypothesized that any bacteria in transmitting silks that originated from pollen might possess genes for aluminum tolerance. Despite various claims in the literature, we only included Al-tolerance genes that were backed by functional studies (Figure 8).
Malate dehydrogenase synthesizes malate, a precursor for citrate, and these organic acids promote aluminum tolerance; the underlying gene mdh is upregulated in aluminum-tolerant plant-associated bacteria when treated with aluminum [108,109,110]. Twenty-one of the genomes contained malate dehydrogenase, eighteen of which were annotated specifically as mdh (Figure 8).
The heavy metal-inducible dmeRF gene cluster is suggested to contribute to endophyte tolerance of metals, perhaps including aluminum [111,112]. The divalent metal efflux gene (dmeF) and the open reading frame/transcriptional repressor (dmeR) were found together in two bacteria, and dmeF was found alone in another bacterium (Figure 8).
Aluminum resistance proteins G2alt and ALU1-P [33,113] were not found in the genomes (Figure 8). However, ALU1-P is a member of the QueC family [33,114]. This family encodes 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine synthase, the first step in the queuosine biosynthetic pathway, and was found in 22 of the genomes, but it is not clear whether the immediate product promotes aluminum tolerance or is just a precursor and, hence, is non-specific.
In vitro testing of silk-associated bacteria under acid and aluminum stresses: The functional assay (adapted from Huang et al. [32] and Lim et al. [33]) for bacterial aluminum tolerance in GM broth required a pH of 3.5 to solubilize aluminum and, hence, inadvertently tested for acid tolerance in the 0% aluminum control. This was relevant to pollen tube-associated bacteria, since pollen tube tips secrete protons to facilitate growth and acidify the media in vitro [20,21,22,115]. Of the 25 isolates tested, 10–12 were resistant to pH 3.5 GM broth (Figure 8). The assay required sequential priming to initial low concentrations of aluminum (50 µmol/L, then 0.1 mmol/L); at this stage, 10 of the isolates failed to grow. Of the twelve isolates that showed sustained resistance to acid and Al priming, six grew at 0.4 mmol/L Al3+ [16–96% of growth (OD600) compared to growth without Al3+] and two isolates grew at 4 mmol/L Al3+, one of which, B09 (Enterobacter), showed moderate growth (14%). All six bacteria that showed resistance to acid and aluminum contained mdh and queC (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Overview

The fertilization stage at which male gametes are transmitted to the ovule in the style/silks (transmitting stage) is a critical stage in reproduction. Here, genome mining and functional testing of bacteria cultured from the transmitting silk microbiome (TSM) revealed evidence of signaling traits including auxin, GABA, NO, and ACC deaminase, all implicated in successful host fertilization. Further evidence suggested that members of the TSM are tolerant to silk- and pollen-relevant stressors, including water and nitrogen limitation, and acid and aluminum toxicity.

4.2. TSM Traits in the Context of Vertical Transmission

The male and/or female gamete may transmit endophytes to the offspring [15,116]. It has been suggested that endophytes may be inherited via the pollen tube [13,14,116]. A study by Liu et al. [10] showed evidence of hybrid maize offspring receiving members of their microbiome from both the male and female parents. Wu et al. [12] recently demonstrated that maize pollen carries a Bacillus mojavensis strain that can be transmitted to progeny seed. The pollinated silks in the current study potentially contain pollen tubes and migrating male gametes.
Therefore, fertilization-stage silks presumably contain maternally derived silk-associated microbes along with paternally derived (pollen) microbes associated with the pollen tubes and male gametes. Vertically transmitted pollen-associated bacteria would either need to colonize the male gametes or the leading edge of the pollen tube (Figure 9). By contrast, vertically transmitted maternal host bacteria would either colonize the ovule directly or transfer onto the pollen tube as it grows through the silk channel. This poses two challenges for such vertically transmitted microbes: surviving the unique stresses of the pollen and/or silk environment and promoting host reproductive success to ensure their own survival or the survival of their genetically related siblings, like worker bees in a colony functioning as a superorganism to help their queen proliferate [117].

4.3. Tolerance of the TSM to Silk/Pollen Abiotic Stresses

Both the silks and the pollen tectum (outer surface) can be a place of water and nitrogen limitation. Pollen, in particular, undergoes dehydration and shriveling (infolding of the sporoderm aperature) [118] before rehydrating on the surface of silks [2]. Pollen is also relatively high in aluminum [19], which can be toxic to bacteria [119]. As well, the leading edge of the pollen tube is believed to have a high concentration of hydrogen ions, making it a locally acidic environment [21,22,120]. In this context, it is noteworthy that the TSM is abundant in Gammaproteobacteria, which are known to survive in diverse, sometimes extreme environments [121,122]. Furthermore, the TSM is rich in Pseudomonadota, which includes many nitrogen fixers [123]. Here, culturing permitted detailed genome mining and phenotyping. We found support for the hypothesis that members of the TSM are tolerant of the stresses common on silks/pollen:

4.3.1. Desiccation Tolerance

Functional desiccation tolerance tests revealed that all 18 TSM isolates tested grew in 10% PEG-6000 and 9 grew in 30% PEG-6000, providing functional evidence of desiccation tolerance in the TSM. Gene mining also supported this hypothesis, with evidence for osmoprotectant biosynthesis in 23/25 isolates, osmoprotectant import in 22/25 isolates, and possible osmoprotectant efflux (mscL and mscS) in all 25 isolates. The export of osmoprotectants leaves open the intriguing possibility that TSM bacteria may be providing osmoprotectants to benefit the host plant, including reproductive tissues. Bacterial osmoprotectant export (secretion and efflux) is an area of active research, and there are major export routes that have not yet been identified [124,125].
There were 15 isolates that contained genes implicated in different biosynthesis pathways for the osmoprotectant trehalose, indicating their ability to use different substrates to produce trehalose. This potential redundancy may imply the bacteria’s ability to produce trehalose under different conditions. Likewise, one isolate (H13) contained biosynthesis genes (ectA, ectB, and ectC) for the osmoprotectant ectoine and encoded an import protein with an affinity for ectoine (EctT). Ectoine can be synthesized or imported by bacteria, and some bacteria, like Halomonas elongata, do both [125].
Some bacteria can use the osmoprotectants glycine betaine and choline additionally as sources of nitrogen and carbon [62]. Bacteria in the Rhizobiaceae family metabolize glycine betaine for energy, and only specific strains utilize glycine betaine as an osmoprotectant [62]. Bacteria from the TSM may be feeding off of glycine betaine and choline produced by the host or by other bacteria. Maize produces trehalose and glycine betaine at the silking stage [126], so it is possible that these are present in the silks. Choline is biosynthesized and exuded by plants and utilized by symbiotic microbes [127]. Maize also can accumulate choline [128], so the silk bacteria with choline import and utilization genes may be harvesting host-produced choline.
After successful pollination, an abscission zone forms in the silk, essentially cutting off the tissue from its connection to the vascular system, causing the silks to dehydrate and senesce [23,24]. This brings into question whether TSM bacteria require these mechanisms to survive on senescing silks.

4.3.2. Nitrogen Limitation

Functional tests showed nine TSM isolates had convincing nitrogen-free anaerobic growth. Curiously, only 1 of the 25 isolates contained a suite of nif genes. However, this may not be surprising, because nif operons are often found on plasmids [129], which are sometimes excluded from whole-genome sequencing. The sole isolate containing nif genes was Klebsiella variicola/pneumoniae; Klebsiella species, especially K. variicola in maize, are well-known nitrogen fixers and believed to be transmitted by maize seeds [130,131,132,133]. Our data suggest that nitrogen-fixing Klebsiella are colonizing pollinated silks. Molybdenum, a cofactor for nitrogenase, is present in maize pollen [19,134]. This opens doors for further studies investigating whether TSM bacteria contribute to nitrogen fixation in the silks, pollen tubes, or pollen, or are simply transmitted to seeds to supply nitrogen to other progeny tissues such as the maize xylem sap [135].

4.3.3. Aluminum Tolerance

Bacteria have been previously shown to live on pollen [107], which, in maize, is unusually high in aluminum [19]. Many plant growth-promoting microbes have been identified as inducing the overexpression of aluminum tolerance genes by the plant host (some perhaps working with IAA, etc.) [136]. Alternative to the pollen–aluminum concept, aluminum tolerance may help the bacteria (and host) survive high-aluminum soil environments [137]. Aluminum tolerance can also be associated with cell wall thickness [138]. Several TSM bacteria in the functional tests appeared to be aluminum tolerant: six isolates grew in 0.4 mmol/L Al3+, and two grew at 4 mmol/L Al3+. Gene mining revealed all of the positive candidates contained the aluminum tolerance genes mdh and queC, although these genes may be involved in other cellular processes [130,139]. The three isolates containing dmeR/F, a gene cluster suggested to help metal tolerance by endophytes [111,112], were not resistant to the acidity in the assays; thus, their aluminum tolerance could not be assessed.

4.3.4. Acid Tolerance

The pollen tube tip secretes protons in the process of extending through the silks, so microbes attempting to enter seed with the male gamete may need to tolerate this slightly acidic environment [20,21,22,115]. In this context, it was interesting that the acidic aluminum tolerance assay revealed that 13/25 of the tested TSM bacteria were tolerant to a pH of 3.5.

4.4. Evidence for Possible Selection on the TSM for Signaling Compounds That Promote Host Reproduction

We hypothesized that bacteria inhabiting fertilization-stage silks may promote host reproductive success to ensure their own survival. In fruit flies and mammals, bacteria promote successful mating [16,17]; however, it is unknown whether bacteria play a beneficial role in plant reproduction. Here, members of the TSM were found to encode signaling metabolites known to be involved in plant reproduction:

4.4.1. Auxin Biosynthesis

Maize pollen is abundant in the auxin, indoleacetic acid (IAA), and delivers IAA to silks upon pollination, where it stimulates egg cell maturation [70]. Auxin RNAs are also overexpressed in silks [71], presumably to promote growth. Five of the seventeen tested TSM isolates were positive for indole production. Combining the 25 TSM genomes analyzed, genes implicated in four IAA biosynthetic pathways were identified; at least 1 gene was found in 24/25 isolates. Thirteen of the genomes contained both acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and indole-3-pyruvic acid decarboxylase, which are both involved in the IPyA pathway for biosynthesis of IAA [78]. The in vitro assay detected strong production of indole compounds from 5/17 tested isolates, although less intense IAA producers were likely missed because the color-based test was not particularly sensitive. It is also worth mentioning that although individual genes involved in IAA production were detected, these genes are involved in complex pathways that rely on multiple genes (steps) to reach the final product. It is possible that the bacteria did contain a complete set of genes required for IAA production (some could have been missed in genome sequencing/processing), but the bacteria did not produce detectable amounts or did not produce IAA under the non-native assay conditions. It is also a possibility that the bacteria did not contain all of the genes necessary to complete a pathway for IAA production independently. Endophytes and plant hosts are known to share secondary metabolites, for example, the taxol pathway in Taxus (yew) trees [140,141]. It may be that TSM bacteria and host maize exchange IAA and/or share IAA biosynthetic pathway intermediates. Indeed, it is hypothesized that the IPyA pathway functions in both bacteria and plants [78], with the enzyme indolepyruvate decarboxylase being a rate-limiting step [142], leaving open the possibility that the 14 TSM isolates identified here to encode ipdC may be collaborating to synthesize IAA, possibly in maize reproductive tissues. Alternatively, these microbial genes may be acting in host progeny tissues (e.g., roots) [82].

4.4.2. GABA

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA, γ-aminobutyrate) is involved in tube attraction to an ovule by forming a concentration-dependent gradient [90,91]. Both GABA importers and exporters may be involved in regulating the concentration gradient of GABA in transmitting silks. Here, the GABA permease (gabP) gene, which imports GABA, was found in 11 TSM genomes; previously, this gene was thought to be involved in repressing virulence gene expression [95], which could promote an endophytic lifestyle. GABA can also provide acid resistance to bacteria [143], which may help TSM endophytes adapt to the growing pollen tube (as mentioned above). In addition to GABA import, two TSM isolates, including L. lactis, had GABA export genes. This is consistent with a prior study showing that Lactococcus bacteria can produce high levels of GABA [143]. However, the TSM isolates may be encoding GABA import/export genes for other reasons. For example, GABA can be a food source for some bacteria [95]. Furthermore, in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, quorum sensing can be downregulated by GABA [144], though here, no GABA genes were found in the fully sequenced A. tumefaciens isolated from pollinated silks.

4.4.3. ACC Deaminase

Ethylene increases in maize ears at pollination and promotes egg cell maturation [70]. Ethylene is also known as a signal for senescence [96,97], so reducing ethylene levels may extend the pollination window of silks, potentially contributing to host reproductive success. Here, we found evidence that at least one TSM isolate encodes ACC deaminase, which catabolizes the ethylene precursor [98]. Previously, the focus of this enzyme has been on the ability of root microbes to help host plants tolerate flooding stress [99], but perhaps ACC deaminase-encoding microbes play additional roles in plant reproduction.

4.4.4. Nitric Oxide

Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule in animals and plants [145]. Here, the nitric oxide synthase oxygenase gene was detected in one TSM isolate. This was of interest, because nitric oxide regulates pollen tube growth and guidance [102,103]. In Paulownia tomentosa, UV-B treatment of pollen decreased germination and pollen tube growth and increased NO synthesis [146]. He et al. [146] suggest that UV-induced pollen inhibition is partly caused by NO synthesis. In general, bacterial nitric oxide synthases are involved in adapting to oxidative stress, repairing UV radiation damage, and acting as a protective agent, but have also been shown to promote the adhesion of a Streptomyces fungus to host plant roots [104,105,145]. In some Streptomyces, NO synthases are involved in nitrating plant toxins [147].

4.5. Some TSM Isolates Show Multiple Adaptations

Some important TSM isolates showed positive results for up to three functional tests. Two isolates [Klebsiella aerogenes (L21, OTU118) and Klebsiella variicola/pneumoniae (Q27, OTU144)] grew anaerobically without nitrogen and were resistant to 0.4 mmol/L Al3+ and to a high concentration of PEG-6000 (30%). Three other isolates [Leclercia adecarboxylata (S39, OTU167)], P. agglomerans (E04, OTU246), and P. ananatis (L19, OTU271, OTU276, OTU290, OTU292)] were PEG-tolerant (at 10%), produced indole compounds, and grew anaerobically without nitrogen. This latter result was of particular interest, because P. agglomerans and P. ananatis were amongst the most prevalent cultured TSM species [5,28].

4.6. Prior Studies Show Pantoea Can Benefit Plants and Be Vertically Transmitted

The genus Pantoea is prevalent and diverse in the TSM, including many strains of P. agglomerans and P. ananatis [5,28], which, as noted above, also displayed multiple adaptive traits relevant to host reproductive tissues in this study. P. agglomerans and P. ananatis have been found to cause growth promotion in maize [9,148]. P. agglomerans has been observed to produce IAA, solubilize phosphate [148], and induce salt tolerance [149] in maize. In green onion, a single strain of P. agglomerans can fix nitrogen in addition to promoting growth, solubilizing phosphate, and producing indole [150]. Maize-associated Pantoea have been found to fix nitrogen [151]. Pantoea found in Zea seeds have been shown to produce ACC deaminase [7]. In addition, P. agglomerans and P. ananatis have been used as biocontrols on the flowers of fruit trees [152,153,154,155] and to reduce the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in wheat infected with Fusarium graminearum [156], respectively.
In general, Pantoea is ubiquitous across environments, a common plant colonizer, and includes many known epiphyte and endophyte species, as noted above [157]. Pantoea, at the genus level, have been observed in the germinated seeds [8], rhizosphere [148], roots, stems, and leaves [158] of maize. In support of vertical microbial transmission, genetically similar pathogenic and beneficial strains of P. ananatis have been isolated from healthy maize seeds [9]. Pantoea, intriguingly, are vertically transmitted in rice [11]. Xylanase may impact pollen grains getting into silk tissue, and a rice-endophytic P. ananatis has been shown to produce a xylanase-like compound [4,159].

4.7. Study Limitations and Future Experiments

A relatively small subset of the cultured healthy TSM was sequenced with WGS and used for gene mining and in vitro tests. Even before narrowing down the library of cultured isolates to the subset of bacteria used in this study, the library showed only a portion of the bacteria present in the TSM due to the limitations of culturing and sequencing (incompatibility with culturing conditions or primers). In general, the literature shows that culturing captures <10% of the bacteria present in a microbiome [160]. Nevertheless, we strove to include representatives of the most prevalent bacteria from healthy silks. Additional microbes from this library and other silk, pollen, and seed microbe collections should undergo gene mining and in vitro testing in the future.
In terms of whole-genome mining, there are many more genes which could be explored. Additionally, only a limited number of isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing due to cost. There are many more samples that may hold interesting genes. It is possible that certain genes were not identified due to low-depth sequencing. Furthermore, this is an emerging area of research, where some genes responsible for osmoprotectant transport and IAA synthesis are yet to be identified [73,124,125]. Additionally, genes (including nitrogen fixation genes) could be located on plasmids [129], which are sometimes excluded in this type of sequencing [161]. Likewise, silk/style bacteria could undergo further testing such as acetylene reduction assays. In addition to the potential impacts on maize reproduction presented in the current study, it is possible that the TSM may affect various agronomic traits in maize; we recommend that future breeding studies incorporate TSM analyses. Transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics would also make interesting additions to future studies.
Aside from being essential for maize production, silks have been used as herbal or traditional medicine for hundreds of years, a feed supplement for stressed poultry, and contain various phytochemicals [162,163,164,165]. Some of these benefits perhaps come from the transmitting silk microbiome (TSM) [4]. A future area of study would be to phenotype and use multi-omics approaches on the cultured TSM microbes to investigate their ability to produce the phytochemicals previously attributed to silks.
This study focused on pollinated silks, but moving forward, unpollinated silks and pollen should be studied separately, as our group has begun [166,167], to resolve questions about the origin, inheritance, and roles of the TSM. In terms of future application, the bacteria identified here as providing potential benefits to host plants (e.g., nitrogen fixation) could be tested as future seed and/or field treatments. Furthermore, the identification of microbes that improve host reproductive success may allow breeders to use associated microbial markers for selection.

5. Conclusions

This was the first comprehensive functional study of a style microbiome at the fertilization stage (transmitting stage microbiome, TSM) in any plant species to the best of our knowledge. Microbes in the style tissue of other plant species should now also be investigated. Our results demonstrate value in culturing and testing potential roles of the microbiome, in addition to NGS. The findings suggest that members of the TSM, including from the core, encode adaptations to survive stress conditions of silk and pollen habitats, including water and nitrogen scarcity. Drought episodes are worsening due to climate change [168,169], while many resource-poor smallholder farmers cannot afford nitrogen fertilizer [170,171], both of which hinder reproductive success [18,25,26,172]; the extent to which these stresses will impact reproductive microbiomes and their consequences on host plants represent important areas of future study. This is especially the case because the results here demonstrate that members of the TSM have the potential to express signaling compounds known to impact reproduction. We propose that bacteria that are vertically transmitted secrete these compounds to promote host reproductive success to ensure their own survival. The concept that the microbiome may play a direct role in plant reproduction is a novel direction for future research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12071473/s1, Figure S1: Whole-genome details; Supplementary Text S1: In vitro testing of microbial traits; Supplementary Text S2: Details for whole-genome sequencing, gene annotation, and mining.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.H.T. and M.N.R.; methodology, M.E.H.T.; formal analysis, M.E.H.T.; investigation, M.E.H.T.; data curation, M.E.H.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.H.T.; writing—review and editing, M.E.H.T. and M.N.R.; visualization, M.E.H.T.; supervision, M.N.R.; project administration, M.N.R.; funding acquisition, M.N.R. and M.E.H.T. performed all experiments, analyzed all data and wrote the manuscript. M.N.R. supervised the study and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by grants to M.N.R. from Grain Farmers of Ontario (054810), the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA 030356 and 030564), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC 401424, 401663, and 400924).

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequences corresponding to the strains in this study were deposited in the NCBI GenBank, and the accession numbers can be found in Figure 1b.

Acknowledgments

Scholarships were provided to M.E.H.T. by NSERC CGS-D, NSERC CGS-M, and a Food from Thought Research Assistantship. We thank Elaine Corbett (SPARK, Ontario Genomics) for her enthusiasm and support of this project. We thank Jake Gregory and Benjamin McFadyen (University of Guelph) for providing advice on the auxin and nitrogen assays. This research was made possible because of a previously reported silk culture collection and NGS study, and we thank the prior collaborators involved in that research: Anuja Shrestha, Jeffrey Rinne, and Eman Khalaf (all University of Guelph), as well as Victor Limay-Rios, Todd Phibbs, Stacie Dobson, Katiani Eli, and Darrell Galbraith (all Ridgetown Campus, University of Guelph), and finally, Lana Reid (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sauter, M. A Guided Tour: Pollen Tube Orientation in Flowering Plants. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2009, 54, 2376–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kiesselbach, T. The Structure and Reproduction of Corn; Brown, D., Schaefer, S., Eds.; 50th Anniv.; Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbour, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  3. Turc, O.; Bouteillé, M.; Fuad-Hassan, A.; Welcker, C.; Tardieu, F. The Growth of Vegetative and Reproductive Structures (Leaves and Silks) Respond Similarly to Hydraulic Cues in Maize. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 377–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Khalaf, E.M.; Shrestha, A.; Rinne, J.; Lynch, M.D.J.; Shearer, C.R.; Limay-Rios, V.; Reid, L.M.; Raizada, M.N. Transmitting Silks of Maize Have a Complex and Dynamic Microbiome. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thompson, M.E.H.; Shrestha, A.; Rinne, J.; Limay-Rios, V.; Reid, L.; Raizada, M.N. The Cultured Microbiome of Pollinated Maize Silks Shifts after Infection with Fusarium graminearum and Varies by Distance from the Site of Pathogen Inoculation. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Diniz, G.F.D.; Figueiredo, J.E.F.; Lana, U.G.P.; Marins, M.S.; Silva, D.D.; Cota, L.V.; Marriel, I.E.; Oliveira-Paiva, C.A. Microorganisms from Corn Stigma with Biocontrol Potential of Fusarium verticillioides. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 82, e262567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Johnston-Monje, D.; Raizada, M.N. Conservation and Diversity of Seed Associated Endophytes in Zea across Boundaries of Evolution, Ethnography and Ecology. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rijavec, T.; Lapanje, A.; Dermastia, M.; Rupnik, M. Isolation of Bacterial Endophytes from Germinated Maize Kernels. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sheibani-Tezerji, R.; Naveed, M.; Jehl, M.A.; Sessitsch, A.; Rattei, T.; Mitter, B. The Genomes of Closely Related Pantoea ananatis Maize Seed Endophytes Having Different Effects on the Host Plant Differ in Secretion System Genes and Mobile Genetic Elements. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, Y.; Zuo, S.; Xu, L.; Zou, Y.; Song, W. Study on Diversity of Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Seeds of Hybrid Maize and Their Parental Lines. Arch. Microbiol. 2012, 194, 1001–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, H.; Jeon, J.; Lee, K.K.; Lee, Y.H. Longitudinal Transmission of Bacterial and Fungal Communities from Seed to Seed in Rice. Commun. Biol. 2022, 5, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Xu, T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y. Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Hybrid Maize Seeds and Bacillus mojavensis J2416-7 May Be Capable of Vertical Transmission. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hodgson, S.; de Cates, C.; Hodgson, J.; Morley, N.J.; Sutton, B.C.; Gange, A.C. Vertical Transmission of Fungal Endophytes Is Widespread in Forbs. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4, 1199–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zampino, D.; Duro, A.; Sciandrello, S.; Parafati, L.; Restuccia, C. Pollen Viability and Endophytic Yeast Species of Cistus creticus and C. monspeliensis. Plant Biosyst. 2020, 155, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Truyens, S.; Weyens, N.; Cuypers, A.; Vangronsveld, J. Bacterial Seed Endophytes: Genera, Vertical Transmission and Interaction with Plants. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015, 7, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharon, G.; Segal, D.; Ringo, J.M.; Hefetz, A.; Zilber-Rosenberg, I.; Rosenberg, E. Commensal Bacteria Play a Role in Mating Preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20051–20056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Theis, K.R.; Venkataraman, A.; Dycus, J.A.; Koonter, K.D.; Schmitt-Matzen, E.N.; Wagner, A.P.; Holekamp, K.E.; Schmidt, T.M. Symbiotic Bacteria Appear to Mediate Hyena Social Odors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 19832–19837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pacini, E.; Dolferus, R. Pollen Developmental Arrest: Maintaining Pollen Fertility in a World with a Changing Climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kostić, A.; Kaluđerović, L.M.; Dojčinović, B.P.; Barać, M.B.; Babić, V.B.; Mačukanović-Jocić, M.P. Preliminary Investigation of Mineral Content of Pollen Collected from Different Serbian Maize Hybrids–Is There Any Potential Nutritional Value? J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2803–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Feijó, J.A.; Sainhas, J.; Hackett, G.R.; Kunkel, J.G.; Hepler, P.K. Growing Pollen Tubes Possess a Constitutive Alkaline Band in the Clear Zone and a Growth-Dependent Acidic Tip. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hepler, P.K.; Rounds, C.M.; Winship, L.J. Control of Cell Wall Extensibility during Pollen Tube Growth. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 998–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tupý, J.; Řhová, L. Changes and Growth Effect of pH in Pollen Tube Culture. J. Plant Physiol. 1984, 115, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Heslop-Harrison, Y.; Reger, B.J.; Heslop-Harrison, J. The Pollen-Stigma Interaction in the Grasses. 6. The Stigma ('silk’) of Zea mays L. as Host to the Pollens of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench and Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke. Acta Bot. Neerl. 1984, 33, 205–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dresselhaus, T.; Lausser, A.; Márton, M.L. Using Maize as a Model to Study Pollen Tube Growth and Guidance, Cross-Incompatibility and Sperm Delivery in Grasses. Ann. Bot. 2011, 108, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Uhart, S.A.; Andrade, F.H. Nitrogen Deficiency in Maize: II. Carbon-Nitrogen Interaction Effects on Kernel Number and Grain Yield. Crop Sci. 1995, 35, 1384–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Uhart, S.A.; Andrade, F.H. Nitrogen Deficiency in Maize: I. Effects on Crop Growth, Development, Dry Matter Partitioning, and Kernel Set. Crop Sci. 1995, 35, 1376–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borrás, L.; Vitantonio-Mazzini, L.N. Maize Reproductive Development and Kernel Set under Limited Plant Growth Environments. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3235–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thompson, M.E.H. Discovery and Testing of Pollinated Maize Silk-Associated Microbes Including Microbiome Assisted Selection of Biocontrol Agents against Fusarium graminearum. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bric, J.M.; Bostock, R.M.; Silverstone, S.E. Rapid in Situ Assay for Indoleacetic Acid Production by Bacteria Immobilized on a Nitrocellulose Membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hernández-Fernández, G.; Galán, B.; Carmona, M.; Castro, L.; García, J. Transcriptional Response of the Xerotolerant Arthrobacter sp. Helios Strain to PEG-Induced Drought Stress. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Latif, M.; Bukhari, S.A.H.; Alrajhi, A.A.; Alotaibi, F.S.; Ahmad, M.; Shahzad, A.N.; Dewidar, A.Z.; Mattar, M.A. Inducing Drought Tolerance in Wheat through Exopolysaccharide-Producing Rhizobacteria. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; He, G.; Wu, J. Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of an Aluminum-Tolerant Bacterium Burkholderia sp. SB1 from an Acidic Red Soil. Pedosphere 2018, 28, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lim, J.C.; Goh, K.M.; Shamsir, M.S.; Ibrahim, Z.; Chong, C.S. Characterization of Aluminum Resistant Anoxybacillus sp. SK 3–4 Isolated from a Hot Spring. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2015, 55, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Herrero, M.P.; Johnson, R.R. Drought Stress and Its Effects on Maize Reproductive Systems. Crop Sci. 1981, 21, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wood, J.M. Osmosensing by Bacteria. Sci. STKE 2006, 2006, pe43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sleator, R.D.; Hill, C. Bacterial Osmoadaptation: The Role of Osmolytes in Bacterial Stress and Virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Christgen, S.L.; Becker, D.F. Role of Proline in Pathogen and Host Interactions. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2019, 30, 683–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Meadows, J.A.; Correspondence, M.J.W.; Wargo, M.J. Carnitine in Bacterial Physiology and Metabolism. Microbiology 2015, 161, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Booth, I.R.; Blount, P. The MscS and MscL Families of Mechanosensitive Channels Act as Microbial Emergency Release Valves. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4802–4809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Padilla, L.; Morbach, S.; Krämer, R.; Agosin, E. Impact of Heterologous Expression of Escherichia coli UDP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase on Trehalose and Glycogen Synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 3845–3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, H.J.; Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, S.J. Mechanism of Neuroprotection by Trehalose: Controversy Surrounding Autophagy Induction. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qu, Q.; Lee, S.J.; Boos, W. TreT, a Novel Trehalose Glycosyltransferring Synthase of the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus litoralis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 47890–47897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ruhal, R.; Kataria, R.; Choudhury, B. Trends in Bacterial Trehalose Metabolism and Significant Nodes of Metabolic Pathway in the Direction of Trehalose Accumulation. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Klein, W.; Horlacher, R.; Boos, W. Molecular Analysis of TreB Encoding the Escherichia coli Enzyme II Specific for Trehalose. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4043–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kalera, K.; Stothard, A.I.; Woodruff, P.J.; Swarts, B.M. The Role of Chemoenzymatic Synthesis in Advancing Trehalose Analogues as Tools for Combatting Bacterial Pathogens. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 11528–11547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kalscheuer, R.; Weinrick, B.; Veeraraghavan, U.; Besra, G.S.; Jacobs, W.R. Trehalose-Recycling ABC Transporter LpqY-SugA-SugB-SugC Is Essential for Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21761–21766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ampomah, O.Y.; Avetisyan, A.; Hansen, E.; Svenson, J.; Huser, T.; Jensen, J.B.; Bhuvaneswari, T.V. The ThuEFGKAB Operon of Rhizobia and Agrobacterium tumefaciens Codes for Transport of Trehalose, Maltitol, and Isomers of Sucrose and Their Assimilation through the Formation of Their 3-Keto Derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 3797–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kuhlmann, A.U.; Bremer, E. Osmotically Regulated Synthesis of the Compatible Solute Ectoine in Bacillus pasteurii and Related Bacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kuhlmann, A.U.; Hoffmann, T.; Bursy, J.; Jebbar, M.; Bremer, E. Ectoine and Hydroxyectoine as Protectants against Osmotic and Cold Stress: Uptake through the SigB-Controlled Betaine-Choline-Carnitine Transporter-Type Carrier Ectt from Virgibacillus pantothenticus. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 4699–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kuhlmann, S.I.; Van Scheltinga, A.C.T.; Bienert, R.; Kunte, H.J.; Ziegler, C. 1.55 Å Structure of the Ectoine Binding Protein TeaA of the Osmoregulated TRAP-Transporter TeaABC from Halomonas elongata. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 9475–9485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Grammann, K.; Volke, A.; Kunte, H.J. New Type of Osmoregulated Solute Transporter Identified in Halophilic Members of the Bacteria Domain: TRAP Transporter TeaABC Mediates Uptake of Ectoine and Hydroxyectoine in Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 3078–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Schweikhard, E.S.; Kuhlmann, S.I.; Org Kunte, H.-J.; Grammann, K.; Ziegler, C.M. Structure and Function of the Universal Stress Protein TeaD and Its Role in Regulating the Ectoine Transporter TeaABC of Halomonas elongata DSM 2581 T. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 2194–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yu, Q.; Cai, H.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, L.; Merritt, J.; Zhang, S.; Dong, Z. Negative Regulation of Ectoine Uptake and Catabolism in Sinorhizobium meliloti: Characterization of the EhuR Gene. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 199, e00119-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Reshetnikov, A.S.; Rozova, O.N.; Trotsenko, Y.A.; But, S.Y.; Khmelenina, V.N.; Mustakhimov, I.I. Ectoine Degradation Pathway in Halotolerant Methylotrophs. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhao, Q.; Li, S.; Lv, P.; Sun, S.; Ma, C.; Xu, P.; Su, H.; Yang, C. High Ectoine Production by an Engineered Halomonas hydrothermalis Y2 in a Reduced Salinity Medium. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Richter, A.A.; Mais, C.N.; Czech, L.; Geyer, K.; Hoeppner, A.; Smits, S.H.J.; Erb, T.J.; Bange, G.; Bremer, E. Biosynthesis of the Stress-Protectant and Chemical Chaperon Ectoine: Biochemistry of the Transaminase EctB. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ly, A.; Henderson, J.; Lu, A.; Culham, D.E.; Wood, J.M. Osmoregulatory Systems of Escherichia coli: Identification of Betaine-Carnitine-Choline Transporter Family Member BetU and Distributions of BetU and TrkG among Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Isolates. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 296–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rübenhagen, R.; Rönsch, H.; Jung, H.; Krämer, R.; Morbach, S. Osmosensor and Osmoregulator Properties of the Betaine Carrier BetP from Corynebacterium glutamicum in Proteoliposomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Frossard, S.M.; Khan, A.A.; Warrick, E.C.; Gately, J.M.; Hanson, A.D.; Oldham, M.L.; Sanders, D.A.; Csonka, L.N. Identification of a Third Osmoprotectant Transport System, the OsmU System, in Salmonella enterica. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 3861–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kempf, B.; Bremer, E. OpuA, an Osmotically Regulated Binding Protein-Dependent Transport System for the Osmoprotectant Glycine Betaine in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 16701–16713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ziegler, C.; Bremer, E.; Krämer, R. The BCCT Family of Carriers: From Physiology to Crystal Structure. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 78, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Boncompagni, E.; Østerås, M.; Poggi, M.-C.; Le Rudulier, D. Occurrence of Choline and Glycine Betaine Uptake and Metabolism in the Family Rhizobiaceae and Their Roles in Osmoprotection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2072–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pocard, J.A.; Vincent, N.; Boncompagni, E.; Tombras Smith, L.; Poggi, M.C.; Le Rudulier, D. Molecular Characterization of the Bet Genes Encoding Glycine Betaine Synthesis in Sinorhizobium meliloti 102F34. Microbiology (N Y) 1997, 143, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aragón-Aranda, B.; Palacios-Chaves, L.; Salvador-Bescós, M.; de Miguel, M.J.; Muñoz, P.M.; Vences-Guzmán, M.Á.; Zúñiga-Ripa, A.; Lázaro-Antón, L.; Sohlenkamp, C.; Moriyón, I.; et al. The Phospholipid N-Methyltransferase and Phosphatidylcholine Synthase Pathways and the ChoXWV Choline Uptake System Involved in Phosphatidylcholine Synthesis Are Widely Conserved in Most, but Not All Brucella Species. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 614243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rath, H.; Reder, A.; Hoffmann, T.; Hammer, E.; Seubert, A.; Bremer, E.; Völker, U.; Mäder, U. Management of Osmoprotectant Uptake Hierarchy in Bacillus subtilis via a SigB-Dependent Antisense RNA. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. MacMillan, S.V.; Alexander, D.A.; Culham, D.E.; Kunte, H.J.; Marshall, E.V.; Rochon, D.; Wood, J.M. The Ion Coupling and Organic Substrate Specificities of Osmoregulatory Transporter ProP in Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 1999, 1420, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Culham, D.E.; Lasby, B.; Marangoni, A.G.; Milner, J.L.; Steer, B.A.; Van Nues, R.W.; Wood, J.M. Isolation and Sequencing of Escherichia coli Gene ProP Reveals Unusual Structural Features of the Osmoregulatory Proline/Betaine Transporter, ProP. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 229, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jebbar, M.; Talibart, R.; Gloux, K.; Bernard, T.; Blanco, C. Osmoprotection of Escherichia coli by Ectoine: Uptake and Accumulation Characteristics. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 5027–5035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wood, J.M. Proline Porters Effect the Utilization of Proline as Nutrient or Osmoprotectant for Bacteria. J. Membr. Biol. 1988, 106, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mól, R.; Filek, M.; Machačkova, I.; Matthys-Rochon, E. Ethylene Synthesis and Auxin Augmentation in Pistil Tissues Are Important for Egg Cell Differentiation after Pollination in Maize. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, X.M.; Sang, Y.L.; Zhao, X.Y.; Zhang, X.S. High-Throughput Sequencing of Small RNAs from Pollen and Silk and Characterization of MiRNAs as Candidate Factors Involved in Pollen-Silk Interactions in Maize. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 72852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Duca, D.R.; Glick, B.R. Indole-3-Acetic Acid Biosynthesis and Its Regulation in Plant-Associated Bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8607–8619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Keswani, C.; Singh, S.P.; Cueto, L.; García-Estrada, C.; Mezaache-Aichour, S.; Glare, T.R.; Borriss, R.; Singh, S.P.; Angel Blázquez, M.; Sansinenea, E. Auxins of Microbial Origin and Their Use in Agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8549–8565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kunkel, B.N.; Harper, C.P. The Roles of Auxin during Interactions between Bacterial Plant Pathogens and Their Hosts. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Morffy, N.; Strader, L.C. Old Town Roads: Routes of Auxin Biosynthesis across Kingdoms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 55, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shao, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, N.; Cui, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, G.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Analysis and Cloning of the Synthetic Pathway of the Phytohormone Indole-3-Acetic Acid in the Plant-Beneficial Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Microb. Cell Fact. 2015, 14, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shao, J.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xun, W.; Zhang, N.; Feng, H.; Miao, Y.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Participating Mechanism of a Major Contributing Gene YsnE for Auxin Biosynthesis in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. J. Basic. Microbiol. 2021, 61, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Spaepen, S.; Vanderleyden, J.; Remans, R. Indole-3-Acetic Acid in Microbial and Microorganism-Plant Signaling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 31, 425–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Spaepen, S.; Versées, W.; Gocke, D.; Pohl, M.; Steyaert, J.; Vanderleyden, J. Characterization of Phenylpyruvate Decarboxylase, Involved in Auxin Production of Azospirillum brasilense. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 7626–7633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Spaepen, S.; Vanderleyden, J. Auxin and Plant-Microbe Interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a001438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Duca, D.; Rose, D.R.; Glick, B.R. Characterization of a Nitrilase and a Nitrile Hydratase from Pseudomonas sp. Strain UW4 That Converts Indole-3-Acetonitrile to Indole-3-Acetic Acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 4640–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Patten, C.L.; Glick, B.R. Bacterial Biosynthesis of Indole-3-Acetic Acid. Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pace, H.C.; Brenner, C. The Nitrilase Superfamily: Classification, Structure and Function. Genome Biol. 2001, 2, reviews0001.1–reviews0001.9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Koga, J.; Adachi, T.; Hidaka, H. Molecular Cloning of the Gene for Indolepyruvate Decarboxylase from Enterobacter cloacae. Mol. General. Genet. 1991, 226, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Idris, E.S.E.; Iglesias, D.J.; Talon, M.; Borriss, R. Tryptophan-Dependent Production of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) Affects Level of Plant Growth Promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Perley, J.E.; Stowe, B.B. On the Ability of Taphrina deformans to Produce Indoleacetic Acid from Tryptophan by Way of Tryptamine. Plant Physiol. 1966, 41, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Oberhansli, T.; Defago, G.; Haas, D. Indole-3-Acetic Acid (IAA) Synthesis in the Biocontrol Strain CHA0 of Pseudomonas fluorescens: Role of Tryptophan Side Chain Oxidase. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1991, 137, 2273–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. McClerklin, S.A.; Lee, S.G.; Harper, C.P.; Nwumeh, R.; Jez, J.M.; Kunkel, B.N. Indole-3-Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenase-Dependent Auxin Synthesis Contributes to Virulence of Pseudomonas syringae Strain DC3000. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Debruin, J.L.; Hemphill, B.; Schussler, J.R. Silk Development and Kernel Set in Maize as Related to Nitrogen Stress. Crop Sci. 2018, 58, 2581–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Palanivelu, R.; Brass, L.; Edlund, A.F.; Preuss, D. Pollen Tube Growth and Guidance Is Regulated by POP2, an Arabidopsis Gene That Controls GABA Levels. Cell 2003, 114, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Li, L.; Dou, N.; Zhang, H.; Wu, C. The Versatile GABA in Plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2021, 16, e1862565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Phuengjayaem, S.; Booncharoen, A.; Tanasupawat, S. Characterization and Comparative Genomic Analysis of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA)-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria from Thai Fermented Foods. Biotechnol. Lett. 2021, 43, 1637–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Yunes, R.A.; Poluektova, E.U.; Dyachkova, M.S.; Klimina, K.M.; Kovtun, A.S.; Averina, O.V.; Orlova, V.S.; Danilenko, V.N. GABA Production and Structure of GadB/GadC Genes in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Strains from Human Microbiota. Anaerobe 2016, 42, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Guan, N.; Liu, L. Microbial Response to Acid Stress: Mechanisms and Applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. McCraw, S.L.; Park, D.H.; Jones, R.; Bentley, M.A.; Rico, A.; Ratcliffe, R.G.; Kruger, N.J.; Collmer, A.; Preston, G.M. GABA (g-Aminobutyric Acid) Uptake via the GABA Permease GabP Represses Virulence Gene Expression in Pseudomonas syringae Pv. Tomato DC3000. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016, 29, 938–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pandey, S.; Ranade, S.A.; Nagar, P.K.; Kumar, N. Role of Polyamines and Ethylene as Modulators of Plant Senescence. J. Biosci. 2000, 25, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dar, R.A.; Nisar, S.; Tahir, I. Ethylene: A Key Player in Ethylene Sensitive Flower Senescence: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 290, 110491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gamalero, E.; Glick, B.R. Bacterial Modulation of Plant Ethylene Levels. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Glick, B.R. Modulation of Plant Ethylene Levels by the Bacterial Enzyme ACC Deaminase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 251, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Moon, Y.S.; Ali, S. Possible Mechanisms for the Equilibrium of ACC and Role of ACC Deaminase-Producing Bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 877–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ali, S.; Kim, W.C. Plant Growth Promotion under Water: Decrease of Waterlogging-Induced ACC and Ethylene Levels by ACC Deaminase-Producing Bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhou, L.Z.; Dresselhaus, T. Friend or Foe: Signaling Mechanisms during Double Fertilization in Flowering Seed Plants. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2019, 131, 453–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Prado, A.M.; Porterfield, D.M.; Feijó, J.A. Nitric Oxide Is Involved in Growth Regulation and Re-Orientation of Pollen Tubes. Development 2004, 131, 2707–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sudhamsu, J.; Crane, B.R. Bacterial Nitric Oxide Synthases: What Are They Good For? Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Filippovich, S.Y. Bacterial NO Synthases. Biochemistry 2010, 75, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Arai, H.; Kodama, T.; Igarashi, Y. Effect of Nitrogen Oxides on Expression of the nir and nor Genes for Denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 170, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ambika Manirajan, B.; Ratering, S.; Rusch, V.; Schwiertz, A.; Geissler-Plaum, R.; Cardinale, M.; Schnell, S. Bacterial Microbiota Associated with Flower Pollen Is Influenced by Pollination Type, and Shows a High Degree of Diversity and Species-Specificity. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 5161–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Barra, P.J.; Viscardi, S.; Jorquera, M.A.; Duran, P.A.; Valentine, A.J.; De la Luz Mora, M. Understanding the Strategies to Overcome Phosphorus-Deficiency and Aluminum-Toxicity by Ryegrass Endophytic and Rhizosphere Phosphobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ligaba, A.; Shen, H.; Shibata, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tanakamaru, S.; Matsumoto, H. The Role of Phosphorus in Aluminium-Induced Citrate and Malate Exudation from Rape (Brassica napus). Physiol. Plant 2004, 120, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, Q.F.; Zhao, Y.; Yi, Q.; Li, K.Z.; Yu, Y.X.; Chen, L.M. Overexpression of Malate Dehydrogenase in Transgenic Tobacco Leaves: Enhanced Malate Synthesis and Augmented Al-Resistance. Acta Physiol. Plant 2010, 32, 1209–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jaiswal, S.K.; Naamala, J.; Dakora, F.D. Nature and Mechanisms of Aluminium Toxicity, Tolerance and Amelioration in Symbiotic Legumes and Rhizobia. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2018, 54, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Rubio-Sanz, L.; Prieto, R.I.; Imperial, J.; Palacios, J.M.; Brito, B. Functional and Expression Analysis of the Metal-Inducible DmeRF System from Rhizobium leguminosarum Bv. Viciae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 6414–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Beris, F.S.; De Smet, L.; Karaoglu, H.; Canakci, S.; Van Beeumen, J.; Belduz, A.O. The ATPase Activity of the G2alt Gene Encoding an Aluminium Tolerance Protein from Anoxybacillus gonensis G2. J. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jo, J.; Jang, Y.S.; Kim, K.Y.; Kim, M.H.; Kim, I.J.; Chung, W. Il Isolation of ALU1-P Gene Encoding a Protein with Aluminum Tolerance Activity from Arthrobacter viscosus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 239, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Feijó, J.A.; Malhó, R.; Obermeyer, G. Ion Dynamics and Its Possible Role during in Vitro Pollen Germination and Tube Growth. Protoplasma 1995, 187, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sahu, P.K.; Mishra, S. Effect of Hybridization on Endophytes: The Endo-Microbiome Dynamics. Symbiosis 2021, 84, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Seeley, T.D. The Honey Bee Colony as a Superorganism. Am. Sci. 1989, 77, 546–553. [Google Scholar]
  118. Chichiriccò, G. Post-shedding Dehydration and in Vivo Temporal Germination of Crocus Pollen. Grana 2007, 44, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Flis, S.E.; Glenn, A.R.; Dilworth, M.J. The Interaction between Aluminium and Root Nodule Bacteria. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Holdaway-Clarke, T.L.; Hepler, P.K. Control of Pollen Tube Growth: Role of Ion Gradients and Fluxes. New Phytol. 2003, 159, 539–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yamamoto, M.; Takai, K. Sulfur Metabolisms in Epsilon-and Gamma-Proteobacteria in Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Fields. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jorquera, M.A.; Maruyama, F.; Ogram, A.V.; Navarrete, O.U.; Lagos, L.M.; Inostroza, N.G.; Acuña, J.J.; Rilling, J.I.; de La Luz Mora, M. Rhizobacterial Community Structures Associated with Native Plants Grown in Chilean Extreme Environments. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 633–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rudnick, P.; Meletzus, D.; Green, A.; He, L.; Kennedy, C. Regulation of Nitrogen Fixation by Ammonium in Diazotrophic Species of Proteobacteria. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 1997, 29, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Czech, L.; Gertzen, C.; Smits, S.H.J.; Bremer, E. Guilty by Association: Importers, Exporters and MscS-Type Mechanosensitive Channels Encoded in Biosynthetic Gene Clusters for the Stress-Protectant Ectoine. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 5306–5331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Vandrich, J.; Pfeiffer, F.; Alfaro-Espinoza, G.; Kunte, H.J. Contribution of Mechanosensitive Channels to Osmoadaptation and Ectoine Excretion in Halomonas elongata. Extremophiles 2020, 24, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Salgado-Aguilar, M.; Molnar, T.; Pons-Hernández, J.L.; Covarrubias-Prieto, J.; Ramírez-Pimentel, J.G.; Raya-Pérez, J.C.; Hearne, S.; Iturriaga, G.; Salgado-Aguilar, M.; Molnar, T.; et al. Physiological and Biochemical Analyses of Novel Drought-Tolerant Maize Lines Reveal Osmoprotectant Accumulation at Silking Stage. Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2020, 80, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. De Rudder, K.E.E.; Sohlenkamp, C.; Geiger, O. Plant-Exuded Choline Is Used for Rhizobial Membrane Lipid Biosynthesis by Phosphatidylcholine Synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 20011–20016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Peel, G.J.; Mickelbart, M.V.; Rhodes, D. Choline Metabolism in Glycinebetaine Accumulating and Non-Accumulating near-Isogenic Lines of Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Masterson, R.V.; Russell, P.R.; Atherly, A.G. Nitrogen Fixation (nif) Genes and Large Plasmids of Rhizobium japonicum. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 152, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rosenblueth, M.; Martínez, L.; Silva, J.; Martínez-Romero, E. Klebsiella variicola, a Novel Species with Clinical and Plant-Associated Isolates. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 27, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Yang, L.; Yang, K. Biological Function of Klebsiella variicola and Its Effect on the Rhizosphere Soil of Maize Seedlings. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Johnston-Monje, D.; Gutiérrez, J.P.; Lopez-Lavalle, L.A.B. Seed-Transmitted Bacteria and Fungi Dominate Juvenile Plant Microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dumigan, C.R.; Muileboom, J.; Gregory, J.; Shrestha, A.; Hewedy, O.A.; Raizada, M.N. Ancient Relatives of Modern Maize from the Center of Maize Domestication and Diversification Host Endophytic Bacteria That Confer Tolerance to Nitrogen Starvation. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hoover, T.; Imperial, J.; Ludden, P.; Shah, V. Biosynthesis of the Iron-Molybdenum Cofactor of Nitrogenase. Biofactors 1988, 1, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Huang, S.; Li, L.; Gao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Huang, S.; Yuan, L.; Wen, Y.; et al. A Highly Conserved Core Bacterial Microbiota with Nitrogen-Fixation Capacity Inhabits the Xylem Sap in Maize Plants. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Farh, M.E.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Singh, P.; Yang, D.C. Aluminium Resistant, Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Induce Overexpression of Aluminium Stress Related Genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and Increase the Ginseng Tolerance against Aluminium Stress. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 200, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shi, Q.; Jin, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Ma, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Wen, R.; Nian, H.; Lian, T. High Aluminum Drives Different Rhizobacterial Communities between Aluminum-Tolerant and Aluminum-Sensitive Wild Soybean. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wang, C.; Zhao, X.Q.; Aizawa, T.; Sunairi, M.; Shen, R.F. High Aluminum Tolerance of Rhodotorula sp. RS1 Is Associated with Thickening of the Cell Wall Rather than Chelation of Aluminum Ions. Pedosphere 2013, 23, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Noller, A.C.; McEllistrem, M.C.; Stine, O.C.; Morris, J.G.; Boxrud, D.J.; Dixon, B.; Harrison, L.H. Multilocus Sequence Typing Reveals a Lack of Diversity among Escherichia coli O157:H7 Isolates That Are Distinct by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Soliman, S.S.M.; Raizada, M.N. Interactions between Co-Habitating Fungi Elicit Synthesis of Taxol from an Endophytic Fungus in Host Taxus Plants. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Soliman, S.S.M.; Greenwood, J.S.; Bombarely, A.; Mueller, L.A.; Tsao, R.; Mosser, D.D.; Raizada, M.N. An Endophyte Constructs Fungicide-Containing Extracellular Barriers for Its Host Plant. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 2570–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Li, M.; Guo, R.; Yu, F.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.; Li, H.; Wu, J. Indole-3-Acetic Acid Biosynthesis Pathways in the Plant-Beneficial Bacterium Arthrobacter pascens ZZ21. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Dhakal, R.; Bajpai, V.K.; Baek, K.H. Production of Gaba (γ-Aminobutyric Acid) by Microorganisms: A Review. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lang, J.; Gonzalez-Mula, A.; Taconnat, L.; Clement, G.; Faure, D. The Plant GABA Signaling Downregulates Horizontal Transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Virulence Plasmid. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Crane, B.R.; Sudhamsu, J.; Patel, B.A. Bacterial Nitric Oxide Synthases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79, 445–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. He, J.M.; Bai, X.L.; Wang, R.B.; Cao, B.; She, X.P. The Involvement of Nitric Oxide in Ultraviolet-B-Inhibited Pollen Germination and Tube Growth of Paulownia tomentosa in Vitro. Physiol. Plant 2007, 131, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Crane, B.R. The Enzymology of Nitric Oxide in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Resistance. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2008, 36, 1149–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Mishra, A.; Chauhan, P.S.; Chaudhry, V.; Tripathi, M.; Nautiyal, C.S. Rhizosphere Competent Pantoea agglomerans Enhances Maize (Zea mays) and Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Growth, without Altering the Rhizosphere Functional Diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2011, 100, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Gond, S.K.; Torres, M.S.; Bergen, M.S.; Helsel, Z.; White, J.F. Induction of Salt Tolerance and Up-Regulation of Aquaporin Genes in Tropical Corn by Rhizobacterium Pantoea agglomerans. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 60, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, B.R.; Rong, X.; Gardener, B.B.M.; Ji, H.J.; Park, C.S.; Kim, Y.C. Draft Genome Sequence of Pantoea ananatis B1-9, a Nonpathogenic Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Montañez, A.; Abreu, C.; Gill, P.R.; Hardarson, G.; Sicardi, M. Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Maize (Zea mays L.) by 15N Isotope-Dilution and Identification of Associated Culturable Diazotrophs. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2009, 45, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Dutkiewicz, J.; Mackiewicz, B.; Lemieszek, M.K.; Golec, M.; Milanowski, J. Pantoea agglomerans: A Mysterious Bacterium of Evil and Good. Part IV. Beneficial Effects. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2016, 23, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sammer, U.F.; Reiher, K.; Spiteller, D.; Wensing, A.; Völksch, B. Assessment of the Relevance of the Antibiotic 2-Amino-3-(Oxirane-2,3-Dicarboxamido)-Propanoyl-Valine from Pantoea agglomerans Biological Control Strains against Bacterial Plant Pathogens. Microbiologyopen 2012, 1, 438–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Pusey, P.L.; Stockwell, V.O.; Reardon, C.L.; Smits, T.H.M.; Duffy, B. Antibiosis Activity of Pantoea agglomerans Biocontrol Strain E325 against Erwinia amylovora on Apple Flower Stigmas. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 1234–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Cañamás, T.P.; Viñas, I.; Abadias, M.; Usall, J.; Torres, R.; Teixidó, N. Acid Tolerance Response Induced in the Biocontrol Agent Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2 and Effect on Its Survival Ability in Acidic Environments. Microbiol. Res. 2009, 164, 438–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Deroo, W.; De Troyer, L.; Dumoulin, F.; De Saeger, S.; De Boevre, M.; Vandenabeele, S.; De Gelder, L.; Audenaert, K. A Novel in Planta Enrichment Method Employing Fusarium graminearum-Infected Wheat Spikes to Select for Competitive Biocontrol Bacteria. Toxins 2022, 14, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Brady, C.; Cleenwerck, I.; Venter, S.; Vancanneyt, M.; Swings, J.; Coutinho, T. Phylogeny and Identification of Pantoea Species Associated with Plants, Humans and the Natural Environment Based on Multilocus Sequence Analysis (MLSA). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 31, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gaoa, J.; Xue, J.; Yan, H.; Tong, S.; Khan, M.S.; Wang, L.; Mao, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, J. Pantoea endophytica sp. Nov., Novel Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from Maize Planting in Different Geographic Regions of Northern China. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 42, 488–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ma, J.; Zhang, K.; Liao, H.; Hector, S.B.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Xu, T.; Tong, C.; Liu, X.; et al. Genomic and Secretomic Insight into Lignocellulolytic System of an Endophytic Bacterium Pantoea ananatis Sd-1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Sarhan, M.S.; Hamza, M.A.; Youssef, H.H.; Patz, S.; Becker, M.; ElSawey, H.; Nemr, R.; Daanaa, H.S.A.; Mourad, E.F.; Morsi, A.T.; et al. Culturomics of the Plant Prokaryotic Microbiome and the Dawn of Plant-Based Culture Media—A Review. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 19, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Antipov, D.; Hartwick, N.; Shen, M.; Raiko, M.; Lapidus, A.; Pevzner, P.A. PlasmidSPAdes: Assembling Plasmids from Whole Genome Sequencing Data. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 3380–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Rahman, N.A.; Wan Rosli, W.I. Nutritional Compositions and Antioxidative Capacity of the Silk Obtained from Immature and Mature Corn. J. King Saud. Univ. Sci. 2014, 26, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ha, A.W.; Kang, H.J.; Kim, S.L.; Kim, M.H.; Kim, W.K. Acute and Subacute Toxicity Evaluation of Corn Silk Extract. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 23, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Hasanudin, K.; Hashim, P.; Mustafa, S. Corn Silk (Stigma maydis) in Healthcare: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review. Molecules 2012, 17, 9697–9715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Nassar, F.S.; Alsahlawi, A.M.; E Abdellatif, H.A.; Kamel, N.N.; Abbas, A.O. Dietary Corn Silk (Stigma maydis) Extract Supplementation Modulate Production Performance, Immune Response and Redox Balance in Corticosterone-Induced Oxidative Stress Broilers. Animals 2023, 13, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Shrestha, A.; Rios, V.L.; Brettingham, D.J.L.; Raizada, M. Bacteria Existing in Pre-Pollinated Styles (Silks) Can Defend the Exposed Male Gamete Fertilization Channel of Maize against an Environmental Fusarium Pathogen. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1292109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Shrestha, A.; Rios, V.L.; Brettingham, D.J.L.; Raizada, M. Maize Pollen Carry Bacteria That Suppress a Fungal Pathogen That Enters through the Male Gamete Fertilization Route. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1286199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wu, G.; Chen, J.; Shi, X.; Kim, J.S.; Xia, J.; Zhang, L. Impacts of Global Climate Warming on Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts and Their Propagations. Earths Future 2022, 10, e2021EF002542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Naumann, G.; Alfieri, L.; Wyser, K.; Mentaschi, L.; Betts, R.A.; Carrao, H.; Spinoni, J.; Vogt, J.; Feyen, L. Global Changes in Drought Conditions under Different Levels of Warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 3285–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Van Loon, J.; Speratti, A.B.; Gabarra, L.; Govaerts, B.; Batán, E.; de Mexico, E. Precision for Smallholder Farmers: A Small-Scale-Tailored Variable Rate Fertilizer Application Kit. Agriculture 2018, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Thar, S.P.; Farquharson, R.J.; Ramilan, T.; Coggins, S.; Chen, D. Recommended vs. Practice: Smallholder Fertilizer Decisions in Central Myanmar. Agriculture 2021, 11, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zheng, H.; Wu, H.; Pan, X.; Jin, W.; Li, X. Aberrant Meiotic Modulation Partially Contributes to the Lower Germination Rate of Pollen Grains in Maize (Zea mays L.) under Low Nitrogen Supply. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 342–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Fertilization-stage silk samples were taken from the tip and the base of each cob within the portion covered by husk leaves. See Thompson et al., 2023, Supplemental Materials, Figure S1c [5]. (b) Details for bacterial isolates used in this study, including isolate origin (maize host genotype and heterotic group), sample location (tip or base portion of silks), medium that was used to isolate the bacteria from silks (LB agar or potato dextrose agar [PDA]), whole-genome sequencing results (including relative abundance for the assignment of taxonomy), and NCBI GenBank accession number. The asterisks (*) indicate bacterial strains that were previously predicted to be part of the cultured core TSM based on 16S sequences from the cultured library of 748 bacteria. The cultured core was defined as cultured OTUs that were prevalent in both healthy and F. graminearum-treated silks, meaning they were cultured from at least three host genotypes in each treatment [5,28]. The obelisks (†) indicate strains that were previously predicted to be part of the core TSM via the matching of 16S sequences to V4-MiSeq-defined core OTUs [4,5,28].
Figure 1. (a) Fertilization-stage silk samples were taken from the tip and the base of each cob within the portion covered by husk leaves. See Thompson et al., 2023, Supplemental Materials, Figure S1c [5]. (b) Details for bacterial isolates used in this study, including isolate origin (maize host genotype and heterotic group), sample location (tip or base portion of silks), medium that was used to isolate the bacteria from silks (LB agar or potato dextrose agar [PDA]), whole-genome sequencing results (including relative abundance for the assignment of taxonomy), and NCBI GenBank accession number. The asterisks (*) indicate bacterial strains that were previously predicted to be part of the cultured core TSM based on 16S sequences from the cultured library of 748 bacteria. The cultured core was defined as cultured OTUs that were prevalent in both healthy and F. graminearum-treated silks, meaning they were cultured from at least three host genotypes in each treatment [5,28]. The obelisks (†) indicate strains that were previously predicted to be part of the core TSM via the matching of 16S sequences to V4-MiSeq-defined core OTUs [4,5,28].
Microorganisms 12 01473 g001
Figure 2. Genes involved in osmoprotectant transport and utilization. Genes that appeared to be relevant to this research were selected from the literature. Abbreviations: T: trehalose; GB: glycine betaine; CH: choline; E: ectoine; G: glucose; P: proline; HE: hydroxyectoine; PB: proline betaine; C: carnitine; CO: choline-O-sulfate; ?: possibly other osmoprotectants. Proline-specific transporters were not included, because proline plays many roles in cells and is non-specific to osmoprotection. The 3 dots (…) indicates that the metabolite is broken down into further metabolites. This is not a complete account of all osmoprotectants or osmoprotectant transport/utilization genes, as this is a dynamic area of research, and many genes have been discovered recently or are predicted to exist but not yet identified.
Figure 2. Genes involved in osmoprotectant transport and utilization. Genes that appeared to be relevant to this research were selected from the literature. Abbreviations: T: trehalose; GB: glycine betaine; CH: choline; E: ectoine; G: glucose; P: proline; HE: hydroxyectoine; PB: proline betaine; C: carnitine; CO: choline-O-sulfate; ?: possibly other osmoprotectants. Proline-specific transporters were not included, because proline plays many roles in cells and is non-specific to osmoprotection. The 3 dots (…) indicates that the metabolite is broken down into further metabolites. This is not a complete account of all osmoprotectants or osmoprotectant transport/utilization genes, as this is a dynamic area of research, and many genes have been discovered recently or are predicted to exist but not yet identified.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g002
Figure 3. Summary of whole-genome mining for genes involved in osmoprotectant transport and utilization and results of functional in vitro tests for PEG-6000 tolerance (mimicking desiccation) for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. Yellow cells indicate positive in vitro results. Green cells indicate the presence of relevant genes. The asterisk (*) indicates a likely match to the indicated gene. § indicates the resistance to PEG-6000 in terms of growth (calculated as the ratio of bacterial growth with PEG-6000/without PEG-6000 based on the average of 3 OD600 readings) and is grouped into the following ranges: - (not resistant, 0.00–0.08), + (mild resistance, 0.08–0.12), ++ (moderate resistance, 0.12–0.31), +++ (moderate-high resistance, 0.31–0.50), and ++++ (high resistance, >0.50). The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Figure 3. Summary of whole-genome mining for genes involved in osmoprotectant transport and utilization and results of functional in vitro tests for PEG-6000 tolerance (mimicking desiccation) for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. Yellow cells indicate positive in vitro results. Green cells indicate the presence of relevant genes. The asterisk (*) indicates a likely match to the indicated gene. § indicates the resistance to PEG-6000 in terms of growth (calculated as the ratio of bacterial growth with PEG-6000/without PEG-6000 based on the average of 3 OD600 readings) and is grouped into the following ranges: - (not resistant, 0.00–0.08), + (mild resistance, 0.08–0.12), ++ (moderate resistance, 0.12–0.31), +++ (moderate-high resistance, 0.31–0.50), and ++++ (high resistance, >0.50). The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g003
Figure 4. Summary of bacterial indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis pathways. Pathways and genes that appeared to be relevant to this research were selected from the literature. The asterisk (*) indicates that the gene was not reported in GenBank. This is a dynamic area of research, and some genes have been predicted to exist but not yet identified. The question mark (?) indicates that the step is unknown. Based on works by D. R. Duca and Glick [72], Keswani et al. [73], Kunkel and Harper [74], Morffy and Strader [75], Shao et al., [76,77], Spaepen, Vanderleyden, et al. [78], Spaepen, Versées, et al. [79], and Spaepen and Vanderleyden [80].
Figure 4. Summary of bacterial indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis pathways. Pathways and genes that appeared to be relevant to this research were selected from the literature. The asterisk (*) indicates that the gene was not reported in GenBank. This is a dynamic area of research, and some genes have been predicted to exist but not yet identified. The question mark (?) indicates that the step is unknown. Based on works by D. R. Duca and Glick [72], Keswani et al. [73], Kunkel and Harper [74], Morffy and Strader [75], Shao et al., [76,77], Spaepen, Vanderleyden, et al. [78], Spaepen, Versées, et al. [79], and Spaepen and Vanderleyden [80].
Microorganisms 12 01473 g004
Figure 5. Summary of whole-genome mining results for genes involved in indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and results of functional in vitro testing for production of indole-containing compounds (3 replicates) for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. † There were no exact matches for indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, IAAld dehydrogenase, or IAld dehydrogenase (AIDH, also called AldA), but various genes are labeled more generically as aldehyde dehydrogenase. ¶ Amine oxidase is a putative step in the pathway, which is not well defined, and the genes found in this study are primary-amine oxidases. Symbol definitions: # gene family, not specific to this pathway; * acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (acetylating); ^ aldehyde dehydrogenase; § aldA (aldehyde dehydrogenase). The addition symbol (+) indicates that the isolate convincingly produced indole compounds in 3/3 replicates. The subtraction symbol (-) indicates that the isolate did not meet these requirements. The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Figure 5. Summary of whole-genome mining results for genes involved in indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and results of functional in vitro testing for production of indole-containing compounds (3 replicates) for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. † There were no exact matches for indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, IAAld dehydrogenase, or IAld dehydrogenase (AIDH, also called AldA), but various genes are labeled more generically as aldehyde dehydrogenase. ¶ Amine oxidase is a putative step in the pathway, which is not well defined, and the genes found in this study are primary-amine oxidases. Symbol definitions: # gene family, not specific to this pathway; * acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (acetylating); ^ aldehyde dehydrogenase; § aldA (aldehyde dehydrogenase). The addition symbol (+) indicates that the isolate convincingly produced indole compounds in 3/3 replicates. The subtraction symbol (-) indicates that the isolate did not meet these requirements. The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g005
Figure 6. Summary of (a) whole-genome mining for genes involved in nitrogen fixation and (b) results of functional in vitro results for growth on nitrogen-free media for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. Nitrogen-free growth testing occurred in an anaerobic chamber, and the results indicate continued growth after restreaking from an initial nitrogen-free plate, all within an anaerobic chamber. Candidates were considered positive if they grew on both the first and second set of restreaked plates, in 3/3 replicates. The symbol “-” in red cells indicates no growth, in green cells “+” indicates growth, and “++” indicates strong growth. The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Figure 6. Summary of (a) whole-genome mining for genes involved in nitrogen fixation and (b) results of functional in vitro results for growth on nitrogen-free media for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. Nitrogen-free growth testing occurred in an anaerobic chamber, and the results indicate continued growth after restreaking from an initial nitrogen-free plate, all within an anaerobic chamber. Candidates were considered positive if they grew on both the first and second set of restreaked plates, in 3/3 replicates. The symbol “-” in red cells indicates no growth, in green cells “+” indicates growth, and “++” indicates strong growth. The “na” indicates that the isolate was not tested.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g006
Figure 7. Summary of whole-genome mining results for genes involved in pollen/fertilization signaling compounds for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Genes include those related to ethylene, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and nitric oxide. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize.
Figure 7. Summary of whole-genome mining results for genes involved in pollen/fertilization signaling compounds for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Genes include those related to ethylene, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and nitric oxide. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g007
Figure 8. Summary of whole-genome mining results for aluminum-related genes and results of functional in vitro testing for aluminum and acid tolerance for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. The functional data are the average of 3 replicates for each aluminum concentration. Resistance to aluminum was measured in terms of growth (calculated as the ratio of bacterial growth with aluminum/without aluminum based on the average of 3 OD600 readings) and grouped into the following ranges: - (not resistant, 0.00–0.08), + (mild resistance, 0.08–0.12), ++ (moderate resistance, 0.12–0.31), +++ (moderate-high resistance, 0.31–0.50), and ++++ (high resistance, >0.50). The “na” indicates that the isolate was not included in the specific test.
Figure 8. Summary of whole-genome mining results for aluminum-related genes and results of functional in vitro testing for aluminum and acid tolerance for the most prevalent and select isolates from the cultured transmitting silk microbiome of maize. Silk samples spanned diverse host inbred/hybrid lines and heterotic groups of maize. The functional data are the average of 3 replicates for each aluminum concentration. Resistance to aluminum was measured in terms of growth (calculated as the ratio of bacterial growth with aluminum/without aluminum based on the average of 3 OD600 readings) and grouped into the following ranges: - (not resistant, 0.00–0.08), + (mild resistance, 0.08–0.12), ++ (moderate resistance, 0.12–0.31), +++ (moderate-high resistance, 0.31–0.50), and ++++ (high resistance, >0.50). The “na” indicates that the isolate was not included in the specific test.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g008
Figure 9. Proposed summary model of (a) possible locations of bacteria and stressors that bacteria encounter in the context of style tissue, pollen, and pollen tubes of fertilization-stage maize silks and (b) possible interactions of predicted stress tolerance and signaling metabolites associated with bacteria in fertilization-stage silks. ACC refers to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the precursor of ethylene. GABA refers to gamma-aminobutyric acid.
Figure 9. Proposed summary model of (a) possible locations of bacteria and stressors that bacteria encounter in the context of style tissue, pollen, and pollen tubes of fertilization-stage maize silks and (b) possible interactions of predicted stress tolerance and signaling metabolites associated with bacteria in fertilization-stage silks. ACC refers to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, the precursor of ethylene. GABA refers to gamma-aminobutyric acid.
Microorganisms 12 01473 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thompson, M.E.H.; Raizada, M.N. The Microbiome of Fertilization-Stage Maize Silks (Style) Encodes Genes and Expresses Traits That Potentially Promote Survival in Pollen/Style Niches and Host Reproduction. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071473

AMA Style

Thompson MEH, Raizada MN. The Microbiome of Fertilization-Stage Maize Silks (Style) Encodes Genes and Expresses Traits That Potentially Promote Survival in Pollen/Style Niches and Host Reproduction. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7):1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thompson, Michelle E. H., and Manish N. Raizada. 2024. "The Microbiome of Fertilization-Stage Maize Silks (Style) Encodes Genes and Expresses Traits That Potentially Promote Survival in Pollen/Style Niches and Host Reproduction" Microorganisms 12, no. 7: 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071473

APA Style

Thompson, M. E. H., & Raizada, M. N. (2024). The Microbiome of Fertilization-Stage Maize Silks (Style) Encodes Genes and Expresses Traits That Potentially Promote Survival in Pollen/Style Niches and Host Reproduction. Microorganisms, 12(7), 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop