Next Article in Journal
Influence of Fatigue and Defensive Pressure on Three-Point Jump-Shot Kinematics in Basketball
Previous Article in Journal
Torsional Fatigue Performance of a Spot-Welded Structure: An XFEM Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Beer Produced with the Addition of Brown Macroalgae Fucus virsoides

by
Kristina Habschied
1,
Zdenko Lončarić
2,
Stela Jokić
1,
Krunoslav Aladić
1,
Vinko Krstanović
1 and
Krešimir Mastanjević
1,*
1
Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, F. Kuhača 18, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
2
Faculty of Agrobiotechnical Sciences Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga 1, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9594; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209594
Submission received: 14 September 2024 / Revised: 15 October 2024 / Accepted: 18 October 2024 / Published: 21 October 2024

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The concept of this investigation aimed to formulate a beer enriched with functional ingredients originating from sea macroalgae Fucus virsoides.

Abstract

Marine macroalgae are organisms rich in bioactive compounds such as polysaccharides, polyphenols, and various minerals. Macroalgae are increasingly being added to the human diet precisely because they contain useful compounds that can also be used in the pharmaceutical industry. Previous research describes their addition to meat products, yogurt, bread, and baby food. However, data on the addition of algae to beer have been scarce. The goal of this work was to produce beer with the addition of brown macroalgae (Fucus virsoides) from the Adriatic Sea. In addition, the basic physical–chemical parameters (color, pH, ethanol, extract, and polyphenols) were determined. The most important premise is the transfer of selenium (Se) to beer, since Se is deficient in human food chain. The transfer of different metals, namely, S (sulfur), Mg (magnesium), P (phosphorus), K (potassium), Ca (calcium), Cr (chromium), Mn (manganese), Fe (iron), Co (cobalt), Ni (nickel), Cu (copper), Zn (zinc), As (arsenic), Se (selenium), Mo (molybdenum), Cd (cadmium), Hg (mercury), and Pb (lead), from algae to beer was determined using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP−MS). The results, however, were not satisfactory regarding metal transfer. In particular, Se was detected in beer, but other metals such as As, Cd, and Pb were not. Alga addition contributed to extract values, and the original extract reached 14.3 °P in wort with alga addition, as opposed to 12.8 °P in the control sample. Such high extract content, however, resulted in beer with low alcohol content, <4% v/v for both beers. This could be explained by the high levels of unfermentable extract. pH values showed statistical difference between samples, meaning that the addition of algae significantly affected the pH value of beer, reducing acidity by almost 5%.

1. Introduction

Algae can be designated as heterogeneous flora widely distributed in different parts of the world. As reported by Mac Monagail et al. [1], about 10,000 species of algae are found around the globe, and many species are used by people [2]. Marine algae are proven to be abundant in proteins, carbohydrates, fiber, amino acids, vitamins, and fatty acids. All these components act positively on the human body. Algae can be marketed in different forms (e.g., natural forms, powder, and extracts), with various bioactive functions [3,4,5]. Countries that traditionally use marine sources of food, such as Japan, have the world’s longest life expectancy and this has been related to their dietary patterns, which include the regular consumption of macroalgae [5]. Thus, marine macroalgae are designated as plant-based food, a trend that is slowly taking over the market. This is the trend of the future, which is spreading among the Western civilization [6].
Fucus is a widespread genus of brown, perennial seaweeds. It can thrive in cold-temperate waters from the littoral and sublittoral regions along the rocky shorelines of the northern hemisphere [7]. The genus Fucus includes 66 currently accepted taxonomical species with a greenish brown trisected thallus, which is composed of a holdfast, a small stipe, and flattened dichotomously branched blades with terminal receptacles that swell during the reproductive season [8,9]. One of the algae belonging to the genus Fucus is Fucus virsoides J. Agardh. This is an endemic brown alga that grows only in the Adriatic Sea [10,11]. Some members of this genus can exhibit anticancer potential (F. vesiculosus L.) [12]. Besides the huge range of beneficial effects of the brown alga F. virsoides, the increased anthropogenic impact on the marine environment causes an accumulation of heavy metals in algal biomass.
Beer is made from mash/wort obtained by extracting sugars from crushed malt during mashing with water and then boiling with hops. F. virsoides contains certain amounts of carbohydrates, but the most interesting compounds are actually metals, especially the ones designated as deficient in human nutrition, such as selenium (Se), which are abundant in alga biomass. Nearly every European country is being classified as a low-selenium region, meaning that the dietary intake of this metal is insufficient. This is due to the low concentration of Se in soils, water, food, and feed [13]. Se is the active center of many proteins, thus being an essential micronutrient for living organisms [14]. Oxidative stress is a major trigger for other health issues related to Se deficiency [15]. For this reason, Se supplementation is widely stipulated. Such supplements can be derived from microorganisms like microalgae and can be implemented in food or feed. The biofortification of soil with Se in order to obtain Se enriched crops is also possibility [16,17,18]. Yeast is also a great biotransformation pod of inorganic Se to an organic form [19], so it can be utilized by higher organisms. Since beer is such a widespread medium, there have been several attempts to enrich beer with Se via biofortified barley/malt, or even with the direct addition of sodium selenite during the beer fermentation process [20,21,22]. Thus, the intention of this investigation is to provide a Se-rich beer.
The hypothesis of this work was that adding the alga F. virsoides into the boil, together with hops, and then subjecting it to fermentation can result in beer with valuable compounds such as Se. The additional carbohydrates could potentially enhance fermentation, resulting in higher alcohol content. This kind of beer could be utilized as a food supplement. In other words, the aim was to assess the transfer of metals from the alga to beer and to check if fermentation obstructs the concentrations of these compounds in the final beer. Physical–chemical properties were also determined in the final beer. Additionally, Se and other heavy metals were analyzed in the spent yeast which can be re-utilized or used for other purposes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Alga Collection

Fucus virsoides J. Agardh, 1868, was collected in the southwest Novigrad sea area, located in the Adriatic Sea (44°1200200 N, 15°2805100 E), Croatia. A representative sample was collected using a single-point sample collection from a depth of 0.5 m at a sea temperature of 12 °C. Fresh F. virsoides was then freeze-dried using a laboratory freeze dryer (CoolSafe PRO, Labogene, Denmark). The freeze-drying was performed under a high vacuum (0.13–0.55 hPa) for 24 h, with 30 °C and 20 °C as the primary and secondary drying temperatures. The freeze-dried alga was further used in beer production.

2.2. Beer Production

For this purpose, porter beer style was brewed in a homebrewing unit BrewTaurus (40 L). Twenty L of wort was prepared containing 2.5 kg of pale ale malt (Simpsons Malt, Northumberland, UK), 5.0 kg DRC® malt (Simpsons Malt, Northumberland, UK), and 0.1 kg of chocolate malt (Paul’s Malt, Bury Saint Edmunds, United Kingdom). Malt was purchased from the local brewing and malting equipment store. Reverse-osmosis water was adjusted for porter production by adding 2.5 g calcium chloride, 2 g Epsom salt, and 1 g gypsum. Mashing was carried out at 65 °C for 60 min, and mash-out was performed at 75 °C for 10 min. Boiling was carried out at 100 °C for 60 min. Then, 25 g of dry algae was added during boiling time (60 min), alongside hops: 5 g Chinook (12.0% α-acids) and 5 g of Galaxy (17.9% α-acids) were added at the beginning of the boil. An additional 5 g of Columbus hops (15.0% α-acids) was added 20 min before the end of the boil. Cooling was conducted using a coil chilled with tap water, so the temperature was reduced to 25 °C. Then, 20 L of wort was separated in two fermentation vessels, 10 L each, marked as “A”. Inoculation was performed with Safale US-05 yeast (Fermentis, Marcq en Baroeul, France). One bag (11.5 g) of dried yeast was used for 20 L of wort.
Control beer was produced in the same way, using the same ingredients, but without the addition of algae during boiling. The corresponding fermenter was marked as “C”. Upon inoculation, vessels were stored at 21 °C (in a cooling chamber). At the end of fermentation, beer was transferred to kegs, carbonated, and stored in a cool place (4 °C). Brewing was conducted in duplicate for each batch (control and with the addition of algae).

2.3. Physical–Chemical Analysis of Beer

Before the inoculation of wort, samples were analyzed using an Anton Paar Beer Analyser (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). Fermentation was analyzed via a portable EasyDens Anton Paar (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). Polyphenol, color, and bitterness analysis was performed according to MEBAK [23], and the final beers were analyzed using an Anton Paar Beer Analyser (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria). All analyses were performed in duplicate for both fermentation vessels.

2.4. Measurement of Metals with ICP-MS

Alga samples were dried in a laboratory dryer at 70 °C to a constant mass, and the dry sample was ground to powder using an ultra-centrifugal grinding mill without heavy metal residues (Retsch ZM 200, Haan, Germany). All samples of algae, yeast, and beer were digested with a wet microwave technique (CEM Mars 6, Charlotte, NC, USA) according to the procedure described in [24,25,26]. Briefly, the samples were quantitatively transferred into a Teflon cuvette, and 9 mL of 65% HNO3 and 2 mL of 30% H2O2 were added. After digestion, the solutions were filtered into volumetric flasks, transferred to a 50 mL polypropylene tube, and filled up to the mark with deionized water. The concentrations of analyzed elements (S (sulfur), Mg (magnesium), P (phosphorus), K (potassium), Ca (calcium), Cr (chromium), Mn (manganese), Fe (iron), Co (cobalt), Ni (nickel), Cu (copper), Zn (zinc), As (arsenic), Se (selenium), Mo (molybdenum), Cd (cadmium), Hg (mercury), and Pb (lead)) were measured directly in solution using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS, Agilent Technologies 7800 ICP-MS, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Each batch of samples run on the ICP was analyzed with an internal pooled plasma control and with the different certified reference materials (Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements BCR 129; Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology (INCT/ICHTJ) INCT-SBF-4) prepared in the same way as were the other samples. Recovery values, LOD and LOQ values are visible in Supplementary Materials as Table S1. Recovery values for analyzed metals and Table S2. LOD and LOQ values of analyzed metals.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher’s least significant difference test (LSD) were conducted, with the least statistical significance set to p < 0.05. Statistica 13.1. (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was the software of choice for this data set.

3. Results and Discussion

The results of this research are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Table 1 shows the basic physical–chemical indicators determined in the produced beers. When looking at the basic parameter, such as the specific gravity, it can be noted that wort with the addition of algae had a somewhat higher extract content, 1.02935 mg/L, in comparison to the control sample, which had 1.02495 mg/L.
This indicates that alga addition contributed to extract values, due to its content of carbohydrates. This was reflected on the original extract which reached 14.3 °P in wort with alga addition, as opposed to 12.8 °P in the control sample. Such high extract content, however, resulted in beer with low alcohol content, <4% v/v for both beers. This could be explained by the high levels of unfermentable extract that is unavailable to yeast to conduct fermentation. The pH values are showing statistical difference between samples, meaning that the addition of algae significantly affected the pH value of beer, reducing the acidity by almost 5%. This is a significant change in pH and would affect the sensory properties. Such significant change could be related to a higher alcohol content in beer with the addition of algae (3.80% v/v) in comparison to the control sample which contained 3.55% v/v. Bitterness did not undergo any changes with the addition of algae, but it was the same for both beers, 42 IBU, meaning that algae do not contribute to bitterness. Color was slightly affected with the addition of algae, and was a bit higher in beer with the addition of F. virsoides. This is expected since F. virsoides is a brown alga. Since there are not many data about this topic, it is hard to compare the obtained results with published materials. There are some research studies in which microalgae such as Arthrospira platensis (spirulina) or Tetraselmis chui were added into the brew [27,28], but macroalgae have not yet been described as a potential brewing adjunct, even though they possess health-beneficiary ingredients such as fucoidan and carrageenan [29]. The results of wort in the original extract, in the research conducted by Beisler and Sandmann [27], are in accordance with the data collected in this research. The pH value was higher in their research and did not show a decline with the addition of the microalga spirulina. Also, alcohol content was higher than in this research, above 4.5 % v/v for all samples. The lower alcohol content was probably a result of the high content of DRC® malt. To avoid astringent and bitter aromas and taste, native to dark ales, and to bring about the alga aromas, DRC® malt was used. Small amounts of hops (bitter and aromatic) were used too. This combination aimed to reduce the influence of raw materials such as malt and hops to beer brewed with algae. The high content of DRC® malt also contributed to the beer color, reducing the influence of alga addition. Heavier notes of dark ale matched the heavy notes of algae during boiling.
The lower polyphenol content in beer with the addition of algae could be caused by the presence of carrageenan in alga biomass. Specifically, carrageenan is used as a fining agent during boiling. Fining agents are usually added to the wort approximately 10 min before the end of the boil. They tend to speed up the aggregation and sedimentation of the protein–protein and protein–polyphenol complexes during cooling [30]. Carrageenan reacts mainly with high-molecular-weight proteins [31]. As algae were added to the boiling phase in the brew, it is possible that some of the polyphenolic substances were precipitated with proteins during cooling. Thus, lower polyphenolic levels were determined in beer with alga addition. However, this is yet to be investigated.
The results of metal analysis in the samples are presented in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. Metals were determined in alga dry matter (Table 2) and in beer and spent yeast (Table 3 and Table 4). Macroalgae are known to retain heavy metals such as chromium, cadmium, copper, nickel, arsenic, mercury, lead, and zinc, which are globally the most commonly detected metals [32,33]. Some of them are crucial for the normal functioning of metabolism, but in higher concentrations, they are surely toxic to humans and animals [34]. Concentrations of heavy metals, and trace metals, can be used as a bioindicator of the pollution of an ecosystem [35]. However, heavy metals exhibit a harmful impact on algae by initiating oxidative stress [36]. The results of this research indicate that alga biomass contains high concentrations of different metals, or “potentially toxic elements”, as they are referred to in studies [37]. Alga biomass contained extremely high concentrations of K, 24,035.00 mg/kg, then S, 23,855.00 mg/kg, and Ca with 18,305.00 mg/kg. Mg, Ni, P, and Co showed high concentrations in alga biomass, over 1000.00 mg/kg. Alga dry matter contained significant amounts of As (25,390.00 µg/kg), Ni (2685.00 µg/kg), and Co (1268.00 µg/kg). Such high concentrations of heavy metals are not surprising since algae are an excellent bioremediation medium [38].
Cr, Cd, Pb, and Mo were below 500 µg/kg. The most surprising finding in alginic biomass was the low Se concentration (<20 µg/kg).
The beer produced with the addition of alga showed higher levels of all metals in comparison to the control sample (Table 2). Beer with F. virsoides addition had approximately 25% higher levels of all elements than control beer. However, only a small portion of heavy metals transferred from alga biomass to the brew. As levels were determined to be high, reaching 77.94 µg/L, which is significantly higher than the tolerable intake level (TIL) of 3 µg/kg body weight per day, recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) [39]. By drinking 0.5 L of such beer, one would take over 35 µg of As in the system. Thus, the idea of sensory analysis was dropped. On the other hand, the levels of As in control beer were significantly lower, reaching 0.42 µg/L. Zn showed a certain deviation. Specifically, its concentration was significantly lower in beer produced with F. virsoides. Zn is necessary for yeast growth and metabolism, and it was probably utilized by yeast biomass during fermentation [40]. Alcohol dehydrogenase is the terminal enzyme of the fermentation process and it is a zinc-dependent enzyme [41]. Its job is to reduce acetaldehyde to ethanol during glucose fermentation [42].
Yeast samples were also tested for heavy metals. The results are shown in Table 3. These results show a deviation in heavy metal accumulation. Specifically, spent yeast obtained after fermentation with alga showed lower levels of macroelements such as S, Ca, Mg, K, P, Mn, Cu, and Zn than yeast from the control sample. Microelements As, Pb, Cr, Co, and Ni showed higher levels in beer with the addition of alga than in the control beer. This could indicate that dry alga biomass could have absorbed heavy metals from beer/alga. Recent studies showed that dead (or dried) algal biomass is a good absorbent of heavy metals or other xenobiotics from wastewater due to their complex mucilaginous polysaccharide-composing cell walls which exhibit a high affinity for di- and trivalent cations [43,44,45]. Brown algae have a higher capacity for binding metals than red and green algae due to alginate content which has a high affinity for bivalent metals [46,47,48]. Spent alga biomass was discarded with hops after boiling, and thus there are no results for this by-product of brewing. In that sense, further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the amount of metals left in spent alga biomass.
The addition of F. virsoides changed the wort content, resulting in a higher extract. Subsequently, this beer contained higher alcohol levels and higher real extract, which would give beer a sweeter taste than the control. However, the planned sensory analysis was avoided due to the subsequent analysis of heavy metals. In particular, the high concentrations of metals in beer were considered a potential health hazard, and thus the sensory analysis was halted at smell, and tasting was not performed. The smell of the brew during boiling was indigenous to dry algae/seaweed, very heavy, and took over the malty odors. After fermentation, the smell was reduced, and finer notes of chocolate and caramel arose in the beer smell. After two weeks, the alginic smell was even more reduced, and just a hint of seaweed could be smelled during this part of the sensory analysis.

4. Conclusions

The results of this research show that the addition of alga F. versoides contributes to the extract content and subsequently to higher alcohol content in beer. Lower polyphenol levels were determined in beer with the addition of alga F. virsoides, probably due to the fining properties of alga biomass through the presence of carrageenan. Lower pH was detected in the control sample. This could be related with the higher alcohol content in beer with algae. In any case, alga addition to beer could be useful and could result in a functional alcoholic beverage. However, the heavy metals which can be detected in algae end up in the brew and could present a hazard to humans. Perhaps, this risk could be reduced by adding the alga extract to wort during boiling or even at the end of cooling. Nevertheless, the extract should also undergo heavy metal analysis prior to using it in beer production. Even though beer with alga addition did not exhibit any negative odors, it changed over time, resulting in a less alginic odor. Another benefit of using extract would be the reduced alginic odor during boiling and consequently in beer. A potential practical benefit of alga addition to beer could be the reduction in high-molecular-weight proteins, which would improve and extend the shelf life of beer [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. However, this is yet to be investigated, preferably on a lighter beer style.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/app14209594/s1, Table S1: Recovery values for analyzed metals; Table S2: LOD and LOQ values of analyzed metals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.H.; methodology, Z.L.; software, K.M.; validation, Z.L. and S.J.; formal analysis, Z.L.; investigation, K.M. and K.A.; data curation, K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.H. and K.M.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and Z.L.; visualization, K.H.; supervision, V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific Centre of Excellence for Marine Bioprospecting–BioProCro co-financed by the Croatian Government and the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund—the Competitiveness and Cohesion Operational Programme (KK.01.1.1.01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mac Monagail, M.; Cornish, L.; Morrison, L.; Araújo, R.; Critchley, A.T. Sustainable harvesting of wild seaweed resources. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 371–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. White, W.L.; Wilson, P. Seaweed Sustainability-World Seaweed Utilization; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 7–25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ścieszka, S.; Klewicka, E. Algae in food: A general review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 3538–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Charoensiddhi, S.; Abraham, R.E.; Su, P.; Zhang, W. Seaweed and seaweed-derived metabolites as prebiotics. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2020, 91, 97–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cardoso, S.; Pereira, O.; Seca, A.; Pinto, D.; Silva, A. Seaweeds as preventive agents for cardiovascular diseases: From nutrients to functional foods. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6838–6865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. BBC News Mag. Future Foods: What Will We Be Eating in 20 Years’ Time? 2012. Available online: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-18813075 (accessed on 25 July 2024).
  7. AlgaeBase, World-Wide Electronic Publication. Available online: https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/20001423979/ (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  8. Kucera, H.; Saunders, G.W. Assigning morphological variants of Fucus (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in Canadian waters to recognized species using DNA barcoding. Botany 2008, 86, 1065–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Catarino, M.D.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Phycochemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Fucus spp. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guiry, M.; Agardh, J. 1868, in: Algae Base Fucus virsoides. 2020. Available online: https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/detail/?tc=accept&species_id=1358 (accessed on 3 September 2024).
  11. Dobrinčić, A.; Dobroslavić, E.; Pedisić, S.; Balbino, S.; Elez Garofulić, I.; Čož-Rakovac, R.; Dragović-Uzelac, V. The effectiveness of the Fucus virsoides and Cystoseira barbata fucoidan isolation as a function of applied pre-treatment and extraction conditions. Algal Res. 2021, 56, 102286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, E.J.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, J.H. Fucoidan present in brown algae induces apoptosis of human colon cancer cells. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lintschinger, J.; Fuchs, N.; Moser, J.; Kuehnelt, D.; Goessler, W. Selenium-enriched sprouts. A raw material for fortified cereal-based diets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 5362–5368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hatfield, D.L.; Tsuji, P.A.; Carlson, B.A.; Gladyshev, V.N. Selenium and selenocysteine: Roles in cancer, health, and development. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014, 39, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gómez-Jacinto, V.; Navarro-Roldán, F.; Garbayo-Nores, I.; Vílchez-Lobato, C.; Borrego, A.A.; García-Barrera, T. In vitro selenium bioaccessibility combined with in vivo bioavailability and bioactivity in se-enriched microalga (Chlorella sorokiniana) to be used as functional food. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 66, 103817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, N.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, T. Selenium transformation and selenium-rich foods. Food Biosci. 2021, 40, 100875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Galić, L.; Vinković, T.; Ravnjak, B.; Lončarić, Z. Agronomic Biofortification of Significant Cereal Crops with Selenium—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Manojlović, M.S.; Lončarić, Z.; Cabilovski, R.R.; Popović, B.; Karalić, K.; Ivezić, V.; Ademi, A.; Singh, B.R. Biofortification of wheat cultivars with selenium. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil. Plant Sci. 2019, 69, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alzate, A.; Fernández-Fernández, A.; Pérez-Conde, M.C.; Gutiérrez, A.M.; Cámara, C. Comparison of biotransformation of inorganic selenium by Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces in lactic fermentation process of yogurt and kefir. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8728–8736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gibson, C.; Park, Y.H.; Myoung, K.H.; Suh, M.K.; McArthur, T.; Lyons, G.; Stewart, D. The bio-fortication of barley with selenium. In Proceedings of the Convention of the Institute of Brewing and Distilling, Asia Pacific Section, Hobart, Australia, 19–24 March 2006; Leishman Associates: Hobart, Australia; 2006; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  21. Perez-Corona, M.T.; Sanchez-Martínez, M.; Valderrama, M.J.; Rodríguez, M.E.; Camara, C.; Madrid, Y. Selenium biotransformation’ by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus during white wine manufacture: Laboratory-scale experiments. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sanchez-Martínez, M.; da Silva, E.G.P.; Pérez-Corona, T.; Cámara, C.; Ferreira, S.L.C.; Madrid, Y. Selenite biotransformation during brewing. Evaluation by HPLC−ICP−MS. Talanta 2012, 88, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Middle European Brewing Analysis Commission (MEBAK); Band II.n Brautechnische Middle European Brewing Analysis Commission (MEBAK). Band II.n Brautechnische Analysenmethoden, 3rd ed.; Selbstverlag der MEBAK: Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kingston, H.M.; Jassie, L.B. Microwave energy for acid decomposition at elevated temperatures and pressures using biological and botanical samples. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2534–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lončarić, Z.; Ivezić, V.; Kerovec, D.; Rebekić, A. Foliar zinc-selenium and nitrogen fertilization affects content of Zn, Fe, Se, P, and Cd in wheat grain. Plants 2021, 10, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Špoljarić Maronić, D.; Žuna Pfeiffer, T.; Bek, N.; Štolfa Čamagajevac, I.; Galir Balkić, A.; Stević, F.; Maksimović, I.; Mihaljević, M.; Lončarić, Z. Distribution of selenium: A case study of the Drava, Danube and associated aquatic biotopes. Chemosphere 2024, 354, 141596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Beisler, N.; Sandmann, M. Integration of Arthrospira platensis (spirulina) into the brewing process to develop new beers with unique sensory properties. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 918772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Carnovale, G.; Leivers, S.; Rosa, F.; Norli, H.-R.; Hortemo, E.; Wicklund, T.; Horn, S.J.; Skjånes, K. Starch-Rich Microalgae as an Active Ingredient in Beer Brewing. Foods 2022, 11, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rocha de Souza, M.C.; Marques, C.T.; Guerra Dore, C.M.; Ferreira da Silva, F.R.; Oliveira Rocha, H.A.; Leite, E.L. Antioxidant activities of sulfated polysaccharides from brown and red seaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 2007, 19, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Saluri, M.; Robal, M.; Tuvikene, R. Hybrid carrageenans as beer wort fining agents. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 86, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poreda, A.; Sterczyńska, M.; Jakubowski, M.; Zdaniewicz, M. Klarowanie brzeczki piwnej przy użyciu karagenu–aspekty technologiczne i jakościowe. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk. Rolniczych 2014, 576, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaishankar, M.; Tseten, T.; Anbalagan, N.; Mathew, B.; Beeregowda, K. Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Raknuzzaman, M.; Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M.; Islam, M.K. Heavy Metal Pollution in Surface Water and Sediment: A Preliminary Assessment of an Urban River in a Developing Country. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Odobašić, A.; Šestan, I.; Begić, S. Biosensors for Determination of Heavy Metals in Waters. In Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring; BoD—Books on Demand: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  35. Dehbi, M.; Dehbi, F.; Kanjal, M.I.; Tahraoui, H.; Zamouche, M.; Amrane, A.; Assadi, A.A.; Hadadi, A.; Mouni, L. Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Macroalgae from Surface Waters in Djelfa, Algeria. Water 2023, 15, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi, R.; Malekabadi, M.; Rahimi, R.; Johari, S.A. Aquatic Pollution Caused by Mercury, Lead, and Cadmium Affects Cell Growth and Pigment Content of Marine Microalga, Nannochloropsis oculata. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pan, L.; Fang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Su, B.; Li, D.; Xiang, B. Potentially Toxic Element Pollution Levels and Risk Assessment of Soils and Sediments in the Upstream River, Miyun Reservoir, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chugh, M.; Kumar, L.; Shah, M.P.; Bharadvaja, N. Algal bioremediation of heavy metals: An insight into removal mechanisms, recovery of by-products, challenges, and future opportunities. Energy Nexus 2022, 7, 100129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. World Health Organization: Exposure To Arsenic: A Major Public Health Concern. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/food-safety/arsenic/who-ced-phe-epe-19-4-1-eng.pdf (accessed on 9 September 2024).
  40. De Nicola, R.; Walker, G.M. Accumulation and cellular distribution of zinc by brewing yeast. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009, 44, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. van Voorst, F.; Houghton-Larsen, J.; Jønson, L.; Kielland-Brandt, M.C.; Brandt, A. Genome-wide identification of genes required for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under ethanol stress. Yeast 2006, 23, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Raj, S.B.; Ramaswamy, S.; Plapp, B.V. Yeast alcohol dehydrogenase structure and catalysis. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 5791–5803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Figueira, M.M.; Volesky, B.; Mathieu, H.J. Instrumental Analysis Study of Iron Species Biosorption by Sargassum Biomass. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 1840–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fourest, E.; Canal, C.; Roux, J.-C. Improvement of Heavy Metal Biosorption by Mycelial Dead Biomasses (Rhizopus arrhizus, Mucor miehei and Penicillium chrysogenum): PH Control and Cationic Activation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 14, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khoo, K.-M.; Ting, Y.-P. Biosorption of Gold by Immobilized Fungal Biomass. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001, 8, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brinza, L.; Dring, M.J.; Gavrilescu, M. Marine Micro and Macro Algal Species as Biosorbents for Heavy Metals. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2007, 6, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ordóñez, J.I.; Wong-Pinto, L.; Cortés, S. Biotecnología Aplicada a La Valorización de Relaves Mineros. In Economía Circular en Procesos Mineros; Cisternas, L., Gálvez, E., Rivas, M., Valderrama, J., Eds.; RIL Editores: Santiago, Chile, 2021; pp. 63–91. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheng, P.X.; Ting, Y.-P.; Chen, J.P.; Hong, L. Sorption of Lead, Copper, Cadmium, Zinc, and Nickel by Marine Algal Biomass: Characterization of Biosorptive Capacity and Investigation of Mechanisms. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Królak, K.; Kobus, K.; Kordialik-Bogacka, E. Effects on beer colloidal stability of full-scale brewing with adjuncts, enzymes, and finings. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2023, 249, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Basic physical–chemical indicators of produced beers.
Table 1. Basic physical–chemical indicators of produced beers.
Quality IndicatorUnitAlgae BeerControl Beer
Specific gravitymg/L1.02935 a ± 0.000121.02495 b ± 0.00010
Real extract%8.70 a ± 0.17.60 b ± 0.2
Original extract (wort)°P14.30 a ± 0.512.80 b ± 0.3
Apparent extract%7.40 a ± 0.16.30 b ± 0.1
Alcohol content%3.80 a ± 0.453.55 b ± 0.23
Polyphenol contentmg/L513 b ± 1590 a ± 1
pH 4.25 a ± 0.024.07 b ± 0.05
BitternessIBU42 a ± 142 a ± 1
ColorEBC100 a ± 298 a ± 1
Means ± SD; a, b within rows with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05); IBU—international bitterness unit.
Table 2. Results of metal analysis in alga F. virsoides dry matter.
Table 2. Results of metal analysis in alga F. virsoides dry matter.
MetalSMgPKCaCrMnFeCoNiCuZnAsSeMoCdHgPb
Beer/Unitmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lµg/Lmg/Lmg/Lµg/Lµg/Lmg/Lmg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/Lµg/L
Control113.45 b148.55 b300.05 b903.10 b98.22 b1.03 a1.01 b0.23 b0.19 b7.690.07 a0.07 a0.42 b1.72 a28.71 a0.19 b<LOD0.98 a
Algae179.9 a188.40 a361.05 a1140.50 b149.05 a1.67 a1.26 a0.72 a2.30 a15.520.03 b0.49 b77.94 b1.77 a26.98 b0.91 a<LOD1.05 a
Table 3. Results of metal analysis in produced beer.
Table 3. Results of metal analysis in produced beer.
MetalSMgPKCaCrMnFeCoNiCuZnAsSeMoCdHgPb
Sample/Unitmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgµg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kg
Algae (dry matter)23,855.009167.001290.5024,035.0018,305.00572.7072.4086.971215.002685.002.4419.5925,390.0036.32264.12484.544.31328.68
Table 4. Results of metal analysis in yeast biomass after fermentation (spent yeast).
Table 4. Results of metal analysis in yeast biomass after fermentation (spent yeast).
MetalSMgPKCaCrMnFeCoNiCuZnAsSeMoCdHgPb
Yeast/Unitmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgµg/kgmg/kgmg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kgµg/kg
Control535.65 a530.95 a2421.50 a3298.50 a813.35 a4.99 b2.51 a41.80 b23.84 a113.90 b2.88 a34.46 a14.46 b13.38 a225.17 a27.73 a<LOD11.82 b
Algae375.00 b167.15 b489.70 b780.80 b655.00 b13.30 b1.57 b22.54 b24.59 a142.25 a2.15 b13.47 b44.78 a4.37 b165.61 b8.74 b<LOD32.66 a
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Habschied, K.; Lončarić, Z.; Jokić, S.; Aladić, K.; Krstanović, V.; Mastanjević, K. Characterization of Beer Produced with the Addition of Brown Macroalgae Fucus virsoides. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9594. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209594

AMA Style

Habschied K, Lončarić Z, Jokić S, Aladić K, Krstanović V, Mastanjević K. Characterization of Beer Produced with the Addition of Brown Macroalgae Fucus virsoides. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(20):9594. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Habschied, Kristina, Zdenko Lončarić, Stela Jokić, Krunoslav Aladić, Vinko Krstanović, and Krešimir Mastanjević. 2024. "Characterization of Beer Produced with the Addition of Brown Macroalgae Fucus virsoides" Applied Sciences 14, no. 20: 9594. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209594

APA Style

Habschied, K., Lončarić, Z., Jokić, S., Aladić, K., Krstanović, V., & Mastanjević, K. (2024). Characterization of Beer Produced with the Addition of Brown Macroalgae Fucus virsoides. Applied Sciences, 14(20), 9594. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop