Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Size Effects Due to Different Cooling Rates of As-Quenched Martensite Microstructures in a Low-Alloy Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical 3D Modeling: Microwave Plasma Torch at Intermediate Pressure
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 15
10.3390/app10155394
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microstructure and Nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under High Pressure

by
Duo Dong
1,
Li Liu
2,
Dongdong Zhu
1,*,
Yang Liu
2,
Ye Wang
2,
Xiaohong Wang
1 and
Zunjie Wei
3
1
Key Laboratory of Air-Driven Equipment Technology of Zhejiang Province, Quzhou University, Quzhou 324000, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150001, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(15), 5394; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155394
Submission received: 8 July 2020 / Revised: 28 July 2020 / Accepted: 2 August 2020 / Published: 4 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nanotechnology and Applied Nanosciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy, solidified under different pressures and temperatures, was investigated in detail. The effect of high pressure on the microstructure and nanohardness of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy was investigated by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and a nanoindenter XP testing machine. The results showed that the B2 phase disappeared after high-pressure solidification. Compared with ambient pressure solidification, high pressure led to the increase of (α2 + γ) lamellar structure and the decrease of γ phase. The nanohardness of the lamellar structure was discussed based on the microstructure observation. When solidified at 5 GPa/1873 K, the hardness rose to 5.54 GPa, an increase of 60.5% compared with that solidified at ambient pressure. However, the increased holding temperature of 1973 K made the dislocation density in the lamellar structures greatly decrease, and reduced the structure’s hardness to 4.48 GPa.

1. Introduction

As high temperature structure materials, TiAl-based alloys show excellent advantages, such as low density [1], high specific strength [2], good corrosion resistance and creep resistance [3], high hardness and strength [4]. Due to such outstanding properties, TiAl-based alloys have been considered to be promising materials for application in aircraft, gas turbines and automotive engine [5,6]. However, the low ductility [7,8,9] greatly decreases the reliability of the microstructures and limits their application, a problem which has attracted the attention of many researchers [10,11]. Niu et al. [12] reported that after forging, the cast Ti-43Al-6Nb-1B alloy transformed from fully lamellar (FL) structures to duplex (DP) structures. The microstructure was refined and the mechanical properties were improved significantly. Many studies have been done to optimize the mechanical properties of TiAl-based alloys through the addition of a third element. In view of the β phase stabilizer addition, Cr is a notable element to improve ambient temperature, ductility, and mechanical strength of the TiAl-based alloys, which has been widely adopted by many researchers. Zhu et al. [13] indicated that the ductility of Ti-48Al-2Cr can be improved through the rapid solidification method. At the wheel speed of 30 m/s, the mechanical properties showed a great increase. Wang et al. [14] have found that after spark plasma sintering, the Vickers hardness of the TiAl alloy is increased by 15%.
Pressure is an important thermodynamic parameter of metallic materials which can influence the solidification process, especially under high pressure [15,16]. The influence of the alloying element and temperature during solidification processes has been widely studied. However, due to the limitations of traditional technology, the effect of pressure has usually been ignored [17]. High pressure solidification has gained much attention because of its special features, such as the refined microstructure and the decreasing diffusion coefficient [18,19,20,21], and this technique is an important and robust approach widely used in basic and applied science as well as industrial applications. High pressures and high temperatures have revolutionary impacts in modern society, ranging from industrial applications such as the fabrication of superconducting and superhard materials, to exploration of the properties of materials obtained under extreme conditions [22,23,24,25]. These characteristics are different from alloys that have solidified under ambient pressure. Wang et al. [26] confirmed that high pressure increases the eutectic point from 5.69% under ordinary pressure to 26.49% under 2 GPa, and the velocity of dilute solute solidified at interface declines exponentially. Wei et al. [27] reported the tensile strength and yield strength of Al-20Mg alloy increased to 467 MPa and 245 MPa respectively, because of solution strengthening and deformation strengthening caused by high pressure heat treatment. Nanoindentation is a widespread test technique for measuring the mechanical properties of the nanoscale, the microscale, and the thin-films materials [28,29]. It makes it possible to determine the hardness of the material, especially the hardness of target phase from hardness-depth data [29,30].
Up to now, the microstructure and mechanical properties of TiAl-based alloys solidified under high pressure has been rarely reported. Alloying elements such as Cr, Nb and Zr were added to improve the room temperature brittleness of the TiAl-based alloy [31]. Furthermore, it has been considered that 2% (at. %) Cr additions added to Ti-48Al alloy have the best room temperature ductility [13]. Therefore, the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy was chosen to study the evolution of the microstructure and mechanical properties when solidified under high pressure in this work. The variation of the phase transformation and nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy has been studied.

2. Materials and Methods

A nominal composition of the Ti-48Al-2Cr (at. %) alloy was selected for melting by induction skull melt (ISM) under an Ar atmosphere. The main raw materials were pure sponge titanium (99.95%), aluminum ingot (99.99%), and high purity chromium (99.99%). The samples for high pressure solidification were cut into small cylinders with a diameter of 6 mm and a length of 9 mm by electrical discharge machine. The high pressure solidification experiments were conducted using the tungsten-carbide six-anvil apparatus (CS-IB), which can achieve the highest pressure up to 10 GPa and the temperature up to 2073 K. The pressure was determined by Bi’s phase transformation [32]. The sample was heated in the graphite furnace in this equipment and the assembly of sample was shown in Figure 1. Because BN ceramic is a favorable heat-transmitting material which is stable for TiAl-based alloy melting, the sample was wrapped in BN ceramic to avoid the reaction between the graphite and high-pressure samples during the high pressure solidification process. Pyrophyllite was used as an encapsulant material, and can transmit pressure to the high-pressure samples. A thermocouple (W3%Re–W25%Re, type D) was used to measure the temperature of the samples. During high pressure solidification process, the pressure was first increased up to 5 GPa, and then the temperature was heated up to the target temperature, 1873 K and 1973 K, respectively. When the samples reached the preset pressure and temperature, the molten parameter was held for 30 min to obtain the fully melted samples. After that, the samples were cooled down to room temperature. The Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy prepared by ISM was also investigated for comparison.
In order to study the microstructures and properties of samples, the surface was mechanically ground up to 2000 grit SiC paper, polished using diamond paste, and etched before microstructure observation. The phase composition of the samples was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation, and the samples were scanned in a 2θ range of 15–90° angular region. The microstructure and chemical composition were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (SU8010, Hitachi) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The samples were etched in Kroll’s solution (5 vol.% HNO3, 5 vol.% HF and 90 vol.% H2O) and cleaned using an ultrasonic cleaning machine for 3 min in ethanol. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Philips CM12) samples were prepared via twin-jet polishing. Here the twin-jet solution was mixture of 6% perchloric acid, 34% butanol and 60% methanol. The nanohardness of the samples was measured by the Nanoindenter XP testing machine (Nano Test, Vantage 7) (Aglient company, USA) at room temperature with the loading of 50 mN, and holding time of 10 s. The testing was performed 5 times on the target phase to obtain the average values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Phase Composition of the Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under ambient pressure at 1873 K, 5 GPa at 1873 K, and 5 GPa at 1973 K, respectively. Combined with the results of point analysis (EDS), it can be clearly known that the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy was composed of a TiAl phase (γ) and a Ti3Al phase (α2) when solidified under different processes. High pressure solidification doesn’t change the phase constitution of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy. However, the intensity of γ phase decreases greatly as the solidification pressure increases to 5 GPa. In particular, when the solidified condition was 5 GPa and 1973 K, the diffraction peak intensity of γ phase remarkably decreased and diffraction peak broadening also occurred, indicating that the grain size of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy decreases with the increasing solidification pressure.

3.2. Microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under Different Processes

According to the phase diagram of the Ti-Al-Cr ternary alloy [33], the solidification process of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy is Liquid (L) → β (primary phase), and L + β → α (peritectic transformation) occurs after continuous cooling. Then, the residual β phase transforms into the α phase and the B2 phase. During subsequent cooling, the lamellar structure is formed by α → αresidual + γ → (α2 + γ) lamellar + γ transformation (α2-Ti3Al, γ-TiAl).
Figure 3 shows the microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy under different solidification conditions. As shown in Figure 3a, there are a large number of γ phases in the alloy after solidification at ambient pressure. When solidified at 5 GPa, the volume fraction of γ phase decreases while the lamellar structure increases (Figure 3c). Because of the shifted eutectic point to higher Al content and the increased eutectic reaction temperature, the content of the lamellar structure increases, according to the lever rule [34,35,36]. The increase of superheat will not only make the element distribution more uniform, but will also improve the thermodynamic undercooling and reduce the content of interdendritic γ phase (Figure 3d) [22]. However, according to Gao’s study [37], the effect of temperature on the size and shape stability of microstructural features has been extensively investigated, the lamellar structure would be coarsened with increasing superheat. When the solidification condition of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy changed from ambient pressure to 5 GPa at 1873 K and 5 GPa at 1973 K, the volume fraction of γ phase decreased from 43% to 29.4% and 11.2%, respectively (Figure 3a,c,d).
Few B2 phase particles can also be found in the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy when solidified under ambient pressure, as shown in Figure 3b (the content of the B2 phase is less and cannot be detected by XRD), but no B2 phase was found after solidification under high pressure. This is because the B2 phase is the result of the ordering of the primary β phase at high temperature [38]; high-pressure solidification can increase the undercooling of the melt and directly lead to the formation of the α phase from the liquid phase [26]. Meanwhile, high pressure inhibits the diffusion which leads to the increasing of Al content in the liquid phase [26]. The content of Al element in the liquid phase will increase, which can also promote the peritectic phase, direct nucleation, and precipitation. Therefore, the B2 phase cannot be found during high-pressure solidification.
Figure 4 shows the EDS analysis result of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different processes. As shown in Figure 4a, the solubility of Cr element in the lamellar structure is about 2.56 at. % under ambient pressure, whereas it increases to 3.09 at. % and 3.26 at. % under 5 GPa pressure at 1873 K and 1973 K respectively (Figure 4b,c). Considering the errors of EDS, it can be seen that high pressure increases the concentration of Cr in the lamellar structure. Further increasing the holding temperature to 5 GPa, the concentration of Cr is nearly unchanged. Al element in the lamellar structure also shows the same phenomenon. The EDS analysis proves that high pressure inhibits the element diffusion. Moreover, the EDS results further confirm the decrease of the γ phase and the disappearance of the B2 phase after high pressure solidified.
TEM analysis was carried out to further study the detailed microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under high pressure. Figure 5 shows several representative areas (SAED) of Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under 5 GPa at 1873 K and 1973 K. A large volume fraction of dislocations exists in the alloy structure after solidification at 5 GPa and 1873 K (Figure 5a), and the dislocations can be found across the lamellar structure in Figure 5a,b. The number of dislocations in the alloy structure decreases with the increase in holding temperature (Figure 5b,c), indicating that higher holding temperature and longer cooling time lead to the decrease in dislocation density.

3.3. Nanohardness of High Pressure Solidified Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy

A nanoindenter was used to measure the mechanical property of high pressure solidified Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy under different processes. Figure 6 shows the hardness-depth curves of the lamellar structures of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different solidification processes. As can be seen, the fluctuations of the curves are small when the indentation is above 900 nm, which means the hardness of the lamellar structures remains nearly constant with the increase in indentation depth. The average hardness values are displayed in Table 1. When solidified at 5 GPa and 1873 K, the nanohardness is 5.54 GPa. Compared with the samples solidified at ambient pressure, the nanohardness increases about 60.5%. Further increasing the holding temperature led to a decrease in nanohardness.
The nanohardness of the high pressure solidified samples depends on the solidification process. As we mentioned, high pressure leads to an increase in Cr concentration and to dislocations in the microstructures8. Hence, the increase in nanohardness can be attributed to the solution strengthening and dislocation strengthening. When increasing the temperature to 1973 K at 5 GPa, the change of Cr content in the lamellar structures is very small. Combined with the microstructure analysis, the main reasons for the decrease in nanohardness are the coarsening of the lamellar structure and the decrease in dislocation volume; thus, dislocation strengthening is the dominant mechanism.

3.4. The Mechanism of the Relationship between Dislocation Density, Microstructure Refinement, and Properties under High Pressure

Figure 7 shows a diagram of the dislocation structure relationship of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy, which reveals the grain size and dislocation movement in the grain under high pressure and different solidification temperatures. High pressure can inhibit the diffusion of the element and lead to solute enrichment at solidification interface, and supercooling can affect the nucleation and growth of grains and the microstructure evolution mechanism of the alloy [17,22].
Under high pressure, the pile-up of dislocations between grains is relatively close, and the stress produced by high pressure causes the dislocation source to start, release a large number of dislocations, and pile up at the grain boundary (Figure 7a,b). Due to the increased pressure, the dislocations pass through the grain boundary and enter the adjacent grain, which leads to increasing dislocation density and the improvement of mechanical properties [39]. (Figure 5a,b). Compared with the samples solidified at ambient pressure, the nanohardness of the alloy after high-pressure solidification increased to 5.45 GPa and 4.48 GPa, respectively. This is because when solidified at 5 GPa and 1873 K, dislocations cross the grain boundary and enter the adjacent grains, which can activate internal dislocations and release the dislocation pile-ups (Figure 7b). The nanohardness of the alloy was increased by increasing the dislocation density.
The nanohardness of the alloy decreased after being solidified under high pressure at higher superheating temperature. After high pressure solidification, the increased holding temperature led to the increase in dislocation and local stress in the grains. Consequently, the samples after high pressure were more unstable. Therefore, dislocation annihilation plays a dominant role at higher superheating temperatures, which leads to a decrease in dislocation density [40]. It was found that with the increase in solidification temperature, the dislocation density in the α2 phase decreases, and increases in the B2 phase [41]. As was demonstrated in Section 3.2, high pressure led to the increase of the α2 phase and the disappearance of the B2 phase, which further explains the decrease in dislocation density in the samples when solidified under high 5 GPa, 1973 K. (Figure 7c). Therefore, the main strengthening mechanism of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy is dislocation strengthening.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the microstructure and mechanical properties of the Ti-48Al-2Cr (at. %) alloys solidified under ambient pressure 5 GPa/1873 K and 5 GPa/1973 K were systematically studied. The conclusions are summarized as follows:
(1)
In the process of high-pressure solidification, the volume fraction of interdendritic γ phase decreases while that of the lamellar structure increases.
(2)
After high-pressure solidification, the content of Cr and Al increased and the B2 phase disappeared due to the inhibition of element diffusion by high pressure.
(3)
The strengthening mechanism of the alloy is solution strengthening and dislocation strengthening after high-pressure solidification. Solidified at 5 GPa and 1873 K, the hardness reached 5.54 GPa. The hardness decreases, and dislocation strengthening plays a dominant role in the superheated state.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Z. and Z.W.; methodology, D.D.; formal analysis, L.L. and D.Z.; investigation, L.L. and Y.L.; resources, D.D., D.Z. and Z.W.; data curation, Y.W. and X.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and D.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.D. and D.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51801112 and 51774105, the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China grant number LY18E010003.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ye, X.C.; Xiao, K.Q.; Cao, R.X.; Wu, H.H.; Zhao, G.W.; Li, B. Microstructure evolution and microhardness of TiAl based alloy blade by vacuum suction casting. Vacuum 2019, 163, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bewlay, B.P.; Nag, S.; Suzuki, A.; Weimer, M.J. TiAl alloys in commercial aircraft engines. Mater. High Temp. 2016, 33, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, G.; Wu, P.; Wang, W.; Zhu, D.D.; Tan, C.W.; Su, Y.S.; Shi, X.Y.; Cao, W. Brazing Ti-48Al-2Nb-2Cr Alloys with Cu-Based Amorphous Alloy Filler. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Yenera, T.; Erdoğan, A.; Gök, M.S.; Zeytin, S. Nb and B effect on mechanical properties of Ti-Al based intermetallic materials. Vacuum 2019, 169, 108867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Han, J.K.; Li, X.; Dippenaar, R.; Liss, K.D.; Kawasaki, M. Microscopic plastic response in a bulk nano-structured TiAl intermetallic compound processed by high-pressure torsion. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2018, 714, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tan, Y.M.; Chen, R.R.; Fang, H.Z.; Liu, Y.L.; Ding, H.S.; Su, Y.Q.; Guo, J.J.; Fu, H.Z. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of TiAl binary alloys added with SiC fibers. Intermetallics 2018, 98, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, G.H.; Russell, A.M.; Oertel, C.G.; Skrotzki, W. Microstructural evolution of TiAl-based alloys deformed by high-pressure torsion. Acta Mater. 2015, 98, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lapin, J.; Pelachova, T.; Bajana, O. High temperature deformation behaviour and microstructure of cast in-situ TiAl matrix composite reinforced with carbide particles. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 797, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tian, S.W.; Jiang, H.T.; Guo, W.Q.; Zhang, G.H.; Zeng, S.W. Hot deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of TiAl-based alloy. Intermetallics 2019, 112, 106521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dong, S.L.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q. Hot deformation processing capability of Fe-contained high Nb TiAl-based alloy. Vacuum 2019, 159, 391–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phillip, D.; Helmut, C.; Svea, M.; David, H. Impact of Alloying on Stacking Fault Energies in γ-TiAl. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Niu, H.Z.; Chen, Y.Y.; Kong, F.T.; Lin, J.P. Microstructure evolution, hot deformation behavior and mechanical properties of Ti-43Al-6Nb-1B alloy. Intermetallics 2012, 31, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, D.D.; Dong, D.; Ni, C.Y.; Zhang, D.F.; Zhou, Z.Z.; Wang, H.W.; Wei, Z.J. Effect of wheel speed on the microstructure and nanohardness of rapidly solidified Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy. Mater. Charact. 2015, 99, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Z.H.; Sun, H.X.; Du, Y.L.; Yuan, J.T. Effects of Powder Preparation and Sintering Temperature on Properties of Spark Plasma Sintered Ti-48Al-2Cr-8Nb Alloy. Metals 2019, 9, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ma, P.; Wei, Z.J.; Jia, Y.D.; Yu, Z.S.; Prashanth, K.G.; Yang, S.L.; Li, C.G.; Huang, L.X.; Eckert, J. Mechanism of formation of fibrous eutectic Si and thermal conductivity of SiCp/Al-20Si composites solidified under high pressure. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 709, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, Z.J.; Ma, P.; Wang, H.W.; Zou, C.M.; Scudino, S.; Song, K.K.; Prashanth, K.G.; Jiang, W.; Eckert, J. The thermal expansion behaviour of SiCp/Al-20Si composites solidified under high pressures. Mater. Des. 2015, 65, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jie, J.C.; Zou, C.M.; Wang, H.W.; Wei, Z.J. Microstructure evolution of Al-Mg alloy during solidification under high pressure. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 869–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Menshikova, S.G.; Brazhkin, V.V.; Lad’yanov, V.I.; PushkarevDcdsv, B.E. Features of the Al90Y10 alloy structure during solidification under high pressure. J. Cryst. Growth 2019, 524, 125–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xi, L.; Rian, D.; Ayumi, S.; Takahisa, S.; Yuji, H.; Mark, R.; Suzuki, H.; Akita, K.; Funakoshi, K.I.; Liss, K.D. Lattice parameter evolution during heating of Ti-45Al-7.5Nb-0.25/0.5C alloys under atmospheric and high pressures. Intermetallics 2018, 102, 120–131. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zou, C.M.; Jiang, W.; Wang, H.W.; Hu, Z.L.; Wei, Z.J. Modeling of yield strength in binary hypoeutectic alloy under high pressure solidification. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 686, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kashchiev, D.; Rosmalen, G.M. Effect of pressure on nucleation in bulk solutions and solutions in pores and droplets. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1995, 169, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Lee, K.K.M. From soft to superhard: Fifty years of experiments on cold-compressed graphite. J. Superhard Mater. 2012, 34, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wang, Y.J.; Panzik, J.E.; Kiefer, B.; Lee, K.K.M. Crystal structure of graphite under room-temperature compression and decompression. Sci. Per-UK 2012, 2, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Y.J.; Liu, Z.T.Y.; Khare, S.V.; Collins, S.A.; Zhang, J.Z.; Wang, L.P.; Zhao, Y.S. Thermal equation of state of silicon carbide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 061906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Efthimiopoulos, I.; Liu, Z.T.Y.; Khare, S.V.; Sarin, P.; Lochbiler, T.; Tsurkan, V.; Loidl, A.; Popov, D.; Wang, Y. Pressure-induced transition in the multiferroic CoCr2O4 spinel. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 064108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, X.H.; Ran, Z.; Wei, Z.J.; Zou, C.M.; Wang, H.W.; Gouchi, J.; Uwatoko, Y. The formation of bulk β-Al3Ni phase in eutectic Al-5.69wt%Ni alloy solidified under high pressure. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 742, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wei, Z.J.; Jiang, W.; Zou, C.M.; Wang, H.W.; Zhao, W.Q. Microstructural evolution and mechanical strengthening mechanism of the high pressure heat treatment (HPHT) on Al-Mg alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 692, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vladislav, D.; Yury, G.; Sergey, D. Effect of phase transformations on the shape of the unloading curve in the nanoindentation of silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 2214. [Google Scholar]
  29. John, Ł.; Janeta, M.; Rajczakowska, M.; Ejfler, J.; Łydzba, D.; Szafert, S. Synthesis and microstructural properties of the scaffold based on a 3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate-POSS hybrid towards potential tissue engineering applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 66037–66047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. David, J.S.; André, L.M.C.; Margareth, S.A. Calculating the elastic modulus from nanoindentation and microindentation reload curves. Mater. Charact. 2007, 58, 380–389. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Peng, D.L. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy. Trans. Mater. Heat Treat. 2019, 6, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, H.K.; Ren, Y.; He, D.W.; Xu, C. Force analysis and pressure quantitative measurement for the high pressure cubic cell. Acta Phys. Sin. 2017, 66, 090702. [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, G.; Lian, Y.F.; Xu, X.J.; He, J.P.; Lin, J.P. Phase equilibria in the Ti-Al-Cr system at 1000 °C. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 826, 154236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, R. The effect of high pressure on solidification microstructure of Al-Ni-Y alloy. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 2818–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yun, D.; Lin, X.P.; Xu, R.; Zheng, R.G.; Fan, Z.B.; Liu, S.J.; Wang, Z. Microstructure and compression deformation behavior in the quasicrystal-reinforced Mg-8Zn-1Y alloy solidified under super-high pressure. J. Rare Earth. 2014, 32, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar]
  36. Han, X.M.; Dong, Y.; Zhao, T.B. Microstructure and compression deformation behavior in the in the quasicrystal-reinforced Ma-6Zn-2Y alloy solidified under super-high pressure at room-temperature. Adv. Mat. Res. 2014, 887, 311–314. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sharma, G.; Ramanujan, R.; Tiwari, G. Instability mechanisms in lamellar microstructures. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, Y.Y.; Yamada, J.; Nakamura, J.; Hidemi, K. Effect of B2-ordered phase on the deformation behavior of Ti-Mo-Al alloys at elevated temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 696, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, M.G.; Xiao, S.L.; Chen, Y.Y.; Xu, L.J.; Tian, J. The effect of carbon addition on the high-temperature properties of β solidification TiAl alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 775, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, W.S.; Chen, T.H.; Hwang, H.H. Impact response and microstructural evolution of biomedical titanium alloy under various temperatures. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2008, 39, 1435–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wu, Y.; Tang, Z.X.; Yang, D.Z.; Li, D.M. Microscopic analysis on tensile fracture behavior of Ti3AlNb alloy with various microstructures. Trans. Nonferrous Metal. Soc. 1996, 6, 66–105. [Google Scholar]
Applsci 10 05394 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the assembly sample for high pressure solidification.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the assembly sample for high pressure solidification.
Applsci 10 05394 g001
Applsci 10 05394 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures. (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures. (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Applsci 10 05394 g002
Applsci 10 05394 g003 550
Figure 3. Microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different temperatures. (a) ambient pressure under lower magnification; (b) Backscattered Electron (BSE) picture of (a) under higher magnification of the B2 phase; (c) SEM picture under 5 GPa, 1873 K; (d) SEM picture under 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Figure 3. Microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different temperatures. (a) ambient pressure under lower magnification; (b) Backscattered Electron (BSE) picture of (a) under higher magnification of the B2 phase; (c) SEM picture under 5 GPa, 1873 K; (d) SEM picture under 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Applsci 10 05394 g003
Applsci 10 05394 g004 550
Figure 4. EDS analysis of the lamellar structure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures. (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Figure 4. EDS analysis of the lamellar structure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures. (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Applsci 10 05394 g004
Applsci 10 05394 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM images of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified at 5 GPa pressure under different temperatures. (a) 1873 K; (b) and (c) 1973 K; (d) SAED of γ phase in (c).
Figure 5. TEM images of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified at 5 GPa pressure under different temperatures. (a) 1873 K; (b) and (c) 1973 K; (d) SAED of γ phase in (c).
Applsci 10 05394 g005
Applsci 10 05394 g006 550
Figure 6. Hardness-depth curves obtained from solidified Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy under different pressures.
Figure 6. Hardness-depth curves obtained from solidified Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy under different pressures.
Applsci 10 05394 g006
Applsci 10 05394 g007 550
Figure 7. The strengthening mechanism in the microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Figure 7. The strengthening mechanism in the microstructure of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy (a) ambient pressure, 1873 K; (b) 5 GPa, 1873 K; (c) 5 GPa, 1973 K.
Applsci 10 05394 g007
Table
Table 1. The average nanohardness of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures.
Table 1. The average nanohardness of the Ti-48Al-2Cr alloy solidified under different pressures.
SampleNanohardness (GPa)
Ambient pressure, 1873 K3.45 ± 0.19
5 GPa, 1873 K5.54 ± 0.21
5 GPa, 1973 K4.48 ± 0.27

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, D.; Liu, L.; Zhu, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wei, Z. Microstructure and Nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under High Pressure. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155394

AMA Style

Dong D, Liu L, Zhu D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang X, Wei Z. Microstructure and Nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under High Pressure. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(15):5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Duo, Li Liu, Dongdong Zhu, Yang Liu, Ye Wang, Xiaohong Wang, and Zunjie Wei. 2020. "Microstructure and Nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under High Pressure" Applied Sciences 10, no. 15: 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155394

APA Style

Dong, D., Liu, L., Zhu, D., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., & Wei, Z. (2020). Microstructure and Nanohardness of Ti-48Al-2Cr Alloy Solidified under High Pressure. Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5394. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop