Next Article in Journal
Foodborne Pathogen Campylobacter
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Polyamines Influence In Vitro Microbial Adhesion to Human Mucus According to the Age of Mucus Donor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Molecular Detection of Polychromophilus Parasites in Brazilian Bat Species

by
Guilherme Augusto Minozzo
1,†,
Bruno da Silva Mathias
2,†,
Irina Nastassja Riediger
1,
Lilian de Oliveira Guimarães
3,
Carolina Clares dos Anjos
2,
Eliana Ferreira Monteiro
2,
Andrea Pires dos Santos
4,
Alexander Welker Biondo
5 and
Karin Kirchgatter
2,3,*
1
Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Paraná, São José dos Pinhais 83060-500, PR, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Tropical, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Superintendência de Controle de Endemias, São Paulo 01027-000b, SP, Brazil
4
Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
5
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, PR, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(6), 1240; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061240
Submission received: 22 April 2021 / Revised: 2 June 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 7 June 2021

Abstract

:
Blood parasites of the Haemosporida order, such as the Plasmodium spp. responsible for malaria, have become the focus of many studies in evolutionary biology. However, there is a lack of molecular investigation of haemosporidian parasites of wildlife, such as the genus Polychromophilus. Species of this neglected genus exclusively have been described in bats, mainly in Europe, Asia, and Africa, but little is known about its presence and genetic diversity on the American continent. Here, we investigated 406 bats from sites inserted in remnant fragments of the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes and urbanized areas from southern Brazil for the presence of Polychromophilus species by PCR of the mitochondrial cytochrome b encoding gene. A total of 1.2% of bats was positive for Polychromophilus, providing the first molecular information of these parasites in Myotis riparius and Eptesicus diminutus, common vespertilionid bats widely distributed in different Brazilian biomes, and Myotis ruber, an endangered species. A Bayesian analysis was conducted to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships between Polychromophilus recovered from Brazilian bats and those identified elsewhere. Sequences of Brazilian Polychromophilus lineages were placed with P. murinus and in a clade distinct from P. melanipherus, mainly restricted to bats in the family Vespertilionidae. However, the sequences were split into two minor clades, according to the genus of hosts, indicating that P. murinus and a distinct species may be circulating in Brazil. Morphological observations combined with additional molecular studies are needed to conclude and describe these Polychromophilus species.

1. Introduction

The phylum Apicomplexa forms one of the most diverse groups of unicellular protists with a wide environmental distribution. They are classified as mandatory intracellular parasites and they have mobile invasive stages. They are characterized by the presence of an evolutionarily unique structure called the apical complex, used to adhere and invade host cells. Many of the species that are part of this group are considered pathogens in humans and other vertebrates. All animal species are believed to host at least one species of apicomplexan parasites [1,2,3]. Apicomplexa are divided into two orders: Eucoccidiorida (coccidian parasites) and Haemosporida (haemosporidian parasites). Haemosporida are organized into four families: Garniidae, Haemoproteidae, Leucocytozoidae, and Plasmodiidae, which include malaria parasites that infect various vertebrates and invertebrate hosts [4].
The hosts of the order Chiroptera have the greatest diversity of haemosporidian parasites among mammals, including nine genera. In addition to the well-known genera (Plasmodium and Hepatocystis), seven genera exclusively infect chiropterans: Polychromophilus, Nycteria, Bioccala, Biguetiella, Dionisia, Johnsprentia, and Sprattiella [5,6], clearly highlighting this group of mammals as a vital tool in the taxonomic, systematic, and evolutionary study of haemosporidians in mammals. Although Bioccala was elevated to a genus in 1984 [7], many studies, as well as this work, still use it as a subgenus of Polychromophilus, since its species present similar morphological characteristics and its genetics have not been studied [8].
The genus Polychromophilus has been found in insectivorous bats in tropical and temperate regions [9,10,11,12]. Only five species of Polychromophilus are known. Although they can be distinguished by slight differences in ultrastructure, they are classified mainly based on the type of host [13]. Of the five species of Polychromophilus described, Polychromophilus (Polychromophilus) melanipherus and Polychromophilus (Bioccala) murinus are mainly linked to two bat families: Miniopteridae and Vespertilionidae, respectively [14]. However, occasionally, P. melanipherus has been reported in Hipposideridae and Vespertilionidae and P. murinus in Rhinolophidae, Hipposideridae, and Miniopteridae [6]. In addition, the species P. (P.) corradetti and P. (P.) adami have been described in bats from the African region: Miniopterus inflatus in Gabon and Miniopterus minor in the Republic of Congo [13].
Recent studies have demonstrated a greater concentration of molecular studies aimed at African and European bats, e.g., [8,15,16,17]. In contrast, our knowledge about haemosporidian parasites of Brazilian bats is still restricted to morphological investigations, such as the case of Polychromophilus (Bioccala) deanei found in Myotis nigricans (Vespertilionidae). Myotis nigricans is an evening bat from Brazil, and is the first chiropteran host in which this group of parasites was found in the New World [18,19]. Nevertheless, no molecular data is available for this parasite in Brazil, and the only sequence of Polychromophilus sp. of bats from the American continent is from Myotis nigricans, from the Vespertilionidae family, found in Panama [20].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

Brain tissue samples of bats with no identified species (n = 406) were acquired from the Parana State Reference Laboratory (LACEN) program for monitoring rabies virus circulation. They were collected between September 2019 and August 2020 in 67 different municipalities in the State of Paraná, most of them inserted in remnant fragments of Atlantic Forest and Cerrado biomes, as well as in urbanized areas (Figure 1).
All tissue samples and bats were collected and handled under appropriate authorizations by the Brazilian government. The project was approved by the Ethics in Use of Animals Committee, CEUA/SESA, of the Centro de Produção e Pesquisa de Imunobiológicos—CPPI/PR (approval number 01/2019 and date of approval 3 March 2020).

2.2. Polychromophilus Detection

The extraction of total nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) from collected samples was performed using the BioGene Extraction kit (K204-4, Bioclin, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
A fragment of ~1.1 kb (approximately 92% of the gene) from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) was amplified using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), taking standard precautions to prevent cross-contamination of samples. The PCR reactions were conducted as previously described [21] using primers DW2 and DW4 and 5 uL of genomic DNA in the first reaction, and 1 uL aliquot of this product was used as a template for a nested reaction with primers DW1 and DW6.
PCR products were sequenced using BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit in ABI PRISM® 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using nested PCR primers. The cytb sequences were obtained and aligned with the sequences available at the GenBank® database.
The phylogenetic relationship among reported parasites was inferred using partial cytb gene sequences (1116 bp). GenBank® accessions of the used sequences are shown in the phylogenetic trees. The phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using the Bayesian inference method implemented in MrBayes v3.2.0 [22]. Bayesian inference was executed with two Markov Chain Monte Carlo searches of 3 million generations, with each sampling 1 of 300 trees. After a burn-in of 25%, the remaining 15,002 trees were used to calculate the 50% majority-rule consensus tree. The phylogeny was visualized using FigTree version 1.4.0 [23].

2.3. Host Species Identification

The positive samples were processed using a PCR protocol that amplifies host DNA with primers L14841 and H15149 that were designed to amplify fragments with ~390 bp of the mitochondrial cytb gene from a wide range of animals, including mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and fish [24]. Amplified fragments were sequenced directly using the corresponding flanking primers. Obtained sequences were compared to other sequences deposited in the GenBank® database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi accessed on 19 March 2021). The best close match (BCM) algorithm was used to identify the best barcode matches of a query, and the species name of that barcode was assigned to the query if the barcode was sufficiently similar [25]. Positive identification and host species assignment were made when sequences presented a match of >97%.
Alternatively, for some specimens, a fragment with ~650 bp from the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (coi) gene was amplified by two methods: (i) using the primers VF1_t1 (5′-TGT AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT TCT CAA CCA ACC ACA AAG ACA TTG G-3′) [26] and VR1_t1 (5′-AGG AAA CAG CTA TGA CTA GAC TTC TGG GTG GCC AAA GAA TCA-3′) [27] with PCR conditions and cycling from Kumar et al. [28], and (ii) using the universal primers LCO 1490 and HCO 2198 [29] and PCR protocol based on Ruiz et al. [30].

3. Results

This study detected five samples that were positive for Polychromophilus sp. (sample IDs: 116, 198, 335, 650, and 69642), confirming the presence of parasites of this genus in Brazilian bats. The percentage of positives was 1.2% (5/406) of the number of samples analyzed. Accordingly, the sequences of cytb and coi genes from the positive host samples were from Myotis ruber (116), Myotis riparius (198, 335, and 69642), and Eptesicus diminutus (650), all bats belonging to the Vespertilionidae family, collected in four municipalities in the State of Paraná (Araucaria, Cruz Machado, Curitiba, and Pato Branco) (Figure 2). The two samples obtained in Curitiba city were probably from an urban area since Curitiba is the most populous municipality of Paraná state and the eighth in the country.
The nucleic acid polymorphism in mitochondrial cytb sequences (1116 bp) of Polychromophilus sp. isolates from Brazil compared to the best match sequence from GenBank® (#LN483038 of Myotis nigricans from Panama with 595 bp) is shown in Table 1. Thirteen sites were polymorphic among Brazilian sequences (Table 1). The Panamanian sequence, the only available one obtained from bats from the American continent, showed two nucleic acid substitutions found only in this isolate (gray columns) (Table 1).
The sequence obtained from bat 650 was the most divergent, with 98–99% of identity with the others (with 11 or 12 nucleic acid substitutions) (Table 2). The Panamanian sequence presented two to eight nucleic acid substitutions compared to Brazilian sequences (98–99% of identity) (Table 2).
The phylogenetic tree in Figure 3 was generated with reference sequences found in the Genbank® database, covering different haemosporidian genera obtained from different hosts (Table A1, Appendix A). The Polychromophilus sequences found in this study and all sequences of the genus available in the Genbank® database (Table A2, Appendix A) were included. The clade of the genus Polychromophilus is shown in evidence, and the remaining haemosporidian from other genera were collapsed.
Phylogenetic analysis based on cytb did not produce conflict in any of the main nodes. All the main genera and subgenera were recovered and represented in the phylogenetic tree by separate monophyletic clades. The results show the existence of four clades within the Haemosporida order analyzed here. Phylogeny also showed Polychromophilus as a sister clade of a group that contains Plasmodium species of ungulates, but with a distant relationship between Plasmodium and Hepatocystis from other mammals, such as primates and rodents.
All Polychromophilus sequences from bats of different parts of the world were grouped into a monophyletic clade (posterior probability of 100) composed of four subclades, with all Polychromophilus found in Brazilian bats segregated in only one of them. The first distinct subclade comprised all sequences of P. melanipherus from Miniopterus bat hosts, and the second subclade exclusively included sequences of Polychromophilus from vespertilionids (including Brazilian ones), confirming a clear separation of parasites from miniopterid and vespertilionid hosts. The other subclade that was separated contained the Polychromophilus sequences from Scotophilus kuhlii from Thailand (MT750305-MT750309). Two samples of parasites of Pipistrellus aff. grandidieri and Laephotis capensis from Guinea (KF159700 and KF159714) formed a separate group.
The subclade of Polychromophilus from vespertilionids was divided into two branches: one contained sequences of P. murinus from bats in Europe (Switzerland, Bulgaria), Madagascar, and Thailand, and a sequence of Eptesicus diminutus (650) from Brazil, and the other clade with M. nigricans from Panama and all the other Brazilian sequences isolated from the Myotis species.

4. Discussion

Based on the results presented herein, although the total number of bat families tested is unknown, Polychromophilus infection in Brazilian bats appears to be limited to just one family (Vespertilionidae). This finding is in accordance with the only previous report of Polychromophilus from Brazil, described as P. deanei, found in Myotis nigricans, also a Vespertilionidae bat [18,19].
According to one study, Paraná state has poor fauna regarding the number of bat species, with only 53 species from five families recorded [31]. The Phyllostomidae family has the highest species richness (25; 47% of the total), followed by Molossidae (13; 24%), Vespertilionidae (12; 22%), Noctilionidae (2; 4%), and Emballonuridae (1; 2.5%) [31]. Miretzki also showed the occurrence of only 55% of the species of the Atlantic Forest biome and the relative predominance of vespertilionids and molossids over phyllostomids. Herein, we analyzed samples obtained from much of the state’s area, with great sampling opportunities for other families. However, we were unable to find Polychromophilus in bat species that were not vespertilionids, suggesting that this parasite may be restricted to this group of bats in Brazil.
Regarding the frequency, we found the lowest positivity rate reported to date, although the total number of samples analyzed herein is one of the highest among published studies (Table 3). This could be related to the sample type analyzed in this study. This was the first time that Polychromophilus DNA was obtained from brain tissue, probably from parasites in the blood vessels that irrigate the organ. Thus, the direct comparison of the prevalence data with published studies that used blood samples is impaired.
Three different Brazilian bats species were found to be positive for Polychromophilus sp.: two Myotis species (M. ruber and M. riparius) and one species from the Eptesicus genus (E. diminutus). There are reports of Myotis species infections in Africa (M. tricolor in Kenya and M. goudoti in Madagascar) [17,36,37], Europe (M. daubentonii and M. myotis in Switzerland) [38], and Asia (M. siligorensis in Thailand) [40]. However, the only record of Polychromophilus infection in Eptesicus comes from Europe (E. serotinus in Switzerland) [38].
Myotis riparius is present in Honduras, Uruguay, Bolivia, Argentina, Paraguay, Trinidad, and Brazil [41], including the state of Paraná [31,42,43]. Myotis ruber is an endangered species under the category of “vulnerable” according to the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources—IBAMA [44], and under the category of “near threatened” at a global level according to IUCN [45]. It is distributed across Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay [40,46,47,48], and southeastern Brazil, including Paraná [49].
It is important to note that in our molecular identification of the host species using cytb and sequence comparisons, Eptesicus furinalis was the species with the best close match with the sequence obtained from bat 650. However, the percentage of identity was low (89%) compared to sequences available in the GenBank® database, making it impossible to identify the species. Thus, alternatively, we used the coi gene and the BOLD database (https://www.boldsystems.org/ (accessed on 31 March 2021), finding 98% of identity with an Eptesicus diminutus sequence, a reliable value for the species identification using the BCM method. Eptesicus diminutus has a distribution in the north and east regions of Paraná state [31]. It is from the Vespertilionidae family, and it is absent from the GenBank® database, which explains the first finding. Thus, we considered specimen 650 to be Eptesicus diminutus.
Our phylogenetic analysis showed a strongly defined clade represented by Plasmodium infecting rodents and primate hosts, which also included Hepatocystis isolated from bats. Similar data were obtained by other authors [38,50]. Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon species were grouped separately in individual clades, as previously shown [51,52].
Regarding Polychromophilus sequences, a similar topology in the phylogenetic tree was obtained by Chumnandee et al. [39], where they grouped into a monophyletic clade with a clear separation of parasites from miniopterid and vespertilionid hosts. Four Brazilian sequences (GenBank® MW984519, MW984520, MW984522 from Polychromophilus sp. isolated of Myotis riparius, and MW984518 from Polychromophilus sp. isolated of Myotis ruber) were positioned close to the sequence of Polychromophilus sp. of bats of the species Myotis nigricans, Vespertilionidae family, from the Latin American region (Panama) (GenBank® #LN483038) [20]. One Brazilian sequence (GenBank® #MW984521, from Polychromophilus isolated from Eptesicus diminutus) was grouped with all P. murinus sequences in a sister clade. The latter, likely P. murinus, presented 1% divergence in the cytb sequence compared to the other Brazilian or Panamanian sequences, and was obtained from a different genus of bats. Thus, the possibility of most Brazilian sequences being a different Polychromophilus species must be investigated.
The present study provides the first molecular description of Polychromophilus parasites in Myotis ruber, Myotis riparius, and Eptesicus diminutus from Brazil and confirms the presence of this parasite 50 years after its first and only report in Brazilian territory. Moreover, our results suggest the occurrence of two distinct Polychromophilus species infecting two different genera of hosts, improving the current knowledge on blood parasites infecting Brazilian bats. However, it is crucial to add additional molecular markers to the phylogenetic analysis for an in-depth investigation. A three-genome phylogenetic analysis for robust haemosporidian phylogenies has been recommended [53] and must be properly included as part of a follow-up paper. Moreover, additional studies including morphological observations of these parasites combined with molecular data are needed to resolve its taxonomy. Furthermore, due to the great Brazilian extensions and the immense diversity of species and biomes, new bat populations should be investigated to provide a complete portrait of the biology of host–parasite interactions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.W.B. and K.K.; formal analysis, B.d.S.M. and C.C.d.A.; investigation, B.d.S.M., L.d.O.G., C.C.d.A. and E.F.M.; resources, G.A.M., I.N.R. and K.K.; data curation, B.d.S.M. and C.C.d.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.d.S.M., A.P.d.S. and K.K.; writing—review and editing, G.A.M., B.d.S.M., I.N.R., L.d.O.G., C.C.d.A., E.F.M., A.P.d.S., A.W.B. and K.K.; visualization, B.d.S.M. and C.C.d.A.; supervision, K.K.; project administration, K.K.; funding acquisition, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

B.d.S.M. and C.C.d.A. are currently funded by a master scholarship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES (process numbers 88887.463661/2019-00 and 88887.463659./2019-00). K.K. is a CNPq research fellow (process number 308678/2018-4). L.d.O.G. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship (FAPESP 2018/16232-1). This research benefited from the State Research Institutes Modernization Program, funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2017/50345-5).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics in Use of Animals Committee, CEUA/SESA, of the Centro de Produção e Pesquisa de Imunobiológicos—CPPI/PR (approval number 01/2019 and date of approval 3 March 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Appendix A and also in the GenBank® database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 19 March 2021)) (accession numbers MW984518-MW984522).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of the parasite used as references for phylogenetic analyses and their respective accession numbers in the Genbank® database.
Table A1. Mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of the parasite used as references for phylogenetic analyses and their respective accession numbers in the Genbank® database.
GenBank® Accession NumberParasite SpeciesHost
HQ173882Eimeria magnaRabbit
HQ173892Eimeria vejdovskyiRabbit
AY099045Haemoproteus majorisBird
HM222472Haemoproteus sp.Bird
KT367832, KT367833, KT367822, KT367828Haemosporida sp.Antelope
KT367830, KT367819, KT367837Haemosporida sp.Antelope
FJ168565Hepatocystis sp.Bat
JQ070951, JQ070956Hepatocystis sp.Monkey
AY099063Leucocytozoon dubreuliBird
NC_012450, FJ168563Leucocytozoon majorisBird
KF159690, KF159720, MK098843-MK098847Nycteria sp.Bat
GQ141581, GQ141585, KT367845, KM598212Parahaemoproteus sp.Bird
NC_012447, FJ168561Parahaemoproteus vireonisBird
HM235081Plasmodium adleriGorilla
AY099054, HQ712051Plasmodium atheruriRodent
AY099055Plasmodium azurophilumLizard
KP875474Plasmodium billcollinsiChimpanzee
HM235065Plasmodium blacklockiGorilla
KF159674Plasmodium cyclopsiBat
AB444126Plasmodium cynomolgiMonkey
FJ895307Plasmodium gaboniChimpanzee
AF069612Plasmodium gallinaceumBird
AY099053Plasmodium giganteumLizard
JF923751Plasmodium gonderiMandrill
JQ345504Plasmodium knowlesiHuman
HM000110Plasmodium malariaeChimpanzee
GU723548Plasmodium ovaleHuman
JF923762Plasmodium praefalciparumMonkey
KP875479Plasmodium reichenowiChimpanzee
AY733090Plasmodium relictumBird
HM222485Plasmodium sp.Bird
JF923753Plasmodium sp.Mandrill
KJ700853, KJ700854Plasmodium vinckeiRodent
KF591834Plasmodium vivaxHuman
KF159671Plasmodium voltaicumBat
DQ414658Plasmodium yoelii killickiRodent
Table A2. Genbank® accession numbers of Polychromophilus mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences used as a reference for phylogenetic analyses and sequences found in this study.
Table A2. Genbank® accession numbers of Polychromophilus mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences used as a reference for phylogenetic analyses and sequences found in this study.
GenBank Accession NumberParasite SpeciesHostOrigin
KU318045P. melanipherusAnopheles marshalliiGabon
HM055583P. murinusMyotis daubentoniiSwitzerland
HM055583P. murinusEptesicus serotinusSwitzerland
HM055583P. murinusNyctalus noctulaSwitzerland
HM055583P. murinusMyotis myotisSwitzerland
HM055584–HM055589P. murinusMyotis daubentoniiSwitzerland
MW984521Polychromophilus sp.Eptesicus diminutusBrazil (this study)
KT750375Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus africanusKenya
MH744509–MH744511, MH744518, MH744521P. melanipherusMiniopterus gleniMadagascar
MH744506, MH744519P. melanipherusMiniopterus griffithsiMadagascar
MH744514–MH744516P. melanipherusMiniopterus griveaudiMadagascar
MH744508, MH744522–MH744525P. melanipherusMiniopterus griveaudiMadagascar
JQ995284–JQ995288Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus inflatusGabon
MH744504, MH744505P. melanipherusMiniopterus mahafaliensisMadagascar
MH744512, MH744526P. melanipherusMiniopterus manaviMadagascar
KT750430Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus minorTanzania
MK098848, MK098849Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus minorGabon
MW007677P. melanipherusMiniopterus natalensisSouth Africa
KT750376-KT750382, KT750401, KT750402Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus natalensisKenya
KT750406, KT750408, KT750409Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus natalensisKenya
MK088162–MK088168P. melanipherusMiniopterus orianaeAustralia
KT750383-KT750386, KT750415, KT750418Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus rufusKenya
JN990708–JN990711P. melanipherusMiniopterus schreibersiiSwitzerland
KJ131270–KJ131277P. melanipherusMiniopterus schreibersiiSouthern and Central Europe
MW007689P. melanipherusMiniopterus schreibersiiSpain
KT750389Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus sp.Tanzania
KT750387Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus sp.Kenya
KF159675, KF159681, KF159699Polychromophilus sp.Miniopterus villiersiGuinea
JN990712, JN990713P. murinusMyotis daubentoniiSwitzerland
MH744532–MH744536P. murinusMyotis goudotiMadagascar
LN483038Polychromophilus sp.Myotis nigricansPanamá
MW984519, MW984520, MW984522Polychromophilus sp.Myotis ripariusBrazil (this study)
MW984518Polychromophilus sp.Myotis ruberBrazil (this study)
MT136168P. murinusMyotis siligorensisThailand
KF159700Polychromophilus sp.Neoromicia capensisGuinea
MW007685P. melanipherusNycteribia schmidliiSpain
MW007680, MW007681P. melanipherusNycteribia schmidliiHungary
MW007682P. melanipherusNycteribia schmidliiItaly
MW007671–MW007674, MW007676P. melanipherusNycteribia schmidlii scottiSouth Africa
KU182361–KU182367P. melanipherusNycteribia schmidlii scottiGabon
MH744527P. melanipherusNycteribia stylidiopsisMadagascar
MH744520P. melanipherusParatriaenops furculusMadagascar
KU182368P. melanipherusPenicillidia fulvidaGabon
MH744528–MH744531P. melanipherusPenicillidia leptothrinaxMadagascar
MH744537P. murinusPenicillidia sp.Madagascar
KF159714Polychromophilus sp.Pipistrellus aff. grandidieriGuinea
LN483036P. murinusRhinolophus sp.Bulgaria
MT750305–MT750309Polychromophilus sp.Scotophilus kuhliiThailand
MT136167P. melanipherusTaphozous melanopogonThailand

References

  1. Morrison, D.A.; Bornstein, S.; Thebo, P.; Wernery, U.; Kinne, J.; Mattsson, J.G. The current status of the small subunit rRNA phylogeny of the coccidia (Sporozoa). Int. J. Parasitol. 2004, 34, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gould, S.B.; Tham, W.H.; Cowman, A.F.; Mcfadden, G.I.; Waller, R.F. Alveolins, a new family of cortical proteins that define the protist infrakingdom Alveolata. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1219–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yoon, H.S.; Grant, J.; Tekle, Y.I.; Wu, M.; Chaon, B.C.; Cole, J.C.; Logsdon, J.M., Jr.; Patterson, D.J.; Bhattacharya, D.; Katz, L.A. Broadly sampled multigene trees of eukaryotes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. O’Donoghue, P. Haemoprotozoa: Making biological sense of molecular phylogenies. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2017, 6, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Landau, I.; Chavatte, J.M.; Karadjian, G.; Chabaud, A.; Beveridge, I. The Haemosporidian parasites of bats with description of Sprattiella alecto gen. nov., sp. nov. Parasite 2012, 19, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Perkins, S.L.; Schaer, J. A modern menagerie of mammalian malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 772–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Landau, I.; Baccam, D.; Ratanaworabhan, N.; Yenbutra, S.; Boulard, Y.; Chabaud, A.G. Nouveaux Haemoproteidae parasites de Chiroptères en Thailande [New Haemoproteidae parasites of Chiroptera in Thailand]. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1984, 59, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Witsenburg, F.; Salamin, N.; Christe, P. The evolutionary host switches of Polychromophilus: A multi-gene phylogeny of the bat malaria genus suggests a second invasion of mammals by a haemosporidian parasite. Malar. J. 2012, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dionisi, A. Les parasites endoglobulaires des chauves-souris. Atti Reale Acad. Lincei 1898, 7, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dionisi, A. Un parassita del globulo rosso in una specie di pipistrello (Miniopterus Schreibersii Kuhl). Atti Reale Acad. Lincei 1898, 7, 214–215. [Google Scholar]
  11. Garnham, P.C.C. Polychromophilus species in insectivorous bats. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1973, 67, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Garnham, P.C.C. The zoogeography of Polychromophilus and description of a new species of a gregarine (Lankesteria galliardi). Ann. Parasitol. 1973, 48, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Landau, I.; Rosin, G.; Miltgen, F. The genus Polychromophilus (Haemoproteidae, parasite of Microchiroptera). Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp. 1980, 55, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Garnham, P.C.C. Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schaer, J.; Perkins, S.L.; Decher, J.; Leendertz, F.H.; Fahr, J.; Weber, N.; Matuschewski, K. High diversity of West African bat malaria parasites and a tight link with rodent Plasmodium taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 43, 17415–17419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schaer, J.; Perkins, S.L.; Ejotre, I.; Vodzak, M.E.; Matuschewski, K.; Reeder, D.M. Epauletted fruit bats display exceptionally high infections with a Hepatocystis species complex in South Sudan. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lutz, H.L.; Patterson, B.D.; Kerbis Peterhans, J.C.; Stanley, W.T.; Webala, P.W.; Gnoske, T.P.; Hackett, S.J.; Stanhope, M.J. Diverse sampling of East African haemosporidians reveals chiropteran origin of malaria parasites in primates and rodents. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 99, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Garnham, P.C.C.; Lainson, R.; Shaw, J.J. A malaria-like parasite of a bat from Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1970, 64, 13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Garnham, P.C.C.; Lainson, R.; Shaw, J.J. A contribution to the study of the haematozoon parasites of bats. A new mammalian haemoproteid, Polychromophilus deanei n. sp. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1971, 69, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borner, J.; Pick, C.; Thiede, J.; Kolawole, O.M.; Kingsley, M.T.; Schulze, J.; Cottontail, V.M.; Wellinghausen, N.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; Bruchhaus, I.; et al. Phylogeny of haemosporidian blood parasites revealed by a multi-gene approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016, 94, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perkins, S.L.; Schall, J.J. A molecular phylogeny of malarial parasites recovered from cytochrome b gene sequences. J. Parasitol. 2002, 88, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Rambaut, A. FigTree: Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 1.4.0; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kocher, T.D.; Thomas, W.K.; Meyer, A.; Edwards, S.V.; Pääbo, S.; Villablanca, F.X.; Wilson, A.C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6196–6200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Meier, R.; Shiyang, K.; Vaidya, G.; Ng, P.K.L. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 2006, 55, 715–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ivanova, N.V.; de Waard, J.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ward, R.D.; Zemlak, T.S.; Innes, B.H.; Last, P.R.; Hebert, P.D.N. DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kumar, V.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, A. DNA barcoding of the Indian blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) and their correlation with other closely related species. Egypt J. Forensic. Sci. 2017, 7, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Ruiz, F.; Linton, Y.M.; Ponsonby, D.J.; Conn, J.E.; Herrera, M.; Quiñones, M.L.; Vélez, I.D.; Wilkerson, R.C. Molecular comparison of topotypic specimens confirms Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) dunhami Causey (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Colombian Amazon. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Miretzki, M. Morcegos do Estado do Paraná, Brasil (Mammalia, Chiroptera): Riqueza de espécies, distribuição e síntese do conhecimento atual. Pap. Avulsos Zool. 2003, 43, 101–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holz, P.H.; Lumsden, L.F.; Legione, A.R.; Hufschmid, J. Polychromophilus melanipherus and haemoplasma infections not associated with clinical signs in southern bent-winged bats (Miniopterus orianae bassanii) and eastern bent-winged bats (Miniopterus orianae oceanensis). Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2018, 8, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Witsenburg, F.; Clément, L.; López-Baucells, A.; Palmeirim, J.; Pavlinić, I.; Scaravelli, D.; Ševčík, M.; Dutoit, L.; Salamin, N.; Goudet, J.; et al. How a haemosporidian parasite of bats gets around: The genetic structure of a parasite, vector and host compared. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 926–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Duval, L.; Mejean, C.; Maganga, G.D.; Makanga, B.K.; Mangama Koumba, L.B.; Peirce, M.A.; Ariey, F.; Bourgarel, M.; Bourgarel, M. The chiropteran haemosporidian Polychromophilus melanipherus: A worldwide species complex restricted to the family Miniopteridae. Infec. Genet. Evol. 2012, 12, 1558–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rosskopf, S.P.; Held, J.; Gmeiner, M.; Mordmüller, B.; Matsiégui, P.; Eckerle, I.; Weber, N.; Matuschewski, K.; Schaer, J. Nycteria and Polychromophilus parasite infections of bats in Central Gabon. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 68, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramasindrazana, B.; Goodman, S.M.; Dsouli, N.; Gomard, Y.; Lagadec, E.; Randrianarivelojosia, M.; Dellagi, K.; Tortosa, P. Polychromophilus spp. (Haemosporida) in Malagasy bats: Host specificity and insights on invertebrate vectors. Malar. J. 2018, 17, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rasoanoro, M.; Goodman, S.M.; Randrianarivelojosia, M.; Rakotondratsimba, M.; Dellagi, K.; Tortosa, P.; Ramasindrazana, B. Diversity, distribution, and drivers of Polychromophilus infection in Malagasy bats. Malar. J. 2021, 20, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Megali, A.; Yannic, G.; Christe, P. Disease in the dark: Molecular characterization of Polychromophilus murinus in temperate zone bats revealed a worldwide distribution of this malaria-like disease. Mol. Ecology 2011, 20, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chumnandee, C.; Pha-obnga, N.; Werb, O.; Matuschewski, K.; Schaer, J. Molecular characterization of Polychromophilus parasites of Scotophilus kuhlii bats in Thailand. Parasitology 2020, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arnuphapprasert, A.; Riana, E.; Ngamprasertwong, T.; Wangthongchaicharoen, M.; Soisook, P.; Thanee, S.; Bhodhibundit, P.; Kaewthamasorn, M. First molecular investigation of haemosporidian parasites in Thai bat species. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2020, 13, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reis, N.R.; Peracchi, A.L.; Pedro, W.A.; Lima, I.P. Morcegos do Brasil; Nélio, R. Reis: Londrina, Brazil, 2007; p. 253. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sekiama, M.L.; Reis, N.R.; Peracchi, A.L.; Rocha, V.J. Morcegos do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu, Paraná (Chiroptera, Mammalia). Rev. Bras. Zool. 2001, 18, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bianconi, G.V.; Mikich, S.B.; Pedro, W.A. Diversidade de morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) em remanescentes florestais do município de Fênix, noroeste do Paraná, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 2004, 21, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Machado, A.B.M.; Martins, C.S.; Drummond, G.M. Lista da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção: Incluindo a Lista de Espécies Quase Ameaçadas e Deficientes em Dados; Fundação Biodiversitas: Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2005; p. 158. [Google Scholar]
  45. IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2021.1. 2019. Available online: http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 15 April 2021).
  46. Barquez, R.M.; Mares, M.A.; Braun, J.K. The bats of Argentina. Spec. Publ. Texas Tech Univ. 1999, 42, 1–275. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lopez-Gonzalez, C.; Presley, S.J.; Owen, R.D.; Willig, M.R. Taxonomic status of Myotis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Paraguay. J. Mammal. 2001, 82, 138–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Achaval, F.; Clara, M.; Olmos, A. Mamiferos de la Republica Oriental del Uruguay; Biophoto: Montevideo, Uruguay, 2008; p. 213. [Google Scholar]
  49. Weber, M.M.; Terribile, L.C.; Caceres, N.C. Potential geographic distribution of Myotis ruber (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae), a threatened Neotropical bat species. Mammalia 2010, 74, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thurber, M.I.; Ghai, R.R.; Hyeroba, D.; Weny, G.; Tumukunde, A.; Chapman, C.A.; Wiseman, R.W.; Dinis, J.; Steeil, J.; Greiner, E.C.; et al. Co-infection and cross-species transmission of divergent Hepatocystis lineages in a wild African primate community. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 613–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Martinsen, E.S.; Paperna, I.; Schall, J.J. Morphological versus molecular identification of avian Haemosporidia: An exploration of three species concepts. Parasitology 2006, 133, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Javanbakht, H.; Kvičerová, J.; Dvořáková, N.; Mikulíček, P.; Sharifi, M.; Kautman, M.; Maršíková, A.; Široký, P. Phylogeny, Diversity, Distribution, and Host Specificity of Haemoproteus spp. (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) of Palaearctic Tortoises. J. Eukaryot Microbiol. 2015, 62, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martinsen, E.S.; Perkins, S.L.; Schall, J.J. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): Evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2008, 47, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of municipalities in the State of Paraná, Brazil, where bat samples were collected.
Figure 1. Location of municipalities in the State of Paraná, Brazil, where bat samples were collected.
Microorganisms 09 01240 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of the positive samples of Polychromophilus sp. isolates from Paraná state, Brazil.
Figure 2. Distribution of the positive samples of Polychromophilus sp. isolates from Paraná state, Brazil.
Microorganisms 09 01240 g002
Figure 3. Bayesian phylogeny based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) from Polychromophilus spp. of the sequences identified in the present study (1116 bp) and reference sequences listed in Table A1 and Table A2 in Appendix A. * Sequence HM055583 has also been reported in P. murinus from Eptesicus serotinus, Nyctalus noctule, and Myotis myotis (Table A2, Appendix A). Eimeria spp. were used as an external group. The support values of the nodes (in percentage) indicate posterior probabilities. The red branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in mammals. The yellow branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in birds. The green branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in reptiles. The sequences found in the present study are highlighted in bold. The remaining reference sequences are collapsed to highlight the branch of the Polychromophilus genus.
Figure 3. Bayesian phylogeny based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) from Polychromophilus spp. of the sequences identified in the present study (1116 bp) and reference sequences listed in Table A1 and Table A2 in Appendix A. * Sequence HM055583 has also been reported in P. murinus from Eptesicus serotinus, Nyctalus noctule, and Myotis myotis (Table A2, Appendix A). Eimeria spp. were used as an external group. The support values of the nodes (in percentage) indicate posterior probabilities. The red branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in mammals. The yellow branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in birds. The green branches highlight the haemosporidian sequences found in reptiles. The sequences found in the present study are highlighted in bold. The remaining reference sequences are collapsed to highlight the branch of the Polychromophilus genus.
Microorganisms 09 01240 g003
Table 1. Nucleic acid polymorphism in mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of Polychromophilus sp. isolates from Brazil (116, 198, 335, 650, and 69642) and Panama (MYOPA01).
Table 1. Nucleic acid polymorphism in mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of Polychromophilus sp. isolates from Brazil (116, 198, 335, 650, and 69642) and Panama (MYOPA01).
Isolate2192472612733394055127897928108118538859451086
116CTATTTTTCCTCATA
198CTATGTTTTCTCATG
335CTATGTTTTCTCATG
650TTCAACTCTTCTTTA
69642CTATTTTTCCTCACA
MYOPA01CCATTTG
MYOPA01 has 595 bp and thus, there was no overlap for the nucleotides from 789–1086 with the Brazilian sequences (1116 bp). Gray columns show two nucleic acid substitutions found only in this isolate.
Table 2. Similarity percentage between the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of Polychromophilus sp. found in different bats from Brazil and Panama (MYOPA01).
Table 2. Similarity percentage between the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) sequences of Polychromophilus sp. found in different bats from Brazil and Panama (MYOPA01).
Bat Species11619833565069642MYOPA01
116Myotis ruber111699%99%99%99%99%
198Myotis riparius11131116100%99%99%99%
335Myotis riparius11131116111699%99%99%
650Eptesicus diminutus110511051105111698%98%
69642Myotis riparius1115111211121104111699%
MYOPA01Myotis nigricans592591591587592595
Table 3. Occurrence of Polychromophilus sp. in this study and previous studies worldwide.
Table 3. Occurrence of Polychromophilus sp. in this study and previous studies worldwide.
Country or ContinentAnalyzed SamplesPositive Samples (Positivity)Positive Host SpeciesReference
Africa 150556 (11%)Miniopterus africanus, M. fraterculus, M. minor, M. natalensis, M. rufus, Myotis tricolor[17]
Australia 28547 (55%)Miniopterus orianae[32]
Brazil 34065 (1.2%)Eptesicus diminutus, Myotis ruber, Myotis ripariusThis study
Europe 4310231 (74.5%)Miniopterus schreibersii[33]
Gabon1645 (3%)Miniopterus inflatus[34]
Gabon922 (2%)Miniopterus minor[35]
Guinea2745 (2%)Miniopterus villiersi, Neoromicia capensis, Pipistrellus aff. grandidieri[15]
Madagascar947130 (13.5%)Paratriaenops furculus, Miniopterus aelleni, M. manavi, M. gleni, M. grifthsi, M. griveaudi, M. mahafaliensis, M. majori, M. sororculus, Myotis goudoti[36]
Madagascar22227 (12.2%)Miniopterus egeri, M. griveaudi, M. ambohitrensis, M. gleni, Scotophilus robustus, Myotis goudoti[37]
Switzerland20770 (34%)Myotis daubentonii, M. myotis, Nyctalus noctula, Eptesicus serotinus[38]
Thailand445 (11%)Scotophilus kuhlii[39]
Thailand27113 (4.8%)Myotis siligorensis, Taphozous melanopogon[40]
1 Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, and Uganda. 2 Detection of haemosporidians was performed by microscopy in all samples (274), but the molecular analysis was performed on only part of them (85 samples). 3 Detection of Polychromophilus was performed in samples of brain tissue. 4 Croatia, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, Italy, Slovakia, and France.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minozzo, G.A.; da Silva Mathias, B.; Riediger, I.N.; de Oliveira Guimarães, L.; dos Anjos, C.C.; Monteiro, E.F.; dos Santos, A.P.; Biondo, A.W.; Kirchgatter, K. First Molecular Detection of Polychromophilus Parasites in Brazilian Bat Species. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061240

AMA Style

Minozzo GA, da Silva Mathias B, Riediger IN, de Oliveira Guimarães L, dos Anjos CC, Monteiro EF, dos Santos AP, Biondo AW, Kirchgatter K. First Molecular Detection of Polychromophilus Parasites in Brazilian Bat Species. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(6):1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minozzo, Guilherme Augusto, Bruno da Silva Mathias, Irina Nastassja Riediger, Lilian de Oliveira Guimarães, Carolina Clares dos Anjos, Eliana Ferreira Monteiro, Andrea Pires dos Santos, Alexander Welker Biondo, and Karin Kirchgatter. 2021. "First Molecular Detection of Polychromophilus Parasites in Brazilian Bat Species" Microorganisms 9, no. 6: 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061240

APA Style

Minozzo, G. A., da Silva Mathias, B., Riediger, I. N., de Oliveira Guimarães, L., dos Anjos, C. C., Monteiro, E. F., dos Santos, A. P., Biondo, A. W., & Kirchgatter, K. (2021). First Molecular Detection of Polychromophilus Parasites in Brazilian Bat Species. Microorganisms, 9(6), 1240. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop