Next Article in Journal
System Identification of Mosques Resting on Soft Soil. The Case of the Suleiman Mosque in the Medieval City of Rhodes, Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Determination of Water Retention Properties of Silty Sands by Means of Combined Commercial Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Sedimentology and Stratigraphy of an Upper Permian Sedimentary Succession: Northern Sydney Basin, Southeastern Australia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of a River Embankment Model under Transient Seepage Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Capillary Barriers during Rainfall Events in Pyroclastic Deposits of the Vesuvian Area

1
Department of Earth Science, Environment and Resources, University of Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli, Italy
2
Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy
3
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, 06125 Perugia, Italy
4
INGV/Osservatorio Vesuviano—Napoli, 80125 Napoli, Italy
5
Geotechnical Consulting Group, London SW7 5BE, UK
6
James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2021, 11(7), 274; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070274
Submission received: 12 May 2021 / Revised: 22 June 2021 / Accepted: 23 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural and Artificial Unsaturated Soil Slopes)

Abstract

:
In the present paper, the capillary barrier formation at the interface between soil layers, which is characterized by textural discontinuities, has been analyzed. This mechanism has been investigated by means of a finite element model of a two-layer soil stratification. The two considered formations, belonging to the pyroclastic succession of the “Pomici di Base” Plinian eruption (22 ka, Santacroce et al., 2008) of the Somma–Vesuvius volcano, are affected by shallow instability phenomena likely caused by progressive saturation during the rainfall events. This mechanism could be compatible with the formation of capillary barriers at the interface between layers of different grain size distributions during infiltration. One-dimensional infiltration into the stratified soil was parametrically simulated considering rainfall events of increasing intensity and duration. The variations in the suction and degree of saturation over time allowed for the evaluation of stability variations in the layers, which were assumed as part of stratified unsaturated infinite slopes.

1. Introduction

Infiltration processes through layered soil deposits can be deeply affected by the presence of layers with contrasting hydraulic properties. In saturated conditions, the hydraulic conductivity of an upper, finer-grained layer overlying a coarser-grained layer can be higher than that of the coarser layer; however, in unsaturated conditions, the situation can be the opposite. The coarser layer can hinder the infiltration process through reduced unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, thus promoting the formation of a capillary barrier. This principle is applied in artificial layered soil covers to develop capillary barriers that prevent infiltration and promote lateral drainage (e.g., for landfill covers [1] and slope stabilization [2]).
Layered pyroclastic soil profiles are often complex, owing to the different eruptive phases and the deposition process of volcanic materials that follows. This is the case for the pyroclastic materials spread out over a large part of the mountainous areas surrounding the volcanic centers of Campania (southern Italy). Soil covers are indeed characterized by alternating layers of ashes, pumices, scoriae, and other volcanic products, which presents significant differences in terms of the geochemical nature, texture, density, hydraulic and mechanical properties [3,4].
Pyroclastic soil covers of Campania are frequently involved in rainfall-induced shallow landslides. Multiple factors can trigger landslides among these materials, including the site conditions (geomorphological characteristics, rainfall patterns, etc.) and properties (e.g., porosity, particle size distributions) of the pyroclastic soils [5,6,7,8].
The spatial variations in the textural characteristics and the related hydro-mechanical properties of the pyroclastic layers are the key factors controlling the rates of water infiltration, with the potential to form capillary barriers at the interface between layers of different soil textures (e.g., [1,9]). Capillary barriers have been considered by some authors to be one of the factors influencing the possible instability of shallow landslides [10,11]. Several studies [10,11,12,13,14] have shown that the differences in texture between the layers of the pyroclastic covers of Campania may affect infiltration processes and, eventually, slope instability.
The in situ observation of capillary barrier formation is a difficult task, due to the transient nature of the phenomenon and the fact that it is highly dependent on the initial soil-moisture profiles and boundary conditions, as shown by several laboratory experiments in soil columns, lysimeters, and instrumented flumes [15,16,17,18,19]. Numerical simulations represent an alternative to experimental measurements when examining the performance of the capillary barrier system. Oldenburg and Pruess [20] comprehensively studied the behavior of capillary barriers through the use of numerical methods. Stormont and Morris [21] and Khire et al. [1] performed parametric numerical analyses on horizontal capillary systems to investigate the effects of different parameters on the water storage capacity and hydraulic response of capillary barrier systems when subjected to different environmental loads. Numerical analyses were conducted by Rahardjo et al. [22] to determine the thickness and length of the fine- and coarse-grained materials of the capillary barrier system. Scarfone et al. [23,24] used advanced numerical modeling to extensively study the effectiveness of capillary barrier systems in introducing water retention hysteresis into the hydraulic behavior of unsaturated soils, considering a new hydraulic conductivity model at a low degree of saturation, and the complex phenomenon of soil–atmosphere interaction in the long term.
In the present paper, the capillary barrier formation at the interface between soil layers, which is characterized by textural discontinuities, has been investigated by means of a finite element model. Two layers of soil stratification belonging to the pyroclastic succession of the “Pomici di Base” Plinian eruption (22 ka, Santacroce et al. [25]) of the Somma–Vesuvius volcano have been considered in the numerical model. The stratification is affected by shallow instability phenomena [26] that are likely caused by the progressive saturation during the rainfall events; this is a mechanism that is compatible with the formation of capillary barriers at the interface between layers of contrasting hydraulic properties during infiltration. The water retention properties and hydraulic conductivity function were derived for the two layers, and one-dimensional infiltration was parametrically simulated considering rainfall events of increasing intensity and duration. Variations in the suction and degree of saturation over time allowed for the evaluation of the stability of the stratification assumed as a stratified unsaturated infinite slope.

2. Pyroclastic Soils

The territory around the town of Palma Campania, about 20 km east of the city of Naples, Southern Italy, is located in the “Conca Napoletana” (Campanian plain) at the border of the Nola and Sarno plains; it is delimited to the East by the Apennine Mesozoic carbonate reliefs and to the West by the Somma–Vesuvius Quaternary volcanic complex (Figure 1).
On the carbonate slopes surrounding Palma Campania, relatively recent small landslides of the translational sliding type [27] have been observed among pyroclastic materials. A detailed field survey allowed for the identification of a series of recent landslides, mainly located in the “Vallone Lupici”, involving the Somma–Vesuvius pyroclastic deposits. The failure surface has been identified at the interface between the grey pumice and dark scoria layers (Figure 2). This is possibly due, in large part, to the substantial variation in the grain size distributions and hydraulic properties between these two levels, such that water infiltration is affected.
The studied volcanic succession (Figure 3) includes a few-meters-thick fallout deposit consisting—from the base to the top—of a basal, high-vesiculated, white pumice layer; an intermediate level of high to moderate vesiculated grey pumices; and an upper level of denser, black scoriae. This stratigraphic sequence corresponds to fallout deposits emplaced during the so-called “Pomici di Base” Plinian eruption (22,000 yrs BP [25]) of the Somma–Vesuvius volcano, which is well described in the literature [28,29,30,31].
The observed variations in lithological facies in the stratigraphy of this fallout deposit well-match the changes in eruption dynamics during the progression of the volcanic activity. In fact, the reduction in the clast vesicularity and size at the top of the sequence reflects the existence of a compositional gradient in the magma chamber. Whereas the first explosive phases tap the volatile-rich top of the felsic magma body (forming the first deposited materials at the base of the sequence), the following less-explosive phases sample partially degassed mafic magmas at the bottom of the reservoir (deposited later in the upper stratigraphic levels).
Bulk samples were collected at different stratigraphic heights, consistent with variations in lithological facies (i.e., grain size, color, and texture). Moreover, relatively undisturbed whole samples were retrieved using thin-walled tube samplers, from the zone close to the failure surface, specifically at the transition between the grey pumices and the black scoriae layer.
Grain size distributions of samples vary along the stratigraphic sequence. As reported in Figure 4—according to ASTM D422—black scoriae consist of 80% sand and 20% gravel, grey pumices consist of 80% gravel and 20% sand, and white pumices consist of 70% gravel and 30% sand.
The specific weight of solid grains (γs) is 27.8 kN/m3 for black scoriae, 27.2 kN/m3 for grey pumices, and 24 kN/m3 for white pumices. Variations in the density of the solid phase are consistent with the geochemical changes described in the literature [29], from the dense trachybasaltic-latitic scoriae of the top layer to the light trachytic pumices at the bottom of the volcanic succession.
Bulk weight measurements, carried out on at least 100 single clasts of each representative class (namely 2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm), showed no significant variations within each stratigraphic unit [26]. The dry specific weight (γd) increased from the base to the top of the stratigraphic succession, with lower average values pertaining to basal white pumices (γd = 6 kN/m3), intermediate values pertaining to grey pumices (γd = 12.4 kN/m3), and larger values pertaining to black scoriae (γd = 15 kN/m3). Intergranular porosities, determined using a microstructural analysis performed by means of X-ray tomography on the reconstituted sample [26], were estimated to be equal to 33.8% for black scoriae and 36.5% for grey pumices.

3. Water Retention Properties

The water retention properties of the pyroclastic soil under study were determined using the model proposed by Arya and Paris [32], based on the particle size distribution of each formation in the stratigraphic sequence. In the model proposed by Arya and Paris, it is assumed that the solid grains are spherical, and the pore volume is approximated to that of cylindrical capillary tubes. For each ith particle-size class, the pore radius (ri)—associated with the mean grain radius (Ri)—is related to the suction value si according to:
r i = R i 2 e n i 1 α / 3 1 / 2 and s i = 2 T w r i
where ni, e, Tw, and α are, respectively, the number of spherical grains, the void ratio, the surface tension of water (Tw = 7.27 × 10−2 N/m at 20 °C), and a constant parameter larger than unity. Thus, for a given grain size distribution, Equation (1) allows for the calculation of the value of the suction required to desaturate a given fraction of pores. In the following, α is assumed to be constant, as consistent with the one evaluated for other typical pyroclastic weak rocks and the coarse-grained soils of Central Italy [33,34].
The Arya and Paris model was applied to two layers of the considered stratigraphic succession, namely to the black scoriae (BS) and grey pumices (GP), which form the interface of interest for the possible formation of a capillary barrier during an infiltration process. From the application of the method described above, volumetric water content values were obtained as a function of suction, which represents the behavior of the materials during wetting. These values were expressed in terms of the effective degree of saturation (Se), assuming a residual degree of saturation for both soils equal to zero, and were interpolated using the function proposed by Van Genuchten [35]:
S e = 1 1 + a s n m
where a, n, and m are fitting parameters, reported in Table 1 for both GP and BS, along with fitting parameters proposed in the literature for similar coarse layers. Soil water retention curves for both the BS and GP layers are reported in Figure 5.

4. Infiltration Process

The implemented numerical model, aimed at simulating the formation of a capillary barrier at the interface between two layers, is characterised by textural discontinuities. A parametric study of infiltration was carried out by varying the intensity and duration of the considered rainfall events.
The hydraulic constitutive Van Genuchten model for unsaturated soils was implemented in the CODE_BRIGHT finite-element code [36,37]. The numerical model was a vertical column of soil made of two layers: an upper layer, 2.5 m thick, representing the finer layer (BS) of a capillary barrier system, and a lower layer, 0.5 m thick, representing the coarser layer (GP) (Figure 6). The materials forming the two layers were each modeled by defining the soil water retention curve and the porosity. The intergranular porosities of reconstituted samples of BS and GP were assumed to be representative for each layer. The potential hydraulic effects of double porosity (i.e., intergranular and intragranular porosity) were not considered. Each of the two layers was treated as a uniform material. The hydraulic conductivity function was derived from the Mualem model [38].
During numerical simulations of one-dimensional infiltration, only isothermal liquid transport was considered, with the solid phase treated as nondeformable and the gas phase as nonmobile. Thus, constant and uniform values of temperature (T = 20 °C), displacements of the solid phase (u = 0 m), and gas pressure (ua = 0 kPa) were imposed.
The initial condition for the numerical analyses was a hydrostatic suction profile with s = 20 kPa at the bottom boundary, s = 50 kPa at the top, and a linear variation between these values, with null water pressure at depth equal to 2.0 m below the bottom boundary (zw = 5 m from the ground table). In this initial condition, the coarser layer was at a very low degree of saturation. For the bottom boundary condition, a free drainage condition was imposed. This consists of a zero water flow value if the suction is higher than 0.3 kPa, whereas a suction value of 0.3 kPa is imposed if the suction at the bottom boundary attains this value. The value of 0.3 kPa is the suction value at which the lower coarser layer GP starts draining water (see hydraulic properties in Figure 6). For the top boundary condition, a constant value of vertical water flux (the infiltration rate) was imposed. To assess the influence of the infiltration rate, different rainfall scenarios—in terms of rainfall intensity (5 mm/h and 10 mm/h) and duration (12 h and 24 h)—were considered. The selected rainfall events have been considered to be representative events at the site, as highlighted by the data shown in Figure 7, which was acquired across approximately two years of monitoring.

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Infiltration Process

The infiltration analysis is carried out with reference to the suction and degree of saturation profiles, and by checking the water storage in the upper BS layer. These parameters are controlled over time, beginning at the start of the considered rainfall event.
For a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 12 h, it is observed that (Figure 8) the infiltration front proceeding downward causes a reduction in suction and an increase in the degree of saturation along the vertical column for periods of time that are longer than the duration of the rainfall event. When the interface is reached (depth of 2.5 m), the degree of saturation increases and reaches its maximum value in the upper layer, while it remains almost constant in the lower layer. Similarly, suction decreases at the interface in the BS layer and reaches the minimum value, while it remains at the initial value in the grey pumices. The conditions described correspond with the formation of a capillary barrier at the interface between black scoriae and grey pumices. The capillary barrier also persists for a longer time, as evidenced by both the suction and saturation degree profiles at observation time t = 480 h. Further confirmation of this permanence comes from the constant value over time of the water storage in the BS layer, as shown in Figure 9.
For a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h, the infiltration front close to the interface causes an increase in the degree of saturation (Figure 10a); however, this is coupled with suction reduction at the interface. The suction attained at the interface is so low that break-through has occurred in the capillary barrier, and water flow takes place toward the lower formation, with a progressive reduction in water storage in the upper black scoriae layer, as highlighted in Figure 9. As reported in Figure 11, break-through occurs when suction at the interface drops down from 25 kPa to 0.6 kPa, which is close to the theoretical value (s = 0.46 kPa) proposed by Lu and Likos [39].
For a rainfall event with an intensity of 10 mm/h and a duration of 24 h (Figure 12), the infiltration front crosses the interface in less time than the duration of the rainfall event. The observed increase in the degree of saturation in the BS layer approaching the interface is due to the contrast in the hydraulic conductivities of the two layers. The reduction in water storage over time, beginning at the end of the rainfall event, is a further confirmation that the capillary barrier effect at the interface is rapidly lost for the simulated rainfall event.

5.2. Stability Analyses

This section refers to the results obtained from a numerical example of application, which was aimed at highlighting the hydraulic effects on slope stability conditions following a rainfall event lasting 24 h and at an intensity equal to 5 mm/h and 10 mm/h, respectively. The case study is a slope (slope angle α = 36°) of black scoriae layer (φ = 35°, c’ = 0, γ = 15 kN/m3) 2.5 m thick superposed to a bottom layer of grey pumices (φ = 37°, c’ = 0, γ = 12.4 kN/m3) 0.5 m thick. The shear strength parameters of the two layers have been deduced by [5] and [40]. The water table is located at a depth of zw = 5 m from the ground table. The profiles of the saturation degree and soil suction during the infiltration events are shown in Figure 7, Figure 9, and Figure 10 at different times of observation (t = 12 h, 24 h, 240 h, and 480 h). These profiles, in turn, made it possible to estimate the soil shear strength at increasing depths, by adopting the failure criterion for unsaturated cohesionless soils proposed by Vanapalli et al. [41]. This leads to Equation (3), below:
SF ( z ) = τ f τ = 1 + S r z · s z γ z cos 2 α · tan φ tan α
The decrease in the safety factor with depth, as the infiltration front proceeds, has been shown in Figure 13 as a consequence of the reduction in the positive contribution provided by the degree of saturation and suction in the expression (3). For a slope inclination close to the value of the internal friction angle of the shallow layer, it can be observed that for a rainfall event with an intensity (i) of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h, the factor of safety is progressively reduced as the infiltration front proceeds, but no instability of the slope occurs. At longer observation times, when the front reaches the interface between black scoriae and grey pumices, the formation of the capillary barrier (as described in Section 5.1 and shown in Figure 10) favors the further reduction in the safety factor—down to the instability condition—which is evident for the observation times of 240 h and 480 h. The failure surface is localized within the black scoriae layer, while the underlying grey pumices layer remains stable (SFmin = 1.07).
For a rainfall event at a higher intensity (i = 10 mm/h) and a duration of 24 h, the infiltration front reaches the interface during the rainfall event, and the formation of the capillary barrier favors the onset of the unstable condition during the 24 h of a rainfall event.
A stability analysis of the infinite slope model (for stability conditions close to failure) showed how the formation and permanence of the capillary barrier can induce the instability of the shallow layer, confirming the in situ observation of the localization of instabilities in the shallow finer layers. The failure condition is triggered by rainfall events at intensity and duration levels favoring water storage in the upper layer and minimizing the beneficial contribution of suction to the stability of the slope.

6. Conclusions

A detailed field survey allowed for the identification of a series of recent landslides, mainly located in the “Conca Napoletana” (Campanian plain), involving the Somma–Vesuvius pyroclastic deposits. The failure surface has been identified at the interface between grey pumice and black scoriae layers, likely due to the contrasting hydraulic properties between these two levels, which promote the formation of capillary barriers. This hypothesis has been explored in the present paper by means of a numerical study of water infiltration, parametrically simulated considering rainfall events of increasing intensity and duration. The numerical analyses showed the effects of progressive water storage in the upper, finer-grained layer of black scoriae, which can give place to the capillary barrier at the interface with the coarser-grained layer of grey pumices. The time history of the infiltration process allowed the present analyses to highlight the capillary barrier water break-through as a consequence of progressive suction equalization between the two layers, as well as the gravity-driven downward flux of water over time. The impact of infiltration, and the influence of the capillary barrier on the layers’ stability, has been evaluated with reference to the unsaturated infinite slope model. The attainment of failure conditions of the black scoriae layer for a medium intensity, long duration rainfall event is consistent with the field observations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, M.C., G.R., D.C., L.P. and D.D.M.; investigation, C.S.; data curation, C.S., R.S., L.P. and E.V.; writing—original draft preparation, G.R. and M.C.; writing—review and editing, D.C., D.D.M., L.P., R.S. and E.V.; supervision, M.C., G.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khire, M.V.; Benson, C.H.; Bosscher, P.J. Capillary barriers: Design variables and water balance. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2000, 126, 695–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rahardjo, H.; Satyanaga, A.; Leong, E.C. Unsaturated soil mechanics for slope stabilization. In Proceedings of the 5th Asia–Pacific Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Pattaya, Thailand, 29 February–2 March 2012; pp. 103–117. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pappalardo, L.; Piochi, M.; Mastrolorenzo, G. The 3550 YR BP-1944 AD magma-plumbing system of Somma-Vesuvius: Constraints on its behavior and present state through a review of Sr-Nd isotope data. Ann. Geophys. 2004, 47, 1471–1483. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pappalardo, L.; Mastrolorenzo, G. Short residence times for alkaline Vesuvius magmas in a multi-depth supply system: Evidence from geochemical and textural studies. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010, 296, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Vita, P.; Napolitano, E.; Godt, J.W.; Baum, R.L. Deterministic estimation of hydrological thresholds for shallow landslide initiation and slope stability models: Case study from the Somma-Vesuvius area of southern Italy. Landslides 2013, 10, 713–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cascini, L.; Sorbino, G.; Cuomo, S.; Ferlisi, S. Seasonal effects of rainfall on the shallow pyroclastic deposits of the Campania region (southern Italy). Landslides 2014, 11, 779–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Urciuoli, G.; Pirone, M.; Comegna, L.; Picarelli, L. Long-term investigations on the pore pressure regime in saturated and unsaturated sloping soils. Eng. Geol. 2016, 212, 98–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Picarelli, L.; Olivares, L.; Damiano, E.; Darban, R.; Santo, A. The effects of extreme precipitations on landslide hazard in the pyroclastic deposits of Campania Region: A review. Landslides 2020, 17, 2343–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shackelford, C.D.; Chang, C.-K.; Chiu, T.-F. The capillary barrier effect in unsaturated flow through soil barriers. In Proceedings of the First International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 10–15 July 1994; pp. 789–793. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mancarella, D.; Doglioni, A.; Simeone, V. On capillary barrier effects and debris slide triggering in unsaturated soil covers. Eng. Geol. 2012, 147–148, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Damiano, E. Effects of layering on triggering mechanisms of rainfall-induced landslides in unsaturated pyroclastic granular soils. Can. Geotech. J. 2018, 56, 1278–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crosta, G.B.; Negro, P.D. Observations and modelling of soil slip-debris flow initiation processes in pyroclastic deposits: The Sarno 1998 event. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2003, 3, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Vingiani, S.; Mele, G.; De Mascellis, R.; Terribile, F.; Basile, A. Volcanic soils and landslides: A case study of the island of Ischia (southern Italy) and its relationship with other Campania events. Solid Earth 2015, 6, 783–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Reder, A.; Pagano, L.; Picarelli, L.; Rianna, G. The role of the lowermost boundary conditions in the hydrological response of shallow sloping covers. Landslides 2017, 14, 861–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, H.; Rahardjo, H.; Leong, E.C.; Fredlund, D.G. A study of infiltration on three sand capillary barriers. Can. Geotech. J. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharma, R.H.; Nakagawa, H. Numerical model and flume experiments of single- and two-layered hillslope flow related to slope failure. Landslides 2010, 7, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mancarella, D.; Simeone, V. Capillary barrier effects in unsaturated layered soils, with special reference to the pyroclastic veneer of the Pizzo d’Alvano, Campania (Italy). Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2011, 71, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pagano, L.; Reder, A.; Rianna, G. Experiments to Investigate the Hydrological Behaviour of Volcanic Covers. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2014, 9, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tan, S.H.; Wong, S.W.; Chin, D.J.; Lee, M.L.; Ong, Y.H.; Chong, S.Y.; Kassim, A. Soil column infiltration tests on biomediated capillary barrier systems for mitigating rainfall-induced landslides. Environ. Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oldenburg, C.M.; Pruess, K. On Numerical Modeling of Capillary Barriers. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stormont, J.C.; Morris, C.E. Method to Estimate Water Storage Capacity of Capillary Barriers. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 1998, 124, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rahardjo, H.; Tami, D.; Leong, E.C. Effectiveness of sloping capillary barriers under high precipitation rates. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Problematic Soils, Selangor, Malaysia, 3–5 December 2006; pp. 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  23. Scarfone, R.; Wheeler, S.J.; Lloret-Cabot, M. A hysteretic hydraulic constitutive model for unsaturated soils and application to capillary barrier systems. Géoméch. Energy Environ. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Scarfone, R.; Wheeler, S.J.; Lloret-Cabot, M. Conceptual Hydraulic Conductivity Model for Unsaturated Soils at Low Degree of Saturation and Its Application to the Study of Capillary Barrier Systems. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2020, 146, 04020106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Santacroce, R.; Cioni, R.; Marianelli, P.; Sbrana, A.; Sulpizio, R.; Zanchetta, G.; Donahue, D.J.; Joron, J.L. Age and whole rock–glass compositions of proximal pyroclastics from the major explosive eruptions of Somma-Vesuvius: A review as a tool for distal tephrostratigraphy. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2008, 177, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sepe, C.; Calcaterra, D.; Di Martire, D.; Ramondini, M.; Russo, G.; Vitale, E.; Pappalardo, L. Role of capillary barriers in landslide susceptibility assessment in pyroclastic soils: Microstructure investigation and numerical analysis. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Vita, P.; Di Clemente, E.; Rolandi, M.; Celico, P. Engineering geological models of the initial landslides occurred on april 30 2006, at the Mount of Vezzi (Ischia island, Italy). Ital. J. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2007, 2, 119–141. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cruden, D.M.; Varnes, D.J. Landslide types and processes. In Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation; Turner, A.K., Schuster, R.L., Eds.; Transportation Research Board Special Report 247, National Research Council; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 36–75. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bertagnini, A.; Landi, P.; Rosi, M.; Vigliargio, A. The Pomici di Base plinian eruption of Somma-Vesuvius. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 1998, 83, 219–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pappalardo, L.; Buono, G.; Fanara, S.; Petrosino, P. Combining textural and geochemical investigations to explore the dynamics of magma ascent during Plinian eruptions: A Somma–Vesuvius volcano (Italy) case study. Contrib. Miner. Pet. 2018, 173, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buono, G.; Pappalardo, L.; Harris, C.; Edwards, B.R.; Petrosino, P. Magmatic stoping during the caldera-forming Pomici di Base eruption (Somma-Vesuvius, Italy) as a fuel of eruption explosivity. Lithos 2020, 370, 105628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arya, L.M.; Paris, J.F. A physicoempirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle size. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1981, 45, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cecconi, M.; Vecchietti, A.; Pane, V.; Russo, G.; Cencetti, C. Geotechnical Aspects in the Assessment of Stability Conditions of the Volumni Hypogeum in Perugia. In Geotechnical Research for Land Protection and Development, CNRIG 2019; Calvetti, F., Cotecchia, F., Galli, A., Jommi, C., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 2020; Springer: Berlin/Heisenberg, Germany, 2020; Volume 40. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cecconi, M.; Cambi, C.; Carrisi, S.; Deneele, D.; Vitale, E.; Russo, G. Sustainable Improvement of Zeolitic Pyroclastic Soils for the Preservation of Historical Sites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Van Genuchten, M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Olivella, S.; Carrera, J.; Gens, A.; Alonso, E.E. Non isothermal multiphase flow of brine and gas through saline media. Transp. Porous Media 1994, 15, 271–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Olivella, S.; Gens, A.; Carrera, J.; Alonso, E.E. Numerical formulation for a simulator (CODE_BRIGHT) for the coupled analysis of saline media. Eng. Comput. 1996, 13, 87–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mualem, Y. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 1976, 12, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lu, N.; Likos, W.J. Unsaturated Soil Mechanics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2004; ISBN 978-0-471-44731-3. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bilotta, E.; Cascini, L.; Foresta, V.; Sorbinow, G. Geotechnical characterisation of pyroclastic soils involved in huge flowslides. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2005, 23, 365–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vanapalli, S.K.; Fredlund, D.G.; Pufahl, D.E.; Clifton, A.W. Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Can. Geotech. J. 1996, 33, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological map of the southwestern portion of the Campanian plain: (1) alluvial deposits, (2) travertine, (3) loose ash-fall deposits, (4) mainly coherent ash-flow deposits, (5) lavas, (6) debris and slope talus deposits, (7) Miocene flysch, (8) middle Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous limestones, (9) lower Triassic–Middle Jurassic dolomites and calcareous limestones, (10) fault, (11) total isopach lines (m) of the most important Mt. Somma–Vesuvius explosive eruptions. This figure is modified from [5].
Figure 1. Geological map of the southwestern portion of the Campanian plain: (1) alluvial deposits, (2) travertine, (3) loose ash-fall deposits, (4) mainly coherent ash-flow deposits, (5) lavas, (6) debris and slope talus deposits, (7) Miocene flysch, (8) middle Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous limestones, (9) lower Triassic–Middle Jurassic dolomites and calcareous limestones, (10) fault, (11) total isopach lines (m) of the most important Mt. Somma–Vesuvius explosive eruptions. This figure is modified from [5].
Geosciences 11 00274 g001
Figure 2. (A) A 3D satellite image of the studied area (from Google Earth); (B) the detachment zone of a landslide in Vallone Lupici; and (C) the cross-section of a typical landslide.
Figure 2. (A) A 3D satellite image of the studied area (from Google Earth); (B) the detachment zone of a landslide in Vallone Lupici; and (C) the cross-section of a typical landslide.
Geosciences 11 00274 g002
Figure 3. Vallone Lupici pyroclastic deposits—the identification of the Pomici di Base Plinian Eruption layers: BS, black scoriae; GPs, grey pumices; WPs, white pumices.
Figure 3. Vallone Lupici pyroclastic deposits—the identification of the Pomici di Base Plinian Eruption layers: BS, black scoriae; GPs, grey pumices; WPs, white pumices.
Geosciences 11 00274 g003
Figure 4. Grain size distributions of the investigated units in stratigraphic succession.
Figure 4. Grain size distributions of the investigated units in stratigraphic succession.
Geosciences 11 00274 g004
Figure 5. Water retention curves of GP and BS soils, estimated using the Arya and Paris (AP) model and the Van Genuchten (VG) model.
Figure 5. Water retention curves of GP and BS soils, estimated using the Arya and Paris (AP) model and the Van Genuchten (VG) model.
Geosciences 11 00274 g005
Figure 6. The geometry of the two-layer numerical model, Van Genuchten water retention curves, and Mualem hydraulic conductivity.
Figure 6. The geometry of the two-layer numerical model, Van Genuchten water retention curves, and Mualem hydraulic conductivity.
Geosciences 11 00274 g006
Figure 7. Rainfall events monitored at the site during the time interval from 05/2017–02/2019.
Figure 7. Rainfall events monitored at the site during the time interval from 05/2017–02/2019.
Geosciences 11 00274 g007
Figure 8. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 12 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Figure 8. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 12 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Geosciences 11 00274 g008
Figure 9. Water stored in the BS layer during the simulated infiltration processes.
Figure 9. Water stored in the BS layer during the simulated infiltration processes.
Geosciences 11 00274 g009
Figure 10. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Figure 10. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Geosciences 11 00274 g010
Figure 11. Suction evolution at the interface between BS and GP during the rainfall event at an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h.
Figure 11. Suction evolution at the interface between BS and GP during the rainfall event at an intensity of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h.
Geosciences 11 00274 g011
Figure 12. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 10 mm/h and a duration of 24 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Figure 12. Infiltration process for a rainfall event with an intensity of 10 mm/h and a duration of 24 h: (a) the suction profile, and (b) the degree of saturation profile.
Geosciences 11 00274 g012
Figure 13. Safety factor (SF) vs. depth (z) for a rainfall event with an intensity (i) of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h, at increasing observation times.
Figure 13. Safety factor (SF) vs. depth (z) for a rainfall event with an intensity (i) of 5 mm/h and a duration of 24 h, at increasing observation times.
Geosciences 11 00274 g013
Table 1. Fitting parameters of the Van Genuchten model.
Table 1. Fitting parameters of the Van Genuchten model.
This StudyDamiano et al. (2012)De Vita et al. (2013)Mancarella et al.
(2012)
BSGP
a [kPa−1]2.218.13.34.228
n1.82.071.432.5
m0.50.50.50.30.6
Sr000.500
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sepe, C.; Calcaterra, D.; Cecconi, M.; Di Martire, D.; Pappalardo, L.; Scarfone, R.; Vitale, E.; Russo, G. Capillary Barriers during Rainfall Events in Pyroclastic Deposits of the Vesuvian Area. Geosciences 2021, 11, 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070274

AMA Style

Sepe C, Calcaterra D, Cecconi M, Di Martire D, Pappalardo L, Scarfone R, Vitale E, Russo G. Capillary Barriers during Rainfall Events in Pyroclastic Deposits of the Vesuvian Area. Geosciences. 2021; 11(7):274. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sepe, Ciro, Domenico Calcaterra, Manuela Cecconi, Diego Di Martire, Lucia Pappalardo, Riccardo Scarfone, Enza Vitale, and Giacomo Russo. 2021. "Capillary Barriers during Rainfall Events in Pyroclastic Deposits of the Vesuvian Area" Geosciences 11, no. 7: 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070274

APA Style

Sepe, C., Calcaterra, D., Cecconi, M., Di Martire, D., Pappalardo, L., Scarfone, R., Vitale, E., & Russo, G. (2021). Capillary Barriers during Rainfall Events in Pyroclastic Deposits of the Vesuvian Area. Geosciences, 11(7), 274. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11070274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop