Next Article in Journal
The Role of Macrophage Dynamics in Atherosclerosis Analyzed Using a Petri Net-Based Model
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Burdock and Black Radish Powders Obtained by Low-Temperature Drying in Emulsion-Type Hair Conditioners
Previous Article in Journal
On Integrating Time-Series Modeling with Long Short-Term Memory and Bayesian Optimization: A Comparative Analysis for Photovoltaic Power Forecasting
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Efficacy of a Cosmetic Preparation Containing Sheep Colostrum on Mature Skin: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kamchatka Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Pomace Bioferment as an Innovative Cosmetic Raw Material

1
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Interdisciplinary Doctoral School, Lodz University of Technology, 171/173 Wólczańska Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, 171/173 Wólczańska Street, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
3
Institute of Food Technology and Analysis, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, 2/22 Stefanowskiego Street, 90-537 Lodz, Poland
4
Lindsey Wilson College, 210 Lindsey Wilson Street, Columbia, KY 42728, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(8), 3218; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083218
Submission received: 11 March 2024 / Revised: 8 April 2024 / Accepted: 9 April 2024 / Published: 11 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Development of Innovative Cosmetics)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Method of producing bioferment from fruit waste for use in the food industry, cosmetics industry and dietary supplements, by fermentation with environmental strains.

Abstract

Kamchatka berries (Lonicera caerulea L.) are known for their high content of phenolic compounds or vitamins, which is reflected in their antibacterial, detoxifying and anti-inflammatory properties. They are used in the production of jams, juices, wines and as natural dye. A bioferment was prepared from the pomace of the Kamchatka berry varieties Aurora and Indigo Gem and the strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, which was used to prepare a cosmetic preparation with a concentration of 5% in accordance with the guidelines of the COSMOS certification body. We conducted physico-chemical and organoleptic analyses and bioactive profile characterisation (UHPLC-DAD and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS). The results showed that the presence of caffeic acid (4.47 ± 0.07 mg/100 g) was detected after fermentation of Kamchatka berry pomace. In addition, vitamin C content increased by 141% after fermentation. The results of stability tests showed that in the process of physico-chemical analysis of the cosmetic preparation with bioferment of Kamchatka berry pomace, the pH should oscillate in the range of 4.38–4.76 ± 0.01. Stability tests showed that the cosmetic should be protected from high temperatures and UV radiation and proved that the product is stable under changing conditions, resulting in lower transport and storage costs.

1. Introduction

Kamchatka berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) is one of the most ecologically important species. It is found mainly in the northern hemisphere, in countries such as Russia, Canada, Japan and China [1].
The fruits of the Kamchatka berry (Lonicera caerulea var. kamtschatica) are characterised by a blue-violet colouring of the skin, and an ellipsoid cylindrical or slightly oval shape. They contain sugars such as glucose and fructose and minerals such as potassium, iron and calcium. They also contain organic acids such as citric acid, malic acid and phytic acid. Kamchatka berries owe their fame to their high content of biologically active compounds, including phenolic compounds or vitamins, which translates into their antibacterial, detoxifying and anti-inflammatory properties. In the food industry, they are mainly used in the production of jams, juices, tinctures, wines and as natural colourings [2]. In contrast, no data were found in the literature on the use of Kamchatka berry pomace in cosmetic technology.
Bioferments are preparations produced from natural raw materials by a fermentation process using appropriate strains of bacteria and/or yeast [3,4]. They are mainly obtained by fermentation using lactic fermentation bacteria of the genus Levilactobacillus, with the strains used showing potential probiotic activity [5]. Fermentation increases the bioactivity of raw materials by breaking down high-molecular compounds into low-molecular compounds, so that fermented raw materials have a better effect on skin and hair than non-fermented raw materials [6]. The use of fermentation also refers to the enrichment of organoleptic properties such as colour or aroma [7,8]. The range of applications of bioferments includes skin whitening, antioxidant, anti-aging, moisturising and anti-allergic properties [9,10].
The use of biomass waste from the agri-food industry has attracted the attention of researchers in many fields. Pomace, once used exclusively for the production of alcoholic beverages, vinegar or animal feed, now represents a potential for reuse as a valuable raw material [11]. In addition to their biological and chemical properties, plant biomass wastes are also a rich source of wild microorganisms with interesting fermentation capabilities and faster adaptation to less favourable environmental conditions [12].
A bioferment using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strains was prepared from pomace of Kamchatka berry varieties Aurora and Indigo Gem. The formulation was used to formulate a cosmetic paste on a commercial COSMOS certified shampoo base [13,14].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material consists of blue honeysuckle pomace, which is considered waste. Extrudates of the Kamchatka berry of the Aurora variety were obtained from cultivation in Łagiewniki, Poland.
The Aurora and Indigo Gem varieties were harvested in July 2022. The pressing of the fruit took place in the company “Dar Ogrodu” Błaszki, Poland.

2.2. Microorganisms

Microorganisms isolated in August 2022 and identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei lactic acid fermentation bacteria were used for the study. The microorganisms were isolated from the pomace of the Kamchatka berry cultivars Aurora and Indigo Gem by Weronika Majchrzak in August 2022.

2.3. Physico-Chemical Tests

To check the basic physico-chemical parameters, pH (METTLER TOLEDO Five Essay Plus FP20), water activity (AQUALAB) and sugar content (ATC TESSATM) were measured.

2.4. Organoleptic Tests

In order to observe the changes in the plant material during fermentation, an organoleptic evaluation was carried out, describing colour, aroma and texture.

2.5. Microbiological Tests

2.5.1. Agar Bacteria Cultures

Lactic acid fermentation bacterial cultures were performed on MRS Agar GranuCult® medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This medium is used for enrichment, cultivation and isolation of all Lactobacillus species from all types of material. Agar 12 g/L, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2 g/L, D(+)-glucose 20 g/L, magnesium sulphate (equivalent to 0.2 g/L heptahydrate) 0.1 g/L, manganous sulphate monohydrate 0.05 g/L, meat extract 5 g/L, sodium acetate 5 g/L, triammonium citrate 2 g/L, universal peptone 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L.
Preparation: Suspend 61.15 g in 1000 mL distilled water containing 1 mL polysorbate 80 (TWEEN® 80; Sigma P8074). Boil to complete dissolution and mix thoroughly. Sterilise by autoclaving at 15 lbs pressure (121 °C) for 15 min. Adjust pH with glacial acetic acid after sterilisation if necessary.

2.5.2. Agar Yeast Cultures

Yeast cultures were performed on Sabouraud 4% dextrose agar GranuCult® (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This medium is used for the cultivation of fungi. Composition of the medium: casein peptone 5.0 g/L, meat peptone 5.0 g/L, D(+)glucose 40.0 g/L, agar 15.0 g/L.
Preparation: Suspend 65 g in 1000 mL. Boil to complete dissolution and mix thoroughly. Sterilise by autoclaving at 15 lbs pressure (121 °C) for 15 min.

2.5.3. Inoculum Preparation

The inoculum for lactic acid fermentation bacteria was cultivated in MRS broth medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This medium is used for the cultivation of lactic acid bacteria of the species Lactobacillus. Medium composition: Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2 g/L, D(+)-glucose 20 g/L, magnesium sulfate (equivalent to 0.2 g/L heptahydrate) 0.1 g/L, manganous sulfate monohydrate 0.05 g/L, meat extract 5 g/L, sodium acetate 5 g/L, triammonium citrate 2 g/L, universal peptone 10 g/L, yeast extract 5 g/L.
Preparation: Suspend 50 g in 1000 mL distilled water containing 1 mL polysorbate 80 (TWEEN® 80; Sigma P8074). Boil to complete dissolution and mix thoroughly. Sterilise by autoclaving at 15 lbs pressure (121 °C) for 15 min.
The yeast inoculum was cultivated on YPG medium (BTL, Lodz, Poland). The medium is used for yeast cultivation. Composition: yeast extract 10 g/L, peptone 20 g/L, glucose 20 g/L.
Preparation: Suspend 50 g in 1000 mL distilled water. Boil to dissolve the medium completely and mix thoroughly. Sterilise by autoclaving at 15 lbs pressure (121 °C) for 15 min.
Single colonies were picked from the slanting surfaces of the MRS or Sabouraud agar medium using a sterile swab in liquid MRS or YPG medium, respectively; the volume of the medium was 10 mL. The inoculum thus prepared was incubated at 30 ± 1 °C for 24 h. After this time, the number of cfu/mL was checked using a Thom chamber. The target inoculum should be 106 cfu/mL.

2.6. Production of Bioferment

The method of Bioferment production is described in patent application no. P.444531 at the Polish Patent Office. For this purpose, 75 g ± 0.1 g of fresh grape marc (Aurora and Indigo Gem varieties were mixed in a ratio of 1:1) was weighed, to which 75 g ± 0.1 g of water was added at near room temperature (in the range of 22 ± 1 °C), the sample was mixed by shaking several times. Then, 0.75 mL of inoculum in MRS medium of the bacterial strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei with a cell count of 106 cfu/mL and 0.75 mL of inoculum in YPG medium of the yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae were added. The sample was mixed by inversion several times. The inoculated sample was placed in an incubator under controlled conditions at a temperature of 22 ± 1 °C for a period of 5 days. The resulting pre-bioferment was then decanted into sterile 50 mL Falcon-type tubes and placed in an EppendorfTM Centrifuge 5804 R bench-top centrifuge, rotation 4200 rpm, time 10 min. The supernatant and the solid fraction were collected. The solid fraction was separated from the supernatant by pouring it into sterile falcons. The isolated solid fraction was then analysed for its polyphenolic content, including anthocyanins, vitamins, water activity, and subjected to physico-chemical and organoleptic tests.

2.7. Freeze-Drying

The solid fraction of the bioferment and the pomace (Indigo Gem and Aurora 1:1) were freeze-dried according to the method described in patent application no. P.443438 (Polish Patent Office). After testing, 440 g of the sample was freeze-dried in a Labconco™ Triad freeze dryer, model: 794001030, nXDS Edwards dry spiral vacuum pump. The pomace tray was placed in the freeze dryer in manual mode, followed by a temperature setting of −15 °C. After approximately 2.5 h, the sample was placed in the freeze dryer and the pressure in the freeze dryer was set to 0.15 Pa and the temperature to −10 °C. The sample was freeze-dried for a period of 24 h, after which the storage temperature was set at 30 °C and the raw material was heated under these conditions for approximately 24 h to prevent it from absorbing moisture from the environment.
The freeze-dried material obtained was subjected to grinding in a mortar to obtain the raw material in powder form, which was analysed for phenolic compounds, including anthocyanins, sugars and vitamins, and subjected to physico-chemical and organoleptic tests.

2.8. Chromatographic Analysis of Vitamins and Phenolic Compounds (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS)

Ultra-high performance reversed-phase liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) was used to determine the content of vitamin C and B vitamins (B1, B2, B3 and B6) in the samples [15,16,17].
Ultra-high performance reversed-phase liquid chromatography with spectrophoto-metric detection (UHPLC-DAD) and tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) were used to identify and analyse the polyphenolic content of the samples [18,19].

2.8.1. Sample Preparation

Samples were weighed (0.1 ± 0.01 g) into 100 mL glass bottles and 25 mL of distilled water was added. The bottles were closed with screw caps and placed in a shaking water bath at 60 °C. The extraction process was carried out at 60 °C for 20 min. After this time, the samples were immediately cooled to 20 °C and centrifuged at this temperature for 10 min at 4800 rpm. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.2 μm nylon syringe filter into glass autosampler vials. Samples were stored at −20 °C until UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis.

2.8.2. UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analytical Conditions for Vitamins

The analysis of B vitamins in the samples was performed using a Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometry system (Thermo Scientific™) coupled to a Thermo Scientific™ Transcend™ TLX-1 high-resolution UHPLC liquid chromatograph. An Acclaim™ Polar Advantage II HPLC column (2.1 × 150 mm, 3 µm) was used for the separation of vitamin C compounds. The following separation parameters were used for the compounds analysed: column temperature—40 °C, mobile phase flow—0.25 mL/min, gradient elution, mobile phase A—0.015% aqueous formic acid solution, mobile phase B—mixture of methanol and acetonitrile (v/v, 20:80), sample injection volume—10 μL. The following gradient elution programme was used: initial conditions 100% A and 0% B; 0–4 min, 100% A and 0% B; 4–10 min, 55% A, 45% B; 10–11 min, 0% A, 100% B; 11–12 min, 0% A, 100% B; 12–15 min, 100% A, 0% B; 15–18 min, 100% A, 0% B. ESI-MS/MS analysis conditions: capillary voltage—4000 V in positive ion scanning mode, capillary temperature—250 °C, drying gas temperature—350 °C, drying and collision gas—nitrogen, drying and collision gas flow rates—10 and 8 L/min, collision energy—25 eV, mass spectrum sweep range—50–50 m/z.
Full MS and MS2 fragmentation spectra were monitored in the m/z range of 50 to 750. MS2 fragmentation spectra were obtained in Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) mode using High Resolution Collisional Dissociation (HCD). Qexactive Tune 2.1, Aria 1.3.6 and Thermo Xcalibur software were used to control, record and analyse the results obtained.
Identification of B vitamins was based on comparison of retention times, UV-VIS spectra, full mass spectra (ESI-MS) and fragmentation spectra (MS/MS) of analytes with available standards. An external standard method was used to determine the concentration of vitamins C, B1, B2, B3 and B6.

2.8.3. UHPLC-DAD Analytical Conditions for Phenolic Compounds

UHPLC-DAD analyses of the samples were performed on a Dionex UltiMate 3000 high-resolution UHPLC liquid chromatograph equipped with a diode array detector (DAD). An Accucore™ C18 column (2.6 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm) was used for reversed-phase separation of the compounds identified. Phase A was a 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid and phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The column was thermostatted at 30 °C. Gradient elution was used with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The separation programme was as follows: 0–8 min, 1–5% B; 8–15 min, 5–8% B; 15–20 min, 8–10% B; 20–25 min, 10–15% B; 25–35 min, 15–20% B; 35–40 min, 20–25% B; 40–50 min, 25–90% B; 50–53 min, 90% B; 53–58 min, 90-1% B; and finally the initial conditions were maintained for 7 min until the column was rebalanced. The volume of sample injected was 10 μL. Spectrophotometric detection was performed at different wavelengths: flavan-3-ols, hydroxybenzoic acids—280 nm, hydroxycinnamic acids—320 nm, flavonols—365 nm and anthocyanins—520 nm. To control, record and analyse the results obtained.

2.8.4. UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analytical Conditions for Phenolic Compounds

UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS analyses of the samples were performed using a Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometry system (Thermo Scientific™) coupled to a Thermo Scientific™ Transcend™ TLX-1 high-resolution UHPLC liquid chromatograph. An Accucore™ C18 column (2.6 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm) was used to separate the compounds identified in a reversed-phase system. Phase A was a 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid and phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. The column was thermostatted at 30 °C. Gradient elution was used with a mobile phase flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The separation programme was identical to the UHPLC-DAD analysis. The volume of the sample injected was 10 μL. The following ESI-MS/MS analytical conditions were used: capillary voltage—4500 V in negative ion scanning mode and 4500 V in positive ion scanning mode, capillary temperature—325 °C, gas drying temperature—400 °C, drying and collision gas—nitrogen, drying gas flow—10 L/min, Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) mode, collision energy—25 eV, resolution—35,000. Full MS and MS2 fragmentation spectra were monitored in the m/z range of 50 to 750. MS2 fragmentation spectra were obtained in Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) mode using High Resolution Collisional Dissociation (HCD). Qexactive Tune 2.1, Aria 1.3.6 and Thermo Xcalibur software were used to control, record and analyse the results obtained.
Polyphenolic compounds present in the samples were identified based on retention times, UV-VIS spectra, full mass spectra (ESI-MS) and fragmentation spectra (MS/MS) compared with available standards and literature data.
Quantitative analysis was performed using calibration curves of standard solutions of polyphenolic compounds. Based on the obtained chromatograms of standard solutions, the concentration dependence was plotted as a function of the peak area of the standard compound.

2.9. Preparation of Cosmetic Mass

After analysis of the freeze-dried solid fraction of the bioferment, it was used as an ingredient in the cosmetic formulation of a natural shampoo. For this purpose, 950 g of unperfumed COSMOS-certified, commercially available shampoo base was measured, a dipole was placed, and a magnetic stirrer was switched on. Then, 50 g of the freeze-dried solid fraction of the bioferment was added to the base (the content of the additional ingredient in the compound recommended by the manufacturer is up to 5%) and stirred for 10 min. The cosmetic mass thus prepared was poured into sterile 15 mL vials and further tested.
Composition: Aqua, Aloe vera leaf juice, decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside, xanthan gum, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, citric acid.

2.10. Stability Testing

One method of assessing stability is to expose samples to different temperature conditions to accelerate the changes that occur in a normal environment. Such a test makes it possible to predict the stability and the effect of temperature on the cosmetic mass. The relationship is described by the Arrhenius equation [20], which shows that a 10 °C increase in temperature doubles the reaction rate, resulting in faster transformations. To this end, stability tests were carried out on a natural shampoo manufactured with the addition of bioferment. The tests lasted 12 weeks, during which the cosmetic was exposed to increased temperature (40 ± 1 °C), decreased temperature (5 ± 1 °C), UV light (UV lamp) and room temperature (21 ± 1 °C).
Temperature variations during transport or storage can significantly affect the stability of a cosmetic product. In order to accurately determine the stability to temperature changes, a so-called shock test is performed in which the cosmetic product is exposed to elevated temperature conditions (40 ± 1 °C) for 24 h, followed by reduced temperature conditions (5 ± 1 °C) for 24 h and elevated temperature conditions (40 ± 1 °C) for the last 24 h. A further shock test is carried out in a similar manner, but the cosmetic product is first exposed to a reduced temperature and then to an increased temperature.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with three replicates for each sample (n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Bioferment

3.1.1. Physico-Chemical Analysis

The pH, total sugars and water activity were measured in triplicate for Kamchatka berry pomace of the Aurora and Indigo Gem varieties (mixed in a ratio of 1:1), the solid fraction of the bioferment, and for the freeze-dried pomace and the solid fraction of the bioferment. The average results of the measurements together with the standard deviation are given in the table below.
The data in Table 1 show that the pH changed after the fermentation process: there was a decrease of 0.08 ± 0.01. The content of monosaccharides also decreased, which means that the microorganisms inoculated in the bioferment used sugars as a carbon source in the fermentation process, and their low content in the bioferment (0.12 g/100 g ± 0.02) shows that 5 days is the optimal fermentation time.
The activity of the water in the bioferment increased due to the dissolution of the pomace in water before the fermentation process, which translates into better conditions for lactic bacteria and yeast to carry out the fermentation process. High water activity also increases the likelihood of negative effects of external factors on the solid fraction of the bioferment, such as microbial contamination, negative effects of environmental factors such as heat or UV radiation, so this fraction was freeze-dried. The water activity in the freeze-dried fraction was reduced by more than 87% (0.770 ± 0.02), resulting in a much higher stability of the formulation.

3.1.2. Organoleptic Analysis

The organoleptic analysis was carried out in a special room designed for this type of analysis by an independent assessor experienced in this type of testing.
Aroma, colour and texture were assessed. The first differences between the pomace (Figure 1) and the solid fraction of the bioferment (Figure 2) were already evident in the changes in aroma, as the laboratory technician noted that the lactic acid in the bioferment was palpable, which can be translated into the next parameter, colour, since the high content of anthocyanins gives colour to the raw material and the change in pH due to lactic fermentation directly affects the change in colour (Table 2).
The results collected in the table also show that the freeze-drying process does not lead to a change in the aroma palette, neither in the pomace nor in the solid fraction of the bioferment (Figure 3), which is very beneficial. The colour change in the freeze-dried product is also related to the pH, as it was lower than in the samples not subjected to freeze drying. The process also affected the consistency, which is technologically more suitable for the mass production of cosmetics, as it is homogeneous. This is due to the fact that freeze-dried samples do not contain plant parts such as seeds, peels and stem fragments.

3.1.3. Analysis of Bioactive Compounds

Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8 show that Kamchatka berry pomace and the solid fraction of the bioferment are a source of many bioactive compounds, including phenolic compounds, including anthocyanins, and B vitamins and vitamin C.
The fermentation process influences the profile of bioactive compounds in Kamchatka berry pomace. Table 3 summarises the results of the content analysis of caffeic acid (CA) and its derivatives: 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA), 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA), p-coumaric acid (p-CuA), 3,4-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3,4-DiCQA) caffeic acid derivative (CA derivative). After fermentation, 4.47 ± 0.07 mg/100 g caffeic acid (CA) was determined, which was not found in the pomace, and a 484% increase in caffeic acid derivative (CA derivative) was observed. A decrease of 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (5-CQA) by more than 91%, 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA) by 31%, p-coumaric acid (p-CuA) by 94% and 3,4-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (3,4-DiCQA) by 91% was also observed in the solid fraction of the bioferment compared to the pomace.
The fermentation process also decreased vanillic acid (VA), syringic acid (SA) and ellagic acid (EA) by about 17%, 58% and 63%, respectively, while protocatechuic acid (PCA) increased by about 50%. Gallic acid (GA) and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) were not affected by fermentation.

3.2. Cosmetic Mass

3.2.1. Physico-Chemical and Organoleptic Analysis

The pH measurement and organoleptic analysis (Table 9) showed that the addition of the bioferment to the cosmetic mass lowered its pH by 1.15 ± 0.1, which means that the bioferment acidifies the environment of the cosmetic formulation, so in addition to a number of bioactive properties, it can also act as a pH regulator.
Organoleptic evaluation (Table 9) showed that the bioferment had a positive effect on the sensory profile of the cosmetic compound, enriching its aroma (floral, wine) and giving it a more attractive colour, without altering its consistency.

3.2.2. Stability Tests

Stability tests were carried out on the cosmetic preparation with the addition of the freeze-dried bioferment solid fraction (Table 10) and the cosmetic base (Table 11) from which the formulation was made, in order to check whether the bioferment was responsible for any changes in mass or whether the formulation of the cosmetic base was also affected.
After 12 weeks of analysis, it was found that the cosmetic formulation with the freeze-dried solid fraction of the bioferment showed the least changes for samples placed under reduced temperature conditions (5 ± 1 °C), the pH value decreased by 0.13 ± 0.01, while the other parameters showed no change.
Samples incubated at elevated temperature (40 ± 1 °C) and exposed to UV light showed the greatest changes, with pH increasing by 0.37 ± 0.01 (elevated temperature) and 0.21 ± 0.01 (UV). In both cases, the aroma changed adversely, cosmetic ingredients were detectable and the colour changed from violet-pink to yellow (UV) and orange (elevated temperature).
At room temperature (21 ± 1 °C), the pH did not change significantly, increasing by only 0.03 ± 0.01. The aroma changed from a floral, wine, aroma to a less floral, wine aroma. The most significant change was in colour from violet-pink to red-orange (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Stability tests carried out on the cosmetic base without the freeze-dried bioferment solid fraction showed that the cosmetic mass itself also changes at a given time and under given conditions. The first changes in the mass were observed much earlier than in the mass with the bioferment, as early as week 3, when the aroma changed to odourless under elevated temperature (40 ± 1 °C) and UV radiation, and the colour changed from yellow to straw in the test at UV radiation. The aroma of raw materials appeared in the base after 4 weeks in a test at elevated temperature (40 ± 1 °C).
After 12 weeks, the pH of the sample decreased by 0.12 ± 0.01 at reduced temperature (5 ± 1 °C), increased by 0.24 ± 0.01 at elevated temperature (40 ± 1 °C), decreased by 0.26 ± 0.01 at UV radiation and decreased by 0.07 ± 0.01 at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C).
Shock tests (Table 12) have shown that both the cosmetic base and the shampoos produced are stable under varying temperature conditions, which translates into stability during storage and transport.

4. Discussion

Comparing the data obtained, the highest content of the anthocyanin group was shown by cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in Kamchatka berry pomace. It has been confirmed in the literature that Kamchatka berry is the main source of this phenolic compound. Depending on the variety, it ranges from 68 to 649 mg/100 g fresh fruit weight. From the data obtained, it was 1653.80 ± 0.15 mg/100 g in the pomace before freeze drying. This shows that the pomace, which is the waste product in this case, is more valuable than the fruit itself [21]. During the fermentation process, the content of polyphenols, especially those in complex form, can change. It has been reported in the literature that after the fermentation process, the composition showed a higher amount of lower molecular weight flavonoid derivatives (di- and triglycerides) as well as flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic aglycones than in fresh Pak Choi and Chinese mustard leaves [22]. After fermentation, the content of flavonoid derivatives and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives decreases, but the total polyphenol content increases due to the release of bound sugar groups and the formation of free hydroxyl groups. Simpler hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (e.g., caffeoylquinic acid) were more stable under fermentation conditions, whereas the more complex derivatives were more easily degraded [22]. Referring to the above scientific reports, it can be concluded that the formation of caffeic acid after fermentation may have been due to the breakdown of the caffeic acid derivative 5-O-cavoylquinic acid, while the increase in 3-O-cavoylquinic acid may indicate that it is more stable and does not degrade during the fermentation process. In addition, the presence of 4.47 ± 0.07 mg/100 g of caffeic acid, which had not been demonstrated before fermentation, was shown after fermentation of pomace of the Kamchatka berry cultivars Indigo Gem and Aurora. In cosmetic products, caffeic acid and its derivatives are potent active ingredients in the treatment of skin diseases, as they exhibit a range of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. In addition, they have been shown to have anti-wrinkle effects in vivo [23]. The effect of the fermentation process on gallic acid content has not been demonstrated. This compound has excellent properties in cosmetic terms, such as strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and anticancer effects. Gallic acid and its derivatives are widely used in many therapeutic preparations, e.g., as a substitute for hydrocortisone in children with atopic dermatitis. This compound has USFDA GRAS status showing low systemic toxicity and associated mortality at high concentrations in many experimental models [24]. The most common polyphenolic substances are phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes or lignans. Many studies have confirmed that various polyphenolic substances have anti-glycaemic functions in vivo and in vitro. This is related to the structure of flavonoids, which contain three benzene rings and an -OH group, giving them antioxidant properties, which may be related to the anti-glycation properties of flavonoids [25].
Antioxidants in the form of plant extracts not only have the function of protecting the cosmetic preparation from oxidative processes, but also have an excellent effect on skin physiology. Studies by many authors show that plant extracts, e.g., oils and ethanolic extracts of lavender, have a free radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) of 90–93%, while synthetic BHA (hydroxybenzoic acid) has a free radical scavenging capacity (DPPH) of 95–98% [26,27,28,29]. However, it is important to note that antioxidant activity varies from one natural resource to another. Furthermore, this factor is influenced by many other parameters such as climate and soil conditions or harvest time, which makes standardisation of natural products very difficult. Due to their ability to inhibit oxidation processes and the growth of microorganisms, including many pathogenic ones such as Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli, natural antioxidants are increasingly used as natural preservatives, e.g., in foods. In recent years, much evidence has been published that they increase the stability of edible oils, carotenoid colours and fruit juice flavourings, successfully replacing artificial preservatives and stabilisers. This is not only for environmental or economic reasons, but also because they have a positive impact on human health [30,31].
Vitamins are used as active ingredients in cosmetic products. According to the Overview of Ingredients Used in Cosmetic Products, B vitamins are a group of water-soluble vitamins that are used in cosmetics for their beneficial properties in dermatological care (i.e., skin and hair conditioners, antiseborrheic, antistatic and emollient properties). As a result, these groups of compounds are included in cosmetic formulations as high value-added cosmetic ingredients. In addition to its dermatological properties, riboflavin (vitamin B2) can also be used as a cosmetic colouring agent and its maximum allowable concentration is limited by the European Cosmetics Regulation (EU Regulation 1223/2009) [32]. The vitamin C content of the biofermentable solid fraction of Kamchatka berry pomace increased dramatically (141%) compared to the pomace before the fermentation process. As one of the most potent antioxidants, vitamin C has been shown to protect the skin against photo-aging, UV-induced immunosuppression and photocarcinogenesis. It also has anti-ageing effects by increasing collagen synthesis, stabilising collagen fibres and reducing collagen degradation. It reduces the formation of melanin, thus reducing pigmentation, i.e., it acts as a bleaching agent and evens out skin tone. Vitamin C is the main complement to vitamin E and acts synergistically with vitamin E to protect against oxidative damage [33,34].
The addition of the freeze-dried solid fraction of the Kamchatka berry pomace bioferment to cosmetic mass lowers the pH by 0.15 ± 0.01. The pH of cosmetic products has an effect on the condition of the skin. It has been shown that a lower pH of cosmetics reduces water loss through the skin, supports the skin barrier and reduces peeling of the epidermis [35]. The chosen cosmetic base has a simple composition and does not contain aggressive cleansing agents such as SLS or SLES, as skin cleansing products containing mainly anionic surfactants can cause increased dryness and skin irritation [36].
The use of pomace may not only bring environmental benefits through its reduction but has also found its potential application in the cosmetics industry as a raw material for the production of valuable preparations. Further research and development in this field may open new perspectives for the use of Kamchatka berry marc as a valuable biologically active raw material.

5. Conclusions

A bioferment was prepared from the pulp of the Kamchatka berry cv. Aurora and Indigo Gem and strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei, which was used to formulate a cosmetic preparation at a concentration of 5%, in accordance with the guidelines of the COSMOS certification body.
Searching the SciFinder database, no reports of this type of microbiological valorisation of Kamchatka berry marc were found in the literature, so the solution was registered as an invention at the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland.
The conducted research showed that Kamchatka berry pomace is a valuable source of biologically active compounds. Experiments conducted confirmed the presence of substances with potential health benefits, such as phenolic compounds, vitamins, antioxidants.
In a cosmetic product, they not only play the role of a biologically active raw material, but also help to enrich the fragrance palette, the colour of the cosmetic product and even regulate its pH by acidifying the formulation environment or consistency due to the low water activity of the freeze-dried product.
The results of stability tests showed that in the process of physico-chemical analysis of a cosmetic preparation with freeze-dried solid fraction of bioferment from Kamchatka berry pomace, the pH should oscillate in the range of 4.38–4.76 ± 0.01. The tests showed that the cosmetic should be protected from high temperature and UV radiation and proved that the product is stable under different conditions, which translates into lower transport and storage costs.

6. Patents

The methodology of producing bioferment is described in patent application no. P.444531 at the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland.
Methodology for the production of a bioactive preparation is described in patent application no. P.443438 at the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.M., K.Ś. and I.M.; methodology, W.M. and J.O.; formal analysis, W.M.; data curation, W.M. and J.O.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M., K.S. and S.M.; writing—review and editing, W.M. and K.Ś. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Raudonė, L.; Liaudanskas, M.; Vilkickytė, G.; Kviklys, D.; Žvikas, V.; Viškelis, J.; Viškelis, P. Phenolic Profiles, Antioxidant Activity and Phenotypic Characterization of Lonicera caerulea L. Berries, Cultivated in Lithuania. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Belcar, J.; Kapusta, I.; Sekutowski, T.R.; Gorzelany, J. Impact of the Addition of Fruits of Kamchatka Berries (L. caerulea var. kamtschatica) and Haskap (L. caerulea var. emphyllocalyx) on the Physicochemical Properties, Polyphenolic Content, Antioxidant Activity and Sensory Evaluation Craft Wheat Beers. Molecules 2023, 28, 4011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Choi, N.M.; Choi, J.I. Fermented Cosmetics. Korean Patent KR1430591, 18 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoseph, C.; Avanti, C.; Hadiwidjaja, M.; Briliani, K. The importance of fermented plant extract for anti aging in cosmetics product. World J. Pharm. Res. 2021, 10, 1330–1343. [Google Scholar]
  5. Joon, S.S.; Song, H.X.; So, H.P.; Keon, S.L.; Young, M.P.; Soo, N.P. Antioxidative and antiaging activities and component analysis of Lespedeza cuneata G. don extracts fermented with Lactobacillus pentosus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 1961–1970. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Chaiyasut, C.; Kesika, P. Cosmeceutical importance of fermented plant extracts: A short review. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2018, 10, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, W.; Xie, C.; He, Q.; Sun, J.; Bai, W. Improvement in color expression and antioxidant activity of strawberry juice fermented with lactic acid bacteria: A phenolic-based research. Food Chem. X 2023, 17, 100535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Lei, G.; Huang, Y. Aged fragrance formed during the post-fermentation process of dark tea at an industrial scale. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128175. [Google Scholar]
  9. Otsuka, A.; Moriguchi, C.; Shigematsu, Y.; Tanabe, K.; Haraguchi, N.; Iwashita, S.; Tokudome, Y.; Kitagaki, H. Fermented Cosmetics and Metabolites of Skin Microbiota—A New Approach to Skin Health. Fermentation 2022, 8, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Majchrzak, W.; Motyl, I.; Śmigielski, K. Biological and Cosmetical Importance of Fermented Raw Materials: An Overview. Molecules 2022, 27, 4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. European Parliament Circular Economy: Definition, Importance and Benefits. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  12. Hungría, J.; Siles, J.A.; Chica, A.F.; Gil, A.; Martín, M.A. Anaerobic co-digestion of winery waste: Comparative assessment of grape marc waste and lees derived from organic crops. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 3618–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. ECOSPA Baza Szamponowa EKOLOGICZNA. Available online: https://ecospa.pl/baza-szamponowa-ekologiczna (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  14. COSMOS Natural and Organic Certification for Cosmetics. Available online: https://www.cosmos-standard.org/ (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  15. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Determination of Water- and Fat-Soluble Vitamins by HPLC. TECHNICAL NOTE 72488. 2017. Available online: https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/CMD/Technical-Notes/tn-72488-hplc-water-fat-soluble-vitamins-tn72488-en.pdf (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  16. Kahoun, D.; Fojtíková, P.; Vácha, F.; Čížková, M.; Vodička, R.; Nováková, E.; Hypša, V. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for determination of B vitamins and some its derivatives in whole blood. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Szultka, M.; Buszewska-Forajta, M.; Kaliszan, R.; Buszewski, B. Determination of ascorbic acid and its degradation products by high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 2014, 35, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Oracz, J.; Żyżelewicz, D.; Pacholczyk-Sienicka, B. UHPLC-DAD-ESI-HRMS/MS profile of phenolic compounds in northern red oak (Quercus rubra L., syn. Q. borealis F. Michx) seeds and its transformation during thermal processing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 189, 115860. [Google Scholar]
  19. Khattab, R.; Brooks, M.S.L.; Ghanem, A. Phenolic Analyses of Haskap Berries (Lonicera caerulea L.): Spectrophotometry versus High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Int. J. Food Prop. 2016, 19, 1708–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guaratini, T.; Gianeti, M.D.; Campos, P.M. Campos, Stability of cosmetic formulations containing esters of Vitamins E and A: Chemical and physical aspects. Int. J. Pharm. 2006, 327, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bylinowska, J. Jagoda Kamczacka- Superowoc, Który Czeka na Odkrycie. Available online: https://dietetycy.org.pl/jagoda-kamczacka/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  22. Šalić, A.; Šamec, D. Changes in the content of glucosinolates, polyphenols and carotenoids during lactic-acid fermentation of cruciferous vegetables: A mini review. Food Chem. X 2022, 16, 100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bastianini, M.; Faffa, C.; Sisani, M.; Petracci, A. Caffeic Acid-layered Double Hydroxide Hybrid: A New Raw Material for Cosmetic Applications. Cosmetics 2018, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, B.A.; Mahmood, T.; Menaa, F.; Shahzad, Y.; Yousaf, A.M.; Hussain, T.; Ray, S.D. New Perspectives on the Efficacy of Gallic Acid in Cosmetics & Nanocosmeceuticals. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 5181–5187. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yeh, W.J.; Hsia, S.M.; Lee, W.H.; Wu, C.H. Polyphenols with antiglycation activity and mechanisms of action: A review of recent findings. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017, 25, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Allemann, B.; Baumann, L. Antioxidants used in skin care formulations. Skin Ther. Lett. 2008, 13, 5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Glina, R.; Góra, J. Związki Naturalne w Kosmetyce; Biblioteka Salonu i Elegancji-Kosmetik International, Warsaw Voice: Warszawa, Poland, 2000; pp. 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  28. Martini, M.C. Kosmetologia i Farmakologia Skóry; PZWL: Warszawa, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Seun-Ah, Y.; Sang-Kyung, J.; Eun-Jung, L.; Chang-Hyun, S.; In-Seon, L. Comparitive study of the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of six essential oils and their components. Nat. Prod. Res. 2010, 24, 140–151. [Google Scholar]
  30. Flieger, J.; Flieger, W.; Baj, J.; Maciejewski, R. Antioxidants: Classification, Natural Sources, Activity/Capacity Measurements, and Usefulness for the Synthesis of Nanoparticles. Materials 2021, 14, 4135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ziemlewska, A.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Bujak, T.; Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I. Effect of fermentation time on the content of bioactive compounds with cosmetic and dermatological properties in Kombucha Yerba Mate extracts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vállez-Gomis, V.; Peris-Pastor, G.; Benedé, J.L.; Chisvert, A.; Salvador, A. Green determination of eight water-soluble B vitamins in cosmetic products by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 205, 114308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Al-Niaimi, F.; Chiang, N.Y.Z. Topical Vitamin C and the Skin: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2017, 10, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Boo, Y.C. Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) as a Cosmeceutical to Increase Dermal Collagen for Skin Antiaging Purposes: Emerging Combination Therapies. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lichterfeld-Kottner, A.; El Genedy, M.; Lahmann, N.; Blume-Peytavi, U.; Büscher, A.; Kottner, J. Maintaining Skin Integrity in the Aged: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020, 103, 103509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hawkins, S.; Dasgupta, B.R.; Ananthapadmanabhan, K.P. Role of pH in Skin Cleansing. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2021, 43, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kamchatka berry pomace: (a) Indigo Gem; (b) Aurora.
Figure 1. Kamchatka berry pomace: (a) Indigo Gem; (b) Aurora.
Applsci 14 03218 g001
Figure 2. Solid fraction of bioferment from Kamchatka berry pomace.
Figure 2. Solid fraction of bioferment from Kamchatka berry pomace.
Applsci 14 03218 g002
Figure 3. Freeze-dried solid fraction of bioferment from Kamchatka berry pomace: (a) before grinding; (b) after grinding.
Figure 3. Freeze-dried solid fraction of bioferment from Kamchatka berry pomace: (a) before grinding; (b) after grinding.
Applsci 14 03218 g003
Figure 4. Shampoo base with the addition of bioferment solid fraction of Kamchatka berry pomace.
Figure 4. Shampoo base with the addition of bioferment solid fraction of Kamchatka berry pomace.
Applsci 14 03218 g004
Figure 5. Accelerated ageing test results after 12 weeks with samples kept at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C): (a) Shampoo base; (b) Shampoo base with the addition of bioferment solid fraction of Kamchatka berry pomace.
Figure 5. Accelerated ageing test results after 12 weeks with samples kept at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C): (a) Shampoo base; (b) Shampoo base with the addition of bioferment solid fraction of Kamchatka berry pomace.
Applsci 14 03218 g005
Table 1. Physico-chemical parameters of Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying.
Table 1. Physico-chemical parameters of Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying.
SamplepHTotal Monosaccharides
(g/100 g)
Water Activity
Pomace3.89 ± 0.012.75 ± 0.010.876 ± 0.02
Bioferment3.81 ± 0.030.12 ± 0.010.883 ± 0.01
Freeze-dried pomace3.61 ± 0.0219.05 ± 0.030.101 ± 0.03
Freeze-dried bioferment3.58 ± 0.020.84 ± 0.020.113 ± 0.01
Table 2. Results of organoleptic analysis of Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying.
Table 2. Results of organoleptic analysis of Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying.
SampleAromaColourConsistency
PomaceFloral, wine, sweetPurpleMashed spread
BiofermentFloral, sweet, lactic acidPurple-pinkMashed spread
Freeze-dried pomaceFloral, wine, sweetPink-purplePowder
Freeze-dried biofermentFloral, sweet, lactic acidPink-purplePowder
Table 3. Content of phenolic compounds, hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 3. Content of phenolic compounds, hydroxycinnamic acids and their derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleCA
(mg/100 g)
3-CQA
(mg/100 g)
5-CQA
(mg/100 g)
pCuA
(mg/100 g)
3,4-DiCQA
(mg/100 g)
CA
Derivative
(mg/100 g)
Sum
(mg/100 g)
Pomace0.00 ± 0.003.51 ± 0.0528.82 ± 0.125.06 ± 0.0411.09 ± 0.050.69 ± 0.0149.17 ± 0.06
Bioferment4.47 ± 0.072.41 ± 0.042.50 ± 0.040.29 ± 0.010.90 ± 0.013.34 ± 0.0313.91 ± 0.04
Freeze-dried pomace0.00 ± 0.0019.93 ± 0.02238.52 ± 0.1486.11 ± 0.08224.30 ± 0.112.84 ± 0.03571.70 ± 0.08
Freeze-dried bioferment16.31 ± 0.1116.91 ± 0.0722.76 ± 0.093.26 ± 0.0218.24 ± 0.067.69 ± 0.0485.17 ± 0.07
Table 4. Content of phenolic compounds hydroxybenzoic acid and its derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 4. Content of phenolic compounds hydroxybenzoic acid and its derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleGA
(mg/100 g)
4-HBA
(mg/100 g)
PCA
(mg/100 g)
VA
(mg/100 g)
SA
(mg/100 g)
EA
(mg/100 g)
Sum
(mg/100 g)
Pomace0,20 ± 0.020.37 ± 0.021.36 ± 0.020.65 ± 0.020.89 ± 0.012.62 ± 0.046.09 ± 0.03
Bioferment0.18 ± 0.010.37 ± 0.012.27 ± 0.040.11 ± 0.010.52 ± 0.010.98 ± 0.014.43 ± 0.02
Freeze-dried pomace0.94 ± 0.030.78 ± 0.049.60 ± 0.0612.98 ± 0.0717.66 ± 0.042.29 ± 0.0244.25 ± 0.04
Freeze-dried bioferment0.75 ± 0.020.48 ± 0.0317.62 ± 0.072.00 ± 0.059.95 ± 0.060.96 ± 0.0131.76 ± 0.07
Table 5. Content of flavan-3-ol compounds in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 5. Content of flavan-3-ol compounds in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleCat (mg/100 g)Epicat (mg/100 g)Sum (mg/100 g)
Pomace3.50 ± 0.044.70 ± 0.038.20 ± 0.04
Bioferment0.94 ± 0.010.80 ± 0.011.74 ± 0.01
Freeze-dried pomace62.72 ± 0.095.14 ± 0.0467.86 ± 0.07
Freeze-dried bioferment16.91 ± 0.071.10 ± 0.0218.01 ± 0.05
Table 6. Content of quercetin and its derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 6. Content of quercetin and its derivatives in Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleQu-gal
(mg/100 g)
Qu-rut
(mg/100 g)
Qu-glu
(mg/100 g)
Qu
(mg/100 g)
Sum
(mg/100 g)
Pomace13.95 ± 0.075.67 ± 0.030.43 ± 0.014.00 ± 0.0424.05 ± 0.05
Bioferment0.06 ± 0.010.46 ± 0.010.00 ± 0.000.41 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.01
Freeze-dried pomace127.68 ± 0.1268.42 ± 0.074.92 ± 0.0388.78 ± 0.08289.80 ± 0.07
Freeze-dried bioferment0.54 ± 0.015.63 ± 0.040.04 ± 0.019.05 ± 0.0515.26 ± 0.03
Table 7. Anthocyanin content of Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 7. Anthocyanin content of Kamchatka berry pomace and solid fraction of bioferment before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleCy-3.5-diglu
(mg/100 g)
Cy-3-glu
(mg/100 g)
Cy-3-rut
(mg/100 g)
Pe-3-glu
(mg/100 g)
Sum
(mg/100 g)
Pomace19.40 ± 0.071653.80 ± 0.1540.14 ± 0.0613.51 ± 0.061726.84 ± 0.08
Bioferment3.78 ± 0.02140.99 ± 0.093.09 ± 0.021.95 ± 0.01149.81 ± 0.03
Freeze-dried pomace168.86 ± 0.1129,497.37 ± 0.18449.80 ± 0.08291.05 ± 0.1330,407.07 ± 0.11
Freeze-dried bioferment32.90 ± 0.032516.30 ± 0.1555.91 ± 0.0740.85 ± 0.032645.95 ± 0.08
Table 8. Vitamin C and B vitamin content of Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
Table 8. Vitamin C and B vitamin content of Kamchatka berry pomace and bioferment solid fraction before and after freeze drying (mg/100 g).
SampleVit. C
(mg/100 g)
Vit. B1
(mg/100 g)
Vit. B2
(mg/100 g)
Vit. B3
(mg/100 g)
Vit. B6
(mg/100 g)
Pomace2.85 ± 0.010.41 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.010.04 ± 0.01
Bioferment4.05 ± 0.010.26 ± 0.010.37 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.01
Freeze-dried pomace10.12 ± 0.061.89 ± 0.020.35 ± 0.010.45 ± 0.010.17 ± 0.01
Freeze-dried bioferment66.90 ± 0.041.38 ± 0.012.17 ± 0.030.49 ± 0.010.44 ± 0.01
Table 9. Analysis of a cosmetic product with a freeze-dried bioferment solid fraction compared to a shampoo base.
Table 9. Analysis of a cosmetic product with a freeze-dried bioferment solid fraction compared to a shampoo base.
SamplepHAromaColourConsistency
Shampoo base5.53 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
Cosmetic product4.38 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple/pinkHomogeneous liquid
Table 10. Stability test results for a cosmetic product containing the freeze-dried solid fraction of the bioferment.
Table 10. Stability test results for a cosmetic product containing the freeze-dried solid fraction of the bioferment.
WeekSamplepHAromaColourConsistency
15 ± 1 °C4.34 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.32 ± 0.01
UV4.36 ± 0.01
21 ± 1 °C4.38 ± 0.01
25 ± 1 °C4.34 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.36 ± 0.01Purple-pink
UV4.34 ± 0.01Purple-pink (less)
21 ± 1 °C4.38 ± 0.01Purple-pink
35 ± 1 °C4.33 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.42 ± 0.01WinePurple-pink
UV4.28 ± 0.01WinePurple-pink (pale)
21 ± 1 °C4.40 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink
45 ± 1 °C4.30 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.42 ± 0.01WinePurple-pink (pale)
UV4.31 ± 0.01WinePurple-pink, yellowing
21 ± 1 °C4.35 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink
55 ± 1 °C4.30 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.43 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsPurple-pink (pale)
UV4.33 ± 0.01WinePurple-pink, yellowing
21 ± 1 °C4.34 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink
65 ± 1 °C4.29 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.45 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsPurple-pink, yellowing
UV4.35 ± 0.01WineRed-orange
21 ± 1 °C4.34 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink
75 ± 1 °C4.29 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.47 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsPurple-pink, yellowing
UV4.38 ± 0.01WineRed-orange
21 ± 1 °C4.35 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink (less)
85 ± 1 °C4.28 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.50 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsPurple-pink, yellowing
UV4.38 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsDark orange
21 ± 1 °C4.35 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink (less)
95 ± 1 °C4.29 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.54 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsRed-orange
UV4.41 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsOrange
21 ± 1 °C4.37 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink, yellowing
105 ± 1 °C4.26 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pinkHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.55 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsRed-orangeHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV4.46 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsOrangeHomogeneous liquid
21 ± 1 °C4.41 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink, yellowingHomogeneous liquid
115 ± 1 °C4.25 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink, yellowingHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.60 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsOrangeHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV4.51 ± 0.01Wine, perceptible raw materialsDark yellowHomogeneous liquid
21 ± 1 °C4.40 ± 0.01Floral, wine (less)Red-orangeHomogeneous liquid
125 ± 1 °C4.25 ± 0.01Floral, winePurple-pink, yellowingHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C4.75 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsOrangeHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV4.59 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsYellowHomogeneous, flowing liquid
21 ± 1 °C4.41 ± 0.01Floral, wine (less)Red-orangeHomogeneous liquid
Table 11. Stability test results for a commercial shampoo base.
Table 11. Stability test results for a commercial shampoo base.
WeekSamplepHAromaColourConsistency
15 ± 1 °C5.51 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.41 ± 0.01
UV5.50 ± 0.01
21 ± 1 °C5.53 ± 0.01
25 ± 1 °C5.51 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.42 ± 0.01
UV5.50 ± 0.01
21 ± 1 °C5.53 ± 0.01
35 ± 1 °C5.50 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.45 ± 0.01OdourlessYellow
UV5.52 ± 0.01OdourlessStraw colour
21 ± 1 °C5.51 ± 0.01HerbalYellow
45 ± 1 °C5.48 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.55 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsStraw colour
UV5.44 ± 0.01OdourlessStraw colour
21 ± 1 °C5.51 ± 0.01HerbalYellow
55 ± 1 °C5.47 ± 0.01HerbalYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.59 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsStraw colour
UV5.45 ± 0.01OdourlessStraw colour
21 ± 1 °C5.50 ± 0.01HerbalYellow
65 ± 1 °C5.47 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.63 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsStraw colour
UV5.41 ± 0.01OdourlessClear
21 ± 1 °C5.50 ± 0.01OdourlessYellow
75 ± 1 °C5.45 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.67 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsStraw colour
UV5.38 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsClear
21 ± 1 °C5.52 ± 0.01OdourlessYellow
85 ± 1 °C5.46 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.63 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsStraw colour
UV5.36 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsClear
21 ± 1 °C5.51 ± 0.01OdourlessYellow
95 ± 1 °C5.44 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.69 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV5.32 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous liquid
21 ± 1 °C5.48 ± 0.01OdourlessStraw colourHomogeneous liquid
105 ± 1 °C5.44 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.70 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV5.32 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous liquid
21 ± 1 °C5.48 ± 0.01OdourlessStraw colourHomogeneous liquid
115 ± 1 °C5.42 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.73 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV5.29 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
21 ± 1 °C5.45 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsStraw colourHomogeneous liquid
125 ± 1 °C5.41 ± 0.01OdourlessYellowHomogeneous liquid
40 ± 1 °C5.77 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
UV5.27 ± 0.01Perceptible raw materialsClearHomogeneous, flowing liquid
2 ± 1 °C5.46 ± 0.01Very slightly perceptible raw materialsStraw colourHomogeneous liquid
Table 12. Results of the shock test for the base without bio-ferments and the shampoos with bio-ferments.
Table 12. Results of the shock test for the base without bio-ferments and the shampoos with bio-ferments.
SampleConditionspHColourAromaConsistency
Shampoo base5/40/5 °C5.46 ± 0.01YellowHerbalHomogeneous liquid
40/5/40 °C5.38 ± 0.01YellowHerbalHomogeneous liquid
Cosmetic product5/40/5 °C4.38 ± 0.01Purple/pinkFloral, wineHomogeneous liquid
40/5/40 °C4.39 ± 0.01Purple/pinkFloral, wineHomogeneous liquid
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Majchrzak, W.; Śmigielski, K.; Motyl, I.; Oracz, J.; Skura, K.; Motyl, S. Kamchatka Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Pomace Bioferment as an Innovative Cosmetic Raw Material. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083218

AMA Style

Majchrzak W, Śmigielski K, Motyl I, Oracz J, Skura K, Motyl S. Kamchatka Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Pomace Bioferment as an Innovative Cosmetic Raw Material. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(8):3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Majchrzak, Weronika, Krzysztof Śmigielski, Ilona Motyl, Joanna Oracz, Karina Skura, and Sara Motyl. 2024. "Kamchatka Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Pomace Bioferment as an Innovative Cosmetic Raw Material" Applied Sciences 14, no. 8: 3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083218

APA Style

Majchrzak, W., Śmigielski, K., Motyl, I., Oracz, J., Skura, K., & Motyl, S. (2024). Kamchatka Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Pomace Bioferment as an Innovative Cosmetic Raw Material. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3218. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop