Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress as A Mechanism for Functional Alterations in Cardiac Hypertrophy and Heart Failure
Next Article in Special Issue
Glycoside Hydrolases and Non-Enzymatic Glycation Inhibitory Potential of Viburnum opulus L. Fruit—In Vitro Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Hydroquinone Exposure Worsens Rheumatoid Arthritis through the Activation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor and Interleukin-17 Pathways
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Induce Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest of HepG2 Cells Accompanied by Induction of the MAPK Pathway and NAG-1
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Red Cabbage Rather Than Green Cabbage Increases Stress Resistance and Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans

Shanghai Food Safety and Engineering Technology Research Center, Key Lab of Urban Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture & Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2021, 10(6), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060930
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 19 May 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidants in Fruits and Vegetables)

Abstract

:
Many studies have demonstrated that cabbages possess various biological activities, and our previous studies confirmed that cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside (CY3D5G), the major core of red cabbage anthocyanins, exhibited in vitro antioxidant activity. This study further investigated the protective effects of CY3D5G derivative from red cabbage juice (RCJ) on oxidative stress and lifespan in cells and Caenorhabditis elegans, green cabbage juice (GCJ) was used as control. RCJ rather than GCJ significantly improved cell viability and decreased lactate dehydrogenase release in H2O2-induced caco-2 cells. RCJ significantly increased survival during oxidative and heat stress and mean lifespan in C. elegans by 171.63% and 31.64%, and 28.16%, respectively, while GCJ treatment showed no significant effects (p < 0.05). These results might be attributed to significantly (p < 0.05) higher contents of total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins in RCJ compared to those in GCJ. Additionally, both of them decreased autofluorescence and reproductive capacity, increased body length, but did not alter the intracellular ROS level. Prolonged lifespan by RCJ might require heat-shock transcription factor pathway, sirtuin signaling, and calmodulin kinase II pathway, independent of insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway. RCJ showed promising antioxidant properties in caco-2 cells and C. elegans, which provided more information on the health benefits of cabbage.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aging is a universal and inevitable biological phenomenon. According to the free radical theory of aging, oxidative stress damages various cell components and activates specific signal pathways, which influences numerous cellular processes linked to aging [1]. Supplementation of antioxidants has been provided to reduce the oxidative stress level in model organisms [1]. The optimal source of antioxidants might come from diet. Diet has significantly impact on physiological well-being, and high intake of vegetables has been proved to be beneficial in aging and age-related diseases [2].
Cabbage, which belongs to the family of Cruciferae, is one of the most important dietary vegetables consumed in Asia, such as red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L. f. rubra) and green cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.). One hundred grams of cabbage contains 5.8 g of carbohydrate, 1.28 g of protein, 0.1 g of fat, 2.5 g of fiber, 40 mg of calcium, and 0.47 mg of iron. Additionally, cabbage contains numerous phytochemicals such as phenolics, glucosinolates, vitamins, and anthocyanins [3]. Recent studies indicated that the extracts from cabbage possess a range of biological activities, including cardioprotective, hepatoprotective, hypoglycemic, and hypolipidemic effects [4,5,6]. Our previous study investigated the in vitro antioxidant effects of cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside (CY3D5G) from red cabbage. Results suggested that CY3D5G relieved cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level and exhibited antioxidant activities in H2O2-induced RAW264.7 cells via Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways [7,8]. However, the effects of CY3D5G derivative from red cabbage in cells and a whole organism have not been fully characterized.
Caenorhabditis elegans is a widely accepted and established model organism with the advantages of ease of culture, relatively short lifespan, a simple structure, and a distinct molecular signaling pathway [9]. C. elegans contains more than 18,000 genes where 60–80% consist of human gene homologs [10]. These conserved pathways include insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 signaling (IIS) pathway, calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) pathway, and heat-shock transcription factor (HSF-1) pathway, which are vital for stress resistance and lifespan regulation [11]. C. elegans has been widely used to study anti-aging activity in recent years. Chen et al. [12] reported that the extract of 3 Tsai Tai (Brassica chinensis) varieties, cruciferous vegetables, significantly decreased the intracellular ROS level, and the extract of Hon Tsai Tai extend lifespan in C. elegans.
The aims of the present research were to understand i) if red cabbage juice (RCJ) containing unique phytochemicals rather than green cabbage juice (GCJ) extends the lifespan of C. elegans, and ii) the relationship of oxidative stress of C. elegans with its lifespan and healthspan. For those purposes, we evaluated the antioxidant and anti-aging actions of RCJ and GCJ with distinctive phytochemicals in models of H2O2-induced caco-2 cells and C. elegans. The mechanisms were also investigated using C. elegans strains N2, GR1307 [daf-16(mgDf50)I], VC199 [sir-2.1(ok434)IV], and MT2605 [unc-43(n498n1186)IV].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Folin–Ciocâlteu reagents were purchased from Hushi Laboratory Equipment Co. (Shanghai, China). 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA), sinigrin (purity ≥ 99%), and TRI reagent were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Ascorbic acid (purity ≥ 99%), 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine (5-FUDR), ampicillin, and paraquat were purchased from Aladdin Chemical Reagents Co. (Shanghai, China). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) high glucose medium was obtained from KeyGEN BioTECH (Shanghai, China). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay kit and CCK-8 cell viability assay kit were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). PrimeScriptTM RT reagent Kit and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ were provided by Takara Biotechnology (Shiga, Japan). The oligonucleotide primers were synthesized from Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals were purchased from Hushi Laboratory Equipment Co. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation of RCJ and GCJ

The red and green cabbage heads were purchased from a local market in Shanghai, China, in September 2019. Three heads of red cabbage or green cabbage were sliced into pieces and squeezed to juice by a low-speed juicer (MIUIB03C, Xiaomi, China). The juice was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and stored at −20 °C for further analysis.

2.3. Determination of Total Phenolics

Total phenolics were determined using a modified Folin–Ciocâlteu method as described by Zhang et al. [13]. Briefly, 0.5 mL of samples was mixed with 2.5 mL Folin–Ciocâlteu reagents (diluted 1:10 with distilled water). After that, 2 mL of 75 g/L Na2CO3 solution was added and mixed before incubation at 37 °C for 15 min. Then, the absorbance was measured at 760 nm by UV–vis spectrophotometer (BIOMATE 3S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The results were calculated using a standard curve of gallic acid and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 mL of juice.

2.4. Determination of Ascorbic Acid

Ascorbic acid was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as described by Denardin et al. [14]. A volume of 1 mL of juice was mixed with 2 mL of extraction solution containing 8% acetic acid (v/v) and 3% meta-phosphoric acid (v/v) and allowed to extract for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.22 μm filters (Tansoole, Shanghai, China) for HPLC analysis. Ascorbic acid was determined using a Shimadzu LC-2030C HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) system. Separation was obtained by reverse phase elution on a C18-WP column (1.7 μm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm, ANPEL, Shanghai, China). Mobile phase was 0.01% sulfuric acid-water for isocratic elution. An injection volume of 10 μL with 1 mL/min flow rate was used. The UV detection wavelength was 260 nm. Identification was achieved by comparing retention time with standard. Ascorbic acid was quantified by external calibration and expressed as mg/100 mL of juice.

2.5. Determination of Glucosinolates

A modified HPLC method was used to determine the total glucosinolates content [15]. Briefly, 5 mL volumes of RCJ and GCJ were mixed with 25 mL of methanol and immersed in a water bath at 75 °C for 10 min. The mixtures were centrifuged at 2000× g for 10 min at 4 °C with the addition of 5 mL of barium acetate (0.4 mol/L) and supernatants were collected. Residual methanol in the supernatant was removed in a rotary evaporator. Distilled water was added to bring the total volume to 10 mL. A 5 mL aliquot of extract was loaded onto a DEAE-Sephadex A-25 and washed with 5 mL of distilled water. Aryl sulphatase (100 μL) was loaded onto a column. After an overnight incubation period, the desulphonated glucosinolates were eluted with 3 mL of distilled water and refrigerated at 12,000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.22 μm filters (Tansoole, Shanghai, China) for HPLC analysis. The desulpho-glucosinolates was analyzed using a Shimadzu LC-2030C HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) system. Separation was obtained by reverse phase elution on a Shim-pack VP-ODS column (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) fitted with a 4.6 × 10 mm Shim-pack GVP-ODS guard column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Mobile phases were: (A) 0.1% formic acid-water and (B) acetonitrile. Separation was achieved through a gradient elution: 0–10 min, 10% B; 10–15 min, 10–25% B; 15–35 min, 25% B; 35–40 min, 25–10% B. An injection volume of 20 μL with 1 mL/min flow rate was used. The UV detection wavelength was 229 nm. Identification was achieved by comparing retention time with standard. Total amount of glucosinolates was calculated as sinigrin equivalent and expressed as mg sinigrin equivalent/100 mL of juice.

2.6. Determination of Total Anthocyanin

The total anthocyanins of RCJ were determined using pH differential method described previously [7]. Briefly, RCJ was diluted using KCl solution (0.025 mol/L, pH 1.0) and NaAc buffers (0.4 mol/L, pH 4.5). The solution was allowed to stay for 1 h in the dark. Absorbance was determined at 530 and 700 nm using the UV–vis spectrophotometer (BIOMATE 3S, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Total anthocyanins were calculated as:
Total = ( ( A 530 A 700 ) p H   1 ( A 530 A 700 ) p H   4.5 ) × DF × 1000 × MW ε
where total anthocyanins were expressed as cyanidin 3-glucoside (C3G) with a molar absorptivity (ε) of 26,900 × cm−1 mg−1 and a molecular weight (MW) of 449.2. DF was the dilution factor. The total anthocyanins content was expressed as mg cyanidin-3-glucoside equivalent/100 mL of RCJ.

2.7. Extraction and HPLC-MS Analysis of Anthocyanins

Anthocyanins were extracted and identified according to previously reported procedures [7]. A volume of 1 mL of juice was mixed with 3 mL of 0.1% hydrochloric acid-methanol and the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.22 μm filters (Tansoole, Shanghai, China). The anthocyanins in RCJ were identified using Acquity I-class ultra-performance liquid chromatography (Acquity UPLC™) system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with a Vion IMS Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Separation was obtained on a BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 100 mm × 2.1 mm i.d., Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phases were: (A) 0.1% formic acid-water and (B) 0.1% formic acid-acetonitrile. A gradient program was used for mobile phases as follows: 0–3 min, 5–20% B; 3–10 min, 20–100% B; 10–12 min, 100% B; 12–15 min, 100–95%; 15–19 min, 95%. An injection volume of 1 μL with 0.4 mL/min flow rate was used. Data were collected at 530 nm. The applied electrospray/ion optic parameters were set according to previous studies: Capillary voltage, 2.0 kV; cone voltage, 40 V; desolvation temperature, 450 °C; desolvation gas, 900 L/h; cone gas, 50 L/h; source temp, 115 °C; scan rate, 0.2 s; collision energy, 6 eV. Spectra were collected using MSE scan mode over the mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio range of 50–1000 au in positive mode. Data were collected and analyzed with UNIFI software (v 18.2.0, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). Identification of each anthocyanin was achieved by comparing molecular weight and fragmentation patterns to those reported in available references.

2.8. Cell Culture and Viability Assay

Caco-2 cells were obtained from Chinese cell bank (Shanghai, China) and cultured in DMEM high glucose medium supplemented 10% FBS at 37 °C humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.
Cell viability was tested by CCK-8 assay according to a previous method [7]. Briefly, caco-2 cells were plated at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well into a 96-well microplate and allowed to grow for 24 h. Then, cells were treated with 1–5% of RCJ and GCJ for 24 h. CCK-8 reagent was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humid atmosphere. The reduction in CCK-8 was quantified by Infinite F200 PRO microplate reader (Tecan, Switzerland) at 450 nm. The cell viability was calculated as a relative percentage of control.

2.9. RCJ and GCJ Pre-Treatment and H2O2-Induced Oxidative Injury Model

Caco-2 cells were seeded into a 96-well microplate at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well for 24 h. Then, the cells were incubated with 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% of RCJ and GCJ for 24 h, respectively. After 24 h incubation, the treatment medium was removed and treated with 1 μM of H2O2 for 2 h. The cell viability was determined using the method shown in Section 2.8.

2.10. Assay of LDH in H2O2-Induced Caco-2 Cells

The activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the supernatants was determined using commercial assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China). Caco-2 cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at the density of 3 × 104 cells/well and allowed to grow for 24 h. Cells were then pre-treated with RCJ and GCJ for 24 h and later stimulated with 1 mM of H2O2 for 2 h. The supernatant was collected and assayed for LDH following the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.11. Strains and Growth Conditions

C. elegans strains N2 (wild-type), GR1307 [daf-16(mgDf50)I], VC199 [sir-2.1(ok434)IV], and MT2605 [unc-43(n498n1186)IV] were obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN). All worm strains were maintained at 20 °C on solid nematode growth medium (NGM) plated with Escherichia coli OP50 as food source [16]. Synchronized worms were obtained by allowing about 10 hermaphrodites to lay eggs for 4 h before removing them.

2.12. Lifespan Assay

Lifespan was monitored as described previously [17]. On day 0 of the experiment, synchronized L4 larvae worms were transferred to NGM plates containing 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% of either RCJ or GCJ, 50 μM of 5-FUDR to prevent the growth of progeny, and 100 µg/mL of ampicillin to arrest bacterial growth. Worms were transferred to fresh medium and scored for survival every other day. Worms were judged to be dead when they did not respond to a gentle touch with the platinum wire. Worms with internal hatching and missing worms were censored. Kaplan–Meier lifespan analysis was carried out, and p values were calculated using the log-rank test, p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

2.13. Stress Resistance Assay

To evaluate stress resistance, synchronized wild-type worms at L1 larval stage were treated with RCJ and GCJ for 3 days followed by exposure to the stressor. For the oxidative stress resistance assay, animals were exposed to 10 mM paraquat and survival rates were scored at 3.5 days. For the heat stress resistance assay, animals were incubated at 35 °C for 4 h, and then plates were removed from the incubator and scored for survival. The assay was repeated three times with n > 60 worms per group.

2.14. Autofluorescence

Briefly, synchronized L4 larvae worms (n = 20 per group) were treated with different concentrations of RCJ and GCJ for 8 days. Worms were mounted on 2% agarose pads on a glass slide and immobilized with 0.25 μM levamisole. Slides were visualized using Leica inverted microscope DMi8 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a DAPI filter set. The bright field and fluorescence images were captured with a Leica DFC365 FX camera using Leica Application Suite X. The images were taken at 100× magnification. The fluorescence intensity was measured using Image J software and normalized to the body size [18].

2.15. Quantification of Intracellular ROS

Synchronized worms at L1 larval stage were cultivated on NGM with different concentrations of RCJ and GCJ for 48 h. Subsequently, 30 worms were collected and transferred to a 96-well plate containing H2DCF-DA (final concentration was 25 μM). The fluorescence intensity was recorded every 10 min for 4 h in an Infinite F200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) with 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission [19].

2.16. Body Length and Brood Size Assays

Body length and brood size assays were performed essentially as previously described [20]. Briefly, synchronized L4 larvae were treated with different concentrations of RCJ and GCJ for 5 days. Images were captured and the body length was measured along the animal axis using Image J software. To assay the brood size, synchronized L4 larvae worms were transferred to control plates or treatment plates with different concentrations of RCJ and GCJ with one worm per plate (n = 10 per group). Worms were transferred to new plates every day until the end of the reproductive period. The total number of the offspring that grew up from each animal was counted.

2.17. Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR)

The worms at L1 larval stage were grown on NGM plates with or without 5% RCJ for 2 days. Then, the worms were collected and washed three times in M9 buffer. Total RNA was isolated from approximately 2000 worms in each group using TRI reagent, and cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ by qTower 3G real-time PCR system (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). Primer sequences, genes accession number, annealing temperature, and primer pair efficiency are shown in Supporting Information Table S1. The qPCR amplifications were performed with initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The formation of PCR products was confirmed by melting curve analysis. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative mRNA expression levels. The act-1 was used as an internal control for normalization. Each group was measured in six biological replicates, and each biological replicate was measured in technical triplicates.

2.18. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis of data was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction using SPSS (version16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Tests were conducted in triplicate determinations with data reported as means ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results

3.1. Total Phenolics, Ascorbic Acid, Glucosinolates, and Anthocyanins Contents in RCJ and GCJ and Identification of Anthocyanins in RCJ

Phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins contents of RCJ and GCJ are shown in Table 1. The total phenolics were 29.95 ± 0.94 and 17.20 ± 0.15 mg GAE/100 mL of juice in RCJ and GCJ, respectively. Ascorbic acid content of RCJ was 30.55 ± 0.03 mg/100 mL of juice, which was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of GCJ (21.68 ± 0.17 mg/100 mL of juice). RCJ presented higher glucosinolates content (70.21 ± 3.64 mg sinigrin equivalent/100 mL of juice) as compared to GCJ (59.66 ± 1.04 mg sinigrin equivalent/100 mL of juice). Additionally, total anthocyanin was 33.87 ± 0.60 mg/100 mL of juice expressed as C3G equivalents in RCJ.

3.2. Identification of Anthocyanins in RCJ

The main anthocyanins were identified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS), and the UPLC profiles are presented in Figure 1. Altogether, seven anthocyanins were identified in our study (Table 2), and all of them were based on a core of cyanidin 3-diglucoside-5-glucoside. The most prevalent anthocyanins detected in RCJ were acylated with caffeic, p-coumaric, ferulic, and/or sinapic acids.

3.3. RCJ exhibited Antioxidant Activity in Caco-2 Cells

Caco-2 cells, similar to the intestinal epithelial cells, partly reflect the intestinal absorption and are widely used to reflect potential antioxidant activity. The CCK-8 assay was carried out to determine the cytotoxicity of RCJ and GCJ. According to the result, the cell viabilities for all treatment groups were higher than 80%, indicating that no cytotoxic effects were observed.
As shown in Figure 2A, cell viability decreased to 54.60% after being exposed to 1 mM of H2O2 for 2 h, suggesting that a model of H2O2-induced injury in caco-2 cells was successfully established. RCJ treatment significantly improved the cell viability (p < 0.05), while GCJ showed no effects compared with the model group (p > 0.05). The LDH activity in the control group significantly increased to 253.42 U/L compared to the model group (127.25 U/L) (p < 0.05). RCJ treatment groups, which were pre-incubated with 1–5% RCJ, significantly decreased LDH activity to 192.73 U/L (1% RCJ), 185.87% (2% RCJ), 167.78% (3% RCJ), and 215.98 (5% RCJ) U/L, respectively (Figure 2B, p < 0.05). In contrast, treatment with GCJ had no impact on the release of LDH.

3.4. RCJ enhanced the Oxidative and Thermal Stress Resistance

In addition to in vitro antioxidant activities, the in vivo antioxidant capacities of RCJ and GCJ were also investigated in C. elegans. Wild-type N2 worms were pretreated with and without RCJ and GCJ for 3 days and then exposed to paraquat and heat. After treatment with 10 mM of paraquat for 3.5 days, approximately 70% of the worms had died. At that time, 56.11%, 62.52%, and 82.25% of worms treated with 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ were alive, respectively (Figure 3A), suggesting that RCJ supplementation enhanced resistance to oxidative stress in C. elegans. However, 1–5% GCJ treatments did not increase the survival rate of wild-type worms under oxidative stress. A similar phenomenon was observed in the heat tolerance conditions (Figure 3B). Treatment with 5% RCJ led to 171.63% and 31.64% increase in the survival rate under oxidative conditions and high temperature, respectively.

3.5. RCJ and GCJ Attenuated Autofluorescence Accumulation but Do Not Affected ROS Level

Autofluorescence is a byproduct of lysosomal degradation which accumulated in aging cells. Wild-type N2 worms treated with 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ and GCJ for 8 days significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the accumulation of autofluorescence (Figure 4A). In the fluorescence photography assays, intestinal autofluorescence levels were reduced by 18.19% and 19.79% in 5% RCJ and GCJ-treated worms compared with control, respectively (Figure 4B). The effects of RCJ and GCJ on the intracellular ROS were measured using H2DCF-DA. After treatment with RCJ and GCJ for 2 days, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between RCJ and GCJ treatment groups and the control (Figure 4C).

3.6. RCJ and GCJ Decreased Brood Size and Increased Body Length

Brood size and body length of worms were tested to reflect the general fitness after RCJ and GCJ treatment. RCJ and GCJ treatments significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the total offspring quantity compared to control in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5A). Body length was determined in wild-type worms treated with or without RCJ and GCJ for 5 days. As shown in Figure 5B, the body length for worms treated with 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ was significantly increased by 8.72%, 6.63%, 10.95%, and 12.52%, respectively. Similarly, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% GCJ increased body length by 8.41%, 8.26%, 6.98%, and 10.42%, respectively.

3.7. RCJ Extend the Lifespan of Wild-Type C. elegans

We further investigated whether RCJ and GCJ treatment could affect the lifespan of C. elegans under standard laboratory conditions. Four concentrations of RCJ and GCJ range from 1 to 5% were tested. As shown in Figure 6A, worms treated with 2% and 3% RCJ displayed a significant right-shift survival curve compared with the control, and the survival curve of 5% RCJ was continuously above that of control. RCJ at 2%, 3%, and 5% significantly (p < 0.05, by the log-rank test) extended the lifespan by 10.37%, 13.04%, and 28.18% in comparison to the control, respectively (Table 3). Wild-type worms treated with GCJ did not show a significant increase in lifespan (Figure 6B), but GCJ treatment exhibited a slight increase in mean lifespan (Table 3). The mean lifespan of worms treated with 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ significantly increased by 5.25%, 7.52%, 9.18%, and 21.45%, respectively, as compared to GCJ at the same concentration.

3.8. Genetic Requirements for Increased Survival from RCJ Treatment

RT-qPCR was performed to analyze the transcriptional level of some key genes to explore how RCJ prolongs the lifespan of C. elegans. Whether mutations in three major stress response and longevity pathways, e.g., daf-16(mgDf50), sir-2.1(ok434), and unc-43(n498n1186) mutant, impaired the ability of RCJ to prolong lifespan was investigated.
IIS is known to regulate aging and longevity. As shown in Figure 7A, RCJ up-regulated the mRNA level of daf-2, while daf-16 and sod-3 mRNA levels were not altered in wild-type worms. The daf-16(mgDf50) mutant treated with 5% RCJ displayed a significantly (p < 0.05 by the log-rank test) extended mean lifespan compared to the control (Figure 7B). These results suggested that RCJ might act independently of IIS pathway.
Heat shock factor 1 (HSF-1) is another transcription factor crucial for longevity downstream of IIS. As shown in Figure 7A, RCJ treatment markedly increased the mRNA expression of hsp-16.1 and hsp-16.2 (p < 0.05), indicating that the HSF-1 pathway might be involved in the mechanism of lifespan extension. We hypothesized that RCJ might go through the HSF-1 pathway to improve stress resistance. Additionally, RCJ treatment did not extend the lifespan of sir-2.1(ok434) worms (p < 0.05 by the log-rank test; Figure 7C), indicating that sir-2.1 was required for the longevity effect of RCJ.
Whether the protective effect of RCJ through OSR-1/UNC-43/SEK-1 stress response pathway was investigated. As shown in Figure 7D, RCJ treatment did not prolong lifespan of unc-43(n498n1186) worms, suggesting that RCJ might act through unc-43. Additionally, RCJ treatment significantly down-regulated the transcription level of osr-1 (p < 0.05), but did not alter sek-1 mRNA level (Figure 7A). These results implied that the OSR-1/UNC-43 pathway was a target for RCJ in C. elegans.

4. Discussion

Fruits and vegetables have been recommended worldwide in dietary guidance since the abundant phytochemicals and vitamins [21]. Red and green cabbages are fresh edible vegetables, which contain amounts of bioactive compounds. The contents of total phenolics, ascorbic acid, and glucosinolates in RCJ were 74.13%, 40.91%, and 17.68% higher than those of GCJ, respectively, which was consistent with previous studies [3,22]. Red cabbage anthocyanins are typically cyanidin mono- or di-acylated with hydroxycinnamic acids [23]. Mizgier et al. [24] reported a total of 21 anthocyanins in red cabbage extracted with acid acetone.
H2O2 is continually generated during normal metabolism and has been used to construct cell oxidative injury model [25]. CCK-8 assay measured the redox activity of living cells. LDH releases into the medium from dead cells, which is a good indicator of cellular damage. RCJ treatment significantly improved the cell viability and decreased the cell death in H2O2-induced oxidative injury model. Similarly, RCJ greatly improved survival following paraquat-induced oxidative stress and heat shock in C. elegans. GCJ exhibited no protective effect against H2O2-induced oxidative stress, nor did it show increased resistance to oxidative and heat stress in C. elegans. Phytochemicals-rich extracts have been shown to exhibit antioxidant activities in cells and C. elegans. For example, thistle extract exhibited the protective effects against ROS in PC 12 cells and also increased the lifespan of C. elegans under the oxidative stress [25]. Pasteurized orange juice rich in carotenoids promotes survival of C. elegans to oxidative stress [26]. Notability, RCJ treatment provided better results on stress tolerance in cells and C. elegans compared to GCJ. These benefits could be explained based on the higher total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins content of RCJ compared with that of GCJ.
In C. elegans, RCJ increased aging-related healthspan and lifespan. Both RCJ and GCJ treatment decreased the autofluorescence accumulation and brood size, increased the body length, but did not reduce ROS level. These results showed a similar trend between RCJ and GCJ treatment, which might not attribute to the different amount of total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins. According to “free radical theory of aging”, antioxidants supplementation was expected to be beneficial to lifespan. However, many studies demonstrated that antioxidant effect was unlikely to be the main factor for lifespan extension [27,28]. Phytochemicals could target signal pathways and molecules to removing cellular damage [29]. While high ROS levels are recognized to cause cellular damage and to promote aging, comparably low amounts of ROS may exert positive effects on the biological process by inducing some adaptive response, which is called “mitochondrial hormesis” [30].
Autofluorescent materials have accumulated over time and were often used as a marker of aging in C. elegans. Our results revealed that RCJ treatment significantly decreased autofluorescence, while GCJ treatment had no impact on the accumulation of autofluorescent materials in worms. Blue fluorescence was widely used in analysis of autofluorescent materials [10]. Notably, a recent study reported that red autofluorescence was more appropriate to use to characterize aging than blue and green autofluorescence [31]. Endogenous ROS was determined by the H2DCF-DA assay. RCJ and GCJ were not able to provoke any changes in ROS level. An explanation was that the antioxidant activity of RCJ was not sufficient to reduce the accumulation of ROS in worms. Another factor may be that the H2DCFDA assay relied on ingestion and membrane permeability to enter into the worm; the different efficiencies of H2DCFDA cells may lead to misinterpretation [32]. Lin, Zhang, Xiao, Zhong, Kuang, Cao and Chen [10] showed a similar result that carnosic acid treatment improved the survival rate under oxidative stress, but did not reduce ROS accumulation.
Body length for worms treated with RCJ and GCJ was significantly increased (p < 0.05), suggesting that RCJ and GCJ promoted the growth of C. elegans. Similarly, withanolide A treatment increased the body length and width on day 2, 5, and 10 of adulthood [33]. Gallic acid treatment significantly increased the body length of worms [34]. Brood size was decreased by RCJ and GCJ treatment, indicating that RCJ and GCJ impaired the fertility rate. According to “disposable soma” theory, the reduced reproduction can divert the energy to maintenance of the adult [35]. Interestingly, withanolide A and gallic acid also decreased brood size, which exhibited similar trends with RCJ [33,34].
In the current study, RCJ treatment significantly extended lifespan in a dose-dependent manner, and mean lifespan of wild-type worms increased from 19.57 to 25.08 days in the presence of 5% RCJ. GCJ treatments were not able to prolong the lifespan of wild-type worms. In view of these findings, we speculate that the content of phytochemicals and some specific phytochemicals might play a key a role in lifespan extension. Previous studies have shown that anthocyanins can provide a variety of health benefits. For example, Chen et al. [36] showed that anthocyanin-rich extract of purple wheat extended the mean lifespan of wild-type C. elegans by 10.5% and the lifespan extension depended on the transcription factor DAF-16. Likewise, mulberry anthocyanin extract extended the lifespan of C. elegans [37]. Peixoto et al. [38] showed that anthocyanin-rich extract of Acai protected worms against oxidative stress, but no lifespan extension effect was observed.
IIS pathway is one of the most potent facilitators of longevity in C. elegans, which includes the DAF-2 transmembrane receptor and DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor [39]. The inactivation of daf-2 leads to the activation of daf-16, which prolongs the lifespan of C. elegans [40]. RCJ significantly up-regulated daf-2 mRNA level, but did not alter the mRNA level of daf-16 and sod-3 with statistically significant differences. Furthermore, RCJ significantly (p < 0.05 by the log-rank test) prolonged the lifespan of the daf-16(mgDf50) mutants, suggesting that IIS pathway was not a direct target of RCJ. Additionally, RCJ did not extend the lifespan of sir-2.1(ok434) mutant. Sirtuin signaling might be part of the mechanism that increased the longevity induced by RCJ (Figure 5E). SIR-2.1, a member of the Sir-2 family of NAD+-dependent protein deacetylases, extended the lifespan via the transcription factor daf-16 [41], whereas Wang and Tissenbaum [42] also reported that sir-2.1 and daf-16 might have a distinct function, since sir-2.1 exhibited lifespan extension by caloric restriction pathway. Similarly, treatment of C. elegans with resveratrol extended lifespan dependent upon sir-2.1, but independent of daf-16 [11].
The transcription factor HSF-1 controls the inducible transcription of genes encoding heat shock proteins (HSPs), which acts by counteracting the misfolded proteins in cytoplasm and nucleus [43]. RCJ did not significantly affect the hsf-1 gene expression, but increased the expression of hsf-1 target hsp-16.1 and hsp-16.2. RCJ might act through inducing the translocation of HSF-1 to the nucleus to modulate adaptive responses to environmental changes (Figure 5E). Increased heat shock proteins (HSPs) are known to have enhanced stress resistance in C. elegans, which are consistent with the increased resistance to oxidative and heat stress [44].
In C. elegans, the resistance to hyperosmotic stress requires several proteins of the CaMKII pathway, in which OSR-1 is coupled to SEK-1/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase through UNC-43/CaMKII [45]. RCJ did not prolong the lifespan of the unc-43(n498n1186) mutants, suggesting that unc-43 was necessary for RCJ-mediated lifespan extension. RCJ down-regulated expression of osr-1 but not alter the expression of sek-1. These findings indicated that the action of RCJ was likely mediated through CaMKII pathways (Figure 5E). Similarly, osr-1, but not sek-1, was required for cranberry-induced longevity [46]. Wilson, Shukitt-Hale, Kalt, Ingram, Joseph and Wolkow [17] found that blueberry polyphenol-induced longevity required the presence of the CaMKII pathway that mediated osmotic stress resistance.
The results of this study have several limitations. First, blinding was suggested for survival studies in worms. A randomized trial without blinding might show larger effects than a blinded study [47]. Blinding of manual measurement assay was found to increase consistency between operators and replication. Additionally, the timing of administration was important in relation to the phytochemical effects in worms [48]. Guha, Natarajan, Murbach, Dinh, Wilson, Cao, Zou and Dong [30] reported that early start intervention (supplementation started from L1 stage) with cranberry extract significantly promoted healthspan and led to more prominent benefits as compared to late-start interventions (supplementation started from L4 stage). In this study, RCJ and GCJ were administered to worms from the beginning of L1 or L4 larval stage, it was not clear whether RCJ exhibited similar effects in the same larval developmental stage or in aged worms.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that RCJ rather than GCJ exhibited protected effects in both oxidative stressed caco-2 cells and C. elegans and led to a life-prolonging effect under standard laboratory conditions. RCJ could target multiple longevity mechanisms including Sirtuin signaling, HSF-1 pathway, and CaMKII pathway. These results might be attributed to higher total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins content of RCJ compared with that of GCJ.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox10060930/s1, Table S1: Quantitative PCR primers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Z. and P.J.; methodology, N.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and P.J.; supervision, S.J. and P.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, grant number 2018B020239001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in this study are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000, 408, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Manchali, S.; Chidambara Murthy, K.N.; Patil, B.S. Crucial facts about health benefits of popular cruciferous vegetables. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Park, S.; Arasu, M.V.; Lee, M.-K.; Chun, J.-H.; Seo, J.M.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Kim, S.-J. Analysis and metabolite profiling of glucosinolates, anthocyanins and free amino acids in inbred lines of green and red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). Lwt Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Al-Dosari, M.S. Red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) mediates redox-sensitive amelioration of dyslipidemia and hepatic injury induced by exogenous cholesterol administration. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2014, 42, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cruz, A.B.; Pitz, H.d.S.; Veber, B.; Bini, L.A.; Maraschin, M.; Zeni, A.L.B. Assessment of bioactive metabolites and hypolipidemic effect of polyphenolic-rich red cabbage extract. Pharm. Biol. 2016, 54, 3033–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sankhari, J.M.; Thounaojam, M.C.; Jadeja, R.N.; Devkar, R.V.; Ramachandran, A. Anthocyanin-rich red cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) extract attenuates cardiac and hepatic oxidative stress in rats fed an atherogenic diet. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xu, W.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Z.; Jing, P. Effects of dietary cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside complexes with rutin/Mg(II) against H2O2-induced cellular oxidative stress. Food Res. Int. 2019, 126, 108591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qian, B.J.; Wu, C.F.; Lu, M.M.; Xu, W.; Jing, P. Effect of complexes of cyanidin-3-diglucoside-5-glucoside with rutin and metal ions on their antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shen, P.; Yue, Y.; Zheng, J.; Park, Y. Caenorhabditis elegans: A convenient in vivo model for assessing the impact of food bioactive compounds on obesity, aging, and alzheimer’s disease. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lin, C.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhong, Q.; Kuang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y. Effects on longevity extension and mechanism of action of carnosic acid in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1398–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Viswanathan, M.; Kim, S.K.; Berdichevsky, A.; Guarente, L. A role for SIR-2.1 regulation of ER stress response genes in determining C. elegans life span. Dev. Cell 2005, 9, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, Y.; Xiang, L.; Liu, Y.; He, X.; Zhou, X.; Liu, X.; Huang, Z. Extracts of Tsai Tai (Brassica chinensis): Enhanced antioxidant activity and anti-aging effects both in vitro and in Caenorhabditis elegans. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, N.; He, Z.; He, S.; Jing, P. Insights into the importance of dietary chrysanthemum flower (Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. Hangju)-wolfberry (Lycium barbarum fruit) combination in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Denardin, C.C.; Hirsch, G.E.; da Rocha, R.F.; Vizzotto, M.; Henriques, A.T.; Moreira, J.C.F.; Guma, F.T.C.R.; Emanuelli, T. Antioxidant capacity and bioactive compounds of four Brazilian native fruits. J. Food Drug Anal. 2015, 23, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jing, P.; Ruan, S.-Y.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, X.-G.; Yue, J.; Kan, J.-Q.; Slavin, M.; Yu, L. Optimization of purification conditions of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) anthocyanin-rich extracts using chitosan. Lwt Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2097–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brenner, S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 1974, 77, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wilson, M.A.; Shukitt-Hale, B.; Kalt, W.; Ingram, D.K.; Joseph, J.A.; Wolkow, C.A. Blueberry polyphenols increase lifespan and thermotolerance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 2006, 5, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, M.; Yang, X.; Xu, W.; Cai, X.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; Yu, P.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. Evaluation of the effects of three sulfa sweeteners on the lifespan and intestinal fat deposition in C. elegans. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Xiong, L.G.; Huang, J.A.; Li, J.; Yu, P.H.; Xiong, Z.; Zhang, J.W.; Gong, Y.S.; Liu, Z.H.; Chen, J.H. Black tea increased survival of Caenorhabditis elegans under stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 11163–11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Vayndorf, E.M.; Lee, S.S.; Liu, R.H. Whole apple extracts increase lifespan, healthspan and resistance to stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Alissa, E.M.; Ferns, G.A. Dietary fruits and vegetables and cardiovascular diseases risk. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1950–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Singh, J.; Upadhyay, A.K.; Bahadur, A.; Singh, B.; Singh, K.P.; Rai, M. Antioxidant phytochemicals in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Sci. Hortic. 2006, 108, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wiczkowski, W.; Szawara-Nowak, D.; Topolska, J. Red cabbage anthocyanins: Profile, isolation, identification, and antioxidant activity. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mizgier, P.; Kucharska, A.Z.; Sokół-Łętowska, A.; Kolniak-Ostek, J.; Kidoń, M.; Fecka, I. Characterization of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of red cabbage and purple carrot extracts. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 21, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jang, M.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, G.H. Antioxidant Capacity of Thistle (Cirsium japonicum) in Various Drying Methods and their Protection Effect on Neuronal PC12 Cells and Caenorhabditis elegans. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. de Oliveira Caland, R.B.; Cadavid, C.O.M.; Carmona, L.; Pena, L.; de Paula Oliveira, R. Pasteurized orange juice rich in carotenoids protects Caenorhabditis elegans against oxidative stress and beta-amyloid toxicity through direct and indirect mechanisms. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 5046280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Van Raamsdonk, J.M.; Hekimi, S. Reactive oxygen species and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: Causal or casual relationship? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 13, 1911–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pun, P.B.L.; Gruber, J.; Tang, S.Y.; Schaffer, S.; Ong, R.L.S.; Fong, S.; Ng, L.F.; Cheah, I.; Halliwell, B. Ageing in nematodes: Do antioxidants extend lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans? Biogerontology 2010, 11, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guha, S.; Natarajan, O.; Murbach, C.G.; Dinh, J.; Wilson, E.C.; Cao, M.; Zou, S.; Dong, Y. Supplement timing of cranberry extract plays a key role in promoting Caenorhabditis elegans healthspan. Nutrients 2014, 6, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Ristow, M. Unraveling the truth about antioxidants: Mitohormesis explains ROS-induced health benefits. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 709–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Pincus, Z.; Mazer, T.C.; Slack, F.J. Autofluorescence as a measure of senescence in C. elegans: Look to red, not blue or green. Aging 2016, 8, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Labuschagne, C.F.; Brenkman, A.B. Current methods in quantifying ROS and oxidative damage in Caenorhabditis elegans and other model organism of aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2013, 12, 918–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Akhoon, B.A.; Pandey, S.; Tiwari, S.; Pandey, R. Withanolide A offers neuroprotection, ameliorates stress resistance and prolongs the life expectancy of Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp. Gerontol. 2016, 78, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Saul, N.; Pietsch, K.; Stürzenbaum, S.R.; Menzel, R.; Steinberg, C.E.W. Diversity of Polyphenol Action in Caenorhabditis elegans: Between Toxicity and Longevity. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kirkwood, T.B.; Rose, M.R. Evolution of senescence: Late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. BBiol. Sci. 1991, 332, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chen, W.; Muller, D.; Richling, E.; Wink, M. Anthocyanin-rich purple wheat prolongs the life span of Caenorhabditis elegans probably by activating the DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3047–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yan, F.; Chen, Y.; Azat, R.; Zheng, X. Mulberry anthocyanin extract ameliorates oxidative damage in HepG2 cells and prolongs the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans through MAPK and Nrf2 pathways. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7956158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Peixoto, H.; Roxo, M.; Krstin, S.; Rohrig, T.; Richling, E.; Wink, M. An anthocyanin-rich extract of Acai (Euterpe precatoria Mart.) increases stress resistance and retards aging-related markers in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ewald, C.Y.; Castillo-Quan, J.I.; Blackwell, T.K. Untangling longevity, dauer, and healthspan in Caenorhabditis elegans insulin/IGF-1-signalling. Gerontology 2018, 64, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gami, M.S.; Wolkow, C.A. Studies of Caenorhabditis elegans DAF-2/insulin signaling reveal targets for pharmacological manipulation of lifespan. Aging Cell 2006, 5, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Berdichevsky, A.; Viswanathan, M.; Horvitz, H.R.; Guarente, L.C. elegans SIR-2.1 interacts with 14-3-3 proteins to activate DAF-16 and extend life span. Cell 2006, 125, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, Y.; Tissenbaum, H.A. Overlapping and distinct functions for a Caenorhabditis elegans SIR2 and DAF-16/FOXO. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006, 127, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Seo, K.; Choi, E.; Lee, D.; Jeong, D.E.; Jang, S.K.; Lee, S.J. Heat shock factor 1 mediates the longevity conferred by inhibition of TOR and insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathways in C. elegans. Aging Cell 2013, 12, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Singh, V.; Aballay, A. Heat-shock transcription factor (HSF)-1 pathway required for Caenorhabditis elegans immunity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13092–13097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Solomon, A.; Bandhakavi, S.; Jabbar, S.; Shah, R.; Beitel, G.J.; Morimoto, R.I. Caenorhabditis elegans OSR-1 regulates behavioral and physiological responses to hyperosmotic environments. Genetics 2004, 167, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Guha, S.; Cao, M.; Kane, R.M.; Savino, A.M.; Zou, S.; Dong, Y. The longevity effect of cranberry extract in Caenorhabditis elegans is modulated by daf-16 and osr-1. Age 2013, 35, 1559–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gruber, J.; Ng, L.F.; Poovathingal, S.K.; Halliwell, B. Deceptively simple but simply deceptive–Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan studies: Considerations for aging and antioxidant effects. Febs Lett. 2009, 583, 3377–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Saul, N.; Möller, S.; Cirulli, F.; Berry, A.; Luyten, W.; Fuellen, G. Health and longevity studies in C. elegans: The “healthy worm database” reveals strengths, weaknesses and gaps of test compound-based studies. Biogerontology 2021, 22, 215–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. UPLC profile of anthocyanins in red cabbage juice. The corresponding compounds are list in Table 2.
Figure 1. UPLC profile of anthocyanins in red cabbage juice. The corresponding compounds are list in Table 2.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g001
Figure 2. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on the cell viability (A) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (B) in H2O2-induced caco-2 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Figure 2. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on the cell viability (A) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release (B) in H2O2-induced caco-2 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g002
Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment with red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on resistance to stress in C. elegans. Synchronized L1 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ for 3 days and exposed to stressors: (A) 10 mM paraquat for 3.5 days (n > 60); (B) 35 °C heat shock for 4 h (n > 60). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Figure 3. Effect of pretreatment with red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on resistance to stress in C. elegans. Synchronized L1 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ for 3 days and exposed to stressors: (A) 10 mM paraquat for 3.5 days (n > 60); (B) 35 °C heat shock for 4 h (n > 60). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g003
Figure 4. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on autofluorescence (A,B) and ROS (C) accumulation. (A) Representative images of autofluorescence from RCJ- and GCJ-treated worms on day 8. The images were taken with a DAPI filter set and at 100× magnification. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity from autofluorescence in day 8 worms treated with RCJ and GCJ (n = 20). (C) Synchronized L1 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ for 2 days and collected for determination of ROS level using DCF assay (n = 30). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Figure 4. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on autofluorescence (A,B) and ROS (C) accumulation. (A) Representative images of autofluorescence from RCJ- and GCJ-treated worms on day 8. The images were taken with a DAPI filter set and at 100× magnification. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity from autofluorescence in day 8 worms treated with RCJ and GCJ (n = 20). (C) Synchronized L1 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ for 2 days and collected for determination of ROS level using DCF assay (n = 30). Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g004
Figure 5. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on brood size (A) and body length (B) of C. elegans. (A) Synchronized L4 larvae were individually transferred to a fresh plate each day until reproduction ceased (n = 10). (B) Synchronized L4 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ. Photographs were taken of animals on day 5, and the body length of each individual nematode was analyzed by Image J software (n = 30). The images were taken at 100× magnification. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Figure 5. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on brood size (A) and body length (B) of C. elegans. (A) Synchronized L4 larvae were individually transferred to a fresh plate each day until reproduction ceased (n = 10). (B) Synchronized L4 larvae worms were treated with RCJ and GCJ. Photographs were taken of animals on day 5, and the body length of each individual nematode was analyzed by Image J software (n = 30). The images were taken at 100× magnification. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g005
Figure 6. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on the lifespan of wild-type C. elegans. Synchronized L4 larvae worms were treated with or without 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ (A) and GCJ (B). Three independent trials were performed.
Figure 6. Effect of red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) on the lifespan of wild-type C. elegans. Synchronized L4 larvae worms were treated with or without 1%, 2%, 3%, and 5% RCJ (A) and GCJ (B). Three independent trials were performed.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g006
Figure 7. The molecular mechanism of red cabbage juice (RCJ) in lifespan extension. (A) Relative mRNA level of daf-2, daf-16, sod-3, hsf-1, hsp-16.1, hsp-16.2, sek-1, osr-1 after 2 days of 5% RCJ treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction. (B) Survival curves of daf-16(mgDf50). (C) Survival curves of sir-2.1(ok434). (D) Survival curves of unc-43(n498n1186). (E) Hypothetical model of action of the longevity extension mediated by RCJ.
Figure 7. The molecular mechanism of red cabbage juice (RCJ) in lifespan extension. (A) Relative mRNA level of daf-2, daf-16, sod-3, hsf-1, hsp-16.1, hsp-16.2, sek-1, osr-1 after 2 days of 5% RCJ treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. control by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction. (B) Survival curves of daf-16(mgDf50). (C) Survival curves of sir-2.1(ok434). (D) Survival curves of unc-43(n498n1186). (E) Hypothetical model of action of the longevity extension mediated by RCJ.
Antioxidants 10 00930 g007
Table 1. Total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins content in red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) (mg/100 mL of juice).
Table 1. Total phenolics, ascorbic acid, glucosinolates, and anthocyanins content in red cabbage juice (RCJ) and green cabbage juice (GCJ) (mg/100 mL of juice).
RCJGCJ
Phenolics a29.95 ± 0.9417.20 ± 0.15 *
Ascorbic acid30.55 ± 0.0321.68 ± 0.17 *
Glucosinolates b70.21 ± 3.6459.66 ± 1.04 *
Anthocyanins c33.87 ± 0.60none
Values are represented as means ± SD (n = 3); * p < 0.05 vs. RCJ. a Total phenolics were calculated as gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE/100 mL of juice). b Total glucosinolates were calculated as mg sinigrin equivalent/100 mL of juice. c Total anthocyanins were calculated as cyanidin 3-glucoside (C3G) equivalents (mg C3G/100 mL of juice).
Table 2. Identification of red cabbage juice anthocyanins by UPLC-MS analysis.
Table 2. Identification of red cabbage juice anthocyanins by UPLC-MS analysis.
Peak aRetention Time (min)[M]+ (m/z)Fragments (m/z)Tentative Identification
14.49773.21287.05Cyanidin 3-diglucoside-5-glucoside
26.601081.3919.25/502.86/449.11/287.05Cyanidin 3-(caffeoyl)(p-coumaroyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside
36.771111.311111.31/949.26/606.18/449.11/287.05Cyanidin 3-(caffeoyl)(feruloyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside
48.13919.25919.25/757/287.05Cyanidin 3-(p-coumaroyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside
58.31949.26949.26/787.2/449.11/287.05Cyanidin 3-(feruloyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside
68.36979.27979.27/817.22/449.11/287.05Cyanidin 3-(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-glucoside
79.151185.3061185.33/1023.28/993.27/569.31/449.11/287.05Cyanidin 3-(sinapoyl)-diglucoside-5-(sinapoyl)-glucoside
a Peak numbers are the same as the peaks shown in the chromatograms in Figure 1.
Table 3. Statistical analysis of the lifespan of C. elegans.
Table 3. Statistical analysis of the lifespan of C. elegans.
ConditionTreatmentNumberMean Lifespan (Days) a% of Control
N2011619.57 ± 0.45
1% RCJ15020.63 ± 0.355.40
2% RCJ15921.60 ± 0.32 *10.37
3% RCJ14822.12 ± 0.29 *13.04
5% RCJ15725.08 ± 0.48 *28.18
1% GCJ19619.60 ± 0.450.16
2% GCJ20820.09 ± 0.262.65
3% GCJ22720.26 ± 0.263.51
5% GCJ15520.65 ± 0.485.50
GR1370010215.98 ± 0.27
5% RCJ10517.41 ± 0.11 *8.95
VC19908818.82 ± 0.40
5% RCJ7018.88 ± 0.720.32
MT260507720.47 ± 0.62
5% RCJ7621.50 ± 0.245.03
a Mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 vs. control, log-rank test. RCJ: red cabbage juice, GCJ: green cabbage juice.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, N.; Jiao, S.; Jing, P. Red Cabbage Rather Than Green Cabbage Increases Stress Resistance and Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060930

AMA Style

Zhang N, Jiao S, Jing P. Red Cabbage Rather Than Green Cabbage Increases Stress Resistance and Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(6):930. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060930

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Nan, Shunshan Jiao, and Pu Jing. 2021. "Red Cabbage Rather Than Green Cabbage Increases Stress Resistance and Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans" Antioxidants 10, no. 6: 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060930

APA Style

Zhang, N., Jiao, S., & Jing, P. (2021). Red Cabbage Rather Than Green Cabbage Increases Stress Resistance and Extends the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Antioxidants, 10(6), 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060930

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop