Next Article in Journal
Polyphenols in Alzheimer’s Disease and in the Gut–Brain Axis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Bacterial Gut Microbiota of Adult Patients Infected, Colonized or Noncolonized by Clostridioides difficile
Previous Article in Journal
Planktonic Bacterial and Archaeal Communities in an Artificially Irrigated Estuarine Wetland: Diversity, Distribution, and Responses to Environmental Parameters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Porcine Colostrum Protects the IPEC-J2 Cells and Piglet Colon Epithelium against Clostridioides (syn. Clostridium) difficile Toxin-Induced Effects
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms8020200
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Insights into the Role of Human Gut Microbiota in Clostridioides difficile Infection

by
Melina Kachrimanidou
* and
Eleftherios Tsintarakis
First Department of Microbiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Medical School, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020200
Submission received: 9 January 2020 / Revised: 29 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 January 2020 / Published: 31 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clostridium difficile)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has emerged as a major health problem worldwide. A major risk factor for disease development is prior antibiotic use, which disrupts the normal gut microbiota by altering its composition and the gut’s metabolic functions, leading to the loss of colonization resistance and subsequent CDI. Data from human studies have shown that the presence of C. difficile, either as a colonizer or as a pathogen, is associated with a decreased level of gut microbiota diversity. The investigation of the gut’s microbial communities, in both healthy subjects and patients with CDI, elucidate the role of microbiota and improve the current biotherapeutics for patients with CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation has a major role in managing CDI, aiming at re-establishing colonization resistance in the host gastrointestinal tract by replenishing the gut microbiota. New techniques, such as post-genomics, proteomics and metabolomics analyses, can possibly determine in the future the way in which C. difficile eradicates colonization resistance, paving the way for the development of new, more successful treatments and prevention. The aim of the present review is to present recent data concerning the human gut microbiota with a focus on its important role in health and disease.

1. Introduction

Clostridioides difficile(C. difficile) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections and an important healthcare pathogen; however, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology has changed over the past 20 years, with the emergence of a hypervirulent clone NAP1/027/BI implicated in large outbreaks worldwide in the early 2000s [1,2]. Since the application of fecal transplantation (FMT) suggests a causal relationship between gut microbiota composition and the cure for several diseases, we have come to appreciate the central role of gut microbiota in the development of CDI [3].
The microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract is estimated to consist of 100 trillion of microorganisms (1014 microbes), the vast majority of which are found in the large intestine, where their population approaches 1011–1012 cells/ml, the largest number ever recorded for any natural microbial ecosystem [4,5]. The diverse gastrointestinal microbiota is predominantly composed of bacteria from two major phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes [6]. This diverse and complex microbiome serves as a functional expansion of host genomes and is estimated to harbor 50- to 100-fold more genes compared to the host [7].
The human gut microbiota is involved in many functions of the host, such as food processing, adjustment of the gut epithelium development, the synthesis of essential vitamins, and pathogen protection [6,8,9,10]. The role of gut microbiota and their unique metabolites is crucial in conferring the host defense against invading pathogens, colonization, and the regulation of important host functions, including metabolism, the development of immunity and the nervous system.
Although human microbiome research is still at a preliminary stage, findings are promising in terms of clarifying the microbiome–host relationships, their crucial role in disease pathogenesis, as well as their therapeutic value.
Advances in sequencing technologies, as well as the metagenomics of the human intestinal tract, focus research on the gut microbiome and their correlation with health and disease. Several analyses such as 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing to taxonomically classify the microbial populations and whole-genome shotgun (WGS) metagenomic sequencing of body-site specific whole community DNA provide precious data of human microbiota [11].
A gut microbial imbalance (dysbiosis) may lead to dysfunction of the host, contributing to pathogenesis or progression toward a broad spectrum of diseases such as C. difficile infection. Undoubtedly, the development of new sequencing techniques and bioinformatic techniques allow the study of the human microbiota and increase the interest in the disturbances or alteration of gut microbiota composition, which can favor C. difficile colonization, infection and recurrence.
The purpose of this review is to explore current data and discuss recent investigations specifically related to the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of CDI, focusing on the role of the risk factors for CDI, such as age, antibiotics and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI). Novel therapies derived from microbiome studies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) to target CDI, have been reviewed to introduce the hypothesis of symptoms resolution through dysbiosis correction, thus revealing a new scientific approach toward disease treatment.

2. C. difficile Microbiology and Epidemiology

C. difficile is a Gram-positive, obligate anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium. The microorganism exists either in its vegetative form, which is sensitive to oxygen, or in its spore-forming form that survives in difficult circumstances for long periods. C. difficile was first isolated in 1935, but it was not until 1978 that it was identified as the causative agent of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis [12]. C. difficile causes a broad spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from mild diarrhea to severe life-threatening colonic perforation and toxic megacolon [13,14].
Nowadays, C. difficile has become a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections and CDI represents a major health problem. The epidemiology of CDI has changed dramatically over the last 20 years. Since 2000, there has been a significant increase in the incidence and severity of CDI in the US, Canada, and Europe, primarily due to the hypervirulent clone PCR ribotype 027/NAP1/BI [2,15]. Mortality rates have also increased worldwide, with an estimated 14,000 deaths annually in the US [16].
Changing epidemiology of CDI has been described not only in hospitals but also in the community. Community-acquired CDI accounts for one-quarter of all diagnosed CDI patients, and usually, these subjects do not have the classic risk profile of patients who develop the infection in a healthcare facility [17].
However, the majority of hospitalized patients infected by C. difficile are asymptomatic carriers, who serve as silent reservoirs for continued C. difficile contamination of the hospital environment. C. difficile is commonly present in the stools of approximately 3–5% of healthy adults and about 30–70% of infants [18].

3. C. difficile Infection (CDI) Pathogenesis

C. difficile is spread via the fecal–oral route. The organism is ingested either as the vegetative form or as spores, which can survive for long periods in the environment and can penetrate the acidic barrier of the stomach [19]. In the small intestine, spores germinate into a vegetative form [20]. The gut microbiota act as a protective barrier against the colonization of the intestine with C. difficile. This barrier is disrupted when the normal gut microbiota have been altered by antibiotic therapy (Figure 1). After contamination by C. difficile spores, spores germinate and vegetative forms multiply, which leads to colonization with C. difficile. After colonization, the organism produces and releases the main virulence factors, the two large clostridial toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB). TcdA and TcdB are exotoxins that bind to human intestinal epithelial cells and are responsible for inflammation, fluid and mucous secretion, as well as damage to the intestinal mucosa [21]. TcdA is an enterotoxin that is responsible for the activation of inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 and IL-8 of the human intestinal epithelial cells and IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α of the monocytes. However, TcdB is a cytotoxin that appears to be required for the pathogenic effect of the microorganism [22]. Some C. difficile strains produce an additional toxin, a binary toxin (ADP-ribosyl-transferase, CDT) that consists of two components—CDTa, the enzymatic ADP-ribosyltransferase which modifies actin, and CDTb, which binds to host cells and translocates CDTa into the cytosol [23,24,25]. Basic predisposing factors for the C. difficile infection are the intake of antibiotics that disrupt the gut microbiota, an extended hospital stay, and advanced patient age.

4. Gut Microbiota: Structure and Function

Gut microbiota consists of members of bacteria, phages, archaea, fungi, viruses, and eukaryotic microorganisms. The microbial colonization of the human gut evolves at birth and is influenced by several factors, including host genetics, modality of birth, age, diet, weight, environment, antibiotic exposure, and hospitalization, among others. However, exposure to antimicrobial agents is considered the most disruptive among these factors [26].
The gut microbiome comprises the totality of microorganisms, bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and fungi, and their collective genomes inhabiting our gut [27,28]. Disruptions in the gut microbiome have been associated with a wide range of important diseases including inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, obesity, neurodevelopmental disorders, and Crohn’s disease [29,30,31]. The diversity and the abundance of human microbiota, and specifically the gut microbiota, pose a challenge to the researchers that investigate the alterations in its composition over time. The development of new modern qualitative and quantitative techniques based on DNA hybridization and PCR methods allowed the detailed description of the composition of microbiota, and specifically the one of the gut [32].
The 16S rRNA gene appears in all bacteria and has both fixed and variable areas (V1–V9). Bacterial 16S rRNA genes generally contain nine “hypervariable regions” that demonstrate considerable sequence diversity among different bacterial species. 16S sequencing is a rapid and accurate identification method for bacterial and archaeal isolates; however, it is not applicable for several genera and provides relatively good resolution until the genus level. This genomic analysis is significant for the analysis of the microbes directly from their environment, providing information for the nucleotide sequence of genes out of the total microbes’ genome [33]. Modern microbiome studies often rely on the analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA sequences for the taxonomic identification of bacterial strains and various microbial communities.
The dominant gut microbial phyla are Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia, with the two phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes representing 90% of gut microbiota [34]. In the human large intestine, Bacteroides are abundant and the Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae bacteria families that belong to the phylum Firmicutes are quite abundant, typically representing 50%-70% of the bacteria, based on the analyses of 16SrRNA [35]. In the small intestine, the prevailing phylum are Firmicutes and Actinobacteria [36]. The composition of gut microbiota is characterized by strong differentiation in each person. Studies have shown that it may be categorized in three gut types, depending on the prevalence of the genus: Bacteriodes (gut type 1), Prevotella (gut type 2), or Ruminococcus (gut type 3) [37,38]. A study of consecutive stool samples from 207 individuals showed that despite the alterations in the overall composition of stool at various time points, the participants maintained specific strains, verified by identical mutations (SNP) in these microbes at various time points [38]. Therefore, in each person’s microbiota, there are bacterial strains that characterize their microbiome, and which cannot be easily replaced [39].
The gut microbiota provides many benefits to the host. They confer colonization resistance against pathogens, develop the host immune response, and exert important metabolic functions [40,41]. Recent studies have started to illuminate the mechanisms by which different bacterial species confer resistance against infections. These mechanisms vary from direct inhibitory molecule production and nutrition competition to indirect routes through the stimulation of local innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), myeloid cells, or T- and B-cell responses. ILCs have been implicated in protection against different intestinal pathogens, and specifically, ILC1s protect against C. difficile through interferon (IFN)-γ production [42].
Bacteroidetes have the ability to break down host glycans and non-digestible carbohydrates. Firmicutes, especially members of the Clostridium genus, have demonstrated their ability to degrade polysaccharides and ferment amino acids [35]. The availability of carbohydrates, supplied by host and diet, in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, plays a major role in shaping the structure–function of the microbiota. Some gut bacteria have the ability to forage on mucin glycans within the GI tract. The O-glycan structures present in mucin are diverse and complex and the ability to metabolize these mucin O-linked oligosaccharides is probably the critical factor in determining which bacterial species colonize the mucosal surface [43]. Mucin-degrading bacteria are privileged to influence the host immune response [44]. Recent findings showed that alterations in mucosal carbohydrate availability affect the composition of microbial species [45,46]. Anaerobic microorganisms in the gut play a dominant role in fermenting complex carbohydrates and amino acids into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). SCFAs, specifically butyrate, are important for regulating the gene expression, inflammation, differentiation, and apoptosis of the host epithelial cells [47,48]. Moreover, members of the gut microbiota are important for bile acid metabolism. Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol by hepatic enzymes, are important for lipid digestion, and also modulate lipoprotein, glucose, drug and energy metabolism [47,48]. While most BAs are efficiently absorbed and recycled back to the liver, 5% of total BA serve as a substrate for bacterial metabolism in the GIT and constitute the major route for cholesterol excretion [49]. Bacterial deconjugation of bile salts makes them less soluble and less efficiently reabsorbed, resulting in higher excretion of free BA into the feces [50]. Although several hypotheses have been proposed, the benefits of this transformation to the bacterium are still a matter of conflict and appear to vary between bacterial isolates [51].
However, gut dysbiosis, the imbalance in a microbial ecosystem characterized by a shift in the composition or function of microbes, can result in pathogenesis.

5. Disruption of the Microbiome and CDI Risk Factors

The alteration in the composition of the normal gut microbiota is affected by both physical factors (age, environment) and external factors (nutrition, use of antibiotics, use of proton pump inhibitors-PPIs), which make it vulnerable to its colonization with pathogenic strains, such as toxigenic strains of C. difficile.

5.1. Gut Microbiota and Antibiotics

The use of antibiotics remains the primary risk factor for the development of CDI, reducing colonization resistance against C. difficile via the bio-conversion of primary bile acid to secondary bile acids in the small intestine, as evidenced in studies in experimental animals, as well as in humans [52,53]. Antibiotics alter the structure of the gut microbiota and reduce their diversity, which then alters microbial metabolism in the intestine. These alterations are traceable during the administration and several days after the discontinuation of an antibiotic [54], depending on the administered antimicrobial as well as on the person’s microbiota [55,56]. The restoration of the gut microbiota appears after the discontinuation of antibiotics, while the recovery of the initial composition can be incomplete. Dethlefsen et al. found that although the restoration started within a few weeks after the discontinuation of the administered antibiotic, the new composition did not include all bacterial genera that had been found prior to the initiation of treatment [55,56]. Various animal models have been developed to improve our understanding of the pathogenicity of C. difficile. In 2008, Chen et al. developed a mice model that resembles the human infection with C. difficile using five antibiotics (gentamicin, kanamycin, colistin, metronidazole, vancomycin) [56]. Reeves et al. used Chen’s model and found a decrease in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, specifically in unidentified Lachnospiraceae and an increase in Proteobacteria and specifically in the members of the Enterobacteriaceae family as compared to healthy control subjects [57]. The same investigators also examined in mice the role of Enterobacteriaceae and Lachnospiraceae in the colonization resistance to C. difficile [58]. They found that members of the bacteria family Lachnospiraceae were able to suppress C. difficile colonization, toxin production, and disease in vaccinated mice with Lachnospiraceae. In addition, mice treated with cefoperazone exhibited an increase in their gut microbiota, in the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and more specifically in the Lactobacillaceae and Pseudomonadaceae families, respectively [57]. Similarly, Buffie et al. found that treatment with clindamycin only demonstrated as prevalent phylum the Proteobacteria (Enterobacteriaceae family), with a simultaneous decrease in the genera Bifidobacterium, Clostridium and Bacteroides [59]. The specific alterations in the gut microbiota of the mice have been associated with the loss of colonization resistance to C. difficile.
However, all categories of antibiotics have been associated with CDI; the antimicrobials most commonly associated with CDI are fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, and clindamycin [60].
A recent study conducted by Antharam et al. compared the gut microbiota of 40 healthy control subjects, 36 patients with diarrhea associated with antibiotics (antibiotic-associated diarrhea, AAD) and 39 patients with CDI. In the AAD and CDI cases, as compared to the healthy control subjects, a decrease was found in the bacteria that produce butyric acid from the Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae families and the Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa. Furthermore, in CDI cases, an increase was found in the strains Enterococcus, Veillonella, and Lactobacillus, and in members from the class Gammaproteobacteria [61]. In another comparative study of alterations to the intestinal microbiota by Manges et al., hospitalized patients with CDΙ exhibited an increase in the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria and a decrease in Bacteroidetes. The above patients also exhibited an increase in the Lactobacillaceae and Enterococcaceae families [62]. Rea et al. compared the gut microbiome of patients with positive cultures for C. difficile (carriers) to that of patients with negative cultures for C. difficile. The positive patients had a decrease in Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Bifobacteria genera and an increase in the members of the Lactobacillaceae and Enterobacteriaceae families [63,64].
Antibiotics affect the total number and the proportions of metabolites in the intestine by altering the gut microbiota. Bacterial fermentation is particularly modified, leading to a decrease of short-chain fatty acids and an excess of carbohydrates and amino acids [64,65], C. difficile could utilize primary bile acids for stimulating germination process and, therefore, would also be able to colonize and grow [66]. The primary bile acids assist in digesting fat, after being produced in the liver and reabsorbed from the small intestine. A small amount of primary bile acids that is not reabsorbed is passed into the colon, where they are metabolized into secondary bile acids by the normal gut microbiota. These secondary bile acids inhibit C. difficile growth [66].

5.2. Gut Microbiota and Age

Advanced age (>65 years) is an independent risk factor for the development of CDI. The age-related normal alterations in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as the dietary habits, the more frequent hospital visits, and the human immune response impact the composition of gut microbiota. While the gut microbiota of healthy adults appears to be relatively stable, in individuals over the age of 65, a reduction of the protective species of the Bifidobacteria and some members of the Firmicutes has been found, as well as an increase in Bacteroidetes and the more harmful phylum, such as Proteobacteria [63,67].

5.3. Gut Microbiota and Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs- Gastric Acid Suppressants)

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a class of medications used to treat common gastrointestinal conditions. They work by blocking an enzyme in the wall of the stomach to suppress the gastric acid production [68,69]. These gastric acid suppression agents may decrease the colonization barrier against C. difficile by increasing gastric pH [70]. The use of PPIs, particularly in combination with antibiotics, disrupts the gut microbiota and is associated with the development of CDI. In vitro studies have shown that the PPIs can affect the development of Lactobacillus, and at the same time cause a decrease in the Bacteroidetes and an increase in the Firmicutes at the phylum level, and an increase in Holdomania filiformis and a decrease in Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus at a species level [71]. Persons who develop CDI are known to have a decrease in the diversity of the fecal microbiota compared to healthy controls and are more likely to have a relative increase in Firmicutes as well as a reduction in Bacteroidetes [72]. The alteration in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes may pre-dispose to the development of CDI.

5.4. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and CDI

There is increasing evidence of the pathogenic implication of host microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Patients who suffer from other gastrointestinal diseases run a possible higher risk of occurrence of C. difficile infection [73]. The inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been studied in relation to CDI and reduced diversity of the Firmicutes and the Bacteroidetes in the gut microbiome of these patients was found [74]. In addition, the microbiome of patients with IBD has been associated with the existence of many potentially pathogenic bacteria, mainly Proteobacteria [75]. (Figure 2). Clayton et al. evaluated the outpatients with IBD who were in clinical remission and had no recent exposure to antimicrobials, corticosteroids, immunomodulatory drugs, or hospitalizations [76]. These patients were carriers of C. difficile by 8.2%, in comparison with 1% of the healthy outpatient population. The immune response of the host also has the ability to regulate the microbiome. Patients with IBD are at increased risk of developing CDI, have worse outcomes of CDI, and also higher rates of recurrence [77]. The inflammatory products, such as antimicrobial peptides lipocalin-2 and calprotectin, deprive the bacteria of iron and zinc essential to their growth, potentially affecting the development of the microorganisms [78].
A relevant study conducted by Andersen et al. reports that IBD activity influences gut microbiota, and also the disease severity and treatment have an effect on the microbial community of the gut. Their results suggested that gut microbiota alteration (dysbiosis) in IBD patients is not only related to current activity but also to the course of the disease [79], providing a favorable environment for the colonization of the gut with C. difficile and the subsequent CDI.

6. Alterations in Gut Microbiota in CDI

The normal gut microbiota plays a key role in the prevention of infection by increasing colonization resistance against C. difficile. The intestinal colonization resistance against pathogens is achieved either with immediate inhibition of the pathogens by substances produced by the microbiota (bacteriocins, antibiotics, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA)) or with competition for the available nutrients or indirectly through the stimulation of the immune defense mechanisms [80,81]. The decrease in the colonization resistance leads to the eradication of certain species or genera, a decrease in the diversity of the microbiota, and alterations in the availability of nutrients and the physiology of the mucus [81]. The exact mechanisms with which the gut microbiota limits the development of C. difficile are associated with the alteration of the metabolism of the bile salts, the competition for nutrients, and the decrease in bacteria that produce butyric acid [50,82]. The impact of gut microbiota in the intestinal metabolism (including carbohydrate fermentation, regulation of amino acid metabolism, protein digestion, and lipid metabolism) is important, converting luminal compounds into secondary metabolites, which can be either beneficial or harmful to the host.
Alterations in gut microbial composition have been described for CDI patients, including lower species richness and microbial diversity than in healthy individuals [83,84], with the dominance of Proteobacteria and specifically an abundance of Enterobacteriaceae [85].
However, alterations in gut microbial composition in patients with asymptomatic C. difficile colonization have not been clearly described. The intestinal microbial communities of patients with CDI differ from C. difficile carriers, and therefore it is suggested that the absence, presence, or abundance of specific bacterial taxa is a possible cause for the development of CDI or C. difficile colonization [86,87]. C. difficile carriers were found to have fewer Proteobacteria and a larger proportion of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes than CDI patients, so as to closely resemble healthy individuals [84]. The role of asymptomatic C. difficile colonization in the development of CDI is still a controversial matter of debate.
Horvat et al. demonstrated that C. difficile could have a strain-dependent impact on gut microbiota [88]. The study suggested that the association of C. difficile colonization and/or infection with a decrease in gut microbiota diversity is not only a predisposing condition [89] but also a consequence of C. difficile infection [88].
According to Khana et al., the gut microbiome predicts the treatment response and recurrence potentially in primary CDI. Patients who responded to treatment had an increase in Ruminococcaceae, Rikenellaceae, Clostridiaceae, Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, and Rothia compared to nonresponders. Moreover, patients with recurrent CDI had statistically significant increases in Veillonella, Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococci, Parabacteroides, and Lachnospiraceae compared to patients without recurrence [90].

6.1. Bile Acids and C. difficile

Gut microbiota also plays an important role in the co-metabolism of bile acids with the host. The primary bile acids that are synthesized in the liver consist mainly of cholic and chenodeoxycholic acid, which are conjugated with taurine or glycine [91,92]. The fraction of the bile acids that is not reabsorbed in the ileum (<5%) passes through the colon, where it undergoes bacterial metabolism; the primary bile acids are metabolized in secondary ones, such as lithocholic and deoxycholic respectively [49,50,93]. In vitro studies have shown that the conjugated and deconjugated forms of cholic acid cause the spore germination of C. difficile, while chenodeoxycholic acid inhibits it [94,95]. Lithocholic acid inhibits the germination of the spores, whereas deoxycholic acid fosters it, but it is toxic for the vegetative form of C. difficile [94,96]. When the gut microbiota is disrupted by the intake of antibiotics, the primary bile acids are not transformed into secondary ones [97], with an increase in the proportion of the cholic to chenodeoxycholic derivatives [97] due to faster absorption of the latter by the epithelium of the large intestine. This entire procedure causes the germination of the spores and the development of C. difficile [20]. Primary bile acids (cholate derivatives), which are in high concentrations in the small intestine, serve as germinant for C. difficile spores, whereas secondary bile acids (deoxycholate) in low concentration in the hind gut inhibit vegetative growth of C. difficile. Antibiotic administration reduces the gut microbial communities’ diversity, leading to a significant reduction in microbial bioconversion of primary bile acids into antimicrobial secondary bile acids, leading to reduced inhibition of C. difficile vegetative growth, allowing C. difficile overgrowth and colonization [98]. As a result, there is a higher susceptibility of the host toward CDI.

6.2. Availability of Substrate Sources and C. difficile

Antibiotics can affect the availability of nutrients in the intestine in various ways. First, by decreasing the diversity of the gut microbiota, they reduce the competition for limited resources, fostering the development of micro-organisms. At the same time, the lysis of the sensitive to antibiotics bacteria releases carbon sources that are consumed by other members of the microbial community [99]. Wilson and Perini found that the components of the mucin (sialic acids, Ν-acetylglucosamine, and Ν-acetylneuramanic acid) which are abundant in the intestine, positively affect the in vitro development of C. difficile [100]. Under normal conditions, the gut microbiota microorganisms compete for the consumption of sialic acids that are released by the intestinal mucosa. However, when the microbiota is suppressed by antimicrobials, the sialic acid catabolism by C. difficile provides an advantage in C. difficile proliferation [46].

6.3. Butyric Acid and C. difficile

Butyric acid is a source of energy for the intestinal cells and plays a key role in the regulation of the proliferation, the intestinal epithelial cells’ diversity, and in preserving the integrity of the gut epithelium [101]. It protects the host from infection by increasing the defense barriers through the stimulation of the production of mucin and antimicrobial peptides [102]. SCFA have been proven to inhibit the in vitro development of C. difficile, and has an anti-inflammatory effect. The decrease in the bacteria that produce butyric acid can alter the defense of the host against C. difficile, and can increase the sensitivity to CDI [61]. The genera Roseburia and Coprococcus that belong to the Lahnospiraceae family and also Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a major member of the Firmicutes, are important members of the gut microbiota and are involved in the production of butyric acid [103]. In a relevant study by Antharam et al., several members of the Ruminicoccaceae and Lahnospiraceae families appeared decreased in an infection from C. difficile [61]. Beneficial bacteria, particularly butyrate-producing bacteria (Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae), are present in larger proportions in microbiota without C. difficile. These bacteria are usually found in healthy subjects and are thought to provide colonization resistance against CDI [80].

7. Restoration of the Gut Microbiota as Therapeutic for CDI

Improved understanding of antibiotic-induced microbiome dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of CDI has given rise to the development of new promising therapeutic approaches that involve the restoration of gut microbiota, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).
The administration of antibiotics, such as vancomycin, metronidazole, or fidaxomicin, is typically successful in relieving CDI symptoms. However, the treatment of recurrent infections from C. difficile is a great therapeutic challenge, where the transplantation of gut microbiota seems particularly promising in restoring gut homeostasis [104]. After CDI treatment, the risk of a recurrence within 8 weeks is 15–25% and is further increased up to 60% in patients with multiple recurrences [105]. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was used as a treatment, aiming at re-establishing colonization resistance in the host’s gastrointestinal tract by replenishing the gut microbiota. Restoration of the composition of the microbiota and community structure leads to restoration of its function, including colonization resistance, gut homeostasis, and physical barrier defense [106].
FMT is becoming a mainstream treatment for recurrent CDI. Microbiota replacement therapies for CDI include capsule-based and enema-based therapies [107].
In enema based therapy, feces from a healthy donor are inserted into the colon of a patient with recurrent disease after filtering through a nasogastric oral tube, rectal enema, or colonoscopy [108,109]. The ideal recipients of FMT are patients over the age of 18 with concurrent CDI and failure of appropriate antibiotic treatment. The number of concurrent infections required to conduct fecal transplantations has not been clearly defined. However, recent evidence includes cases of patients with three or more incidents of CDI despite appropriate treatment, or two or more incidents of CDI with hospitalization and significant morbidity, patients with moderate CDI irresponsive to treatment with oral vancomycin for over a week, or patients with severe CDI irresponsive to oral vancomycin for 48 hours [110,111,112]. In a randomized study, 93% of the patients that received oral vancomycin and bowel irrigation followed by FMT exhibited a significant decrease in their diarrheal episodes, whereas only 31% of the patients that received only vancomycin and 23% of those who received vancomycin and bowel irrigation had positive outcomes, demonstrating that FMT was significantly more effective for the treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection than the use of vancomycin [113]. FMT is an approved treatment for recurrent CDI but there is uncertainty about its use and could represent a treatment option with perspective. The FMT cost is potentially lower in relation to the cost of repeated courses of antibiotics and hospitalization. The identification of symbiotic bacteria of the gastrointestinal tract, which are able to induce protection against C. difficile, could lead, in the future, to the use of beneficial bacteria of either one genus or one mixture of symbiotic bacteria to fight the said pathogen and prevent the infection [114]. Following FMT, there is a shift in gut microbiome composition with an abundance of Bacteroidetes and a significant reduction of Proteobacteria. Van Nood et al. observed an increase in gut Bacteroidetes and Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa (Firmicutes), and a reduction in Proteobacteria post-FMT, suggesting the importance of Bacteroidetes and the non-pathogenic Clostridia member in suppressing C. difficile outgrowth [7]. Konturek et al. also demonstrated a high curing rate (94%) of CDI after FMT application, presenting an increase in beneficial bacteria including Lactobacillaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Desulfovibrionaceae, Sutturellaceae, and Porhyromonadeacae, along with decrease in aggresive bacteria such as Enterobacteriaceae and Veillonellaceae [115].
Khanna et al. detected that SER-109 potentially prevents CDI recurrence within an 8-week follow-up period in patients experiencing recurrence, presumably through a change in the gut microbiota and recovery of natural colonization resistance [116]. SER-109 comprises Firmicutes spores derived from healthy donor stool. Results from the phase II trial indicate that SER-109 did not have the primary outcome for reducing CDI recurrence overall. However, in high-risk populations (those 65 years or older), SER-109 treatment showed reduced recurrence rates (45% versus 80% recurrence risk) [117]. There is also another oral microbiome therapeutic called SER-262, in contrast to SER-109, which is a defined microbial community consisting of the spores of anaerobic, commensal bacteria produced by in vitro fermentation and is not an undefined consortium derived from human stool [118]. SER-262 is currently being tested in a phase I trial for adult patients to prevent recurrent CDI. Furthermore, the understanding of metabolic pathways used by symbiotic microbes in order to compete with pathogenic microbes can lead to the genetic modification of the symbiotic microbes with an increased ability to limit the colonization with pathogens. Such a development would enhance our therapeutic arsenal to fight intestinal infections, such as these are caused by C. difficile. Moreover, it has been estimated that the change in the diet and the use of prebiotics or probiotics could possibly restore the colonization resistance against C. difficile [119,120]. Reducing antimicrobial use would arguably reduce antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Clearly, hand decontamination through proper handwashing and glove utilization may impact on controlling C. difficile transmission within healthcare environments.
A comprehensive understanding of the gut microbiota composition, in both states of health and various diseases, is needed for the development of future approaches for microbiota modulation and for developing targeted therapies.

8. Conclusions

C. difficile is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although CDI pathogenesis is relatively well known, it is important to better understand the role of the gut microbiota in the prevention and outcome of disease and also the value of FMT in CDI. The role of gut microbiota is prevalent throughout the entire life-cycle of C. difficile, from spore transmission and germination into infection development. Several studies have described the composition of the gut microbiota in subjects that develop colonization or infection from C. difficile. While the exact reasons for the loss of colonization resistance remain unclear, comprehensive bacterial replacement during FMT has shown that restoration of certain components of the microbiota is effective in treating recurrence. Decreased microbial diversity is associated with recurrent disease. Future research is needed to find the specific community members needed to restore colonization resistance. However, the interactions among host, pathogen, and microbiota in CDI present multiple opportunities for the development of novel therapies that target specific steps in pathogenesis. As such, emerging therapies can reduce the risk of CDI by lowering the effect of systemic antibiotics, decreasing the levels of primary bile acids, increasing secondary bile acids, and restoring the native gut microbiota.
Insights gained from human gut microbiota have revealed novel therapeutic options for CDI. New techniques, such as post-genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses, can possibly determine the way in which C. difficile eradicates the colonization resistance in the intestine, paving the way for the development of new, more successful treatments and prevention.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Coignard, B.; Barbut, F.; Blanckaert, K.; Thiolet, J.M.; Poujol, I.; Carbonne, A.; Petit, J.C.; Desenclos, J.C. Emergence of Clostridium difficile toxinotype III, PCR-ribotype 027-associated disease, France, 2006. Euro Surveill. 2006, 11, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuijper, E.J.; Coignard, B.; Tull, P. Emergence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in North America and Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006, 12 (Suppl. S6), 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Van Nood, E.; Keller, J.J.; Kuijper, E.J.; Speelman, P. New treatment options for infections with Clostridium difficile. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 2013, 157, A6580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Hillman, E.T.; Lu, H.; Yao, T.; Nakatsu, C.H. Microbial Ecology along the Gastrointestinal Tract. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Thursby, E.; Juge, N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1823–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hooper, L.V.; Midtvedt, T.; Gordon, J.I. How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2002, 22, 283–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Kho, Z.Y.; Lal, S.K. The Human Gut Microbiome—A Potential Controller of Wellness and Disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Guarner, F.; Malagelada, J.R. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet 2003, 361, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kawabata, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Terao, J. Role of Intestinal Microbiota in the Bioavailability and Physiological Functions of Dietary Polyphenols. Molecules 2019, 24, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hattori, M.; Taylor, T.D. The human intestinal microbiome: A new frontier of human biology. DNA Res. 2009, 16, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Spor, A.; Koren, O.; Ley, R. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bartlett, J.G.; Gorbach, S.L. Pseudomembranous enterocolitis (antibiotic-related colitis). Adv. Intern. Med. 1977, 22, 455–476. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Dubberke, E. Clostridium difficile infection: The scope of the problem. J. Hosp. Med. 2012, 7 (Suppl. S3), S1–S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sunenshine, R.H.; McDonald, L.C. Clostridium difficile-associated disease: New challenges from an established pathogen. Cleve Clin. J. Med. 2006, 73, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Honda, H.; Dubberke, E.R. The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2014, 30, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013 (accessed on 4 December 2019).
  17. Bloomfield, L.E.; Riley, T.V. Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection: A Narrative Review. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2016, 5, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rousseau, C.; Poilane, I.; De Pontual, L.; Maherault, A.C.; Le Monnier, A.; Collignon, A. Clostridium difficile carriage in healthy infants in the community: A potential reservoir for pathogenic strains. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 1209–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Underwood, S.; Guan, S.; Vijayasubhash, V.; Baines, S.D.; Graham, L.; Lewis, R.J.; Wilcox, M.H.; Stephenson, K. Characterization of the sporulation initiation pathway of Clostridium difficile and its role in toxin production. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 7296–7305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Staley, C.; Weingarden, A.R.; Khoruts, A.; Sadowsky, M.J. Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lyerly, D.M.; Lockwood, D.E.; Richardson, S.H.; Wilkins, T.D. Biological activities of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile. Infect. Immun. 1982, 35, 1147–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kachrimanidou, M.; Malisiovas, N. Clostridium difficile infection: A comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anderson, D.M.; Sheedlo, M.J.; Jensen, J.L.; Lacy, D.B. Structural insights into the transition of Clostridioides difficile binary toxin from prepore to pore. Nat. Microbiol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gerding, D.N.; Johnson, S.; Rupnik, M.; Aktories, K. Clostridium difficile binary toxin CDT: Mechanism, epidemiology, and potential clinical importance. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. King, A.M.; Mackin, K.E.; Lyras, D. Emergence of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strains: Epidemiological and clinical considerations. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Collado, M.C.; Cernada, M.; Bauerl, C.; Vento, M.; Perez-Martinez, G. Microbial ecology and host-microbiota interactions during early life stages. Gut Microbes 2012, 3, 352–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cani, P.D. Human gut microbiome: Hopes, threats and promises. Gut 2018, 67, 1716–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ursell, L.K.; Metcalf, J.L.; Parfrey, L.W.; Knight, R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70 (Suppl. S1), S38–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kang, S.; Denman, S.E.; Morrison, M.; Yu, Z.; Dore, J.; Leclerc, M.; McSweeney, C.S. Dysbiosis of fecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease patients as revealed by a custom phylogenetic microarray. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 2034–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sekirov, I.; Russell, S.L.; Antunes, L.C.; Finlay, B.B. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 859–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Morgan, X.C.; Tickle, T.L.; Sokol, H.; Gevers, D.; Devaney, K.L.; Ward, D.V.; Reyes, J.A.; Shah, S.A.; LeLeiko, N.; Snapper, S.B.; et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 2012, 13, R79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fraher, M.H.; O’Toole, P.W.; Quigley, E.M. Techniques used to characterize the gut microbiota: A guide for the clinician. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 9, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tringe, S.G.; Hugenholtz, P. A renaissance for the pioneering 16S rRNA gene. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rinninella, E.; Raoul, P.; Cintoni, M.; Franceschi, F.; Miggiano, G.A.D.; Gasbarrini, A.; Mele, M.C. What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Flint, H.J.; Scott, K.P.; Duncan, S.H.; Louis, P.; Forano, E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 2012, 3, 289–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Dumas, M.E. The microbial-mammalian metabolic axis: Beyond simple metabolism. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 489–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jeffery, I.B.; Claesson, M.J.; O’Toole, P.W.; Shanahan, F. Categorization of the gut microbiota: Enterotypes or gradients? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schloissnig, S.; Arumugam, M.; Sunagawa, S.; Mitreva, M.; Tap, J.; Zhu, A.; Waller, A.; Mende, D.R.; Kultima, J.R.; Martin, J.; et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 2013, 493, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lozupone, C.A.; Stombaugh, J.I.; Gordon, J.I.; Jansson, J.K.; Knight, R. Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 2012, 489, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fukuda, S.; Toh, H.; Hase, K.; Oshima, K.; Nakanishi, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Tobe, T.; Clarke, J.M.; Topping, D.L.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature 2011, 469, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olszak, T.; An, D.; Zeissig, S.; Vera, M.P.; Richter, J.; Franke, A.; Glickman, J.N.; Siebert, R.; Baron, R.M.; Kasper, D.L.; et al. Microbial exposure during early life has persistent effects on natural killer T cell function. Science 2012, 336, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Pickard, J.M.; Zeng, M.Y.; Caruso, R.; Nunez, G. Gut microbiota: Role in pathogen colonization, immune responses, and inflammatory disease. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 279, 70–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tailford, L.E.; Crost, E.H.; Kavanaugh, D.; Juge, N. Mucin glycan foraging in the human gut microbiome. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. McGuckin, M.A.; Linden, S.K.; Sutton, P.; Florin, T.H. Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tong, M.; Jacobs, J.P.; McHardy, I.H.; Braun, J. Sampling of intestinal microbiota and targeted amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes for microbial ecologic analysis. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2014, 107, 7.41.1–7.41.11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ng, K.M.; Ferreyra, J.A.; Higginbottom, S.K.; Lynch, J.B.; Kashyap, P.C.; Gopinath, S.; Naidu, N.; Choudhury, B.; Weimer, B.C.; Monack, D.M.; et al. Microbiota-liberated host sugars facilitate post-antibiotic expansion of enteric pathogens. Nature 2013, 502, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Macfarlane, G.T.; Macfarlane, S. Bacteria, colonic fermentation, and gastrointestinal health. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Canani, R.B.; Costanzo, M.D.; Leone, L.; Pedata, M.; Meli, R.; Calignano, A. Potential beneficial effects of butyrate in intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gerard, P. Metabolism of cholesterol and bile acids by the gut microbiota. Pathogens 2013, 3, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ridlon, J.M.; Kang, D.J.; Hylemon, P.B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid. Res. 2006, 47, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Begley, M.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 625–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Theriot, C.M.; Koenigsknecht, M.J.; Carlson, P.E., Jr.; Hatton, G.E.; Nelson, A.M.; Li, B.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Li, J.; Young, V.B. Antibiotic-induced shifts in the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome increase susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Theriot, C.M.; Young, V.B. Microbial and metabolic interactions between the gastrointestinal tract and Clostridium difficile infection. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Antonopoulos, D.A.; Huse, S.M.; Morrison, H.G.; Schmidt, T.M.; Sogin, M.L.; Young, V.B. Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 2367–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Dethlefsen, L.; Relman, D.A. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4554–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, X.; Katchar, K.; Goldsmith, J.D.; Nanthakumar, N.; Cheknis, A.; Gerding, D.N.; Kelly, C.P. A mouse model of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Reeves, A.E.; Theriot, C.M.; Bergin, I.L.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Schloss, P.D.; Young, V.B. The interplay between microbiome dynamics and pathogen dynamics in a murine model of Clostridium difficile Infection. Gut Microbes 2011, 2, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Reeves, A.E.; Koenigsknecht, M.J.; Bergin, I.L.; Young, V.B. Suppression of Clostridium difficile in the gastrointestinal tracts of germfree mice inoculated with a murine isolate from the family Lachnospiraceae. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 3786–3794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Buffie, C.G.; Jarchum, I.; Equinda, M.; Lipuma, L.; Gobourne, A.; Viale, A.; Ubeda, C.; Xavier, J.; Pamer, E.G. Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to Clostridium difficile-induced colitis. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Spigaglia, P. Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, 23–42. [Google Scholar]
  61. Antharam, V.C.; Li, E.C.; Ishmael, A.; Sharma, A.; Mai, V.; Rand, K.H.; Wang, G.P. Intestinal dysbiosis and depletion of butyrogenic bacteria in Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2884–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Manges, A.R.; Labbe, A.; Loo, V.G.; Atherton, J.K.; Behr, M.A.; Masson, L.; Tellis, P.A.; Brousseau, R. Comparative metagenomic study of alterations to the intestinal microbiota and risk of nosocomial Clostridum difficile-associated disease. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 1877–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Claesson, M.J.; Cusack, S.; O’Sullivan, O.; Greene-Diniz, R.; de Weerd, H.; Flannery, E.; Marchesi, J.R.; Falush, D.; Dinan, T.; Fitzgerald, G.; et al. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4586–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chambers, E.S.; Preston, T.; Frost, G.; Morrison, D.J. Role of Gut Microbiota-Generated Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Metabolic and Cardiovascular Health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2018, 7, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Luu, M.; Visekruna, A. Short-chain fatty acids: Bacterial messengers modulating the immunometabolism of T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2019, 49, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Francis, M.B.; Allen, C.A.; Shrestha, R.; Sorg, J.A. Bile acid recognition by the Clostridium difficile germinant receptor, CspC, is important for establishing infection. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hopkins, M.J.; Sharp, R.; Macfarlane, G.T. Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 2001, 48, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shen, N.T.; Maw, A.; Tmanova, L.L.; Pino, A.; Ancy, K.; Crawford, C.V.; Simon, M.S.; Evans, A.T. Timely Use of Probiotics in Hospitalized Adults Prevents Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review With Meta-Regression Analysis. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1889–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Vernaya, M.; McAdam, J.; Hampton, M.D. Effectiveness of probiotics in reducing the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in elderly patients: A systematic review. JBI Database System Rev. Implement Rep. 2017, 15, 140–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khanafer, N.; Vanhems, P.; Barbut, F.; Luxemburger, C.; Demont, C.; Hulin, M.; Dauwalder, O.; Vandenesch, F.; Argaud, L.; Badet, L.; et al. Factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection: A nested case-control study in a three year prospective cohort. Anaerobe 2017, 44, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Clooney, A.G.; Bernstein, C.N.; Leslie, W.D.; Vagianos, K.; Sargent, M.; Laserna-Mendieta, E.J.; Claesson, M.J.; Targownik, L.E. A comparison of the gut microbiome between long-term users and non-users of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 43, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Goldberg, E.; Amir, I.; Zafran, M.; Gophna, U.; Samra, Z.; Pitlik, S.; Bishara, J. The correlation between Clostridium-difficile infection and human gut concentrations of Bacteroidetes phylum and clostridial species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Berg, A.M.; Kelly, C.P.; Farraye, F.A. Clostridium difficile infection in the inflammatory bowel disease patient. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Manichanh, C.; Rigottier-Gois, L.; Bonnaud, E.; Gloux, K.; Pelletier, E.; Frangeul, L.; Nalin, R.; Jarrin, C.; Chardon, P.; Marteau, P.; et al. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut 2006, 55, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Nagalingam, N.A.; Lynch, S.V. Role of the microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 968–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Clayton, E.M.; Rea, M.C.; Shanahan, F.; Quigley, E.M.; Kiely, B.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. The vexed relationship between Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease: An assessment of carriage in an outpatient setting among patients in remission. Am J. Gastroenterol 2009, 104, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Jodorkovsky, D.; Young, Y.; Abreu, M.T. Clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis and co-existing Clostridium difficile infection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2010, 55, 415–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Faber, F.; Baumler, A.J. The impact of intestinal inflammation on the nutritional environment of the gut microbiota. Immunol. Lett. 2014, 162, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Vester-Andersen, M.K.; Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, H.C.; Prosberg, M.V.; Mortensen, C.O.; Trager, C.; Skovsen, K.; Thorkilgaard, T.; Nojgaard, C.; Vind, I.; Krogfelt, K.A.; et al. Increased abundance of proteobacteria in aggressive Crohn’s disease seven years after diagnosis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ross, C.L.; Spinler, J.K.; Savidge, T.C. Structural and functional changes within the gut microbiota and susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection. Anaerobe 2016, 41, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Stecher, B.; Hardt, W.D. Mechanisms controlling pathogen colonization of the gut. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Britton, R.A.; Young, V.B. Interaction between the intestinal microbiota and host in Clostridium difficile colonization resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2012, 20, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Gu, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lu, H.; Lv, T.; Shen, P.; Lv, L.; Zheng, B.; Jiang, X.; Li, L. Identification of key taxa that favor intestinal colonization of Clostridium difficile in an adult Chinese population. Microbes Infect. 2016, 18, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, L.; Dong, D.; Jiang, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Peng, Y. Insight into alteration of gut microbiota in Clostridium difficile infection and asymptomatic C. difficile colonization. Anaerobe 2015, 34, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Seekatz, A.M.; Theriot, C.M.; Molloy, C.T.; Wozniak, K.L.; Bergin, I.L.; Young, V.B. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Eliminates Clostridium difficile in a Murine Model of Relapsing Disease. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 3838–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Schaffler, H.; Breitruck, A. Clostridium difficile—From Colonization to Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Crobach, M.J.T.; Vernon, J.J.; Loo, V.G.; Kong, L.Y.; Pechine, S.; Wilcox, M.H.; Kuijper, E.J. Understanding Clostridium difficile Colonization. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Horvat, S.; Rupnik, M. Interactions Between Clostridioides difficile and Fecal Microbiota in in Vitro Batch Model: Growth, Sporulation, and Microbiota Changes. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vincent, C.; Manges, A.R. Antimicrobial Use, Human Gut Microbiota and Clostridium difficile Colonization and Infection. Antibiotics 2015, 4, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khanna, S.; Montassier, E.; Schmidt, B.; Patel, R.; Knights, D.; Pardi, D.S.; Kashyap, P. Gut microbiome predictors of treatment response and recurrence in primary Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 44, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Russell, D.W. The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003, 72, 137–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Chiang, J.Y. Regulation of bile acid synthesis: Pathways, nuclear receptors, and mechanisms. J. Hepatol. 2004, 40, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jones, B.V.; Begley, M.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G.; Marchesi, J.R. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 13580–13585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Sorg, J.A.; Sonenshein, A.L. Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for Clostridium difficile spores. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 2505–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Sorg, J.A.; Sonenshein, A.L. Chenodeoxycholate is an inhibitor of Clostridium difficile spore germination. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 1115–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Sorg, J.A.; Sonenshein, A.L. Inhibiting the initiation of Clostridium difficile spore germination using analogs of chenodeoxycholic acid, a bile acid. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 4983–4990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Wang, S.; Dong, W.; Liu, L.; Xu, M.; Wang, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Cao, H. Interplay between bile acids and the gut microbiota promotes intestinal carcinogenesis. Mol. Carcinog. 2019, 58, 1155–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Theriot, C.M.; Bowman, A.A.; Young, V.B. Antibiotic-Induced Alterations of the Gut Microbiota Alter Secondary Bile Acid Production and Allow for Clostridium difficile Spore Germination and Outgrowth in the Large Intestine. mSphere 2016, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Britton, R.A.; Young, V.B. Role of the intestinal microbiota in resistance to colonization by Clostridium difficile. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1547–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Wilson, K.H.; Perini, F. Role of competition for nutrients in suppression of Clostridium difficile by the colonic microflora. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 2610–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Kong, S.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zhang, W. Regulation of Intestinal Epithelial Cells Properties and Functions by Amino Acids. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 2819154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Guilloteau, P.; Martin, L.; Eeckhaut, V.; Ducatelle, R.; Zabielski, R.; Van Immerseel, F. From the gut to the peripheral tissues: The multiple effects of butyrate. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 366–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Chu, N.D.; Smith, M.B.; Perrotta, A.R.; Kassam, Z.; Alm, E.J. Profiling Living Bacteria Informs Preparation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantations. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Levy, A.N.; Allegretti, J.R. Insights into the role of fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2019, 12, 1756284819836893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Ramsay, I.; Brown, N.M.; Enoch, D.A. Recent Progress for the Effective Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. Infect. Dis. (Auckl.) 2018, 11, 1178633718758023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Kelly, C.R.; Khoruts, A.; Staley, C.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Abd, M.; Alani, M.; Bakow, B.; Curran, P.; McKenney, J.; Tisch, A.; et al. Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrence in Multiply Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016, 165, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Kao, D.; Roach, B.; Silva, M.; Beck, P.; Rioux, K.; Kaplan, G.G.; Chang, H.J.; Coward, S.; Goodman, K.J.; Xu, H.; et al. Effect of Oral Capsule- vs Colonoscopy-Delivered Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017, 318, 1985–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Aas, J.; Gessert, C.E.; Bakken, J.S. Recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis: Case series involving 18 patients treated with donor stool administered via a nasogastric tube. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Rubin, T.A.; Gessert, C.E.; Aas, J. Stool transplantation for older patients with Clostridium difficile infection. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2009, 57, 2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cammarota, G.; Gallo, A.; Bibbo, S. Fecal microbiota transplant for C. difficile infection: Just say yes. Anaerobe 2019, 102109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hui, W.; Li, T.; Liu, W.; Zhou, C.; Gao, F. Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection: An updated randomized controlled trial meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Nowak, A.; Hedenstierna, M.; Ursing, J.; Lidman, C.; Nowak, P. Efficacy of Routine Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Microbiol. 2019, 2019, 7395127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Van Nood, E.; Vrieze, A.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Fuentes, S.; Zoetendal, E.G.; de Vos, W.M.; Visser, C.E.; Kuijper, E.J.; Bartelsman, J.F.; Tijssen, J.G.; et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Ubeda, C.; Djukovic, A.; Isaac, S. Roles of the intestinal microbiota in pathogen protection. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2017, 6, e128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Konturek, P.C.; Koziel, J.; Dieterich, W.; Haziri, D.; Wirtz, S.; Glowczyk, I.; Konturek, K.; Neurath, M.F.; Zopf, Y. Successful therapy of Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2016, 67, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Khanna, S.; Pardi, D.S.; Kelly, C.R.; Kraft, C.S.; Dhere, T.; Henn, M.R.; Lombardo, M.J.; Vulic, M.; Ohsumi, T.; Winkler, J.; et al. A Novel Microbiome Therapeutic Increases Gut Microbial Diversity and Prevents Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Martin, J.; Wilcox, M. New and emerging therapies for Clostridium difficile infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 29, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Dieterle, M.G.; Rao, K.; Young, V.B. Novel therapies and preventative strategies for primary and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1435, 110–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Hudson, L.E.; Anderson, S.E.; Corbett, A.H.; Lamb, T.J. Gleaning Insights from Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Probiotic Studies for the Rational Design of Combination Microbial Therapies. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 191–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00200 g001 550
Figure 1. Gut microbiota and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Gut microbiota has central role to C. difficile infection pathogenesis. ↓ decreased.
Figure 1. Gut microbiota and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Gut microbiota has central role to C. difficile infection pathogenesis. ↓ decreased.
Microorganisms 08 00200 g001
Microorganisms 08 00200 g002 550
Figure 2. Taxonomic alterations associated with CDI risk factors. Following exposure to CDI risk factors, the microbiome is altered. Disruption of the microbiota due to factors such as antibiotic use, drugs, and prolonged age can lead to the development of CDI. Following fecal microbiota transplantation, the structure and function of the gut microbiota is restored. PPI, proton pump inhibitor. CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection. FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. ↑ increased. ↓ decreased.
Figure 2. Taxonomic alterations associated with CDI risk factors. Following exposure to CDI risk factors, the microbiome is altered. Disruption of the microbiota due to factors such as antibiotic use, drugs, and prolonged age can lead to the development of CDI. Following fecal microbiota transplantation, the structure and function of the gut microbiota is restored. PPI, proton pump inhibitor. CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection. FMT, fecal microbiota transplantation. IBD, inflammatory bowel disease. ↑ increased. ↓ decreased.
Microorganisms 08 00200 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kachrimanidou, M.; Tsintarakis, E. Insights into the Role of Human Gut Microbiota in Clostridioides difficile Infection. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020200

AMA Style

Kachrimanidou M, Tsintarakis E. Insights into the Role of Human Gut Microbiota in Clostridioides difficile Infection. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kachrimanidou, Melina, and Eleftherios Tsintarakis. 2020. "Insights into the Role of Human Gut Microbiota in Clostridioides difficile Infection" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020200

APA Style

Kachrimanidou, M., & Tsintarakis, E. (2020). Insights into the Role of Human Gut Microbiota in Clostridioides difficile Infection. Microorganisms, 8(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop