Next Article in Journal
Refined Answer Selection Method with Attentive Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Network and Self-Attention Mechanism for Intelligent Medical Service Robot
Next Article in Special Issue
Techno-Economic Potential of Plasma-Based CO2 Splitting in Power-to-Liquid Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Aspects of Cyber Security in Autonomous and Connected Vehicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aging of Polylactide Films Exposed to Plasma—Hydrophobic Recovery and Selected Application Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 5
10.3390/app13053015
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plasma-Activated Tap Water Production and Its Application in Atomization Disinfection

by
Ao Xiao
1,
Dawei Liu
1,2,* and
Yan Li
1,*
1
State Key Lab of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
2
Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3015; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053015
Submission received: 15 February 2023 / Revised: 23 February 2023 / Accepted: 25 February 2023 / Published: 26 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plasma Technology and Its Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plasma-activated tap water (PATW) is a new technology for obtaining a high concentration of active aqueous plasma substances by discharging underwater. Commonly plasma-activated water (PAW) is realized by activating deionized water or distilled water, which has problems such as high cost, a small discharge area, and insufficient dissolution of active substances. This paper reports the development of a dielectric barrier discharge array to generate a high concentration of active aqueous plasma substances. The device can realize a uniform, stable, and large-area discharge in a large volume of tap water, and it has the advantages of low cost, high integration, and reusability. Using the device to treat 1000 mL of tap water for 1 h can reduce the pH of the tap water from 8.10 to 2.54, and the logarithmic value of killing E. coli is greater than 5.0. We sprayed PATW onto clothes to sterilize the bacteria when people were through the disinfection door and verified that the PATW had a good sterilization effect. The short-lived substances, singlet oxygen, and superoxide anion radicals played a key role in the sterilization process by PATW.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the population on the earth has grown rapidly. It is estimated that the world’s population will reach 10 billion by the middle of this century. The resulting problems of food safety, hygiene, and health have become increasingly prominent [1]. The SARS, Ebola, COVID-19, and other diseases that broke out in this century remind us always to be alert to possible safety hazards, take timely cleaning and disinfection measures, and inhibit the spread of germs.
Traditional disinfectants commonly used in sterilization, such as chlorine-containing disinfectants, alcohol disinfectants, and aldehyde disinfectants, etc., can effectively disinfect and sterilize the surface of objects, but they are irritating when used, and their chemical residues cause particular harm to the environment and the human body [2,3]. Some bacteria even develop strong resistance to these disinfectants. Human society urgently needs a new disinfection method that can effectively kill pathogens. Plasma-activated water (PAW) is a new technology that uses low-temperature plasma to treat water. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) are transferred from the plasma, where they are produced, into water so that the water contains nitrates, nitrites, hydrogen peroxide, singlet oxygen, superoxide, etc. [4]. These aqueous RONS react with the components of pathogenic microorganisms and effectively inactivate these microorganisms [5]. The bactericidal effect of PAW is significantly enhanced in an acidic environment [6].
PAW has the advantages of convenient preparation and portability. It can sterilize efficiently and be combined with existing disinfection systems. In recent years, it has been used in medical disinfection [7,8,9,10], food preservation [11,12,13], and wound treatment [14,15,16], and it does not produce apparent side effects on the human body and the environment. It is a green, clean, safe, and compelling new sterilization and freshness preserving technology. Matthew J. Traylor et al. treated distilled water with a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) to generate PAW and used it to treat E. coli for 15 min. The active bacterial population was reduced by five orders of magnitude [17]. Li Y. et al. used a DC-driven needle array to activate a chemical solution containing nitrite and hydrogen peroxide, reducing the active E. coli population by 6 orders of magnitude [18].
There are mainly two methods to generate PAW: discharges on water and discharges in water. The existing PAW preparation systems primarily use water surface discharges and include plasma jets, needle water discharges, surface dielectric barrier discharges, sliding arc discharges, etc. [19,20,21,22,23]. This method wastes some gaseous RONS and is often used to activate small amounts of deionized or distilled water. When dealing with cheap and readily available tap water, the acid produced by plasma is consumed by the high level of carbonate and bicarbonate in the tap water, which act as buffers, so it is difficult to lower the pH value of tap water [19,24], resulting in a poor bactericidal effect. In contrast to water surface discharges, discharges in water increase the contact area between the plasma and water significantly and promote the dissolution of the gaseous RONS [25].
Aiming at the shortcomings of traditional devices, we developed a plasma-activated tap water (PATW) preparation device based on an air dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) in tap water. The plasma generated during the discharge was in direct contact with the tap water through the discharge channel, and the gaseous RONS dissolved easily through the discharge channel and the subsequent bubbling. The high concentration of aqueous RONS had a good bactericidal effect. The atomized PATW was also sprayed onto clothes to sterilize bacteria when people were through the disinfection door. By studying the bactericidal effects of various long-lived and short-lived aqueous RONS, we verified that short-lived singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radical RONS played a key role.

2. Experimental Setup

2.1. DBD-Based PAW Device

An overall structure diagram of the DBD-based PAW is shown in Figure 1, showing in particular 4 DBD devices in a water tank. The voltage of discharge was measured by a voltage probe (Tektronix P6015A, USA), and the current was measured by a current probe (Tektronix TCP312A, USA). The homemade kHz AC power supply was used to drive the discharge. The optical emission spectrum of the plasma was measured by a spectrometer (Princeton Instruments Acton SpectraHub 2500i, USA).
The DBD device consisted of a metal rod electrode, an inner glass wall, and an outer glass wall from the inside to the outside (Figure 2). The metal rod electrode was closely attached to the inner glass wall and was directly connected to the high-voltage pole of the power supply. There are air inlets and outlet holes on the outer glass wall. When the air flow rate was 10 L/min (provided by an air pump), a discharge environment of pure air was formed under the water surface, thereby generating a DBD discharge between the metal rod electrode, and the water, which was used as the ground electrode. The glass tube’s length and diameter were 150 mm and 11 mm, respectively. The diameter of the metal rod electrode was 4 mm. The thickness of the glass wall was 1 mm. The diameter of the air inlet on the outer glass wall was 6 mm, the diameter of the air outlet hole was 2 mm, and the distance between the inner and outer glass wall was 2 mm.

2.2. Measurement of Aqueous RONS

We treated 1 L of tap water (the living water provided by Wuhan Water Affairs Group Co., Ltd. Wuhan, China) and distilled water (high -purity industrial distilled water, Honghuangzhili Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) for 1 h using the DBD source shown in Figure 1, and then measured the concentrations of aqueous NO 3 − , NO 2 − , and H 2 O 2 , pH, and conductivity in the two activated waters. We used absorption spectrometry to measure the concentration of NO 3 − , NO 2 − ion, and H 2 O 2 . The analytical instrument was a microplate reader (SpectraMaxM4, SRI 8610C GC, USA). As for nitrate and nitrite, in the presence of sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid, nitrate reacts with 2,6-dimethylphenol to produce 4-nitro-2,6-dimethylphenol, and its absorbance is measured at 324 nm to obtain the corresponding nitrate concentration. The interference of nitrite can be eliminated by aminosulfonic acid. When the pH is around 1.9 and phosphoric acid is present, nitrite reacts with 4-aminobenzenesulfonamide to form diazonium salt and then reacts with (1-naphthyl)-1,2-ethylenediamine dihy-drochloride to form a pink dye. The absorbance is measured at 540 nm to obtain the concentration of nitrite. As for hydrogen peroxide, it can react with titanium sulfate in an acid medium to form a yellow colored precipitate. We can measure its absorbance at around 410 nm to define the concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The pH value and conductivity of the activated water were measured by a pH probe (Testo 206-pH1, Hangzhou China) and a conductivity tester (Hengxin AZ86031, Hangzhou China), respectively.

2.3. Bactericidal Effect Analysis

2.3.1. Comparison of Bactericidal Effect between Plasma-Activated Tap Water (PATW) and Plasma-Activated Distilled Water (PADW)

We used E. coli (A TCC25922) provided by the School of Life Science and Technology of Huazhong University of Science and Technology to determine the bactericidal effect of PAW. To do this, 1 L of tap water and distilled water were treated by plasma for 1 h, respectively, and the obtained PATW and PADW were immediately used to cultivate E. coli with a concentration of 108 CFU/mL. 5 mL of normal saline to the centrifuged colony as the control group and 5 mL of PATW and PAW as the experimental group, mixed well and reacted with E. coli for 15 min and 30 min. After oscillating evenly, 100 μL of the corresponding mixed solution was used to coat the petri dish (90 mm CITOCIST) and was incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 37 °C for 18 h. We used a CFU counting method to measure the number of surviving colonies after 18 h of cultivation. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. By comparing the number of surviving colonies in the control group and the experimental group, the bactericidal ability of PATW and PADW were determined.

2.3.2. Disinfection of Clothing Surface with Atomized PATW

In order to determine the bactericidal effect of PATW in a particular application, we atomized PATW in a disinfection door (an engineering prototype, the structure diagram is shown in Figure 3) and disinfected the surface of the bacteria-contaminated clothing on a dummy. We first put the stainless steel sampling plate (G01 Bikeman) on the surface of the experimental cloth, used a sterile cotton swab to take an E. coli suspension with an initial concentration of 108 CFU/mL, and spread it evenly on the blank area of the stainless steel sampling plate and dried it naturally. Afterward, we sprayed the atomized PATW onto the surface of the contaminated clothes in the disinfection door for 1 min and 2 min, waited for 10 min for disinfection, and then sampled and cultured the collected bacteria.

2.3.3. Comparison of Sterilization Effects of PATW and Chemical Solutions

In order to verify the specific effects of NO 3 − , NO 2 − , H 2 O 2 (long-lived RONS) in PATW sterilization, we used sodium NO 3 − , sodium nitrite, and hydrogen peroxide solution to prepare a slightly higher concentration NO 3 − (5600 μmol/L), NO 2 − (50 μmol/L), and H 2 O 2 (850 μmol/L) of the chemical solution and adjusted its pH to about 2.5 with dilute hydrochloric acid. This chemical solution was added to the centrifuged E. coli solution and incubated for 15 min.
Active particle removers, such as 50 mM L-histamine (singlet oxygen scavenger), 100 U/mL SOD (superoxide anion radical scavenger), and 50 mM mannitol (hydroxyl radical scavenger), were added to the PATW. Afterward, this solution was mixed with the centrifuged E. coli suspension to test whether these short-lived substances, O 1 2 2 , O 2 − , and OH, played a key role in the sterilization process of PATW [26,27,28].

3. Experimental Results

3.1. Discharges of Plasma Sources in Tap Water

Figure 4 shows DBD source discharges in tap water. The discharge started at about 16 kV (peak-to-peak), and a blue-purple uniform filamentary discharge appeared in the glass tube. As the bubbles extended outward from the small holes in the outer glass tube (10 L/min air provided by an air pump, Figure 1), part of the plasma extended to the tap water outside the tube through the channel formed by many bubbles, generating many bubbles with plasma. The extended volume of the plasma outside the tube increased significantly as the voltage increased.
Figure 5 captured the simultaneous discharge of four DBD devices driven by 20 kV pulses. The 4-DBD discharge array generated a stable discharge below the water surface, producing aqueous RONS, which can generate 500 mL PATW at one time.
The voltage and current characteristics of the discharge array are shown in Figure 6. The peak-to-peak voltage was 20 kV, the frequency was 10 kHz, and the peak-to-peak current was about 100 mA. The plasma power calculated by Lissajous graphic was 17.5 W.
The optical emission spectrum (OES) is shown in Figure 7. The emission spectra of N2 and N2+ in excited states dominated the OES. Because the DBD discharge formed in the air injection zone underwater (Figure 5), the OES was dominated by N2 species as common air plasma [29,30]. This measurement result is consistent with the mass spectrometry measurement result of the discharge when the air humidity was high [31]. Mass spectrometry shows that N2 in vibrational states easily reacted with O, O3, and OH to generate NO and NO2 and further generated particles such as NO 2 − , NO 3 − , and NO 3 − ( H 2 O ) n .

3.2. Aqueous RONS Measurement

We measured the concentration of NO 3 − ,   NO 2 − , and H 2 O 2 in PATW and PADW as a function of plasma activation time (Figure 8). During the plasma activation process, we also measured the pH and conductivity of PATW and PADW (Figure 9).
The RONS concentrations in PATW and PADW were within 90% of each other. However, the pH and conductivity of PATW and PADW considerably differed. The concentration of NO 3 − and H 2 O 2 increased, the pH decreased, and the conductivity increased with the treatment time, while the concentration of NO2− increased first and then decreased. NO 2 − accumulated in the PATW and PADW in the initial stage of plasma treatment. After 30 min of plasma treatment, due to the accumulation of more oxidizing substances, NO 2 − reacted with hydrogen peroxide and ozone to generate NO 3 − and peroxynitrite [32], and its consumption rate was greater than the production rate, resulting in a decrease in concentration.
The differences of concentration of the three aqueous RONS between PATW and PADW were less than 5%, but unlike distilled water, due to the presence of various impurities in tap water, most of the acids produced during plasma treatment in the first 30 min were consumed by carbonates and bicarbonates (707–935 mg/L CaCO3) [33], causing the pH value to drop from 8 to 7 during the first 30 min, and afterward, due to the generation and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide, nitric acid, and peroxynitrite, the pH value dropped from 7 to 2.5 during the last 30 min. The initial conductivity of PATW and PADW was 360 uS/cm and 0 uS/cm, respectively. The conductivity of the two treated liquids increased to ~1800 uS/cm at 60 min (Figure 9b). NO 3 − and NO 2 − produced by underwater discharges increased the conductivity (Figure 8).

3.3. Sterilization by PATW and PADW

Figure 10 shows that the bactericidal effect of PATW and PADW (tap water and deionized water treated by plasma for 1 h) was almost the same. The concentration of E. coli colonies on the culture medium in the control group was 107 CFU/mL, while in the experimental group, when PATW and PADW were mixed with E. coli for 15 min, the concentration of colonies dropped from the initial 107 CFU/mL to 102 CFU/mL. When the mixed reaction increased to 30 min, the concentration of colonies dropped from the initial 107 CFU/mL to 101 CFU/mL, and it was difficult to find surviving E. coli on the medium. Therefore, the PATW and PADW both had a good bactericidal effect.
Many short-lived vital bactericidal substances in PAW, such as superoxides, singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals, etc., are essential in sterilization [34,35]. Storage often leads to the inactivation of these short-lived substances and affects the bactericidal effect of PATW [35]. Therefore, we studied the sterilization effect of PATW stored at low temperature (2 °C) and room temperature (30 °C) for 6 h and 24 h (Figure 11). Compared with the unpreserved PATW, the sterilizing ability of the PATW stored at 2 °C for 6 h did not change, while the sterilizing ability of the PATW stored at 30 °C decreased. When mixed with bacteria for 15 min, the bactericidal effect of PATW stored 2 °C was 6 orders of magnitude, while the bactericidal effect of PATW stored at 30 °C decreased to 4. When the reaction time increased to 30 min, the PATW stored at 2 °C still killed all E. coli in the culture medium, while less than 0.001% of E. coli treated with PATW stored at 30 °C still survived.
The bactericidal components in the PATW gradually decomposed, and the bactericidal effect of the PATW decreased by about 1 order of magnitude after 24 h of 2 °C and 30 °C storage (compare Figure 11a,b). Therefore, the PATW was suitable for storage at low temperatures for 24 h or for immediate use.
We also used the disinfection door (Figure 12) to spray the atomized PATW onto the surface of clothes to study its disinfection effect. We evenly spread the E. coli solution on the surface of the clothes, used the disinfection door to atomize PATW for disinfection for 1 min and 2 min, respectively, and sampled and cultured the collected bacteria.
Figure 12 shows the sterilization efficiency (the number of bacteria reduced after PATW treatment divided by the initial amount of bacteria) of treating the clothes with atomized PATW in the disinfection door for 1 min was 91.8%, and the sterilization efficiency increased to 96.7% for 2 min of treatment. By prolonging the preparation time of PATW and increasing the spray volume of PATW, the sterilization efficiency of atomized PATW might be further improved.

4. Discussion

The underwater DBD first produced UV, charged particles, and gaseous RONS. These substances interacted with water to produce aqueous RONS, such as peroxynitrite, NO 3 − , NO 2 − , OH, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, etc. (the reactions pathways are summarized in Figure 13) [36,37,38,39], while reducing the PAW’s pH.
Julák J. et al. found that PAW maintained a long-term bactericidal effect, in which hydrogen peroxide in an acidic environment was the dominant substance because other active ingredients (short lifetime RONS) decomposed in ms-s time range [20]. However, other scholars thought that hydrogen peroxide alone could not play a decisive role. The bactericidal effect of PAW is jointly determined by various long-lived and short-lived active substances [40,41,42]. Whether PAW has a strong bactericidal effect not only depends on the individual effects of various substances, but also depends on the complex reactions between various species. In addition to several long-lived substances, the substances with bactericidal effects in PAW also include short-lived substances such as peroxynitrite, singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide anion radicals. Among them, peroxynitrite is produced by the reaction of NO 2 − , H 2 O 2 , and H + . It is a strong oxidant, which can oxidize and thus denature the protein in the bacteria, thereby changing the bacterial morphology and thus inactivating the bacteria [43]. At low pH, peroxynitrite decomposes into hydroxyl radicals and nitrogen dioxide. Hydroxyl free radicals have strong oxidative properties and can attack bacterial cell membranes, increasing their permeability, inhibiting the regeneration ability of biofilms, and severely damaging bacteria [44]. Singlet oxygen is the excited state of oxygen molecules and has potent cytotoxicity. It can interact with biological macromolecules such as proteins and DNA in cells and cause damage to the cell membrane system by combining with molecules, causing oxidative stress in bacteria [45].
Figure 14 compares the sterilization effect of PATW and the chemical mixed solution. It can be seen that the chemical mixed solution had a killing effect of less than one logarithm on E. coli, which was far less than the five logarithm inactivation effect of PATW on E. coli. Therefore, long-lived RONS are not the most important factor for the bactericidal effect in PATW, and we should focus on the impact of other short-lived RONS.
Figure 15 shows that these scavengers alone had no appreciable sterilization effect on E. coli. Figure 16 reflects the bactericidal effect of PATW after adding several scavengers. L-histidine almost completely eliminated the sterilizing effect of PATW, and after adding L-histidine to remove singlet oxygen, E. coli survived almost completely. Adding SOD also greatly weakened the effect of PATW on E. coli, and the bacteria were only inactivated by about 1 order of magnitude. In contrast, the addition of mannitol did not significantly affect the sterilization effect of PATW. Therefore, singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radicals play a key role in the sterilization by PATW.
According to the Reactions (1)–(6), we speculate that the peroxynitrite produced by the plasma treatment further slowly reacts with hydrogen peroxide to form peroxynitrate, and the decomposition of peroxynitrate produces a singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radicals. These reactions allow the continuous production of important short-lived (ms-s range lifetime) reactive species after the discharge, and the strongly oxidative environment of the PATW slows down the decomposition of short-lived ROS [46] so that the sterilizing effect is maintained.
N O 2 − + H 2 O 2 + H + → O N O O H + H 2 O  
O N O O H + H 2 O 2 → O 2 N O O H + H 2 O
O N O O H ↔ O H + N O 2
O 2 N O O − → N O 2 − + O 1 2
O 2 N O O − → N O 2 + O 2 −
2 O 2 − + 2 H + → O 1 2 + H 2 O 2

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the DBD discharge effectively decreased the pH value of tap water and generated high-concentration aqueous RONS. DBD treatment of tap water for 1 h and then treatment of E. coli for 15 min and 30 min, produced a bactericidal effectiveness of 5 and 6 orders of magnitude, respectively. The bactericidal effects of PATW and PADW were almost the same. Atomizing PATW onto the surface of clothes contaminated with bacteria through a disinfection door produced good sterilization and has application potential. It was determined that short-lived singlet oxygen and superoxide anion radicals played a dominant sterilization role. The suspected chemical pathway includes hydrogen peroxide reacting with NO2− continuously to generate peroxynitrite during the DSD discharge. After the discharge, peroxynitrite further reacts with hydrogen peroxide to generate peroxynitric acid. The singlet oxygen and superoxide anion free radicals produced by the decomposition of peroxynitric acid play a vital sterilization role.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and A.X.; methodology, A.X.; validation, A.X.; formal analysis, D.L.; investigation, A.X.; resources, Y.L.; data curation, D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.X.; writing—review and editing, D.L. and Y.L.; visualization, D.L.; supervision, Y.L.; project administration, D.L.; funding acquisition, D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52277149) and the Interdisciplinary Program of Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center (Grant No.WHMFC202144), Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thirumdas, R.; Kothakota, A.; Annapure, U.; Siliveru, K.; Blundell, R.; Gatt, R.; Valdramidis, V.P. Plasma Activated Water (PAW): Chemistry, Physico-Chemical Properties, Applications in Food and Agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dindarloo, K.; Aghamolaei, T.; Ghanbarnejad, A.; Turki, H.; Hoseinvandtabar, S.; Pasalari, H.; Ghaffari, H.R. Pattern of Disinfectants Use and Their Adverse Effects on the Consumers after COVID-19 Outbreak. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dhama, K.; Patel, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Masand, R.; Rana, J.; Yatoo, M.I.; Tiwari, R.; Sharun, K.; Mohapatra, R.K.; Natesan, S.; et al. The Role of Disinfectants and Sanitizers during COVID-19 Pandemic: Advantages and Deleterious Effects on Humans and the Environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 34211–34228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiang, Q.; Kang, C.; Niu, L.; Zhao, D.; Li, K.; Bai, Y. Antibacterial Activity and a Membrane Damage Mechanism of Plasma-Activated Water against Pseudomonas Deceptionensis CM2. LWT 2018, 96, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qi, Z.; Tian, E.; Song, Y.; Sosnin, E.A.; Skakun, V.S.; Li, T.; Xia, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, X.; Liu, D. Inactivation of Shewanella Putrefaciens by Plasma Activated Water. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2018, 38, 1035–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ikawa, S.; Tani, A.; Nakashima, Y.; Kitano, K. Physicochemical Properties of Bactericidal Plasma-Treated Water. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 425401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vlad, I.E.; Martin, C.; Toth, A.R.; Papp, J.; Anghel, S.D. Bacterial inhibition effect of plasma activated water. Rom. Rep. Phys. 2019, 71, 602. [Google Scholar]
  8. Machala, Z.; Tarabová, B.; Sersenová, D.; Janda, M.; Hensel, K. Chemical and Antibacterial Effects of Plasma Activated Water: Correlation with Gaseous and Aqueous Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species, Plasma Sources and Air Flow Conditions. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 52, 034002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Machala, Z.; Tarabova, B.; Hensel, K.; Spetlikova, E.; Sikurova, L.; Lukes, P. Formation of ROS and RNS in Water Electro-Sprayed through Transient Spark Discharge in Air and Their Bactericidal Effects. Plasma Process. Polym. 2013, 10, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kamgang-Youbi, G.; Herry, J.-M.; Meylheuc, T.; Laminsi, S.; Naïtali, M. Microbial Decontamination of Stainless Steel and Polyethylene Surfaces Using GlidArc Plasma Activated Water without Chemical Additives. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2018, 93, 2544–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thirumdas, R.; Sarangapani, C.; Annapure, U.S. Cold Plasma: A Novel Non-Thermal Technology for Food Processing. Food Biophys. 2015, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Misra, N.N.; Pankaj, S.K.; Segat, A.; Ishikawa, K. Cold Plasma Interactions with Enzymes in Foods and Model Systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 55, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ma, R.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J. Effect of Plasma Activated Water on the Postharvest Quality of Button Mushrooms, Agaricus Bisporus. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, D.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Qi, M.; Feng, R.; Li, Q.; Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Kong, M.G. Effects of Plasma-Activated Water on Skin Wound Healing in Mice. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Chen, H.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K. Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasmas in Dermatology: Sources, Reactive Agents, and Therapeutic Effects. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 17, 1900218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, D.; Szili, E.J.; Ostrikov, K. Plasma Medicine: Opportunities for Nanotechnology in a Digital Age. Plasma Process. Polym. 2020, 17, 2000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Traylor, M.J.; Pavlovich, M.J.; Karim, S.; Hait, P.; Sakiyama, Y.; Clark, D.S.; Graves, D.B. Long-Term Antibacterial Efficacy of Air Plasma-Activated Water. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 472001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Li, Y.; Nie, L.; Liu, D.; Kim, S.; Lu, X. Plasma-Activated Chemical Solutions and Their Bactericidal Effects. Plasma Process. Polym. 2022, 19, 2100248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wartel, M.; Faubert, F.; Dirlau, I.D.; Rudz, S.; Pellerin, N.; Astanei, D.; Burlica, R.; Hnatiuc, B.; Pellerin, S. Analysis of Plasma Activated Water by Gliding Arc at Atmospheric Pressure: Effect of the Chemical Composition of Water on the Activation. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 233301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Julák, J.; Hujacová, A.; Scholtz, V.; Khun, J.; Holada, K. Contribution to the Chemistry of Plasma-Activated Water. Plasma Phys. Rep. 2018, 44, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oehmigen, K.; Winter, J.; Hähnel, M.; Wilke, C.; Brandenburg, R.; Weltmann, K.-D.; von Woedtke, T. Estimation of Possible Mechanisms of Escherichia Coli Inactivation by Plasma Treated Sodium Chloride Solution. Plasma Process. Polym. 2011, 8, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rathore, V.; Patel, D.; Butani, S.; Nema, S.K. Investigation of Physicochemical Properties of Plasma Activated Water and Its Bactericidal Efficacy. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2021, 41, 871–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Satoh, K.; MacGregor, S.J.; Anderson, J.G.; Woolsey, G.A.; Fouracre, R.A. Pulsed-Plasma Disinfection of Water Containing Escherichia Coli. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 46, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Judée, F.; Simon, S.; Bailly, C.; Dufour, T. Plasma-Activation of Tap Water Using DBD for Agronomy Applications: Identification and Quantification of Long Lifetime Chemical Species and Production/Consumption Mechanisms. Water Res. 2018, 133, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Nonequilibrium Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jets|Fundamentals, Diagno. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780429053665/nonequilibrium-atmospheric-pressure-plasma-jets-xinpei-lu-stephan-reuter-mounir-laroussi-dawei-liu (accessed on 9 February 2023).
  26. Xu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Du, M.; Wang, Y.; Ju, S.; Ma, R.; Jiao, Z. Subcellular Mechanism of Microbial Inactivation during Water Disinfection by Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, H.; Ma, R.; Zhu, Y.; Du, M.; Zhang, H.; Jiao, Z. A Systematic Study of the Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma for Water Disinfection. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 703, 134965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Guo, L.; Xu, R.; Gou, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Kong, M.G. Mechanism of Virus Inactivation by Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma and Plasma-Activated Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00726-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lu, X.; Reuter, S.; Laroussi, M.; Liu, D.; Reuter, S.; Laroussi, M.; Liu, D. Nonequilibrium Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jets: Fundamentals, Diagnostics, and Medical Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-429-05366-5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chu, P.K.; Lu, X. (Eds.) Low Temperature Plasma Technology: Methods and Applications, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, B.; Liu, D. Mass Spectrometry Study on Ions Generated by Low-Temperature Plasma Jet. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2021, 49, 1190–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, R.; Zhou, R.; Wang, P.; Xian, Y.; Mai-Prochnow, A.; Lu, X.; Cullen, P.J.; Ostrikov, K.; Bazaka, K. Plasma-Activated Water: Generation, Origin of Reactive Species and Biological Applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 303001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chiappim, W.; Sampaio, A.d.G.; Miranda, F.; Fraga, M.; Petraconi, G.; da Silva Sobrinho, A.; Kostov, K.; Koga-Ito, C.; Pessoa, R. Antimicrobial Effect of Plasma-Activated Tap Water on Staphylococcus Aureus, Escherichia Coli, and Candida Albicans. Water 2021, 13, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, Y.-M.; Patange, A.; Sun, D.-W.; Tiwari, B. Plasma-Activated Water: Physicochemical Properties, Microbial Inactivation Mechanisms, Factors Influencing Antimicrobial Effectiveness, and Applications in the Food Industry. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3951–3979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ma, R.; Wang, G.; Tian, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, J.; Fang, J. Non-Thermal Plasma-Activated Water Inactivation of Food-Borne Pathogen on Fresh Produce. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 300, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, Z.; Xiao, A.; Liu, D.; Lu, X.; Ostrikov, K. Plasma-Water-Based Nitrogen Fixation: Status, Mechanisms, and Opportunities. Plasma Process. Polym. 2022, 19, 2100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, S.; Gao, Y.; Sun, H.; Fan, Z.; Shao, T. Dry Reforming of Methane by Microsecond Pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma: Optimizing the Reactor Structures. High Volt. 2022, 7, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zeng, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Shao, T. Energy-Efficient Pathways for Pulsed-Plasma-Activated Sustainable Ammonia Synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, Y.; Ding, L.; Zhang, C.; Shao, T.; Chen, W. Experimental Study on the Treatment of Oil-Based Drill Cutting by Pulsed Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma at Atmospheric Pressure. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 339, 130757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lukes, P.; Dolezalova, E.; Sisrova, I.; Clupek, M. Aqueous-Phase Chemistry and Bactericidal Effects from an Air Discharge Plasma in Contact with Water: Evidence for the Formation of Peroxynitrite through a Pseudo-Second-Order Post-Discharge Reaction of H2O2 and HNO2. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2014, 23, 015019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yokoyama, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Akagi, H.; Ikawa, S.; Kitano, K. Kinetics of Bacterial Inactivation by Peroxynitric Acid in the Presence of Organic Contaminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e01860-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Han, Q.-Y.; He, Z.-Y.; Zhong, C.-S.; Wen, X.; Ni, Y.-Y. The Optimization of Plasma Activated Water (PAW) Generation and the Inactivation Mechanism of PAW on Escherichia Coli. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2022, 46, e17120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alvarez, B.; Radi, R. Peroxynitrite Reactivity with Amino Acids and Proteins. Amino Acids 2003, 25, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xiong, Q.; Liu, H.; Lu, W.; Chen, Q.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Q.; Zeng, X.; Yi, P. Inactivation of Candida Glabrata by a Humid DC Argon Discharge Afterglow: Dominant Contributions of Short-Lived Aqueous Active Species. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 205203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Glaeser, J.; Nuss, A.M.; Berghoff, B.A.; Klug, G. Chapter 4-Singlet Oxygen Stress in Microorganisms. In Advances in Microbial Physiology; Poole, R.K., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; Volume 58, pp. 141–173. [Google Scholar]
  46. Man, C.; Zhang, C.; Fang, H.; Zhou, R.; Huang, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Shao, T. Nanosecond-Pulsed Microbubble Plasma Reactor for Plasma-Activated Water Generation and Bacterial Inactivation. Plasma Process. Polym. 2022, 19, 2200004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 13 03015 g001 550
Figure 1. The overall structure diagram of the DBD-based PAW system.
Figure 1. The overall structure diagram of the DBD-based PAW system.
Applsci 13 03015 g001
Applsci 13 03015 g002 550
Figure 2. The schematic of the DBD tube.
Figure 2. The schematic of the DBD tube.
Applsci 13 03015 g002
Applsci 13 03015 g003 550
Figure 3. The disinfection door based on the atomized PATW (Spray volume of PATW: 10 L/h).
Figure 3. The disinfection door based on the atomized PATW (Spray volume of PATW: 10 L/h).
Applsci 13 03015 g003
Applsci 13 03015 g004 550
Figure 4. Discharges in the tap water at different applied voltages (Pictures taken by Nikon D750, exposure time 50 ms).
Figure 4. Discharges in the tap water at different applied voltages (Pictures taken by Nikon D750, exposure time 50 ms).
Applsci 13 03015 g004
Applsci 13 03015 g005 550
Figure 5. Four DBD devices discharge simultaneously under 20 kV high voltage drive (Pictures taken by Nikon D750, exposure time 10 ms).
Figure 5. Four DBD devices discharge simultaneously under 20 kV high voltage drive (Pictures taken by Nikon D750, exposure time 10 ms).
Applsci 13 03015 g005
Applsci 13 03015 g006 550
Figure 6. The voltage and current waveform of the 4−DBD tube array.
Figure 6. The voltage and current waveform of the 4−DBD tube array.
Applsci 13 03015 g006
Applsci 13 03015 g007 550
Figure 7. Optical emission Spectroscopy of the plasma.
Figure 7. Optical emission Spectroscopy of the plasma.
Applsci 13 03015 g007
Applsci 13 03015 g008 550
Figure 8. The concentration of aqueous RONS in PATW and PADW as a function of activation time. (a) NO 3 − , (b) NO 2 − , (c) H 2 O 2 .
Figure 8. The concentration of aqueous RONS in PATW and PADW as a function of activation time. (a) NO 3 − , (b) NO 2 − , (c) H 2 O 2 .
Applsci 13 03015 g008
Applsci 13 03015 g009 550
Figure 9. The (a) pH value and (b) conductivity of PATW and PADW as a function of activation time.
Figure 9. The (a) pH value and (b) conductivity of PATW and PADW as a function of activation time.
Applsci 13 03015 g009
Applsci 13 03015 g010 550
Figure 10. Comparison of the number of surviving E. coli after PATW and PADW treatment.
Figure 10. Comparison of the number of surviving E. coli after PATW and PADW treatment.
Applsci 13 03015 g010
Applsci 13 03015 g011 550
Figure 11. PATW disinfection effect after storage for (a) 6 h, (b) 24 h.
Figure 11. PATW disinfection effect after storage for (a) 6 h, (b) 24 h.
Applsci 13 03015 g011
Applsci 13 03015 g012 550
Figure 12. Disinfection effect of atomized PATW on clothing surface.
Figure 12. Disinfection effect of atomized PATW on clothing surface.
Applsci 13 03015 g012
Applsci 13 03015 g013 550
Figure 13. Generation pathways of major aqueous RONS in PATW.
Figure 13. Generation pathways of major aqueous RONS in PATW.
Applsci 13 03015 g013
Applsci 13 03015 g014 550
Figure 14. Comparison of the sterilization effect of PATW and a chemical mixed solution of a slightly higher concentration.
Figure 14. Comparison of the sterilization effect of PATW and a chemical mixed solution of a slightly higher concentration.
Applsci 13 03015 g014
Applsci 13 03015 g015 550
Figure 15. The short-lived ROS scavenger solutions alone had no appreciable sterilization effect on E. coli.
Figure 15. The short-lived ROS scavenger solutions alone had no appreciable sterilization effect on E. coli.
Applsci 13 03015 g015
Applsci 13 03015 g016 550
Figure 16. The bactericidal effect of PATW after adding different scavengers.
Figure 16. The bactericidal effect of PATW after adding different scavengers.
Applsci 13 03015 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, A.; Liu, D.; Li, Y. Plasma-Activated Tap Water Production and Its Application in Atomization Disinfection. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053015

AMA Style

Xiao A, Liu D, Li Y. Plasma-Activated Tap Water Production and Its Application in Atomization Disinfection. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(5):3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Ao, Dawei Liu, and Yan Li. 2023. "Plasma-Activated Tap Water Production and Its Application in Atomization Disinfection" Applied Sciences 13, no. 5: 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053015

APA Style

Xiao, A., Liu, D., & Li, Y. (2023). Plasma-Activated Tap Water Production and Its Application in Atomization Disinfection. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3015. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop