Next Article in Journal
Herd Protection against Meningococcal Disease through Vaccination
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Fungal Endophyte Epichloë festucae var. lolii on Growth and Physiological Responses of Perennial Ryegrass cv. Fairway to Combined Drought and Pathogen Stresses
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Genome Sequence Analyses of Geographic Samples of Aspergillus fumigatus—Relevance for Amphotericin B Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trichoderma Enhances Net Photosynthesis, Water Use Efficiency, and Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Salt Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms8111674
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Response of Soybean to Hydrochar-Based Rhizobium Inoculation in Loamy Sandy Soil

by
Dilfuza Egamberdieva
1,2,*,
Hua Ma
1,3,
Jakhongir Alimov
2,
Moritz Reckling
1,
Stephan Wirth
1 and
Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura
1
1
Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
2
Faculty of Biology, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan
3
School of Life Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(11), 1674; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111674
Submission received: 25 August 2020 / Revised: 24 October 2020 / Accepted: 25 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endophytes for Managing Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrochar is rich in nutrients and may provide a favorable habitat or shelter for bacterial proliferation and survival. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the efficiency of a hydrochar-based rhizobial inoculant (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) on the symbiotic performance of soybean under both greenhouse and field conditions. There were positive and significant effects of hydrochar-based inoculation on the root and shoot growth of soybean as compared to uninoculated plants grown under irrigated and drought conditions. The drought stress significantly inhibited the symbiotic performance of rhizobia with soybean. Soybean inoculated with hydrochar-based B. japonicum produced twofold more nodules under drought stress conditions as compared to plants inoculated with a commercial preparation/inoculant carrier B. japonicum (HISTICK). The N concentration of inoculated plants with hydrochar-based B. japonicum was by 31% higher than that of un-inoculated plants grown in pots and by 22% for HISTICK. Furthermore, the soybean treated with hydrochar-based B. japonicum showed higher grain yield of 29% under irrigated conditions and 40% higher under rainfed condition compared to un-inoculated plants. In conclusion, the obtained results proved the potential of hydrochar-based B. japonicum inoculant for soybean in terms of increased symbiotic performance and agronomic traits, especially under rainfed conditions.

1. Introduction

Soybean is an important legume and source of food, oil, and as a forage crop, is widely grown in China and other countries of the world [1,2]. Legumes, associated with rhizobia, can fix nitrogen, increase the availability of nitrogen in several agroecosystems. According to previous reports, half of all N (4–5 million t) supplied in agricultural systems was fixed by legumes, and it can be increased by improving the soybean-Rhizobium symbioses [3,4]. Therefore, plant-microbe interaction, especially in drought-affected regions, may have an essential role in maintaining highly productive legume cultivation. Soybean establishes a symbiotic association with Bradyrhizobium japonicum, where bacteria use nutrients and carbohydrates provided by the plant and fix atmospheric nitrogen and make it bioavailable to the plant [5]. Soybean may fix up to 50% N via its symbiosis with Bradyrhizobum japonicum present in the soil or applied as inoculants [6,7,8].
Several studies reported that abiotic factors, including drought and high temperature, might cause nodulation failure, because of the low survival of introduced bacteria in the soil and root system [9,10,11]. Furthermore, high competition for nutrients and niches occurs among microbes, including Rhizobia in the rhizosphere of plants in arid lands, which affects the bacterial ability to form nodules.
The formulation of microbes with various carrier substrates has been considered as an improvement in rhizobial survival and symbiotic effectiveness under different environmental conditions [12,13,14]. However, the short shelf life in the formulated substrate and low rhizobial survival after seed coating because of desiccation are key complications [15]. Under drought condition, a decreased survival of peat-based rhizobia inoculants in soil and failure of symbiotic performance with the host was observed [16].
Peat is considered as a carrier for the growth and survival of Rhizobia and widely used for field applications [17,18]. Other reports confirm perlite as a successful carrier for B. japonicum applied for soybean in the greenhouse and under field conditions [19,20]. Albareda et al. [21] suggested perlite as an alternative to peat for soybeans inoculants as it supports better survival of bacteria than peat. Furthermore, the shortage of peat deposits in many countries lead to the search for alternative carrier materials for rhizobial inoculants [21]. Hydrochar is another material to carry Rhizobium, produced via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) at a temperature range of 180–260 °C during which biomass is heated in water in a closed system [22]. Hydrochar proved to be suitable as a bacterial carrier since it contains soluble organic compounds combined with additional habitat niches for microbial colonization [23]. In addition, several reports indicate a positive impact of hydrochar application on soil cation exchange capacity [24,25,26], water holding capacity [27], soil organic matter content, and plant growth [28,29]. Moreover, hydrochar improved soil fertility by increasing soil nutrient contents and providing increased amounts of available nutrients [30]. Hence, the selection of carriers suitable for bacterial inoculants must consider several factors, such as cost-effectiveness, non-toxic properties for microbes and the environment, and should be generally available, especially in countries that lack natural peat deposits [21]. In the areas where soybean is not naturally present or a newly introduced crop, such as Central Europe, legumes require inoculation with effective strains of Rhizobia [31]. The presence and survival of Rhizobia in soil are usually dependent on the presence of their legume host. Therefore, farmers are advised to apply rhizobial inoculants to benefit fully from biological nitrogen fixation. Given the increasing importance of soybean production in Europe, especially under drought or in semi-arid regions, the development and testing of rhizobial formulations combined with a survey of the agronomic performance under rainfed conditions would be promising. The aim of this study was to; (i) evaluate hydrochar produced from maize silage for its suitability as a carrier of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, and (ii) test the effectiveness of hydrochar-based B. japonicum inoculants forming root nodules with soybean, and (iii) survey improved growth, nutrient uptake and yield under both greenhouse and field conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Soil, Plant, Hydrochar and Rhizobia

The soil used for pot experiments was from an arable field under irrigation operated by the Experimental Field Station of the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany. Selected chemical and physical properties of soil are as follows: clay and fine silt, 7%; coarse and medium silt, 19%; sand, 74%; Corg, 570 mg 100 g−1; pH 6.2; organic C content, 0.55%; total N content, 0.07%; P content, 32.0 mg (100 g soil)−1; K content, 1.25 g (100 g soil)−1; and Mg content, 0.18 g (100 g soil)−1 [32].
The soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivar Sultana was used for the pot and field experiments. The hydrochar was obtained from the Leibniz-Institute for Agrartechnik Potsdam-Bornim e.V. (ATB), and used as carrier material for bacteria. The hydrochar was produced from maize silage by batch-wise hydrothermal carbonization at 210 °C and 23 bar for 8 h and had the following properties: C, 64.6%, N, 2.1%, P, 1.0%, K, 3.6%, pH 5.3).
The strain Bradyrhizobium japonicum (HAMBI 2314) was obtained from the Culture Collection of the University of Helsinki (HAMBI). The strain was grown on yeast extract-mannitol (YEM) medium at 28 °C. As a control, the formulated strain Bradyrhizobium japonicum (HISTICK® Soy, BASF Services Europe Inc., Limburgerhof, Germany) was used at a rate of 2 × 109 CFU/g for the inoculation of soybean.

2.2. Survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in HTC Char

For the preparation of the bacterial inoculum, hydrochar was powdered, filled in glass tubes and sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min. The bacterial strain Bradyrhizobium japonicum (HAMBI 2314) was grown in yeast extract mannitol (YEM) broth. After three days, bacterial cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and adjusted to 107 CFU mL−1. The bacterial cell suspension (5 mL) was uniformly and aseptically mixed with 10 g of sterilized HTC powder. The glass tubes were incubated at 28 °C for eight weeks, and every two weeks, samples were taken to analyze inoculum survival. One g of HTC-based inoculum was serially diluted (10-fold) in PBS and plated in triplicate on YEM agar plates supplemented with Congo red. The mean values of the viable bacteria (CFU) per g of the samples were determined.

2.3. Pot Experiments

To prepare hydrochar-based inocula for coating seeds, B. japonicum HAMBI2314 was grown in YEM broth for three days and adjusted to a final concentration of approximately 108 CFU mL−1. Then, 50 mL of bacterial cell suspension was mixed with 10 g HTC and incubated for one week at 28 °C to facilitate bacterial growth. Soybean (Glycine max L. var. sultana) seeds surface-sterilized using 10% v/v NaOCl for 5 min and 70% ethanol for 5 min, and then rinsed five times with sterile distilled water. Finally, surface-sterilized seeds were coated with bacterial inoculants. The inoculation treatments were as follows: i) uninoculated seeds, ii) seeds inoculated with HTC-based inoculum of B. japonicum (BHTC), and iii) seeds coated with B. japonicum (HISTICK). Six replicate pots were used per treatment (n = 6). All pots were arranged in a randomized block design. The plants were grown in a greenhouse (day/night temperature 25 °C/18 °C; humidity 50–60%, day length 12 h for 35 days. Two conditions, namely watered (at 75% field capacity) and drought stress (watered at 45% field capacity) were maintained by daily weighing and watering each pot if required. At harvest, the roots were separated from shoots and were oven-dried at 70 °C for 48 h, and dry weight was determined. The number of nodules (nodule size >1 mm) was visually counted for each plant.

2.4. Analysis of Plant Nutrients

Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) contents in plant tissue were determined with an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES; iCAP 6300 Duo, Termo Fisher Scientific Inc., Watham, MA, USA).

2.5. Plant Growth Under Field Conditions

The field experiment was conducted at the Experimental Field Station of the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany (52°31’17.4″N 14°07’40.0″E). A total of 12 plots of 18 m2 with a harvesting area of 11.75 m2 were established. The experiment was conducted in a complete block design with three replications. Four treatments were randomly arranged; the treatments were: (a) No bacterial inoculation, with irrigation, (b) no bacterial inoculation, without irrigation, (c) inoculation with B. japonicum (BHTC), with irrigation, and (d) inoculation with B. japonicum (BHTC), without irrigation.
Soybean was cultivated using regular machinery according to local farming practices. Sowing was done by a drilling machine on 10 April 2015; no fertilizers or herbicides were applied. Harvesting was conducted on 5 October 2015 using a harvester combined with a yield-measuring system. Precipitation and temperature were collected on a daily basis by the weather station of ZALF. The year 2015 was exceptionally dry with a mean precipitation of 473 mm as compared to the 30-year mean of 555 mm with water shortages during the entire soybean growth period. The mean temperature was 10.3 °C higher as compared to the 30-year mean of 9.1 °C. Irrigation water was applied with a sprinkler system using the Web-BEREST model to determine the amounts and timing as described in Reckling et al. [33]. In 2015, 165 mm of irrigation water were applied at ten dates (10–25 mm per date).
Soybean was planted in eight rows for each plot, the row space was 50 cm, and the seeding rate was 80 seeds m−2. Seeds were inoculated with hydrochar-based B. japonicum HAMBI2314 at a rate of 7 × 108 CFU/g before planting. After 90 days, ten plants were sampled from each plot, and then the roots were washed with tap water, and nodule numbers were determined. The plant biomass (30 July 2015) and grain (5 October 2015) were harvested plot by plot, and yields were estimated.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All data were performed to the general linear model procedure to analyze the variance. The significance between treatments was tested by Duncan test at the p < 0.05 level. The interactions between factors were conducted by general linear model. All these analyses were performed with SPSS 22 (IBM Deutschland GmbH, Ehningen, Germany).

3. Results

3.1. Survival of B. japonicum in the HTC Carrier

Survival and viability of B. japonicum HAMBI2314 over eight weeks in the HTC-char carrier materials showed that hydrochar is a suitable carrier for the bacterial inoculant. After two weeks, the log10 CFU count of B. japonicum HAMBI2314 was 5.1 ± 0.11. Only after six and eight weeks, there were decreases in the bacterial populations being 4.6 ± 0.17, and 4.2 ± 0.14 Log CFU, respectively.

3.2. Plant Growth under Greenhouse Conditions

The root and shoot of soybean responded differently to HISTICK and B. japonicum (BHTC) inoculants under-watered and drought conditions (Figure 1). The growth of soybean shoots inoculated with HISTICK was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the un-inoculated plants. Furthermore, there were positive and significant effects of BHTC inoculations on the root and shoot growth of soybean grown under watered conditions. The shoot growth was significantly increased by 25% and root growth by 39% when compared to un-inoculated control plants (Figure 1A,B).
The drought stress negatively affected the root and shoot growth of soybean. The weight of shoots and roots were reduced by 33% and 34%, respectively (Figure 1). The soybean growth responded differently after bacterial inoculation with HISTICK or BHTC. The inoculation of soybean with HISTICK enhanced root and shoot growth by 19 and 25% compared to un-inoculated plants, respectively. The BHTC inoculant improved the root growth of soybean even more than the HISTICK inoculant under drought conditions, being significantly higher by 36% as compared to un-inoculated control plants. The drought stress significantly inhibited the symbiotic performance of rhizobia with soybean. However, soybean inoculated with BHTC produced twofold more nodules under drought stress conditions as compared to plants inoculated with HISTICK (Figure 2).
The inoculation of soybean with HISTICK and BHTC positively affected on N, P, and K contents of plants (Table 1). The N concentration of inoculated plants with BHTC was by 31% higher than that of un-inoculated plants and by 22% for HISTICK. There were slight increases of P and K uptake by inoculation of soybean, however, not significant increases. The acquisition of N by soybean was significantly improved by BHTC inoculation under drought conditions, but there were no significant effects on P and K uptake of plants by both inoculants (Table 1). Treatments × irrigation showed a significant interaction effect on the nodule number, but no interaction effect on N, P, K content, or shoot and root biomass (Table 2).

3.3. Soybean Growth under Field Conditions

In previous pot experiments, the BHTC inoculant showed good performance in terms of nodulation, and was thus, used for further field trials. The effects of bacterial inoculants on soybean growth and yield under irrigated and rainfed conditions are shown in Figure 3 A,B. The plant biomass was affected by the bacterial inoculant and also by irrigation. At the same time, the average of irrigated treatments provided 3.5 and 4.6 t ha−1 plant biomass for the un-inoculated and the BHTC variants, respectively. Compared with un-inoculated plants, the plant biomass inoculated with BHTC was increased by 12% under rainfed condition. However, the difference was not significant (Figure 3A).
Furthermore, the soybean treated with BHTC inoculant showed higher grain yield (29% and the absolute difference was 0.55 t/ha) than the uninoculated control plants in irrigated plots (Figure 3B). The grain yield of soybean was reduced under the rainfed condition by three-fold. The grain yield of soybean treated with BHTC was higher (40% and the absolute difference was 0.19 t/ha) than for un-inoculated plants under rainfed condition. The N contents of plants inoculated with BHTC were increased under irrigation only. The irrigated plots with BHTC showed 19% (0.4% N) higher values for N contents in the shoot than the plots without BHTC (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

For successful bacterial inoculation, it is essential to use a substrate that holds the potential as a carrier for microbes, which supports microbial shelf life, protects from stressors, and contributes as a nutrient source for propagation [15,34]. The porosity and a low ash content of biochar are essential factors for the growth of beneficial microbes that determine the extent of bacterial adhesion, cohesion, and proliferation. The present work focusses on the analysis of hydrochar-based B. japonicum for its symbiotic performance with soybean and plant growth under rainfed conditions. The bacterial inoculants based on hydrochar as carrier was demonstrated to promote plant growth, seed yield, and nutrient acquisition [14,35,36]. For example, Saxena et al. [37] observed a positive effect of combined inoculation of Bacillus sp. with hydrochar on the plant biomass, pod formation and seed yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In our study, biochar-based B. japonicum HAMBI2314 improved soybean root and shoot growth and nutrient uptake under both irrigated and drought conditions as compared to un-inoculated control plants. The significantly higher nodule numbers explain the improved N concentrations in plant tissue. The hydrochar-based B. japonicum inoculant improved soybean growth under drought conditions, which are even better than a commercial inoculant, hence, confirming the agronomic potential of hydrochar-based inocula is important.
We observed that the inoculant B. japonicum HAMBI2314 survived in hydrochar for six and eight weeks after incubation, which proves the suitability of this material as an inoculant carrier. Similar observations were demonstrated by Khavazi et al. [38] when B. japonicum could survive in biochar pores for more than six months. Tripti et al. [36] also observed higher CFU of Bacillus sp. and Burkholderia sp. in a biochar substrate after 240 days of storage. In an earlier report by Głodowska et al. [39], the effective survival of B. japonicum in Dynamotive and Pyrovac biochars was reported. The hydrochar showed a similar porous structure, compared to biochar, which supports microbial proliferation by providing nutrients, water and protection from abiotic stresses [40,41]. Moreover, it contains higher amounts of soluble organic compounds used by microorganism as C resource. According to Li et al. [42], biochar provides cationic and neutral surface properties and contains functional groups such as carboxyl and hydroxyl groups, allowing rapid immobilization of bacterial cells. Thus, biochar might be a promising effective carrier for beneficial inoculants.
In the current study, soybean seeds inoculated with a hydrochar-based inoculant of B. japonicum HAMBI2314 showed increased nodule numbers. Improved symbiotic performance of biochar-formulated B. japonicum was also reported by Glodowska et al. [41]. In another study, Ghazi [43] demonstrated an enhanced nodule formation in kidney bean by biochar-based Rhizobia. The finding of Sangeetha [44,45] indicates that biochar pores play an essential role in bacterial proliferation, by improving gas exchange, nutrient and water supply and protection from environmental stresses. Once the application of BHTC inoculants showed improved growth and symbiotic performance with soybean in pot experiments, the next step was to validate the optimal formulation to be applied as an inoculant under field conditions. In our field trials, BHTC inocula increased plant biomass, grain yield and N uptake of soybean both under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Similar observations were reported for lupin when hydrochar-based Bradyrhizobium sp. increased plant growth, pod formation and grain yield under both irrigated and rainfed conditions compared to un-inoculated control plants [32]. Saxena et al. [37] observed an increase of plant biomass and yield of the common bean by a combined application of biochar with Bacillus sp. However, even if an efficient link between symbiotic performance, N concentration and plant growth can be assumed, the effects were often small and not significant under field conditions due to additional constraints in crop growth. Nevertheless, the improvement of soybean yield by hydrochar-based rhizobial inoculants under rainfed field conditions suggests that hydrochar as a formulation or carrier plays an essential role in the symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in soybean.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the obtained results proved the potential of the hydrochar-based B. japonicum inoculant for soybean in terms of increased symbiotic performance and agronomic traits, especially under rainfed conditions. This study indicated that hydrochar-based rhizobial inoculants could contribute to a step-change in the sustainable cu ltivation of soybean, especially at local dry conditions and act as an alternative to other commercially used materials, such as peat-derived materials.

Author Contributions

D.E., M.R. and S.D.B.-K. designed the experiments. D.E., and H.M. conducted the experiments. J.A. and S.W. analyzed the data. D.E., S.W., and H.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Georg Forster Research Fellowship (HERMES), Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. MR was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—420661662.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Experimental Station of the Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) in Müncheberg for implementing the field experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wilcox, J. World distribution and trade of soybean. In Soybean: Improvement, Production, and Uses; Boerma, H.R., Specht, J.E., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 2004; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  2. Vieira, R.F.; Mendes, I.C.; Reis-Junior, F.B.; Hungria, M. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in tropical food grain legumes: Current status. In Microbes for Legume Improvement; Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., Musarrat, J., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2010; pp. 427–472. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al-Huqail, A.A.; Wirth, S.; Egamberdieva, D. Comparing symbiotic performance and physiological responses of two soybean cultivars to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under salt stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 26, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reckling, M.; Bergkvist, G.; Watson, C.A.; Stoddard, F.L.; Zander, P.M.; Walker, R.; Pristeri, A.; Toncea, I.; Bachinger, J. Trade-offs between economic and environmental impacts of introducing legumes into cropping systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Panzieri, M.; Marchettini, N.; Hallam, T.G. Importance of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum symbiosis for the sustainability of a soybean cultivation. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, H.; Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Li, Q.; Omari, R.A.; Hou, M.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Effect of biochar and irrigation on the interrelationships among soybean growth, root nodulation, plant p uptake, and soil nutrients in a sandy field. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ma, H.; Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Effect of biochar and irrigation on soybean-rhizobium symbiotic performance and soil enzymatic activity in field rhizosphere. Agronomy 2019, 9, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rodríguez-Navarro, D.N.; Margaret Oliver, I.; Albareda Contreras, M.; Ruiz-Sainz, J.E. Soybean interactions with soil microbes, agronomical and molecular aspects. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 31, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bouhmouch, I.; Souad-Mouhsine, B.; Brhada, F.; Aurag, J. Influence of host cultivars and Rhizobium species on the growth and symbiotic performance of Phaseolus vulgaris under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Egamberdieva, D.; Li, L.; Lindström, K.; Räsänen, L. A synergistic interaction between salt tolerant Pseudomonas and Mezorhizobium strains improves growth and symbiotic performance of liquorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fish.) under salt stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 100, 2829–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Egamberdieva, D.; Davranov, K.; Wirth, S.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Impact of soil salinity on the plant-growth–promoting and biological control abilities of root associated bacteria. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1601–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A.; Palni, L.M. Carrier-based preparations of plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculants suitable for use in cooler regions. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 941–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abd El-Fattah, D.A.; Eweda, W.E.; Zayed, M.S.; Hassanein, M.K. Effect of carrier materials, sterilization method, and storage temperature on survival and biological activities of Azotobacter chroococcum inoculant. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2013, 58, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tamreihao, K.; Ningthoujam, D.S.; Nimaichand, S.; Singh, E.S.; Reena, P.; Singh, S.H.; Nongthomba, U. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting activities of a Streptomyces corchorusii strain UCR3-16 and preparation of powder formulation for application as biofertilizer agents for rice plant. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 192, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Prabhu, S.R.; Hernandez, J.P. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: Formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 2014, 378, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ardakani, S.S.; Hedari, A.; Tayebi, L.; Mohammadi, M. Promotion of cotton seedlings growth characteristics by development and use of new bioformulations. Int. J. Bot. 2010, 6, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hynes, R.K.; Kraig, K.A.; Covert, D.; Smith, R.S.; Rennie, R.J. Liquid rhizobial inoculants for lentil and field pea. J. Prod. Agric. 1995, 8, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Atieno, M.; Wilson, N.; Casteriano, A.; Crossett, B.; Lesueur, D.; Deaker, R. Aqueous peat extract exposes rhizobia to sub-lethal stress which may prime cells for improved desiccation tolerance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7521–7539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ronchi, A.L.; Grassano, A.; Balatti, A.P. Perlite as a carrier for legume inocu-lants. Agrochimica 1997, 41, 186–195. [Google Scholar]
  20. Daza, A.; Santamarı, C.; Rodriguez-Navarro, D.N.; Camacho, M.; Orive, R.; Temprano, F. Perlite as a carrier for bacterial inoculants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Albareda, M.; Dulce, N.; Navarro, R.; Camacho, M.; Tenprano, F.J. Alternatives to peat as carrier for rhizobia inoculants, solid and liquid formulations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2771–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Libra, J.A.; Ro, K.S.; Kammann, C.; Funke, A.; Berge, N.D.; Neubauer, Y. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: A comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2, 71–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S.; Behrendt, U.; Abd Allah, E.F.; Berg, G. Biochar treatment resulted in a combined effect on soybean growth promotion and a shift in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Gai, C.; Chen, M.; Liu, T.; Peng, N.; Liu, Z. Gasification characteristics of hydrochar and pyrochar derived from sewage sludge. Energy 2016, 113, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gasco, G.; Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Alvarez, M.L.; Saa, A.; Mendez, A. Biochars and hydrochars prepared by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation of pig manure. Waste Manag. 2018, 79, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Feng, Y.; Sun, H.; Han, L.; Xue, L.; Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Xing, B. Fabrication of hydrochar based on food waste (FWHTC) and its application in aqueous solution rare earth ions adsorptive removal: Process, mechanisms and disposal methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, O.Y.; Raichle, B.; Sink, S. Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2013, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yu, S.; Feng, Y.; Xue, L.; Sun, H.; Han, L.; Yang, L.; Sun, Q.; Chu, Q. Biowaste to treasure: Application of microbial-aged hydrochar in rice paddy could improve nitrogen use efficiency and rice grain free amino acids. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 240, 118180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ji, M.; Sang, W.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Usman, M.; Zhang, S.; Luo, G. Molecular and microbial insights towards understanding the effects of hydrochar on methane emission from paddy soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 714, 136769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Malghani, S.; Jüschke, E.; Baumert, J.; Thuille, A.; Antonietti, M.; Trumbore, S.; Gleixner, G. Carbon sequestration potential of hydrothermal carbonization char (hydrochar) in two contrasting soils; results of a 1-year field study. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2015, 51, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zimmer, S.; Messmer, M.; Haase, T.; Piepho, H.P.; Mindermann, A.; Schulz, H.; Habekuß, A.; Ordon, F.; Wilbois, K.-P.; Heß, J. Effects of soybean variety and Bradyrhizobium strains on yield, protein content and biological nitrogen fixation under cool growing conditions in Germany. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 72, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Egamberdieva, D.; Reckling, M.; Wirth, S. Biochar-based inoculum of Bradyrhizobium sp. improves plant growth and yield of lupin (Lupinus albus L.) under drought stress. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 78, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reckling, M.; Bergkvist, G.; Watson, C.A.; Stoddard, F.L.; Bachinger, J. Re-designing organic grain legume cropping systems using systems agronomy. Eur. J. Agron. 2000, 112, 125951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brahmaprakash, G.P.; Sahu, P.K. Biofertilizers for Sustainability. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 2012, 92, 37–62. [Google Scholar]
  35. Egamberdieva, D.; Ma, H.; Reckling, M.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Potential effects of biochar-based microbial inoculants in agriculture. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 1, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tripti; Kumar, A.; Usmani, Z.; Kumar, V.; Anshumali. Biochar and flyash inoculated with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria act as potential biofertilizer for luxuriant growth and yield of tomato plant. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 190, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saxena, J.; Rana, G.; Pandey, M. Impact of addition of biochar along with Bacillus sp. on growth and yield of French beans. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 162, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khavazi, K.; Rejali, F.; Seguin, P.; Miransari, M. Effects of carrier, sterilization method, and incubation on survival of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in soybean (Glycine max L.) inoculants. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 41, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Głodowska, M.; Husk, B.; Schwinghamer, T.; Smith, D.L. Biochar is a growth-promoting alternative to peat moss for the inoculation of corn with a pseudomonad. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Saranya, K.; Kumutha, K.; Krishnan, P.S. Influence of biochar and Azospirillum application on the growth of maize. Madras Agric. J. 2011, 98, 158–164. [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, H.; Chi, Z.; Pan, G.; Li, L.; Zhen, J.; Zhang, X.; et al. Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 71, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L. Determination of the best conditions for modified biochar immobilized petroleum hydrocarbon degradation microorganism by orthogonal test. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 94, 012191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghazi, A.A. Potential for biochar as an alternate carrier to peat moss for the preparation of Rhizobia bio inoculum. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2017, 18, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sangeetha, D. Survival of plant growth promoting bacterial inoculants in different carrier materials. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Arch. 2002, 3, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  45. Steiner, C.; Teixeira, W.G.; Lehmann, J.; Zech, W. Microbial response to charcoal amendments of highly weathered soils and Amazonian dark earths in Central Amazonia preliminary results. In Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time; Glaser, B., Woods, W.I., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; pp. 195–212. [Google Scholar]
Microorganisms 08 01674 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC- based rhizobia) inoculants on soybean shoot; (A) and root; (B) dry weight under watered and drought conditions. The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days. Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effect of B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC- based rhizobia) inoculants on soybean shoot; (A) and root; (B) dry weight under watered and drought conditions. The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days. Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01674 g001
Microorganisms 08 01674 g002 550
Figure 2. Nodule numbers of soybean under watered and drought conditions in a pot experiment. Plants were inoculated with B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC-based Rhizobia). The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days. Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Nodule numbers of soybean under watered and drought conditions in a pot experiment. Plants were inoculated with B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC-based Rhizobia). The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days. Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the * p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01674 g002
Microorganisms 08 01674 g003 550
Figure 3. The effect of hydrochar-based inoculant B. japonicum (BHTC) on plant biomass; (A) and grain yield; (B) of soybean under field conditions (tons per hectare). Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Figure 3. The effect of hydrochar-based inoculant B. japonicum (BHTC) on plant biomass; (A) and grain yield; (B) of soybean under field conditions (tons per hectare). Column means marked by a different letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01674 g003
Microorganisms 08 01674 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of hydrochar-based inoculant B. japonicum (BHTC) on N% in plant biomass under field conditions. Column means marked by letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Figure 4. The effect of hydrochar-based inoculant B. japonicum (BHTC) on N% in plant biomass under field conditions. Column means marked by letters indicate significant differences at the p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 08 01674 g004
Table
Table 1. Nutrient concentrations in soybean inoculated with B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC-based Rhizobia) under watered and drought conditions. The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days.
Table 1. Nutrient concentrations in soybean inoculated with B. japonicum (HISTICK) and B. japonicum (BHTC, HTC-based Rhizobia) under watered and drought conditions. The plants were grown in a greenhouse for 35 days.
WateredDrought
NPKNPK
Control2.263c0.271a1.920b1.803a0.254a1.459a
HISTICK2.782d0.277a2.086b1.923ab0.270a1.511a
BHTC2.983d0.278a1.954b2.149bc0.285a1.502a
Table
Table 2. Interaction effects of treatments (Control, HISTICK, BHTC), and irrigation (Watered, Drought) on the plant N, P, K content, shoot and root biomass, and nodule number. Significance denoted by *** p < 0.001.
Table 2. Interaction effects of treatments (Control, HISTICK, BHTC), and irrigation (Watered, Drought) on the plant N, P, K content, shoot and root biomass, and nodule number. Significance denoted by *** p < 0.001.
GreenhouseNPKShootRootNodule
Treatments × Irrigationnsnsnsnsns***
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Egamberdieva, D.; Ma, H.; Alimov, J.; Reckling, M.; Wirth, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Response of Soybean to Hydrochar-Based Rhizobium Inoculation in Loamy Sandy Soil. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111674

AMA Style

Egamberdieva D, Ma H, Alimov J, Reckling M, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD. Response of Soybean to Hydrochar-Based Rhizobium Inoculation in Loamy Sandy Soil. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(11):1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Egamberdieva, Dilfuza, Hua Ma, Jakhongir Alimov, Moritz Reckling, Stephan Wirth, and Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath-Kimura. 2020. "Response of Soybean to Hydrochar-Based Rhizobium Inoculation in Loamy Sandy Soil" Microorganisms 8, no. 11: 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111674

APA Style

Egamberdieva, D., Ma, H., Alimov, J., Reckling, M., Wirth, S., & Bellingrath-Kimura, S. D. (2020). Response of Soybean to Hydrochar-Based Rhizobium Inoculation in Loamy Sandy Soil. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop