Next Article in Journal
Fungal Community Analyses of a Pirogue from the Tang Dynasty in the National Maritime Museum of China
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Air Voids Distribution in the Open-Graded Asphalt Mixture Based on 2D Image Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Application of Uplift-Restricted Slip-Permitted (URSP) Connectors in Steel-Concrete Composite Frames
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure

1
Smart Materials & Structures Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Dongguang University of Technology, Dongguan 523000, China
3
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(19), 4127; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194127
Submission received: 16 September 2019 / Accepted: 27 September 2019 / Published: 2 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure)
As well reported, ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production causes between 0.8 and 1 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission for every ton of cement produced which corresponds to 5%–10% global CO2 emissions [1]. However, reinforced concrete is still the most common material used in the construction of roads, bridges, buildings and other infrastructures. The demand for this material is expected to increase in the future due to the rise of infrastructure needs in developing and industrial countries. In addition, ageing and deterioration of reinforced concrete infrastructure due to degradation of materials, harsh environmental conditions, seismic excitations, overloading, inadequate maintenance and lack of frequent inspections are worldwide problems that pose serious risks to structural and life safety [2]. Most of this deterioration is the result of corrosion of the steel in steel structures [3,4,5] or the steel reinforcing bars (rebars) embedded in the concrete structures [6,7,8]. Due to the repair and rehabilitation of deteriorated reinforced concrete infrastructure and the sustainability issues owing to the extremely resources- and energy-intensive process of producing steel and cement materials, researchers and engineers have sought some alternative construction materials [9,10].
To answer the challenge of deterioration of those aging concrete structures and the demand for low carbon-footprint and durable infrastructure, the study of sustainable construction is developed by academics and engineers standing on a basis of emerging low-energy construction materials together with structural design optimisation [11]. Nowadays, innovative “green” construction materials can be designed or tailored to different requirements by controlling their microstructure, and have been proposed as alternatives for the substitution of the conventional construction materials [12,13]. In addition, smart materials, such as PZT (Lead Zirconate Titanate), are increasingly integrated with structures [14,15] to form intelligent structures that possess structural health monitoring and damage detection capacities [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, infrastructural behaviours can be improved by using those materials and the related design and construction solutions in terms of durability and safety. These emerging construction materials are extending the frontiers of design and construction of highly sustainable infrastructure, and allow significant enhancement in response to environmental impact. However, the properties of those construction materials and the behaviours of structures constructed with the related materials, such as durability, time-dependent behaviour and mechanical properties, have not been fully explored. Those properties should be well-understood in practical construction application.
This issue focuses on the latest development in “Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure”. In the study of properties of sustainable construction materials, “green” concrete materials [20,21,22,23], composite materials [24,25], recycled materials [26,27,28], soil/rock materials [29,30] and other novel environmentally friendly construction materials [31,32] are reported in this issue. The investigations of the behaviours of structures constructed with different materials include demolished concrete structures [33,34], high-performance concrete structures [35], steel structures [36,37], steel–concrete composite structures [38,39] and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-concrete hybrid structures [40,41,42,43]. In addition, seismic behaviour and the interaction behaviour between superstructure and substructure are discussed in two papers [44,45]. In this special issue, four papers investigate the behaviours of novel prefabricated structures using experimental and numerical approaches [46,47,48,49]. On the other hand, several innovative structural forms are invented and the behaviours of those structures are presented and discussed in four other papers [50,51,52,53]. Two structural strengthening techniques using composite and shape memory alloy materials for the reinforced concrete structures are proposed and studied [54,55].
Though tremendous progress has been achieved in developing new construction materials and sustainable structures, many challenges remain. With the use of new reinforcing materials, such as various FRPs [56,57,58,59], the bonding behaviour between the new reinforcing materials and the traditional material, such as cement, should be better understood analytically and numerically with experimental verifications. As a form of sustainable structure, prefabricated structures that can be quick assembled and also dissembled for re-use have found increasing applications. Often the joints that enable the assembling of these prefabricated structures experience stress concentration and effective methods of monitoring of these joints, including bolted joints [60,61], welded joints [62,63], and epoxied joints [64], should be developed.
In summary, the development and application of emerging construction materials, including recycled materials, together with innovative structures and structural design optimization, results in lower energy and durable products in civil infrastructure [65,66,67,68]. The need for this field is significantly high and the related innovative research will be a foundation of sustainable construction in infrastructure.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferdous, W.; Manalo, A.; Khennane, A.; Kayali, O. Geopolymer concrete-filled pultruded composite beams-Concrete mixdesign and application. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 58, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maranan, G.B.; Manalo, A.C.; Benmokrane, B.; Karunasena, W.; Mendis, P. Evaluation of the flexural strength and serviceability of geopolymer concrete beams reinforced with glass-fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Eng. Struct. 2015, 101, 529–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Krivy, V.; Kubzova, M.; Kreislova, K.; Urban, V. Characterization of corrosion products on weathering steel bridges influenced by chloride deposition. Metals 2017, 7, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Peng, J.; Xiao, L.; Zhang, J.; Cai, C.S.; Wang, L. Flexural behavior of corroded HPS beams. Eng. Struct. 2019, 195, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huo, L.; Li, C.; Jiang, T.; Li, H. Feasibility study of steel bar corrosion monitoring using a piezoceramic transducer enabled time reversal method. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dubuc, B.; Ebrahimkhanlou, A.; Salamone, S. Corrosion monitoring of prestressed concrete structures by using topological analysis of acoustic emission data. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 055001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, W.; Xu, C.; Ho, S.; Wang, B.; Song, G. Monitoring concrete deterioration due to reinforcement corrosion by integrating acoustic emission and FBG strain measurements. Sensors 2017, 17, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, J.; Hu, S.; Zhang, J.; Cai, C.S.; Li, L.Y. Influence of cracks on chloride diffusivity in concrete: A five-phase mesoscale model approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 197, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Taylor, S.E.; Ma, H. Serviceability of one-way high-volume fly ash-self-compacting concrete slabs reinforced with basalt FRP bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 217, 108–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, L.; Zheng, Y.; Taylor, S.E. Finite-element investigation of the structural behavior of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP)-reinforced Self-compacting concrete (SCC) deck slabs in Thompson Bridge. Polymers 2018, 10, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zheng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Xia, L.; Luo, Y.; Taylor, S.E. Investigation of the behaviour of SCC bridge deck slabs reinforced with BFRP bars under concentrated loads. Eng. Struct. 2018, 171, 500–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhou, L.; Huo, L.; Ma, H.; Song, G. Evaluation of the Effect of Fly Ash on Hydration Characterization in Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) at Very Early Ages Using Piezoceramic Transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Garcia-Taengua, E.; Sonebi, M.; Crossett, P.; Taylor, S.; Deegan, P.; Ferrara, L. Pattarini, APerformance of sustainable SCC mixes with mineral additions for use in precast concrete industry. J. Sustain. Cem. Based Mater. 2016, 5, 19. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dumoulin, C.; Deraemaeker, A. Real-time fast ultrasonic monitoring of concrete cracking using embedded piezoelectric transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 104006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kong, Q.; Robert, R.; Silva, P.; Mo, Y. Cyclic crack monitoring of a reinforced concrete column under simulated pseudo-dynamic loading using piezoceramic-based smart aggregates. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaur, N.; Bhalla, S.; Shanker, R.; Panigrahi, R. Experimental evaluation of miniature impedance chip for structural health monitoring of prototype steel/RC structures. Exp. Tech. 2016, 40, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, G.; Li, Y.; Zhou, M.; Feng, Q.; Song, G. Detecting damage size and shape in a plate structure using PZT transducer array. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2018, 31, 04018075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, W.; Liu, T.; Wang, J.; Zou, D.; Gao, S. Finite-element analysis of an electromechanical impedance–based corrosion sensor with experimental verification. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2019, 32, 04019012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, L.; Zheng, Y.; Song, G.; Chen, D.; Ye, Y. Identification of the structural damage mechanism of BFRP bars reinforced concrete beams using smart transducers based on time reversal method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 220, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peng, H.; Yin, J.; Song, W. Mechanical and Hydraulic Behaviors of Eco-Friendly Pervious Concrete Incorporating Fly Ash and Blast Furnace Slag. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, Y.; Liu, P.; Tian, J.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y. Preliminary Investigation of the Feasibility of Using a Superpave Gyratory Compactor to Design Cement-Treated Aggregate Mixture. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asadi Shamsabadi, E.; Ghalehnovi, M.; De Brito, J.; Khodabakhshian, A. Performance of Concrete with Waste Granite Powder: The Effect of Superplasticizers. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Głuchowski, A.; Sas, W.; Dzięcioł, J.; Soból, E.; Szymański, A. Permeability and Leaching Properties of Recycled Concrete Aggregate as an Emerging Material in Civil Engineering. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, H.; Li, S.; Lu, Y.; Yang, T. Reliability Study on FRP Composites Exposed to Wet-Dry Cycles. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, D.; Qian, G.; Liu, J.; Yao, J. Application of Polymer Curing Agent in Ecological Protection Engineering of Weak Rock Slopes. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Fan, J. Sensitivity Factors Analysis on the Compressive Strength and Flexural Strength of Recycled Aggregate Infill Wall Materials. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arredondo-Rea, S.; Corral-Higuera, R.; Gómez-Soberón, J.; Gámez-García, D.; Bernal-Camacho, J.; Rosas-Casarez, C.; Ungsson-Nieblas, M. Durability Parameters of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete: Case Study. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hasnain Saeed, M.; Shah, S.; Arshad, H.; Waqar, A.; Imam, M.; Sadiq, A.; Hafeez, S.; Mansoor, J.; Waseem, M. Sustainable Silicon Waste Material Utilization for Road Construction: An Application of Modified Binder for Marshall Stability Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, T.; Liu, S.; Feng, Y.; Yu, J. Compaction Characteristics and Minimum Void Ratio Prediction Model for Gap-Graded Soil-Rock Mixture. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cheng, Y.; Huang, X. Effect of Mineral Additives on the Behavior of an Expansive Soil for Use in Highway Subgrade Soils. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, P.; Yu, Y.; Guan, X. Preparation of Carbon Nitride Dots with Sizes Larger than 20 nm. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jang, Y.; Lee, B.; Lee, J. Strength and Water Purification Properties of Environment-Friendly Construction Material Produced with the (D)PAOs and Zeolite. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, B.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Z. Compressive Behaviors of Prisms Made of Demolished Concrete Lumps and Fresh Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, B.; Ji, M. Fire Behavior of U-shaped Steel Beams Filled with Demolished Concrete Lumps and Fresh Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Smarzewski, P. Hybrid Fibres as Shear Reinforcement in High-Performance Concrete Beams with and without Openings. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suo, Y.; Yang, W.; Chen, P. Study on Hysteresis Model of Welding Material in Unstiffened Welded Joints of Steel Tubular Truss Structure. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, B.; Huang, W.; Zheng, S. Study on Restoring Force Performance of Corrosion Damage Steel Frame Beams under Acid Atmosphere. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, G.; Andjelic, A.; Li, Z.; Lei, Z.; Bie, X. Residual Axial Bearing Capacity of Concrete-Filled Circular Steel Tubular Columns (CFCSTCs) after Transverse Impact. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Z.; Xu, C. Research on Compression Behavior of Square Thin-Walled CFST Columns with Steel-Bar Stiffeners. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gong, J.; Zou, X.; Shi, H.; Jiang, C.; Li, Z. Numerical Investigation of the Nonlinear Composite Action of FRP-Concrete Hybrid Beams/Decks. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gong, J.; Zou, X.; Xia, P. Experimental Investigation of the Natural Bonding Strength between Stay-In-Place Form and Concrete in FRP-Concrete Decks/Beams. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, K.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Tu, J.; Li, X. Experimental Research on Bond Behavior between GFRP Bars and Stirrups-Confined Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tan, Y.; Zhu, B.; Yan, T.; Huang, B.; Wang, X.; Yang, W.; Huang, B. Experimental Study of the Mechanical Behavior of the Steel–Concrete Joints in a Composite Truss Bridge. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, W.; Bao, C.; Ma, X.; Zhang, S. Study on Structural Robustness of Isolated Structure Based on Seismic Response. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Niu, X.; Yao, Y.; Sun, Y.; He, Y.; Zhang, H. 3D Numerical Analysis of Synergetic Interaction between High-Rise Building Basement and CFG Piles Foundation. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, F. Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Behavior of Newly-Developed Precast Reinforced Concrete Block Masonry Shear Walls. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ju, H.; Han, S.; Choi, I.; Choi, S.; Park, M.; Kim, K. Experimental Study on an Optimized-Section Precast Slab with Structural Aesthetics. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, S.; Lian, S.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; Ma, S. Influence of a New Form of Bolted Connection on the Mechanical Behaviors of a PC Shear Wall. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, F.; Chi, B. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Seismic Performance of Prefabricated Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, W.; Lin, J.; Gao, N.; Yan, R. Experimental Study on the Static Behavior of Reinforced Warren Circular Hollow Section (CHS) Tubular Trusses. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yin, Z.; Feng, D.; Yang, W. Damage Analyses of Replaceable Links in Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF) Subject to Cyclic Loading. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zheng, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, C. Experimental and Parametric Study on the Pull-Out Resistance of a Notched Perfobond Shear Connector. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Duan, L.; Nie, X.; Ding, R.; Zhuang, L. Research on Application of Uplift-Restricted Slip-Permitted (URSP) Connectors in Steel-Concrete Composite Frames. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xia, L.; Zheng, Y. Deep Embedment (DE) FRP Shear Strengthening of Concrete Bridge Slabs under Loads Close to Supports. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hong, K.; Lee, S.; Han, S.; Yeon, Y. Evaluation of Fe-Based Shape Memory Alloy (Fe-SMA) as Strengthening Material for Reinforced Concrete Structures. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Spadea, S.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Nanni, A. Development of new FRP reinforcement for optimized concrete structures. In High Tech Concrete: Where Technology and Engineering Meet; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2018; pp. 867–876. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, W.; Fan, S.; Ho, S.C.M.; Wu, J.; Song, G. Interfacial debonding detection in fiber-reinforced polymer rebar–reinforced concrete using electro-mechanical impedance technique. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 17, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Di, B.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, Y.; Song, G. Investigation of bonding behavior of FRP and steel bars in self-compacting concrete structures using acoustic emission method. Sensors 2019, 19, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jiang, T.; Kong, Q.; Patil, D.; Luo, Z.; Huo, L.; Song, G. Detection of debonding between fiber reinforced polymer bar and concrete structure using piezoceramic transducers and wavelet packet analysis. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 1992–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yin, H.; Wang, T.; Yang, D.; Liu, S.; Shao, J.; Li, Y. A smart washer for bolt looseness monitoring based on piezoelectric active sensing method. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huo, L.; Wang, F.; Li, H.; Song, G. A fractal contact theory based model for bolted connection looseness monitoring using piezoceramic transducers. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baumgartner, J.; Schnabel, K.; Huberth, F. Fatigue assessment of EMPT-welded joints using the reference radius concept. Procedia Eng. 2018, 213, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jiang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Song, G. Monitoring fatigue damage of modular bridge expansion joints using piezoceramic transducers. Sensors 2018, 18, 3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jiang, J.; Hei, C.; Feng, Q.; Jiang, J. Monitoring of Epoxy-Grouted Bonding Strength Development between an Anchored Steel Bar and Concrete Using PZT-Enabled Active Sensing. Sensors 2019, 19, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Singh, R.; Kumar, R.; Farina, I.; Colangelo, F.; Feo, L.; Fraternali, F. Multi-material additive manufacturing of sustainable innovative materials and structures. Polymers 2019, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hou, S.; Kong, Z.; Wu, B.; Liu, L. Compactness monitoring of compound concrete filled with demolished concrete lumps using PZT-based smart aggregates. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2018, 31, 04018064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, B.; Jian, S.M.; Zhao, X.Y. Structural behavior of steel-concrete partially encased composite columns containing demolished concrete lumps under axial compression. Eng. Struct. 2019, 197, 109383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Singh, R.; Kumar, R.; Ranjan, N.; Penna, R.; Fraternali, F. On the recyclability of polyamide for sustainable composite structures in civil engineering. Compos. Struct. 2018, 184, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, G.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, B. Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194127

AMA Style

Song G, Zheng Y, Wu B. Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(19):4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Gangbing, Yu Zheng, and Bo Wu. 2019. "Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure" Applied Sciences 9, no. 19: 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194127

APA Style

Song, G., Zheng, Y., & Wu, B. (2019). Emerging Construction Materials and Sustainable Infrastructure. Applied Sciences, 9(19), 4127. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9194127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop