Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conversion Systems”
Next Article in Special Issue
Total Polyphenols and Antioxidant Properties of Selected Fresh and Dried Herbs and Spices
Previous Article in Journal
ALIPPF-Controller to Stabilize the Unstable Motion and Eliminate the Non-Linear Oscillations of the Rotor Electro-Magnetic Suspension System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Short-Term Treatment of Metformin and Glipizide on Oxidative Stress, Lipid Profile and Renal Function in a Rat Model with Diabetes Mellitus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elemental Profiles of Wild Thymus L. Plants Growing in Different Soil and Climate Conditions

by
Irina E. Vasil’eva
1,*,
Elena V. Shabanova
1,
Byambasuren Tsagaan
2 and
Khuukhenkhuu Bymbaa
2
1
A.P. Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia
2
Institute of Physics and Technology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar 13330, Mongolia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 3904; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083904
Submission received: 3 March 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The data obtained can be useful for obtaining high-quality food and pharmacopoeia raw materials from wild thyme with a given chemical composition and controlled biological activity.

Abstract

Plants of the genus Thymus L. are traditionally used in medicine and cooking due to the presence of biologically active compounds in them that have fungicidal, antibacterial and other medicinal properties and original taste qualities. Genetic features and growing conditions cause the elemental composition, responsibly of the synthesised medicinal compounds. However, information on the contents and distributions of elements in the organs of Thymus L. is very limited. This study was to set and compare the elements in organs of wild thyme for different soil and climatic conditions. Two species of wild Thymus L. from Mongolian steppe and on the coast of Lake Baikal were collected during flowering. Twenty-four elements, including Si, in soils, roots, stems, leaves and flowers were simultaneously determined by atomic emission spectrometry. Elemental profiles of two species of wild Thymus L. are described. It is assumed that Si is a necessary element of the plant. The predominance of the genetic resistance of plants over the influence of soil and climatic conditions is shown.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plants participate in the migration of chemical elements in natural ecosystems. Although the biological selectivity of plants in essential and toxic elements allows their chemical composition to be controlled within certain limits, the content of elements in plants is influenced by natural conditions such as soil type, climate, landscape, insolation, seasons and anthropogenic activity. Therefore, an investigation into the elemental composition of a soil–plant system coupled with environment discloses useful information [1,2,3], and variations in trace element concentrations can be used as a tool for examining specific features of plant growth conditions as well as the state of the environment [1,2,3,4]. The determination of a wide range of elements in plants is required for geoecological environmental monitoring [1,3], assessment of the quality and safety of food and medicinal plants [5,6], as well as regulation of their quantity in the diets of humans, domestic animals and poultry [7,8,9].
Currently, it is of commercial interest to study the biological activity of medicinal plants, herbs and spices that have been used for centuries in folk medicine and cuisine including thyme. The genus Thymus L. includes a large variety of species that are difficult to classify visually, as different species of the Thymus L. genus are similar in appearance [10,11]. Several hundred species of Thymus L. are widely distributed throughout the Eurasian continent (excluding the tropics) as well as North Africa and Greenland. More than 170 species of thyme grow on the territory of Russia and its neighbouring countries. In Eastern Siberia and Mongolia, Thymus serpyllum L. (creeping thyme) [11] and Thymus baicalensis Serg. L. [12] are among the most common species. Groundcover plants Thymus serpyllum L. and Thymus baicalensis Serg. L. spread intensively in steppe zones, filling gaps between boulders and creating a dense carpet-like groundcover that is completely covered with numerous purple–pink flowers during the flowering period, which lasts between 2 and 2.5 months. The specific pleasant smell of this plant is due to the essential oil present in this genus, the chemical composition of which varies from one plant species to another and is dependent on morphological characteristics, climatic conditions, the stage of plant maturity, the time of harvest and post-harvest processing [11,12,13,14,15].
The composition and concentration of organic compounds synthesised by plants, the mechanisms by which these organic compounds influence metabolic processes as well as their interaction with bacteria, viruses and fungi, were previously discussed in a number of publications [16,17,18,19,20]. In studies comparing essentials oils extracted from thyme with those obtained from other plant species, it was shown that thyme’s essential oils were the most effective for the treatment of fungal and bacterial infections and also endocrine and tumour diseases [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Numerous publications have been devoted to the mechanisms of the synthesis of biologically active compounds in plants including those of a catalytic nature. The role of coenzymes, containing ions of essential elements and/or their organic compounds on the enzyme structure, are discussed in [14,23]. Although over 70 chemical elements have been identified in various plant species [1,3], the data concerning the abundances and specific roles of each trace element contained in the inorganic and organoelement compounds of Thymus L. species are very limited [15,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. For instance, the composition of the essential oil of Hungarian Thymus pannonicus plants was studied, and the role elements, such as K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cr and Mo, played in this was described through investigation of the biosynthesis of certain volatile compounds [23]. Chemometric data processing revealed a correlation between Zn and citral, Mn and oxygenated monoterpenes, and between Mg and β-bourbonene, which explains the participation of these metals in the biosynthesis of the plant’s essential oil. However, the initial analytical information used is incomplete, since the authors did not determine the high concentrations of Si and Al, which are generally characteristic of Thymus L. plants, and did not include them in the chemometric models. At the same time, it is known that mono- and dimmers of silicic acid (i.e., biogenic silica) are present in xylem, phloem and plant cell walls. Transport of soluble silicon compounds is carried out through the synthesis of a special Si-containing protein to ensure the mechanical strength of the cell wall, increase the natural resistance of plants to abiogenic stresses and fungal diseases, reduce the toxic effects of Fe, Mn, As, Al, 90Sr and phenols [1,15,21,24,32]. In addition, numerous volatile organic compounds are characterised by strong variability [7,12,14,19] due to the presence of different factors including elemental composition. It is difficult to interpret unambiguously the complexity relationships between trace elements and organic compounds of Thymus L. species plants without knowing the distributions of a wide range of elements in their organs. For this reason, the aim of the study was to compile and compare the elemental profiles (also containing silicon information) of organs of two Thymus L. species growing wild under different soil types and climatic conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Two plants of the species Thymus L. were the objects of the study. The herbs were collected during a period of intensive flowering under different soil types and climatic conditions: (1) Mongolian thyme—Thymus serpyllum L., Tsongjin Boldog steppe area, Nalaikh District, 54 km from Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia; (2) Baikal thyme Thymus baikalensis Serg. L. on the coast of Lake Baikal near the village of Sakhyurta, approximately 250 km from the city of Irkutsk, Russia.
Both territories represent mountainous landscapes. Soils in Mongolia are mountain meadow–steppe soils that are formed on poorly leached soil-forming rocks (Mesozoic granites, carboniferous metamorphic clay shales and Neogene variegated clays) under conditions of a periodic washing water regime. The mountainous steppe soils of the Baikal coast are predominantly carbonate–clay, formed in the cold climate of Eastern Siberia (Russia) with moderate humidity. The Mongolian steppe territory, where the plants were selected, belongs to the eastern sector of the most continental part of the arid zone of Central Asia and has a mountainous climate with features of a sharply continental character. The climate in Sakhyurta is sharply continental.
In each district, arrays of 3 × 3 m in size were allocated. Soil samples were also taken at the plant collection sites using the “envelope” method: five points along the edges and in the middle of the site to a depth of 10–15 cm. Similarly, samples of plants of the species Thymus L. with roots and flowers were taken from these territories.
The collected plants were thoroughly washed with distilled water in order to remove soil particles; then divided into roots, stems, leaves and flowers; dried with filter paper. Samples of the plant organs and soils were dried at room temperature in a shaded place. The dry weight of the average sample for each type of thyme and soil were 200–300 g and 1 kg, accordingly. The produced material was crushed to a particle size of −0.08 mm in the KM-1 ball agate mill (Fritsch GmbH, Idar-Oberstein, Germany). The organic carbon content was approximately 3 wt.% in the soils from both places.

2.2. Atomic Emission Spectrometry with Direct Current Arc Discharge

Direct current arc atomic emission spectrometry (DC-arc AES) was used to determine the relative concentrations of 24 elements (Al, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Si, Sr, Ti, V, Zn and Zr) [33]. This method does not require concentration or ashing of the samples. To reduce the negative impact of the organic matrix on the residence time of the substance’s atoms in the excitation zone (in the arc discharge plasma), samples of plants and soils that had a high organic matter content were diluted with a spectroscopic buffer that slows down the oxidation process and maintains a constant arc temperature. Graphite powder (ultra pure) was used as a spectroscopic buffer. The sample, mixed in a 1:1 ratio with the buffer, was homogenised in an agate mortar for 5–7 min. The prepared samples were stored in a desiccator. Immediately before the analysis, two subsamples (10 ± 1 mg) of mixtures of either a calibration CRM or a probe were weighed and placed in the channel of pre-fired graphite electrodes. The following are the dimensions of the lower electrode (i.e., anode): base diameter—6 mm; height—35 mm; channel depth—4 mm; external diameter—5.4 mm; internal diameter—4 mm; wall thickness—0.7 mm. The upper electrode (i.e., cathode) was a graphite cylinder rod with plane ends: height—7 cm; diameter—6 mm. The mixture of the sample and graphite powder occupied no more than 80–90% of the electrode channel, providing a jet evaporation, primarily of highly volatile Pb, Zn and Li compounds. Plant and soil samples, graphite powder and their mixtures were weighed using the analytical scales LVA-210A (Sartogosm, Saint Petersburg, Russia).

2.3. Instrumentation

To record atomic emission spectra, an upgraded spectral setup was used. It consisted of the diffraction spectrograph DFS-458S (PO KOMZ, Kazan, Russia), the DC arc generator “Vesuvius” and photoelectric MAES analyser (VMK-Optoelectronics, Novosibirsk, Russia). The processing of the spectra was performed in the commercial program “ATOM” (VMK-Optoelectronics, Novosibirsk, Russia). It is described in detail in [33].

2.4. Calibration

The plant-matrix certified reference materials (CRMs) were used as calibration samples: GSO 8921-2007 and COOMET 0065-2008-RU (EC-1, Canadian pond weed), GSO 8922-2007 and COOMET 0066-2008-RU (Tr-1, meadowherbs mixture) and GSO 8923-2007 and COOMET 0067-2008-RU (LB-1, birch leaf) [34]; GSO 1483-78 (SBMK-01, potato tubers), GSO 1484-78 (SBMP-01, wheat grain) and GSO 1485-78 (SBMT-01, grass mixture) [35]; GWB07602, GWB07603 (GSV-1, GSV-2, bush branches and leaves), GWB07604 (GSV-3, black poplar leaves) and GWB07605 (GSV-4, tea leaves) [36].
The content of the elements in the calibration CRMs and their mixtures varied in wide ranges. However, they were not wide enough to analyse plants growing in areas with different climatic conditions and which had differing anthropogenic impacts. Therefore, for the analysis of plants from arid or heavily polluted areas, the upper limits of the measuring ranges were expanded by using mixtures of plant-matrix CRMs combined with CRMs of soils and loose sediments from the collection of IGC SB RAS (SGHM-1—GSO 3483-86, SGHM-2—GSO 3484-86 and SGHM-3—GSO 3485-86) and CRMs of sediments and silts (SGH-1—GSO 3131-85, BIL-1—GSO 7126-94 and BIL-2—GSO 7176-95), soil CRMs OOKO-151, -152 and -153; and other nature CRMs [37].
Examples of calibrations in bilogarithmic coordinates constructed in accordance with the empirical Lomakin–Scheibe equation (program “ATOM”) are shown in the Supplementary Materials (Figure S1).

2.5. Quality Assurance and Quality Control

To assess the accuracy and traceability of the results by the DC-arc AES, in addition to the samples under study, we analysed the encrypted CRMs of the meadowherbs mixture Tr-1 GSO 8922 and tea leaves GSV-4 GWB07605. The accuracy, expressed as a relative standard deviation, amounted to 10–15% on average, varying from 1 to 35% for different analytes, depending on the element content. The reliability of the DC-arc AES was evaluated by comparing the results of the analysis of encrypted CRMs with the data obtained via the ICP-AES and ICP-MS methods [33].
The ICP-AES analysis was accomplished using the atomic emission spectrometer iCAP 6300 DUO (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); ICP-MS determinations were obtained via the mass spectrometer ELEMENT 2 (Finnigan MAT, Bremen, Germany). The solutions for analysis were prepared following the certified method [38]. After acid digestion, the sample solutions were evaporated with a small addition of hydrofluoric acid to concentrate the impurities. This procedure results in the removal of silicon from the solution. Therefore, silicon was not determined. Losses of other trace elements, such as Zr, Al and Ti, are also possible [39]. Perhaps also for this reason, the Zr content in the CRMs Tr-1 and GSV-4, obtained by the DC-arc AES method, was greater than that determined by the ICP-MS by 30% and more than 30 times, respectively (Tables S1 and S2, see Supplementary Materials). The concentrations of Be and Ga in the solutions were insufficient to determine them using the ICP-AES method (Table S1). For the DC-arc AES method, the determination of Be and Ga was accomplished without difficulty. The vanadium contents in GSV-4 (Table S2), obtained through different methods, were similar to each other, but significantly lower than the content recommended by the developer of this CRM. These results can be used to correct the V content in the GSV-4 CRM. The comparison between the results obtained using different methods and the certified contents in Tr-1 and GSV-4 CRMs indicates their good agreement for most of the elements (Tables S1 and S2). The 95% probability confidence intervals of the elemental contents obtained using different methods were comparable, and the means were close in accuracy.

3. Results and Discussion

The 24 element contents obtained by the DC-arc AES in the dried roots, stems, leaves and flowers of Thymus serpyllum L. and Thymus baikalensis Serg. L. plants as well as soils of Mongolia (1) and Russia (2) are given in Table 1. This Table also presents the literature data on the typical concentration ranges of these elements in the dry matter of plants of different species [1,2]. The observed contents of Al, Ba, Ti and Zr were found to exceed that recorded in the literature data (marked in italics in Table 1). Concentrations of elements (Si, K, P, Ti, Zn, Cu, V and B) that are close in value or differ by less than 30% for different Thymus L. species are shown in bold in the “Flowers” column. The simultaneous determination of both essential (P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Cu, B, Mn, Co, Na, V and Fe) [2] and toxic elements (Al, Be, Ba Cr, Ga, Li, Ni, Pb and Sr), as well as silicon, which is noted in a number of publications as an element necessary for plants in the maintenance of a normal life cycle [15,24], is an important advantage of the analytical method used.
Soil samples from the sites where we collected the two Thymus species differed in the contents of major elements, such as Fe, Ca, Mg, Na, Mn and Ti, by 3.5, 4.9, 18, 2.5, 4.2 and 1.7 times, respectively (Figure 1). The contents of trace elements, such as P, Co, Ga, Li, Pb, Sr and Zn, in soil samples varied by less than two times and were regarded as similar. The concentrations of trace elements in the Mongolian soil samples were higher compared to the Baikal ones as follows: 4 times for barium, 4.7 times for beryllium and 16 times for zirconium. Compared to the Mongolian soil, the Baikal soil samples were more enriched in boron (2.6 times), cobalt (5 times), Cr (3 times), Cu (2.3 times), V (5.8 times) and Ni (3.4 times). However, these features of the soils’ elemental composition did not affect the absorption by different Thymus species of elements such as P, B, Zn, Cu, Ca and Mg, which are traditionally regarded as essential elements (Figure 2a).
The element ratio in the roots and soil indicates the intake of individual elements by the root system. The value of the ratio depends both on the specific physiological characteristics of the plant and the total element content in the soil. The two plants of the Thymus species growing in different climatic conditions demonstrate unrestricted uptake of only such elements as P, B, Cu and Zn. A similar phenomenon was observed in the drier climate of Mongolia for both the essential elements (i.e., Ca, Co, Mg, Mn and V) and conditionally toxic elements, such as Ni and Sr, the concentrations in the soil of which were very low. Around Lake Baikal, the contents of Mg, Mn, Ni, V and Sr in the soil are higher, and the root system limits their uptake into the plant. Only the accumulation of Ba, which is scarce in the soil, is unrestricted by the root system. In the Mongolian soil samples, the contents of Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Co, Cr, Ni and Ti were lower compared with the Baikal samples. Despite this, the distribution profiles of these elements in plant organs differed slightly. The Si, Al, Be, Ga, Li, Na, Pb and Zr concentrations were found to be high in the Mongolian soil, but their uptake through the roots was limited (Figure 2), and they hardly accumulated at all in plant tissues. Though the total contents of Si, Na and Be in the Baikal soil were lower, the distribution profiles of these elements in the soils and organs of the two plants were similar to each other: the concentration of the element in the roots decreased sharply, remained approximately the same in the stems, leaves and flowers or increased slightly in the leaves and flowers (Figure 2).
The element content in plants usually reflects their biological necessity for plant survival. The element concentration is also an indication of the composition of the soil in which they grow. As was previously shown [26], higher Al content in the organs of Thymus serpyllum L. may result from the increased abundance of this element in the soil. A similar phenomenon was also observed in plants growing in soils with a higher chromium content [25]. Chromium and nickel are usually considered toxic elements, but plants can use these metals in the biosynthesis of organic compounds for electron charge transfer, just as Cu, Fe, Mn, Co, Mo and V are used [1,2,40]. The behaviour of Ba and Sr in plant organs depends on their content in the soil. If the element is present in large quantities in the soil, then its concentration decreases towards the flowers. If the element is not present in large quantities, then its accumulation in flowers will remain constant. Thus, when the concentration of Ba in the soil is 400 and 93 mg/kg, concentrations of 126 and 113 mg/kg in flowers are observed; when the concentration of Sr in the soil is 100 and 150 mg/kg, concentrations of 126–113 mg/kg and 64–52 mg/kg are observed in flowers. The Ca/Sr ratio in plant organs is 70–138 for Thymus serpyllum L. and 123–402 for Thymus baikalensis Serg. L., accordingly. The increase in the ratio of these elements indicates an increase in the contribution of enzymes to the transfer of elements from the soil in the Baikal plant, situated in a wetter climate [41]. The increased content of Cr, Ni and V in Thymus baikalensis Serg. L. flowers is likely associated with the same effect. However, it is difficult to unambiguously attribute biophilic behaviour to Ni, Co and Cr. Such elements as Be, Ga and Pb were evaluated as toxic, since even at low concentrations in soils, their abundances decreased sharply in the root system, although they accumulated in small quantities in the flowers.
We observed an intense accumulation of phosphorus from the roots to the leaves and flowers even at low P levels in the soil. The food supply of biophilic K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn and Na from the soils to the plants was partially limited but reached the maximum concentration in the flowers. Similar elemental profiles of the “roots–stems–leaves–flowers” sequences for biophilic B, Cu, V and Zn for the different Thymus species were obtained (Figure 2).
It is known that silicon compounds are involved in the synthesis of proteins, which allows for the transport of soluble silicon compounds required for the mechanical strength of the cell wall. In gymnosperms and aquatic plants, the silicon content is often higher than 1 wt.%. The element is difficult to analyse by ICP-AES and ICP-MS. During polymerisation and hydrolysis of silicon, large particles are formed in the solutions of the plant samples, which are filtered out before the analysis or are distilled through heating with hydrofluoric acid [39]. These Si contents are not determined by method of X-ray fluorescence spectrometry because it has a high detection limit for silicon. The factors mentioned above usually cause the exclusion of silicon from the analyte list. For plants grown in the studied climatic conditions, the concentrations of Si and Ti in the “roots–stems–leaves–flowers” sequence are significantly different, though in flowers their abundances are similar: Si—3.70 wt.% and Ti—400 mg/kg (Table 1). These are probably the maximum concentrations of Si and Ti that Thymus plants can accumulate and use in essential processes safely. In the shoots of Thymus marschallianus L., the silicon content was found to be 2.21 wt.% [15], which is in good agreement with the data obtained for the studied plants, averaging for stems and leaves 2.91 and 1.19 wt.%, respectively. Data concerning the Ti content in Thymus plants were not found in the literature.
The 24-element profile of Baikal Thymus indicates that flowers accumulate more trace elements than vegetative organs (i.e., roots, stems and leaves) (Figure 3a). This pattern was not observed for Mongolian Thymus (Figure 3b). It is likely that the dry steppe climate of Mongolia and the specific features of this plant limit the transfer of some trace elements from the soil to the flowers [41]. As seen in Table 1, the assimilation of dominant and trace elements in the flowers of the two Thymus L. species differs as follows:
Thymus serpyllum L.
Si > K > Al > Ca > Na > Mg = Fe > P > Ti > Mn = Ba > Sr = Zn > Zr > Cu = V > B > Ni > Li > Cr > Pb > Ga > Co > Be;
Thymus baikalensis Serg. L.
Si > Ca > K > Mg > Al > Fe > Na > P > Ti > Mn > Ba > Sr = Zn = Cr > Cu = V > Ni > B > Li > Zr = Co > Ga > Pb > Be.
Silicon is probably a necessary element of Thymus species due to the fact that its content is the largest in flowers and comparable to the essential elements (i.e., potassium and calcium). The mineral contents of plants are quite variable, but their composition is strongly controlled through genetic means. This is evidenced by the near-identical contents in the flowers of the biophilic K, Na, P, B, Cu and Zn but also Si and Ti as conditionally biophilic elements, which are rarely determined in plants (Table 1, Figure 2). The V, Mn, Ba, Sr and Al contents in the flowers of the two species, growing in different natural and climatic conditions, varied no more than twice. Some of the elements found were redox-active, which makes them indispensable as catalytically active cofactors in enzymes; the others demonstrate enzyme-activating functions, while the third group of elements play a structural role in protein stabilisation. The role of each element in the biosynthesis of numerous volatile organic compounds in plants of this species is yet to be fully determined.
For the Mongolian species, the accumulation of Si, Al, Fe, Na, Ba, Be, Co, Cr, Ga, Ni, Pb, Sr and V in the flowers was lower than in the roots (Figure 3a). The concentration of most elements in the flowers of Baikal thyme was lower than the soil but higher than the roots (Figure 3b). Compared to the dry steppe climate of Mongolia, the high moisture levels near Lake Baikal promotes the uptake of elements from the soil to the plants.
The published elemental concentrations in the thyme leaves, measured using a number of analytical methods and obtained for the two studied plants, were collected and compared (Table 2).
The elements were determined in the leaves of wild and cultivated Thymus species [15,23,31], or their “herb” form, and sold in supermarkets and markets [25,27,28,29,30]. Similar element abundances are displayed in bold in this table. The values of Ca, Cu, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, Zn, Si and Pb concentrations agree satisfactorily, despite differences in plant species, variations in growing conditions and, possibly, specific pre-treatment of the leaves before being sold for use as a dried herb. Thus, the genetic relationship linking plants from different regions of the world is observed. Analytical traceability is also present for the results of elements from 1 to 6, obtained mainly using different methods of atomic absorption spectrometry (i.e., FAAS, ETA-AAS and GFAAS), for elements 11–18 found using one or more analytical methods, such as ICP-AES, ICP-MS, FAES, TRXF or X-ray analysis, including different options for chemical preparation of plant samples (acid digestion, melting, etc.). However, the highest number of simultaneous element concentrations (24 elements) was determined using the DC-arc AES method without the use of ashing or acid digestion of plant samples.

4. Conclusions

Two Thymus L. plant species growing wild in different soil types and climatic conditions were collected and studied: Thymus serpyllum L.—in the Mongolian steppe—and Thymus baikalensis Serg. L.—on the coast of Lake Baikal in Russia. The concentrations of 24 elements were determined in the underground and aboveground parts of the two Thymus L. species. To obtain the element concentrations, we used the method of atomic emission spectrometry with arc discharge, which does not include ashing or acid digestion of plant samples. The average RSD values amounted to 10–20%. The traceability of the results was evaluated based on the data for the certified reference samples (i.e., CRMs Tr-1 and GSV-4) obtained by ICP-AES and ICP-MS.
For Thymus species plants growing in different soil types and climatic conditions, the accumulation profiles of 24 elements in the sequence “soil–roots–stems–leaves–flowers” was obtained. The maximum Si accumulation in the aboveground organs of the plants indicates the essential nature of this element in the plant’s life cycle gained during the plant’s evolution. Although the absolute values of element concentrations varied, the middle members of the obtained sequence of trace elements (i.e., element profiles) remained constant: … P > Ti > Mn ≥ Ba > Sr = Zn … Cu = V > B > Ni > Li …. The similar concentrations of Si, K, P, Ti, Zn, Cu, V and B found to have accumulated in plant flowers, along with very similar values of Na, Mn, Ba and Sr, also indicate the high level of genetic resistance in Thymus plants to external element concentrations and a less significant influence of soil and climatic conditions. Such elements as Pb, Ga and Be were found to be toxic to plants. It is likely that, depending on the accumulated content of Fe, Co, Ni and Cr, these elements can characterise both essential behaviour and toxic processes. It was shown that the behaviour of Zr in aboveground plant organs was similar to the behaviour of Fe, Ca, Mg, Cr, Co and Ni: the higher the content of the element in the soil, the more it accumulated in aboveground plant organs (leaves and flowers).
The data obtained can be useful for collecting wild thyme and obtaining high-quality food and pharmaceutical raw materials with a given chemical composition and controlled biological activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app12083904/s1, Figure S1: Calibrations for determination of phosphorus (a) and silicon (b) contents in the soils and plant organs by the DC-arc AES technique, Table S1: Certified (A ± ΔA) and defined (C ± ΔC) element contents in GSO Tr-1 CRM by DC-arc AES, ICP-AES and ICP-MS (P = 95%, n = 3), Table S2: Certified (A ± ΔA) and defined (C ± ΔC) element contents (mg/kg) in GSV-4 CRM by DC-arc AES and ICP-MS (P = 95%, n = 3).

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, I.E.V., E.V.S., K.B. and B.T.; methodology, I.E.V. and E.V.S.; validation, I.E.V. and E.V.S.; formal analysis, I.E.V., E.V.S. and B.T.; investigation, B.T., I.E.V. and E.V.S.; resources, E.V.S., I.E.V., K.B. and B.T.; data curation, I.E.V. and E.V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.E.V. and E.V.S.; writing—review and editing, I.E.V. and E.V.S.; visualisation, E.V.S. and I.E.V.; project administration, I.E.V. and K.B.; funding acquisition, I.E.V., K.B. and B.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors collected and prepared the plant material in compliance with institutional, national and international guidelines.

Acknowledgments

The study was performed within the framework of the state task № 0284-2021-0005 and the agreement on scientific cooperation between the IPT MAS and IGC SB RAS for environmental studies in Siberia and Mongolia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Kabata-Pendias, A. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780429192036. [Google Scholar]
  2. Maurice, P.A. Environmental Surfaces and Interfaces from the Nanoscale to the Global Scale; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Reimann, C.; Koller, F.; Frengstad, B.; Kashulina, G.; Niskavaara, H.; Englmaier, P. Comparison of the Element Composition in Several Plant Species and Their Substrate from a 1,500,000-Km2 Area in Northern Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 278, 87–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lagada, R.A.; Alamelua, D.; Guravb, T.; Pandeb, K.; Aggarwal, S.K. Elemental Profiling of Indian Tea by Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). At. Spectrosc. 2011, 32, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, A.; Khan, S.; Khan, M.A.; Qamar, Z.; Waqas, M. The Uptake and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals by Food Plants, Their Effects on Plants Nutrients, and Associated Health Risk: A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 13772–13799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rai, P.K.; Lee, S.S.; Zhang, M.; Tsang, Y.F.; Kim, K.H. Heavy Metals in Food Crops: Health Risks, Fate, Mechanisms, and Management. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 365–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, A.; Shukla, R.; Singh, P.; Prasad, C.S.; Dubey, N.K. Assessment of Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oil as a Safe Botanical Preservative against Post Harvest Fungal Infestation of Food Commodities. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2008, 9, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Udincev, S.N.; Zhiljakova, T.P.; Melnikov, D.P. Prospects of Using Thyme Grass and Meal. Pig-Breeding 2010, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ismail, F.S.A.; El-Gogary, M.R.; El-Morsy, N. Impact of Dietary Supplementation of Different Levels of Thyme and Its Essential Oils on Performance, Blood Parameters, Metabolic and Immune Response of Broiler Chickens. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J. 2019, 39, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bączek, K.; Pióro-Jabrucka, E.; Kosakowska, O.; Węglarz, Z. Intraspecific Variability of Wild Thyme (Thymus serpyllum L.) Occurring in Poland. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2019, 12, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chudnovskaya, G.V. Thymus serpyllum L. in East Transbaikalia. Bull. Kemerovo State Univ. 2013, 4, 12–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rabzhaeva, A.N.; Zhigzhitzhapova, S.V.; Radnaeva, L.D. Component Composition of the Essential Oils of Thymus baicalensis Serg. (Lamiaceae), Growning in the Eastern Siberia and Mongolia. Chem. Plant Raw Mater. 2015, 2, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nikolić, M.; Glamočlija, J.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Calhelha, R.C.; Fernandes, Â.; Marković, T.; Marković, D.; Giweli, A.; Soković, M. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Antitumor Activity of Thymus serpyllum L., Thymus algeriensis Boiss. and Reut and Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taghouti, M.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Félix, L.M.; Schäfer, J.; Santos, J.A.; Bunzel, M.; Nunes, F.M.; Silva, A.M. Polyphenol Composition and Biological Activity of Thymus citriodorus and Thymus vulgaris: Comparison with Endemic Iberian Thymus Species. Food Chem. 2020, 331, 127362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hodson, M.J.; White, P.J.; Mead, A.; Broadley, M.R. Phylogenetic Variation in the Silicon Composition of Plants. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 1027–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Moradi, P.; Ford-Lloyd, B.; Pritchard, J. Metabolomic Approach Reveals the Biochemical Mechanisms Underlying Drought Stress Tolerance in Thyme. Anal. Biochem. 2017, 527, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zava, D.T.; Dollbaum, C.M.; Blen, M. Estrogen and Progestin Bioactivity of Foods, Herbs, and Spices. Exp. Biol. Med. 1998, 217, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dean, M.; Murphy, B.T.; Burdette, J.E. Phytosteroids beyond Estrogens: Regulators of Reproductive and Endocrine Function in Natural Products. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 442, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Marino, M.; Bersani, C.; Comi, G. Antimicrobial Activity of the Essential Oils of Thymus vulgaris L. Measured Using a Bioimpedometric Method. J. Food Prot. 1999, 62, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martins-Gomes, C.; Souto, E.B.; Cosme, F.; Nunes, F.M.; Silva, A.M. Thymus carnosus Extracts Induce Anti-Proliferative Activity in Caco-2 Cells through Mechanisms That Involve Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis. J. Funct. Foods 2019, 54, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mseddi, K.; Alimi, F.; Noumi, E.; Veettil, V.N.; Deshpande, S.; Adnan, M.; Hamdi, A.; Elkahoui, S.; Alghamdi, A.; Kadri, A.; et al. Thymus musilii Velen. as a Promising Source of Potent Bioactive Compounds with Its Pharmacological Properties: In Vitro and in Silico Analysis. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6782–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Silva, A.M.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Souto, E.B.; Schäfer, J.; Santos, J.A.; Bunzel, M.; Nunes, F.M. Thymus zygis Subsp. zygis an Endemic Portuguese Plant: Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant, Anti-Proliferative and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arsenijević, J.; Marković, J.; Šoštarić, I.; Ražić, S. A Chemometrics as a Powerful Tool in the Elucidation of the Role of Metals in the Biosynthesis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Hungarian Thyme Samples. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 71, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kashin, V.K. Conditionally Essential Microelements in the Medicinal Herbs of Transbaikalia. Chem. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 19, 237–244. [Google Scholar]
  25. Garcia, E.; Cabrera, C.; Lorenzo, M.L.; López, M.C. Chromium Levels in Spices and Aromatic Herbs. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 247, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. López, F.F.; Cabrera, C.; Lorenzo, M.L.; López, M.C. Aluminium Levels in Spices and Aromatic Herbs. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 257, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chizzola, R.; Michitsch, H.; Franz, C. Monitoring of Metallic Micronutrients and Heavy Metals in Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants from Austria. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003, 216, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rihawy, M.S.; Bakraji, E.H.; Aref, S.; Shaban, R. Elemental Investigation of Syrian Medicinal Plants Using PIXE Analysis. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2010, 268, 2790–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kara, D. Evaluation of Trace Metal Concentrations in Some Herbs and Herbal Teas by Principal Component Analysis. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karadaş, C.; Kara, D. Chemometric Approach to Evaluate Trace Metal Concentrations in Some Spices and Herbs. Food Chem. 2012, 130, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. De La Calle, I.; Costas, M.; Cabaleiro, N.; Lavilla, I.; Bendicho, C. Fast Method for Multielemental Analysis of Plants and Discrimination According to the Anatomical Part by Total Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gaur, S.; Kumar, J.; Kumar, D.; Chauhan, D.K.; Prasad, S.M.; Srivastava, P.K. Fascinating Impact of Silicon and Silicon Transporters in Plants: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vasil’eva, I.E.; Shabanova, E.V. Determination of Trace Elements in Plants Using the Direct Current Arc Atomic-Emission Spectrometry. Anal. Kontrol 2019, 23, 298–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Shabanova, E.V.; Vasil’eva, I.E.; Tausenev, D.S.; Scherbarth, S.; Pierau, U. Features of «Plants» Cluster from the Reference Materials Collection IGC SB RAS. Meas. Stand. Ref. Mater. 2021, 17, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arnautov, N.V. Certified Reference Materials of the Chemical Composition of Natural Mineral Substances, 1st ed.; Institute of Geology and Geophysics SB RAS: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yan, M.; Cheng, Z. Study and Application of Geochemical Reference Materials in the Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration (IGGE), China. Geostand. Geoanalytical Res. 2007, 31, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Govindaraju, K. 1994 Compilation of Working Values and Sample Description for 383 Geostandards. Geostand. Newsl. 1994, 18, 1–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. NSAM. Determination of Elemental Composition of Plant Samples (Grass, Leaves) by Atomic Emission and Mass Spectral Analysis Methods, 1st ed.; VIMS: Moscow, Russia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sucharová, J.; Suchara, I. Determination of 36 Elements in Plant Reference Materials with Different Si Contents by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: Comparison of Microwave Digestions Assisted by Three Types of Digestion Mixtures. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 576, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Semhi, K.; Clauer, N.; Chaudhuri, S. Variable Element Transfers from an Illite-Rich Substrate to Growing Plants during a Three-Month Experiment. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 57, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Usman, Y.M.; Nasiru, Y.P.; Modibbo, U.U. Health Risk Assessment on Humans by Contamination of Heavy Metals in Some Edible Crops and Fish at Galena Mining Area of Nahuta, Alkaleri Local Government Area, Bauchi State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 14, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Elemental profiles of the soils.
Figure 1. Elemental profiles of the soils.
Applsci 12 03904 g001
Figure 2. The elemental profiles: (a) essential elements; (b) toxic and sub-toxic (or sub-essential) elements.
Figure 2. The elemental profiles: (a) essential elements; (b) toxic and sub-toxic (or sub-essential) elements.
Applsci 12 03904 g002aApplsci 12 03904 g002b
Figure 3. Element contents in the soils, roots and flowers of plants: (a) Thymus serpyllum L. (Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar); (b) Thymus baikalensis Serg. L. (Russia, Irkutsk).
Figure 3. Element contents in the soils, roots and flowers of plants: (a) Thymus serpyllum L. (Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar); (b) Thymus baikalensis Serg. L. (Russia, Irkutsk).
Applsci 12 03904 g003aApplsci 12 03904 g003b
Table 1. Element contents (mg/kg) in soils and the dried plant organs of Thymus L. species (n = 3).
Table 1. Element contents (mg/kg) in soils and the dried plant organs of Thymus L. species (n = 3).
ElementSoilRootsStemsLeavesFlowersGathering Place
(1 or 2) *
Range of
Element Content in the Dried Plants [1,2]
Al85,85021,5505540670062801<100–10,000
56,95017101900214095002
B25.118.020.027.122.512–800
9.515.113.617.618.02
Ba41127123622012611–160
93731121171132
Be2.850.570.260.200.251<0.001–7
0.610.030.060.070.102
Ca8495772072458715882013000–100,000
44,2506035779510,45020,8502
Co4.22.21.31.00.910.05–10
28.71.72.41.64.22
Cr36.410.54.63.32.311–1100
1539.61010542
Cu231620132911–500
60292432392
Fe12,95070952565252019451300–100,000
49,50014752000197567952
Ga13.04.22.31.31.610.02–16
11.80.71.20.92.42
K38,400805016,100504016,10015000–80,000
32,500848026,70019,20013,9002
Li9.22.92.62.04.010.02–1000
11.72.02.02.09.02
Mg245020101380215021001200–60,000
34,80025003200502512,7002
Mn262284155132122115–330
104370961142402
Na29,40050504365214039301200–100,000
85453861730131532902
Ni17.814.710.110.87.810.05–50
62.615.29.39.430.22
P278651995116516001100–70,000
360820995115517602
Pb21.06.13.21.31.910.01–2500
25.40.51.20.61.12
Si316,50080,00029,10029,10037,00011000–100,000
258,000786512,95010,90037,0002
Sr10311089866411.5–600
149494557522
Ti1640100749845140010.15–80
2640981201333962
V231620132910.2–1000
60292432392
Zn716152456115–250
52495048512
Zr4556227235010.005–2.6
30.41.05.52.542
* Gathering Place: 1—Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar; 2—Russia, Irkutsk.
Table 2. The elemental contents (mg/kg) in the leaves and spices of the Thymus plant, found by different analytical methods.
Table 2. The elemental contents (mg/kg) in the leaves and spices of the Thymus plant, found by different analytical methods.
ElementThymus vulgarisThymus vulgarisThymus serpyllumThymus marschallianusThyme (Thymbra spicata)Thymus vulgaris
Al6.35–7.90
Ba 81.6
Ca 775921,100
Co 0.15
Cr 0.83 0.57
Cu 4.17.2 6.18.8
Fe 111.5267.3 440427
K 14,708 14,700
Mg 2115
Mn 60.984.9 11619.3
Na 106.5
Ni 1.5
Pb 0.621.12
Si 22,100
Sr 45.626.8
Zn 32.814.4 22.435.1
Gathering placeSpain, supermarketAustria, near Vienna Turkey, supermarketSyria, supermarket
MethodETA–AASETA–AAS, FAAS ICP–MS PIXE
Reference[25,26][27][15][29][28]
ElementThymus vulgaris, LabiataeThyme pannonicus All. (Lamiaceae)Thymus vulgarisThymus serpyllumThymus baikalensis
Al 67002140
Ba18.06 200117
Ca13,8107886.126,580.9418,066871510,450
Co0.193 1.01.6
Cr 0.970.41–1.41 3.310
Cu 12.177.0414.59151332
Fe 30189.5–749.91119425201975
K 8006.0623,066.9310,160504019,200
Mg16701820.343802.95 21505025
Mn 44.520.54–219.09150132114
Na 2.53–114.01 21401315
Ni2.341.35–16.22 10.89.4
Pb 1.300.60
Si 29,10010,900
Sr 27.60 8657
Zn 20.433.85106.665144.748.5
Gathering placeTurkey, supermarketSerbiaSpainMongolia, UlaanbaatarRussia,
Irkutsk
MethodICP–MS, ICP–AESICP–AES, FAAS, GFAASTRXFDC–arc AES
Reference[30][23][31]This article
Note. Empty cells–no data.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vasil’eva, I.E.; Shabanova, E.V.; Tsagaan, B.; Bymbaa, K. Elemental Profiles of Wild Thymus L. Plants Growing in Different Soil and Climate Conditions. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083904

AMA Style

Vasil’eva IE, Shabanova EV, Tsagaan B, Bymbaa K. Elemental Profiles of Wild Thymus L. Plants Growing in Different Soil and Climate Conditions. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(8):3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083904

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vasil’eva, Irina E., Elena V. Shabanova, Byambasuren Tsagaan, and Khuukhenkhuu Bymbaa. 2022. "Elemental Profiles of Wild Thymus L. Plants Growing in Different Soil and Climate Conditions" Applied Sciences 12, no. 8: 3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083904

APA Style

Vasil’eva, I. E., Shabanova, E. V., Tsagaan, B., & Bymbaa, K. (2022). Elemental Profiles of Wild Thymus L. Plants Growing in Different Soil and Climate Conditions. Applied Sciences, 12(8), 3904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083904

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop