Next Article in Journal
Techniques of Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation and Accuracy Compared with the Frame-Based Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility of Canine Adenovirus Type 2 (CAV2) Based Vector for the Locus Coeruleus Optogenetic Activation in Non-Transgenic Rats: Implications for Functional Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/brainsci12070905
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cognitive Sequelae and Hippocampal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease following 5/6 Nephrectomy

by
Yeon Hee Yu
1,†,
Seong-Wook Kim
2,†,
Hyuna Im
1,
Se Won Oh
3,
Nam-Jun Cho
4,
Samel Park
4,
Dae-Kyoon Park
1,
Duk-Soo Kim
1,* and
Hyo-Wook Gil
4,*
1
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan-Si 31151, Korea
2
Graduate School of New Drug Discovery & Development, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34143, Korea
3
Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Korea
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(7), 905; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070905
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 11 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropharmacology and Neuropathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neurological disorders are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Vascular factors and uremic toxins are involved with cognitive impairment in CKD. In addition, vascular dementia-induced alterations in the structure and function of the hippocampus can lead to deficits in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and cognitive function. However, regardless of this clinical evidence, the pathophysiology of cognitive impairment in patients with CKD is not fully understood. We used male Sprague Dawley rats and performed 5/6 nephrectomy to observe the changes in behavior, field excitatory postsynaptic potential, and immunostaining of the hippocampus following CKD progression. We measured the hippocampus volume on magnetic resonance imaging scans in the controls (n = 34) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysis patients (n = 42). In four cognition-related behavior assays, including novel object recognition, Y-maze, Barnes maze, and classical contextual fear conditioning, we identified deficits in spatial working memory, learning and memory, and contextual memory, as well as the ability to distinguish familiar and new objects, in the rats with CKD. Immunohistochemical staining of Na+/H+ exchanger1 was increased in the hippocampus of the CKD rat models. We performed double immunofluorescent staining for aquaporin-4 and glial fibrillary acidic protein and then verified the high coexpression in the hippocampus of the CKD rat model. Furthermore, results from recoding of the field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) in the hippocampus showed the reduced amplitude and slope of fEPSP in the CKD rats. ESRD patients with cognitive impairment showed a significant decrease in the hippocampus volume compared with ESRD patients without cognitive impairment or the controls. Our findings suggest that uremia resulting from decreased kidney function may cause the destruction of the blood–brain barrier and hippocampus-related cognitive impairment in CKD.

1. Introduction

Previous clinical studies have shown that psychiatric problems, including cognitive impairment and dementia, are prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Notably, cognitive disorders in patients with CKD are causally related to cerebrovascular disease, anemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, dialysis disequilibrium, and uremic toxins [4,7,8]. In a recent clinical study, brain–kidney crosstalk revealed the similarities of the vascular and hemodynamic system in the kidney and brain [9]. Many comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and CKD, are risk factors for cognitive impairment. A recent study showed glycemic variability could influence brain perfusion, which causes a decrease in perfusion in the hippocampus, and may impact the rate of cognitive deterioration [10]. However, regardless of this clinical evidence, the pathophysiology of cognitive deficit in patients with CKD is not fully known.
The hippocampus in the brain is essential for learning and memory function. Hippocampal volume has been measured to verify the relevance of cognitive deficits in psychiatric diseases [11,12,13,14]. However, the presence of hippocampal volume loss has not been reported in human CKD. Behavioral and neurochemical studies in animals, including our previous findings, showed that the hippocampal area in the brain is vulnerable to the effects of uremia [15,16,17,18], suggesting that uremia may induce cognitive impairment. Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus underlies memory formation and cognition. However, the effect of chronic CKD, usually induced by the long-term effects of uremia on hippocampal synaptic plasticity, is unknown.
Here, in order to verify whether CKD contributes to cognitive deficits, we firstly performed 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6 Nx) and established a stable rat model of CKD. We next measured cognitive dysfunction and intrinsic synaptic properties in the hippocampus by performing behavioral, anatomical, and electrophysiological tests in the CKD rat model. Interestingly, we observed deficits in novel object recognition (NOR) memory, spatial working memory, 24-h contextual fear memory, and hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Together, our findings clearly showed that uremia caused hippocampus-relevant cognitive impairment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (8 weeks old) obtained from the Experimental Animal Center, Soonchunhyang University (Cheonan, South Korea), were used. All animals were provided with a commercial diet and water ad libitum under controlled temperature, humidity, and lighting conditions of 22 ± 2 °C, 55 ± 5%, and 12:12 light/dark cycle, respectively. All animal experiments were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care of Soonchunhyang University (permit no. SCH18-0056). All possible efforts were made to avoid the suffering of the rats and minimize the number used during the experiments. CKD was induced by 5/6 Nx, as described previously [18]. Briefly, the rats were placed in a chamber, and general anesthesia was delivered using 2.5% isoflurane in a mixture of 33% oxygen and 67% nitrous oxide. Adrenal glands were protected, and then the upper and lower poles of the left kidney were resected using surgical scissors. Right site unilateral nephrectomy was performed.

2.2. Serum Biochemical Assays

Blood samples for standard biochemical assay were collected at different time points (4 and 10 weeks (wks) after surgery) by cardiac puncture. All serum biochemicals were measured as described in the Supplementary Methods. In our study, all groups obtained similar results to prior study results (data not shown) [18].

2.3. Behavioral Tasks

All rats were used for cognition-related behavioral tests at 4 wks and 10 wks after CKD induction. Behavioral tests were monitored and analyzed using the PC-based video behavior analysis and automated tracking software Noldus EthoVision 3.1.

2.3.1. Novel Objective Recognition Test

Object exploration behavior for discrete novel objects was investigated as a form of exploration activity that is a basic characteristic of rodents. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods [19,20].

2.3.2. Y-Maze with Special Cue

Spontaneous alternation was assessed in a Y-maze test, as described previously [21]. A hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory Y-maze was placed in an isolated room with an existing clue and a special cue above each arm. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods.

2.3.3. Barnes Maze

The Barnes maze consisted of a circular platform (122 cm diameter) with 20 holes located at the perimeter at equal distances and was elevated 105 cm above the floor. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods [21,22].

2.3.4. Classical Fear Conditioning Test

Contextual and cued fear conditioning and 24-h retrieval of contextual memory were performed [23,24]. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods.

2.4. In Vivo fEPSP Recording

fEPSPs were recorded in the hippocampal CA1 region of the rats, as described in [25,26,27,28], with some modifications. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods.

2.5. Tissue Processing and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

For the immunohistochemical experiments, animals were anesthetized (urethane 1.5 g/kg, i.p.) and perfused transcardially with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PB. The brains were extracted and post-fixed in the same fixative for 4 h and rinsed in PB containing 30% sucrose at 4 °C for 2 days. Thereafter, the tissues were cryocutted using a microtome at 30 μm. The sections were incubated with the primary antibody in PBS containing 0.3 % Triton X-100 overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were mouse antiglial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) IgG (Millipore, MA, USA; diluted 1:1000) and rabbit anti-Na+/H+ exchanger-1 (NHE-1) IgG (Millipore; diluted 1:200). The sections were washed three times for 10 min with PBS, incubated sequentially in biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (Vector labs, CA, USA) or goat antimouse IgG (Vector) and ABC complex (Vector), and diluted 1:250 in the same solution as the primary antiserum. The sections were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) in 0.1 M Tris buffer and mounted on gelatin-coated slides. The immunoreactions were observed using a DMRB microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), and images were captured using a model DP72 digital camera and DP2-BSW microscope digital camera software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) [29].

2.6. Double Immunofluorescent Staining

To identify the morphological changes in the blood–brain barrier (BBB) induced by CKD in the same hippocampal tissue, double immunofluorescent staining for GFAP and aquaporin-4 (AQP-4) was performed. Brain tissues were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a mixture of mouse anti-GFAP IgG (Millipore; diluted 1:500) and rabbit anti-AQP-4 IgG (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel; diluted 1:200). After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated in a mixture of Cy2- and Cy3-conjugated secondary antisera (Jackson Immuno Research Labs, West Grove, PA, USA; diluted 1:200) for 3 h at room temperature. Then, the tissues were incubated in DAPI (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA; diluted 1:500) for counterstaining for 15 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, the slices were placed on a slide and mounted with DPX (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and then all images were captured using a model Fluoview FV10i and the FV10i software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.7. Hippocampal Volume in Patients with Cognitive Impairment

This human study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical patient data were obtained from electronic medical records with the approval of the Institutional Review Board, our hospital’s ethics committee (IRB no. 2017-04-014). The Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (K-MoCA, English version 7.1, available at www.mocatest.org, accessed on 1 May 2022) was used for assessing cognitive function. We defined mild cognitive impairment as a score of ≤22 in our study [8]. The K-MoCA was scored by a researcher in accordance with the Korean version instructions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired on a 3 Tesla (3T) MRI Philips scanner (Philips Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods [30,31,32,33,34].

2.8. Quantification of Data and Statistical Analysis

Optical fractionation was used to estimate the cell numbers, and the dentate gyrus (DG) and/or CA1 regions were delineated with a 2.5× objective lens for immunodensity quantification. The detailed method is described in the Supplementary Methods. All data obtained from the quantitative measurements were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine statistical significance. Bonferroni’s test was used for post hoc comparisons. p-values of <0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cognitive Behaviors Deficits in CKD Rat Model

To evaluate whether CKD has an effect on cognition deficit, we performed four cognition-related behavior assays—NOR, Y-maze, Barnes maze, and classical contextual fear conditioning—in the CKD rat models using a previously described procedure. In the NOR test (Figure 1A), the exploration frequency and duration of the naïve and CKD 4-wk rats showed equally adapted exploration patterns between the same two objects. Thus, these were not statistically different (Figure 1(B1,B2)). However, CKD 10-wk rats displayed reduced total exploration times for objects compared with naïve rats (CKD 10 wks, F1,11 = 9.36, p < 0.01, vs. naïve; F1,10 = 10.6, p < 0.01, vs. CKD 4 wks; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1(B3)). In the results of the memory phase, the exploration frequency and duration for novel objects in the naïve rats were significantly increased compared with familiar objects (frequency, F1,14 = 16.36, p < 0.01, duration, F1,14 = 42.18, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1(C1,C2)). In CKD 4-wk rats, the exploration time for novel objects was increased (F1,12 = 15.82, p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1(C2)), whereas the CKD 10-wk rats exhibited similar exploration frequencies and times for recognizing both novel and old objects (Figure 1(C1,C2)). The discrimination index of CKD rats showed a marked reduction compared with that of the naïve rats (CKD 4 wks, F1,13 = 11.66, p < 0.01, CKD 10 wks, F1,11 = 28.96, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1(C3)).
We examined hippocampus-dependent spatial working memory through the Y-maze task with special cues (Figure 2(A1)) and spatial learning and memory through the Barnes maze (Figure 2(B1)). In hippocampus-dependent spatial memory test, the CKD rats showed reduced spontaneous alterations compared with naïve rats (CKD 4 wks, F1,18 = 5.46, p < 0.05, CKD 10 wks, F1,16 = 24.35, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 2(A2)). Similarly, to investigate spatial reference memory, the Barnes maze test was performed, and visual cues were placed on each quadrant wall surrounding the platform (Figure 2(B1)). Each animal was trained during an adaptation phase over 4 days, and the time taken for each group to reach the escape hole was measured on the fifth day as a probe day. During the training period, all tested rats showed faster in finding the position of the target hole upon repeated trials (Figure 2(B1)). Notably, CKD 10-wk rats had a higher number of errors for escape hole on the training 2 day and the probe test day (training 2 day, F1,10 = 10.43, p < 0.01, probe test day, F1,10 = 6.23, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 2(B2)). In addition, CKD 10-wk rats had longer target latencies on the probe test day (F1,10 = 4.39, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 2(B3)). These results revealed consistent spatial memory and learning deficits in CKD rats.
Additionally, we investigated whether CKD could cause learning and memory disorders in contextual fear conditioning (Figure 3). In freezing contextual fear learning, CKD 10-wk rats showed decreased freezing times (6 min, F1,10 = 6.04, p < 0.05, 7 min, F1,10 = 7.59, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 3A). After 24 h, contextual fear memory deficits were observed in the CKD rats compared with the naïve rats (CKD 4 wks, F1,10 = 10.87, p < 0.05, CKD 10 wks, F1,10 = 18.51, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 3B), indicating that CKD led to deficits in hippocampus-dependent memory.

3.2. Decreased fEPSP in the Hippocampal Neurons of CKD Rat Model

We additionally investigated activity-dependent synaptic plasticity under the induction of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated long-term potentiation (LTP) in CKD rats because the LTP of synaptic activity is an important researched model for learning and memory [34,35]. Figure 4A shows the schema of the in vivo experimental fEPSP recordings from the rat hippocampus. These sTPS stimulations reliably elicited the LTP of the slope of the fEPSP in the CA1 (Figure 4A,B). In CKD rats, the amplitude and the slope of the evoked fEPSP following LTP induction were significantly decreased compared with naïve rats (127.2 ± 17.3% in CKD 4 wks, p < 0.01; 109.7 ± 9.6% in CKD 10 wks, p < 0.001; 161.1 ± 4.8% in naïve; Figure 4C,D).

3.3. Immunoreactivities of Na+/H+ Exchanger-1 (NHE-1) in CKD Rat Model

To verify acidosis in the hippocampus by CKD uremic toxins, we performed NHE-1 immunostaining. In the naïve rats, NHE-1 immunoreactivity was detected mostly in the hippocampal neurons (Figure 5A–A3). However, NHE-1 expression was enhanced in the neuropil at stratum lacunosum-moleculare (CKD 10 wks, F1,8 = 5.79, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; Figure 5B, arrow; C), molecular layer (CKD 10 wks, F1,8 = 12.57, p < 0.01; one-way ANOVA; Figure 5B, arrow; D), and hilus (Figure 5B, *) in CKD rats compared with naïve rats. In particular, NHE1 immunoreactivity was reduced in the CA1 region (Figure 5(B2), arrow) and markedly increased in the alveus region of the subiculum and mossy fiber in the CKD 10-wk rats (CKD 10 wks, F1,8 = 37.77, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 5(B1), *; Figure 5(B3), arrow, E).

3.4. Astrogliosis in the Hippocampus of CKD Rat Model

To identify the alterations in the distribution of astroglia expression in the hippocampus following CKD, we performed immunohistochemical analysis for GFAP. In CRF rats, the GFAP immunoreactive astroglia was markedly elevated in the CA1 region and molecular layer of the DG compared with naïve rats (Figure 6(B1–B4)). In brief, the average number of GFAP-positive astrocytes was increased compared with naïve rats (CKD 10 wks, F1,9 = 56.4, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 6(C1,C3)). Quantitation of the relative densities of GFAP-positive astroglia revealed a result similar to GFAP immunohistochemical expression, which was more than in naïve rats (CKD 10 wks, F1,9 = 28.43, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 6(C2,C4)). To verify the functional alterations caused by BBB damage in the hippocampus of CKD rats, we performed double immunofluorescent labeling with GFAP and AQP-4 (Figure 6D–G). In CKD rats, AQP4-positive immunoreactivity in the astrocytes and vessels was significantly increased in the hippocampal CA1 and DG regions compared with naïve rats (CKD 10 wks, CA1, F1,14 = 107.55, p < 0.001; DG, F1,12 = 107.55, p < 0.001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 6E,G,(H1),(H2)).

3.5. Hippocampal Volume in CKD Patients with Cognitive Impairment

There was no difference in age between the controls (n = 34) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysis patients (n = 42). There was also no difference in age between ESRD patients with cognitive impairment (n = 17) and without cognitive impairment (n = 25). Relative to the controls, the ESRD patients showed a significant decrease in hippocampal volume (Figure 7). Moreover, the ESRD patients with cognitive impairment showed a significant decrease in hippocampal volume compared with ESRD patients without cognitive impairment.

4. Discussion

The present study showed that CKD was associated with cognition-related behavioral deterioration, BBB disruption, and a decrease in synaptic plasticity. In addition, we showed a decrease in hippocampal volume in ESRD patients with cognitive disorders compared with ESRD without cognitive impairment or the controls. These findings provide evidence suggesting an association between cognitive impairment and vascular disorders in CKD patients. The available behavior studies showed similar disturbances involving cognitive dysfunction in the 5/6 nephrectomy model [36,37], although there were no expected behavior changes in the CKD rat model [38,39].
Recently, Renczés et al. conducted behavior tests (open field, light/dark transition, and novel object recognition tests) at 2, 4, and 6 months after 5/6 nephrectomy [39]. The CKD rats showed shorter distances and spent less time in the center zone at 2 and 4 months. However, the open-field ambulation returned back to baseline level at 6 months in CKD rats. They did not show significant differences between the CKD and control rats in any of the observed behaviors. Discrepancies from our results may arise from variability in the susceptibility to cognitive impairment in CKD animals, progression of CKD after 5/6 nephrectomy, and repeated behavior testing.
To assess hippocampal-dependent memory, we used the novel object recognition test, Y-maze with a special cue, Barnes maze, and classical contextual fear conditioning test. Memory deficiencies were verified using the novel object recognition test and spatial working memory test [40]. Several studies have reported on cognitive dysfunction in animal models of CKD [36,37,38,41]. In our study, CKD rats exhibited decreased novel object recognition memory, consistent with previous reports. In addition, we verified impaired spatial working memory and deficits in 24-h contextual fear memory. The hippocampus is part of a system of structures in the medial temporal lobe that is essential for memory, as they play roles in the acquisition and retrievability of spatial knowledge [42]. Contextual fear memory is an associative memory dependent upon the hippocampus [43]. According to previous studies, enhanced IL-1β expression is disturbed processes of contextual fear conditioning, and this response is affected by uremic toxin due to chronic kidney disease [44,45,46]. However, studies on the correlation between uremic toxin and inflammatory reactivity according to chronic kidney disease are still insufficient, and further studies are needed. In addition, the expression of contextual fear memory showed differences according to gender in the previous study results [47]. Therefore, mechanistic differences may occur for hippocampal dysfunction caused by chronic renal failure according to gender, and various memory-related behavioral tests and various effect mechanism studies are needed to investigate the relationship. Our results revealed that CKD was involved in poor hippocampal-dependent short-term spatial working memory and spatial learning and memory. Our findings showed a decline in hippocampal-dependent memory according to CKD progression, and this suggests that hippocampal dysfunction may have an important role in cognitive impairment in CKD patients.
Memory acquisition is based on changes in synaptic efficiency that permit strengthening of the associations between neurons, and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity at appropriate synapses during memory formation is essential for the storage of information [48]. LTP is a complex response dependent upon changes in ionic distribution (especially of Ca2+) and the activation of a number of different intracellular biochemical mechanisms [49]. Indeed, the correlation between enhanced LTP in the CA1 and better learning performance has been reported in previous studies [50,51,52]. The present findings suggest that prolonged, reduced LTP induction after CKD may be accompanied by long-term memory deficits due to impairments in synaptic plasticity. Moreover, improving hippocampal LTP may be a direct mechanism for improving learning and memory behavior in CKD rats [53,54,55].
NHE-1 is a membranous protein and ubiquitously expressed when neurons adjust their intracellular pH to mediate DNA synthesis, cell volume, neurotransmission, and protein function and degradation in the initiation of cellular growth and differentiation [56,57]. The activation of NHE regulates extra- and intracellular pH and affects intracellular Na+ concentration, which, in turn, can alter the function of a number of ion channels and result in changes in neuronal excitability [58]. Among the NHE family, NHE-1 plays an important role in regulating physiological and pathophysiological processes in brain diseases [59,60,61]. NHE-1 activity is increased by intracellular acidosis caused by the interaction of intracellular H+ in the myocardium and renal tissues [62,63,64]. In addition, the hippocampal neurons and astrocytes upregulate NHE-1 expression by intracellular acidosis, and NHE1 plays an essential role in acid extrusion after acidosis in cortical neurons [65,66,67]. However, there are no published studies on changes in hippocampal NHE-1 expression in 5/6 nephrectomy rats. To extend our knowledge, we reported that NHE-1 expression was enhanced in the hippocampus of CKD rats. A previous study showed that a broad-spectrum NHE inhibitor improved LTP induced by a theta burst in the hippocampal slices in both young and senescent animals [68]. Thus, we think that changes in the NHE-1 expression may affect intracellular pH, which could affect cognitive function. In addition, alkali therapy may attenuate the progression of kidney injury and ameliorate accompanying cognitive deficiency by inhibiting NHE in 5/6 nephrectomy rats [69].
Aquaporin channels regulate water transport for maintaining water homeostasis, and its functional abnormalities are implicated in several disease pathways [70]. Glial AQP-4 regulates extracellular matrix volume, potassium buffering, cerebrospinal fluid circulation, neuroinflammation, osmosensation, and calcium signaling [71]. A previous study reported that mice lacking AQP-4 were partially protected from brain edema in water intoxication and ischemic brain injury [72]. As astrocyte markers, AQP-4 and GFAP have been related to several physiological and pathological conditions in the central nervous system as well as in BBB breakdown [73]. Some studies suggest a causal relationship between BBB disruption and cognitive dysfunction in aging, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s disease [74,75,76]. Recently, indoxyl sulfate was shown to mediate BBB disruption, leading to cognitive impairment during experimental renal dysfunction [77]. Uric acid passed through the BBB and resulted in the accumulation of gliosis in the hippocampus [78]. Furthermore, CKD affects several organs, including the nervous system, due to the retention of uremic toxins, electrolytes, and water, causing metabolic disturbances [79,80]. In the present study, we observed that GFAP expression was increased, and the coexpression with AQP-4 in the hippocampal CA1 and DG regions was enhanced. Therefore, our results may indicate that CKD disrupts the BBB.
The hippocampus has a role in working memory, processing speed, and executive functioning, in addition to encoding and storage [81]. A decline in hippocampal volume has been well observed in aging, epilepsy, ethanol ingestion, and Alzheimer’s disease [14,82,83,84]. We found that the volume of the hippocampus was smaller in hemodialysis patients than in the general population, and it was also shown to be smaller in hemodialysis patients with cognitive impairment. Various causes have been associated with cognitive dysfunction in CKD. Thus, our clinical results also suggest that the hippocampus is an area vulnerable to the effects of CKD. A limitation of the current study is that the relationship between the level of uremia in the hippocampus according to the level of chronic renal failure according to the GFR has not been clearly identified. In future studies, it is thought that pharmacological treatment effects can be applied to clinical patients more efficiently if comparative studies are conducted to prove the effect of antagonists and if GFR is measured.

5. Conclusions

The present study suggested uremia due to kidney damage may cause destruction to the BBB by acidosis in the brain and, thus, may lead to recognition dysfunction in hippocampal association following CKD. However, this hypothesis requires definitive knowledge of the pathophysiology mechanisms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/brainsci12070905/s1, Supplementary Methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.-S.K. and H.-W.G.; methodology, Y.H.Y., S.-W.K., D.-K.P., S.P. and S.W.O.; formal analysis, Y.H.Y. and S.-W.K.; investigation, H.I.; data curation, S.-W.K. and N.-J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.Y., S.-W.K. and H.-W.G.; writing—review and editing, S.-W.K. and D.-S.K.; visualization, Y.H.Y. and S.-W.K.; supervision, D.-S.K. and H.-W.G.; funding acquisition, D.-S.K. and H.-W.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07043247, NRF-2021R1F1A1060352, and NRF-2017R1D1A1B05036195) through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal protocols were approved by the Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care of Soonchunhyang University (permit no. SCH18-0056). The human study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical patient data were obtained from electronic medical records with the approval of the Institutional Review Board, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital’s ethics committee (IRB no. 2017-04-014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, R.; Kiernan, M.C.; Murray, A.; Rosner, M.H.; Ronco, C. Kidney-brain crosstalk in the acute and chronic setting. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2015, 11, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Madan, P.; Kalra, O.P.; Agarwal, S.; Tandon, O.P. Cognitive impairment in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2007, 22, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Weiner, D.E.; Gaussoin, S.A.; Nord, J.; Auchus, A.P.; Chelune, G.J.; Chonchol, M.; Coker, L.; Haley, W.E.; Killeen, A.A.; Kimmel, P.L.; et al. Cognitive Function and Kidney Disease: Baseline Data From the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 70, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Bugnicourt, J.M.; Godefroy, O.; Chillon, J.M.; Choukroun, G.; Massy, Z.A. Cognitive disorders and dementia in CKD: The neglected kidney-brain axis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chaiben, V.B.O.; Silveira, T.B.D.; Guedes, M.H.; Fernandes, J.P.A.; Ferreira, J.H.F.; Beltrão, J.; Leal, G.F.; Erbano, L.H.O.; Bosch, N.L.; Pecoits Filho, R.; et al. Cognition and renal function: Findings from a Brazilian population. Braz. J. Nephrol. 2019, 41, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hasegawa, S.; Inoue, T.; Inagi, R. Neuroimmune interactions and kidney disease. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 38, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kurella Tamura, M.; Yaffe, K. Dementia and cognitive impairment in ESRD: Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cho, N.J.; Park, S.; Lee, E.Y.; Oh, S.W.; Oh, H.G.; Gil, H.W. Association of Intracranial Artery Calcification with Cognitive Impairment in Hemodialysis Patients. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 5036–5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mogi, M.; Horiuchi, M. Clinical Interaction between Brain and Kidney in Small Vessel Disease. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2011, 2011, 306189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alster, P.; Dunalska, A.; Migda, B.; Madetko, N.; Królicki, L. The Rate of Decrease in Brain Perfusion in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndrome May Be Impacted by Glycemic Variability-A Pilot Study. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 767480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sexton, C.E.; Mackay, C.E.; Lonie, J.A.; Bastin, M.E.; Terrière, E.; O’Carroll, R.E.; Ebmeier, K.P. MRI correlates of episodic memory in Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy aging. Psychiatry Res. 2010, 184, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Josephs, K.A.; Murray, M.E.; Tosakulwong, N.; Whitwell, J.L.; Knopman, D.S.; Machulda, M.M.; Weigand, S.D.; Boeve, B.F.; Kantarci, K.; Petrucelli, L.; et al. Tau aggregation influences cognition and hippocampal atrophy in the absence of beta-amyloid: A clinico-imaging-pathological study of primary age-related tauopathy (PART). Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 133, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dawe, R.J.; Yu, L.; Arfanakis, K.; Schneider, J.A.; Bennett, D.A.; Boyle, P.A. Late-life cognitive decline is associated with hippocampal volume, above and beyond its associations with traditional neuropathologic indices. Alzheimers Dement 2020, 16, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Devanand, D.P.; Pradhaban, G.; Liu, X.; Khandji, A.; De Santi, S.; Segal, S.; Rusinek, H.; Pelton, G.H.; Honig, L.S.; Mayeux, R.; et al. Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment: Prediction of Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2007, 68, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Adhikari, A.; Topiwala, M.A.; Gordon, J.A. Synchronized activity between the ventral hippocampus and the medial prefrontal cortex during anxiety. Neuron 2010, 65, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, J.W.; Ha, G.Y.; Jung, Y.W. Chronic renal failure induces cell death in rat hippocampal CA1 via upregulation of alphaCaMKII/NR2A synaptic complex and phosphorylated GluR1-containing AMPA receptor cascades. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 33, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Malek, M. Brain consequences of acute kidney injury: Focusing on the hippocampus. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 37, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, Y.H.; Kim, S.W.; Park, D.K.; Song, H.Y.; Kim, D.S.; Gil, H.W. Altered Emotional Phenotypes in Chronic Kidney Disease Following 5/6 Nephrectomy. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leger, M.; Quiedeville, A.; Bouet, V.; Haelewyn, B.; Boulouard, M.; Schumann-Bard, P.; Freret, T. Object recognition test in mice. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 2531–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sivakumaran, M.H.; Mackenzie, A.K.; Callan, I.R.; Ainge, J.A.; O’Connor, A.R. The Discrimination Ratio derived from Novel Object Recognition tasks as a Measure of Recognition Memory Sensitivity, not Bias. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, B.; Song, L.; Huang, C.; Zhang, W. P7C3 Attenuates the Scopolamine-Induced Memory Impairments in C57BL/6J Mice. Neurochem. Res. 2016, 41, 1010–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Attar, A.; Liu, T.; Chan, W.T.; Hayes, J.; Nejad, M.; Lei, K.; Bitan, G. A shortened Barnes maze protocol reveals memory deficits at 4-months of age in the triple-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, T.; Guo, M.; Garza, J.; Rendon, S.; Sun, X.L.; Zhang, W.; Lu, X.Y. Cognitive and neural correlates of depression-like behaviour in socially defeated mice: An animal model of depression with cognitive dysfunction. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011, 14, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Seo, B.A.; Cho, T.; Lee, D.Z.; Lee, J.J.; Lee, B.; Kim, S.W.; Shin, H.S.; Kang, M.G. LARGE, an intellectual disability-associated protein, regulates AMPA-type glutamate receptor trafficking and memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 7111–7116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Minamiura, Y.; Hirayama, K.; Murata, R.; Matsuura, S. Effect of hyperthermia on hippocampal synaptic transmission and CA3 kindling in developing rats. Brain Res. 1996, 732, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wong, T.P.; Howland, J.G.; Robillard, J.M.; Ge, Y.; Yu, W.; Titterness, A.K.; Brebner, K.; Liu, L.; Weinberg, J.; Christie, B.R.; et al. Hippocampal long-term depression mediates acute stress-induced spatial memory retrieval impairment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11471–11476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ge, Y.; Dong, Z.; Bagot, R.C.; Howland, J.G.; Phillips, A.G.; Wong, T.P.; Wang, Y.T. Hippocampal long-term depression is required for the consolidation of spatial memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16697–16702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cho, T.; Ryu, J.K.; Taghibiglou, C.; Ge, Y.; Chan, A.W.; Liu, L.; Lu, J.; McLarnon, J.G.; Wang, Y.T. Long-term potentiation promotes proliferation/survival and neuronal differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yu, Y.H.; Lee, K.; Sin, D.S.; Park, K.H.; Park, D.K.; Kim, D.S. Altered functional efficacy of hippocampal interneuron during epileptogenesis following febrile seizures. Brain Res. Bull. 2017, 131, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cho, Y.; Seong, J.K.; Jeong, Y.; Shin, S.Y. Individual subject classification for Alzheimer’s disease based on incremental learning using a spatial frequency representation of cortical thickness data. Neuroimage 2012, 59, 2217–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lee, J.S.; Kim, C.; Shin, J.H.; Cho, H.; Shin, D.S.; Kim, N. Machine Learning-based Individual Assessment of Cortical Atrophy Pattern in Alzheimer’s Disease Spectrum: Development of the Classifier and Longitudinal Evaluation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012, 62, 774–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Guo, C.; Ferreira, D.; Fink, K.; Westman, E.; Granberg, T. Repeatability and reproducibility of FreeSurfer, FSL-SIENAX and SPM brain volumetric measurements and the effect of lesion filling in multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol. 2019, 29, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Nicoll, R.A. A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation. Neuron 2017, 93, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hölscher, C. Synaptic plasticity and learning and memory: LTP and beyond. J. Neurosci. Res. 1999, 58, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fujisaki, K.; Tsuruya, K.; Yamato, M.; Toyonaga, J.; Noguchi, H.; Nakano, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Tokumoto, M.; Hirakata, H.; Kitazono, T. Cerebral oxidative stress induces spatial working memory dysfunction in uremic mice: Neuroprotective effect of tempol. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2014, 29, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Degaspari, S.; Tzanno-Martins, C.B.; Fujihara, C.K.; Zatz, R.; Branco-Martins, J.P.; Viel, T.A.; Buck Hde, S.; Orellana, A.M.; Böhmer, A.E.; Lima Lde, S.; et al. Altered KLOTHO and NF-κB-TNF-α Signaling Are Correlated with Nephrectomy-Induced Cognitive Impairment in Rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tothova, L.; Babickova, J.; Borbelyova, V.; Filova, B.; Sebekova, K.; Hodosy, J. Chronic renal insufficiency does not induce behavioral and cognitive alteration in rats. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 138, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Renczés, E.; Marônek, M.; Gaál Kovalčíková, A.; Vavrincová-Yaghi, D.; Tóthová, L.; Hodosy, J. Behavioral Changes During Development of Chronic Kidney Disease in Rats. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Antunes, M.; Biala, G. The novel object recognition memory: Neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn. Process. 2012, 13, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Abu Ahmad, N.; Armaly, Z.; Berman, S.; Jabour, A.; Aga-Mizrachi, S.; Mosenego-Ornan, E.; Avital, A. l-Carnitine improves cognitive and renal functions in a rat model of chronic kidney disease. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 164, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Teng, E.; Squire, L.R. Memory for places learned long ago is intact after hippocampal damage. Nature 1999, 400, 675–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sanders, M.J.; Wiltgen, B.J.; Fanselow, M.S. The place of the hippocampus in fear conditioning. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 463, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Franco, Á.O.; Starosta, R.T.; Roriz-Cruz, M. The specific impact of uremic toxins upon cognitive domains: A review. Braz. J. Nephrol. 2019, 41, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Palin, K.; Bluthé, R.M.; Verrier, D.; Tridon, V.; Dantzer, R.; Lestage, J. Interleukin-1beta mediates the memory impairment associated with a delayed type hypersensitivity response to bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the rat hippocampus. Brain Behav. Immun. 2004, 18, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rossi, M.; Campbell, K.L.; Johnson, D.W.; Stanton, T.; Vesey, D.A.; Coombes, J.S.; Weston, K.S.; Hawley, C.M.; McWhinney, B.C.; Ungerer, J.P.; et al. Protein-bound uremic toxins, inflammation and oxidative stress: A cross-sectional study in stage 3–4 chronic kidney disease. Arch. Med. Res. 2014, 45, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Russo, A.S.; Parsons, R.G. Behavioral Expression of Contextual Fear in Male and Female Rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 671017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lynch, M.A. Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 87–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hussain, R.J.; Carpenter, D.O. Development of synaptic responses and plasticity at the SC-CA1 and MF-CA3 synapses in rat hippocampus. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2001, 21, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Manabe, T.; Noda, Y.; Mamiya, T.; Katagiri, H.; Houtani, T.; Nishi, M.; Noda, T.; Takahashi, T.; Sugimoto, T.; Nabeshima, T.; et al. Facilitation of long-term potentiation and memory in mice lacking nociceptin receptors. Nature 1998, 394, 577–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tang, Y.P.; Shimizu, E.; Dube, G.R.; Rampon, C.; Kerchner, G.A.; Zhuo, M.; Liu, G.; Tsien, J.Z. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 1999, 401, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Okada, T.; Yamada, N.; Tsuzuki, K.; Horikawa, H.P.; Tanaka, K.; Ozawa, S. Long-term potentiation in the hippocampal CA1 area and dentate gyrus plays different roles in spatial learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dere, E.; De Souza-Silva, M.A.; Topic, B.; Spieler, R.E.; Haas, H.L.; Huston, J.P. Histidine-decarboxylase knockout mice show deficient nonreinforced episodic object memory, improved negatively reinforced water-maze performance, and increased neo- and ventro-striatal dopamine turnover. Learn. Mem. 2003, 10, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Liu, I.Y.; Lyons, W.E.; Mamounas, L.A.; Thompson, R.F. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor plays a critical role in contextual fear conditioning. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 7958–7963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Acevedo, S.F.; Ohtsu, H.; Benice, T.S.; Rizk-Jackson, A.; Raber, J. Age-dependent measures of anxiety and cognition in male histidine decarboxylase knockout (Hdc−/−) mice. Brain Res. 2006, 1071, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ma, E.; Haddad, G.G. Expression and localization of Na+/H+ exchangers in rat central nervous system. Neuroscience 1997, 79, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kang, T.C.; An, S.J.; Park, S.K.; Hwang, I.K.; Suh, J.G.; Oh, Y.S.; Bae, J.C.; Won, M.H. Alterations in Na+/H+ exchanger and Na+/HCO3− cotransporter immunoreactivities within the gerbil hippocampus following seizure. Mol. Brain Res. 2002, 109, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kang, T.C.; An, S.J.; Park, S.K.; Hwang, I.K.; Bae, J.C.; Won, M.H. The evidence for GABAB receptor-mediated regulation of acid-base balance: Involvement of Na+/H+ exchanger and Na+/HCO3− cotransporter. Mol. Brain Res. 2003, 114, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Luo, J.; Sun, D. Physiology and pathophysiology of Na(+)/H(+) exchange isoform 1 in the central nervous system. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2007, 4, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Song, H.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, P.; Cao, J.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Shen, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Sodium/Hydrogen Exchanger 1 Participates in Early Brain Injury after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage both in vivo and in vitro via Promoting Neuronal Apoptosis. Cell Transplant. 2019, 28, 985–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Zhao, H.; Carney, K.E.; Falgoust, L.; Pan, J.W.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Z. Emerging roles of Na+/H+ exchangers in epilepsy and developmental brain disorders. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, 138–140, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Haworth, R.S.; McCann, C.; Snabaitis, A.K.; Roberts, N.A.; Avkiran, M. Stimulation of the plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1 by sustained intracellular acidosis. Evidence for a novel mechanism mediated by the ERK pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31676–31684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Coccaro, E.; Karki, P.; Cojocaru, C.; Fliegel, L. Phenylephrine and sustained acidosis activate the neonatal rat cardiomyocyte Na+/H+ exchanger through phosphorylation of amino acids Ser770 and Ser771. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. 2009, 297, H846–H858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Odunewu, A.; Fliegel, L. Acidosis-mediated regulation of the NHE1 isoform of the Na+/H+ exchanger in renal cells. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2013, 305, F370–F381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Luo, J.; Chen, H.; Kintner, D.B.; Shull, G.E.; Sun, D. Decreased neuronal death in Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1-null mice after in vitro and in vivo ischemia. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 11256–11268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Cengiz, P.; Kleman, N.; Uluc, K.; Kendigelen, P.; Hagemann, T.; Akture, E.; Messing, A.; Ferrazzano, P.; Sun, D. Inhibition of Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 1 is neuroprotective in neonatal hypoxic ischemic brain injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 1803–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Verma, V.; Bali, A.; Singh, N.; Jaggi, A.S. Implications of sodium hydrogen exchangers in various brain diseases. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 26, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rönicke, R.; Schröder, U.H.; Böhm, K.; Reymann, K.G. The Na+/H+ exchanger modulates long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2009, 379, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Heo, N.J.; Lee, J.W.; Han, J.S. Alkali therapy attenuates the progression of kidney injury via Na/H exchanger inhibition in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Vella, J.; Zammit, C.; Di Giovanni, G.; Muscat, R.; Valentino, M. The central role of aquaporins in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Nagelhus, E.A.; Ottersen, O.P. Physiological roles of aquaporin-4 in brain. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 1543–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Manley, G.T.; Fujimura, M.; Ma, T.; Noshita, N.; Filiz, F.; Bollen, A.W.; Chan, P.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporin-4 deletion in mice reduces brain edema after acute water intoxication and ischemic stroke. Nat. Med. 2000, 6, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Stavale, L.M.; Soares, E.S.; Mendonça, M.C.; Irazusta, S.P.; da Cruz Höfling, M.A. Temporal relationship between aquaporin-4 and glial fibrillary acidic protein in cerebellum of neonate and adult rats administered a BBB disrupting spider venom. Toxicon 2013, 66, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Montagne, A.; Barnes, S.R.; Sweeney, M.D.; Halliday, M.R.; Sagare, A.P.; Zhao, Z.; Toga, A.W.; Jacobs, R.E.; Liu, C.Y.; Amezcua, L.; et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 2015, 85, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Montagne, A.; Huuskonen, M.T.; Rajagopal, G.; Sweeney, M.D.; Nation, D.A.; Sepehrband, F.; D’Orazio, L.M.; Harrington, M.G.; Chui, H.C.; Law, M.; et al. Undetectable gadolinium brain retention in individuals with an age-dependent blood-brain barrier breakdown in the hippocampus and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s Dement 2019, 15, 1568–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nation, D.A.; Sweeney, M.D.; Montagne, A.; Sagare, A.P.; D’Orazio, L.M.; Pachicano, M.; Sepehrband, F.; Nelson, A.R.; Buennagel, D.P.; Harrington, M.G.; et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bobot, M.; Thomas, L.; Moyon, A.; Fernandez, S.; McKay, N.; Balasse, L.; Garrigue, P.; Brige, P.; Chopinet, S.; Poitevin, S.; et al. Uremic Toxic Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Mediated by AhR Activation Leads to Cognitive Impairment during Experimental Renal Dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020, 31, 1509–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shao, X.; Lu, W.; Gao, F.; Li, D.; Hu, J.; Li, Y.; Zuo, Z.; Jie, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cen, X. Uric Acid Induces Cognitive Dysfunction through Hippocampal Inflammation in Rodents and Humans. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 10990–11005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Mazumder, M.K.; Paul, R.; Bhattacharya, P.; Borah, A. Neurological sequel of chronic kidney disease: From diminished Acetylcholinesterase activity to mitochondrial dysfunctions, oxidative stress and inflammation in mice brain. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Oh, K.H.; Kang, M.; Kang, E.; Ryu, H.; Han, S.H.; Yoo, T.H.; Kim, S.W.; Chae, D.W.; Lee, K.B.; Park, S.K.; et al. The KNOW-CKD Study: What we have learned about chronic kidney diseases. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 39, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Toda, T.; Parylak, S.L.; Linker, S.B.; Gage, F.H. The role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in brain health and disease. Mol. Psychiatry 2019, 24, 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Allebone, J.; Kanaan, R.; Maller, J.; O’Brien, T.; Mullen, S.A.; Cook, M.; Adams, S.J.; Vogrin, S.; Vaughan, D.N.; Connelly, A.; et al. Bilateral volume reduction in posterior hippocampus in psychosis of epilepsy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2019, 90, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. de Flores, R.; La Joie, R.; Chételat, G. Structural imaging of hippocampal subfields in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 2015, 309, 29–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Contreras, A.; Polín, E.; Miguéns, M.; Pérez-García, C.; Pérez, V.; Ruiz-Gayo, M.; Morales, L.; Del Olmo, N. Intermittent-Excessive and Chronic-Moderate Ethanol Intake during Adolescence Impair Spatial Learning, Memory and Cognitive Flexibility in the Adulthood. Neuroscience 2019, 418, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brainsci 12 00905 g001 550
Figure 1. Decreased novel object recognition memory in CKD model rats. Schema of the novel object recognition test (A). In the habituation period, the frequency of searching for familiar and novel objects was similar in naïve and CKD 4, 10- wk rats (B1). The exploration time for familiar and novel objects was similar in both naïve and CKD rats (B2). However, the object exploration times were markedly decreased in CKD 10-wk rats compared with naïve rats (B3). Naïve rats showed significantly increased frequency and times for novel objects (C1,C2). CKD 4-wk rats showed novelty preferences in exploration times (C2). However, CKD 10-wk rats did not show preferences for novel objects (C1,C2). In particular, the discrimination index of CKD rats for new objects was notably different as time passed after surgery (C3). L, left side; R, right side; O1, object-1; O2, object-2. Data are presented as means ± standard errors of the mean. n.s.: not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance naïve: n = 8; CKD 4 wks: n = 7; CKD 10 wks: n = 5.
Figure 1. Decreased novel object recognition memory in CKD model rats. Schema of the novel object recognition test (A). In the habituation period, the frequency of searching for familiar and novel objects was similar in naïve and CKD 4, 10- wk rats (B1). The exploration time for familiar and novel objects was similar in both naïve and CKD rats (B2). However, the object exploration times were markedly decreased in CKD 10-wk rats compared with naïve rats (B3). Naïve rats showed significantly increased frequency and times for novel objects (C1,C2). CKD 4-wk rats showed novelty preferences in exploration times (C2). However, CKD 10-wk rats did not show preferences for novel objects (C1,C2). In particular, the discrimination index of CKD rats for new objects was notably different as time passed after surgery (C3). L, left side; R, right side; O1, object-1; O2, object-2. Data are presented as means ± standard errors of the mean. n.s.: not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance naïve: n = 8; CKD 4 wks: n = 7; CKD 10 wks: n = 5.
Brainsci 12 00905 g001
Brainsci 12 00905 g002 550
Figure 2. Decreased spatial working memory in CKD model rats. A schematic diagram showing the special cues working memory test (A1). In the CKD rats, the average percentage of spontaneous movement was decreased compared with naïve rats (A2). Barnes maze apparatus was used to examine spatial learning and memory in CKD model rats (B1). The number of errors for escape hole was reduced for all rats upon repeated trials (B2). CKD 10-wk rats had a higher time of error on the second day and fifth day (probe test) compared with naïve rats (B2). The latent time to find the target hole increased on the probe test day in the CKD 10 wks compared with naïve rats. (B3). The blue round symbol in B1indicates the escape hole. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance. Y-maze, naïve: n = 12; CKD 4 wks: n = 7; CKD 10 wks: n = 5; Barnes maze: n = 6/group.
Figure 2. Decreased spatial working memory in CKD model rats. A schematic diagram showing the special cues working memory test (A1). In the CKD rats, the average percentage of spontaneous movement was decreased compared with naïve rats (A2). Barnes maze apparatus was used to examine spatial learning and memory in CKD model rats (B1). The number of errors for escape hole was reduced for all rats upon repeated trials (B2). CKD 10-wk rats had a higher time of error on the second day and fifth day (probe test) compared with naïve rats (B2). The latent time to find the target hole increased on the probe test day in the CKD 10 wks compared with naïve rats. (B3). The blue round symbol in B1indicates the escape hole. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance. Y-maze, naïve: n = 12; CKD 4 wks: n = 7; CKD 10 wks: n = 5; Barnes maze: n = 6/group.
Brainsci 12 00905 g002
Brainsci 12 00905 g003 550
Figure 3. Impairment of contextual fear memory in CKD 4, 10- wk rats. Contextual and cued fear conditioning and 24-h retrieval of contextual memory were performed (A,B) No differences in classical fear conditioning were observed in CKD 4-wk rats, although CKD 10-wk rats spent a significantly lower percentage of time freezing compared with naïve rats (A). The horizontal line indicates the duration of a tone (28 s), and the vertical arrow indicates the time of foot shocks (2 s). Deficits in contextual fear memory were observed in the CKD rats (B). Data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance, contextual fear conditioning: n = 6/group.
Figure 3. Impairment of contextual fear memory in CKD 4, 10- wk rats. Contextual and cued fear conditioning and 24-h retrieval of contextual memory were performed (A,B) No differences in classical fear conditioning were observed in CKD 4-wk rats, although CKD 10-wk rats spent a significantly lower percentage of time freezing compared with naïve rats (A). The horizontal line indicates the duration of a tone (28 s), and the vertical arrow indicates the time of foot shocks (2 s). Deficits in contextual fear memory were observed in the CKD rats (B). Data are presented as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one-way analysis of variance, contextual fear conditioning: n = 6/group.
Brainsci 12 00905 g003
Brainsci 12 00905 g004 550
Figure 4. Decreased fEPSP in the hippocampal CA1 regions of CKD model rats. A schematic diagram showing the in vivo experimental setup for recording fEPSP in the rat hippocampus (A). Representative traces for fEPSP in the hippocampal CA1 region before and after single-pulse stimuli in naïve and CKD rats (B). The amplitude of evoked fEPSP (C) and the slope changes (D) following LTP in CKD rats were attenuated compared with naïve rats. The arrows in panel B indicate the time point of strong theta-patterned stimulus (sTPS) application for LTP. Data are presented as means ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, fEPSP: n = 5/group.
Figure 4. Decreased fEPSP in the hippocampal CA1 regions of CKD model rats. A schematic diagram showing the in vivo experimental setup for recording fEPSP in the rat hippocampus (A). Representative traces for fEPSP in the hippocampal CA1 region before and after single-pulse stimuli in naïve and CKD rats (B). The amplitude of evoked fEPSP (C) and the slope changes (D) following LTP in CKD rats were attenuated compared with naïve rats. The arrows in panel B indicate the time point of strong theta-patterned stimulus (sTPS) application for LTP. Data are presented as means ± SEM. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, fEPSP: n = 5/group.
Brainsci 12 00905 g004
Brainsci 12 00905 g005 550
Figure 5. Upregulation of NHE1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of CKD model rats. NHE1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of naïve rats was mainly observed in the neurons (A): subiculum (A1), CA1 (A2), and CA2-3 (A3). CKD did not affect NHE1 expression in the neurons of the hippocampus ((B) and arrows of (B2)). NHE1 expression was enhanced in the neuropil at stratum lacunosum-moleculare, molecular layer (arrows), and hilus (*) regions in the CKD rats (B). CKD rats showed increased NHE1 immunoreactivity in the subiculum and alveus regions ((B1), *) and mossy fiber ((B3), arrows) of the hippocampus compared with naïve rats. NHE1 expression in the CA1 region was decreased in the neurons of CKD rats ((B2), arrows). The NHE1 densitometric results were similar to the immunohistochemical data ((C), LMol; (D), Mol; (E), CA2-3). Scale bar = 400 μm (panels (A,B)), 50μm (panels (A1–A3) and (B1–B3)). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, n = 5/group.
Figure 5. Upregulation of NHE1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of CKD model rats. NHE1 immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of naïve rats was mainly observed in the neurons (A): subiculum (A1), CA1 (A2), and CA2-3 (A3). CKD did not affect NHE1 expression in the neurons of the hippocampus ((B) and arrows of (B2)). NHE1 expression was enhanced in the neuropil at stratum lacunosum-moleculare, molecular layer (arrows), and hilus (*) regions in the CKD rats (B). CKD rats showed increased NHE1 immunoreactivity in the subiculum and alveus regions ((B1), *) and mossy fiber ((B3), arrows) of the hippocampus compared with naïve rats. NHE1 expression in the CA1 region was decreased in the neurons of CKD rats ((B2), arrows). The NHE1 densitometric results were similar to the immunohistochemical data ((C), LMol; (D), Mol; (E), CA2-3). Scale bar = 400 μm (panels (A,B)), 50μm (panels (A1–A3) and (B1–B3)). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, n = 5/group.
Brainsci 12 00905 g005
Brainsci 12 00905 g006 550
Figure 6. Gliosis in the hippocampal region of CKD model rats. Diagram of the rat hippocampus (A). GFAP immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of CKD 10-wk rats was enhanced in the CA1 and DG regions (arrows) compared with naïve rats (B1–B4): scale bar = 25 μm. The average number of GFAP-positive astroglia and the densitometric analysis results of GFAP immunoreactivity were consistent with the immunohistochemical data (C1–C4). Double labeling of GFAP and AQP-4 in the hippocampal CA1 and DG regions of naïve rats (D,F) and CKD 10-wk rats (E,G): GFAP (green); AQP-4 (red); merged images (yellow); scale bar = 18.8 μm; A.U., arbitrary unit. Data are presented as the mean and SEM. Significant differences from naïve rats (H1,H2), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, IHC: n = 5/group; CA1 of double labeling: n = 8/group; DG of double labeling: n = 7/group.
Figure 6. Gliosis in the hippocampal region of CKD model rats. Diagram of the rat hippocampus (A). GFAP immunoreactivity in the hippocampus of CKD 10-wk rats was enhanced in the CA1 and DG regions (arrows) compared with naïve rats (B1–B4): scale bar = 25 μm. The average number of GFAP-positive astroglia and the densitometric analysis results of GFAP immunoreactivity were consistent with the immunohistochemical data (C1–C4). Double labeling of GFAP and AQP-4 in the hippocampal CA1 and DG regions of naïve rats (D,F) and CKD 10-wk rats (E,G): GFAP (green); AQP-4 (red); merged images (yellow); scale bar = 18.8 μm; A.U., arbitrary unit. Data are presented as the mean and SEM. Significant differences from naïve rats (H1,H2), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 by one-way analysis of variance, IHC: n = 5/group; CA1 of double labeling: n = 8/group; DG of double labeling: n = 7/group.
Brainsci 12 00905 g006
Brainsci 12 00905 g007 550
Figure 7. Hippocampal volume in control and end-stage renal disease patients with/without cognitive impairment. There was no difference among the groups (A). The ESRD patients with or without cognitive impairment had smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than the control subjects (B,C). ESRD patients with cognitive impairment had smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than ESRD patients without cognitive impairment (B,C). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 7. Hippocampal volume in control and end-stage renal disease patients with/without cognitive impairment. There was no difference among the groups (A). The ESRD patients with or without cognitive impairment had smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than the control subjects (B,C). ESRD patients with cognitive impairment had smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than ESRD patients without cognitive impairment (B,C). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Brainsci 12 00905 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Y.H.; Kim, S.-W.; Im, H.; Oh, S.W.; Cho, N.-J.; Park, S.; Park, D.-K.; Kim, D.-S.; Gil, H.-W. Cognitive Sequelae and Hippocampal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease following 5/6 Nephrectomy. Brain Sci. 2022, 12, 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070905

AMA Style

Yu YH, Kim S-W, Im H, Oh SW, Cho N-J, Park S, Park D-K, Kim D-S, Gil H-W. Cognitive Sequelae and Hippocampal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease following 5/6 Nephrectomy. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12(7):905. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070905

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Yeon Hee, Seong-Wook Kim, Hyuna Im, Se Won Oh, Nam-Jun Cho, Samel Park, Dae-Kyoon Park, Duk-Soo Kim, and Hyo-Wook Gil. 2022. "Cognitive Sequelae and Hippocampal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease following 5/6 Nephrectomy" Brain Sciences 12, no. 7: 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070905

APA Style

Yu, Y. H., Kim, S. -W., Im, H., Oh, S. W., Cho, N. -J., Park, S., Park, D. -K., Kim, D. -S., & Gil, H. -W. (2022). Cognitive Sequelae and Hippocampal Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease following 5/6 Nephrectomy. Brain Sciences, 12(7), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070905

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop