Next Article in Journal
Correction: Mbehang Nguema, P.P., et al. Characterization of ESBL-Producing Enterobacteria from Fruit Bats in an Unprotected Area of Makokou, Gabon. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 138
Previous Article in Journal
Extending the Enterovirus Lead: Could a Related Picornavirus be Responsible for Diabetes in Humans?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathogenesis-Targeted Preventive Strategies for Multidrug Resistant Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for Special Issue “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens”

by
Despoina Koulenti
1,2,*,
Paraskevi C. Fragkou
3 and
Sotirios Tsiodras
3
1
UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
2
2nd Critical Care Department, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
3
4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(9), 1383; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091383
Submission received: 31 July 2020 / Accepted: 31 August 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens)
The era of injudicious use of antibiotics in both humans and animals has led to the selection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, which in turn has left the medical community with limited therapeutic options. MDR infections are associated not only with significant morbidity and mortality, but also they represent a huge economic burden for the healthcare system globally [1]. Importantly, in addition to MDR infections associated with the healthcare setting, which represent the major concerns at present, MDR organisms are increasingly identified in community-acquired infections as well as in animals. This phenomenon signifies that excessive use of antibiotics has led to the universal spread of resistant pathogens, affecting humans both directly and indirectly though the food chain. Hence, further research is urgently needed to guide the best approaches and practices for the prevention and control of MDR infections, as well as to investigate the role of novel and old antimicrobials in the fight against MDR pathogens. Moreover, the development and validation of rapid and reliable diagnostic techniques will enable the fast identification of resistance patterns that would facilitate the prompt implementation of targeted treatment and infection control measures. The 22 articles in the Special Issue on “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens” present an in-depth and multifaceted approach to different aspects of infections caused by MDR strains, including epidemiological aspects, prevention strategies, as well as the role of novel and old “re-discovered” antimicrobials and other emerging therapeutic options.
MDR pathogens are usually implicated in nosocomial infections. Rouzé et al. conducted an ancillary analysis of a prospective multicenter study on the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections, and found that the rate of MDR bacteria was not significantly different between COPD and non-COPD patients, while Escherichia coli and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia were significantly more frequent in COPD patients [2]. A retrospective five-year single cohort observational study on the epidemiology of MDR infection in 73 oncological patients by Perdikouri et al. showed that the most frequently isolated pathogens were carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, while infection-associated mortality was as high as 32% [3]. Caneiras et al. conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 81 K. pneumoniae strains isolated from patients with community-acquired or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections; the authors concluded that all 31 hospital-acquired isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers and had a multidrug resistant profile as compared to the community strains, despite that bla genes were also detected in 12% of the community strains [4]. Although MDR pathogens are primarily associated with nosocomial infections, evidence shows that bacteria such as MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ESBL Enterobacteriaceae and MRSA are increasingly isolated by patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia, as demonstrated by Cillóniz et al. [5].
Even though the use of colistin has been abandoned for years, due to the small therapeutic range and high potential for toxicity, its utility as a last-resort agent for MDR infections has been revisited. Colistin dosing schemes, especially in critically ill patients, remain ambiguous. However, the study by Ehrentraut et al. shed light on the pharmacokinetics of colistin in this patient group. The authors evaluated the efficiency of the current guidelines’ recommendations by using high resolution therapeutic drug monitoring of colistin. The authors analyzed plasma levels of colistin and its pro-drug colisthimethate sodium (CMS) in 779 samples, drawn from eight intensive care unit (ICU) patients with pan-drug resistant (PDR) infections [6]. This study found that CMS levels did not correlate with colistin levels and over- or under-dosing occurred regardless of renal function and the mode of renal replacement therapy, while colistin elimination half-time appeared to be longer than previously reported [6].
The resurgence of colistin in the antimicrobial armamentarium against MDR infections has led to the emergence of resistance among these pathogens. Papathanakos et al. conducted a retrospective observational study in ICU patients with colistin-resistant extensively drug-resistant (XDR) A. baumannii bacteremia to assess the mortality and to compare the characteristics of bloodstream infections by colistin-resistant and colistin-sensitive A. baumannii strains [7]. The authors found a mortality rate of 100% in colistin-resistant A. baumannii bacteremia, which was significantly higher than in patients with susceptible strains; additionally, the majority (69%) of colistin-resistant A. baumannii bacteremias led to fulminant septic shock and death within three days of symptoms’ onset [7].
Regarding the epidemiology of colistin-resistant MDR strains, Elbediwi et al., in their systematic review and meta-analysis, found an overall average prevalence of 4.7% (0.1–9.3%) among 47 countries and across six continents, with China reporting the highest numbers of mobilized colistin resistance (mcr)-positive strains in bacteria isolated from humans, animals, the environment and food products [8]. E. coli (54%) isolated from animals (52%) and harboring an IncI2 plasmid (34%) were the bacteria with the highest prevalence of mcr genes, while the estimated prevalence of mcr-1 pathogenic E. coli was higher in food-animals than in humans and food products, suggesting a possible contribution of foodborne transmission of such strains [8]. Additionally, Wyrsch et al. identified two atypical Z/I1 hybrid plasmids (pSTM32-108 and pSTM37-118) hosting antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated genes within endemic pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium 1,4,[5],12:i:-, isolated in Australian swine production facilities, and demonstrated that these plasmids are relatives of close relatives of two plasmids isolated from E. coli of human and bovine origin many years ago [9]. The epidemiology of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars was reviewed by Lima et al. who concluded that mcr-like genes are carried in conjugative plasmids that spread among bacterial populations and plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes may reach human microbiota through the food chain [10]. Interestingly, Harada et al. investigated the resistance profile of Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. in companion animals, and found that 34.8% of Citrobacter isolates were extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant, while no resistant profiles were detected in Serratia strains [11].
Although horizontal gene transfer plays a key role in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance acquisition, other mechanisms such as competence and natural transformation may also contribute to resistance development in some strains, such as A. baumannii. Domingues et al. in their study with 22 Acinetobacter isolates demonstrated that natural competence is common among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. and therefore it is likely an important contributor of resistance acquisition in this genus [12]. Andrzejczuk et al. studied the prevalence of β-lactam resistance and bla genes among 87 Haemophilus parainfluenzae isolates from respiratory microbiota of adult patients, and demonstrated that among the 57 (65.5%) beta-lactam-resistant isolates, 63.2% encoded bla genes with blaTEM-1 being the most frequent identified gene [13].
In addition to colistin, other treatment options, including older antibiotics as well as novel agents and approaches, have been studied. Fragkou et al. reviewed the role of minocycline in the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by MDR, XDR and PDR A. baumannii, concluding that it represents a plausible treatment option for these strains but further studies are needed [14]. Moreover, Feehan and Garcia-Diaz reviewed the evidence on novel non-antibiotic-based microbiome-modifying bacterial therapies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), prebiotics and probiotics in the management of infections and gut colonization caused by MDR organisms, and highlighted the need for further development of other therapies, such as bacteriophages, lytic enzymes, novel cleaning techniques, repurposed drugs with antibiotic activity, and bacterial byproducts [15]. Naskar and Kim reviewed the role of different types of nanomaterials, such as metallic and organic nanoparticles, both as antimicrobial carriers and as potential alternative therapeutic options for MDR pathogens, but clinical research data on nanomaterial-based antibacterial approaches are still limited [16]. Koulenti et al. reviewed the evidence on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, microbiological spectrum, efficacy and safety profiles of novel branded antibiotics against MDR Gram-positive pathogens, namely ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, telavancin, oritavancin, dalbavancin, tedizolid, besifloxacin, delafloxacin, ozenoxacin, omadacycline and lefamulin [17,18]. Moreover, the same authors conducted another thorough review of all emerging agents that are currently under clinical development in phase I, II and III clinical trials for the treatment of MDR Gram-positive organisms including novel β-lactams, oxazolidinones, quinolones, amininoglycosides, ketolides, defensin mimetic drugs, a new bacterial topoisomerase II inhibitor, FabI inhibitors under development, new polymyxin derivatives as well as bacteriophages and monoclonal antibodies [19]. Finally, Russo et al. conducted an experimental study using predatory bacteria (Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus) against Yersinia pestis inoculated in the lungs of mice, and demonstrated that three doses of B. bacteriovorus reduced the number of colony-forming units by 86% within 24 h of infection, thus posing another possible therapeutic strategy for severe Gram-negative infections [20].
The prevention of the spread of MDR organisms remains one of the most important strategies in the management of these pathogens. Cotoia et al. reviewed the evidence from 27 original articles regarding preventative strategies for MDR-induced ventilator-associated pneumonia; the authors reported numerous preventative measures with the most convincing evidence coming from those that prevent oropharyngeal tract colonization with MDR strains and their descent into the respiratory tract [21]. Finally, one of the most important determinants of resistance development is the impact of antibiotics on gut microbiota; thus, Pilmis et al. reviewed various strategies to limit these effects on intestinal microbiome or to cure dysbiosis such as antimicrobial stewardship, action on residual antibiotics at colonic level, prebiotics, probiotics and FMT, concluding that more data are needed before we can draw robust outcomes [22].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial office of the Microorganisms for their assistance in managing and organizing this Special Issue and also to all contributing authors and reviewers for their excellent work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Biggest Threats and Data|Antibiotic/Antimicrobial Resistance|CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html (accessed on 29 July 2020).
  2. Rouzé, A.; Boddaert, P.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Povoa, P.; Rodriguez, A.; Ramdane, N.; Salluh, J.; Houard, M.; Nseir, S. Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Incidence, Microbiology and Outcome of Ventilator-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Perdikouri, E.I.A.; Arvaniti, K.; Lathyris, D.; Apostolidou Kiouti, F.; Siskou, E.; Haidich, A.B.; Papandreou, C. Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Oncological Patients: Insights from a Five-Year Epidemiological and Clinical Analysis. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Caneiras, C.; Lito, L.; Melo-Cristino, J.; Duarte, A. Community- and Hospital-Acquired Klebsiella pneumoniae Urinary Tract Infections in Portugal: Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cillóniz, C.; Dominedò, C.; Nicolini, A.; Torres, A. PES Pathogens in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ehrentraut, S.F.; Muenster, S.; Kreyer, S.; Theuerkauf, N.U.; Bode, C.; Steinhagen, F.; Ehrentraut, H.; Schewe, J.-C.; Weber, M.; Putensen, C.; et al. Extensive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Colistin in Critically Ill Patients Reveals Undetected Risks. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Papathanakos, G.; Andrianopoulos, I.; Papathanasiou, A.; Priavali, E.; Koulenti, D.; Koulouras, V. Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Bacteremia: A Serious Threat for Critically Ill Patients. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Elbediwi, M.; Li, Y.; Paudyal, N.; Pan, H.; Li, X.; Xie, S.; Rajkovic, A.; Fang, Y.; Rankin, S.C.; Yue, M. Global Burden of Colistin-Resistant Bacteria: Mobilized Colistin Resistance Genes Study (1980–2018). Microorganisms 2019, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wyrsch, E.R.; Hawkey, J.; Judd, L.M.; Haites, R.; Holt, K.E.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Billman-Jacobe, H. Z/I1 Hybrid Virulence Plasmids Carrying Antimicrobial Resistance genes in S. Typhimurium from Australian Food Animal Production. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lima, T.; Domingues, S.; Da Silva, G. Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Salmonella enterica: A Review. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Harada, K.; Shimizu, T.; Ozaki, H.; Kimura, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Tsuyuki, Y. Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance in Serratia spp. and Citrobacter spp. Isolates from Companion Animals in Japan: Nosocomial Dissemination of Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Citrobacter freundii. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Domingues, S.; Rosário, N.; Cândido, Â.; Neto, D.; Nielsen, K.; Da Silva, G. Competence for Natural Transformation Is Common among Clinical Strains of Resistant Acinetobacter spp. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Andrzejczuk, S.; Kosikowska, U.; Chwiejczak, E.; Stępień-Pyśniak, D.; Malm, A. Prevalence of Resistance to β-Lactam Antibiotics and bla Genes Among Commensal Haemophilus parainfluenzae Isolates from Respiratory Microbiota in Poland. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Fragkou, P.; Poulakou, G.; Blizou, A.; Blizou, M.; Rapti, V.; Karageorgopoulos, D.; Koulenti, D.; Papadopoulos, A.; Matthaiou, D.; Tsiodras, S. The Role of Minocycline in the Treatment of Nosocomial Infections Caused by Multidrug, Extensively Drug and Pandrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Feehan, A.; Garcia-Diaz, J. Bacterial, Gut Microbiome-Modifying Therapies to Defend against Multidrug Resistant Organisms. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Naskar, A.; Kim, K. Nanomaterials as Delivery Vehicles and Components of New Strategies to Combat Bacterial Infections: Advantages and Limitations. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Koulenti, D.; Xu, E.; Yin Sum Mok, I.; Song, A.; Karageorgopoulos, D.E.; Armaganidis, A.; Lipman, J.; Tsiodras, S. Novel Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Koulenti, D.; Xu, E.; Yin Sum Mok, I.; Song, A.; Karageorgopoulos, D.E.; Armaganidis, A.; Lipman, J.; Tsiodras, S. Lefamulin. Comment on: “Novel Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms. Microorganisms, 2019, 7, 270”. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Koulenti, D.; Xu, E.; Song, A.; Sum Mok, I.Y.; Karageorgopoulos, D.E.; Armaganidis, A.; Tsiodras, S.; Lipman, J. Emerging Treatment Options for Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Russo, R.; Kolesnikova, I.; Kim, T.; Gupta, S.; Pericleous, A.; Kadouri, D.; Connell, N. Susceptibility of Virulent Yersinia pestis Bacteria to Predator Bacteria in the Lungs of Mice. Microorganisms 2018, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Cotoia, A.; Spadaro, S.; Gambetti, G.; Koulenti, D.; Cinnella, G. Pathogenesis-Targeted Preventive Strategies for Multidrug Resistant Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pilmis, B.; Le Monnier, A.; Zahar, J.-R. Gut Microbiota, Antibiotic Therapy and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koulenti, D.; Fragkou, P.C.; Tsiodras, S. Editorial for Special Issue “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens”. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091383

AMA Style

Koulenti D, Fragkou PC, Tsiodras S. Editorial for Special Issue “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens”. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(9):1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091383

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koulenti, Despoina, Paraskevi C. Fragkou, and Sotirios Tsiodras. 2020. "Editorial for Special Issue “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens”" Microorganisms 8, no. 9: 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091383

APA Style

Koulenti, D., Fragkou, P. C., & Tsiodras, S. (2020). Editorial for Special Issue “Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens”. Microorganisms, 8(9), 1383. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8091383

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop