Next Article in Journal
Study on Accuracy of CFD Simulations of Wind Environment around High-Rise Buildings: A Comparative Study of k-ε Turbulence Models Based on Polyhedral Meshes and Wind Tunnel Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Imaging Fall Detection Based on Spectral Signatures Obtained Using a Micro-Doppler Millimeter-Wave Radar
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting Rock Brittleness Using a Robust Evolutionary Programming Paradigm and Regression-Based Feature Selection Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles in Water Using Surface-Functionalized Terahertz Microfluidic Metamaterials

1
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
2
Department of Physics and Department of Energy Systems Research, Ajou University, Suwon 16499, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7102; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147102
Submission received: 11 June 2022 / Revised: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Terahertz Sensing and Imaging)

Abstract

:
We propose a novel method for detecting microplastic particles in water using terahertz metamaterials. Fluidic channels are employed to flow the water, containing polystyrene spheres, on the surface of the metamaterials. Polystyrene spheres are captured only near the gap structure of the metamaterials as the gap areas are functionalized. The resonant frequency of terahertz metamaterials increased while we circulated the microplastic solution, as polystyrene spheres in the solution are attached to the metamaterial gap areas, which saturates at a specific frequency as the gap areas are filled by the polystyrene spheres. Experimental results were revisited and supported by finite-difference time-domain simulations. We investigated how this method can be used for the detection of microplastics with various solution densities. The saturation time of the resonant frequency shift was found to decrease, while the saturated resonant frequency shift increased as the solution density increased.

1. Introduction

Microplastics are defined as plastic particles with a size between 1 µm and 5 mm, which have become a tremendous issue for the aquatic environment [1,2], and subsequently may affect human health through the food chain [2]. For example, microbeads composed of either polyethylene, polypropylene, or polystyrene have been used in various hygiene products such as toothpaste, shampoo, conditioner, and body wash and have been found to be accumulated in seafood, oceans, freshwater lakes, and rivers [3,4,5,6]. It was reported that the typical size of microbeads detected in bottled water is between 1 and 5 µm [7]. Various methods including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman spectroscopy have been employed to both qualitatively and quantitatively monitor microplastics in aquatic environments [8,9,10]. However, their limitations in measurement time, target particle size, and complex pre-treatment steps (e.g., density separation) make developing novel in-situ detection methods for microplastics in water environments imperative [2].
Metamaterials are artificially designed structures that interact with electromagnetic waves at a specific frequency, determined by their geometrical parameters and surrounding dielectric environment [11,12,13]. The inductive–capacitive (LC) resonance mode in metamaterials, described by f 0 = 1 / 2 π L C , where L is the inductance and C is the capacitance of the gap area, has been extensively investigated in biosensing research owing to its controllability and high sensitivity [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. It is noteworthy that it has been demonstrated that metamaterials operating in the terahertz (THz) frequency range offer ideal platforms for dielectric sensing, more specifically for sensing a few micron-sized target materials such as fungi, and bacteria in ambient and aqueous environments [23,24,25,26]. Additionally, the sensitivity of THz metamaterials as a function of the relative position of the polystyrene microbead has been recently studied explicitly [27].
Therefore, it is pertinent to exploit THz metamaterials to develop novel microplastic sensors working in water environments. As the detection volume of THz metamaterials is strongly confined to the region near the surface of the metamaterials [15,28], a fluidic channel with a thin water layer can be integrated into the metamaterials to minimize the THz absorption from water and flow the microplastic solution on the surface of the metamaterials [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Further to this, the gap area of the metamaterials could be functionalized to capture the microplastics only near the gap structure of the metamaterials where the actual detection occurs [27]. However, the in situ detection of microplastics using functionalized THz metamaterials devices in water environments has not been demonstrated yet.
Here, we investigated a new approach to detecting microplastics in aqueous environments using surface-functionalized THz microfluidic metamaterials that can overcome the limitation of existing methods based on FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. The fast circulation technique has been employed to enhance the detection speed and sensitivity for sensing microplastics in aqueous environments. We monitored the change in the resonant frequency of the metamaterials with in situ THz spectroscopy while circulating the microplastic solution on the surface-functionalized metamaterials using fluidic channel devices. Finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations were performed to understand the experimental results. Additionally, we studied the saturation behavior in the resonant frequency shift as polystyrene-microplastic spheres (PS) were attached to the gap area of the metamaterials for various PS solution densities.

2. Results and Discussions

Fluidic channel devices that incorporate the functionalized metamaterials were fabricated as shown schematically in Figure 1a,b. The key idea is that the gap areas of metamaterials are filled by the target materials while the PS solution is continuously circulated as the gap area are functionalized. We note that plasmonic and metamaterial sensors generally address the density of target material at the sensor surface [16,23,37], while it is the volume density that is required for sensing in the aqueous environment. We monitored the change in the resonant frequency of the metamaterials with in situ THz spectroscopy while injecting the PS solution into the fluidic device. The transmission amplitudes of THz metamaterial devices were obtained from a conventional in situ THz time-domain spectroscopy system with an acquisition time of 4 s as described elsewhere [38,39].
A conventional photolithography method was used to pattern metamaterials on a high-resistivity Si substrate with a thickness of 550 µm. Cr/Au (2 nm/98 nm) metal layers were deposited to define the arrays of the split-ring resonator (SRR) with a periodicity of 50 µm. The SRR consists of a rectangle ring with outer dimensions of 36 × 36 µm2, a gap width of 3 µm and a gap length of 10 µm. The linewidth and the thickness of the SRR were chosen to be 4 µm and 100 nm, respectively. The geometrical parameters of the metamaterial unit cell are shown in Figure 1c. Metamaterials were then functionalized to capture the PS in the water by partially coating an adhesive poly-L-lysine (PLL) layer only in the gap area, while the rest of the area was coated with an anti-adhesive hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) layer [27]. The full-width at half maximum of the metapattern resonance in water was 130 GHz and we obtained the resonant peak position by using the Gaussian fitting with an uncertainty of around 1 GHz. To circulate the PS solution on the metasurface, we fabricated the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fluidic channel with a height of 20 µm and a width of 2 mm on the metamaterials. The height of the PDMS channel is determined by the height of the SU-8 mold which was used to fabricate the PDMS channel. The PDMS fluidic channel was bonded to the surrounding substrate area of the metasurface using the plasma surface treatment method [31]. We note that the PS solution was circulated through the fluidic channel using a peristaltic pump with an 80 μL/min rate.
Figure 2a shows the separated THz transmission amplitudes of the surface-functionalized microfluidic metamaterials when the water (black solid line) and PS solution (red solid line) was circulated through the fluidic channel. The inset of Figure 2a shows an optical image of fabricated metamaterials after the circulation of PS solution through the fluidic channel. The polarization direction of the incident THz waves is indicated with a white arrow. It was clearly shown that the PSs were captured only in the functionalized gap areas where the PLL layer was deposited, while HMDS-coated area repelled the PS in the water [27]. We observed a 15.4 GHz blue-shift in the resonant frequency from 717 to 732 GHz with the presence of the PS in the water. We note that the blue-shift occurred as the PS in the water decreased the effective dielectric constant of the target solution due to its low dielectric constant (εPS = 2.56) [27] when compared to that of water (εwater = 4.8) [31]. At the low density regime, the blue-shift induced by the presence of the PS in the water can be quantified by the following relationship: Δ f / f 0 = α N P S ( ε P S ε w a t e r ) / ε e f f , where α is a sensitivity coefficient, NPS is the average number of PS in the gap areas, and εeff is the effective dielectric constant near the gap area, which is determined by the combined contributions of the dielectric constants of the substrate and the water [23]. εeff can be obtained from the relation of f w a t e r = f a i r / ( ε e f f ) 1 / 2 , where fwater is the resonant frequency of the metamaterials with an overlaid water layer on the substrate and fair is the resonant frequency of the metamaterials without the substrate (air embedded). We also note that the fluidic channel device without metamaterials pattern was used as a reference to mitigate the transmission loss from the water layer.
To verify and understand our experimental findings, we performed FDTD simulations using commercial software (CST Studio Suite 2022). The time-domain solver was used to minimize the effect of the internal reflection from the substrate. The geometric parameters and periodic boundary conditions were adopted from the metamaterials used in the experiments. Dielectric constants of 11.8, 4.8, and 2.56, were used for silicon, water, and PS structures, respectively. Two-ports were assigned to the simulation model to generate and receive a linearly polarized incident THz plane wave in the time-domain. We then performed a fast-Fourier transform to obtain the frequency-domain transmission amplitude of the metamaterials. Figure 2b shows the simulated transmission amplitudes of the metamaterials with a 20 µm thick water layer for NPS = 0, 30, 90. The resonant frequency of 667 GHz was observed for NPS = 0 and the blue-shift of the resonant frequency occurred as NPS increased. A discrepancy between the experimental results and simulations in the resonant frequency of the metamaterials was observed, which can be attributed to the fabrication tolerance in the experiments. We note that NPS was first gradually increased to NPS = 30 with a step of three until there was no space to locate additional PS in the gap area, then we increased NPS with a step of 30 up to NPS = 120 by adding the additional PS layer that consists of 30 PS right above the existing PS layer. The resonant frequency of the metamaterials as a function of NPS was investigated in Figure 2c to see how the presence of the PS in the water layer affects the resonant frequency shift behavior. The amount of blue-shift increased as the number of PS layers increased, but was saturated at a specific frequency owing to the confined effective sensing volume of the metamaterials near the gap area; this is consistent with the saturation thickness of 1.5 μm estimated for the gap-width of 3 μm [28]. Conversely, in the monolayer case (for NPS < 30), the sensitivity coefficient α of 7.1 × 10−4 was obtained, when fair = 1963 GHz and εeff = 8.66.
In order to study the resonant frequency shift behavior of the surface functionalized fluidic metamaterials, we performed in situ THz spectroscopy while we were circulating the PS solution with a density of 2 × 108 mL−1 through the fluidic channel. Figure 3a shows THz transmission amplitude as a function of the circulation time of the PS solution. The blue-shift behavior was observed as the PLL layer in the gap area attracted the PS in the solution. In Figure 3b, we extracted the resonant frequency from Figure 3a as a function of circulation time. We note that a fluctuation was observed in the extracted resonant frequency over circulation time that could be attributed to the mechanical motion of the peristaltic pump [40,41]. Therefore, the fitted curve of the resonant frequency (red line) was plotted along with the extracted resonant frequency (black square dots). The resonant frequency of the metamaterials increased while the PSs in the solution were being attached to the gap area but was saturated at a specific frequency as there is no change in the effective dielectric constant of the gap area after a certain level of accumulation of the PS in the gap area over time, as indicated from our simulation results in Figure 2c.
To investigate the effect of the PS solution density on the saturation behavior of the resonance, we performed the same in situ THz spectroscopy again but for various PS solution densities (2 × 108, 1 × 109, 3 × 109, 6 × 109 mL−1). In Figure 4, the saturation time (Tsat) of the resonant frequency shift and the saturated resonant frequency (Δfmax) were plotted as a function of the PS solution density. Here, Tsat corresponds to the time when the resonant frequency shift reaches the half of the maximum frequency shift. Δf–time curves for different solution densities were best fitted with the sigmodal function of Δ f = Δ f m a x ( 1 1 / ( 1 + ( t / T s a t ) p ) ) , where p is the exponent. The saturation time of 16.6 min was obtained with the PS solution density of 2 × 108 mL−1, which decreased to 18.5 s with the PS solution density of 6 × 109 mL−1. We note that FTIR and Raman spectroscopy have been often employed to detect microplastics in water [8,9,10]. However, a liquid sample containing microplastics must go through a pre-treatment step called density separation. The density separation extracts microplastics from the sample liquid by either letting microplastics float or sink in solutions with higher or lower densities than the microplastics [8,9,10]. This process makes the detection techniques employing FTIR and Raman spectroscopy a time-consuming job, which often takes 5 h to up to 1 day [8]. On the other hand, we could detect microplastics in water with in situ THz spectroscopy by using surface-functionalized fluidic metamaterials. The saturated resonant frequency shift increased further from 15 to 24 GHz as we increased the PS solution density from 2 × 108 to 6 × 109 mL−1 even though it was expected that the number of the accumulated PS in the gap area would be similar for different PS solution densities. This could be explained by the fact that the effective dielectric constant of the surrounding PS solution also decreases as the PS solution density increases, owing to the low dielectric constant of the PS compared to the water, leading to a further increase in the saturated resonant frequency shift. It is noteworthy that we reported the relationship between the dielectric constant of overlaid liquid and the resonant frequency shift in our previous study [31]. For instance, we estimated the effective dielectric constant for the 6 × 109 mL−1 case from the saturated frequency shift and found that the dielectric constant decreased by −1.0 when compared to the water case.

3. Conclusions

We investigated a novel real-time microplastic sensor in a water environment by performing in situ THz spectroscopy on surface-functionalized fluidic metamaterials. PSs were only captured in the gap structure of the metamaterials as the PLL layer in the gap attracted the PS in the water, while HMDS coated area repelled the PS. We showed that the resonant frequency of metamaterials increased as the PSs were captured in the gap area. Also, we monitored the resonant frequency change while we were circulating the PS solution through the fluidic channel and extracted the saturation time of the resonant frequency shift, and the saturated resonant frequency shift for various PS solution densities. Experimental results were confirmed and supported by FDTD simulation results. We successfully demonstrated the detection of the PS in water with in situ THz spectroscopy by using surface-functionalized fluidic metamaterials. We anticipate that this work will contribute to the development of real-time, on-site, cost-efficient, and highly sensitive microplastic sensors to tackle the absence of efficient microplastic sensors working in an aqueous environment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.A.; Data curation, S.J.P.; Formal analysis, S.J.P.; Funding acquisition, Y.H.A.; Investigation, S.J.P. and Y.H.A.; Methodology, Y.H.A.; Writing—original draft, S.J.P. and Y.H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Midcareer Researcher Program (2020R1A2C1005735) and Basic Science Research Program (2021R1A6A1A10044950) through a National Research Foundation grant funded by the Korea Government.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dehaut, A.; Cassone, A.L.; Frère, L.; Hermabessiere, L.; Himber, C.; Rinnert, E.; Rivière, G.; Lambert, C.; Soudant, P.; Huvet, A.; et al. Microplastics in seafood: Benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 215, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lv, L.; He, L.; Jiang, S.; Chen, J.; Zhou, C.; Qu, J.; Lu, Y.; Hong, P.; Sun, S.; Li, C. In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 728, 138449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lam, C.S.; Ramanathan, S.; Carbery, M.; Gray, K.; Vanka, K.S.; Maurin, C.; Bush, R.; Palanisami, T. A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastics and Microplastic Legislation Worldwide. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. McDevitt, J.P.; Criddle, C.S.; Morse, M.; Hale, R.C.; Bott, C.B.; Rochman, C.M. Addressing the Issue of Microplastics in the Wake of the Microbead-Free Waters Act—A New Standard Can Facilitate Improved Policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6611–6617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Rochman, C.M.; Brookson, C.; Bikker, J.; Djuric, N.; Earn, A.; Bucci, K.; Athey, S.; Huntington, A.; McIlwraith, H.; Munno, K.; et al. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Santillo, D.; Miller, K.; Johnston, P. Microplastics as contaminants in commercially important seafood species. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2017, 13, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, Y.; Li, W.; Jarvis, P.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Tan, Q.; Tian, Y. Occurrence, removal and potential threats associated with microplastics in drinking water sources. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huppertsberg, S.; Knepper, T.P. Instrumental analysis of microplastics—Benefits and challenges. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 6343–6352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mani, T.; Blarer, P.; Storck, F.R.; Pittroff, M.; Wernicke, T.; Burkhardt-Holm, P. Repeated detection of polystyrene microbeads in the lower Rhine River. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prata, J.C.; da Costa, J.P.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Methods for sampling and detection of microplastics in water and sediment: A critical review. Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, H.T.; O’Hara, J.F.; Azad, A.K.; Taylor, A.J.; Averitt, R.D.; Shrekenhamer, D.B.; Padilla, W.J. Experimental demonstration of frequency-agile terahertz metamaterials. Nat. Photonics 2008, 2, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, H.T.; Padilla, W.J.; Zide, J.M.O.; Gossard, A.C.; Taylor, A.J.; Averitt, R.D. Active terahertz metamaterial devices. Nature 2006, 444, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Smith, D.R.; Pendry, J.B.; Wiltshire, M.C.K. Metamaterials and negative refractive index. Science 2004, 305, 788–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Meng, K.; Park, S.J.; Burnett, A.D.; Gill, T.; Wood, C.D.; Rosamond, M.; Li, L.H.; Chen, L.; Bacon, D.R.; Freeman, J.R.; et al. Increasing the sensitivity of terahertz split ring resonator metamaterials for dielectric sensing by localized substrate etching. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 23164–23172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Hara, J.F.; Singh, R.; Brener, I.; Smirnova, E.; Han, J.; Taylor, A.J.; Zhang, W. Thin-film sensing with planar terahertz metamaterials: Sensitivity and limitations. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 1786–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.J.; Cha, S.H.; Shin, G.A.; Ahn, Y.H. Sensing viruses using terahertz nano-gap metamaterials. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 3551–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lee, D.-K.; Kang, J.-H.; Kwon, J.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, S.; Woo, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Song, C.-S.; Park, Q.H.; Seo, M. Nano metamaterials for ultrasensitive Terahertz biosensing. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Weisenstein, C.; Schaar, D.; Katharina Wigger, A.; Schäfer-Eberwein, H.; Bosserhoff, A.K.; Haring Bolívar, P. Ultrasensitive THz biosensor for PCR-free cDNA detection based on frequency selective surfaces. Biomed. Opt. Express 2020, 11, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.; Mu, N.; Liu, L.; Xie, J.; Feng, H.; Yao, J.; Chen, T.; Zhu, W. Highly sensitive detection of malignant glioma cells using metamaterial-inspired THz biosensor based on electromagnetically induced transparency. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 185, 113241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, G.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhan, X.; Tian, H.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fu, W. Molecule-Specific Terahertz Biosensors Based on an Aptamer Hydrogel-Functionalized Metamaterial for Sensitive Assays in Aqueous Environments. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1884–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Zhu, F.; Lang, T.; Liu, J.; Hong, Z.; Qin, J. All-metal terahertz metamaterial biosensor for protein detection. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, X.; Chen, X.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; Tian, Z.; Wang, M. Highly sensitive terahertz metamaterial biosensor for bovine serum albumin (BSA) detection. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 2268–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Park, S.J.; Hong, J.T.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Park, W.K.; Han, S.T.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.S.; Ahn, Y.H. Detection of microorganisms using terahertz metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, X.; Yang, K.; Luo, Y.; Fu, W. Terahertz spectroscopy for bacterial detection: Opportunities and challenges. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5289–5299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, S.H.; Lee, Y.K.; Lee, S.-H.; Kwak, J.; Song, H.S.; Seo, M. Detection and discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-derived peptides using THz metamaterials. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 202, 113981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jun, S.W.; Ahn, Y.H. Terahertz thermal curve analysis for label-free identification of pathogens. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cha, S.H.; Park, S.J.; Ahn, Y.H. Investigation of sensitivity distribution in thz metamaterials using surface functionalization. Curr. Opt. Photonics 2019, 3, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, S.J.; Yoon, S.A.N.; Ahn, Y.H. Effective sensing volume of terahertz metamaterial with various gap widths. J. Opt. Soc. Korea 2016, 20, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. George, P.A.; Hui, W.; Rana, F.; Hawkins, B.G.; Smith, A.E.; Kirby, B.J. Microfluidic devices for terahertz spectroscopy of biomolecules. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 1577–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Astley, V.; Reichel, K.S.; Jones, J.; Mendis, R.; Mittleman, D.M. Terahertz multichannel microfluidic sensor based on parallel-plate waveguide resonant cavities. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 231108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Park, S.J.; Yoon, S.A.N.; Ahn, Y.H. Dielectric constant measurements of thin films and liquids using terahertz metamaterials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 69381–69386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, Q.; Liang, M.; Lu, Y.; Wong, P.K.; Wilmink, G.J.; Zhang, D.; Xin, H. Microfluidic Devices for Terahertz Spectroscopy of Live Cells Toward Lab-on-a-Chip Applications. Sensors 2016, 16, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Geng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Z.; Lv, X.; Chen, H. A Route to Terahertz Metamaterial Biosensor Integrated with Microfluidics for Liver Cancer Biomarker Testing in Early Stage. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Serita, K.; Matsuda, M.; Okada, K.; Murakami, H.; Kawayama, I.; Tonouchi, M. Invited Article: Terahertz microfluidic chips sensitivity-enhanced with a few arrays of meta-atoms. APL Photonics 2018, 3, 051603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Russell, C.; Swithenbank, M.; Wood, C.D.; Burnett, A.D.; Li, L.; Linfield, E.H.; Davies, A.G.; Cunningham, J.E. Integrated On-Chip THz Sensors for Fluidic Systems Fabricated Using Flexible Polyimide Films. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, Y.; Nallappan, K.; Guerboukha, H.; Gervais, T.; Skorobogatiy, M. Additive manufacturing of resonant fluidic sensors based on photonic bandgap waveguides for terahertz applications. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 27663–27681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shih, K.; Pitchappa, P.; Manjappa, M.; Ho, C.P.; Singh, R.; Lee, C. Microfluidic metamaterial sensor: Selective trapping and remote sensing of microparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 023102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, S.J.; Kim, A.R.; Hong, J.T.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Ahn, Y.H. Crystallization Kinetics of Lead Halide Perovskite Film Monitored by In Situ Terahertz Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, H.S.; Ha, N.Y.; Park, J.-Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.-S.; Ahn, Y.H. Phonon-Polaritons in Lead Halide Perovskite Film Hybridized with THz Metamaterials. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 6690–6696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bromley, A.J.; Holdich, R.G.; Cumming, I.W. Particulate fouling of surface microfilters with slotted and circular pore geometry. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 196, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, T.; Sun, S.; Li, B.; Chu, J. Piezoelectric peristaltic micropump integrated on a microfluidic chip. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2019, 292, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of surface-functionalized fluidic THz metamaterials for microplastic detection in the aqueous environment. The gap area is coated by adhesive polymer (pink area), whereas it is coated by HMDS (blue area), which repels the microplastics. (b) Schematic for the experiments in which the fluidic metamaterials device is connected to a peristaltic pump for the fast circulation of the analyte solution. (c) SRR pattern design used in this work.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of surface-functionalized fluidic THz metamaterials for microplastic detection in the aqueous environment. The gap area is coated by adhesive polymer (pink area), whereas it is coated by HMDS (blue area), which repels the microplastics. (b) Schematic for the experiments in which the fluidic metamaterials device is connected to a peristaltic pump for the fast circulation of the analyte solution. (c) SRR pattern design used in this work.
Applsci 12 07102 g001
Figure 2. (a) Experimentally obtained THz transmission amplitude (normalized) of the surface-functionalized fluidic metamaterials after circulation of the specimen with (red solid line) and without (black solid line) the PS in the water. (inset) Dark-field microscope image of metamaterials with PS captured in the gap area. (b) Simulated THz transmission amplitude of the metamaterials with a 20 µm thick water layer for NPS = 0, 30, 90. (c) The resonant frequency of the metamaterials as a function of NPS.
Figure 2. (a) Experimentally obtained THz transmission amplitude (normalized) of the surface-functionalized fluidic metamaterials after circulation of the specimen with (red solid line) and without (black solid line) the PS in the water. (inset) Dark-field microscope image of metamaterials with PS captured in the gap area. (b) Simulated THz transmission amplitude of the metamaterials with a 20 µm thick water layer for NPS = 0, 30, 90. (c) The resonant frequency of the metamaterials as a function of NPS.
Applsci 12 07102 g002
Figure 3. (a) A color-scale plot of the normalized transmission amplitude as a function of circulation time of the PS solution. (b) The extracted (black dots) resonant frequency as a function of the circulation time. Red line indicates the fitted curve to the experimental data.
Figure 3. (a) A color-scale plot of the normalized transmission amplitude as a function of circulation time of the PS solution. (b) The extracted (black dots) resonant frequency as a function of the circulation time. Red line indicates the fitted curve to the experimental data.
Applsci 12 07102 g003
Figure 4. Saturation time of the resonant frequency shift (black square dots), and saturated resonant frequency shift (red square dots) as a function of the PS solution density. Error bars indicate the standard deviation extracted from the fitting process.
Figure 4. Saturation time of the resonant frequency shift (black square dots), and saturated resonant frequency shift (red square dots) as a function of the PS solution density. Error bars indicate the standard deviation extracted from the fitting process.
Applsci 12 07102 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, S.J.; Ahn, Y.H. Detection of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles in Water Using Surface-Functionalized Terahertz Microfluidic Metamaterials. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147102

AMA Style

Park SJ, Ahn YH. Detection of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles in Water Using Surface-Functionalized Terahertz Microfluidic Metamaterials. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(14):7102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147102

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Sae June, and Yeong Hwan Ahn. 2022. "Detection of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles in Water Using Surface-Functionalized Terahertz Microfluidic Metamaterials" Applied Sciences 12, no. 14: 7102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147102

APA Style

Park, S. J., & Ahn, Y. H. (2022). Detection of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles in Water Using Surface-Functionalized Terahertz Microfluidic Metamaterials. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 7102. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147102

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop