Industry 4.0 and World Class Manufacturing Integration: 100 Technologies for a WCM-I4.0 Matrix
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Brief Introduction to Industry 4.0
- Flexible production for the entire plant life cycle based on the integration of data-based models and decisions [7];
- The profound transformation of business models enabling the fusion of virtual and real worlds in robotics, the application of digitization, automation and robotics [8];
- Knowledge-based and sensor-based self-regulating production systems [9].
1.2. Brief Introduction to World Class Manufacturing
2. Literature Review on WCM and I4.0 Relations
- Reduction of time-to-market to develop, produce and market new products and services, which require increasingly high innovation capacities;
- Increased customization to meet the needs of individual consumers;
- Greater flexibility with faster and more versatile production processes capable of producing in smaller batches while maintaining high levels of quality;
- Decentralization of the decision-making process;
- Increased resource efficiency;
- Technological innovations such as the Internet, apps, social, networks, systems engineering, smartphones, laptops, 3D printers, AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Machine Learning, MES (Manufacturing Execution Systems), etc.
3. Methodology to Structure the WCM-I4.0 Matrix
- Cloud Computing;
- Cognitive Computing;
- Internet of Things;
- Machine-to-Machine (M2M);
- Mobile Technologies;
- Augmented Reality;
- Simulation;
- Additive Manufacturing;
- Advanced Robotics.
- -
- Cybersecurity—Intended as the protection of computer systems and networks from the theft of or damage to their hardware, software, or electronic data—is to be considered a prerequisite for Industry 4.0 technologies, not an opportunity area for WCM pillars;
- -
- RFID—Intended as the technology that allows the automatic identification and tracking of objects through radio-frequency tags—was considered as surpassed by, or at least included in, IoT paradigm;
- -
- Big Data—Intended as the area that refers to analyzing and systematically extracting information from data sets that are too large or complex to be dealt with by traditional data-processing application software—can be considered a generic concept and a transversal approach to all the cited areas: for example, Big Data may originate from M2M applications or from mobile technologies, or from IoT. Thus we assumed that the capabilities of performing advanced data analytics methods and extracting value from data can be shared among several cited areas. Analogous consideration can be done for Cyber-Physical Systems, intended as a computer system in which a mechanism is controlled or monitored by computer-based algorithms.
4. Industry 4.0 Technological Groups
4.1. Cloud Computing
4.2. Internet of Things (IoT)
4.3. Machine-To-Machine (M2M)
4.4. Cognitive Computing
4.5. Mobile Technologies
4.6. Augmented Reality
4.7. Simulation
4.8. Additive Manufacturing
4.9. Advanced Robotics
5. World Class Manufacturing Pillars
5.1. Safety
- Process analysis: for each activity, the presence of risks related to accidents, near misses, conditions (Unsafe Conditions (UC)) or insecure actions (Unsafe Act (UA)) are verified;
- Process monitoring: a matrix is built to track the relevance of injuries and the relationship between them and the UC and AU, the body parts involved, and root causes (S-Matrix);
5.2. Cost Deployment
- Step 1: Total Transformation Cost (TTC) is calculated, the sum of direct transformation costs, indirect costs (personnel costs, variable costs, fixed costs and personnel costs) and rejects. Top Management defines the TTC Reduction target;
- Step 2: The data coming from the shop floor (Bordereau, Waste collection, production data, HR software, SAP, etc.) are conveyed into Matrix A, obtaining the relationship between the loss or waste tracked and the related process that generates it;
- Step 3: With Matrix B, the relationship between causal losses and resulting losses is identified, in order to reverse the costs of the latter on the former and to evaluate their negative impact;
- Step 4: With Matrix C, a value is given to the losses found in the previous steps;
- Step 5: In Matrix D, through the index ICE (Impact, Cost, Easiness), the priorities of the plant are defined. The losses with a higher ICE value are attacked by the various pillars during the calendar year;
- Step 6: A cost/benefit analysis of the projects defined in the previous step is carried out with the E Matrix;
- Step 7: Starting from the E matrix, an F matrix is built for monitoring and follow-up of improvement projects. The G matrix identifies the projects to be implemented the following year to reach the TTC Reduction foreseen by the management.
5.3. Focused Improvement
5.4. Autonomous Maintenance
5.5. Workplace Organization (WO)
5.6. Professional Maintenance
- Step 1: The degradation of the machinery is reduced, and the basic conditions are recovered to avoid accelerated degradation in order to stabilize the MTBF—Mean Time Between Failure (with the support of AM);
- Step 2: A deep analysis of the historical failures is performed to intercept the root causes and eliminate them avoiding their repetition. The so-called EWO (Emergency Work Order) modules are used;
- Step 3: The PM (Machine Ledger) calendar is drawn up, i.e., the calendar of preventive maintenance activities. With this step, we aim at the total zeroing of the stops due to the lack of professional maintenance;
- Step 4: Focus on maintenance costs. The objective at this time is to extend the life of the component, according to techniques of strengthening or reduction of perceived stress;
- Step 5: Reduction of MTTR—Mean Time To Replace or the frequency of planned activities. It is also possible to transfer tasks from PM to AM, reducing the workload of maintenance workers;
- Step 6: Construction of a predictive maintenance system;
- Step 7: Construction of the most advanced maintenance system, such as Improvement Maintenance.
5.7. Quality Control
5.8. Logistics
- Step 1–3: The re-engineering of the production line, internal logistics and external logistics, takes place. Attempts are made to reduce lead time, batch size by passing through machine set-up times, to reduce material handling and to apply First In First Out (FIFO) logic for material management;
- Step 4–5: The aim is to set up a continuous flow through the leveling of production and of the production mix;
- Step 6–7: The achievement of an accurate and controlled flow, pursuing the objective of fully synchronizing sales, production and procurement activities;
5.9. Early Equipment Management
5.10. People Development
- Step 1: The priority intervention areas and the model area are defined through interaction with the C matrix of CD;
- Step 2: The map of expected competencies, the CD of human errors and the competence gaps are defined;
- Step 3: Improve team performance, reduce human error and associated losses;
- Step 4: B/C analysis of the training based on the costs associated with lack of knowledge; drafting of a training plan for each resource;
- Step 5: The effectiveness of training processes is improved by focusing on the personal involvement of the operator and identifying the best resources. In general, an attempt is made to establish a system for the development and strengthening of knowledge;
- Step 6: People are trained with more complex tools in order to have specific and elective knowledge, and benchmarking is carried out;
- Step 7: Setting up a system for the continuous evaluation of skills.
5.11. Energy and Environment
6. Methodology and Results
7. Discussion: I4.0 and WCM Synergy
7.1. Industry 4.0 Impact on Safety Pillar
- Streamlining the main bottom-up processes: the registry of AU, UC and NM can be carried out directly by the operator in the workplace and instantly displayed by safety managers, line managers, supervisors and other operators, ensuring greater transparency of information and shorter response times from management;
- Ensuring the proper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Visual Camera and nonuse alarm systems can reduce accidents due to the lack of use of PPE;
- Reducing the risks for pedestrians: forklifts and people can be equipped with sensors that signal their presence on interactive maps; a forced braking system can be activated in case the distance between forklift and pedestrian becomes dangerous and the speed does not decrease;
- Introducing new countermeasures: AI allows an automatic stop of the machine as soon as UC occurs, which can also be learned over time thanks to Machine Learning techniques; augmented reality enables the operator to real-time monitoring process parameters in order to recognize UC and prevent UA or, for example, identifying the weight of a load; collaborative robotics and exoskeletons reduce unergonomic operations and help the operator to carry out operations by strongly reducing the associated risk factors.
7.2. Industry 4.0 Impact on Cost Deployment Pillar
7.3. Industry 4.0 Impact on Focused Improvement Pillar
- Enable continuous monitoring of efficiency data: Thanks to IoT, it is possible to constantly, reliably and accurately control the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) of the plant in the Cloud, by performing real-time analysis that can be displayed on the Human–Machine Interface (HMI) or workplace devices;
- Increase MTBMS (Mean Time Between Minor Stoppages) and reduce the duration of the microstops: Machine Learning techniques allow the machine to optimally set working parameters by learning from previous stops, increasing the mean time between two microstops. HMI shows the procedures to solve the most complex anomalies; augmented reality glasses allow the display of malfunctioning components of the machine
- Significantly improve the SMED activities: Augmented reality glasses can show in real time the optimal sequence of activities of a set-up cycle on a machine; virtual training improves the performance of maintenance workers during the production changeover; Plug and Play systems allow a modular design of the machine, aiming to eliminate the set-up activities; in the same way, 3D printing requires almost zero time to set up new production.
7.4. Industry 4.0 Impact on Autonomous Maintenance Pillar
- Improve the control and monitoring of basic conditions: Thanks to IoT the machines can autonomously signal the departure from a preset basic condition; with Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality it is possible to be guided during the autonomous inspection phase of the machine;
- Improve the time and effectiveness of CIRL and AM activities: Through CPS, HMI allows the monitoring of dirt sources and lubrication points by signaling to the operator the execution of a planned CIRL activity; through the use of on-the-job devices or augmented reality glasses it is possible to view CIRL and AM calendars and be guided during the relevant procedures;
- Improve the phase of detection and resolution of anomalies: Anomalies are automatically signaled by the machine through different types of warnings, directly displayed on the device or to an operator in range; through AR glass visualization, operators can identify the malfunctioning components and be guided during the phase of the resolution of anomalies; Machine Learning techniques enable the machine to “learn” from anomalous events happened in the past and signal the risk of recurrence.
7.5. Industry 4.0 Impact on Workplace Organization Pillar
- Significantly improve ergonomics: Collaborative robots and exoskeletons, in addition to reducing the number of NVA operations, replace humans in less ergonomic and more risky operations; the simulation of the work environment and operations can prevent exposure to risk to more or less serious injuries;
- Optimize the use of SOP and OPL: Virtual training instruct operators on the standard procedures to be performed during production cycles; the same procedures can be visualized with augmented reality glasses, by means of a device in the workplace or by reading RFID tags containing this information. This eliminates a large number of paper-based procedures that very often limit the effectiveness of operator training, eventually feeding an effective digitized training system;
- Balance the operators’ workload.
7.6. Industry 4.0 Impact on Professional Maintenance Pillars
- MTTR reduction: Machines can autonomously warn the maintainer about the presence of the fault by reporting descriptive information of the faulty component; thanks to Machine Learning techniques, machines can learn from previous faults and remember their precedent behavior; virtual training can reduce MTTR and augmented reality can guide replacement operations;
- PM Calendar execution: The maintenance technician examining the various machines in few seconds can get information on the status of the PM Calendar thanks to augmented reality or to a device connected to the network; the Standard Maintenance Procedures (SMP) can be tested in a virtual environment or can be guided by means of augmented reality glasses;
- Predictive Maintenance: Through suitably positioned CPS and software able to perform computations on complex predictive mathematical models or with the help of Neural Networks and Deep Learning algorithms, it is now possible to have real-time information on the health status of the component, showing the maintainer the estimated residual life via mobile device or through augmented reality glasses; it is possible to receive notifications about the current status of the component, and an alarm before an expected failure.
7.7. Industry 4.0 Impact on Quality Control Pillar
- Automate the compilation of QA, QA Network, X Matrix, QM Matrix matrices: Cloud services make it possible to take advantage of greater computational power by replacing manual compilation; the necessary condition is also an accurate, precise and reliable system of waste collection that can be ensured through IoT;
- Improve statistical process control: As soon as it is highlighted, the automatic process data analysis can be automated and made available in real-time on any device. The benefits can be seen in the timeliness of the response when a failure occurs, in the reliability of the results, and in the reduction to zero of the expected analysis time;
- Improve quality controls and waste collection systems: Thanks to CPS and learning techniques of recognition and classification, the waste register stays inside the machinery. Machine Learning algorithms enable the machine to recognize nonlinear defect patterns, otherwise untraceable, and advanced cameras allow the prevention (Poka-Yoke) or interception of defects with a maximum degree of reliability.
7.8. Industry 4.0 Impact on the Logistics Pillar
- Balance workloads: Interconnected machines are able to autonomously decide how to distribute workloads according to the number of orders required and their available production capacity; they are also able to adapt the production rate to the detected buffer levels, and thanks to real-time simulation a continuous optimization of resources is guaranteed;
- Reduce lead times: The creation of a shared platform with suppliers for order allocation and order management considerably reduces the complexity of relations with suppliers and customers;
- Enabling Just in Time production: In addition to the previously described functionalities, automatic guiding vehicles (AGVs) missions can be directly triggered by machines, and a kanban system can be autonomously managed and implemented through interconnected machines, and/or optimized through real-time simulation.
- Improve warehouse management activities and decrease handling effort: RFID tags continuously track the product and allow continuous monitoring of stock levels, also through augmented reality glasses; picking activities can be optimized through real-time simulation and can be guided by voice and/or interactive map reducing errors and lead times. The use of collaborative and intelligent robots that can move loading units as well as shelving, greatly reduces handling activities.
7.9. Industry 4.0 Impact on Early Equipment Management Pillar
- Improve the Design phase of the machinery: A Computer-Aided Design (CAD) platform shared with suppliers allows the faster exchange of information and more efficient cooperation;
- Significantly increase performance: Plug and Play systems generate a modular design of the machine through which set-ups, tooling and cleaning times are reduced: Advanced robotics allow the reduction of the duration of complex operations and additive printing couples many stages of the production process ensuring high product quality most of the time by reducing to zero set-up times;
- Reduce start-up times: Thanks to Machine Learning skills, the machines can quickly learn from previous errors by setting the correct process parameters.
7.10. Industry 4.0 Impact on People Development Pillar
- Speed up the Gap Analysis phases: Online or virtual tests can instantly define the current level of competence and trace the gaps in knowledge, indicating exactly where to intervene by carrying out training activities;
- Improve training activities and the use of tools by limiting human errors: Guides to the use of WCM tools are available directly on the device in the workplace; RFID tags contain specific procedures or instructions for the use of tools that can also be viewed through augmented reality glasses; in the same way, virtual training can be implemented;
- Streamline Bottom-Up flows in suggestion management: Operators can upload suggestions directly to the Cloud, immediately and directly sharing these with the appropriate managers; they can also monitor the status of the suggestion follow-up.
7.11. Industry 4.0 Impact on Energy and Environment Pillar
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Beier, G.; Ullrich, A.; Niehoff, S.; Reißig, M.; Habich, M. Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keegan, R. An Introduction to World Class Manufacturing; Oak Tree Press: Cork, Ireland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, Y.; Deschamps, F.; Loures, d.F.R.; Ramos, L.F.P. Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3609–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Taigang, L.; Lifeng, Z. Industry 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), Zhangjiajie, China, 15–17 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J. Recommendation for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0—Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry, Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. In Acatech—National Academy of Science and Engineering; Forschungsunion: Munchen, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Gilchrist, A. Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things; Apress: Berkley, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Götz, M.; Jankowska, B. Clusters and Industry 4.0—do they fit together? Eur. Plan. Stud. 2017, 25, 1633–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.; Feld, T.; Hoffman, M. Application-Pull and Technology-Push as Driving Forces for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermann, M.; Pentek, T.; Otto, B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, J.; Liu, Y.; Grosvenor, R. A Categorical Framework of Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and Beyond. Procedia CIRP 2016, 52, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sakib, N.; Wuest, T. Challenges and Opportunities of Condition-based Predictive Maintenance: A Review. Procedia CIRP 2018, 78, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saturno, M.; Pertel, V.M.; Deschamps, F.; de Freitas Rocha Loures, E. Proposal of an automation solutions architecture for Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Production Research, Posnan, Poland, 30 July–3 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rüßmann, M.; Lorenz, M.; Gerbert, P.; Waldner, M.; Justus, J.; Engel, P.; Harnisch, M. Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing Industries, White Paper; The Boston Consulting Group: Boston, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ohno, T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production; Productivity Press: Portland, OR, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Krafcik, J. Triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Manag. Rev. 1988, 1, 41–52. [Google Scholar]
- Schonberger, R. World Class Manufacturing—The Next Decade: Building Power, Strength, and Value; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Yamashina, H. Challenge to world-class manufacturing. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2000, 17, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, L.M. Industry 4.0 and the digital society: Concepts, dimensions and envisioned benefits. Int. Conf. Bus. Excell. 2018, 12, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hamel, G.; Välikangas, L. The quest for resilience. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2003, 81, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Roland Berger Strategy Consultants. Industry 4.0, The New Industrial Revolution: How Europe Will Succeed. In Proceedings of the International Conference The Next Industrial Revolution Manufacturing and Society in the XXI Century, Turin, Italy, 14–15 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wagner, T.A.; Herrmann, C.; Thiede, S. Industry 4.0 Impacts on Lean Production Systems. Procedia CIRP 2017, 63, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayr, A.; Weigelt, M.; Kuhl, A.; Grimm, S.; Erll, A.; Potzel, M.; Franke, J. Lean 4.0—A conceptual conjunction of lean management and Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 2018, 72, 622–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosin, F.; Forget, P.; Lamouri, S.; Pellerin, R. Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean principles. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1644–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolberg, D.; Zühlke, D. Lean Automation enabled by Industry 4.0 Technologies. IFAC PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 1870–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prinz, C.; Kreggenfeld, N.; Kuhlenkötter, B. Lean meets Industrie 4.0—a practical approach to interlink the method world and cyber-physical world. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthony, P. Lean Manufacturing and Industry 4.0. Advanced Manufacturing.org: 2017. Available online: www.sme.org/lean-manufacturing-industry-4-0 (accessed on 25 April 2020).
- Buer, S.-V.; Strandhagen, J.O.; Chan, F.T.S. The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2924–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dombrowski, U.; Richter, T.; Krenkel, P. Inter-dependencies of Industrie 4.0 & Lean Production Systems—A Use Cases Analysis. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 1, 1061–1068. [Google Scholar]
- Khanchanapong, T.; Prajogo, D.; Sohal, A.; Cooper, B.; Yeung, A.C.; Cheng, T. The unique and complementary effects of manufacturing technologies and lean practices on manufacturing operational performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 153, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leyh, C.; Martin, S.; Schäffer, T. Industry 4.0 and Lean Production—A Matching Relationship? An Analysis of Selected Industry 4.0 Models. In Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Prague, Czech Republic, 3–6 September 2017; Volume 11, pp. 989–993. [Google Scholar]
- Ebrahimi, M.; Baboli, A.; Rother, E. The evolution of world class manufacturing toward Industry 4.0: A case study in the automotive industry. IFAC PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimi, M.; Baboli, A.; Rother, E. A Roadmap for evolution of existing production system toward the factory of the future: A case study in automotive industry. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), Marrakech, Morocco, 21–23 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Erboz, G. How To Define Industry 4.0: Main Pillars Of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management (ICoM 2017) “Managerial Trends in the Development of Enterprises in Globalization Era”, Nitra, Slovakia, 1–2 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- SGCC ISO/IEC JTC 1 SC38. Study Group Report on Cloud Computing; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- McKinsey&Company. Industry 4.0: How to Navigate Digitization of the Manufacturing Sector, Working Paper. 2015. Available online: www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/mck_industry_40_report.pdf (accessed on 25 April 2020).
- Gates, K. KPMG Industry 4.0 Case Studies. 2018. Available online: https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2018/11/industry-4-0-case-studies.html (accessed on 25 April 2020).
- ETSI TS 102 689 V 2.1.1. Machine-to-Machine Communications (M2M); M2M Service Requirements; ETSI: Valbonne, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, M.I.; Mitchell, T.M. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 2015, 349, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cowan, J. Caterpillar Shows How PTC’s Augmented and Virtual Reality Technology Plus IoT can Benefit Industry. 2016. Available online: https://www.iot-now.com/2016/06/11/48399-cat-shows-how-ptcs-augmented-and-virtual-reality- technology-impacts-on-industrial-iot/ (accessed on 25 April 2020).
- Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO. Standards Catalogue. Technical Committee: ISO/TC 261 Additive Manufacturing, ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 (ASTM F2792), 1st ed.; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lundbeck, A.; Lindgren, L. Finite Element Simulation to Support Sustainable Production by Additive Manufacturing. Procedia Manuf. 2016, 7, 127–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girdwood, R.; Bezuidenhout, M.; Hugo, P.; Conradie, P.; Oosthuizen, G.; Dimitrov, D. Investigating components affecting the resource efficiency of incorporating metal additive manufacturing in process chains. Procedia Manuf. 2016, 8, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Xu, X.; Stringer, J. Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process 2018, 64, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Y.; Chou, K.; Chou, Y. A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2008, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahrin, A.K.M.; Othman, F.M.; Azli, N.H.N.; Talib, F.M. Industry 4.0: A review on industrial automation and robotics. J. Teknologi (Sci. Eng.) 2016, 78, 137–143. [Google Scholar]
- Schonberger, R. World Class Manufacturing: The Lessons of Simplicity Applied; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Palucha, K. World Class Manufacturing model in production management. Int. Sci. J. 2012, 58, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
- Masadeh, M. Focus group: Review and practices. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 63–68. [Google Scholar]
- Murgado-Armenteros, E.; Torres-Ruiz, F.V.-Z.M. Differences between online and face-to-face focus groups, viewed through two approaches. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2012, 7, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cloud | IoT | (M2M) Machine-To-Machine | Cognitive Computing | Mobile Technologies | Augmented Reality | Simulation | Additive Manufacturing | Advanced Robotics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAFETY | S-Matrix | 1, 4 | 2 | |||||||
UA, UC, NM, FA, Injuries Recording | 1 | 3 | ||||||||
Risk Assessment | 68 | |||||||||
Autonomous Inspection | 1, 4 | 6 | ||||||||
PPE Check | 8 | 11 | ||||||||
Risk for Pedestrian | 51, 52 | 53 | ||||||||
Countermeasures | 1, 4 | 10 | 59 | 6, 100 | 30 | |||||
COST DEPLOYMENT | TTC Computing | 1, 4 | ||||||||
Data Collection | 1, 4 | 7 | ||||||||
A-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
B-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
C-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
D-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
E-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
F-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
G-Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
FOCUS IMPROVEMENT | Operator’s Tool Knowledge | 9 | 5 | 79 | 77 | |||||
Workload Management—Saturation Matrix | 4, 71, 73 | 72 | 74 | |||||||
OEE | 1, 4 | 78 | 78 | |||||||
Micro stoppages | 1, 4 | 20, 56 | 24 | 58 | 22 | 23, 75 | ||||
SMED | 34, 67 | 76 | 77 | 40 | ||||||
B/C Monitoring | 1, 4 | |||||||||
AUTONOMOUS MAINTENANCE | Machine Basic Condition | 14, 15 | 6 | |||||||
CIRL | 19, 20, 25 | 16, 18 | 13, 17, 76 | 77 | ||||||
Anomalies Detection | 1 | 21, 56 | 24 | 58 | 3, 22 | 23, 75 | ||||
AM Calendar | 25 | 16, 18, 25 | 13, 76 | |||||||
WORKPLACE ORGANIZATION | 5S | 26, 27 | 28, 29 | |||||||
Ergonomics | 100 | 99 | 30 | |||||||
NVA | 30 | |||||||||
Workload Balancing | 1, 4 | 35 | 33, 98 | 39 | 89 | |||||
Process Standardization (SOP, OPL) | 32 | 16 | 76 | 77 | ||||||
PROFESSIONAL MAINTENANCE | Maintenance Box Management | 26, 27 | 28, 29 | |||||||
Replacement Management | 41 | 44 | 48 | 50 | ||||||
Pm Calendar | 25 | 16, 18, 25 | 13, 76 | |||||||
MTTR Reduction | 20, 57 | 58 | 22 | 23, 76 | 77 | |||||
Predictive Maintenance | 1, 62 | 70 | 60 | 55, 63 | ||||||
QUALITY CONTROL | QA Matrix | 1, 4 | ||||||||
QA Network | 1, 4 | |||||||||
X Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
QM Matrix | 1, 4 | |||||||||
Defects Monitoring | 1, 4 | 84, 90 | 61 | 7 | 88 | |||||
Statistical Process Control | 1, 4 | 85 | ||||||||
Customer Claims Management | 86 | 87 | ||||||||
LOGISTICS | Line Balancing | 1, 4 | 35 | 33, 98 | 39 | 89 | ||||
Lead Time | 1, 41, 54 | 34, 36, 37 | 33 | 45 | 40 | 30 | ||||
Jit Production | 1,4 | 35, 43, 44 | 33, 42, 47 | 45, 46 | ||||||
Stock Management and Picking Activities | 43, 44, 82 | 42 | 48 | 38, 50 | 49 | 31 | ||||
Handling | 82 | 30, 31 | ||||||||
EARLY EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT | Design Process | 64 | 65 | |||||||
N. of Modifies | 69 | |||||||||
Technical Database | 66 | |||||||||
Performance | 67 | 67 | 40 | 30 | ||||||
Vertical Start-Up | 92 | |||||||||
Poka-Yoke | 90 | 61 | 97 | |||||||
PEOPLE DEVELOPMENT | Human Error Management (HERCA) | 9 | 2 | |||||||
Training | 5 | 32 | 5 | 79 | 77 | |||||
Gap Detection | 1, 4, 93 | 91 | ||||||||
Benchmarking | 83 | |||||||||
Tips Management | 80 | 2, 81 | ||||||||
Absenteeism Management | 95, 96 | 94 | ||||||||
EN&ENV | Energy, Waste, Water, Pollution Monitoring and Reduction | 1,4 | 61 | 12 | 60 | 6 |
1 | Automatic Real-Time Cloud-based Data Acquisition (Energy Consumption, Efficiency, Wear, Heat, Pollution, Noise, Workload, Product Data, Production Data, Competence) | 51 | Forklift embedded of sensor mapping the human in the area |
2 | S-EWO/EWO/HERCA recording with workplace device | 52 | Automatic braking of forklift sensing a human in a close distance |
3 | Tag recording with workplace device | 53 | Pedestrian equipped with map of forklift in movement |
4 | Real-Time Cloud-based automatic analytics | 54 | Cloud-based shipping slot booking |
5 | Cloud Database with WCM tools accessible with workplace device | 55 | Glass visualization of current component health status |
6 | Real-Time parameters monitoring with glass visualization | 56 | HMI panel with procedure to solve anomalies by operator |
7 | Recording of Bordereau and Scraps with workplace device | 57 | Automatic call of the machine to maintainer |
8 | Alert systems for nonuse | 58 | Machine learning abilities to learn how to solve new anomalies |
9 | Alarm systems for training needed | 59 | Machine Learning to prevent unsafe conditions |
10 | Automatic machine stop due to unsafe conditions | 60 | Automatic warning with workplace device of abnormal condition of the component |
11 | PPE check use with Camera | 61 | Machine learning Quality control for nonlinear defect’s pattern |
12 | Automatic machine stop due to starving situation | 62 | Real-Time Cloud-based automatic analysis of component remaining life |
13 | Glass visualization of AM/CIRL/PM Calendar | 63 | Glass visualization of component remaining life |
14 | Automatic Warning due to the missing of basic conditions | 64 | Vertical integration in a shared Digital online CAD Platform |
15 | Assisted Control of Basic conditions with workplace device | 65 | Digital Twin plant simulation |
16 | Guided CIRL/AM(SMP)/PM/Operative Procedure (SOP/OPL) activities step by step | 66 | Horizontal integration in a shared technical database |
17 | Glass visualization of dirt source | 67 | Plug and Play system to create a modular design of the machine |
18 | CIRL/AM/PM calendar visualization with workplace device | 68 | Simulation of workplace environment for risk assessment |
19 | Dirt source monitoring | 69 | Intelligent Cloud-based Checklist |
20 | Lubrification Points Monitoring | 70 | Deep and Reinforcement Learning to predict component remaining life |
21 | Automatic warning on people on range due to machine anomalies | 71 | Cloud Database with production engineer’s workload linked with Team Project building |
22 | WhatsApp messages of malfunctioning | 72 | Alarm System for excessive workload |
23 | Glass visualization of malfunctioning parts | 73 | Automatic optimization of workload in a new scenario |
24 | Automatic Warning on next and previous machines of malfunctioning parts | 74 | Reminder system for ongoing project |
25 | Notice of planned CIRL/AM/PM activities | 75 | Glass visualization for how to solve anomalies |
26 | RFID objects identification and localization | 76 | Glass visualization of CIRL/AM/PM/SOP/OPL/SMP SMED procedure |
27 | RFID tags which store instructions for cleaning tools and objects | 77 | Virtual Training Simulation (Machine Breakdown, WCM tools, SMED, Procedure) |
28 | Glass visualization of where replace instruments | 78 | Efficiency Data on HMI and Workplace device |
29 | Substitution of physical shadow board with virtual board | 79 | Tool/utilization glass—guided |
30 | Robot Collaborative/Exoskeletons support | 80 | Tips directly sent to Responsible |
31 | AGV systems for bins and container transportation/picking activities | 81 | Tips status directly visible by operator with workplace device |
32 | RFID tag with procedure instructions | 82 | Automatic Lighting of part to be handled/picked |
33 | Autonomous workload deployment among the machines | 83 | Common shared Platform with other company’s plant |
34 | RFID tag embedded in unfinished products to prepare next machine production | 84 | Automatic Scraps Categorization given by machine sensors |
35 | Workload shift among stations given by real-time production data analysis | 85 | Automatic Warning of out of parameters process |
36 | Automatic Machine configuration | 86 | Common shared Platform with Customer and Suppliers |
37 | IT Systems directly connected with MES and PLC | 87 | Claim directly sent to Line Leader and Quality Manager |
38 | Glass visualization of unloading procedure goods for suppliers | 88 | Glass Visualization of Product Defect |
39 | Automatic request on workplace device of switching workstation | 89 | Line Process Simulation |
40 | Operation tuning and better performance with 3D Printing Technology | 90 | Visual Camera Poka-Yoke and Product’s parameters monitoring |
41 | Digital Platform—opportunity to allocate orders watching at suppliers’ capacity | 91 | Virtual Test to assess competence with automatic gap definition and training needed |
42 | AGV guided by machines needs indication | 92 | Machine Learning to prevent reworking and to set correct machine parameters |
43 | RFID tag on unfinished products to track them in real time | 93 | Online Test to assess competence with automatic gap definition and training needed |
44 | Continuous stock monitoring with RFID tag | 94 | RFID Tag for each employer’s badge with his information |
45 | Virtual CAD model on Kanban loops | 95 | Automatic data analysis on absenteeism for machine and department |
46 | Real-Time Kanban optimal size and frequency Simulation | 96 | Automatic data analysis on absenteeism cause |
47 | Autonomous Kanban system among stations | 97 | Glass visualization of defects linear and nonlinear |
48 | Vocal/Maps interactive guide to find the SKU | 98 | Production pace tuning according to buffer levels |
49 | Real-Time Simulation of picking activities path to have the faster one | 99 | Simulation of workplace environment for ergonomic optimization |
50 | Glass visualization of stock data | 100 | Glass visualization of heavy packs |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
D’Orazio, L.; Messina, R.; Schiraldi, M.M. Industry 4.0 and World Class Manufacturing Integration: 100 Technologies for a WCM-I4.0 Matrix. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144942
D’Orazio L, Messina R, Schiraldi MM. Industry 4.0 and World Class Manufacturing Integration: 100 Technologies for a WCM-I4.0 Matrix. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(14):4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144942
Chicago/Turabian StyleD’Orazio, Lorenzo, Roberto Messina, and Massimiliano M. Schiraldi. 2020. "Industry 4.0 and World Class Manufacturing Integration: 100 Technologies for a WCM-I4.0 Matrix" Applied Sciences 10, no. 14: 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144942
APA StyleD’Orazio, L., Messina, R., & Schiraldi, M. M. (2020). Industry 4.0 and World Class Manufacturing Integration: 100 Technologies for a WCM-I4.0 Matrix. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4942. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144942