Next Article in Journal
The Antioxidant Selenoprotein T Mimetic, PSELT, Induces Preconditioning-like Myocardial Protection by Relieving Endoplasmic-Reticulum Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Developmental and Early Life Origins of Hypertension: Preventive Aspects of Melatonin
Previous Article in Journal
Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Beyond Lipids: The Role in Oxidative Stress and Thrombosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Melatonin: Regulation of Biomolecular Condensates in Neurodegenerative Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Melatonin-Cultured Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials for Wound Healing

by
Beata Kaczmarek-Szczepańska
1,†,
Judith M. Pin
2,†,
Lidia Zasada
1,
Mauritz M. Sonne
2,
Russel J. Reiter
3,
Andrzej T. Slominski
4,5,
Kerstin Steinbrink
2 and
Konrad Kleszczyński
2,*
1
Department of Biomaterials and Cosmetics Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Gagarin 7, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
2
Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 58, 48149 Münster, Germany
3
UT Health Science Center, Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
4
Department of Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
5
VA Medical Center, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(3), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030570
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 9 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 17 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Melatonin and Vitamin D in Diseases and Health)

Abstract

:
Chitosan (CTS) and collagen (Coll) are natural biomaterials that have been extensively used in tissue engineering or wound healing applications, either separately or as composite materials. Most methods to fabricate CTS/Coll matrices employ chemical crosslinking to obtain solid and stable scaffolds with the necessary porosity and mechanical properties to facilitate regeneration. In this study, we comparatively assessed the physicochemical properties of 3D scaffolds loaded with a cross-linker, glyoxal. Using a scanning electron microscope, we evaluated the microstructure of resultant matrices and their mechanistic testing by the determination of the compressive modulus (Emod), the maximum force (Fmax), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR), and proliferation rate in vitro using human epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts cultured in presence of melatonin solution (10−5 M). We observed that enhanced content of collagen (50CTS/50Coll or 20CTS/80Coll compared to 80CTS/20Coll) significantly elevated the physicochemical capacities of resultant materials. Besides, presence of 5% glyoxal increased porosity, Emod and Fmax, compared to scaffolds without glyoxal. Finally, keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts cultured on subjected matrices in presence of melatonin revealed a prominently enhanced growth rate. This indicates that the combination of glyoxal and melatonin make it imperative to consider these materials as a promising approach for targeting skin tissue engineering or regenerative dermatology.

1. Introduction

Large molecules that consist of covalently bonded repeating monomer units called polymers can be obtained synthetically from fossil fuels such as coal, oil, natural gases, or they can be also isolated from natural sources. To date, there is an increasing imperative for new biopolymeric materials for cell-based transplantation, gene therapy, and tissue engineering; therefore, the enhancing environmental consciousness triggers us to introduce alternative renewable resources for the sustainable production of polymers [1]. Thus, compounds of natural origin are not harmful to the environment and this significantly increases their strengths [2]. Of note, biopolymers can be modified in order to change their functional capacities and this allows for the replacement of commonly used synthesized materials [3].
Polymer cross-linking consists of adding new substances to its basic structure and it has a great influence on its physicochemical properties [4]. Namely, this process is performed by the introduction of synthetic or natural substances containing reactive groups capable of forming covalent, intramolecular, or intermolecular bonds. It should be noted that cross-linking can be conducted either by immersing the polymer in the cross-linking agent or by adding the cross-linking agent directly to the solution [5,6,7].
Tissue engineering is a field of science that deals with the search for new methods of treating damaged tissues or entire organs. New methods of therapy for patients by creating new tissue scaffolds offer great opportunities to improve the state of regenerative medicine [8]. The selection of new biomaterial targeting the replacement patient’s tissue on the surface of the biomaterial is the key issue in terms of the entire treatment process.
Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is an indole-derivative, produced mainly by the pineal gland, and exerts ubiquitous occurrence in nearly every species [9]. Its pulsatile secretion with a peak during the night is considered a key mechanism by which the wake/sleep rhythm is orchestrated [10]. It is taken up by cells and may also be produced in mitochondria [11,12], where it improves mitochondrial metabolism by ATP enhancement or reduction of mitochondrial stress. Thus, melatonin activates anti-oxidative enzymes mediated via specific melatonin 1 (MT1) and MT2 membrane receptors [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
Skin with hypodermis represents the largest body organ responding to environmental stresses [21,22,23]. Skin cells can produce and metabolize melatonin [24,25,26], and significant information has accumulated on the diverse function in this organ [27,28]. Thus, melatonin inhibits the tyrosinase activity, cell growth, and DNA synthesis of normal melanocytes [27,29], indicating a fundamentally different role than typical melanocyte peptide growth factors, which are induced upon UVB exposure, leading to increased skin pigmentation [30,31]. Furthermore, melatonin induces anti-oxidative and DNA repair mechanisms in skin cells after UVB exposure [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Significant high concentrations of melatonin have been detected in the bone marrow, cerebrospinal fluid, ovary, bile fluid, eye, lymphocytes, or skin [41]. Its amount is also differentially distributed in subcellular organelles due to its amphiphilic character [9,42,43]. Melatonin is able to efficiently protect intracellular organelles including proteins, enzymes, mitochondria, lipids, and the nucleus against oxidative damage [44,45]. Since mitochondria are target organelles for melatonin, it is reported to be responsible for mitochondrial or calcium homeostasis, preventing of neurodegenerative diseases or aging correlated to mitochondrial disturbances [46,47].
The objective of this study was to consider glyoxal as cross-linker for a chitosan/collagen mixture in the scaffold form accompanied by melatonin. The novelty of the study includes the use of glyoxal as a cross-linker for the biopolymeric mixture such as chitosan and collagen, in different weight ratios. Resultant scaffolds were assessed regarding physicochemical properties in order to consider their capacities for tissue regeneration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Chitosan (CTS; DD = 78%, low molecular weight), glyoxal solution (40%), low glucose (1 g/L) MEM culture medium, MTT solution (5 mg/mL), PBS, acetic acid, ethanol, isopropanol, L-glutamine (200 mM), melatonin, and 0.05% trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA solution were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Collagen (Coll) used in this study was isolated from rat tail tendon by the procedures described previously [48].

2.2. Samples Preparation

CTS and Coll were dissolved in 0.1 M acetic acid (the final solution: 1%). Subsequently, CTS/Coll solutions were prepared as 80/20, 50/50, and 20/80 (w/w) ratio on the magnetic stirrer. Glyoxal solution was added (5% w/w) and the resultant scaffolds were placed into 24-wells plates, frozen, and lyophilized. Next, they were assessed for physicochemical properties as well as proliferation analysis.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

The internal morphology of the subjected scaffolds was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM; LEO Electron Microscopy Ltd., Cambridge, UK), where samples were gold-covered to form the conductive surface for the electron beam interaction and respective images were made accordingly for each examined scaffold with a resolution of 500 µm.

2.4. Stability Test

Dry scaffolds with known weight were immersed in PBS solution (pH = 7.4). After 1 and 24 h, subjected scaffolds were removed from the solution, frozen, and lyophilized. Obtained matrices were weighed and their weight change was determined as a result of the scaffolds immersion.

2.5. Mechanical Testing

Mechanical properties were measured using a mechanical testing machine (Shimadzu EZ-Test EZ-SX, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Analysis was carried out by a scaffolds compression with the initial force of 0.1 N and speed of 5 mm min−1. The Young modulus and the maximum force were determined with the Trapezium X Texture program.

2.6. Thermal Properties

Thermogravimetric assessment (TG) was conducted using a TA Instruments SDT 2960 Simultaneous TGA–DTA at a heating rate from 25 °C to 600 °C, in nitrogen (heating rate of 10 °C/min). Respective spectra were analyzed using of TA Universal Analysis software to determine the maximum temperatures and the enthalpy of the process.

2.7. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy—Attenuated Total Reflectance

FTIR-ATR analysis was made for each kind of sample. Dry scaffolds were scanned in the range 4000–600 cm−1 with 4 cm−1 resolution (64 scans) with the use of the Nicolet iS10 spectrophotometer equipped with an attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR) device with a germanium crystal (Nicolet iS10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using OMNIC software.

2.8. Cell Culture

Human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were supplied by PromoCell (Heidelberg, Germany) and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA), respectively. NHEK were maintained in Keratinocyte Growth Medium 2 supplemented with 1% Pen/Strep solution, while NHDF were cultured in MEM medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% (v/v) streptomycin-penicillin solution. Cells were seeded on 24-well plates at the density of 0.5 × 105 cells/well to allow the cells to attach to the subjected 5% glyoxal-loaded scaffolds for 24 h. Comparatively, cells were cultured in the presence of melatonin, which was prepared in EtOH/1 × PBS to yield 10−2 M stock solution; then, they were subsequently dissolved in culture medium to the final working concentration of 10−5 M. Cells were cultured for 96 h and the culture medium was refreshed every 48 h. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay.

2.9. Cell Viability Assay

The MTT assay was performed as stated in the previously described procedure [49]. MTT solution (5 mg/mL in 1 × PBS) was added to each well, and cells were incubated for 3 h in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The crystals of formazan were dissolved in isopropanol/HCl, and absorbance was measured at λ = 595 nm using the BioTek ELx808™ microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as the pooled means + standard deviations (S.D.) of six experiments (n = 6). Significant differences were determined using the ANOVA or the Student’s t-test (GraphPad Prism 7.05, La Jolla, CA, USA). We presented the obtained results as a percentage of the control sample and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)

The morphology of scaffolds is an important factor to be considered for the biomedical application of designed materials. All scaffolds based on chitosan and collagen mixture with or without glyoxal supplementation revealed a porous structure with interconnected pores. Thus, the glyoxal addition enhanced the porosity of the scaffolds; however, it did not changed the shape of pores (Figure 1A–F).

3.2. Stability Test

Scaffolds based on natural polymers are able to swell in aqueous conditions [50]. Herein, all samples revealed their weight increase. It is related to the swelling process, which occurs after the scaffolds’ immersion in the PBS solution. The increase of collagen content results in elevated weight change, and this suggests that collagen has a higher ability to swell than chitosan itself. However, for each type of the investigated samples, additional loading with glyoxal resulted their weight decrease. Glyoxal, acting as a cross-linker, stabilizes the biopolymeric structure, and the swelling ratio of the scaffolds is significantly lower. Moreover, scaffolds with and without glyoxal showed that their weight changes were lower after 24 h compared to 1 h (Table 1), and this may suggest that the degradation process of the samples was initiated.

3.3. Mechanical Testing

The cross-linking process may be carried out to improve the mechanical properties of the material, as it has been shown previously [51]. Thus, considering the chitosan/collagen mixtures, it was observed that enhanced chitosan content triggered the higher mechanical parameters (Figure 2). The glyoxal addition is considered as a cross-linker of the chitosan/collagen-based materials. Indeed, our study of subjected scaffolds revealed significant differences in terms of mechanical capacities between non-cross-linked samples (50CTS/50Coll and 20CTS/80Coll) containing 5% glyoxal and those where this cross-linker was present. Furthermore, cross-linked scaffolds showed a significantly higher compressive modulus (Emod) (Figure 2A) and maximum force (Fmax) (Figure 2B) compared to materials without glyoxal. Besides, the increasing content of collagen in subjected scaffolds from 80CTS/20Coll via 50CTS/50Coll until 20CTS/80Coll caused the prominent reduction of Emod and Fmax.

3.4. Thermal Properties

During the thermal decomposition for each scaffold, three-stage process was observed (Table 2). The first and second ones are related to the release of water molecules structurally bonded to the material components [52]. Namely, the addition of glyoxal decreased the T1 for each CTS/Coll ratio; however, T2 decreased only for the 80CTS/20Coll composition. The third stage is related to the denaturation of polymers caused by high temperatures. The addition of glyoxal as a cross-linker did not affect the increase of T3. This suggests that the thermal stability of the material was not significantly improved. The highest maximum temperature of the third stage was noticed for the 80CTS/20Coll composition, without glyoxal, and with the 5% addition, respectively. Thus, this may suggest that glyoxal is more effective for materials with a higher amount of polysaccharides than protein.

3.5. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–Attenuated Total Reflectance

Obtained FTIR-ATR spectra revealed changes triggered by the presence of glyoxal in the subjected scaffolds (Figure 3). The addition of this cross-linker induced the appearance of new peaks present in the spectra around 1061 and 988 cm−1, representing the skeletal vibrations of the C–O bonds. Thus, these peaks are characteristic for chemical compounds such as glyoxal, which are absent within the matrices without this cross-linker (Figure 3). Besides, there were visible changes in the shape of peaks around 3340 cm−1 between the cross-linked and non-cross-linked samples. This could be connected with the fact that the –OH and –NH groups that provide these peaks interact with the cross-linker; however, their position was not significantly shifted and it may be assumed that only hydrogen bonds are formed. Additionally, peaks in the range of 767–723 cm−1 from C–H out-of-plane deformation are not present after the addition of glyoxal since it stabilizes the polymeric structure; however, they may be observed on the spectra for scaffolds without glyoxal.

3.6. Cellular Assessments Using Human Epidermal Keratinocytes and Dermal Fibroblasts

Herein, we assessed the proliferation rate of human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) cultured on various CTS/Coll ratio scaffolds compared to the 5% glyoxal-loaded ones. The pattern of regulation was similar in both cell lines (Figure 4). Thus, 80CTS/20Coll led to a 39% (NHEK) and 67% (NHDF) drop, and 20CTS/80Coll caused a 32% (NHEK) and 64% (NHDF) enhancement of viability vs. the 50CTS/50Coll samples. Comparatively, cells cultured in the 10−5 M melatonin-supplemented culture medium significantly elevated cell viability for the respective scaffolds by 39% (50CTS/50Coll), 30% (80CTS/20Coll), and 10% (20CTS/80Coll) for NHEK, and by 18% (50CTS/50Coll), 25% (80CTS/20Coll), and 52% (20CTS/80Coll) for NHDF. Furthermore, scaffolds enriched by glyoxal (without melatonin) revealed a significant increase of cell viability compared to the respective CTS/Coll scaffolds without glyoxal itself.
Namely, NHEK cultured on glyoxal-enriched scaffolds showed 14% and 24% enhancement for 50CTS/50Coll and 80CTS/20Coll, respectively, and a 36% drop for the 20CTS/80Coll sample. Similarly, proliferation of NHDF increased significantly by 10% (50CTS/50Coll) and 49% (80CTS/20Coll) against a 59% decrease of viability for 20CTS/80Coll. Finally, scaffolds containing 5% glyoxal and cultured cells in the presence of melatonin showed significant elevations of cell proliferation, indicating melatonin’s capacity towards skin re-epithelization.

4. Discussion

Scaffolds dedicated for biomedical application should have a porous structure to allow for the oxygen flow since oxygen distinctly accelerates wound healing processes. Thus, it is involved in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and protein synthesis, which are all required for restoration of tissue integrity [53]. Scaffolds obtained in this study showed a porous structure with interconnected pores, and their application on the skin surface would not inhibit the flow of gases. It has been studied previously that glyoxal exerts the ability to react with hydroxyl and amine groups [54,55,56]. Both of them are present in chitosan as well as in collagen. Glyoxal has cross-linking ability via acetal formation between the aldehyde groups of glyoxal and the hydroxyl groups of the glucosamine units of chitosan, or via Schiff’s base formation between the free amino groups of chitosan or collagen and the aldehyde groups of glyoxal [56]. To consider the influence of a cross-linker on the materials’ properties, the zeta potential can be elucidated. The use of glyoxal results in the decrease of positive zeta potential values [57]. It can be explained that some of the amine groups are occupied by the cross-linker, which is glyoxal itself.
Scaffolds obtained from natural polymers possess the ability to swell but also degrade in aqueous conditions [58]. The balance between those two processes depends on the time of immersion and the type of solvent. Scaffolds based on chitosan and collagen revealed a high ability to swell in the initial stage of the experiment. However, the weight change decreased after 24 h, which indicates the degradation process. The addition of glyoxal resulted in the inhibition of those two processes insofar as the weight change was lower than for the scaffolds without cross-linker. Similar results were obtained by Perez-Puyana [59], who showed that the cross-linking decreased the swelling ratio of the scaffolds based on chitosan and collagen.
The low mechanical parameters of the biopolymeric scaffolds affect the ability to bind water molecules, which causes the increase of the materials’ flexibility [60]. Thereby, there is a need to search for compounds that can be added to newly introduced materials to improve mechanical properties, and cross-linkers may be proposed as such substances. However, it is important to consider their influence on polymers and detect the formation of bonds and/or interactions [61]. The most effective are those cross-linkers, which are able to form covalent bonds with functional groups of the polymeric chain. Nevertheless, strong hydrogen bonds formed between material components can also improve the mechanical properties of scaffolds. For instance, and comparatively, it was reported that the chitosan/collagen mixture can be cross-linked by genipin [62], EDC/NHS [63], or dialdehyde starch [64]. It was additionally described that glyoxal is an effective cross-linker for chitosan [65], poly(vinyl alcohol) [66], and starch [67]. Indeed, our studies showed that glyoxal could be proposed as an effective cross-linker for chitosan/collagen matrices. Namely, the addition of glyoxal to the mixture in the 80CTS/20Coll ratio did not provide a significant improvement of the mechanical properties. Contrarily, a statistically significant increase of the compression modulus and maximum force was observed for ratios 50CTS/50Coll and 20CTS/80Coll. This confirms that glyoxal is a more effective cross-linker for materials with a higher content of collagen. On one side, it resulted in the presence of hydroxyl groups in the collagen structure, which, on the other side, are able to form hydrogen bonds with glyoxal, and they are stronger than hydrogen bonds with amine groups. Furthermore, thermal stability was also noticed for the composition of the scaffolds based on 50CTS/50Coll and 20CTS/80Coll. These results are in agreement with previous report described by Wang et al. [68]. The authors assessed subjected hydrogels based on the various chitosan/collagen weight (w/w) composition as follows: 75/25, 50/50, 25/75, and 0/100. Results revealed that increased collagen content improved cell viability, and matrices were stiffer compared to those which did not contain the respective cross-linker. Similar responses were observed in terms of the FTIR assessment, where Beşkardeş et al. [69] or Grabska-Zielinska et al. [70] indicated appearance of characteristic peaks followed by the incorporation of the respective cross-linker, which is in accordance with our study when glyoxal was added to the subjected matrices.
Besides, we comparatively assessed the impact of subjected scaffolds loaded with glyoxal on the proliferation ratio of human cutaneous cells (human epidermal keratinocytes, NHEK, and dermal fibroblasts, NHDF) cultured with the addition of melatonin alongside our previous report [71]. The presence of 10−5 M melatonin prominently enhanced the growth ratio, indicating the proliferating capacity of melatonin itself, and this effect was also notable when glyoxal was present. A similar pattern of regulation in terms of proliferation ratio was noticed in our previous report [71]. We observed that cells cultured on scaffolds loaded with melatonin revealed an enhanced growth rate, and it was visible within human keratinocytes and human fibroblasts, but also in human melanoma cells used as reference models [62]. It should still be added that melatonin acts as a “double-edged sword” depending on the current cell conditions [72]. Thus, we know that melatonin protects cells in terms of maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis and scavenging ROS under stress conditions [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. On the other hand, in normal conditions, i.e., without external stress factors, melatonin elevates proliferation rate and it significantly enhances oxidative phosphorylation. Based on our previous report [24], we know that melatonin applied exogenously may enhance the skin barrier, the expression of involucrin and keratins, and it increases the proliferative activity of keratinocytes in ex vivo skin explants, which is in agreement with previous earlier observations on murine skin [73]. Apart from this, melatonin can also accelerate skin wound healing [74,75,76,77] and can improve the antimicrobial action of wound dressing [75]. Despite melatonin’s anti-oxidative actions and the information described above, its physiological key role of a tightly controlled burst of reactive oxygen species production in tissue repair and regeneration [78,79], one of the functions of the melatoninergic system [28,80], may also be to control reactive oxygen species availability during wound healing. Thus, brand new studies [81,82,83,84,85] confirmed that melatonin may exert a beneficial role on epidermal barrier formation, indicating altogether that this indoleamine in combination with glyoxal could be considered as a safe solution, improving wound healing potential.

5. Conclusions

Chitosan and collagen could be lyophilized to obtain forms known as 3D scaffolds. On the other hand, glyoxal solution is reported as a good cross-linking agent for 3D materials. Thus, cross-linking with glyoxal solution modified the physicochemical properties of the biomaterials. The presence of glyoxal in the scaffolds results in the decrease of the swelling ratio and slightly reduces the thermal stability. Namely, it revealed elevated porosity and increased water content, accelerating tissue regeneration. Besides, the presence of glyoxal does not affect cell proliferation of cutaneous cells, i.e., human epidermal keratinocytes or human dermal fibroblasts, which were additionally assessed in the presence of melatonin. This indoleamine significantly enhanced cell proliferation when compared either to scaffolds without 5% glyoxal and to those containing this cross-linker. To sum up, 50CTS/50Coll and 20CTS/80Coll scaffolds were found to be the most effective and enrichment with glyoxal could be an effective alternative to the current methods of cross-linkage and a future tool in terms of designing biomaterials for therapeutic approaches for skin tissue engineering or wound healing.

Author Contributions

B.K.-S. designed and performed the experiments, analyzed obtained data, and together with J.M.P. and K.K. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. L.Z. prepared collagen/chitosan biomaterials. J.M.P. and K.K. performed experiments in terms of cutaneous cell lines, analyzed the results, and together with M.M.S. carried out statistical assessment. B.K.-S., A.T.S., K.S. and K.K. obtained respective funding. Finally, B.K.-S., J.M.P. and K.K. evaluated all the results, made their interpretation and together with L.Z., M.M.S., R.J.R., A.T.S. and K.S. drafted and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported in some part by the grants of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG]), grant numbers: KL2900/2-1 (K.K.), TR156/C05-246807620 (K.S.), SFB1009/B11-194468054 (K.S.), SFB1066/B06-213555243 (K.S.), SFB1450/C06-431460824 (K.S.); Nicoluas Copernicus University in Torun, grant number: 282/2021 IDUB SD (B.K.-S.); NIH, grant number: 1R01AR073004 (A.T.S.), R01AR071189 (A.T.S.), R21AI149267-01A1 (A.T.S.) and VA merit 1I01BX004293-01A1 (A.T.S.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin (62/2016, 24 October 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Özçimen, D.; İnan, B.; Morkoç, O.; Efe, A. A Review on algal biopolymers. J. Chem. Eng. Res. Updates 2017, 4, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Seymour, V. The human–nature relationship and its impact on health: A critical review. Front. Public Health 2016, 18, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Shamsuri, A.A.; Jamil, S. Functional properties of biopolymer-based films modified with surfactants: A brief review. Processes 2020, 8, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Delgado, L.M.; Bayon, Y.; Pandit, A.; Zeugolis, D.I. To Cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2015, 21, 298–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A.; Kozłowska, J.; Osyczka, A.M. New composite materials prepared by calcium phosphate precipitation in chitosan/collagen/hyaluronic acid sponge cross-linked by EDC/NHS. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Warżyńska, O.; Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Łukowicz, K.; Osyczka, A.M.; Walczak, M. Preparation and characterization of fish skin collagen material modified with β-glucan as potential wound dressing. Materials 2021, 14, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kaczmarek, B.; Mazur, O.; Miłek, O.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Osyczka, A.M.; Kleszczyński, K. Development of tannic acid-enriched materials modified by poly (ethylene glycol) for potential applications as wound dressing. Prog. Biomater. 2020, 9, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Naderi, H.; Matin, M.M.; Bahrami, A.R. Review paper: Critical issues in tissue engineering: Biomaterials, cell sources, angiogenesis, and drug delivery systems. J. Biomater. Appl. 2011, 26, 383–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cipolla-Neto, J.; do Amaral, F.G. Melatonin as a hormone: New physiological and clinical insights. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 990–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhao, D.; Yu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Sharma, R.; Reiter, R. Melatonin synthesis and function: Evolutionary history in animals and plants. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Venegas, C.; García, J.A.; Escames, G.; Ortiz, F.; Lopez, A.; Doerrier, C.; Garcia-Corzo, L.; Lopez, L.C.; Raiter, R.J.; Acuna-Castroviejo, D. Extrapineal melatonin: Analysis of its subcellular distribution and daily fluctuations. J. Pineal Res. 2012, 52, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tan, D.X.; Manchester, L.C.; Liu, X.; Rosales-Corral, S.A.; Acuna-Castroviejo, D.; Reiter, R.J. Mitochondria and chloroplasts as the original sites of melatonin synthesis: A hypothesis related to melatonin’s primary function and evolution in eukaryotes. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 54, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Reiter, R.J.; Rosales-Corral, S.; Tan, D.X.; Jou, M.J.; Galano, A.; Xu, B. Melatonin as a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant: One of evolution’s best ideas. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 3863–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ashrafizadeh, M.; Najafi, M.; Kavyiani, N.; Mohammadinejad, R.; Farkhondeh, T.; Samarghandian, S. Anti-inflammatory activity of melatonin: A focus on the role of NLRP3 inflammasome. Inflammation 2021, 44, 1207–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chitimus, D.M.; Popescu, M.R.; Voiculescu, S.E.; Panaitescu, A.M.; Pavel, B.; Zagrean, L.; Zagrean, A.M. Melatonin’s impact on antioxidative and anti-inflammatory reprogramming in homeostasis and disease. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Socaciu, A.I.; Ionuţ, R.; Socaciu, M.A.; Ungur, A.P.; Barsan, M.; Chiorean, A.; Socaciu, C.; Rajnoveanu, A.G. Melatonin, an ubiquitous metabolic regulator: Functions, mechanisms and effects on circadian disruption and degenerative diseases. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020, 21, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Acuña-Castroviejo, D.; López, L.C.; Escames, G.; Lopez, A.; Garcia, J.A.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin-mitochondria interplay in health and disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Reiter, R.J.; Ma, Q.; Sharma, R. Melatonin in mitochondria: Mitigating clear and present dangers. Physiology 2020, 35, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reiter, R.J.; Tan, D.X.; Rosales-Corral, S.; Galano, A.; Jou, M.J.; Acuna-Castroviejo, D. Melatonin mitigates mitochondrial meltdown: Interactions with SIRT3. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Slominski, R.M.; Reiter, R.J.; Schlabritz-Loutsevitch, N.; Ostrom, R.S.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin membrane receptors in peripheral tissues: Distribution and functions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 351, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Skobowiat, C.; Zbytek, B.; Slominski, R.M.; Steketee, J.D. Sensing the environment: Regulation of local and global homeostasis by the skin’s neuroendocrine system. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 2012, 212, 1–115. [Google Scholar]
  22. Slominski, A.; Wortsman, J. Neuroendocrinology of the skin. Endocr. Rev. 2000, 21, 457–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kleszczyński, K.; Kim, T.K.; Bilska, B.; Sarna, M.; Mokrzynski, K.; Stegemann, A.; Pyza, E.; Reiter, R.J.; Steinbrink, K.; Böhm, M.; et al. Melatonin exerts oncostatic capacity and decreases melanogenesis in human MNT-1 melanoma cells. J. Pineal Res. 2019, 67, e12610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, T.K.; Kleszczynski, K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Sweatman, T.; Lin, Z.; Li, W.; Reiter, R.J.; Fischer, T.W.; Slominski, A.T. Metabolism of melatonin and biological activity of intermediates of melatoninergic pathway in human skin cells. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 2742–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Slominski, A.; Baker, J.; Rosano, T.G.; Guisti, L.W.; Ermak, G.; Grande, M.; Gaudet, S.J. Metabolism of serotonin to N-acetylserotonin, melatonin, and 5-methoxytryptamine in hamster skin culture. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 12281–12286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Slominski, A.; Pisarchik, A.; Semak, I.; Sweatman, T.; Wortsman, J.; Szczesniewski, A.; Slugocki, G.; McNulty, J.; Kauser, S.; Tobin, D.J.; et al. Serotoninergic and melatoninergic systems are fully expressed in human skin. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 896–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Slominski, A.T.; Hardeland, R.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Slominski, R.M.; Reiter, R.J.; Paus, R. Melatonin: A cutaneous perspective on its production, metabolism, and functions. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Semak, I.; Kim, T.K.; Janjetovic, Z.; Slominski, R.M.; Zmijewski, J.W. Melatonin, mitochondria, and the skin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 3913–3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, T.K.; Lin, Z.; Tidwell, W.J.; Li, W.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin and its metabolites accumulate in the human epidermis in vivo and inhibit proliferation and tyrosinase activity in epidermal melanocytes in vitro. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2015, 404, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Slominski, A.; Tobin, D.J.; Shibahara, S.; Wortsman, J. Melanin pigmentation in mammalian skin and its hormonal regulation. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 1155–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Slominski, A.T.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Plonka, P.M.; Szaflarski, J.P.; Paus, R. How UV light touches the brain and endocrine system through skin, and why. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 1992–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Fischer, T.W.; Kleszczyński, K.; Hardkop, L.H.; Kruse, N.; Zillikens, D. Melatonin enhances antioxidative enzyme gene expression (CAT, GPx, SOD), prevents their UVR-induced depletion, and protects against the formation of DNA damage (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine) in ex vivo human skin. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 54, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Janjetovic, Z.; Jarrett, S.G.; Lee, E.F.; Duprey, C.; Reiter, R.J.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin and its metabolites protect human melanocytes against UVB-induced damage: Involvement of NRF2-mediated pathways. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Janjetovic, Z.; Nahmias, Z.P.; Hanna, S.; Jarrett, S.G.; Kim, T.K.; Reiter, R.J.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin and its metabolites ameliorate ultraviolet B-induced damage in human epidermal keratinocytes. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kleszczyński, K.; Bilska, B.; Stegemann, A.; Flis, D.J.; Ziolkowski, W.; Pyza, E.; Luger, T.A.; Reiter, R.J.; Böhm, M.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin and its metabolites ameliorate UVR-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress in human MNT-1 melanoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Kleszczyński, K.; Tukaj, S.; Kruse, N.; Zillikens, D.; Fischer, T.W. Melatonin prevents ultraviolet radiation-induced alterations in plasma membrane potential and intracellular pH in human keratinocytes. J. Pineal Res. 2013, 54, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kleszczyński, K.; Zillikens, D.; Fischer, T.W. Melatonin enhances mitochondrial ATP synthesis, reduces reactive oxygen species formation, and mediates translocation of the nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 resulting in activation of phase-2 antioxidant enzymes (γ-GCS, HO-1, NQO1) in ultraviolet radiation-treated normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK). J. Pineal Res. 2016, 61, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Kleszczyński, K.; Zwicker, S.; Tukaj, S.; Kasperkiewicz, M.; Zillikens, D.; Wolf, R.; Fischer, T.W. Melatonin compensates silencing of heat shock protein 70 and suppresses ultraviolet radiation-induced inflammation in human skin ex vivo and cultured keratinocytes. J. Pineal Res. 2015, 58, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Skobowiat, C.; Brożyna, A.; Janjetovic, Z.; Jeayeng, S.; Oak, A.S.W.; Kim, T.; Panich, U.; Reiter, R.J.; Slominski, A.T. Melatonin and its derivatives counteract the ultraviolet B radiation-induced damage in human and porcine skin ex vivo. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, 12501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Slominski, A.T.; Kleszczyński, K.; Semak, I.; Janjetovic, Z.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Kim, T.K.; Slominski, R.M.; Reiter, R.J.; Fischer, T.W. Local melatoninergic system as the protector of skin integrity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 17705–17732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Fischer, T.W.; Sweatman, T.W.; Semak, I.; Sayre, R.M.; Wortsman, J.; Slominski, A. Constitutive and UV-induced metabolism of melatonin in keratinocytes and cell-free systems. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1564–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Reiter, R.J.; Tan, D.X.; Rosales-Corral, S.; Manchester, L.C. The universal nature, unequal distribution and antioxidant functions of melatonin and its derivatives. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. León, J.; Acuña-Castroviejo, D.; Escames, G.; Tan, D.X.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin mitigates mitochondrial malfunction. J. Pineal Res. 2005, 38, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fischer, T.W.; Scholz, G.; Knöll, B.; Hipler, U.C.; Elsner, P. Melatonin suppresses reactive oxygen species induced by UV irradiation in leukocytes. J. Pineal Res. 2004, 37, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Reiter, R.J.; Tan, D.X.; Rosales-Corral, S.; Galano, A.; Zhou, X.J.; Xu, B. Mitochondria: Central organelles for melatonin’s antioxidant and anti-aging actions. Molecules 2018, 23, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Acuña-Castroviejo, D.; Martín, M.; Macías, M.; Escames, G.; León, J.; Khaldy, H.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin, mitochondria, and cellular bioenergetics. J. Pineal Res. 2001, 30, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Cardinali, D.P. Melatonin and healthy aging. Vitam. Horm. 2021, 115, 67–88. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Sionkowska, A.; Kaczmarek, B.; Lewandowska, K.; Grabska, S.; Pokrywczyńska, M.; Kłosowski, T.; Drewa, T. 3D composites based on the blends of chitosan and collagen with the addition of hyaluronic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 89, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carmichael, J.; DeGraff, W.G.; Gazdar, A.F.; Minna, J.D.; Mitchell, J.B. Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay; assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 936–942. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhu, J.; Marchant, R.E. Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2011, 8, 607–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Piątek-Hnat, M.; Bomba, K. The influence of cross-linking process on the physicochemical properties of new copolyesters containing xylitol. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A.; Skopińska-Wiśniewska, J. Influence of glycosaminoglycans on the properties of thin films based on chitosan/collagen blends. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018, 80, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Castilla, D.M.; Liu, Z.J.; Velazquez, O.C. Oxygen: Implications for wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 2012, 1, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, Q.; Duo, F.; Liang, B.; Shen, Q. Studies of cross-linking reaction on chitosan fiber with glyoxal. Carbohyd. Polym. 2005, 59, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Knaul, J.Z.; Hudson, S.M.; Creber, K.A.M. Crosslinking of chitosan fibers with dialdehydes: Proposal of a new reaction mechanism. J. Polym. Sci. B 1999, 37, 1079–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jawad, A.H.; Norrahma, S.S.A.; Hameed, B.H.; Ismail, K. Chitosan-glyoxal film as a superior adsorbent for two structurally different reactive and acid dyes: Adsorption and mechanism study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Mazur, O.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Łukowicz, K.; Osyczka, A.M. The preparation and characterization of chitosan-based hydrogels cross-linked by glyoxal. Materials 2021, 14, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chang, X.; Chen, D.; Jiao, X. Chitosan-based aerogels with high adsorption performance. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 7721–7725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hejazi, R.; Amiji, M. Stomach-specific anti-H. pylori therapy: Part III: Effect of chitosan microspheres crosslinking on the gastric residence and local tetracycline concentrations in fasted gerbils. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 272, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Nikolova, M.P.; Chavali, M.S. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review. Bioact. Mat. 2019, 4, 271–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, L.; Xu, S.; Li, J. Recent advances in molecular imprinting technology: Current status, challenges and highlighted applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2922–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bi, L.; Cao, Z.; Hu, Y.; Song, Y.; Yu, L.; Yang, B.; Mu, J.; Huang, Z.; Han, Y. Effects of different cross-linking conditions on the properties of genipin-cross-linked chitosan/collagen scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Mater. Sci. Med. 2011, 22, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Andonegi, M.; Heras, K.L.; Santos-Vizcaino, E.; Igartua, M.; Hernandez, R.M.; Caba, K.; Guerrero, P. Structure-properties relationship of chitosan/collagen films with potential for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 237, 116159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kaczmarek, B.; Sionkowska, A.M.; Osyczka, A.M. The comparison of physic-chemical properties of chitosan/collagen/hyaluronic acid composites with nano-hydroxyapatite cross-linked by dialdehyde starch and tannic acid. Polym. Test. 2017, 62, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Miłek, O.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Osyczka, A.M. Bio-studies of scaffolds based on chitosan/tannic acid cross-linked by glyoxal. Mat. Lett. 2021, 292, 129667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, P.C.; Edgren, D. Crosslinking reaction of poly(vinyl alcohol) with glyoxal. J. Polym. Res. 2010, 17, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Uslu, M.K.; Polat, S. Effects of glyoxal cross-linking on baked starch foam. Carb. Polym. 2012, 87, 1994–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, L.; Stegemann, J.P. Glyoxal crosslinking of cell-seeded chitosan/collagen hydrogels for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Beşkardeş, I.G.; Demirtaş, T.T.; Durukan, M.D.; Gümüşderelioğlu, M. Microwave-assisted fabrication of chitosan-hydroxyapatite superporous hydrogel composites as bone scaffolds. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2015, 9, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Grabska-Zielińska, S.; Sionkowska, A.; Coelho, C.C.; Monteiro, F.J. Silk fibroin/collagen/chitosan scaffolds cross-linked by a glyoxal solution as biomaterials toward bone tissue regeneration. Materials 2020, 13, 3433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Ostrowska, J.; Kozłowska, J.; Szota, Z.; Brożyna, A.A.; Dreier, R.; Reiter, R.J.; Slominski, A.T.; Steinbrink, K.; Kleszczyński, K. Evaluation of polymeric matrix loaded with melatonin for wound dressing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hardeland, R. Melatonin and inflammation-story of a double-edged blade. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 65, e12525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Slominski, A.; Chassalevris, N.; Mazurkiewicz, J.; Maurer, M.; Paus, R. Murine skin as a target for melatonin bioregulation. Exp. Dermatol. 1994, 3, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, S.J.; Jung, Y.H.; Oh, S.Y.; Yun, S.P.; Han, H.J. Melatonin enhances the human mesenchymal stem cells motility via melatonin receptor 2 coupling with Gαq in skin wound healing. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Romić, M.D.; Klarić, M.S.; Lovrić, J.; Pepić, I.; Cetina-Čižmek, B.; Filipović-Grčić, J.; Hafner, A. Melatonin-loaded chitosan/Pluronic® F127 microspheres as in situ forming hydrogel: An innovative antimicrobial wound dressing. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 107, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Song, R.; Ren, L.; Ma, H.; Hu, R.; Gao, H.; Wang, L.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, J. Melatonin promotes diabetic wound healing in vitro by regulating keratinocyte activity. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 4682–4693. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Soybir, G.; Topuzlu, C.; Odabaş, O.; Dolay, K.; Bilir, A.; Köksoy, F. The effects of melatonin on angiogenesis and wound healing. Surg. Today 2003, 33, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kimmel, H.M.; Grant, A.; Ditata, J. The presence of oxygen in wound healing. Wounds 2016, 28, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Love, N.R.; Chen, Y.; Ishibashi, S.; Kritsiligkou, P.; Lea, R.; Koh, Y.; Gallop, J.L.; Dorey, K.; Amaya, E. Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 222–228. [Google Scholar]
  80. Slominski, A.; Tobin, D.J.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Wortsman, J.; Paus, R. Melatonin in the skin: Synthesis, metabolism and functions. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 19, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hafner, A.; Lovrić, J.; Voinovich, D.; Filipović-Grcić, J. Melatonin-loaded lecithin/chitosan nanoparticles: Physicochemical characterisation and permeability through Caco-2 cell monolayers. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 381, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ferrero, R.; Pantaleone, S.; Piane, M.D.; Caldera, F.; Corno, M.; Trotta, F.; Brunella, V. On the interactions of melatonin/β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex: A novel approach combining efficient semiempirical extended tight-binding (xTB) results with Ab initio methods. Molecules 2021, 26, 5881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mirmajidi, T.; Chogan, F.; Rezayan, A.H.; Sharifi, A.M. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a nanofiber wound dressing loaded with melatonin. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 596, 120213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Romić, M.D.; Sušac, A.; Lovrić, J.; Cetina-Čižmek, B.; Filipović-Grčić, J.; Hafner, A. Evaluation of stability and in vitro wound healing potential of melatonin loaded (lipid enriched) chitosan based microspheres. Acta Pharm. 2019, 69, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Yao, Z.; Qian, Y.; Jin, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Yuan, W.; Fan, C. Biomimetic multilayer polycaprolactone/sodium alginate hydrogel scaffolds loaded with melatonin facilitate tendon regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118865. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of 80CTS/20Coll (A), 80CTS/20Coll+5%G (B), 50CTS/50Coll (C), 50CTS/50Coll+5%G (D), 20CTS/80Coll (E), and 20CTS/80Coll+5%G (F) (magnification: 150×).
Figure 1. SEM images of 80CTS/20Coll (A), 80CTS/20Coll+5%G (B), 50CTS/50Coll (C), 50CTS/50Coll+5%G (D), 20CTS/80Coll (E), and 20CTS/80Coll+5%G (F) (magnification: 150×).
Antioxidants 11 00570 g001
Figure 2. The compressive modulus (Emod) (A) and maximum force (Fmax) (B) obtained for the scaffold during the compression; * p < 0.001.
Figure 2. The compressive modulus (Emod) (A) and maximum force (Fmax) (B) obtained for the scaffold during the compression; * p < 0.001.
Antioxidants 11 00570 g002
Figure 3. FTIR-ATR spectra obtained for all tested samples where the characteristic peaks are visible upon incorporation of 5% glyoxal (arrows).
Figure 3. FTIR-ATR spectra obtained for all tested samples where the characteristic peaks are visible upon incorporation of 5% glyoxal (arrows).
Antioxidants 11 00570 g003
Figure 4. Human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were seeded on CTS/Coll scaffolds alone or containing 5% glyoxal in comparison to the culture medium including 10−5 M melatonin, cultured for 96 h, and viability was assessed using the MTT assay as described in Materials and Methods. Data are presented as mean + S.D. (n = 6), expressed as a percentage of the control sample (cells cultured on scaffolds without glyoxal and without melatonin). Statistically significant differences were indicated as follows; § p < 0.01: vs. 50CTS/50Coll sample, # p < 0.01: comparison of the corresponding samples containing 5% glyoxal and scaffolds alone, and corresponding statistical comparison as * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, n.s.-not significant.
Figure 4. Human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) were seeded on CTS/Coll scaffolds alone or containing 5% glyoxal in comparison to the culture medium including 10−5 M melatonin, cultured for 96 h, and viability was assessed using the MTT assay as described in Materials and Methods. Data are presented as mean + S.D. (n = 6), expressed as a percentage of the control sample (cells cultured on scaffolds without glyoxal and without melatonin). Statistically significant differences were indicated as follows; § p < 0.01: vs. 50CTS/50Coll sample, # p < 0.01: comparison of the corresponding samples containing 5% glyoxal and scaffolds alone, and corresponding statistical comparison as * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, n.s.-not significant.
Antioxidants 11 00570 g004
Table 1. The weight change of scaffold after 1 h and 24 h immersion in PBS.
Table 1. The weight change of scaffold after 1 h and 24 h immersion in PBS.
Specimen1 h [%]24 h [%]
80CTS/20Coll2730 ± 252110 ± 28
80CTS/20Coll+5%G1750 ± 291560 ± 22
50CTS/50Coll3215 ± 382877 ± 34
50CTS/50Coll+5%G2890 ± 442540 ± 29
20CTS/80Coll3980 ± 313570 ± 41
20CTS/80Coll+5%G3470 ± 353109 ± 27
Table 2. Parameters of the thermal decomposition of the scaffolds for the maximum temperature of the obtained peaks on TG-DTG spectra.
Table 2. Parameters of the thermal decomposition of the scaffolds for the maximum temperature of the obtained peaks on TG-DTG spectra.
SpecimenT1 [°C]T2 [°C]T3 [°C]
80CTS/20Coll62.69172.28285.53
80CTS/20Coll+5%G54.54165.85284.68
50CTS/50Coll55.49161.17282.51
50CTS/50Coll+5%G51.41168.79281.68
20CTS/80Coll55.76160.27281.28
20CTS/80Coll+5%G51.47160.85277.05
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Pin, J.M.; Zasada, L.; Sonne, M.M.; Reiter, R.J.; Slominski, A.T.; Steinbrink, K.; Kleszczyński, K. Assessment of Melatonin-Cultured Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials for Wound Healing. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030570

AMA Style

Kaczmarek-Szczepańska B, Pin JM, Zasada L, Sonne MM, Reiter RJ, Slominski AT, Steinbrink K, Kleszczyński K. Assessment of Melatonin-Cultured Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials for Wound Healing. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(3):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, Beata, Judith M. Pin, Lidia Zasada, Mauritz M. Sonne, Russel J. Reiter, Andrzej T. Slominski, Kerstin Steinbrink, and Konrad Kleszczyński. 2022. "Assessment of Melatonin-Cultured Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials for Wound Healing" Antioxidants 11, no. 3: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030570

APA Style

Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B., Pin, J. M., Zasada, L., Sonne, M. M., Reiter, R. J., Slominski, A. T., Steinbrink, K., & Kleszczyński, K. (2022). Assessment of Melatonin-Cultured Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials for Wound Healing. Antioxidants, 11(3), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11030570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop