Payment Behavioral Response Mechanisms for All-Age Retrofitting of Older Communities: A Study among Chinese Residents
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology and Data Sources
2.1. Category Refinement
2.1.1. Release Codes
2.1.2. Spindle Coding
2.1.3. Selective Coding
2.1.4. Mediating Variables
2.2. Willingness to Pay Influencing Factors Analysis
2.3. Structural Equation Modeling Analysis
2.3.1. Research Hypothesis
2.3.2. Questionnaire Design and Data Collection
2.3.3. Measurement Model Testing
2.3.4. Structural Model Testing
3. Conclusions
4. Discussion
4.1. Payment Behavioral Study
4.2. Recommendations
4.3. Limitations and Future Directions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cobbold, C. A Cost Benefit Analysis of Lifetime Homes; Joseph Rowntree Foundation: York, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Trends and Countermeasures of Population Aging in China; Research Center on Aging: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, L. Research on Design Strategy of Cultural Activity Center in Old Community under the Background of Urban Renewal. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, L.; Hou, J.; Xiao, P.; Che, N. Whole-age community planning based on the perspective of population aging. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2022, 22, 5381–5387. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, P. Research on the reconstruction of China’s all-age community planning under the background of active aging. Mod. Urban Stud. 2018, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Dian, Z.; Xu, Y. Planning and index control of residential space in urban community in aging society. Archit. J. 2014, 56–59. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Ma, Z.; Ouyang, X.; Tweed, C. Optimization of open space in old residential streets from the perspective of activity demand of the elderly. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2021, 2021, 9020–9028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bo, X.; Wei, W.; Jie, Z. Evaluation of residential space environment and planning strategies for elderly care in urban aging communities. Planner 2015, 31, 5–11+33. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, X.; Hu, X.; Shen, B. Abnormal analysis method of spatial behavior trajectory of the elderly in the community. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2021, 21, 3676–3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Gu, Z. Planning and design of retirement communities under the background of aging. Planner 2015, 31, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
- He, L.; Wei, G. Problems and countermeasures of aging-adapted renovation of outdoor environment in existing communities. Planner 2015, 31, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
- To, K.; Chong, K.H. The traditional shopping street in Tokyo as a culturally sustainable and ageing-friendly community. J. Urban Des. 2017, 22, 637–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, D. Influencing Factors of Willingness to Pay for Age-Appropriate Renovation of Public Space in Old Residential Areas. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breidert, C. Estimation of Willingness-to-Pay: Theory, Measurement, Application; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, C. Questionnaires, individual interviews and focus groups. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts; Williamson, K., Johanson, G., Eds.; Tilde University Press: Prahran, Australia, 2013; pp. 379–403. [Google Scholar]
- Kazi, A.M.; Khalid, W. Questionnaire designing and validation. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2012, 62, 514. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Mary, L. Structured Questionnaire Limitations: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Improvement. J. Surv. Res. 2020, 123–140. [Google Scholar]
- Glaser, B.G.; Strauss, A.L. Theoretical sampling. In Sociological Methods; Denzin, N.K., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 105–114. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, G. Research on influencing factors of reading promotion development in colleges and universities based on grounded theory. Libr. Inf. Work 2017, 61, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, L. In-Depth Interviews: A Methodological Review and Best Practice Recommendations. Qual. Res. J. 2023, 20, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Corbin, J.; Miller, S. A Grounded Theory Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2020, 20, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Rhemtulla, M.; Brosseau-Liard, P.É.; Savalei, V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol. Methods 2012, 17, 354–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corbin, J.; Strauss, A. The First Step in Grounded Theory: Open Coding. J. Qual. Health Res. 2021, 21, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Moghaddam, A. Coding issues in grounded theory. Issues Educ. Res. 2006, 16, 52–66. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, L. Thematic Content Analysis: Using Grounded Theory for Thematic Analysis. Qual. Res. J. 2022, 23, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Kendall, J. Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. West. J. Nurs. Res. 1999, 21, 743–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birks, M.; Mills, J.; Francis, K.; Chapman, Y. A thousand words paint a picture: The use of storyline in grounded theory research. J. Res. Nurs. 2009, 14, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walker, D.; Myrick, F. Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qual. Health Res. 2006, 16, 547–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol. Health 2011, 26, 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Triandis, H.C. Theoretical framework for evaluation of cross-cultural training effectiveness. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 1977, 1, 19–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nicholas, L. Trust: A Mechanism for Simplifying Social Complexity; Shanghai People’s Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, L. Measuring Costs in Healthcare: A Critical Analysis of Current Practices. Healthc. Manag. Rev. 2021, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahim, A.; Kumar, R. The Impact of Customer Perceptions on Service Performance: A Study of Banking Industry. J. Serv. Res. 2021, 24, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, D.; Davis, K. The Nature and Impact of Group Pressure: A Review and Research Agenda. J. Organ. Behav. 2021, 42, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Spielberger, C.D. State-trait anxiety inventory for adults (STAI-AD). PsycTESTS Dataset 1983, 1, 14–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haugeland, J. Objective perception. In Perception; Akins, E., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1996; pp. 268–298. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, K.; Hancock, P.A. Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 1995, 37, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, L. The Role of Government Support in Promoting Entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 2021, 36, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.; Wang, J. Assessing the Direct Impact of Structural Equation Modeling on Organizational Performance. J. Organ. Behav. 2022, 43, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, K.; Johnson, B. Using the Liket 7-Point Scale to Measure Job Satisfaction: An Examination of Its Validity and Reliability. J. Organ. Behav. 2021, 42, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Luo, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Shim, J.P. Examining multi-dimensional trust and multi-faceted risk in initial acceptance of emerging technologies: An empirical study of mobile banking services. Decis. Support Syst. 2010, 49, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, P.E.; Enis, B.M. Classifying products strategically. J. Mark. 1986, 50, 24–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rhodes, R.E.; Courneya, K.S. Investigating multiple components of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived control: An examination of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 42, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gultom, S.; Dalle, J.; Restu; Baharuddin; Hairudinoar; Gultom, S. The influence of attitude and subjective norm on citizen’s intention to use e-government services. J. Secur. Sustain. Issues 2020, 9, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarason, I.G. The test anxiety scale: Concept and research. In Stress and Anxiety; Spielberger, C.D., Sarason, I.G., Eds.; Hemisphere Publishing Corp: Washington, DC, USA, 1977; Volume 5, pp. 193–216. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, K.M.W.; Manzo, W.R. The purpose and perception of learning objectives. J. Polit. Sci. Educ. 2018, 14, 456–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Liu, J. Stratified Sampling: An Efficient Method for Data Collection. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol. 2021, 58, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Li, Z. Testing Reactivity and Formative Indicators in Structural Equation Modeling. J. Struct. Equ. Model. 2023, 29, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, W.W.; Marcolin, B.L.; Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Park, S. Smart PLS 3.0: Path Analysis of Structural Models. J. Struct. Equ. Model. 2023, 29, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I.; Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predictiing Social Behavior; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
Respondent Serial Number | Respondents | Gender | Age | Academic Qualifications | Occupation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Respondent 01 | Mr. Tang | Male | 25 | Masters | Postgraduate student |
Respondent 02 | Mr. An | Male | 62 | Specialties | Fitter |
Respondent 03 | Ms. Wang | Female | 72 | Junior High School | Factory worker |
Respondent 04 | Mr. Liu | Male | 54 | Specialties | Electrical sales |
Respondent 05 | Mr. Lee | Male | 62 | Specialties | Materials management |
Respondent 06 | Mr. Yang | Male | 31 | Undergraduate | Antiques |
Respondent 07 | Ms. Zhang | Female | 44 | Specialties | Design department |
Respondent 08 | Mr. Lui | Male | 48 | Specialties | Factory worker |
Respondent 09 | Mr. Zhao | Male | 44 | Specialties | Factory worker |
Respondent 10 | Mr. Wang | Male | 39 | Undergraduate | Finance |
Respondent 11 | Ms. Chan | Female | 31 | Undergraduate | Factory worker |
Respondent 12 | Mr. Zhao | Male | 24 | Undergraduate | Construction industry |
Respondent 13 | Mr. Zhang | Male | 26 | Undergraduate | Financial sector |
Respondent 14 | Ms. Wang | Female | 23 | Undergraduate | Construction industry |
Respondent 15 | Ms. Zhang | Female | 23 | Specialties | Sales |
Respondent 16 | Mr. Wang | Male | 33 | Undergraduate | Foreign trade |
Respondent 17 | Mr. Liu | Male | 25 | Masters | Postgraduate student |
Respondent 18 | Mr. Wang | Male | 23 | Undergraduate | Estimator |
Respondent 19 | Mr. Locke | Male | 24 | Masters | Postgraduate student |
Respondent 20 | Ms. Lee | Female | 25 | Masters | Physical distribution management |
Respondent 21 | Mr. Lee | Male | 32 | Undergraduate | Project Manager |
Respondent 22 | Mr. Choi | Male | 33 | PhD | University teacher |
Respondent 23 | Miss Chow | Female | 28 | Undergraduate | Accounting |
Respondent 24 | Miss Shang | Female | 21 | Undergraduate | Financial practitioner |
Category | Original Statement (Initial Concept) |
---|---|
Risk perception (RP) | A01 How much do you have to charge for which services after the renovation (financial risk) A09 What to do if your family doesn’t adapt (adaptation risks) A01 Where this money is spent, we don’t know (risk of benefit) |
Transforming trust (TT) | A01 It is generally considered that it will be more convenient to wait for your family to get old (remodeling brings convenience) A03 I am definitely willing to pay for the renovation if it is done well (the renovation is good) A13 feels pretty good if it’s really like you say it is (the makeover fits the need) |
Economic costs (EC) | A01 If you want to pay for it, just change the plumbing and electricity or something (to cover the cost of the basic type of renovation) A09 It’s too much effort to go up and down the stairs in this old neighborhood, I think we can install a lift and spend money on it (to pay for the cost of renovation of the perfect class) A18 I have no one to take care of the children at home now, if I can have childcare I can pay appropriately (to cover the cost of upgrading the class) |
Value perception (VP) | A07 I’m getting older now, I live on the fifth floor and I’d still like to have a lift added to make it easier (more convenient to get around) A15 If the community can be renovated, the children can have a better play environment, the elderly can take a walk or something, now there is nothing in the community (renovation to provide convenience) A16 to maintain the infrastructure, for example, like the water supply, and then the electricity, that is, at the very least not to have power and water cuts (to improve the situation) |
Perceived performance (PP) | A03 I don’t know if this modification has ever been successful (case impact) A07 I am willing to fund this as long as the scheme is good. (Actual transformation effect) A09 will also have noise, negative impact of housing devaluation (tangential benefits) |
Group pressure (GP) | A01 must consider what other people think, after all, we all live together (the influence of other people’s wishes) A09 If everyone around us agrees to the change, then we have to listen to the majority opinion (the influence of others’ wishes) A19 The wishes of my surrounding neighbors are still important to me (the influence of the wishes of others) |
Main Category | Corresponding Categories | The Connotation of Relationships |
---|---|---|
Anxiety (AN) | Risk perception | Residents’ perception of the risks of retrofitting can induce anxiety, reducing their willingness to pay for retrofitting |
Transforming trust | Residents’ trust in all-age rehabilitation programs reduces their own anxiety and influences their psychological sense of support for rehabilitation | |
Objective perception (OP) | Economic costs | The financial cost to residents of participating in the renovation (incurred by the various renovation projects) will affect their willingness to pay for the renovation |
Value perception | The value (use, economic, emotional value) that the renovation generates for the neighborhood affects the willingness of residents to pay for the renovation | |
External Situation (EC) | Perceived performance | The impact of completed retrofit cases on residents’ willingness to pay for retrofitting (i.e., whether the results meet residents’ expectations) can affect residents’ willingness to pay for retrofitting |
Group pressure | The influence of social atmosphere and the willingness of others on residents’ willingness to pay for renovations |
Typical Relationship Structure | Relationship Structure Connotation |
---|---|
Anxiety→Willingness | Anxiety is an endogenous trigger for residents to pay for the response and can have an internal inducing effect on whether they pay for the retrofit |
Objective Perception→Willingness | Impact of perception of objective environment (cost of participation, improvement in living experience by renovation) on willingness to pay |
External Situation→Willingness | The influence of perceptions of external situations (transformation effects, group pressure) on willingness to pay |
Influencing Factors | Theoretical Definitions | Operational Definitions |
---|---|---|
Risk perception (RP) | Slovic defines risk perception as “the subjective assessment of future losses and uncertainties formed by residents based on their personal experiences and attributes” [31]. | In the context, this refers to residents’ perceptions of the cost, effectiveness, and ability to adapt to the lifestyle risks of retrofitting activities. |
Transforming trust (TT) | In Trust and Power, the sociologist Luhmann argues that trust is an expectation generalized by relying on information beyond what is available, and that “in its broadest sense, trust refers to confidence in someone’s expectations, and it is a fundamental fact of social life” [32]. | Drawing on Rousseau and others, this paper defines trust in government as “the belief in the reliability and dependability of government departments and the expectation and belief that government will protect the public interest in the face of uncertainty”. |
Economic costs (EC) | Costs are the monetary representation and objectification of resources that must be expended in order to carry out a production activity or to achieve a certain purpose. In another sense, cost can also be the price that must be paid for a choice (Ref. [33]). | Participation costs include the economic costs for residents to participate in the different types of renovation (basic category improvement category upgrading category). |
Value perception (VP) | The concept of perceived value was first introduced by Zeithaml in 1988 in the theory of perceived value from the customer’s perspective, where she defined perceived value as the customer’s overall assessment of the utility of a product or service when the perceived benefit is weighed against the cost of acquiring the product or service (Ref. [34]). She defines perceived value as the customer’s overall evaluation of the usefulness of a product or service when the benefits are weighed against the cost of obtaining it. | In this paper, we refer to the extent to which residents feel that making all-age modifications would improve the current situation of care for the elderly and for children. |
Perceived performance (PP) | Perceived performance refers to the level of performance that consumers can perceive as meeting their needs when experiencing a product or service [35]. | In the text, this refers to the impact of residents’ perceptions of the effectiveness of retrofitting on their payment response. |
Group pressure (GP) | Group pressure is the perceived psychological oppression that occurs when an individual’s intentions conflict with the norms of the group. The group in which an individual lives is one of the most important considerations when making a purchase decision, and the group can modify the individual’s behavior through the exchange of information and the guidance of values, which can have a model and constraining effect on the individual’s choices (Ref. [36]). | In the context, it refers to the influence of the wishes of neighbors, family, and friends around the resident on the resident’s response. |
Anxiety (AN) | “Anxiety state”, which refers to the degree of anxiety experienced by an individual at a given moment in a given situation. “Anxiety quality”, which refers to the psychological characteristics of an individual’s personality in terms of anxiety disposition, i.e., an aspect of personality [37]. | The text refers to the negative emotions of residents facing the risks of renovation and the uncertainty caused by trust issues. |
Objective perception (OP) | The series of processes by which the conscious mind perceives, senses, and notices information about the objective world. Perception can be divided into sensory processes and perceptual processes [38]. | The text refers to residents’ perceptions of the cost of participating in the transformation and the value generated. |
External Situation (EC) | External Situations include macro and micro factors, with macro contexts generally referring to external political, social, technological, and economic contexts [39]. | The text abstracts group pressure, government support, and perceived performance as External Situations. They give residents influence from the outside. |
Government Support (GS) | Government support is the conscious activity of the government in regulating economic and social life by various means in order to achieve the desired objectives [40]. | The text refers to the impact of government policies and subsidies on rehabilitation on the response of residents. |
Potential Variables | Serial Number | Title Item | Reference Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Risk perception | RP1 | I am concerned about the increase in expenditure after the renovation | [43] |
RP2 | I am concerned about not adapting to the modified lifestyle (adaptation risk) | ||
RP3 | I am concerned that the use of the fee is not disclosed and transparent (risk of benefit) | ||
Transforming trust | TT1 | I believe that rehabilitation can solve problems and conflicts | [43] |
TT2 | I believe the renovation program and process is sound | ||
TT3 | I believe that when an all-age transformation is carried out it is for the good of all | ||
Economic costs | EC1 | I am willing to pay for the economic costs of infrastructure improvements (water, electricity, gas, heating, etc.) | [44] |
EC2 | I am willing to pay the economic costs of the improvement category (additional barrier-free access, additional lifts, additional charging posts, greening of the plot, etc.) | ||
EC3 | I am willing to pay the economic costs of upgrading the type of renovation (elderly care, health services, convenient markets, etc.) | ||
Value perception | VP1 | The renovated community is more suitable for retirement and childcare than it is now (use value) | Research |
VP2 | House prices will rise after the conversion (economic value) | ||
VP3 | Closer to family after remodeling (emotional value) | ||
Perceived performance | PP1 | The inconvenience of living in my current neighborhood makes me willing to fund the renovation | Research |
PP2 | Knowledge of completed renovation cases will influence my thoughts | ||
PP3 | Comments from residents of the completed renovation block can influence my thoughts | ||
Group pressure | GP1 | Family and friends support the renovation and I will consider funding it | [45] |
GP2 | I will consider funding the renovation with vigorous publicity from the residents’ committee and the media | ||
GP3 | I would consider contributing if the majority of my neighbors were willing to do so | ||
Government support | GS1 | I would consider funding if the government provided policy support | [46] |
GS2 | I would consider contributing if the government provided financial support | ||
GS3 | I would consider funding a renovation if the government made the process of monitoring it public | ||
Anxiety | AN1 | Worried and apprehensive after learning of the renovation | [47] |
AN2 | Nervous and unsettled to learn of the renovation | ||
AN3 | The remodel has to deal with a lot of things and feel annoyed | ||
Objective perception | OP1 | The renovated neighborhood makes me feel happy physically and mentally | [48] |
OP2 | Acceptable inconveniences during renovation | ||
OP3 | Adequate funding allows for better results and a faster transformation process | ||
External situation | ES1 | The completed renovation of the community has been very effective | [48] |
ES2 | The government is actively promoting the renovation to proceed | ||
ES3 | Growing support for renovation | ||
Willingness to pay | WTP1 | I am willing to pay for the renovation | [49] |
WTP2 | I will pay for the renovation | ||
WTP3 | I will do my best to cover the cost of the renovation | ||
Payment response | PR | Level of positive payment |
Demographic Variables | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 130 | 43.77% |
Female | 167 | 56.23% |
Age | ||
Under 30 years old | 86 | 36.14% |
30–55 years | 123 | 37.39% |
55+ years | 120 | 36.47% |
Region | ||
East | 132 | 44.44% |
Western | 23 | 7.74% |
Central | 112 | 37.71% |
North East | 30 | 10.10% |
Level of education | ||
Undergraduate | 36 | 12.12% |
Undergraduate | 228 | 76.77% |
Postgraduate and above | 33 | 11.11% |
Annual household income (USD 10,000) | ||
Below 5 | 16 | 5.39% |
5–15 | 101 | 34.01% |
15–30 | 133 | 44.78% |
Over 30 | 47 | 15.82% |
Cronbach’s Alpha | rhoA | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
VP | N.A. | 1.000 | N.A. | N.A. |
EC | 0.777 | 0.781 | 0.870 | 0.691 |
OP | 0.761 | 0.761 | 0.863 | 0.678 |
PP | N.A. | 1.000 | N.A. | N.A. |
PR | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
WTP | 0.857 | 0.859 | 0.913 | 0.777 |
TT | 0.847 | 0.855 | 0.907 | 0.765 |
GS | 0.788 | 0.805 | 0.876 | 0.702 |
AN | 0.862 | 0.864 | 0.916 | 0.784 |
EC | N.A. | 1.000 | N.A. | N.A. |
GP | 0.743 | 0.808 | 0.847 | 0.649 |
RP | N.A. | 1.000 | N.A. | N.A. |
VP | EC | OP | PP | RP | WTP | TT | GS | AN | EC | GP | RP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VP | N.A. | |||||||||||
EC | 0.301 | 0.831 | ||||||||||
OP | 0.436 | 0.472 | 0.823 | |||||||||
PP | 0.196 | 0.323 | 0.171 | N.A. | ||||||||
PR | 0.453 | 0.547 | 0.666 | 0.272 | 1.000 | |||||||
WTP | 0.380 | 0.565 | 0.656 | 0.249 | 0.791 | 0.882 | ||||||
TT | 0.359 | 0.306 | 0.195 | 0.162 | 0.393 | 0.360 | 0.875 | |||||
GS | 0.374 | 0.409 | 0.429 | 0.213 | 0.672 | 0.549 | 0.463 | 0.838 | ||||
AN | −0.213 | −0.626 | −0.530 | −0.126 | −0.594 | −0.614 | −0.410 | −0.443 | 0.886 | |||
EC | 0.374 | 0.414 | 0.457 | 0.409 | 0.480 | 0.468 | 0.383 | 0.373 | −0.347 | N.A. | ||
GP | 0.361 | 0.267 | 0.232 | 0.050 | 0.294 | 0.219 | 0.318 | 0.209 | −0.121 | 0.362 | 0.805 | |
RP | −0.038 | −0.310 | −0.296 | −0.083 | −0.365 | −0.333 | −0.207 | −0.259 | 0.414 | −0.332 | −0.210 | N.A. |
Research Hypothesis | Estimate | t-Value | P | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 0.253 | 7.201 | *** | Support |
H2 | 0.299 | 6.006 | *** | Support |
H3 | −0.301 | 5.878 | *** | Support |
H4 | −0.465 | 4.404 | *** | Support |
H5 | −0.484 | 10.569 | *** | Support |
H6 | 0.200 | 3.693 | *** | Support |
H7 | 0.475 | 8.655 | *** | Support |
H8 | 0.324 | 6.590 | *** | Support |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, Y.; Dong, L. Payment Behavioral Response Mechanisms for All-Age Retrofitting of Older Communities: A Study among Chinese Residents. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110925
Zhang Y, Dong L. Payment Behavioral Response Mechanisms for All-Age Retrofitting of Older Communities: A Study among Chinese Residents. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(11):925. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110925
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Yang, and Lei Dong. 2023. "Payment Behavioral Response Mechanisms for All-Age Retrofitting of Older Communities: A Study among Chinese Residents" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 11: 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110925
APA StyleZhang, Y., & Dong, L. (2023). Payment Behavioral Response Mechanisms for All-Age Retrofitting of Older Communities: A Study among Chinese Residents. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110925