Next Article in Journal
Eye-Tracking Metrics as a Digital Biomarker for Neurocognitive Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Binaural Pulse Modulation (BPM) as an Adjunctive Treatment for Anxiety: A Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

by
Lucie Métivier
1,2,3 and
Sonia Dollfus
1,2,3,4,*
1
UMR-S 1237, Neuropresage Team, GIP Cyceron, 14000 Caen, France
2
Department of Health (UFR Santé), University of Caen Normandy (UNICAEN), 14000 Caen, France
3
Academic and Medical Research Federation (FHU A2M2P), University of Caen Normandy (UNICAEN), 14000 Caen, France
4
Department of Psychiatry, Esquirol Center, University Hospital Center (CHU), 14000 Caen, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(2), 148; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020148
Submission received: 12 December 2024 / Revised: 17 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 31 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Neuropsychiatry)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Negative symptoms (NSs) significantly impair the outcome of schizophrenia, primarily due to their effect on quality of life and their resistance to pharmacological treatments. Several scales have been developed to assess the various dimensions of NSs, including avolition, anhedonia, alogia, social withdrawal, and blunted affect. While observer-rated scales are the most commonly used, self-assessment tools remain underutilized. However, self-assessments offer a promising approach for gaining insights into the personal experiences of individuals. The objective of this review was to identify and report the psychometric properties of self-assessment scales for NSs that are relevant for both research and clinical practice, with a focus on tools that assess multiple domains of NSs in order to support comprehensive evaluations and tailored therapeutic strategies. Methods: We conducted an exhaustive literature review following PRISMA guidelines to identify self-evaluation scales that evaluate several domains of NSs in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. The COSMIN checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each tool. Results: Our review identified five self-assessment scales. Among these, two scales received a Grade A recommendation for use in clinical or research practice: the Self-evaluation Negative Symptom (SNS), which assesses the five domains of NSs, and the Motivation And Pleasure Scale Self-report (MAP-SR), which evaluates anhedonia, avolition, and social withdrawal. Conclusions: The SNS and the MAP-SR are the only tools with sufficient psychometric properties, making them reliable for use in both research and clinical practice. Despite the development of self-assessment tools for NSs, their integration into research and clinical settings remains limited, highlighting the need for increased utilization to enhance the understanding and management of these symptoms.
Keywords: self-assessment; negative symptoms; schizophrenia self-assessment; negative symptoms; schizophrenia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Métivier, L.; Dollfus, S. Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia. Brain Sci. 2025, 15, 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020148

AMA Style

Métivier L, Dollfus S. Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia. Brain Sciences. 2025; 15(2):148. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Métivier, Lucie, and Sonia Dollfus. 2025. "Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia" Brain Sciences 15, no. 2: 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020148

APA Style

Métivier, L., & Dollfus, S. (2025). Systematic Review of Self-Assessment Scales for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia. Brain Sciences, 15(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop