Next Article in Journal
Fisetin Inhibits Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells via the Inhibition of YAP
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Curcumin Improves Energy Metabolism, Brain Monoamines, Carcass Traits, Muscle Oxidative Stability and Fatty Acid Profile in Heat-Stressed Broiler Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of the Ripening Stage and Extraction Conditions on the Phenolic Fingerprint of ‘Corbella’ Extra-Virgin Olive Oil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Redox Homeostasis in Poultry: Regulatory Roles of NF-κB
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/antiox10060878
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mitigation of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Hedyotis diffusa Is Associated with Activation of NRF2/ARE Signaling in Chicks

by
Ling Zhao
1,
Jiang Deng
1,
Zi-Jian Xu
1,
Wan-Po Zhang
2,
Mahmoud Mohamed Khalil
3,
Niel Alexander Karrow
4 and
Lv-Hui Sun
1,*
1
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Cairo 13736, Egypt
4
Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(6), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060878
Submission received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 21 May 2021 / Accepted: 27 May 2021 / Published: 30 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant Defences and Redox Homeostasis in Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to explore the mechanism of Hedyotis diffusa (HD) in mediating the detoxification of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)-induced hepatic injury in chicks. A total of 144 one-day-old male broilers (Cobb 500) were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (n = 6 cages/diet, 6 chicks/cage). After three days of acclimation, the broilers were fed either a control diet (Control), Control plus 0.5 mg/kg of AFB1, or Control plus 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 with 500 or 1000 mg/kg HD for two weeks. Both serum and liver were collected at the end of the feeding trial for biochemistry, histology, and NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2 (NRF2)/antioxidant response element (ARE) signaling analysis. Compared with Control, the AFB1 treatment caused liver injury and decreased (p < 0.05) body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and serum albumin and total protein by 6.2–20.7%. AFB1 also induced swelling, necrosis, and severe vacuolar degeneration in chicks’ livers. Notably, HD supplementation at 500 and 1000 mg/kg mitigated (p < 0.05) the alterations induced by AFB1. HD supplementation alleviated (p < 0.05) AFB1-induced impairment in hepatic glutathione peroxidase activity, protein carbonyl, and exo-AFB1-8,9-epoxide (AFBO)–DNA concentrations by 57.7–100% and increased (p < 0.05) the activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase by 23.1–40.9% more than those of AFB1 treatment alone. Furthermore, HD supplementation at the two doses upregulated (p < 0.05) NRF2, NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1, heme oxygenase-1, glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit, and glutathione-S transferase A2 and A3 in livers relative to the AFB1 group by 0.99–3.4-fold. Overall, dietary supplementation of HD at a high dose displayed better protection effects against aflatoxicosis. In conclusion, a dietary HD supplementation at 500 and 1000 mg/kg protected broilers from AFB1-induced hepatotoxicity, potentially due to the activation of NRF2/ARE signaling in the chicks.

1. Introduction

Aflatoxins (AFs) are secondary metabolites of the fungi Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus that can be detected in various agricultural commodities [1,2]. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is considered the most toxic variant among AFs and their metabolites. It exhibits harmful teratogenic, mutagenic, and hepatotoxic effects on both humans and livestock [3,4,5]. Moreover, AFB1 is also classified as a Group I carcinogen [6]. The biotransformation pathways of AFB1 represent the main reason for its toxicity. The bioactivation of AFB1 in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP450), a member of the phase I metabolizing enzymes, into the highly reactive exo-AFB1-8,9-epoxide (AFBO) [5,7] forms adducts with DNA and proteins, resulting into cytotoxicity, mutations, and DNA lesions [5,8]. On the contrary, detoxification of AFBO can occur in conjunction with glutathione (GSH), forming a non-toxic adduct that can be catalyzed by glutathione-S transferases (GST), the phase II detoxification enzymes [8]. Moreover, AFB1 also can induce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress and oxidation of DNA, proteins, and lipids [6,9,10]. Several strategies have been proposed to detoxify and deactivate these toxins in order to decrease their harmful effects on animals. Lately, the use of natural active biological compounds derived from plants has been attracting more attention. Some metabolites of herbs have been proven to be an effective alternative that can ameliorate the adverse effects of AFB1 in broiler diets [11,12,13].
Hedyotis diffusa (HD), a natural medicinal plant, is composed of flavonoids, iridoids, triterpenes, anthraquinones, alkaloids, lignans, coumarins, cerebrosides, and sterols [11]. These chemical compounds provide HD with multiple biological properties including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor chemo-preventive, proapoptotic, and anti-angiogenic effects [14,15]. Since it possesses these properties, HD has been widely applied for the treatment of inflammation-related diseases, bronchitis, urethritis, and appendicitis and has been proposed as a potential therapy for liver, breast, lung, colon, and pancreatic cancers [14,15,16,17,18,19].
Interestingly, HD has shown the ability to protect against AFB1-induced mutation and carcinoma by inhibiting CYP450-mediated bioactivation of AFB1 to toxic AFBO [20,21]. Numerous natural compounds protect against toxicity of xenobiotics through regulating NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2 (NRF2)/antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway [22]. NRF2 binds to ARE, which promotes the transcriptional expression of phase II-detoxifying enzymes and antioxidant genes, such as GST, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC), heme oxygenase-1 (HO1), and NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) [23,24,25]. To our knowledge, no information is available about HD’s potential to influence NRF2/ARE signaling in the context of AFB1-induced hepatoxicity. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate whether the dietary supplementation of HD has any effect in mitigating AFB1-induced hepatotoxic effects through the regulation of the NRF2/ARE signaling pathway in chicks.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Birds, Dietary Treatments, and Sample Collections

The animal trial was conducted following the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University, China. A total of 144 one-day-old male broiler chickens (Cobb 500) were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups, with 6 replicates of 6 chicks/cage. Chicks were fed a corn/soybean-based diet (BD) formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of broilers (Supplemental Table S1) [10] with unlimited access to water. After 3 days of adaptation, chicks in the four experimental groups were fed either the BD diet (Control), Control plus 0.5 mg AFB1/kg (AFB1), Control plus 0.5 mg AFB1/kg and 500 mg HD/kg (AFB1 + 500HD), or Control plus 0.5 mg AFB1/kg and 1000 mg HD/kg (AFB1 + 1000HD). The HD was added as the form of the extract of HD plant, which was prepared as previously described [26]. Briefly, the dried whole plant (1000 g) of HD was extracted with 70% ethanol at room temperature for 2 days and repeated three times. Then, it was vacuum dried and given 81.5 g of HD extract. The AFB1 was bought from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). The experimental duration was chosen on the basis of previous studies that reported that dietary consumption of >100 μg AFB1/kg ≥ 2 weeks induced hepatotoxicity in broilers [10,27]. The experiment lasted for 2 weeks, and body weights and feed intake were measured weekly. At the end of the feeding trial, 1 broiler from each replicate (thus, 6 broilers from each treatment group) were slaughtered for blood and liver sample collection for serologic and liver histologic examination, as previously described [10]. The liver samples were washed with ice-cold isotonic saline, divided into aliquots, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use [28].

2.2. Serum Biochemical and Histologic Analysis

The serum activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and the concentrations of total bilirubin (TBIL), total protein (TP), and albumin (ALB) were measured by an automatic biochemistry analyzer (Beckman Synchron CX4 PRO). The liver tissues were examined microscopically after being fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin [29].

2.3. Hepatic Antioxidant Parameters and AFBO–DNA Adduct Concentrations Analysis

The activities of SOD, GPX, and CAT, along with concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyl (PC), were measured by specific assay kits (A001, A005, A007–1, A003, and A087–1–2) purchased from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute of China. Protein concentrations were measured by the bicinchoninic acid assay. The hepatic AFBO–DNA adduct concentrations were analyzed as previously described [10]. Briefly, hepatic genomic DNA was extracted by a DNA isolation kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Then, approximately 15 μg of the genomic DNA was used to determine the AFBO–DNA adduct concentration using an AFBO–DNA adduct competitive ELISA Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

2.4. Real-Time qPCR and Western Blot Analyses

Real-time q-PCR analyses of the pertaining samples were conducted as previously described [10]. Primers (Supplemental Table S2) for the NRF2/ARE signaling-related genes and the reference gene β-actin were designed using Primer Express 3.0 (Applied Biosystems). The 2−ddCt method was used for the quantification with β-actin as a reference gene, and the relative abundance was normalized to the Control group. Western blot analyses of the pertaining samples were performed as previously described [30]. The primary antibodies used for each gene product are presented in Supplementary Table S3. Protein concentrations were measured by the bicinchoninic acid assay.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS statistics software (version 19, IBM) with the significance level declared at p < 0.05, and the Tukey–Kramer method was used for multiple mean comparisons. The data are presented as means ± standard errors (SE).

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance, Serum Biochemistry, and Liver Histology

No differences (p ≥ 0.05) were observed for the initial body weight of broilers among the four groups (Table 1). After two weeks of experimental treatments, AFB1 decreased (p < 0.05) the final body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and gain/feed efficiency of chicks by 6.2–12.3% (Table 1). These changes induced by AFB1 were significantly mitigated (p < 0.05) by HD supplementation at 500 and 1000 mg/kg. Furthermore, although AFB1 did not alter (p ≥ 0.05) serum ALT and AST activities and TBIL concentration, it decreased (p < 0.05) ALB and TP concentrations by 16.6–20.7% relative to the Control (Table 2). Interestingly, dietary supplementation with HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg alleviated (p < 0.05) AFB1-induced changes on these biochemistry variables. Moreover, the histological results indicated that AFB1 induced liver damage including swelling, necrosis, severe vacuolar degeneration, and bile duct hyperplasia (Figure 1). However, the hepatic injury induced by AFB1 was alleviated by dietary HD supplementation in a dose-dependent manner.

3.2. Hepatic Antioxidant Variables and AFBO–DNA Adduct Concentration

Birds exposed to AFB1 treatment for two weeks showed significant alterations in the hepatic antioxidant variables, as presented in Table 3. Compared to the Control, AFB1 decreased (p < 0.05) the activity of GPX (19.8%) but increased the concentration of PC (33.4%) in the liver of broilers. Notably, these changes induced by AFB1 were significantly mitigated (p < 0.05) by the dietary supplementation of HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg. Interestingly, the activities of SOD and CAT in the liver were increased (p < 0.05) by 23.1–40.9% in the AFB1 + 1000HD group compared to the AFB1 group. However, the concentration of MDA in the liver was not affected (p ≥ 0.05) by AFB1 or HD. Additionally, AFB1 increased (p < 0.05) the concentration of AFBO–DNA adducts by 11-fold in the liver compared with the Control (Figure 2). Notably, dietary supplementation with HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg reduced (p < 0.05) the concentration of AFBO–DNA adducts by 51.0–62.7% in comparison to the AFB1-supplemented group.

3.3. Expression of the NRF2/ARE Signaling-Related Genes

Among the six NRF2/ARE signaling-related genes examined in the liver of chicks, three genes were influenced by AFB1 and HD treatment (Figure 3). Specifically, AFB1 upregulated (p < 0.05) the mRNA levels of HO1 and downregulated (p < 0.05) the mRNA level of GSTA2. Interestingly, dietary supplementation of HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg increased (p < 0.05) the mRNA levels of HO1, GSTA1, and GSTA3 compared to the AFB1 treatment group. Moreover, Western blot results showed that the hepatic protein levels of NRF2, NQO1, HO1, GCLC, GSTA2, and GSTA3 were affected by AFB1 and HD treatment (Figure 4). Specifically, AFB1 downregulated (p < 0.05) the protein levels of NRF2, NQO1, HO1, GSTA2, and GSTA3 in the liver of broilers. Notably, these changes induced by AFB1 were significantly mitigated (p < 0.05) by the dietary supplementation of HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg. Strikingly, the protein levels of GSTA3 and GCLC were much higher (p < 0.05) in the AFB1 + 500HD and AFB1 + 1000HD groups compared to the Control and AFB1 groups.

4. Discussion

The current study showed that HD was able to mitigate hepatotoxicity induced by AFB1 in broilers. Birds that consumed AFB1 diets exhibited a reduction in final body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and gain/feed of broilers, all of which remain in agreement with previous studies [13,31,32]. This poor growth performance could be related to anorexia and inhibition of lipogenesis and protein synthesis [32,33]. Meanwhile, AFB1 also induced the typical clinical and pathological signs of hepatic injury, including decreased concentrations of ALB and TP in serum as well as swelling, necrosis, severe vacuolar degeneration, and bile duct hyperplasia in the liver of broilers and Japanese quail [29,31,34]. Intriguingly, dietary supplementation of HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg alleviated AFB1-induced toxic effects on performance, serum biochemistry, and hepatic histopathology. Notably, dietary supplementation with HD at the 1000 mg/kg displayed better mitigation based on these parameters than 500 mg/kg. These findings are similar to previous studies that showed that dietary supplementation of HD can mitigate AFB1-induced growth retardation and hepatic damage [20,21].
AFB1 dysregulation of the response of hepatic redox parameters (GPX and PC) indicated that the chicks exposed to AFB1 suffered from oxidative stress in the present study. Specifically, AFB1 reduced the antioxidant enzyme GPX activity and induced the protein oxidation maker PC [10,27,32]. These outcomes are similar to previous studies [10,27,32], which explained that AFB1 can induce oxidative stress and results in proteins, lipids and DNA oxidation, thereby causing cytotoxicity and genotoxicity [9,10,32]. Interestingly, dietary supplementation with HD at 500 mg/kg mitigated AFB1-induced changes in these redox parameters in the liver. Moreover, dietary supplementation of HD at 1000 mg/kg even increased the hepatic antioxidant enzymes activities of SOD, GPX, and CAT compared to levels in the AFB1 groups. Taken together, these outcomes indicate that HD could alleviate AFB1-induced oxidative stress in the liver of chicks. These findings are similar to previous studies, which have reported that HD could detoxify other xenobiotic-induced oxidative stress both in vivo and in vitro [16,35,36].
A novel finding from the current study is that the alleviation of AFB1-induced hepatotoxicity by HD was associated with the activation of NRF2/ARE signaling in broilers. Although the mRNA of NRF2 was not affected by AFB1 treatment, the NRF2 protein was upregulated by the HD treatment in the liver of broilers. As the NRF2-targeted antioxidative genes, NQO1 and HO1 played important roles in the protection against oxidative stress [25,37,38]. AFB1 sharply downregulated approximately 70% abundances of these two proteins, which might promote AFB1-induced oxidative injury in the liver of broilers. These findings are similar to previous reports [39,40]. Intriguingly, dietary supplementation of HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg mitigated AFB1-induced downregulation of NQO1 and HO1 proteins, which may be attributed to reduced oxidative injury in livers induced by AFB1. Moreover, the phase II metabolizing enzymes GSTA2, GSTA3, and GCLC, which play roles in the detoxification of AFB1 by catalyzing the conjugation of toxic AFBO with GSH [8,10,27,41], can be transcriptional activated by NRF2 [23,24,25]. Similar to previous studies, AFB1 decreased the mRNA and protein levels of GSTA2 and GSTA3 in the liver, which may be contributed to its induced hepatic injury [8,42,43,44]. Notably, dietary supplementation with HD at 500 and 1000 mg/kg inhibited the AFB1-induced reduction of GSTA2 and GSTA3 proteins and increased the GCLC protein, which could help to ameliorate the AFB1-induced hepatotoxicity of chicks. Indeed, as the primary toxic adduct of AFBO [10,45], AFBO–DNA was sharply decreased in the liver of broilers exposed to AFB1 by the HD dietary supplementation. These results indicate that the protective effects of HD against AFB1 toxicity are potentially mediated by activating the pivotal GSTs isozymes that promote the detoxification of the highly toxic AFBO.
Paradoxically, the abundance of hepatic proteins NRF2, NQO1, HO1, and GCLC did not correlate well with their mRNA abundance. Additionally, as the target genes of NRF2, the mRNA levels of NQO1, HO1, and GCLC also did not change as well as expected. These divergences may be attributed to complex feedback or posttranscriptional mechanisms regulating the synthesis of these proteins [28,32].

5. Conclusions

In summary, the present study has illustrated that dietary HD supplementation could mitigate poor growth performance and hepatic injury induced by AFB1 in broilers, as illustrated by the amelioration of the changes in serum biochemistry and histopathologic lesions. The protective mechanism of HD against AFB1-induced hepatoxicity is associated with the activation of NRF2/ARE signaling in broiler chicks. Specifically, (1) HD could mitigate AFB1-induced oxidative stress by increasing the expression of the proteins with antioxidant capacities and (2) HD could effectively promote the expression of phase II detoxification enzymes, which play crucial roles in the detoxification of AFB1 by catalyzing the conjugation of highly toxic AFBO with GSH. These findings support the use of HD to prevent aflatoxicosis in chicks.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox10060878/s1: Table S1: Basal diet formulation and nutritional values; Table S2: List of primers used for Q-PCR analysis; Table S3: Name, type, dilution, and source of primary antibodies.

Author Contributions

L.-H.S. designed the research; L.Z., J.D., Z.-J.X., and W.-P.Z. conducted the experiments and analyzed the data; L.Z., L.-H.S., M.M.K., and N.A.K. wrote the paper; L.-H.S. takes primary responsibility for the final content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the Chinese Natural Science Foundation Projects (32072775 and 31772636) and Top-notch Young Talent Supporting Program.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research was approved by Scientific Ethic Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University on 28 September 2019. The project identification code is HZAUSW-2019-016.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support Chinese Natural Science Foundation Projects (32072775 and 31772636) and Top-notch Young Talent Supporting Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koehler, P.E.; Hanlin, R.T.; Beraha, L. Production of aflatoxins B1 and G1 by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus isolated from market pecans. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 30, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sun, L.H.; Lei, M.Y.; Zhang, N.Y.; Zhao, L.; Krumm, C.S.; Qi, D.S. Hepatotoxic effects of mycotoxin combinations in mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 74, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs; IARC: Lyon, France, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guengerich, F.P.; Johnson, W.W.; Shimada, T.; Ueng, Y.F.; Yamazaki, H.; Langouët, S. Activation and detoxication of aflatoxin B1. Mutat. Res. 1998, 402, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yunus, A.W.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Bohm, J. Aflatoxin B1 in affecting broiler’s performance, immunity, and gastrointestinal tract: A review of history and contemporary issues. Toxins 2011, 3, 566–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sun, L.H.; Lei, M.Y.; Zhang, N.Y.; Gao, X.; Li, C.; Krumm, C.S.; Qi, D.S. Individual and combined cytotoxic effects of aflatoxin B1, zearalenone, deoxynivalenol and fumonisin B1 on BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicon 2015, 95, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hussein, H.S.; Brasel, J.M. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology 2001, 167, 101–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deng, J.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, N.Y.; Karrow, N.A.; Krumm, C.S.; Qi, D.S.; Sun, L.H. Aflatoxin B1 metabolism: Regulation by phase I and II metabolizing enzymes and chemoprotective agents. Mutat. Res. 2018, 778, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mary, V.S.; Theumer, M.G.; Arias, S.L.; Rubinstein, H.R. Reactive oxygen species sources and biomolecular oxidative damage induced by aflatoxin B1 and fumonisin B1 in rat spleen mononuclear cells. Toxicology 2012, 302, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, L.H.; Zhang, N.Y.; Zhu, M.K.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, J.C.; Qi, D.S. Prevention of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Selenium Is Associated with Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 Isozymes and Up-Regulation of 6 Selenoprotein Genes in Chick Liver. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Abidin, Z.; Khatoon, A.; Numan, M. Mycotoxins in broilers: Pathological alterations induced by aflatoxins and ochratoxins, diagnosis and determination, treatment and control of mycotoxicosis. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manafi, M.; Heydari, M.; Yari, M. Aflatoxicosis and herbal detoxification: The effectiveness of thyme essence on performance parameters and antibody titers of commercial broilers fed aflatoxin B1. Res. Zool. 2014, 4, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nazarizadeh, H.; Hosseini, S.M.; Pourreza, J. Effect of plant extracts derived from thyme and chamomile on the growth performance, gut morphology and immune system of broilers fed aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A contaminated diets. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wang, C.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Wei, D.; Deng, C.; Xu, X.; Xin, P.; Sun, S. The Antitumor Constituents from Hedyotis Diffusa Willd. Molecules 2017, 22, 2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gupta, S.; Zhang, D.; Yi, J.; Shao, J. Anticancer activities of Oldenlandia diffusa. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 2004, 4, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmad, R.; Ali, A.M.; Israf, D.A.; Ismail, N.H.; Shaari, K.; Lajis, N.H. Antioxidant, radical-scavenging, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antibacterial activities of methanolic extracts of some Hedyotis species. Life Sci. 2005, 76, 1953–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, C.C.; Ng, L.T.; Yang, J.J.; Hsu, Y.F. Anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective activity of peh-hue-juwa-chi-cao in male rats. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2002, 30, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ren, F.; Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Niu, G. Studies on chemical constituents of Hedyotis diffusa Willd. Chin. Pharm. J. 2005, 40, 502–504. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ahmad, R.; Shaari, K.; Lajis, N.H.; Hamzah, A.S.; Ismail, N.H.; Kitajima, M. Anthraquinones from Hedyotis capitellata. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1141–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wong, B.; Lau, B.; Yamasaki, T.; Teel, R. Inhibition of dexamethasone-induced cytochrome P450-mediated mutagenicity and metabolism of aflatoxin B1 by Chinese medicinal herbs. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1993, 2, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wong, B.Y.; Lau, B.H.; Tadi, P.P.; Teel, R.W. Chinese medicinal herbs modulate mutagenesis, DNA binding and metabolism of aflatoxin B1. Mutat. Res. 1992, 279, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yarmohammadi, F.; Rezaee, R.; Karimi, G. Natural compounds against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: A review on the involvement of Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 1163–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Guo, Y.; Yu, S.; Zhang, C.; Kong, A.T. Epigenetic regulation of Keap1-Nrf2 signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, J.M.; Johnson, J.A. An important role of Nrf2-ARE pathway in the cellular defense mechanism. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 37, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Shaw, P.; Chattopadhyay, A. Nrf2-ARE signaling in cellular protection: Mechanism of action and the regulatory mechanisms. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 3119–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gu, G.W.; Barone, I.; Gelsomino, L.; Giordano, C.; Bonofiglio, D.; Statti, G.; Menichini, F.; Catalano, S.; Andò, S. Oldenlandia diffusa extracts exert antiproliferative and apoptotic effects on human breast cancer cells through ERα/Sp1-mediated p53 activation. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227, 3363–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, L.; Deng, J.; Ma, L.B.; Zhang, W.P.; Khalil, M.M.; Karrow, N.A.; Qi, D.S.; Sun, L.H. Dietary Se deficiency dysregulates metabolic and cell death signaling in aggravating the AFB1 hepatotoxicity of chicks. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 149, 111938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, L.; Sun, L.H.; Huang, J.Q.; Briens, M.; Qi, D.S.; Xu, S.W.; Lei, X.G. A novel organic selenium compound exerts unique regulation of selenium speciation, selenogenome, and selenoproteins in broiler chicks. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sun, L.H.; Zhang, N.Y.; Sun, R.R.; Gao, X.; Gu, C.; Krumm, C.S.; Qi, D.S. A novel strain of Cellulosimicrobium funkei can biologically detoxify aflatoxin B1 in ducklings. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, J.Q.; Ren, F.Z.; Jiang, Y.Y.; Xiao, C.; Lei, X.G. Selenoproteins protect against avian nutritional muscular dystrophy by metabolizing peroxides and regulating redox/apoptotic signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015, 83, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, J.; Song, W.J.; Zhang, N.Y.; Tan, J.; Krumm, C.S.; Sun, L.H.; Qi, D.S. Biodetoxification of aflatoxin B1 in cottonseed meal by fermentation of Cellulosimicrobium funkei in duckling diet. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, L.; Feng, Y.; Deng, J.; Zhang, N.Y.; Zhang, W.P.; Liu, X.L.; Rajput, S.A.; Qi, D.S.; Sun, L.H. Selenium Deficiency Aggravates Aflatoxin B1-Induced Immunotoxicity in Chick Spleen by Regulating 6 Selenoprotein Genes and Redox/Inflammation/Apoptotic Signaling. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 894–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kasmani, F.B.; Torshizi, M.A.K.; Allameh, A.; Shariatmadari, F. A novel aflatoxin-binding Bacillus probiotic: Performance, serum biochemistry, and immunological parameters in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 1846–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khaleghipour, B.; Khosravinia, H.; Toghiyani, M.; Azarfar, A. Effects of silymarin on productive performance, liver function and serum biochemical profile in broiler Japanese quail challenged with dietary aflatoxins. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 18, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chen, R.; He, J.; Tong, X.; Tang, L.; Liu, M. The Hedyotis diffusa Willd. (Rubiaceae): A Review on Phytochemistry, Pharmacology, Quality Control and Pharmacokinetics. Molecules 2016, 21, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, X.; Li, C.; Tang, Y.L.; Zhang, H.; Chan, S.W. Effect of Hedyotis diffusa water extract on protecting human hepatocyte cells (LO2) from H2O2-induced cytotoxicity. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Talalay, P. NAD(P)H:quinone acceptor oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), a multifunctional antioxidant enzyme and exceptionally versatile cytoprotector. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 501, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Loboda, A.; Damulewicz, M.; Pyza, E.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: An evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3221–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zhou, Y.; Jin, Y.; Yu, H.; Shan, A.; Shen, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, Y.; Fang, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. Resveratrol inhibits aflatoxin B1-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in bovine mammary epithelial cells and is involved the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Toxicon 2019, 164, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ji, Y.; Nyamagoud, S.B.; SreeHarsha, N.; Mishra, A.; Gubbiyappa, S.K.; Singh, Y. Sitagliptin protects liver against aflatoxin B1-induced hepatotoxicity through upregulating Nrf2/ARE/HO-1 pathway. Biofactors 2020, 46, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, S.C. Glutathione synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013, 1830, 3143–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sriwattanapong, K.; Slocum, S.L.; Chawanthayatham, S.; Fedeles, B.I.; Egner, P.A.; Groopman, J.D.; Satayavivad, J.; Croy, R.G.; Essigmann, J.M. Editor’s Highlight: Pregnancy Alters Aflatoxin B1 Metabolism and Increases DNA Damage in Mouse Liver. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 160, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guo, Y.; Balasubramanian, B.; Zhao, Z.H.; Liu, W.C. Marine algal polysaccharides alleviate aflatoxin B1-induced bursa of Fabricius injury by regulating redox and apoptotic signaling pathway in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 844–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, N.Y.; Qi, M.; Gao, X.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Gu, C.Q.; Song, W.J.; Krumm, C.S.; Sun, L.H.; Qi, D.S. Response of the hepatic transcriptome to aflatoxin B1 in ducklings. Toxicon 2016, 111, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, N.Y.; Qi, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, M.K.; Guo, J.; Liu, J.; Gu, C.Q.; Rajput, S.A.; Krumm, C.S.; Qi, D.S.; et al. Curcumin Prevents Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Inhibition of Cytochrome P450 Isozymes in Chick Liver. Toxins 2016, 8, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 10 00878 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of dietary AFB1 and HD on the histopathology of livers of chicks. The liver sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin; Photo-micrographs are shown at 200× magnification. Here, arrows indicate swelling and necrosis; arrowheads indicate vacuolar degeneration. Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Figure 1. Influence of dietary AFB1 and HD on the histopathology of livers of chicks. The liver sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin; Photo-micrographs are shown at 200× magnification. Here, arrows indicate swelling and necrosis; arrowheads indicate vacuolar degeneration. Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Antioxidants 10 00878 g001
Antioxidants 10 00878 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HD on the concentrations of AFBO–DNA adducts in the liver of chicks. Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means for a given gene not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. AFBO, exo-AFB1-8,9-epoxide; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000 HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Figure 2. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HD on the concentrations of AFBO–DNA adducts in the liver of chicks. Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means for a given gene not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. AFBO, exo-AFB1-8,9-epoxide; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000 HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Antioxidants 10 00878 g002
Antioxidants 10 00878 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HP on the relative mRNA abundances of NRF2–ARE signaling in the livers of chicks. Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means for a given gene not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. NRF2, NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2; NQO1, NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase-1; HO1, heme oxygenase-1; GCLC, glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; GST, glutathione-S transferase. Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Figure 3. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HP on the relative mRNA abundances of NRF2–ARE signaling in the livers of chicks. Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means for a given gene not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. NRF2, NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2; NQO1, NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase-1; HO1, heme oxygenase-1; GCLC, glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; GST, glutathione-S transferase. Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Antioxidants 10 00878 g003
Antioxidants 10 00878 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HP on the relative protein abundances of NRF2–ARE signaling in the livers of chicks. For a given protein, the band was a representative image of 3–5 independent analyses (A), and the value shows the relative density of protein bands (mean ± SEs, n = 3–5; (B)). Means for a given protein not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. NRF2, NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2; NQO1, NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase-1; HO1, heme oxygenase-1; GCLC, glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; GST, glutathione-S transferase; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Figure 4. Effects of dietary AFB1 and HP on the relative protein abundances of NRF2–ARE signaling in the livers of chicks. For a given protein, the band was a representative image of 3–5 independent analyses (A), and the value shows the relative density of protein bands (mean ± SEs, n = 3–5; (B)). Means for a given protein not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. NRF2, NF-E2-related nuclear factor 2; NQO1, NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase-1; HO1, heme oxygenase-1; GCLC, glutathione cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; GST, glutathione-S transferase; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Antioxidants 10 00878 g004
Table
Table 1. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on growth performances of broilers 1.
Table 1. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on growth performances of broilers 1.
ControlAFB1AFB1 + 500HDAFB1 + 1000HD
Initial Body Weight, g69.4 ± 0.169.2 ± 0.169.3 ± 0.169.4 ± 0.2
Final Body Weight, g647± 8.3 c575 ± 12.5 a592 ± 17.4 ab619 ± 8.8 b
Body Weight Gain, g577 ± 8.3 c506 ± 12.5 a523 ± 17.4 ab550 ± 8.8 b
Feed Intake, g676 ± 9.8 b632 ± 12.9 a636± 16.7 ab662± 8.8 ab
Gain/Feed, g/kg854 ± 9 b801 ± 24 a822 ± 17 ab831 ± 5 a
1 Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means in a row not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. HD, Hedyotis diffusa; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1 + 500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1 + 1000 HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Table
Table 2. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on serum biochemistry of broilers 1.
Table 2. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on serum biochemistry of broilers 1.
ControlAFB1AFB1 + 500HDAFB1 + 1000HD
ALT, U/L3.40 ± 0.432.73 ± 0.553.79 ± 0.563.23 ± 0.72
AST, U/L268 ± 18.7270 ± 27.4230 ± 5.8243 ± 21.7
TBIL, µmol/L3.64 ± 0.063.65 ±0.083.70 ± 0.153.75 ±0.2
ALB, g/L16.3 ± 0.5 b14.1 ± 0.9 a17.6 ± 1.7 ab16.6 ± 0.5 b
TP, g/L26.1 ± 1.2 b20.7 ± 3.0 a23.8 ± 2.0 ab37.5 ± 5.0 c
1 Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Means in a row not sharing a common letter are significantly different, where p < 0.05. ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HD, Hedyotis diffusa; TBIL, total bilirubin; TP, total protein; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1+500HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1+1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Table
Table 3. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on hepatic redox status of broilers 1.
Table 3. Effects of dietary aflatoxin B1 and HD on hepatic redox status of broilers 1.
ControlAFB1AFB1 + 500HDAFB1 + 1000HD
SOD, U/mg Protein88.7 ± 12.1 ab83.7 ± 7.1 a94.5 ± 12.4 ab103 ±17.5 b
GPX, U/mg Protein26.2 ± 4.8 b21.0 ± 2.1 a24.0 ± 5.3 ab30.6 ± 7.8 b
CAT, U/mg Protein28.4 ± 5.1 ab25.9 ± 3.0 a27.5 ± 5.4 ab36.5 ± 9.9 b
MDA, nmol/mg Protein1.15 ± 0.261.01 ± 0.241.18 ± 0.221.25 ± 0.32
PC, nmol/mg Protein6.19 ± 1.04 a8.26 ± 2.09 b6.08 ± 0.92 a5.58 ± 0.18 a
1 Values are means ± SEs, n = 6. Labeled means in a row without a common letter differ, where p < 0.05. HD, Hedyotis diffusa; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; MDA, malondialdehyde; PC, protein carbonyl; Control, base diet; AFB1, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1; AFB1+500 HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 500 mg/kg HD; AFB1+1000HD, base diet supplement with 0.5 mg/kg AFB1 plus 1000 mg/kg HD.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.; Deng, J.; Xu, Z.-J.; Zhang, W.-P.; Khalil, M.M.; Karrow, N.A.; Sun, L.-H. Mitigation of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Hedyotis diffusa Is Associated with Activation of NRF2/ARE Signaling in Chicks. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060878

AMA Style

Zhao L, Deng J, Xu Z-J, Zhang W-P, Khalil MM, Karrow NA, Sun L-H. Mitigation of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Hedyotis diffusa Is Associated with Activation of NRF2/ARE Signaling in Chicks. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(6):878. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Ling, Jiang Deng, Zi-Jian Xu, Wan-Po Zhang, Mahmoud Mohamed Khalil, Niel Alexander Karrow, and Lv-Hui Sun. 2021. "Mitigation of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Hedyotis diffusa Is Associated with Activation of NRF2/ARE Signaling in Chicks" Antioxidants 10, no. 6: 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060878

APA Style

Zhao, L., Deng, J., Xu, Z. -J., Zhang, W. -P., Khalil, M. M., Karrow, N. A., & Sun, L. -H. (2021). Mitigation of Aflatoxin B1 Hepatoxicity by Dietary Hedyotis diffusa Is Associated with Activation of NRF2/ARE Signaling in Chicks. Antioxidants, 10(6), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop