An Experimental Study on the Sealing Mechanism of a Karst Pipeline by Dynamic Water Grouting
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Pilot Study on WEMS
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.1.1. Waterborne Epoxy Resin and Curing Agent
2.1.2. Nanoscale Magnetic Powders
2.1.3. Cement
2.1.4. Flocculants
2.1.5. Water-Reducing Agents
2.2. Test Program
2.3. Test Methods
2.3.1. Liquidity Testing
2.3.2. Compressive Strength Test
2.3.3. Adsorption Range Testing of Grouting Materials
2.3.4. Setting Time Test
2.4. Experimental Results
2.4.1. Liquidity Analysis
2.4.2. Adsorption Range Analysis
2.4.3. Setting Time Analysis
2.4.4. Compressive Strength Analysis
3. Dynamic Water Sealing Test Study
3.1. Experimental Systems
3.2. Experimental Scheme
3.3. Test Methods
3.3.1. Monitoring Data Acquisition
3.3.2. Slurry Retention Rate
3.4. Results and Discussion
Plugging Pressure Analysis
- (1)
- Calculate the sum of the test results under each factor condition, defined as ki;
- (2)
- Take the average value of the above Ki, defined as ki;
- (3)
- Calculate the extreme difference R using the difference between and and determine the degree of influence of each factor on the test index by the R-value.
- (1)
- With the increase in plugging length, the average pressure increased by 51.2% when the plugging length increased from 100 mm to 200 mm. When the plugging length increases from 200 mm to 300 mm, the average pressure increases by 29.7%. There is a significant positive correlation between plugging length and plugging pressure.
- (2)
- As the water–cement ratio increases, the plugging pressure decreases. As the water–cement ratio increases, the solid phase concentration decreases, so the slurry’s plastic viscosity and ultimate shear decrease, significantly reducing the contact force between the slurry and the pipeline, making the sealing effect of the slurry worse.
- (3)
- The plugging pressure also increases with the increase in the amount of Fe3O4 powder tragedy. When Fe3O4 powder tragedy increases, the plastic viscosity of the magnetic slurry reduces, and under the action of the external magnetic field, the slurry’s original loss of rheology viscosity will instantly increase, and the contact stress between the particles are used to enhance the angle of friction, thus making the magnetic slurry plugging shear capacity increase.
Factor | Water–Cement Ratio | Fe3O4 Power Ratio | Plugging Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|
K1 | 35.10 | 23.40 | 20.50 |
K2 | 32.90 | 30.50 | 31.00 |
K3 | 23.70 | 37.80 | 40.20 |
k1 | 11.70 | 7.800 | 6.83 |
k2 | 10.96 | 10.17 | 10.33 |
k3 | 7.900 | 12.60 | 13.40 |
Range | 3.80 | 4.80 | 6.57 |
Primary and secondary factor | Plugging length > Fe3O4 power ratio > water–cement ratio |
3.5. Analysis of Velocity of Dynamic Water and Dynamic Water Scour Resistance Effects
- (1)
- The velocity of dynamic water and the dynamic water scour resistance effect negatively correlate with the water–cement ratio. The water–cement ratio of the slurry affects its specific gravity, dynamic viscosity, and rheological properties. The smaller the water–cement ratio, the larger the specific gravity and dynamic viscosity of the slurry and the poorer the fluidity, and the sassafras force between the slurry and the pipe wall becomes larger, so it makes the velocity of dynamic water decrease, and the slurry retention rate becomes larger.
- (2)
- The velocity of dynamic water and dynamic water scouring resistance is negatively correlated with the amount of Fe3O4. As the amount of Fe3O4 increases, the number of magnetic powder particles wholly wrapped by the base liquid increases, and at the same time, under the effect of magnetic field magnetization, the instantaneous viscosity of the slurry increases and the contact force between the magnetic particles is enhanced, which means that the magnetic rod adsorption of the slurry attached to the body is also gradually increased; it not only enhances the slurry to the resistance of the water but also increases the slurry’s dynamic water scouring resistance effect.
- (3)
- The velocity of dynamic water and dynamic water scouring resistance effect positively correlate with the blocking length. Due to the increase in blocking length, the magnetic slurry adsorbed by the magnetic rod increases, so the slurry that impedes the water flow increases, the speed of the dynamic water scouring slurry slows down, and the slurry loss rate slows down so that the velocity of dynamic water decreases and the performance of the dynamic water scouring resistance enhances.
4. Analysis of the Shear-Resisting Mechanism of Magnetic Slurry Magnetized Blocking
4.1. Magnetic Field Magnetism Model
- (1)
- It is assumed that the slurry is homogeneous and is in a state of fully saturated magnetization;
- (2)
- It is assumed that the magnetic medium inside the magnet is homogeneous.
4.2. Derivation of Shear Strength Equations for Magnetic Slurries
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Experiments show that when the water–cement ratio of the new WEMS is 0.35–0.55 and the amount of Fe3O4 powder is 20–40%, the grouting sealing performance is the best.
- (2)
- The orthogonal test was carried out on the plugging law of the magnetic self-polymerizing slurry under high flow velocity and dynamic water conditions. The water plugging pressure, dynamic water flow rate, and slurry retention rate were selected as evaluation indexes, and the primary and secondary relationships of the influencing factors of each evaluation index were obtained by range analysis.
- (3)
- In the indoor experiment, the primary and secondary relationship between various factors and slurry plugging pressure was determined as plugging length > Fe3O4 power ratio > water–cement ratio. The water plugging pressure is positively correlated with the length of water plugging and the amount of Fe3O4 powder, and the water plugging pressure increases with its increase.
- (4)
- In the analysis of the dynamic water flow rate and the dynamic water anti-scouring effect, the dynamic water flow rate and slurry retention rate are most affected by the amount of Fe3O4 powder, followed by the plugging length, and the water–cement ratio has a minor effect. The new WEMS can effectively complete the long-distance plugging of karst pipelines.
- (5)
- The relationship between the shear strength and magnetic field strength, plugging length, and slurry ratio was established by analyzing the force of WEMS in the process of grouting plugging.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, S.C.; Xu, Z.H.; Huang, X.; Lin, P.; Zhao, X.C.; Zhang, Q.S.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H.F.; Pan, D.D. Classification, geological identification, hazard mode and typical case studies of hazard-causing structures for water and mud inrush in tunnels. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2018, 37, 1041–1069. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Lin, P.; Xing, H.; Pan, D.; Huang, X. Hydro-mechanical coupling response behaviors in tunnel subjected to a water-filled karst cave. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2021, 54, 3737–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.H.; Wang, W.Y.; Lin, P.; Nie, L.C.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.M. Hard-rock TBM jamming subject to adverse geological conditions: Influencing factor, hazard mode and a case study of Gaoligongshan Tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 108, 103683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, P.; Xiong, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W.; Shao, R. Risk assessment of TBM jamming based on Bayesian networks. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2022, 81, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Q.; Bu, Z.; Pan, D.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. An integrated evaluation method for the grouting effect in karst areas. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 2021, 25, 3186–3197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Bu, Z.; Pan, D.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y. A novel numerical method for grouting simulation in flowing water considering uneven spatial and temporal distribution of slurry: Two-Fluid Tracking (TFT) method. Comput. Geotech. 2022, 147, 104756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.T.; Zhang, C.; Wei, S.F.; Zhang, X.G.; Guo, S.H. Whole section anchor-grouting reinforcement technology and its application in underground roadways with loose and fractured surrounding rock. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 51, 133–143. [Google Scholar]
- Li, P.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Li, X.; Zuo, J. Grouting diffusion characteristics in faults considering the interaction of multiple grouting. Int. J. Geomech. 2017, 17, 04016117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sha, F.; Lin, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, R. Reinforcement simulation of water-rich and broken rock with Portland cement-based grout. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, Z.; Kang, H.; Yang, J. Discussion on grouting technology for crack rock mass. Coal Sci. Technol. 2005, 33, 63–66. [Google Scholar]
- Ruan, W.; Wang, W.; Hu, A. Development and application of new kind of cement composite grout. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2001, 23, 212–216. [Google Scholar]
- Ge, J. Development and prospect of chemical grouting techniques. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2006, 25 (Suppl. S2), 3384–3392. [Google Scholar]
- Bezuijen, A.; Grotenhuis, T.; Vantol, A.F. Analytical model for fracture grouting in sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2010, 137, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sui, W.H.; Liu, J.Y.; Hu, W.; Qi, J.F.; Zhan, K.Y. Experimental investigation on sealing efficiency of chemical grouting in rock fracture with flowing water. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2015, 50, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.P.; Liu, C.W.; Zhou, X.W. Full-scale physical modelling of fissure grouting in deep underground rocks. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 89, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, F.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Chen, H.M. A simplified model for predicting slurry flow in fracture channels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2017, 70, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Rong, Y. Saturated sand layer water flooding seepage grouting analysis. Geotech. Mech. 2009, 30, 2016–2020. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Lei, J.; Xia, L. Study on diffusion radius of power-law grout. Geomechanics 2005, 26, 1803–1806. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, K.; Sui, W.; Gao, Y. Single fracture hydrodynamic grouting diffusion model. Geomechanics 2011, 32, 1659–1663. [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, J.; Sui, W.; Wang, W. Correlation analysis between seepage pressure and water plugging effect of fracture grouting. Geotech. Mech. 2012, 33, 2650–2655. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q. Study on diffusion mechanism and sealing method of grouting water-stop slurry for water inrush in underground engineering. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2011, 30, 2377–2395. [Google Scholar]
- Rabinow, J. The magnetic fluid clutch. Electr. Eng. 1951, 67, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Guan, J.; Cheng, H. Preparation of polyethylene glycol coated carbonyl iron core-shell particles and properties of water-based magnetorheological fluid. J. Phys. Chem. 2005, 21, 817–821. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, J.D. Properties and Applications of Commercial Magnetorheological Fluids. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 1998, 10, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, S.H.; Prusty, B.G.; Pearce, G.; Kelly, D.; Thomson, R.S. Study of magnetorheological fluids towards smart energy absorption of composite structures for crashworthiness. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2016, 23, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.D.; Shen, Y.P.; Guo, Y.Q. Semi-active control of structures incorporated with magnetorheological dampers using neural networks. Smart Mater. Struct. 2003, 12, 80–87. [Google Scholar]
- Ghorbani, S.; Sharifi, S.; Rokhsarpour, H.; Shoja, S.; Gholizadeh, M.; Rahmatabad, M.A.D.; de Brito, J. Effect of magnetized mixing water on the fresh and hardened state properties of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete. Construct. Build. Mater. 2020, 248, 118660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ku, T.; Palanidoss, S.; Zhang, Y.; Moon, S.W.; Wei, X.; Huang, E.S.; Kumarasamy, J.; Goh, K.H. Practical configured microtremor array measurements (MAMs) for the geological investigation of underground space. Undergr. Space 2020, 6, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, R.; Zhao, Q.; Tian, W. Preparation and properties of unidirectional steel fiber reinforced cement slurry. J. Hebei Univ. Technol. 2012, 41, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
- Song, H.; Ding, Y. Review on the research methods of spatial distribution of steel fibers in concrete matrix. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 33, 768–775. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Yi, S.; Zhang, L.; Xu, R. Research status and development prospect of magnetized water cement concrete. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 37, 331–338. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, H.; Dai, X.; Zeng, X.; Liu, Y. Experimental Study on Reducing Dust Content of Shotcrete by Magnetized Water. J. Min. Saf. Eng. 2008, 03, 371–374. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Cai, X. Study on the sealing scheme of annular magnet pressure bonding for large diameter pipeline. New Technol. New Process 2012, 08, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Guo, J.; Yu, F.; Li, Z. Experimental Study on Reinforcement of Reef Limestone by Magnetic Anchoring System. Materials 2023, 16, 3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DL/T5126-2001; Test Code on Polymer-Modified Cement Martor. National Standard of China: Beijing, China, 2001.
Component | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | K2O | SO3 | Loss |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content% | 22.34 | 6.03 | 2.76 | 56.98 | 1.86 | 0.73 | 2.78 | 3.76 |
Serial Number | Cement/g | Water/g | Epoxy Resin/g | Curing Agent/g | Fe3O4 Powder/% | Flocculants/% | Water Reducer/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 100 | 35 | 12 | 10.2 | 20 | 7 | 0.8 |
2 | 100 | 35 | 12 | 10.2 | 30 | 7 | 0.8 |
3 | 100 | 35 | 12 | 10.2 | 40 | 7 | 0.8 |
4 | 100 | 45 | 12 | 10.2 | 20 | 7 | 0.8 |
5 | 100 | 45 | 12 | 10.2 | 30 | 7 | 0.8 |
6 | 100 | 45 | 12 | 10.2 | 40 | 7 | 0.8 |
7 | 100 | 55 | 12 | 10.2 | 20 | 7 | 0.8 |
8 | 100 | 55 | 12 | 10.2 | 30 | 7 | 0.8 |
9 | 100 | 55 | 12 | 10.2 | 40 | 7 | 0.8 |
Number | Fluidity/mm | Initial Setting Time/min | Final Setting Time/min | Adsorption Range/mm | Compressive Strength/MPa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 d | 14 d | 28 d | |||||
1 | 199.5 | 95.00 | 170.00 | 10.50 | 12.00 | 16.40 | 20.10 |
2 | 189.0 | 129.00 | 186.00 | 12.50 | 14.70 | 21.50 | 26.10 |
3 | 178.0 | 164.00 | 220.00 | 14.00 | 18.30 | 29.40 | 34.30 |
4 | 209.5 | 122.00 | 186.00 | 9.50 | 8.20 | 13.65 | 17.80 |
5 | 194.5 | 156.00 | 212.00 | 10.50 | 10.60 | 20.80 | 25.30 |
6 | 189.0 | 196.00 | 262.00 | 12.00 | 13.60 | 24.70 | 30.20 |
7 | 232.5 | 260.00 | 376.00 | 8.00 | 3.30 | 10.20 | 12.60 |
8 | 215.0 | 326.00 | 442.00 | 9.50 | 5.30 | 13.40 | 16.30 |
9 | 202.0 | 428.00 | 546.00 | 11.00 | 9.60 | 21.50 | 24.40 |
Name | Paperless Recorder | Electrical Flowmeter | Pressure Pickup |
---|---|---|---|
Model | SIN-R9600 | LD-DN25 | BX-131 |
Range | −999~R9600 | 1.2–12 m3/h | 0–1 MPa |
Precision | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
Output signal | 4–20 mA | 4–20 mA | 4–20 mA |
Measuring medium | Water, slurry, oil | Water, slurry, oil | Water, slurry, oil |
Factor Level | Slurry Type | Water Cement Ratio | Fe3O4 Power Ratio | Plugging Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WEMS | 0.35 | 20% | 100 |
2 | 0.45 | 30% | 200 | |
3 | 0.55 | 40% | 300 |
Test Number | Slurry Type | Water Cement Ratio | Fe3O4 Power Ratio | Plugging Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WEMS | 0.35 | 20% | 100 |
2 | 0.35 | 30% | 200 | |
3 | 0.35 | 40% | 300 | |
4 | 0.45 | 20% | 200 | |
5 | 0.45 | 30% | 300 | |
6 | 0.45 | 40% | 100 | |
7 | 0.55 | 20% | 300 | |
8 | 0.55 | 30% | 100 | |
9 | 0.55 | 40% | 200 |
Factor | Water–Cement Ratio | Fe3O4 Power Ratio | Plugging Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|
K1 | 0.521 | 0.540 | 0.484 |
K2 | 0.511 | 0.506 | 0.506 |
K3 | 0.486 | 0.473 | 0.528 |
k1 | 0.174 | 0.180 | 0.161 |
k2 | 0.170 | 0.169 | 0.169 |
k3 | 0.162 | 0.156 | 0.176 |
Range | 0.012 | 0.022 | 0.015 |
Primary and secondary factor | Fe3O4 power ratio > plugging length > water–cement ratio |
Factor | Water–Cement Ratio | Fe3O4 Power Ratio | Plugging Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|
K1 | 24.54 | 25.20 | 22.73 |
K2 | 23.43 | 23.24 | 23.76 |
K3 | 23.36 | 23.01 | 24.84 |
k1 | 8.18 | 8.40 | 7.58 |
k2 | 7.81 | 7.75 | 7.92 |
k3 | 7.79 | 7.67 | 8.28 |
Range | 0.39 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
Primary and secondary factor | Fe3O4 power ratio > plugging length > water–cement ratio |
Magnetic Field Strength | 14,000 GS | ||
---|---|---|---|
Fe3O4 power ratio | 20% | 30% | 40% |
Plugging length (mm) | 100 | 200 | 300 |
Water plugging pressure (kPa) | 6 | 11.4 | 17.7 |
Shear strength (kPa) | 2.69 | 7.62 | 13.71 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Peng, B. An Experimental Study on the Sealing Mechanism of a Karst Pipeline by Dynamic Water Grouting. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041381
Liu J, Liu S, Wang M, Peng B. An Experimental Study on the Sealing Mechanism of a Karst Pipeline by Dynamic Water Grouting. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(4):1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041381
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Jie, Shuai Liu, Mingyuan Wang, and Bo Peng. 2024. "An Experimental Study on the Sealing Mechanism of a Karst Pipeline by Dynamic Water Grouting" Applied Sciences 14, no. 4: 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041381
APA StyleLiu, J., Liu, S., Wang, M., & Peng, B. (2024). An Experimental Study on the Sealing Mechanism of a Karst Pipeline by Dynamic Water Grouting. Applied Sciences, 14(4), 1381. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14041381