Next Article in Journal
Sleep in the Aging Brain
Next Article in Special Issue
Focus on Peripheral Biomarkers of Mental Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Relationship between Cognitive Functions and Sport-Specific Physical Performance in Youth Volleyball Players
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Bipolar Disorder
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/brainsci11020228
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Biological Pathways Associated with Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder

by
Bianca Wollenhaupt-Aguiar
1,2,
Flavio Kapczinski
1,2,3,4,5 and
Bianca Pfaffenseller
1,2,*
1
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neuroscience, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada
2
Mood Disorders Program, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8N 3K7, Canada
3
Neuroscience Graduate Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
4
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia Translacional em Medicina (INCT-TM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-903, Brazil
5
Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(2), 228; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020228
Submission received: 19 December 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peripheral Biomarkers of Mental Disorders and Related Clinical Features)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is evidence suggesting clinical progression in a subset of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). This progression is associated with worse clinical outcomes and biological changes. Molecular pathways and biological markers of clinical progression have been identified and may explain the progressive changes associated with this disorder. The biological basis for clinical progression in BD is called neuroprogression. We propose that the following intertwined pathways provide the biological basis of neuroprogression: inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired calcium signaling, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired neuroplasticity and cellular resilience. The nonlinear interaction of these pathways may worsen clinical outcomes, cognition, and functioning. Understanding neuroprogression in BD is crucial for identifying novel therapeutic targets, preventing illness progression, and ultimately promoting better outcomes.

1. Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) affects approximately 60 million people worldwide and negatively impacts their quality of life, functioning, and overall health from a young age [1]. Furthermore, BD is among the top 20 disorders with the highest global burden of disease, and patients with BD have a reduced life expectancy of about 8–12 years [2]. In addition, a recent study showed that functional impairment is progressive in a subset of patients, characterized primarily by a higher number of relapses, greater neurocognitive impairment, and greater overall severity of depressive symptoms [3], which corroborates previous studies showing that patients who had multiple episodes present with cognitive and functional impairment [4,5]. A recent meta-analysis also showed that the risk of progression to dementia is higher in patients with BD [6]. In addition, the number of mood episodes predicts the development of dementia in BD [6].
Furthermore, recent studies have shown that multiple mood episodes are associated with brain changes in BD [7]. For instance, brain imaging showed that reductions in hippocampal subfields [8], total hippocampal volume [9], brain regions covering the fronto-limbic system (gray matter), cerebellum, and corpus callosum (white matter) [10] are associated with a higher number of mood episodes. Other studies have also reported associations between impairments in verbal learning memory and a higher number of mood episodes [9].
The impact of repeated mood episodes in clinical outcomes over time is known as clinical progression [11]. The biological basis for clinical progression in BD is called neuroprogression [12]. Importantly, cognitive impairments in BD have been linked with low-grade inflammation and brain structural alterations [13]. As the illness progresses, the clinical and biological changes associated with mood episodes become more pronounced, increasing the patient’s vulnerability to stress and new episodes which in turn reinforces the cycle of neuroprogression in BD (Figure 1).
In past years, research has focused on peripheral biomarkers as a way of understanding the underlying basis of BD [14]. Studies showed that patients at a late stage of BD presented decreased serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor [15] and increased levels of inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) [15,16] and interleukin (IL)-6 [17], as well as the C-C motif ligand 11 (CCL11) [18]. Changes in peripheral biomarkers were also shown in meta-analyses [19,20,21]. The development of biomarkers to improve diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis is an ongoing pursuit in the field of BD. Due to the heterogeneity of BD, the possibility of developing a single, specific biomarker is still remote; however, there is a set of promising biomarkers that may serve as predictive, prognostic, or diagnostic markers in the future. Recently, a composite biomarker panel was able to discriminate between patients with rapid-cycling BD and healthy individuals and between manic and depressive states [22]. It was also shown that machine learning techniques, coupled with peripheral biomarkers, provided a potential diagnostic tool to aid in distinguishing depressed patients with BD from major depressive disorder [23]. The field has been investigating several biological pathways, mostly associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, neurotrophic factors, and cellular resilience. Based on the available evidence, in this overview, we suggest a potential mechanistic association between these pathways and the course of the illness in BD.

2. Inflammation

There is increasing evidence suggesting that chronic inflammatory processes in the periphery and in the brain (neuroinflammation) are involved in the pathophysiology of BD [24]. Low-grade immune activation has been reported in BD, related to the mood states [25,26], illness progression [15,18], and higher rates of comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease [27,28]. Several meta-analyses have shown increased levels of inflammatory markers in patients with BD, including soluble interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (sIL-2R), sIL-6R, TNF-alpha, soluble TNF receptor-1, and IL-4 [19,20,21,22]. This immune response may be generated and amplified by the actions of the damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs); some of them—circulating cell-free (ccf) nuclear (n)DNA, heat shock protein (HSP)70, and HSP90a—were found to be increased during BD mood episodes when compared to healthy subjects [29].
In addition, previous studies suggest that neuroinflammation plays a role in recurrent mood disorders [30,31]. It has been shown that mood episodes can lead to neuronal injury causing the release of DAMPs that in turn activate the microglia [32]. After multiple mood episodes, the excessive release of proinflammatory cytokines can inhibit the neurogenesis and may continue to activate microglial cells, which can lead to pruning and remodeling synaptic plasticity and, ultimately, neuronal death [32]. Microglial and astroglial activation [33], with a consequent reduction in glial density [34] and in the turnover of oligodendrocytes [35,36], have been reported in postmortem studies of BD, which potentially can lead to an increase in the permeability of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [37]. Of note, microglial activation has been shown in the hippocampus of patients with BD [38]. Moreover, neuroimaging studies have supported the presence of white matter alterations in BD, indicating the involvement of oligodendrocytes [39]. Taken together, these changes support a potential link between neuroinflammation and peripheral inflammation in BD.
It is also important to note that increased levels of cytokines can lead to changes in the production and release of neurotransmitters in the brain [40,41,42]. In this context, changes in monoamine neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, or serotonin, have been consistently reported in BD and are associated with the mechanisms of action of antidepressants [43]. Altogether, proinflammatory cytokines are associated with reduced synthesis of serotonin and increased neurotoxic metabolites of the kynurenine pathway [44,45,46], which may play a key role in the development of mood symptoms [40,45]. Studies have also shown that increased dopamine neurotransmission is associated with manic symptoms, while decreased dopamine neurotransmission is associated with depressive symptoms [47].

3. Impaired Cellular Resilience

Impaired cellular resilience may be one potential explanation for an increased vulnerability to stressful events and episode recurrence among individuals with BD. At the cellular level, resilience is the ability of cells to adapt to different insults or stressful conditions, activating molecular pathways to restore the cellular balance. There is evidence that some patients with BD may present impairments in neuroplasticity and cellular resilience [48] potentially related to the pathological brain rewiring that has been associated with neuroprogression [49]. In addition, increased susceptibility to cell death in the olfactory neuroepithelium [50] and blood cells has been reported in patients with BD [51]. Therefore, the impaired cell resilience reported in BD, both in neurons and peripheral cells, may be associated with an increased vulnerability to cellular stress.
However, the mechanisms underlying the impaired neuroplasticity and cellular resilience in BD have not been fully clarified. The mechanisms causing this reduced resilience most likely involve specific organelles typically responsible for cellular homeostasis such as the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Factors including inflammatory signals, oxidative stress, calcium homeostasis disturbances, and other cellular stressful stimuli can disrupt ER and mitochondrial function. It is known that ER and mitochondria are subcellular compartments with a close physical and functional interaction that is crucial for cellular homeostasis and proper functioning [52]. However, disturbances in these organelles under pathological conditions may contribute to impairments in the neural tissue. For instance, research from the past few decades reported apoptotic crosstalk between ER and mitochondria [53], in which ER dysfunction could induce mitochondrial cytochrome-c release and caspase 3 activation leading to apoptosis. In addition, recent findings showed that ER chaperones can control mitochondrial apoptosis through the control of ER–mitochondria calcium flux [54].
Apoptosis has been reported in BD with studies also showing a significant increase in the levels of proapoptotic factors and a decrease in the levels of antiapoptotic factors in both peripheral blood cells [55,56,57] and postmortem brain tissue [58,59]. This may contribute to structural changes in the brain and progressive cognitive changes associated with neuroprogression in BD. Neuroprogression in BD could be an outcome of impaired activation of inflammatory, oxidative, and mitochondrial–ER pathways, which may further lead to impaired neuroplasticity, dysfunction in neuronal signaling, and consequent apoptosis and/or cell death.

4. Impaired Calcium Signaling

Research from decades ago found increased levels of calcium in platelets, lymphocytes, and lymphoblastoid cells from patients with BD [60,61]. Among the molecular pathways related to BD, calcium signaling has been highlighted [62,63], supporting previous findings on aberrant calcium signaling in BD [64,65]. In addition, a recent meta-analysis showed that there is a robust increase of basal and stimulated free intracellular calcium in BD [66], reinforcing the role of impaired calcium signaling in this illness. A chronic accumulation of calcium could be associated with cellular dysfunctions and the aforementioned impaired cellular resilience in BD.
Genetic factors may contribute to impaired intracellular calcium signaling in BD. For instance, the genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis has shown an association of BD with the CACNA1C gene, encoding the α1C subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel [67]. Whole-genome sequencing analysis also indicated a potential role of calcium signaling-related genes [68,69] in BD. In this scenario, polymorphisms and deletions in mitochondrial DNA have been suggested to affect intracellular calcium regulation in BD [70], supporting the hypothesis of mitochondrial dysfunction and impaired calcium signaling in BD.
Calcium signaling plays a key role in regulating neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity involved in cognitive processes. Alterations in this pathway, including abnormally increased calcium levels or changes in properties of calcium channels such as that encoded by the CACNA1C gene, might influence the neuronal membrane excitability, and a phenotypic switch in the excitatory or inhibitory neurons [64]. This could affect essential neural components that could contribute to BD [64]. Calcium activates numerous calcium-dependent enzymes, including kinases, phosphatases, and proteases, and also ion channels [65]. For instance, changes in calcium levels in BD may also act through persistent calcium-dependent protein kinase activation influencing neural circuitry [64]. Recently, more than a hundred calcium-dependent/activated proteins have been related to neuropsychiatry [71], indicating the potential role of calcium signaling in the regulation of oligodendrogenesis mechanisms and myelination involving neural cells and stem/progenitor cells, which are processes potentially involved in BD [39].
Regarding calcium regulation in BD, a recent study that evaluated components of an integrated hormonal system involving parathyroid hormone and vitamin D suggested that chronic calcium imbalance may influence the long-term outcome of BD in terms of clinical severity [72].

5. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Chronic stress and exposure to glucocorticoids have been shown to cause mitochondrial dysfunction, with alterations in oxygen consumption, mitochondrial membrane potential, and calcium holding capacity, ultimately leading to apoptosis [73,74]. Importantly, studies have reported an impaired hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis [75], mitochondrial dysfunction [76], and increased apoptosis in patients with BD [55,56,59]. Mitochondrial dysfunction in BD has been evidenced by decreased levels of mitochondrial respiration, high energy phosphates, and pH; changes in mitochondrial morphology; deletions and polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA; and downregulation of mRNA and proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism (as reviewed by [70,76]). For instance, postmortem studies have shown decreased expression of genes encoding subunits of complexes of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [77,78,79].
In addition, a recent study evaluating neurons generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of patients with BD showed neuronal hyperexcitability associated with increased mitochondrial membrane potential, reduced size of mitochondria, and upregulation of mitochondrial genes [80]. Mitochondrial dysfunction in BD is further supported by impaired brain energy metabolism, with metabolic studies reporting increased levels of lactate and gamma-aminobutyric acid in the brain [81] and increased levels of isocitrate in cerebrospinal fluid [82].
These changes in mitochondrial functioning may be associated with impaired calcium signaling and support a key role of this organelle in reduced neuroplasticity underlying neuroprogression in BD. Impaired mitochondrial functioning could lead to an increase in free radicals, causing an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidant mechanisms, potentially resulting in oxidative damage.

6. Oxidative Stress

The excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the result of an imbalance of oxidant processes and antioxidant defenses, which is called oxidative stress [83]. Oxidative stress has been associated with BD and is closely connected to increased inflammation [84,85]. The increase in ROS can lead to increased damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA, ultimately leading to cell death [83]. Evidence of increased ROS and reduced antioxidant defenses has been reported in patients with BD and is associated with their number of episodes [86,87].
Evidence has pointed to oxidative damage in proteins in BD, such as increased 3-nitrotyrosine [88] and protein carbonyl content [89]. Most findings have focused on patients at late stages, including increased levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) [90,91], glutathione reductase, glutathione S-transferase [88], nitric oxide [90], and total oxidant status [92].

7. Endoplasmic Reticulum Dysfunction

Evidence from the past two decades has suggested an association between the ER and BD, including pharmacological experiments showing that ER-related chaperones are modulated by mood stabilizers [93,94,95]. Similarly, genetic studies showed an association of BD with a polymorphism in the promoter region of X-box binding protein (XBP)1 (a transcription factor that induces the expression of ER chaperones) [96] and in the chaperone glucose-regulated protein (GRP)78 [97], suggesting them as potential risk factors for developing the disorder. Moreover, lymphoblastoid cells from patients with BD presented a decreased response involving XBP1 and C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) when exposed to ER stress inducers [98] and a reduction in stress-induced splicing of XBP1 and GRP94 expression [99]. These findings suggest that patients with BD may present with a dysfunctional response to ER stress, which may impair cellular homeostasis.
Interestingly, lymphocytes from patients with BD at late stages presented an impaired response to in vitro induced ER stress (no induction of essential proteins involved in ER stress response signaling) and a pronounced increase in ER stress-induced cell death when compared to patients at early stages and controls [51]. These findings indicate that dysfunction in ER-related stress response may be associated with decreased cellular resilience in BD and that protective cellular mechanisms may become less effective throughout illness progression.

8. Biological Basis of Neuroprogression

The knowledge about the biological mechanisms of neuroprogression has advanced considerably in the field of psychiatry, however little is known about the interaction between molecular pathways that may be responsible for clinical outcomes. In addition, it is not known why only a subset of patients may develop a progressive course and worse clinical outcomes, such as reduced responsiveness to treatment, recurrent mood episodes, and impaired cognition and functioning. Understanding such heterogeneity at the biological level may provide valuable information to the field, ultimately providing knowledge related to heterogeneous clinical presentations in patients.
As discussed earlier, increased inflammation is associated with neuroprogression and may be implicated in cellular vulnerability most likely related to a cascade of alterations in mitochondrial function and ER signaling pathways. The ER and mitochondria are tightly interconnected in specific and dynamic microdomains called mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs). MAMs provide a means of crosstalk between the ER and mitochondria, providing a rapid exchange of physical stimuli and molecules including calcium and ROS [67]. MAMs play crucial roles in calcium signaling, lipid homeostasis, mitochondrial dynamics, autophagy, and inflammation [100]. Disturbances in ER–mitochondria interactions have been associated with the progression of neurological disorders [101]. Herein, we postulate that dysfunctions of the signaling pathway involving these organelles may be important components of illness progression in BD. Considering that (1) BD has been strongly associated with a dysregulation of immune responses, comprising inflammation, oxidative stress, and release of DAMPs, and (2) patients with BD present comorbidities associated with chronic inflammation such as cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, we suggest that the inflammation/MAMs dynamics are the most probable mechanisms linking the systemic changes and impaired cellular resilience observed in patients with BD.
Thus, we suggest that impairments of cellular resilience may underlie the pathological brain rewiring in BD, contributing to the systemic impairments observed among these patients. In view of that, we propose that the following pathways are interconnected and contribute to neuroprogression in BD: inflammation, oxidative stress, ER and mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired calcium signaling, and impaired neuroplasticity and resilience (Figure 2). These players, interconnected in a vicious loop, may worsen clinical outcomes, cognition, and functioning and promote more pronounced changes in peripheral biomarkers and the brain.
Considering that peripheral markers related to oxidative stress, inflammation, and neurotrophins are altered in patients with BD [26], studies with peripheral samples may yield promising findings in the assessment of neuroprogression pathways in BD. Neuroinflammation appears to orchestrate biological mechanisms that are fundamental to disorders associated with cognitive impairment [102].

9. Conclusions

A subset of patients with BD present a neuroprogressive course associated with clinical, functional, cognitive, and biological changes. Molecular pathways and biological markers related to BD have been identified and may help understand the progressive clinical and biological changes associated with this disorder.
We propose that the following pathways are connected in the neuroprogression of BD: (1) inflammation, (2) oxidative stress, (3) impaired calcium signaling, (4) ER dysfunction, (5) mitochondrial dysfunction, and (6) impaired neuroplasticity and cellular resilience. Understanding these pathways may help to clarify the pathophysiology underlying BD and provide novel insights into key molecular players that could be pharmacologically modulated to prevent illness progression, ultimately promoting better outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.W.-A., F.K., and B.P.; data curation, B.W.-A. and B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, B.W.-A. and B.P.; writing—review and editing, B.W.-A., F.K., and B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Cezar Farias for his contribution in designing the figures for this manuscript, as well as Devon Watts and Coral Rakovski for language review.

Conflicts of Interest

F.K. reports personal fees as a speaker/consultant from Janssen—Johnson & Johnson, as well as grants from INCT–CNPq and the Canada Foundation for Innovation, outside the submitted work. B.W.-A. and B.P. declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Mental Disorders. Fact Sheet N°396. Available online: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs396/en/ (accessed on 1 October 2020).
  2. Kessing, L.V.; Vradi, E.; Andersen, P.K. Life expectancy in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2015, 17, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. López-Villarreal, A.; Sánchez-Morla, E.M.; Jiménez-López, E.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.; Aparicio, A.I.; Mateo-Sotos, J.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, R.; Vieta, E.; Santos, J.L. Progression of the functional deficit in a group of patients with bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis based on longitudinal data. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2020, 270, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rosa, A.R.; González-Ortega, I.; González-Pinto, A.; Echeburúa, E.; Comes, M.; Martínez-Àran, A.; Ugarte, A.; Fernández, M.; Vieta, E. One-year psychosocial functioning in patients in the early vs. late stage of bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2012, 125, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rosa, A.R.; Magalhães, P.V.; Czepielewski, L.; Sulzbach, M.V.; Goi, P.D.; Vieta, E.; Gama, C.S.; Kapczinski, F. Clinical staging in bipolar disorder: Focus on cognition and functioning. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2014, 75, e450–e456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Velosa, J.; Delgado, A.; Finger, E.; Berk, M.; Kapczinski, F.; de Azevedo Cardoso, T. Risk of dementia in bipolar disorder and the interplay of lithium: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2020, 141, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Librenza-Garcia, D.; Suh, J.S.; Watts, D.P.; Ballester, P.L.; Minuzzi, L.; Kapczinski, F.; Frey, B.N. Structural and Functional Brain Correlates of Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2020. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao, B.; Passos, I.C.; Mwangi, B.; Amaral-Silva, H.; Tannous, J.; Wu, M.J.; Zunta-Soares, G.B.; Soares, J.C. Hippocampal subfield volumes in mood disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 2017, 22, 1352–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, B.; Passos, I.C.; Mwangi, B.; Bauer, I.E.; Zunta-Soares, G.B.; Kapczinski, F.; Soares, J.C. Hippocampal volume and verbal memory performance in late-stage bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2016, 73, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mwangi, B.; Wu, M.J.; Cao, B.; Passos, I.C.; Lavagnino, L.; Keser, Z.; Zunta-Soares, G.B.; Hasan, K.M.; Kapczinski, F.; Soares, J.C. Individualized Prediction and Clinical Staging of Bipolar Disorders using Neuroanatomical Biomarkers. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 2016, 1, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kessing, L.V.; Andersen, P.K. Evidence for clinical progression of unipolar and bipolar disorders. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2017, 135, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yatham, L.N.; Kennedy, S.H.; Parikh, S.V.; Schaffer, A.; Bond, D.J.; Frey, B.N.; Sharma, V.; Goldstein, B.I.; Rej, S.; Beaulieu, S.; et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2018, 20, 97–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van Rheenen, T.E.; Lewandowski, K.E.; Bauer, I.E.; Kapczinski, F.; Miskowiak, K.; Burdick, K.E.; Balanzá-Martínez, V. Current understandings of the trajectory and emerging correlates of cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: An overview of evidence. Bipolar Disord. 2020, 22, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Frey, B.N.; Andreazza, A.C.; Houenou, J.; Jamain, S.; Goldstein, B.I.; Frye, M.A.; Leboyer, M.; Berk, M.; Malhi, G.S.; Lopez-Jaramillo, C.; et al. Biomarkers in bipolar disorder: A positional paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Biomarkers Task Force. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2013, 47, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kauer-Sant’Anna, M.; Kapczinski, F.; Andreazza, A.C.; Bond, D.J.; Lam, R.W.; Young, L.T.; Yatham, L.N. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and inflammatory markers in patients with early- vs. late-stage bipolar disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tatay-Manteiga, A.; Balanzá-Martínez, V.; Bristot, G.; Tabarés-Seisdedos, R.; Kapczinski, F.; Cauli, O. Clinical staging and serum cytokines in bipolar patients during euthymia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017, 77, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grande, I.; Magalhães, P.V.; Chendo, I.; Stertz, L.; Panizutti, B.; Colpo, G.D.; Rosa, A.R.; Gama, C.S.; Kapczinski, F.; Vieta, E. Staging bipolar disorder: Clinical, biochemical, and functional correlates. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2014, 129, 437–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Panizzutti, B.; Gubert, C.; Schuh, A.L.; Ferrari, P.; Bristot, G.; Fries, G.R.; Massuda, R.; Walz, J.; Rocha, N.P.; Berk, M.; et al. Increased serum levels of eotaxin/CCL11 in late-stage patients with bipolar disorder: An accelerated aging biomarker? J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 182, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rowland, T.; Perry, B.I.; Upthegrove, R.; Barnes, N.; Chatterjee, J.; Gallacher, D.; Marwaha, S. Neurotrophins, cytokines, oxidative stress mediators and mood state in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Br. J. Psychiatry 2018, 213, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Modabbernia, A.; Taslimi, S.; Brietzke, E.; Ashrafi, M. Cytokine alterations in bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis of 30 studies. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 74, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Munkholm, K.; Vinberg, M.; Vedel Kessing, L. Cytokines in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 144, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Munkholm, K.; Vinberg, M.; Pedersen, B.K.; Poulsen, H.E.; Ekstrøm, C.T.; Kessing, L.V. A multisystem composite biomarker as a preliminary diagnostic test in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2019, 139, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, B.; Librenza-Garcia, D.; Bristot, G.; Przybylski, L.; Stertz, L.; Kubiachi Burque, R.; Ceresér, K.M.; Spanemberg, L.; Caldieraro, M.A.; Frey, B.N.; et al. Differential biomarker signatures in unipolar and bipolar depression: A machine learning approach. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2020, 54, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Berk, M.; Kapczinski, F.; Andreazza, A.C.; Dean, O.M.; Giorlando, F.; Maes, M.; Yücel, M.; Gama, C.S.; Dodd, S.; Dean, B.; et al. Pathways underlying neuroprogression in bipolar disorder: Focus on inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotrophic factors. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35, 804–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Misiak, B.; Bartoli, F.; Carrà, G.; Małecka, M.; Samochowiec, J.; Jarosz, K.; Banik, A.; Stańczykiewicz, B. Chemokine alterations in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 88, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Kapczinski, F.; Dal-Pizzol, F.; Teixeira, A.L.; Magalhaes, P.V.; Kauer-Sant’Anna, M.; Klamt, F.; Moreira, J.C.; de Bittencourt Pasquali, M.A.; Fries, G.R.; Quevedo, J.; et al. Peripheral biomarkers and illness activity in bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2011, 45, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goldstein, B.I.; Baune, B.T.; Bond, D.J.; Chen, P.H.; Eyler, L.; Fagiolini, A.; Gomes, F.; Hajek, T.; Hatch, J.; McElroy, S.L.; et al. Call to action regarding the vascular-bipolar link: A report from the Vascular Task Force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2020, 22, 440–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Correll, C.U.; Ng-Mak, D.S.; Stafkey-Mailey, D.; Farrelly, E.; Rajagopalan, K.; Loebel, A. Cardiometabolic comorbidities, readmission, and costs in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A real-world analysis. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2017, 16, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stertz, L.; Fries, G.R.; Rosa, A.R.; Kauer-Sant’anna, M.; Ferrari, P.; Paz, A.V.; Green, C.; Cunha, Â.B.; Dal-Pizzol, F.; Gottfried, C.; et al. Damage-associated molecular patterns and immune activation in bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2015, 132, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kapczinski, F.; Vieta, E.; Magalhães, P.V.S.; Berk, M. Neuroprogression and Staging in Bipolar Disorder, 1st ed.; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 2015; p. 368. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kapczinski, F.; Berk, M.; Magalhães, P.V.S. Neuroprogression in Psychiatric; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; p. 272. [Google Scholar]
  32. Stertz, L.; Magalhães, P.V.; Kapczinski, F. Is bipolar disorder an inflammatory condition? The relevance of microglial activation. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2013, 26, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rao, J.S.; Harry, G.J.; Rapoport, S.I.; Kim, H.W. Increased excitotoxicity and neuroinflammatory markers in postmortem frontal cortex from bipolar disorder patients. Mol. Psychiatry 2010, 15, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rajkowska, G.; Halaris, A.; Selemon, L.D. Reductions in neuronal and glial density characterize the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2001, 49, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vostrikov, V.M.; Uranova, N.A.; Orlovskaya, D.D. Deficit of perineuronal oligodendrocytes in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and mood disorders. Schizophr. Res. 2007, 94, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Uranova, N.A.; Vostrikov, V.M.; Orlovskaya, D.D.; Rachmanova, V.I. Oligodendroglial density in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and mood disorders: A study from the Stanley Neuropathology Consortium. Schizophr. Res. 2004, 67, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patel, J.P.; Frey, B.N. Disruption in the Blood-Brain Barrier: The Missing Link between Brain and Body Inflammation in Bipolar Disorder? Neural Plast. 2015, 2015, 708306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haarman, B.C.; Riemersma-Van der Lek, R.F.; de Groot, J.C.; Ruhé, H.G.; Klein, H.C.; Zandstra, T.E.; Burger, H.; Schoevers, R.A.; de Vries, E.F.; Drexhage, H.A.; et al. Neuroinflammation in bipolar disorder—A [(11)C]-(R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study. Brain Behav. Immun. 2014, 40, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sehmbi, M.; Rowley, C.D.; Minuzzi, L.; Kapczinski, F.; Steiner, M.; Sassi, R.B.; Bock, N.A.; Frey, B.N. Association of intracortical myelin and cognitive function in bipolar I disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2018, 138, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Miller, A.H.; Haroon, E.; Raison, C.L.; Felger, J.C. Cytokine targets in the brain: Impact on neurotransmitters and neurocircuits. Depress. Anxiety 2013, 30, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Benedetti, F.; Aggio, V.; Pratesi, M.L.; Greco, G.; Furlan, R. Neuroinflammation in Bipolar Depression. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barbosa, I.G.; Bauer, M.E.; Machado-Vieira, R.; Teixeira, A.L. Cytokines in bipolar disorder: Paving the way for neuroprogression. Neural Plast. 2014, 2014, 360481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. López-Muñoz, F.; Alamo, C. Monoaminergic neurotransmission: The history of the discovery of antidepressants from 1950s until today. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 1563–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wichers, M.C.; Maes, M. The role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in the pathophysiology of interferon-alpha-induced depression. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2004, 29, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Jans, L.A.; Riedel, W.J.; Markus, C.R.; Blokland, A. Serotonergic vulnerability and depression: Assumptions, experimental evidence and implications. Mol. Psychiatry 2007, 12, 522–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rosenblat, J.D.; McIntyre, R.S. Bipolar Disorder and Immune Dysfunction: Epidemiological Findings, Proposed Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications. Brain Sci. 2017, 7, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Berk, M.; Dodd, S.; Kauer-Sant’anna, M.; Malhi, G.S.; Bourin, M.; Kapczinski, F.; Norman, T. Dopamine dysregulation syndrome: Implications for a dopamine hypothesis of bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 2007, 116, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rajkowska, G. Cell pathology in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2002, 4, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Berk, M. Neuroprogression: Pathways to progressive brain changes in bipolar disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. McCurdy, R.D.; Féron, F.; Perry, C.; Chant, D.C.; McLean, D.; Matigian, N.; Hayward, N.K.; McGrath, J.J.; Mackay-Sim, A. Cell cycle alterations in biopsied olfactory neuroepithelium in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder using cell culture and gene expression analyses. Schizophr. Res. 2006, 82, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Pfaffenseller, B.; Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, B.; Fries, G.R.; Colpo, G.D.; Burque, R.K.; Bristot, G.; Ferrari, P.; Ceresér, K.M.; Rosa, A.R.; Klamt, F.; et al. Impaired endoplasmic reticulum stress response in bipolar disorder: Cellular evidence of illness progression. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 17, 1453–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Filadi, R.; Theurey, P.; Pizzo, P. The endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling in health and disease: Molecules, functions and significance. Cell Calcium 2017, 62, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Häcki, J.; Egger, L.; Monney, L.; Conus, S.; Rossé, T.; Fellay, I.; Borner, C. Apoptotic crosstalk between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria controlled by Bcl-2. Oncogene 2000, 19, 2286–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gutiérrez, T.; Simmen, T. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperones tweak the mitochondrial calcium rheostat to control metabolism and cell death. Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fries, G.R.; Vasconcelos-Moreno, M.P.; Gubert, C.; Santos, B.T.; da Rosa, A.L.; Eisele, B.; Sartori, J.; Pfaffenseller, B.; Kapczinski, F.; Kauer-Sant’anna, M. Early apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with bipolar disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2014, 152–154, 474–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pietruczuk, K.; Lisowska, K.A.; Grabowski, K.; Landowski, J.; Witkowski, J.M. Proliferation and apoptosis of T lymphocytes in patients with bipolar disorder. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Scaini, G.; Fries, G.R.; Valvassori, S.S.; Zeni, C.P.; Zunta-Soares, G.; Berk, M.; Soares, J.C.; Quevedo, J. Perturbations in the apoptotic pathway and mitochondrial network dynamics in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from bipolar disorder patients. Transl. Psychiatry 2017, 7, e1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, H.W.; Rapoport, S.I.; Rao, J.S. Altered expression of apoptotic factors and synaptic markers in postmortem brain from bipolar disorder patients. Neurobiol. Dis. 2010, 37, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gigante, A.D.; Young, L.T.; Yatham, L.N.; Andreazza, A.C.; Nery, F.G.; Grinberg, L.T.; Heinsen, H.; Lafer, B. Morphometric post-mortem studies in bipolar disorder: Possible association with oxidative stress and apoptosis. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011, 14, 1075–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dubovsky, S.L.; Murphy, J.; Thomas, M.; Rademacher, J. Abnormal intracellular calcium ion concentration in platelets and lymphocytes of bipolar patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 1992, 149, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Perova, T.; Wasserman, M.J.; Li, P.P.; Warsh, J.J. Hyperactive intracellular calcium dynamics in B lymphoblasts from patients with bipolar I disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008, 11, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nurnberger, J.I., Jr.; Koller, D.L.; Jung, J.; Edenberg, H.J.; Foroud, T.; Guella, I.; Vawter, M.P.; Kelsoe, J.R.; Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Bipolar Group. Identification of pathways for bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2014, 71, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jones, G.H.; Rong, C.; Shariq, A.S.; Mishra, A.; Machado-Vieira, R. Intracellular Signaling Cascades in Bipolar Disorder. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Berridge, M.J. Calcium signalling and psychiatric disease: Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Cell Tissue Res. 2014, 357, 477–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Heyes, S.; Pratt, W.S.; Rees, E.; Dahimene, S.; Ferron, L.; Owen, M.J.; Dolphin, A.C. Genetic disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Prog. Neurobiol. 2015, 134, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Harrison, P.J.; Hall, N.; Mould, A.; Al-Juffali, N.; Tunbridge, E.M. Cellular calcium in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ferreira, M.A.; O’Donovan, M.C.; Meng, Y.A.; Jones, I.R.; Ruderfer, D.M.; Jones, L.; Fan, J.; Kirov, G.; Perlis, R.H.; Green, E.K.; et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Collaborative genome-wide association analysis supports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1056–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ament, S.A.; Szelinger, S.; Glusman, G.; Ashworth, J.; Hou, L.; Akula, N.; Shekhtman, T.; Badner, J.A.; Brunkow, M.E.; Mauldin, D.E.; et al. Rare variants in neuronal excitability genes influence risk for bipolar disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3576–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kataoka, M.; Matoba, N.; Sawada, T.; Kazuno, A.A.; Ishiwata, M.; Fujii, K.; Matsuo, K.; Takata, A.; Kato, T. Exome sequencing for bipolar disorder points to roles of de novo loss-of-function and protein-altering mutations. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kato, T. Neurobiological basis of bipolar disorder: Mitochondrial dysfunction hypothesis and beyond. Schizophr. Res. 2017, 187, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, X.; Luo, H.; Sun, J.; Han, C.; Gu, X.; Li, J.; Cai, G.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Modulation of Stem Cells as Therapeutics for Severe Mental Disorders and Cognitive Impairments. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Steardo, L., Jr.; Luciano, M.; Sampogna, G.; Carbone, E.A.; Caivano, V.; Di Cerbo, A.; Giallonardo, V.; Palummo, C.; Vece, A.; Del Vecchio, V.; et al. Clinical Severity and Calcium Metabolism in Patients with Bipolar Disorder. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lee, S.R.; Kim, H.K.; Song, I.S.; Youm, J.; Dizon, L.A.; Jeong, S.H.; Ko, T.H.; Heo, H.J.; Ko, K.S.; Rhee, B.D.; et al. Glucocorticoids and their receptors: Insights into specific roles in mitochondria. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2013, 112, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Picard, M.; McEwen, B.S.; Epel, E.S.; Sandi, C. An energetic view of stress: Focus on mitochondria. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Belvederi Murri, M.; Prestia, D.; Mondelli, V.; Pariante, C.; Patti, S.; Olivieri, B.; Arzani, C.; Masotti, M.; Respino, M.; Antonioli, M.; et al. The HPA axis in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016, 63, 327–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Scaini, G.; Rezin, G.T.; Carvalho, A.F.; Streck, E.L.; Berk, M.; Quevedo, J. Mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder: Evidence, pathophysiology and translational implications. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 68, 694–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Konradi, C.; Eaton, M.; MacDonald, M.L.; Walsh, J.; Benes, F.M.; Heckers, S. Molecular evidence for mitochondrial dysfunction in bipolar disorder. Arch Gen. Psychiatry 2004, 61, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sun, X.; Wang, J.F.; Tseng, M.; Young, L.T. Downregulation in components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain in the postmortem frontal cortex of subjects with bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006, 31, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Andreazza, A.C.; Shao, L.; Wang, J.F.; Young, L.T. Mitochondrial complex I activity and oxidative damage to mitochondrial proteins in the prefrontal cortex of patients with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen. Psychiatry. 2010, 67, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mertens, J.; Wang, Q.W.; Kim, Y.; Yu, D.X.; Pham, S.; Yang, B.; Zheng, Y.; Diffenderfer, K.E.; Zhang, J.; Soltani, S.; et al. Differential responses to lithium in hyperexcitable neurons from patients with bipolar disorder. Nature 2015, 527, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dager, S.R.; Friedman, S.D.; Parow, A.; Demopulos, C.; Stoll, A.L.; Lyoo, I.K.; Dunner, D.L.; Renshaw, P.F. Brain metabolic alterations in medication-free patients with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen. Psychiatry 2004, 61, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yoshimi, N.; Futamura, T.; Bergen, S.E.; Iwayama, Y.; Ishima, T.; Sellgren, C.; Ekman, C.J.; Jakobsson, J.; Pålsson, E.; Kakumoto, K.; et al. Cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics identifies a key role of isocitrate dehydrogenase in bipolar disorder: Evidence in support of mitochondrial dysfunction hypothesis. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Pfaffenseller, B.; Fries, G.R.; Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, B.; Colpo, G.D.; Stertz, L.; Panizzutti, B.; Magalhães, P.V.; Kapczinski, F. Neurotrophins, inflammation and oxidative stress as illness activity biomarkers in bipolar disorder. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2013, 13, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gill, R.; Tsung, A.; Billiar, T. Linking oxidative stress to inflammation: Toll-like receptors. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Young, A.H.; Juruena, M.F. The Neurobiology of Bipolar Disorder. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2021. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kapczinski, F.; Dal-Pizzol, F.; Teixeira, A.L.; Magalhaes, P.V.; Kauer-Sant’Anna, M.; Klamt, F.; Pasquali, M.A.; Quevedo, J.; Gama, C.S.; Post, R. A systemic toxicity index developed to assess peripheral changes in mood episodes. Mol. Psychiatry 2010, 15, 784–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Andreazza, A.C.; Kapczinski, F.; Kauer-Sant’Anna, M.; Walz, J.C.; Bond, D.J.; Gonçalves, C.A.; Young, L.T.; Yatham, L.N. 3-Nitrotyrosine and glutathione antioxidant system in patients in the early and late stages of bipolar disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009, 34, 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  89. Magalhães, P.V.; Jansen, K.; Pinheiro, R.T.; Colpo, G.D.; da Motta, L.L.; Klamt, F.; da Silva, R.A.; Kapczinski, F. Peripheral oxidative damage in early-stage mood disorders: A nested population-based case-control study. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 15, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Andreazza, A.C.; Kauer-Sant’anna, M.; Frey, B.N.; Bond, D.J.; Kapczinski, F.; Young, L.T.; Yatham, L.N. Oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2008, 111, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kunz, M.; Gama, C.S.; Andreazza, A.C.; Salvador, M.; Ceresér, K.M.; Gomes, F.A.; Belmonte-de-Abreu, P.S.; Berk, M.; Kapczinski, F. Elevated serum superoxide dismutase and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances in different phases of bipolar disorder and in schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2008, 32, 1677–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yumru, M.; Savas, H.A.; Kalenderoglu, A.; Bulut, M.; Celik, H.; Erel, O. Oxidative imbalance in bipolar disorder subtypes: A comparative study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 33, 1070–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, B.; Wang, J.F.; Young, L.T. Chronic valproate treatment increases expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in the rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Biol. Psychiatry 2000, 48, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shao, L.; Sun, X.; Xu, L.; Young, L.T.; Wang, J.F. Mood stabilizing drug lithium increases expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in primary cultured rat cerebral cortical cells. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kakiuchi, C.; Ishigaki, S.; Oslowski, C.M.; Fonseca, S.G.; Kato, T.; Urano, F. Valproate, a mood stabilizer, induces WFS1 expression and modulates its interaction with ER stress protein GRP94. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kakiuchi, C.; Iwamoto, K.; Ishiwata, M.; Bundo, M.; Kasahara, T.; Kusumi, I.; Tsujita, T.; Okazaki, Y.; Nanko, S.; Kunugi, H.; et al. Impaired feedback regulation of XBP1 as a genetic risk factor for bipolar disorder. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kakiuchi, C.; Ishiwata, M.; Nanko, S.; Kunugi, H.; Minabe, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Mori, N.; Fujii, K.; Umekage, T.; Tochigi, M.; et al. Functional polymorphisms of HSPA5: Possible association with bipolar disorder. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 336, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. So, J.; Warsh, J.J.; Li, P.P. Impaired endoplasmic reticulum stress response in B-lymphoblasts from patients with bipolar-I disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2007, 62, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hayashi, A.; Kasahara, T.; Kametani, M.; Toyota, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Kato, T. Aberrant endoplasmic reticulum stress response in lymphoblastoid cells from patients with bipolar disorder. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Missiroli, S.; Patergnani, S.; Caroccia, N.; Pedriali, G.; Perrone, M.; Previati, M.; Wieckowski, M.R.; Giorgi, C. Mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) and inflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Veeresh, P.; Kaur, H.; Sarmah, D.; Mounica, L.; Verma, G.; Kotian, V.; Kesharwani, R.; Kalia, K.; Borah, A.; Wang, X.; et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria crosstalk: From junction to function across neurological disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1457, 41–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bradburn, S.; Murgatroyd, C.; Ray, N. Neuroinflammation in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Ageing Res. Rev. 2019, 50, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 11 00228 g001 550
Figure 1. Neuroprogression in bipolar disorder (BD). Association between clinical changes (cognitive and functional impairment and impaired resilience), biological changes (inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired calcium signaling, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired cellular resilience) and recurrent mood episodes in the clinical progression of BD. As the illness progresses, the clinical and biological changes associated with mood episodes become more pronounced, increasing the patient’s vulnerability to stress and new episodes which in turn reinforces the cycle of neuroprogression in BD.
Figure 1. Neuroprogression in bipolar disorder (BD). Association between clinical changes (cognitive and functional impairment and impaired resilience), biological changes (inflammation, oxidative stress, impaired calcium signaling, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired cellular resilience) and recurrent mood episodes in the clinical progression of BD. As the illness progresses, the clinical and biological changes associated with mood episodes become more pronounced, increasing the patient’s vulnerability to stress and new episodes which in turn reinforces the cycle of neuroprogression in BD.
Brainsci 11 00228 g001
Brainsci 11 00228 g002 550
Figure 2. Biological basis of neuroprogression in BD. Several biological changes have been associated with the illness progression in BD. A summary of the main biological pathways that we propose are connected in the neuroprogression of BD is as follows: (1) Inflammation, which includes increased levels of cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-a, and CCL11; increased levels of DAMPs (ccf, (n)DNA, HSP70, and HSP90a); and microglial and astroglial activation, which ultimately can lead to an increase in the permeability of BBB. (2) Oxidative stress, including increased levels of several markers, 3-nitrotyrosine, protein carbonyl content, TBARS, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase, nitric oxide, and total oxidant status. (3) Mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting the decreased mitochondrial respiration, high energy phosphates, and pH; mitochondrial morphology changes; deletions and polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA; and downregulation of mRNA and proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism. (4) ER dysfunction, including polymorphism in genes related to ER chaperone expression (XBP1, GRP78), decreased response to ER stress (involving XBP1, CHOP, GRP94), and impaired response to ER stress in late-stage patients (involving eIF2a, CHOP, GRP78). (5) Impaired calcium signaling, which includes strong evidence showing increased basal and stimulated free intracellular calcium in cells from patients with BD. (6) Impaired neuroplasticity and resilience, represented by the increased susceptibility to cell death and apoptosis. These factors connected may worsen the patient’s clinical outcomes, cognition, and functioning and promote more pronounced changes in peripheral biomarkers and the brain, leading to a progressive illness course (neuroprogression). BD = bipolar disorder, IL = interleukin, TNF = tumour necrosis factor, CCL11 = C-C motif ligand 11, DAMPs = damage-associated molecular patterns, ccf = circulating cell-free, HSP70 = 70 kilodalton heat shock proteins, HSP90a = heat shock 90 kDa protein alpha, BBB = blood–brain barrier, TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, ER = endoplasmic reticulum, XBP1 = X-box binding protein 1, CHOP = C/EBP homologous protein, GRP94 = glucose-regulated protein 94, eIF2α = eukaryotic initiation factor 2α, GRP78 = glucose-regulated protein 78.
Figure 2. Biological basis of neuroprogression in BD. Several biological changes have been associated with the illness progression in BD. A summary of the main biological pathways that we propose are connected in the neuroprogression of BD is as follows: (1) Inflammation, which includes increased levels of cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-a, and CCL11; increased levels of DAMPs (ccf, (n)DNA, HSP70, and HSP90a); and microglial and astroglial activation, which ultimately can lead to an increase in the permeability of BBB. (2) Oxidative stress, including increased levels of several markers, 3-nitrotyrosine, protein carbonyl content, TBARS, glutathione reductase and glutathione S-transferase, nitric oxide, and total oxidant status. (3) Mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting the decreased mitochondrial respiration, high energy phosphates, and pH; mitochondrial morphology changes; deletions and polymorphisms in mitochondrial DNA; and downregulation of mRNA and proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism. (4) ER dysfunction, including polymorphism in genes related to ER chaperone expression (XBP1, GRP78), decreased response to ER stress (involving XBP1, CHOP, GRP94), and impaired response to ER stress in late-stage patients (involving eIF2a, CHOP, GRP78). (5) Impaired calcium signaling, which includes strong evidence showing increased basal and stimulated free intracellular calcium in cells from patients with BD. (6) Impaired neuroplasticity and resilience, represented by the increased susceptibility to cell death and apoptosis. These factors connected may worsen the patient’s clinical outcomes, cognition, and functioning and promote more pronounced changes in peripheral biomarkers and the brain, leading to a progressive illness course (neuroprogression). BD = bipolar disorder, IL = interleukin, TNF = tumour necrosis factor, CCL11 = C-C motif ligand 11, DAMPs = damage-associated molecular patterns, ccf = circulating cell-free, HSP70 = 70 kilodalton heat shock proteins, HSP90a = heat shock 90 kDa protein alpha, BBB = blood–brain barrier, TBARS = thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, ER = endoplasmic reticulum, XBP1 = X-box binding protein 1, CHOP = C/EBP homologous protein, GRP94 = glucose-regulated protein 94, eIF2α = eukaryotic initiation factor 2α, GRP78 = glucose-regulated protein 78.
Brainsci 11 00228 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, B.; Kapczinski, F.; Pfaffenseller, B. Biological Pathways Associated with Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020228

AMA Style

Wollenhaupt-Aguiar B, Kapczinski F, Pfaffenseller B. Biological Pathways Associated with Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder. Brain Sciences. 2021; 11(2):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020228

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, Bianca, Flavio Kapczinski, and Bianca Pfaffenseller. 2021. "Biological Pathways Associated with Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder" Brain Sciences 11, no. 2: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020228

APA Style

Wollenhaupt-Aguiar, B., Kapczinski, F., & Pfaffenseller, B. (2021). Biological Pathways Associated with Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020228

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop