Next Article in Journal
The FaaS-Based Cloud Agnostic Architecture of Medical Services—Polish Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal and Efficient Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Classification and Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Optimization of Production Objectives Based on Surrogate Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes: Volume II

by
Luis Norberto López de Lacalle
1,* and
Jorge Posada
2
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering (High Performance Manufacturing Group), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Parque Tecnológico de Zamudio 202, 48170 Bilbao, Spain
2
Fundación Vicomtech, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Mikeletegi 57, 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(15), 7952; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157952
Submission received: 1 August 2022 / Accepted: 5 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
The second volume of the Special Issue New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes is now closed with 17 interesting research contributions and 1 review. Two years since the previous Special Issue, industrial factories have been experiencing a rapid digital transformation because of the introduction of emerging ICT technologies, such as the industrial Internet of things (IIOT), industrial big data and cloud technologies, deep learning and deep analytics, artificial intelligence, intelligent robotics, cyber–physical systems, digital twins and visual computing (including augmented reality, visual analytics, cognitive computer vision, and new HMI interfaces and simulation and computer graphics), among others. This is evident in the global trend of Industry 4.0 and related initiatives, which are present in one way or another in many different production strategies at an international level. In recent times, the term Industry 5.0 has been used to strength the meaning of the influence of human-centric manufacturing and sustainability.
Both classical and new manufacturing processes are being enhanced by the use of big data analytics on industrial sensor data. In the current machine tools and systems, there are complex sensors that are able to gather useful information, which can be captured, stored, and processed with edge, fog, or cloud computing technologies. Manufacturing process modelling can lead to improvements in productivity and quality and, in several cases, are implemented by means of digital twins on cyber–physical production devices and systems.
In this line, manufacturing process models (e.g., thermal, vibration, deformation) can be improved with digital monitoring, digital twins, visual data analytics, artificial intelligence, and computer vision in order to achieve a more productive and reliable smart factory.
On the other hand, the role of the human factor is absolutely fundamental in these new paradigms. Collaborative robots are spreading in several applications in order to work along with human skillful workers. New approaches for augmented reality and immersive virtual reality, as well as other multimodal ways of improving human computer interaction in manufacturing scenarios, are enhancing the capabilities of operators and engineers so as to capture and reproduce human knowledge, improve their performance in operational tasks, and seamlessly integrate their valuable experience and flexibility in smart factory scenarios for manufacturing. Visual analytics can help in decision-making by management, domain experts, operators, engineers, and so on, by providing user-specific interactive visualization and the exploration of operational data in combination with machine learning approaches.
Regarding the Special Issue contributions, Červeňanská et al. [1] addresses an approximate solution to the multi-objective optimization problem for a black-box function of a manufacturing system. Sasian et al. [2] focused on the influence of new 5G networks in factories; 5 g and field buses are key enabling technologies. Ojstersek et al. [3] makes a contribution based on three-dimensional modelling made from capturing spherical camera data. Edge-computing devices and architectures are currently being implemented in factories; this is the context of contributions [4,5,6]. Redondo et al. [7] aims at hybrid unsupervised exploratory plots (HUEPs) as a visualization technique that combines exploratory projection pursuit (EPP) and clustering methods. Erasmus et al. [8] summarizes the so-called HORSE Project, investigating several of the new technologies to find novel ways to improve the flexibility as part of the Horizon 2020 research and innovation program. Serras et al. [9] introduced extended reality (XR) technologies (such as virtual, augmented, immersive, and mixed reality), with a focus on speech and AR interaction complementary to the work of Simoes et al. [10,11], as is the case in Kim et al. [12], who present a new data-augmentation method.
In the work [13], Mejia-Parra et al. present four different schemes that translate the problem of laser heating of rectangular plates into equivalent FFT problem. The presented schemes make use of the FFT algorithm to reduce the computational time complexity of the problem, improving his previous work in [14].
The authors of contributions [15,16,17] introduced algorithms and applications in the field of machine learning, a classic effort nowadays because artificial neural networks or Markov nets, etc., help to solve problems in manufacturing. In [18,19,20], three applications are shown. The closing work by Prinsloo et al. [21] is a review about cyber-security risks because the Internet and connectivity are key in automated systems.
The future will bring more challenges and opportunities; in fact, digitalization is a global trend with multiple possibilities, and a Special Issue is only a humble attempt to go a step beyond, adding new ideas to other approaches, such those in the previous Special Issue [22], or other related works in European projects [23]. In the not-so-distant future, factory workers will be helped by new digital twins, utilities, and software toolboxes to improve the production quality, productivity, and health of workers. Other related Special Issues are [24,25], where Industry 4.0 technologies are now a hot topic.

Author Contributions

All authors are special issue editors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author did not receive funding for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Červeňanská, Z.; Kotianová, J.; Važan, P.; Juhásová, B.; Juhás, M. Multi-Objective Optimization of Production Objectives ase don Surrogate Model. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sasiain, J.; Sanz, A.; Astorga, J.; Jacob, E. Towards Flexible Integration of 5G and IioT Technologies in Industry 4.0: A Practical Use Case. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ojstersek, R.; Buchmeister, B.; Vujica Herzog, N. Use of Data-Driven Simulation Modeling and Visual Computing Methods for Workplace Evaluation. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Minchala, L.I.; Peralta, J.; Mata-Quevedo, P.; Rojas, J. An Approach to Industrial Automation based on Low-Cost Embedded Platforms and Open Software. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ougaabal, K.; Zacharewicz, G.; Ducq, Y.; Tazi, S. Visual Workflow Process Modeling and Simulation Approach ase don Non-Functional Properties of Resources. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garrido-Labrador, J.L.; Puente-Gabarri, D.; Ramírez-Sanz, J.M.; Ayala-Dulanto, D.; Maudes, J. Using Ensembles for Accurate Modelling of Manufacturing Processes in an IoT Data-Acquisition Solution. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Redondo, R.; Herrero, Á.; Corchado, E.; Sedano, J. A Decision-Making Tool ase don Exploratory Visualization for the Automotive Industry. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Erasmus, J.; Vanderfeesten, I.; Traganos, K.; Keulen, R.; Grefen, P. The HORSE Project: The Application of Business Process Management for Flexibility in Smart Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Serras, M.; García-Sardiña, L.; Simões, B.; Álvarez, H.; Arambarri, J. Dialogue Enhanced Extended Reality: Interactive System for the Operator 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simoes, B.; de Amicis, R.; Barandiaran, I.; Posada, J. X-reality system architecture for industry 4.0 processes. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2018, 2, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Simoes, B.; de Amicis, R.; Barandiaran, I.; Posada, J. Cross reality to enhance worker cognition in industrial assembly operations. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2019, 105, 3965–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, E.K.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, S. Data Augmentation Method by Applying Color Perturbation of Inverse PSNR and Geometric Transformations for Object Recognition ase don Deep Learning. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mejia-Parra, D.; Arbelaiz, A.; Ruiz-Salguero, O.; Lalinde-Pulido, J.; Moreno, A.; Posada, J. Fast Simulation of Laser Heating Processes on Thin Metal Plates with FFT Using CPU/GPU Hardware. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mejia, D.; Moreno, A.; Arbelaiz, A.; Posada, J.; Ruiz-Salguero, O.; Chopitea, R. Accelerated Thermal Simulation for Three-Dimensional Interactive Optimization of Computer Numeric Control Sheet Metal Laser Cutting. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2018, 140, 31006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, S.; Fang, S.; Tang, R. An ANN-Based Approach for Real-Time Scheduling in Cloud Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, C.-N.; Liu, T.-K.; Chen, Y.J. Human-Machine Interaction: Adapted Safety Assistance in Mentality Using Hidden Markov Chain and Petri Net. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tran, L.V.; Huynh, B.H.; Akhtar, H. Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Scheduling Optimization in the Context of Industrie 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Stachowiak, A.; Adamczak, M.; Hadas, L.; Domański, R.; Cyplik, P. Knowledge Absorption Capacity as a Factor for Increasing Logistics 4.0 Maturity. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jimenez-Cortadi, A.; Irigoien, I.; Boto, F.; Sierra, B.; Rodriguez, G. Predictive Maintenance on the Machining Process and Machine Tool. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ottogalli, K.; Rosquete, D.; Amundarain, A.; Aguinaga, I.; Borro, D. Flexible Framework to Model Industry 4.0 Processes for Virtual Simulators. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Prinsloo, J.; Sinha, S.; von Solms, B. A Review of Industry 4.0 Manufacturing Process Security Risks. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. De Lacalle, L.N.L.; Posada, J. Special Issue on New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Del Olmo, A.; de Lacalle, L.L.; de Pissón, G.M.; Pérez-Salinas, C.; Ealo, J.A.; Sastoque, L.; Fernandes, M.H. Tool wear monitoring of high-speed broaching process with carbide tools to reduce production errors. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2022, 172, 109003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zambon, I.; Egidi, G.; Rinaldi, F.; Cividino, S. Applied Research Towards Industry 4.0: Opportunities for SMEs. Processes 2019, 7, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Papakostas, N.; Constantinescu, C.; Mourtzis, D. Novel Industry 4.0 Technologies and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López de Lacalle, L.N.; Posada, J. New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes: Volume II. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7952. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157952

AMA Style

López de Lacalle LN, Posada J. New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes: Volume II. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(15):7952. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157952

Chicago/Turabian Style

López de Lacalle, Luis Norberto, and Jorge Posada. 2022. "New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes: Volume II" Applied Sciences 12, no. 15: 7952. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157952

APA Style

López de Lacalle, L. N., & Posada, J. (2022). New Industry 4.0 Advances in Industrial IoT and Visual Computing for Manufacturing Processes: Volume II. Applied Sciences, 12(15), 7952. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop