Next Article in Journal
Study of the Influence of the Dielectrophoretic Force on the Preferential Growth of Bacterial Biofilms in 3D Printed Microfluidic Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Blockchain and Smart Contracts to Secure Property Transactions in Smart Cities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving the Performance of an Ultrashort Soft X-ray Free-Electron Laser via Attosecond Afterburners
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two-Color Operation of a Soft X-ray FEL with Alternation of Undulator Tunes

1
Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Notkestr. 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany
2
Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Haike Road 99, Shanghai 201210, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is dedicated to the memory of Andrey Sorokin.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010067
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Applications in X-ray Free-Electron Lasers)

Abstract

:
FLASH is the first soft X-ray FEL user facility, routinely providing brilliant photon beams for users since 2005. The second undulator branch of this facility, FLASH2, is gap-tunable, which allows for testing and using advanced lasing concepts. In particular, we developed a two-color operation mode based on the alternatingly tuned undulator segments (every other segment is tuned to the second wavelength). This scheme is advantageous in comparison with a subsequent generation of two colors in two consecutive sections of the undulator line. First, source positions of the two FEL beams are close to each other which makes it easier to focus them on a sample. Second, the amplification is more efficient in this configuration since the segments with respectively “wrong” wavelength still act as bunchers. We studied operation of this scheme in the regime of small and large separation of tunes (up to a factor of two). We developed new methods for online intensity measurements of the two colors simultaneously that require a combination of two detectors. We also demonstrated our capabilities to measure spectral and temporal properties of two pulses with different wavelengths.

1. Introduction

Two-color lasing is a popular operation mode of X-ray FEL user facilities. A possible way to generate two colors in a gap-tunable undulator, operating in the SASE regime, is to split the undulator into two sections, and set different K-values in each of these sections. An additional useful element for X-ray pump, X-ray probe experiments could be a chicane between the two sections to control a time delay between the pulses of two different colors. One can use the same electron bunch (parts of the same bunch) for lasing in the two sections of the undulator [1,2]. In this case, the beam quality is partially spoiled in the first section (that typically operates at the onset of saturation), and one has to compromise intensities of two colors. As an alternative, one can use the fresh-bunch technique based on the principle of the betatron switcher [3]. A practical realization of this principle was conducted in a way that the head and the tail of the bunch lase in two different sections of the undulator (fresh-slice technique). This was first realized by applying beam tilt due to a transverse head-tail kick in the dechirper [4]. Beam tilt for fresh slice operation can also be introduced by combination of an energy chirp and dispersion [5,6] as well as by a transverse deflecting structure [3,7]. Alternatively, the fresh-slice technique can be based on a time-dependent transverse mismatch of the electron beam [8,9]. Other beam manipulation techniques [10,11,12,13] in the context of the split undulator scenario can be used as well.
One of the issues with all these schemes is a significant spatial separation of effective source positions of the two X-ray beams. This separation can make it difficult to efficiently focus both beams on a sample. As an alternative, one can consider two-color lasing in the undulator with the alternation of tunes of single undulator segments enabling near positions of source points. This scheme was realized at LCLS for small separation of tunes (about 1 % ) and was described in [14] as the gain-modulated FEL. Another advantage of the scheme with alternatingly tuned undulator segments is that the FEL gain for both colors is higher than in the case of the split undulator scheme with the same number of segments. This is related to the fact that the segments with “wrong” wavelengths generate longitudinal dispersion that boosts the amplification of microbunching in the electron beam. This can enable two-color operation in cases when the split undulator configuration does not provide sufficient FEL gain.
We studied extensively the two-color mode with the alternation of undulator tunes at FLASH [15,16] in 2018–2021 in the regime of a large separation of tunes spanning up to a factor of two. We developed new methods of photon diagnostics for this operation mode, including simultaneous measurements of intensity, spectral and temporal properties. The first results were published in the Proceedings of the FEL’2019 Conference [17]. Since that time, we extended our studies substantially (in particular, we developed spectral and temporal diagnostics, observed interesting new effects such as anti-correlation of pulse energies in a nonlinear regime or a significant timing jitter between two pulses, improved operation procedures). This paper summarizes the results of our studies of two-color operation mode at FLASH.

2. Two-Color Lasing with the Alternation of Undulator Tunes

Let us consider gap-tunable segmented undulators that are normally used at X-ray FEL facilities. For generation of two colors, all odd segments of an undulator are tuned to wavelength λ 1 , and even segments to λ 2 (see Figure 1). With respect to the amplification of the electromagnetic wave with the wavelength λ 1 , the FEL process is disrupted as soon as the electron beam leaves a λ 1 segment and enters a “wrong” segment tuned to λ 2 . However, energy modulations in the electron bunch, accumulated due to the interaction with the electromagnetic field in the λ 1 segment, continue to be converted into density modulations (bunching) in the λ 2 segment due to its longitudinal dispersion. Thus, in the next λ 1 segment, the beam with an enhanced bunching quickly radiates a stronger field than the one coming from the previous λ 1 segment (which in addition is diffracted), and the FEL process continues with higher amplitudes. In some sense, the mechanism is similar to that of the multi-stage (or distributed) optical klystron [18,19,20,21]. In this qualitative description, we do not consider effects of longitudinal velocity spread due to the energy spread and emittance of the electron beam. According to our estimates, these effects were practically negligible in our experiments.
The longitudinal dispersion of an undulator segment is characterized by a transfer matrix element R 56 = 2 N w λ , where N w is the number of undulator periods per segment, and λ is the resonance wavelength. If λ 1 < λ 2 , the FEL gain is, obviously, weaker for λ 1 in the corresponding λ 1 segments. However, the R 56 in λ 2 segments is stronger and gives a larger addition to the final gain at λ 1 wavelength. Thus, the total gain in the linear regime can be comparable even if λ 1 is significantly shorter than λ 2 . In principle, the number of segments does not have to be the same for λ 1 and λ 2 ; this depends on desired intensity ratio. If the undulator line is sufficiently long, nonlinear effects start to play a role in the last segments. In this case, the amplification processes at both wavelengths are not independent anymore, and they start to compete in terms of modification of the longitudinal phase space of the electron beam. As a result, the radiation power is somewhat smaller compared to standard single-color lasing in saturation regime. However, it can still be sufficient for many experiments.
Finally, we should note that the considered scheme was the only possibility to establish two-color operation of FLASH because the undulator is too short to have a sufficient gain in the split-undulator configuration.

3. Experimental Studies at FLASH

FLASH (Free-electron LASer in Hamburg) [15] started user operation in summer 2005 as the first free-electron laser for XUV and soft X-ray radiation. It is operated in the “self-amplified spontaneous emission” (SASE) mode [22] and currently covers a wavelength range from 4 nm to about 90 nm in the first harmonic with GW peak power and pulse durations between a few fs and 200 fs. The electron bunches with maximum energy of 1.25 GeV are distributed between the two branches, FLASH1 and FLASH2 [16], see Figure 2. The facility operates with long pulse trains (several hundred pulses) with a 10 Hz repetition rate. Presently, the facility is being upgraded towards a high repetition rate seeding in FLASH1 branch [23].
The segmented variable-gap undulators of the FLASH2 branch have a period of 3.14 cm and can provide a maximum undulator parameter K about 2.7. FLASH2 hosts twelve 2.5 m long segments with quadrupoles in the intersections. After successful experiments with two-color lasing, the control system of the undulator was upgraded to make the operation in this regime easier. In particular, it allows user control of two-color operation. In addition, special photon diagnostics methods were developed as described below, and there is online intensity diagnostics suitable for user operation.
Below in this paper, we present exemplary results obtained during two-color operation of FLASH2 undulator in 2018–2021. Electron energy in these experiments was between 430 MeV and 1240 MeV, and bunch charge was typically in the range of 70–300 pC. We generated FEL wavelengths between 6 nm and 50 nm, and pulse energies in both colors were up to several tens of microjoules. The spectral separation between two colors can be set from ∼1% to ∼100%. It is possible to do rough changes of the pulse energy ratio by changing, for example, between 6 + 6 configuration of the undulator segments (as shown in Figure 1) and 5 + 7 configuration, as well as fine-tuning by slightly changing the K values of a few segments.

4. Simultaneous Measurements of Two Colors

4.1. Intensity Measurement

As it was mentioned, the two colors are not generated independently, so that one can not measure their intensities by turning off one color and measuring the other one (and vice versa). Moreover, in case of user experiments, one should have online nondisruptive measurements. Thus, one of the goals of our studies was to develop methods for such measurements. It is obvious that we can determine pulse energies of each of the X-ray beams using two linear detectors having a different response for the different wavelengths. In this case, we have a system of two linear equations with two unknowns and can easily retrieve pulse energies at λ 1 and λ 2 .
We have four of such detectors available in the FLASH2 tunnel and experimental hall: two gas monitor detectors (GMDs) for measurements of absolute pulse energy [24], the online photoionization spectrometer (OPIS) for non-invasive wavelength measurements [25], and a micro-channel-plate (MCP) detector for pulse energy measurements with a large dynamic range [26]. Note that, in the following, we refer to ensemble-averaged pulse energies throughout the text.
As an example, let us consider the measurement we did with the tunnel GMD and OPIS. Note that both devices are placed in the tunnel next to each other, and there are no propagation effects that can be different for the two X-ray beams. In the time-of-flight spectra of the OPIS, relative intensities of the two X-ray colors can be determined since the signals of the respective photoelectrons are separated in arrival time due to different kinetic energies. From these signal intensities, a ratio of number of photons of the two wavelengths can be evaluated. Thus, we have the first linear equation:
N 2 = p N 1 ,
where N 1 and N 2 are unknown average photon numbers, and p is the measured coefficient. If the tunnel GMD is set to the measurements of pulse energy at λ 1 , it will show spurious pulse energy E ˜ g m d , when the second color is present:
E ˜ g m d = ω 1 N 1 + N 2 σ 2 γ 2 σ 1 γ 1 .
Here, σ 1 , 2 are the photoionization cross sections and γ 1 , 2 are the mean charges for a given gas and the two photon energies (see, e.g., [27]), ω 1 = 2 π c / λ 1 . Solving Equations (1) and (2) for N 1 and N 2 , we obtain the final result for the actual pulse energies E 1 = ω 1 N 1 and E 2 = ω 2 N 2 :
E 1 = E ˜ g m d 1 + p σ 2 γ 2 σ 1 γ 1 , E 2 = p E 1 ω 2 ω 1 .
In a similar way, one can obtain simple expressions for the combination of the MCP-based detector and the tunnel GMD. The MCP detector can be cross-calibrated with the GMD at a certain wavelength, say λ 1 . When two X-ray beams are present, it shows a linear combination of two actual pulse energies: E ˜ m c p = E 1 + s E 2 . It is interesting to note that, in the wavelength range of our experiments, we had s 1 . Combining this equation with Equation (2), we obtain the actual pulse energies.
We also did the measurements with two GMDs, one in the tunnel and one in the experimental hall. They have to be filled with different gases; then, Equation (2) can be also used for the second GMD but with the different constants σ and γ . Moreover, we should correct the photon numbers N 1 and N 2 in that equation for the beamline transmission that has to be measured once for each wavelength individually. Then, we have again the system of two equations from which we obtain actual pulse energies. The two-color measurement with two GMDs has been integrated into the GMD control software and can be used online for tuning and monitoring of this operation mode at FLASH2 (see Figure 3).
For simultaneous lasing at 7 nm and 10 nm, we could measure a part of the FEL gain curve (see Figure 4) using the methods described above. We opened the undulator segments one by one, starting with the last one. One can see that the pulse energy of a color 1 stays constant when we open the segment tuned to color 2, and vice versa. This is an indication of validity of the measurement. In general, the three methods show a reasonable agreement at a high intensity level, when the FEL operated in a nonlinear regime and the intensities were relatively stable.
Another interesting measurement is a scan of one wavelength while the other stays constant. Pulse energies were measured with the help of OPIS and the tunnel GMD (see Figure 5). The undulator was in 6 + 6 configuration: the even segments were kept tuned to λ 2 = 22.6 nm, while the odd segments were scanned in the range of λ 1 between 13.7 nm and 20.6 nm. One can see from Figure 5 that such a wavelength scan is possible in a wide range, but the two colors are not generated independently. When we increase λ 1 , the pulse energy at this wavelength increases significantly at the expense of the pulse energy reduction of λ 2 due to nonlinear effects.

4.2. Spectral Measurements

FLASH2 provides an invasive grating spectrometer located at the beam line FL22 providing a wavelengths range of 10 nm to 62 nm. The spectrometer is equipped with an intensified camera (IDDC) which can select one bunch of a train [28]. Usually, only one wavelength is monitored by the spectrometer. Simultaneous observation of two colors may be possible with the help of higher grating orders as shown in Figure 6. Here, the 4th grating order of the first color at 39 nm and in the 3rd order of the second color at 38 nm are used. Higher grating orders are preferred due to better resolution but suffer in signal-to-noise ratio. The first color and the second color are recorded with 9.83 nm/126.13 eV and 12.78 nm/97 eV, with a bandwidth of 0.7% and 0.4%. Since the spectrometer records the vertical beam profile, the measurement can monitor the relative pointing of the two colors.
The simultaneous detection of two colors in single shots allows for observing the correlation between the pulse energies. An example of such a measurement for wavelengths 15 nm and 17 nm is presented in Figure 7. One can observe, in fact, an anti-correlation which is a feature of the nonlinear regime of operation of the two-color scheme as explained above.
Continuous monitoring of spectral features is possible using the OPIS spectrometer. Figure 8 shows a spectral measurement with the FLASH2 OPIS, where one of the colors was kept constant while the other one was scanned. The measurement varied the first color from 13.6 nm to 20.6 nm in seven steps while the second wavelength was kept at 22.6 nm. We clearly observed the increase in resulting photon pulse energy with longer first wavelengths λ 1 . This online monitoring is needed as an influence of changing one wavelength to the other was observed.

4.3. Measurements of Temporal Properties

In order to gain information about the pulse duration of the two XUV pulses, we used the THz streaking technique [29,30]. THz streaking uses a noble gas target that is photoionized by the FEL pulses. The generated photoelectrons propagate in the time-varying electric field of the co-propagating THz radiation. After interaction with the terahertz field, the photoelectrons have changed their momentum component in the direction of the field. If the electron wave packet is short compared to the period length of the THz field, the temporal structure of the wave packet will be mapped onto the kinetic energy distribution of the emitted electrons and can be used to determine the pulse duration.
The measurements were performed at the dedicated photon diagnostic beamline FL21, which is equipped with a permanently installed THz streaking setup (for details, see e.g., [31,32]). For the shown data, the FEL was operated at wavelengths of λ 1 = 15 nm (83 eV) and λ 2 = 19 nm (66 eV). Using Ne as target gas leads to kinetic energies of 61 and 45 eV for the 2p photoelectron lines, resulting from the two different wavelengths. Figure 9 shows the kinetic energy of the two photoelectron lines as a function of the delay between the THz field and the XUV pulse. This delay scan depicts the vector potential of the THz field and shows the linear slope which is used to map the temporal information into kinetic energy. Acquiring data at a fixed delay in the middle of the linear slope, we can determine the pulse-to-pulse variation of the pulse duration by monitoring the broadening of the streaked photoelectron line with respect to an unstreaked reference (THz off). The result for the two wavelength is shown in Figure 10. The averaged pulse duration of λ 1 is 70 ± 12 fs and 90 ± 12 fs for the second wavelength, respectively. The given error denotes the RMS width of the distribution of the pulse durations. Analyzing the shot-to-shot fluctuations, it turns out that the pulse duration as well as the pulse energy (determined as integral over the photoelectron line) fluctuate independently for the two colors. No correlation was found; this is the consequence of the fact that FEL operated in a linear regime.
The method of THz streaking also allows for determining the arrival time of the XUV pulses with respect to the THz [31]. Here, the technique can be used to investigate the relative arrival times between the two-color pulses. First of all, a temporal shift between the two streaking curves in Figure 9 indicates an average offset of the arrival time of the two pulses. For the shown experimental data, we found a slight offset, indicating that the pulses with λ 1 arrive on average of ∼15 fs earlier as pulses with λ 2 . Further measurements will be needed to investigate the dependence of the shift on FEL parameters. Secondly, we can analyze the shot-to-shot arrival time fluctuations between the two pulses. As it was shown in Ref. [33], the SASE based fluctuations of the XUV pulse shapes lead to a variation of the mean arrival time (center of gravity), which is between 10% and 30% of the pulse duration depending on the XUV pulse length and degree of saturation. For the measured settings, we found that the relative temporal fluctuations between the two pulses follow a Gaussian distribution (see Figure 11) with an RMS width of 10 fs, in good agreement with the theoretical expectations of Ref. [33].
Using the two color pulses for pump–probe experiments (e.g., using split and delay units), one has to be aware of the shot-to-shot fluctuation of the pulse duration as well as of a potential average offset. The effects are, however, significantly smaller as the pulse duration and will not lead to substantial loss in temporal resolution for experiments.

5. Conclusions

A method of two-color operation of an FEL with alternation of undulator tunes was successfully developed at the user facility FLASH. Parameters of the radiation (wavelength range and tunability, pulse energy, pulse duration, repetition rate) as well as developed photon diagnostics make such a source unique and suitable for different user experiments. In the future, we plan to use a split-and-delay unit with filters so that pump–probe experiments with ∼10 fs resolution will become possible.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.; Methodology, E.S. and M.B. (Martin Beye); Software, U.F.J. and A.S.; Investigation, E.S., I.J.B.M., M.B. (Martin Beye), M.B. (Markus Braune), M.K.C., S.D., B.F., R.I., U.F.J., M.K., J.R.-S., S.S., A.S., K.T., M.Y. and J.Z.; Resources, S.S.; Data curation, I.J.B.M., M.B. (Markus Braune), S.D., R.I., M.K. and M.Y.; Writin–original draft, E.S., S.D. and M.K.; Writing–review & editing, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Wim Leemans and Edgar Weckert as well as scientific and technical staff of FLASH for support. We are grateful to Markus Ilchen for careful reading of the manuscript and useful comments. The work was carried out when Bart Faatz was still employed as a scientist at DESY. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Andrey Sorokin, our colleague and friend.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hara, T.; Inubushi, Y.; Katayama, T.; Sato, T.; Tanaka, H.; Tanaka, T.; Togashi, T.; Togawa, K.; Tono, K.; Yabashi, M.; et al. Two-colour hard X-ray free-electron laser with wide tunability. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lutman, A.A.; Coffee, R.; Ding, Y.; Huang, Z.; Krzywinski, J.; Maxwell, T.; Messerschmidt, M.; Nuhn, H.D. Experimental demonstration of femtosecond two-color x-ray free-electron lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 134801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Brinkmann, R.; Schneidmiller, E.A.; Yurkov, M.V. Possible operation of the European XFEL with ultra-low emittance beams. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2016, 616, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lutman, A.A.; Maxwell, T.J.; MacArthur, J.P.; Guetg, M.W.; Berrah, N.; Coffee, R.N.; Ding, Y.; Huang, Z.; Marinelli, A.; Moeller, S. et al. Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free-electron lasers. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guetg, M.W.; Lutman, A.A.; Ding, Y.; Maxwell, T.J.; Huang, Z. Dispersion-based fresh-slice scheme for free-electron lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 264802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dijkstal, P.; Malyzhenkov, A.; Reiche, S.; Prat, E. Demonstration of two-color X-ray free-electron laser pulses with a sextupole magnet. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2020, 23, 030703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Reiche, S.; Prat, E. Two-color operation of a free-electron laser with a tilted beam. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2016, 23, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qin, W.; Ding, Y.; Lutman, A.A.; Chao, Y.C. Matching-based fresh-slice method for generating two-color x-ray free-electron lasers. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2017, 20, 090701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chao, Y.-C.; Qin, W.; Ding, Y.; Lutman, A.A.; Maxwell, T. Control of the lasing slice by transverse mismatch in an X-ray free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 064802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Marinelli, A.; Ratner, D.; Lutman, A.A.; Turner, J.; Welch, J.; Decker, F.J.; Loos, H.; Behrens, C.; Gilevich, S.; Miahnahri, A.A.; et al. High-intensity double-pulse X-ray free-electron laser. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bettoni, S.; Prat, E.; Reiche, S. Two-color beam generation based on wakefield excitation. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2016, 19, 050702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hernandez, A.S.; Prat, E.; Reiche, S. Generation of two-color x-ray free-electron-laser pulses from a beam with a large energy chirp and a slotted foil. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2019, 22, 030702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Vicario, C.; Bettoni, S.; Lutman, A.; Dax, A.; Huppert, M.; Trisorio, A. Two-color x-ray free-electron laser by photocathode laser emittance spoiler. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 2021, 24, 060703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marinelli, A.; Lutman, A.A.; Wu, J.; Ding, Y.; Krzywinski, J.; Nuhn, H.D.; Feng, Y.; Coffee, R.N.; Pellegrini, C. Multicolor operation and spectral control in a gain-modulated X-ray free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 134801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ackermann, W.; Asova, G.; Ayvazyan, V.; Azima, A.; Baboi, N.; Bähr, J.; Balandin, V.; Beutner, B.; Brandt, A.; Bolzmann, A.; et al. Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the water window. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Faatz, B.; Plönjes, E.; Ackermann, S.; Agababyan, A.; Asgekar, V.; Ayvazyan, V.; Baark, S.; Baboi, N.; Balandin, V.; von Bargen, N.; et al. Simultaneous operation of two soft x-ray free-electron lasers driven by one linear accelerator. New J. Phys. 2016, 18, 062002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schneidmiller, E.A.; Braune, M.; Faatz, B.; Jastrow, F.; Kuhlmann, M.; Sorokin, A.; Tiedtke, K.; Yurkov, M.V. Two color operation of FLASH2 undulator. In Proceedings of the 2019 Free Electron Laser Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 26–30 August 2019; p. 168. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vinokurov, N.A.; Skrinsky, A.N. Preprint of INP 77-59, Novosibirsk. 1977. Available online: https://inp.nsk.su/images/preprint/1977_059.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  19. Litvinenko, V. High gain distributed optical klystron. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 1991, 304, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Saldin, E.L.; Schneidmiller, E.A.; Yurkov, M.V. In Proceedings of the 2004 Free Electron Laser Conference, Trieste, Italy, 29 August–3 September 2004; p. 143.
  21. Ding, Y.; Emma, P.; Huang, Z.; Kumar, V. Optical klystron enhancement to self-amplified spontaneous emission free electron lasers. Phys. Rev. ST-AB 2006, 9, 070702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kondratenko, A.M.; Saldin, E.L. Generating of coherent radiation by a relativistic electron beam in an ondulator. Part. Accel. 1980, 10, 207. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schaper, L.; Ackermann, S.; Allaria, E.; Amstutz, P.; Baev, K.; Beye, M.; Gerth, C.; Hartl, I.; Hillert, W.; Honkavaara, K.; et al. Flexible and Coherent Soft X-ray Pulses at High Repetition Rate: Current Research and Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sorokin, A.A.; Bican, Y.; Bonfigt, S.; Brachmanski, M.; Braune, M.; Jastrow, U.F.; Gottwald, A.; Kaser, H.; Richter, M.; Tiedtke, K. An X-ray gas monitor for free-electron lasers. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2019, 26, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Braune, M.; Buck, J.; Kuhlmann, M.; Grunewald, S.; Düsterer, S.; Viefhaus, J.; Tiedtke, K. Non-invasive online wavelength measurements at FLASH2 and present benchmark. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2018, 25, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Brovko, O.; Mueller, E.; Schneidmiller, E.A.; Tiedtke, K.; Yurkov, M.V.; Brovko, O.I.; Grebentsov, A.; Syresin, E.M. Experience With MCP-Based Photon Detector at FLASH2. In Proceedings of the 2019 Free Electron Laser Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 26–30 August 2019; p. 495. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tiedtke, K.; Feldhaus, J.; Hahn, U.; Jastrow, U.; Nunez, T.; Tschentscher, T.; Bobashev, S.V.; Sorokin, A.A.; Hastings, J.B.; Möller, S.; et al. Gas detectors for x-ray lasers. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 094511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tanikawa, T.; Hage, A.; Kuhlmann, M.; Gonschior, J.; Grunewald, S.; Plönjes, E.; Düsterer, S.; Brenner, G.; Dziarzhytski, S.; Braune, M.; et al. First observation of SASE radiation using the compact wide-spectral-range XUV spectrometer at FLASH2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2016, 830, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Frühling, U.; Wieland, M.; Gensch, M.; Gebert, T.; Schütte, B.; Krikunova, M.; Kalms, R.; Budzyn, F.; Grimm, O.; Rossbach, J.; et al. Single-shot terahertz-field-driven X-ray streak camera. Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grguras, I.; Maier, A.R.; Behrens, C.; Mazza, T.; Kelly, T.J.; Radcliffe, P.; Düsterer, S.; Kazansky, A.K.; Kabachnik, N.M.; Tschentscher, T.; et al. Ultrafast X-ray pulse characterization at free-electron lasers. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ivanov, R.; Liu, J.; Brenner, G.; Brachmanski, M.; Düsterer, S. FLASH free-electron laser single-shot temporal diagnostic: Terahertz-field-driven streaking. J. Synchrotron Rad. 2018, 25, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ivanov, R.; Macias, I.J.B.; Liu, J.; Brenner, G.; Roensch-Schulenburg, J.; Kurdi, G.; Frühling, U.; Wenig, K.; Walther, S.; Dimitriou, A.; et al. Single-shot temporal characterization of XUV pulses with duration from0 fs to50 fs at FLASH. J. Phys. B 2020, 53, 184004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bermudez Macias, I.J.; Düsterer, S.; Ivanov, R.; Liu, J.; Brenner, G.; Rönsch-Schulenburg, J.; Czwalinna, M.K.; Yurkov, M.V. Study of temporal, spectral, arrival time and energy fluctuations of SASE FEL pulses. Optics Express 2021, 29, 10491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual scheme of two-color lasing with the alternation of undulator tunes. The figure was published in [17].
Figure 1. Conceptual scheme of two-color lasing with the alternation of undulator tunes. The figure was published in [17].
Applsci 13 00067 g001
Figure 2. Layout of FLASH facility.
Figure 2. Layout of FLASH facility.
Applsci 13 00067 g002
Figure 3. Online measurement of FEL intensities in two-color mode with two gas monitor detectors. Pulse energies in microjoules are shown for 7 nm (yellow) and for 10 nm (pink) versus real time.The figure was published in [17].
Figure 3. Online measurement of FEL intensities in two-color mode with two gas monitor detectors. Pulse energies in microjoules are shown for 7 nm (yellow) and for 10 nm (pink) versus real time.The figure was published in [17].
Applsci 13 00067 g003
Figure 4. Gain curve of two-color lasing. Pulse energies at 7 nm (blue) and at 10 nm (red) versus the undulator segment number. Measurements were carried out with three methods: two GMDs (squares), GMD+OPIS (circles), and GMD+MCP (triangles).The figure was published in [17].
Figure 4. Gain curve of two-color lasing. Pulse energies at 7 nm (blue) and at 10 nm (red) versus the undulator segment number. Measurements were carried out with three methods: two GMDs (squares), GMD+OPIS (circles), and GMD+MCP (triangles).The figure was published in [17].
Applsci 13 00067 g004
Figure 5. Pulse energies of two XUV beams measured with the GMD+OPIS method. The first color (odd undulator segments) is scanned between 13.7 nm and 20.6 nm (shown in blue). The second color (even segments) stays at 22.6 nm (shown in red).The figure was published in [17].
Figure 5. Pulse energies of two XUV beams measured with the GMD+OPIS method. The first color (odd undulator segments) is scanned between 13.7 nm and 20.6 nm (shown in blue). The second color (even segments) stays at 22.6 nm (shown in red).The figure was published in [17].
Applsci 13 00067 g005
Figure 6. Sum of spectra with 3rd grating order of color 2 (12.78 nm/97 eV) and 4th grating order of color 1 (9.83 nm/126.13 eV). The photon beam intensity relation was due to experimental needs during the two-color test experiment.
Figure 6. Sum of spectra with 3rd grating order of color 2 (12.78 nm/97 eV) and 4th grating order of color 1 (9.83 nm/126.13 eV). The photon beam intensity relation was due to experimental needs during the two-color test experiment.
Applsci 13 00067 g006
Figure 7. Correlation plot of pulse energies at 15 nm and 17 nm measured with the grating spectrometer.
Figure 7. Correlation plot of pulse energies at 15 nm and 17 nm measured with the grating spectrometer.
Applsci 13 00067 g007
Figure 8. Two-color OPIS measurement while scanning color 1 from λ 1 = 13.6 nm to 20.6 nm. Color 2 was kept at λ 2 = 22.6 nm. The time of flight directly translates into photon beam wavelength. The OPIS was operated with argon as a target gas. The main features to which the wavelength labels are assigned to are the Ar 3p photoelectron lines. A retardation voltage of 25 V had been applied to the flight tube.
Figure 8. Two-color OPIS measurement while scanning color 1 from λ 1 = 13.6 nm to 20.6 nm. Color 2 was kept at λ 2 = 22.6 nm. The time of flight directly translates into photon beam wavelength. The OPIS was operated with argon as a target gas. The main features to which the wavelength labels are assigned to are the Ar 3p photoelectron lines. A retardation voltage of 25 V had been applied to the flight tube.
Applsci 13 00067 g008
Figure 9. The plot shows the vector potential of the THz streaking field recorded in a delay scan. The THz pulses were temporally scanned with respect to the XUV pulses. For each delay, 30 photoelectron spectra were recorded. For the pulse duration analysis, the spectra in the middle of the linear slope (delay −0.2 ps) were used. One can also see the broadening of the spectral lines with respect to the larger delays (with very low THz field), containing the information about the pulse duration.
Figure 9. The plot shows the vector potential of the THz streaking field recorded in a delay scan. The THz pulses were temporally scanned with respect to the XUV pulses. For each delay, 30 photoelectron spectra were recorded. For the pulse duration analysis, the spectra in the middle of the linear slope (delay −0.2 ps) were used. One can also see the broadening of the spectral lines with respect to the larger delays (with very low THz field), containing the information about the pulse duration.
Applsci 13 00067 g009
Figure 10. Measured pulse duration for 3000 FEL pulses. The shorter wavelength λ 1 = 15 nm (red) shows a shorter pulse duration on average of 70 fs FWHM, while the pulse duration of λ 2 = 19 nm (blue) is 90 fs FWHM.
Figure 10. Measured pulse duration for 3000 FEL pulses. The shorter wavelength λ 1 = 15 nm (red) shows a shorter pulse duration on average of 70 fs FWHM, while the pulse duration of λ 2 = 19 nm (blue) is 90 fs FWHM.
Applsci 13 00067 g010
Figure 11. Histogram of the relative arrival time fluctuations between the two pulses. For the used FEL parameters, we found a ∼10 fs rms fluctuation of the relative arrival time.
Figure 11. Histogram of the relative arrival time fluctuations between the two pulses. For the used FEL parameters, we found a ∼10 fs rms fluctuation of the relative arrival time.
Applsci 13 00067 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schneidmiller, E.; Bermudez Macias, I.J.; Beye, M.; Braune, M.; Czwalinna, M.K.; Düsterer, S.; Faatz, B.; Ivanov, R.; Jastrow, U.F.; Kuhlmann, M.; et al. Two-Color Operation of a Soft X-ray FEL with Alternation of Undulator Tunes. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010067

AMA Style

Schneidmiller E, Bermudez Macias IJ, Beye M, Braune M, Czwalinna MK, Düsterer S, Faatz B, Ivanov R, Jastrow UF, Kuhlmann M, et al. Two-Color Operation of a Soft X-ray FEL with Alternation of Undulator Tunes. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schneidmiller, Evgeny, Ivette J. Bermudez Macias, Martin Beye, Markus Braune, Marie Kristin Czwalinna, Stefan Düsterer, Bart Faatz, Rosen Ivanov, Ulf Fini Jastrow, Marion Kuhlmann, and et al. 2023. "Two-Color Operation of a Soft X-ray FEL with Alternation of Undulator Tunes" Applied Sciences 13, no. 1: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010067

APA Style

Schneidmiller, E., Bermudez Macias, I. J., Beye, M., Braune, M., Czwalinna, M. K., Düsterer, S., Faatz, B., Ivanov, R., Jastrow, U. F., Kuhlmann, M., Rönsch-Schulenburg, J., Schreiber, S., Sorokin, A., Tiedtke, K., Yurkov, M., & Zemella, J. (2023). Two-Color Operation of a Soft X-ray FEL with Alternation of Undulator Tunes. Applied Sciences, 13(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop