Optimization Study of Drainage Network Systems Based on the SWMM for the Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Current Research Status
1.2.1. Research Status of Urban Stormwater Simulation Model
1.2.2. Research Status of SWMM
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area Profile
2.2. SWMM
2.3. Data and Preprocessing
2.4. Model Construction
2.5. Model Parameter Validation Index
2.6. Algorithm Optimization
2.7. Design of Stormwater Network Optimization Schemes Based on GA
2.7.1. Objective Function
2.7.2. Constraint Condition
2.7.3. Justification for Economic Objective
2.8. Technical Route
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Model Calibration and Verification Results
3.2. Model Optimization Results
3.3. Analysis of Model Optimization Results
3.3.1. Optimized Drainage Network Layout and LID Measures
- (1)
- New Rainwater Main
- (2)
- Additional Branch Drainage
- (3)
- Construction of Rainwater Storage Ponds
- (4)
- Rain Garden
- (5)
- Permeable Pavement
3.3.2. Socio-Economic and Policy Implications
- (1)
- Cost–Benefit Analysis
- (2)
- Stakeholder Engagement Challenges
- (3)
- Policy Recommendations
3.3.3. Research Innovation and Contribution
3.3.4. Current Deficiencies in Research
4. Conclusions
- The amount of rainfall runoff in the study area was monitored, and the data obtained were used to calibrate and verify the SWMM parameters. The constructed SWMM simulation is highly accurate, and the model is suitable for Wujin District.
- By optimizing the drainage system and implementing low-impact development (LID) measures, the average duration of internal flooding in Wujin District was reduced from 7.43 h to 3.12 h, a 58% reduction. The results show that the optimized drainage system can drain floodwater more quickly, significantly reducing the impact of internal flooding on the area and improving the area’s flood control capabilities and the quality of life of residents. The average depth of accumulated floodwater was also reduced from 21.27 cm to 8.65 cm, a 59.33% reduction. The data show that by constructing new stormwater mains, adding drainage branches, and building stormwater storage ponds, the depth of accumulated water has been significantly reduced, and the extent of accumulated water during internal flooding has been effectively controlled, reducing damage to buildings and farmland and protecting the infrastructure and ecological environment in the area. At the same time, drainage efficiency has increased from 58.32% before optimization to 91.46%, representing an increase of 56.82%. The drainage system failure rate has dropped from 5.15% to 1.86%, a decrease of 63.88%. These results show that the overall performance and reliability of the drainage system can be significantly improved by optimizing the drainage network layout and conducting regular maintenance. An efficient drainage system can remove rainfall runoff more quickly, reduce the risk of waterlogging, and improve the stability and reliability of the regional drainage system.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Johnson, A.B.; Lee, C.D. Urban Flooding Analysis. Water Manag. Sci. 2020, 16, 201–215. [Google Scholar]
- Boah, D.K.; Twum, S. A Review of Water Quality Optimisation Models and Techniques. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 2020, 8, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, A.B.; Zhang, C.D. Optimization of Urban Pipe Networks. J. Urban. Infra. 2022, 18, 77–92. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Kharsan, I.H.; Marhoon, A.F.; Mahmood, J.R. Phase Swapping Load Balancing Algorithms: A Comprehensive Survey. Iraqi J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2019, 15, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kareem, M.; Shamkhi, M. Optimal Design of Sewage Networks for Al-Jaffryah Quarter and Al-Kut Trade Center Using Genetic Algorithms and Spectral Analysis of the River to Know the Effect of Network Waste. Wasit J. Eng. Sci. 2022, 10, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayas-Jiménez, L.; Martínez-Solano, F.J.; Iglesias-Rey, P.L.; Mora-Meliá, D. Search Space Reduction for Genetic Algorithms Applied to Drainage Network Optimization Problems. Water 2021, 13, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burszta-Adamiak, E.; Mrowiec, M. Modelling of Green Roofs’ Hydrologic Performance Using EPA’s SWMM. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, W.B.; Zhao, X.; Li, M.; Xue, X.Z. Progress and Development Trends in Urban Flood Simulation Technology. China Flood Control Drought Relief 2020, 30, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Rosa, D.J.; Clausen, J.C.; Dietz, M.E. Calibration and Verification of SWMM for Low Impact Development. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2015, 51, 746–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossman, L.A. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual, Version 5.0; National Risk Management Research Laboratory; Office of Research and Development; US Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010.
- Terstriep, M.L.; Stall, J.B. The Illinois Urban Drainage Area Simulator, ILLUDAS; Illinois State Water Survey: Champaign, IL, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Tae, J.K. Determination of Urban Runoff Using ILLUDAS and GIS. J. Korea Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 38, 791–800. [Google Scholar]
- URBANM. MIKE URBAN Model User Manual; Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI): Hørsholm, Denmark, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Software, DHI. MIKE URBAN–Collection System; Hørsholm, Denmark. 2014. Available online: https://www.advanceduninstaller.com/DHI-MIKE-URBAN-2014-64-bit-a559779f6cfa2ff94c7ef88fc04f0cba-application.htm (accessed on 30 December 2024).
- Yao, S.L. Urban Drainage System Simulation Method Based on MIKE FLOOD. Master’s Thesis, Beijing University, Beijing, China, 2012; pp. 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Innovyze. InfoWorks ICM Help; Innovyze: Broomfield, CO, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.-B.; Yoon, C.-G.; Jung, K.W.; Hwang, H.S. Comparative Evaluation of Runoff and Water Quality Using HSPF and SWMM. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guan, M.; Sillanpää, N.; Koivusalo, H. Modelling and Assessment of Hydrological Changes in a Developing Urban Catchment. Hydrol. Process. 2015, 29, 2880–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; He, P. Approach for Evaluating Inundation Risks in Urban Drainage Systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 553, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campbell, C.W.; Sulli Van, S.M. Simulating ti me varying cave flow and water levels using the storm water management model. Eng. Geol. 2002, 65, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krebs, G.; Kokkonen, T.; Valtanen, M.; Koivusalo, H.; Setälä, H. A high resolution application of a stormwater management model (SWMM) using genetic parameter optimization. Urban. Water J. 2013, 10, 394–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.H.; Lee, J.H. Parameter optimization for runoff calibration of SWMM. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 2006, 15, 435–441. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, B.; Wang, Z.; Yang, H.; Xu, H.; Gao, M.; Liang, Q. Parameter optimization of SWMM model using integrated morris and GLUE methods. Water 2022, 15, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assaf, M.N.; Manenti, S.; Creaco, E.; Giudicianni, C.; Tamellini, L.; Todeschini, S. New optimization strategies for SWMM modeling of stormwater quality applications in urban area. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 361, 121244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, F.; Tian, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ali, G. Parameter calibration of SWMM model based on optimization algorithm. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2020, 65, 2189–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Liang, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, R.; Lu, X. Automatic SWMM Parameter Calibration Method Based on the Differential Evolution and Bayesian Optimization Algorithm. Water 2023, 15, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behrouz, M.S.; Zhu, Z.; Matott, L.S.; Rabideau, A.J. A new tool for automatic calibration of the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). J. Hydrol. 2020, 581, 124436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dent, S.; Hanna, R.B.; Wright, L.T. Automated calibration using optimization techniques with SWMM RUNOFF. J. Water Manag. Model. 2004, 220, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barco, J.; Wong, K.M.; Stenstrom, M.K. Automatic calibration of the US EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 134, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perin, R.; Trigatti, M.; Nicolini, M.; Campolo, M.; Goi, D. Automated calibration of the EPA-SWMM model for a small suburban catchment using PEST: A case study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, B.; James, W. SWMM calibration using genetic algorithms. In Global Solutions for Urban Drainage; ASCEPublishing: Reston, VA, USA, 2002; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Xiong, L.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Cai, X.; Chen, K.; Wu, J. Runoff simulation of two typical urban green land types with the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM): Sensitivity analysis and calibration of runoff parameters. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.H.; Seo, H.J. Parameter optimization of SWMM for runoff quantity and quality calculation in a eutrophic lake watershed using a genetic algorithm. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2007, 7, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rabori, A.M.; Ghazavi, R.; Reveshty, M.A. Sensitivity analysis of SWMM model parameters for urban runoff estimation in semi-arid area. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 284–294. [Google Scholar]
- Kourtis, I.M.; Kopsiaftis, G.; Bellos, V.; Tsihrintzis, V.A. Calibration and validation of SWMM model in two urban catchments in Athens, Greece. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (CEST), Rhodes, Greece, 31 August–2 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.; Xu, C.; Liu, Z.; Yin, D.; Jia, H.; Guan, Y. Spatial layout optimization of green infrastructure based on life-cycle multi-objective optimization algorithm and SWMM model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 191, 106906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Li, Q.; He, P.; Zou, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, S.; Han, X.; Zeng, T. Simultaneous optimization of SWMM parameters by the dynamic system response curve with multi-objective function. Water Resour. Manag. 2023, 37, 5061–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanim, A.H.; Smith-Lewis, C.; Downey, A.R.; Imran, J.; Goharian, E. Bayes_Opt-SWMM: A Gaussian process-based Bayesian optimization tool for real-time flood modeling with SWMM. Environ. Model. Softw. 2024, 179, 106122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghizadeh, S.; Khani, S.; Rajaee, T. Hybrid SWMM and particle swarm optimization model for urban runoff water quality control by using green infrastructures (LID-BMPs). Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 60, 127032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakizadeh, F.; Nia, A.M.; Salajegheh, A.; Sañudo-Fontaneda, L.A.; Alamdari, N. Efficient urban runoff quantity and quality modelling using SWMM model and field data in an urban watershed of tehran metropolis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macro, K.; Matott, L.S.; Rabideau, A.; Ghodsi, S.H.; Zhu, Z. OSTRICH-SWMM: A new multi-objective optimization tool for green infrastructure planning with SWMM. Environ. Model. Softw. 2019, 113, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, N.; Hall, M.; Hong, B.; Zhang, L. Impact of SWMM catchment discretization: Case study in Syracuse, New York. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2014, 19, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, G.V.; Agrawal, R.; Bhanderi, R.; Jayaprasad, P.; Patel, J.; Agnihotri, P.; Samtani, B. Estimation of sub-catchment area parameters for Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) using geo-informatics. Geocarto Int. 2016, 31, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekmekcioğlu, Ö.; Yılmaz, M.; Özger, M.; Tosunoğlu, F. Investigation of the low impact development strategies for highly urbanized area via auto-calibrated Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 84, 2194–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Shen, P.; Lai, C. A novel spatial optimization approach for the cost-effectiveness improvement of LID practices based on SWMM-FTC. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhai, J.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, K. Automatic calibration of SWMM parameters based on multi-objective optimisation model. J. Hydroinformatics 2024, 26, 683–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del Giudice, G.; Padulano, R. Sensitivity analysis and calibration of a rainfall-runoff model with the combined use of EPA-SWMM and genetic algorithm. Acta Geophys. 2016, 64, 1755–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, B.; Wu, Z.; Hu, C.; Wang, H.; Xu, H.; Yan, D.; Soomro, S.-E. Process-oriented SWMM real-time correction and urban flood dynamic simulation. J. Hydrol. 2022, 605, 127269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaghloul, N.A.; Kiefa, M.A.A. Neural network solution of inverse parameters used in the sensitivity-calibration analyses of the SWMM model simulations. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2001, 32, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, H. Tomatoes, Tribes, Bananas, and Businessmen: An Analysis of the Shadow State and of the Politics of Water in Jordan. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 84, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, A.B.; Lee, C.D. Resilient Urban Infrastructure. J. Environ. Resil. 2023, 19, 98–112. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, L. City Pilot Area Flood Prevention System and Case Studies of Wujin District, Jiangsu Province. Urban Roads Bridges Flood Control 2020, 12, 103–104. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.; Qin, H.P.; Zhao, Z.J. Control studies of peak flow and non-point source pollution for urbanized areas based on SWMM. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Pekin. 2015, 51, 141–150. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y.; Li, Q.F.; Niu, M.Y.; Yan, F.; He, P.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Du, Y. Rainstorm and waterlogging simulation in typical inundated districts of Nanjing based on SWMM. Adv. Sci. Technol. Water Resour. 2019, 39, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, X.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, G.; Li, H. Sensitivity analysis on SWMM model parameters based on Sobol method. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2018, 37, 59–68. [Google Scholar]
- Holland, J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg, D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Deb, K. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Grefenstette, J.J. Optimization of Control Parameters for Genetic Algorithms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1986, 16, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Q.N.; Chen, Z.H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, R. Simulation of control efficiency of low impact development measures for urban stormwater. Water Resour. Prot. 2017, 33, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, G.R.; Zeng, J.J.; Wu, H.C.; Zhang, M. First flush effect of non-point source pollution in Guangzhou typical community unit. Water Resour. Prot. 2018, 34, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, H.C.; Huang, G.R. Risk assessment of urban waterlogging based on PCSWMM model. Water Resour. Prot. 2016, 32, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- GB50014-2006; Code for Design of Outdoor Wastewater Engineering (2016 Edition). China Planning Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
Data Type | Data Source | Description | Processing Method | Key Parameters | Precision/Resolution |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topographic Data | UAV Remote Sensing (DJI Phantom 4 RTK) | Covered 500 km2, divided into 50 zones; high-resolution DEM created | Geostatistical smoothing and filtering | DEM resolution | 0.5 m |
Land Use Data | Remote Sensing Satellite Imagery | 2018–2023 imagery data; grassland, cropland, construction land identified | SVM and RF classification, ENVI geometric correction, validation | Classification accuracy | >90% |
Meteorological Data | Automatic Weather Stations, Historical Records | 10 stations, recorded every 15 min; monthly average temperature, rainfall, and evaporation | Missing data interpolation, IQR outlier detection | Missing value ratio | <2% |
Hydrological and Water Quality Data | Monitoring Stations, Automated Equipment | Flow, water level, pH, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations | Data cleaning and cross-checking with lab measurements | Parameter deviation | <5% |
Algorithm | Strengths | Limitations |
---|---|---|
Genetic Algorithm (GA) | Strong global search; robust for discrete variables; handles non-linearity | May require higher computational effort in large search spaces |
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) | Rapid convergence for simple problems | Prone to premature convergence in multimodal problems |
Simulated Annealing (SA) | Escapes local optima; simple implementation | Computationally slow for large datasets |
Differential Evolution (DE) | Effective in high-dimensional problems | Sensitive to parameter tuning |
Type | Date | ENS | EQW | EPR/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Calibration | 20170610 | 0.912 | 0.14 | 11.12 |
Calibration | 20170803 | 0.959 | 0.12 | 14.41 |
Calibration | 20170808 | 0.935 | 0.07 | 8.52 |
Calibration | 20170925 | 0.886 | 0.12 | 12.82 |
Verification | 20160623 | 0.796 | -0.27 | 7.68 |
Verification | 20160627 | 0.743 | 0.20 | 4.82 |
Verification | 20160701 | 0.795 | -0.12 | 11.56 |
Verification | 20160704 | 0.823 | -0.28 | 5.08 |
Verification | 20160914 | 0.812 | 0.16 | 8.63 |
Verification | 20160915 | 0.766 | 0.27 | 12.32 |
Verification | 20160929 | 0.697 | -0.28 | 9.47 |
Verification | 20161026 | 0.774 | 0.02 | 4.89 |
Index | Pre-Optimization | Optimized |
---|---|---|
Average duration of waterlogging (h) | 7.43 | 3.12 |
Average water depth (cm) | 21.27 | 8.65 |
Drainage efficiency (%) | 58.32 | 91.46 |
Reduction of peak flood flow (%) | 0 | 25.38 |
Surface runoff reduction | 0 | 20.16 |
Increase of soil water content | 0 | 15.98 |
Amount of increase in groundwater recharge | 0 | 17.32 |
Utilization rate of rainwater | 61.84 | 77.14 |
Failure rate of drainage system | 5.15 | 1.86 |
Component | Design Area (m2) | Infiltration Rate (mm/h) | Soil/Material Porosity (%) | Water Capacity (m3) | Additional Details |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permeable Pavement | 5000 | 20 | 40 | \ | Permeable concrete and bricks used |
Rain Garden | 200 | 30 | 45 | \ | Plant species: drought-tolerant grasses and shrubs |
Rainwater Storage Pond | 5000 | \ | \ | 5000 | Includes filtration and purification systems |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pan, Y.; Li, X. Optimization Study of Drainage Network Systems Based on the SWMM for the Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031276
Pan Y, Li X. Optimization Study of Drainage Network Systems Based on the SWMM for the Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(3):1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031276
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Yi, and Xungui Li. 2025. "Optimization Study of Drainage Network Systems Based on the SWMM for the Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China" Applied Sciences 15, no. 3: 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031276
APA StylePan, Y., & Li, X. (2025). Optimization Study of Drainage Network Systems Based on the SWMM for the Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China. Applied Sciences, 15(3), 1276. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031276