Next Article in Journal
Secure PBFT Consensus-Based Lightweight Blockchain for Healthcare Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Process Variables for the Sustainable Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Chicory and Fennel By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
Seismotectonics, Geomorphology and Paleoseismology of the Doroud Fault, a Source of Seismic Hazard in Zagros
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Research on Unit Operation for Fruit Crops’ Bones Calibration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Organic Fertilization and Soil Tillage on the Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Seed Cake: An Alternative Feed Ingredient

by
Foteini Angelopoulou
1,
Ioannis Roussis
1,
Ioanna Kakabouki
1,
Antonios Mavroeidis
1,
Vassilios Triantafyllidis
2,
Dimitrios Beslemes
3,
Chariklia Kosma
2,
Panteleimon Stavropoulos
1,
Eleni Tsiplakou
4 and
Dimitrios Bilalis
1,*
1
Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Patras, 30100 Agrinio, Greece
3
Institute of Industrial and Forage Crops, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, 41335 Larissa, Greece
4
Laboratory of Nutritional Physiology and Feeding, Department of Animal Science, School of Animal Biosciences, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(6), 3759; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063759
Submission received: 6 February 2023 / Revised: 25 February 2023 / Accepted: 13 March 2023 / Published: 15 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovations in Agri-Food Plants)

Abstract

:
Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] oilseed cake has been identified as an alternative protein feedstuff and as a valuable feed resource. Moreover, over the last decades, there has been an increased interest in the organic production of feed supplements. A 2-year field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design with three replications, two main plots (conventional tillage: moldboard ploughing at 25 cm followed by rotary hoeing at 10–15 cm, and minimum tillage: chiseling at 25 cm depth followed by rotary hoeing at 10–15 cm), and three sub-plots (organic fertilization type: untreated, vermicompost, and compost) to evaluate the fertilization and tillage system effect on the yield and quality of cold-pressed camelina seed cake. Seed yield and cake yield were only affected by organic fertilization, with the highest values observed in the compost treatment. Crude protein was influenced by both factors examined, and the greatest content was found under conventional tillage and compost application. As for the fatty acid composition of oilseed cake, this can be characterized as a major source of polyunsaturated fatty acids (~52% of total FAs), particularly linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, which were only affected by fertilization, with the highest values found after compost application. To conclude, the cold-pressed cake from camelina seed cultivated under compost fertilization and conventional tillage appears to be an effective alternative to conventionally used protein feed ingredients.

1. Introduction

Modern methods of animal husbandry are designed to address concerns facing the world, including feeding the rising population while simultaneously minimizing environmental pollution and mitigating climate change. This will be accomplished by making more effective use of natural resources, reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, and growing more resilient to changes in the climate. The European Union’s Farm to Fork Strategy includes requirements for reducing the adverse effects of environmental and climate change on livestock farming. In addition, it requires transitioning to more environmentally friendly animal husbandry [1]. The European Union imports around 75% of the high plant-based protein sources required to maintain balanced rations for high-producing animals [2]. As a result, an ecologically sustainable approach can be adopted by lowering reliance on essential feed ingredients such as soybean cultivated on degraded lands. Growing alternative protein crops or other plants that can be used to produce protein by-products is one solution to the problem [3,4].
Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is an oilseed and protein crop of the Brassicaceae family. Several archaeobotanical researches proved that camelina has been cultivated for a long time in Europe and Asia Minor [5,6,7]. It was used as an agricultural crop in numerous European countries until the mid-twentieth century [4,8]. Over the last decade, camelina has increased in popularity due to its environmental adaptability and nutritional profile, which is comparable to that of widely used oilseeds. Camelina can be successfully cultivated under several climatic patterns since it is characterized by its drought, low temperature, and heat tolerance [9,10,11,12]. Moreover, because of its decreased nutrient and water requirements, it is able to grow without irrigation and with little amounts of fertilizers, and it is typically grown on marginal and saline soils [9,13]. This crop seems to be more resilient to numerous pests and diseases in contrast to other plant species of the Brassicaceae family, making its production more ecologically beneficial because of lower herbicide and pesticide use [8,14,15]. In addition to the above-mentioned characteristics, camelina seed oil has a distinct oil composition, abundant in α-linolenic acid (>25%) and tocopherols [16,17], consequently characterizing its oil as a potential alternative source for food or non-food applications such as biodiesel and aviation turbine fuel production [18,19]. Whilst the seed cake is characterized by its high content in proteins (30–40%), its remaining oil (10–15%), carbohydrates, and additional phytochemicals [8,20] have been proposed as a cheap alternative protein feed-stuff and a valuable source in animal nutrition [3,4,8], because camelina byproducts are less expensive than other crop sources, particularly soybean [21].
Agronomic management techniques, such as seed rate, plant density, fertilization, tillage system, sowing time, and irrigation, influence crop environment, which subsequently influences crop growth and, ultimately, yield and quality [9,11,12,13]. Fertilization plays a critical role in increasing agricultural output by providing the necessary nutrients, particularly nitrogen, that crop plants require to maintain vegetative development in tandem with reproductive growth. Improved crop yield can only be obtained when nutrients are supplied at the optimum dose required by crop plants [12,22]. Furthermore, data from many researchers clearly illustrate the beneficial effects of organic fertilization on the quality characteristics of several crops [23,24]. Tillage is one of the most crucial procedures in the agricultural production system. Tillage methods suppress weeds, provide a proper seedbed for crops, incorporate crop residues into the soil, promote chemical reactivity, and therefore improve all physicochemical soil conditions that affect plant growth, development, and quality. Conservation tillage, including minimum tillage, is an environmentally friendly method of managing soil surface and seedbed preparation. It is used all over the world to conserve soil moisture, reduce soil erosion, and improve soil organic C, plant-available water capacity, aggregation, and soil water transmission [25].
The demand for organically grown products has risen in recent decades because many people are concerned about the environment and believe that organic products are healthier than conventional ones. The most recent modifications to EU legislation for organic animal production [26,27] tightened restrictions on livestock feed source materials by lowering the permitted proportion of conventional feed to zero. Consequently, many livestock farmers are experiencing a scarcity of organic feedstuffs [28]. The increased interest in the organic production of feed supplements enforced the need to evaluate the yield and quality parameters of organically produced camelina oilseed cake. In addition, cold-pressing, involving mechanical pressing without the use of heat, is a low-cost, simple, quick, and environmentally friendly method for producing cakes from small quantities of raw materials [29,30,31,32]. The objective of the present research was therefore to evaluate the effects of organic fertilization with compost, vermicompost, and soil tillage systems (conventional and minimum) on yield and quality parameters of cold-pressed oilseed cakes of camelina.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Experimental Design

A two-year field experiment was conducted in the Tripoli region (37°30′ N and 22°22′ E; 660 m altitude), central Peloponnese, southern Greece, during the 2015 and 2016 spring–summer cropping seasons (Figure 1). The primary soil physicochemical parameters (at 0–25 cm soil depth) of the experimental site are the following: the soil was characterized as a clay loam (28.6% clay, 37.8% silt, and 33.6% sand) with a pH (1:2 H2O) of 6.62, 0.104% total nitrogen (N), 1.52 % total organic carbon, a sufficient supply of phosphorus (Olsen P: 10.7 mg·kg−1 soil), potassium (K) of 100.5 mg·kg−1 soil, magnesium (Mg) of 182 mg·kg−1 soil, and electrical conductivity of 58.2 μS cm−1. The site was certified as organic and managed in accordance with European Union organic agriculture regulations (EC 834/2007) [26]. The meteorological data (mean monthly air temperature and precipitation) for the experimental site over the experimental periods were gathered from an automatic weather station of the Institute for Environmental Research, National Observatory of Athens (IERSD/NOA) [33] situated 4 km from the site; the data are presented in Table 1. Total precipitation in 2015 and 2016 (from April to July) was 142.2 and 216.6 mm, respectively. The mean temperature during the experimental periods was 17.0 °C for 2015 and 18.2 °C for 2016.
The experiment was set up on an area of 546 m2 according to the split-plot design with three replications, two main plots (conventional tillage: CT, and minimum tillage: MT), and three sub-plots [organic fertilization type: untreated (control), vermicompost, and compost] (Figure 2). Specifically, the application of conventional tillage was achieved by moldboard ploughing at a depth of 25 cm with a BKD plough (BKD 20003; Kariotakis, Doxato, Drama, Greece) equipped with three M12 type moldboards, followed by one rotary hoeing at a depth of about 10–15 cm with a Maschio Gaspardo rotary tiller (Weekend Warrior SD; Maschio Gaspardo S.p.A, Padova, Italy) equipped with 28 blades; the plots of minimum tillage treatment included chiseling at 25 cm depth with an Alpler chisel plough (Alpler Agricultural Machinery, Aydin, Turkey) equipped with seven shanks, followed by rotary hoeing at 10–15 cm. The total applied organic fertilizer (vermicompost and compost) dose was 2000 kg·ha−1, and this amount is the general recommended dose of the respective fertilizer type for camelina cultivation in clay–loam soils [34]. In the present study, the two organic fertilizers differed in their composting process [organic waste (wheat straw, maize straw, and farmyard manure at a ratio of 6:3:1) converted into compost under aerobic conditions (a) by microorganisms (thermophilic bacteria): composting and (b) through the interaction of earthworms (Eisenia foetida and Lumbricus rubellis) and microorganisms (mesophilic bacteria) at room temperature (25 °C): vermicomposting and composition (Table 2).
The main plot and sub-plot sizes were 76 m2 (19 m × 4 m) and 24 m2 (6 m × 4 m), respectively (Figure 2). In each experimental year, soil tillage took place three days prior to sowing. Organic fertilizers were manually broadcasted as a basal dressing and integrated into the soil by rotary hoeing. Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz cv. Midas] seeds were sown by hand in rows 30 cm apart at 2–3 cm depth. The sowing rate was 6 kg·ha−1, and seed sowing took place on 10 May 2015 and 13 April 2016. The crop was manually harvested on 31 July 2015 and 10 July 2016, once the seeds had attained full maturity (seed moisture was about 7%). There were no pests or diseases in the camelina crop over the cropping seasons. Supplemental irrigation was set up by means of a dripline irrigation system, and the total quantity of water applied during the experiment was 30 mm for each growing period. In addition, weeds were controlled by hand-hoeing as necessary and prior to the closure of the canopy.

2.2. Sampling Procedures, Measurements, and Methods

To obtain oilseed cake samples, camelina seeds weighing a total of 300 g were harvested from each experimental plot. The seeds were cleaned from foreign materials and then cold-pressed using a cold mechanical screw pressing (TäbyPress Type 20, Örebro, Sweden) operated at a temperature below 50 °C. The press cake was left to dry at room conditions for 24 h before chemical composition analysis. The seed cake extraction rate (%) was determined by dividing the mass of cake extracted with initial weight of camelina seeds and multiplying by 100. The seed cake yield was calculated by multiplying the seed cake extraction rate with the seed yield.
As regards chemical analysis, the oilseed cake samples were crushed to pass through a 1 mm Wiley mill screen (Thomas T4274.E15 Steel Model 4 Wiley Mill; Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA, USA). The samples were assessed for dry matter (DM) analysis (method 943.01), crude ash (CA; method 924.05), and crude protein (CP; method 984.13) with a fully automated Kjeldahl analyzer (Kjeltec 8400; Foss Tecator AB, Höganas, Sweden), as well as crude fat (CF; method 920.39) and crude fiber (CFr; method 978.10) [35]. The crude protein (CP) content was estimated by multiplying the Kjeldahl nitrogen content by 6.25. Concerning the carbohydrate content (CHO), it was calculated as the remainder up to 100% of the sample dry matter (DM) after subtraction of the sum of crude fat (CF), crude protein (CP), and crude ash (CA). The residual oil from the oilseed cake was extracted using the Soxhlet n-hexane method. Specifically, 250 mL of solvent and 10 g of camelina oilseed cake sample were used in order to maintain a solvent to solid ratio of 25:1. The total extraction process was completed within one 1 h. The extracted phase was then distilled to separate the oil from the solvent. The residual oil content (%) was determined by dividing the mass of oil extracted by the initial weight of camelina cake and multiplying by 100.
The quantification and determination of fatty acids (FAs) were also performed in the oilseed cake samples using an Agilent 6890 GC chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a single capillary column HP-88 GC (60 m × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.20 μm film thickness; Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA) after the transesterification procedure described by Heleno et al. [36]. The temperatures in the initial and final columns were 170 °C and 230 °C, respectively, and the temperature increased at a rate of 4 °C min−1. The temperatures of the injector and the detector were both 230 °C. The FID temperature was set to 260 °C, and the chromatographic analysis included a temperature-programmed run beginning at 120 °C and lasting 1 min. Then, there were two step-ramps, one at 1.25 °C min−1 to 230 °C and another at 10 °C min−1 to 240 °C, each for 3 min. The flame gases were hydrogen (at least >99% purity) and synthetic air. The carrier gas was helium with a linear velocity set at 30 cm s−1. Fatty acid identification was made by comparing the relative retention times from samples with a mix standard of 37 component FA methyl esters (FAME) (Supelco, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Extra FA standards were also utilized for cis-9, trans-11, C18:2, trans-10, cis-12 C18:2, and trans-11 C18:1 FA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The results were processed using a Hewlett-Packard 3365 Chemstation data analysis software (Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, USA). In the present study, the seven major fatty acids (~99%) identified in camelina oilseed cake were studied and expressed as the relative fraction of each individual fatty acid contained in the sample. The seven main fatty acids discovered were as follows: palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1 n-9), linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6), α-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3), cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1), and erucic acid (C22:1). In addition, the values of saturated fatty acids (SAFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), omega 6 (n-6), and omega 3 (n-3) were summed from the profiles of identified FAs in camelina oilseed cake samples, and the PUFA/SAFA and n-6/n-3 ratios were determined.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

This study was statistically analyzed using SigmaPlot 12 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). A mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, with years and replications as random effects and soil tillage and organic fertilization as fixed effects. In order to estimate whether there were significant differences between the treatments, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey’s HSD) was applied. By using Pearson’s correlation analysis, the relationships between yield components and nutritive characteristics were described. All statistical analyses conducted in this study were declared significant at 5% (p ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

The two-year data analysis demonstrated that the interaction between soil tillage and organic fertilization had only a substantial effect on the crude fat content of camelina oilseed cake (Table 3). Moreover, the year × soil tillage interaction was also found to be statistically significant for the above-mentioned trait. The main effect of soil tillage was significant on the crude protein content, crude fat content, cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1), erucic acid (C22:1), and total monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) of camelina oilseed cake. With the exception of seed cake extraction rate, crude ash content, stearic acid (C18:0), and omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids ratio (n-6/n-3), the main effect of organic fertilization regimes was substantial on seed yield, seed cake extraction rate, and yield, together with nutritional components and fatty acids composition of oilseed cake. In addition, the main effect of the year presented a substantial effect on seed yield, seed cake content and yield, dry matter content, crude fat content, total carbohydrate (CHO) content, residual oil content of oilseed cake, as well as on its fatty acids composition and their combinations, excepting cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1), erucic acid (C22:1), α-Linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3), total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), and n-6/n-3 ratio.

3.1. Seed Yield, Oilseed Cake Extraction Rate, and Yield of Camelina

The present study proved that fertilization only had a significant effect on the seed yield of the camelina crop (Table 4). Specifically, the highest yields were found in compost plots (1083.6 and 955.2 kg·ha−1 in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (703.1 and 602.5 kg·ha−1 in 2015 and 2016, respectively), with untreated plants yielding the lowest (558.9 and 462.5 kg·ha−1 for the corresponding growing periods).
Concerning the seed cake extraction rate of camelina, there were no significant differences among different soil tillage and fertilization plots (Table 4). Seed cake yield was estimated by multiplying the seed yield of the camelina crop and the content of seed cake residue derived from the crop’s seeds after removing the fixed oil. According to the combined analysis (Table 3), seed cake yield was only affected by fertilization. Averaged over soil tillage treatments, the highest values of cake yield were found in plants treated with compost (671.3 and 576.1 kg·ha−1 in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (437.4 and 368.9 kg·ha−1 for the respective years; Table 4).

3.2. Nutritional Composition of Camelina Oilseed Cake

The influence of the soil tillage system and organic fertilization on the dry matter (DM) content of camelina oilseed cake is shown in Table 5. During the two-year experiment, DM content was not affected by soil tillage systems; however, the experiment results showed that the mean values of this trait offered strong evidence of the effect of varied organic fertilization treatments. In particular, the highest values were presented for compost fertilizer (93.54% and 93.70% in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (93.11% and 93.46% for the corresponding growing seasons).
Both soil tillage and organic fertilization had a significant impact on crude protein (CP) content (Table 3 and Table 5). Concerning the soil tillage effect, the CP content mean values in conventional tillage plots (35.60% and 35.18% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) were substantially higher than that in minimum tillage plots (33.99% and 33.71% DM for the corresponding growing periods). As regards the fertilization effect, the highest mean values of CP content were discovered in plots with compost (35.53% and 35.16% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) and vermicompost (34.91% and 34.64% DM for the respective years) fertilizers, whereas the lowest values (33.94% and 33.54% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) were achieved in the unfertilized (control) plots.
The current study found that soil tillage had a substantial impact on the crude fat (CF) content of camelina oilseed cake during the experimental periods (Table 5), with the minimum tillage plots achieving higher values of this measure (17.93% and 16.01% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) in relation to the conventional tillage treatment (15.47% and 14.87% DM for the corresponding growing seasons). As regards organic fertilization, this also had a considerable effect on the CF content, with greater values (17.88% and 16.02% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) observed in plots fertilized with compost fertilizer followed by vermicompost (16.69% and 15.79% DM for the corresponding experimental years).
There were no significant variations in crude fiber (CFr) content between the two studied soil tillage systems; nonetheless, the oilseed cake from plants of minimum tillage exhibited slightly higher values (7.48% and 7.52% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) in comparison to those of conventional tillage (7.46% and 7.39% DM for the corresponding years) (Table 5). Contrariwise, the organic fertilization impact was determined to be significant, with the higher values (7.74% and 7.69% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) recorded in the compost plots.
As for the crude ash (CA) content, there were no significant differences among the conventional and minimum soil tillage systems; however, the oilseed cake from plants grown under minimum tillage exhibited marginally higher values of this measure (5.53% and 5.58% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) than those of the conventional tillage treatment (5.48% and 5.49% DM for the corresponding growing seasons). Likewise, organic fertilization was not found to have a substantial impact, although slightly greater values (5.57% and 5.72% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) were achieved in compost plots, whereas the lowest values (5.44% and 5.43% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) were recorded in unfertilized plots.
Total carbohydrate (CHO) content was not influenced by the different soil tillage systems, but it was influenced by the different fertilization treatments (Table 5). In particular, the highest value of CHO was discovered in unfertilized plots, with the values being 45.09% and 46.53% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively, whilst the lowest values (41.02% and 43.10% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) were recorded in compost plots.
During the two-year research trial, only fertilization had a substantial effect on residual oil content. Specifically, the highest residual oil content values were achieved in the oilseed cake from plants fertilized with compost (19.93% and 14.28% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively), whilst the lowest values (13.75% and 13.83% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) were found in the oilseed cake from unfertilized plants.

3.3. Fatty Acid Composition and Ratios of Camelina Oilseed Cake

In the current research study, the seven primary fatty acids detected in camelina oilseed cake were studied. They were expressed as the relative percentage of each individual fatty acid present in the seed cake sample. Specifically, the seven major fatty acids observed that accounted for about 99% of total fatty acids were palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1 n-9), linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6), α-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3), cis-11-eicosenoic acid (C20:1), and erucic acid (C22:1) (Table 6).
The combined analysis of variance (Table 3) revealed that the contents of saturated (SAFA: palmitic and stearic acid), monounsaturated (MUFA: oleic, cis-11-eicosenoic, and erucic acid), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA: linoleic and α-linolenic acid) were significantly influenced by organic fertilization during the growing seasons of the current study. In particular, averaged over the soil tillage systems, the greatest SAFA values were detected in the oilseed cake from plants fertilized with vermicompost (9.85% and 9.86% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) and compost (9.78% and 9.91% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) (Table 6). As regards MUFA content, the highest value was recorded in unfertilized (control) plots, with values of 34.10% and 33.36% DM for the corresponding growing seasons. As for PUFA content, the highest values (52.74% and 52.62% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) were observed in compost plots. As regards the soil tillage effect, this also had a significant impact on MUFA content (Table 3). During the experimental periods, the mean values of MUFA (33.85% and 33.08% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) were greater in those in the conventional tillage system plots (Table 6).
Palmitic acid presented the highest content between SAFAs. According to the combined analysis (Table 3), seed cake yield was only affected by organic fertilization. In particular, the greatest values of palmitic acid content were recorded in the oilseed cake of plants treated with compost (7.23% and 7.39% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively) and vermicompost (7.28% and 7.33% DM for the corresponding years) fertilizers (Table 6).
Among MUFAs, the highest content was recorded in oleic acid (Table 6). During the two-year research study, oleic acid content was not influenced by soil tillage; however, the experimental results proved a significant effect of different organic fertilization regimes on this trait. Specifically, the highest values were presented in the untreated (control: 18.38% and 17.56% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (18.29% and 17.47% DM for the corresponding growing seasons) fertilizers.
In the PUFA category, the greatest content was obtained from α-linolenic acid, and it was the highest content among all the other fatty acids in camelina oilseed cake (Table 6). Diverse soil tillage strategies had no effect on the α-linolenic acid concentration, which was exclusively altered by distinct organic fertilization treatments. In particular, the greatest values were observed under compost fertilization (30.32% and 30.07% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively), followed by vermicompost (29.56% and 29.82% DM for the corresponding growing seasons).
As for the linoleic acid, which recorded the second highest content among PUFAs and all the other fatty acids of camelina oilseed cake, the effects of the soil tillage system and organic fertilization on its content are shown in Table 6. Concerning soil tillage, there were no substantial differences between the two tested soil tillage systems. Contrariwise, the linoleic acid content presented strong evidence of the effect of varied organic fertilization treatments. The greatest values were recorded in the oilseed cake of plants treated with compost (22.42% and 22.55% DM in 2015 and 2016, respectively).
The ratio of PUFA/SAFA was not influenced by soil tillage, and it was only affected by the different organic fertilization regimes during the second year of the experiment. In particular, during the second experimental period, the highest PUFA/SAFA ratio was recorded in the case of compost (5.31), while the lowest value was obtained from untreated (control: 5.18) plots (Table 6).
Finally, PUFAs consist of two types: omega 3 (n-3) and omega 6 (n-6) fatty acids. In the current research, n-3 fatty acids consisted only of α-linolenic acid, whereas n-6 fatty acids consisted of linoleic acid. Concerning the ratio of n-6/n-3, there were no significant differences between the two examined soil tillage systems; however, the conventional tillage system plants recorded slightly higher values of the measure (0.76 and 0.74 in 2015 and 2016, respectively) than those of the minimum tillage system (0.74 and 0.73 for the corresponding growing seasons) (Table 6). Likewise, the organic fertilization impact was not determined to be statistically significant in the current trial, although, untreated (control: 0.77 and 0.75 in 2015 and 2016, respectively) presented slightly higher n-6/n-3 ratio values.

4. Discussion

During the two-year trial, the seed yield of camelina crop was slightly higher in minimum tillage (Table 3). The minimum tillage for camelina crop can generate an equivalent seed yield to conventional tillage and should result in less tillage intensity in the distinctive Mediterranean environment [37,38]. However, there has been some disagreement in previous research studies on how different oilseed crops react to soil tillage systems, with lower yields discovered under conventional tillage compared with minimum [39,40], as well as higher yields observed under conventional tillage [41,42] and little effect of tillage treatment [43]. Considering all the above mentioned, it is possible to conclude that the interaction effect between the tillage method and environment is more essential than the applied tillage method alone [42,44].
In terms of fertilization, the application of different organic amendments had a significant response to the camelina seed yield. The two-year mean value of this trait was considerably greater in compost fertilizer plots (1019.4 kg·ha−1), followed by vermicompost (652.8 kg·ha−1), and the untreated (control: 510.7 kg·ha−1) recorded the lowest yield. The current results of organically grown camelina are equal to those found in conventionally grown camelina in other Mediterranean environments around the world [12,45,46]. In addition, the application of compost seemed to increase seed yield by 56.16% as compared with vermicompost application. This increment could be related to the type of organic amendment (a greater proportion of compost in nitrogen and other main nutrients than vermicompost) that supplied the specific needs of the camelina crop for nutrients, as well as the improved chemical, hydro-physical, and biological properties of soils where organic amendments were applied [47,48].
Throughout the two-year experiment, the oilseed cake extraction rate was not statistically affected by fertilization; however, the two-year average value of extraction rate was slightly higher in untreated plots (61.85%), whereas the lowest rate was offered by compost fertilizer (61.13%). The present results revealed that organic fertilization seemed to slightly reduce the values of this trait. In addition, the cake extraction rate is inversely proportional to the oil content of the seeds [29]. Consequently, these findings are in agreement with previous studies that confirmed the alternative use of organic fertilization in order to minimize the potential reductions in oil content and quality in comparison with the negative effects of synthetic fertilizers [49,50].
The combined analysis of variance revealed that the seed cake yield of camelina was significantly influenced by organic fertilization regimes (Table 2). Specifically, the highest two-year average value was obtained from compost treatments, with the value being 97.28% higher than that of the control, respectively. The yield of oilseed cake is determined by the crop’s seed yield and the residue content, which continues to exist after the significant proportion of the oil has been extracted from oilseeds (seed cake extraction rate). As a result, seed yield and seed cake residual rate correlated strongly with seed cake yield (r = 0.993, p < 0.001 and r = 0.769, p < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 3).
Dry matter (DM) content of the oilseed cake was only affected by fertilization, and the highest values were found after the application of organic fertilizers (Table 4). In particular, the compost treatment presented the greatest two-year value (93.62%), followed by vermicompost (93.29%). The available nitrogen raised the DM content in a positive linear relationship. This happened as nitrogen promotes plant maturity and metabolism, causing a substantial increase in photoassimilates’ accumulation and transformation into plant tissues [12,51].
The camelina plant constitutes an excellent protein source. The crude protein (CP) content of various camelina feed components varies. According to the literature, camelina seed contains ~25% CP, whilst the seed byproducts, for instance, of seed cake have higher CP content, with values ranging from 30.3 to 39.8% depending on genotype (variety), growing season, and environment (soil and climatic conditions), as well as agronomic practices [4,52]. The current study found that the CP content of camelina oilseed cake was substantially affected by both the soil tillage system and fertilization. Regarding the effect of soil tillage, the two-year mean value of CP content found in conventional tillage plots (35.39% of DM) was higher than that in minimum tillage plots (33.85% of DM). These findings are in accordance with those obtained by Wilhelm and Wortman [53], Spoljar et al. [54], and Cociu and Alionte [55] determined the good effects of crop rotation and more intensive tillage on protein content in the seed of soybean and maize crops. Increasing available nutrient levels generally improves feed quality measures, including CP content. In terms of fertilization effect, compost had the highest two-year average value (35.35% DM), followed by vermicompost fertilization (34.78% DM). The higher CP content following the application of compost fertilizer could be attributed to larger quantities of plants’ available nitrogen, which improves and enhances nitrogen uptake and which is critical for protein synthesis [56]. Furthermore, the current results confirmed that the CP content in camelina cake is comparable to that discovered in rapeseed meal (29.7–39.9%); however, it is lower than that in soybean meal (43.0–56.3%) [52,57,58].
Crude fat (CF) is constituted of lipids, such as galactolipids, triglycerides, and phospholipids, and several non-polar substances including phosphatides, steroids, pigments, and fat-soluble vitamins, as well as waxes. According to Juodka et al. [52], the CF content obtained from camelina seed is high (36.8%), although the CF content in oilseed cake varies from 6.4% to 22.7%. In the current investigation, the CF content of camelina seed cake was significantly affected by both examined factors. CF content received the highest values in the minimum tillage system, with the 2-year mean value being 11.87% higher in comparison with conventional tillage. Similar results, with increased fat content in soybean seeds as tillage became more minimized, were obtained by Urda et al. [59]. Concerning the organic fertilization effect, the greatest 2-year mean value was obtained from compost (16.95 DM), whereas the lowest was recorded in the untreated (control: 15.02%). The positive effect of compost fertilization on CF content was previously reported by Jariene et al. [60] in pumpkin oil cake. In general, a comparison of our findings to the findings of previous research studies on other oilseed crop species reveals that the CF content in oilseed cake of camelina is greater than that in soybean (0.6–3.3%) and rapeseed (1.4–10.5%) meals [57,58].
A high percentage of fibrous components (crude fiber; CFr) implies that the feed is characterized by low digestibility and energy value [61]. Previous research proved that high CFr content was observed in camelina seed by-products, with the values varying from 9.7% to 17.4%, indicating a higher content in comparison to that in soybean meal and similar to that in rapeseed expellers and meal [62]. CFr content was only influenced by organic fertilization regimes in the current research, and the highest 2-year mean value was reported in compost (7.72% DM), followed by vermicompost (7.48% DM). Barker and Sawer [63] and Kaur et al. [64] reported that the CFr content in soybean seeds remained unchanged when nitrogen fertilizers were applied.
An increased crude ash (CA) content implies considerable soil pollution, which might raise the content of insoluble fiber components in neutral detergent fiber (total cellulose) solution greatly. In our study, this measure was not affected by the assessed factors, although there was a tendency for CA content to be higher with the increase in available nitrogen, and a slightly greater 2-year value (5.65% DM) was recorded in plots fertilized with compost (Table 5). The CA content of camelina oilseed cake was reported to vary from 4.9% to 6.3% [50]. Bobrecka-Jamro et al. [65] demonstrated that high rates of nitrogen increased the CP content and decreased the content of CF, as well as causing a significant decrease in ash and CFr content in soybean seeds.
Carbohydrates (CHO) represent the principal source of energy for rumen microorganisms, as well as the primary plant energy reserve, comprising 50–80% of total reserves [66]. CHOs offer energy to livestock, with the rumen performing the majority of digestion in the case of ruminants [67]. The CHO of camelina seed meal comprises monosaccharides, disaccharides, oligosaccharides, as well as polysaccharides [4]. The total CHO content declined linearly in the current experiment, with increasing levels of nitrogen supply to the plant (Table 4) due to the increased usage of these carbs to convert available nitrogen into protein as a natural plant reaction [68,69].
Regarding the residual oil content in camelina oilseed cake, the combined analysis of variability showed that organic fertilization only influenced this trait. Specifically, the highest 2-year mean value was discovered in compost treatment (14.11% of DM), while the lowest was obtained from untreated (13.79% DM). The current findings distinctly reveal that a substantial quantity of oil continues to exist in the cake after mechanical screw press extraction of oilseeds. In addition, cold-pressed cakes preserve more oil than solvent-extracted meals [32]. As a result, cold-pressed cakes contribute a substantial quantity of energy to livestock rations due to their high content of residual oil [4,32].
The fatty acid (FA) composition of camelina oilseed cake is presented in Table 6. The results revealed that the cold-pressed cake was distinguished by low quantities of saturated fatty acids (SAFA), of which palmitic acid (C16:0) was the predominant one. During the two experimental years, the contents of SAFA and palmitic acid were only affected by organic fertilization, presenting a similar trend. Specifically, the highest concentrations in the first year of the study were achieved after vermicompost application, with the maximum average values of SAFA and palmitic acid content being 9.85% and 9.28% DM, respectively, whereas, during the second year, the highest values of SAFA (9.91% DM) and palmitic acid (7.39% DM) were recorded after compost fertilization, with the differences among compost and vermicompost fertilization not being statistically significant. In the present study, this similar response trend of SAFA and palmitic acid content is also confirmed by the very strong and positive correlation among the above-mentioned traits (r = 0.956, p < 0.001, respectively) (Figure 3). The amount of SAFA and palmitic acid content in camelina seed cake seems to be lower than that found in soybean meal (19.9%) and rapeseed cake (16.3%), although higher compared with that found in hempseed cake (7.7%) [70,71].
Concerning the proportion of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), this was substantially affected by both examined factors. In particular, the conventional tillage system, with a 2-year mean value of 33.47% DM, was significantly higher than that of minimum tillage, with a 2-year mean value of 33.14% DM. In terms of fertilization, the highest 2-year mean value (33.73%) was observed in the untreated plots. Oleic acid (C18:1 n-9), which is characterized by its cholesterol-lowering properties [72], was the most dominant acid among MUFA and was negatively affected by organic fertilization application, with the highest two-year average value (13.54% of DM) of its content observed in the unfertilized (control) plots. Hazardous erucic acid (C22:1) was the lowest MUFA in content and presented a similar response to that of total MUFA towards the examined factors’ effects. The highest average 2-year values were observed under conventional tillage (2.17% DM) and untreated (2.23% DM). As for the above-mentioned results, similar behavior of MUFA and their consequents was also detected in previous research studying the influence of similar factors (minimum soil tillage and organic fertilization) on the fatty acid profile of camelina seed oil [50,73,74]. The current findings confirmed that camelina cake contains more MUFA than hempseed cake (10%) but less than soybean meal (52.4%) and rapeseed cake (48.7%) [70,71]. Moreover, the erucic acid content in cold-pressed camelina cake seemed to be thirty-six times higher than that in rapeseed cake [71].
Camelina oilseed cake constitutes a major source of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), particularly linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6) and α-linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3), which are characterized as essential since they are essential for good health, and must be incorporated into the diet as they are not able to be produced by the body. Omega 6 (n-6) and omega 3 (n-3) are fatty acids of PUFA, and specifically in the present research, the n-6 and n-3 omega fatty acids in cold-pressed camelina cake were composed exclusively of linoleic and α-linolenic acid, respectively. According to the results of our study, the total PUFA and their constituents’ contents were only affected by organic fertilization, and the highest average 2-year values of their contents were presented in oilseed cake obtained from plants fertilized with compost (52.68%, 22.49%, and 30.20% for total PUFA, linoleic acid, and α-linolenic acid, respectively). In the same manner, in the research study of Martinez et al. [74] evaluating the organic fertilization effect on camelina oil, the application of composted sludge seemed to significantly increase the proportion of linoleic acid, while there was a significant decrease in the proportion of erucic acid with respect to untreated plants. In addition, correlation analysis revealed highly significant correlations between the levels of linoleic and linolenic acids and between these fatty acids and seed cake extraction rate (Figure 3), which is in accordance with the relevant study of Obour et al. [75] on the fatty acid profile of camelina seed oil. As for α-linolenic acid, camelina cake presents a much higher content of this fatty acid in comparison with other feed ingredients, including soybean meal (7.2–8.6%), hempseed cake (15.9–24.7%), and rapeseed cake (10.6–13.1%), but lower than the relevant content recorded in linseed cake (51.5%) [52,71,76,77]. As a result, it is important to remember that camelina is the second highest α-linolenic acid-containing plant that is cultivated in the Northern Hemisphere and utilized as a feed ingredient [50,69]. Furthermore, essential linoleic acid was found to be lower than in other feed ingredients, such as soybean meal (52.4–55.2%) and hempseed cake (52.5–59.5%), but lower than the relevant content recorded in linseed cake (14.60%) [52,71,77].
In response to the fatty acid ratios, the PUFA/SAFA were only affected by organic fertilization during the second year of the study, and the greatest value was found in compost plots, with the average values being 5.31, while the n-6/n-3 or linoleic/α-linolenic ratio was not influenced by either examined factor, and its values ranged from 0.73 to 0.77%. Finally, the n-6/n-3 or linoleic/α-linolenic ratio in cold-pressed camelina cake was found to be lower compared with soybean meal (6.11), hempseed cake (3.76), as well as rapeseed cake (1.66) [52,71,76,77].

5. Conclusions

The results of the present research demonstrated that the seed yield, as well as the seed cake yield of camelina, were significantly affected by organic fertilization, with the highest values observed in the compost treatment, whereas the different tillage systems had no significant effect. In terms of nutritional characteristics, cold-pressed cake from camelina seed cultivated under compost fertilization and conventional tillage seems to be an excellent alternative to commonly used protein feed additives in livestock diets. Camelina cake is characterized by great nutritional properties, as it contains a significant quantity of CP and high CF content, making it a viable protein and energy source for ruminant and non-ruminant animals. In addition, camelina cake has the potential to provide crucial polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) (~52% of total FAs), especially under compost fertilization, which can be utilized for the production of animal products rich in omega 3 (n-3) and omega 6 (n-6) PUFA, demonstrating several beneficial effects on human health. Finally, special consideration should be given to antinutritional ingredients (e.g., erucic acid) that can decrease feed consumption and nutrient utilization; in consequence, further research studies including various animal species at different growing stages are required in order to determine the appropriate feed supplementation level of camelina oilseed cake without any negative effect on animal performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); methodology, F.A., I.R., I.K., A.M., V.T., D.B. (Dimitrios Beslemes), C.K., P.S., E.T. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); validation, F.A., I.K., E.T. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); formal analysis, F.A., E.T. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); investigation, F.A., I.R., I.K., A.M., V.T., D.B. (Dimitrios Beslemes), C.K., P.S., E.T. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); resources, F.A., I.R., I.K., A.M. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); writing—original draft preparation, F.A., I.R., I.K., A.M. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); writing—review and editing, F.A., I.R., I.K., A.M. and D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis); supervision, D.B. (Dimitrios Bilalis). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. COM (2020) 381 Final; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2020; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0381 (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  2. Denanot, J.P. Report on a European Strategy for the Promotion of Protein Crops—Encouraging the Production of Protein and Leguminous Plants in the European Agriculture Sector (2017/2116(INI)). Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. European Parliament 2014–2019. 2018. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0121_EN.html (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  3. Lolli, S.; Grilli, G.; Ferrari, L.; Battelli, G.; Pozzo, S.; Galasso, I.; Russo, R.; Brasca, M.; Reggiani, R.; Ferrante, V. Effect of different percentage of Camelina sativa cake in laying hens diet: Performance, welfare, and eggshell quality. Animals 2020, 10, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Riaz, R.; Ahmed, I.; Sizmaz, O.; Ahsan, U. Use of Camelina sativa and by-products in diets for dairy cows: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dönmez, E.O.; Belli, O. Urartian plant cultivation at Yoncatepe (Van), eastern Turkey. Econ. Bot. 2007, 61, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kroll, H. Agriculture and arboriculture in mainland Greece at the beginning of the first millenium B.C. Pallas 2000, 52, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Zeist, W.A. Plant remains from Iron Age Noordbarge, province of Drenthe, the Netherlands. Palaeohistoria 1981, 23, 169–193. [Google Scholar]
  8. Matthäus, B.; Zubr, J. Variability of specific components in Camelina sativa oilseed cakes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2000, 12, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vollmann, J.; Moritz, T.; Kargl, C.; Baumgartner, S.; Wagentristl, H. Agronomic evaluation of camelina genotypes selected for seed quality characteristics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2007, 26, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wittkop, B.; Snowdon, R.; Friedt, W. Status and perspectives of breeding for enhanced yield and quality of oilseed crops for Europe. Euphytica 2009, 170, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hunsaker, D.J.; French, A.N.; Clarke, T.R.; El-Shikha, D.M. Water use, crop coefficients, and irrigation management criteria for camelina production in arid regions. Irrig. Sci. 2011, 29, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zanetti, F.; Eynck, C.; Christou, M.; Krzyzaniak, M.; Righini, D.; Alexopoulou, E.; Stolarski, M.J.; VanLoo, E.N.; Puttick, D.; Monti, A. Agronomic performance and seed quality attributes of Camelina (Camelina sativa L. crantz) in multi-environment trials across Europe and Canada. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 107, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Mohammed, Y.A.; Chen, C.; Afshar, R.K. Nutrient requirements of camelina for biodiesel feedstock in Central Montana. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zubr, J. Oil-seed crop: Camelina sativa. Ind. Crops Prod. 1997, 6, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Seguin-Swartz, G.; Eynck, C.; Gugel, R.K.; Strelkov, S.E.; Olivier, C.Y.; Li, J.L.; Klein-Gebbinck, H.; Borhan, H.; Caldwell, C.D.; Falk, K.C. Diseases of Camelina sativa (false flax). Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 31, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zubr, J.; Matthäus, B. Effects of growth conditions on fatty acids and tocopherols in Camelina sativa oil. Ind. Crops Prod. 2002, 15, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abramovič, H.; Butinar, B.; Nikolič, V. Changes occurring in phenolic content, tocopherol composition and oxidative stability of Camelina sativa oil during storage. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 903–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zaleckas, E.; Makarevičiene, V.; Sendžikiene, E. Possibilities of using Camelina sativa oil for producing biodiesel fuel. Transport 2012, 27, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Agusdinata, D.B.; Zhao, F.; Ileleji, K.; DeLaurentis, D. Life cycle assessment of potential biojet fuel production in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 9133–9143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ibrahim, F.M.; El Habbasha, S.F. Chemical composition, medicinal impacts and cultivation of camelina (Camelina sativa). Int. J. PharmTech. Res. 2015, 8, 114–122. [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of Feed Materials; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2013; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R0068&from=EN (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  22. Kakabouki, I.P.; Hela, D.; Roussis, I.; Papastylianou, P.; Sestras, A.F.; Bilalis, D.J. Influence of fertilization and soil tillage on nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of quinoa crop (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 18, 220–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kakar, K.; Xuan, T.D.; Noori, Z.; Aryan, S.; Gulab, G. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer application on growth, yield, and grain quality of rice. Agriculture 2020, 10, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alzamel, N.M.; Taha, E.M.M.; Bakr, A.A.A.; Loutfy, N. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties, growth yield, and physiochemical properties of sunflower seeds and oils. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Busari, M.A.; Kukal, S.S.; Kaur, A.; Bhatt, R.; Dulazi, A.A. Conservation tillage impacts on soil, crop and the environment. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2015, 3, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. European Council. Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products and Repealing Regulation (ECC) No. 2092/91. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2007; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32007R0834 (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  27. European Commission. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008 Laying down Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Comission Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products with Regard to Organic Production, Labelling and Control. European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32008R0889 (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  28. Escribano, A.J. Organic feed: A bottleneck for the development of the livestock sector and its transition to sustainability? Sustainability 2018, 10, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cakaloglu, B.; Ozyurt, V.H.; Otles, S. Cold press in oil extraction. A review. Ukr. Food J. 2018, 7, 640–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Woyengo, T.A.; Sánchez, J.E.; Yáñez, J.; Beltranena, E.; Cervantes, M.; Morales, A.; Zijlstra, R.T. Nutrient digestibility of canola co-products for grower pigs. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2016, 222, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roy, A.; Deshmukh, R. Cold-Pressed Oil Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2019–2026. 2019. Allied Market Research. Available online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/cold-pressed-oil-market (accessed on 18 January 2023).
  32. Rakita, S.; Kokić, B.; Manoni, M.; Mazzoleni, S.; Lin, P.; Luciano, A.; Ottoboni, M.; Cheli, F.; Pinotti, L. Cold-pressed oilseed cakes as alternative and sustainable feed ingredients: A review. Foods 2023, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Institute for Environmental Research, National Observatory of Athens (IERSD/NOA). Available online: https://meteosearch.meteo.gr/data/index.cfm (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  34. Kakabouki, I.; Tataridas, A.; Mavroeidis, A.; Kousta, A.; Roussis, I.; Katsenios, N.; Efthimiadou, A.; Papastylianou, P. Intro-duction of alternative crops in the Mediterranean to satisfy EU Green Deal goals. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 41, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; AOAC: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  36. Heleno, S.A.; Barros, L.; Sousa, M.J.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Study and characterization of selected nutrients in wild mushrooms from Portugal by gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. Microchem. J. 2009, 93, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kisic, I.; Basic, F.; Birkas, M.; Jurisic, A.; Bicanic, V. Crop yield and plant density under different tillage systems. Agric. Conspec. Sci. 2010, 75, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  38. Valujeva, K.; Pilecka-Ulcugaceva, J.; Skiste, O.; Liepa, S.; Lagzdins, A.; Grinfelde, I. Soil tillage and agricultural crops affect greenhouse gas emissions from Cambic Calcisol in a temperate climate. Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 2022, 72, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abdullah, A. Minimum tillage and residue management increase soil water content, soil organic matter and canola seed yield and seed oil content in the semiarid areas of Northern Iraq. Soil Till. Res. 2014, 144, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Seddaiu, G.; Iocola, I.; Farina, R.; Orsini, R.; Iezzi, G.; Roggero, P.P. Long term effects of tillage practices and N fertilization in rainfed Mediterranean cropping systems: Durum wheat, sunflower and maize grain yield. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 77, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torabi, H.; Naghdibadib, H.A.; Omidi, H.; Amirshekaria, H.; Mohammad, M. Effects of soil tillage, canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars and planting date on canola yield, and oil and some biological and physical properties of soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2008, 54, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cheţan, F.; Rusu, T.; Cheţan, C.; Urdă, C.; Rezi, R.; Şimon, A.; Bogdan, I. Influence of soil tillage systems on the yield and weeds infestation in the soybean crop. Land 2022, 11, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hocking, P.J.; Mead, J.A.; Good, A.J.; Diffey, S.M. The response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to tillage and fertilizer placement in contrasting environments in southern New South Wales. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2003, 43, 1323–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Roper, M.; Ward, P.; Keulen, A.; Hill, J. Under no-tillage and stubble retention, soil water content and crop growth are poorly related to soil water repellency. Soil Till. Res. 2013, 126, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Campbell, M.; Rossi, A.; Erskine, W. Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz): Agronomic potential in Mediterranean environments and diversity for biofuel and food uses. Crop Pasture Sci. 2013, 64, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schillinger, W. Camelina: Long-term cropping systems research in a dry Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Res. 2019, 235, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Duong, T.; Penfold, C.; Marschner, P. Amending soils of different texture with six compost types: Impact on soil nutrient availability, plant growth and nutrient uptake. Plant Soil 2012, 354, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Adugna, G. A review on impact of compost on soil properties, water use and crop productivity. Agric. Sci. Res. J. 2018, 4, 93–104. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gao, J.; Thelen, K.D.; Min, D.H.; Smith, S.; Hao, X.; Gehl, R. Effects of manure and fertilizer applications on canola oil content and fatty acid composition. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Angelopoulou, F.; Tsiplakou, E.; Bilalis, D. Tillage intensity and compost application effects on organically grown camelina productivity, seed and oil quality. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2020, 48, 2153–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sandrakirana, R.; Arifin, Z. Effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on the growth and production of soybean (Glycine max) in dry land. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín. 2021, 74, 9643–9653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Juodka, R.; Nainiene, R.; Juškiene, V.; Juška, R.; Leikus, R.; Kadžiene, G.; Stankevičiene, D. Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) as Feedstuffs in Meat Type Poultry Diet: A Source of Protein and n-3 Fatty Acids. Animals 2022, 12, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wilhelm, W.W.; Wortman, S.C. Tillage and rotation interactions for corn and soybean grain yield as affected by precipitation and air temperature. Agron. J. 2004, 96, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Spoljar, A.; Kisic, I.; Birkas, M.; Kvaternjak, I.; Marencic, D.; Orehovacki, V. Influence of tillage on soil properties, yield and protein content in maize and soybean grain. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2009, 10, 1013–1031. [Google Scholar]
  55. Cociu, A.I.; Alionte, E. Effect of different tillage systems on grain yield and its quality of winter wheat, maize and soybean under different weather conditions. Rom. Agric. Res. 2017, 34, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  56. Quemada, M.; Gabriel, J.L. Approaches for increasing nitrogen and water use efficiency simultaneously. Glob. Food Sec. 2016, 9, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Bulbul, T.; Rahmann, A.; Ozdemir, V. Effect of false flax meal on certain growth serum and meat parameters of Japanese quails. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2015, 25, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar]
  58. Banaszkiewicz, T. Nutritional Value of Soybean Meal. In Soybean and Nutrition; El-Shemy, H., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 1–20. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/soybean-and-nutrition/nutritional-value-of-soybean-meal (accessed on 22 January 2023).
  59. Urda, C.; Suciu, L.; Mureșanu, F.; Pacurar, L.; Tritean, N.; Negrea, A.; Crişan, I.; Rezi, R.; Russu, F.; Tarau, A. Influence of soil tillage system, fertilizer and treatment applied to seeds on soybean chemical composition. Rom. J. Plant Prot. 2021, 14, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jariene, E.; Danilcenko, H.; Kulaitienė, J.; Gajewski, M. Effect of fertilizers on oil pumpkin seeds crude fat, fibre and protein quantity. Agron. Res. 2007, 5, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  61. Krachunov, I. Estimation of energy feeding value of forages for ruminants II. Energy prediction through crude fiber content. J. Mt. Agric. Balk. 2007, 10, 122–134. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kalmendal, R.; Wall, H. Effects of a high oil and fibre diet and supplementary roughage on performance, injurious pecking and foraging activities in two layer hybrids. Br. Poult. Sci. 2012, 53, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Barker, D.W.; Sawyer, J.E. Nitrogen application to soybean at early reproductive development. Agron. J. 2005, 97, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Kaur, G.; Serson, W.R.; Orlowski, J.M.; McCoy, J.M.; Golden, B.R.; Bellaloui, N. Nitrogen sources and rates affect soybean seed composition in Mississippi. Agronomy 2017, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bobrecka-Jamro, D.; Jarecki, W.; Buczek, J. 2018. Response of soya bean to different nitrogen fertilization levels. J. Elem. 2018, 23, 559–568. [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Soest, P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed.; Cornell University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  67. Roussis, I.; Kakabouki, I.; Tsiplakou, E.; Bilalis, D. Influence of plant density and fertilization on yield and crude protein of Nigella sativa L.: An alternative forage and feed source. In Nigella sativa: Properties, Uses and Effects; Berghuis, S., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 145–180. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pereira, J.R.; Neres, M.A.; Sandini, I.E.; Fluck, A.C.; Costa, O.A.D.; Sartor, L.R. Chemical compounds and gas production ki-netics of annual ryegrass hay in distinct nitrogen levels and cutting heights. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2020, 44, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Leite, R.G.; Cardoso, A.D.S.; Fonseca, N.V.B.; Silva, M.L.C.; Tedeschi, L.O.; Delevatti, L.M.; Ruggieri, A.C.; Reis, R.A. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on protein and carbohydrate fractions of Marandu palisadegrass. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 14786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bailoni, L.; Bortolozzo, A.; Mantovani, R.; Simonetto, A.; Schiavon, S.; Bittante, G. Feeding dairy cows with full fat extruded or toasted soybean seeds as replacement of soybean meal and effects on milk yield, fatty acid profile and CLA content. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 3, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Juodka, R.; Juska, R.; Juskiene, V.; Leikus, R.; Stankeviciene, D.; Nainiene, R. The effect of feeding with hemp and Camelina cakes on the fatty acid profile of duck muscles. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2018, 61, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Rakow, G.; Raney, G. In Present Status and Future Perspectives of Breeding for Seed Quality in Brassica Oilseed Crops. In Proceedings of the 11th International Rapeseed Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–10 July 2003. [Google Scholar]
  73. Gesch, R.W.; Cermak, S.C. Sowing date and tillage effects on fall-seeded Camelina in the Northern Corn Belt. Agron. J. 2011, 103, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Martinez, S.; Gabriel, J.L.; Alvarez, S.; Capuano, A.; Delgado, M.d.M. Integral assessment of organic fertilization on a Camelina sativa rotation under Mediterranean conditions. Agriculture 2021, 11, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Obour, A.K.; Obeng, E.; Mohammed, Y.A.; Ciampitti, I.A.; Durrett, T.P.; Aznar-Moreno, J.A.; Chen, C. Camelina seed yield and fatty acids as influenced by genotype and environment. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Halle, I.; Schöne, F. Influence of rapeseed cake, linseed cake and hemp seed cake on laying performance of hens and fatty acid composition of egg yolk. JCF 2013, 8, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mierlita, D. Effects of diets containing hemp seeds or hemp cake on fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of sheep milk. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of camelina experimental field during the second (2016) experimental year.
Figure 1. Overview of camelina experimental field during the second (2016) experimental year.
Applsci 13 03759 g001
Figure 2. Experimental layout.
Figure 2. Experimental layout.
Applsci 13 03759 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap of correlation coefficients between evaluated traits. ns: Non-significant; *, **, and ***: significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels, respectively. CHO: total carbohydrate content, C16:0: palmitic acid, C18:0: stearic acid, C18:1 n-9: oleic acid, C20:1: cis-11-eicosenoic acid, C22:1: erucic acid, C18:2 n-6: linoleic acid, C18:3 n-3: α-linolenic acid, SAFA: saturated fatty acids, MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids, n-3: omega-3 fatty acids, and n-6: omega-6 fatty acids.
Figure 3. Heatmap of correlation coefficients between evaluated traits. ns: Non-significant; *, **, and ***: significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels, respectively. CHO: total carbohydrate content, C16:0: palmitic acid, C18:0: stearic acid, C18:1 n-9: oleic acid, C20:1: cis-11-eicosenoic acid, C22:1: erucic acid, C18:2 n-6: linoleic acid, C18:3 n-3: α-linolenic acid, SAFA: saturated fatty acids, MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids, n-3: omega-3 fatty acids, and n-6: omega-6 fatty acids.
Applsci 13 03759 g003
Table 1. Weather data for experimental location during the growing periods (April–July 2015 and 2016).
Table 1. Weather data for experimental location during the growing periods (April–July 2015 and 2016).
Mean Temperature (°C)Precipitation (mm)
2015201620152016
April10.413.66.63.4
May16.014.949.633.0
June18.321.778.0135.0
July21.722.68.045.2
Table 2. Main chemical properties of organic materials used in the experimental procedure.
Table 2. Main chemical properties of organic materials used in the experimental procedure.
ParameterVermicompostCompost
pH (1:2 H2O)7.226.61
Total organic substance (%)52.032.9
N (g·kg−1)20.170.3
P (g·kg−1)6.517.4
K (g·kg−1)12.4558.10
Mg (g·kg−1)6.0312.06
Table 3. Combined analysis of variance (F values) for all studied parameters of camelina crop grown under different soil tillage and organic fertilization during the two-year study.
Table 3. Combined analysis of variance (F values) for all studied parameters of camelina crop grown under different soil tillage and organic fertilization during the two-year study.
Source of VarianceDfSeed YieldSeed Cake
Extraction Rate
Seed
Cake Yield
Dry
Matter Content
Crude ProteinCrude Fat
Year (Y)130.917 ***15.827 **18.111 **14.915 **1.544 ns18.354 **
Tillage (T)13.799 ns0.199 ns4.057 ns0.271 ns30.937 ***37.161 ***
Fertilization (F)2241.461 ***2.063 ns214.628 ***61.134 ***11.480 **14.677 ***
Y × T10.124 ns0.090 ns0.024 ns6.977 *0.065 ns5.047 *
Y × F20.266 ns0.470 ns0.129 ns1.137 ns0.021 ns1.041 ns
T × F21.373 ns0.041 ns1.330 ns0.127 ns0.961 ns3.372 *
Y × T × F20.267 ns0.581 ns0.073 ns0.223 ns0.924 ns1.001 ns
Source of VarianceDfCrude FiberCrude AshTotal
Carbohydrate
Residual Oil ContentPalmitic Acid (C16:0)Stearic Acid (C18:0)
Year (Y)10.052 ns0.242 ns19.345 ***34.744 ***22.318 ***5.245 *
Tillage (T)10.976 ns0.069 ns0.450 ns2.959 ns0.018 ns0.583 ns
Fertilization (F)220.748 ***3.044 ns29.517 ***24.982 ***20.287 ***0.094 ns
Y × T10.786 ns0.945 ns3.439 ns0.005 ns0.049 ns0.065 ns
Y × F20.374 ns0.562 ns0.901 ns4.688 ns3.593 ns1.058 ns
T × F21.459 ns0.009 ns4.978 *0.062 ns0.111 ns1.446 ns
Y × T × F20.585 ns0.410 ns2.391 ns0.144 ns0.821 ns0.281 ns
Source of VarianceDfTotal Saturated Fatty Acids (SAFA)Oleic Acid
(C18:1 n-9)
Cis-11-Eicosenoic Acid (C20:1)Erucic Acid (C22:1)Total Monounsaturated Fatty Acids (MUFA)
Year (Y)19.974 **376.113 ***1.468 ns0.048 ns85.196 ***
Tillage (T)10.236 ns0.002 ns26.996 ***9.809 **19.186 ***
Fertilization (F)216.618 ***10.187 **24.657 ***21.363 ***32.930 ***
Y × T10.007 ns0.509 ns0.834 ns0.334 ns0.903 ns
Y × F22.523 ns1.667 ns0.078 ns0.024 ns0.653 ns
T × F20.802 ns0.072 ns0.068 ns1.422 ns0.224 ns
Y × T × F21.212 ns0.540 ns0.017 ns1.019 ns0.148 ns
Source of VarianceDfLinoleic Acid
(C18:2 n-6)
α-Linolenic Acid
(C18:3 n-3)
Total
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFA)
PUFA/SAFAn-6/n-3
Year (Y)117.091 **0.078 ns1.856 ns6.542 *3.681 ns
Tillage (T)10.323 ns2.461 ns3.147 ns1.720 ns0.876 ns
Fertilization (F)217.138 ***13.177 ***26.723 ***9.590 **1.650 ns
Y × T12.159 ns0.602 ns0.033 ns0.069 ns1.369 ns
Y × F28.548 ns0.551 ns0.344 ns0.545 ns2.829 ns
T × F21.278 ns2.663 ns3.040 ns1.227 ns1.712 ns
Y × T × F20.734 ns0.475 ns1.036 ns1.601 ns0.095 ns
F-test ratios originated from analysis of variance. ns: non-significant; *, **, and ***: significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels, respectively. Df: degrees of freedom.
Table 4. Seed yield, cake extraction rate, and cake yield as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
Table 4. Seed yield, cake extraction rate, and cake yield as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
TreatmentSeed Yield
(kg·ha−1)
Seed Cake Extraction Rate (%)Seed Cake Yield
(kg·ha−1)
2015
Tillage System
CT759.4 A62.20 A472.3 A
MT804.3 A62.16 A499.9 A
Fertilization
Control558.9 c62.37 a348.6 c
Vermicompost703.1 b62.21 a437.4 b
Compost1083.6 a61.95 a671.3 a
Source of Variation
FTillage2.410 ns0.059 ns2.532 ns
FFertilization117.108 ***1.713 ns120.901 ***
FTillage × Fertilization1.289 ns1.362 ns1.093 ns
2016
Tillage System
CT657.8 A61.07 A401.7 A
MT688.9 A60.84 A419.1 A
Fertilization
Control462.5 c61.33 a283.7 c
Vermicompost602.5 b61.22 a368.9 b
Compost955.2 a60.31 a576.1 a
Source of Variation
FTillage1.416 ns0.154 ns1.617 ns
FFertilization125.452 ***1.221 ns95.586 ***
FTillage×Fertilization0.247 ns0.207 ns0.365 ns
F-test ratios originated from analysis of variance. ns: non-significant; ***: significant at the 0.1% level. The different upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05) under different soil tillage and organic fertilization regimes, respectively, within a cultivation period.
Table 5. Nutritional components of oilseed cake as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
Table 5. Nutritional components of oilseed cake as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
TreatmentDry Matter Content (%)Crude
Protein
(% DM)
Crude Fat
(% DM)
Crude Fiber
(% DM)
Crude Ash
(% DM)
Total
Carbohydrate
(% DM)
Residual Oil Content
(% DM)
2015
Tillage System
CT93.07 A35.60 A15.47 B7.46 A5.48 A43.46 A13.82 A
MT93.89 A33.99 B17.93 A7.48 A5.53 A42.55 A13.87 A
Fertilization
Control92.28 c33.94 b15.53 b7.17 b5.44 a45.09 a13.75 b
Vermicompost93.11 b34.91 ab16.69 ab7.51 ab5.50 a42.91 b13.86 ab
Compost93.54 a35.53 a17.88 a7.74 a5.57 a41.02 c13.93 a
Source of Variation
FTillage2.459 ns15.786 **27.289 **0.003 ns0.321 ns3.526 ns2.197 ns
FFertilization42.594 ***5.217 *8.297 *8.175 *0.706 ns20.972 **6.503 **
FTillage × Fertilization0.133 ns0.392 ns1.566 ns0.407 ns0.197 ns2.611 ns0.066 ns
2016
Tillage System
CT93.43 A35.18 A14.87 B7.39 A5.49 A44.37 A14.02 A
MT93.17 A33.71 B16.01 A7.52 A5.58 A44.79 A14.09 A
Fertilization
Control92.75 b33.54 b14.50 b7.23 c5.43 a46.53 a13.83 c
Vermicompost93.46 a34.64 ab15.79 a7.44 b5.48 a44.10 b14.07 b
Compost93.70 a35.16 a16.02 a7.69 a5.72 a43.10 b14.28 a
Source of Variation
FTillage4.604 ns15.173 **10.223 *4.117 ns0.627 ns0.639 ns1.160 ns
FFertilization21.482 **6.367 *7.087 *19.354 **2.508 ns10.450 *18.584 **
FTillage × Fertilization0.210 ns1.579 ns3.279 ns3.289 ns0.217 ns4.570 ns0.119 ns
F-test ratios originated from analysis of variance. ns: non-significant; *, **, and ***: significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels, respectively. The different upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05) under different soil tillage and organic fertilization regimes, respectively, within a cultivation period.
Table 6. Fatty acid components and ratios of oilseed cake as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
Table 6. Fatty acid components and ratios of oilseed cake as affected by soil tillage system (conventional and minimum tillage: CT and MT, respectively) and fertilization (control, vermicompost, and compost).
Saturated Fatty Acids (SAFA)Monounsaturated Fatty Acids (MUFA)Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFA)PUFA/SAFAn-6/n-3
Palmitic Acid (C16:0)
(% DM)
Stearic Acid (C18:0)
(% DM)
Total SAFA
(% DM)
Oleic Acid (C18:1 n-9) (% DM)Cis-11-
EiCosenoic Acid (C20:1)
(% DM)
Erucic Acid (C22:1)
(% DM)
Total MUFA (% DM)Linoleic Acid
(C18:2 n-6)
(% DM)
α-Linolenic Acid
(C18:3 n-3)
(% DM)
Total PUFA (% DM)
2015Tillage System
CT7.22 A2.54 A9.76 A18.27 A13.41 A2.17 A33.85 A22.37 A29.31 A51.67 A5.29 A0.76 A
MT7.21 A2.56 A9.78 A18.24 A13.11 B2.10 B33.45 B22.29 A29.80 A52.09 A5.33 A0.74 A
Fertilization
Control7.15 b2.54 a9.69 b18.38 a13.49 a2.23 a34.10 a22.23 b28.79 b51.03 b5.26 a0.77 a
Vermicompost7.28 a2.56 a9.85 a18.29 ab13.20 b2.04 c33.53 b22.33 ab29.56 ab51.88 ab5.27 a0.76 a
Compost7.23 ab2.55 a9.78 ab18.09 b13.09 b2.13 b33.31 b22.42 a30.32 a52.74 a5.39 a0.74 a
Source of Variation
FTillage0.002 ns0.581 ns0.072 ns0.172 ns11.453 *8.603 *9.483 *4.008 ns1.860 ns1.273 ns0.796 ns1.976 ns
FFertilization6.215 *0.503 ns8.101 *5.812 *6.865 *20.167 **12.732 **7.786 *5.865 *7.053 *3.597 ns3.098 ns
FTillage × Fertilization0.444 ns1.016 ns1.386 ns0.302 ns0.033 ns3.702 ns0.242 ns1.649 ns0.660 ns0.463 ns0.315 ns0.951 ns
2016Tillage System
CT7.30 A2.53 A9.83 A17.47 A13.43 A2.16 A33.08 A21.89 A29.69 A51.48 A5.23 A0.74 A
MT7.31 A2.52 A9.84 A17.50 A13.21 B2.11 A32.81 B22.06 A29.53 A51.76 A5.26 A0.73 A
Fertilization
Control7.21 b2.54 a9.75 b17.56 a13.58 a2.22 a33.36 a21.53 b28.96 b50.49 c5.18 b0.75 a
Vermicompost7.33 a2.53 a9.86 a17.47 ab13.24 b2.04 b32.75 b21.84 b29.82 a51.66 b5.24 ab0.73 a
Compost7.39 a2.52 a9.91 a17.42 b13.15 b2.16 a32.73 b22.55 a30.07 a52.62 a5.31 a0.74 a
Source of Variation
FTillage0.109 ns0.117 ns0.186 ns0.656 ns27.727 **3.430 ns11.721 *1.093 ns0.602 ns2.551 ns1.243 ns0.031 ns
FFertilization26.328 **0.636 ns11.509 **6.479 *36.536 ***7.132 *28.910 ***13.112 **9.680 *33.163 ***10.238 *1.142 ns
FTillage × Fertilization0.521 ns0.740 ns0.505 ns0.326 ns0.085 ns0.230 ns0.018 ns0.971 ns4.128 ns6.809 ns5.277 ns0.843 ns
F-test ratios originated from analysis of variance. ns: non-significant; *, **, and ***: significant at the 5%, 1%, and 0.1% levels, respectively. The different upper- and lower-case letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05) under different soil tillage and organic fertilization regimes, respectively, within a cultivation period.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Angelopoulou, F.; Roussis, I.; Kakabouki, I.; Mavroeidis, A.; Triantafyllidis, V.; Beslemes, D.; Kosma, C.; Stavropoulos, P.; Tsiplakou, E.; Bilalis, D. Influence of Organic Fertilization and Soil Tillage on the Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Seed Cake: An Alternative Feed Ingredient. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063759

AMA Style

Angelopoulou F, Roussis I, Kakabouki I, Mavroeidis A, Triantafyllidis V, Beslemes D, Kosma C, Stavropoulos P, Tsiplakou E, Bilalis D. Influence of Organic Fertilization and Soil Tillage on the Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Seed Cake: An Alternative Feed Ingredient. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(6):3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Angelopoulou, Foteini, Ioannis Roussis, Ioanna Kakabouki, Antonios Mavroeidis, Vassilios Triantafyllidis, Dimitrios Beslemes, Chariklia Kosma, Panteleimon Stavropoulos, Eleni Tsiplakou, and Dimitrios Bilalis. 2023. "Influence of Organic Fertilization and Soil Tillage on the Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Seed Cake: An Alternative Feed Ingredient" Applied Sciences 13, no. 6: 3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063759

APA Style

Angelopoulou, F., Roussis, I., Kakabouki, I., Mavroeidis, A., Triantafyllidis, V., Beslemes, D., Kosma, C., Stavropoulos, P., Tsiplakou, E., & Bilalis, D. (2023). Influence of Organic Fertilization and Soil Tillage on the Yield and Quality of Cold-Pressed Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] Seed Cake: An Alternative Feed Ingredient. Applied Sciences, 13(6), 3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13063759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop