Next Article in Journal
Economic Integrated Structural Framing for BIM-Based Prefabricated Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Racks
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Fruit Quality Criteria and Heavy Metal Contents of Strawberries Grown in Organic and Conventional Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
Quad-Band Uniformly Spaced Array Antenna Using Diverse Patch and Fractal Antennas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nutritional, Antioxidant, Sensory, Energetic, and Electrical Properties of Enriched Pasta
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/app13063676
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Compost Fertilization in Organic Agriculture—A Comparison of the Impact on Corn Plants Using Field Spectroscopy

by
Martin Strenner
*,
Lucie Chmelíková
and
Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen
Chair of Organic Agriculture and Agronomy, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3676; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063676
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability and Digitalization of Organic Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Potential use of a fast and non-destructive method to detect and optimize organic fertilization.

Abstract

To protect the environment and reduce the impact of fertilizing on climate change, a tailored fertilization according to the needs of the plants becomes more and more important. In organic farming, the main sources of nitrogen (N) are organic fertilizers, such as compost and farmyard manure. In conventional agricultural systems, various plant sensors have already proven that they can guide efficient fertilization. Since these sensors can record the growth of the biomass growth, they can also be used in organic farming to detect the influence of various organic fertilizers on the growth of corn plants. In a field trial established in 2017, eight different organic fertilizers (biogas fermentation residue, matured farmyard manure, fresh and matured organic waste compost, fresh and matured green compost, and microbial carbonized compost) were used and applied in two different amounts (120 and 240 kg N ha−1) along with an unfertilized control variant. The fertilization was applied according to the current version of the German fertilizer ordinance. In 2021, sensor measurements of the corn plants were taken at six different stages of development (from BBCH 13 to BBCH 35) with a hand-held field spectrometer using the REIP vegetation index. The measurements showed that the unfertilized control variant could be reliably recorded. Furthermore, even at early growth stages the measurements showed the differences between different composts. The results presented in this study show that sensor measurements using vegetation indices reacted sensitively to organic fertilization and can be a tool for farmers to support their decision for an adequate fertilization strategy.

1. Introduction

As in every crop production system, an optimal supply of nutrients for plant production is essential. In particular, nitrogen (N) is an elementary nutrient component for optimal plant growth. Plant N concentrations below an optimal value can lead to significant yield losses [1,2,3]. High doses of applied nitrogen will lead to a loss of N in different forms, i.e., ammonia, nitrous oxide emissions from the soil, and nitrate leaching into the groundwater [4,5,6,7]. This loss leads to negative effects to the environment, as well as to a contribution to climate change [8,9,10]. However, this does not only apply to conventional farming systems. Even in organic farming, there are risks of N losses, such as nitrous oxide emissions after ploughing clover grass or green manure [11,12].
In comparison to conventional farming, the input of nutrients in organic farming is relatively low, especially in terms of nitrogen [13,14,15,16]. In organic farming, a large source of nitrogen input, besides compost, is N2 fixation because of the symbiotic interaction of legumes and rhizobia. This provides substantial amounts of N supply to the plants and the soil as well. Furthermore, it reduces the need for additional N fertilizers [17]. However, fertilization only based on N2 fixation does not suite the needs of the plants. A possible solution for this lack of nutrients is to close the cycle of nutrients. With regard to climate change and reducing the cost of fertilizer, the recycling of nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, is becoming more and more important [18,19]. One way to recycle nutrients is through the use of compost [20,21]. The use of compost also offers an optimization of nutrient supply for organic plant production.
Unlike mineral fertilization, the release of nutrients from organic fertilization is much slower [22]. In particular, N from compost is initially stored in the soil N pool and will be released in a plant-available form often after decades [23]. It is, therefore, much more difficult for the farmer to determine the effect of organic fertilizers on the crop and the soil as well. N mineralization, which produces a plant-available form of N, is essential for plants and depends on the soil as well as the weather conditions [24], but does not coincide with plant requirements [13]. In addition to the above-mentioned N mineralization, the release of soil-borne N shows no homogeneity within a heterogeneous field [25]. As the necessary amount of fertilized N is the difference between the required N of the crops minus the supply of soil-borne N, the challenge for organic farming is to know and decide which and how much organic fertilizer to use (in this study different composts were used as organic fertilizers) to best suit the needs of the crop. A conventional approach for researchers to gather reliable information about the optimal N fertilization is the use of multi-location and multi-annual field trials [3,26], to gather many soil and plant samples to analyze them based on their nutrient status. For an estimation of the N requirements only based on soil analyses, a high number, as well as a high areal resolution, of soil tests becomes necessary. This approach is time-consuming and not economic [27,28].
The growth and development of plants are dependent on the actual nutrient status. Therefore, plants themselves are the best indicators for estimating their nutritional status, i.e., N requirement and above-ground biomass [29,30,31,32]. The current N status can be determined easily using spectral sensors, which detect the light of different wavelengths reflected by the plants [33,34,35,36]. In addition, this method is non-destructive, which means that in field use it is not required to cut plant samples to analyze them afterwards in a laboratory to obtain information about their actual nutrient status. In conventional farming, non-destructive spectral sensing has already proved its ability to guide nitrogen fertilization in winter wheat [29,37]. Sensors that detect the reflectance usually show their results as vegetation indices. Common sensors on the market, such as the GreenSeeker (Trimble Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) mostly show their measuring results using the normalized differentiated vegetation index (NDVI). This vegetation index is one of the oldest [38] and has serious problems in detecting the biomass and N uptake of plants at higher growth stages because of a significant saturation effect for various crop species [39,40,41,42]. As a result of this saturation effect of the NDVI, another vegetation index, the red-edge inflection point (REIP) [43], was recommended to detect the N status of plants [44,45]. In this study, we use the vegetation index REIP, which has shown a slight saturation effect only in the later growth stages of a crop [46,47] and has consistently shown a good correlation of the REIP vegetation index and above-ground N uptake of corn plants [45].
As described, optical sensors have already proven their ability to detect the biomass and nutrient status in conventional grown cereal plants. As corn (Zea mays L.) was in 2021 the most cultivated grain worldwide [48], and although conventional corn cultivation predominates in Germany, a clear expansion of organically grown corn can be observed [49]. Most of the studies using optical sensors to detect the nutrient status of plants in agriculture are made for conventional agricultural systems to guide fertilization. The aim of this study was to research the ability of optical sensors using the REIP vegetation index to detect differences in development of corn plants, where different composts fertilizers were used in an organic field trial.

2. Materials and Methods

The field trial was established in the northeast of Munich at the organic trial site of the agricultural research center of the Technical University of Munich near Freising-Weihenstephan (48.39742 N, 11.64324 E) as a long-term experiment in autumn 2017. The experiment on different organic fertilizers was established as part of the ProBio Project (Project title: Optimum production and agronomic use of compost from organic and green waste in organic farming, www.projekt-probio.de, accessed on 20 December 2022). The soil is a silty and sandy loam with good supply of nutrients for grain production. The average values from 2017 until 2021 at this location were 914.4 mm of precipitation with an average temperature of 9.4 °C. Figure 1 shows an overview of the average monthly precipitation and temperatures at the research location.
In 2021 after sowing corn by the end of April for the growth of the corn plants in the months from May to August, the precipitation was higher than the mean value shown in Figure 1. In May the precipitation was, with 156 mm, nearly 60 mm above the mean value. The same could be observed for June with 140 mm of precipitation and, thus, being approximately 60 mm above the mean value. For July 2021, the precipitation was approximately 135 mm and within the mean values. In August 2021, there was 171 mm precipitation, which was 15 mm higher than the mean value. In 2021 for the recorded temperatures, May had an average temperature of 10 °C, which was approximately 2 °C colder than the mean values from 2017 to 2021. Whilst May 2021 was too cold, June 2021 was, with an average of 20 °C, approximately 1 °C too hot. July and August were, with recorded temperatures of 18 °C and 17 °C, respectively, within the mean values.
Before the experiment was established, soil samples were taken on all plots in order to record the initial humus and nutrient levels. For the compost trial, a fully randomized latin square design was used with four replicates. One plot was used for sensor measurements and harvesting, whilst the other was for biomass sampling at different growth stages. Each plot was 10 m long and 3 m wide, and in 2021 each plot consisted of four rows of corn. The row width was 75 cm and the plant density was 10 plants per m2.
In the observation period, in early April 2021, before planting the corn and depending on their N content, seven different organic compost fertilizers were applied, along with an unfertilized control. Five of them had two different N rates of 120 kg N ha−1 and 240 kg N ha−1. The application rate and nutrient content of the different composts are given in Table 1. The fertilization was conducted according to the German fertilizer ordinance in one application for three years.
The composts we used were from organic farmers (biogas fermentation residues, matured farmyard manure and the microbial carbonized compost). The organic waste composts, as well as the green composts, came from compost producers. These producers are certified according to RAL (Deutsches Institut für Gütesicherung und Kennzeichung e.V., Bonn, Germany). The complete process of composting consists of three phases. The first is the mesophilic phase with moderate temperature. It lasts only a couple of days. The second is the thermophilic phase with high temperatures up to 70 °C. This phase lasts between a few days to several months. Finally, the third phase is the maturation of the compost, which can last several months [50]. Unlike matured compost, fresh compost is gathered after the end of the mesophilic phase and just before the thermophilic phase has begun. The microbial carbonized compost is a special case. Unlike conventional produced composts, microbial carbonized composts produced according to Walter Witte (Witte Bio Consult, Gernrode, Germany) are not mixed up and during composting the temperature within the pile of the compost should not exceed 60 °C. This manufacturing method should keep the carbon of the organic matter within the compost and should, therefore, avoid a loss of carbon into the atmosphere in the form of CO2.
The crop management on the trial site was performed according to the organic farming guidelines of the German organic cultivation associations Bioland (Bioland e.V., Mainz, Germany) and Naturland (Naturland–Verband für Ökologischen Landbau e.V., Gräfelfing, Germany) by hoeing and harrowing.
Three times during the growing period, at growth stages BBCH 32, BBCH 49 and BBCH 85 [51], above-ground biomass samples were gathered. For each biomass sampling, 16 plants of two planting rows of each plot were harvested, which covered a sample area of 1.5 m2. The samples were afterwards weighed and chopped. Then, a sub-sample was oven dried and weighed again to calculate above-ground dry-matter yield, followed by a conversion of the values into mass per ha. A part of the sample was grounded and afterwards the N content was analyzed using a varioMAX auto-analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). Dry-matter yield and N concentration in dry matter were multiplied to compute N uptake into above-ground biomass.
Measurements of the reflected sunlight were made six times during the vegetation period, at growth stages BBCH 13, BBCH 14, BBCH 15, BBCH 32, BBCH 33, and BBCH 35. The sensor device for detecting reflectance spectra was a HandySpec two-channel field spectrometer of tec5 AG (tec5 AG, Steinbach, Germany). It simultaneously recorded irradiation and reflection with a spectral resolution of 1 nm in a range from 400 nm to 850 nm. An optical fiber receiver within the device recorded the sunlight reflected by the vegetation and ground with a viewing angle of 25° to determine reflection. A diffuser plate on top of the device detected irradiance within a viewing angle of 180° as reference. To calculate spectral reflectance, the emission was divided by irradiance and corrected with an internal standard spectrum. The sensor device was held approximately 50 cm above the canopy in a horizontal position. Each measurement covered an area of 0.25 m2. While walking through the plots, in each plot, seven readings were recorded and an average value was calculated. The measurements were made between approximately 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. to be sure the sun was approximately at its zenith.
Figure 2 shows the reflection curves of the corn plants recorded using the field spectrometer at the research location at growth stage BBCH 32. Table 2 shows how the REIP vegetation index was calculated and which wavelengths are needed.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was calculated with the statistical software package SPSS 23.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) using the general linear model and Tukey-b tests for post-hoc analysis.

3. Results

In the observation period in 2021, at the first measurement date at growth stage BBCH 13 (Figure 3) the REIP-values were highest in the variants with fresh organic waste and green compost with high application rates, as well as with biogas fermentation residues. The corn plant was at that time in the three-leaf stage and had developed therefore only a little biomass. The N uptake from the soil was correspondingly low.
At the four-leaf stage at BBCH 14 (Figure 4), these differences became statistically significant (ANOVA and post-hoc test with Tukey-b).
At growth stage BBCH 32 (Figure 5), the REIP-values looked different. The highest values were measured in the variants with matured organic waste compost and microbial carbonized compost with the high application rate. In contrast, the values for the fresh compost and biogas fermentation residue had decreased.
The differences that were observed in growth stage BBCH 32 became clearer and statistically significant at growth stage BBCH 33 (Figure 6).
The same development over time was also observed for the nitrate content in the soil (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Measuring corn plants fertilized with organic fertilizers using field spectroscopy is much more difficult than other plants fertilized with mineral fertilizers due to the release of soil-borne N in combination with environmental circumstances such as the soil temperature and water supply through rainfall [52]. Nevertheless, it was possible to detect differences in the development of the plants. Similar to the findings of [53], in this experiment the sensor showed these differences in different values of the REIP vegetation index.
At the first measurement date at the early growth stage of BBCH 13 (Figure 3), the development of the above-ground biomass was very low. The visible soil had a slight effect on the measurement results taken at that time [54,55]. Similar to the findings of [56] for winter wheat, the results showed clear differences between the various organic fertilizer variants. It is known from previous studies that corn reacts to a differentiated supply of N at this vegetation stage [57,58,59,60]. This can be measured with multispectral sensors and the REIP vegetation index [61]. Moreover, at this early stage the fresh composts showed the highest REIP values of all fertilizer variants. Unlike matured compost, for fresh compost the composting time is much shorter. Fresh composts are generally not yet as stable as matured composts [62,63,64]. Both organic waste composts, as well as green composts, contain a larger proportion of easily decomposable organic matter that promotes soil life and mineralization within the soil [65]. This can explain the faster fertilization effect in corn and, therefore, the higher values of the REIP vegetation index. At growth stage BBCH 14 (Figure 4), these differences became significant. Except for the unfertilized control variant, the fertilization with biogas fermentation residues, as well as fresh green and fresh organic waste composts, at an application rate of 120 kg N/ha and the matured green compost at an application rate of 240 kg N/ha were statistically clearly distinguishable. On the other hand, the highest REIP values were found for the variants fertilized with biogas fermentation residues and fresh organic and fresh green waste composts at an application rate of 240 kg N/ha. Except for the control variant, these compost variants were not statistically clearly differentiated. At growth stage BBCH 32 (Figure 5), other values of the vegetation index REIP could be observed. The highest values were recorded in the variants fertilized with matured organic waste compost with an application rate of 240 kg N/ha and with microbial carbonized compost. Fresh composts and biogas fermentation residues had decreased. A possible explanation could be that between the very early growth stages and stem elongation at growth stage BBCH 32, more organically bound N was released due to higher soil temperatures and water supply [52]. These differences became clearer at the next growth stage of BBCH 33 and were significant (Figure 6). The highest REIP values were observed for the variant fertilized with matured green compost at an application rate of 240 kg N/ha (Figure 6). The second highest values of the REIP vegetation index showed the variant fertilized with 240 kg N/ha of the microbial carbonized composts. The variants with the organic waste compost and the microbial carbonized compost could be statistically significantly differentiated from the variant fertilized with green compost. All three of them had an application rate of 240 kg N/ha (Figure 6). A first result was that the differences between variants fertilized with 120 kg N/ha and 240 kg N/ha were not very high at later growth stages. This result was supported by the values of the REIP vegetation index. The interaction of microbial activity within the soil, as well as rising temperatures in combination with soil water, caused a higher mineralization rate and, therefore, a better supply of nitrogen for the growth of the plants [66,67]. The soil samples, taken with the sensor measurement at the same time, showed that the values for nitrate within the soil, which are also relevant for nitrogen loss, i.e., leeching nitrogen into the groundwater, showed the same behavior as the values of the REIP vegetation index measured with the field spectrometer (Figure 7). These results showed that, like in conventional farming systems, in organic farming the danger of nitrogen loss is evident [68,69]. With this paper, we tried to apply sensor measurements to organic farming which are already in use in conventional agriculture. The results showed us that there is much unforeseen behavior in the interaction of fertilizer, soil, plants, and the weather. In common with conventional agriculture, we found that regardless of its form, the more nitrogen that is applied to a field, the higher the risk for an uncontrolled loss of nitrogen. However, as already described, this is location dependent. As there is very little research work available for sensor measurements in combination with vegetation indices in organic fertilizer use, and especially in organic farming, sensor measurements can, therefore, help any farmer to gather more information about the interactions of the environment and their location. The organic farmer, therefore, collects long-term information about their location and the applied organic fertilization in particular. However, it is not only the farmer who collects these data. With sensor measurements we have a tool to record and collect a lot of information on a very small scale. This information helps to develop a decision-support tool for the farmer in organic farming systems. Nevertheless, to develop such a system over a long-time period, a lot of sensor measurements have to be recorded, with a lot of soil and plant samples as well, which have to be gathered. Another source of information is the laboratory analyses of composts regarding their composition of nutrients, as shown in Table 1. With this information and the already existing knowledge of the optimal N supply for various plants from conventional farming fertilization trials, this goal can be reached. Although organic fertilizers, and in this case composts, are not uniform (neither a batch nor a subsample of them), an additional benefit is to have information about the average composition of their nutrients. All this information together enables us to develop a decision-support system for organic farmers to help them decide whether, when, which, and how much compost they should apply for their intended crop rotation to achieve the minimum environmental burden possible in combination with an optimal supply of nutrients for the plants.

5. Conclusions

A high application rate of nitrogen, regardless of its form, i.e., mineral or organic, always increases the risk of over-fertilization and, thus, a loss of nitrogen. The difference between a mineral and organic fertilization is the period of time at which nitrogen is available for the plants. In contrast to a conventional farmer, an organic farmer has much more difficulties in handling nitrogen. Field spectroscopy could help to learn more about the properties of their fields and to come to a clearer understanding of the interactions of the soil, fertilizer, climate, and plants. Using the REIP vegetation index enabled to identify small differences in the effect of the fertilized compost using the reflection of the sunlight by the plants. This technique offers researchers and farmers new real-time large-scale potentials in organic fertilizing to gather more knowledge about the soil system, water, temperature, fertilizer, and specific crop. This could lead to a more efficient organic farming system, to achieve a higher yield and minimize the environmental burden at the same time.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, M.S.; Supervision, L.C. and K.-J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project ProBio (Optimum production and agronomic use of compost from organic and green waste in organic farming, Funding number [FKZ]: 2818OE009) is supported by funds of the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) based on a decision of the parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany via the Federal Office for Agriculture and food (BLE) under the Federal Program for Ecological Farming.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available on request. They are not online available.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all ProBio project partners and the producers of organic fertilizers in the experiment. We are grateful to the research station Viehhausen of the Technical University of Munich, especially Horst Laffert, Florian Schmid, and Stefan Kimmelmann, for their help with the management of the long-term experiment. Thanks to Johann Ludwig, Nicole Maier, and Isabella Hohenester for help with the field work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mollier, A.; Pellerin, S. Maize root system growth and development as influenced by phosphorus deficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Plénet, D.; Lemaire, G. Relationship between dynamics of nitroegen uptake and dry matter accumulation in maize crops. Detremination of critical N concentration. Plant Soil 1999, 216, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Federolf, C.P.; Westerschulte, M.; Olfs, H.W.; Broll, G.; Trautz, D. Assesing crop performance in maize field trials using a vegetation index. Open Agric. 2018, 3, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clark, M.; Tilman, D. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 064016. Available online: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6cd5/meta (accessed on 26 September 2022). [CrossRef]
  5. Erisman, J.W.; Galloway, J.; Seitzinger, S.; Bleeker, A.; Butterbach-Bahl, K. Reactive nitrogen in the environment and its effect on climate change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2011, 3, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Galloway, J.N.; Townsend, A.R.; Erisman, J.W.; Bekunda, M.; Cai, Z.; Freney, J.R.; Martinelli, L.A.; Seitzinger, S.P.; Sutton, M.A. Transformation of the Nitrogen Cycle: Recent Trends, Questions, and Potential Solutions. Science 2008, 320, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sutton, M.A.; Oenema, O.; Erisman, J.W.; Leip, A.; van Grinsven, H.J.M.; Winiwarter, W. Too much of a good thing. Nature 2011, 472, 159–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Blanke, J.; Boke-Olén, N.; Olin, S.; Chang, J.; Sahlin, U.; Lindeskog, M.; Lehsten, V. Implications of accounting for management intensity on carbon and nitrogen balances of European grasslands. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bleken, M.A.; Steinshamn, H.; Hansen, S. High Nitrogen Costs of Dairy Production in Europe: Worsened by Intensification. Ambio A J. Hum. Environ. 2005, 34, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van Grinsven, H.J.M.; ten Berge, H.F.M.; Dalgaard, T.; Fraters, B.; Durand, P.; Hart, A.; Hofman, G.; Jacobsen, B.H.; Lalor, S.T.J.; Lesschen, J.P.; et al. Management regulation and environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilization in northwestern Europe under Nitrates Directive; a benchmark study. Biogeosciences 2012, 9, 5143–5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Heuwinkel, H.; Gutser, R.; Schmidhalter, U. Auswirkung einer Mulch-Statt Schnittnutzung von Kleegras auf Die N-Flüsse in Einer Fruchtfolge. In Tagungsband—Forschung für den Ökologischen Landbau in Bayern; Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft: Freising, Germany, 2005; pp. 71–79. Available online: https://lfl.bayern.de/mam/cms07/publikationen/daten/schriftenreihe/p_19819.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  12. Reinsch, T.; Loges, R.; Kluß, C.; Taube, F. Renovation and conversion of permanent grass-clover swards to pasture or crops: Effects on annual N2O emissions in the year after ploughing. Soil Tillage Res. 2018, 175, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chmelíková, L.; Schmid, H.; Anke, S.; Hülsbergen, K.-J. Nitrogen-use efficiency of organic and conventional arable and dairy farming systems in Germany. Nutr. Cycle Agroecosyst. 2021, 119, 337–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Küstermann, B.; Christen, O.; Hülsbergen, K.-J. Modeling nitrogen cycles of farming systems as basis of site- and farm-specific nitrogen management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 135, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Migliorini, P.; Moschini, V.; Tittarelli, F.; Ciaccia, C.; Benedettelli, S.; Vazzana, C.; Canali, S. Agronomic performance, carbon storage and nitrogen utilisation of long-term organic and conventional stockless arable systems in Mediterranean area. Eur. J. Agron. 2014, 52, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pandey, A.; Li, F.; Askegaard, M.; Rasmussen, I.A.; Olesen, J.E. Nitrogen balances in organic and conventional arable crop rotations and their relations to nitrogen yield and nitrate leaching losses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 350–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Herridge, D.F.; Peoples, M.B.; Boddey, R.M. Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agriculture systems. Plant Soil 2008, 311, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Möller, K. Soil fertility status and nutrient input-output flows of specialised organic cropping systems: A review. Nutr. Cycle Agroecosyst. 2018, 112, 147–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brock, C.; Oltmanns, M.; Matthes, C.; Schmehe, B.; Schaaf, H.; Burghardt, D.; Horst, H.; Spieß, H. Compost as an Option for Sustainable Crop Production at Low Stocking Rates in Organic Farming. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dede, C.; Ozer, H.; Dede, O.H.; Celebi, A.; Ozdemir, S. Recycling Nutrient-Rich Municipal Wastes into Ready-to-Use Potting Soil: An Approach for the Sustainable Resource Circularity with Inorganic Porous Materials. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wei, Y.; Wang, N.; Lin, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Ding, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, A.; Ding, G.; Xu, T.; Li, J. Recycling of nutrients froom organic waste by advanced compost technology—A case study. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shaji, H.; Chandran, V.; Mathew, L. Chapter 13—Organic Fertilizers as a Route to Controlled Release of Nutrients. In Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture; Volova, L., Rakhimol, T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hartl, W.; Erhart, E. Crop nitrogen recovery and soil nitrogen dynamics in a 10-year field experiment with biowaste compost. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ros, G.H.; Hanegraaf, M.C.; Hoffland, E.; van Riemsdijk, W.H. Predicting soil N-mineralization: Relevance of organic matter fractions and soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Baxter, S.J.; Oliver, M.A.; Gaunt, J. A geostatical analysis of the spatial variation of soil mineral nitrogen and potentially available nitrogen within an arable field. J. Precis. Agric. 2003, 4, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gomez, K.A.; Gomez, A.A. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 0471870927. [Google Scholar]
  27. Olfs, H.W.; Blankenau, K.; Brentrup, F.; Jasper, J.; Link, A.; Lammel, J. Soil- and plant based nitrogen-fertilizer recommendations in arable farming. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rambo, L.; Ma, B.L.; Xiong, Y.; Regis Ferreira da Silva, P. Leaf and canopy optical characteristics as crop-N-status indicators for field nitrogen management in corn. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maidl, F.-X. Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Düngerbedarfs, Insbesondere des Stickstoff-Düngerbedarfs und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens. German Patent DE102011050877A1, 6 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  30. Spicker, A. Entwicklung von Verfahren der Teilflächenspezifischen Stickstoffdüngung zu Wintergerste (Hordeum vulgare) und Winterraps (Brassica napus L.) auf Grundlage Reflexionsoptischer Messungen. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2016. Available online: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1292540/1292540.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2020).
  31. Osborne, S.L.; Schepers, J.S.; Francis, D.D.; Schlemmer, M.R. Detection of Phosphorus and Nitrogen deficiencies in Corn Using Spectral Radiance Measurements. Agron. J. 2002, 94, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Winterhalter, L.; Mistele, B.; Japatong, S.; Schmidhalter, U. High-Throughput Sensing of Aerial Biomass and Above-Ground Nitrogen Uptake in the Vegetative Stage of well-Watered and Drought Stressed Tropical Maize Hybrids. Crop Sci. 2011, 51, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barret, F.; Houlès, V.; Guérif, M. Quantification of plant stress using remote sensing observations and crop models: The case of nitrogen management. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Erdle, K.; Mistele, B.; Schmidhalter, U. Comparison of active and passive spectral sensors in discriminating biomass parameters and nitrogen status in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2011, 124, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Herrera, J.; Rubio, G.; Häner, L.; Delgado, J.; Lucho-Constantino, C.; Islas-Valdez, S.; Pellet, D. Emerging and established technologies to increase nitrogen use efficiency of cereals. Agronomy 2016, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pinter, P.J.; Hatfield, J.L.; Schepers, J.S.; Barnes, E.M.; Moran, M.S.; Doughtry, C.S.T.; Upchurch, D.R. Remote Sensing for Cop Management. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2003, 6, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Link, A.; Panitzki, M.; Reusch, S. Hydro-N-Sensor: Tractor-mounted remote sensing for variable nitrogen fertilization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Precision Agriculture and Other Precision Resources Management, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 14–17 July 2002; pp. 1012–1017. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rouse, J.W.; Haas, R.H.; Schell, J.A.; Deering, D.W.; Harlan, J.C. Monitoring the Vernal Advancement of the Retrogradation of Natural Vegetation. 1974, Final Report Type III, Greenbelt, NSA-GSFC, 1–371. Available online: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730017588/downloads/19730017588.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  39. Baret, F.; Guyot, G. Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 35, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maresma, Á.; Ariza, M.; Martínez, E.; Lloveras, J.; Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A. Analysis of Vegetation Indices to Determine Nitrogen Application and Yield Prediction in Maize (Zea mays L.) from a Standard UAV Service. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Xia, T.; Miao, Y.; Wu, D.; Shao, H.; Khosla, R.; Mi, G. Active Optical Sensing of Spring Maize for In-Season Diagnosis of Nitrogen Status Based on Nitrogen Nutrition Index. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Yao, X.; Yao, X.; Jia, W.; Tian, Y.; Ni, J.; Cao, W.; Zhu, Y. Comparison and Intercalibration of Vegetation Indices from Different Sensors for Monitoring Above-Ground Plant Nitrogen Uptake in Winter Wheat. Sensors 2013, 13, 3109–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Guyot, G.; Baret, F. Utilisation de la haute resolution spectrale pour suivre l’état des couverts vegetaux. In Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Spectral Signatures in Remote Sensing, Aussois, France, 18–22 January 1988; pp. 279–286. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mistele Schmidhalter, U. Estimating the nitrogen nutrition index using spectral canopy reflectance measurements. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 29, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sticksel, E.; Schächtl, J.; Huber, G.; Liebler, J.; Maidl, F.X. Diurnal variation in hyperspectral vegetation indices related to winter wheat biomass formation. Precis. Agric. 2004, 5, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Herrmann, I.; Pimstein, A.; Karnieli, A.; Cohen, Y.; Alchantis, V.; Bonfil, D.J. Ground Level LAI Assessment of Wheat and Potatoe Crops by Sentinel-2 Bands. European Space Agency, (Special Publication) ESA SP. 707. Available online: https://researchgate.net/profile/Arnon-Karnieli/publication/285987056_Ground_level_LAI_assessment_of_wheat_And_potatoe_crops_by_Sentinel-2_bands/links/5aa3b4f90f7e9badd9a8249c/Ground-level-LAI-assesment-of-wheat-and-potaote-crops-by-sentinel-2-bands.pdf (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  47. Tavakolo, H.; Mohtasebi, S.S.; Alimardi, R.; Gebbers, R. Evaluation of different sensing approaches concerning to nondestructive estimation of leave area index (LAI) for winter wheat. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 2017, 7, 337–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Anbaufläche von Getreide Weltweit. Available online: https://de.statista.com/statistic/daten/studie/28883/umfrage/anbaufläche-von-getreide-weltweit/ (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  49. Anbaufläche von Biomais seit 2007 Versiebenfacht. 2021. Available online: https://www.bwagrar.de/Pflanzenbau/Ackerbau/Anbauflaeche-von-Biomais-seit-2007-versiebenfacht,QUIEPTcwMzUwNjUmTUIEPTUyOTIw.html (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  50. Trautmann, N.; Olynciw, E. Compost Microorganisms. 1996, Cornell Composting—Science and Engineering, Cornell Waste Management Institute, Cornell University. Available online: https://compost.css.cornell.edu/microorg.html (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  51. Meier, U. Entwicklungsstadien Mono- und Dikotyler Pflanzen—BBCH Monografie, 2001, Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, 2. Auflage; pp. 1–15. Available online: https://openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/openagrar_derivate_00010429/BBCH-Skala_de.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2021).
  52. Maidl, F.X.; Schächtl, J.; Huber, G. Strategies for Site-Specific Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Wheat. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Precision Agriculture and Other Precision Resources Management, Hyatt Regency, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25–28 July 2004. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maidl, F.X. Einsatz von N-Sensoren zur Maisdüngung. In Mais; DLG-Verlag GmbH: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2012; pp. 18–20. [Google Scholar]
  54. Huete, A.R.; Jackson, R.D. Soil and Atmosphere Influences on the Spectra of Partial Canopies. Remote Sens. Environ. 1988, 25, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ruicheng, Q.; Shang, W.; Man, Z.; Han, L.; Hong, S.; Gang, L.; Minzan, L. Sensors for measuring plant phenotyping: A review. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2018, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kipp, S.; Mistele, B.; Baresel, P.; Schmidhalter, U. High-throughput phenotyping early plant vigour of winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 2014, 52, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Asibi, A.E.; Chai, Q.; Coulter, J.A. Mechanisms of Nitrogen Use in Maize. Agronomy 2018, 9, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Crespo, C.; Martínez, R.D.; Wyngaard, N.; Divito, G.; Cuesta, N.M.; Barbieri, P. Nitrogen diagnosis for double-cropped maize. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 140, 12660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Scharf, P.; Wiebold, W.; Lory, J. Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Timing and Deficiency Level. Agron. J. 2002, 94, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Siqueira, R.; Mandal, D.; Longchamps, L.; Khosla, R. Assessing Nitrogen Variability at Early Stages of Maize Using Mobile Fluorescence Sensing. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hülsbergen, K.J.; Maidl, F.X.; Mittermayer, M.; Weng, J.; Kern, A. Digital Basiertes Stickstoffmanagement in Landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben—Emissionsminderung Durch Optimierte Stickstoffkreisläufe und Sensorgestützte Teilflächenspezifische Düngung; Projektbericht; Technische Universität München: Munich, Germany, 2020; Available online: https://dbu.de/OPAC/ab/DBU-Abschlussbericht-AZ-30743_01-Hauptbericht.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2022).
  62. Mahapatra, S.; Ali, M.H.; Samal, K. Assessment of compost maturity-stability indices and recent development of composting bin. Energy Nexus 2022, 6, 100062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Muscolo, A.; Papalia, T.; Setterini, G.; Mallamaci, C.; Jeske-Kaczanowska, A. Are raw materials or composting conditions and time that most influence the maturity and/or quality of composts? Comparison of obtained composts on soil properties. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 195, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zou, J.M. The effect of Different C/N Ratios on the Composting of Pig Manure and Edible Fungus Residue with Rice Bran. Compost. Sci. Util. 2017, 25, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wild, B.; Schnecker, J.; Alves, R.J.E.; Barsukov, P.; Bárta, J.; Čapek, P.; Gentsch, N.; Gittel, A.; Guggenberger, G.; Lashinsky, N.; et al. Input of easily available organic C and N stimulates microbial decomposition of soil organic matter in arctic permafrost soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Maslov, M.N.; Maslova, O.A. Soil nitrogen mineralization and its sensitivity to temperature and moisture in temperate peatlands under different land-use management practices. CATENA 2022, 210, 105922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sun, S.; Liu, J.; Chang, S.X. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: Impacts of nitrogen species and land use type. Plant Soil 2013, 372, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Giordano, M.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Rouphael, Y. The Fate of Nitrogen from Soil to Plants: Influence of Agruicultural Practices in Modern Agriculture. Agriculture 2021, 11, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, C.W.; Sung, Y.; Chen, B.C.; Lai, H.Y. Effects of nitrogen fertilizers on the growth and nitrate content of lettuce (Lactuca sative L.). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 4427–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Applsci 13 03676 g001 550
Figure 1. Average precipitation and temperature at research location (2017–2021).
Figure 1. Average precipitation and temperature at research location (2017–2021).
Applsci 13 03676 g001
Applsci 13 03676 g002 550
Figure 2. Typical reflection curves of corn plants at growth stage BBCH 32.
Figure 2. Typical reflection curves of corn plants at growth stage BBCH 32.
Applsci 13 03676 g002
Applsci 13 03676 g003 550
Figure 3. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 13.
Figure 3. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 13.
Applsci 13 03676 g003
Applsci 13 03676 g004 550
Figure 4. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 14 (variants with the same letters do not differ significantly at 95% level; ANOVA with Tukey-b test).
Figure 4. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 14 (variants with the same letters do not differ significantly at 95% level; ANOVA with Tukey-b test).
Applsci 13 03676 g004
Applsci 13 03676 g005 550
Figure 5. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 32.
Figure 5. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 32.
Applsci 13 03676 g005
Applsci 13 03676 g006 550
Figure 6. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 33 (variants with same letters do not differ significantly at 95% level, ANOVA with Tukey-b test).
Figure 6. Measured REIP-values at BBCH 33 (variants with same letters do not differ significantly at 95% level, ANOVA with Tukey-b test).
Applsci 13 03676 g006
Applsci 13 03676 g007 550
Figure 7. Measurement results of the soil-nitrate at growth stage BBCH 32.
Figure 7. Measurement results of the soil-nitrate at growth stage BBCH 32.
Applsci 13 03676 g007
Table
Table 1. Applied N rates and nutrient content of the organic fertilizers (2021).
Table 1. Applied N rates and nutrient content of the organic fertilizers (2021).
CompostApplication
Rate
(kg N ha−1)		Dry Matter
(%)		N
(%)		C/N
(Ratio)		P2O5
(%)		K2O
(%)
Biogas fermentation residue12023.61.6526.51.122.78
Farmyard manure (matured)12022.21.8617.90.814.10
Organic waste compost (fresh)12055.11.5716.70.651.09
240
Organic waste compost (matured)12063.41.7212.50.911.64
240
Green compost (fresh)12059.22.1218.50.741.33
240
Green compost (matured)12056.91.4415.70.591.07
240
Microbial carbonized compost12045.11.5212.30.692.09
240
Table
Table 2. Formula and reference of the REIP vegetation index.
Table 2. Formula and reference of the REIP vegetation index.
Vegetation IndexFormulaReference
REIP 700 + 40 0 . 5 R 670 + R 780   -   700 R 740   -   R 700 [43]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Strenner, M.; Chmelíková, L.; Hülsbergen, K.-J. Compost Fertilization in Organic Agriculture—A Comparison of the Impact on Corn Plants Using Field Spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063676

AMA Style

Strenner M, Chmelíková L, Hülsbergen K-J. Compost Fertilization in Organic Agriculture—A Comparison of the Impact on Corn Plants Using Field Spectroscopy. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(6):3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063676

Chicago/Turabian Style

Strenner, Martin, Lucie Chmelíková, and Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen. 2023. "Compost Fertilization in Organic Agriculture—A Comparison of the Impact on Corn Plants Using Field Spectroscopy" Applied Sciences 13, no. 6: 3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063676

APA Style

Strenner, M., Chmelíková, L., & Hülsbergen, K. -J. (2023). Compost Fertilization in Organic Agriculture—A Comparison of the Impact on Corn Plants Using Field Spectroscopy. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063676

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop