Interoception in Old Age
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Interoception
1.2. Aging and Physiological Arousal
1.3. Aging and the Emotional Experience
1.4. Aging and Interoception
1.5. The Present Study
2. Materials and Methods- Experiment 1
2.1. Method
2.2. Participants
2.3. Procedure
2.4. Measures
2.4.1. Emotional Stimuli
2.4.2. Physiological Index
2.5. Interoception Measures
2.5.1. Self-Report
2.5.2. Body Perception
2.5.3. Demographics and Health Questionnaire
2.6. Statistical Analyses
2.7. Results
2.7.1. Demographic Variables
2.7.2. Testing Hypothesis a: Interoceptive Accuracy Compared between Young and Older Adults Using Physiological Arousal and Self-Report
2.7.3. Testing Hypothesis b: Interoceptive Awareness Compared between Young and Older Adults
2.7.4. Secondary Hypothesis e: Arousal Reports in Response to Negative Pictures Were Higher Than in Response to Positive Pictures
2.7.5. Secondary Hypothesis g: HR Prominent Deceleration Occurred When Viewing Negative Compared to Positive Pictures
2.7.6. Interim Discussion
3. Materials and Methods- Experiment 2
3.1. Method
3.2. Participants
3.3. Procedure
3.4. Emotional Stimuli
3.5. Measures
3.6. Emotionally Subjective Reports Index
3.7. Statistical Analysis
3.8. Results
3.8.1. Demographic Variables
3.8.2. Testing Hypothesis c: Interoceptive Awareness and Pleasant Experiences during the Emotional Stimuli Task
3.8.3. Testing Hypothesis d: Association between Interoceptive Awareness and Changes in Physiological Arousal during the Emotional Stimuli
3.8.4. Secondary Hypothesis e and f: Arousal Reports to Negative Pictures Were Higher Than in Response to Positive Pictures, and Reports of Pleasant Emotional Experiences in Response to Positive Pictures Were Higher Than in Response to Negative Pictures
3.8.5. Secondary Hypothesis g: HR Deceleration While Viewing Negative Compared to Positive Pictures
4. Data Comparison of Experiments 1 and 2 between the Old Adult Groups
5. General Discussion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Indices | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. participant number | - | |||||
2. Arousal report | −0.036 | - | ||||
3. BPSYS | −0.006 | −0.068 * | - | |||
4. BPDIA | −0.006 | −0.065 * | 0.999 *** | - | ||
5. HR | −0.011 | 0.075 * | 0.279 *** | 0.280 *** | - | |
6. Mean BA sub-scale | 0.000 | −0.163 *** | 0.066 * | 0.065 ** | 0.041 | - |
Indices | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Age | - | |||||||
2. Weight | 0.183 | - | ||||||
3. Education | −0.050 | 0.211 | - | |||||
4. Working hours | −0.365 ** | 0.113 | 0.148 | - | ||||
5. BP medication duration | 0.301 * | −0.050 | −0.127 | −0.145 | - | |||
6. Mean BA sub-scale | −0.560 *** | −0.307 * | −0.058 | 0.037 | −0.243 | - | ||
7. Mean SUPRAR sub-scale | −0.199 | −0.301 * | −0.098 | −0.137 | −0.019 | 0.425 *** | - | |
8. Mean SUBR sub-scale | −0.254 * | −0.354 ** | −0.037 | −0.205 | 0.054 | 0.448 *** | 0.530 *** | - |
Picture Content | Young = 1 | Old = 2 | Mean Difference | Std. Error | Significant Level | 95% Confidence Interval for Difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
Domestic violence | 1 | 2 | −1.624 * | 0.705 | 0.027 | −3.054 | −0.193 |
Environmental pollution | 1 | 2 | −1.762 * | 0.708 | 0.018 | −3.199 | −0.325 |
Injured people | 1 | 2 | −1.038 | 0.784 | 0.194 | −2.629 | 0.553 |
Injured animals | 1 | 2 | −0.762 | 0.747 | 0.315 | −2.279 | 0.756 |
Negative emotion | 1 | 2 | −1.091 | 0.696 | 0.126 | −2.505 | 0.323 |
Negative situation | 1 | 2 | −1.156 | 0.571 | 0.051 | −2.316 | 0.004 |
Old people | 1 | 2 | −1.726 * | 0.692 | 0.017 | −3.131 | −0.322 |
Babies | 1 | 2 | −1.945 * | 0.751 | 0.014 | −3.470 | −0.420 |
Couples in love | 1 | 2 | −1.449 * | 0.690 | 0.043 | −2.850 | −0.047 |
Desserts | 1 | 2 | 0.373 | 0.557 | 0.508 | −0.757 | 1.503 |
Happy children | 1 | 2 | −2.539 * | 0.731 | 0.001 | −4.023 | −1.056 |
Pets | 1 | 2 | −1.355 * | 0.595 | 0.029 | −2.563 | −0.147 |
Sport | 1 | 2 | −0.582 | 0.531 | 0.281 | −1.660 | 0.496 |
Views | 1 | 2 | −1.332 | 0.713 | 0.070 | −2.779 | 0.115 |
General | Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | Parameter | p< | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 47 | n = 20 | n = 27 | ||||
Age | 78.60 (5.78) | 79.65 (5.72) | 77.81 (5.81) | t = 1.08 | ns | |
Weight | 72.98 (14.82) | 72.45 (17.41) | 73.37 (12.92) | t = −0.21 | ns | |
Years of education | 12.36 (5.07) | 13.65 (3.42) | 11.41 (5.89) | t = 1.52 | ns | |
Sex (by females) | 25 | 10 | 15 | χ2 = 1.14 | ns | |
Family status | χ2 = 1.55 | ns | ||||
single | 1 | 1 | ||||
married | 29 | 13 | 16 | |||
divorced | 1 | 1 | ||||
widow | 16 | 7 | 9 | |||
Living area | ||||||
South-Zeelim | 16 | 14 | 2 | |||
South-Nir Itzchak | 6 | 6 | ||||
South-Kisufom | 18 | 18 | ||||
South-Tzochar settlement | 7 | 7 | ||||
Work status | χ2 = 0.86 | ns | ||||
Work | 15 | 6 | 9 | |||
Unemployed | 21 | 8 | 13 | |||
Volunteer | 11 | 6 | 5 | |||
Hours of work or volunteering per week | 18.46 (12.98) | 16.17 (11.87) | 20.75 (14.15) | t = −0.86 | ns | |
BP medication | χ2 = 1.18 | ns | ||||
1. yes | 30 | 11 | 19 | |||
2. no | 17 | 9 | 8 | |||
Psychiatric medication | χ2 = 0.048 | ns | ||||
1. yes | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
2. no | 45 | 19 | 26 | |||
Diabetes | χ2 = 1.16 | ns | ||||
1. yes | 5 | 1 | 4 | |||
2. no | 42 | 19 | 23 |
Experiment 1 n = 20 | Experiment 2 n = 27 | t (45) | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-scale body awareness (BA) | 60.00 (15.88) | 55.78 (17.17) | 0.86 | [−5.66, 14.11] |
Sub-scale supradiaphragmatic reactivity (SUPRAR) | 24.60 (7.18) | 20.74 (6.55) | 1.92 | [−0.19, 7.91] |
Sub-scale subdiaphragmatic reactivity (SUBR) | 10.25 (3.06) | 9.85 (3.57) | 0.40 | [−1.60, 2.40] |
References
- Wiens, S. Interoception in emotional experience. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2005, 18, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- James, W. What is an emotion? Mind 1884, 9, 188–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannon, W.B. The James-Lange theory of emotions: A critical examination and an alternative theory. Am. J. Psychol. 1927, 39, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekman, P.; Cordaro, D. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emot. Rev. 2011, 3, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazarus, R.S. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Roseman, I.J. Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emot. Rev. 2011, 3, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barlassina, L.; Newen, A. The role of bodily perception in emotion: In defense of an impure somatic theory. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 2014, 89, 637–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, L.F.; Lindquist, K. The embodiment of emotion. In Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscience Approaches; Semin, G., Smith, E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 237–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Craig, A.D. How do you feel-now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Critchley, H.D.; Nagai, Y. How emotions are shaped by bodily states. Emot. Rev. 2012, 4, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Damasio, A. Fundamental feelings. Nature 2001, 413, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindquist, K.A. Emotions emerge from more basic psychological ingredients: A modern psychological constructionist model. Emot. Rev. 2013, 5, 356–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oosterwijk, S.; Lindquist, K.A.; Anderson, E.; Dautoff, R.; Moriguchi, Y.; Barrett, L.F. States of mind: Emotions, body feelings, and thoughts share distributed neural networks. NeuroImage 2012, 62, 2110–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dunn, B.D.; Dalgleish, T.; Lawrence, A.D. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2006, 30, 239–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craig, A.D. Opinion: How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 2002, 3, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garfinkel, S.N.; Seth, A.K.; Barrett, A.B.; Suzuki, K.; Critchley, H.D. Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol. Psychol. 2015, 104, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ceunen, E.; van Diest, I.; Vlaeyen, J. Accuracy and awareness of perception: Related, yet distinct (commentary on Herbert et al., 2012). Biol. Psychol. 2013, 92, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Farb, N.; Daubenmier, J.; Price, C.J.; Gard, T.; Kerr, C.; Dunn, B.D.; Klein, A.C.; Paulus, M.P.; Mehling, W.E. Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mehling, W.E.; Gopisetty, V.; Daubenmier, J.; Price, C.J.; Hecht, F.M.; Stewart, A. Body awareness: Construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Calì, G.; Ambrosini, E.; Picconi, L.; Mehling, W.E.; Committeri, G. Investigating the relationship between interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive awareness, and emotional susceptibility. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mehling, W.E.; Price, C.; Daubenmier, J.J.; Acree, M.; Bartmess, E.; Stewart, A. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porges, S. Body Perception Questionnaire. Available online: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5f25b9efdb626835686c2dac/t/624486a4decd127ea4dbe985/1648658086167/BPQ+Manual+V2+3.7.22.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- Terasawa, Y.; Fukushima, H.; Umeda, S. How does interoceptive awareness interact with the subjective experience of emotion? An fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34, 598–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schandry, R. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology 1981, 18, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brener, J.; Kluvitse, C. Heartbeat detection: Judgments of the simultaneity of external stimuli and heartbeats. Psychophysiology 1988, 25, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katkin, E.S.; Reed, S.D.; Deroo, C. A methodological analysis of 3 techniques for the assessment of individual-differences in heartbeat detection. Psychophysiology 1983, 20, 452. [Google Scholar]
- Critchley, H.D.; Wiens, S.; Rotshtein, P.; Dolan, R.J. Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pollatos, O.; Kirsch, W.; Schandry, R. On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 25, 948–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollatos, O.; Herbert, B.M.; Matthias, E.; Schandry, R. Heart rate response after emotional picture presentation is modulated by interoceptive awareness. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 63, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terasawa, Y.; Shibata, M.; Moriguchi, Y.; Umeda, S. Anterior insular cortex mediates bodily sensibility and social anxiety. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012, 8, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bechara, A.; Naqvi, N. Listening to your heart: Interoceptive awareness as a gateway to feeling. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 102–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simmons, W.K.; Avery, J.A.; Barcalow, J.C.; Bodurka, J.; Drevets, W.C.; Bellgowan, P. Keeping the body in mind: Insula functional organization and functional connectivity integrate interoceptive, exteroceptive, and emotional awareness. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34, 2944–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaki, J.; Davis, J.I.; Ochsner, K.N. Overlapping activity in anterior insula during interoception and emotional experience. Neuroimage 2012, 62, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ernst, J.; Böker, H.; Hättenschwiler, J.; Schüpbach, D.; Northoff, G.; Seifritz, E.; Grimm, S. The association of interoceptive awareness and alexithymia with neurotransmitter concentrations in insula and anterior cingulate. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 9, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Barrett, L.F.; Quigley, K.S.; Bliss-Moreau, E.; Aronson, K.R. Interoceptive sensitivity and self-reports of emotional experience. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 87, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dunn, B.D.; Galton, H.C.; Morgan, R.; Evans, D.; Oliver, C.; Meyer, M.; Cusack, R.; Lawrence, A.D.; Dalgleish, T. Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21, 1835–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Herbert, B.M.; Pollatos, O.; Schandry, R. Interoceptive sensitivity and emotion processing: An EEG study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 65, 214–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weiß, S.; Sack, M.; Henningsen, P.; Pollatos, O. On the interaction of self-regulation, interoception and pain perception. Psychopathology 2014, 47, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Füstös, J.; Gramann, K.; Herbert, B.M.; Pollatos, O. On the embodiment of emotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2012, 8, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- North, B.J.; Sinclair, D.A. The intersection between aging and cardiovascular disease. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunzmann, U.; Kupperbusch, C.S.; Levenson, R.W. Behavioral inhibition and amplification during emotional arousal: A comparison of two age groups. Psychol. Aging 2005, 20, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Levenson, R.W. Expressive, physiological, and subjective changes in emotion across adulthood. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL, USA, 14–17 August 1997; Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10363-007 (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- Mather, M.; Ponzio, A. Emotion and aging. In Handbook of Emotions; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Aupée, A.; Jönsson, P. Age-related changes of phasic heart rate responses to affective pictures. Scand. J. Psychol. 2008, 49, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradley, M.M. Natural selective attention: Orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology 2009, 46, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bradley, M.M.; Codispoti, M.; Cuthbert, B.N.; Lang, P.J. Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion 2001, 1, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burriss, L.; Powell, D.A.; White, J. Psychophysiological and subjective indices of emotion as a function of age and gender. Cogn. Emot. 2007, 21, 182–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez, P.; Danuser, B. Cardiovascular patterns associated with appetitive and defensive activation during affective picture viewing. Psychophysiology 2010, 47, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarlo, M.; Palomba, D.; Buodo, G.; Minghetti, R.; Stegagno, L. Blood pressure changes highlight gender differences in emotional reactivity to arousing pictures. Biol. Psychol. 2005, 70, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hempel, R.J.; Tulen, J.H.; van Beveren, N.J.; Mulder, P.G.; Hengeveld, M.W. Subjective and physiological responses to emotion-eliciting pictures in male schizophrenic patients. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 64, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, D.P.; Hillman, C.H.; Duley, A.R. Influences of age on emotional reactivity during picture processing. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2005, 60, P49–P56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kunzmann, U.; Grühn, D. Age differences in emotional reactivity: The sample case of sadness. Psychol. Aging 2005, 20, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seider, B.H.; Shiota, M.N.; Whalen, P.; Levenson, R.W. Greater sadness reactivity in late life. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2011, 6, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Uchino, B.N.; Berg, C.A.; Smith, T.W.; Pearce, G.; Skinner, M. Age-related differences in ambulatory blood pressure during daily stress: Evidence for greater blood pressure reactivity with age. Psychol. Aging 2006, 21, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hay, E.L.; Diehl, M. Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. Eur. J. Ageing 2011, 8, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, M.; Seymour, T.L.; Gaunt, J.T.; Baker, C.; Nesmith, K.; Mather, M. Aging and goal-directed emotional attention: Distraction reverses emotional biases. Emotion 2007, 7, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carstensen, L.L.; Mikels, J.A. At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 14, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scheibe, S.; Carstensen, L.L. Emotional aging: Recent findings and future trends. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2010, 65, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Riediger, M.; Schmiedek, F.; Wagner, G.G.; Lindenberger, U. Seeking pleasure and seeking pain: Differences in prohedonic and contra-hedonic motivation from adolescence to old age. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20, 1529–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mather, M.; Knight, M. Goal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory. Psychol. Aging 2005, 20, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Backs, R.W.; da Silva, S.P.; Han, K. A comparison of younger and older adults’ Self-Assessment Manikin ratings of affective pictures. Exp. Aging Res. 2005, 31, 421–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ito, T.A.; Larsen, J.T.; Smith, N.K.; Cacioppo, J.T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 75, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lang, P.J.; Bradley, M.M.; Cuthbert, B.N. Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biol. Psychiatry 1998, 44, 1248–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavazzeni, J. Age Differences in Arousal, Perception of Affective Pictures, and Emotional Memory Enhancement: Appraisal, Electrodermal Activity, and Imaging Data. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Psykologiska Institutionen, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Gavazzeni, J.; Wiens, S.; Fischer, H. Age effects to negative arousal differ for self-report and electrodermal activity. Psychophysiology 2008, 45, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grühn, D.; Scheibe, S. Age-related differences in valence and arousal ratings of pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Do ratings become more extreme with age? Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keil, A.; Freund, A.M. Changes in the sensitivity to appetitive and aversive arousal across adulthood. Psychol. Aging 2009, 24, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neiss, M.B.; Leigland, L.A.; Carlson, N.E.; Janowsky, J.S. Age differences in perception and awareness of emotion. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 1305–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baltes, P.B. On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. Am. Psychol. 1997, 52, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carstensen, L.L. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science 2006, 312, 1913–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Charles, S.T. Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well- being across adulthood. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lohani, M. Experiential-Behavioral-Physiological Coherence During Emotional Reactivity and Regulation in Younger and Older Adults. Doctoral Dissertation, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Carstensen, L.L.; Pasupathi, M.; Mayr, U.; Nesselroade, J.R. Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carstensen, L.L.; Fung, H.H.; Charles, S.T. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motiv. Emot. 2003, 27, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes, W.B. Weakened links between mind and body in older age: The case for maturational dualism in the experience of emotion. Emot. Rev. 2010, 2, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertz, H.; Fullerton, S.; Naliboff, B.; Mayer, E.A. Symptoms and visceral perception in severe functional and organic dyspepsia. Gut 1998, 42, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, S.J.; Farrell, M. A review of age differences in the neurophysiology of nociception and the perceptual experience of pain. Clin. J. Pain 2004, 20, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lautenbacher, S.; Kunz, M.; Strate, P.; Nielsen, J.; Arendt-Nielsen, L. Age effects on pain thresholds, temporal summation and spatial summation of heat and pressure pain. Pain 2005, 115, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thornbury, J.M.; Mistretta, C.M. Tactile sensitivity as a function of age. J. Gerontol. 1981, 36, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lagier, E.; Delvaux, M.; Vellas, B.; Fioramonti, J.; Bueno, L.; Albarede, J.L.; Frexinos, J. Influence of age on rectal tone and sensitivity to distension in healthy participants. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 1999, 11, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bannister, J.J.; Abouzekry, L.; Read, N.W. Effect of aging on anorectal function. Gut 1987, 28, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dickerson, P.C.; Jones, G.E. The effect of age on cardiac awareness. Psychophysiology 1990, 27, S25. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, G.E.; Jones, K.R.; Cunningham, R.A.; Caldwell, J.A. Cardiac awareness in infarct patients and normals. Psychophysiol. 1985, 22, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera, A.; Kolacz, J.; Pailhez, G.; Bulbena-Cabre, A.; Bulbena, A.; Porges, S.W. Assessing body awareness and autonomic reactivity: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Body Perception Questionnaire-Short Form (BPQ-SF). Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2018, 27, e1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khalsa, S.S.; Rudrauf, D.; Tranel, D. Interoceptive awareness declines with age. Psychophysiology 2009, 46, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murphy, J.; Geary, H.; Millgate, E.; Catmur, C.; Bird, G. Direct and indirect effects of age on interoceptive accuracy and awareness across the adult lifespan. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2018, 25, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ewing, D.L.; Manassei, M.; van Praag, C.G.; Philippides, A.O.; Critchley, H.D.; Garfinkel, S.N. Sleep and the heart: Interoceptive differences linked to poor experiential sleep quality in anxiety and depression. Biol. Psychol. 2017, 127, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garfinkel, S.N.; Tiley, C.; O’Keeffe, S.; Harrison, N.A.; Seth, A.K.; Critchley, H.D. Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism: Implications for emotion and anxiety. Biol. Psychol. 2016, 114, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Limmer, J.; Kornhuber, J.; Martin, A. Panic and comorbid depression and their associations with stress reactivity, interoceptive awareness and interoceptive accuracy of various bioparameters. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 185, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wiebking, C.; de Greck, M.; Duncan, N.W.; Heinzel, A.; Tempelmann, C.; Northoff, G. Are emotions associated with activity during rest or interoception? An exploratory fMRI study in healthy participants. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 491, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Folstein, M.F.; Folstein, S.E.; McHugh, P.R. “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975, 12, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isenberg, D.; Barak, Y. Alzheimer’s Disease-Dealing with Forgetfulness; Prologue: Rosh Ha’Ein, Israel, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Gomez, P.; von Gunten, A.; Danuser, B. Autonomic nervous system reactivity within the valence–arousal affective space: Modulation by gender and age. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2016, 109, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lang, P.J.; Bradley, M.M.; Cuthbert, B.N. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings; The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Marchewka, A.; Żurawski, Ł.; Jednoróg, K.; Grabowska, A. The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behav. Res. Methods 2014, 46, 596–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michałowski, J.M.; Droździel, D.; Matuszewski, J.; Koziejowski, W.; Jednoróg, K.; Marchewka, A. The Set of Fear Inducing Pictures (SFIP): Development and validation in fearful and nonfearful individuals. Behav. Res. Methods 2017, 49, 1407–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riegel, M.; Żurawski, Ł.; Wierzba, M.; Moslehi, A.; Klocek, Ł.; Horvat, M.; Grabowska, A.; Michałowski, J.; Jednoróg, K.; Marchewka, A. Characterization of the Nencki Affective Picture System by discrete emotional categories (NAPS BE). Behav. Res. Methods 2016, 48, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wierzba, M.; Riegel, M.; Pucz, A.; Leśniewska, Z.; Dragan, W.Ł.; Gola, M.; Jednoróg, K.; Marchewka, A. Erotic subset for the Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS ERO): Cross-sexual comparison study. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mathôt, S.; Schreij, D.; Theeuwes, J. OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2012, 44, 314–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dan-Glauser, E.S.; Gross, J.J. Emotion regulation and emotion coherence: Evidence for strategy-specific effects. Emotion 2013, 13, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luong, G.; Charles, S.T. Age differences in affective and cardiovascular responses to a negative social interaction: The role of goals, appraisals, and emotion regulation. Dev. Psychol. 2014, 50, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hultsch, D.F.; MacDonald, S.W.S. New frontiers in cognitive aging. In Intraindividual Variability in Performance as a Theoretical Window onto Cognitive Aging; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; p. 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hultsch, D.F.; MacDonald, S.W.; Dixon, R.A. Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2002, 57, P101–P115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nissen, S.E.; Camelot Investigators. Effect of antihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease and normal blood pressure: The CAMELOT study: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004, 292, 2217–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brosschot, J.F.; Thayer, J.F. Heart rate response is longer after negative emotions than after positive emotions. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2003, 50, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, L.F. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2006, 10, 20–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MacCormack, J.K.; Lindquist, K.A. Bodily contributions to emotion: Schachter’s legacy for a psychological constructionist view on emotion. Emot. Rev. 2017, 9, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chobanian, A.V.; Bakris, G.L.; Black, H.R.; Cushman, W.C.; Green, L.A.; Izzo, J.L., Jr.; Jones, D.W.; Materson, B.J.; Oparil, S.; Wright, J.T., Jr.; et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003, 289, 2560–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franklin, S.S.; Gustin, W., IV; Wong, N.D.; Larson, M.G.; Weber, M.A.; Kannel, W.B.; Levy, D. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997, 96, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
General | Young Adults | Older Adults | Parameter | p< | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 37 | n = 17 | n = 20 | ||||
Age | 54.11 (27.68) | 25.72 (3.21) | 79.65 (5.72) | t = −35.27 | 0.05 | |
Weight | 69.5 (16.19) | 66.22 (14.5) | 72.45 (17.41) | t = −1.19 | ns | |
Years of education | 13.26 (2.83) | 12.83 (1.98) | 13.65 (3.42) | t = −0.89 | ns | |
Gender (by females) | 23 | 13 | 10 | |||
Family status | ||||||
Single | 15 | 15 | ||||
Married | 14 | 1 | 13 | |||
Divorced | 1 | 1 | ||||
Widow | 7 | 7 | ||||
Work status | ||||||
Work | 20 | 14 | 6 | |||
Unemployed | 11 | 3 | 8 | |||
Volunteer | 6 | 6 | ||||
Hours of work or volunteering per week | 15.21 (14.25) | 21.33 (14.20) | 9.70 (12.15) | t = 2.72 | 0.05 | |
BP medications | 11 | 11 | ||||
Duration of taking the medication | 9.75 (6.76) | 9.75 (6.76) | ||||
Psychiatric medication | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||
Diabetes | 1 | 1 | ||||
Current use of cigarettes | 9 | 8 | 1 | |||
Current alcohol use | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
Mean HR change | 2.02 | 2.09 (10.78) | 1.96 (9.17) | t =0.25 | ns | |
Mean BPDIA change | 0.76 | 0.76 (3.81) | 0.76 (3.24) | t = −0.01 | ns | |
Mean BPSYS change | 1.12 | 1.22 (5.82) | 1.02 (4.97) | t = 0.61 | ns | |
Sub-scale body awareness (BA) | 82.94 (17.65) | 60.00 (15.88) | t = 4.16 | 0.05 | ||
Sub-scale supradiaphragmatic reactivity (SUPRAR) | 25.24 (5.18) | 24.60 (7.19) | 0.30 | ns | ||
Sub-scale subdiaphragmatic reactivity (SUBR) | 12.12 (4.53) | 10.25 (3.06) | 1.49 |
Use BP Medications (n = 11) | No Use BP Medications (n = 26) | F (1,35) | Effect Size- ηP2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |||
HR change | 0.07 (6.43) | −4.36 (4.46) | 5.81 * | 0.14 |
BPDIA change | −0.14 (2.40) | −1.53 (1.57) | 4.40 * | 0.11 |
BPSYS change (normally distributed) | 0.09 (3.48) | 2.41 (2.42) | 6.35 * | 0.15 |
Young Adults | Older Adults | |
---|---|---|
1. Mean self-report | 1. Mean self-report | |
2. Mean HR change | 0.51 * | −0.20 |
3. Mean BPDIA change | 0.61 ** | −0.14 |
4. Mean BPSYS change | 0.53 * | −0.18 |
Indices | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. BA sub-scale | - | |||||
2. Age | −0.60 * | - | ||||
3. Mean self-report | −0.19 | 0.30 | - | |||
4. Mean HR change | 0.27 | −0.25 | −0.05 | - | ||
5. Mean BPDIA change | 0.21 | −0.23 | −0.12 | 0.99 ** | - | |
6. Mean BPSYS change | 0.26 | −0.26 | −0.07 | 0.99 ** | 0.98 ** | - |
1. | 2. | 3. | |
---|---|---|---|
1. Age | - | ||
2. BP medications | 0.57 ** | - | |
3. BA sub-scale | −0.60 ** | −0.62 ** | - |
Picture Content | General (n = 37) | Young Participants (n = 17) | Old Participants (n = 20) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
negative | 3.91 (2.03) | 3.20 (1.40) | 4.51 (2.30) | |
Domestic violence * | 4.55 (2.26) | 3.67 (1.47) | 5.30 (2.57) | |
Environmental pollution * | 3.04 (2.29) | 2.08 (1.43) | 3.85 (2.60) | |
Injured people | 4.97 (2.41) | 4.41 (1.91) | 5.45 (2.70) | |
Injured animals | 4.50 (2.27) | 4.08 (1.68) | 4.85 (2.66) | |
Negative emotion | 3.64 (2.15) | 3.05 (1.69) | 4.15 (2.41) | |
Negative situations * | 2.91 (1.81) | 2.29 (1.62) | 3.45 (1.82) | |
Old people * | 3.75 (2.24) | 2.82 (1.50) | 4.55 (2.49) | |
positive | 2.78 (1.78) | 2.09 (1.45) | 3.36 (1.87) | |
Babies * | 3.36 (2.45) | 2.31 (1.87) | 4.25 (2.57) | |
Couples in love * | 3.12 (2.19) | 2.34 (1.83) | 3.79 (2.29) | |
Desserts | 2.17 (1.67) | 2.37 (1.98) | 2.00 (1.40) | |
Happy children ** | 3.17 (2.53) | 1.79 (1.37) | 4.33 (2.73) | |
Pets * | 2.47 (1.91) | 1.74 (1.51) | 3.10 (2.02) | |
Sport | 2.15 (1.61) | 1.84 (1.73) | 2.42 (1.50) | |
views | 3.06 (2.23) | 2.34 (1.86) | 3.67 (2.38) |
General | ||
---|---|---|
n = 27 | ||
Age | 77.81 (5.81) | |
Weight | 73.37 (12.92) | |
Years of education | 11.41 (5.9) | |
Gender (by females) | 15 | |
Family status | ||
Single | 1 | |
Married | 16 | |
Divorce | 1 | |
Widow | 9 | |
Work status | ||
Work | 9 | |
Unemployed | 13 | |
Volunteer | 5 | |
Hours of work or volunteering per week | 9.72 (14.42) | |
BP medications | 19 | |
Duration of taking the medication | 12.28 (15.01) | |
Psychiatric medication | 1 | |
Diabetes | 4 | |
Current use of cigarettes | 2 | |
Current alcohol use | 1 | |
Mean HR change | −0.07 (12.13) | |
Mean BPDIA change | −0.13 (4.23) | |
Mean BPSYS change | −0.09 (6.56) | |
Sub-scale body awareness (BA) | 55.78 (17.16) | |
Sub-scale supradiaphragmatic reactivity (SUPRAR) | 20.74 (6.55) | |
Sub-scale subdiaphragmatic reactivity (SUBR) | 9.85 (3.57) |
Females n = 15 | Males n = 12 | t(25) | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sub-scale body awareness (BA) | 63.13 (17.53) | 46.58 (11.81) | −2.80 ** | [−28.74, −4.36] |
Sub-scale Supradiaphragmatic reactivity (SUPRAR) | 24.33 (6.79) | 16.25 (1.76) | −4.00 *** | [−12.24, −3.92] |
Sub-scale Subdiaphragmatic reactivity (SUBR) | 11.67 (3.64) | 7.58 (1.78) | −3.55 ** | [−6.45, −1.72] |
Indices | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. BA | - | |||||||
2. Mean change in HR | −0.37 | - | ||||||
3. Mean change in BPDIA | −0.38 * | 0.96 ** | - | |||||
4. Mean change in BPSIS | −0.38 * | 0.96 ** | 0.97 ** | - | ||||
5. EE-negative | −0.38 * | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | - | |||
6. EE-positive | −0.02 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.19 | −0.11 | - | ||
7. EA-negative | 0.34 | −0.30 | −0.34 | −0.29 | −0.51 ** | 0.00 | - | |
8. EA-positive | −0.04 | −0.39 * | −0.32 | −0.41 * | 0.06 | 0.03 | −0.10 | - |
Picture Type | Picture Contents | Emotional Experience | Emotional Arousal |
---|---|---|---|
negative | 1.07 (1.30) | 6.00 (1.04) | |
Domestic violence | 0.56 (1.19) | 7.07 (1.21) | |
Environmental pollution | 0.59 (1.25) | 6.33 (1.57) | |
Injured people | 0.52 (1.19) | 6.89 (1.50) | |
Injured animals | 0.74 (1.48) | 6.19 (1.52) | |
Negative emotion | 1.93 (1.57) | 5.07 (1.44) | |
Negative situations | 2.26 (1.53) | 5.19 (1.08) | |
Old people | 1.93 (2.06) | 5.11 (1.48) | |
positive | 6.56 (.85) | 4.33 (1.78) | |
Babies | 7.11 (1.37) | 4.19 (2.56) | |
Couples in love | 7.26 (1.09) | 5.19 (2.42) | |
Desserts | 6.07 (1.61) | 4.93 (2.09) | |
Happy children | 6.78 (1.53) | 4.56 (2.33) | |
Pets | 6.11 (1.45) | 3.81 (1.42) | |
Sport | 4.78 (1.31) | 3.93 (1.75) | |
views | 7.33 (1.24) | 3.41 (2.99) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ulus, G.; Aisenberg-Shafran, D. Interoception in Old Age. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101398
Ulus G, Aisenberg-Shafran D. Interoception in Old Age. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(10):1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101398
Chicago/Turabian StyleUlus, Gili, and Daniela Aisenberg-Shafran. 2022. "Interoception in Old Age" Brain Sciences 12, no. 10: 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101398
APA StyleUlus, G., & Aisenberg-Shafran, D. (2022). Interoception in Old Age. Brain Sciences, 12(10), 1398. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12101398