Next Article in Journal
Biochar Suppresses Bacterial Wilt of Tomato by Improving Soil Chemical Properties and Shifting Soil Microbial Community
Previous Article in Journal
Exploiting the Advantages of Molecular Tools for the Monitoring of Fungal Indoor Air Contamination: First Detection of Exophiala jeanselmei in Indoor Air of Air-Conditioned Offices
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/microorganisms7120675
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action

by
Anja Klančnik
1,*,
Katarina Šimunović
1,
Jasna Kovac
1,2,
Orhan Sahin
3,
Zuowei Wu
3,
Darinka Vučković
4,
Maja Abram
4,
Qijing Zhang
3 and
Sonja Smole Možina
1
1
Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
3
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
4
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(12), 675; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120675
Submission received: 17 November 2019 / Revised: 5 December 2019 / Accepted: 7 December 2019 / Published: 10 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Antimicrobial Agents and Resistance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We investigated the anti-Campylobacter activity of pinocembrin and its mechanism of action, as well as Campylobacter responses to pinocembrin treatment at the genetic and phenotypic levels, using C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and a multidrug efflux system repressor mutant (11168ΔcmeR). At its minimal inhibitory concentration, pinocembrin significantly increased cell membrane permeability of Campylobacter. Interestingly, at sub-inhibitory concentrations, pinocembrin did not significantly alter membrane functionality and it increased bacterial fitness. Treatment with pinocembrin evoked decreased expression of ribosomal proteins and down-regulation of several NADH dehydrogenase I chain subunits and proteins involved in iron uptake. This suggests altered protein production and redox cycle and iron metabolism. Interestingly, the chelation of Fe ions during the treatment with pinocembrin increased C. jejuni survival, although there was no increase in the formation of reactive oxygen species. Pre-treatment of C. jejuni with sub-inhibitory concentrations of pinocembrin for 2 h resulted in a 1 log decrease in C. jejuni colony forming units in mice liver at 8 days post-infection, compared to untreated C. jejuni. These findings suggest that pinocembrin modulates the metabolic activity of C. jejuni and that pre-treatment of C. jejuni with pinocembrin influences its virulence potential in mice. This anti-Campylobacter potential of pinocembrin warrants further investigation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Campylobacteriosis was the most frequently reported zoonotic disease in humans in Europe over last decade [1]. Diarrhoeal disease and chronic complications of Campylobacter infection are common, including reactive arthritis and Guillain-Barré syndrome [2].
The European Centre for Disease Control has reported increased frequencies of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria and it is actively encouraging alternative strategies to control Campylobacter contamination and to combat infections without further increases in bacterial resistance [3]. Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni prevalence would decrease the risk of human exposure, which would have substantial positive impact on food safety and public health. Alternative approaches for prevention of Campylobacter contamination have been focused on the use of antimicrobials of natural origins. One such product is the 5,7-dihydroxyflavanone, pinocembrin, which is a major flavonoid that is used as a multifunctional active compound in the pharmaceutical industry [4,5,6]. Pinocembrin is found in a wide range of different plant species and is considered to be part of a normal healthy diet. It is commonly found in honey, propolis, and ginger roots [7]. Pinocembrin has a number of known pharmacological activities, including antibacterial activity [5,6]. However, its potential to inhibit Campylobacter has not been tested to date.
Resistance of C. jejuni to antimicrobials, including phenolic compounds and plant extracts, involves the activity of the main resistance-nodulation-cell-division (RND)-type efflux pump, known as CmeABC [8,9]. This efflux system is regulated through the transcriptional repressor CmeR, which is encoded by a gene that is positioned immediately upstream of cmeA and interacts directly with the promoter region of cmeABC, to modulate its expression [10]. Recently, Yang et al. [11] and Zhang et al. [12] defined the impact of substitutions, insertions, and deletions in the cmeR–cmeA intergenic region of C. jejuni and reported that strains with specific polymorphisms are more likely to show increased resistance to tetracycline, doxycycline, florfenicol, chloramphenicol and gentamicin [12,13]. This is due to decreased binding of CmeR to CmeABC, which results in overexpression of the efflux pump.
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of pinocembrin action in resistant Camplyobacter using a C. jejuni NCTC 11168 construct with an inactivated efflux system repressor (11168ΔcmeR) as a model strain with induced antimicrobial resistance. The effects of pinocembrin on growth kinetics, membrane integrity, oxidative stress induction, and global gene transcription were investigated in vitro. Finally, the potential virulence-modifying effects of C. jejuni pre-treatment with sub-inhibitory concentrations of pinocembrin were investigated in vivo through quantification of the bacterial burden in the liver of infected BALB/c mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for the reference strain C. jejuni NCTC 11168 (National Collection of Type Cultures) and for C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR, which has a disrupted open reading frame of the gene encoding for the efflux repressor cmeR, and thus provides a model strain of intrinsic resistance [10]. Additionally, two C. jejuni NCTC 11168 mutants with disrupted cmeB and cmeF genes were also included in the study [9]. Cultures were stored at −80 °C, and grown on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) with incubations at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, in 85% N2) for 24 h. The second passage of each culture in exponential growth phase was used in the experiments.

2.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Resistance Mechanism

The microdilution method was used to measure the MICs, with optical density measurements at 600 nm (OD600) and addition of a bacterial viability indicator (BacTiter-Glo reagent; Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) [14]. The MIC was the lowest concentration where no metabolic activity was observed after 24 h, on the basis of absence of a bioluminescence signal, measured using a microplate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf/Zurich, Switzerland) [14]. Stock solutions of pinocembrin were prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin was tested against C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and its efflux pump knockout mutant strains that lack functional genes for the efflux pumps CmeABC (ΔcmeB) and CmeDEF (ΔcmeF) and for the efflux pump repressor CmeR (ΔcmeR). Additionally, the antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin was tested using disc diffusion and agar-well diffusion according to EUCAST 2019 [15]. The contents of the compounds per disc (7 mm diameter) and well (4 mm diameter) were as follows: ciprofloxacin 5 µg, erythromycin 15 µg, and pinocembrin of 100 µg, 50 µg, 25 µg, and 12.5 µg. Ciprofloxacin and erythromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for comparisons of the antimicrobial effects. All of the MIC measurements were carried out in triplicate with appropriate controls.

2.3. Time-Kill Kinetics

The time-kill kinetics were determined for C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR using the broth microdilution method, with incubation at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions, as described previously [16]. Sequential plating of serial culture dilutions was carried out on Mueller-Hinton agar, at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h after addition of pinocembrin at 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC), 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), 64 µg/mL (MIC), and 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC). The colony forming units (CFUs) were counted after 24 h incubation at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions [16].

2.4. Membrane Integrity

The influence of pinocembrin on the membrane integrity of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR was investigated at 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) to 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC), using Live/Dead BacLight Bacterial Viability kits (L-7012; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), as reported previously [17]. Two individual experiments were carried out in duplicate. Membrane disruption (%) was calculated from the kinetics measurements of the treated relative to the untreated cultures [17].

2.5. Gene Expression

The influence of pinocembrin on gene expression in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR was evaluated using DNA microarray analysis and confirmed using quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR, as previously described [17]. Overnight log-phase cultures incubated for 16 h at 42 °C and under a microaerophilic atmosphere were adjusted to OD600 of 0.2 in Mueller-Hinton broth using a spectrophotometer (Smart Spec; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). These cultures were then treated with 16 µg/mL pinocembrin (i.e., 0.25 × MIC). DMSO (0.048%) was added as solvent to the untreated samples. These cultures were treated microaerobically for 2 h at 42 °C, with shaking. The experiments were carried out as three biological replicates. After the treatment, the RNA Protect Bacteria reagent (Qiagen, Maryland, USA) was added to the cultures to prevent mRNA degradation. Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen), and further treated using Ambion Turbo DNA-free kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), for removal of any contaminating DNA.
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a RT-PCR detection system (ABI 7500; Applied Biosystems, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the universal KAPA SYBR One-Step qRT-PCR kits (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA). The qRT-PCR primers (Supplementary Table S1) were designed using the Primer3 online tool. A standard quantification curve was generated for each RNA template using 10-fold serial dilutions from 25 ng/µL to 0.0025 ng/µL. Quantitation was performed in 15 µL reactions with three technical replicates of three biological replicates, using the following program: 10 min at 50 °C; 5 min at 60 °C; 3 min at 95 °C; and 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 30 s at 58 °C. The melt curve analysis was performed after the amplification. The 16S rRNA gene served as an internal normalization standard for calculation of the relative fold-changes in gene expression, using the comparative threshold cycle method (ΔΔCt) [18].

2.6. Intracellular Oxidation

The level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a result of treatments with a sub-inhibitory concentration of pinocembrin of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) was measured as described previously [14].

2.7. Oxidative Stress Reduction by Iron Chelation with 2,2-Dipyridyl

Campylobacter jejuni 11168∆cmeR suspensions (OD600, 0.2) were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline and then treated with pinocembrin (64 µg/mL), 2,2-dipyridyl (78 µg/mL) and pinocembrin and 2,2-dipyridyl combined [19]. An untreated Campylobacter culture was used as the control. The cultures were incubated for 24 h at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions. The experiment was carried out in triplicate, with sampling at 2, 6, and 24 h. The data are presented as log CFU/mL.

2.8. Motility Assay on Soft Agar

For the motility assay, C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR were grown overnight on Mueller-Hinton agar and then re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline to OD600 0.2. Pinocembrin was added to the Campylobacter cultures at 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC) and an untreated Campylobacter culture was used as the control. These cultures were incubated for 2 h at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions. One microliter of the bacterial suspension was stabbed into 0.5% Mueller-Hinton agar and incubated for 48 h at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions. Motility was defined as the diameters of the colonies, with two independent experiments carried out in triplicate.

2.9. In-Vivo Testing of Campylobacter Virulence Potential

These experiments used C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR as controls, and the same C. jejuni strains pre-treated with 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC) pinocembrin for 2 h at 42 °C under microaerobic conditions. The strains were grown overnight on Mueller-Hinton agar and re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline to OD600 0.2. In vivo experiments were performed in BALB/c mice according to ethical clearance No. 2170-24-01-3-07-02 and as previously described [19].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out for the antimicrobial assays, intracellular oxidation, oxidative stress reduction by iron chelation, and intracellular energy metabolism by one-way ANOVA using SPSS Statistics 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical analysis of the microarray results was carried out in R, using the LIMMA package [20].

3. Results

3.1. Anti-Campylobacter Activity of Pinocembrin, and the Resistance Mechanism

To evaluate the anti-Campylobacter activity of pinocembrin and the role of active efflux in Campylobacter resistance against pinocembrin, we determined the MICs for the wild-type C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and the three knockout mutants of C. jejuni NCTC 11168, with the defective efflux transporter genes cmeB and cmeF and transcriptional repressor cmeR. The antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin was moderate against C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and weaker compared to the antibiotics ciprofloxacin (MIC 0.062 µg/mL) and erythromycin (MIC 0.250 µg/mL), with a MIC of 64 µg/mL. When tested against the efflux pump mutants, the greatest changes in the susceptibility to pinocembrin were seen in the cmeB gene mutant, with decreased MICs for pinocembrin of 4-fold (Table 1). With the cmeF and cmeR mutants, no MIC changes were seen (Table 1, Supplementary Table S2), as compared with the wild-type C. jejuni NCTC 11168.

3.2. Campylobacter Fitness under Pinocembrin Treatment

The antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR was further tested according to the time-kill kinetics of pinocembrin at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), at the MIC of 64 µg/mL, and at the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC). The survival of the ΔcmeR mutant was significantly decreased by over 4 log units at the MIC after 24 h of incubation at 42 °C, in comparison to the untreated control, as seen from the growth curves shown in Figure 1. With the treatment of the double MIC pinocembrin, the bactericidal effects were seen already after 1 h of exposure of C. jejuni to pinocembrin, with the viability decreased by over 1 log unit; after 6 h, all of the C. jejuni were dead (Figure 1). Interestingly, the viability of the ΔcmeR mutant increased by 1 log unit in the presence of both of the sub-inhibitory pinocembrin concentrations, as seen from the kinetics of the inactivation curves over 24 h (Figure 1).

3.3. Alterations of Campylobacter Membrane Integrity by Pinocembrin

The influence of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR membrane integrity was evaluated at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), at the MIC of 64 µg/mL, and at the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC). As expected, the highest pinocembrin (i.e., supra-inhibitory concentration) had large effects, with disruption of membrane integrity almost complete within 2 h (p < 0.05). At the MIC of pinocembrin, the membrane permeability was increased by 77% compared to the untreated culture (p < 0.05). All of the sub-inhibitory pinocembrin concentrations significantly altered membrane permeability in comparison to the untreated control (Figure 2).

3.4. Changes in Campylobacter Gene Expression by Pinocembrin

To define other possible modes of pinocembrin activity in Campylobacter, we evaluated the Campylobacter responses to the sub-inhibitory pinocembrin concentration of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC). This treatment was expected to up-regulate the expression of genes in key pathways that are targeted by pinocembrin. After a 2-h treatment, 70 genes of NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR were differentially transcribed (with cut-off set at ≥2-fold difference; Table 2). Of these, 44 were up-regulated and 26 were down-regulated. The functional classification of these differentially expressed genes revealed that they were mainly involved in cell processes (23 genes), macromolecule metabolism (19 genes), and small molecule metabolism (16 genes).
The up-regulated genes after pinocembrin treatment were spread across 12 of the functional categories (Table 2, Supplementary Table S3), with most involved in small molecule metabolism (11) and macromolecule metabolism (10). For the small molecule metabolism, these genes were mostly involved in: energy metabolism (electron transport, aerobic metabolism); encoding of NADH dehydrogenase I (nuoN, nuoK, nuoL, nuoH); biosynthesis of co-cofactors, prosthetic groups, and carriers (molybdopterin, thiredoxin trxA, thiamine moeB); and amino-acid biosynthesis (serine family) and cysteine synthase (cysM). The cj1153 gene was previously identified as a putative periplasmic cytochrome C that is involved in energy metabolism and was strongly up-regulated in this study (4.16-fold). The up-regulated genes for macromolecule metabolism were involved in the cell envelope, inside the groups of: membranes, lipoproteins, and porins; surface polysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides, and antigens (pglJ); surface structures with several flagellum genes (fliK, flaC, flgE2, flaA, flgB, flgD); and for a miscellaneous periplasmic protein (p19). Among these, the serine protease htrA was also expressed, with a function in degradation of macromolecules, such as proteins, peptides, and glycopeptides. Under the broad regulatory functions, two genes were up-regulated in signal transduction processes. Interestingly, the most strongly up-regulated genes (Cj414, 9.04-fold; Cj415, 7.78-fold; Cj1338, 3.73-fold) showed miscellaneous functions (8 genes) and unknown functions (Table 2, Supplementary Table S3).
On the other hand, under this pinocembrin treatment, the down-regulated genes were scattered across eight functional categories (Table 2, Supplementary Table S3). Similarly, most of these genes were involved in cell processes (11), including transport/ binding proteins (amino acids and amines, carbohydrates, organic acids, alcohols) and pathogenicity. Cj0864 and Cj1358c were the most down-regulated genes, which encode a putative periplasmic protein (3.14-fold reduction), and a nrfH putative periplasmic cytochrome C (2.73-fold reduction), respectively. Among the genes involved in macromolecule metabolism (9 genes), five ribosomal proteins were down-regulated (rpsD, rpsK, rpsM, rpsA, rpmG), with two of these at higher levels (rpsA, rpmG: from 2.74-fold reduction to 2.87-fold reduction). Together with rRNA methylase (cstA) and transcription anti-termination protein (nusG), these genes are involved in synthesis and modification of macromolecules: both ribosomal and RNA synthesis. Two membrane proteins belong to the group of the cell envelope. Five genes with functions in small molecule metabolism are involved in energy metabolism, mostly in electron transport (nrfG, nrfA, iron Sulphur protein). Interestingly, the highly down-regulated aspartate ammonia–lyse protein (aspA) (3.05-fold reduction) is involved in central intermediary metabolism, with a general function. Three down-regulated proteins show other functions (2 genes) or miscellaneous functions (1 gene).
With qRT-PCR, up-regulation was confirmed for the superoxide dismutase (Fe) (sodB) gene and the putative flagellar hook assembly protein (flgD), and down-regulation was confirmed for three genes, namely the 30S ribosomal protein S4 (rpsD), carbon starvation protein A homologue with putative function as an integral membrane protein (cstA), and putative periplasmic cytochrome C (nrfH). These three genes (cstA, aspA, nrfH) have important functions in macromolecule metabolism, small molecule metabolism, and cell processes, respectively, and they were strongly down-regulated by more than 2.5-fold reduction.

3.5. Intracellular ROS Formation

To confirm that oxidative stress was one of the key mechanisms of the pinocembrin antimicrobial activity, as suggested by the gene expression analyses, the intracellular levels of ROS were determined after treatment of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR with 0.25 × MIC pinocembrin. The results did not confirm oxidative stress as one of the key antimicrobial mechanisms. The differences in intracellular levels of ROS between the treated and untreated cultures were not significant (p = 0.266) (Supplementary Figure S1).

3.6. Inhibition of Pinocembrin Activity with Fe Chelator 2,2-Dipyridyl

To examine the influence of pinocembrin on hydroxyl radical formation, we tested the viability of the C. jejuni 11168 ΔcmeR cultures under treatment with pinocembrin and 2,2-dipyridyl. 2,2-Dipyridyl is an iron chelator that can reduce harmful hydroxyl radicals generated in the Fenton reaction [22]. We found a significant influence of 2,2-dipyridyl on the pinocembrin action, especially after 24 h of treatment. The viabilities of the C. jejuni cultures treated with the combination of pinocembrin at the inhibitory concentration of 64 µg/mL plus 2,2-dipyridyl were significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to those treated with the pinocembrin alone. Pinocembrin decreased C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR viability by 2 log units after 24 h, which was decreased to 1 log unit with the addition of 2,2-dipyridyl. Treatment with 2,2-dipyridyl alone increased the viability by 0.5 log unit compared to the untreated C. jejuni cultures (Figure 3).

3.7. Modulation of Campylobacter Motility

The influence of pinocembrin on the motility of C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR was measured on soft agar, as compared to untreated cells. After 2-h treatment with the sub-inhibitory pinocembrin concentration of 0.5 × MIC, the C. jejuni motility increased significantly. The diameter of the untreated C. jejuni cultures was 21.2 ± 1.6 mm, whereas after the pinocembrin treatment, this was 31.0 ± 1.9 mm (Table 3).

3.8. Modulation of Campylobacter Virulence under Pinocembrin Treatment

The influence of the sub-inhibitory pinocembrin concentration (32 µg/mL; 0.5 × MIC) on C. jejuni virulence was tested in a murine model. Four groups of BALB/c mice were intravenously infected with C. jejuni NCTC 11168 wild-type and the C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR mutant, as either untreated or pre-treated with the sub-inhibitory concentration of pinocembrin. After an initial and significant rise in the number of C. jejuni isolated for the third day post-infection, at eight days post-infection, the number of C. jejuni recovered from the mice livers in the pinocembrin-treated group diminished significantly in comparison to the untreated control (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

We have demonstrated antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin against C. jejuni and indicated possible mechanisms of its action. Specific intracellular sites of action and derivative targets would need to be further investigated to fully understand the mechanism of the mode of action of pinocembrin. Pinocembrin can potentially be used for medical applications or to serve as a chemical template for the design, synthesis and semi-synthesis of new substances for treatment of human Campylobacter infections [5,7].
In the present study, we first characterized the anti-Campylobacter activity of pinocembrin and defined the specific roles of the CmeABC and CmeDEF efflux pumps in resistance to pinocembrin. The 4-fold decrease in MIC of the mutant defective in cmeB, compared to wild-type, indicates possible involvement of the CmeABC efflux pump in the resistance against pinocembrin. The disruption of cmeF and cmeR did not have any effects on the MIC, which indicated that the CmeDEF efflux pump is not likely to be involved in Campylobacter protection against pinocembrin when CmeABC functions normally. These data are consistent with a previous study of Klančnik et al. [9], where the CmeABC efflux pump was shown to be an important resistance mechanism against plant extracts and phenolic compounds in C. jejuni. Therefore, further experiments were carried out on a null mutant in a cmeABC transcriptional repressor (ΔcmeR) that models an intrinsically resistant strain.
To determine the kinetics of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR, growth was tested at sub-inhibitory, inhibitory, and supra-inhibitory pinocembrin concentrations. These data confirmed pinocembrin as a bacteriostatic antimicrobial that sufficiently prevents growth at the MIC and significantly decreases viability at a supra-inhibitory concentration. Conversely, sub-inhibitory concentrations enhanced bacterial fitness.
Antibiotics targeting intracellular processes must penetrate the bacterial cell envelope. This applies in particular to the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, as this provides a formidable barrier [23]. We have shown here that pinocembrin affects the membrane integrity at inhibitory and sub-inhibitory concentrations, and that the effects observed are concentration dependent. As pinocembrin can increase membrane permeability and also act as an antimicrobial, it might be suitable for use in combination with other antimicrobials with low membrane permeability, to achieve synergistic effects. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of pinocembrin only slightly modulated Campylobacter membrane permeability and thus we can conclude that at sub-inhibitory concentrations, pinocembrin does not significantly decrease cell viability, but promotes bacterial growth and increases bacterial fitness. The up-regulation of 11 genes and down-regulation of 5 genes after exposure of C. jejuni to pinocembrin might indicate that pinocembrin treatment induces stress responses in Campylobacter cells. Additionally, the higher number of up-regulated genes involved in energy metabolism suggests stress responses [24]. Further, nine up-regulated genes involved in cell envelope synthesis indicate possible envelope stress responses [25].
These findings led us to investigate the effects of a sub-inhibitory concentration of pinocembrin on gene expression in C. jejuni NCTC 11168 ΔcmeR using microarrays and qRT-PCR. The most significantly up-regulated genes (>7-fold) were putative oxidoreductase subunits of unknown function (Cj0414, Cj0415). These two co-transcribed genes encode the two components of gluconate-oxidizing oxidoreductase, which is predicted to be localized in the periplasm, to peripherally associate with the cytoplasmic membrane, and to transfer electrons to periplasmic cytochrome c [26]. Up-regulation of these genes was seen also in response to acid shock, but it is not clear how this activity would contribute to the C. jejuni acid-shock response [27]. The changed transcription of a larger number of important genes points to a wider systemic response of C. jejuni in the presence of pinocembrin. We note here the significance of molybdoproteins Cj0725c, Cj0379c, and Cj1046-moeB, as these are also important in competition with the host microbiota. Moreover, for the genes involved in respiratory functions, as for the putative periplasmic cytochrome C (cj1153), which is important in defense against H2O2 through the reduction and detoxification of exogenous H2O2 [28,29]. Similarly, for the C551 peroxidase Cj0358, as one of the most down-regulated genes (2.89-fold reduction), which confirms that it is not significant in the resistance of C. jejuni against H2O2 [28,30]. On the other hand, two periplasmic cytochrome C proteins nrfA (Cj1357c) and nrfH (Cj1358c), and the putative ferredoxin napG (Cj0781; known as periplasmic located Nap-type nitrate reductase) were down-regulated in this study, which will disable nitrate as an electron acceptor in C. jejuni and further the reduction of nitrate to nitrite [30,31].
Up-regulation of the oxidative stress response genes sodB, ahpC, and tpx observed in the microarray study here indicates that pinocembrin treatment generates toxic ROS, like hydroxyl (·OH) and superoxide (O−2) radicals, as well as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Increased ROS causes damage to DNA, membranes, and proteins in the bacterial cell [32]. Consequently, a variety of ROS-detoxifying enzymes were expressed at the highest levels, which included the alkyl hydroxide reductase AhpC [33], superoxide dismutase SodB [34], and the thiolperoxidases Tpx [31,35]. The expression of oxidative stress defense genes in C. jejuni (e.g., dps, sodB, trxB, ahpC) was shown to increase also by exposure to HCl or acetic acid [36,37], which links the oxidative stress response mechanism and the acid-shock response in C. jejuni [27]. Additionally, the serine protease htrA (Cj1228c), required for heat and oxygen tolerance [38], was up-regulated, which indicated that it might be important for protection against pinocembrin treatment. As is known, these genes are also important to counteract oxidative and other stresses for optimal interactions with human epithelial cells, and during the host colonization processes of C. jejuni [38,39,40,41]. Recently, Kendall et al. [42] indicated that the OORC subunit of 2-oxoglutarate:acceptor oorC is one of the important genes involved in oxygen tolerance of C. jejuni. This gene (oorC; cj0538) was also up-regulated by pinocembrin.
This led us to investigate the phenotypic effects of pinocembrin on intracellular ROS formation and the decrease in hydroxyl radical formation by an iron chelator, which might explain the pinocembrin killing mechanism. Increased ROS levels in cells might indicate that oxidation occurs and antioxidant defense systems are a target of pinocembrin action. Previous studies of pinocembrin have shown its antioxidative activity in vitro as well as in vivo [43], while others have reported that it can cause oxidative damage in the presence of transition metal ions [44]. The underlying mechanism is thus relatively complex and no significantly decreased intracellular oxidation was observed in the present study. This might have been due to the mild oxidative stress caused by pinocembrin, rather than to its antioxidative activity. According to the results of our transcriptional study, weak oxidative stress induces the expression of oxidative stress defense genes. The higher levels of defensive enzymes can therefore efficiently neutralize ROS, which provides a protective effect that is reflected as ROS inhibition and time-kill kinetics. Furthermore, we confirmed the involvement of oxidative stress in the pinocembrin antibacterial activity by using 2,2-dipyridyl, an iron chelator that is involved in decreasing hydroxyl radical formation in the Fenton reaction When the C. jejuni cultures were treated with the combination of pinocembrin and 2,2-dipyridyl, the C. jejuni numbers compared to the treatment with only pinocembrin were halved. However, 2,2-dipyridyl did not counteract the effects of pinocembrin completely, which confirmed that oxidative stress is only part of the mechanism of pinocembrin. The involvements of other mechanisms together with oxidative stress, such as membrane disruption, are key mechanisms in the antimicrobial activity of pinocembrin.
It is known that as well as serine, proline, and glutamate catabolism, aspartate is crucial for the metabolic fitness of C. jejuni [45]. In the present study, down-regulated expression was seen for the C4-dicarboxylate transporter gene dcuB (Cj0671) and the aspartase gene aspA (Cj0087), both of which are important for persistence of C. jejuni in its host [44,45]. Down-regulation with pinocembrin was also seen for the putative HAMP-containing membrane protein Cj0952c, which affects chemotactic behavior towards formic acid and is important for invasion of host cells [45], the Cj0073c gene, which is important for NAD-independent respiratory lactate dehydrogenase activity, and the Cj0903c gene, which is a gene for putative amino-acid transporters with homology to members of the sodium:alanine symporter family with unknown substrate specificity [45]. The down-regulation of ribosomal proteins observed with pinocembrin treatment correlated with the lower levels required for protein synthesis and biosynthesis of amino acids, purines and fatty acids during the extended intracellular persistence inside the Campylobacter-containing vacuole. Further, several protein-degrading and peptide-degrading proteins and transporters involved in the uptake of amino acids, phosphate, and metals showed lower levels 20 h post-infection [45]. In contrast, a transporter involved in the uptake of iron cfbpA (Cj0175c) was up-regulated under pinocembrin.
The C. jejuni bipolar flagellum is particularly important for its motility. Interestingly, under pinocembrin treatment, the up-regulated proteins are involved in all three conserved parts of the bipolar flagellum; namely, the basal body, hook, and filament. In the present study, flagellin flaA (Cj1139c) was up-regulated, which is one of two flagellins (FlaA, FlaB) of the flagellar filament [28,46]. The flagellar channel serves as a non-conventional type III secretion system that is necessary for the export of the adhesive protein FlaC that influences invasion and interactions with the host environment [46]. This flagellin gene flaC (Cj0720c) was up-regulated by 2.22-fold under pinocembrin treatment. Similarly, there was up-regulation of some flagellar hook protein regulatory genes: fliK (Cj0041), which encodes a hook length control and export specificity switch, and flgD (Cj0042) and flgE (Cj1729c), which have important roles in motility, flagellar filament assembly, hook assembly, and regulation of flagellin synthesis and secretion [47]. The basal body constitutes a major portion of the flagellar organelle and consists of a number of rings that are mounted on a central rod [46]. The gene flgB (Cj0528c) encodes the flagellar basal body rod protein FlgB and this was up-regulated 2.15-fold under pinocembrin treatment. Furthermore, Gaynor et al. [48] reported that protein misfolding and degradation are consistent with a stress-related response to misdirection of the assembly of the flagellum.
In Campylobacter, flagellar biosynthesis is co-regulated with virulence [46], making motility a major virulence factor in its infection and pathogenesis [49,50]. We confirmed the data from the transcriptomic analysis at a phenotypic level, with significantly increased Campylobacter motility after pinocembrin treatment. This confirmed the importance of up-regulated genes involved in flagellar assembly and motility after pinocembrin treatment. Up-regulation of flagellar genes and increased motility in Campylobacter have been linked to acid-shock exposure [51]. In agreement with this, in acid-shocked Campylobacter there is increased expression of flagellar biosynthetic genes, as genes involved in oxidative and general stress responses. This response presents a problem, as acid shock in Campylobacter not only increases their motility, but also increases their passing through the acidic gastric environment and their ability to invade the m-ICcl2 mouse small intestine crypt cells [51].
We noted that under pinocembrin treatment, C. jejuni ΔcmeR showed up-regulation of the expression of heat-shock, acid-shock, and oxygen stress response genes. It is known that the flagellum (basal body, hook, and filament portions) and also the heat-shock response in C. jejuni influences colonization of a chicken host [40,52,53]. In the present study, we investigated the systemic infection of BALB/c mice with pinocembrin-treated C. jejuni ΔcmeR. On the third day after infection, the number of pinocembrin-treated Campylobacter was higher than that in the control group, which can be explained by the up-regulation of motility-associated proteins, including flaA, flaC, and fliK, and stress-response genes that contribute to the resistance of C. jejuni in the host environment. Despite this initial increase, there were later reductions in the bacterial numbers in the liver of the host, with a drop in numbers by the eighth day post-infection, which makes the advantage at day three a temporary phenomenon. This suggests increased sensitivity of pinocembrin-treated Campylobacter to the host immune response. Consequently, pinocembrin-treated C. jejuni cells were less likely to persist in the host.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, pinocembrin, a compound naturally occurring in foods such as honey, shows antimicrobial activity towards Campylobacter through reduction of membrane integrity. However, this activity is lost at a sub-inhibitory concentration of pinocembrin, which also, in contrast, promotes bacterial growth and increases bacterial fitness. The subinhibitory concentration of pinocembrin modified transcription of Campylobacter genes involved in cell-wall synthesis, heat-shock, acid-shock, and oxidative-stress, which is likely to result in improved fitness, membrane integrity and oxidative stress defense.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/7/12/675/s1: Figure S1: Time-course of influence of sub-inhibitory pinocembrin (16 μg/mL; 0.25 × MIC) on intracellular reactive oxygen species in Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR; Table S1: Primers of the genes for qRT-PCR confirmation used in this study; Table S2: Antimicrobial activity of ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg), erythromycin (ERY 15 μg) and pinocembrin (Pc 100 μg, 50 μg, 25 μg, 12.5 μg) against C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and its efflux pump knockout mutant strains lacking the functional genes for efflux pumps CmeABC (ΔcmeB) and CmeDEF (ΔcmeF), and the efflux pump repressor CmeR (ΔcmeR), presented as inhibition zone diameters (mm); Table S3: Differentially expressed genes after treatment of C. jejuni 11168 ΔcmeR with pinocembrin (0.25 × MIC).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: A.K., J.K., O.S., Z.W., D.V., and Q.Z.; performed the experiments: A.K., K.Š., J.K., and O.S; analyzed the data: A.K., K.Š., J.K, O.S., W.U., D.V., and Q.Z.; contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: A.K., S.S.M., M.A., and Q.Z. Wrote the paper: A.K., K.Š., J.K, O.S., Z.W., D.V., M.A., Q.Z., and S.S.M.

Funding

The study was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant No. P4-0116, J4-9299), and bilateral SI-USA projects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EFSA. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2016. EFSA J. 2017, 15, 5077. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nyati, K.K.; Nyati, R. Role of Campylobacter jejuni infection in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome: an update. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 859125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. ECDC. Antimicrobial Resistance in Zoonotic Bacteria Still High in Humans, Animals and Food, Say ECDC and EFSA. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). 2018. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/antimicrobial-resistance-zoonotic-bacteria-still-high-humans-animals-and-food-say-ecdc (accessed on 9 December 2019).
  4. Friedman, M. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria: prevalence in food and inactivation by food-compatible compounds and plant extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3805–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lan, X.; Wang, W.; Li, Q.; Wang, J. The natural flavonoid pinocembrin: Molecular targets and potential therapeutic applications. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1794–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Aiello, F.; Armentano, B.; Polerà, N.; Carullo, G.; Loizzo, R.M.; Bonesi, M.; Cappello, M.S.; Capobianco, L.; Tundis, R. From vegetable waste to new agents for potential health applications: Antioxidant properties and effects of extracts, fractions and pinocembrin from Glycyrrhiza glabra L. aerial parts on viability of five human cancer cell lines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7944–7954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rasul, A.; Millimouno, F.M.; Ali Eltayb, W.; Ali, M.; Li, J.; Li, X. Pinocembrin: a novel natural compound with versatile pharmacological and biological activities. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 203, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, J.; Overbye, M.L.; Zhang, Q. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antim. Agents Chemotherap. 2002, 46, 2124–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Klančnik, A.; Smole Možina, S.; Zhang, Q. Anti-Campylobacter activities and resistance mechanisms of natural phenolic compounds in Campylobacter. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lin, J.; Akiba, M.; Sahin, O.; Zhang, Q. CmeR functions as a transcriptional repressor for the multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in Campylobacter jejuni. Antim. Agents Chemotherap. 2005, 49, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yang, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, J.; Pang, L.; Wang, G.; Hou, F. The molecular mechanisms of ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical Campylobacter jejuni and their genotyping characteristics in Beijing, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2017, 14, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, T.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, Q.; Lu, Q.; Dong, J.; Zhang, R.; Wen, G.; Wang, H.; Luo, L.; Wang, H.; et al. Correlation between gyrA and CmeR box polymorphism and fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni isolates in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemoth. 2017, 61, e00422-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lekshmi, M.; Ammini, P.; Kumar, S.; Varela, M.F. The food production environment and the development of antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens of animal origin. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Klančnik, A.; Guzej, B.; Hadolin Kolar, M.; Abramovič, H.; Smole Možina, S. In-vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of commercial rosemary extract formulations. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1744–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. EUCAST 2019. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 9.0, 2019. Available online: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_9.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2019).
  16. Klančnik, A.; Piskernik, S.; Jeršek, B.; Smole Možina, S. Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antibacterial activity of plant extracts. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kovač, J.; Šimunović, K.; Wu, Z.; Klančnik, A.; Bucar, F.; Zhang, Q. Smole Možina, S. Antibiotic resistance modulation and modes of action of (-)-α-pinene in Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klančnik, A.; Vučković, D.; Plankl, M.; Abram, M.; Smole Možina, S. In-vivo modulation of Campylobacter jejuni virulence in response to environmental stress. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Z.; Sahin, O.; Shen, Z.; Liu, P.; Miller, W.G.; Zhang, Q. Multi-omics approaches to deciphering a hypervirulent strain of Campylobacter jejuni. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5, 2217–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Riley, M.; Labedan, B. Gene products: physiological functions and common ancestries. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd ed.; Neidhardt, F.C., Curtiss, R., III, Ingraham, J.L., Lin, E.C.C., Low, K.B., Magasanik, B., Reznikoff, W.S., Riley, M., Schaechter, M., Umbarger, H.E., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 2118–2202. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kohanski, M.A.; Dwyer, D.J.; Hayete, B.; Lawrence, C.A.; Collins, J.J. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 2007, 130, 797–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Delcour, A.H. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1794, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Schwachtje, J.; Whitcomb, S.J.; Firmino, A.A.P.; Zuther, E.; Hincha, D.K.; Kopka, K. Induced, Imprinted, and primed responses to changing environments: Does metabolism store and process information? Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hews, C.L.; Cho, T.; Rowley, G.; Raivio, T.L. Maintaining integrity under stress: envelope stress response regulation of pathogenesis in gram-negative bacteria. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Pajaniappan, M.; Hall, J.E.; Cawthraw, S.A.; Newell, D.G.; Gaynor, E.C.; Fields, J.A.; Rathbun, K.M.; Agee, W.A.; Burns, C.M.; Hall, S.J.; et al. A temperature-regulated Campylobacter jejuni gluconate dehydrogenase is involved in respiration-dependent energy conservation and chicken colonization. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 474–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Reid, A.N.; Pandey, R.; Palyada, K.; Naikare, H.; Stintzi, A. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in the response to acidic pH and stomach transit. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1583–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hendrixsonm, D.R.; DiRitam, V.J. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in commensal colonization of the chick gastrointestinal tract. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sellars, M.J.; Hall, S.J.; Kelly, D.J. Growth of Campylobacter jejuni supported by respiration of fumarate, nitrate, nitrite, trimethylamine-N-oxide, or dimethyl sulfoxide requires oxygen. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4187–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bingham-Ramos, L.K.; Hendrixson, D.R. Characterization of two putative cytochrome c peroxidases of Campylobacter jejuni involved in promoting commensal colonization of poultry. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, J.-C.; Oh, E.; Kim, J.; Jeon, B. Regulation of oxidative stress resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, a microaerophilic foodborne pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pittman, M.S.; Elvers, K.T.; Lee, L.; Jones, M.A.; Poole, R.K.; Park, S.F.; Kelly, D.J. Growth of Campylobacter jejuni on nitrate and nitrite: electron transport to NapA and NrfA via NrfH and distinct roles for NrfA and the globin Cgb in protection against nitrosative stress. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baillon, M.L.; Van Vliet, A.H.; Ketley, J.M.; Constantinidou, C.; Penn, C.W. An iron-regulated alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) confers aerotolerance and oxidative stress resistance to the microaerophilic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4798–4804. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Pesci, E.C.; Cottle, D.L.; Pickett, C.L. Genetic, enzymatic, and pathogenic studies of the iron superoxide dismutase of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 2687–2694. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Atack, J.M.; Kelly, D.J. Contribution of the stereospecific methionine sulphoxide reductases MsrA and MsrB to oxidative and nitrosative stress resistance in the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology 2008, 154, 2219–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Murphy, C.; Carroll, C.; Jordan, K.N. Induction of an adaptive tolerance response in the foodborne pathogen, Campylobacter jejuni. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 23, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Birk, T.; Wik, M.T.; Lametsch, R.; Knøchel, S. Acid stress response and protein induction in Campylobacter jejuni isolates with different acid tolerance. BMC Microbiol. 2012, 12, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Brøndsted, L.; Andersen, M.T.; Parker, M.; Jørgensen, K.; Ingmer, H. The HtrA protease of Campylobacter jejuni is required for heat and oxygen tolerance and for optimal interaction with human epithelial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 3205–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Novik, V.; Hofreuter, D.; Galán, J.E. Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in its interaction with epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 3540–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Palyada, K.; Sun, Y.Q.; Flint, A.; Butcher, J.; Naikare, H.; Stintzi, A. Characterization of the oxidative stress stimulon and PerR regulon of Campylobacter jejuni. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Stintzi, A.; Marlow, D.; Palyada, K.; Naikare, H.; Panciera, R.; Whitworth, L.; Clarke, C. Use of genome-wide expression profiling and mutagenesis to study the intestinal lifestyle of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 1797–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kendall, J.J.; Barrero-Tobon, A.M.; Hendrixson, D.R.; Kelly, D.J. Hemerythrins in the microaerophilic bacterium Campylobacter jejuni help protect key iron-sulphur cluster enzymes from oxidative damage. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mavri, A.; Abramovič, H.; Polak, T.; Bertoncelj, J.; Jamnik, P.; Smole Možina, S.; Jeršek, B. Chemical properties and antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Slovenian propolis. Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 1545–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tsai, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-H.; Liou, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.-C. Induction of oxidative DNA damage by flavonoids of propolis: its mechanism and implication about antioxidant capacity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 13, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hofreuter, D. Defining the metabolic requirements for the growth and colonization capacity of Campylobacter jejuni. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Carrillo, C.D.; Taboada, E.; Nash, J.H.E.; Lanthier, P.; Kelly, J.; Lau, P.C.; Verhulp, R.; Mykytczuk, O.; Jonathan, S.; Findlay, W.A.; et al. Genome-wide expression analyses of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 reveals coordinate regulation of motility and virulence by flhA. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 20327–20338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Gaynor, E.C.; Cawthraw, S.; Manning, G.; MacKichan, J.K.; Falkow, S.; Newell, D.G. The genome-sequenced variant of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 and the original clonal clinical isolate differ markedly in colonization, gene expression, and virulence-associated phenotypes. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 503–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gaynor, E.C.; Wells, D.H.; MacKichan, J.K.; Falkow, S. The Campylobacter jejuni stringent response controls specific stress survival and virulence-associated phenotypes. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Guerry, P.; Poly, F.; Riddle, M.; Maue, A.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Monteiro, M.A. Campylobacter polysaccharide capsules: virulence and vaccines. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Stintzi, C.M.; King, M.; Haardt, M.; Armstrong, G.D. Campylobacter jejuni motility and invasion of Caco-2 cells. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 4295–4300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Le, M.T.; Porcelli, I.; Weight, C.M.; Gaskin, D.J.H.; Carding, S.R.; van Vliet, A.H.M. Acid-shock of Campylobacter jejuni induces flagellar gene expression and host cell invasion. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2012, 2, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kalmokoff, M.; Lanthier, P.; Tremblay, T.L.; Foss, M.; Lau, P.C.; Sanders, G.; Austin, J.; Kelly, J.; Szymanski, C.M. Proteomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni 11168 biofilms reveals a role for the motility complex in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 4312–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Konkel, M.E.; Kim, B.J.; Klena, J.D.; Young, C.R.; Ziprin, R. Characterization of the thermal stress response of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 3666–3672. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 07 00675 g001 550
Figure 1. Time-kill kinetics of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), the inhibitory concentration of 64 µg/mL (MIC), and the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC), as indicated.
Figure 1. Time-kill kinetics of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), the inhibitory concentration of 64 µg/mL (MIC), and the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC), as indicated.
Microorganisms 07 00675 g001
Microorganisms 07 00675 g002 550
Figure 2. Influence of pinocembrin on membrane integrity of C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR after 2-h treatment at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), at 64 µg/mL (MIC), and at the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC), as indicated. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Influence of pinocembrin on membrane integrity of C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR after 2-h treatment at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), at 64 µg/mL (MIC), and at the supra-inhibitory concentration of 128 µg/mL (2 × MIC), as indicated. * p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 07 00675 g002
Microorganisms 07 00675 g003 550
Figure 3. Inhibition of the pinocembrin (64 µg/mL; MIC) antibacterial activity on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR with the iron chelator 2,2-dipyridyl (78 µg/mL), as indicated. *, p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Inhibition of the pinocembrin (64 µg/mL; MIC) antibacterial activity on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR with the iron chelator 2,2-dipyridyl (78 µg/mL), as indicated. *, p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 07 00675 g003
Microorganisms 07 00675 g004 550
Figure 4. Influence of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR in the livers of BALB/c mice. The mice were intravenously infected with untreated C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR or C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR treated with pinocembrin at the sub-inhibitory concentration of 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), as indicated. Data are means ±standard deviation of C. jejuni colony-forming units (CFU)/liver. *, p = 0.006, **, p = 0.012, ***, p = 0.018 and ****, p = 0.024.
Figure 4. Influence of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR in the livers of BALB/c mice. The mice were intravenously infected with untreated C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR or C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR treated with pinocembrin at the sub-inhibitory concentration of 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), as indicated. Data are means ±standard deviation of C. jejuni colony-forming units (CFU)/liver. *, p = 0.006, **, p = 0.012, ***, p = 0.018 and ****, p = 0.024.
Microorganisms 07 00675 g004
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial activities of ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and pinocembrin against C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and its efflux pump knockout mutant strains that lack functional genes for efflux pumps CmeABC (ΔcmeB) and CmeDEF (ΔcmeF), and the efflux pump repressor CmeR (ΔcmeR), presented as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in µg/mL.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activities of ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and pinocembrin against C. jejuni NCTC 11168 and its efflux pump knockout mutant strains that lack functional genes for efflux pumps CmeABC (ΔcmeB) and CmeDEF (ΔcmeF), and the efflux pump repressor CmeR (ΔcmeR), presented as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in µg/mL.
StrainMIC (µg/mL)
CiprofloxacinErythromycinPinocembrin
C. jejuni NCTC 111680.0620.2564
C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeB0.0160.06216
C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeF0.1250.2564
C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR0.250.564
Table
Table 2. Differentially expressed genes after treatment of C. jejuni 11168 ΔcmeR with pinocembrin (16 µg/mL, as 0.25 × MIC).
Table 2. Differentially expressed genes after treatment of C. jejuni 11168 ΔcmeR with pinocembrin (16 µg/mL, as 0.25 × MIC).
Functional Classification of
Predicted C. jejuni Genes *		Differentially Expressed
Genes (n)		Up-Regulated
Genes (n)		Down-Regulated Genes (n)
1 Small molecule metabolism16115
1.B Energy metabolism 64
1.G Biosynthesis of cofactors, prosthetic groups and carriers 40
1.C Central intermediary metabolism 01
1.D Amino acid biosynthesis 10
2 Broad regulatory functions220
2.1 Signal transduction 2
3 Macromolecule metabolism20109
3.A Synthesis and modification of macromolecules 07
3.B Degradation of macromolecules 10
3.C Cell envelope 92
4 Cell processes231211
4.A Transport/ binding proteins 42
4.E Protein and peptide secretion 10
4.G Detoxification 30
4.I Pathogenicity 47
5 Other312
5.H Conserved hypothetical proteins 12
6. Miscellaneous981
Total73
* Classification is based on that used for Escherichia coli by Riley, M. and Labedan, B. in Escherichia coli and Salmonella (ed. Neidhardt, F.C.) 2118–2202 (ASM, Washington, 1996) [21].
Table
Table 3. Influence of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR motility on soft agar after 2-h treatment at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), as indicated. Data are means ±standard deviation for the diameter measured on the agar plate.
Table 3. Influence of pinocembrin on C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeR motility on soft agar after 2-h treatment at the sub-inhibitory concentrations of 16 µg/mL (0.25 × MIC) and 32 µg/mL (0.5 × MIC), as indicated. Data are means ±standard deviation for the diameter measured on the agar plate.
C. jejuni NCTC 11168ΔcmeRDiameter (mm)
Untreated21.2 ± 1.57
Pinocembrin (0.25 × MIC)19 ± 0.81
Pinocembrin (0. 5 × MIC)31 ± 1.91 a
ap < 0.05 (vs. untreated control).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klančnik, A.; Šimunović, K.; Kovac, J.; Sahin, O.; Wu, Z.; Vučković, D.; Abram, M.; Zhang, Q.; Smole Možina, S. The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120675

AMA Style

Klančnik A, Šimunović K, Kovac J, Sahin O, Wu Z, Vučković D, Abram M, Zhang Q, Smole Možina S. The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(12):675. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120675

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klančnik, Anja, Katarina Šimunović, Jasna Kovac, Orhan Sahin, Zuowei Wu, Darinka Vučković, Maja Abram, Qijing Zhang, and Sonja Smole Možina. 2019. "The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action" Microorganisms 7, no. 12: 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120675

APA Style

Klančnik, A., Šimunović, K., Kovac, J., Sahin, O., Wu, Z., Vučković, D., Abram, M., Zhang, Q., & Smole Možina, S. (2019). The Anti-Campylobacter Activity and Mechanisms of Pinocembrin Action. Microorganisms, 7(12), 675. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120675

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop