Next Article in Journal
Improving the Fuel Economy and Battery Lifespan in Fuel Cell/Renewable Hybrid Power Systems Using the Power-Following Control of the Fueling Regulators
Next Article in Special Issue
Combination of Thermal, Hydrometallurgical and Electrochemical Tannery Waste Treatment for Cr(III) Recovery
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Micro-Raman Spectroscopy Investigation of Crystalline Phases in EAF Slag
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation on the Chemical and Thermal Behavior of Recycling Agglomerates from EAF by-Products

1
Department for Industrial Furnaces and Heat Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Kopernikusstr. 10, 52074 Aachen, Germany
2
Nonferrous Metallurgy, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Franz-Josef-Str. 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
3
Process Metallurgy Group, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014 Oulu, Finland
4
Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy
5
MFG Metall-und Ferrolegierungsgesellschaft mbH Hafner, Blondin & Tidou, Rudolf-Diesel-Str. 9, 40670 Meerbusch, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(22), 8309; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228309
Submission received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 16 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 23 November 2020

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The aim of this investigation is a simple and easily adaptable agglomeration process for the different quantities and qualities of EAF by-products. The costs and need of disposal for these by-products will be omitted if internal, on-site recycling is possible.

Abstract

In addition to the blast furnace converter route, electric steel production in the electric arc furnace (EAF) is one of the two main production routes for crude steel. In 2019, the global share of crude steel produced via the electric steel route was 28%, which in numbers is 517 million metric tons of crude steel. The production and processing of steel leads to the output of a variety of by-products, such as dusts, fines, sludges and scales. At the moment, 10–67% of these by-products are landfilled and not recycled. These by-products contain metal oxides and minerals including iron oxide, zinc oxide, magnesia or alumina. Apart from the wasted valuable materials, the restriction of landfill space and stricter environmental laws are additional motivations to avoid landfill. The aim of the Fines2EAF project, funded by the European Research Fund for Coal and Steel, is to develop a low-cost and flexible solution for the recycling of fines, dusts, slags and scales from electric steel production. During this project, an easy, on-site solution for the agglomeration of fine by-products from steel production has to be developed from lab scale to pilot production for industrial tests in steel plants. The solution is based on the stamp press as the central element of the agglomeration process. The stamp press provides the benefit of being easily adapted to different raw materials and different pressing parameters, such as pressing-force and -speed, or mold geometry. Further benefits are that the stamp press process requires less binding material than the pelletizing process, and that no drying process is required as is the case with the pelletizing process. Before advancing the agglomeration of by-products via stamp press to an industrial scale, different material recipes are produced in lab-scale experiments and the finished agglomerates are tested for their use as secondary raw materials in the EAF. Therefore, the tests focus on the chemical and thermal behavior of the agglomerates. Chemical behavior, volatilization and reduction behavior of the agglomerates were investigated by differential thermogravimetric analysis combined with mass spectroscopy (TGA-MS). In addition, two melts with different agglomerates are carried out in a technical-scale electric arc furnace to increase the sample size.

1. Introduction

The agglomeration of residues into briquettes is one way to handle the challenge of reducing the amount of material disposed in landfill and the amount of primary raw materials. Especially during the production of steel by the electric arc furnace (EAF) route different types of by-products occur. These by-products vary in quality and quantity. Some examples are slags, dusts, sludges and scale. The amount of each by-product differs for each plant and ranges from a few 100 t/y up to over 200,000 t/y. Most of these by-products are not recycled due to a lack of low-cost pre-treatment methods for their recycling. At the moment, they are being disposed in landfill or being used as construction material. Changes in the worldwide environmental policies towards the stricter regulation of applications outside steel plants and restrictions on landfill necessitate integrated pollution prevention and lead to the development of new processes [1,2,3]. Most of the processes for the recycling of steel production are dedicated to the recovery of metallic oxides like Zn [4,5,6,7]. The most known process for the recycling of EAF dusts is the Waelz process. A rotary kiln is used to recover the zinc from EAF dusts. However, besides the poor quality because of impurities, this is a solution for a single by-product and not internal recycling [5]. Because of their low metal content, the recycling of refractory material for the internal use is a less investigated topic [2]. Due to the high content of CaO and MgO, refractory material can be used as slag former in the EAF [8,9]. Ladle furnace slag can also be utilized as slag former and substitute primary raw materials such as limestone or dolomite lime. In the theory, the slag could be charged in a liquid state into the EAF, but the coordination of both processes and the handling make it practically impossible. In long-term trials, the possibility of the injection of slag powder was proven [8,9,10,11,12]. Although the agglomeration of EAF by-products via roller press or extrusion press were the aim of many studies, their focus was on by-products with high Cr-content and EAF-dusts [13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, a simple solution for the internal recycling of the different kinds of EAF-steel plant by-products is still missing.
The aim of the Fines2EAF-Project (funded by the European Research Fund for Coal and Steel) is the on-site agglomeration of by-products of the EAF-steel route. Three European steel plants are participating in the project to find a low-cost and flexible solution to recycle their residues/by-products internally. The stamp press is the central element of the project because it can easily be adapted for different materials and requires a lower amount of binding agent compared to the pelletizing process. Because of the simple technic and the lower content of binder the capital and operational expenditures can be kept low level and contribute to the achievement of economic viability of the process [19]. Furthermore, the adjustable press force, pressing speed and mold size as well as grain size flexibility are specifically beneficial properties of the stamp press for the agglomeration of the different by-products of the steel plants. Another benefit is that the stamp press does not require an additional drying process, as is the case with the pelletizing process [20,21].
This work presents tests to prove the suitability of the agglomerated residues in briquette form for later use in electric arc furnaces as a secondary raw material. The scope is the analysis of the thermal behavior through thermal gravity analysis combined with mass spectrometry. Additional melts in a pilot-scale 45-litre electric arc furnace were carried out to investigate the melting behavior and the metallurgical influence on the steel and slag. An economical and environmental evaluation of the agglomeration process is not part of this work and will be part of a separate work.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

The residues that are agglomerated in this work are produced during different steps of the electric steel production process chain or sometimes even originate from other manufacturing processes, for instance the grinding sludge is a residue of a local bearing manufacturer located next to the steel plant. Oxy-cutting fines consist of dusty, metallic spheres. Pursuant to its name, these fines originate from cutting billets with an oxygen lance. Belt conveyer fines are fines collected from the belt that supplies lime to the EAF. Combustion chamber dust is a fine material from the dedusting system of the EAF. Ladle furnace slag is a residue of the ladle furnace. Spent refractory is old, worn pieces of furnace lining. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the residues, their moisture content, bulk density, and true density.

2.2. Manufacture of Briquettes

Depending on the material, different processing steps were necessary for processing the residues from electric steel production. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the processing steps. In some cases, the materials occur in such a form that no further processing is necessary and the materials can directly be agglomerated. All materials are first screened and coarse and metallic impurities are removed by hand. The target size of the process is a grain size of less than 4 mm. This value was empirically determined in pre-tests and shows good results in this study. Moist materials (moisture > 10 wt.-%) can be treated by drying. In the industrial processes, this is omitted and the material is processed in the factory to have a lower moisture content. Afterwards, the residual materials are placed on a vibration sieve. Residues larger than 4 mm are crushed in a jaw crusher and then transferred to a magnetic separator. The magnetic separator is necessary to protect the downstream impact mill. The material is put back onto the vibration sieve and sieved to lump sizes of less than 4 mm. An intensive mixer is used to mix the fine residues, binders and additives. The stamp press is the central element of the agglomeration process and is suitable for the different materials in this project, thanks to its variability with regard to the pressing process and geometry. Through a downstream drying step, it was possible to achieve faster drying of the green compacts during laboratory tests.
Several preliminary tests were conducted in which different types of binder, for example, copolymer binders, bitumous binders, polyethylenglycol (PEG), carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), different types of starch and molasses, as well as super absorbers were tested. Furthermore, different agglomeration parameters were tested including pressing force and time, different clearances between the mold and the upper stamp, aging condition and additives such as CaCO3, bentonite, SiO2 and sodium silicate hardener used with sodium silicate binder. Tests with fibers from paper recycling to increase the strength of the briquettes were also done [22].
The results of the pre-tests led to the decision to use starch as binders for the briquettes, and recycled fibers from paper production to increase the strength of the briquettes. Table 2 shows the recipes for the laboratory production of the briquettes.
Figure 2 shows an example of the manufactured briquettes. The briquettes have a diameter of 73 mm and a height of 24 to 54 mm depending on the filling factor of the mold and the manufacturing pressure.

2.3. Thermal Behaviour

Volatizing components, e.g., from reducing agents such as biomass/biochar or lignite fines and/or binder, and the reduction behavior of the briquettes, were determined by differential thermogravimetric analysis combined with mass spectroscopy (TGA-MS) in argon atmosphere at the University of Oulu. TGA-MS tests combined with thermogravimetric experiments give detailed information about the chemical behavior of the briquettes at high temperatures. Some thermogravimetric experiments were carried out in a furnace allowing for a larger sample size, which gives a large enough sample for further analysis about the structure forming in the reduced brick.
The simultaneous thermal analyzer STA 449 F3 Jupiter with graphite furnace coupled with an NETZSCH QMS 403 mass spectrometer was used to analyze the samples and obtain TGA and mass spectroscopy (MS) data.
For all tests, argon gas was introduced to the TGA during the test at a rate of 351.5 mL/min. This rate was chosen to avoid the oxidation of the evolved gases and/or the tested materials, since similar studies suggest using a high flow rate to minimize such problems [23,24]. The heating rate in the TGA was kept constant at a rate of 5 °C/min up to a final temperature of 1600 °C. NETZSCH Proteus® software was used for thermal analysis.
Some of the residues after TGA-MS analysis were characterized through optical and scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD). The residues being mainly made by iron, they were polished and then etched in Nital 2% solution (98% ethanol, 2% nitric acid) to reveal the microstructure. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was conducted to analyze locally the chemical composition of the second phases within the iron. XRD analysis was performed by means of a Rigaku SmartLab SE diffractometer, in θ–θ Bragg-Brentano configuration, scanning the samples from 5 to 80° 2θ at 0.5°/min, with a step size of 0.02° 2θ and a fixed divergent slit of 0.5°. To reduce texture effect, the samples was rotated at 120 rpm. A copper tube (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54 Å) excited at 40 KV and 40 mA was used to generate X-ray. Diffracted X-ray was collected through 1D D/teX Ultra 250 detector with fluorescence suppressor filter.

2.4. Pilot-Scale Trials

The purpose of the trials was to determine the dissolution behavior of agglomerated steel mill residues in an EAF-furnace environment. The trials were carried out using a 50 kW direct current electric arc furnace (DC-EAF) with a volume of approximately 45 L. The cylindrical vessel can be tilted for casting into prepared molds. A traversable graphite rod-electrode is used, which is anodically connected and immersed into the slag, while the cathode is a graphite bottom electrode. Figure 3 shows the EAF with its transformer. The system is heated via the slag, as it is the component with the highest electric resistance. To start the process, the slag was charged to form a liquid base to which the further feed materials (construction steel alloy) were added. The slag was prepared by remelting a typical slag provided from the partner steel plants. The first trial used 15 kg of slag provided from the first steel mill and 17 kg steel, whereas the second trial used 10 kg of slag from the second steel plant and 40 kg of steel. The agglomerated residues (MH51 0.9 kg and MA604B 10 kg) were charged and dissolved, and the change in the chemical analysis of the steel and slag phases were determined to evaluate the process performance. The composition of the used briquettes is given in Table 1.
The procedure for both trials was nearly the same. In Table 3, the differences between the two trials are highlighted. After preheating the furnace, the arc was ignited on an initial base of petroleum coke and EAF slag. After the slag was molten, steel scrap was charged into the furnace and melted down. Samples of the steel and slag were taken before the briquettes were charged into the melt. The melt and slag were tapped when the briquettes were completely dissolved and samples of the slag and steel were taken again. The time at which the briquettes were melted was visually determined. The briquettes float on the top of the slag due to their density, which made the determination of dissolution possible just by looking into the furnace.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermal Behavior

Figure 4 shows the diagram of the TGA-MS for the CC02 briquette. Strong ion current signals of H2O+ (m/z = 18) evolving starting from a temperature around 100 °C corresponds to sample moisture evaporation. A strong peak is formed at about 310 °C, which corresponds to binder decomposition. The strong signal persists up to a temperature of 570 °C, indicating chemically bound water leaving the sample. The signal then deteriorates up to a temperature of 670 °C, indicating a small amount of bound water is still leaving the sample. A decrease in mass up to 400 °C is likely to correspond to water leaving the sample as well as decomposition of fibers and starch. The decomposition fibers and starch is supported by strong peaks corresponding to the release of CO and CO2 detected at around 288 °C. A decrease in mass starting around 700 and 950 °C likely corresponds to the reduction of hematite and magnetite, respectively. CO2 is also detected at 763 °C, suggesting that significant reduction by CO is taking place, probably due to the iron oxides present in the briquette sample. A significant CO peak is detected near the end of measurement at around 1575 °C, suggesting that further reduction of oxides is taking place.
The results deduced from the MS analysis are confirmed by optical microscopy and XRD analysis of briquette residues collected from the crucible. Most of the briquette converted into metallic material, the microstructure and chemical composition of which are reported in Figure 5 and Figure 6 and Table 4. The iron has assumed a typical cast-iron microstructure, with a pearlitic matrix surrounded by primary cementite and graphite flakes.
The non-metallic residue is mainly formed by unreduced iron oxides (especially wustite). An intense and wide XRD peak associated to unburned carbon is detected (Figure 7). Akermanite is due to the reaction between oxides within the bricks and TGA crucible.
The BC03 briquette mainly consists of conveyer belt fines (more than 63 wt.-%). The chemical analysis of conveyer belt fines shows that consists of more than 90 wt.-% CaO, which is very stable at high temperatures and cannot be reduced by carbon at the testing temperature range according to the Ellingham diagram. Moreover, water addition during the making of the briquette was 31.1%.
Figure 8 shows the TGA-MS diagram of BC03. During the initial stage of the heat, water and volatiles appear to be leaving the sample. The first sharp drop in the sample mass starting from around 400 °C is probably due to the release of chemically bound water. The CO and CO2 peaks at around 250 °C probably correspond to the decomposition of starch and fibers. The second sharp decrease in mass occurring from 600 to 800 °C is likely due to the decomposition of residual calcium carbonate, as the loss of mass corresponds to significant peaks in CO and CO2. For instance, at 1 atm pressure, CaCO3 decomposes in the range 900–1200 °C. However, under argon flow, calcium carbonate decomposes to a lower temperature, typically in the range 550–950 °C [25] Another source indicates the decomposition peak at 750 °C [26], whereas Drobikova et al. [27] indicate that CaCO3 decomposes in the temperature range between 570 and 830 °C. Thus, the CO2 peak is certainly associated to calcite decomposition.
The FD13 briquette consists mainly of FMC (69.7 wt.-%). It also has a significant amount of added water (11.7 wt.-%). Figure 9 shows a diagram of the TGA-MS analysis. Water appears to be released from the sample at a temperature of between 100 and 535 °C. At around 250 °C, a small amount of mass is lost, probably due to the decomposition of starch and fibers. This is consistent with the small CO and CO2 peak. CO2 also peaks significantly near 533° C, indicating that reduction takes place. Two more significant CO and CO2 peaks appear near 680 °C accompanied by a steep and short decreasing mass curve, likely indicating another reduction. From 1200 to 1600 °C, the briquette lost more than 20% of its total original mass accompanied by a release of CO, indicating that high temperature reduction took place during this stage.
The analysis of the residue collected from the TGA crucible shows that a small fraction of metallic manganese was obtained by the reduction of manganese oxide (Figure 10). However, the main product after the thermal test was manganese silicide carbide (Mn5SiC). This is a typical product of carbothermic reduction of manganese ores, as stated by Kononov [28]. A residual fraction of hausmannite (Mn3O4) and Mn2O3 bearing compound (potassium birnessite) was observed.
Figure 11 shows the TG-MS diagram of MA604B. MA604B mainly comprises grinding sludge and oxy-cutting fines. Grinding sludge and oxy-cutting fines consist for the most part of iron and iron oxides. In addition to grinding sludge and oxy-cutting fines, the briquette contains injection carbon which is mostly carbon. Water appears to be leaving the sample just under 100 °C up to 400 °C. Again, a small mass change near 250 °C accompanied with CO and CO2 peaks suggest that fibers and starch are decomposed. Starting from a temperature of around 700 °C, it can be seen that there is continuous mass loss accompanied by emission of CO and CO2. This indicates that carbon is utilized to reduce iron oxides in the following order Hematite → Magnetite → Wuestite → Metallic iron. Around 1100 °C, the mass loss becomes steeper, suggesting that further iron oxide reduction takes place.
A summary of TGA-MS results is presented in Table 5.

3.2. Pilot-Scale Trials

For the trial with briquettes from MA604B, a total of 48.0 kg of iron alloy was tapped. The 8.0 kg mass increase in the alloy can be explained by both the reduction of iron oxide from the slag and the dissolution of the briquettes, which consist mainly of iron. It was not possible to determine the exact slag mass as significant amounts solidified in the furnace vessel during the tapping procedure. As shown in Table 6, the chemical analysis of the ferrous alloy was not significantly influenced by the charging of the briquettes. The carbon content of the steel sample is high because of the dissolution of carbon from the bottom and top electrodes in the furnace. The chemical composition of the slag phase shows a drop in basicity due to the charging of the briquettes. At the same time, the iron oxide content decreased as can be seen in Table 7. MgO on the other hand increased slightly. The experiment showed a good dissolution behavior of the briquettes although the ratio of charged material compared to the pre-molten slag and iron alloy was probably higher than it will be in an industrial application. Additionally, the iron content of the slag decreased, indicating good separation of the contained metallic iron without any unwanted oxidation. However, partial reduction of iron oxide by the electrode cannot be neglected.
For the trial with briquettes from MH51, a total of 19.6 kg ferrous alloy was tapped. The mass increase was due to the partial reduction of iron oxide from the slag and the dissolution of the charged briquettes. It was not possible to determine the exact slag mass as significant amounts solidified in the furnace vessel during the tapping procedure. Comparing the chemical analysis of the steel and slag phase before and after the adding of the briquettes in Table 5 and Table 6, it is evident that the composition was not influenced significantly. The high carbon content is due to the slight dissolution of the bottom and top electrode. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the dissolving behavior of the briquettes in the slag when utilizing CaO as a substitute, and its influence on the chemical composition of slag and metal phase. The dissolution took place rapidly. The mass of charged briquettes was low compared to the amount of pre-molten slag and did not change the steel composition significantly. The target of substituting CaO additives with the briquettes seems to be achievable based on the good dissolution behavior.

4. Conclusions

The results show that the production of briquettes from metallurgical residues with the stamp press is feasible. Furthermore, these briquettes have sufficient physical properties, i.e., good abrasion resistance and compression strength over 25 MPa. The combination of different residues leads to briquettes that include only secondary raw materials, binders and fibers.
The thermal behavior of the investigated briquettes shows that a reduction of iron could take place during the heating of the briquettes and no abrupt release of gases takes place that could destroy the briquettes.
The pilot trials were a success because the briquettes influenced the steel and slag as expected. The mass of iron increased in the test with MA604B briquettes, thus indicating that an unwanted oxidation of the carbon had not taken place and the carbon reduced the iron oxides. The dissolving behavior of the lime-rich briquettes was good; a substitution of primary lime or limestone in the EAF-process could be possible.
The next step will focus on the industrial scale-up. This will include the production of 100 t of briquettes in total for industrial tests. These tests will be performed at steelmaking plants in three different types of electric arc furnaces.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W., M.A., D.M. and S.S.; validation, T.E. and M.A.; investigation, T.W., S.P., M.A., S.S. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, T.W., T.E., M.A. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, T.W., M.A., D.M. and S.P.; visualization, T.W., S.S., M.A., D.M. and S.P.; supervision, T.E., C.M. and T.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding by the European Commission from the Research Fund for Coal and Steel under grant agreement No 754197. This paper reflects only the author’s view and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Algermissen, D.; Morillon, A.; Wendler, B.; Kozariszczuk, M.; Cirilli, F.; Miceli, P. Control of Slag Quality for Utilisation in the Construction Industry (SLACON): Final Report; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017; Volume 28460. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stubbe, G.; Harp, G.; Marx, K.; Ebner, M.; Mirabile, D.; Pistelli, M.I. Upgrading and Utilisation of Residual Iron Oxide Materials for Hot Metal Production (URIOM): Final Report; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2013; Volume 25081. [Google Scholar]
  3. Derungs, P.; Brouhon, J.M.; Harp, G. Briquetting of Self-Reducing Blendings of Waste Iron Oxide Mixtures: Final Report; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2002; Volume 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wozniacki, Z.; Telejko, T.K. Sintering as the method of utilization of steelmaking dusts with a high content of zinc oxides. Hutnik-WH 2014, 81, 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stevart, C. Sustainability in Action: Recovery of Zinc from EAF Dust in the Steel Industry, 2015. Intergalva Conference, Liverpool, England, June 2015. Available online: http://www.icz.org.br/upfiles/arquivos/apresentacoes/intergalva-2015/5-2-Stewart.pdf (accessed on 24 April 2018).
  6. Palimaka, P.; Pietrzyk, S.; Stepien, M. Recycling of Zinc from the Steelmaking Dust in the Sintering Process. In Energy Technology 2017, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series; Zhang, L., Drelich, J.W., Neelameggham, N.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 181–189. ISBN 978-3-319-52191-6. [Google Scholar]
  7. Palimąka, P.; Pietrzyk, S.; Stępień, M.; Ciećko, K.; Nejman, I. Zinc Recovery from Steelmaking Dust by Hydrometallurgical Methods. Metals 2018, 8, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kuehn, M.; Cores, A.; Drissen, P.; Kuehn, M.; Jung, H.; Mernitz, J.; Richter, F.; Veneri, N. Efficient Utilisation of Raw Materials used in Secondary Metallurgy as Flux in Steelmaking Furnaces; ECSC research project N° 7210-PR-203, Final Report; Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg 2985: Luxembourg, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  9. Porisiensi, S. Recycling of Ladle Slag and Spent Refractories by Injection Into an EAF. Iron Steel Technol. 2004, 1, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
  10. Memoli, F.F.; Memoli, F.; Brioni, O.; Mapelli, C.; Guzzon, M.; Sonetti, O. Recycling of Ladle Slag in the EAF: A Way to Improve Environmental Conditions and Reduce Variable Costs in the Steel Plants—The results of Stefana SpA (Italy). In Iron & Steel Technology Conference Proceedings (AISTech); Association for Iron and Steel Technology: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2006; Volume II, pp. 1171–1179. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sahajwalla, V.; Guzzon, M.; Mapelli, C.; Sahajwalla, V.; Saha-Chaudhury, N.; Memoli, F.; Pustorino, M. Recycling Ladle Slag as Slag Former for EAF Steelmaking—A Study of Foaming Behavior. In Iron & Steel Technology Conference Proceedings (AISTech); Association for Iron and Steel Technology: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2007; Volume I, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schliephake, H. Sustainable stabilisation and reuse of ladle furnace slag from electric steelmaking. In Proceedings of the 7th European Slag Conference Proceedings, Aachen, Germany, 9–11 October 2013; pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  13. TMS; Grillo, F.F.; De Oliveira, P.J.R.; Espinosa, D.C.; Tenorio, P.J.A.S. Addition of Electric Arc Furnace Dusts in Hot Metal; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 361–367. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, Q.; Holmberg, N.; Björkman, B. EAF smelting trials of briquettes at Avesta Works of Outokumpu Stainless AB for recycling oily mill scale sludge from stainless steel production. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, Luleå, Sweden, 8–11 June 2008; pp. 561–570. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aalto, P.; Johansson, M. In-Plant Recycling of Dust and Sludge: Experience from the Oxyfines Concept. In Proceedings of the SCANMET II: 2nd International Conference on Process Development in Iron and Steelmaking, Lulea, Sweden, 6–9 June 2004; pp. 481–490. [Google Scholar]
  16. Akhmetov, A.B.; Baisanov, S.O.; Akhtanova, R.S.; Myshkin, O.N.; Kreimer, E.L.; Abdrakhmanov, A.K.; Sibgatullin, R.R. Reduction of iron from iron-carbon briquets in electrosmelting of steel. Steel Transl. 2007, 37, 702–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mizuno, K.; Kamiya, Y.; Yamada, T.; Inoue, M.; Soejima, H.; Enomoto, K.; Kaneko, T. Development of a new method of recycling stainless steel by products into EAF. SEAISI Q. 2007, 36, 66–72. [Google Scholar]
  18. Elanskii, G.N.; Babich, V.K.; Smirnov, G.A.; Perevalov, N.N. Oxide-carbon briquettes are a reserve for steelmaking shops. Steel Transl. 2001, 31, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  19. Echterhof, T.; Willms, T.; Preiß, S.; Omran, M.; Fabritius, T.; Mombelli, D.; Mapelli, C.; Steinlechner, S.; Unamuno, I.; Schüler, S.; et al. Developing a new process to agglomerate secondary raw material fines for recycling in the electric arc furnace—The Fines2EAF project. In Proceedings of the CLEAN TECH 4—The 4th European Conference on Clean Technologies in the Steel Industry, Bergamo, Italy, 28–29 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Steele, R.B.; Bizhanov, A.P. Stiff Extrusion Agglomeration of Arc Furnace Dust and Ore Fines For Recovery at a Ferro Alloy Smelter; JC Steel and Sons Inc.: New Orleans, LA, USA, 2011; Volume 32, pp. 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pietsch, W.B. Agglomeration Processes: Phenomena, Technologies, Equipment; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Echterhof, T.; Willms, T.; Preiss, S.; Aula, M.; Abdelrahim, A.; Fabritius, T.; Mombelli, D.; Mapelli, C.; Steinlechner, S.; Unamuno, I. Fabrication of Agglomerates from Secondary Raw Materials Reinforced with Paper Fibres by Stamp Pressing Process. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lotfian, S.; Ahmed, H.; Samuelsson, C.; El-Geassy, A.A. Alternative Reducing Agents in Metallurgical Processes: Gasification of Shredder Residue Material. J. Sustain. Met. 2016, 3, 336–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wei, Z.; Zhang, J.; Qin, B.; Dong, Y.; Lu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, W.; Zhang, Y. Reduction kinetics of hematite ore fines with H2 in a rotary drum reactor. Powder Technol. 2018, 332, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morandeau, A.; Thiery, M.; Dangla, P. Investigation of the carbonation mechanism of CH and C-S-H in terms of kinetics, microstructure changes and moisture properties. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. El-Didamony, H. Application of differential thermogravimetry to the hydration of expansive cement pastes. Thermochim. Acta 1980, 35, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Drobíková, K.; Plachá, D.; Motyka, O.; Gabor, R.; Kutláková, K.M.; Vallová, S.; Seidlerová, J. Recycling of blast furnace sludge by briquetting with starch binder: Waste gas from thermal treatment utilizable as a fuel. Waste Manag. 2016, 48, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kononov, R.; Ostrovski, O.; Ganguly, S. Carbothermal Solid State Reduction of Manganese Ores: 3. Phase Development. ISIJ Int. 2009, 49, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chart of the manufacturing process.
Figure 1. Chart of the manufacturing process.
Applsci 10 08309 g001
Figure 2. Photograph of the MA604B briquettes manufactured with a 10 N/mm2 manufacturing pressure.
Figure 2. Photograph of the MA604B briquettes manufactured with a 10 N/mm2 manufacturing pressure.
Applsci 10 08309 g002
Figure 3. EAF during operation (a) and tapping (b).
Figure 3. EAF during operation (a) and tapping (b).
Applsci 10 08309 g003
Figure 4. CC02 thermogravimetric analysis combined with mass spectroscopy (TGA-MS) diagram.
Figure 4. CC02 thermogravimetric analysis combined with mass spectroscopy (TGA-MS) diagram.
Applsci 10 08309 g004
Figure 5. Optical microscope microstructure of metallic material obtained after CC02 dilatometer test (Nital 2%).
Figure 5. Optical microscope microstructure of metallic material obtained after CC02 dilatometer test (Nital 2%).
Applsci 10 08309 g005
Figure 6. SEM-energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) local chemical composition of metallic material obtained after CC02 dilatometer test.
Figure 6. SEM-energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) local chemical composition of metallic material obtained after CC02 dilatometer test.
Applsci 10 08309 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of CC02 briquette after TGA-MS test.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of CC02 briquette after TGA-MS test.
Applsci 10 08309 g007
Figure 8. BC03 TGA-MS diagram.
Figure 8. BC03 TGA-MS diagram.
Applsci 10 08309 g008
Figure 9. FD13 TGA-MS diagram.
Figure 9. FD13 TGA-MS diagram.
Applsci 10 08309 g009
Figure 10. XRD pattern of FD13 briquette after TGA-MS test.
Figure 10. XRD pattern of FD13 briquette after TGA-MS test.
Applsci 10 08309 g010
Figure 11. MA604B TGA-MS diagram.
Figure 11. MA604B TGA-MS diagram.
Applsci 10 08309 g011
Table 1. Main components and physical properties of the electric arc furnace (EAF) residues.
Table 1. Main components and physical properties of the electric arc furnace (EAF) residues.
Al2O3CaOCr2O3MgOMnOP2O5SSiO2Fe Total as Fe2O3Fe2+Fe3+Fe MetMoistureBulk DensityTrue Density
Raw Materialwt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%%g/cm3g/cm3
Grinding sludge1.0690.1571.7390.1020.3200.4370.0853.57792.0924.10.359.224.7871.1925.302
Belt conveyer fines0.21490.081.0640.9951.4520.3370.2112.9791.759----1.0293.651
Oxy-cutting fines0.1701.2950.6540.3680.8150.5300.1881.06592.7216.451.50.34.731.8244.739
Com-bustion chamber dust1.9119.3011.2891.9503.4550.6310.1994.38964.0916.426.91.86.3972.1934.276
Ladle Furnace slag8.27246.650.04611.741.9840.5060.38827.521.421---0.1801.3203.239
Spent refractory3.69258.340.04124.121.8420.4870.0619.3321.411----1.8053.867
FeMnC-Dust 11.895.61-3.3858.810.06-9.652.67------
1 Rest in wt.-%: 9.86 K2O; 3.90 Na2O; 0.99 Cl.
Table 2. Recipes and preparation.
Table 2. Recipes and preparation.
Grinding SludgeBelt Conveyer FinesOxy-Cutting FinesCombustion Chamber DustInjection CoalLadle Furnace SlagSpent RefractoryFMCCa(OH)2Type 3 FibersStarch Type 6501H2O Addition
Recipewt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%wt.-%
CC02--36.235.915.6----0.94.07.4
BC03-63.4-------0.74.831.1
MA604B46.0-33.8-10.2----0.99.2-
MH51-----55.227.5--0.88.38.3
FD13----8.4--69.72.41.06.911.7
Table 3. Trial test procedures.
Table 3. Trial test procedures.
1st Trial2nd Trial
  • Overnight heating of the furnace by an electrical pre-heating device up to 400 °C
  • Ignition of the arc using petrol coke and charging of 15 kg of slag to ensure a liquid base in the furnace
  • After 25 min: slag entirely liquid, start of stepwise charging of construction steel scrap (17.04 kg)
  • After 45 min the entire feed material was liquid
  • Sampling (steel and slag), temperature measurement (1510 °C)
  • Adding of two briquettes MH51 (each 450 g)
  • After 5 min the feed briquettes were dissolved entirely
  • Sampling (steel and slag), temperature measurement (1585 °C)
  • Tapping
  • Overnight heating of the furnace by an electrical pre-heating device up to 400 °C
  • Ignition of the arc using petrol coke and charging of 10 kg of slag to ensure a liquid base in the furnace
  • Slag entirely liquid, start of stepwise charging of construction steel scrap (40 kg), after 165 min the entire feed material was liquid
  • Sampling (steel and slag), temperature measurement (1480 °C)
  • Stepwise adding of briquettes MA604B, due to the carbon content a noteworthy flame formation was objected. The charging of 10 kg of briquettes took 45 min after which the material was dissolved entirely
  • Sampling (steel and slag), temperature measurement (1530 °C)
  • Tapping
Table 4. SEM-EDS chemical composition of obtained metallic material after CC02 dilatometer test (% by weight).
Table 4. SEM-EDS chemical composition of obtained metallic material after CC02 dilatometer test (% by weight).
wt.-%CFAlSiSPCrVMnFe
General chemical composition6.2-0.20.20.1-0.8-0.692
Spectrum 23.0-0.20.2--0.5-0.595.7
Spectrum 35.11.30.1-0.2-2.90.10.789.6
Spectrum 440.5-0.10.1--0.5--58.8
Spectrum 54.1 0.20.20.20.20.7-0.793.7
Table 5. Summary of TGA-MS results.
Table 5. Summary of TGA-MS results.
SampleReaction 1Reaction 2Reaction 3Reaction 4
CC02Binder decomposition at 286 °C, fastReduction at 800–1400 °C
BC03Binder decomposition 200–500 °C, slowCaCO3 decomposition at 600–800 °C
FD13Binder decomposition at 222 °C, fastSlow water removal at 100–500 °CDecomposition of manganese ore at 670 °CReduction at 1100–1500 °C
MA604BEvaporation of free water at 109–200 °CSlow decomposition of binder at 200–400 °CSlow reduction at 700–1100 °CFast reduction at 1100–1250 °C
Table 6. Composition of the steel before and after adding the briquettes.
Table 6. Composition of the steel before and after adding the briquettes.
Recipein wt.-%FeCSiMnPSCrNiMoCuVSnN
MH51Steel sample before95.3>1.680.041.210.120.020.980.130.030.340.020.020.006
Steel sample after95.1>1.680.031.390.130.020.950.140.030.350.020.020.009
MA604BSteel sample before94.17>1.680.0041.180.060.020.40.090.020.170.020.020.02
Steel sample after93.62>1.680.0021.110.070.030.540.1090.030.20.020.020.02
Table 7. Composition of the slag before and after adding the briquettes.
Table 7. Composition of the slag before and after adding the briquettes.
Recipein wt.-%CaOSiO2MgOAl2O3MnOFe2O3Cr2O3TiO2S
MH51Slag sample before42.516.45.77.23.711.60.50.80.23
Slag sample after40.119.29.97.13.25.20.20.70.15
MA604BSlag sample before40.618.28.013.44.43.50.40.80.54
Slag sample after39.917.67.811.73.73.00.40.70.23
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Willms, T.; Echterhof, T.; Steinlechner, S.; Aula, M.; Abdelrahim, A.; Fabritius, T.; Mombelli, D.; Mapelli, C.; Preiss, S. Investigation on the Chemical and Thermal Behavior of Recycling Agglomerates from EAF by-Products. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228309

AMA Style

Willms T, Echterhof T, Steinlechner S, Aula M, Abdelrahim A, Fabritius T, Mombelli D, Mapelli C, Preiss S. Investigation on the Chemical and Thermal Behavior of Recycling Agglomerates from EAF by-Products. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(22):8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Willms, Thomas, Thomas Echterhof, Stefan Steinlechner, Matti Aula, Ahmed Abdelrahim, Timo Fabritius, Davide Mombelli, Carlo Mapelli, and Stefan Preiss. 2020. "Investigation on the Chemical and Thermal Behavior of Recycling Agglomerates from EAF by-Products" Applied Sciences 10, no. 22: 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228309

APA Style

Willms, T., Echterhof, T., Steinlechner, S., Aula, M., Abdelrahim, A., Fabritius, T., Mombelli, D., Mapelli, C., & Preiss, S. (2020). Investigation on the Chemical and Thermal Behavior of Recycling Agglomerates from EAF by-Products. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop