Next Article in Journal
Alpha-Tocopherol Significantly Improved Squalene Production Yield of Aurantiochytrium sp. TWZ-97 through Lowering ROS levels and Up-Regulating Key Genes of Central Carbon Metabolism Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
Rational Design of Multifunctional Ferulic Acid Derivatives Aimed for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Blood Plasma Calorimetric Profiles of Women with Preeclampsia: Effect of Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relevant Membrane Transport Proteins as Possible Gatekeepers for Effective Pharmacological Ascorbate Treatment in Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/antiox12051033
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of O6-Aminoalkyl-Hispidol Analogs as Multifunctional Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors towards Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases

by
Ahmed H. E. Hassan
1,2,
Hyeon Jeong Kim
3,
Keontae Park
4,
Yeonwoo Choi
5,
Suyeon Moon
5,
Chae Hyeon Lee
5,
Yeon Ju Kim
5,
Soo Bin Cho
5,
Min Sung Gee
5,
Danbi Lee
5,
Jong-Hyun Park
3,
Jong Kil Lee
5,
Jong Hoon Ryu
6,
Ki Duk Park
3 and
Yong Sup Lee
2,5,*
1
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
2
Medicinal Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
3
Convergence Research Center for Diagnosis, Treatment and Care System of Dementia, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Fundamental Pharmaceutical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
6
Department of Oriental Pharmaceutical Science College of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(5), 1033; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051033
Submission received: 10 April 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 29 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Nature to Synthetic Small Molecule Antioxidants: New Candidates in Drug Discovery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oxidative catabolism of monoamine neurotransmitters by monoamine oxidases (MAOs) produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contributes to neuronal cells’ death and also lowers monoamine neurotransmitter levels. In addition, acetylcholinesterase activity and neuroinflammation are involved in neurodegenerative diseases. Herein, we aim to achieve a multifunctional agent that inhibits the oxidative catabolism of monoamine neurotransmitters and, hence, the detrimental production of ROS while enhancing neurotransmitter levels. Such a multifunctional agent might also inhibit acetylcholinesterase and neuroinflammation. To meet this end goal, a series of aminoalkyl derivatives of analogs of the natural product hispidol were designed, synthesized, and evaluated against both monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B). Promising MAO inhibitors were further checked for the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and neuroinflammation. Among them, compounds 3aa and 3bc were identified as potential multifunctional molecules eliciting submicromolar selective MAO-B inhibition, low-micromolar AChE inhibition, and the inhibition of microglial PGE2 production. An evaluation of their effects on memory and cognitive impairments using a passive avoidance test confirmed the in vivo activity of compound 3bc, which showed comparable activity to donepezil. In silico molecular docking provided insights into the MAO and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of compounds 3aa and 3bc. These findings suggest compound 3bc as a potential lead for the further development of agents against neurodegenerative diseases.

1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), impose a high global disease burden [1]. Together, they constituted the leading cause of the highest disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and the second-highest cause of death in 2016 [2]. The fact that the currently implemented therapeutic agents are far from achieving comprehensive remedy and, moreover, are ineffective in some patients raises an urgent need for the development of novel therapeutic agents.
Neurodegenerative diseases share several commonalities, including neuronal death and degeneration that triggers abnormal levels of chemical neurotransmitters, including monoamines and acetylcholine. It is well-established that both types A and B of monoamine oxidases (MAOs), which are responsible for the metabolic oxidation of monoamine neurotransmitters, have crucial roles in the induction of neurodegeneration through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [3,4,5,6]. The pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is implication by MAOs and associated with the neurodegeneration of the cholinergic system. Accordingly, both monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) are candidates for developing anti-Alzheimer’s-disease agents [7,8,9,10]. Meanwhile, Parkinson’s disease (PD) is mainly associated with the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, resulting in low dopamine levels. Hence, monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors not only elicit neuroprotective effects through inhibition of ROS production but also enhance dopamine levels and, thus, are a proven clinical approach for the management of PD [11]. In addition to providing protection against oxidative stress, MAOIs increase the gene expression of antiapoptotic and pro-survival proteins [3,12]. Furthermore, MAO activity is implicated in the formation of β-amyloid plaques in AD, and MAO-B is upregulated in AD [13,14]. On the other hand, the use of AChEIs is beneficial for the management of AD, and they are used off-label to alleviate cognitive symptoms in PD [15]. The combined axial roles for MAOs and AChE in the theory of multiple mechanisms of neurodegeneration stimulate the development of bifunctional molecules, inhibiting both MAO and AChE activities to combat neurodegenerative diseases.
Neuroinflammation is another component in neurodegenerative diseases such as AD and PD [16]. Microglia are the CNS resident form of macrophages, which play axial roles in neuroinflammation and are responsible for the production of inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide (NO), PGE2, and cytokines. Anomalous microglia activity has been detected in neurodegenerative diseases [16]. Growing evidence has proven that alleviating neuroinflammation is a valid strategy in the treatment course of neurodegenerative diseases [17,18,19]. Interestingly, MAO-B inhibitors were reported to repress microglia-contributed neuroinflammation [20,21]. Noteworthily, the literature unveiled anti-neuroinflammatory effects for acetylcholine (ACh) mediated by microglia; hence, AChEIs might suppress neuroinflammation [22,23,24].
Considering the complex multifactorial nature of neurodegenerative diseases, multifunctional molecules modulating multiple components of these diseases could be a more effective approach [25,26,27,28]. In fact, the development of MAO inhibitors possessing multiple activities for neurodegenerative diseases has been called for [29]. Therefore, this work aimed to identify new candidate molecules inhibiting MAOs and AChE as well as microglia-mediated neuroinflammation for the development of potential agents for the management of neurodegenerative diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Synthesis

Compounds 2a–2j, 3aa–3ak, and 3am–3bd were prepared as reported earlier (Supplementary Information) [30,31]. Compound 3al was prepared analogously (Supplementary Information).

2.2. Monoamine Oxidases Inhibition Assay

Evaluation was conducted following standard literature protocols, as described in Supplementary Materials [32,33].

2.3. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Assay

Evaluation was conducted following standard literature protocols, as described in Supplementary Materials [34,35].

2.4. Cellular Viability and Inhibition of PGE2 Production Assays

Evaluations were conducted following standard literature protocols, as described in Supplementary Materials [33].

2.5. In Vivo Evaluations

Evaluation was conducted following standard literature protocols, as described in Supplementary Materials [36]. Animal experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyung Hee University (KHSASP-22–022, 28 March 2022).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test. Differences between groups were considered significant at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.7. Molecular Modeling Studies

Studies were conducted following standard literature protocols [33,37] employing X-ray cocrystals of MAO-B with safinamide (PDB: 2V5Z); (b) MAO-A with harmine (PDB: 2Z5X); and AChE with galantamine (PDB: 4EY6).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Design of Focused O6-Aminoalkyl Derivatives of Hispidol Analogs Library

A growing body of literature reports supports the correlation between the high success in drug discovery and development with the implementation of natural-product-based drug discovery strategies [38,39,40,41]. Encouraged by these reports coupled with the need for new multifunctional molecules, this report aimed to identify promising compounds modulating the monoaminergic, cholinergic, and neuroinflammatory pathways implicated in neurodegenerative diseases. Recently, hispidol (Figure 1), a phytoalexin natural flavonoid isolated from legume plants including soybean, Retama raetam, and Medicago truncatula [42,43,44], has been identified as a potential reversible MAO inhibitor with low micromolar activity and selectivity towards the inhibition of MAO-A over MAO-B. Despite the fact that some flavonoids might show AChE inhibitory activity [45], a preliminary evaluation of the AChE inhibitory activity of hispidol returned a disappointing IC50 value of 202.47 µM. However, an exploration of the MAO-B inhibitory activity of ring-B hydroxylated/methoxylated hispidol analogs unveiled several ring-B methoxylated analogs as highly selective potential MAO-B inhibitors with promising anti-neuroinflammatory effects [33]. Meanwhile, attaching an aminoalkyl moiety to the known chromone-based reversible MAO inhibitor was recently reported to afford compound 1 as a bifunctional MAO-B/AChE inhibitor, albeit showing micromolar activity against both targets (Figure 1) [46]. Aiming to realize a multifunctional molecule inhibiting all monoamine oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, and neuroinflammation pathways, we planned to incorporate hispidol analogs as surrogates to the chromone moiety to prepare and evaluate the activity of a focused library of O6-aminoalkyl-hispidol analogs against these pathways involved in neurodegenerative diseases.
Recently, some O6-aminoalkyl-aurone derivatives were investigated for AD [30]. However, the aim of the previous report was limited to achieving AChEI and did not include achieving potential polypharmacological candidates. Other related O6-aminoalkyl-aurone derivatives appeared in two recent reports that explored very limited methoxylation patterns of aurone’s ring-B to provide enough SAR information and, in addition, were investigated only for either AChEI [47] or the inhibition of MAO/β-amyloid aggregation [48]. Furthermore, their MAO inhibition activity was not sufficient. Moreover, the crucial neuroinflammatory component was overlooked. Following the accredited strategy of repurposing and repositioning in drug design and discovery [49,50,51,52], a retrospective review of the previous compounds according to the design approach presented herein might suggest repurposing them to be explored for their effect on monoamine oxidases, acetylcholinesterase, and neuroinflammation, which are involved in neurodegenerative diseases.
To conduct an efficient exploration of SAR, members of the designed focused library, as shown in Figure 1, featured several structural modifications. They planned to possess diverse ring-B methoxylation patterns. Thus, molecules possessing 2′-/3′- or 4′-methoxy substituents were represented in library’s compounds to explore the outcome of a positional shift of monomethoxy substituents. In addition, different patterns of ring-B dimethoxylation were planned to be represented among library members. The designed library also encompassed members possessing a ring-B trimethoxylation pattern. Regarding the aminoalkyl moiety linked to O6-position of the incorporated hispidol analogs, and as shown in Figure 1, the amine moiety varied between diethylamine and cycloalkylamines. The explored cycloalkylamines included the five-membered pyrrolidine as well as the six-membered piperidine and morpholine. Finally, the length of the alkyl linker was varied between two, three, four, and five carbons to assess its impact on the activity.

3.2. Synthesis of Targeted Library Members

Concise synthesis is an important goal to achieve practical and economic synthesis [53,54,55]. In this regard, synthesis of the targeted library members was achieved in two or three sequential synthetic steps in analogy to the reported protocol as outlined in Scheme 1 [30]. First, 10 hispidol analogs 3a–j bearing diverse methoxylation patterns were prepared via the acid-catalyzed cross-aldol condensation of the commercially available 6-hydroxy-3-coumaranone with diversely-substituted aromatic aldehydes. The targeted compounds 3aa–ak, 3am–aq, and 3at–bd were accessed through the O6-alkylation of hispidol analogs 3a–j with the appropriate commercially available aminoalkyl chloride using anhydrous potassium carbonate in refluxing acetone as a solvent. The obtained O6-aminoalkyl hispidol analogs were converted into salt form via adding acetyl chloride to ethanolic solutions, which yielded the targeted compounds as HCl salts. Regarding aminoalkyl derivatives 3al, 3ar, and 3as having four or five carbon chain linkers, the phenolic hydroxyl group was first alkylated using the appropriate terminally halogenated chloroalkyl bromide employing anhydrous potassium carbonate in refluxing DMF to afford alkyl chloride derivatives 5a–c, followed by reaction with the appropriate cyclic amine in refluxing DMF in the presence of potassium iodide. The treatment of ethanolic solutions of the products with acetyl chloride afforded the desired compounds 3al, 3ar, and 3as in the form of HCl salts.

3.3. InVitro Biological Evaluations

3.3.1. Evaluation of Inhibition of Different Monoamine Oxidase Isoforms

Two isoforms of MAOs, namely MAO-A and MAO-B, are expressed in CNS, showing different substrate specificity. Consequently, different pharmacological effects can be elicited depending on the inhibited MAO isoform. Therefore, the prepared O6-aminoalkyl-hispidol analogs were evaluated against both recombinant human MAO-A and MAO-B isoforms following the well-established spectrophotometric method [32]. The results are displayed in Table 1 and discussed in the following sections.

Evaluation of MAO-A Inhibitory Activity

As the members of the prepared library are O6-aminoalkyl-hispidol analogs, while hispidol was reported with sub-micromolar IC50 value against MAO-A, evaluations of the compounds’ inhibitory activities against recombinant human MAO-A were conducted at a 1 µM concentration to detect potential MAO-A inhibitors. Regardless of the ring-B methoxylation pattern or the O6-aminoalkyl moiety, all tested compounds showed no to very weak MAO-A inhibition that did not exceed 12.73% at the tested 1 µM concentration. Such an outcome, which contrasts hispidol’s tendency to show a potential MAO-A inhibition is, in fact, consistent with the recently found low activity of hispidol analogs as MAO-A inhibitors [33].

Structure-Activity Relationship of MAO-B Inhibitory Activity

The unveiled low activity against MAO-A could be beneficial in achieving selective MAO-B inhibition. As hispidol was reported to have a low micromolar IC50 value for the inhibition of MAO-B, equivalent to 2.45 µM, the prepared compounds were evaluated for the inhibition of activity of recombinant human MAO-B isoforms at a single dose of 10 µM. According to the results, the activity was influenced by the ring-B methoxylation pattern, the introduced amino moiety, and the length of the carbon chain linker. As shown in Table 1, among three compounds having 2′-methoxy substituents (3aa–3ac), O6-diethylaminoethyl derivative 3aa triggered the excellent inhibition of MAO-B by 91.49%. Meanwhile, replacing the diethylamino with the cyclic pyrrolidino moiety afforded derivative 3ab with decreased activity, which was almost half that of derivative 3aa. Increasing the linker’s length by one carbon resulted in a further activity reduction (compounds 3ac). Shifting the methoxy from the 2′-position in compound 3aa to the 3′-position resulted in derivative 3ad having almost half activity. Again, increasing the linker’s length by one carbon resulted in a further decrease of the activity (compounds 3ae), while replacing the diethylamino with the cyclic pyrrolidino moiety to afford compound 3af slightly decreased the activity, and when coupled with an increase in linker length by one carbon to afford compound 3ae, it resulted in a marked activity decrement. Replacing the pyrrolidine of compound 3ag with piperidine while retaining the same linker’s length maintained almost the same low MAO-B inhibition level (compound 3ah), while replacing the pyrrolidine of compound 3af with morpholine while maintaining the same linker’s length resulted in decreased activity (compound 3ai). In contrast to the observed activity reduction in the cases of the presence of a methoxy group at the 2′- or 3′-positions, switching to the ring 4′-methoxylation pattern and incorporating a pyrrolidine moiety was associated with a slight increase in activity upon increasing the length of the alkyl chain linker (Table 1, compounds 3aj, 3ak, and 3al). Meanwhile, replacing the pyrrolidine with a piperidine moiety resulted in compound 3am eliciting nearly half the measured activity for compound 3aj, which shares the same alkyl chain length. It was noted that compounds 3af and 3aj share the same pyrrolidine moiety and length of the alkyl chain but have ring-B possessed a 3′-methoxy or 4′-methoxy, respectively, and elicited almost the same activity level. Therefore, the combined ring-B methoxylation pattern, namely 3′,4′-dimethoxy, was explored maintaining the same pyrrolidine moiety and length of the linker (compound 3an) or replacing pyrrolidine with piperidine but retaining the same linker’s alkyl chain length (compound 3ap). As revealed from the results, both compounds 3an and 3ap possessed almost the same activity level, which was slightly higher relative to compounds 3af and 3aj. Despite the decrease in activity upon increasing the linker’s alkyl chain length, it was marginal in the case of pyrrolidine derivative 3ao compared with compound 3an. The activity reduction upon increasing the linker’s alkyl chain length was highly remarkable in the case of piperidine derivatives 3aq, 3ar, and 3as, which showed very low activities relative to compound 3ap. Changing the 3′,4′-dimethoxylation pattern of the ring-B of compound 3an into 3′,5′-dimethoxylation pattern to afford compound 3at maintaining the same pyrrolidine moiety and the two-carbon chain linker slightly decreased the activity, and when coupled with increasing the linker’s length to a three-carbon chain, it resulted in further decrease of the activity (compound 3au). An exploration of other ring-B dimethoxylation patterns while retaining two-carbon chain linker and pyrrolidine moiety showed that, among them, the 2′,5′-dimethoxy derivative 3ax was the most active, while the 2′,4′-dimethoxy derivative 3aw was less active, and the 2′,3′-dimethoxy derivative 3av was almost inactive. Again, increasing the linker’s alkyl chain afforded, in general, compounds with lower activities (Table 1, compounds 3ay, 3az, and 3ba). Finally, an exploration of ring-B trimethoxylation patterns revealed excellent activity for the 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxlated compound 3bc but low activity for the 2′,3′,4′-trimethoxlated compound 3bb; both of them have pyrrolidine moieties and two-carbon alkyl chain linkers. Modifying the pyrrolidine moiety of the excellently active compound 3bc into piperidine moiety afforded the poorly active compound 3bd. Collectively, it might be inferred that a short alkyl chain linker results in better activity, possibly because of substrate pocket size limitations. In addition, the combined ring-B methoxylation pattern and the type of amino moiety together dictate the elicited MAO-B inhibitory activity. Among the explored patterns, a combination of diethylamino and 2′-methoxy substitution patterns as well as pyrrolidine and 3′,4′,5′-trimethoxy substitution patterns coupled with two-carbon chain linkers afforded compounds showing an excellent activity.

Evaluation of IC50 and MAO-B Selectivity

Potency and selectivity are two important criteria that should be assessed for promising compounds. The most active compounds, which triggered almost ≥50 inhibition of MAO-B activity, were evaluated for potency by determining the MAO-B IC50 values employing five doses. In addition, MAO-A inhibition at the high concentration of 100 µM was determined as well as MAO-A IC50 values to calculate MAO-B inhibition selectivity indices. As shown in Table 2, compounds 3al and 3ap inhibited MAO-A by almost 15% and 23% at the high 100 µM concentrations and showed high IC50 values, indicating low potencies and selectivity indices for compounds 3al and 3ap. The calculated selectivity indices were >12 and >9.8 for compounds 3al and 3ap, respectively. Despite compound 3ax showing an approximately 28% inhibition of MAO-A at the high concentration of 100 µM, it was a more potent MAO-B inhibitor compared with compounds 3al and 3ap, which showed an IC50 of 3.16 µM, resulting in a better MAO-B selectivity index of >32. However, the potency of compound 3ax was in low micromolar range, which might require further optimization. Fortunately, compounds 3bc and 3aa elicited low IC50 values in the submicromolar range, reflecting good potencies. Thus, compound 3bc showed IC50 of 0.34 µM, which is almost three times the measured IC50 value of safinamide, the reference standard drug. The calculated >289 selectivity index for MAO-B inhibition by compound 3bc was excellent. Meanwhile, compound 3aa was also a good selective MAO-B inhibitor, eliciting IC50 for MAO-B inhibition in the submicromolar range by 0.96 µM, which was around 8.6 times the measured IC50 value of safinamide and possessed a good selectivity index of >104.

3.3.2. Evaluation of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Activity

While AChE inhibition was assessed previously for some members of these compounds, the results were unknown for other compounds. Accordingly, AChE inhibition was assessed for compounds that emerged as promising MAO-B inhibitors whenever AChE inhibition was unreported, adopting the same reported assay protocol and employing galantamine as a reference standard AChEI [30]. As in Table 2, all promising compounds were more potent than galantamine as AchEIs. Thus, compound 3bc, which was the most potent and selective MAO-B inhibitor, elicited a potential AChE inhibition with a measured low IC50 value of 1.56 µM. Hence, compound 3bc possesses almost three times the potency of the reference standard galantamine. In addition, compound 3aa, which was the second-most potent and selective MAO-B inhibitor, also triggered a potential AChE inhibition. It showed a measured IC50 of 2.67 µM, which is nearly 1.8 times the potency of the reference galantamine. Despite the lower MAO-B potency and selectivity of compounds 3ax and 3al as MAO-B inhibitors, they possessed potential AChEI, showing equipotent activities to compound 3bc. Finally, compound 3ap was the most potent AChEI among these five compounds, but it was the least potent and selective as a MAO-B inhibitor. As the ligand binding pockets of AChE and MAO-B are different, the absence of a correlation between AChE and MAO-B inhibitions is a logical outcome. However, it is possible to develop potential ligands interacting with both different enzymes, as found for compounds 3aa and 3bc.

3.3.3. Evaluation of Anti-Neuroinflammatory Activity

To advance the compounds for further cellular evaluations, a preliminary check for the absence of undesirable cytotoxic effects might be needed. This might enable the early elimination of toxic compounds as well as the reduction of non-specific responses arising from cell death. Accordingly, the impact of compounds 3aa and 3bc on the cellular viability of microglial BV2 cells was evaluated. The results indicated the absence of cytotoxic activity in both compounds 3aa and 3bc on a cellular viability of up to 10 micromolar concentrations (Figure 2A). Consequently, compounds 3aa and 3bc were advanced for the evaluation of their impact on BV2 cells’ induced production of PGE2, a known mediator of neuroinflammation linked to neurodegenerative diseases. As shown in Figure 2B, LPS treatment induced an increase in PGE2 production, suggesting the initiation of a neuroinflammatory reaction. Such increased PGE2 production was alleviated and returned to almost normal levels after 10 micromolar doses of compounds 3aa or 3bc. Meanwhile, the normal PGE2 production level was still by the lower five micromolar concentrations of compound 3bc, while the attrition of the inhibitory effect was observed in the case of compound 3aa. Together, these findings demonstrate that both compounds 3aa and 3bc are multifunctional compounds showing potential anti-neuroinflammatory effects at 10 micromolar doses in addition to their MAO-B and AChE inhibitory effects.

3.4. In Vivo Evaluation of Cognitive Deficit Amelioration

To evaluate the in vivo effects of compounds 3aa and 3bc on cognitive deficits, an in vivo model of scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits in rodents was employed using a passive avoidance test. The passive avoidance task is a fear-motivated test intended to assess the effects of deteriorating cognitive functions caused by neurodegenerative diseases on the capacity to learn and memorize [56]. First, mice underwent acquisition to learn avoidance. Next, the capacity of mice to memorize and retain the learned avoidance was assessed. As shown in Figure 3, the administration of 1 and 10 mg/kg doses of compound 3bc significantly enhanced latency in the retention experiment. These results revealed that the 10 mg/kg dose of compound 3bc was as effective as donepezil in ameliorating cognitive deficits. Meanwhile, compound 3aa did not show significant amelioration of cognitive deficits. These findings suggest that compound 3bc could potentially alleviate the impairment of memory and cognitive functions because of neurodegenerative diseases.

3.5. In Vivo Evaluation of Antidepressant Activity

Recently, ladostigil, an investigational AChEI/selective MAO-B inhibitor, has been found to elicit antidepressant-like effects and was proposed for treatment of depression and psychiatric disorders associated with neurodegenerative diseases [57]. This suggested the evaluation of the antidepressant-like activity of compounds 3aa and 3bc using an in vivo model of forced-swim test in rodents: a well-recognized model for evaluation of antidepressants [58]. Thus, an acute-treatment forced-swim test was applied to six rat groups: an untreated control group, four groups treated with 1 and 10 mg/Kg oral doses of compounds 3aa and 3bc, respectively, and a group treated with 15 mg/kg intraperitoneal dose of the antidepressant drug desipramine. As shown in Figure 4, the results showed that compounds 3aa and 3bc did not show antidepressant-like effects in the acute-treatment model. Despite this seems to be in line with the reported results of ladostigil which indicated that it shows antidepressant-like effects in chronic-treatment model but not in acute-treatment model, compounds 3aa and 3bc significantly increased immobility time in the conducted acute-treatment model. Therefore, they were not advanced for evaluation in the chronic-treatment model. Although these findings suggest that compounds 3aa and 3bc might have no therapeutic effects on depression and psychiatric disorders associated with neurodegenerative diseases, compound 3bc might have potential activity against the neurodegenerative diseases themselves. However, the found increase in immobility time suggests that the use of this class of compound be cautioned in neurodegenerative diseases that are comorbid with depression.

3.6. In Silico Simulation Study

To obtain insights into the molecular interactions of the potential compounds 3aa and 3bc, in silico calculations were addressed to anticipate their possible binding modes to MAO-B (PDB: 2V5Z), MAO-A (PDB: 2Z5X), and AChE (PDB: 4EY6). Structural studies indicated that MAO-A has a 550 Å3 substrate-pocket, which is relatively smaller than the elongated 700 Å3 substrate-pocket of MAO-B, which is characterized by the presence of gating amino acid residues, namely Ile199 and Tyr326, that can close to form a bipartite cavity or open to accommodate linear ligands such as safinamide (Figure 5A, PDB code: 2V5Z). In the case of MAO-A, residues Ile335 and Phe208 serve as gating amino acids in a similar fashion to Tyr326 and Ile199 of MAO-B. In addition, both MAOs have functionally important two-cage aromatic amino acid residues in front of flavin (Tyr398 and Tyr435 for MAO-B and Tyr407 and Tyr444 for MAO-B). Depending on size and shape differences as well as the involvement of gating residues, some substrates, such as harmine (Figure 5B, PDB code: 2Z5X), are selective MAO-A inhibitors, while others are selective MAO-B inhibitors [59,60,61]. On the other hand, characterization studies showed that AChE has much larger binding site in which there is an important catalytic triad of Ser203, His447, and Glu334 residues, which is crucial for the functional activity of AChE in conjugation with an oxyanion hole formed of the backbone NH groups of Gly121, Gly122, and Ala204 [62]. As illustrated in Figure 5C, the cocrystals of AChE-galantamine (PDB: 4EY6) revealed that the galantamine ether bridge interacts with His447 in addition to the methoxy function interaction with Ser203; both residues belong to the catalytic triad. Furthermore, amide–π stacking was found between galantamine and the peptide bonds of Gly121–Gly122 in the oxyanion hole. Moreover, other hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding interactions were found for other residues with the galantamine’s skeleton and functional groups.
As illustrated in Figure 6A, the potent selective MAO-B inhibitor, compound 3bc, perfectly fitted within the MAO-B substrate pocket, showing an estimated good energy score of −8.56548 Kcal/mol and establishing an intricate network of favorable interactions. The predicted binding mode showed that the pyrrolidine moiety is sandwiched between the two aromatic cage amino acids, namely Tyr398 and Tyr435, establishing one π–alkyl hydrophobic interaction per aromatic cage residue and a third π–π hydrophobic interaction with the FAD moiety. In addition, the gating Tyr326 amino acid residue interacted favorably with ring-C of the aurone part, while the other gating Ile199 amino acid residue showed a favorable interaction with the 3′-methoxy substituent at ring-B. Furthermore, several other residues established favorable interactions, which, in conjugation with the aforementioned key interactions, provide evidence of the excellent inhibition of MAO-B. On the contrary, compound 3bc poorly fitted within the MAO-A substrate pocket, clashing due to the pocket size limitation (Figure 6B) and showing a low energy score of only −5.5883 Kcal/mol. Furthermore, no favorable interactions with the aromatic cage amino acids of MAO-A, namely Tyr407 and Tyr444, were observed in the predicted binding mode. Due to the absence of these crucial interactions, the low energy score, and the clash with the pocket boundary distant to FAD, the very limited inhibition of MAO-A activity and, consequently, the excellent MAO-B selectivity that we found is understandable. In regard to AChE, the second-best predicted pose of compound 3bc within the AChE pocket showed an energy score of −8.89504 Kcal/mol and established favorable interactions via the pyrrolidine moiety with the crucial catalytic triad member His447, as well as with other residues (Figure 6C). In addition, the ethyl linker interacted favorably with Glu202 next to both the oxyanion hole residue Ala204 and the catalytic triad member Ser203. In lieu of the established interactions, the good AChE inhibitory activity of compound 3bc is understandable.
As illustrated in Figure 7A, in silico calculations predicted that the potent selective MAO-B inhibitor compound 3aa perfectly fits within the substrate pocket of MAO-B but in a flipped mode relative to compound 3bc, showing good energy score of -9.41281 Kcal/mol. Thus, ring-B of the aurone part was sandwiched between two aromatic cage amino acids, Tyr398 and Tyr435, establishing one π–π hydrophobic interaction per aromatic cage residue, a third π–πl hydrophobic interaction with the FAD moiety, and a fourth π–σ hydrophobic interaction between the 2′-methoxy substituent at ring-B and aromatic cage Tyr398 residue. Meanwhile, the diethylamino moiety was directed towards the distant side to the aromatic cage and showed a favorable interaction with the gating residue Ile199 as well as other residues. Moreover, ring-A of the aurone moiety also interacted favorably with the gating residue Ile199 as well as the other gating residue Tyr326. According to these calculated interactions with the crucial features of MAO-B and the overall good energy score, the potential activity of compound 3aa against MAO-B is reasonable. In contrast to MAO-B, a poor-fitting, low energy score of −5.1401 Kcal/mol and poor interactions were predicted for compound 3aa within the substrate pocket of MAO-A. As illustrated in Figure 7B, the best predicted pose showed clashing with the substrate-pocket at the distant boundary to the aromatic cage. In addition, only one far interaction >5.7 Å distance was established with one aromatic cage Tyr407 residue. Due to the lack of crucial interactions, the calculated low energy score coupled, and the clash with the pocket’s boundary distant to FAD and the aromatic cage, the measured limited inhibition of MAO-A activity and, consequently, the excellent MAO-B selectivity is a logical outcome. Similar to compound 3bc, the results of the in silico docking of compound 3aa to AChE showed that the second-best predicted pose showed a favorable energy score of −7.80987 Kcal/mol, which is less than that of compound 3bc, which is in agreement with the difference in potency of AChE inhibitory activity of the two compounds. Analogous to compound 3bc, compound 3aa established favorable interactions via the diethylamino moiety with the crucial catalytic triad member His447, as well as with other residues (Figure 7C). Accordingly, the good AChE inhibitory activity of compound 3aa is comprehensible.

4. Conclusions

To attain a multifunctional molecule inhibiting the commonalities of neurodegenerative disorders, including ROS, the impaired neurochemical transmission of monoamines, and acetylcholine esterase and neuroinflammation, a series of O6-aminoalkyl derivatives of analogs of the natural product hispidol were prepared and evaluated for MAO and AChE inhibition. Several compounds showed potential inhibition of MAO and AChE. Among these, compounds 3aa and 3bc triggered selective MAO-B inhibition with decent selectivity indices over 104 and 289, respectively. An evaluation of the anti-neuroinflammatory activity of the promising compounds 3aa and 3bc demonstrated their potential capability to inhibit induced microglial production of PGE2 without impacting cellular viability. The developed multifunctional compounds 3aa and 3bc were advanced for an in vivo evaluation of their effects on impairment of memory and cognitive functions and antidepressant-like activity in a forced swim test. The results indicated that the more potent and selective compound 3bc can improve memory and cognitive function impairment, while the less potent and less selective compound 3aa has little effect. Neither 3aa nor 3bc showed antidepressant-like activity in the acute-treatment model of the forced swim test, but the increase in immobility time could be a sign that this class of compound might be cautioned in neurodegenerative diseases that are comorbid with depression, possibly because of AChEIs’ contraindication for mood disorders. Finally, an in silico docking study provided insights into the MAO and AChE inhibitory activity of compounds 3aa and 3bc. Collectively, our efforts present compound 3bc as a multifunctional molecule inhibiting MAO-B, AChE, and neuroinflammation for the possible management of neurodegenerative diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox12051033/s1, Experimental protocols.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.L. and A.H.E.H.; methodology, Y.S.L., K.D.P., J.K.L. J.H.R. and A.H.E.H.; formal analysis, Y.C., S.M., J.-H.P.; investigation, A.H.E.H., H.J.K., K.P., C.H.L., Y.J.K., S.B.C. and M.S.G.; resources, Y.S.L., K.D.P., J.H.R. and J.K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.H.E.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.S.L.; visualization, J.-H.P. and D.L.; supervision, Y.S.L., K.D.P., J.H.R. and J.K.L.; project administration, Y.S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyung Hee University (KHSASP-22–022, 28 March 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farag, A.K.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Jeong, H.; Kwon, Y.; Choi, J.G.; Oh, M.S.; Park, K.D.; Kim, Y.K.; Roh, E.J. First-in-class DAPK1/CSF1R dual inhibitors: Discovery of 3,5-dimethoxy-N-(4-(4-methoxyphenoxy)-2-((6-morpholinopyridin-3-yl)amino)pyrimidin-5-yl)benzamide as a potential anti-tauopathies agent. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 162, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Feigin, V.L.; Vos, T.; Nichols, E.; Owolabi, M.O.; Carroll, W.M.; Dichgans, M.; Deuschl, G.; Parmar, P.; Brainin, M.; Murray, C. The global burden of neurological disorders: Translating evidence into policy. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Naoi, M.; Maruyama, W.; Inaba-Hasegawa, K. Type A and B monoamine oxidase in age-related neurodegenerative disorders: Their distinct roles in neuronal death and survival. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 2177–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Behl, T.; Kaur, D.; Sehgal, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Zengin, G.; Andronie-Cioara, F.L.; Toma, M.M.; Bungau, S.; Bumbu, A.G. Role of Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease: An Insight into the Therapeutic Potential of Inhibitors. Molecules 2021, 26, 3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Naoi, M.; Maruyama, W.; Inaba-Hasegawa, K.; Akao, Y. Type A monoamine oxidase regulates life and death of neurons in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. In International Review of Neurobiology; Youdim, M.B.H., Douce, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2011; Volume 100, pp. 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Elkamhawy, A.; Paik, S.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, H.J.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Lee, K.; Park, K.D.; Roh, E.J. Discovery of novel and potent safinamide-based derivatives as highly selective hMAO-B inhibitors for treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD): Design, synthesis, in vitro, in vivo and in silico biological studies. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 115, 105233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Quartey, M.O.; Nyarko, J.N.K.; Pennington, P.R.; Heistad, R.M.; Klassen, P.C.; Baker, G.B.; Mousseau, D.D. Alzheimer Disease and Selected Risk Factors Disrupt a Co-regulation of Monoamine Oxidase-A/B in the Hippocampus, but Not in the Cortex. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Park, J.-H.; Ju, Y.H.; Choi, J.W.; Song, H.J.; Jang, B.K.; Woo, J.; Chun, H.; Kim, H.J.; Shin, S.J.; Yarishkin, O.; et al. Newly developed reversible MAO-B inhibitor circumvents the shortcomings of irreversible inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav0316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Holzgrabe, U.; Kapková, P.; Alptüzün, V.; Scheiber, J.; Kugelmann, E. Targeting acetylcholinesterase to treat neurodegeneration. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2007, 11, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Renard, P.Y.; Jean, L. Probing the cholinergic system to understand neurodegenerative diseases. Future Med. Chem. 2017, 9, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dezsi, L.; Vecsei, L. Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2017, 16, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foley, P.; Gerlach, M.; Youdim, M.B.; Riederer, P. MAO-B inhibitors: Multiple roles in the therapy of neurodegenerative disorders? Park. Relat. Disord. 2000, 6, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cai, Z. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors: Promising therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 9, 1533–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Schedin-Weiss, S.; Inoue, M.; Hromadkova, L.; Teranishi, Y.; Yamamoto, N.G.; Wiehager, B.; Bogdanovic, N.; Winblad, B.; Sandebring-Matton, A.; Frykman, S.; et al. Monoamine oxidase B is elevated in Alzheimer disease neurons, is associated with γ-secretase and regulates neuronal amyloid β-peptide levels. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2017, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Pagano, G.; Rengo, G.; Pasqualetti, G.; Femminella, G.D.; Monzani, F.; Ferrara, N.; Tagliati, M. Cholinesterase inhibitors for Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dorothée, G. Neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration: Role in pathophysiology, therapeutic opportunities and clinical perspectives. J. Neural. Transm. 2018, 125, 749–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, N.; Yoo, H.-S.; Ju, Y.-J.; Oh, M.S.; Lee, K.-T.; Inn, K.-S.; Kim, N.-J.; Lee, J.K. Synthetic 3′,4′-Dihydroxyflavone Exerts Anti-Neuroinflammatory Effects in BV2 Microglia and a Mouse Model. Biomol. Ther. 2018, 26, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yan, A.; Liu, Z.; Song, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, N.; Lin, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z. Idebenone Alleviates Neuroinflammation and Modulates Microglial Polarization in LPS-Stimulated BV2 Cells and MPTP-Induced Parkinson’s Disease Mice. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2019, 12, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gordon, R.; Woodruff, T.M. Neuroinflammation as a therapeutic target in neurodegenerative diseases. In Disease-Modifying Targets in Neurodegenerative Disorders; Baekelandt, V., Lobbestael, E., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 49–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, X.; Gao, S.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Wu, C.; Cao, X.; Xia, S.; Shao, P.; Bao, X.; Yang, H.; et al. A monoamine oxidase B inhibitor ethyl ferulate suppresses microglia-mediated neuroinflammation and alleviates ischemic brain injury. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 1004215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, Q.; Yu, G.; Li, W.; Xu, Y.; Cong, S.; Liu, X.; Tan, Z.; Deng, Y. 6-Benzyloxyphthalides as selective and reversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitors with antioxidant and anti-neuroinflammatory activities for Parkinson’s disease treatment. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 120, 105623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Shen, W.-X.; Peng, Y.-P.; Qiu, Y.-H. Acetylcholine suppresses microglial inflammatory response via α7nAChR to protect hippocampal neurons. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2019, 18, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Takata, K.; Kimura, H.; Yanagisawa, D.; Harada, K.; Nishimura, K.; Kitamura, Y.; Shimohama, S.; Tooyama, I. Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Microglia as Therapeutic and Imaging Targets in Alzheimer&rsquo;s Disease. Molecules 2022, 27, 2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Xia, Y.; Wu, Q.; Mak, S.; Liu, E.Y.L.; Zheng, B.Z.Y.; Dong, T.T.X.; Pi, R.; Tsim, K.W.K. Regulation of acetylcholinesterase during the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in microglial cells. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Savelieff, M.G.; Nam, G.; Kang, J.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, M.; Lim, M.H. Development of Multifunctional Molecules as Potential Therapeutic Candidates for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in the Last Decade. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 1221–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van der Schyf, C.J.; Geldenhuys, W.J.; Youdim, M.B. Multifunctional drugs with different CNS targets for neuropsychiatric disorders. J. Neurochem. 2006, 99, 1033–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wong, E.H.; Yocca, F.; Smith, M.A.; Lee, C.M. Challenges and opportunities for drug discovery in psychiatric disorders: The drug hunters’ perspective. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 13, 1269–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Milelli, A.; Turrini, E.; Catanzaro, E.; Maffei, F.; Fimognari, C. Perspectives in Designing Multifunctional Molecules in Antipsychotic Drug Discovery. Drug Dev. Res. 2016, 77, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Riederer, P.; Danielczyk, W.; Grünblatt, E. Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibition in Alzheimer’s Disease. NeuroToxicology 2004, 25, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, Y.H.; Shin, M.C.; Yun, Y.D.; Shin, S.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Seo, J.M.; Kim, N.J.; Ryu, J.H.; Lee, Y.S. Synthesis of aminoalkyl-substituted aurone derivatives as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hassan, A.H.E.; Phan, T.-N.; Moon, S.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Cho, S.B.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Choi, Y.; No, J.H.; Lee, Y.S. Design, synthesis, and repurposing of O6-aminoalkyl-sulfuretin analogs towards discovery of potential lead compounds as antileishmanial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 251, 115256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, J.W.; Jang, B.K.; Cho, N.-C.; Park, J.-H.; Yeon, S.K.; Ju, E.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Han, G.; Pae, A.N.; Kim, D.J.; et al. Synthesis of a series of unsaturated ketone derivatives as selective and reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 6486–6496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hassan, A.H.E.; Kim, H.J.; Gee, M.S.; Park, J.-H.; Jeon, H.R.; Lee, C.J.; Choi, Y.; Moon, S.; Lee, D.; Lee, J.K.; et al. Positional scanning of natural product hispidol’s ring-B: Discovery of highly selective human monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor analogues downregulating neuroinflammation for management of neurodegenerative diseases. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, D.H.; Hung, T.M.; Bae, K.H.; Jung, J.W.; Lee, S.; Yoon, B.H.; Cheong, J.H.; Ko, K.H.; Ryu, J.H. Gomisin A improves scopolamine-induced memory impairment in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 542, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yi, J.H.; Jeon, J.; Kwon, H.; Cho, E.; Yun, J.; Lee, Y.C.; Ryu, J.H.; Park, S.J.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, D.H. Rubrofusarin Attenuates Chronic Restraint Stress-Induced Depressive Symptoms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hassan, A.H.E.; Park, H.R.; Yoon, Y.M.; Kim, H.I.; Yoo, S.Y.; Lee, K.W.; Lee, Y.S. Antiproliferative 3-deoxysphingomyelin analogs: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking of pyrrolidine-based 3-deoxysphingomyelin analogs as anticancer agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 84, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hassan, A.H.E.; Choi, E.; Yoon, Y.M.; Lee, K.W.; Yoo, S.Y.; Cho, M.C.; Yang, J.S.; Kim, H.I.; Hong, J.Y.; Shin, J.S.; et al. Natural products hybrids: 3,5,4′-Trimethoxystilbene-5,6,7-trimethoxyflavone chimeric analogs as potential cytotoxic agents against diverse human cancer cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 161, 559–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shen, B. A New Golden Age of Natural Products Drug Discovery. Cell 2015, 163, 1297–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Harvey, A.L.; Edrada-Ebel, R.; Quinn, R.J. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hassan, A.H.E.; Mahmoud, K.; Phan, T.-N.; Shaldam, M.A.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Cho, S.B.; Bayoumi, W.A.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Choi, Y.; et al. Bestatin analogs-4-quinolinone hybrids as antileishmanial hits: Design, repurposing rational, synthesis, in vitro and in silico studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 250, 115211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wong, E. Occurrence and biosynthesis of 4′,6-dihydroxyaurone in soybean. Phytochemistry 1966, 5, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. El Sherbeiny, A.E.A.; El Sissi, H.I.; Nawwar, M.A.M.; El Ansari, M.A. The flavonoids of the seeds of Lygos raetam. Planta Med. 1978, 34, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Farag, M.A.; Deavours, B.E.; de Fáltima, A.; Naoumkina, M.; Dixon, R.A.; Sumner, L.W. Integrated metabolite and transcript profiling identify a biosynthetic mechanism for hispidol in Medicago truncatula cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1096–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Khan, H.; Marya; Amin, S.; Kamal, M.A.; Patel, S. Flavonoids as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Current therapeutic standing and future prospects. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 101, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lemke, C.; Christmann, J.; Yin, J.; Alonso, J.M.; Serrano, E.; Chioua, M.; Ismaili, L.; Martínez-Grau, M.A.; Beadle, C.D.; Vetman, T.; et al. Chromenones as Multineurotargeting Inhibitors of Human Enzymes. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 22161–22168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Liew, K.-F.; Chan, K.-L.; Lee, C.-Y. Blood–brain barrier permeable anticholinesterase aurones: Synthesis, structure–activity relationship, and drug-like properties. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 94, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liew, K.F.; Lee, E.H.; Chan, K.L.; Lee, C.Y. Multi-targeting aurones with monoamine oxidase and amyloid-beta inhibitory activities: Structure-activity relationship and translating multi-potency to neuroprotection. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 110, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Giroud, M.; Dietzel, U.; Anselm, L.; Banner, D.; Kuglstatter, A.; Benz, J.; Blanc, J.-B.; Gaufreteau, D.; Liu, H.; Lin, X.; et al. Repurposing a Library of Human Cathepsin L Ligands: Identification of Macrocyclic Lactams as Potent Rhodesain and Trypanosoma brucei Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 3350–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hassan, A.H.E.; Yoo, S.Y.; Lee, K.W.; Yoon, Y.M.; Ryu, H.W.; Jeong, Y.; Shin, J.-S.; Kang, S.-Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, H.-H.; et al. Repurposing mosloflavone/5,6,7-trimethoxyflavone-resveratrol hybrids: Discovery of novel p38-α MAPK inhibitors as potent interceptors of macrophage-dependent production of proinflammatory mediators. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 180, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Farag, A.K.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Chung, K.-S.; Lee, J.-H.; Gil, H.-S.; Lee, K.-T.; Roh, E.J. Diarylurea derivatives comprising 2,4-diarylpyrimidines: Discovery of novel potential anticancer agents via combined failed-ligands repurposing and molecular hybridization approaches. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 103, 104121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Farag, A.K.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Ahn, B.S.; Park, K.D.; Roh, E.J. Reprofiling of pyrimidine-based DAPK1/CSF1R dual inhibitors: Identification of 2,5-diamino-4-pyrimidinol derivatives as novel potential anticancer lead compounds. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 311–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Seo, J.M.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Lee, Y.S. An expeditious entry to rare tetrahydroimidazo[1,5-c]pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-7(8H)-ones: A single-step gateway synthesis of glochidine congeners. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 130760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gaich, T.; Baran, P.S. Aiming for the Ideal Synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4657–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jo, H.; Hassan, A.H.E.; Jung, S.Y.; Lee, J.K.; Cho, Y.S.; Min, S.-J. Construction of 8-Azabicyclo[3.2.1]octanes via Sequential DDQ-Mediated Oxidative Mannich Reactions of N-Aryl Pyrrolidines. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 1175–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, J.; Seo, Y.H.; Kim, J.; Goo, N.; Jeong, Y.; Bae, H.J.; Jung, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Ryu, J.H. Casticin ameliorates scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 259, 112843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hussain, M.; Kumar, P.; Khan, S.; Gordon, D.K.; Khan, S. Similarities Between Depression and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Pathophysiology, Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Options. Cureus 2020, 12, e11613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jung, J.M.; Park, S.J.; Lee, Y.W.; Lee, H.E.; Hong, S.I.; Lew, J.H.; Hong, E.; Shim, J.S.; Cheong, J.H.; Ryu, J.H. The effects of a standardized Acanthopanax koreanum extract on stress-induced behavioral alterations in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 148, 826–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Binda, C.; Newton-Vinson, P.; Hubalek, F.; Edmondson, D.E.; Mattevi, A. Structure of human monoamine oxidase B, a drug target for the treatment of neurological disorders. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gaweska, H.; Fitzpatrick, P.F. Structures and Mechanism of the Monoamine Oxidase Family. Biomol. Concepts 2011, 2, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Son, S.-Y.; Ma, J.; Kondou, Y.; Yoshimura, M.; Yamashita, E.; Tsukihara, T. Structure of human monoamine oxidase A at 2.2-Å resolution: The control of opening the entry for substrates/inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zhang, Y.; Kua, J.; McCammon, J.A. Role of the Catalytic Triad and Oxyanion Hole in Acetylcholinesterase Catalysis:  An ab initio QM/MM Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10572–10577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 12 01033 g001 550
Figure 1. Design of O6-aminoalkyl-hispidol analogs’ focused library considering known monoamine oxidases inhibition and selectivity of hispidol as well as other methoxylated-aurones.
Figure 1. Design of O6-aminoalkyl-hispidol analogs’ focused library considering known monoamine oxidases inhibition and selectivity of hispidol as well as other methoxylated-aurones.
Antioxidants 12 01033 g001
Antioxidants 12 01033 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Reagents and reaction conditions: (a) 12N HCl, ethanol, 60–70 °C; (b) Appropriate aminoalkyl chloride, K2CO3, acetone, reflux; Acetyl chloride, ethanol; (c) For 5a and 5b: 1-bromo-4-chlorobutane, K2CO3, DMF, rt, reflux; For 5c: 1-bromo-5-chloropentane, K2CO3, DMF, rt; (d) For 3al: pyrrolidine, DMF, KI, reflux; For 3ar and 3as: piperidine, DMF, KI, reflux; Acetyl chloride, ethanol.
Scheme 1. Reagents and reaction conditions: (a) 12N HCl, ethanol, 60–70 °C; (b) Appropriate aminoalkyl chloride, K2CO3, acetone, reflux; Acetyl chloride, ethanol; (c) For 5a and 5b: 1-bromo-4-chlorobutane, K2CO3, DMF, rt, reflux; For 5c: 1-bromo-5-chloropentane, K2CO3, DMF, rt; (d) For 3al: pyrrolidine, DMF, KI, reflux; For 3ar and 3as: piperidine, DMF, KI, reflux; Acetyl chloride, ethanol.
Antioxidants 12 01033 sch001
Antioxidants 12 01033 g002 550
Figure 2. Dose-dependent effect of compounds 3aa and 3bc on microglial BV2 cells: (A) Viability assessment (mean ± SD) of BV2 cells in presence of LPS and variable doses of compounds 3aa and 3bc; (B) Dose-dependent inhibition (mean ± SD) of LPS-induced BV2 cell production of PGE2 variable doses of compounds 3aa and 3bc. Results were analyzed by ANOVA. * p < 0.05 versus LPS-treated control group.
Figure 2. Dose-dependent effect of compounds 3aa and 3bc on microglial BV2 cells: (A) Viability assessment (mean ± SD) of BV2 cells in presence of LPS and variable doses of compounds 3aa and 3bc; (B) Dose-dependent inhibition (mean ± SD) of LPS-induced BV2 cell production of PGE2 variable doses of compounds 3aa and 3bc. Results were analyzed by ANOVA. * p < 0.05 versus LPS-treated control group.
Antioxidants 12 01033 g002
Antioxidants 12 01033 g003 550
Figure 3. In vivo Evaluation of effects (mean ± SD) of compounds 3aa and 3bc (1 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in comparison with donepezil (5 mg/kg, p.o.). Results were analyzed by ANOVA. n = 10 per group, **** p < 0.0001 versus vehicle control group, # p < 0.05 and #### p < 0.0001 versus scopolamine treated group.
Figure 3. In vivo Evaluation of effects (mean ± SD) of compounds 3aa and 3bc (1 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on scopolamine-induced cognitive deficits (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in comparison with donepezil (5 mg/kg, p.o.). Results were analyzed by ANOVA. n = 10 per group, **** p < 0.0001 versus vehicle control group, # p < 0.05 and #### p < 0.0001 versus scopolamine treated group.
Antioxidants 12 01033 g003
Antioxidants 12 01033 g004 550
Figure 4. In vivo evaluation of effects (mean ± SD) of compounds 3aa and 3bc (1 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on immobility time in comparison with 15 mg/kg desipramine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Results were analyzed by ANOVA. n = 10 per group, * p < 0.05 versus control group.
Figure 4. In vivo evaluation of effects (mean ± SD) of compounds 3aa and 3bc (1 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) on immobility time in comparison with 15 mg/kg desipramine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Results were analyzed by ANOVA. n = 10 per group, * p < 0.05 versus control group.
Antioxidants 12 01033 g004
Antioxidants 12 01033 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Interactions network of safinamide within MAO-B pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 2V5Z); (B) Interactions network of harmine within MAO-A pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 2Z5X); (C) Interactions network of galantamine within AChE substrate pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 4EY6).
Figure 5. (A) Interactions network of safinamide within MAO-B pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 2V5Z); (B) Interactions network of harmine within MAO-A pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 2Z5X); (C) Interactions network of galantamine within AChE substrate pocket as found in the co-crystalized complex (PDB: 4EY6).
Antioxidants 12 01033 g005
Antioxidants 12 01033 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within MAO-B pocket (PDB: 2V5Z); (B) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within MAO-A pocket (PDB: 2Z5X): Yellow surface represents the solvent accessible surface of compounds 3bc; (C) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within AChE pocket (PDB: 4EY6).
Figure 6. (A) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within MAO-B pocket (PDB: 2V5Z); (B) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within MAO-A pocket (PDB: 2Z5X): Yellow surface represents the solvent accessible surface of compounds 3bc; (C) Predicted binding mode of compound 3bc within AChE pocket (PDB: 4EY6).
Antioxidants 12 01033 g006
Antioxidants 12 01033 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within MAO-B pocket (PDB: 2V5Z) (B) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within MAO-A pocket (PDB: 2Z5X): Yellow surface represents the solvent accessible surface of compounds 3aa; (C) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within AChE pocket (PDB: 4EY6).
Figure 7. (A) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within MAO-B pocket (PDB: 2V5Z) (B) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within MAO-A pocket (PDB: 2Z5X): Yellow surface represents the solvent accessible surface of compounds 3aa; (C) Predicted binding mode of compound 3aa within AChE pocket (PDB: 4EY6).
Antioxidants 12 01033 g007
Table
Table 1. Results of MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition by the synthesized compounds (3aa–3bd).
Table 1. Results of MAO-A and MAO-B inhibition by the synthesized compounds (3aa–3bd).
Antioxidants 12 01033 i001
CompoundXn1n2R1% Inhibition
MAO-A 1MAO-B 2
3aaNo atoms102′-methoxyNI 391.49 ± 0.27
3abCH2002′-methoxyNI43.00 ± 0.55
3acCH2012′-methoxy1.31 ± 0.8232.27 ± 0.23
3adNo atoms103′-methoxyNI46.09 ± 0.11
3aeNo atoms113′-methoxyNI18.76 ± 0.45
3afCH2003′-methoxyNI39.11 ± 0.96
3agCH2013′-methoxy12.24 ± 1.0516.99 ± 0.11
3ahCH2113′-methoxyNI18.07 ± 1.83
3aiO103′-methoxy4.1 ± 0.4827.87 ± 0.37
3ajCH2004′-methoxy3.26 ± 0.7539.26 ± 0.03
3akCH2014′-methoxy9.83 ± 0.6445.64 ± 0.08
3alCH2024′-methoxyNI49.80 ± 0.02
3amCH2104′-methoxy0.92 ± 0.8320.56 ± 0.79
3anCH2003′,4′-dimethoxyNI48.06 ± 1.46
3aoCH2013′,4′-dimethoxyNI39.21 ± 0.58
3apCH2103′,4′-dimethoxyNI50.81 ± 0.44
3aqCH2113′,4′-dimethoxyNI4.51 ± 1.30
3arCH2123′,4′-dimethoxyNI3.89 ± 1.63
3asCH2133′,4′-dimethoxyNI4.76 ± 1.91
3atCH2003′,5′-dimethoxyNI36.84 ± 0.44
3auCH2013′,5′-dimethoxyNI21.20 ± 0.30
3avCH2002′,3′-dimethoxy12.56 ± 0.322.61 ± 1.78
3awCH2002′,4′-dimethoxy12.73 ± 0.5441.64 ± 1.03
3axCH2002′,5′-dimethoxyNI65.05 ± 0.43
3ayCH2012′,3′-dimethoxyNI4.37 ± 0.90
3azCH2012′,4′-dimethoxyNI35.87 ± 0.17
3baCH2012′,5′-dimethoxyNI20.33 ± 0.49
3bbCH2002′,3′,4′-trimethoxyNI23.90 ± 0.81
3bcCH2003′,4′,5′-trimethoxyNI99.30 ± 0.38
3bdCH2103′,4′,5′-trimethoxyNI27.93 ± 0.36
1 Percent inhibition (±sem values) of enzyme activity at a single dose concentration of 1 µM., 2 Percent inhibition (±sem values) of enzyme activity at a single dose concentration of 10 µM., 3 NI: no measured inhibition.
Table
Table 2. IC50 values for MAO-A, MAO-B, and AChE as well as MAO-B inhibition selectivity indices for the most promising compounds.
Table 2. IC50 values for MAO-A, MAO-B, and AChE as well as MAO-B inhibition selectivity indices for the most promising compounds.
Antioxidants 12 01033 i002
CompoundXn1n2R1MAO-AMAO-BMAO-B Selectivity IndexAChE IC50 (µM) 3
% Inhibition 1IC50 (µM) 2IC50 (µM) 2
3aaNo atoms102′-methoxy27.18 ± 2.94>1000.96 ± 0.004>1042.67 ± 0.05
3alCH2024′-methoxy14.89 ± 3.46>1008.65 ± 0.196>121.42 ± 0.09
3apCH2103′,4′-dimethoxy22.52 ± 0.04>10010.18 ± 0.099>9.80.40 ± 0.03 [30]
3axCH2002′,5′-dimethoxy27.70 ± 4.95>1003.16 ± 0.036>321.49 ± 0.31 [30]
3bcCH2003′,4′,5′-trimethoxy21.37 ± 3.51>1000.34 ± 0.002>2891.56 ± 0.07 [30]
SafinamideNDND0.11 ± 0.004ND—
Clorgyline100.49 ± 0.030.005 ± 0.0002NDND—
GalantamineNDNDNDND4.69 ± 0.12 [30]
1 Percent inhibition (±sem values) of MAO-A activity at a single dose concentration of 100 µM., 2 IC50: Concentration (±sem values) of the synthesized compound expressed in µM value that inhibits 50% of MAO-A/MAO-B activity., 3 IC50: Concentration (±SD values) of the synthesized compound expressed in µM value that inhibits 50% of AChE activity.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassan, A.H.E.; Kim, H.J.; Park, K.; Choi, Y.; Moon, S.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Cho, S.B.; Gee, M.S.; Lee, D.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of O6-Aminoalkyl-Hispidol Analogs as Multifunctional Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors towards Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051033

AMA Style

Hassan AHE, Kim HJ, Park K, Choi Y, Moon S, Lee CH, Kim YJ, Cho SB, Gee MS, Lee D, et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of O6-Aminoalkyl-Hispidol Analogs as Multifunctional Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors towards Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(5):1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051033

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassan, Ahmed H. E., Hyeon Jeong Kim, Keontae Park, Yeonwoo Choi, Suyeon Moon, Chae Hyeon Lee, Yeon Ju Kim, Soo Bin Cho, Min Sung Gee, Danbi Lee, and et al. 2023. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of O6-Aminoalkyl-Hispidol Analogs as Multifunctional Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors towards Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases" Antioxidants 12, no. 5: 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051033

APA Style

Hassan, A. H. E., Kim, H. J., Park, K., Choi, Y., Moon, S., Lee, C. H., Kim, Y. J., Cho, S. B., Gee, M. S., Lee, D., Park, J. -H., Lee, J. K., Ryu, J. H., Park, K. D., & Lee, Y. S. (2023). Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of O6-Aminoalkyl-Hispidol Analogs as Multifunctional Monoamine Oxidase-B Inhibitors towards Management of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants, 12(5), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051033

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop