Previous Article in Journal
Maintenance of Bodily Expressions Modulates Functional Connectivity Between Prefrontal Cortex and Extrastriate Body Area During Working Memory Processing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study

1
Institute of Neurosciences and Cell Biology, City St. George’s, University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK
2
Department of Neurosurgery, St. George’s University Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121173
Submission received: 22 October 2024 / Revised: 11 November 2024 / Accepted: 19 November 2024 / Published: 22 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Neuroscience of Pain)

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as an effective treatment for managing chronic pain that is unresponsive to traditional therapies. While SCS is well documented for conditions like failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), its effectiveness in managing pain related to spinal cord injuries (SCI) is less studied. This study aims to assess the efficacy of SCS in alleviating SCI-related pain and improving patients’ quality of life, filling a gap in the existing literature. Methods: This cohort study included 15 adult patients with traumatic and non-traumatic SCIs, treated between 2016 and 2022. Patients received SCS implants after either a trial or direct implantation. Pain levels were assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) scores, while quality of life was evaluated using the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) scale. The SCS devices were implanted at different spinal levels, with various stimulation protocols applied, including high-frequency stimulation (10 kHz). Results: In patients with traumatic SCI, the mean VAS score decreased from 8.6 to 4.5, with 71% reporting more than 50% pain relief. Non-traumatic SCI patients experienced a reduction from 8.5 to 2.5, with all showing more than 50% pain relief. EQ-5D scores improved in both groups. A 49% reduction in pain medication usage was also observed, though one patient required revision surgery due to an adverse event. Conclusions: SCS significantly reduces pain and improves quality of life for SCI patients, particularly with high-frequency protocols. While promising, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and stimulation parameters for better long-term outcomes.
Keywords: spinal cord stimulation; chronic pain; spinal cord injury; high-frequency stimulation; neuropathic pain; pain management; quality of life; neurostimulation therapy; traumatic SCI; non-traumatic SCI spinal cord stimulation; chronic pain; spinal cord injury; high-frequency stimulation; neuropathic pain; pain management; quality of life; neurostimulation therapy; traumatic SCI; non-traumatic SCI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alamri, A.; MacDonald, M.; Al-Mohammad, A.; Ricciardi, L.; Hart, M.G.; Pereira, E.A. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study. Brain Sci. 2024, 14, 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121173

AMA Style

Alamri A, MacDonald M, Al-Mohammad A, Ricciardi L, Hart MG, Pereira EA. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study. Brain Sciences. 2024; 14(12):1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alamri, Alexander, Meredith MacDonald, Alaa Al-Mohammad, Lucia Ricciardi, Michael G. Hart, and Erlick A. Pereira. 2024. "Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study" Brain Sciences 14, no. 12: 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121173

APA Style

Alamri, A., MacDonald, M., Al-Mohammad, A., Ricciardi, L., Hart, M. G., & Pereira, E. A. (2024). Spinal Cord Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury-Related Pain: A Pilot Study. Brain Sciences, 14(12), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop