Next Article in Journal
Present Tectonic Dynamics of the Geological Structural Setting of the Eastern Part of the Adriatic Region Obtained from Geodetic and Geological Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Parametric Analysis of the Edge Capacitance of Uniform Slots and Application to Frequency-Variation Permittivity Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
Whole-Body Vibration Exercise: A Possible Intervention in the Management of Post COVID-19 Complications?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Complementary Metaresonator Sensor with Dual Notch Resonance for Evaluation of Vegetable Oils in C and X Bands

Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Jouf University, Skaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(12), 5734; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125734
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 16 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 21 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Technologies for Microwave and Wireless Sensors)

Abstract

:
This paper investigates the effect of complementary metaresonator for evaluation of vegetable oils in C and X bands. Tremendously increasing technology demands the exploration of complementary metaresonators for high performance in the related bands. This research probes the complementary mirror-symmetric S resonator (CMSSR) that can operate in two bands with compact size and high sensitivity features. The prime motivation behind the proposed technique is to utilize the dual notch resonance to estimate the dielectric constant of the oil under test (OUT). The proposed sensor is designed on a compact 30 × 25 mm 2 and 1.6 mm thick FR-4 substrate. A 50 Ω microstrip transmission line is printed on one side, while a unit cell of CMSSR is etched on the other side of the substrate to achieve dual notch resonance. A Teflon container is attached to CMSSR in the ground plane to act as a pool for the OUT. According to the simulated transmission spectrum, the proposed design manifested dual notch resonance precisely at 7.21 GHz (C band) and 8.97 GHz (X band). A prototype of complementary metaresonator sensor is fabricated and tested using CEYEAR AV3672D vector network analyzer. The comparison of measured and simulated data shows that the difference between the first resonance frequency is 0.01 GHz and the second is 0.04 GHz. Furthermore, a mathematical model is developed for the complementary metaresonator sensor to evaluate dielectric constant of the OUT in terms of the relevant, resonant frequency.

1. Introduction

Complementary metaresonator-based microwave sensors have high sensitivity, fast response time, broad sensing range, inexpensive fabrication, and high accuracy and are appropriate for diverse climates; therefore, these sensors are very popular in research and industrial applications. These sensors can be employed for the identification of electromagnetic properties of gases [1,2], liquids [3,4], and solids [5,6] in various frequency bands. Metamaterials were theoretically predicted by V. G. Veselago in 1968 [7] and experimentally verified by D. R. Smith in 2000 [8]. The main components of metamaterials are split-ring resonators (SRRs) [9] and complementary split-ring resonators (CSRRs) [10]. Recently, the development of theoretical and experimental models within the scope of microwave sensing using SRR and CSRR has led to the potential applications for biomedical [11,12], chemical [13,14], and electronic sector [15,16].
SRR was a superconducting resonator [17] before its introduction as a microstructure with imaginary magnetic permeability components. Initially, it was used to demonstrate left-handed behavior [18], negative refraction [19], backward wave radiation [20], negative group velocity [21], stopband [22], and passband filters [23]. Later on it was used to design alignment sensor [24], biosensor [25], displacement sensor [26], microfluidic sensor [27], rotation sensor [28], strain sensor [29], thin-film sensor [30], and velocity sensor [31]. SRR based sensors have a very narrow region for the electric field concentration between the splits at the resonance, which interacts with the material under test (MUT). These sensors are not suitable for testing large samples due to the small sensing area; CSRR solves this problem. By applying the babinet principle on SSR [32], its dual counterpart was introduced as CSRR. Initially, CSRR was used to design metamaterial transmission lines [33], passband [34] and stopband filters [35]. Later on, it was used to measure dielectric loss tangent [36], liquid characterization [37], thickness measurement [38], and evaluation of permittivity [39].
In the recent past, several techniques have been proposed to calculate the dielectric properties of oil samples [40,41,42,43]. In [40], a single port sensor based on CSRR is presented to detect adulteration of edible oils with a minimum frequency shift of 14 MHz in the X band. An analytical method is proposed in [41] to calculate the dielectric constant and loss tangent of oils based on a CSRR sensor with a resonant frequency of 2.5 GHz and an average sensitivity of 3.58%. In [42], a metamaterial sensor operating at millimeter-wave is designed to evaluate the oils and their chemical characteristics with a frequency shift of 1.12 GHz. A submersible single-port microwave sensor is presented in [43] to evaluate the complex permittivity of oils based on multiple complementary SRR with a resonant frequency of 8.49 GHz and an average sensitivity 7.25%. However, the aforementioned sensors have sensitivity limitations due to noncompact structure design and minor interaction of electromagnetic fields with the OUT. Furthermore, most of the proposed sensors for oil testing are based on single resonance frequency, which causes low precision and less accuracy in measurement.
This paper proposes a dual notch metaresonator sensor with high sensitivity, compact size, low cost, and convenient operation. The proposed complementary mirror-symmetric S resonator (CMSSR) shows dual notch resonance in the C and X bands. The CMSSR is coupled electrically with the microstrip transmission line for excitation, and a Teflon container is attached to the CMSSR, which makes it suitable for oil characterization. The unique design of the proposed metaresonator sensor and simulation analysis is explained in Section 2. Measurement setup and characterization of oil samples are accomplished in Section 3. Mathematical modeling of the measured data is performed in Section 4. Finally, the main results and technical contributions are summarized in Section 5.

2. Design of Metaresonator Sensor

The design of the proposed sensor is straightforward with five different layers, as shown in Figure 1. The first layer consists of 0.035 mm thick copper in a 3 mm microstrip transmission line (MTL) configuration. The second layer comprises a 1.6 mm FR-4 substrate with the dimensions 30 mm × 25 mm. The relative permittivity ( ϵ r ) and dielectric loss tangent ( t a n δ ) of FR-4 substrate are 4.4 and 0.02, respectively. The effective dielectric constant ( ϵ r e ) of MTL is 3.326, and characteristic impedance ( Z c ) is 50 Ω . These parameters ( ϵ r e and Z c ) are calculated using the following equations [44]:
ϵ r e = ϵ r + 1 2 + ϵ r 1 2 1 + 10 u a b ,
where u = w / h , a = 1 + 1 49 l n u 4 + u 52 2 u 4 + 0.432 + 1 18.7 l n 1 + u 18.1 3 , and b = 0.564 ϵ r 0.9 ϵ r + 3 0.053 .
Z c = η 2 π ϵ r e l n F u + 1 + 2 u 2 ,
where u = w / h , η = 120 π Ω , and F = 6 + 2 π 6 e x p 30.666 u 0.7528 .
Complementary mirror-symmetric S resonator (CMSSR) is etched in the third layer known as the ground plane. The fourth layer consists of 0.01 mm thick polyimide double-sided adhesive film, which is used to connect the third and fifth layers. The fifth layer consists of a 1 mm thick Teflon container that will act as a pool for OUT.
The size of the CMSSR resonator is 6 mm × 6 mm, and the width of resonator lines is 0.5 mm. The effect of geometrical dimensions on the bandwidth and unloaded Q factor is already discussed in Reference [45]. According to [45], the maximum value of the Q factor is achieved using a 0.5 mm wide resonator. The substrate and pool material are selected due to low cost, and the thickness is chosen due to easy availability. The proposed metaresonator sensor is simulated in ANSYS Electronics Suite 2021 with the conditions given in Table 1. The magnitude and phase of transmission ( S 21 ) and reflection ( S 11 ) coefficients for the metaresonator sensor are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The simulated transmission spectrum shows that the metaresonator sensor provides dual notch resonance with wide bandwidth. The first and second notch has a resonance at 7.21 GHz with a notch depth of −23.85 dB, and 8.97 GHz with a notch depth of −21.57 dB, respectively. The unloaded quality (Q) factor of first notch is 55.38, and that of the second notch is 21.26. The unloaded (Q) factor of the metaresonator sensor is measured by the S 21 using the following equation [46]:
Q = f r Δ f 3 d B .

3. Measurement Setup

For experimental verification, the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor was fabricated using standard PCB fabrication technique and measured on CEYEAR AV3672D series vector network analyzer (VNA), as shown in Figure 4. The VNA is calibrated with a frequency sweep of 4 GHz to 12 GHz and a step size of 0.01 GHz. The fabricated prototype of the complementary metaresonator sensor is connected to VNA using SMA connectors, and S 21 is measured. The measured resonance frequency of the first notch is 7.20 GHz and the second notch is 8.93 GHz, as shown in Figure 5. The percentage errors between the measured and simulated results for the first and second notch are 0.13% and 0.44%, respectively. Figure 6 shows the measurement environment for oil characterization, and a single adjustable channel automatic pipette (Dragon Lab, 10–100 µL) is used to measure the quantity of oils. The quantity of each OUT is chosen 40 µL to fill the Teflon container, and measurements are performed at room temperature. Measurements are taken very carefully to characterize the oils with dielectric constant ranges from 2.52 to 4.47. The dielectric and chemical properties of common available vegetable oils are given in Table 2. Figure 7 shows the complementary metaresonator sensor loaded with the OUT. In order to reduce the contamination of the previous OUT, the sensor is cleaned with alcohol using a cotton ball. Before the subsequent measurement, it ensures that the alcohol is evaporated and the resonance frequency of the unloaded sensor is returned to its original state. Four samples of vegetable oils are used to measure the S 21 of the sensor as shown in Figure 8, and results are listed in Table 3. The effect of the dielectric constant of the OUT on the resonance frequencies of the complementary metaresonator sensor is shown in Figure 9.
In Figure 9, the slopes of the first (red curve), and second (blue curve) curves provide the fabricated metaresonator sensor’s sensitivity, which can be measured mathematically using the following relation [48]:
S = f d ϵ r d = lim ( Δ ϵ r 2 Δ ϵ r 1 ) 0 Δ f u Δ f l Δ ϵ r 2 Δ ϵ r 1 .
Using (4), the sensitivity of the complementary metaresonator sensor is calculated and tabulated in Table 4. The sensitivity of second resonance is higher than the first resonance due to the higher resonance frequency for all the OUTs. The sensitivity of corn oil is maximum due to small dielectric constant. The sensitivity due to the first resonance frequency lies between 31.4% to 27% and that due to the second resonance is between 46.5% and 39.4%.

4. Mathematical Modeling for Oil Characterization

The mathematical model for the measured data is obtained using the curve fitting technique. To achieve the best fitting curve, the technique of least squares is used. According to this technique, the sum of deviation must be minimum for a best fitting curve [49]:
1 n e i 2 = 1 n y i f x i 2 ,
where e i is the deviation, x is the independent variable and y is the dependent variable. The least error (E) for the best fitting polynomial y = a 1 + a 2 x + a 3 x 2 is:
E = 1 n e i 2 = 1 n y i a 1 + a 2 x i + a 3 x i 2 2 ,
For E to be minimum, the following conditions are compulsory: E a = 0 , E b = 0 , and E c = 0 . By applying these conditions to Equation (6), the unknown coefficients ( a 1 , a 2 , and a 3 ) for the best fitted polynomial are calculated in the form of the following matrix:
a 1 a 2 a 3 = n x i x i 2 x i x i 2 x i 3 x i 2 x i 3 x i 4 1 y i x i y i x i 2 y i ,
The best fitting polynomial for the complementary metaresonator sensor can be expressed as:
f i = a 1 + a 2 ϵ r + a 3 ϵ r 2 ,
where f i is the dependent variable and ϵ r is the independent variable. For the first and second resonance of the fabricated complementary metaresonator sensor, the unknown coefficients ( a 1 , a 2 , and a 3 ) are calculated using matrix (7), and the results given in Table 3. The equations for f 1 and f 2 are given as:
f 1 = 7.362 0.221 ϵ r 0.007 ϵ r 2 ,
f 2 = 9.234 1.079 ϵ r 0.0005 ϵ r 2 .
Equations (9) and (10) are used to calculated to the resonance frequencies of the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with the OUT and tabulated in Table 5. The measured and formulated results are very close to each other. The complementary metaresonator sensor is compared for sensitivity and application with others available sensors in the literature. The sensitivity of proposed complementary metaresonator sensor is high as compared to other state-of-the-art sensors, as tabulated in Table 6.

5. Conclusions

In this work, a dual notch complementary metaresonator sensor is designed, simulated, fabricated, and measured to evaluate vegetable oils. Furthermore, a mathematical model for the proposed sensor is obtained using the least square curve-fitting technique, and a good agreement is achieved between measured and formulated results. The complementary metaresonator sensor is based on five layers: one FR-4, one polyimide, one Teflon, and two copper layers. A complementary mirror-symmetric S resonator (CMSSR) unit is used as a metaresonator with some unique features like dual notch resonance, strong electromagnetic field concentration, and high sensitivity. The sensitivity of the first notch is 31.4%, and that of the second notch is 46.5%, of the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with the corn oil. The normalized average sensitivity of the proposed metaresonator sensor is high compared to that of the other microwave sensors. Due to its unique design, broad sensing range, and high sensitivity, evaluating the vegetable oils with a very close dielectric constant is possible. The simple and inexpensive fabrication makes the proposed sensor very attractive for the oil industry.

Author Contributions

A.A. designed, simulated, fabricated, and measured the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor with technical help from INZA Research Laboratory for Electromagnetic Field and Microwave Engineering. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author extends his appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University for funding this work through research grant No 466/39.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, F.; Zheng, Y.; Hua, C.; Jian, J. Gas sensing by microwave transduction: Review of progress and challenges. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, J.K.; Kang, T.G.; Kim, B.H.; Lee, H.J.; Choi, H.H.; Yook, J.G. Real-time Humidity Sensor Based on Microwave Resonator Coupled with PEDOT:PSS Conducting Polymer Film. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zhang, X.; Ruan, C.; Haq, T.; Chen, K. High-Sensitivity Microwave Sensor for Liquid Characterization Using a Complementary Circular Spiral Resonator. Sensors 2019, 19, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, K.; Amineh, R.K.; Dong, Z.; Nadler, D. Microwave Sensing of Water Quality. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 69481–69493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, X.; Ullah, S.; Fahad, A.K. Complementary Metamaterial based Dual Notch Microwave Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, X.; Ullah, S.; Fahad, A.K. Microwave Sensor Based on Complementary Spiral Resonator with Fitting Equation to Evaluate Dielectric Substrates. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Guangzhou, China, 19–22 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Veselago, V.G. The electrodynamics of substances with simultaneously negative values of ϵ and µ. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi 1968, 10, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, D.R.; Padilla, W.J.; Vier, D.C.; Nemat-Nasser, S.C.; Schultz, S. Composite medium with simultaneously negative permeability and permittivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 4184–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Falcone, F.; Lopetegi, T.; Baena, J. Effective Negative-ϵ Stopband Microstrip Lines Based on Complementary Split Ring Resonators. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2004, 14, 280–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pendry, J.B.; Holden, A.J.; Robbins, D.J.; Stewart, W.J. Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1999, 47, 2075–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Omer, A.E.; Shaker, G.; Safavi-Naeini, S.; Kokabi, H.; Alquié, G.; Deshours, F.; Shubair, R.M. Low-cost portable microwave sensor for non-invasive monitoring of blood glucose level: Novel design utilizing a four-cell CSRR hexagonal configuration. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zarifi, M.H.; Sadabadi, H.; Hejazi, S.H.; Daneshmand, M.; Sanati-Nezhad, A. Noncontact and Nonintrusive Microwave-Microfluidic Flow Sensor for Energy and Biomedical Engineering. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ebrahimi, A.; Tovar-Lopez, F.J.; Scott, J.; Ghorbani, K. Differential microwave sensor for characterization of glycerol–water solutions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 321, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Javed, A.; Arif, A.; Zubair, M.; Mehmood, M.Q.; Riaz, K. A Low-Cost Multiple Complementary Split-Ring Resonator-Based Microwave Sensor for Contactless Dielectric Characterization of Liquids. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 11326–11334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, X.; Ullah, S. Complementary Metamaterial Sensor for Nondestructive Evaluation of Dielectric Substrates. Sensors 2019, 19, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Fan, L.C.; Zhao, W.S.; Gan, H.Y.; He, L.; Liu, Q.; Dong, L.; Wang, G. A high-Q active substrate integrated waveguide based sensor for fully characterizing magneto-dielectric (MD) materials. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 301, 111778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Delayen, J.R.; Dick, G.J.; Mercereau, J.E. Test of A β≃ 0.1 superconducting split ring resonator. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1981, 17, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marqués, R.; Martel, J.; Mesa, F.; Medina, F. Left-Handed-Media Simulation and Transmission of EM Waves in Subwavelength Split-Ring-Resonator-Loaded Metallic Waveguides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Eleftheriades, G.V.; Iyer, A.K.; Kremer, P.C. Planar negative refractive index media using periodically L-C loaded transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2002, 50, 2702–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grbic, A.; Eleftheriades, G.V. Experimental verification of backward-wave radiation from a negative refractive index metamaterial. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 5930–5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Siddiqui, O.F.; Mojahedi, M.; Eleftheriades, G.V. Periodically Loaded Transmission Line with Effective Negative Refractive Index and Negative Group Velocity. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2003, 51, 2619–2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martín, F.; Falcone, F.; Bonache, J.; Marqués, R.; Sorolla, M. Miniaturized Coplanar Waveguide Stop Band Filters Based on Multiple Tuned Split Ring Resonators. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2003, 13, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Falcone, F.; Martín, F.; Bonache, J.; Marqués, R.; Lopetegi, T.; Sorolla, M. Left Handed Coplanar Waveguide Band Pass Filters Based on Bi-layer Split Ring Resonators. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2004, 14, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naqui, J.; Durán-Sindreu, M.; Martín, F. Alignment and position sensors based on split ring resonators. Sensors 2012, 12, 11790–11797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, H.J.; Lee, H.S.; Yoo, K.H.; Yook, J.G. DNA sensing using split-ring resonator alone at microwave regime. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mata-Contreras, J.; Herrojo, C.; Martin, F. Application of Split Ring Resonator (SRR) Loaded Transmission Lines to the Design of Angular Displacement and Velocity Sensors for Space Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2017, 65, 4450–4460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wiltshire, B.D.; Rafi, M.A.; Zarifi, M.H. Microwave resonator array with liquid metal selection for narrow band material sensing. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ebrahimi, A.; Withayachumnankul, W.; Al-Sarawi, S.F.; Abbott, D. Metamaterial-inspired rotation sensor with wide dynamic range. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 2609–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Thai, T.T.; Aubert, H.; Pons, P.; Dejean, G.; Mtentzeris, M.; Plana, R. Novel design of a highly sensitive RF strain transducer for passive and remote sensing in two dimensions. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2013, 61, 1385–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Galindo-Romera, G.; Javier Herraiz-Martínez, F.; Gil, M.; Martínez-Martínez, J.J.; Segovia-Vargas, D. Submersible Printed Split-Ring Resonator-Based Sensor for Thin-Film Detection and Permittivity Characterization. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 3587–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Herrojo, C.; Mata-Contreras, J.; Paredes, F.; Martín, F. Microwave Encoders for Chipless RFID and Angular Velocity Sensors Based on S-Shaped Split Ring Resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 17, 4805–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Falcone, F.; Lopetegi, T.; Laso, M.A.G.; Baena, J.D.; Bonache, J.; Beruete, M.; Marques, R.; Martín, F.; Sorolla, M. Babinet principle applied to the design of metasurfaces and metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Bonache, J.; Gil, M.; Gil, I.; García-garcía, J.; Martín, F. On the Electrical Characteristics of Complementary Metamaterial Resonators. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2006, 16, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haq, T.; Khan, M.F.; Siddiqui, O.F. Design and implementation of waveguide bandpass filter using complementary metaresonator. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2016, 122, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Ullah, S.; Kosar, A. Reconfigurable Ultra Wide Band Notch Filter based on Complementary Metamaterial. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Auckland, New Zealand, 5–8 August 2018; pp. 381–382. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, C.S.; Yang, C.L. Complementary split-ring resonators for measuring dielectric constants and loss tangents. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2014, 24, 563–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ebrahimi, A.; Scott, J.; Ghorbani, K. Ultrahigh-Sensitivity Microwave Sensor for Microfluidic Complex Permittivity Measurement. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2019, 67, 4269–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, C.; Lee, C.; Chen, K.; Chen, K. Noncontact Measurement of Complex Permittivity and Thickness by Using Planar Resonators. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2016, 64, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, X.; Ullah, S.; Fahad, A.K.; He, W. Extremely sensitive microwave sensor for evaluation of dielectric characteristics of low-permittivity materials. Sensors 2020, 20, 1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Tiwari, N.K.; Singh, S.P.; Akhtar, M.J. Novel Improved Sensitivity Planar Microwave Probe for Adulteration Detection in Edible Oils. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2019, 29, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, L.; Mata-Contreras, J.; Vélez, P.; Fernández-Prieto, A.; Martín, F. Analytical method to estimate the complex permittivity of oil samples. Sensors 2018, 18, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Qureshi, S.A.; Abidin, Z.Z.; Ashyap, A.Y.I.; Majid, H.A.; Kamarudin, M.R.; Yue, M.; Zulkipli, M.S.; Nebhen, J. Millimetre-Wave Metamaterial-Based Sensor for Characterisation of Cooking Oils. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2021, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Ruan, C.; Wang, W.; Cao, Y. Submersible High Sensitivity Microwave Sensor for Edible Oil Detection and Quality Analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 1, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hong, J.-S. Microstrip Filters for RF/Microwave Applications; Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2011; ISBN 9780470408773. [Google Scholar]
  45. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Zhang, X.; Kosar, A.; Ullah, S. Low cost and compact wideband microwave notch filter based on miniaturized complementary metaresonator. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2019, 125, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Arif Hussain Ansari, M.; Jha, A.K.; Akhter, Z.; Jaleel Akhtar, M. Multi-Band RF Planar Sensor Using Complementary Split Ring Resonator for Testing of Dielectric Materials. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 6596–6606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohamad, N.A.; Azis, N.; Jasni, J.; Ab Kadir, M.Z.A.; Yunus, R.; Ishak, M.T.; Yaakub, Z. A study on the dielectric properties of Palm Oil and Coconut Oil. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy (PECon), Kuching, Malaysia, 1–3 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  48. Haq, T.; Ruan, C.; Ullah, S.; Kosar Fahad, A. Dual Notch Microwave Sensors Based on Complementary Metamaterial Resonators. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 153489–153498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Armghan, A.; Alanaz, T.M.; Altaf, A.; Haq, T. Characterization of Dielectric Substrates Using Dual Band Microwave Sensor. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 62779–62787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Memon, M.U.; Lim, S. Millimeter-wave chemical sensor using substrate-integrated-waveguide cavity. Appl. Sens. 2016, 16, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Chuma, E.L.; Iano, Y.; Fontgalland, G.; Bravo Roger, L.L. Microwave sensor for liquid dielectric characterization based on metamaterial complementary split ring resonator. IEEE Sens. J. 2018, 18, 9978–9983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Herrera-Sepulveda, L.V.; Olvera-Cervantes, J.L.; Corona-Chavez, A.; Kaur, T. Sensor and methodology for determining dielectric constant using electrically coupled resonators. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Components Lett. 2019, 29, 626–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Juan, C.G.; Potelon, B.; Quendo, C.; Bronchalo, E.; Sabater-Navarro, J.M. Highly-Sensitive Glucose Concentration Sensor Exploiting Inter-resonators Couplings. In Proceedings of the 49th European Microwave ConferenceAt, Paris, France, 1–3 October 2019; pp. 662–665. [Google Scholar]
  54. Juan, C.G.; Bronchalo, E.; Potelon, B.; Quendo, C.; Ávila-Navarro, E.; Sabater-Navarro, J.M. Concentration Measurement of Microliter-Volume Water-Glucose Solutions Using Q Factor of Microwave Sensors. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2019, 68, 2621–2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mohammadi, S.; Nadaraja, A.V.; Luckasavitch, K.; Jain, M.C.; June Roberts, D.; Zarifi, M.H. A Label-Free, Non-Intrusive, and Rapid Monitoring of Bacterial Growth on Solid Medium Using Microwave Biosensor. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2020, 14, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdulkarim, Y.I.; Deng, L.; Karaaslan, M.; Altıntaş, O.; Awl, H.N.; Muhammadsharif, F.F.; Liao, C.; Unal, E.; Luo, H. Novel metamaterials-based hypersensitized liquid sensor integrating omega-shaped resonator with microstrip transmission line. Sensors 2020, 20, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ebrahimi, A.; Scott, J.; Ghorbani, K. Microwave reflective biosensor for glucose level detection in aqueous solutions. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 301, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zarifi, M.H.; Daneshmand, M. Liquid sensing in aquatic environment using high quality planar microwave resonator. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 225, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Velez, P.; Su, L.; Grenier, K.; Mata-Contreras, J.; Dubuc, D.; Martin, F. Microwave Microfluidic Sensor Based on a Microstrip Splitter/Combiner Configuration and Split Ring Resonators (SRRs) for Dielectric Characterization of Liquids. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 6589–6598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Su, L.; Mata-Contreras, J.; Vélez, P.; Martín, F. Configurations of splitter/combiner microstrip sections loaded with stepped impedance resonators (SIRs) for sensing applications. Sensors 2016, 16, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Su, L.; Mata-Contreras, J.; Vélez, P.; Martín, F. Splitter/Combiner Microstrip Sections Loaded With Pairs of Complementary Split Ring Resonators Differential Sensing Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2016, 64, 4362–4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Three dimensional view of complementary metaresonator sensor. (a) Top view of the sensor where w = 3 mm, (b) Bottom view of the sensor, (c) Dimetric view of the sensor where h = 1.6 mm.
Figure 1. Three dimensional view of complementary metaresonator sensor. (a) Top view of the sensor where w = 3 mm, (b) Bottom view of the sensor, (c) Dimetric view of the sensor where h = 1.6 mm.
Applsci 11 05734 g001
Figure 2. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) and reflection ( S 11 ) coefficients for the metaresonator sensor. The first and second notches have a resonance at 7.21 GHz with notch depth −23.85 dB and 8.97 GHz with notch depth −21.57 dB.
Figure 2. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) and reflection ( S 11 ) coefficients for the metaresonator sensor. The first and second notches have a resonance at 7.21 GHz with notch depth −23.85 dB and 8.97 GHz with notch depth −21.57 dB.
Applsci 11 05734 g002
Figure 3. The phase of transmission ( S 21 ) and reflection ( S 11 ) coefficients for the metaresonator sensor. Near resonance frequencies, there is sudden change in phase.
Figure 3. The phase of transmission ( S 21 ) and reflection ( S 11 ) coefficients for the metaresonator sensor. Near resonance frequencies, there is sudden change in phase.
Applsci 11 05734 g003
Figure 4. (a) Photograph of CEYEAR AV3672D series vector network for measurement, (b) fabricated prototype of the complementary metaresonator sensor.
Figure 4. (a) Photograph of CEYEAR AV3672D series vector network for measurement, (b) fabricated prototype of the complementary metaresonator sensor.
Applsci 11 05734 g004
Figure 5. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) coefficient for simulated and measured metaresonator sensor. The unloaded Q factor of the first notch is 55.38 and that of the second notch is 21.26.
Figure 5. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) coefficient for simulated and measured metaresonator sensor. The unloaded Q factor of the first notch is 55.38 and that of the second notch is 21.26.
Applsci 11 05734 g005
Figure 6. Measurement environment (a) dragon lab 10–100 µL adjustable single channel automatic pipette, (b) oil quantity measurement, (c) pouring the OUT into the Teflon container.
Figure 6. Measurement environment (a) dragon lab 10–100 µL adjustable single channel automatic pipette, (b) oil quantity measurement, (c) pouring the OUT into the Teflon container.
Applsci 11 05734 g006
Figure 7. Complementary metaresonator sensor loaded with the OUT.
Figure 7. Complementary metaresonator sensor loaded with the OUT.
Applsci 11 05734 g007
Figure 8. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) coefficients for the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with different OUT.
Figure 8. The magnitude of transmission ( S 21 ) coefficients for the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with different OUT.
Applsci 11 05734 g008
Figure 9. Dielectric constant of OUT versus the resonance frequency of the sensor due to interaction with the OUTs.
Figure 9. Dielectric constant of OUT versus the resonance frequency of the sensor due to interaction with the OUTs.
Applsci 11 05734 g009
Table 1. Simulation conditions for ANSYS Electromagnetics Suite 2020R1.
Table 1. Simulation conditions for ANSYS Electromagnetics Suite 2020R1.
Analysis AreaSize25 × 30 × 1.6 mm 3
Boundary ConditionRadiation
CellsNumber14,201
ShapeTetrahedron
FeedWave port (50 Ω)
Solution TypeDriven Model
Frequency Sweep0.1 GHz to 30 GHz
Convergence condition determinationMaximum number of passes; 20
Maximum delta S; 0.02
Table 2. Dielectric and chemical properties of OUT [42,47].
Table 2. Dielectric and chemical properties of OUT [42,47].
NameChemical NameMolecular FormulaIodine Contents (gI 2 /100 g)Dielectric ConstantDielectric Loss Tangent
Corn Oil--1102.5260.0566
Coconut OilTrilaurin C 3 H 5 ( C 12 H 23 O 2 ) 3 -2.83-
Olive OilTriolein C 3 H 5 ( C 18 H 33 O 2 ) 3 843.3520.0331
Castor OilTriricinolein C 3 H 5 ( C 18 H 33 O 3 ) 3 854.470.0322
Table 3. Measured S 21 for the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with different OUT.
Table 3. Measured S 21 for the complementary metaresonator sensor due to interaction with different OUT.
Oil Under Test (OUT)Dielectric ConstantMeasured First Resonance Frequency (GHz)Notch Depth (dB)Measured Second Resonance Frequency (GHz)Notch Depth (dB)
Air1.00067.20−23.518.93−21.57
Corn Oil2.5266.72−18.718.22−20.21
Coconut Oil2.836.64−18.398.12−20.14
Olive Oil3.3526.50−19.287.91−21.06
Castor Oil4.476.26−18.437.56−21.11
Table 4. Relative sensitivity of the complementary metaresonator sensor with respect to OUT.
Table 4. Relative sensitivity of the complementary metaresonator sensor with respect to OUT.
Oil Under Test (OUT)Dielectric ConstantSensitivity of First Resonance (%)Sensitivity of Second Resonance (%)
Corn Oil2.52631.446.5
Coconut Oil2.8330.644.2
Olive Oil3.35229.743.3
Castor Oil4.472739.4
Table 5. Comparison of measured and formulated resonance frequencies of the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor.
Table 5. Comparison of measured and formulated resonance frequencies of the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor.
Oil Under Test (OUT)Dielectric ConstantMeasured f 1 (GHz)Formulated f 1 (GHz)Measured f 2 (GHz)Formulated f 2 (GHz)
Air1.00067.207.138.938.85
Corn Oil2.5266.726.758.228.26
Coconut Oil2.836.646.678.128.15
Olive Oil3.3526.506.537.917.94
Castor Oil4.476.266.227.567.51
Table 6. Comparison of the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor with various state of art sensors.
Table 6. Comparison of the proposed complementary metaresonator sensor with various state of art sensors.
ReferencesSensor DesignMethod of SensingOperating Frequency (GHz)Sensitivity (GHz)Applications
[41]CSRRTransmission Coefficient S212.520.08Oil Characterization
[50]SIWReflection Coefficient S11160.14Chemical
[51]CSRRTransmission Coefficient S2.30.1Water-Ethanol Mixtures
[52]ECRsElectric Coupling Coefficient ke--Dielectric Materials
[53]OLSIRElectric Coupling4.40-Glucose Concentration
[54]OLMRUnloaded Q factor1.920.46Glucose Concentration
[55]PSRRTransmission Coefficient S211.90.2Bacterial Growth
[56]OmegaTransmission Coefficient S2120.05Methanol
[57]M-CRRTransmission Coefficient S212.40.06Liquids
[58]PMWRTransmission Coefficient S211.50.01Liquids
[59]SRRsTransmission Coefficient S210.870.07Liquids
[60]SIRsTransmission Coefficient S2130.05Dielectric Materials
[61]CSRRsTransmission Coefficient S211.70.03Substrates
ProposedCMSSRTransmission Coefficient S217.200.48Vegetable Oils
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Armghan, A. Complementary Metaresonator Sensor with Dual Notch Resonance for Evaluation of Vegetable Oils in C and X Bands. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5734. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125734

AMA Style

Armghan A. Complementary Metaresonator Sensor with Dual Notch Resonance for Evaluation of Vegetable Oils in C and X Bands. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(12):5734. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Armghan, Ammar. 2021. "Complementary Metaresonator Sensor with Dual Notch Resonance for Evaluation of Vegetable Oils in C and X Bands" Applied Sciences 11, no. 12: 5734. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125734

APA Style

Armghan, A. (2021). Complementary Metaresonator Sensor with Dual Notch Resonance for Evaluation of Vegetable Oils in C and X Bands. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5734. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop