Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Research Questions
- What are the main components of AI-based PdM systems?
- What are the state-of-the-art (SOTA) PdM methods? Regarding accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and scale, what are their advantages?
- What are the advantages of AI-based PdM techniques over traditional techniques regarding performance and cost-effectiveness?
- What are the challenges and limitations of AI-based PdM?
- How can AI-based PdM systems ensure high transparency and explanation?
- How can AI be integrated into existing PdM systems and workflows?
- What are the ethical issues in AI-based PdM?
- How can an efficient human–machine interaction in AI-based PdM systems be obtained?
- How can testing and validation of AI-based PdM systems be effectively conducted in real-world scenarios?
- What are recent advances and future trends in AI-based PdM?
2. Key Components in AI-Based Predictive Maintenance
- Sensors: Sensors are the frontline data collectors in a PdM system. These specialized devices are strategically placed on equipment and machinery to continuously monitor various parameters, such as temperature, pressure, vibration, and more. Sensor data provides real-time insights into equipment health and forms the foundation for predictive maintenance analysis.
- Data Preprocessing: Raw data obtained from sensors often contains noise and inconsistencies. Data preprocessing is the initial step in preparing the data for analysis. It includes data cleaning, normalization, and missing data handling. High-quality data are essential for accurate PdM modeling.
- AI Algorithms: AI algorithms, including machine learning and deep learning techniques, are the brain of the PdM systems. The algorithms analyze the data to identify the most important features relating to possible failures. They learn from historical data to predict equipment failures, anomalies, and RUL.
- Decision-Making Modules: The insights and predictions generated by the AI algorithms are processed by decision-making modules. These modules are responsible for determining when maintenance actions are needed. They can recommend preventive or corrective maintenance tasks, schedule maintenance, and trigger alerts to maintenance teams when necessary.
- Communication and Integration: Communication and integration ensure that the insights generated by the system are effectively translated into action. This component involves interactions with various stakeholders, including maintenance personnel and management. Furthermore, integration with enterprise systems such as ERP and asset management software aligns predictive maintenance with broader organizational goals.
- User Interface and Reporting: To make these insights accessible to maintenance staff and decision makers, user interfaces and reporting tools are essential. The tools make it easier for users to understand complex data patterns and make informed decisions by providing data visualization, dashboard, and reporting capabilities. Data visualization tools and dashboards communicate data insights and forecast information to maintenance teams and decision makers. Visual aids help understand complex data patterns and make informed decisions.
3. State-of-the-Art Techniques for Predictive Maintenance
4. Transparency and Explainability in AI-Based Predictive Maintenance
5. Challenges and Limitations of Using AI for PdM Autonomy
6. Recent Advances and Future Trends in AI-Based PdM
- Integration of advanced machine learning algorithms;
- Edge and cloud computing for real-time analysis and data storing;
- Predictive analytics with big data;
- XAI for transparency;
- IoT sensor integration;
- Digital twin, AR, VR, MR, and extended versions.
- Big data and analytics are used to collect, analyze, and interpret large amounts of data.
- The exponential growth of cyber–physical systems of digital twins, AR, VR, XR, metaverse, and human-driven industrial metaverse solutions to both physical and virtual work environments allows smooth collaboration and communication between employees, machines/robots, and AI.
- Development of autonomous maintenance systems that are capable of self-diagnosis, decision making, and proactive interventions without human intervention.
- Evolving toward zero-touch maintenance operations where AI systems automate the maintenance process from detection to resolution.
- Extraction of actionable insight advancements in AI algorithms to predict failures and provide actionable insights and recommendations for optimal maintenance strategies.
- Integrating experiential learning and reinforcement learning techniques to improve AI models based on ongoing data and continuous feedback.
- Implementation of blockchain technology for data security to enhance the security and integrity of PdM data, ensuring trust and transparency.
- Development of trustworthy AI algorithms and human-centric AI interfaces for better collaboration between AI systems and human operators, facilitating seamless interaction and decision making.
- Development of energy-efficient AI-based PdM to minimize resource consumption while maintaining high prediction accuracy.
- Development of collaborative robots (cobots), IIoT, edge and cloud computing, and 5G/6G connectivity for next-step PdM autonomy and smart factory that can adjust to shifting circumstances and changing conditions and streamline manufacturing processes.
- Development of generative AI models to contribute to the above items. For example, they can provide failure warnings, present encompassing instructions for repair and replacement methodologies, achieve suggestions to optimize energy consumption and cut down the carbon footprint to human operators by simulating the real system and/or analyzing maintenance logs and sensor data, and facilitate better collaboration between automated systems and human operators through natural language communication in automated maintenance planning.
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dalzochio, J.; Kunst, R.; Pignaton, E.; Binotto, A.; Sanyal, S.; Favilla, J.; Barbosa, J. Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Current status and challenges. Comput. Ind. 2020, 123, 103298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, H. Uncertainty Management in Prognosis of Electric Vehicle Energy System. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, T.; Lim, K.H.; Yam, K.S. Predictive maintenance of oil and gas equipment using recurrent neural network. In Proceedings of the Iop Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Jakarta, Indonesia, 21–22 November 2019; p. 012067. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Yang, D.; Wang, H. Data-driven methods for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment: A survey. IEEE Syst. J. 2019, 13, 2213–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.; Liu, Z.; Tao, Y. Mechanical fault diagnosis and prediction in IoT based on multi-source sensing data fusion. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2020, 102, 101981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arena, F.; Collotta, M.; Luca, L.; Ruggieri, M.; Termine, F.G. Predictive maintenance in the automotive sector: A literature review. Math. Comput. Appl. 2021, 27, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Liu, C.; Su, S.; Han, Y.; Li, X. A feature extraction method for predictive maintenance with time-lagged correlation–based curve-registration model. Int. J. Netw. Manag. 2018, 28, e2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, A.; Yellen, M. Decision-Making with Machine Prediction: Evidence from Predictive Maintenance in Trucking. 2024. Available online: https://adamharris380.github.io/files/HarrisYellen-JMP.pdf (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Ahmad, A.A.; Alshurideh, M. Digital Twin in Facility Management Operational Decision Making and Predictive Maintenance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Cairo, Egypt, 20–22 November 2022; pp. 437–448. [Google Scholar]
- Achouch, M.; Dimitrova, M.; Ziane, K.; Sattarpanah Karganroudi, S.; Dhouib, R.; Ibrahim, H.; Adda, M. On predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: Overview, models, and challenges. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatri, M.R. Integration of natural language processing, self-service platforms, predictive maintenance, and prescriptive analytics for cost reduction, personalization, and real-time insights customer service and operational efficiency. Int. J. Inf. Cybersecur. 2023, 7, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Vulpio, A.; Oliani, S.; Suman, A.; Zanini, N.; Saccenti, P. A Mechanistic Model for the Predictive Maintenance of Heavy-Duty Centrifugal Fans Operating With Dust-Laden Flows. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2023, 145, 011007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, L.; Liang, Y.; Leng, J.; Zheng, P. Maintenance planning recommendation of complex industrial equipment based on knowledge graph and graph neural network. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2023, 232, 109068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Yang, Y.; Kang, Q.; Tian, Z.; Song, Y. EEG-based emotion recognition with feature fusion networks. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2022, 13, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouadah, A.; Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L.; Salhi, N. Selecting an appropriate supervised machine learning algorithm for predictive maintenance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 119, 4277–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Dai, P.; Fang, P.; Zhong, R.Y.; Cao, X. Electrical-STGCN: An electrical spatio-temporal graph convolutional network for intelligent predictive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 8509–8518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Buono, F.; Calabrese, F.; Baraldi, A.; Paganelli, M.; Regattieri, A. Data-driven predictive maintenance in evolving environments: A comparison between machine learning and deep learning for novelty detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing, Split, Croatia, 15–17 September 2021; pp. 109–119. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Gao, C.; Tang, T. A review of sustainable maintenance strategies for single component and multicomponent equipment. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Kang, D.H.; Jeong, S.C. A Study on Industrial Artificial Intelligence-Based Edge Analysis for Machining Facilities. In Emotional Artificial Intelligence and Metaverse; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 55–69. [Google Scholar]
- Sanzana, M.R.; Maul, T.; Wong, J.Y.; Abdulrazic, M.O.M.; Yip, C.-C. Application of deep learning in facility management and maintenance for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141, 104445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, J.; Li, X.; Sun, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Bao, J. A bio-inspired LIDA cognitive-based Digital Twin architecture for unmanned maintenance of machine tools. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2023, 80, 102489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y. Optimizing predictive maintenance with machine learning for reliability improvement. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part B Mech. Eng. 2021, 7, 030801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, D.; Ferreira, L. Application of predictive maintenance concepts using artificial intelligence tools. Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Yong, Z.; Han, D. Research on key technology of industrial artificial intelligence and its application in predictive maintenance. Acta Autom. Sin. 2020, 46, 2013–2030. [Google Scholar]
- Paolanti, M.; Romeo, L.; Felicetti, A.; Mancini, A.; Frontoni, E.; Loncarski, J. Machine learning approach for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th IEEE/ASME International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications (MESA), Oulu, Finland, 2–4 July 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bordegoni, M.; Ferrise, F. Exploring the intersection of metaverse, digital twins, and artificial intelligence in training and maintenance. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 2023, 23, 060806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, T.P.; Soares, F.A.; Vita, R.; Francisco, R.d.P.; Basto, J.P.; Alcalá, S.G. A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 137, 106024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Traini, E.; Bruno, G.; D’antonio, G.; Lombardi, F. Machine learning framework for predictive maintenance in milling. IFAC-Pap. 2019, 52, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çınar, Z.M.; Abdussalam Nuhu, A.; Zeeshan, Q.; Korhan, O.; Asmael, M.; Safaei, B. Machine learning in predictive maintenance towards sustainable smart manufacturing in industry 4.0. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aremu, O.O.; Palau, A.S.; Parlikad, A.K.; Hyland-Wood, D.; McAree, P.R. Structuring data for intelligent predictive maintenance in asset management. IFAC-Pap. 2018, 51, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez, V.J.; Bouhmala, N.; Gausdal, A.H. Developing a predictive maintenance model for vessel machinery. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2020, 5, 358–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, B.; Fan, I.-S.; Jennions, I. Opportunities for explainable artificial intelligence in aerospace predictive maintenance. In Proceedings of the PHM Society European Conference, Turin, Italy, 1–3 July 2020; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
- Theissler, A.; Pérez-Velázquez, J.; Kettelgerdes, M.; Elger, G. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 215, 107864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayvaz, S.; Alpay, K. Predictive maintenance system for production lines in manufacturing: A machine learning approach using IoT data in real-time. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 173, 114598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Meyendorf, N.; Mrad, N. The role of data fusion in predictive maintenance using digital twin. In Proceedings of the AIP Conference Proceedings, Depok, Indonesia, 30–31 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Massaro, A.; Selicato, S.; Galiano, A. Predictive maintenance of bus fleet by intelligent smart electronic board implementing artificial intelligence. IoT 2020, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosamo, H.H.; Svennevig, P.R.; Svidt, K.; Han, D.; Nielsen, H.K. A Digital Twin predictive maintenance framework of air handling units based on automatic fault detection and diagnostics. Energy Build. 2022, 261, 111988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakir, M.; Guvenc, M.A.; Mistikoglu, S. The experimental application of popular machine learning algorithms on predictive maintenance and the design of IIoT based condition monitoring system. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 151, 106948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Benedetti, M.; Leonardi, F.; Messina, F.; Santoro, C.; Vasilakos, A. Anomaly detection and predictive maintenance for photovoltaic systems. Neurocomputing 2018, 310, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.M.; Lee, D.; Kim, Y.S. The quality management ecosystem for predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0 era. Int. J. Qual. Innov. 2019, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pech, M.; Vrchota, J.; Bednář, J. Predictive maintenance and intelligent sensors in smart factory. Sensors 2021, 21, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mourtzis, D.; Tsoubou, S.; Angelopoulos, J. Robotic Cell Reliability Optimization Based on Digital Twin and Predictive Maintenance. Electronics 2023, 12, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, R.O.; Coppola, M.; Vermesan, O. AI in Food and Beverage Industry. In Artificial Intelligence for Digitising Industry–Applications; River Publishers: Roma, Italy, 2022; pp. 251–259. [Google Scholar]
- AI, H. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Pashami, S.; Nowaczyk, S.; Fan, Y.; Jakubowski, J.; Paiva, N.; Davari, N.; Bobek, S.; Jamshidi, S.; Sarmadi, H.; Alabdallah, A. Explainable Predictive Maintenance. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.05120. [Google Scholar]
- Zonta, T.; Da Costa, C.A.; da Rosa Righi, R.; de Lima, M.J.; da Trindade, E.S.; Li, G.P. Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, W.; Han, J.; Rhee, W. AI-assistance for predictive maintenance of renewable energy systems. Energy 2021, 221, 119775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelopoulos, J.; Mourtzis, D. An intelligent product service system for adaptive maintenance of Engineered-to-Order manufacturing equipment assisted by augmented reality. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Gao, R.X. Innovative smart scheduling and predictive maintenance techniques. In Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 181–207. [Google Scholar]
- Lalik, K.; Wątorek, F. Predictive maintenance neural control algorithm for defect detection of the power plants rotating machines using augmented reality goggles. Energies 2021, 14, 7632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namuduri, S.; Narayanan, B.N.; Davuluru, V.S.P.; Burton, L.; Bhansali, S. Deep learning methods for sensor based predictive maintenance and future perspectives for electrochemical sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Divya, D.; Marath, B.; Santosh Kumar, M. Review of fault detection techniques for predictive maintenance. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 2023, 29, 420–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gianoglio, C.; Ragusa, E.; Gastaldo, P.; Gallesi, F.; Guastavino, F. Online Predictive Maintenance Monitoring Adopting Convolutional Neural Networks. Energies 2021, 14, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zonta, T.; da Costa, C.A.; Zeiser, F.A.; de Oliveira Ramos, G.; Kunst, R.; da Rosa Righi, R. A predictive maintenance model for optimizing production schedule using deep neural networks. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 62, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Santo, A.; Ferraro, A.; Galli, A.; Moscato, V.; Sperlì, G. Evaluating time series encoding techniques for predictive maintenance. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 210, 118435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pierleoni, P.; Palma, L.; Belli, A.; Raggiunto, S.; Sabbatini, L. Supervised Regression Learning for Maintenance-related Data. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, International Conference on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, International Conference on Cloud and Big Data Computing, International Conference on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech), Calabria, Italy, 12–15 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.-Y.; Wu, M.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.-L.; Yan, R. Degradation-aware remaining useful life prediction with LSTM autoencoder. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, R.M.; Nascimento, E.G.; Miranda, U.A.; Silva, W.J.; Lepikson, H.A. Deep learning for diagnosis and classification of faults in industrial rotating machinery. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 153, 107060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Xiong, M.; Li, F.; Su, L.; Wu, J. A novel fault diagnosis algorithm for rotating machinery based on a sparsity and neighborhood preserving deep extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 2019, 350, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Ji, X.; Wang, J.; Gu, Y.; Wang, J.; Qi, D. ICNCS: Internal Cascaded Neuromorphic Computing System for Fast Electric Vehicle State of Charge Estimation. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balazy, P.; Gut, P.; Knap, P. Neural classifying system for predictive maintenance of rotating devices. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2022; p. 012013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Bu, S.; He, Z. Achieving predictive and proactive maintenance for high-speed railway power equipment with LSTM-RNN. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 6509–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.C.; Chen, T.-L.; Liu, W.-J.; Cheng, C.; Li, M.-G. Combining empirical mode decomposition and deep recurrent neural networks for predictive maintenance of lithium-ion battery. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 50, 101405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Dai, P.; Fang, P.; Zhong, R.Y.; Zhao, X.; Cao, X. A2-LSTM for predictive maintenance of industrial equipment based on machine learning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 172, 108560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamayleh, A.; Awad, M.; Farhat, J. IoT based predictive maintenance management of medical equipment. J. Med. Syst. 2020, 44, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gohel, H.A.; Upadhyay, H.; Lagos, L.; Cooper, K.; Sanzetenea, A. Predictive maintenance architecture development for nuclear infrastructure using machine learning. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2020, 52, 1436–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, L. Study on Life Prediction Method of MOSFET Thermal Environment Experiments Based on Extended Kalman Filter. In Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on MMESE, Beijing, China, 20–23 October 2020; Springer: New Yorik, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 495–503. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, J.C.; Chen, W.; Chen, K.; Wang, Q. Data-driven predictive maintenance planning framework for MEP components based on BIM and IoT using machine learning algorithms. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaparthi, S.; Bumblauskas, D. Designing predictive maintenance systems using decision tree-based machine learning techniques. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2020, 37, 659–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, J.-Y.; Wang, Y.-F.; Lin, K.-C.; Chen, M.-Y.; Hsu, J.H.-Y. Wind turbine fault diagnosis and predictive maintenance through statistical process control and machine learning. Ieee Access 2020, 8, 23427–23439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezerra, A.; da Silva, K.C.N.; Nascimento, E. Industrial environment: A strategy for preventive maintenance using Machine Learning to predict the useful life of equipment and Statistical Process Control for Continuous Monitoring of Variables. INFOCOMP J. Comput. Sci. 2023, 22, 1–9. Available online: https://infocomp.dcc.ufla.br/index.php/infocomp/article/view/3029 (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Saidy, C.; Xia, K.; Kircaliali, A.; Harik, R.; Bayoumi, A. The application of statistical quality control methods in predictive maintenance 4.0: An unconventional use of statistical process control (SPC) charts in health monitoring and predictive analytics. In Advances in Asset Management and Condition Monitoring: COMADEM 2019; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1051–1061. [Google Scholar]
- Gomes, I.P.; Wolf, D.F. Health monitoring system for autonomous vehicles using dynamic Bayesian networks for diagnosis and prognosis. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2021, 101, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devare, M. Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. In Computational Intelligent Security in Wireless Communications; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 79–98. [Google Scholar]
- Lakehal, A.; Ramdane, A.; Tachi, F. Probabilistic reasoning for improving the predictive maintenance of vital electrical machine: Case study. J. Adv. Eng. Comput. 2018, 2, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Marsh, D.W.R. Generic Bayesian network models for making maintenance decisions from available data and expert knowledge. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 2018, 232, 505–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perini, L. Predictive Maintenance for off-Road Vehicles Based on Hidden Markov Models and Autoencoders for Trend Anomaly Detection. Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Simões, A.; Farinha, J.T.; Fonseca, I. Ecological Predictive Maintenance of Diesel Engines. In Diesel and Gasoline Engines; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; p. 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Luo, H.; Yang, Y.; Lv, P.; Zhu, X.; Ji, Y.; Wu, B. K-PdM: KPI-oriented machinery deterioration estimation framework for predictive maintenance using cluster-based hidden Markov model. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 41676–41687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinghorst, J.; Geramifard, O.; Luo, M.; Chan, H.-L.; Yong, K.; Folmer, J.; Zou, M.; Vogel-Heuser, B. Hidden Markov model-based predictive maintenance in semiconductor manufacturing: A genetic algorithm approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 13th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Xi’an, China, 20–23 August 2017; pp. 1260–1267. [Google Scholar]
- Delmas, A.; Sallak, M.; Schön, W.; Zhao, L. Remaining useful life estimation methods for predictive maintenance models: Defining intervals and strategies for incomplete data. In Proceedings of the 10th IMA International Conference on Modelling in Industrial Maintenance and Reliability, Manchester, UK, 13–15 June 2018; pp. 48–53. [Google Scholar]
- Dutta, N.; Palanisamy, K.; Shanmugam, P.; Subramaniam, U.; Selvam, S. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Pumping System through Machine Learning and Hidden Markov Model. Processes 2023, 11, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gualeni, P.; Vairo, T. A prediction tool for maintenance costs estimation during the design process of a ship engine room. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2023, 6, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliosi, E.; Calzavara, G.; Ferrari, G. On Sensor Data Clustering for Machine Status Monitoring and Its Application to Predictive Maintenance. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 9620–9639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, C.-J.; Huang, S.-F. Real-time big data analytics for hard disk drive predictive maintenance. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2018, 71, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Dillon, T.; Mostafa, F.; Rahayu, W.; Liu, Y. A global manufacturing big data ecosystem for fault detection in predictive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2019, 16, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalathas, I.; Papoutsidakis, M. Predictive maintenance using machine learning and data mining: A pioneer method implemented to Greek railways. Designs 2021, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Q.; Samet, A.; Zanni-Merk, C.; de Bertrand de Beuvron, F.; Reich, C. Combining chronicle mining and semantics for predictive maintenance in manufacturing processes. Semant. Web 2020, 11, 927–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, R.-I.; Lee, C.-Y.; Hung, Y.-H. Cloud-based analytics module for predictive maintenance of the textile manufacturing process. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proto, S.; Di Corso, E.; Apiletti, D.; Cagliero, L.; Cerquitelli, T.; Malnati, G.; Mazzucchi, D. REDTag: A predictive maintenance framework for parcel delivery services. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 14953–14964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajic, B.; Suzic, N.; Moraca, S.; Stefanović, M.; Jovicic, M.; Rikalovic, A. Edge Computing Data Optimization for Smart Quality Management: Industry 5.0 Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Izagirre, U.; Andonegui, I.; Landa-Torres, I.; Zurutuza, U. A practical and synchronized data acquisition network architecture for industrial robot predictive maintenance in manufacturing assembly lines. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2022, 74, 102287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balachandar, K.; Jegadeeshwaran, R.; Gandhikumar, D. Condition monitoring of FSW tool using vibration analysis–A machine learning approach. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 2970–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinheiro, A.A.; Brandao, I.M.; Da Costa, C. Vibration analysis in turbomachines using machine learning techniques. Eur. J. Eng. Technol. Res. 2019, 4, 12–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bouabdallaoui, Y.; Lafhaj, Z.; Yim, P.; Ducoulombier, L.; Bennadji, B. Predictive maintenance in building facilities: A machine learning-based approach. Sensors 2021, 21, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zenisek, J.; Holzinger, F.; Affenzeller, M. Machine learning based concept drift detection for predictive maintenance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 137, 106031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, R.; Curran, K. Predictive Maintenance for Vibration-Related failures in the Semi-Conductor Industry. J. Comput. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2019, 8, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.; Yu, H.; Yang, H.; Song, I.; Choi, J.; Yang, J.; Lim, G.; Kim, K.-S.; Choi, B.; Kwon, J. A study on deep learning application of vibration data and visualization of defects for predictive maintenance of gravity acceleration equipment. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haggag, S. Vibration analysis for predictive maintenance and improved reliability of rotating machines in ETRR-2 research reactor. Kerntechnik 2022, 87, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakose, M.; Yaman, O. Complex fuzzy system based predictive maintenance approach in railways. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 6023–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathirathna, K.A.B.; Dhanushka, R.M.; Rathnayake, M.; Hathanguruge, W.; Fernando, G.D. Use of thermal imaging technology for locomotive maintenance in Sri Lanka Railways. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Intelligent Rail Transportation (ICIRT), Singapore, 12–14 December 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Andritoi, D.; Luca, C.; Corciova, C.; Ciorap, R. The use of thermography as a prediction element in the maintenance of medical equipment. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 17–20 October 2018; pp. 73–78. [Google Scholar]
- Marinescu, A.-D.; Chiriţă, A.-P.; Cristescu, C.; Safta, C.-A. Numerical Simulation of Thermal Processes Occurring at Testing Hydrostatic Pumps in Cavitation Mode. Hidraulica 2018, 1, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
- Arena, S.; Florian, E.; Zennaro, I.; Orrù, P.F.; Sgarbossa, F. A novel decision support system for managing predictive maintenance strategies based on machine learning approaches. Saf. Sci. 2022, 146, 105529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostoláni, M.; Murín, J.; Kozák, Š. Intelligent predictive maintenance control using augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 22nd International Conference on Process Control (PC19), Strbske Pleso, Slovakia, 11–14 June 2019; pp. 131–135. [Google Scholar]
- Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. Intelligent predictive maintenance and remote monitoring framework for industrial equipment based on mixed reality. Front. Mech. Eng. 2020, 6, 578379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Zhu, H.; Tang, D.; Nie, Q.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Song, Y. Probing an intelligent predictive maintenance approach with deep learning and augmented reality for machine tools in IoT-enabled manufacturing. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2022, 77, 102357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deshpande, A.; Buktar, R. Convergence of Augmented Reality, Internet of Things (Iot) and Machine Learning for Visualizing Finite Element Analysis Results and Predictive Maintenance. 2023. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4559683 (accessed on 19 January 2024). [CrossRef]
- Wellsandt, S.; Klein, K.; Hribernik, K.; Lewandowski, M.; Bousdekis, A.; Mentzas, G.; Thoben, K.-D. Hybrid-augmented intelligence in predictive maintenance with digital intelligent assistants. Annu. Rev. Control 2022, 53, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, F.; Glawar, R.; Nemeth, T. PriMa: A prescriptive maintenance model for cyber-physical production systems. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2019, 32, 482–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, C.A.K.; Burnak, B.; Onel, M.; Pistikopoulos, E.N. Data-driven prescriptive maintenance: Failure prediction using ensemble support vector classification for optimal process and maintenance scheduling. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 19607–19622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elbasheer, M.; Longo, F.; Mirabelli, G.; Padovano, A.; Solina, V.; Talarico, S. Integrated Prescriptive Maintenance and Production Planning: A Machine Learning Approach for the Development of an Autonomous Decision Support Agent. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2022, 55, 2605–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goby, N.; Brandt, T.; Neumann, D. Deep reinforcement learning with combinatorial actions spaces: An application to prescriptive maintenance. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2023, 179, 109165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Lin, J.; Zhang, L.; Kumar, U. A dynamic prescriptive maintenance model considering system aging and degradation. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 94931–94943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meissner, R.; Rahn, A.; Wicke, K. Developing prescriptive maintenance strategies in the aviation industry based on a discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostics decision making. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 214, 107812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Liu, Y.; Dillon, T.; Rahayu, W. Edge computing-assisted IoT framework with an autoencoder for fault detection in manufacturing predictive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 19, 5701–5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.; Zhang, B.-K.; Gao, D. A predictive maintenance solution for bearing production line based on edge-cloud cooperation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Hangzhou, China, 22–24 November 2019; pp. 5885–5889. [Google Scholar]
- Bowden, D.; Marguglio, A.; Morabito, L.; Napione, C.; Panicucci, S.; Nikolakis, N.; Makris, S.; Coppo, G.; Andolina, S.; Macii, A. A Cloud-to-edge Architecture for Predictive Analytics. In Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT Workshops, Lisbon, Portugal, 26 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Lu, Q.; Yu, Q.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lo, S.K.; Chen, S.; Xu, X.; Zhu, L. Blockchain-based federated learning for device failure detection in industrial IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 5926–5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oladapo, K.A.; Adedeji, F.; Nzenwata, U.J.; Quoc, B.P.; Dada, A. Fuzzified Case-Based Reasoning Blockchain Framework for Predictive Maintenance in Industry 4.0. In Data Analytics and Computational Intelligence: Novel Models, Algorithms and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 269–297. [Google Scholar]
- Kaul, K.; Singh, P.; Jain, D.; Johri, P.; Pandey, A.K. Monitoring and Controlling of Energy Consumption using IOT-based Predictive Maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), Moradabad, India, 10–11 December 2021; pp. 587–594. [Google Scholar]
- Holmer, O.; Frisk, E.; Krysander, M. Energy-Based Survival Models for Predictive Maintenance. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.00629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orošnjak, M.; Brkljač, N.; Šević, D.; Čavić, M.; Oros, D.; Penčić, M. From predictive to energy-based maintenance paradigm: Achieving cleaner production through functional-productiveness. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 408, 137177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagiannis, I.; Nikolakis, N.; Alexopoulos, K. Energy-based prognosis of the remaining useful life of the coating segments in hot rolling mill. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elahi, M.; Afolaranmi, S.O.; Mohammed, W.M.; Martinez Lastra, J.L. Energy-based prognostics for gradual loss of conveyor belt tension in discrete manufacturing systems. Energies 2022, 15, 4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fila, R.; El Khaili, M.; Mestari, M. Cloud computing for industrial predictive maintenance based on prognostics and health management. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 177, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calabrese, F.; Regattieri, A.; Bortolini, M.; Gamberi, M.; Pilati, F. Predictive maintenance: A novel framework for a data-driven, semi-supervised, and partially online prognostic health management application in industries. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidy, C.; Valappil, S.P.; Matthews, R.M.; Bayoumi, A. Development of a predictive maintenance 4.0 platform: Enhancing product design and manufacturing. In Advances in Asset Management and Condition Monitoring: COMADEM 2019; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1039–1049. [Google Scholar]
- Razali, M.N.; Jamaluddin, A.F.; Abdul Jalil, R.; Nguyen, T.K. Big data analytics for predictive maintenance in maintenance management. Prop. Manag. 2020, 38, 513–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Leon, V.; Alcazar, Y.; Villa, J.L. Use of edge computing for predictive maintenance of industrial electric motors. In Proceedings of the Applied Computer Sciences in Engineering: 6th Workshop on Engineering Applications, WEA 2019, Proceedings 6, Santa Marta, Colombia, 16–18 October 2019; pp. 523–533. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, J.; Luo, X.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.H. An edge computing-based predictive evaluation scheme toward geological drilling data using long short-term memory network. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2021, 32, e3888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxena, A.; Goebel, K. Turbofan Engine Degradation Simulation Data Set. NASA Ames Progn. Data Repos. 2008. Available online: https://data.nasa.gov/Aerospace/CMAPSS-Jet-Engine-Simulated-Data/ff5v-kuh6/ (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Wen, M.-S.; Wang, C.-Y.; Yeh, J.-K.; Chen, C.-C.; Tsai, M.-L.; Ho, M.-Y.; Hung, K.-C.; Hsieh, I. The role of Asprosin in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2020, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saxena, A.; Goebel, K. Phm08 challenge data set. In NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository; NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA, USA, (consulted 2014-02-15); 2008. Available online: http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic-data-repository (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Agogino, A.; Goebel, K. Milling data set. In NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository; NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA, USA, 2007. Available online: http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic-data-repository (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Lee, J.; Qiu, H.; Yu, G.; Lin, J. Bearing Data Set. IMS, University of Cincinnati, NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository, Rexnord Technical Services. 2007. Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/intelligent-systems-division/discovery-and-systems-health/pcoe/pcoe-data-set-repository/ (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Bearing Data Center. Case Western Reserve University Bearing Data; Bearing Data Center: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- FEMTO Bearing Data Set; FEMTO-ST Institute: Besançon, France, 2012; IEEE PHM 2012 Data Challenge; Available online: https://www.femto-st.fr/en/Research-departments/AS2M/Research-groups/DATA-PHM (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Nectoux, P.; Gouriveau, R.; Medjaher, K.; Ramasso, E.; Chebel-Morello, B.; Zerhouni, N.; Varnier, C. PRONOSTIA: An experimental platform for bearings accelerated degradation tests. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, PHM’12, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 23–27 September 2012; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Backblaze. Hard Drive Data and Stats 2019. Available online: https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html (accessed on 30 December 2023).
- PAKDD2020 Alibaba AI OPS Competition. 2020. Available online: https://tianchi.aliyun.com/competition/entrance/231775/introduction (accessed on 30 December 2023).
- Saha, B.; Goebel, K. Battery data set. In NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository; NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA, USA, 2007. Available online: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/ (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Hasib, S.A.; Islam, S.; Chakrabortty, R.K.; Ryan, M.J.; Saha, D.K.; Ahamed, M.H.; Moyeen, S.I.; Das, S.K.; Ali, M.F.; Islam, M.R. A comprehensive review of available battery datasets, RUL prediction approaches, and advanced battery management. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 86166–86193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celaya, J.; Saxena, A.; Saha, S.; Goebel, K. MOSFET thermal overstress aging data set. In NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository; NASA Ames Research Center: Moffett Field, CA, USA, 2011. Available online: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/tech/dash/groups/pcoe/prognostic-data-repository/ (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Ribeiro, F. MaFaulDa-Machinery Fault Database; Signals, Multimedia, and Telecommunications Laboratory: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Microsoft Azure. Azure ai Guide for Predictive Maintenance Solutions. 2020. Available online: https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/azure/machine-learning/team-data-science-process/predictive-maintenance-playbook#solution-templates-for-predictive-maintenance (accessed on 30 December 2023).
- Hong, T.; Pinson, P.; Fan, S.; Zareipour, H.; Troccoli, A.; Hyndman, R.J. Probabilistic energy forecasting: Global energy forecasting competition 2014 and beyond. Int. J. Forecast. 2016, 32, 896–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCann, M.; Johnston, A. SECOM Dataset UCI Machine Learning Repository. 2008. Available online: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/secom (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- UN Statistics Division. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC); United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Arrieta, A.B.; Díaz-Rodríguez, N.; Del Ser, J.; Bennetot, A.; Tabik, S.; Barbado, A.; García, S.; Gil-López, S.; Molina, D.; Benjamins, R. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 2020, 58, 82–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudin, C. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019, 1, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilpin, L.H.; Bau, D.; Yuan, B.Z.; Bajwa, A.; Specter, M.; Kagal, L. Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Turin, Italy, 1–3 October 2018; pp. 80–89. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, F.-L.; Xiong, J.; Li, M.; Wang, G. On interpretability of artificial neural networks: A survey. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2021, 5, 741–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slack, D.; Hilgard, S.; Jia, E.; Singh, S.; Lakkaraju, H. Fooling lime and shap: Adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, New York, NY, USA, 7–8 February 2020; pp. 180–186. [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro, M.T.; Singh, S.; Guestrin, C. “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 13–17 August 2016; pp. 1135–1144. [Google Scholar]
- Lundberg, S.M.; Erion, G.; Chen, H.; DeGrave, A.; Prutkin, J.M.; Nair, B.; Katz, R.; Himmelfarb, J.; Bansal, N.; Lee, S.-I. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020, 2, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.; Khosla, A.; Lapedriza, A.; Oliva, A.; Torralba, A. Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 June 2016; pp. 2921–2929. [Google Scholar]
- Bach, S.; Binder, A.; Montavon, G.; Klauschen, F.; Müller, K.-R.; Samek, W. On pixel-wise explanations for non-linear classifier decisions by layer-wise relevance propagation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvaraju, R.R.; Cogswell, M.; Das, A.; Vedantam, R.; Parikh, D.; Batra, D. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 27–29 October 2017; pp. 618–626. [Google Scholar]
- Nor, A.K.M.; Pedapati, S.R.; Muhammad, M.; Leiva, V. Overview of explainable artificial intelligence for prognostic and health management of industrial assets based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Sensors 2021, 21, 8020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Došilović, F.K.; Brčić, M.; Hlupić, N. Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia, 21–25 May 2018; pp. 0210–0215. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, D.V.; Pereira, E.M.; Cardoso, J.S. Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics. Electronics 2019, 8, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molnar, C. Interpretable Machine Learning. 2020. Available online: https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/ (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Izza, Y.; Ignatiev, A.; Marques-Silva, J. On explaining decision trees. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.11034. [Google Scholar]
- Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, Ł.; Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2017, 30, 6000–6010. [Google Scholar]
- Alhassan, A.M.; Zainon, W.M.N.W. Review of feature selection, dimensionality reduction and classification for chronic disease diagnosis. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 87310–87317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blum, A.L.; Langley, P. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artif. Intell. 1997, 97, 245–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, A.J.; Figueiredo, M.A. Efficient feature selection filters for high-dimensional data. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2012, 33, 1794–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cernuda, C. On the relevance of preprocessing in predictive maintenance for dynamic systems. In Predictive Maintenance in Dynamic Systems: Advanced Methods, Decision Support Tools and Real-World Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 53–93. [Google Scholar]
- Ojala, J. On Analysis of the Predictive Maintenance of Railway Points Processes and Possibilities. Master’s Thesis, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 14 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Mahalle, P.N.; Hujare, P.P.; Shinde, G.R. Predictive Analytics for Mechanical Engineering: A Beginners Guide; Springer Nature: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Baaj, I. Explainability of Possibilistic and Fuzzy Rule-Based Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, H.; Ökten, G. Derivative-based Shapley value for global sensitivity analysis and machine learning explainability. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.15183. [Google Scholar]
- Hermansa, M.; Kozielski, M.; Michalak, M.; Szczyrba, K.; Wróbel, Ł.; Sikora, M. Sensor-based predictive maintenance with reduction of false alarms—A case study in heavy industry. Sensors 2021, 22, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozielski, M. Contextual Explanations for Decision Support in Predictive Maintenance. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzlu, M.; Cali, U.; Sharma, V.; Güler, Ö. Gaining insight into solar photovoltaic power generation forecasting utilizing explainable artificial intelligence tools. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 187814–187823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serradilla, O.; Zugasti, E.; Ramirez de Okariz, J.; Rodriguez, J.; Zurutuza, U. Adaptable and explainable predictive maintenance: Semi-supervised deep learning for anomaly detection and diagnosis in press machine data. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraro, A.; Galli, A.; Moscato, V.; Sperlì, G. Evaluating explainable artificial intelligence tools for hard disk drive predictive maintenance. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 7279–7314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youness, G.; Aalah, A. An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction. Aerospace 2023, 10, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hajgató, G.; Wéber, R.; Szilágyi, B.; Tóthpál, B.; Gyires-Tóth, B.; Hős, C. PredMaX: Predictive maintenance with explainable deep convolutional autoencoders. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022, 54, 101778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, C.W.; Lee, C.; Lee, K.; Ko, M.-S.; Kim, D.E.; Hur, K. Remaining useful life prognosis for turbofan engine using explainable deep neural networks with dimensionality reduction. Sensors 2020, 20, 6626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Usuga-Cadavid, J.P.; Lamouri, S.; Grabot, B.; Fortin, A. Using deep learning to value free-form text data for predictive maintenance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 60, 4548–4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Huang, A.; Sutherland, J.W. Layer-wise relevance propagation for interpreting LSTM-RNN decisions in predictive maintenance. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 118, 963–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Q.; Zanni-Merk, C.; Samet, A.; Reich, C.; De Beuvron, F.D.B.; Beckmann, A.; Giannetti, C. KSPMI: A knowledge-based system for predictive maintenance in industry 4.0. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2022, 74, 102281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W. A Rule-Based Expert System for Predictive Maintenance of a Hybrid Bus. Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Upasane, S.J.; Hagras, H.; Anisi, M.H.; Savill, S.; Taylor, I.; Manousakis, K. A Type-2 Fuzzy Based Explainable AI System for Predictive Maintenance within the Water Pumping Industry. In IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- De Bernardi, G.; Narteni, S.; Cambiaso, E.; Mongelli, M. Rule-based out-of-distribution detection. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.01860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christou, I.T.; Kefalakis, N.; Zalonis, A.; Soldatos, J. Predictive and explainable machine learning for industrial internet of things applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), Marina del Rey, CA, USA, 25–27 May 2020; pp. 213–218. [Google Scholar]
- Betz, W.; Papaioannou, I.; Zeh, T.; Hesping, D.; Krauss, T.; Straub, D. Data-Driven Predictive Maintenance for Gas Distribution Networks. ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civ. Eng. 2022, 8, 04022016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matzka, S. Explainable artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Industries (ai4i), Irvine, CA, USA, 21–23 September 2020; pp. 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Hrnjica, B.; Softic, S. Explainable AI in manufacturing: A predictive maintenance case study. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Novi Sad, Serbia, 30 August–3 September 2020; pp. 66–73. [Google Scholar]
- Garouani, M.; Ahmad, A.; Bouneffa, M.; Hamlich, M.; Bourguin, G.; Lewandowski, A. Towards big industrial data mining through explainable automated machine learning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 120, 1169–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, W.; Shi, Y.; Ji, Z.; Sui, Y.; Tian, Z.; Wang, W.; Cao, Q. Intelligent predictive maintenance of hydraulic systems based on virtual knowledge graph. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 126, 106798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Tang, D.; Zhu, H.; Nie, Q. A novel predictive maintenance method based on deep adversarial learning in the intelligent manufacturing system. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 49557–49575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.R.B.; Chadha, G.S.; Schwung, A.; Ding, S.X. A sequence-to-sequence approach for remaining useful lifetime estimation using attention-augmented bidirectional lstm. Intell. Syst. Appl. 2021, 10, 200049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Li, S.; Ding, Z.; Zheng, A.; Ye, X. Bidirectional self-Attention Gated Recurrent Unit for Health Index Prediction of Rolling Bearings. In Proceedings of the 2023 42nd Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Tianjin, China, 24–26 July 2023; pp. 6656–6662. [Google Scholar]
- Behizadi, H.R. Application of Attention Mechanism in Deep Neural Network Architecture for System Failure Prognostics. Ph.D. Thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Y.; Chen, H. Synergistic Signal Denoising for Multimodal Time Series of Structure Vibration. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.11644. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, S.; Zhou, X.; Shi, H.; Li, S.; Xu, C. A fault diagnosis method with multi-source data fusion based on hierarchical attention for AUV. Ocean Eng. 2022, 266, 112595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, R.; Ferraro, A.; Galli, A.; Gallo, M.; Moscato, V.; Sperli, G. A deep attention based approach for predictive maintenance applications in IoT scenarios. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2023, 34, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barraza, J.F.; Droguett, E.L.; Martins, M.R. FS-SCF network: Neural network interpretability based on counterfactual generation and feature selection for fault diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2024, 237, 121670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Χριστοδούλου, Γ.A. Interpretable Predictive Maintenance: Global and Local Dimensionality Reduction Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Alfeo, A.L.; Cimino, M.G.; Vaglini, G. Degradation stage classification via interpretable feature learning. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 62, 972–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giordano, D.; Giobergia, F.; Pastor, E.; La Macchia, A.; Cerquitelli, T.; Baralis, E.; Mellia, M.; Tricarico, D. Data-driven strategies for predictive maintenance: Lesson learned from an automotive use case. Comput. Ind. 2022, 134, 103554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, T.; Zheng, P.; Xia, L.; Liu, T. Transformer-based hierarchical latent space VAE for interpretable remaining useful life prediction. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022, 54, 101781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzocca, C.; Romandini, N.; Mendula, M.; Montanari, R.; Bellavista, P. TruFLaaS: Trustworthy Federated Learning as a Service. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 21266–21281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemkhani, B.; Aktas, O.; Birant, D. Balanced K-Star: An Explainable Machine Learning Method for Internet-of-Things-Enabled Predictive Maintenance in Manufacturing. Machines 2023, 11, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.N.; Chasparis, G.; Kelleher, J.D. Interpretable Hidden Markov Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning Hierarchical Framework for Predictive Maintenance of Turbofan Engines. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.13433. [Google Scholar]
- Gilles, O.; Pérez, D.G.; Brameret, P.-A.; Lacroix, V. Securing IIot communications using OPC UA pubsub and trusted platform modules. J. Syst. Archit. 2023, 134, 102797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Unal, P.; Albayrak, Ö.; Jomâa, M.; Berre, A.J. Data-driven artificial intelligence and predictive analytics for the maintenance of industrial machinery with hybrid and cognitive digital twins. In Technologies and Applications for Big Data Value; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 299–319. [Google Scholar]
- Barig, B.; Balzereit, K.; Hutschenreuther, T. Applying OPC-UA for factory-wide industrial assistance systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 15th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), Sundsvall, Sweden, 27–29 May 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kedari, S.; Kulkarni, S.; Vishwakarma, C.; Korgaonkar, J.; Warke, N. Remote monitoring and predictive maintenance in bottle filling process using industry 4.0 concepts. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Dosluoglu, T.; MacDonald, M. Circuit Design for Predictive Maintenance. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2211.10248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balla, M.; Haffner, O.; Kučera, E.; Cigánek, J. Educational Case Studies: Creating a Digital Twin of the Production Line in TIA Portal, Unity, and Game4Automation Framework. Sensors 2023, 23, 4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryalat, M.; ElMoaqet, H.; AlFaouri, M. Design of a smart factory based on cyber-physical systems and Internet of Things towards Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Killeen, P. Knowledge-Based Predictive Maintenance for Fleet Management. Ph.D. Thesis, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Shin, S.-J. An opc ua-compliant interface of data analytics models for interoperable manufacturing intelligence. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 3588–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bojarczuk, G.; Mazur, M.; Wojciechowski, A.; Olszewski, M. Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Abnormal States in a Robotic Production Stand. Pomiary Autom. Robot. 2021, 25, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allahloh, A.S.; Sarfraz, M.; Ghaleb, A.M.; Al-Shamma’a, A.A.; Hussein Farh, H.M.; Al-Shaalan, A.M. Revolutionizing IC Genset Operations with IIoT and AI: A Study on Fuel Savings and Predictive Maintenance. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. Design and Development of an Edge-Computing Platform Towards 5G Technology Adoption for Improving Equipment Predictive Maintenance. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 200, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hafeez, T.; Xu, L.; Mcardle, G. Edge intelligence for data handling and predictive maintenance in IIOT. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 49355–49371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foukalas, F. Cognitive IoT platform for fog computing industrial applications. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2020, 87, 106770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, M.; Canito, A.; Mota, D.; Corchado, J.M.; Marreiros, G. Service-oriented architecture for data-driven fault detection. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, Salamanca, Spain, 14 May 2021; pp. 179–189. [Google Scholar]
- Bulut, B.; Ketmen, H.B.; Atalay, A.S.; Herkiloğlu, O.; Salokangas, R. An Arrowhead and Mimosa Based IoT Framework with an Industrial Predictive Maintenance Application. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), Kocaeli, Turkey, 25–27 August 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Greci, L. XR for Industrial Training & Maintenance. In Roadmapping Extended Reality: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 309–320. [Google Scholar]
- Pujana, A.; Esteras, M.; Perea, E.; Maqueda, E.; Calvez, P. Hybrid-Model-Based Digital Twin of the Drivetrain of a Wind Turbine and Its Application for Failure Synthetic Data Generation. Energies 2023, 16, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamoulis, K. Innovations in the Aviation MRO: Adaptive, Digital, and Sustainable Tools for Smarter Engineering and Maintenance; Eburon Academic Publishers: Delft, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Rossini, R.; Prato, G.; Conzon, D.; Pastrone, C.; Pereira, E.; Reis, J.; Gonçalves, G.; Henriques, D.; Santiago, A.R.; Ferreira, A. AI environment for predictive maintenance in a manufacturing scenario. In Proceedings of the 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vasteras, Sweden, 7–10 September 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, P.; Bergmann, R. Generation of Complex Data for AI-based Predictive Maintenance Research with a Physical Factory Model. In Proceedings of the ICINCO (1), Prague, Czech Republic, 29–31 July 2019; pp. 40–50. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfartsberger, J.; Zenisek, J.; Wild, N. Data-driven maintenance: Combining predictive maintenance and mixed reality-supported remote assistance. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 45, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekar, E.T.; Nyqvist, P.; Skoogh, A. An intelligent approach for data pre-processing and analysis in predictive maintenance with an industrial case study. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2020, 12, 1687814020919207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamariotis, A.; Tatsis, K.; Chatzi, E.; Goebel, K.; Straub, D. A metric for assessing and optimizing data-driven prognostic algorithms for predictive maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2024, 242, 109723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, Q.; Lu, R.; Yin, F.; Cui, S. Privacy-preserving continuous data collection for predictive maintenance in vehicular fog-cloud. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 5060–5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yu, W.; Dillon, T.; Rahayu, W.; Li, M. Empowering IoT predictive maintenance solutions with AI: A distributed system for manufacturing plant-wide monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 18, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Enzberg, S.; Naskos, A.; Metaxa, I.; Köchling, D.; Kühn, A. Implementation and transfer of predictive analytics for smart maintenance: A case study. Front. Comput. Sci. 2020, 2, 578469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E.; Jagatheesaperumal, S.K. Harnessing the potential of the metaverse and artificial intelligence for the internet of city things: Cost-effective XReality and synergistic AIoT technologies. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 2397–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, L.; Wu, J.; Jiang, X.; Almeida, D.; Wainwright, C.; Mishkin, P.; Zhang, C.; Agarwal, S.; Slama, K.; Ray, A. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2022, 35, 27730–27744. [Google Scholar]
- Bubeck, S.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Eldan, R.; Gehrke, J.; Horvitz, E.; Kamar, E.; Lee, P.; Lee, Y.T.; Li, Y.; Lundberg, S. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.12712. [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhery, A.; Narang, S.; Devlin, J.; Bosma, M.; Mishra, G.; Roberts, A.; Barham, P.; Chung, H.W.; Sutton, C.; Gehrmann, S. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.02311. [Google Scholar]
- Touvron, H.; Lavril, T.; Izacard, G.; Martinet, X.; Lachaux, M.-A.; Lacroix, T.; Rozière, B.; Goyal, N.; Hambro, E.; Azhar, F. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.13971. [Google Scholar]
- Rane, N. Potential Role and Challenges of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence in Architectural Engineering. 2023. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4607767 (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Rane, N. Role of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Construction Industry. 2023. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4598258 (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Ghimire, P.; Kim, K.; Acharya, M. Generative ai in the construction industry: Opportunities & challenges. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.04427. [Google Scholar]
- Rane, N.L. Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Key Players in Successful Implementation of ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence in Manufacturing, Finance, Retail, Transportation, and Construction Industry. 2023. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/npm3d (accessed on 19 January 2024).
- Voß, S. Bus Bunching and Bus Bridging: What Can We Learn from Generative AI Tools like ChatGPT? Sustainability 2023, 15, 9625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhbardeh, F.; Desell, T.; Zampieri, M. NLP tools for predictive maintenance records in MaintNet. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, Suzhou, China, 4–7 December 2020; pp. 26–32. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, J.; Samborowski, L.; Mentzer, K. A Human Collaboration with ChatGPT: Developing Case Studies with Generative AI. In Proceedings of the ISCAP Conference on Information Systems and Computing Education, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1–4 November 2023; ISSN 2473–4901. pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Song, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, L.; Bian, J. Pre-Trained Large Language Models for Industrial Control. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.03028. [Google Scholar]
- Frederico, G.F. ChatGPT in Supply Chains: Initial Evidence of Applications and Potential Research Agenda. Logistics 2023, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Qi, Q.; Sun, H.; Lu, L.; Feng, J.; Liao, J. Network Meets ChatGPT: Intent Autonomous Management, Control and Operation. J. Commun. Inf. Netw. 2023, 8, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodenhausen, U.; Braatz, A. Next Level AI-Based Development: From Understanding to Mastering of the Key Elements. In Proceedings of the International Stuttgart Symposium, Stuttgart, Germany, 26–27 September 2023; pp. 549–560. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, M.; Hodkiewicz, M.; Li, S. Large Language Models for Failure Mode Classification: An Investigation. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2309.08181. [Google Scholar]
Ref. | Name | Description |
---|---|---|
[132,133] | NASA Turbofan Dataset-CMAPSSD and CMAPSSD-2 | The turbofan engine degradation simulation dataset, generated with the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS) dynamical model. |
[134] | PHM 2008 Dataset | The degradation collected from aircraft engines derived from CMAPSSD. |
[135] | NASA Ames Milling Dataset | Acoustic emission, vibration, and motor current data collected under different experimental conditions for predicting the milling tool wear. |
[136] | NASA Bearing Dataset | Run-to-failure vibration data from 4 accelerometers in a shaft. |
[137] | Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) Bearing Dataset | Test rig operating with different load conditions. |
[138] | FEMTO Ball Bearing Dataset from IEEE PHM Challenge | Run-to-failure temperature and vibration data from engine thermocouple and accelerometer sensors. |
[139] | Roll Bearing Dataset from IEEE PHM Challenge | A training set of six rolling bearings operated in three different conditions, and a testing set of 11 more. |
[140] | Backblaze Hard Disk Drive Dataset | The daily status of hard disk drives (HDDs), consisting of 433 failed drives and 22,962 good drives. |
[141] | PAKDD2020 Alibaba AI OPS Competition Dataset | HDD daily health status data including both a raw and a normalized value as well as a label and the time of failure. |
[142] | NASA Ames Prognostics Dataset | Li-ion battery degradation data during repeated charge and discharge cycles. |
[143] | Lithium-ion Battery Dataset of the University of Maryland | The current and voltage data on different EV drive cycles at varying ambient temperatures (including 0 °C, 25 °C, and 45 °C). |
[144] | MOSFET Thermal Overstress Aging Dataset | Run-to-failure experiments on power MOSFETs under thermal overstress. |
[145] | MAFAULDA | Fault measurements from machinery simulators run under different load conditions. |
[146] | Microsoft Azure PdM Dataset | Data modules of machines, telemetry, errors, maintenance, and failures collected by a Microsoft employee for PdM modeling collection. |
[147] | Global Energy Forecasting Competition (GEFCOM) Dataset | Hourly solar power generation data and assigning numerical weather forecasts from 1 April 2012 to 1 July 2014. |
[148] | The UCI SECOM Dataset | Measurements of features of semiconductor production within a semiconductor manufacturing process. |
Ref. | Class of Repair and Maintenance | Industry | Application | Problem Type/ Approach | Algorithm/Technology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[53] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | Aging monitoring for twisted pair specimens in low-voltage stator windings of electrical machines | Regression | 2D-CNN |
[54] | Computers and communication equipment | Information technology | RUL estimation on Microsoft Azure AI-based PdM dataset [146] | Regression | CNN, RNN, LSTM, CNN-LSTM, regression random forest (RRF), deep feed-forward (DFF) networks, and gated recurrent unit (GRU) |
[55] | Electrical equipment Electronic and optical equipment | Electrical and electronics Metals and plastics | Failure prediction on PAKDD2020 Alibaba AI OPS competition [141] and NASA bearing dataset [136] | Classification | CNN and time-series encoding techniques |
[56] | Electrical equipment | Metals and plastics | Health monitoring on NASA milling dataset [135] | Regression | 1D CNN |
[57] | Electrical equipment | Metals and plastics | RUL estimation on FEMTO bearing dataset [138] | Regression | LSTM and autoencoder |
[58] | Electrical equipment | Diagnosis and classification of faults in rotating machinery using MAFAULDA dataset [145] and CWRU-bearing datasets [137] | Classification | CNN | |
[59] | Electrical equipment | Metals and plastics | Fault diagnosis on the experimental data collected from a rotor fault diagnosis experimental platform and the CWRU bearing dataset [137] | Regression Classification | ELM, CNN, and autoencoder |
[60] | Electrical equipment | Electric vehicles battery technology | Charge estimation of lithium-ion battery state in electric vehicles | - | Bidirectional GRU circuit module, and attention circuit module |
[61] | Electronic and optical equipment | Electrical and electronics | The condition of rotating machinery in university laboratory by using a single-axis piezoelectric accelerometer | Classification | CNN |
[62] | Transport equipment | High-speed railway | Predictive and proactive maintenance for modeling physical degradation and failure in gas-insulated switchgear in high-speed railway | Regression | LSTM-RNN |
[63] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | RUL estimation of lithium-ion batteries in NASA Ames prognostics data repository [142] | Regression | LSTM |
[64] | Machinery | Aircraft manufacturing | Health condition in a horizontal machining center in an aircraft manufacturing cooperation | Regression | An attribute attentional LSTM |
[65] | Electronic and optical equipment | Medical devices and healthcare services | Failure diagnosis for the Vitros immunoassay analyzer in a local hospital in the United Arab Emirates by using IoT sensors | Classification | SVM |
[66] | Electronic and optical equipment | Nuclear power | Condition monitoring of nuclear infrastructure on NASA turbofan dataset [132,133] | Regression | SVM and logistic regression |
[67] | Electronic and optical equipment | Electrical and electronics | RUL estimation on MOSFET thermal overstress aging dataset [144] | Regression | SVM |
[68] | Buildings and other structures | Architecture, engineering, construction, and facility management | Data-driven condition monitoring based on building information modeling and IoT to predict the future condition of the mechanical, electrical, and plumbing components | Regression | FNN and SVM |
[69] | Fabricated metal products | Large service management | Failure prediction on Backblaze dataset [140] | Classification | Decision tree-based machine learning method |
[70] | Other machinery and equipment | Renewable energy, wind energy | Fault prediction in wind turbines | Classification | RF, decision tree algorithms, DBSC, and statistical process control |
[71] | Electrical equipment | Electronics manufacturing | RUL estimation of the equipment in an industry manufacturer of memory modules (DRAM and SSD) | Regression | Combined statistical process control charts and RF, XGBoost, and LSTM |
[72] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | PdM and health monitoring on appropriate quality data collected in the form of product measurements or readings from various machines | Classification | Statistical process control and naïve Bayes |
[73] | Motor vehicles | Autonomous vehicles | Hierarchical component-based health monitoring system with fault detection, diagnosis, and prognosis on the CaRINA II autonomous vehicle platform and the CARLA simulator | Classification | Dynamic Bayesian network |
[74] | Other machinery and equipment | Manufacturing | State and failure prediction of rim welding machine in the process of creating vehicle rims from the iron plate in the assembly line using IoT-based sensors | Classification | Naïve Bayes and Markov chain |
[75] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | Failure prediction in an electrical motor | Classification | Bayesian network |
[76] | Transport equipment, except motor vehicles | Transport Infrastructure | Failure prediction for rail bridges on the rail network in Great Britain | - | Bayesian network |
[77] | Motor vehicles | Automotive | Anomaly detection for off-road vehicle maintenance | Classification | HMM, kNN and isolation forest, and autoencoders |
[78] | Motor vehicles | Automotive | The ecological PdM through condition monitoring of a bus with diesel engines taking temperature, humidity, pollutant emissions (NOx, CO2, HC, and PM), emitted noise, etc. | - | HMM |
[79] | Transport equipment | Energy and sustainability | RUL estimation of the machines on the PHM 2008 dataset [134] | Regression | Cluster-based HMM |
[80] | Machinery | Semiconductor manufacturing | Condition monitoring in a semiconductor manufacturing station | Clustering | HMM |
[81] | Transport equipment | Energy and sustainability | RUL estimation using degradation indicators in an airplane engine on NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] | Unsupervised Learning | HMM |
[82] | Industrial machinery and equipment | Pumping systems | Fault detection and life cycle cost analysis of pumping systems | Statistics Regression Classification | SVM and HMM |
[83] | Transport equipment | Marine | PdM for cost estimation during the design process of a ship engine room | - | Bayesian probabilistic inferential approach and HMM |
[84] | Other machinery and equipment | Pharmaceutical manufacturing | Real-time health monitoring in an industrial freeze-dryer | Clustering, Classification | DBSC, K-means and GMMs, PCA, one-class SVM, and the local outlier factor |
[85] | Fabricated metal products | Cloud services and data centers | The detection of imminent hard disk drive failures in Backblaze dataset [140] | Classification | Apache Spark, which is an in-memory distributed data analysis platform, and RF |
[86] | Electronic and optical equipment | Smart manufacturing | A manufacturing big data ecosystem addressing the issues of big data ingestion, management, and analytics for fault/anomaly detection in IoT-based smart factories | Clustering | The distributed K-means clustering, MapReduce-based distributed PCA-based T-squared, and SPE algorithms A data lake, NoSQL database, and encryption protocol on the Apache Spark platform |
[87] | Transport equipment | Transport | PdM approach for malfunction evaluation in relation to the kilometers of the train and the periodicity of faults in the Greek Railway Company | Regression Classification | Classification trees J48 and regression trees M5 form algorithms |
[88] | Machinery and equipment | Electronics | Failure prediction of the monitored manufacturing industrial machinery by UCI SECOM dataset [148] | Classification | A fusion of data mining and semantics |
[89] | Other machinery and equipment | Textile | Production quality prediction in the textile industry | Regression | Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) architecture to develop a cloud-based analytics module |
[90] | Transport equipment, except motor vehicles | Logistics and parcel delivery | A big data analytics framework for the data-driven prediction of courier package breaks in smart goods transportation systems | Classification | IoT networks Gradient boosting classifiers, SVM, logistic regression, and Apache Spark |
[91] | - | Vinyl flooring | Quality management in the vinyl flooring industry | - | Big data analytics and optimization Edge computing |
[92] | Electrical equipment | Industrial robots | Health status degradation assessment using real data of the ABB IRB 6400r industrial robot | Regression | Programmable logic controllers (PLC) One-class novelty detection using SVM and extreme learning machine (ELM) IIoT |
[93] | Electrical equipment | Metal and metallurgy | Fault detection in the friction stir welding tool | Classification | Best first tree classifier |
[94] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | Detection of the essence of the unbalanced conditions in the rotary machine in the constructed experimental setup | Classification | SVM |
[95] | Electrical equipment | Building and construction | Failure prediction in HVAC installations at a sports facility in a building automation system in the Paris region using sensors such as vibration, temperature, and energy consumption meters | Regression | LSTM and autoencoders IoT |
[96] | Electrical equipment | Manufacturing | Prediction of gradual degradation of an impeller using the sensors such as vibration, gyroscope/accelerometer, rotational speed, temperature, pressure, ambient pressure, temperature, and humidity on an industrial radial fan | Regression | Linear regression, RFR, and symbolic regression |
[97] | Electrical equipment | Semiconductor | Vibration-related failure prediction on a dataset including machines, errors, maintenance, telemetry, and failures | Regression | Linear regression |
[98] | Electrical equipment | Electrical and electronics | Fault detection in rotating machinery by monitoring and visualizing vibrations using transformed raw data into images through a short-time Fourier transform or Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients spectrogram | Classification | CNNs |
[99] | Fabricated metal products | Nuclear energy | PdM in the research reactor by using core-cooling pump vibration signals | Classification | FNN |
[100] | Electrical equipment | Railways | Fault detection using thermal imaging in rail systems in Turkiye | Classification | Fuzzy |
[101] | Machinery | Railways | Locomotive maintenance in Sri Lanka Railways for the issues of premature axle bearing defects, suspension bearing conditions, diesel engine inspection, compressor inspection, weak thermal insulation detection, dynamic grid resister element inspection, water, air, fuel, and oil pipeline blocks, fuse contractors, resistors, relays, and loose electrical wires | - | Thermal imaging technology |
[102] | Electrical equipment | Medical | PdM for progressive deterioration processes and failure mechanisms of different medical equipment | - | Infrared thermal imaging |
[103] | Electrical equipment | Hydraulics | PdM for evaluating premature failures of hydraulic drive systems in a university laboratory using simulation software AMESim from SIEMENS LMS Imagine.Lab | - | Some numerical simulations using infrared thermography |
[104] | Fabricated metal products, machinery, and equipment | Gearbox manufacturing | PdM through failure prediction and analysis in the gearbox high-speed shaft bearing using temperature and vibrational sensors | Classification | Decision trees |
[105] | Electrical equipment | Automotive | Intelligent PdM control through the collected data from condition monitoring sensors of electrical monorail system | Classification | Rule-base intelligence system IIoT and AR |
[106] | Fabricated metal products | Electrical and electronics | Fault detection and remote monitoring system to control the status of professional refrigeration systems | Regression | Planned SVM Digital twin, IoT, and MR |
[107] | Electrical equipment Electronic and optical equipment | Machine tools manufacturing | Fault prediction in machine tools equipped with various sensors to acquire huge volumes of production data in a typical machining workshop in Wuxi, China | Regression Reinforcement Learning | CNN, LSTM, and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) AR and IoT |
[108] | Fabricated metal products | Steel strip processing | Prediction of the real-time fatigue strength of the component under loading in steel strip processing lines | Regression | Finite element analysis, linear regression AR and IoT |
[109] | - | - | PdM system by a digital intelligent assistant for industry | - | NLP and user feedback about the success of maintenance interventions |
[110] | Electrical equipment | Automotive manufacturing | Prescriptive maintenance for evaluating failure and quality effects in an international manufacturer of gearboxes and engines for the automotive sector | - | Data management, predictive data analytic toolbox, recommender and decision support dashboard, and semantic-based learning and reasoning |
[111] | Fabricated metal products | Chemical industry | The prediction of failure time and probability of a pump | Classification | Ensembles of SVMs |
[112] | Electrical equipment | Manufacturing | The prediction of potential equipment failure, expected failure time, and expected repair time and providing the appropriate action for production planning and control in future factories | Reinforcement Learning | RL Digital twin |
[113] | Machinery | Manufacturing | RUL estimation in a machine park consisting of 100 machines | Reinforcement Learning | DRL |
[114] | Machinery | Rail transport | The optimal maintenance strategy jointly incorporates the effect of aging and degradation for locomotive wheelsets | - | Reliability analysis, sensitivity analysis, and a continuous stochastic process |
[115] | Transport equipment | Aviation | Discrete-event simulation framework for post-prognostic decision for aircraft maintenance using tire pressure indication system for an Airbus A320 | - | The technological maturity of an underlying PHM system |
[116] | Electrical equipment | Manufacturing | Anomaly detection in all the equipment in a global manufacturing system | Unsupervised Learning | Autoencoder-based deep learning technique Edge computing and IoT |
[117] | Machinery | Manufacturing | Failure prediction using different sensors such as temperature, rotation speed, vibration, and humidity in a ball-bearing automatic line | Regression | Autoregressive Integrated moving average model (ARIMA), ARIMA-LSTMs Traditional cloud-edge architecture |
[118] | Machinery | Industrial robotics manufacturing | Failure prediction for monitoring the health status of all machines in COMAU industrial robots company | Regression Classification | NN, RF, logistic regression, SVM, and gradient-boosted tree A hybrid cloud-edge computing |
[119] | Machinery | Air conditioning manufacturing | Failure prediction in air-conditioning systems | Classification | Centroid distance weighted federated averaging algorithm |
[120] | Electronic and optical equipment | Industry 4.0 | Blockchain framework for PdM in Industry 4.0 | Classification | Fuzzy logic, blockchain, case-based reasoning, and KNN |
[121] | Electrical equipment | Home energy management | Failure prediction of the applications in a home energy management system | Classification | IoT sensors SVM |
[122] | Electrical equipment | Electric vehicles battery technology | Prediction of starter battery failure times from a fleet of vehicles | - | Maximum likelihood approach |
[123] | Electrical equipment Machinery | Hydraulics | Energy-based maintenance for lubricant condition monitoring in a rubber-mixing hydraulic control system | Regression Classification | SVM and RF |
[124] | Machinery | Steel manufacturing | RUL estimation in hot rolling milling machines regarding segment surface temperatures and hydraulic force measurements | - | Maximum likelihood approach |
[125] | Fabricated metal products Machinery and equipment | Robotics manufacturing | Failure prediction in a discrete multi-robot mobile assembling line using sensors such as energy analyzer modules, temperature, vibration, corrosion, and humidity | Classification | FNN |
[126] | Machinery and equipment | Electrical and electronics | PHM-based PdM for the degradation estimation of gear motor assembly in mechanical power transmission | - | Cloud computing and the multitenancy principle |
[127] | Electrical equipment Electronic and optical equipment | Electrical and electronics | The detection of changes in the operating conditions and abrupt faults in the platform composed of an asynchronous motor and a gearbox made of two pulleys in the university laboratory | - | Edge and cloud analytics |
[128] | - | Manufacturing | Product lifecycle management by connecting the industrial unit floor with design and manufacturing engineers | - | A predictive analytics software platform |
Class of Repair and Maintenance | Study Number | Industry | Study Number | PdM Task | Study Number | Problem Type/ Approach | Study Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electrical equipment | 30 | Electrical and electronics; electronics | 13 | Failure prediction | 22 | Classification | 33 |
Machinery | 10 | Manufacturing; manufacturing of automotive manufacturing; aircraft semiconductor; machine tools; gearbox; smart; pharmaceutical; electronics; steel; robotics; industrial robotics; air conditioning; industrial robots; Industry 4.0 | 22 | RUL estimation; Cost and charge estimation | 11 | Regression | 26 |
Electronic and optical equipment | 9 | Transport; automotive; high-speed railway; autonomous vehicles; railways; rail transport | 10 | Fault detection | 12 | Clustering | 3 |
Fabricated metal products | 8 | Metals and plastics; metal and metallurgy | 5 | Condition monitoring; Vibration monitoring | 9 | Reinforcement Learning | 3 |
Transport equipment | 6 | Energy and sustainability; nuclear power; nuclear energy; renewable energy; wind energy | 5 | Anomaly detection | 4 | Unsupervised Learning | 2 |
Other machinery and equipment | 5 | Information technology; cloud services and data centers | 2 | Production quality prediction | 1 | The others | 16 |
Motor vehicles | 3 | Electric vehicle battery technology | 2 | Product lifecycle management | 1 | ||
Machinery and equipment | 3 | Medical; medical devices and healthcare services | 2 | Component fatigue strength prediction | 1 | ||
Transport equipment, except motor vehicles | 2 | Building and construction; architecture; engineering; construction; facility management | 2 | PdM system by a digital intelligent assistant | 1 | ||
Computers and communication equipment | 1 | Hydraulics | 2 | Blockchain framework for PdM | 1 | ||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 1 | Large service management | 1 | A big data analytics framework | 1 | ||
Buildings and other structures | 1 | Infrastructure; pumping systems; marine; textile; logistics and parcel delivery; steel strip processing; chemical industry; aviation; home energy management | 9 | Post-prognostic decision | 1 |
Techniques | Accuracy | Cost-Effectiveness | Scalability |
---|---|---|---|
Deep Learning | High | Moderate | High |
Machine Learning | Moderate | High | Moderate |
Methods | Accuracy | Cost-Effectiveness | Scalability |
---|---|---|---|
AI-based | High | Moderate | High |
Traditional | Moderate | High | Low |
Ref. | The Approach | Application |
---|---|---|
[174] | SHAP | PdM in a coal crusher operating at the boiler of the real power plant and gantries in a steelworks converter, a transport line in a steelworks converter |
[175] | SHAP | PdM in a coal crusher operating presented in [174] |
[176] | LIME, SHAP, and ELI5 | Solar photovoltaic energy forecasting by GEFCOM dataset [147] |
[177] | Integrated gradients, SHAP, and SmoothGrad | Anomaly detection in press machine data of a production line |
[178] | SHAP and LIME. | RUL estimation of hard disk drive in the Backblaze dataset [140] |
[179] | SHAP | RUL estimation of the engines on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[180] | Integrated gradients | PdM to reveal the most sensitive gearbox operations in the MW load range in a petrochemical plant to a specific abnormality |
[181] | SHAP | RUL estimation of NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[182] | LIME and NLP | Maintenance work orders |
[183] | LRP | Bearing health condition estimation on the NASA bearing dataset [136] |
[184] | Knowledge-based system including domain ontologies and semantic web rule language rules | The detection of future machinery failures as well as the prediction of their time of occurrence in semiconductor manufacturing process by the UCI SECOM dataset [148] |
[185] | Rule-based expert system | PdM of a real hybrid bus |
[186] | Real type-2 fuzzy-based XAI | PdM within the water pumping industry |
[187] | Rule-based model called logic language model | RUL estimation of the engines on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[188] | QARM algorithm | RUL prediction of a drilling machine of an automotive manufacturer |
[189] | A data-driven sensitivity analysis | The prediction of the future reliability of components in a large gas distribution network |
[190] | Bagged decision trees | A synthetic dataset that reflects real predictive maintenance data encountered in the industry |
[191] | Gradient boosting decision tree | The prediction machine errors or tool failures on Microsoft Azure dataset [146] |
[192] | A premier transparent, interpretable, and self-explainable automated machine learning software, including methods like random forest and gradient boosting | Manufacturing quality prediction in real-life environment |
[193] | A virtual knowledge graph-based approach | PdM in the hydraulic systems |
[194] | Attention and LSTM-GAN | PdM to reduce maintenance costs and downtime of machines in the intelligent manufacturing system |
[195] | Attention and bidirectional LSTM | RUL estimation on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[196] | Bidirectional self-attention gated recurrent unit | The prediction of the health index on the NASA rolling bearing dataset from IEEE PHM challenge [138] |
[197] | The attention mechanism | RUL estimation on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[198] | The attention mechanism | Structural Health Monitoring |
[199] | The multi-layer, multi-source attention distribution | The fault detection and recognition on the general data hierarchy of AUV |
[200] | Attention and LSTM | RUL estimation on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] IoT |
[201] | Feature attribution and counterfactual generation | Fault diagnosis in water injection pump for production stimulation in offshore oil wells, offshore natural gas treatment plant |
[202] | PCA/Kernel PCA/KNN-PCA, LIME, and integrated gradient | RUL estimation of the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[203] | Pobability density function, Fourier transform, spectral kurtosis, autoencoder and variational autoencoder, and K-means clustering | Gearbox and bearing health assessment in wind turbine system |
[204] | Unsupervised feature selection, adapting relevance metrics with the dynamic time-warping algorithm | Health indicators for a rotating machine |
[205] | Temporal fusion separable convolutional network, a hierarchical latent space variational auto-encoder, and a regressor consisting of a linear layer and a sigmoid activation function | RUL estimation on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
[206] | A blockchain-based architecture that achieves trustworthy federated learning | A service |
[207] | Balanced K-star | PdM in an IoT-based manufacturing system |
[208] | HMM and reinforcement learning | RUL estimation of the engines on the NASA turbofan engine dataset [132,133] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ucar, A.; Karakose, M.; Kırımça, N. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898
Ucar A, Karakose M, Kırımça N. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(2):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898
Chicago/Turabian StyleUcar, Aysegul, Mehmet Karakose, and Necim Kırımça. 2024. "Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends" Applied Sciences 14, no. 2: 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898
APA StyleUcar, A., Karakose, M., & Kırımça, N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Applied Sciences, 14(2), 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020898