Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Evolutionary Relationships for Prioritization of Myxobacteria for Natural Product Discovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Fungicide Resistance Evolving in Ramularia collo-cygni Population in Estonia
Previous Article in Journal
The Microbiome Associated with the Reef Builder Neogoniolithon sp. in the Eastern Mediterranean
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in DMI, SDHI, and QoI Fungicide Sensitivity in the Estonian Zymoseptoria tritici Population between 2019 and 2020
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms9071377
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

DMI-Fungicide Resistance in Venturia nashicola, the Causal Agent of Asian Pear Scab—How Reliable Are Mycelial Growth Tests in Culture?

by
Hideo Ishii
1,2,3,*,
Hans Jorgen Cools
4,
Kumiko Nishimura
2,
Lorenzo Borghi
5,
Kenji Kikuhara
6 and
Yuichi Yamaoka
1
1
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba 305-8572, Japan
2
National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Kannondai 3-1-3, Tsukuba 305-8604, Japan
3
Department of Agriculture, Kibi International University, Sareo 370-1, Shichi, Minami-Awaji 656-0484, Japan
4
Syngenta, Jealott’s Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell RG42 6EY, UK
5
Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Werk Stein, Schaffhauserstrasse, WST.820.2.79, CH-4332 Stein, Switzerland
6
Fukuoka Agriculture and Forestry Research Center, Yoshiki 587, Chikushino 818-8549, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(7), 1377; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071377
Submission received: 21 May 2021 / Revised: 19 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Scab, caused by Venturia nashicola, is among the most serious diseases of Asian pears and control of this disease largely relies on sterol demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides. However, pear growers have complained about field performance of DMIs since the mid-2000s. In this study, to evaluate pathogen sensitivity, mycelial growth tests and inoculation tests were conducted using DMI-amended culture medium and fungicide-sprayed potted pear trees, respectively. Results confirmed distribution of isolates resistant to fenarimol, hexaconazole, and difenoconazole in the field populations. Importantly, results from tests in culture did not fully correlate with those from tests in planta. Due to phenotypic instability of resistance and poor sporulation of this pathogen in culture, resistance is generally assessed by laborious and time-consuming inoculation with conidia collected from a field. To improve the result interpretation from in vitro tests, the isolates were genotyped: the CYP51 gene which encodes the target sterol 14α-demethylase was sequenced and various mutations have been detected in the coding sequence of DMI-resistant isolates. In addition to the detected single nucleotide polymorphisms, alternative mechanisms, not based on changes in the structure of the target protein, may also increase DMI resistance. Development of molecular methods for the diagnosis of DMI resistance seems to be challenging in V. nashicola.

1. Introduction

Asian pears such as Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia var. culta) and Chinese pears (P. bretschneideri and P. ussuriensis), distinct from European pear (P. communis), are widely grown in East Asia [1]. Scab, caused by the ascomycete Venturia nashicola [2,3], is among the most serious diseases of Asian pears [4] but is not known to occur outside Asia. Consequently, V. nashicola is a quarantined pathogen in many countries [5,6].
To control this disease, growers largely rely on spray applications of fungicides because there are very few commercially acceptable cultivars with scab resistance [4,7,8]. However, the frequent use of benzimidazole (MBC) fungicides resulted in resistance development in the pathogen in the mid-1970s [9,10]. As a result, various sterol demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides including triflumizole, bitertanol, fenarimol, hexaconazole, fenbuconazole, difenoconazole and others, targeting the P450 sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) protein [11,12], have been registered and sprayed during blossom and after flowers fall since 1986 in Japan [10,13].
Sterols such as ergosterol, ergosta-5,24(241)-dien-3β-ol, and ergosta-5,7-dien-3β-ol are important constituents of fungal cell membranes regulating their stability and permeability [14,15,16]. Therefore, fungicides inhibiting key enzymes involved in fungal sterol biosynthesis including CYP51 have been very effective [11] with DMIs sharing over 30% of the fungicide market in agriculture worldwide [12]. Resistance to DMIs evolves slowly and resistance levels are often low compared with those for MBC resistance [17]. Despite that, DMI resistance was reported in many pathogens including the related fungus V. inaequalis, which causes apple scab, in as early as the 1980s [18,19,20]. In Japan, to maintain their field performance, it has been advised to limit DMI applications to a maximum of three times per year in a mixture or alternative use with other effective fungicides having a different mode action [13,21]. As a consequence, no clear evidence of DMI resistance had been shown for pear scab until the mid-2000s, about 20 years after their introduction to Japan [10,22].
Meanwhile, methods for testing V. nashicola sensitivity to two DMIs triflumizole and bitertanol were developed. A mycelial growth test on fungicide-amended culture medium and comparison of EC50 (50% effective concentration to inhibit growth) rather than MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) values was recommended [23]. Using this method, baseline sensitivity was also determined for fenarimol and less-sensitive isolates were detected occasionally in culture, although the performance of DMIs was maintained in planta [24,25]. In the spring 2005, however, pear trees were heavily attacked by scab in commercial orchards located across Fukuoka Prefecture, the southwest of Japan, where growers tended to apply DMIs more frequently than recommended in a spray calendar [26]. Therefore, we tested DMI sensitivity of V. nashicola isolates and continued to monitor change of sensitivity in field populations.
Various mechanisms are known to be involved in DMI resistance. They include [11,12] (1) modifications in target enzyme caused by mutations of the CYP51 genes resulting in decreased binding affinity of fungicides, (2) overexpression of CYP51 genes, and (3) decreased intracellular fungicide concentration mediated by increased energy-dependent efflux. For V. nashicola, Cools et al. [25] cloned and sequenced the complete CYP51 gene but no alterations were found in the isolates with reduced DMI sensitivity compared with those of wild-type sensitive isolates. Resistance monitoring is extremely laborious and time-consuming for V. nashicola isolates because their growth is slow both in culture and in planta. However, molecular mechanism(s) of DMI resistance are currently unknown for this fungus, making it difficult to develop DNA-based methods for diagnosis of resistance.
Therefore, the major objectives of this study were to (1) demonstrate and monitor DMI resistance of V. nashicola both in planta and in culture, (2) examine field relevance of reduced sensitivity in culture, (3) confirm instability of resistance, and (4) analyze sequences of the CYP51 gene of resistant and sensitive isolates.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Isolation and Fungicides

Fifty-six single-spore stock isolates of V. nashicola originating from Hebei, China, were used to establish the baseline sensitivity to difenoconazole and hexaconazole. They were originally isolated in 1993 from an orchard where DMI fungicides had never been sprayed and tested for baseline fenarimol sensitivity [24]. Imported samples of leaves were handled according to the Plant Protection Act under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Japan. Next, pear leaves or fruit naturally infected with scab were collected arbitrarily from DMI-exposed commercial orchards located in Fukuoka and Saga prefectures, Japan, between 2005 and 2018, and 41 to 52 single-spore isolates obtained from each orchard. Conidia scraped directly from the lesions were suspended in sterile distilled water (DW) using a steel needle. Drops of conidial suspensions were placed on acidified 3% water agar (Wako, Osaka, Japan) plates and incubated at 15 °C for 5 to 7 days in the dark. Agar blocks containing single germinated conidia were individually cut with a steel needle after microscopic observation and transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) slants or plates amended with 50 mg/L of penicillin G potassium salt, 50 mg/L of streptomycin sulphate, and 0.05% (v/v) lactic acid. After incubation at 15 °C for approximately 2 months in the dark, pure cultures were established and stored at 4 °C until use. Formulated fungicides used in tests were fenarimol (Rubigan® 12% wettable powder, Nissan Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), difenoconazole (Score® 10% wettable powder, Syngenta), and hexaconazole (Anvil® 2% flowable, Syngenta). These fungicides were all purchased.

2.2. Mycelial Growth Tests on Culture Medium

Single-spore isolates were transferred to PDA plates and incubated at 20 °C for about 45 days in darkness. Mycelial discs, 4 mm in diameter, were cut from an actively growing colony margin and transferred onto PDA plates containing each DMI fungicide at 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mg/L of active ingredient (AI). After incubation at 20 °C in the dark for 21 days, the colony diameter (minus 4 mm for the disc) of two replicates per treatment was measured using a handheld digital caliper. The values of EC50 were calculated for each isolate by regressing percentage mycelial growth inhibition against the log of fungicide concentration using software supplied by K. So, ZEN-NOH (Tokyo, Japan). Two baseline-sensitive isolates Baoding 1-1 and Baoding 2-2, derived from Hebei, China, as described above, were included in the tests as a reference. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of average values, calculated by Microsoft Office Excel (Seattle, WA, USA), was compared. Statistical differences were found when the 95% CI of the average values did not overlap. The isolates were defined to be less-sensitive to fungicides when the EC50 values exceeded baseline sensitivity levels.

2.3. Conidia Formation in Culture

As conidia formation of V. nashicola is generally very poor on ordinary agar medium, conidia of this fungus were obtained in culture using the method of Parker et al. [27] after slight modification. This was the best method so far tested. Individual isolates were cultured on PDA plates at 20 °C in the dark for approximately 1 month. Mycelia were taken from the colony margins and, after removal of the agar medium, homogenized aseptically in sterile DW. Homogenates were spread over the surface of cellophane membranes, previously autoclaved and placed on PDA plates, and incubated at 20 °C for 1 month under black light blue irradiation.

2.4. Inoculation of Potted Pear Trees

For inoculum, conidia that formed on lesions of leaves or in culture were suspended in 0.01% (v/v) Tween 80 and 0.1% (w/v) sucrose in DW after washing with centrifugation [3]. As a DMI-sensitive reference, conidia were collected from trees at an experimental orchard in the National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences (NIAES), Tsukuba, Japan. The trees had no history of DMI spray treatments. Concentration of conidia was adjusted to approximately 2.5–5.0 × 105 conidia mL−1 and 1.0 × 105 mL−1 for those from lesions [3] and from culture [4], respectively. The suspensions were stored in a −30 °C or a −80 °C freezer until use. Young potted Japanese pear trees of Kousui (=Kosui), the most popular and widely grown cultivar in Japan, highly susceptible to scab, were treated using a hand-held sprayer until run-off with labelled concentrations of fungicides, fenarimol at 30 mg/L, hexaconazole at 10 mg/L, and difenoconazole at 25 mg/L of AI. DW was used as a control. One day after treatment, conidial suspensions were either sprayed on both sides of whole young leaves until run-off or dropped on to three sites for each main vein of five fresh leaves as a rule. Inoculated plants were incubated at 20 °C in a high humidity (RH: 95–100%) chamber (Koitotron™ TH; Koito Electric Industries, Shizuoka, Japan) for 48 h in the dark, and subsequently outside. One or two weeks after inoculation, the same fungicide and DW treatment was repeated because incubation period of scab fungus is 3 to 4 weeks long under optimal conditions and this might influence on residual fungicide efficacy. Three weeks and/or 1 month after inoculation, scab development was assessed visually based on the presence or absence of conidial formation on spray-inoculated leaves or droplet-inoculated sites and scab incidence (%) calculated as (number of sporulating leaves or sporulating sites/number of spray-inoculated leaves or droplet-inoculated sites) × 100. In case of spray inoculation, each leaf was assessed using the following scale: 0 = no visible symptoms; 1 = pinhole with no sporulation; 2 = chlorotic or necrotic lesions with no sporulation; 3 = moderately or sparsely sporulating lesions; and 4 = abundantly sporulating lesions, and disease severity was calculated as [(4A + 3B + 2C + D)/4E] × 100, where A, B, C, and D is the number of leaves corresponding to the scales, 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively, and E is the total number of leaves assessed [28]. Control (%) by individual fungicides was calculated as [(incidence or disease severity on untreated trees − incidence or disease severity on treated trees)/incidence or disease severity on untreated trees] × 100. Resistance was defined based on reduction in fungicide efficacy in planta.

2.5. DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification and Sequence Analysis of the CYP51 Gene

Twenty-one single-spore isolates, obtained in 2005, 2017 and 2018, were selected based on the results from mycelial growth and inoculation tests performed in culture and in planta, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from culture of these isolates using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to instructions from the manufacturer or the methods reported previously [29] after slight modification. In the latter case, a piece of PDA with actively growing mycelium was transferred in a 1.5 mL microtube containing 500 μL of lysis buffer [200 mM of Tris-HCl, 50 mM of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 200 mM of NaCl, and 1% n-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt, pH 8.0] and homogenized using a plastic pestle and an electric drill. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (300 μL) was transferred to a fresh tube. After mixing with 750 μL of ethanol, the DNA was precipitated by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, air-dried in a laminar flow cabinet and dissolved in 50 μL of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer containing 10 mM of Tris-HCl and 1 mM of EDTA (pH 8.0).
To amplify a partial fragment of the CYP51 gene from genomic DNA, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers specific for V. nashicola, Vn51seqF (5′-ATGGGACTCCTCTCTGCTCTCCTC-3′), Vn51seqF2 (5′-GCGCTTCTCATGGCCGGTCA-3′), and Vn51seqR (5′-CTATGATGATGACTTCTCTCTGCGT-3′) were designed by H. J. Cools in this study based on the nucleotide sequence of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank accession: AJ314649 [25]. The 50 μL of PCR mixture contained 1 μL of genomic DNA, a set of forward (Vn51seqF or Vn51seqF2) and reverse (Vn51seqR) primers (0.2 μM for each), DNase-free water, and premixed Go Taq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). PCR was performed in a TaKaRa PCR thermal cycler (TaKaRa Bio, Kusatsu, Siga, Japan) or a Mastercycler nexus gradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) programmed for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1.5 min at 50 °C or 60 °C, 2 min at 72 °C, a final extension for 4 min at 72 °C and holding at 4 °C. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel in TAE (40 mM Tris, 20 mM of acetic acid, and 1mM of EDTA) buffer and stained with GelRedTM (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA). PCR products, 1,688 bp (Vn51seqF and Vn51seqR) and 674 bp (Vn51seqF2 and Vn51seqR) in size, respectively, were cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the instructions supplied by the manufacturer. Sequencing was conducted at Macrogen Japan (Kyoto, Japan) using the same primers as for PCR. After sequencing, the nucleotide and deduced amino-acid sequences were analysed with the NCBI/GenBank database (accession: AJ314649 and CAC85409, respectively) and using basic local alignment search tools (BLAST).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Sensitivity to Difenoconazole and Hexaconazole in Culture

EC50 values of difenoconazole and hexaconazole were of 0.023 ± 0.142 mg/L and 0.007 ± 0.016 mg/L (average and 95% CI), respectively, when tested using 56 stock isolates originating from an orchard in China that had not received DMI applications. EC50 values of fenarimol, retested in this study, ranged from 0.050 mg/L to 1.038 mg/L with 0.142 ± 0.215 mg/L (average and 95% CI). These values represent baseline sensitivity. The average EC50 value of difenoconazole and hexaconazole was 0.017 mg/L and 0.009 mg/L, respectively, for baseline Korean isolates [30] and equivalent to the values shown in this study. No geographic variation was found in the baseline sensitivity between Chinese and Korean isolates.

3.2. Demonstration of Fenarimol Resistance in Planta and in Culture

In a preliminary test conducted in 2005, two applications of fenarimol, sprayed 1 day before and 2 weeks after inoculation, controlled scab completely on trees inoculated with reference conidia from the NIAES. However, the control was 23.1%, 21.4%, and 21.1% on trees inoculated with conidia from the commercial orchards at Kurume, Ninaibaru, and Chikuzen in Fukuoka Pref., respectively. Decrease in fenarimol efficacy was clearly shown in inoculation tests carried out two times in the same year (Table 1 and Figure 1). High control of 94.6% was obtained against reference conidia from the NIAES. 100% control was recorded when conidia from Tagawa were inoculated. In contrast, values of the control were significantly lower and ranged from 2.1% to 77.7% when conidia from Ukiha 2, Kurokawa, Ukiha 1, Chikuzen, and Ninaibaru were inoculated.
In 2005 and 2006, 41 to 52 single-spore pure isolates were established from each of 7 orchards in Fukuoka mentioned above, and their sensitivity to fenarimol was tested in culture. The average EC50 values of this DMI varied from 0.147 mg/L for the isolates from Chikuzen to 1.012 mg/L for those from Kurokawa (Table 1). All of these values were higher than the baseline fenarimol sensitivity of 0.120 mg/L reported previously [24] and 0.142 mg/L retested in this study. In particular, the value 1.012 mg/L for the isolates from Kurokawa exhibited approximately 7 to 8 times higher than that for the baseline although the difference was not significant statistically. To demonstrate resistance more precisely, conidia of single-spore isolates produced on cellophane culture were employed as an inoculum source rather than those collected from naturally occurring sporulating lesions. The three isolates Kurokawa 9, Kurokawa 21 and Kurokawa 22 were chosen, because EC50 value of fenarimol for these isolates was 1.067 mg/L, 21.299 mg/L, and 5.906 mg/L, respectively (Table 2), higher than the concentration of 1 mg/L to distinguish less-sensitive isolates from sensitive ones [24]. Reference conidia from the NIAES were sensitive and completely controlled by fenarimol at each time point of disease assessment (Table 3). In contrast, control efficacy of fenarimol was inferior against the two isolates Kurokawa 21 (49.9%) and Kurokawa 22 (0.0%), 3 weeks after inoculation. The efficacy declined further against the three isolates including Kurokawa 9 (20.0%) under severe disease pressure 1 month after inoculation (Table 3). DMI resistance was thus confirmed in planta for the first time using single-spore isolates.

3.3. Inconsistency of Fenarimol Sensitivity Between in Planta and in Culture Tests

Fenarimol resistance was clearly demonstrated as above. Despite that, however, EC50 values for most of the other isolates from Kurokawa remained less than 1 mg/L, the discriminatory concentration. Moreover, no statistical difference was observed in average EC50 values for the isolates grouped based on sampling orchards (Table 1). It is important to note that the high EC50 values for some less-sensitive isolates influenced wide 95% CIs. The EC50 value of fenarimol was 0.328 ± 0.054 mg/L and 0.227 ± 0.047 mg/L, respectively, for isolates from Ukiha 1 and Ukiha 2, but control by fenarimol was only 21.6% and 2.1%, respectively, in inoculation tests (Table 1). Conversely, the EC50 value was 0.292 ± 0.056 mg/L and 0.253 ± 0.067 mg/L, respectively, for isolates from Ninaibaru and Tagawa. The conidia from these orchards were controlled 77.7% and 100%, respectively (Table 1). Thus, results from mycelial growth tests in culture were inconsistent with those from inoculation tests in planta.
In 2006, results from the inoculation tests using conidia sampled in the same year indicated decrease in fenarimol efficacy. The fungicide controlled 70.1% and 100%, against conidia from Kurokawa and the NIAES, respectively, whereas the control was only 25.0%, 31.7%, 32.4%, and 37.4%, respectively, against those from Usui, Kaho, Akizuki, and Akaike, Fukuoka Pref. (Table 1). In the trial, disease pressure was moderate to high because scab incidence ranged from 23.1% to 53.3% on DW-sprayed reference trees. For single-spore isolates from Kurokawa, reduced fenarimol sensitivity was obvious because the average EC50 value was 3.945 mg/L, exceeded 30 times higher than the baseline sensitivity in culture (Table 1). However, the value was 0.233 mg/L, 0.186 mg/L, 0.196 mg/L, and 0.278 mg/L, respectively, for the isolates from Usui, Kaho, Akizuki, and Akaike, which was less than the discriminative concentration of 1 mg/L (Table 1).
In 2017, 99 single-spore isolates, 19 to 20 for each, were established from five orchards in Imari, Saga Pref. and their sensitivity to fenarimol was examined in culture. The EC50 values were 2.675 mg/L and 1.125 mg/L, respectively, higher than the baseline for the two isolates, 1 Housui 18 and 1 Housui 21 (Table 2), but the values were lower than 1 mg/L for all of the other isolates. In the inoculation tests performed in 2018, however, sprays of fenarimol revealed 100% control against the isolate 1 Housui 18. Furthermore, no efficacy (−100% and −42.8% control) was recorded on the other two isolates, 1 Housui 13 and 2 Housui 11 (Table 2), respectively. Results from in planta tests did not coincide well with those from mycelial growth tests in culture. Therefore, the following three tests were carried out to interpret the inconsistency of both results.

3.4. Possible Source of the Inconsistency between in Planta and in Culture Tests

In 2007, infected leaves were collected from five trees grown in the middle and four corners in an orchard located in Ninaibaru, Fukuoka. Test (1) one single lesion was selected for each tree and conidial suspensions directly prepared from the lesion were used for droplet-inoculation onto leaves of potted trees sprayed with fenarimol preventatively. Control efficacy varied considerably (−100%, −60.1%, −14.1%, 0.0%, and 44.5%) suggesting irregular distribution of resistant isolates in the orchard tested. Test (2) soon after inoculation, 61 single-spore isolates were isolated from the same five lesions used as inoculum, and were tested for their fenarimol sensitivity in culture. Results showed that EC50 values were less than 1 mg/L, the discriminative concentration, for all of the isolates except only one isolate. Test (3) single-spore isolation was further conducted using the lesions newly produced by inoculation mentioned above and sensitivity of isolates was examined in culture again. Fifty-six and 71 isolates from fenarimol- and DW-treated leaves, five for each, respectively, were used for the tests. Very surprisingly, EC50 values of fenarimol were less than 1 mg/L for all of the 127 isolates irrespective of where they derived, i.e., either from fenarimol-treated leaves or from DW-treated leaves. It was strongly suggested that results from mycelial growth tests in culture are not very reliable for determining DMI sensitivity of this fungus.

3.5. Change of Cross-Resistance Pattern among DMI Fungicides with Time

In inoculation tests, reference conidia from the NIAES were controlled 100% by fenarimol, difenoconazole, and hexaconazole 3 weeks after inoculation (Table 4). Control efficacy of fenarimol on the conidia from Kurokawa was as low as 33.2% but both difenoconazole and hexaconazole completely controlled these conidia. However, 1 month after inoculation, sharp decrease occurred in the efficacy of fenarimol and hexaconazole but difenoconazole was still highly effective. Difenoconazole was superior to the other two DMIs at this stage in 2005 and incomplete cross-resistance among the three fungicides was thus found in planta.
Cross-resistance was further examined in culture using eight single-spore isolates including the three isolates (Kurokawa 9, Kurokawa 21, and Kurokawa 22) that showed resistance to fenarimol in planta as above (Table 3). The isolates Kurokawa 4, Kurokawa 9, Kurokawa 20, and Kurokawa 39 (Table 2) were sensitive to both difenoconazole and hexaconazole because EC50 values of these fungicides were within the range of baseline (Table 5). In contrast, the isolate Kurokawa 22 for which the EC50 of fenarimol was 5.906 mg/L, showed reduced sensitivity to difenoconazole and hexaconazole. Sensitivity of the isolates Kurokawa 18, Kurokawa 21, Kurokawa 22, and Kurokawa 26 was lower to hexaconazole.
In 2007, the conidia collected from five orchards in Imari, Saga Pref. were inoculated resulting in the control ranging from −22.7% to 36.7% for hexaconazole. In contrast, difenoconazole gave 71.4% to 100% control. These differences were significant based on comparison of the averages and their 95% CIs, 17.7 ± 21.04% (hexaconazole) and 88.4 ± 11.26% (difenoconazole), respectively, suggesting that difenoconazole was still effective at this stage in the fields although the efficacy of hexaconazole proved to decline largely. Next, single-spore isolates from these orchards in Imari were examined. Sensitivity to difenoconazole was not different significantly among the isolates but the average EC50 value of 0.260 mg/L was higher for isolates from 1 orchard than that for isolates from the other orchards. This result might have been an early sign of sensitivity shift for difenoconazole to resistance. In inoculation tests performed in 2008 using the conidia from Ninaibaru, Yasu, and Takagi, Fukuoka Pref., control efficacy of hexaconazole was 5.6, 7.9, and 91.5%, respectively, clearly indicating the lack of efficacy of this fungicide against the former two samples. On the contrary, difenoconazole revealed 84.0%, 90.9%, and 100% control, respectively, against these conidia. Hexaconazole and difenoconazole exhibited 77.4 and 100% control, respectively, against reference conidia from the NIAES. These results suggest that distribution of the hexaconazole-resistant isolates differed within the same prefectures.
In 2011, conidia collected from five leaves each of three commercial orchards in Yasu, Yasukawa, and Ninaibaru, Fukuoka and an experimental orchard in the Fruit Tree Research Institute, Uki, Kumamoto (FTRI) were droplet-inoculated on leaves of DMI- or DW-pretreated potted trees. Difenoconazole gave 100% and 97.8% control against the conidia from both Yasu and FTRI, respectively. In contrast, the control was 44.4% and 15.5%, significantly lower against the conidia from Yasukawa and Ninaibaru, respectively. Hexaconazole revealed no efficacy against the isolates from Yasu, Yasukawa, and Ninaibaru but exhibited 48.9% control against the isolates from the FTRI although this difference was not significant. Similar incomplete cross-resistance was recognized later when the single-spore isolate 2 Housui 1 was inoculated where difenoconazole revealed 100% control but fenarimol showed no efficacy (data not shown).
Most recently in 2018, 19 single-spores were isolated individually from lesions formed on leaves of inoculated pear trees after treatment with difenoconazole. The inoculum was sampled from 2 orchards in Yame, Fukuoka Pref. The EC50 of difenoconazole for 6 of 19 isolates ranged from 0.168 mg/L to 1.104 mg/L. These isolates were regarded as less-sensitive because the values were significantly higher than 0.001 mg/L for the reference isolate Yasato 2-1-1 [24] and the baseline 0.023 ± 0.142 mg/L as described above. Difenoconazole sensitivity of the other 13 isolates was within the range of baseline ranging from 0.001 mg/L to 0.154 mg/L). In inoculation tests conducted in 2018 and 2019, the two single-spore isolates 2 Housui 14 and 2 Housui 11 (Table 2), both isolated from Imari in 2017, were regarded as sensitive and resistant to difenoconazole, respectively, because control efficacy was 100% and −42.8% against these isolates, respectively.

3.6. Instability of Resistance

Mycelial growth tests were repeated on fenarimol-amended and unamended PDA using eight single-spore isolates collected from Kurokawa, Fukuoka, in 2005. As a result, except for the isolate Kurokawa 22, EC50 values of fenarimol decreased for all of the seven other isolates after storage in the absence of the fungicide (Table 6). Noticeably, the value for the isolate Kurokawa 21 decreased from 21.300 mg/L in the 1st trial to 1.721 mg/L in the 2nd trial, respectively. To confirm the instability of resistance in culture, similar experiments were conducted in 2018 using the eight other single-spore isolates obtained in the previous year. Sensitivity to fenarimol increased in seven isolates except the isolate 1 Housui 18 for which the EC50 value changed from 2.675 mg/L to 3.264 mg/L (Figure 2).
To test the stability of decreased fenarimol sensitivity, eight representative isolates previously cultured on PDA at 20 °C in darkness for 45, 60, or 75 days, were tested for mycelial growth inhibition by transferring mycelial discs on fenarimol-amended PDA. The effect of prolonged cultivation period on the decrease in the EC50 values, i.e., recovery of the sensitivity was found in the isolate 1 Housui 18 (Figure 3).

3.7. Sequence Analysis of CYP51 Gene

Nucleotide sequences of the PCR amplicons from the 21 isolates used in this study (Table 2) showed 97–99% identity with GenBank AJ314649, sequence of the CYP51 gene, encoding the DMI target sterol 14α-demethylase protein in the wild-type sensitive isolate JS-18 of V. nashicola [25]. Sequences of the deduced amino-acids of CYP51 were compared with GenBank CAC85409 reported by Cools et al. [25] and substitution of Y102N in addition to deletion of the Q359 were found in many isolates (Table 2), indicating two differences to GenBank sequence AJ314649 in all isolates not associated with a change in DMI sensitivity. Other substitutions found in less-sensitive or resistant isolates were G60S, Q110H, V131F, D291G, S310P, A320T, P324S, R366P, G428R, and G445D.
Subsequently, substitution of the Y446H was detected first from the two less difenoconazole-sensitive isolates, S Mizu 2 and S Mizu 4, collected from Yame, Fukuoka Pref. in 2018 (Table 2). Deletion of the Q359 and the G428R substitution were found in isolates irrespective of differential DMI sensitivity. Overall, genotypes of the CYP51 gene varied largely leading to amino-acid substitutions (Figure 4 and Table 7 [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]) distinct from each other depending on origin, i.e., year and location of sampling of the isolates.

4. Discussion

The worldwide emergence of pathogens that are resistant to antifungal agents challenges human health and food security [38]. According to the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC), DMI fungicides possess medium risk of resistance development (https://www.frac.info/, accessed on 23 June 2021) and failures of disease control against a variety of pathogens since the early 1980s have been reported. For scab control in Japanese pear, resistance has been managed mainly through restricting the number of DMI applications. Such an effort seemed to be effective as the field performance of DMIs has been maintained for about two decades. However, growers tended to spray DMIs more frequently than three times a year in some regions where disease pressure is generally high due to heavy precipitation. As a result, a decrease in fungicide efficacy became a concern and the development of resistance to fenarimol and hexaconazole was confirmed by inoculation tests. This was the first to confirm reduced DMI efficacy on scab by pathogen inoculation tests about 20 years after commencement of use in Japanese pear orchards. Resistance to hexaconazole and flusilazole was also reported in Korea where DMIs were sprayed more frequently [30].
Incomplete cross-resistance among DMIs is well known in the related fungus V. inaequalis, the causal agent of apple scab [39,40], and other fungi [41]. On the other hand, strong correlation of resistance to myclobutanil and tebuconazole has been found in this pathogen recently [42]. For Japanese pear scab, difenoconazole was intrinsically more active than other DMIs and the high efficacy of this fungicide was kept for years in fields where the others failed in control [22], but difenoconazole efficacy has also started to decline recently [43]. In Yame, Fukuoka Pref., where field performance of difenoconazole declined on scab, resistance development was also suspected in Gymnosporangium asiaticum, the Japanese pear rust fungus, through a retrospective cohort study [44]. Currently, the Fungicide Resistance Research Committee in the Phytopathological Society of Japan recommends limiting DMI applications within two to three times a year in a mixture with other effective fungicides carrying different mode of actions if resistant isolates have not been detected in the orchards (http://www.taiseikin.jp/, accessed on 23 June 2021). Cyprodinil (FRAC code 9, anilino-pyrimidines) and iminoctadine-albesilate (FRAC code M 07, multisite inhibitor) are generally used as a partner fungicide of DMIs (FRAC code 3) in a tank mixture. QoI (FRAC code 11, quinone-outside inhibitor) and SDHI (FRAC code 7, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) fungicides are also sprayed in addition to some other conventional fungicides.
Detection of resistance is critical to prevent control failure and design altered spray programmes as early as possible. When testing culturable fungi for their DMI sensitivity, mycelial growth tests on fungicide-amended culture medium are most commonly used. It was the case for V. inaequalis [45,46]. However, in this study on very slow-growing V. nashicola, reduced DMI sensitivity was not always reproduced in replicate experiments in culture, and sensitivity was often recovered after subculture, storage and/or when the cultivation period was prolonged in the tests. The instability of in vitro DMI resistance was previously reported in other fungi including V. inaequalis [47,48] and Monilinia fructicola [49,50]. For isolates of V. inaequalis cultured on DMI-amended PDA, reduced sensitivity to DMI-fungicides was maintained. In contrast, on fungicide-free media, the sensitivity of some, but not all, isolates increased [48], which implies DMI treatment induces expression of genes involved with resistance. It is a matter of interest whether such mechanisms may incur a fitness penalty which influences stability and could result in a decline of resistance in the field.
The association of a fitness penalty with DMI resistance has not been examined for V. nashicola isolates. For V. inaequalis, DMI resistance did not seem to be related to reduced fitness [51]. On the other hand, DMI-resistant populations of V. inaequalis, although still present, decreased in an apple orchard 3 years after the selection pressure was removed [52]. Myclobutanil sensitivity was recovered in populations of V. inaequalis after delayed-dormant copper treatment [53], and in Brazil, the frequency of resistant M. fructicola isolates decreased in populations after discontinuation of tebuconazole for 3 years [54].
In addition to slow growth of mycelia, conidial production of V. nashicola is extremely poor on culture medium, even worse than that of V. inaequalis. Moreover, the incubation period can be as long as 3 weeks to 1 month after inoculation under optimal environmental conditions. Despite that, two different tests, i.e., in vitro mycelial growth and in planta inoculation were performed in the present study. Importantly, we noticed an inconsistency between the results from these two tests indicating that comparison of the EC50 values of DMIs for pure isolates may not be very reliable for monitoring the sensitivity of field populations. When EC50 values above those of baseline sensitivity are measured, it might indicate the existence of resistant populations in the tested field. In contrast, even if values are within the range of baseline, it is possible that some less-sensitive individuals are included as a result of false negatives which might lead to the underestimation of resistance.
Inconsistency was often found when comparing results from tests in planta with those from tests in culture, due to the instability of resistance during storage or cultivation on media. Another factor that might explain this disparity is the irregular distribution of resistant isolates in pear orchards. Ishii et al. [9] found the isolates of V. nashicola resistant to MBC fungicides were detected irregularly from orchards. When several sampling methods were compared, remarkable differences were detected in the proportion of resistant isolates. This is closely related with biological context such as the lifestyle of this fungus in which conidia scatter mainly by rain splash and are not disseminated over long distances [55]. It was reported that the population subdivisions of V. inaequalis significantly differing in their sensitivity to myclobutanil were present in same apple orchards [56].
If conventional culture methods are not appropriate to monitor fungicide resistance, molecular-based methods might be useful as alternatives for a slow-growing and poor-sporulating fungus like Venturia in particular. The mechanism of MBC resistance was well characterized in V. nashicola [10,57] and various molecular methods such as PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) analysis and ASPCR (allele-specific PCR) have been developed for the diagnosis of resistance [10]. However, mechanisms of the DMI resistance are not well known yet. For the related fungus V. inaequalis, the mechanism has been studied. Gerberich and Beckerman [58] found resistant isolates with larger PCR amplification bands consisting of the insertion or mutations of the CYP51A1 gene and sensitive isolates with smaller amplification bands consisting of no insertions or mutations. Very recently, Yaegashi et al. [59] reported that Y137H substitution of the CYP51A was associated with low DMI sensitivity in Japanese isolates of V. inaequalis. In contrast, Schnabel and Jones [60] mentioned that overexpression of the target-site CYP51A1 gene was an important mechanism of resistance, but other mechanisms of resistance also appeared to exist. Villani et al. [40] found the lack of cross-resistance between myclobutanil and difenoconazole and suggested that different mechanisms may govern resistance to different DMI fungicides in this pathogen. Cools and Fraaije [61] stated that these mechanisms can combine, and levels of resistance are often determined by combinations of CYP51 amino-acid alternations, CYP51 gene overexpression and/or increased efflux. Furthermore, the combination of target-site mutations and over-expression causes a phenotype, with high levels of resistance [62].
Substitution at the equivalent amino-acid residue to Y136 and Y137 is the frequently reported CYP51 alteration in resistant isolates of both human and plant pathogenic fungi [61,63]. For V. nashicola, this substitution was not found but several mutations causing amino-acid substitutions or deletion such as G60S, Y102N, Q110H, V131F, D291G, S310P, A320T, P324S, Q359-, R366P, G428R, G445D, and Y446H were detected in the CYP51 gene in some but not all resistant isolates in this study. Substitutions G445D and Y446H are at positions equivalent to alterations in DMI-resistant isolates of Mycosphaerella fijiensis and Zymoseptoria tritici (Mycosphaerella graminicola) [41,64,65], reported to be a key mutation for azole resistance [64,66]. Over 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported in CYP51, altering the protein structure and the binding activity of fungicides [61,67]. Accumulation of mutations generated various CYP51 variants [61,68], and combination of mutations can result in alterations in the level of resistance to different DMI fungicides [63,67]. In the present study, the mutations leading to the substitutions such as Y102N found in less-sensitive isolates in the mid-2000s were not detected from isolates collected more recently in the late 2010s. Stepwise evolution of new resistant phenotypes in response to more active DMIs was reported in M. graminearum [41,67] but point mutations of the CYP51 gene conferring DMI resistance are not very conserved in phytopathogenic fungi [39]. Therefore, it will be a future subject to examine whether these mutations are the cause of resistance and whether they can be utilized for resistance detection as a marker in V. nashicola.
It is most likely that other factors including increase of fungicide efflux from cells are involved in resistance. In our preliminary experiments, isolates which showed fenarimol resistance on fungicide-sprayed trees, were less-sensitive to the antibiotic cyclohexamide, an indicator of drug efflux pump activity but sensitive to chlorpromazine, a transporter modulator, in culture (Ishii et al. unpublished) indicating possible involvement of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter family [68,69,70,71,72] in DMI resistance of this fungus. Low uptake of penconazole due to energy-dependent efflux was found to be the mechanism of resistance to this DMI in the laboratory mutant strains of V. inaequalis [73].

5. Conclusion and Future Prospects

In V. nashicola, results from mycelial growth tests using fungicide-amended culture medium are not very reliable for monitoring DMI resistance and molecular diagnosis of resistance seems to still be challenging in this fungus. Therefore, it is still necessary to confirm fungicide efficacy by inoculation tests on DMI-sprayed pear trees. The novel fungicide ipflufenoquin potentially possessing a new mode of action has been registered for pear scab recently in Japan. Additionally, the new DMI fungicide mefentrifluconazole [74], effective against scab with a reportedly more favorable toxicity profile [75], is now under development. Use of these fungicides in combination with disease-resistance inducers [76] and/or newly released scab-resistant pear cultivars [4,7] will be useful for integrated scab control in future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.I.; methodology, H.I., H.J.C. and L.B.; validation, H.I., H.J.C. and L.B.; formal analysis, H.I., K.N., H.J.C. and L.B.; investigation, H.I. and K.N.; resources, K.K.; data curation, H.I., K.N., H.J.C. and L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, H.I.; writing—review and editing, H.I., H.J.C. and L.B.; supervision, Y.Y.; project administration, H.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

There are no funders of this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Fraaije, B.A., Rothamstead Research for useful advice, and to Wang, W., Institute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, China, Yamaguchi, M., Imari, Matsuo, E., JA Imari, Saga, and Kumamoto FTRI, for arranging sample collection. We also thank So, K., ZEN-NOH, Tokyo for supplying software, Uzuhashi, S. and Katoh, H. for technical assistance, and the field staff of the National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, for assistance in caring for the pear trees.

Conflicts of Interest

H.J. Cools and L. Borghi are employees of Syngenta.

References

  1. Abe, K.; Saito, T.; Terai, O.; Sato, Y.; Kotobuki, K. Genotypic difference for the susceptibility of Japanese, Chinese and European pears to Venturia nashicola, the cause of scab on Asian pears. Plant Breed. 2008, 127, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tanaka, S.; Yamamoto, S. Studies on pear scab. II. Taxonomy of the causal fungus of Japanese pear scab. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 1964, 29, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ishii, H.; Yanase, H. Venturia nashicola, the scab fungus of Japanese and Chinese pears: A species distinct from V. pirina. Mycol. Res. 2000, 104, 755–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ishii, H.; Nishimura, K.; Tanabe, K.; Yamaoka, Y. Pathogenic specialization of Venturia nashicola, causal agent of Asian pear scab, and resistance of pear cultivars Kinchaku and Xiangli. Phytopathology 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Le Cam, B.; Devaux, M.; Parisi, L. Specific polymerase chain reaction identification of Venturia nashicola using internally transcribed spacer region in the ribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. EPPO. Venturia nashicola.EPPO Datasheets on Pests Recommended for Regulation. 2020. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  7. Ishii, H.; Kimura, Y. A new interspecific pear cultivar Yutaka: Highly resistant to the two major diseases scab and black spot on Asian pears. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 152, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Saito, T. Advances in Japanese pear breeding in Japan. Breed. Sci. 2016, 66, 46–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ishii, H.; Udagawa, H.; Yanase, H.; Yamaguchi, A. Resistance of Venturia nashicola to thiophanate-methyl and benomyl: Build-up and decline of resistance in the field. Plant Pathol. 1985, 34, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ishii, H. Resistance in Venturia nashicola to benzimidazoles and sterol demethylation inhibitors. In Fungicide Resistance in Crop Protection; Thind, T.S., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2012; pp. 21–31. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ziogas, B.N.; Malandrakis, A.A. Sterol biosynthesis inhibitors: C14 demethylation (DMIs). In Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens—Principles and a Guide to Practical Management; Ishii, H., Hollomon, D.W., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mehl, A.; Schmitz, H.; Stenzel, K.; Bloomberg, J. DMI fungicides (FRAC Code 3): Sensitivity status of key target pathogens, field versus laboratory resistance, and resistance mechanisms. In Fungicide Resistance in North America, 2nd ed.; Stevenson, K.L., McGrath, M.T., Wyenandt, C.A., Eds.; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2019; pp. 51–68. [Google Scholar]
  13. Umemoto, S. Studies on the ecology and control of Japanese pear scab. Spec. Bull. Chiba Pref. Agric. Exper. Stn. 1993, 22, 1–99, (In Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  14. Loeffler, R.S.T.; Butters, J.A.; Hollomon, D.W. The sterol composition of powdery mildews. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 1561–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shirane, N.; Takenaka, H.; Ueda, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Katoh, K.; Ishii, H. Sterol analysis of DMI-resistant and -sensitive strains of Venturia inaequalis. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 1301–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chapuis, L.; Corio-Costet, M.R.; Malosse, C. Sterol composition of the woody plant pathogenic fungus Eutypa lata. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1599–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brent, J.K.; Hollomon, D.W. Fungicide Resistance in Crop Pathogens: How Can It Be Managed? FRAC Monograph No. 1 (Second, Revised Edition). 2007. Available online: https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/publications/monographs/monograph-1 (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  18. Stanis, V.F.; Jones, A.L. Reduced sensitivity to sterol-inhibiting fungicides in field isolates of Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 1985, 75, 1098–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thind, T.S.; Clerjeau, M.; Olivier, J.M. First observations on resistance in Venturia inaequalis and Guignardia bidwellii to ergosterol-biosynthesis inhibitors in France. In British Crop Protection Conference. Pests and Diseases; BCPC Publications: Surrey, UK, 1986; Volume 2, pp. 491–498. [Google Scholar]
  20. Köller, W.; Scheinpflug, H. Fungal resistance to sterol biosynthesis inhibitors: A new challenge. Plant Dis. 1987, 71, 1066–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ishii, H. Resistance management in diseases of top fruit in Japan. Pestic. Sci. 1997, 51, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kikuhara, K.; Ishii, H. Fenarimol resistance in Venturia nashicola, the scab fungus of Japanese pear in Fukuoka Prefecture. Kyushu Plant Prot. Res. 2008, 54, 24–29, (In Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Ishii, H.; Takeda, H.; Nagamatsu, Y.; Nakashima, H. Sensitivity of the pear scab fungus (Venturia nashicola) to three ergosterol biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicides. Pestic. Sci. 1990, 30, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tomita, Y.; Ishii, H. Reduced sensitivity to fenarimol in Japanese field strains of Venturia nashicola. Pestic. Sci. 1998, 54, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cools, H.J.; Ishii, H.; Butters, J.A.; Hollomon, D.W. Cloning and sequence analysis of the eburicol 14α-demethylase encoding gene (CYP51) from the Japanese pear scab fungus Venturia nashicola. J. Phytopathol. 2002, 150, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ishii, H.; Kikuhara, K. Occurrence of DMI resistance in Venturia nashicola, the scab fungus of Asian pears. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 17th Symposium of Research Committee on Fungicide Resistance, the Phytopathological Society of Japan, Utsunomiya, Japan, 31 March 2007; pp. 49–60, (In Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  27. Parker, D.M.; Hilber, U.W.; Bodmer, M.; Smith, F.D.; Yao, C.; Köller, W. Production and transformation of conidia of Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 1995, 85, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ishii, H.; Udagawa, H.; Nishimoto, S.; Tsuda, T.; Nakashima, H. Scab resistance in pear species and cultivars. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hun. 1992, 27, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  29. Saitoh, K.; Togashi, K.; Arie, T.; Teraoka, T. A simple method for a mini-preparation of fungal DNA. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2006, 72, 348–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kwon, S.M.; Yeo, M.I.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, G.W.; Jun, K.J.; Uhm, J.Y. Reduced sensitivities of the pear scab fungus (Venturia nashicola) collected in Ulsan and Naju to five ergosterol-biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicides. Res. Plant J. 2010, 16, 48–58, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  31. Stammler, G.; Carstensen, M.; Koch, A.; Semar, M.; Strobel, D.; Schlehuber, S. Frequency of different CYP51-haplotypes of Mycosphaerella graminicola and their impact on epoxiconazole-sensitivity and -field efficacy. Crop Prot. 2008, 27, 1448–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wyand, R.A.; Brown, J.K.M. Sequence variation in the CYP51 gene of Blumeria graminis associated with resistance to sterol demethylase inhibiting fungicides. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rallos, L.E.E.; Baudoin, A.B. Co-occurrence of two allelic variants of CYP51 in Erysiphe necator and their correlation with over-expression for DMI resistance. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, F.; Lin, D.; Wang, J.; Li, B.; Duan, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, X. Heterologous expression of the Monilinia fructicola CYP51 (MfCYP51) gene in Pichia pastoris confirms the mode of action of the novel fungicide, SYP-Z048. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pereira, D.A.; McDonald, B.A.; Brunner, P.C. Mutations in the CYP51 gene reduce DMI sensitivity in Parastagonospora nodorum populations in Europe and China. Pest Manag. Sci. 2017, 73, 1503–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cools, H.J.; Parker, J.E.; Kelly, D.E.; Lucas, J.A.; Fraaije, B.A.; Kelly, S.L. Heterologous expression of mutated eburicol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) proteins of Mycosphaerella graminicola to assess effects on azole fungicide sensitivity and intrinsic protein function. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2866–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Spanner, R.; Taliadoros, D.; Richards, J.; Rivera-Varas, V.; Neubauer, J.; Natwick, M.; Hamilton, O.; Vaghefi, N.; Pethybridge, S.; Secor, G.A.; et al. Genome-wide association studies reveal the complex genetic architecture of DMI fungicide resistance in Cercospora beticola. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fisher, M.C.; Hawkins, N.J.; Sanglard, D.; Gurr, S.J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 2018, 360, 739–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xu, X.M.; Gao, L.Q.; Yang, J.R. Are insensitivities of Venturia inaequalis to myclobutanil and fenbuconazole correlated? Crop Protect. 2010, 29, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Villani, S.M.; Hulvey, J.; Hily, J.M.; Cox, K.D. Overexpression of the CYP51A1 gene and repeated elements are associated with differential sensitivity to DMI fungicides in Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 2016, 106, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Cools, H.J.; Hawkins, N.J.; Fraaije, B. Constraints on the evolution of azole resistance in plant pathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62 (Suppl. 1), 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Cordero-Limon, L.; Shaw, M.W.; Passey, T.A.J.; Robinson, J.D.; Xu, X. Cross-resistance between myclobutanil and tebuconazole and the genetic basis of tebuconazole resistance in Venturia inaequalis. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 844–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kikuhara, K.; Adachi, T.; Saito, N.; Iiyama, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Furuya, N. Development of resistance to DMI fungicides in Venturia nashicola, the causal agent of the Japanese pear scab, in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Kyushu Plant Prot. Res. 2018, 64, 1–6, (In Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kikuhara, K.; Hashimoto, F.; Matsumoto, M.; Iiyama, K.; Furuya, N. The relationship between an increase in Japanese pear rust and decreased efficacy of DMI fungicides: A retrospective cohort study in Yame region, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 2018, 84, 98–104, (In Japanese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Köller, W.; Wilcox, W.F.; Barnard, J.; Jones, A.L.; Braun, P.G. Detection and quantification of resistance of Venturia inaequalis populations to sterol demethylation inhibitors. Phytopathology 1997, 87, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Villani, S.M.; Biggs, A.R.; Cooley, D.R.; Raes, J.J.; Cox, K.D. Prevalence of myclobutanil resistance and difenoconazole insensitivity in populations of Venturia inaequalis. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1526–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Köller, W.; Smith, F.D.; Reynolds, K.L. Phenotypic instability of flusilazole sensitivity in Venturia inaequalis. Plant Pathol. 1991, 40, 608–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ishii, H.; Homma, F.; Miura, T.; Suzaki, H.; van Raak, M. Resistance of Venturia inaequalis to DMIs—Phenotypic instability and genetic control. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 6th International Congress of Plant Pathology, Montreal, ON, Canada, 28 June 1993; p. 92. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cox, K.D.; Bryson, P.K.; Schnabel, G. Instability of propiconazole resistance and fitness in Monilinia fructicola. Phytopathology 2007, 97, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhu, F.; Bryson, P.K.; Schnabel, G. Influence of storage approaches on instability of propiconazole resistance in Monilinia fructicola. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ortega, F.; Steiner, U.; Dehne, H.W. Differentiation of SBI resistance and parasitic fitness components in German isolates of Venturia inaequalis (Cke.) Wint and interest of induced resistance for antiresistance strategies. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent. 1996, 61, 413–423. [Google Scholar]
  52. Braun, P.G. Development and decline of a population of Venturia inaequalis resistant to sterol-inhibiting fungicides. Norw. J. Agric. Sci. 1994, 17, 173–184. [Google Scholar]
  53. Frederick, Z.A.; Villani, S.M.; Cox, K.D. The effect of delayed-dormant chemical treatments on demethylation inhibitor (DMI) sensitivity in a DMI-resistant population of Venturia inaequalis. Plant Dis. 2015, 99, 1751–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Pereira, W.V.; Morales, R.G.F.; Bauer, A.I.G.; Kudlawiec, K.; May-De-Mio, L.L. Discontinuance of tebuconazole in the field restores sensitivity of Monilinia fructicola in stone fruit orchards. Plant Pathol. 2020, 69, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Misonou, T.; Fukatsu, R. Studies on the infection and control of pear scab. II. Dispersion of conidia and their role as the origin of infection. Bull. Chiba Agric. Exp. Stn. 1970, 10, 91–98, (In Japanese with English summary). [Google Scholar]
  56. Gao, L.; Berrie, A.; Yang, J.; Xu, X. Within- and between-orchard variability in the sensitivity of Venturia inaequalis to myclobutanil, a DMI fungicide, in the UK. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kwak, Y.; Min, J.; Song, J.; Kim, M.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.T. Relationship of resistance to benzimidazole fungicides with mutation of β-tubulin gene in Venturia nashicola. Res. Plant Dis. 2017, 23, 150–158, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gerberich, K.M.; Beckerman, J. Rapid detection of fungicide resistance in Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 2011, 101, S2.3. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yaegashi, H.; Hirayama, K.; Akahira, T.; Ito, T. Point mutation in CYP51A1 of Venturia inaequalis is associated with low sensitivity to sterol demethylation inhibitors. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2020, 86, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schnabel, G.; Jones, A.L. The 14α-demethylase (CYP51A1) gene is overexpressed in Venturia inaequalis strains resistant to myclobutanil. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cools, H.J.; Fraaije, B.A. Update on mechanism of azole resistance in Mycosphaerella graminicola and implications for future control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2013, 64, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cools, H.J.; Bayon, C.; Atkins, S.; Lucas, J.A.; Fraaije, B.A. Overexpression of the sterol 14α-demethylase gene (MgCYP51) in Mycosphaerella graminicola isolates confers a novel azole fungicide sensitivity phenotype. Pest Manag. Sci. 2012, 68, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Becher, R.; Wirsel, S.G.R. Fungal cytochrome P450 sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) and azole resistance in plant and human pathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 95, 825–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leroux, P.; Albertini, C.; Gautier, A.; Gredt, M.; Walker, A.S. Mutations in the CYP51 gene correlated with changes in sensitivity to sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitors in field isolates of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 688–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mair, W.; Lopez-Ruiz, F.; Stammler, G.; Clark, W.; Burnett, F.; Hollomon, D.; Ishii, H.; Thind, T.S.; Brown, J.K.M.; Fraaije, B.; et al. Proposal for a unified nomenclature for target-site mutations associated with resistance to fungicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 2016, 72, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Huf, A.; Rehfus, A.; Lorenz, K.H.; Bryson, R.; Voegele, R.T.; Stammler, G. Proposal for a new nomenclature for CYP51 haplotypes in Zymoseptoria tritici and analysis of their distribution in Europe. Plant Pathol. 2018, 67, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Price, C.L.; Parker, J.E.; Warrilow, A.G.S.; Kelly, D.E.; Kelly, S.L. Azole fungicides—understanding resistance mechanisms in agricultural fungal pathogens. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Leroux, P.; Walker, A.S. Multiple mechanisms account for resistance to sterol 14α-demethylation inhibitors in field isolates of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 44–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De Waard, M.; Andrade, A.C.; Hayashi, K.; Schoonbeek, H.J.; Stergiopoulos, I.; Zwiers, L.H. Impact of fugal drug transporters on fungicide sensitivity, multidrug resistance and virulence. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kretschmer, M.; Leroch, M.; Mosbach, A.; Walker, A.S.; Fillinger, S.; Mernke, D.; Schoonbeek, H.J.; Pradier, J.M.; Leroux, P.; de Waard, M.A.; et al. Fungicide-driven evolution and molecular basis of multidrug resistance in the field populations of the grey mould fungus Botrytis cinerea. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Leroux, P.; Walker, A.S. Activity of fungicides and modulators of membrane drug transporters in field strains of Botrytis cinerea displaying multidrug resistance. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 135, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hahn, M.; Leroch, M. Multidrug efflux transporters. In Fungicide Resistance in Plant Pathogens—Principles and a Guide to Practical Management; Ishii, H., Hollomon, D.W., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 233–248. [Google Scholar]
  73. Palani, P.V.; Lalithakumari, D. Resistance of Venturia inaequalis to the sterol biosynthesis-inhibiting fungicide, penconazole [1-(2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)pentyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole]. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 157–1164. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ishii, H.; Bryson, P.K.; Kayamori, M.; Miyamoto, T.; Yamaoka, Y.; Schnabel, G. Cross-resistance to the new fungicide mefentrifluconazole in DMI-resistant fungal pathogens. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 171, 104737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tesh, S.A.; Tesh, J.M.; Fegert, I.; Buesen, R.; Schneider, S.; Mentzel, T.; van Ravenzwaay, B.; Stinchcombe, S. Innovative selection approach for a new antifungal agent mefentrifluconazole (Revysol®) and the impact upon its toxicity profile. Regul. Toxicol. Phamacol. 2019, 106, 152–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nakao, S.; Watanabe, H.; Yano, T.; Yamaoka, Y.; Ishii, H. Control efficacy of the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) inducer acibenzolar S methyl against Venturia nashicola in Japanese pear orchards. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 09 01377 g001 550
Figure 1. Control efficacy of fenarimol (on the right of each photo) sprayed preventatively and curatively at 30 mg/L AI against scab disease on potted Japanese pear trees (cultivar: Kousui). Distilled water was sprayed as a reference (on the left of each photo). Trees were inoculated with the conidial suspensions prepared from (A) naturally occurring sporulating lesions collected from Ukiha 2, (B) the single-spore isolate Kurokawa 21 produced in culture, (C) the single-spore isolate Kurokawa 22 produced in culture, and (D) naturally occurring sporulating lesions collected from the NIAES. Photos were taken one month after inoculation.
Figure 1. Control efficacy of fenarimol (on the right of each photo) sprayed preventatively and curatively at 30 mg/L AI against scab disease on potted Japanese pear trees (cultivar: Kousui). Distilled water was sprayed as a reference (on the left of each photo). Trees were inoculated with the conidial suspensions prepared from (A) naturally occurring sporulating lesions collected from Ukiha 2, (B) the single-spore isolate Kurokawa 21 produced in culture, (C) the single-spore isolate Kurokawa 22 produced in culture, and (D) naturally occurring sporulating lesions collected from the NIAES. Photos were taken one month after inoculation.
Microorganisms 09 01377 g001
Microorganisms 09 01377 g002 550
Figure 2. Change of fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola after storage at 4 °C in absence of the fungicide. 1 Average values of two replicates.
Figure 2. Change of fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola after storage at 4 °C in absence of the fungicide. 1 Average values of two replicates.
Microorganisms 09 01377 g002
Microorganisms 09 01377 g003 550
Figure 3. Influence of precultivation period against fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola. 1 Average values of two replicates.
Figure 3. Influence of precultivation period against fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola. 1 Average values of two replicates.
Microorganisms 09 01377 g003
Microorganisms 09 01377 g004 550
Figure 4. Translated deduced amino-acid sequence of Venturia nashicola CYP51 gene. Dots (.) indicate variants. Variants are summarized in Table 7. * Stop codon.
Figure 4. Translated deduced amino-acid sequence of Venturia nashicola CYP51 gene. Dots (.) indicate variants. Variants are summarized in Table 7. * Stop codon.
Microorganisms 09 01377 g004
Table
Table 1. Sensitivity of Venturia nashicola isolates to fenarimol in planta and in culture.
Table 1. Sensitivity of Venturia nashicola isolates to fenarimol in planta and in culture.
Year of
Isolation		LocationSensitivity to Fenarimol in Planta (Control, %) 1Sensitivity to Fenarimol in Culture (Average EC50, mg/L) 2
2005Ukiha 2, Fukuoka2.1 *0.227
Kurokawa, Fukuoka3.7 *1.012
Ukiha 1, Fukuoka21.6 *0.328
Chikuzen, Fukuoka37.8 *0.147
Kurume, Fukuoka55.30.370
Ninaibaru, Fukuoka77.7 *0.292
Tagawa, Fukuoka1000.253
NIAES, Ibaraki 394.60.142
2006Usui, Fukuoka25.00.233
Kaho, Fukuoka31.70.186
Akizuki, Fukuoka32.40.196
Akaike, Fukuoka37.40.278
Kurokawa, Fukuoka70.13.945
NIAES, Ibaraki 31000.142
1 Conidial suspensions prepared from naturally occurring sporulating lesions were inoculated on the leaves of fenarimol (30 mg AI/L)-treated and untreated pear trees. Control (%) was calculated based on the scab incidence. 2 Forty-one to 52 single-spore isolates from each location were used for the mycelial growth tests. EC50 means 50% effective concentration to inhibit growth. 3 Sensitive reference. * Significantly different from the value of control (%) against the reference National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences (NIAES) isolates based on comparison of the average and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Table
Table 2. Collection information, DMI sensitivity, and deduced amino-acid change of CYP51 for the representative single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola used in this study.
Table 2. Collection information, DMI sensitivity, and deduced amino-acid change of CYP51 for the representative single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola used in this study.
IsolateYear of IsolationLocationResponse to Fenarimol or Difenoconazole in Culture 1Sensitivity to Fenarimol or Difenoconazole in Culture (EC50, mg/L) 2Deduced Amino-Acid Change of CYP51
Kurokawa 42005Asakura, FukuokaSensitive0.151Q359 (-), G428R
Kurokawa 392005Asakura, FukuokaSensitive0.166Q359 (-), G428R
Kurokawa 182005Asakura, FukuokaLess-sensitive1.948Y102N, D291G, Q359 (-), G445D
Kurokawa 202005Asakura, FukuokaLess-sensitive0.504Y102N, A340T, Q359 (-), R366P
Kurokawa 262005Asakura, FukuokaLess-sensitive1.970Y102N, Q110H, V131F
Kurokawa 92005Asakura, FukuokaResistant 31.067Q359 (-), G428R
Kurokawa 212005Asakura, FukuokaResistant21.299G60S, Y102N, Q359 (-), G428R
Kurokawa 222005Asakura, FukuokaResistant5.906Y102N, S310P, P324S, Q359 (-), G428R
2 Housui 12017Imari, SagaSensitive0.003Q359 (-)
1 Housui 92017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive0.884Q359 (-)
1 Housui 182017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive2.675Q359 (-)
1 Housui 212017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive1.125Q359 (-)
2 Housui 102017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive0.551Not tested
2 Housui 142017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive0.526Q359 (-)
2 Housui 242017Imari, SagaLess-sensitive0.512Q359 (-)
1 Housui 132017Imari, SagaResistant0.619Q359 (-)
2 Housui 112017Imari, SagaResistant0.033Not tested
H Mizu 32018Yame, Fukuoka(Sensitive)(0.000)Q359 (-)
H Mizu 52018Yame, Fukuoka(Sensitive)(0.044)Q359 (-)
S Mizu 22018Yame, Fukuoka(Less-sensitive)(1.104)Q359 (-), Y446H
S Mizu 32018Yame, Fukuoka(Less-sensitive)(0.196)Q359 (-)
S Mizu 42018Yame, Fukuoka(Less-sensitive)(0.257)Q359 (-), Y446H
S Mizu 52018Yame, Fukuoka(Less-sensitive)(0.593)Q359 (-)
1 Response to difenoconazole is shown in parenthesis. 2 EC50 value of difenoconazole is shown in parenthesis. 3 Determined based on reduction in fungicide efficacy in planta.
Table
Table 3. Control efficacy of fenarimol (30 mg AI/L) on single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola in planta.
Table 3. Control efficacy of fenarimol (30 mg AI/L) on single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola in planta.
IsolateTime After InoculationControl (%)Scab Incidence (%) on DW-Sprayed Reference Trees
Kurokawa 93 weeks85.793.3
1 month20.0100.0
Kurokawa 213 weeks49.993.3
1 month6.7100.0
Kurokawa 223 weeks0.086.7
1 month0.0100.0
NIAES 13 weeks100.033.3
1 month100.073.3
1 Conidia directly collected from naturally occurring sporulating lesions.
Table
Table 4. Control efficacy of the three DMI fungicides against Venturia nashicola conidia in planta.
Table 4. Control efficacy of the three DMI fungicides against Venturia nashicola conidia in planta.
Timing of Disease AssessmentOrigin of Conidia InoculatedTreatmentScab Incidence (%)
3 weeks after inoculationKurokawaFenarimol 133.219.5
Difenoconazole 21000.0
Hexaconazole 31000.0
Distilled water29.2
NIAESFenarimol1000.0
Difenoconazole1000.0
Hexaconazole1000.0
Distilled water17.9
1 month after inoculationKurokawaFenarimol−14.788.4
Difenoconazole1000.0
Hexaconazole21.760.4
Distilled water77.1
NIAESFenarimol65.920.9
Difenoconazole1000
Hexaconazole90.95.6
Distilled water61.3
1 30 mg AI/L. 2 25 mg AI/L. 3 10 mg AI/L.
Table
Table 5. Sensitivity of Venturia nashicola isolates to the three DMI fungicides in culture.
Table 5. Sensitivity of Venturia nashicola isolates to the three DMI fungicides in culture.
IsolateEC50 (mg/L) of Fungicide
FenarimolDifenoconazoleHexaconazole
Kurokawa 40.151<0.0100.020
Kurokawa 91.067<0.010<0.010
Kurokawa 181.948<0.0100.072
Kurokawa 200.504<0.0100.023
Kurokawa 2121.2990.0320.113
Kurokawa 225.9063.1990.091
Kurokawa 261.970<0.0100.028
Kurokawa 390.166<0.0100.022
Baseline0.142 ± 0.2150.023 ± 0.1420.007 ± 0.016
Table
Table 6. Change of fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola after storage at 4 °C in absence of the fungicide.
Table 6. Change of fenarimol sensitivity in single-spore isolates of Venturia nashicola after storage at 4 °C in absence of the fungicide.
IsolateSensitivity to FenarimolEC50 (mg/L) of Fenarimol
1st trial2nd trial
Kurokawa 4Sensitive0.1510.028
Kurokawa 39Sensitive0.1660.131
Kurokawa 18Less-Sensitive1.9480.973
Kurokawa 20Less-Sensitive0.5040.347
Kurokawa 26Less-Sensitive1.9700.680
Kurokawa 9Resistant 11.0670.263
Kurokawa 21Resistant 121.2991.721
Kurokawa 22Resistant 15.9067.879
1 Reduction in fenarimol efficacy was also confirmed in planta (Table 3).
Table
Table 7. Amino-acid (AA) positions in CYP51 where mutations in the isolates of Venturia nashicola were sequenced. For each AA position the corresponding mutation and its eventual orthology are shown. SEPTTR: Zymoseptoria tritici; ERYSGT: Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici; BRYSGH: Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei; UNCINE: Erysiphe necator; MONIFG: Monilinia fructigena; LEPTNO: Parastagonospora nodorum; CERBE: Cercospora beticola. Table references: 1 Stammler et al. [31]; 2 Wyand and Brown [32]; 3 Rallos and Baudoin [33]; 4 Chen et al. [34]; 5 Pereira et al. [35]; 6 Cools et al. [36]; 7 Spanner et al. [37].
Table 7. Amino-acid (AA) positions in CYP51 where mutations in the isolates of Venturia nashicola were sequenced. For each AA position the corresponding mutation and its eventual orthology are shown. SEPTTR: Zymoseptoria tritici; ERYSGT: Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici; BRYSGH: Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei; UNCINE: Erysiphe necator; MONIFG: Monilinia fructigena; LEPTNO: Parastagonospora nodorum; CERBE: Cercospora beticola. Table references: 1 Stammler et al. [31]; 2 Wyand and Brown [32]; 3 Rallos and Baudoin [33]; 4 Chen et al. [34]; 5 Pereira et al. [35]; 6 Cools et al. [36]; 7 Spanner et al. [37].
AA PositionMutationOrthology
60G60S
102Y102N
110Q110H
131V131FV131F is placed between D130 (SEPTTR_D134 1) and Y133 (ERYSGT 2/BRYSGH 2/UNCINE 3/MONIFG 4/_Y136 or LEPTNO_Y144 5)
291D291G
310S310P
324P324S
340A340T
359Q359-
366R366P
428G428R
445G445DSEPTTR_G460 6
446Y446HCERBE_Y464 7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishii, H.; Cools, H.J.; Nishimura, K.; Borghi, L.; Kikuhara, K.; Yamaoka, Y. DMI-Fungicide Resistance in Venturia nashicola, the Causal Agent of Asian Pear Scab—How Reliable Are Mycelial Growth Tests in Culture? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071377

AMA Style

Ishii H, Cools HJ, Nishimura K, Borghi L, Kikuhara K, Yamaoka Y. DMI-Fungicide Resistance in Venturia nashicola, the Causal Agent of Asian Pear Scab—How Reliable Are Mycelial Growth Tests in Culture? Microorganisms. 2021; 9(7):1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishii, Hideo, Hans Jorgen Cools, Kumiko Nishimura, Lorenzo Borghi, Kenji Kikuhara, and Yuichi Yamaoka. 2021. "DMI-Fungicide Resistance in Venturia nashicola, the Causal Agent of Asian Pear Scab—How Reliable Are Mycelial Growth Tests in Culture?" Microorganisms 9, no. 7: 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071377

APA Style

Ishii, H., Cools, H. J., Nishimura, K., Borghi, L., Kikuhara, K., & Yamaoka, Y. (2021). DMI-Fungicide Resistance in Venturia nashicola, the Causal Agent of Asian Pear Scab—How Reliable Are Mycelial Growth Tests in Culture? Microorganisms, 9(7), 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop